ML20245E064
| ML20245E064 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 02/24/1989 |
| From: | Greenman E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20245E055 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-346-88-37, NUDOCS 8905020006 | |
| Download: ML20245E064 (1) | |
Text
'.
(~
(
~
w.
r
~
- i Docket No. 50-346 Toledo Edison Company As a' result of the inspection conducted on December 1,.1988 through January 15, 1989, and in accordance.with the " General Policy'and Procedures for NRC l
Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), the following violation was identified:
Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires that written procedure; be established, implemented and maintained covering the applicable procedures
.i recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory. Guide 1.33 (November 1972).
One section of the regulatory guide requires that maintenance that can affect i
the. performance of safety-related equipment should be properly planned and performed in accordance with. procedures or drawings appropriate to the circumstances. Licensee administrative procedure DB-PN-00007, " Control of Work," Section 6.4.1 requires the planner to review the P& ids, drawings and vendor manuals to identify corrective actions and necessary documentation l
for the maintenance task.
Contrary to the above, on December 18, 1988, procedure DB-PN-00007, Section 6.4.1, was not implemented when the maintenance planner failed to review the necessary drawings for the safety-related Group 3 and 4 control rod drive programmer drawer and therefore was not able to identify the proper corrective actions for the maintenance work, i
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
j Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation:
(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective-action to be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your I
response time for good cause shown.
B 2 4 mag
(
Dated e L"dsard G. GrednMan, DirecQ$
J Division of Reactor Projects s
8905020006 890421 gDR ADOCK0500g6
-- - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _