ML20205D569

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:19, 30 December 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Memorandum.* Board Confirms Listed Schedule for Completing Case as Discussed W/Parties During 881018 Prehearing Conference.Served on 881024
ML20205D569
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre, 05508347  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 10/21/1988
From: Cotter B
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
References
CON-#488-7330 88-577-02, 88-577-2, EA-88-164, NUDOCS 8810270148
Download: ML20205D569 (2)


Text

_ __

S*

5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COP 91ISSION

.g ,,

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges: .

8. Paul Cotter, Jr. , Chaiman  :

Farry Foreman  !

Kenneth A. McCollom M W ED O C ,'. .' I N I l

5

,p,10 i

,P  ;

60',9 '

l 1

In the Pktter of: Docket No. 55-08347 MAURICE P. ACOSTA, JR. ASLBP No. 88-577-02-EA

{

Operator License No. 6010-2 October 21, 1988 (EA88-164)

{

MEMORANDUM i -

- Pursuant to the Prehearing Conference held October 18, 1988, in the captioned case, the Board hereby confinns the following schedule for completing the case as discussed with the parties at that time

November 4,1988 NRC Staff reports on settlement f efforts

, h January 4, 1989 All discovery completed  ;

January 12, 1989 Each party notifies Board whether it  !

intends to file a motion for sunenary

! disposition January 19, 1989 Motions for sunenary disp'sition o filed i

February 8,1989 Acosta responds to NRC Motion for Sunenary  !

j Disposition  :

FebnJary 13, 1989 NRC Staff responds to Acosta Motion for

[

4 Susinary Disposition  !

i March 3, 1989 Board issues decision on motion (s) for sunenary oisposition l

pp ADCC h 4 e 'D5g  ;

1 '

.  : - i s

1 i

March 3,1989 Parties file joint stipulation of '

i undisputed facts March 20, 1989 Parties file prefiled testimony  :

" [

April 11,1989 Hearing connances l

The foregoing dates are maximums; any document called for is to be  ;

i

received by the Board and parties on the stated date. If any phases or filings can be completed earlier, it should be done, and subsequent t t

l dates would then be adjusted. In addition, if neither party elects to i file a motion for sunnary disposition, the Board will issue a revised I i

schedule advancing the dates for filing prefiled testimony and ,

consnencing hearing.  !

i FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND '

i '

LICENSING BOARD bW B; Paul cotter, Jr.f,' Nairman i

ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE '

1 l i

Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 21st day of October, 1980.

{

I gy--y9,- -y eWMr-ee- %. 2-n. mew..-1p- -e.rrv-. . + -mg- - m - - - --