ML20198P098
| ML20198P098 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 10/31/1997 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20198P096 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-346-97-11, NUDOCS 9711060271 | |
| Download: ML20198P098 (2) | |
Text
-. _ _ _ _ _
n l
~
NOTICE OF Vlot.ATION 4
" Toledo' Edison Company Docket No. 50-346 t Davis 3 esse NPS.
License No. NPF-3
. During an NRC inspection conducted on August 18 through September 2g,19g7, violations of NRC requirements were identi6ed, in accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violations are listed below.-
1, _
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, " Instructions, Procedures and Drawings," requires, in
. part, that ' Activities affecting quality shall be presenbed by documented instructions,.
proceduret., or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructionsiprocedures, or drawings.' '
Davis-Besse Administrative Procedure DB-DP-00013," Surveillance and Periodic
. Testing," (Revision 4), Step 6.3.7.j, requires that Measuring and Test Equipment used in
' testing shall satisfy the requirements of the test procedure and be within its calibration due date, Surveillance Procedure DB-MI-03906, " Channel Calibration of PSL 107A-D, Auxiliary Feed Pump Turbine 1-2 Inlet isolation on Low Inlet Pressure Interlocks,"
(Revision 02), Step 6.1.1, requires the use of four 0 72 psi test gauges with 0.05 percent accuracy or equivalent.
. Contrary to the above, on August 26,1997, the NRC identified that maintenance L
personnel did not use four 0-72 psi test gauges with 0.05 percent accuracy or equivalent while performing DB-Mi-03906. Altematively, test gauges recommended in the instrument information sheets for the subject instruments were employed that were less
[
accurate than required by the surveillance test procedure, l
l
. This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1).
D 2.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, " Corrective Action," requires, in part, that
~
" Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality... are promptly identified and corrected."
- Contrary to the above, corrective actions established to adoress inconsistencies between the test gauges specified by surveillance procedure DB-MI-03906, design
~ calculation C-ICE-050.01-001, and associated instrument information sheets that were
. identified in October and November 1995, were not completely implemented. Although I
the surveillance procedure, design calculation and instrument information sheets all l:
required revision, only the surveillance procedure had been revised as of August 26, g
- 1997.~
. This is a Severity LeYel IV violation (Supplement 1).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Toledo Edison is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region 111, and a copy -
" to the NRC Resident inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of -
p 971156027197 1
PDR ADOCK 0 346 t
PDR h
m
__,_a_
., ~ _
i Notica of Violation the date of the letter transmitt.:q this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearty marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason l
- for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended or revoked, or why such other schon as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Because your response wi!! he placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that
' it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. However, if you find it necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request fw withholding the information from the public.
Dated at Lisle, Illinois l_
this 31st day of October 1997 l
l l
1-
\\
w i
e
~__-.-,m_.,
,di.
+
,+-.._,_...i-.,-.._ _ -_
'