|
---|
Category:Code Relief or Alternative
MONTHYEARML23198A3212023-07-27027 July 2023 Authorization and Safety Evaluation for Proposed Alternative RV-1 ML23121A2202023-05-0404 May 2023 Proposed Alternative P-1 Regarding Safeguard Building Sump Pumps ML22077A8412022-03-24024 March 2022 Proposed Alternative SNB-3 for the Snubber Inservice Program Third Interval Extension ML21021A1002021-02-0101 February 2021 Proposed Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME OM Code to Extend the Inservice Testing Program Interval for Certain Snubbers (EPID L-2020-LLR-0095 (Covid 19)) ML21013A1282021-01-28028 January 2021 Approval of Proposed Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code to Extend the Third Inservice Inspection Interval (EPID L-2020-LLR-0092 (COVID-19)) ML21021A0022021-01-28028 January 2021 Approval of Proposed Alternatives 1A4-1 and 1A4-2 from Certain Requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plants ML20253A1172020-10-0505 October 2020 Approval of Request for Alternative from Certain Requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (EPIDs L-2020-LLR-0063, L-2020-LLR-0064, and L-2020-LLR-0065 (COVID-19)) CP-202000431, Relief Request 1A4-1 Supplement - Reactor Vessel (Rv) Upper Head Examinations2020-08-0505 August 2020 Relief Request 1A4-1 Supplement - Reactor Vessel (Rv) Upper Head Examinations ML20196L8232020-07-14014 July 2020 Relief Request SNB-1, Snubber Testing ML20196L8242020-07-14014 July 2020 Relief Request 1A3-2, Inservice Inspection (Isi), Table 1 ML20196L8252020-07-14014 July 2020 Relief Request SNB-1, Snubber Testing, Table 1 ML20196L8262020-07-14014 July 2020 Relief Request V-3, Inservice Testing (IST) ML20196L8292020-07-14014 July 2020 Relief Request 1A3-2, Inservice Inspection (ISI) ML20196L8272020-07-14014 July 2020 Relief Request 1A4-2, Reactor Vessel (Rv) Bottom Mounted Instrumentation (Bmi) Nozzle Penetration Examination ML20196L8302020-07-14014 July 2020 Relief Request V-3, Inservice Testing (Ist), Table 1 CP-202000262, Snubber Testing and Snubber Visual Examinations Relief Request2020-04-10010 April 2020 Snubber Testing and Snubber Visual Examinations Relief Request CP-202000261, Inservice Inspection (ISI) and Inservice Testing (IST) Program Relief Requests2020-04-0707 April 2020 Inservice Inspection (ISI) and Inservice Testing (IST) Program Relief Requests ML17095A2512017-04-0707 April 2017 Request for Alternative 2B3-1 Re Examination of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Penetration Nozzles ML16179A4052016-07-11011 July 2016 Relief Request Nos. B-9, B-3, B-10, and B-11 for Piping Welds, Second 10-year Inservice Inspection Interval ML16074A0012016-03-14014 March 2016 Relief Request 1B3-3, Alternative for Reactor Pressure Vessel Cold Leg Weld Inspection Frequency from Not to Exceed 7 Years to 9 Years for the Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML16063A0012016-03-11011 March 2016 Relief Request No. B-15, C-2, and C-4 for Welds in the RPV and Containment Spray and Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchanger Shells, Second 10-year Inservice Inspection Interval ML16011A0732016-01-19019 January 2016 Relief Request T-1; Alternative to the ASME OM Code Frequency Specifications for Inservice Testing for the Third 10-Year IST Interval ML15259A0042015-10-30030 October 2015 Relief Request 1B3-4, Alternative for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetration Weld Inspection Frequency (from 10 to 15 Years), Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML15257A2422015-09-18018 September 2015 Relief Request 2A3-1, from ASME Code Section XI Requirements, Risk-Informed Process for Selection of Class 1 and Class 2 Piping Weld Examinations, Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML15257A2402015-09-15015 September 2015 Relief Request 2C3-1, from ASME Code, Section XI Requirements Reactor Pressure Vessel Leak-Off Flange for the Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval CP-201500671, Relief Request T-1 for Inservice Testing Program for Application of an Alternative to the ASME OM Code Frequency Specifications, (2007 Edition of ASME Code, Section XI, 2008 Addenda Third Interval Start Date: August 3.2015-06-30030 June 2015 Relief Request T-1 for Inservice Testing Program for Application of an Alternative to the ASME OM Code Frequency Specifications, (2007 Edition of ASME Code, Section XI, 2008 Addenda Third Interval Start Date: August 3. ML15090A1042015-04-0303 April 2015 Relief Requests B-7, B-12, and B-13 - Steam Generator Head-to-Tube Sheet Welds for the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML14087A0662014-04-10010 April 2014 Relief Request No. 1/2E-1 for Containment Electrical Penetrations for the Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML14073A5442014-04-0101 April 2014 Relief Request No. B-14 for Reactor Pressure Vessel Hot Leg Nozzle Weld Examinations for the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML13158A0932013-06-26026 June 2013 Relief Request No. E-1 Containment Electrical Penetrations, for the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML13148A4372013-06-26026 June 2013 Relief Request No. P-1 for Pumps and Valves, Third 10-Year Inservice Testing Plan Interval ML13113A3792013-05-0808 May 2013 Relief Request No. V-1, from ASME Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants Requirements for Pumps and Valves, for the Third 10-Year Inservice Testing Interval ML13046A3852013-03-19019 March 2013 Relief Request C-2 for the Reactor Pressure Vessel Flange Leak-Off Piping, Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML13056A5032013-03-15015 March 2013 Relief Request B-2, Alternative to ASME Code Requirements for Examination of Reactor Vessel Hot-Leg Nozzle Welds, for the Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval CP-201300003, Submittal of Relief Request No. B-2, Third 10 Year ISI Interval from 10CFR50.55a Requirements for Reactor Vessel Hot Leg Nozzle Weld Examinations (Third ISI Interval Start Date August 13, 2010)2013-01-16016 January 2013 Submittal of Relief Request No. B-2, Third 10 Year ISI Interval from 10CFR50.55a Requirements for Reactor Vessel Hot Leg Nozzle Weld Examinations (Third ISI Interval Start Date August 13, 2010) CP-201201384, Response to Request for Additional Information for Relief Request No. E-12012-11-14014 November 2012 Response to Request for Additional Information for Relief Request No. E-1 ML12194A2502012-08-14014 August 2012 Relief Request A-1 for Approval of Risk-Informed Alternative to ASME Code, Section XI for Class 1 and 2 Piping Welds, Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML1131100922011-12-19019 December 2011 Relief Request No. C-9, Reactor Pressure Vessel Flange Leak-off Piping Configuration, Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML1126500832011-11-10010 November 2011 Approval of Relief Request Nos. B-10 and B-11 for the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval CP-201001546, Relief Request No. B-11 for the Second 10 Years ISI Interval from 10 CFR 50.55a Inspection Requirements Due to Physical Interferences (Second Interval Start Date: August 13, 2000)2010-12-15015 December 2010 Relief Request No. B-11 for the Second 10 Years ISI Interval from 10 CFR 50.55a Inspection Requirements Due to Physical Interferences (Second Interval Start Date: August 13, 2000) CP-201001544, Relief Request No. C-9 for the Second 10 Year Interval from 10 CFR 50.55a Inspection Requirements Due to Hardship (Second Interval Start Date: August 13, 2000)2010-12-15015 December 2010 Relief Request No. C-9 for the Second 10 Year Interval from 10 CFR 50.55a Inspection Requirements Due to Hardship (Second Interval Start Date: August 13, 2000) CP-201000890, Relief Request No. C-7 for the Second 10 Year ISI Interval from 10 CFR 50.55a Inspection Requirements Due to Physical Interferences (Second Interval Start Date: August 13, 2000)2010-12-15015 December 2010 Relief Request No. C-7 for the Second 10 Year ISI Interval from 10 CFR 50.55a Inspection Requirements Due to Physical Interferences (Second Interval Start Date: August 13, 2000) ML0928706372009-12-22022 December 2009 Relief Request B-9 for Unit 1 and B-8 for Unit 2 to Extend the Inservice Inspection Interval for the Reactor Vessel Weld Examination CP-200901227, Revision to Request for Relief to Extend the Unit 1 and 2 in Service Inspection Interval for the Reactor Vessel Weld Examination and Withdrawal of License Amendment Request 09-004 to Add License Condition for Submittal of ISI Informatio2009-09-14014 September 2009 Revision to Request for Relief to Extend the Unit 1 and 2 in Service Inspection Interval for the Reactor Vessel Weld Examination and Withdrawal of License Amendment Request 09-004 to Add License Condition for Submittal of ISI Information an ML0916205482009-07-23023 July 2009 Relief Request P-2, Inservice Testing Plan for Pumps and Valves for Second Interval CP-200801132, Relief Request No. P-2 for the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Inservice Testing Plan for Pumps and Valves (ASME OM Code 1998 Edition, Through 2000 Addenda; Interval Start Date: August 3, 2004, Second Interval)2008-09-24024 September 2008 Relief Request No. P-2 for the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Inservice Testing Plan for Pumps and Valves (ASME OM Code 1998 Edition, Through 2000 Addenda; Interval Start Date: August 3, 2004, Second Interval) ML0821301472008-08-22022 August 2008 Request for Relief B-2 for Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval from 10 CFR 50.55a Inspections Requirements Due to Physical Interferences CP-200800927, (Cpnpp), Relief Request B-8 for Unit 1 Second 10 Year ISI Interval & B-6 for Unit 2 Second 10 Year ISI Interval from 10 CFR 50.55a Requirements for Reactor Vessel Hot & Cold Leg Nozzle Weld Examinations (Unit 1 Second Interval Start..2008-07-10010 July 2008 (Cpnpp), Relief Request B-8 for Unit 1 Second 10 Year ISI Interval & B-6 for Unit 2 Second 10 Year ISI Interval from 10 CFR 50.55a Requirements for Reactor Vessel Hot & Cold Leg Nozzle Weld Examinations (Unit 1 Second Interval Start.. ML0805201952008-03-10010 March 2008 Relief Request B-5 for Second 10-Year ISI Interval from 10 CFR 50.55a Requirements for Class 1 Repair/Replacement of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Canopy Seal Welds ML0804306622008-02-29029 February 2008 Request for Relief No. B-4 from Certain Requirements of ASME Code, Section XI for Implementation of the EPRI-PDI Supplement 11 Program and Application of Weld Overlays 2023-07-27
[Table view] Category:Letter
MONTHYEARCP-202400030, License Renewal Application Revision 0 - Supplement 3, Revision 12024-01-31031 January 2024 License Renewal Application Revision 0 - Supplement 3, Revision 1 IR 05000445/20230042024-01-29029 January 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000445/2023004 and 05000446/2023004 CP-202400034, (CPNPP) - Core Operating Limits Report (Colr), Unit 2 Cycle 21, (ERX-23-001, Revision 1)2024-01-29029 January 2024 (CPNPP) - Core Operating Limits Report (Colr), Unit 2 Cycle 21, (ERX-23-001, Revision 1) ML24024A2102024-01-29029 January 2024 Summary of Regulatory Audit Regarding a License Amendment Request to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors ML24025A0052024-01-25025 January 2024 Review of the Spring 2023 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report ML24023A0242024-01-24024 January 2024 Correction to Amendment Nos. 185 and 185 Regarding Implementation of Full Spectrum Loss-of-Coolant Accident Methodology ML24018A1072024-01-18018 January 2024 Notification of Commercial Grade Dedication Inspection (05000445/2024012 and 05000446/2024012) and Request for Information ML23159A2082023-12-20020 December 2023 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure ML23319A3872023-12-20020 December 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 185 and 185 Regarding Implementation of Full Spectrum Loss-of-Coolant Accident (Fsloca) Methodology ML23348A2392023-12-19019 December 2023 Nonacceptance of License Amendment Request to Relocate Technical Specification 3.9.3, Nuclear Instrumentation, to the Technical Requirements Manual CP-202300575, (Cpnpp), License Amendment Request to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors Supplement 22023-12-13013 December 2023 (Cpnpp), License Amendment Request to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors Supplement 2 ML23333A0872023-12-13013 December 2023 Transmittal of Dam Safety Inspection Report - Public CP-202300566, (Cpnpp), Special Report 1-SR-23-001-00, Inoperable Post Accident Monitoring Instrumentation2023-12-12012 December 2023 (Cpnpp), Special Report 1-SR-23-001-00, Inoperable Post Accident Monitoring Instrumentation CP-202300494, License Renewal Application Revision 0, Supplement 32023-12-0606 December 2023 License Renewal Application Revision 0, Supplement 3 ML23313A0732023-12-0606 December 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 184 and 184 Regarding Revision to Technical Specifications to Implement WCAP-17661-P-A, Rev. 1, Improved Roac and CAOC Fq Surveillance Technical Specifications ML23291A4382023-11-30030 November 2023 Notice of Availability of the Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 60, to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Numbers 1 and 2, License Renewal Applica ML23325A0182023-11-30030 November 2023 Schedule Revision for the License Renewal Application Review IR 05000445/20234022023-11-30030 November 2023 NRC Security Inspection Report 05000445/2023402 and 05000446/2023402 CP-202300349, License Amendment Request (Lar) 23-004 Technical Specifications (TS) 3.9.3, Nuclear Instrumentation2023-11-20020 November 2023 License Amendment Request (Lar) 23-004 Technical Specifications (TS) 3.9.3, Nuclear Instrumentation ML23308A0032023-11-17017 November 2023 Letter to R. Nelson, Executive Director; Achp; Re., Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23308A0022023-11-17017 November 2023 Letter to M. Wolfe, Executive Director; Shpo; Re., Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A3002023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to R. Sylestine, Chairman, Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2972023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to R. Martin, President, Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2872023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to J. Garza, Chairman, Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2832023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to D. Dotson, President, Delaware Nation Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2852023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to E. Martinez, President, Mescalero Apache Tribe Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23306A0302023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to J. Cernek, Chairman; Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2902023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to M. Pierite, Chairman, Tunica Biloxi Tribe of Louisiana Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2982023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to R. Morrow, Town King, Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2842023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to D. Kaskaske, Chairman, Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2822023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to D. Cooper, Chairman, Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2962023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to M. Woommavovah, Chairman, Comanche Nation Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2812023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to C. Hoskin, Principal Chief, Cherokee Nation; Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2862023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to J. Bunch, Chief, United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A3032023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to W. Yargee, Chief, Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2882023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to L. Johnson, Chief, Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A3012023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to S. Yahola, Mekko, Kialegee Tribal Town Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2792023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to B. Gonzalez, Chairman, Caddo Nation Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A3022023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to T. Parton, President, Wichita and Affiliated Tribes Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23317A2892023-11-13013 November 2023 Letter to L. Spottedbird, Chairman, Kiowa Indian Tribe Regarding Comanche Peak Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML23311A2082023-11-0909 November 2023 Reassignment of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Chief in the Division of Operating Reactor Licensing for Plant Licensing Branch IV ML23360A6312023-10-26026 October 2023 FEMA, Submittal of Radiological Emergency Preparedness Final Report for the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Medical Services Drill Evaluated on August 23, 2023 CP-202300416, Supplemental Information to Facilitate Acceptance of Licensee Amendment Request 23-002, Application Regarding GDC-5 Shared System Requirements2023-10-12012 October 2023 Supplemental Information to Facilitate Acceptance of Licensee Amendment Request 23-002, Application Regarding GDC-5 Shared System Requirements CP-202300432, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the Safety Review of the License Renewal Application - Set 42023-10-0404 October 2023 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the Safety Review of the License Renewal Application - Set 4 ML23237B4222023-09-28028 September 2023 Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp. - Vistra Operations Company LLC - Letter Regarding Order Approving Transfer of Licenses and Draft Conforming License Amendments ML23263A0242023-09-21021 September 2023 Revision of Schedule for the Environmental Review of the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 License Renewal Application 2024-01-31
[Table view] Category:Safety Evaluation
MONTHYEARML23319A3872023-12-20020 December 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 185 and 185 Regarding Implementation of Full Spectrum Loss-of-Coolant Accident (Fsloca) Methodology ML23313A0732023-12-0606 December 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 184 and 184 Regarding Revision to Technical Specifications to Implement WCAP-17661-P-A, Rev. 1, Improved Roac and CAOC Fq Surveillance Technical Specifications ML23237B4282023-09-28028 September 2023 Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp. - Vistra Operations Company LLC - Enclosure 2, Draft Conforming License Amendments ML23237B4302023-09-28028 September 2023 Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp. - Vistra Operations Company LLC - Enclosure 4, Safety Evaluation for Transfer of Licenses and Draft Conforming License Amendments (EPID L-2023-LLM-0000) (Public) ML23198A3212023-07-27027 July 2023 Authorization and Safety Evaluation for Proposed Alternative RV-1 ML22192A0072022-08-22022 August 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 183 and 183 Regarding the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler TSTF-505, Revision 2 ML22194A0592022-07-14014 July 2022 Correction to Amendment Nos. 182 and 182 to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-577, Revision 1, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections ML22129A0722022-05-16016 May 2022 Review of Quality Assurance Program Changes ML22077A8412022-03-24024 March 2022 Proposed Alternative SNB-3 for the Snubber Inservice Program Third Interval Extension ML21321A3492022-02-24024 February 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 182 and 182 to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-577, Rev. 1, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections ML21322A1032021-12-0707 December 2021 Proposed Alternative for the Continued Use of a Risk-Informed Process for the Selection of Class 1 and 2 Piping Welds for Inservice Inspection ML21132A0892021-06-0909 June 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 181 and 181 Regarding the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler TSTF-567, Rev. 1, Add Containment Sump TS to Address GSI - 191 Issues ML21061A2172021-05-19019 May 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 180 and 180 to Authorize Revision of Certain Emergency Action Levels of the Emergency Plan ML21103A0392021-04-23023 April 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 179 and 179 the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler, TSTF-569, Revision 2, Revise Response Time Testing Definition (EPID L-2020-0147) ML21015A2122021-02-12012 February 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 178 and 178 Regarding One-Time Revision to Technical Specifications 3.7.8 Station Service Water System (Ssws) and 3.8.1 AC Sources - Operating ML21022A1622021-02-0808 February 2021 Proposed Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME OM Code to Extend the Inservice Testing Program Interval for Certain Check and Relief Valves (EPID L-2020-LLR-0096 (COVID-19)) ML20346A0192021-02-0101 February 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 177 and 177 Regarding Revision to Technical Specifications 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating ML21021A1002021-02-0101 February 2021 Proposed Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME OM Code to Extend the Inservice Testing Program Interval for Certain Snubbers (EPID L-2020-LLR-0095 (Covid 19)) ML21013A1282021-01-28028 January 2021 Approval of Proposed Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code to Extend the Third Inservice Inspection Interval (EPID L-2020-LLR-0092 (COVID-19)) ML21021A0022021-01-28028 January 2021 Approval of Proposed Alternatives 1A4-1 and 1A4-2 from Certain Requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plants ML20282A7092020-11-17017 November 2020 Proposed Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Omcode to Extend the Inservice Testing Program Interval for Certain Snubbers (EPID L-2020-LLR-0060 (COVID-19)) ML20281A4722020-11-0404 November 2020 Use of Later Code Edition to the Requirements of the ASME OM Code ML20255A1002020-10-0707 October 2020 Proposed Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME OM Code to Extend the Inservice Test Program Interval for Certain Check and Relief Valves (EPID L-2020-LLR-0061 and EPID L-2020-LLR-0062 (COVID-19)) ML20223A3492020-08-31031 August 2020 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 175 and 175 Regarding One-Time Revision to Technical Specification 3.7.19, Safety Chilled Water ML20226A0132020-08-17017 August 2020 Use of Later Code Edition to the Requirements of the ASME Code ML20167A3182020-07-0606 July 2020 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 174 and 174 Regarding Revision to Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-563, Revision 0 ML20108E8782020-04-17017 April 2020 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 173 and 173 Revision to TS 5.5.9, Unit 1 Model D76 and Unit 2 Model D5 Steam Generator (SG) Program (Exigent Circumstances) ML20054A2762020-02-27027 February 2020 Approval of Change to the Quality Assurance Program as Described in the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Final Safety Analysis Report ML19267A0182019-11-0404 November 2019 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 172 and 172 to Revise Augmentation Times and Emergency Response Organization Staffing for the Emergency Plan ML18304A4872018-11-30030 November 2018 Issuance of Amendments 171 and 171 Regarding Revision to Technical Specifications for Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation ML18267A3842018-10-25025 October 2018 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 170 and 170 Revision to Technical Specification 3.8.4, DC Sources - Operating, Condition B (Exigent Circumstances) ML18221A6322018-08-15015 August 2018 Eicb Safety Evaluation - Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.3.2 Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation Docket/Epid 000976/05000446/L-2018-LLA-0 ML17129A0242017-06-29029 June 2017 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Issuance of Amendment Nos. 169 and 169 Re: Administrative Change to Licensee Name (CAC Nos. MF8933 and MF8934) ML17074A4942017-04-13013 April 2017 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 168 and 168 Adoption of TSTF-545, Revision 3, TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing ML17095A2512017-04-0707 April 2017 Request for Alternative 2B3-1 Re Examination of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Penetration Nozzles ML16334A1732016-12-14014 December 2016 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 And 2; Safety Evaluation Regarding Implementation Of Mitigating Strategies And Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Related To Orders EA-12-049 And EA-12-051 ML16179A4052016-07-11011 July 2016 Relief Request Nos. B-9, B-3, B-10, and B-11 for Piping Welds, Second 10-year Inservice Inspection Interval ML16137A0562016-06-14014 June 2016 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 166 and 166, Request to Revise Emergency Action Levels Based on Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-01, Revision 6 ML16096A2662016-05-0606 May 2016 Redacted Letter, Order, Safety Evaluation, and Draft Conforming Amendments, Application for Order Approving Direct and Indirect Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments ML16096A2642016-05-0606 May 2016 Draft Conforming Amendments, Application for Order Approving Direct and Indirect Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments ML16074A0012016-03-14014 March 2016 Relief Request 1B3-3, Alternative for Reactor Pressure Vessel Cold Leg Weld Inspection Frequency from Not to Exceed 7 Years to 9 Years for the Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML16063A0012016-03-11011 March 2016 Relief Request No. B-15, C-2, and C-4 for Welds in the RPV and Containment Spray and Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchanger Shells, Second 10-year Inservice Inspection Interval ML16011A0732016-01-19019 January 2016 Relief Request T-1; Alternative to the ASME OM Code Frequency Specifications for Inservice Testing for the Third 10-Year IST Interval ML15309A0732015-12-30030 December 2015 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 165 and 165, Revise Technical Specification 5.5.16, Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, to Increase ILRT Test Interval from 10 to 15 Years and Type C Tests from 60 to 75 Mos ML15259A0042015-10-30030 October 2015 Relief Request 1B3-4, Alternative for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetration Weld Inspection Frequency (from 10 to 15 Years), Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML15257A2422015-09-18018 September 2015 Relief Request 2A3-1, from ASME Code Section XI Requirements, Risk-Informed Process for Selection of Class 1 and Class 2 Piping Weld Examinations, Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML15257A2402015-09-15015 September 2015 Relief Request 2C3-1, from ASME Code, Section XI Requirements Reactor Pressure Vessel Leak-Off Flange for the Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML15090A1042015-04-0303 April 2015 Relief Requests B-7, B-12, and B-13 - Steam Generator Head-to-Tube Sheet Welds for the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval ML15008A1332015-02-24024 February 2015 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 164 and 164, Revise Technical Specification 3.8.1 for a 14-Day Completion Time for Offsite Circuits ML14183A3422014-09-0808 September 2014 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 163 and 163 to Revise License Condition Related to Approval of Revised Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule 2023-09-28
[Table view] |
Text
September 27, 2006 Mr. M. R. Blevins Senior Vice President &
Chief Nuclear Officer TXU Power Attn: Regulatory Affairs Department P.O. Box 1002 Glen Rose, TX 76043
SUBJECT:
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - RELIEF REQUEST FOR 10-YEAR PUMP AND VALVE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM (TAC NOS. MC5385 AND MC5386)
Dear Mr. Blevins:
By letter dated November 30, 2004, TXU Generation Company LP, the licensee for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES), Units 1 and 2, submitted Relief Request P-1 for Safeguards Building Sump Pumps (SBSPs) from certain inservice testing requirements of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants. By letters dated November 15, 2005, and June 29, 2006, the licensee provided additional information related to the Relief Request P-1.
The SBSPs are installed to detect and mitigate passive failures in the emergency core cooling system and containment spray system after a loss-of-coolant accident and to prevent flooding of the safety-related systems. Currently, CPSES is testing these pumps in a dead-head condition. Testing the pumps in a dead-head condition is not an acceptable test method. It provides little or no useful information for assessing the conditions and operability of the pump, and may even cause pump degradation. Operating experience and equipment history show that testing the pumps in a dead-head condition can cause equipment reliability concerns.
Consequently, CPSES proposes an alternative test by filling up the sump to the same approximate level and pumping into the same destination each time the test is performed.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the licensees request.
Based on that review, the NRC staff concludes that the Code-required test is impractical to perform without significant plant modifications, that the proposed alternative test would provide reasonable assurance of pump operability without major degradation, and that providing interim relief will allow time for the licensee to explore other alternatives, make necessary plant modifications for performing the required test, or submit a revised relief request.
Accordingly, pursuant to paragraph 50.55a(f)(6)(i) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Relief Request P-1 is partially granted for an interim period of up to two refueling cycles but not to exceed 4 years. Granting the relief pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(f)(6)(i) is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest giving due consideration to the burden upon the licensee that could result if the requirements were imposed on the facility. All other ASME Code
M. Blevins requirements for which relief has not been specifically requested and authorized herein by the NRC staff remain applicable. The NRC staffs safety evaluation is enclosed.
Sincerely,
/RA/
David Terao, Chief Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc: See next page
ML062510192 *No significant change to SE input.
OFFICE NRR/LPL4/PM NRR/LPL4/LA NRR/CPTB/BC OGC NRR/LPL4/BC NAME MThadani LFeizollahi Tilda Liu, Acting* JRund NLO DTerao DATE 9/27/06 9/27/06 8/28/06 9/21/06 9/27/06 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station cc:
Senior Resident Inspector Mr. Brian Almon U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Utility Commission P.O. Box 2159 William B. Travis Building Glen Rose, TX 76403-2159 P.O. Box 13326 1701 North Congress Avenue Regional Administrator, Region IV Austin, TX 78701-3326 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Ms. Susan M. Jablonski Arlington, TX 76011 Office of Permitting, Remediation and Registration Mr. Fred W. Madden, Director Texas Commission on Environmental Regulatory Affairs Quality TXU Generation Company LP MC-122 P.O. Box 1002 P.O. Box 13087 Glen Rose, TX 76043 Austin, TX 78711-3087 George L. Edgar, Esq. Terry Parks, Chief Inspector Morgan Lewis Texas Department of Licensing 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW and Regulation Washington, DC 20004 Boiler Program P.O. Box 12157 County Judge Austin, TX 78711 P.O. Box 851 Glen Rose, TX 76043 Environmental and Natural Resources Policy Director Office of the Governor P. O. Box 12428 Austin, TX 78711-3189 Mr. Richard A. Ratliff, Chief Bureau of Radiation Control Texas Department of Health 1100 West 49th Street Austin, TX 78756-3189 December 2004
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SECOND 10-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVICE TESTING REQUEST FOR RELIEF NO. P-1 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 TXU GENERATION COMPANY, LLC DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated November 30, 2004, TXU Generation Company LP (TXU), the licensee, for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES), Units 1 and 2, submitted Relief Request P-1 for Safeguards Building Sump Pumps (SBSPs) from certain inservice testing (IST) requirements of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code). By letters dated November 15, 2005, and June 29, 2006, TXU provided additional information related to Relief Request P-1.
2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION
Section 50.55a of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) requires that IST of certain ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 pumps and valves be performed at 120-month (10-year)
IST program intervals in accordance with the specified ASME Code incorporated by reference in the regulations, except where alternatives have been authorized or relief has been requested by the licensee and granted by the Commission pursuant to paragraphs (a)(3)(i), (a)(3)(ii), or (f)(6)(i) of 10 CFR 50.55a. In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(f)(4)(ii), licensees are required to comply with the requirements of the latest edition and addenda of the ASME Code incorporated by reference in the regulations 12 months prior to the start of each 120-month IST program interval. In accordance with 50.55a(f)(4)(iv), IST of pumps and valves may meet the requirements set forth in subsequent editions and addenda that are incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b), subject to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval.
Portions of editions or addenda may be used provided that all related requirements of the respective editions or addenda are met. In proposing alternatives or requesting relief, the licensee must demonstrate that: (1) the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable level of quality and safety; (2) compliance would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety; or (3) conformance is impractical for the facility. Section 50.55a authorizes the Commission to approve alternatives and to grant relief from ASME Code requirements upon making necessary findings. NRC guidance contained in Generic Letter (GL) 89-04, Guidance on Developing Acceptable Inservice Testing Programs, provides alternatives to Code requirements which are acceptable. Further guidance
is given in GL 89-04, Supplement 1, and NUREG-1482, Revision 1, Guidlines for Inservice Testing at Nuclear Power Plants.
At CPSES, the code of record for the second 10-year interval is the 1998 Edition up to and including the 2000 Addenda of the ASME OM Code.
3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION
3.1 Pump Relief Request P-1 3.1.1 Code Requirements The licensee requested relief from ISTB-5121, which requires that the test parameters shown in Table ISTB-3000-1 shall be determined and recorded, and ISTB-5100(a), which requires that for the Group A test, after the pump conditions are stable as the system permits, each pump shall be run at least 2 minutes. Relief was requested for the following SBSPs:
CP1-WPAPSS-01 CP1-WPAPSS-02 CP1-WPAPSS-03 CP1-WPAPSS-04 CP2-WPAPSS-01 CP2-WPAPSS-02 CP2-WPAPSS-03 CP2-WPAPSS-04 3.1.2 Licensees Basis for Requesting Relief In its letter dated November 15, 2005, the licensee stated:
The Safeguards Building Sump Pumps are required to detect and mitigate passive failures in the Emergency Core Cooing System (ECCS) and Containment Spray (CT)
System post-LOCA [loss-of-coolant accident] and to prevent flooding of the safety related system.
In the present design there is no recirculation line from the discharge header of the pumps back to the sumps and there are no installed pressure or differential pressure instruments on the pump suction or discharge. This creates some unique problems.
Without a recirculation line on each pump discharge, there is only one way to maintain a constant differential pressure across the pump as required by ASME OM Code 1998 Edition, through 2000 Addenda, Subsection ISTB-5121, Group A Test Procedure. That way is to dead-head the pump, setting the reference flow at 0 gpm [gallons per minute],
and calculating the differential. The differential pressure is determined by making elevation corrections to the discharge pressure reading which is read from a gauge installed in the available system vent connection. This vent connection is remotely located in a different room on a different floor elevation than the sump pumps. In addition to the fixed elevation corrections for the gauge location relative to the safeguard sump cover, an elevation is measured between the sump cover and the water surface within the sump and used to determine the final differential pressure. This procedure takes four test personnel to conduct the test in this manner. This test has proven to be
very difficult and operating experience (OE) and equipment history show that testing the pumps in a dead-head condition can cause equipment reliability concerns.
CPSES Inservice Testing Program is an approved Risk-Informed Inservice Testing (RI-IST) Program as described in the Safety Evaluation Report (TAC NOS. M94165, M94166, MA1972, and MA1973). There could be safety enhancements obtained by focusing resources on High Safety Significant Components (HSSCs). Extensive testing on Low Safety Significant Components (LSSCs) could have an adverse effect on safety.
Reduction of testing should reduce component wear-out, operator burden, system unavailability, cost of testing, and radiation exposure. Reduced testing could also achieve a more optimum balance between the positive impacts of testing and the negative effects of disturbing equipment from service and entering a less than optimum plant configuration, such as valve misalignments. The CPSES Safeguards Building Sump Pumps have a low risk ranking and are tested every six years on a staggered test basis, such that at least two pumps are tested every 18 months.
To meet the operational readiness requirements for these pumps, a test should require that the pump start on the proper level switch actuation, determine that the pump is capable of delivering a minimum of 50 gpm to the Waste Holdup Tank, and that velocity-based vibration readings are satisfactory. Differential pressure is not needed to show adequate pump performance. Differential pressure measurement creates additional radiation exposure to personnel (ALARA) and potential equipment damage due to dead-heading the pump. Pumping 50 gpm or more to the Waste Holdup Tank demonstrates that an adequate head was developed to overcome system resistance and greater confidence exists that the ASME OM Code requirements for operational readiness have been met.
These pumps alert the operator of potential leakage in the Safeguards Building and mitigate the consequences of the leakage. To meet the testing requirements of ASME OM Code, Subsection ISTB, the pumps must be dead-headed for extended periods.
With the adoption of the 1989 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section XI (which endorsed the OM Part 6 & 10) and continuing in later Code editions, predictive maintenance techniques fundamentally changed. Prior to this edition of the Code, hydraulic performance (pressure, differential pressure, and flow) was the primary tool for detecting pump performance degradation. Currently, velocity-based vibration has proven to be much more sensitive to detecting degradation.
3.1.3 Licensees Proposed Alternative Testing In its letter dated November 15, 2005, the licensee stated:
For the purpose of accomplishing Safeguards Building Sump Pump testing, the following requirements will apply:
The pumps shall be tested in accordance with ISTB-5121 and ISTB-5123 with the exception of waiting at least 2 minutes of pump run time for conditions to stabilize prior to recording test parameters (see ISTB-5100 (a) Duration of Tests) and the recording of differential pressure. The sump will be pumped down rapidly by one pump, and suction pressure will vary as sump level changes; therefore, the purpose of the stabilization time and differential pressure is not applicable in this case.
Setting one hydraulic parameter (flow or differential pressure) at a reference point and measuring the other now serves to set the pump to a consistent reference point on the pump curve so that vibration data can be comparable from test to test. The same reference point and baseline can be achieved by filling up the sump to the same approximate level and pumping it to the same destination each time. There is a limited volume of water in the sump. The time to pump down the sump until the pump automatically secures is approximately 50 seconds providing ample time to collect vibration data. Flow and vibration readings would be just as consistent (valid) as setting a reference differential pressure and recording the data. This is done in less time, generating less waste, using less personnel and obtaining test data without dead-heading the pump. This test and flowpath is currently used (in addition to the pump dead head) in order to perform the open and close tests of the pump discharge check valves.
A baseline reference will be established for flow and vibration; Alert and Required Action Limits will be set and maintained as specified by ASME OM Code ISTB, 1998 Edition, through 2000 Addenda. This alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety.
3.1.4 Evaluation The SBSPs are installed to detect and mitigate passive failures in the ECCS and CT System post-LOCA and to prevent flooding of the safety-related system. In the present design, there is no recirculation line from the discharge header of the SBSPs back to the sumps and there are no installed on-line pressure and flow instruments on the pump suction or discharge. Without significant system and piping modifications, the licensee is unable to test the SBSPs in accordance with the OM Code requirements. Currently, CPSES is testing these pumps in a dead-head condition. Testing the pumps in a dead-head condition is not an acceptable test method, provides little or no useful information for assessing the conditions and operability of the pump, and may even cause pump degradation. Operating experience and equipment history also show that testing the pumps in a dead-head condition can cause equipment reliability concerns. Due to the reliability concerns, CPSES proposes an alternative test by filling up the
sump to the same approximate level and pumping into the same destination each time. The time to pump down the sump until the pump automatically secures is approximately 50 seconds, which provides ample time to collect vibration data. The proposed test requires starting the pump on the proper level switch actuation, and determines that the pump is capable of delivering a minimum of 50 gpm to the Waste Holdup Tank and that velocity-based vibration readings are satisfactory. The staff finds that compared to the dead-headed test, the proposed alternative will provide significantly improved assurance of the pump operability.
ISTB-5000 requires that for a Group A test, each pump be run at a specific reference point for at least 2 minutes, and at the end of this time at least one measurement or determination of each of the parameters required by Table ISTB-3000-1 shall be made, recorded, and compared to its reference value. Table ISTB-3400-1 requires a Group A test quarterly and a comprehensive test biennially. The intent of the OM Code is to determine the hydraulic and mechanical condition of a pump by comparing current conditions against a previous set of reference values. Deviations detected are symptoms of changes or degradations. The proposed test described in Relief Request P-1 does not prescribe a measurable and repeatable specific reference parameter, i.e.,
flow rate or pressure differential. Without a specific reference parameter, a pump test cannot be duplicated and deviations from previous tests cannot be determined and assessed. Therefore, the staff finds the proposed alternative inconsistent with the basic intent of the OM Code and unacceptable.
As discussed above, the Code-required test is impractical, because it cannot be performed without substantial plant modifications. The plant modifications would require time and planning, and compared with the present test, the proposed alternative would provide reasonable and improved assurance of pump operability without major degradation.
Based on its review, the NRC staff concludes that the Code-required test is impractical to perform without significant plant modifications, that the proposed alternative would provide reasonable assurance of pump operability without major degradation, and that the interim relief will allow time for the licensee to explore other alternatives, make necessary plant modifications for performing the required test, or submit a revised relief request.
4.0 CONCLUSION
Accordingly, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(f)(6)(i), Relief Request P-1 is partially granted for an interim period of up to two refueling cycles but not to exceed 4 years. Granting the relief pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(f)(6)(i) is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest giving due consideration to the burden upon the licensee that could result if the requirements were imposed on the facility.
All other ASME Code requirements for which relief has not been specifically requested and authorized herein by the NRC staff remain applicable.
Principal Contributor: J. Huang Date: September 27, 2006