Similar Documents at Fermi |
---|
Category:GENERAL EXTERNAL TECHNICAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20153B7921998-08-31031 August 1998 Rev 0 to Fermi 1 Sar ML20197A9921997-12-15015 December 1997 Rev 0 to Efp,Unit 1 Fermi 1 Sar ML20148A3191997-05-0202 May 1997 SE Summary Rept for Fermi 2, Rev 1 ML20137N1261997-03-25025 March 1997 Rev 0 to Leak-Before-Break Evaluation for Three Locations on Recirculation Sys at Fermi 2 ML20133A2311996-12-19019 December 1996 Ferm 2 CR Simulator Four Yr Rept ML20129A3511996-03-15015 March 1996 Rev 0 to Cchvac Duct & Duct Support Qualification ML20134J6241996-03-13013 March 1996 Rev 0 to Tmr 96-0003, Safety Evaluation ML20083A7591995-05-0808 May 1995 Safety Evaluation Summary Rept, Rev 7 NRC-94-0093, Main Turbine-Generator Vibration Monitoring & Balancing During Start-Up After RF041994-10-0707 October 1994 Main Turbine-Generator Vibration Monitoring & Balancing During Start-Up After RF04 ML20076J6211994-10-0606 October 1994 Safety Evaluation of Rev a to Edp 26726 ML20076J5831994-08-31031 August 1994 Turbine Failure Post-Event Earthquake Passive Instrumentation Data Evaluation ML20076J6081994-08-27027 August 1994 Root Cause Analyses of Fermi 2 Main Turbine Generator Event, Executive Summary ML20076J5891994-08-0808 August 1994 Structural Walkdown Final Rept ML20093N4781994-03-0303 March 1994 Gamma Spectroscopy Analysis Rept ML20093N4901994-03-0303 March 1994 Gamma Spectroscopy Analysis Rept ML20064L9841994-02-0404 February 1994 Turbine Failure,Post-Event Earthquake Instrumentation Data Evaluation ML20126J1141992-12-30030 December 1992 Nuclear Training Simulator Certification ML20099B9921992-07-10010 July 1992 Rev 0 to Updated NUREG-0619 Feedwater Nozzle Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis,Fermi Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 ML20086P2551991-12-31031 December 1991 Nuclear Training Simulator Certification NRC-91-0039, Safety Evaluation Summary Rept 19901991-03-18018 March 1991 Safety Evaluation Summary Rept 1990 NRC-90-0041, Safety Evaluation Re as-built Notices1989-12-31031 December 1989 Safety Evaluation Re as-built Notices NRC-90-0104, Rev 1 to Decommissioning Cost Study of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 11989-11-0808 November 1989 Rev 1 to Decommissioning Cost Study of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 1 ML19354D4801989-10-20020 October 1989 Rev 1 to Safety Evaluation. ML19324B7551989-09-30030 September 1989 Radioiodine & Particle Transmission Through Sampling Lines for Standby Gas Treatment Sys Effluents at Fermi 2, Final Rept ML20248E7021989-09-30030 September 1989 Control Sys Common Power Source Failure Analysis Evaluation Rept for Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 ML20247H8991989-08-31031 August 1989 Control Sys Common Sensor Line Failure Analysis Evaluation Rept for Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 ML20245B3851989-06-13013 June 1989 ATWS Alternate Rod Insertion & Recirculation Pump Trip Response to NRC Rule 10CFR50.62 ML20235J4271987-09-30030 September 1987 Supplemental Environ Info Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 1 ML20235G3041987-09-29029 September 1987 Partially Withheld, Preliminary Investigation of Enrico Fermi II Nuclear Power Plant ML20237K6061987-07-31031 July 1987 Suppl 1 to Dcrdr ML20236C8291987-06-29029 June 1987 Preimplementation Audit Rept for Dcrdr for Fermi-2 ML20234C9821987-05-21021 May 1987 Insp Followup of Failure of South Reactor Feed Pump Turbine,Fermi Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant, Technical Review Rept ML20236C8601987-05-11011 May 1987 Post-Implementation Audit Rept for Fermi-2,SPDS ML20204F1701987-01-31031 January 1987 Maint,Mod & Outage Mgt Monthly Rept. Maint/Mods for Period Ending 870222, Manpower Tracking - Labor Distribution & Period Ending 870125, Hours by Craft Rept, Also Encl ML20209B8231987-01-30030 January 1987 Rev a to Heavy Loads Handling Review,Control of Heavy Loads Over or in Close Proximity to Irradiated Fuel or Critical Safety Sys Components ML20214Q4521986-11-30030 November 1986 Dcrdr Summary Rept,Fermi 2 ML20211D4211986-10-0303 October 1986 Preliminary Steam Bypass Line Structural Evaluation ML20211D3961986-10-0303 October 1986 Preliminary Rept on Main Steam Bypass Piping Fatigue Analysis & Life Expectancy ML20214J8391986-08-31031 August 1986 Final Rept on Metallurgical Investigation of Various Defects on Surfaces of Diesel Engine Aluminum-Tin Bearings ML20209E7591986-07-0202 July 1986 Response to Independent Overview Committee ML20213A5901986-06-30030 June 1986 Investigation of Surface Scoring of Main Bearings:Fairbanks Morse 38TD8-1/8 Diesels at Fermi II Power Plant ML20209E7791986-06-26026 June 1986 Program to Evaluate & Resolve Engineering Issues ML20141M9441986-01-30030 January 1986 Evaluation of Detroit Edison Mgt at Fermi 2 ML20237J4711985-08-31031 August 1985 Rev 1 to Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 Primary Containment Negative Pressure Analysis ML20128B7251985-06-30030 June 1985 Rev 4 to Evaluation of Containment Coatings A10089, Investigation of Engine Bearing Distress in Fairbanks-Morse Emergency Diesel Generators at Fermi-II Power Plant, Phase 1:Insp & Preliminary Conclusions1985-02-28028 February 1985 Investigation of Engine Bearing Distress in Fairbanks-Morse Emergency Diesel Generators at Fermi-II Power Plant, Phase 1:Insp & Preliminary Conclusions ML20115F3901985-02-28028 February 1985 Transfix Sys Description. W/Four Proprietary Drawings 8911-M-2000,2001,2006 & 9402-M-2100 Re Transfix Sys P&Id. Drawings Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20115F4381985-02-28028 February 1985 Comparison of NUS Process Svcs Corp Mobile Radwaste Processing Sys W/Guidelines of Us NRC Reg Guide 1.143 ML20117D5201985-01-31031 January 1985 Rev 0 to Mark I Wetwell to Drywell Differential Pressure Load & Vacuum Breaker Response for Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 ML20106G1221985-01-31031 January 1985 Evaluation of Fire Detection Placement at Fermi 2 1998-08-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217N4381999-10-25025 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 17 to License DPR-9 ML20217P3551999-10-22022 October 1999 LER 99-S01-00:on 990922,loaded 9mm Handgun Was Discovered on Truck Cargo Area of Vehicle Inside Protected Area.Caused by Inadequate Vehicle Search.Guidance in Procedures & Security Training to Address Multiple Vehicle Searches Was Provided NRC-99-0095, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0067, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0065, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0088, Detroit Edison Co Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant,Unit 1 Annual Rept for Period 980701-990630. with1999-06-30030 June 1999 Detroit Edison Co Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant,Unit 1 Annual Rept for Period 980701-990630. with NRC-99-0064, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0062, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fermi 2.With ML20206J9301999-05-10010 May 1999 SER Concluding That Util Adequately Addressed Actions Requested in GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Powered-Operated Gate Valves ML20206G5081999-05-0505 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Approving Request for Relief PR-8,Rev 2 on Basis That Licensee Committed to Meet All Related Requirements of ASME OM-6 Std & PR-12 on Basis That Proposed Alternative Will Provide Acceptable Level of Safety NRC-99-0022, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fermi 2.With ML20205Q7141999-04-15015 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 16 to License DPR-9 ML20205P9721999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Fermi 2 ML20204E0371999-03-17017 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Request for NRC Approval of Alternative Rv Weld Exam,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i) & 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(A)(5) for Plant,Unit 2 for 40-month Period ML20204D0361999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Fermi 2 ML20198S3341999-01-0606 January 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 15 to License DPR-9 NRC-99-0005, Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20207B7491998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Operating Rept for Fermi 2 ML20205Q9621998-12-31031 December 1998 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-99-0021, 1998 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Co. with1998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Co. with NRC-98-0153, Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fermi 2.With NRC-98-0160, Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20154R2331998-10-21021 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 13 to License DPR-9 ML20154L1031998-10-14014 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Response to NRC Bulletin 95-002, Unexpected Clogging of Residual Heat Removal Pump Strainer While Operating in Suppression Pool Cooling Mode NRC-98-0139, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2.With1998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2.With ML20154H8161998-09-30030 September 1998 Rev 0 to COLR Cycle 7 for Fermi 2 ML20153B8811998-09-18018 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Request for Relief from Certain Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Xi,For Plant,Unit 2 ML20151X0651998-09-11011 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Re Inservice Testing Program Relief Request VR-63 for Plant NRC-98-0111, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20153B7921998-08-31031 August 1998 Rev 0 to Fermi 1 Sar ML20237E1171998-08-25025 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Relief Requests for First 10-yr Interval Inservice Insp Nondestructive Exam Program ML20236X8611998-08-0505 August 1998 SER Related to Revised Feedwater Nozzle Analysis to Facility Operating License NPF-43,Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 NRC-98-0109, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Fermi 21998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Fermi 2 ML20236K3261998-07-0101 July 1998 SER Accepting Licensee Response Related to Revised Feedwater Nozzle Analysis to License NPF-43 for Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Plant,Unit 2 NRC-98-0097, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Fermi,Unit 21998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2 NRC-98-0127, Annual Rept for Period 970701-9806301998-06-30030 June 1998 Annual Rept for Period 970701-980630 NRC-98-0079, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Fermi 21998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0076, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Fermi 21998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0072, Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Fermi 21998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0050, Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Fermi 21998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0019, Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Fermi 21998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Fermi 2 ML20198L4241998-01-0808 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Rev 2 to Relief Request VR-51 Under Fermi 2 Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program Per 10CFR50.55a(f)(6)(i) for First 10-yr Interval NRC-98-0015, Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 21997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 2 ML20217N3821997-12-31031 December 1997 Annual Operating Rept for 970101-1231 NRC-98-0053, 1997 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Company1997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Company ML20205Q9601997-12-31031 December 1997 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 2 NRC-97-0141, Deficiency Rept Re Malfunction of EDG Number 11 Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) Printed Circuit Board Rev B,Due to Failure of Operational Amplifier U8 Chip.Avr Board Rev B Was Sent Offsite to Independent Engineering Facility1997-12-23023 December 1997 Deficiency Rept Re Malfunction of EDG Number 11 Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) Printed Circuit Board Rev B,Due to Failure of Operational Amplifier U8 Chip.Avr Board Rev B Was Sent Offsite to Independent Engineering Facility ML20197A9921997-12-15015 December 1997 Rev 0 to Efp,Unit 1 Fermi 1 Sar NRC-97-0131, Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Fermi 21997-11-30030 November 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Fermi 2 ML20248H1151997-10-31031 October 1997 Rev 1 to Colr,Cycle 6 for Fermi 2 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
- -
pncraseIONAL LOes CONTROL, INC.
EVALUATION OF FIRE,000RS 3-20 AND 3-13 AT FERMI 2 DETROIT EDIS0N CO.
Date Submitted: January 31, 1985 bV
- Prepared by: Robert J. 0'Laughlin, P.E., CSP Senior Fire Protection Engineer Professional Loss Control, Inc.
8502140222 850204 PDR ADOCK 05000341 F pyg P. O. Box 446 e Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 e (GIS) 482 3541
e O- f3 v
,e .
TABLE OF CONTENTS Subject Page 1.0 General................................................... 1 2.0 Problem Statement (Door 3-20)............................. 1 2.1 Area Des cri pti on (Door 3-20) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.2 Fire Hazards Analysis................................. 2 2.3 Fire Protection....................................... 2 2.4 Safe Shut Down Equipment.............................. 2
- 2. 5 Con cl u s i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3.0 Problem Statement (Door 3-13)............................. 3 3.1 Area Des c ri p t i on (Door 3-13) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.2 Fire Hazards Analysis (Door 3-13)..................... 3 3.3 Fire Protection (Door 3-13)........................... 3 3.4 Safe Shut Down Equipment.............................. 4 3.5 Conclusion............................................ 4 I
4
0 0 EVALUATION OF FIRE 000RS 3-20 AND 3-13 1.0 GENERAL Previously, Detroit Edison Co. had Underwriter's Laboratory, Inc. (UL) investigate door / frame assemblies that are installed in fire barriers at the Fermi 2 Plant. The fire doors are unlabeled due to security constraints on the doors.
UL issued two reports:
- 1. Project 83NK23365, File NC698, Report NC699-2
" Investigation of Edison's Steel Channel Frames and Security Doors".
- 2. Project 83NK23366, File NC699, Report NC6992
" Fire and Hose Stream Test of Security Doors RB3-13 and RB 3-20".
These reports list modifications which have to be completed to make fire door / frame assemblies acceptable construction to UL designs.
Detroit Edison has completed these modifications except for weather stripping on 4 doors (R1-10, R3-20, R3-13 and R3-4). The weather stripping will be installed by fuel load.
2.0 PROBLEM STATEMENT (Door 3-20)
UL - Test No. I was a 1 1/2 hour test for door R3-20 which has a 100 sq. in. of UL classified Bullet Resistant Glazing material. This door met the criteria of the subject tests with the exception of Sections 11.7 and 12.1 of UL108. Light flaming developed at 21 minutes into the test on the unexposed side and the criteria is no flaming on the unexposed side wihtin 30 minutes (12.1). A through opening developed at 80 minutes along the top latch corner of the glazing and the cri-terion is no opening for 90 minutes (11.7).
1
A A V- V 2.1 AREA DESCRIPTION (Door 3-20)
. . Door R3-20 separates the control room from the stairwell in the northeast corner of the control room. The stairwell construction has a two hour fire resistance. The control room is enclosed in a three hour fire resistive envelope except the north exterior wall. (Refer to Sketch No.1).
2.2 FIRE HAZARDS ANALYSIS (Door 3-20)
The amount of combustible material in the stairwell consists of two (2) cable trays, each 8 ft. high. The type of combustible material in the control room consists of electrical cable insula-tion, paper, and plastics. The quantity of combustible loading is approximately 10 lb/ft ,2 2.3 FIRE PROTECTION (Door 3-20)
The control room has ionization smoke detectors installed above the drop ceiling and in the control room panels. The control room is manned at all times. Halon and CO2 portable extinguish-ers are located on the north and south walls of the control room.
A hose station is located just outside the south wall of the con-trol room.
2.4 SAFE SHUTOOWN EQUIPMENT-(Door 3-20)
The control room contains safe shutdown panels and cabling.
2.5 CONCLUSION
(Door 3-20)
Intermittent flaming on the unexposed surface of the door at 21 minutes into the test is not considered significant since the test criteria permit flame at 30 minutes. Although light flaming occurred 9 minutes beofre the specified time interval, the flam-ing experienced did not increase significantly for the duration of the test (1 1/2 hr). The opening that developed at 80 minutes into the test was not of sufficient magnitude to contribute to the flaming experienced, as indicated above.
2
O O Since the quantity of combustible materials in the stairwell is negligible, this door assembly will prevent the passage of fire through the stairwell and into the control room.
3.0 PROBLEM STATEMENT (Door 3-13)
Test No. 2 was a 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> fire test for door R3-13 which has a transom, and is 3'8" wide which exceeds the width limits of listed doors by this manufacturer. This door met the conditions of acceptance of UL108 with the exception of section 11.2. At 90 minutes into the test, the door separated from the transom panel at its horizontal midpoint, by 2 in. The criterion specified is 1 3/4 in. (width of door). At 180 minutes, the separation was 2 15/16 in. and the criterion is 2 10/16 in.
3.1 AREADESCRIPTION(Door 3-13)
Door R3-13 separates the control room from the Turbine Bldg. ex-tension, floor elevation 643'-6". This security door is instal-led in a 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> fire resistance wall on the south side of the control room. This door is located approximately 25 ft from the main Turbine Building floor. (Refer to sketch No. 1).
3.2 FIREHAZARDSANALYSIS(Loor3-13)
The types of combustible material in the control room consists of electrical cable insulation, paper, and plastic. The quantity of combustible loading is approximately 10 lb/ft2 ,
The quantity of combustible material in the Turbine Building ex-tension is negligible (<1 lb/ft ),
2 3.3 FIREPROTECTION(Door 3-13)
The control room has ionization smoke detectors installed above the drop ceiling and in the control room panels. The control room is manned at all times. Halon and CO2 portable fire extinguish-ers are located on the north and south walls of the control room.
The turbine building extension contains one hose station and two portable fire extinguishers (CO2 and dry chemical).
3
.. O O 3.4 SAFE SHUTDOWN EQUIPMENT (Door 3-13)
The control room contains safe shutdown panels that have been protected to minimize fire exposure damage.
The turbine building extension contains m safe shutdown equip-ment.
3.5 CONCLUSION
(Door 3-13)
Door 3-13 is considered adequate for its installation in the 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> rated fire wall even though an additional 5/16 inch gap oc-curred at the transom panel. This is considered a minor devia-tion from the acceptance criteria. In addition, the Turbine Building extension contains no fixed combustible material and ,
therefore, does not present an exposure hazard to the door assem-bly. Transient combustibles are controlled procedurely.
File Ref: FR-11-004-06 4
t t
..@ @e @ C@ @
N\_\ \ N \\ \N .\\\\\ .g
' ~
\\\ \ \\\
\ Fia.t unst
\ i -
"BerrtM
\ '
e
' Il.] o v^1 N 1 N
N N ceua n_ o e m @
A. , w.y (N T. A N \.n. \ i I
N Mr. w it -+ s N l N i R % 3. ~ ;
3y bow Rt.11
g% .__ _ +
m y
s tesh \ h q 6'.e Met Ro.- \, _, j '
- 7.
p t.sy A NJ pts k x' sxx xxxx xxx 4 x x 'v h NNNNN( s su Q g u,:
a - ; w- .ss s x s y- . 5qe I
:3
. : Tag'ing ,
A-
- t. i 2 : -
i Ce o e- l
' E*
$Ne tumy So
- c. e,L G.
~~ ~
%,y f,y; 4* *t i l 3,m .: tm. :... : , . . . ." 1 ' s t.',.
waw w:i; *1
%.. 3m ;
/ tw y
- ?.
T um. t.a. . .s a , ,wa yy*
v p.
c'n. yu.
E d.s ti.e c
.. ~
y yi
,r u.
not vgi i'-o a 3 *A Root c.ouTg.ot. 9M A R.FA r,e.ues. I oy,'
4.
Attachment B
\
l 1
1 1
O O Results of Fire Detector Placement Review at Fermi 2 A study of Fermi's fire detection system was performed by Detroit Edison personnel to determine conformance to NFPA 72E, a standard for the installation of fire detectors.
This review took into account spacing, location, ceiling types and construction, interferences from HVAC and normal air patterns (along with location of HVAC supply inlets and exhausts) and accessibility for testing and maintenance.
Based upon this study, additional smoke detectors will be installed according to Table 1.
i TABLE 1 DETECTION NUMBER OF NUMBER OF ZONE EXISTING DETdCTORS NUMBER DETECTORS TO BE AREA ADDED First Floor Reactor Building 7 10/8* 6 Second Floor Reactor Building 10 10 3 Third Floor Reactor Building 15 14 2 (Plus relocate one)
Auxiliary Building Basement 4 5 1 Auxiliary Building Mezzanine 6 12 2 (Plus relocate five)
Auxiliary Building Fourth Floor 16 5 1 Top of the Control Room Complex Stairwell (N/W Corner) - - 1 It should be noted that none of the above areas requiring additional detectors to comply with NFPA 72E rely on detec-tors to actuate gaseous suppression systems.
- 10/8 - 10 ionization smoke detectors 8 thermal detectors
x
, V U In addition, the study recommended relocating some detectors as summarized in Table 2:
TABLE 2 DETECTION NUMBER OF DETECTORS AREA ZONE EXISTING TO BE AUXILIARY BUILDING NUMBER DETECTORS RELOCATED Division I Switchgear Rooms 9 4 2*
Division II Switchgear Rooms 14 4 2*
Fifth Floor HVAC Areas 16 4 4 RHR BUILDING EDG #11 Switchgear Room 52 6 2*
EDG #12 Switchgear Room 53 6 2*
EDG #13 Switchgear Room 54 6 2*
EDG #14 Switchgear Room 55 6 2*
These detectors are currently planned to be installed and/or relocated by May 30, 1985.
With the existing fire detectors in their existing locations in service, sufficient detector coverage is provided during the interim period of time until the detectors are relocated and/or added as listed in Tables 1 and.2. Additional justification for this interim deviation to NFPA 72E is provided as follows:
a) Auxiliary Building: Because of previous commitments, an hourly fire watch patrol will be making rounds in the Auxiliary Building. His routes will also include the Auxiliary Building areas listed except for the fifth floor. The fifth floor Auxiliary Building contains HVAC systems needed for safe shutdown and the combustible loading for this zone is light. The present detectors need to be relocated to meet NFPA 72E, but the present layout will detect a fire condition.
This additional fire watch coverage along with the existing fire detector coverage provides sufficient assurance to warrant granting the interim deviation for the Auxiliary Building.
- The exiating location of these detectors is in front of exhaust duct inlets. The detectors are equipped with air shields and should function acceptably. However, to meet code requirements, the detectors will be relocated.
O O b)
Reactor Building: The Reactor Building areas listed in Table 1 are large (approximately 30 ft. ceilings and 10,000 sq. ft floor areas).
The existing detectors are located throughout the floor areas. Due to these detectors, the more than 20 ft. separation of shutdown equipment, and the light fire loading (see FSAR section 9B), a postulated small delay in fire detection due to not explicitly meeting NFPA 72E will not jeopardize safe shutdown capability.
c) RHR Building: The RHR Buildin'g is arranged so Division I (EDG's 11 and 12) is separated from Division II (EDG's 13 and 14) by a three hour rated wall. Additionally, the Switchgear Rooms in each division have been separated by fire rated
~
barriers because of Edison standards. The rooms have the proper number of detectors in them presently which will assure detection of a fire.
Additionally, any postulated fire will be contained by the fire barriers.
The following sections of this Attachment provide permanent deviation requests from NFPA 72E for the following areas:
Control Room Complex Performed by Torus Room Professional Reactor Building Refueling Floor Loss Control, Inc.
Reactor Building Basement Corner Rooms Performed by Detroit Edison l
l . . .i s. . .
O O DEVIATION REQUESTS FOR ,
FIRE DETECTOR PLACEMENT' FOR CONTROL ROOM COMPLEX TORUS ROOM REACTOR BUILDING REFUELING FLOOR PERFORMED BY PROFESSIONAL LOSS CONTROL, INC.
'