ML20196B121

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:22, 13 November 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Deviation from Insp on 880416-0511.Deviation Noted:Plant Operated at Times W/Seawater Cooling Temp in Excess of 85 F Design Limit
ML20196B121
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/14/1988
From: Wilson B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20196B084 List:
References
50-302-88-14, NUDOCS 8806300196
Download: ML20196B121 (1)


Text

. _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -._

l ENCLOSURE 2  ?

NOTICE OF DEVIATION Florida Power Corporation Docket No. 50-302 Crystal River Unit 3 License No. DPR-72 The following deviation was identified during a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on April 16 - May 11,-1988.

Revision 8 of the Crystal River Unit 3 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) specifies in Seawater paragraph (RW) system,9.5.1 that theServices the Nuclear NuclearClosed Services andCooling Cycle Decay (Heat SW) system, and the Decay Heat Closed Cycle Cooling (DC) system are designed to the parameters'shown in Table 9-12. Table 9-12 specifies that the design seawater cooling temperature for both.the SW and DC heat exchangers is 85 degrees Fahrenheit (F).

Contrary to the above, during the period of initial plant operation on March 13, 1977 through September 4,1987, the plant has operated at times with the seawater. cooling temperature in excess.of the 85 degrees F design limit. This temperature has been recorded as high as 90.5 degrees F.

1 Flease provide to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommiWon, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Crystal River 3, in writing within 30 days of the date of this Notice, the reasons for the deviation, the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further deviations, and the date when your corrective action will be completed. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

/

Bruce A. Wilson, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this N o, day of June 1988 8806300196 880614 PDR ADOCK 05000302 Q DCD