ML20138F034

Notice of Violation from Insp on 850909-18

ML20138F034
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	10/18/1985
From:	Harrison J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20138F022	List: IR 05000346/1985031 ML20138F019 ML20138F034
References
50-346-85-31, NUDOCS 8510250169
Download: ML20138F034 (1)

Text

.

a Appendix NOTICE OF VIOLATION Toledo Edison Company Docket No. 50-346 As a result of the inspection conducted on September 9 through 18, 1985, and in accordance with the General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), the following violations were identified:

1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, as implemented by TECo Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual and Nuclear Quality Assurance Procedure, requires establishment of procedures among participating design organi-zations for review, approval, release, distribution, and revision of documents involving design interfaces.

Contrary to the above, the design interface between Bechtel Power Corpora-tion and ITT-Grinnell Corporation during implementation of IE Bulletin No. 79-14 piping as-built activities was not established in an approved controlled interface procedure.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).

2. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, as implemented by TECo Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual and Nuclear Quality Assurance Procedure, requires that conditions adverse to quality such as deficiencies, deviations, and noncomformances be promptly identified and corrected.

Contrary to the above, the licensee did not effectively implement its facility Change Request system in that a number of safety related supports were not restored to their FSAR design condition in a timely manner. These supports were left in a short term operable status for three to five years.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further violation; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

W 1

l Dated OCT1E1995 h)

J. J. Harrison, Chief Engineering Branch 8510250169 PDR ADOCK O 85g P (DR G

l