ML20249A294

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 980322-0509.Violation Noted:As of 980423,licensee Had Not Complied W/Requirements of Procedure CP-111,in That,Only Two of Discrepancies Identified in Ioc NL97-0262,had Been Documented
ML20249A294
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/1998
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20249A263 List:
References
50-302-98-04, 50-302-98-4, NUDOCS 9806160277
Download: ML20249A294 (2)


Text

_.

i

?:

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida. Power Corporation Docket No. 50-302 Crystal River Unit 3 License No. DPR-72 During NRC inspections conducted on March 22 through May 9, 1998, violations of NRC requirements were identified.

In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG 1600, the violations are listed below:

A.

Technical S) edification 5.6.1.1 requires that written )rocedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained covering t1e applicable activities recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, Appendix A.

February 1978.

Regulatory Guide 1.33, Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operation), Appendix A, paragraph 1.d. includes administrative procedures for procedural adherence.

Compliance Procedure CP-111. Processing of Precursor Cards for Corrective Action Program, Revision 58, dated August 12, 1997, required in part, that the precursor card (PC) process be used to identify, document, evaluate, and correct adverse conditions. Adverse conditions included, but were not limited to, non-hardware conditions such as failure to comply with the operating license, technical specifications, licensing comitments, procedures, instructions, or regulations, Licensee interoffice correspondence (IOC) NL97-0262,. dated August 25, 1997, documented potential Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) discrepancies and procedure discre)ancies.

The IOC indicated that j

either a PC had been written or a )C needed to be written for at least 1

15 of the discrepancies.

Contrary to the above, as of April 23, 1998, the licensee had not complied with the requirements of procedure CP-111, in that, only two of the discrepancies identified in IOC NL97-0262 had been documented on precursor cards and entered in the corrective action program for evaluation and correction. The other 13 discrepancies identified in the IOC had not been entered in the corrective action program via a precursor card.

l This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement 1).

B.

10 CFR 50,54(p)(1) states that the licensee may make no change which would decrease the effectiveness of the security plan or guard training and qualification plan.

1 9906160277 990608 PDR ADOCK 05000302 G

PDR

_ _ - _ _ _ _ =

l NOV 2

l Contrary to the above, on July 9,1996, the licensee made and submitted Revision 6-13 to the Physical. Security Plan, which allowed the use of a-roving vital area patrol to com)ensate for five degraded vital area doors. This change decreased tie effectiveness of the Physical Security Plan, in that Revision 6-12 utilized posted security personnel to compensate for degraded barriers.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement 3).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Florida Power Corporation is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, at Crystal River, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation or severity level, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved. (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. If an adequate realy is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, sus) ended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not )e taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

If you contest this enforcement action, you should also provide a copy of your response to the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Because your res)onse will be.placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possi)1e, it should not include any personal privacy, 3roprietary, or safeguards inforniation so that it can be placed in the PDR witlout redaction.

If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information, If you request withholding of such material, you mutt s)ecifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withield and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.790(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information).

If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 8th day. of June'1998 i

w__-___-__-_.

._