ML17286A914
| ML17286A914 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1991 |
| From: | WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9107110304 | |
| Download: ML17286A914 (204) | |
Text
ACCELERATED DI TRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM 0
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9107110304 DOC.DATE: 91/06/30 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
- Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPXENT AFFXLIATION R
SUBJECT:
"Summary of Transactions for 900630-910630."
1 DXSTRIBUTION CODE: M004D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: 50.71(b) Annual Financial Report D NQTEs: 5'~~ F~~w('m( @7~
RECIPIENT COPXES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD5 PD 1 1 ENG P.L. 1 0 A INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA 1 1 REG FILE 01 1 1 D EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 1 1 R
D D
D NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM P 1-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 5 ENCL 4
~~
WNP g2 DE COM TRUST-5 8$ &EBK'MPÃ WPPSS 709-956495 ADMINISTRATOR: US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM DOC CONTROL DOCKET 150-397 WNP2 DEBI SANER 358-0970 MAIL STATION Pj-137 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 9107110304 910630 PDR ADOCK 05000397 I PDR FORM 5091 12/88
WPPSS WNP N2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
O O 709-956495
SUMMARY
OF TRANSACTIONS JUNE 30 8 1 990 TO JUNE 30 8 1 99 1 CASH INVESTMENT COST BALANCE FROM LAST STATEMENT 0.00 0.00 RECEIPTS PROCEEDS FROM SALES/MATURITIES 24,946,411.55 24 927 I 854 52 INTEREST RECEIVED ON BOND SALES 141,752.79 INTEREST INCOME 570,998.52 SECURITIES EZCHANGED 8,876,694.75 TRANSFER OF FUNDS 2 8 247 8 768 63
~
TOTAL RECEIPTS 27,906,931.49 16,051,159.77-DISBURSEMENTS COST OF ASSETS PURCHASED 27 I 582 835 32 27 8 582 I 835 32
~
ACCRUED INTEREST ON BONDS PURCHASED 107,680.31-ADMINISTRATIVE EZPENSES 4,250.50-TRANSFER OF FUNDS 207,240.91-TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 27,902,007.04- 27,582,835.32 CURRENT BALANCE 4,924.45 11,531,675.55 FORM 5091 12/88
C7 C7 WPPSS WNP I2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 1 JUNE 30 ~ 1 990 TO JUNE 30 1 1 99 1 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST BALANCE FROM LAST STATEMENT 0.00 0.00 PROCEEDS FROM SALES/MATURITIES 08/03/90 MATURED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 225,000.00 225,000.00-FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 8/03/90 TRADE DATE 8/ 3/90 8/3/90 MATURITY 08/03/90 MATURED 220I000 PAR VALUE OF 220,000.00 220,000.00-FHLMC DISC NT 8/03/90 DATE 8/ 3/90 'RADE 8/3/90 MATURITY 08/15/90 MATURED 2,115,000 PAR VALUE OF 2 I 1 15 g 000 00
~ 2,115,000.00-FHLMC DISC NT 8/15/90 TRADE DATE 8/15/90 2,115,000 PAR VALUE AT 100o 08/22/90 MATURED 425,000 PAR VAIUE OF 425,000.00 425,000.00-FHLMC DISC NT 8/22/90 TRADE DATE 8/22/90 425,000 PAR VALUE AT 100%
09/20/90 MATURED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 225,000.00 225,000.00-FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 9/20/90 TRADE DATE 9/20/90 225 g 000 PAR VALUE AT 100 ~
FORM 5091 12I88
W
'NP NPPS S 0 2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO .
7 0 9- 9 5 6 4 9 5 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO . 2 JUNE 30 g 1 990 TO JUNE 30 g 1 99 1 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 0 9/20/90 MATURED 4 60, 0 0 0 PAR VALUE OF 455, 338. 67 455, 338. 67-FED NATI MTG ASSN DISC NT 9/20/90 TRADE DATE 9/20/90 460 g 000 PAR VALUE AT 100%
0 9/25/90 MATURED 1 g 000 g 000 PV OF 1, 000, 000 . 00 1,000,000.00-FED HOME LN BK 8 ~ 300% 9/25/90 TRADE DATE 9/25/90 1, 000, 000 PV AT 1 00%
0 9/26/90 SOLD 1 g 920, 000 PAR VALUE OF 1, 908, 000 . 00 1, 920, 000 . 00-U S TREASURY NOTE 7 625 o 1 2/3 1/9 1 TRADE DATE 9/2 6/9 0 S/D 9-26-90 SHEARSON/FED 0 9/27/90 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF 35,008. 70 U S TREASURY NOTE 7 . 625% 1 2/3 1/9 1 1 0/ 1 5/90 MATURED 80, 000 PAR VALUE OF 80, 000 . 00 80, 000 . 00-FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 1 0/1 5/90 TRADE DATE 1 0/1 5/90 80, 000 PAR VALUE AT 100 1 0/ 1 7/90 MATURED 22 5, 0 0 0 PAR VALUE OF 222, 384. 38 222, 384 . 38-FHLMC DISC NT 1 0/1 7/90 TRADE DATE 1 0/1 7/9 0 225 g 000 PAR VALUE AT 100 o
O O WPPSS WNP 02 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 3 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 10/29/90 MATURED 220,000 PAR VALUE OF 220,000.00 220,000.00-FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 10/29/90 TRADE DATE 10/29/90 220 I 000 PAR VALUE AT 100 o 11/01/90 MATURED 225 I 000 PAR VALUE OF 223,052.50 223,052.50-FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 11/01/90 TRADE DATE 11/ 1/90 225i000 PAR VALUE AT 100 o ll/05/90 MATURED 2,230,000 PAR VALUE OF 2,191,802.58 2,191,802.58-FHLMC DISC NT 11/05/90 TRADE DATE 11/ 5/90 2 230 000 PAR VALUE AT 100 o 11/08/90 MATURED 695,000 PAR VALUE OF 687',763.31 687,763.31-FHLMC DISC NT 11/08/90 TRADE DATE 11/ 8/90 695,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 11/14/90 MATURED 435,000 PAR VALUE OF 427,204.80 427,204.80-FED HOME LN BK DISC NT 11/14/90 TRADE DATE 11/14/90 435 I 000 PAR VALUE AT 100 FORM 5091 12/88
WPPSS WNP g2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 4 JUNE 30 i 1990 TO JUNE 30 i 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 11/16/90 SOLD 2i300i000 PAR VALUE OF 2,228,668.06 2,228,668.06-FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 4/08/91 TRADE DATE 11/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 SOLD 220,000 PAR VALUE OF 218,299.64 218,299.64-FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 12/05/90 TRADE DATE 11/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 SOLD li055i000 PAR VALUE OF 1,039,082.69 1,039,082.69-FHLMC DISC NT 12/05/90 TRADE DATE 11/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FD 11/16/90 SOLD 230,000 PAR VALUE OF 228,302.43 228,302.43-FHLMC DISC NT ll/30/90 TRADE DATE ll/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 SOLD 85,000 PAR VALUE OF 84,491.94 84,491.94-FHLMC DISC NT 11/30/90 TRADE DATE 11/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED
O O WPPSS WNP 02 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 5 JUNE 30 ~ 1 990 TO JUNE 30 g 1 99 1 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 11/16/90 SOLD 440,000 PAR VALUE OF 435,806.56 435,806.56-FHLMC DISC NT 12/31/90 TRADE DATE 11/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 SOLD 705,000 PAR VALUE OF 692,419.67 692,419.67-FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/04/91 TRADE DATE 11/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 SOL'D 230,000 PAR VALUE OF 226,280.90 226,280.90-FHLMC DISC NT 1/02/91 TRADE DATE 11/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 SOLD 230,000 PAR VALUE OF 224,097.94 224,097.94-FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/26/91 TRADE DATE 11/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 01/14/91 MATURED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 222,300.75 222,300.75-FHLMC DISC NT 1/14/91 TRADE DATE 1/14/91 225,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 FORM 5081 12I88
WPPSS WNP g2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 6 JUNE 30'990 TO JUNE 30'991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 02/14/91 SOLD 1,920,000 PAR VALUE OF 1,959,450.00 1,928,100.00-U S TREASURY NOTE 8.500% 2/29/92 TRADE .DATE 2/14/91 S/D 2-14-91 SNW/FED 02/14/91 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF 75,288.40 U S TREASURY NOTE 8 '00o 2/29/92 02/28/91 MATURED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 221,694.75 221,694.75-FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 2/28/91 TRADE DATE 2/28/91 225,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 03/21/91 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF 21,549.17 U S TREASURY NOTE 8 000o 7/31/92 S/D 3/21/91 03/21/91 SOLD li990i000 PAR VALUE OF 2,016,274.22 2,028,245.31-U S TREASURY NOTE 8.000'o 7/31/92 TRADE DATE 3/21/91 S.D 3/21/91 SNW/FED 04/04/91 MATURED 310,000 PAR VALUE OF 306,109.11 306,109.11-FHLMC DN 4/04/91 TRADE DATE 4/ 4/91 310,000 PAR VALUE AT 100
WPPSS WNP 02 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 7 JUNE 30 1 990 TO JUNE 30 i 1 99 1 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 04/05/91 MATURED 450,000 PAR VALUE OF 448,189.06 448,189.06-FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 4/05/91 TRADE DATE 4/ 5/91 450 i 000 PAR VALUE AT 100 o 04/05/91 MATURED 310,000 PAR VALUE OF 309,947.90 309,947.90-FHLMC DISC NT 4/05/91 TRADE DA'TE 4/ 5/91 310,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 05/14/91 MATURED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 224,065.62 224,065.62-FED FARM CR BK DISC 5/14/91 TRADE DATE 5/14/91 225,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 05/24/91 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF 9,906.52 U S TREASURY NOTE 7.750o 10/31/92 S/D 5/24/91 DEAN WITTER/FED 05/24/91 SOLD li960g000 PAR VALUE OF 1,989,400.00 1,978,221.88-U S TREASURY NOTE 7.750% 10/31/92 TRADE DATE 5/24/91 S/D 5/24/91 DEAN WITTER/FED 06/06/91 MATURED 955,000 PAR VALUE OF 946,669.80 946,669.80-FHLMC DISC NT 6/06/91 TRADE DATE 6/ 6/91 955,000 PAR VALUE AT 100
O O WPPSS WNP I2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. - 8 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 06/27/91 MATURED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 225,000.00 225,000.00-FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC N 6/27/91 TRADE DATE 6/27/91 225,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 06/27/91 MATURED 75,000 PAR VALUE OF 74,314.27 - 74,314.27-FFCB DISC NT 6/27/91 TRADE DATE 6/27/91 75,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 o SUBTOTAL FOR INTEREST RECEIVED ON BOND SALES 141,752.79 SUBTOTAL FOR PROCEEDS FROM SALES/MATURITIES 24,946,411.55 24,927,854.52-TOTAL 25,088,164.34 24 g 927 ~ 854 52
~
INTEREST INCOME 08/15/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 80,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTE 8 000o 8/15/99
$ 0.04/PV ON 2,000g000 PAR VALUE DUE 8/15/90 09/20/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 4,661.33 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 9/20/90 460,000 PAR VALUE AT,100%
09/25/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 41,500.00 FED HOME LN BK 8.300'-o 9/25/90 80.0415/PV ON 1,000,000 PV DUE 9/25/90 FORM 8091 12/88
O O WPPSS WNP N2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 9 JUNE 30 F 1 990 TO JUNE 30 I 1 99 1 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 10/17/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 2,615.62 FHLMC DISC NT 10/17/90 225 000 PAR VALUE AT 100 o ll/Ol/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 1,947.50 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 11/01/90 225 g 000 PAR VALUE AT 100 'o 11/05/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 38,197.42 FHLMC DISC NT ll/05/90 2 g 230 g 000 PAR VALUE AT 100 11/08/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 7,236.69 FHLMC DISC NT 11/08/90 695,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 11/14/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 7,795.20 FED HOME LN BK DISC NT 11/14/90 4352000~PAR VALUE AT 100 11/16/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 5,551.94 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 4/08/91 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 844.62 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 12/05/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED FORM 5091 12/88
O O WPPSS WNP N2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 10 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 11/16/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 11,813.65 FHLMC DISC NT 12/05/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FD 11/16/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 1,031.21 FHLMC DISC NT 11/30/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 261.80 FHLMC DISC NT 11/30/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 150.94 FHLMC DISC NT 12/31/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 1,143.66 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/04/91 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 1,512.06 FHLMC DISC NT 1/02/91 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 11/16/90 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 1,144.89 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/26/91 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED FORM 8091 12/88
1 t
~
O O WPPSS WNP $ 2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 11 JUNE 30 i 1 990 TO JUNE 30 i 1 99 1 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 01/14/91 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 2,699.25 FHLMC DISC NT 1/14/91 225,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 02/15/91 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 80,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTE 8 '00o 8/15/99
$ 0.04/PV ON 2,000,000 PAR VALUE DUE 2/15/91 02/28/91 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 3,305.25 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 2/28/91 225,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 04/04/91 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 3,890.89 FHLMC DN 4/04/91 310,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 04/05/91 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 1, 810. 94 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 4/05/91 450,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 04/05/91 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 52.10 FHLMC DISC NT 4/05/91 310 000 PAR VALUE AT 100 o 04/30/91 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 75,950.00 U S TREASURY NOTE 7.750'o 10/31/92
$ 0.03875/PV ON 1,960,000 PAR VALUE DUE 4/30/91
O O WPPSS WNP g2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 12 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 05/14/91 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 934.38 FED FARM CR BK DISC 5/14/91 225i000 PAR VALUE AT 100 o 05/15/91 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 185,931.25 U S TREASURY NOTE 8.875'o ll/15/97
$ 0.044375/PV ON 4,190,000 PAR VALUE DUE 5/15/91 06/06/91 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 8,330.20 FHLMC DISC NT 6/06/91 955i000 PAR VALUE AT 100 o 06/27/91 CASH RECEIPT OF INTEREST EARNED ON 685.73 FFCB DISC NT 6/27/91 75,000 PAR VALUE AT 100 TOTAL 570,998.52
O O WPPSS WNP $ 2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 13 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST SECURITIES EXCHANGED 07/26/90 RECEIVED 445,000 PAR VALUE OF 445,000.00 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 8/03/90 TRANS FROM A/C 748-993102 07/26/90 RECEIVED 2i115i000 PAR VALUE OF 2,115,000.00 FHLMC DISC NT 8/15/90 TRANS FROM A/C 748-993102 07/26/90 RECEIVED 425,000 PAR VALUE OF 425,000.00 FHLMC DISC NT 8/22/90 TRANS FROM A/C 748-993102-07/26/90 RECEIVED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 225,000.00 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 9/20/90 TRANS FROM A/C 748-993102 07/26/90 RECEIVED lg000i000 PV OF 1,000,000.00 FED HOME LN BK 8 '00o 9/25/90 TRANS FROM A/C 748-993102 07/26/90 RECEIVED 80,000 PAR VALUE OF 80,000.00 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 10/15/90 TRANS FROM A/C 748-993102 07/26/90 RECEIVED 220,000 PAR VALUE OF 220,000.00 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 10/29/90 TRANS FROM A/C 748-993102
WPPSS WNP 02 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
O O 709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 14 JUNE 30 i 1990 TO JUNE 30 i 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 07/26/90 RECEIVED li920i000 PAR VALUE OF 1,920,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTE 7 '25o 12/31/91 TRANS FROM A/C 748-993102 07/26/90'ECE IVED 2 i 000 i 000 PAR VALUE OF 2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTE 8 '00o 8/15/99 TRANS FROM A/C 748-993102 08/03/90 DISTRIBUTED 220,000 PAR VALUE OF 220,000.00-FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 8/03/90 VALUED AT $ 219,931.80 ORIGINAL BUY WAS INCORRECT S/B FMDN 08/03/90 RECEIVED 220,000 PAR VALUE OF 220,000.00 FHLMC DISC NT 8/03/90 TO CORRECT ORIGINAL BUY 12/19/90 RECEIVED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 221,694.75 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 2/28/91 FROM 748-993102 05/17/91 RECEIVED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 225,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC N 6/27/91
WPPSS WNP 02 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 15 JUNE 30 ~ 1 990 TO JUNE 30 g 1 99 1 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST TOTAL 8,876,694.75 TRANSFER OF FUNDS 07/26/90 CASH RECEIPT 11,508.04 DEPOSIT DDAg1474-600 08/24/90 CASH RECEIPT 224,000.00 DEPOSIT DDA 01474-600 09/21/90 CASH RECEIPT 224,000.00 DEPOSIT DDAC1474-600 10/26/90 CASH RECEIPT 224,000.00 DEPOSIT DDA $ 1474-600 ll/14/90 CASH RECEIPT 207,240.91 TRANSFER FROM OTHER TRUST 11/16/90 CASH RECEIPT 224,000.00 DEPOSIT FUNDS TRANSFERRED FROM 0 2 REV FORM 5091 12/88
O O WPPSS WNP I2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 16 JUNE 30 g 1990 TO JUNE 30 g 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 12/19/90 CASH RECEIPT 2,239.37 DEPOSIT FROM 1474-600 01/22/91 CASH RECEIPT 225,000.00 DEPOSIT DDA I1474-600 02/08/91 CASH RECEIPT 4,042.00 DEPOSIT PRO RATED FEE TO 11/30/90 02/11/91 CASH RECEIPT 225,000.00 DEPOSIT DDA f1474-600 03/25/91 CASH RECEIPT 225,000.00 DEPOSIT DDA 1474-600 $ 2 REV 04/18/91 CASH RECEIPT 225,000.00 DEPOSIT DDA g 1474-600 05/14/91 CASH RECEIPT 208.50 DEPOSIT QUARTERLY FEE TO 2/28/91 FORM 5091 12/88
O O WPPSS WNP g2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-.956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 17 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 05/17/91 CASH RECEIPT 1,529.81 DEPOSIT gDDA1474-600 06/06/91 CASH RECEIPT 225,000.00 DEPOSIT DDAgl474-600 TOTAL 2,247,768.63 COST OF ASSETS PURCHASED 08/03/90 PURCHASED 460,000 PAR VALUE OF 455,338.67- 455,338.67 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 9/20/90 TRADE DATE 8/ 3/90 S/D 8/3/90 SHEARSON/FED 08/15/90 PURCHASED 2g230g000 PAR VALUE OF 2,191,802.58- 2,191,802.58 FHLMC DISC NT 11/05/90 TRADE DATE 8/15/90 PUR FR MERRILL W/H FED
WPPSS WNP $ 2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
C7 Ct 709-956495 OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 18 30, 1'990 ACTIVITY'TATEMENT JUNE TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE CASH INVESTMENT COST 08/22/90 PURCHASED 435,000 PAR VALUE OF 427,204.80- 427,204.80 FED HOME LN BK DISC NT 11/14/90 TRADE DATE 8/22/90 S/D 8-22-90 CARROLL MCENTEE/FED 08/24/90 PURCHASED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 222,384.38- 222,384.38 FHLMC DISC NT 10/17/90 TRADE DATE 8/24/90 S/D 8/24/90 MERRILL/FED 09/20/90 PURCHASED 695,000 PAR VALUE OF 687,763.31- 687,763.31 FHLMC DISC NT 11/08/90 TRADE DATE 9/20/90 S/D 9/20/90 MERRILL/FED 09/21/90 PURCHASED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 223,052.50- 223,052.50 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 11/01/90 TRADE DATE 9/21/90 S/D 9-21-90 MORGAN/FED FORM 5091 12I88
WPPSS WNP g2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
O O 709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 19 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 09/25/90 PURCHASED 1,055,000 PAR VALUE OF 1,039,082.69- 1,039,082.69 FHLMC DISC NT 12/05/90 TRADE DATE 9/25/90 S/D 9/25/90 8 FED 09/26/90 PURCHASED li920i000 PAR VALUE OF 1,928,100.00- 1,928,100.00 U S TREASURY NOTE 8 500o 2/29/92 TRADE DATE 9/26/90 S/D 9-26-90 SHEARSON/FED 09/26/90 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF 11,721.55-U S TREASURY NOTE 8 '00o 2/29/92 10/15/90 PURCHASED 85,000 PAR VALUE OF 84,169.13- 84,169.13 FHLMC DISC NT 11/30/90 TRADE DATE 10/15/90 S/D 10/15/90 SHEARSON/FED
O WPPSS WNP $ 2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
O 709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 20 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 10/17/90 PURCHASED 230,000 PAR VALUE OF 226,280.90- 226,280.90 FHLMC DISC NT 1/02/91 TRADE DATE 10/17/90 S/D 10/17/90 CARROLL/MCENTEE 10/25/90 PURCHASED 230,000 PAR VALUE OF 224,097.94- 224,097.94 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/26/91 TRADE DATE 10/25/90 S/D 10-25-90 SHEARSON/FED 10/29/90 PURCHASED 220,000 PAR VALUE OF 218,299.64- 218,299.64 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 12/05/90 TRADE DATE 10/29/90 SD 10/29/90 SHEARSON/FED 11/02/90 PURCHASED 230,000 PAR VALUE OF 228,625.24- 228,625.24 FHLMC DISC NT 11/30/90 TRADE DATE 11/ 1/90
C) WPPSS WNP $ 2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
C7 709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 21 JUNE 30 g 1 990 TO JUNE 30 g 1 99 1 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST ll/05/90 PURCHASED 2 g 3 0 0 f 0 0 0 PAR VALUE OF 2,228,668.06- 2,228,668.06 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 4/08/91 TRADE DATE 11/ 5/90 SD 11/5/90 SHEARSON/FED 11/08/90 PURCHASED 705,000 PAR VALUE OF 692,419.67- 692,419.67 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/04/91 TRADE DATE 11/ 8/90 S/D 11-8-90 CARROLL MCENTEE 11/14/90 PURCHASED 440,000 PAR VALUE OF 435,806.56- 435,806.56 FHLMC DISC NT 12/31/90 TRADE DATE 11/14/90 11/14 S/D THRU MERRILL 11/16/90 PURCHASED 4,000,000 PAR VALUE OF 1,074,400.00- 1,074,400.00 U S TREAS INT STRIPS 0'o 2/15/06 TRADE DATE 11/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 SNW/FED FORM 5091 12/88
O O WPPSS WNP I2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 22 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 11/16/90 PURCHASED 4,190,000 PAR VALUE OF 4,328,511.62- 4,328,511.62 U S TREASURY NOTE 8.875% 11/15/97 TRADE DATE 11/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 FIRST BOSTON/FED ll/16/90 PURCHASED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 222,300.75- 222,300.75 FHLMC DISC NT 1/14/91 TRADE DATE 11/16/90 S/D 11-16-90 MERRILL/FED 01/14/91 PURCHASED 230,000 PAR VALUE OF 226,754.44- 226,754.44 FHLMC DN 4/04/91 TRADE DATE 1/14/91 S/D 1-14-91 MORGAN/FED 01/22/91 PURCHASED 235,000 PAR VALUE OF 227,994.72- 227,994.72 FNMA DISC NTS 7/10/91 TRADE DATE 1/22/91 SD 1/22/91 PAINE WEBBER/FED FORM 5091 12/88
O O WPPSS WNP 02 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 23 JUNE 30 i 1 990 TO JUNE 30 i 1 99 1 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 02/11/91 PURCHASED 230,000 PAR VALUE OF 224,503.00- 224,503.00 FHLMC DISC NOTE 7/05/91 TRADE DATE 2/11/91 S/D 2-11-91 MORGAN/FED 02/14/91 PURCHASED li990i000 PAR VALUE OF 2,028,245.31- 2,028,245.31 U S TREASURY NOTE 8 '00o 7/31/92 TRADE DATE 2/14/91 S/D 2/14/91 SEATTLE NE/FED 02/14/91 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF 6,156.91-U S TREASURY NOTE 8 '00o 7/31/92 02/15/91 PURCHASED 80,000 PAR VALUE OF 79,354.67- 79,354.67 FHLMC DN 4/04/91 TRADE DATE 2/15/91 S/D 2-14-91 MERRILL/FED
O Q WPPSS WNP 02 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 24 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 02/28/91 PURCHASED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 223,605.00- 223,605.00 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 4/05/91 TRADE DATE 2/28/91 S/D 2/28/91=MERRILL/FED 03/21/91 PURCHASED 1 I 960 I 000 PAR VALUE OF 1,978,221.88- 1,978,221.88 U S TREASURY NOTE 7.750'o 10/31/92 TRADE DATE 3/21/91 S/D 3/21/91 SNW/FED 03/21/91 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF 59,165.47-U S TREASURY NOTE 7 '50o 10/31/92 S/D 3/21/91 03/25/91 PURCHASED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 224,584.06- 224,584.06 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 4/05/91 TRADE DATE 3/25/91 S/D 3/25/91 CARROLL MCENTEE/FED
WPPSS WNP I2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
O O 709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 25 JUNE 30 I 1 990 TO JUNE 30 I 1 99 1 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 04/04/91 PURCHASED 310,000 PAR VALUE OF 309,947.90- 309,947.90 FHLMC DISC NT 4/05/91 TRADE DATE 4/ 4/91 S/D 4/4/91 MERRILL/FED 04/05/91 PURCHASED 770,000 PAR VALUE OF 762,308.56- 762,308.56 FHLMC DISC NT 6/06/91 TRADE DATE 4/ 5/91 S/D 4/5/91 MERRILL/FED 04/18/91 PURCHASED 225,000 PAR VALUE OF 224,065.62- 224,065.62 FED FARM CR BK DISC 5/14/91 TRADE DATE 4/18/91 S/D 4/18/91 MERRILL/FED 04/30/91 PURCHASED 75,000 PAR VALUE OF 74,314.27- 74,314.27 FFCB DISC NT 6/27/91 TRADE DATE 4/30/91 S/D 4/30/91 MERRILL/FED FUNDS FORM 5091 12/88 1
D WNP ACCOUNT NO.
C7 WPPSS $ 2 DE COM TRUST 709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 26 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 05/14/91 PURCHASED 230,000 PAR VALUE OF 227,877.80- 227,877.80 FNMA DISC NT 7/12/91 TRADE DATE 5/14/91 S/D 5/14/91 MERRILL/FED 05/15/91 PURCHASED 185,000 PAR VALUE OF 184,361.24- 184,361.24 FHLMC DISC NT 6/06/91 TRADE DATE 5/15/91 S/D 5/15/91 MERRILL/FED 05/24/91 PURCHASED 1i965i000 PAR VALUE OF 1,965,000.00- 1,965,000.00 US TREASURY NOTES 6.750'o 2/28/93 TRADE DATE 5/24/91 S/D 5/24/91 DEAN WITTER/FED 05/24/91 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF 30,636.38-US TREASURY NOTES 6.750% 2/28/93 S/D 5/24/91 DEAN WITTER/FED
WPPSS WNP $ 2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
O O 709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 27 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST 06/06/91 PURCHASED 1 i 1 90 i 0 0 0 PAR VALUE OF 1 i 183 i 917 ~ 78 1 i 183 i 917 78 FHLMC DISC NT 7/08/91 TRADE DATE 6/ 6/91 S/D 6/6/91 CARROLL MCENTEE/FED 06/27/91 PURCHASED 300,000 PAR VALUE OF 299,470.63- 299,470.63 FHLMC DISC NT 7/08/91 P TRADE DATE 6/27/91 S/D 6/27/91 MORGAN STANLEY/FED SUBTOTAL FOR ACCRUED INT. ON BONDS PURCHASED 107,680.31-SUBTOTAL FOR COST OF ASSETS PURCHASED 27,582,835.32- 27,582,835.32 TOTAL 27,690,515.63- 27,582,835.32 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 02/08/91 SAFEKEEPING FEE COLLECTED 4,042.00-PRO RATED FEE TO 11/30/90 05/14/91 SAFEKEEPING FEE COLLECTED 208.50-QUARTERLY FEE TO 2-28-91 TOTAL 4,250.50-
O O WPPSS WNP I2 DE COM TRUST ACCOUNT NO.
709-956495 STATEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS PAGE NO. 28 JUNE 30, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 DATE ACTIVITY CASH INVESTMENT COST TRANSFER OF FUNDS 11/14/90 CASH DISBURSEMENT 207,240.91-TRANSFER TO OTHER TRUST TOTAL 207,240.91-CURRENT BALANCE 4,924.45 11,531,675.55 FORM 5091 12I88
ASSETS ACQUIRED O O 956495 WPPSS WNP 52 DE COM TRUST PAGE NO. 29 SETTLEMENT FACE VALUE OR *------D E S C R I P T--I 0 N------* TOTAL COST DATE NO. OF SHARES 08/03/90 460,000 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 9/20/90 455,338.67 08/15/90 2,230,000 FHLMC DISC NT 11/05/90 2,191,802.58 08/22/90 435,000 FED HOME LN BK DISC NT 11/14/90 427,204.80 08/24/90 225,000 FHLMC DISC NT 10/17/90 222,384.38 09/20/90 695,000 FHLMC DISC NT 11/08/90 687,763.31 09/21/90 225,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 11/01/90 223,052.50 09/25/90 1,055,000 FHLMC DISC NT 12/05/90 1,039,082.69 09/26/90 1,920,000 U S TREASURY NOTE 8.500% 2/29/92 1,928,100.00 10/15/90 85,000 FHLMC DISC NT 11/30/90 84,169.13 10/17/90 230,000 FHLMC DISC NT 1/02/91 226,280.90 10/25/90 230,000 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/26/91 224,097.94 10/29/90 220,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 12/05/90 218,299.64 11/02/90 230,000 FHLMC DISC NT 11/30/90 228,625.24 ll/05/90 2,300,000 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 4/08/91 2,228,668.06 11/08/90 705,000 FED NATI MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/04/91 692;419.67 ll/14/90 440,000 FHLMC DISC NT 12/31/90 435,806.56 11/16/90 4,000,000 U S TREAS INT STRIPS Oo 2/15/06 1,074,400.00
ASSETS ACQUIRED 956495 WPPSS WNP g2 DE COM TRUST PAGE NO. 30 SETTLEMENT FACE VALUE OR *------D E S C R I P T I 0 N------* TOTAL COST DATE NO. OF SHARES 11/16/90 4,190,000 U S TREASURY NOTE 8.875-'o ll/15/97 4,328,511.62 11/16/90 225,000 FHLMC DISC NT 1/14/91 222,300.75 Ol/14/91 230,000 FHLMC DN 4/04/91 226,754.44 01/22/91 235,000 FNMA DISC NTS 7/10/91 227,994.72 02/11/91 230,000 FHLMC DISC NOTE 7/05/91 224,503.00 02/14/91 1,990,000 U S TREASURY NOTE 8.000% 7/31/92 2,028,245.31 02/15/91 80,000 FHLMC DN 4/04/91 79,354.67 02/28/91 225,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 4/05/91 223,605.00 03/21/91 1,960,000 U S TREASURY NOTE 7.750: 10/31/92 1,978,221.88 03/25/91 225,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 4/05/91 224,584.06 04/04/91 310,000 FHLMC DISC NT 4/05/91 309,947.90 04/05/91 770,000 FHLMC DISC NT 6/06/91 762,308.56 04/18/91 225,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC 5/14/91 224,065.62 04/30/91 75,000 FFCB DISC NT 6/27/91 74,314.27 05/14/91 230,000 FNMA DISC NT 7/12/91 227,877.80 05/15/91 185,000 FHLMC DISC NT 6/06/91 184,361.24 05/24/91 1,965,000 US TREASURY NOTES 6 ~ 750 o 2/28/93 1,965,000.00 FORM 5091 12/88
ASSETS ACQUIRED O O 956495 WPPSS WNP I2 DE COM TRUST PAGE NO. 31 SETTLEMENT FACE VALUE OR *------D E S C R I P T I 0 N------* TOTAL COST DATE NO. OF SHARES 06/06/91 1,190,000 FHLMC DISC NT 7/08/91 1,183,917.78 06/27/91 300,000 FHLMC DISC NT 7/08/91 299,470.63 27 g 582 ~ 835 ~ 32 FORM 5091 12I88
ASSETS DISPOSED OF .
O O 956495 WPPSS WNP g2 DE COM TRUST PAGE NO. 32 SETTLEMENT FACE VALUE OR *------D E S C R I P T I 0 N------* PROCEEDS ADJUSTED REALIZED DATE NO. OF SHARES COST GAIN/LOSS PROCEEDS FROM SALES/MATURITIES 08/03/90 225,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 8/03/90 225000.00 -225000.00 0.00 08/03/90 220,000 FHLMC DISC NT 8/03/90 220000.00 -220000.00 0.00 08/15/90 2,115,000 FHLMC DISC NT 8/15/90 2115000.00 -2115000.00 0.00 08/22/90 425,000 FHLMC DISC NT 8/22/90 425000.00 -425000.00 0.00 09/20/90 225,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 9/20/90 225000.00 -225000.00 0.00 09/20/90 460,000 FED NATI MTG ASSN DISC NT 9/20/90 455338.67 -455338.67 0.00 09/25/90 1,000,000 FED HOME LN BK 8.300; 9/25/90 1000000.00 -1000000.00 0.00 09/26/90 1,920,000 U S TREASURY NOTE 7 ~ 625 o 12/31/91 1908000 00 1920000 00 12000 00 10/15/90 80,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 10/15/90 80000.00 -80000.00 0.00 10/17/90 225,000 FHLMC DISC NT 10/17/90 222384.38 -222384.38 0.00 10/29/90 220,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 10/29/90 220000.00 -220000.00 0.00 11/01/90 225,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 11/01/90 223052.50 -223052.50 0.00 ll/05/90 2,230,000 FHLMC DISC NT 11/05/90 2191802.58 -2191802.58 0.00 11/08/90 695,000 FHLMC DISC NT 11/08/90 687763.31 -687763.31 0.00 11/14/90 435,000 FED HOME LN BK DISC NT 11/14/90 427204.80 -427204.80 0.00 11/16/90 2,300,000 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 4/08/91 2228668.06 -2228668.06 0.00
ASSETS DISPOSED OF C7 C7 956495 WPPSS NNP 02 DE COM TRUST PAGE NO. 33 SETTLEMENT FACE VALUE OR *------D E S C R I P T I 0 N------* PROCEEDS ADJUSTED REALIZED DATE NO. OF SHARES COST GAIN/LOSS 11/16/90 220,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 12/05/90 218299.64 -218299.64 0.00 11/16/90 1,055,000 FHLMC DISC NT 12/05/90 1039082.69 -1039082.69 0.00 11/16/90 230,000 FHLMC DISC NT 11/30/90 228302.43 -228302.43 0.00 11/16/90 85,000 FHLMC DISC NT ll/30/90 84491.94 -84491.94 0.00 11/16/90 440,000 FHLMC DISC NT 12/31/90 435806.56 -435806.56 0.00 11/16/90 705,000 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/04/91 692419.67 -692419.67 0.00 11/16/90 230,000 FHLMC DISC NT 1/02/91 226280.90 -22628'0.90 0.00 11/16/90 230,000 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/26/91 224097.94 -224097.94 0.00
'01/14/91 225,000 FHLMC DISC NT 1/14/91 222300.75 -222300.75 0.00 02/14/91 1,920,000 U S TREASURY NOTE 8.500'; 2/29/92 1959450.00 -1928100.00 31350.00 02/28/91 225,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 2/28/91 221694.75 -221694.75 0.00 03/21/91 1,990,000 U S TREASURY NOTE 8.000% 7/31/92 2016274.22 -2028245.31 -11971.09 04/04/91 310,000 FHLMC DN 4/04/91 306109.11 -306109.11 0.00 04/05/91 450,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 4/05/91 448189.06 -448189.06 0.00 04/05/91 310,000 FHLMC DISC NT 4/05/91 309947.90- -309947.90 0.00 05/14/91 225,000 FED FARM CR BK DISC 5/14/91 224065.62 -224065.62 0.00 05/24/91 1,960,000 U S TREASURY NOTE 7.750% 10/31/92 1989400.00 -1978221.88 11178.12
ASSETS DISPOSED OF O O 956495 WPPSS WNP 42 DE COM TRUST PAGE NO. 34 SETTLEMENT FACE VALUE OR *------D E S C R I P T I 0 N------* PROCEEDS ADJUSTED REALIZED DATE NO. OF SHARES COST GAIN/LOSS 06/06/91 955,000 FHLMC DISC NT. 6/06/91 946669.80 -946669.80 0.00 06/27/91 225,000 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC N 6/27/91 225000.00 -225000.00 0.00 06/27/91 75,000 FFCB DISC NT 6/27/91 74314.27 -74314.27 0.00 24946411.55 -24927854.52 18557.03 225,000.00 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 10/15/90 80,000.00 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 10/29/90 220,000.00 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 9/20/90 225,000.00 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 11/01/90 446,105.00 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 12/05/90 FORM 5091 12/88
FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 4/05/9 ~
O O 896,378.12 FED FARM CR BK DISC NT 2/28/91 221,694.75 FED FARM CR BK DISC 5/14/91 448,131.24 FED HOME LN BK 8.300%'/25/90 1,000,000.00 FED HOME LN BK DISC NT 11/14/90 854,409.60 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC N 6/27/91 225,000.00 FED NATI MTG ASSN DISC NT 9/20/90 910,677.34 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 4/08/91 4,457,336.12 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/26/91 448,195.88 FED NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT 2/04/91 FORM 8091 12188 1,384,839.34
6/27/91 O O 148,628.54 FHLMC DISC NOTE 7/05/91 224,503.00 FHLMC DISC NT 11/08/90 1,375,526.62 FHLMC DISC NT 8/15/90 2,115,000.00 FHLMC DISC NT 1/02/91 452,561.80 FHLMC DISC NT 8/03/90 220,000.00 FHLMC DISC NT 8/22/90 425,000.00 FHLMC DISC NT 11/05/90 4,383,605.16 FHLMC DISC NT 10/17/90 444,768.76 FHLMC DISC NT 12/05/90 FOAM 5091 12/88
2,078,165.38 8 '8AM%
FHLMC DISC NT 4/05/91 619,895.80 625,588.74 FHLMC DISC NT 12/31/90 871,613.12 FHLMC DISC NT 1/14/91 444,601.50 FHLMC DISC NT 6/06/91 1,893,339.60 FHLMC DISC NT 7/08/91 1,483,388.41 FHLMC DN 4/04/91 612,218.22 FNMA DISC NT 7/12/91 227,877.80 FNMA DISC NTS 7/10/91 227,994.72 FORM $ 81 12/88
1,074,400.00
- 8. 875% 11 j15 j97 Pgg~)
4,328,511.62 U S-TREASURY NOTE 7.625% 12/31/91 1,908,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTE 8 ~ 500 o 2/29/92 3,887,550.00 U S TREASURY NOTE 8.000% 7/31/92 4,044,519.53 U S TREASURY NOTE 7 ~ 750 o 10/31/92
,3,967,621.88 US TREASURY NOTES 6.750% 2/28/93 1,965,000.00 FORM 5091 12/88
BROKERAGE
SUMMARY
O O 956495 WPPSS WNP g2 DE COM TRUST PAGE NO. 35 TOTAL COST COMMISSION TRADES TRANSACTION OF BROKER COMMISSION VALUE TRANS. EQUITIES FIXED NO BROKER COMMISSIONS PAID THIS PERIOD FORM 8091 12/88
O O REVALUED GAIN/LOSS INFORMATION FROM 06/30/90 TO 06/30/91 WPPSS WNP I2 DE COM TRUST 956495 REALIZED GAIN/LOSS BASED ON REVALUED COST 18,557.03 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS BASED ON REVALUED COST 54,868.28 FORM 5091 12/88
0
9107010052 Mqg Federal Emergency Management Agency C)
Washington, D.C. 20472 0
t 8 (g Mr. Frank J. Congel Director o G).~~
Division of Radiation Protection C)~
and Emergency Preparedness of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
'ffice O
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission CD Washington, D.C. 20555 CD CD
Dear Mr. Congel:
Enclosed is a copy of the final exercise report for the September 11, 1990, full-participation exercise of the offsite radiological emergency response plans site-specific to the WNP-2 Nuclear Power Plant. The State of Washington and Benton and Franklin Counties, Washington, participated in the exercise.
The exercise report was prepared in December 1990 by the Region X staff of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). A copy of this final exercise report will be provided to the State of Washington by the FEMA Region X staff.
Three Deficiencies, all for the State of Washington, were identified during the exercise. All three related to dose assessment and were for (1) inadequate information flow from the Emergency Operations Facility to the State Emergency Operations Center; (2) inadequate capabilities and expertise of the staff responsible for dose projections; and (3) inadequate dose projection systems. Eighteen Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA) were also identified during this exercise. FEMA Region X has discussed all exercise Deficiencies and ARCAs with Washington State and the report reflects commitments, action plans, and milestone dates to address these issues, including a remedial drill tentatively scheduled for May 7, 1991.
Pending the outcome of the scheduled remedial drill and other pending remedial actions, FEMA is unable to find that the offsite radiological emergency response plans and preparedness for the WNP-2 Nuclear Power Plant are adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate measures can 'e taken offsite to protect the public's health and safety in the event of a radiological emergency at the site. Once FEMA has receive
't the results of the remedial drill and other remedial actions,
~
will notify the Nuclear Regulatory Commission of its findings.
~
~
~
If you should have any questions, please contact Mr. Craig S.
Wingo, Chief, Technological Hazards Division, at 646-3026.
Sincerely,
.,g r~W'<
ennis H. Kwiatkowski Assistant Associate Director Office of Technological. Hazards Enclosure
I
~ I CONTENTS List of Acronyms . ~ ~ fall
~ ~
Summary F
~ v INTRODUCTION ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1.1 Exercise Background ~ 1 1' FEMA Evaluators ~ 3 1.3 Exercise Objectives ~ ~ ~ 3 1.4 Summary of Exercise Scenario ~ ~ ~ 9 1.5 Guide to Tables Used in This Report 10
- 2. EXERCISE EVALUATION 46 2.1 , State of Washington 46 2.2 Benton and Franklin Counties 80
- 3.
SUMMARY
LISTING of EXERCISE INADEQUACIES . . 103 3.1 State of Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 3.2 Benton and Franklin Counties . . . . . . . 109 APPENDIX A: Verification of Corrective Actions . . '113 1 ~ Evaluator Assignment List 5 2 ~ Objective/Location Matrix (Washington State) 6 3 Objective/Location Matrix (B/F Counties) 7 Significant Event Log - WNP-2 Exercise
~ ~ ~
4 ~ 11 5a. Protective Action Recommendations 31 5b. Protective Action Implementation 31
- 6. Text of EBS Messages 32 7a. Summary of Press Conferences JIC 34 7b. Summary of Press Conferences WEIC 39
- 8. Summary of Press Releases 42 9 ~ Washington State Protective Action Guide 66 FIGURES
- 3. First Plume Location Map Received at WA EOC . . 62 1
ACP access control point ARCA area requiring corrective action ARFI area recommended for improvement.
DEF deficiency DOE U. S. Department of Energy DOH Washington State Department of Health EBS Emergency Broadcast System ECXs emergency classification level EDPS electronic dose projection system EEM exercise evaluation methodology EOC emergency operations center EOF emergency operations, facility EPZ emergency planning zone EW emergency worker EWAC emergency worker/assistance center FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FNF fixed nuclear facility FSO Franklin County Sheriff's Office FT field team GE general emergency IPZ ingestion planning zone JIC joint information center KI potassium iodide mr/hr millirems per hour MI mobility impaired MUDAC meteorological and unified dose assessment center NAWAS National Warning System NOUE notice of unusual event NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NWS National Weather Service ORP Office of Radiation Protection ORV off road vehicle PAD protective action decision PAG protective action guide PAR protective action recommendation PC press conference PR press release RAC Regional Assistance Committee RAG radiological assessment group
t' RM recovery manager SAE site area emergency SS Washington Public Power Supply System SSDC Supply System Decision Center REM Radiological Emergency Manager TH thyroid TLD thermoluminescent dosimeter TSC ~ ~ Technical Support Center VCA verification of corrective action WA Washington State WB whole body WEIC Washington Emergency Information Center WNG Washington National Guard WNP-2 Nuclear Plant ¹2 WSP Washington State Patrol
SUMMARY
On September 11, 1990, FEMA Region X evaluated an exercise of offsite plans and preparedness for the State of Washington, and the Counties of Benton and Franklin Counties, Washington for the WNP-2 Nuclear Plant. WNP-2 is located on the Hanford Reservation in Benton County, Washington. This was the first exercise in the second six year cycle. Previous exercises were conducted on March 1, 1989, September 13, 1988, September 18, 1986, May 16, 1984 and June 1, 1983.
This exercise was conducted in accordan'ce with FEMA's regulations concerning the exercise of state and local radiological emergency plans and preparedness contained in 44 CFR 350.9{a)-
FEMA evaluated the following operations:
State of Washington: Accident Assessment/EOF; State EOC; field monitoring teams.
Benton and Franklin EOC; JIC; Columbia River route Counties: alerting; school and mobility impaired evacuation; access control points.
~ ~
SUMMARY
OP RECOMM1WDED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FEMA Region X recommends the following corrective actions.
Exerci,se participants have initiated remedial actions for those items identified as .Deficiencies. Following the completion of remedial actions, a remedial drill will be conducted. See Sections 2 and 3 for further discussion of these issues.
STATE OF NASHINGTON
- Dose Assessment Improve information flow from the EOF to the state EOC. Demonstrate capabilities in a remedial drill.
Dose Assessment - Improve capabilities and expertise of staff responsible for dose projections. Demonstrate capabilities in a remedial drill.
Dose Assessment - Improve dose projection system.
Demonstrate capabilities in a remedial drill.
v
- Control Train DOH staff on the appropriate point, of
'contact at the EOF.
- Communication Acquire and install equipment to provide additional fax capabilities.
- Field Monitoring -'evise procedures and train staff on data collection and reporting processes.
- Media Briefing - Improve capabilities for briefing the media in an accurate and timely manner at the State EOC.
Federal Assistance - Revise procedures to recognize the limitation of federal technical (radiological monitoring) assistance.
BENTON/FRANKLIN COUNTIES
- Control Improve capabilities for two-way briefings at the Bi-county EOC.
v3.
Emergency Worker Instructions Revise instructions to eliminate inconsistency.
Alert Notification Revise procedures to ensure simultaneous activation of sirens and EBS system, if required.
EBS Messages Revise text regarding shelter instructions. Prerecord messages to eliminate preparation and reading errors.
Emergency Workers & KI Revise procedures to ensure that all emergency workers receive KI instructions.
Special Needs Data Base - Review, update, and maintain special needs data base.
Evacuation Verification - Develop procedures and resource needs. Revise plan. Train staff.
Press Releases PIO log at the JIC should list the times that press releases were issued.
VERIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS In addition to the preestablished exercise objectives, FEMA evaluated the implementation of the corrective actions identified in previous exercises. Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated that seven of the eight verification of corrective actions (VCA) were corrected. Washington State demonstrated that only 7 of the 22 VCAs were corrected. See Appendix A for the report and status of corrective actions. Corrections not successfully implemented during this exercise will be the object of review in future exercises.
,4 1- INTRODUCTION 1.1 EKERCISE BACKGROUND On December 7, 1979, the President directed FEMA to assume lead responsibility for all offsite nuclear planning and response.
FEMA's responsibilities in radiological emergency planning for fixed nuclear facilities include the following:
1 ~ Taking the lead in offsite emergency planning and in the review and evaluation of radiological emergency response plans developed by state and local governments;
- 2. Determining whether such plans can be implemented on the basis of observation and evaluation of exercises of the plans developed by state and local governments; 3 'esponding
~ to requests by the NRC pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between NRC and FEMA relating to Radiological Emergency Planning and Preparedness, 50 Federal Register 15485 (April 18, 1985);
- 4. Coordinating the activities of Federal agencies with responsibilities in the radiological emergency planning process:
- U .S. Department of Commerce (DOC)
U .S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
U .S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
U .S. Department of Energy (DOE)
U .S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
U .S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
U .S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
U .S. Department of the Interior (DOI)
Representatives of these agencies serve on the Regional Assistance Committee (RAC), which is chaired by FEMA.
The exercise participants employed their plans of record. The following plans and procedures were used by FEMA in evaluating the performance of the participants:
- 1. The State of Washington Emergency Response Plan dated June 30, 1990.
2 ~ The State of Washington Fixed Nuclear Facility (FNF)
Emergency Response Procedures, dated January 18, 1990.
3 ~ The State of Washington DOH/ORP Response Procedures For Radiation Emergencies dated July 1990 and various Supply System joint procedures.
- 4. The Benton/Franklin County FNF Emergency Response Plan and Procedures dated June 1989.
This exercise was conducted in accordance with the exercise scenario and agreements on extent of play. The scenario presented a hypothetical accident at WNP-2 that was to trigger offsite response activities as well as various offsite conditions and contingencies. The extent of play agreements between FEMA and the emergency response organizations define the manner in which a particular response function will be demonstr'ated by the players.
The agreements were designed to test the ability of the plans and procedures to be implemented under simulated emergency conditions.
Where no extent of play agreement existed, FEMA evaluated the observed activities as followed in their entirety.
if the plans and procedures were to be The criteria used in the evaluation are contained in NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1, Rev. 1, FEMA's Exercise Evaluation Methodology (EEM), and the actions called for in the participants'lans and procedures.
A Control Cell was used in this exercise. The Control Cell placed and received phone calls to the Joint Information Center and the state and county EOC's. The Control Cell was used to represent the media, concerned public and other response organizations. The response by participants to the Control Cell calls gave one basis for FEMA's evaluation of the adequacy of offsite preparedness.
Section 2 of this report contains the exercise evaluation.
Each objective contains a statement. of the objective, the outcome of the evaluation (met/not met) and a narrative summary of our observations which served as a basis for our evaluation, Where applicable, the narrative is followed by one or more exercise issues which fall into the following categories:
demonstrated and obs'erved inadequacies that would cause a finding that offsite preparedness was not adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate measures can be taken to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of a nuclear power plant in the event of a radiological emergency. This .inadequacy could be an exercise related issue regarding inadequate plans and procedures or the ability to implement plans.
Because of the potential impact of deficiencies on emergency preparedness, they are required to be promptly corrected through appropriate remedial
actions.
e 'v QgghJ.: demonstrated and observed inadequacies of performance. Although correction is required, they are'ot.
considered in and of themselves to adversely impact public health and safety.
issues observed that are not considered to adversely impact public health and safety. While not required, improvements in these 'areas would. enhance an organization's level of emergency preparedness.
part of an exercise or drill, that deals with an area of planning that was not included in the scope of the exercise objectives and extent of play agreements.
Corrective actions are required. Plan issues will be rated "inadequate" and will be identified by appropriate criterion in NUREG-0654.
When exercise issues or plan issues are identified in this report, they are listed with a'brief statement of the issue, a reference to the applicable NURZG-0654 element, the level of the issue (DEF, ARCA, Plan, or ARFZ) and, if the issue is DEF, ARCA, or Plan level, a tracking number used to identify the issue. Section 3 of the report is a summary listing of all DEF, ARCA or Plan issues identified during the exercise.
1 2 FENA EVALUATORS The 1990 WNP-2 exercise was evaluated by 32 evaluators drawn from FEHA, other Federal, State, local and contractor organizations. Table 1 lists these evaluators, their organizational affiliation and their assigned locations during the evaluation.
1 3 EXERClSE OMZCTZVES The goal of this exercise was to demonstrate by actual performance a number of primary emergency preparedness functions.
At no time was the exercise to interfere with the safe operation of the WNP-2 plant, or with State or local government activities.
Tables 2 and 3 show the locations where each objective demonstrated
during the exercise was evaluated.
TABLE 1: Evaluator Assignment List - WNP-2 Exercise, September ll, 1990 Richard W. Donovan RAC Chairman o WA State EOC Richard Converse {ANL) Team Leader Jerry Leitch (EPA)
Irv Silver'FEMA)
Bill Van Pelt (FDA)
Bennie Walthall (DOT) o WA Accident Assessment Joe Keller (WINCO). Dep. Team Leader
& Coordination at the EOF Frank Bold (ANL)
Bill Brown (FEMA)
Dave Duncan (ANL)
Gail Good (NRC)
Brad Salmonson {WINCO) o WA Rad Monitoring Dale Denham (DOE-RL)
Carl Hunkler (ANL)
. o Joint Information Ed Ronne (ANL) Dep. Team Leader Center Eleanor Castle (FEMA)
Linda Lewis (ANL)
Anita Nordstrom (FEMA)
Elizabeth Post (USDA)
Judy Tokarz (DOE-RL) o B/F EOC Arvind Teotia (ANL) Team Leader Colleen King (Observer)
Bruce Knipe (FEMA)
Mike Post (FEMA)
George Turner (FEMA)
Mary Beth Vasco (FEMA) o B/F Field Operations ACPs/TCPs Franklin County Franklin County Sam Miller (FEMA) (Group Leader)
Eva Neterowicz (FEMA)
Richland Bill Brown (FEMA)
School Evacuation Bill Knoerzer (ANL)
Mobility Impaired Evacuation Carolyn -Williams (IND)
Route Alerting DOE Jim Price (DOE-RL)
Washington Fish & Game Bilp Gadberry (FEMA)
TABLE 2: Objectives Evaluated at each Washington State Location WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 FIEI D OBJ . RAD V
ECL 1 X Alert, mobilize, 2 X activate Direct, coordinate, 3 X control Communications X Facilities and displays 5 X Emergency worker dose 6 X control Equipment and procedures radiation monitoring 7 Equipment: and procedures airborne monitoring Samples-particulate activity Dose projection 10 X X Protective Action 11 X decisions Coordinate information and instructions 13 X Brief media 14 X Rumor control 15 X X Emergency Workers - KI 16 X X Federal Assistance 26 X Demonstrate collection of air sample and transfer to WSP.
Phone calls from and to Media/Public Control Cell 9 5 calls/hour (minimum) per staff position at the Joint Information Center and at the State EOC.
6
TABLE 3: Objectives Evaluated at each B/F County Location WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 OBJ v
ECL Alert, mobilize, '2 activate Direct, coordinate, control Communications Facilities and displays 5 Emergency worker dose control Protective Actions (PAs) 11 Alert and Notification Coordinate information and instructions 13 Brief media 14 Rumor control 15 Emergency Workers - 'KI 2.6 Implement PAs for Special populations 18 Implement PAs for School population ACP and TCP establishment and maintenance 20 Phone calls from and to Hedia/Public Control Cell 9 5 calls/hr. (minimum) per staff position at S/L EOC's.
~ ~
~
T>>
t I L -~ ~ .
f>>ee l>>
~t ~ e' oooo t
,\,
'>> 4
~ ioee haeI ~ >>
~ hee
~
e ~
r.
~
hg
~
~~
~ r r r. Lr
\
Ch
~ > "I
'h...::.'" i
~
~ .,cf,,ee>> lf ee'Ce "fe t P see I ~ r rr 'I
~ '
eh I ~ ~
~
~ rJ , ~ C h,)g ~rt
~ ~t I ~' ~~
C
)I I
,a ts Lee>> eoeeP4 ~ j
). P.
>>eh A
~ ~ ..! t.
~ ~ ~ ~ I
~~ R II' eel
~
~
'L I
'C .
~ \
~
h,.../
eeIIe1Pgo
~
eoe
~>>
~ r
~
~
~
>> ~ 0 V Li :Al ee~ee eyp ig e coo oe
./ ~ h ~ oe
/ W ~
~ e
~
+i h
gt I
KMKROKHCY
~v 1LAHZOIVEMAP .
,l~ 1 ~ Is 1>
-: -,~txiPw%
10 le rrnne AkC4U4 Figure 1: NNP-2 Plume EPZ Map.
1.4 EXERCISE SCENARIO The scenario was designed to test the objectives listed in Tables 2 and 3.
The scenario started with WNP-2 in the process of power, ascension. It was at 104 power. At 0800, a protest group began a d emmonstration outside the WNP-2 fence. At approximately 0830, a separate group of demonstrators drove a truck up to the fence an d placed a ladder against the fence. One member climbed the ladder and entered WNP-2 property. NNP-2 security detained the person and the control room shift, manager declared an Alert per procedures.
At approximately 0910, a fire in the Technical Support Center started. The fire was quickly extinguished but occupation of this work area impossible.
it made the At 0955, the plant was continuing power ascension when a control rod accident occurred: a high worth control rod was inserted into the core out of sequence into the core. The resulting removal of negative reactivity caused a power excursion which caused a reactor scram. Plant parameters indicated (clad damage of 1.84). fuel'ailure As part of the scram process, two main steam isolation values failed to operate. At 1010, the A Main Steam Line ruptured, allowing reactor steam to vent into the Turbine Bldg. This was the condition that triggered the emergency action level for the emergency classification level of General Emergency.
The release began with the 1010 event and continued until about 1400. During this timeframe the wind was blowing from the northwest at 300 degrees. The stability class was "E". The rate of release dropped significantly at about 1200 and remained constant until 1400.
1.5 GUIDE TO KEY TABLES USED IN THIS REPORT 1.5.1 Significant Event Log Ta bl e 4 p resents the Significant Event Log from the WNP-2 exercise. E va 1 ua tors at the exercise were instructed to recor. d the
'times and substance of significant exercise events. Tab e constructed from their individual logs. It includes the time when the event took place, a short description of the event and any applicable comments. The times given for press releases are the times the releases were available to the media.
1.5.2 Protective Actions otective P ro e actions (PAs) are actions prescribed by public officials to.minimize or prevent dose commitment. Example 4
1 d h ltering evacuation and diversion of milk into cheese, dried or frozen products. These actions are based on p t'on recommendations (PARs) from the utility or the state which in turn are based on protective action guides (PAGs).
projected absorbed radiation dose level to the gen'eral population which warrants protective action to avoid this dose.
This process of recommending and deciding on protective
~ ~
actions, followed by appropriate public instructions is a key lf t f e emen o FEMA's exercise evaluation. Table 5a presents a summary o th e PARs issued during the exercise and the tame each wa by the EOF. Once a PAR is agreed upon (becomes a PA),
implemented by the responding organizations.
A it i is Table 5b shows the time the PA was agreed to, what PAs were implemented by each organization, and other relevant comments.
Table 6 summarizes the implementation of these protective actions. Implementation is via the Emergency Broadcast System (EBS).
1 '.3 Information Provided to the Media Information was provided to the media via news conferences and press releases. Tables 7a and 7b summarize the contents of the news conferences held by the Joint Information Center (JIC) in Richland, and the Washington Emergency Information Center (WEIC) in Olympia, respectively. Table 8 is a list of the press releases issued by the response organizations.
10
Table 4: Significant. Events Log - WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 0823 EOF NOUE Notification: at 816, Civil Disturbance.
0828 EOF to Offsite NOUE fanout completed..
agencies.
0830 B/F EOC NOUE Notification.
0839 EOF Alert Notification:-at 836.
0840 JIC, WA EOC Alert Notification.
0840 B/F EOC NOUE Fanout Complete.
0846 EOF Alert fanout complete.
0849 B/F EOC Alert Notification.
0849 WA EOC Declared functional.
0850 EOF to EOCs, etc. Update Alert: Intruder location 0852 DOE COC Request Helicopter to perform surveillance.
0855 Franklin County Noti fied of ALERT; Of ficer Sheriff (FSO) to EOC. dispatched to EOC.
0855 JIC Team Discussion: regarding apprehension of intruder 0900 JIC Begin calls to Media.
0903 EOF/MUDAC MUDAC declared functional.
0905 B/F EOC Alert Fanout begins.
0905 FSO Begin EW Kit checkouts.
0911 WA EOC WA PRg1 approved.
0913 B/F EOC Alert fanout complete.
11
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 0915-17 to EOCs/JIC EOF is declared Activated, RM in charge.,
0915 EOF/MUDAC Inquiry to Yakima NWS.
0919 B/F EOC Declared Activated.
0920 WA EOC PR WAgl released 0927 B/F EOC First Briefing.
0930 EOF to WA EOC Faxed Alert Notification Form.
0930 JIC Activate Public Inquiry Phone Team.
0932 EOF/MUDAC DOE. Rep arrives.
0936 EOF/MUDAC 3 Field Teams/Standby ready to go.
0936 EOF/SSDC First RM Briefing.
0940 WA EOC Declared Activated.
0941 EOF/MUDAC REM Briefing.
0949'OF 0941 DOE-COC Increased level.
site security 0942 EOF/SSDC Received NOUE 6 Alert Notification Forms.
0942 JIC Declared Activated.
0944 EOF to B/F EOC Discussed Status.
0945 WA EOC Briefing.
EOF TSC Reactivated in Control Room.
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 0951 B/F EOC First SS Rep briefing.
0954 WA EOC Begin callouts to Media.
0955 JIC County Commissioner
{Spokesperson) arrives.
0956 Plant Scrammed.
0956 WA EOC Briefing.-
0957-1005 TSC to EOF Discussed upgrade to SAE.
1003 B/F EOC Reactor has scrammed.
1005 JIC Security arrived.'iscussion:
1005 WA EOC potential release.
1006 EOF Received notification form signed for SAE at 1001.
1007 SSDC to B/F/EOC Request Columbia River Evacuation 1007 DOE 9 EOF to DOE POC Initiate Columbia River Evacuation also assist in moving protestors.
1008 EOF to EOCs SAE, PAR gl: Evacuate Columbia River, evacuate exclusionary zone.
1010 DOE POC Send bus to WNP<<2.
1010 WA EOC Completed Press Release gl.
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TINE LOCATION 1010 EOF/NUDAC Dispatch field team to Leslie Groves Park to meet Sheriff boat.
B/F EOC WSP log entry: request Fish Er Game to evacuate Wahluke hunting area.
1012 EOF/MUDAC Dispatch 2 field teams (East/West side of Columbia River) 1012 FS,O Notification of SAE, effect River Closure (ACPs F15 &
F16).
1012 DOE POC to Effect Columbia River Flight Operation Evacuation for WNP-2.
1012 B/F EOC Posted on status board:
projected dose of 5 Rem at Site Boundary.
1014 B/F EOC PAD gl: Evacuate Columbia River, Sound Sirens, Activate'BS.
1014 DOE POC Dispatch Boat to White Bluffs.
1015 DOE-Helicopter Airborne.
1015 B/F EOC Richland Police - Evacuate Horn Rapids ORV Park; dispatch deputy to Leslie Grove Park.
1015 WA EOC Briefing.
1017 B/F EOC Siren Activation g1.
14
Table 4: Significant Events Log NNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1018 FSO Dispatch FSO g 1 & 2 to Selph/Ringold (F15 & F16).
1018 B/F EOC to SS Request confirmation of siren activation (per procedures) SS cannot confirm siren activation.
1018 NA JIC Team Airport closed due to fog-cannot get to Richland.
1018 EOF KI decision for SS, confirm release has started.
1019 EOF/MUDAC First dose projection (using BEDPS), 25.7 Rem TH at 1.2 miles.
1019 B/F EOC Posted on status board, Fish & Game enroute to perform route alerting &
evacuation verification.
1022 EOF to EOCs GE, PAR g2: Shelter Sector 2 to 5 miles, KI for SS, KI PAR for S/L EWs. Note, form said "no release", but the RM explained on the crash call that the release had just started.
1023 B/F EOC Find out if sirens have activated.
1023 EOF to SS gl-3'/F Take KI.
1024 EOF to SIC GE notification.
1025 EOF to SS gl Use respirators.
15
~
~
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1024-36 WA EOC Discussion on EW KX PAR.
1025 EOF Announced DOE Helicopter Airborne as of 1015.
1025 JXC OR PR gl & WA PR gl are released.
1028 B/F EOC Begin callouts to field re:
siren activation.
1028 EOF/MUDAC SS to DOE gl, re:
monitoring assignment.
1028 DOE POC Hanford boat enroute.
1029 B/F EOC & KONA Broadcast (simulated) EBS gl for PAD gl.
1030 B/F EOC & KONA Broadcast (simulated) EBS g 1 in Spanish.
C 1031 JIC SS PR g2 & B/F PR gl.
1032 DOE to Field Establish Decontamination station at White Bluffs.
1032 B/F EOC WSP noted on their log that Fish & Game had completed the .evacuation of Wahluke hunting area.
1033 EOF/MUDAC Field team 'reports first Contact & measurement with release.
1035 FSO g 1 Arrive at. Selph Landing.
1035 WA EOC Decision to administer KI to S/L EWs.
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1037 WA EOC to EOF & Administer KI to S/L EWs.
B/F EOC 1038 EOF/MUDAC to SSDC First Plume Projection (data point report location. of plume).
1038 EOF/MUDAC First EDPS dose projection.
1039 DOE Helicopter Completes River EPZ Sveep (contacted 4 boats per extent of play agreement).
Actual count is 22 persons on shore and 20 boats.
1040 FSO¹2 Arrive at Ringold; acted as base station for Fish &
Game.
1040 WA EOC WA PR¹2 State of Emergency.
1040 Fish & Game At Ringold - monitor radio traffic.
1041 WSP to WA EOC Field personnel have taken KI.
1042 SS ¹ 1 Take first air sample.
1042 JIC PC ¹1.
1042 WA EOC Briefing.
-1043 DOE/EOF to DOE/POC Release river for 22 vill not reach minutes, perform another run up river.
1043 FSO¹1 Observed DOE Helicopter.
17
Tabl,e 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME 'LOCATION EVENT 1044 B/F EOC PAD¹2: Shelter livestock to 5 miles; Shelter Section 2 from 0 to 5 miles.
Emergency Workers take KZ.
1045 Radio Station KONA Broadcast, EBS test message in English.
1045 EOF/SSDC RM decision, transmit first plume forecast (data point report) to S/L.
1045 EOF/MUDAC First dose projection using ambient (field) radiation measurements, projected dose TH 26 REM at l/2 mile.
1047 Radio Station KONA Broadcast EBS test message'n Spanish.
1047 B/F EOC Receive confirmation of siren activation.
1047 FSO¹2 Inform FSO that road blocks in place on river.
1048 Fish & Game to FSO Decision to proceed with Hunting Area Closure (Note, Fish & Game had not.
received notification &
instructions from WSP).
1048-57 EOF/SSDC Briefing on status of PARs
& PADs.
1049 WA EOC Question, have we received the text of any EBS messages? (AD-DEM asks staff person).
1049 FSO¹2 Observed DOE (Sweep ¹2).
18
Table 4:
{Cont.)
Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September ll, 1990 SCENARIO TIME LOCATION 1049 B/F EOC to PASCO Dispatch buses to schools.
SCHOOL/TRANS.
1049 B/F EOC & KONA Broadcast (simulated) EBS g2: Shelter Section 2 from 0 to .. 5 miles; place livestock in shelter- and on stored feed. Note, no mention of ORV Park closure.
DOE patrol boat Arrives at White Bluff.
1051 Fish & Game to FSOg2 Commencing evacuation verification & route alerting of Hunting Area.
1052 FSO to FSO g,l & 2 Verification of road block.
1053 FSO gl & 2 to FSO Verified positions at F15 &
F16.
1057 B/F EOC SS Briefing: release has started, wind is at, 3 mph, measured dose rate of 173 mr/hr.
1059 EOF to B/F.EOC Briefing: Offsite dose rates are increasing.
1100 EOF/MUDAC First MUDAC PAR with EDPS Dose Projection (TH dose 14,492 mr/hr. at 10 miles, evacuate Section 2, 0-10 miles, no.KI PAR.
1100 EOF/SSDC Discussion: 54 Clad failure, what is the cause?
1100 DOE field team Begin Setup at of Decontamination White Bluffs station 19
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1101 PASCO TRANS SCHOOL
/ Bus departs to Markham School with radio check.
1101 Fish & Game Enroute to Wahluke slope.
1102 B/F EOC re status of Receiving many phone calls schoolchildren.
1102 B/F EOC Signed Proclamation of Emergency.
1102-1106 B/F EOC Decision to evacuate schools.
110S WA EOC State JIC arrives back.
1103 DOE Helicopter Completes upriver sweep.
110S EOF/SSDC Briefing: 4 Boats are out of zone (Columbia River-plume EPZ).
1106 SSgl Count on cartridge, 308 mr/hr.
1107 FSOgl Observed Benton County
.Sheriff's boat patrolling down river.
1107 EOF/REM to MUDAC Sent, back MUDAC PAR (1100) with request to confirm MUDAC dose projection.
1109 Fish & Game Secured north end of Hunting Area.
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1109 HUDAC to REH, Confirm dose projection and HUDAC REH to MUDAC,PAR g1; REH changes MUDAC PAR gl REM to RH to include evacuation of Sections 1, 3 6 4 from 0 to 5 miles.
1110 EOF/MUDAC Second EDPS Dose Projection 10 mr/hr (WB) at 10 miles.
1113 DOE to field teams Terminate DOE portion of River route alerting, access control &
decontamination station.
B/F EOC Decision to evacuate special populations in Section 2 from 0 to 10 miles.
1114-1121 EOF to EOCs PAR g3: Sections Evacuate to 5 miles.
l, 3, 4 Section 2 evacuate to 10 miles, KI for EWs, Evacuate Columbia River.
1116 EOF/REM to WA EOC Discussion on PAR g3.
1118 PASCO/TRANS Bus dispatched for Mobility SCHOOL Impaired pickup.
1120 EOF to WA g2 Dispatched to east side of river.
1122 B/F EOC Status board posted, evacuation bus arrives at Edward Markham School.
21
.Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1124 B/F EOC PAD ¹3, evacuate Section 1 to 5 miles; Evacuate Section 2 to 10 miles.
1124 NA EOC to EOF Discussion: is PAR ¹ 3 both the MUDAC PAR & the RM's PAR? Answer: Yes.
1125 NA EOC Last, Media callout completed.
NA ¹l Radio Check.
1127 Edwin Markham School Bus departs for Isaac Stevens ENAC 112S FSO ¹1 & 2 Dispatch to F¹5 & F¹6, take KI 1130 WA DOH Technical Advisors arrived.
1131 EOF to WA ¹1 Dispatched to N. Taylor Flats.
1131 B/F EOC Status board posted:
Columbia River evacuation is complete.
1131 Fish & Game Completed Nahluke route alert/verification, return to Ringold.
NA EOC to B/F EOC NA concurs with PAR ¹ 3 from SS. State also concurs with PAR ¹ 3.
1133 Fish & Game Complete route alerting, access controls in effect.
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990
{Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT . ~
1134 B/F EOC & KONA Broadcast (simulated) EBS g3 - Evacuate Section 1, to 5 miles; evacuate Section 2, to 10 miles. Schools being evacuated, two assistance centers have been opened.
1135 FSO to FSO 1 & 2 Informed them that 2 assistance centers open.
1135 Fish & Game to FSO Completed Evacuation and Access control; awaiting further instructions.
1137 MUDAC WA DOH arrives.
1140 Fish & Game to FSO Any instructions?
1140 JIC Receive B/F PR g3 & SS PR g5.
FSOg2 Arrives at ACP gF5.
1141 ZIC Received B/F PR g2.
WA EOC Briefing.
1143 EOF to WA gl Briefing on plant status, (Not told to take KI).
1144 WA EOC Receive B/F PR g3.
1145 Fish & Game Depart to EWAC at Connell.
23
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1145 EOF/SSDC Briefing: School evacuation completed; evacuation of ORV park in progress; Columbia River evacuation is completed. Dose Projection 2.9 TH at 10 miles, B/F recommended shelter of animals in Section 2, 0 to 10 miles.
MUDAC is considering PARs beyond 10 miles.
1148 WA EOC to FEMA Request Federal assistance 5 field teams and mobile lab.
~ 1148 JIC Receive WA PR¹2.
1150 FSO¹1 Arrive at ACP ¹F6.
EOF to WA¹1 Take KI.
1151 WA EOC Received B/F EBS ¹1 & ¹2 texts.
1152 MUDAC Receive first lab analysis.
(from SS air sample taken at 1042, 0.5 mile from plant).
1153 School bus Arrived at Host School (EWAC).
1154 MI bus Arrived at residence.
1155 WA EOC Phone team tells public that evacuation is being considered (when its actually taking place) .
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1158 EOF/MUDAC First dose projection based on Iodine measurement, TH 6.29 rem/hr at 1.2 miles, TH 1.09 rem/hr at 5 miles, TH 481 mr/hr at 10 miles.
1204 WA EOC Media section received text of B/F EBS 1 & 2.
1204 JIC PC C2.
1205 B/F EOC Discussion: OK to remove loaded/harvested produce/go back in to evacuated .area No actions are taken to implement this issue.
mr/hr at leading edge of plume.
1,210 EOF/MUDAC MUDAC PAR g 2: IPZ advisory for Sections 1, 2, and 3, from 10 to 50 miles.
1210 B/F EOC First Staff Briefing (Note, no mention by Richland Police of ORV Park closure
& no mention by WSP of Fish
& Game actions).
1218 SS at. B/F EOC to EOF Discussion: County's concerns on sending people in to get, food.
1218 WA EOC/WEIC Received SS PR g5.
1219 REM to RM/EOF New dose projection: no need to go beyond 10 miles re PARs.
1225 B/F EOC Report: Section 1 and 2 evacuation is completed.
25
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990.
(Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1225 RM to WA EOC Notification/discussion of IPZ advisory (MUDAC PAR 2).
1226 WA EOC Received information that core had not been at 1004 power.
1228 JIC OR PR g2 and B/F PR g4.
1230 EOF to WA g2 Take KI.
1230 B/F EOC Controller insert to FSO:
perform evacuation verification of Section .2:
FSO is unable to comply (no procedures).
1231 EWAC MI Bus g1 arrives.
1233 EOF to B/F EOC Discuss differences in dose projections 1235-37 WA gl Made first pass/measurements:
plum.e 6 mr/hr at center line.
1235 WA 42 Made plume edge measurement, (at FIR street) 0.6 mr/hr.
1235 PAS CO/TRANS Dispatch Mobility impaired bus to School second residence.
1240 WA 1 to EOF Report measurements.
EOF to WA gl Take air sample.
WA EOC to B/F EOC IPZ Advisory: Sections l, 2, and 3, from 10 to 50 miles.
26
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT WA ¹1 Take Air Sample ¹1, Taylor Flat Road.
1247 WA ¹2 Takes KI 1250 FSO ¹ 1 & ¹ 2 . Depart sites to EWAC.
1251 , WA ¹2 Take 2nd set of measurements through plume:
3.1 mr/hr (edge) and 4.6 mr/h (center) 9 19K46 1254 B/F EOC to EOF Discussion and question the rationale for the IPZ Advisory for Section s 1 &
3 ~
1255 WA ¹2 to EOF Field Analysis reported 2 '9 x 10~ u/ci/cc; 10 'articulate.
3 33 x 1259 B/F EOC Briefing: WA Field Team reports plume edge (northern side) is at North Elm & Dogwood.
1301 WA¹2 Makes measurements at 19K2B, 822 uR/hr.
1301 REM/RM Discuss IPZ Advisory.
B/F EOC to WA EOC Do not agree with IPZ
'305 Advisory.
EOF to B/F EOC Stand by . IPZ Advisory (MUDAC PAR ¹ 2).
1309 WA EOC Received WA PR ¹3.
27
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1310 WA g1 to MUDAC Reports results of sample taken at 1245 from 27D9G (6.5 miles): iodine 2.93 x10 '.
1310 WA EOC Decides on IPS Advisory.
1310 WA P2 Take air sample 9 19K46.
1320 EOF Received first indication that majority of release was over 1.4 hr/duration.
1320 WA EOC & KONA Broadcast, (simulated) EBS gl: IPZ Advisory.
1321-30 WAP1 to WSP Attempted to contact re:
sample transfer, finally established contact. 1 1322 EOF WA had made decision on IPZ Advisory as submitted.
1325 EOF/MUDAC Field Data (received at 1255) gets to Dose Assessment Group.
1326 EOF/SSDC Discussion re: multiple dose projections received from HUDAC.
1330 EOF/MUDAC Dose Projection based on field data: 27.6 Rem at 6.5 mile.
1333 JIC B/F PR P4.
1334 WA EOC WA PRg4.
1335 EOF/MUDAC State Liaison confirms that WA EWs took KI about 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> ago.
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1335-40 JIC PCP3.
1337 WA EOC PCP1.-
1340 EOF to WA gl & g2 Release had been stopped.
1342 Mob. Imp. Bus Arrive at EWAC.
1342 JIC WA PR g3.
1345 EOF/MUDAC to REM Revised Dose Projection based upon 1.4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> release duration: 8.07 (TH) Rem at 10 mile.
1347 EOF Briefing release stopped.
1349 WA EOC Amends IPZ Advisory Section 1, add 5 to 10 miles.
1351 Control Room to MUDAC Request TH dose projection at 1.2 mile.
1355 WA gl & 2 to WSP Transfer samples for delivery to State DOH Lab.
1358 PASCO TRANS School District terminates School exercise play.
1400 FSO g 1 & g 2 Terminates exercise play.
1400 B/F EOC Checked Rumor Control at JIC.
1402 EOF REM to RM, we may have issued a non conservative PAR.
1402 WA EOC PC gi concludes.
1413 WA EOC WA PR g5.
29
Table 4: Significant Events Log WNP-2 Exercise, September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
SCENARIO TIME LOCATION EVENT 1414 B/F EOC Briefing: Price Anderson Insurance representatives will set up tomorrow at Richland airport.
1417 WA¹2 to MUDAC Sample from 19K4C (taken at 1320): 2 0 X 10 '.
1420 JIC Received WA PR ¹4.
1425 JIC Received WA PR ¹5.
1428 WA EOC Received OR PR ¹2.
1430 B/F EOC Notified that JIC PC at 1330 had an error.
1434 EOF/MUDAC Completed dose projection with different set of field data, 0.37 REM (TH) at 10 miles.
1437 B/F EOC Terminates Exercise Play.
1442 JIC B/F PR ¹6 and SS PR ¹6.
1441 EOF 6 JIC Terminates Exercise play.
1445 WA EOC Terminates Exercise play.
1448 MUDAC to FIELD Terminates Exercise play.
30
TABLE 5a Protective Action Recommendations WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990
\ Time Issued PAR g Protective Action Recommendation at EOF SAE; Evacuate Columbia River; 1008 and exclusion zone at WNP-2.
GE; Shelter Section 2, 1022 0 to 5 miles; KI for EWs.
Evacuate to 5 miles in 1114 Sections 1, 3, 6 4, and to 10 miles in Section 2.
TABLE 5b Protective Action Implementation WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 PA g Protective Action Time Decision Comments 1 Adopt PAR g1 Sound Sirens; Broadcast EBS g1 1014 at 1029 (Sirens sounded at 1017, again at 1024).
2 Adopt PAR g2; Place EBS g2 broadcast at 1049.
1044 livestock on stored feed; shelter in Section 2 to 5 miles.
3 Evacuate to 5 miles EBS g3 broadcast at 1134.
1124 in Section 1, and to 10 miles in Section 2.
1015 RPD begins evacuation of ORV Park.
1106 B/F EOC decides to evacuate 3 schools.
1113 B/F EOC decides to evacuate special populations in Section 2, 5 to 10 miles 31
TABLE 6 Emergency Broadcast System Messages Issued by B/F EOC WNP-2 Exercise September ll, 1990 EBS g / Time Broadcast EBS Hessage Text gl / 1029 This is B/F County PIO at the County EOC-There has been an accident at the Hanford Reservation at the WNP-2 plant. It been classified as a Site Area Emergency.
has No protective measures are advised at this time. Keep your radio tuned to the EBS station KONA for further instructions. Further information will be provided as it becomes available.
The Columbia River is being closed from Leslie Groves Park to the White Bluffs Ferry Landing. The Wahluke Slope is being evacuated. Selph Landing and Ringold boat launches are closed.
g2 / 1049 This is the B/F County PIO at the County EOC. There has been an accident at the Hanford Reservation at the WNP-2 plant,.
It has been classified as a General Emergency. The Columbia River is being closed from Leslie Groves Park to the White Bluffs Ferry Landing.
Sheltering is necessary in Section 2 from 0 to 5 miles. (Gives geographic description of Section 2). (Reads section 7 of EBS form dealing with how to shelter - reads as printed). Sheltering of livestock's directed. Put them on stored feed. We wild. continue to keep you informed.
g3 / ll34 This is the B/F County PIO at the County EOC. There has been an accident at the Hanford Reservation at the WNP-2 plant.
It has been classified as a General Emergency. The Columbia River is being closed from Leslie Groves Park to the White Bluffs Ferry Landing.
32
TABLE 6 Emergency Broadcast System Messages Issued by B/F EOC WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
EBS g / Time Broadcast EBS Message Text g3/1134 (Cont.) The following schools are taking actions to protect their children: Edwin Markham, Country Haven Academy and Country Christian School are being evacuated.
Parents are advised that they can pick up their children at the isaac Stevens Jr.
High School.
Evacuation is necessary in Section 1 from 0 to 5 miles; and in Section 2 from 0 to 10 miles (Gives geographic description of the sections).
Should take the following items
. with you...'(Reads section 10 of the EBS form as it is written).
Assistance Centers have been established (Connell, Stevens and Kiona-Benton).
Keep your radio tuned to KONA.
33
TABLE 7a: Summary of Press Conferences Joint Information Center, Richland Press Conference ECL Number Time Speaker Synopsis GE 1042 B/F Rep EOC Emergency Chairman has requested that the Columbia River be evacuated. Suspect in the plant entry has been arrested. Sirens alerting people to evacuate the River have been activated.
DOE Rep DOE sees none of its facilities impacted at this time. Hanford Patrol boat is assisting in the River evacuation.
SS Rep At approximately 0815, the plant was returning to full power after being down to repair some equipment. There was a plant demonstration taking place. An individual put a ladder against the fence which caused the plant to go to ALERT. Person has been apprehended. During this period there was an equipment malfunction in the steam isolation valves.
(Tries to use a projector to demonstrate would not a point, but work).
it As a result of the failure of those valves to close, there is an escape path for radiation from the plant to turbine which is not a part of the plant containment.
We have some indication that there has been radiation detected outside the plant.
There may have been fuel failure which is contributi ng to radiation readings being picked up.
34
TABLE 7a: Summary of Press Conferences - Joint Information Center, Richland, WNP-2. Exercise September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
Press Conference ECL Number Time Speaker Synopsis GE 1 '1042 As a result of these (Cont.) incidents, the SS declared a GE at 1012 this morning. SS is evacuating non-'essential personnel.
B/F Rep Points out areas affected by PAs on display map.
GE 1204 B/F Rep Additional PAs: B/F has recommended evacuation of Columbia River and Section 1 from 0 to 5 miles; Section 2 from 0 to 10 miles and Sections 3 and 4 0 to 5 miles; Sections 3 and 4 are entirely under the direction of DOE; Busses - have been dispatched to evacuate Edwin Markham School, Country Christian school and Country Haven School. These schools are all in Franklin County.
All students are being moved to Isaac Stevens school where they'ay be picked up by parents. EBS is going out over KONA. Assistance centers have been
~
established at Connell High School, Isaac Stevens Jr High School and at Kiona Benton Middle School.
(Reads items to be taken when evacuating).
DOE Rep Non-essential personnel GE ¹2 1204 evacuated from FFTF. DOE 35
TABLE 7a: Summary of Press Conferences Joint. Information Center, Richland, WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 (Cont-)
Press Conference ECL Number Time Speaker Synopsis (Cont.) monitoring teams have not detected any radiation.
WA DOH Rep Just arrived from west side about 5 minutes ago. Do not have much information to give. Field teams are in the area making measurements.
SS Rep Plant technical status update. Vessel pressure reduced. Decreasing trends in radiation levels in reactor and turbine buildings. Based on releases from turbine building that we have been able to measure, estimated doses at the 10 mile boundary are approx. 2 mr/hr to the whole body and 6 mr/hr to the thyroid. These are very low levels of radiation. These are not measured values, but projections only.
WA DOH Rep Explains what the reported radiation readings mean, and relates them to natural background radiation.
All Staff Q & A session.
36
TABLE 7a: Summary of Press Conferences Joint Xnformation Center, Richland, WNP-2 Exercise September ll, 1990 (Cont.)
Press Conference ECL Number ~ 'ime Speaker Synopsis GE 1335 B/F Rep Summarizes status of PAs to date: School evacuation completed at 1152; Total of 379 students; Richland ORV Park was closed at 1106; Columbia River was closed from Leslie Groves Park to White Bluff Ferry Landing and evacuation was complete at 1131; EBS broadcasts have gone out on KONA and being updated periodically; Gives public concern phone number.
DOE Rep FFTF evacuation completed at 1240.
WA DOH Rep WA field teams are in the field and we are just starting to get data into the EOF; There is a measurable plume east of the Columbia River but we of exact location as are'nsure yet; We will share information with the public when available.
SS Rep Little new information on the plant available; Performing shut down cooling; Closure of the steam tube isolation valve not obtained yet.
All staff Q & A session.
37
TABLE 7a: Summary of Press Conferences - Joint Information Center, Richland, WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
Press Conference ECL Number , Time Speaker Synopsis GE 3 1335 B/F Rep 945 people were evacuated (Cont.) from Section 2; Section 1 evacuated 45 people.
Sections 3 and 4 are under DOE responsibi'lity. Office for insurance claims will be opened in the area.
38
TABLE 7b: Summary of Press Conference - WEIC Olympia, WA WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 Press Conference ECL Number Time Speaker Synopsis GE 1337 WEIC PIO Accident update: NOUE declared at 0816 due to civil Pxoblem disturbance.
with a steam isolation unit led to declaration of SAE shortly after 1000. GE was declared at 101'2.
Release of radioactivity shortly thereafter.
Current PAs: B/F has decided to evacuate Section 1 to 5 miles; Section 2 "to the grey and the clear area here(points to map); and three schools totaling about 400 kids also moved. Sheltering recommended in Sections 3 and 4 out to 5 miles, these are DOE and SS facilities. FC is handling the evacuation of people in Sections 1 and 2; Latest void from County is that those evacuations underway; are Involves 2700 still residents that reside in this whole area but I don't have specific details on Section 2; I refer you to Franklin County for further details. School children were bussed to Kiona Benton middle school in Benton City, Isaac Stevens Jr High in 39
TABLE 7b: Summary of Press Conference NEIC Olympia, NA NNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
Press Conference ECL Number. Time Speaker Synopsis GE 1337 Pasco and Connell High (Cont.) School in Connell.
NA DOA State has issued agricultural advisories in conjunction with DOH and DCD in cooperation with the counties. These are -precautionary advisories in case of radiation movement in these areas (points out affected areas on ingestion map). Milk producing animals and livestock on stored feed and covered water; All harvested crops covered or stored; Milk producers should pick up milk currently in tanks; Close water cisterns. DOA has contacted individually all dairy farms in Sections 1,2 and 3. Also contacted all milk processors and haulers in these sections to make sure they are aware of this advisory. State of OR has issued a similar advisory. All counties are in agreement with this advisory.
NEIC PIO Agricultural advisory has a couple of oversights that I want to fill in on. One is that the you advisory deals with 40
TABLE 7b: Summary of Press Conference WEIC Olympia, WA WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
Press Conference ECL Number, Time Speaker Synopsis GE 1337 Section 1,2, and 3 from (Cont.) 10 to 50 miles.
However, Sections 1 and 3 have only been evacuated out to 5 miles, so there is a 5 mile gap there.
We are modifying the advisory to include this 5 to 10 mile -gap. We will get this information out to the public.
SS Tech. Rep. Gives summary of technical aspects of accident and on site response.
WA DOA Collects PR g4 arid says that replacement PR g5 will be given to media when available.
TABLE 8: Summary of Press Releases in Chronological Order WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 Chronological PR Time of (Organization) Release Summary/Main Points 0853 Alert declared at WNP-2'at OS36.
(SS) 2 0919 Counties EOC activated.
(BF) 3 0920 State EOC being activated (Gives media (WA) phone number which will be activated as of 0945).
4 0945 JXC activated (Gives media and public (SS) concern phone numbers).
5 0952 Oregon monitors WNP-2 emergency.
(OR) 6 0955 Fire extinguished at Plant 2.
(SS) 1030 Protective measures recommended. People (BF) advised to leave Columbia River from Leslie Groves Park to White Bluffs Ferry Landing.
1035 General Emergency declared at Plant 2 (SS) at .1012.
1050 Protective'easures recommended.
(BF) (Repeats Columbia River closure).
Shelter in Section 2 from 0 to 5 miles.
10 1100 Governor declares State of Emergency (WA) in 8 WA Counties.
Time of release is taken from that listed on the organization's press release and may not correspond to the time the media actually received the information.
42
TABLE 8: Summary of Press Releases in Chronological Order WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
Chronological PR g - Time of "
(Organization) Release Summary/Hain Points 11 1120 Radioactivity released from Plant 2.
(SS) 12 1132 Protective measures recommended.
(BF) Students at, 3 schools are being evacuated to Isaac Stevens Jr. High.
Evacuation of the public in Section 1, 0 to 5 miles and Section 2, 0 to 10 miles.
13 1200 Evacuation not necessary in Oregon.
(OR) 14 1225 Evacuations of public in Section 1, (B/F) 0 to 5 miles has been completed as of 1225; Columbia River evacuation from Leslie Groves Park to White Bluffs Ferry Landing completed as of 1131; Richland ORV Park evacuated at 1106; Markham Elementary, Country Haven Academy and Country Christian Center students and staff evacuated at 1105.
379 students reported to Zsaac Stevens Elementary at 1152. Law enforcement officials in the above areas are continuing to restrict access to these areas. People who need to return briefly must check with assistance center workers to make proper arrangements.
15 1251 Washington State has sent 'two (WA) radiological -teams to WNP-2's EOF in Richland.,Persons within 50 miles of Time of release is taken from that listed on the organization's press release and may not correspond to the time the media actually received the information.
43
TABLE 8: Summary of Press Releases in Chronological Order WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
hronological PR g Time of (Organization) Release Summary/Main Points'NP-2
'should stay tuned to the EBS station serving their community (lists stations):
16 1300 Washington State officials recommend (WA) protective actions due to radiation release at WNP-2. Individuals in areas 10 to 50 miles south or east, of the plant should: place milk animals &
livestock on stored feed and covered water; Cover or store all harvested crops; Pick up all milk currently in tanks, if feasible; cisterns and cover surface waters if Close water possible. These are precautionary actions in anticipation of possible movement of radiation releases beyond the current 10 mile evacuation zone.
Advisory is for Sections 1, 2, 3 in Washington State. No advisory for Section 4.
17 1404 Money to compensate those affected by (BF) WNP-2 emergency is available through Price-Anderson Act.
18 1415 Plant'2 containment isolated. \
(SS) 19 1420 Washington State officials recommend (WA) protective actions due to radiation release at WNP-2. Individuals in areas 10 to 50 miles south or east of the plant should (lists same PAs as in Time of release is taken from that listed on the organization's press release and may not correspond to the time the media actually received the information.
44
TABLE 8: Summary of Press Releases in Chronological Order WNP-2 Exercise September 11, 1990 (Cont.)
Chronological PR ¹ Time of (Organization) Release Summary/Main Points 1300 release). The PAs listed in News Release ¹4 affect the area within 5 to 50 miles, of WNP-2, in Sections 1 and
- 3. This advisory is for individuals within 10 to 50 miles of WNP 2 in Section 2. These are precautionary actions in anticipation of possible movement of radiation beyond the current evacuation zone. Evacuation zones are: in Section 2, out to, 10 miles; in Sections 1, 3, and 4, out to 5 miles. This agricultural advisory is for the areas beyond these evacuated areas defined as Sections 1, 2, and 3 out to 50 miles. (Describes areas in terms of geographic landmarks).
'imeinformation.
of release is taken from that listed on the organization's press release and may not correspond to the time the media actually received the 45
~
- 2. 0 EXERCISE EVALUATION
- 2. 1 WASHINGTON STATE Objective gl: Demonstrate the ability to monitor, understand and use emergency classification levels (ECL) through the appropriate implementation of emergency functions and activities corresponding to ECLs as.
required by the scenario. . The four ECLs are:
Notification of Unusual Event, Alert, Site Area Emergency (SAE) and General Emergency (GE).
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington demonstrated the ability to monitor, understand and use ECLs at the EOC, the EOF, and in the field.
At the EOC The ECL levels in effect were quickly posted and prominently displayed in the EQC. The lighted ECL status board is a very effective means of displaying ECL levels. ECL levels were mentioned during EOC briefings and all staff appeared to be aware of the ECL level in effect at any given time.
At the EOF The EOF was notified of ECLs by the Supply System (SS) on-site organization. The NOUE and the ALERT were declared by the SS control room and the SAE and GE by the SS Plant Emergency Director (PED).
After the EOF was activated, the SS Recovery Manager (RM) held briefings to update staff for the reasons for the ECL change. Offsite actions which were based on preplanned actions depending on ECL declaration were all recommended by the SS Recovery Manager (RM).
FIELD MONITORING TEAMS Field Team gl and P2 demonstrated the ability to monitor,'nderstand and use ECLs. Notifications were given to the teams by the Meteorological Unified Dose Assessment Center (MUDAC).
Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
46
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR'WASHINGTON STATE Current Exercise Issues: None.
Objective g2: Demonstrate the ability to fully alert, mobilize and activate personnel for both facility and field-based emergency functions.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington demonstrated the ability to fully alert, mobilize and activate emergency personnel at the EOC, EOF, and in the field.
Activation and mobilization was in accordance with
-the extent of play agreement. The agreement specified that the State EOC would be set up prior to the exercise, and that State representatives to the B/F EOC, JIC, EOF and field teams were not to appear at their assigned locations until 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and 20 minutes after receiving the ALERT at the WA EOC. Staffing of most facilities begins in ernest at the ALERT ECL. The ALERT was declared by the PED at 0836.
At the EOC The ALERT was received in the dispatch area of the WA EOC at 0840. Notification fanout began immediately after this and the EOC was declared functional at 0849. The facility was fully activated at 0940 after all agency representatives had arrived.
In the Field The WA EOC sends representatives to the B/F EOC, the EOF, and the JIC. -
Most of these representatives were prepositioned in the Tri-Cities and reported to their duty locations 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and 20 minutes (to simulate travel time from western Washington) after the ALERT was received at the WA EOC (0840). The EOF and B/F representatives arrived at their locations after the appropriate 47
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE delay. 'he majority of the State JIC team decided not to predeploy. Adverse weather at the Seattle airport on the morning of the exercise prevented the JIC players from traveling to Richland to participate in the exercise.
We note that the WA Fish and Game agents were to have been notified by Washington State Patrol 's (WSP) Office in Yakima to begin route alerting in the Wahluke wildlife area. In a past exercise, WSP had not demonstrated prompt alerting (exercise issue S88-2). The-Fish and Game agents did not receive notification from the WSP in Yakima, who were merely simulating .all n'otifications and response functions. Instead the agents established contact with the Franklin County (FC) Sheriff's dispatch for instructions to begin route alerting of the Wahluke wildlife area.
Past Issues Examined: i: None; : S88-2; (see Appendix A for details).
- Current, Exercise Issues:, None.
Objective g3: Demonstrate the ability to direct, coordinate and control emergency activities.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: Washington State demonstrated the ability to direct, coordinate and control emergency activities at the three sites evaluated during the exercise.'t the WA. EOC The Assistant Director, Division of Emergency Management (AD-DEM), was in charge of the emergency response for the State. Protective Action (PA) decisions were discussed among the members .of the executive group and all members actively participated. Periodic briefings were held and all groups were given the opportunity to participate.
48
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE The status of the alert and notification by the Counties was not adequately reported in the EOC.
Procedure 10.18 gives WSP th'e responsibility to monitor the County EBS broadcasts. The procedure checklist for the State B/F representative gives a very detailed procedure on the way that this person
'hould monitor EBS broadcasts. This includes the 1
monitoring the broadcast and brief the EOC on accuracy. This person is also supposed to send a fax copy of the EBS text to .the WA EOC. We find no record that the State representative reported on EBS activity to the EOC.-
We note that the executive table requested, the EOC manager to find out the status of EBS broadcasts at 1049, and the operations staffs logs indicate that they placed calls to B/F EOC but the results of this request were not made available. However, we did find that copies of the EBS messages were received and available at the State EOC.
We note that frequent and generally informative staff briefings were held. These briefings did report on what the counties were doing to implement PAs, but the status of EBS 'essages and siren sounding was not reported. This is essentially the same issue covered by S0>>89-1, an inadequacy from a previous exercise (See Appendix A).
At the EOF The Supply System's emergency response organization demonstrated the ability to interface with the offsite agencies. Periodic briefings were held to inform the EOF personnel of changing conditions.
FEMA notes that a public address announcement was not made after the GE was declared and a briefing did not occur until 38 minutes after the GE was declared. The GE notifications were made to the offsite authorities at 1022, 10 minutes after the ECL declaration. Procedures were available and used by the Supply System EOF emergency response organization.
Logs were kept to document incoming and outgoing messages. The Supply System has an informal internal message handling system. The Technical Data Center appeared to be the only center that 49
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE utilized a pre-printed form to send messages to the Supply System Decision center (SSDC). There was a delay in getting the NOUE and ALERT Fixed Nuclear Facility (FNF) forms to the SSDC. They were not distributed until 0942, 27 minutes after the EOF was activated. In general, the Supply Systems's activities were conducted in accordance with the applicable Emergency Procedures-Implementing Procedures (EPIPs). The only exception noted involved the Radiological Emergency Manager (REM) and RM's change to the MUDAC Protective Action Recommendation (PAR) discussed on the 1114 CRASH call. MUDAC recommended evacuation to 10 miles in Sector 2. 'he REM & RM added -evacuations to 5 miles in Sectors 1, 3, and 4 to the MUDAC recommendation. The RM did not mention the change or explain the basis for the change to the offsite response organizations in the CRASH call at 1114.
This is essentially the same issue covered by S87-1, an inadequacy from a previous exercise (See Appendix A).
In MUDAC, direction and control was initially demonstrated in a very effective manner. The MUDAC coordinator (MC) provided a briefing to his staff at 0910 and informed the REM that the MUDAC was functional. A public address announcement at, 0918 indicated that the RM had accepted the overall direction and control responsibility from the onsite SS staff. Prior to the arrival of the State personnel in MUDAC, the WA EOC Radiological Assessment Group (RAG) staff requested, on several occasions, clarifications from the MC. Upon the.
arrival of the USDOE and State representatives, the MC immediately provided briefings to these representatives. Periodic briefings after this point were not conducted in MUDAC.
The Field Team Coordinator (FTC) did a very good job of directing the Supply System field teams and the WA State field teams when they arrived. A DOE field team was present in the field at about 1028, but procedures used by DOE field teams do not permit them to enter the plume and as a result the team could not be effectively used to make plume measurements.
The State decided to order KI for emergency workers at 1035 (during the State field teams transit from 50
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE their normal duty stations). This decision was not provided to the State field team gi until 1151.
Field team g2 was not instructed to take KI until 1230. This could have been the result of inadequate briefings of the MUDAC staff.
Past Issues Examined: 8'1 I:
Appendix A for details).
- S87-1 and S089-1 (see Current Exercise Issues Issue g1: Coordination of accident assessment activities (S90-1) (PARs) between WA EOC and EOF. ARCA (A.2.a).
Evaluation: WA EOC was addressing requests for dose data to the MUDAC Coordinator. DOH procedures specify that communication with the EOF should be through the REM or RM (see figure 4-2, WA DOH procedures).
Recommendation:Review and revise procedures, if appropriate. Train staff.
Objective g4: Demonstrate the ability to communicate with all appropriate locations, organizations, and field personnel.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washin'gton demonstrated the ability to communicate with all appropriate locations, organizations and field personnel.
At the WA EOC The EOC staff used commercial telephones (about 25 lines), a dedicated phone system, fax, NAWAS and other radio systems to communicate with offsite agencies. The EOC staff was able to communicate with the EOF, JIC, B/F EOC, the ingestion counties and various state agencies. All communications systems demonstrated worked well.
At the EOF 51
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE The EOP staff'emonstrated the ability to communicate with all appropriate locations.
The EOF Communication Center (EOFCC) had trouble faxing the FNF forms to the State. The problem was initially thought to beState's a problem with the auto/manual switch on the machine. Further investigation revealed that this was not the case, since the State received faxes from other locations during this time frame. It appears that there was no malfunction of equipment. FEHA's conclusion is that there is insufficient fax capability from the EOF to offsite organizations. There is only one dedicated fax circuit from the EOP to other onsite locations and offsite .locations. There is no ability to "fax to all stations" or to determine whether one of the many parties on this "party fax line" is faxing information.
A short delay occurred with verbal notifications of the ALERT over the CRASH phone. The County dropped off the line before a formal role call was taken.
The EOFCC duty off'icer called the B/F EOC to ensure that this notification had been received.
The MUDAC staff demonstrated the ability to communicate via commercial telephones, FH radio, and computer links (used to obtain plant parameter data) with no apparent problems.
In the Field Both Washington State field teams (WA¹1 and WA¹2) successfully demonstrated the ability to communicate with all appropriate locations using portable radios and commercial telephones. Some slight delays in communications occurred for WA ¹2 because of: 1) Line-of-site problems with radios in valleys east of the plant; 2) Other radio traffic obscuring transmissions; 3) Wrong telephone number in the emergency kit for B/F EOC while attempting to contact WSP. The team was able to work around these difficulties and none of them represented a serious impairment to their performance.
Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective Current
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE Exercise Issues:
Issue g2: Insufficient fax capability from EOF to offsite (S90-2) organizations. ARCA (F).
Evaluation: For a period of time, hard copy data transfer was not accomplished from the EOF to the offsite State EOC. The current fax capability is limited to one party line linking the EOF to many locations. The onsite and offsite organizations should have a dedicated system fEOF to the two offsite EOCs only]
that allows for the timely transfer of data.
Recommendation:Acquire equipment and, data lines. Revise procedures. Train staff.
Objective g5: Demonstrate the adequacy of facilities, equipment, displays and other materials to support emergency operations.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington demonstrated that adequate facilities, equipment and displays were available-to support emergency operations.
At the WA EOC The WA EOC complex consists of four rooms; the main room (where most staff are located), the communications area, the WEIC dissemination area which contains the phone teams, and a room which was used for the press conference. The EOC was is considered to be undersized for the number of people it contains. This was especially evident in the main room and in the press briefing area.
Adequate status boards were in place and ventilation and lighting were adequate. Production of news releases was enhanced by the availability of several computers and skilled operators. Status boards in use included a lighted ECL board, plant status, weather, status of PAs and requests for assistance. Maps of both the plume and ingestion planning zones were available. A wireless microphone was used to conduct EOC briefings. This made it easy for all staff to hear what was being
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE said during the briefings. We noted good access control at the EOC entry, and only authorized persons were permitted into the EOC.
At the EOF The SS provides space and facilities in their EOF for representatives from WA State and B/F Counties.
The facilities provide adequate space, furnishings and amenities for the offsite representatives.
These personnel have a dedicated room (the OACC) for their use and have space available in the SSDC for conferences and briefings held by the SS RM.
Access to the EOF was restricted to authorized personnel. Standard office equipment vas available. The SS had access to maintenance vorkers for repairs to equipment which failed to operate properly. The various operational, rooms had status boards displaying ECLs, plume and ingestion EPZ, evacuation routes and assistance center locations. Status board posting was done by the Information Coordinators from information received over a conferencing net. These boards, particularly in MUDAC were not always updated in a timely fashion (within about 20 minutes). 'lso, the Information coordinator in the MUDAC did not change the posting time for events between 0922 and 1210 {e.g., events were current, but the times of the events were not).
At the JIC At the JIC, press conferences vere held in an auditorium which is more than adequate. The use of a boom mike to allov everyone to hear questions from the audience during the second news conference was beneficial.
Past Issues
-Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
Current Exercise Issues: None.
Objective g6: Demonstrate the ability to continuously monitor and control Emergency Worker exposure.
54
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington successfully demonstrated the ability to continuously monitor and control EW exposure.
Each EW was issued the required dosimetry package consisting of two self reading dosimeters (0-200 mR and 0-20 R) and a permanent record TLD badge. The readings were recorded at 30 minute intervals and reported to MUDAC by radio. On the basis of interviews we determined that EWs were familiar
- with the authorized exposure levels and knew what action to take if these levels were exceeded.
The Field Team Coordinator did an excellent job of directing the, field teams in order to minimize their exposure. The teams were directed to report dosimeter readings throughout the exercise.
.Past Issues Examined: S86-8'86-10; SSS-3; : None.
(see Appendix A for details).
Curr ent Exercise Issues: None.
Objective g7: Demonstrate the appropriate equipment and procedures for determining field radiation measurements.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: The State
'appropriate of Washington demonstrated 'he for equipment and procedures determining field radiation measurements.
The Field Teams (FTs) demonstrated the ability to properly complete operational and source checks of all radiation monitoring equipment specified in the plan. The teams were instructed to define the plume in Franklin County. The FTs interpreted the radiation readings accurately and promptly transmitted the results to the MUDAC. The proper 55
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE dosimetry was issued (0-200 mR and 0-20 R dosimeters and a permanent record TLD badge). All team members .had been . fitted for and received certification in the use of respirators.
The Washington FT g1 (WA g1) was not requested to obtain ground deposition measurements, but during an interview the team captain described how the measurements would be taken at groundlevel and waist level had they been requested.
During the exercise the FTs were reporting closed window readings only. The FTC had to request them to report the window open readings. If the team had completed the Field Measurement Worksheet in their procedures, they would have performed this step correctly. This procedure is mentioned on page 7-1 of DSHS (DOH)/ORP procedures dated September 1986.
Past Issues Examined: r~: S86-7; A for details).
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g3: Incomplete FT readings. ARCA (I.8).
(S90-3)
Evaluation: The FTs did not report window open readings along with window closed readings while determining the parameters 'of the plume until the FTC requested them to do so.
Recommendation:Train staff to follow DOH procedures which instructs FTs to obtain window open and window closed measurements.
Issue g4: Incomplete FT procedures. PLAN ISSUE (S90-4) (I.8)
Evaluation: There is no procedure requiring the FT to obtain ground level and waist level measurements (both open and closed window) for ground deposition measurements.
56
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE Recommendation:Revise procedures. Train staff.
Objective g8: Demonstrate the appropriate equipment and procedures for the measurement of airborne radioiodine concentrations as low as microcuries cc in the presence of noble gases.
10-'er Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington successfully demonstrated the proper operation of equipment and procedures to sample and measure airborne iodine.
The WA FTs demonstrated the assembly and disassembly of sampling train, choosing areas free of obstructions (but within observed centerline of the plume) for sample collection, relocating promptly to a low background area for field analysis and ,purging. Proper field analysis methods and delivery of the sample to a WSP trooper for delivery to the state analytical lab was also demonstrated. Charcoal filters were used to simulate silver zeolite. The silver zeolite cartridges were available in the FT kits. The WA g1 team placed the sampling head inlet facing opposite the anticipated direction of the plume.
The flow meter used was in calibration.
.Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g5: Improper placement of sampling head. ARFI (I.9).
Evaluation: The sampling head inlet was placed facing the opposite the anticipated direction of the plume.
Recommendation:Train staff.
Objective g9: Demonstrate the ability to obtain samples of particulate activity in the airborne plume and promptly perform laboratory analyses.
57
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington demonstrated the ability to obtain samples of particulate activity.
The WA state field teams successfully demonstrated the ability to obtain samples of airborne particulate activity, remove promptly to a low background area for field analysis of samples and deliver the appropriately labeled, bagged and contaminated survey samples to a WSP trooper for simulated delivery to the state analytical lab. An appropriate sampling location free of obstructions was chosen by each team member. See Objective g8, Issue g5 (page 57), which also applies to this objective.
Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
Current Exercise Issues: None.
Objective f10: Demonstrate the ability, within the plume exposure pathway, to project dosage to the public via plume exposure, based on plant and field data.
Evaluation: Not Met.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington did not demonstrate the ability to accurately project dose to the public.
The Radiological Assessment Group (RAG) at the WA EOC did not understand the parameters utilized for the basis of the dose projections made by the primary dose assessment system (EDPS) or the backup dose assessment system (BEDPS). The State' representatives at the EOF (MUDAC representative and Administrative Liaison) failed to ensure that data flow was occurring in an accurate and timely manner between the EOF and the State EOC. The MUDAC representative failed to demonstrate the ability to recognize the significance of reported field data and oversee the selection of field data 58
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE for utilization in dose projections. The RAG and EOF representatives failed to demonstrate the development of appropriate dose projections.
INFORMATION TRANSFER PROM MUDAC TO WA ROC Washington's FNF plan assigns the RAG the responsibility to assess the adequacy, timeliness and effectiveness of all PARs generated by the EOF.
The State has responsibility to issue PARs to the County, by either passing along the utility PAR or initiating their own when appropriate. An MOU
'between the SS and the State included in the plan says that the SS is responsible for providing information on the incident (follow up messages as defined by NUREG 0654/FEMA REP-1) to the State in the event, of an emergency at WNP<<2. The State' plan assumes that the EOF will ensure that this information flow is established and maintained by the EOF staff until State representatives to the EOF arrive and are able to assume this role.
FEMA's review of the players'ogs indicate that almost all important information acquired by the RAG at the WA EOC was obtained by inquiries generated by the RAG staff through phone calls to MUDAC. In almost no instances, according to player logs, did the licensee's staff initiate contact with the WA EOC to inform them of critical plant or dose projection information. Once the State' people arrived at the EOF, they were given an initial briefing and never, briefed again during the exercise. The RAG had to continue to call the State's representatives at the MUDAC in order to get information.
Information regarding the assessment of the incident was not completely shared with the RAG at the WA EOC. For example, the WA EOC received hard copy of one EDPS dose projection and one hard copy and three verbal dose projections from the BEDPS (the EOF prepared seventeen separate dose projections). Although the MUDAC staff prepared 10 plume location maps, only two hard copy and six verbal data point reports were transmitted to the State EOC dose assessment staff. By 1300, MUDAC had prepared seven plume maps. The two hard copy plume location maps were, received by the State EOC at 1337 and 1339. These maps were prepared at 1245
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE (Figure 2, page 61 ) and 1249 (Figure 3, page 62);
FEMA notes that the SS notification forms do not.
contain an area for dose rate and dose projection information as specified by criterion E.4 of NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1. Unless the State receives a separate fax for the dose projection, they do not have .any material that supports PARs based upon dose ~
Was W h't an~ on information State was not given the detailed flow of needed to develop and z.ssue P ARss to the Coun C t'res. Thee RAG staff spent much of, their time trying to get information from the EOF, ra h performing analysis of the information, which is their primary function.
DOSE ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES During this exercise, both the primaryand back up dose projection systems were demonstrated for dose projection. Three dose projections were made with the EDPS and 14 projections were made using the BEDPS.
The EDPS produces real time dose projections. In other words, EDPS dose projections represent the projected dose for just the time period beginning xn t'hat with the initiation of the release and to the point mme a the dose projection was made.
Alternatively, the BEDPS can produce ce a dose projection based on a default value for an estimated time of release duration. The SS procedures do not call for the use of a standard set of release duration defaults. Most BEDPS dose projections were based upon real time release durations. The State's procedures call for the use of a three hour release default time unless a better estimate is available.
60
0 l I 0 0 S ~ 4 P w
I
~ A I
J' J
i)I
/' Ak4+-:~~~>N S r
., .~.~ .~.
-'F='
~
57 1% ~
~ 1I
'3 0 ~ 0
i14 C'
~2 Pt.'%~@
4f <<~PI) I .'I W'.KSW', '-. M4 4P:" .
- .4th
~)10 CII;~~
~ '
14P4 ~
2 tl 'itilt"--=-'"-
tr~<<"41 -I IQP + ~ )\
Qi"""4Q ~i P <<P<<\
4 II fECP+
~ ~
IP
~~ P\ ~P !
I4 ~ IP I~ ili ~ PP I
~P ~ ~ t 4PI 4
<<4'4C 4.4 4<<, ~
P
.' 4 C P<<
I I
/." I ea04
';224 I I 4,'.f: I
~II
- h~ri',o ref I
.C.'-I Sita i g4
'a>4P'441 I
P<<P P PP l -:--:..:
e ~
,~24t)I O'X
~~I P
~~ ~
~4 4 PPPP J, PPP <<<<P44P
~ 44P "l
I
- /~ -..i4 t.2
$J QI
~
, 41 2444 Pt I :EIenton ....
24'C 1IPCI PC
) ~ IPP4 ~ I Ct I CC 24421 ~,4
~1044C WC 'C'ounay ..-
ICI410P) f li
~P P ~
,,i
<< ,4 Al 5XIILIC 10 5lILE EPZ F tELO TE'Abi SUHHAAY MAP OATE:
HAJOR DOSE c'i't TS.'1HZ: RATE.'ORi!
OISTANCE: ~
PREPARKO 8V:
Figure 3: First plume location received at NA EOC: Shows whole body dose rate of 0.6 mr/hr trailing edge & 60 mr/hr leading edge. The 0.6 mr/hr datapoint was used by HUDAC for the dose projection made at l434.
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE In the various briefings at the State EOC and at the EOF, comparisons of dose projections were made. These comparisons were not qualified by the statement that these dose projections were based upon actual release durations:, e.g., the input parameters were different. Washington State's PAR process calls for the comparison of dose projections based upon just to the point in time when a particular dose projection is made.
The EDPS and BEDPS dose assessment system allows the tracking of 15 plant,'arameters to provide a time history of these parameters. New dose projections based on field measurements were not rigorously analyzed and no one on the dose assessment staff performed a comprehensive review of the field data and laboratory data to validate the dose projections. This led to incorrect dose assessment conclusions which were used to support PAR g3 developed by the REM.
Most of the 14 BEDPS dose projections were made based on real elapsed time { time from start, of release to time of calculation). These dose projections were not transmitted in chronological order to the SSDC and this led to some confusion as the REM attempted to interpret the data.
As stated above, only two hard copy dose projections were faxed to the WA EOC. The EDPS dose projection was made at 1044, which represented a 44 minute release.- This EDPS dose proj'ection was received by the State EOC at 1127 (note that PA g3 was made at, about 1114). The RAG at the WA EOC did not appear to understand the source term supporting the EDPS dose projection. This resulted in long telephone discussions between the MUDAC Coordinator and the WA EOC, and the REM and the WA EOC. FEMA notes that during this consultation process, the SS Liaison to the State EOC called the EOF and was advised that WNP-2 had only been operating for a day at 154 power. The RAG briefed the State decision makers on this dose projection and characterized it as a "what if" dose projection
'nstead of a real time dose projection based upon measured plant parameter data. The BEDPS dose projection was made at 1200 and represented a 55.2 63
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE minute release. The. BEDPS dose projection was attached to the ingestion advisory and was received by the State EOC at 1254. The PAR for this advisory was made at 1225.
The MUDAC Coordinator and the REM did not, act on a well developed dose projection developed by the systems analyst and the meteorologist and forwarded to the REM at 1345. This dose projection involved the total integrated release and release time based on the BEDPS system monitor history. This dose projection projected a dose of 8.07 REM to the Thyroid at 10 miles for a 1.4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> release duration and would have supported the need for PAs beyond 10 miles based on the PAR decision logic (State and SS procedure 13.14.1 I 2).
Two sets of plume measurements were made at approximately 1245 by the WA FTs gl and g2. The ambient gamma readings were reflected in the data report produced at 1249 (see Figure 3). Air sample analysis was available at the 0.6 mr/hr and the 60 mr/hr locations shown in Figure 3. The MUDAC Coordinator and the'State MUDAC Representative were aware of both sets-of data. The MUDAC Coordinator selected an air sample data point from the trailing edge of the'lume (0.6 mr/hr location shown in Figure 3). The dose projection based on this data point indicated low'hyroid dose (39 mrem) at 10 miles. This dose projection (completed at 1434) was used to support the existing PAs even though it.
did not reflect the correct. total integrated dose at 10 miles. This dose projection was reviewed by the State dose assessor in the MUDAC. The State dose assessor agreed to the dose projection without understanding where and when the air sample was collected. This would have indicated that the chosen sample point should not have been used to generate the total integrated dose.
Washington State's Protective Action Guides have been incorporated into the EOF/MUDAC procedures (See Table 9 on page 66). FEMA notes that the PAG values of < 1 REM WB and < 5 REM Thyroid are not part of the State's PAGs. Table 9 shows that the projected dose for an individual for the entire if release is > 125 mrem and < 1 rem Whole Body or >
625 mrem and < 5 rem Thyroid, then adults should be told to seek shelter and evacuation should be
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE consiidered e for pregnant women and children. The EDPS dose projection received at the State EO 1127 projected a dose rate of 14,492 mrem/hr to the h yrox'd a t 10 miles.
taccident Zf the staff assigned to assessment at the EOF and WA EOC had correc tly y assessed the EDPS dose projection or correctly selected field data. points an d release, durations as input parameters to the BEDPS, they would have noted that. the projected dose rate and dose (EDPS 14,492 mrem/hr to the Thyroid, and the BEDPS 8.07 rem to the Thyroid) would have exceeded this conservative PAG of 625 mrem to the Thyroid at 10 miles, thus requiring protective actions beyond 10 miles.
t t ff at the State EOC and at the EOF did not St aesa demonstrate that they fully understood thee basis for the dose projections, or the actual projections, which were used to confirm that the PAs were adequate.
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE Projected Oose To An ?ndfvfdual For The Entire Re'lease Recomrended Actions Comnentg Whole Body ~ 125 mrem o Ho protective actfon required Protective Action based on projected dose. Recoentendatfons may be required by the classfffcatfon. See Attachment A.
Thyroid < 625 mrem Whole Body )125 mrem o Seek shelter+ and waft further Previously recommended to< 1 rem 'fn'structions ~ protective actions may Thyroid > 625 mrem o Consider evacutfon, particularly be reconsidered or to c' rem for children and pregnant women. terminated.
o Honitor environmental radiation levels.
o Control access.
o Conduct evacuation of populations Seeking shelter would Whole Body > 1 rem fn the predetermined area. be an alternate ff to 4 5 rem o Honitor environmental radiation evacuation were not Thyroid > rem levels and adjust area for evacu- faaedfately possible.
to c'5 rem 5
tfon based on these levels.
o Control access.
Whole Body Oose > 5 rem o Conduct Evacuatfon Seeking shelter would Thyroid > 25 rem o Control Access be an alternative f F evacuation were not faeediately possible.
+ Sheltering fs to be with ventflatfon control. Ventilation control means turning orf air conditioners or fans and closing doors and windows, thus limiting access of outside afr.
Attachment C i4ViCION HVMBER PIC@ MUMSY 13.14.2 13.14.2>>15 of 20 Ttt LRhl ~ 12 Table 9: PAR Decision Logic as contained in EOF/MUDAC procedures.
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE MANAGEMENT OP FIELD TEAMS The FTs vere properly directed to define the plume.
Field monitoring data were plotted and dose projections plotted and displayed in the MUDAC.
Field monitoring data including gamma, gamma plus, beta, and air sample measurements, were recorded and posted on a variety of status boards and data point reports. Six air samples vere collected during the exercise play, three by the SS field teams and 'three by the NA State field teams. The three air samples collected by the SS were brought to the EOF for counting and the three air samples collected by the HA field teams were counted in the field and then given to NSP for transport to the State laboratory for further analysis.
FEMA notes that the MUDAC had collected positive and negative verifications of plume measurements:
e.g., they knev where the plume was, where been based on ground deposition, and where it it had was going. The above referenced data point reports showing plume locations were available to the staff that prepared the ingestion advisory. Field teams were available to continue to track the plume. The near-term weather forecast did not call for any changes in existing conditions. In other words, the MUDAC had access to adequate information (in the field and from veather forecasts) to predict that the plume was going to continue to travel in a south easterly direction (section II on the plume EPZ map). Yet, the ingestion advisory was for an area out to 50 miles in an arc of 270 degrees.
There was no basis for the scope of this advisory.
In fact the evidence was that the plume would probably not leave the southeastern quadrant.
Past Issues Examined: '" I'88-5.
(see Appendix A for details).
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g6: Inadequate Information Transfer. Deficiency (S90-5) (I.10).
67
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE Evaluation: EOF staff an d State Representatives did not an accurate an d timely flow of ation with the WA EOC regarding accident The RAG staff devoted a large amount d d not sent to the WA EO ly.ma n . O ly dose rojections vere faxe o ro'ection 'dvh'xc was not. sent to the pro x e d the information that e 'ustified taking pro ec e ond 10 miles. Only two o f 10 l bey lo tio were faxed to the WA EOC. Also see open issue S88-4 in Appendix A.
Recomm endation:Assign an EOF taff staff member me e the task of providing Review and revise, if prov~de ~ntegra ted
~ ~
ro riate, approprxa e, SS notification e dose progec zons 6 10 miles {whole body & th yr oid) for a re e default: durations. Demonstrate capa z z ies remedial drill.
Issue g7: Inadecgxate capability and expert'se to make dose (S90-6) projections. Deficiency (I.8).
Evaluation: EOC RAG did not demonstrate an understanding of the dose progec 'ections.
mons. The RAG did o the State decision makers a various dose prospect ons vere based upon measured parameters (exther p that the dose projections vere calcu a e o a sed release time" versus a progecte total release time as specxfze 'f'ed byy the state's PAGs and procedures.
- 2. The Washington State staff at the EOF did not stand the basis for the dose assessmen sment that a reed to. The MUDAC Coordinator selected an t, from the trailing edge of the p lume. The dose projection ase o point indicated low thyroi th roid dose (39 mrem a
'les. This dose projection (made at o su ort the existing PAs even though not. reflect the correc t. t, o t, a l integrated dose at 10 it did 68
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE m1'les Th'ose
~ is projection was reviewed by the State dose assessor in the MUQAC. The State assessor agreed to the dose projection without understanding the basis for the dose projection, i.e. where and when the air sample was collected.
An analysis of the available data would have t
zn d'xca e d th a this sample should not have been use d to generate the total integrated dose. The State dose assessor at MUDAC was awaree off the previous dose assessment t
progec e d 8.07 Rem to the Thyroid at 10 miles.
t (made at 1345)) that
.FEMA notes that, no one in HUDAC provided an o verall correlation and validation of dose projections with the field data.
- 3. Also see open issues S86-9 and S88-5 zn Appendix A.
Recommendation:Review staffing assia 'gnm ents the RAG and EOF.
Develop a system for certifying tha d'duals understand the parameters, th d logies strengths, weakness, etc. of the tvo dose projection systems. Provide trazniin g on the use of these dose projection systems and the use of field data to staff assigned to accident assessment functions at the WA EOC and the EOF. Demonstrate capabilities in a remedial drill.
Issue g8: Inadequate dose projection systems. Defzczency
~ ~
(S90-7) (I.10).
Evaluation: Federal guidance (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,Section I, Part D) states that ofRsite organizations should plan for a spectrum of accidents, including a spectrum of release characteristics'nd durations).
NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 (E.4.i) also states that the dose'rojection system should produce dose rates and integrated doses for 2, 5,, and 10 miles.
Washington State's accident, assessment methodology t'sing requires the development of integrated dose pro)ec 1ons us a three hour release default vhen no b e tter estimate of release time is available an the comparison of these dose prospection s to the State's PAGs (vhich represent a projected dose for the ct'ere whole release). Most of the 14 BEDPS based on real elapsed time (time of release to time of calculation). Integrated 69
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE
'I d ose from these projections was interpreted as the total dose for the release. Also see j issue S90-11 (page 67), and open'ssue S84-1 xn appendix A.
Recommendation:Establish a ro riate approp release default ta.me durations. Revise proce d uress too include these f ultss aand to require the operator to produce d eau dose projections consistent with the chosen release d f lt Train staff with accident assessment an PAR responsibilities to ensuree tthat the dose rojections are presented in the context of the release default and that comparisons between dose e made on a consistent basis.
Demonstrate capabilities in 'al a remedy'.a ri drill.
Objective Ill: Demonstrate the ability to make approprz.ate Protective Action Decisions, based on projected 'or shelter, evacuation time estimates and other relevant factors.
Evaluation: Net.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington demonstrated the abxlxty to make appropriate Protective Action Decisions based upon the information available to them.
The State of Washington analyzes protective actions t a k en by the counties.
co ncurrence or non-concurrence to th The State provides the counties. In th e case of non-concurrence, the Sttate will make a state protective acta. on recommendati 'on.
~ ~
- n. The State will make decisions regarding protective actions to be implemented within the ingestion exposure EPZ.
As documented in FEMA's evaluation of objective 10, the state decision makers (executive group) received inadequate analysis and briefings from the state staff assigned to accident assessment concurring wz'th thee PAs for the plume exposure EPZ and the decision for the ingestxon exp advisory might have been different if the accident aff had roperly analyzed the data and properly displayed and briefed the ecision on the location, extent of coverage, andd directxon 70
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE of travel of the plume.
The decision makers in the EOC exhibited a good, consensus oriented decision making process. All appropriate agency representatives were present and, because of the infrared CRASH phone monitoring system, all were able to hear what PARs were made and the rationale for each. All were given the opportunity to ask questions and voice their opinion on the EOF PARs.
There was detailed discussion by the decision makers, especially on the KI PAR and agricultural advisory. They had been told by the RAG and facility representatives that iodine was not a problem in the release, and were understandably puzzled by the facility's decision to issue KI to its EWs and the recommendation that offsite EWs also take the drug. The executive table finally agreed with the facility KI PAR in order to avoid alarming offsite EWs who would know that KI had been ordered for the SS EWs. During the 1252 EOC briefing, the facility representative corrected the earlier statement to say that the plant had been at 15% power coming out, of an outage, but been a one day outage.
it had only The plant had been at 1004 power for about a month prior to this. Later in the exercise, considerable discussion preceded the State's advisory on agricultural products, again with input from Agriculture, Health and B/F Counties as to costs, effectiveness and areas to which the advisory. should apply.
An agricultural advisory was issued by the State issued in Press Release (PR) g4 and PR g5 (also WA EBS gl and WA EBS g2). This advisory recommended that farmers cover and store all harvested crops.
FEMA notes that perishable crops could have been adversely impacted by the delay in marketing. The advisory was not in accord with Federal guidance which states that precautionary actions (advisories) such as the placement of milk animals on stored feed & covered water is appropriate in those situations when "only dose projections" are available. Rather, "recommended actions that include the restrictions on movements of crops to market" should only be based upon laboratory data that confirms the presence of radiation.
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE In spite of the lengthy discussion, the advisory in its final form was poorly worded and confusing.
See our evaluation of Objectives 13 and 14 below.
The executive group questioned a proposed B/F County decision to let farmers back in to retrieve crops and gave cogent reasons to oppose the decision. The Counties decided not to proceed with this decision and this was noted in the WA EOC during the 1252 briefing.
In general, the decision makers knew their authority and considered relevant information. As stated above, FEMA's concern is with the inadequate analysis and briefings made by, the State. staff assigned to accident assessment functions.
Past Issues Examined: J~~v : S87>>2; : S87-3. (see Appendix A for details) .
Current Exercise Issues: None.
Objective f13: Demonstrate the ability to coordinate the formulation and dissemination of accurate information and instructions to the public in a timely fashion after the initial alert and notification has occurred.
Evaluation: Not Met.
Narrative Summary: See Objective f14 below.
Objective f14: Demonstrate the ability to brief the media in an accurate, coordinated and timely manner.
Evaluation: Not Met.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington did demonstrate the ability to coordinate the formulation and dissemination of emergency information and emergency instructions.
The State did not always provide the emergency information in a timely manner. The State did not brief the media in an accurate and timely manner.
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE
'I The State of Washington issued five press releases, two EBS messages and conducted one news 'conference during the exercise. All activity occurred at the WA EOC because, due to airport closure, the State' JIC team was ,unable to fly to Richland to participate at the JZC. One DOH representative did appear at the JIC news conferences g2 and g3, but added 7a).
little substantive information (see Table Press release (PR) g1 announced that the WA EOC was being activated. This PR was issued at 0920 and was well coordinated with other agencies. PR g2 reported on the Governor's declaration of emergency and was released at 1040. PR g3 took an extremely long time to be issued as the situation changed. It it kept being revised as was finally available at about 1251, and informed the public that Washington field teams had been dispatched to the WNP-2 site.
PA g4, issued at 1300, covered the agricultural advisories. PR g5 was a reworked version of PR f4 containing the correct information on the State' agricultural advisory. PRs g4 and g5 spoke of releases from the plant and actions to take. Later in the text is the comment that those actions were in anticipation of possible movement of the release beyond the current evacuation zone. This should perhaps be presented earlier in the text as well, in order to prevent misunderstandings by the public from a partially heard'r read text.
The press briefing was originally scheduled for 1200, but kept being postponed until it finally began at 1337. The press briefing covered the extent of emergency response activities and covered the State's agriculture advisory. PR g 4 was distributed to the media at the press briefing. PR 4 was recalled during the press briefing {at about 1400) with an explanation that it contained an error and would be reissued to the press in correct form. FEMA notes that the briefing contained some incorrect information, such as when it was announced that school children were being evacuated to all three assistance centers that had been established. In reality, school children were moved only to Isaac Stevens. It was also announced that evacuation was still in progress when it had been completed over an hour before the briefing began.
73
0 EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE The two EBS messages covered the agricultural advisory issued by the state and were essentially the texts of PR g4 and PR PS modified for broadcast. The procedure for airing the broadcast was explained in detail and the message was actually read, but not transmitted over the air.
Although the text was somewhat confusing, the operation seemed well executed.
We noted that there was a person assigned to update the status board in the WEIC dissemination room and this was done very well. However, there is still a problem with getting information it appears that to the dissemination area in a timely fashion.
Although PA g3, which included evacuation, had been agreed to at 1124, the dissemination group was still being briefed by their chief at 1157 that evacuation was under consideration.
Past Issues Examined: 1ISSW" I'O89-1.
(see Appendix A for details).
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g9: Inadequate briefing of the media. ARCA (G.3.a; G.4.b).
(S90-8)
Evaluation: Only one press briefing was held by the State. The manner in which PR g 4 was discussed and recalled could have confused the media. Inaccurate information was also provided to the media during the briefing.
Recommendation:Hold press briefings early and often. Train staff.
Issue f10: Inadequate information and instructions. ARCA (S90-9) (E.7 & G.4.6).
Evaluation: PR g4 was partially recalled. PR g5 was issued in its place, but it was confusing and also PR g4 was necessary to fully understand PR g5. The state' EBS messages could have been misconstrued as to 74
0 4
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE whether it was an advisory or a recommendation.
Recommendati'on:Review and revise,, if appropriate, boilerplate releases and EBS message texts. Train staff. on their use.
Issue g11: Information to Dissemination Group was not (S90-10) always current. ARCA (G. 4'.b) .
Evaluation: Although PA g3, which included evacuation, had been agreed to at 1124, the dissemination group was still being briefed by their chief at 1157 that evacuation was under consideration.
Recommendation:Train staff to update dissemination group as soon as possible after a new PA or other relevant information is available.
Objective t15: Demonstrate the ability to establish and operate rumor control in a coordinated and timely fashion.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington demonstrated the ability to establish and operate rumor control in a coordinated and timely manner.
The WEIC and Rumor Control section were activated at 0845. The WEIC dissemination room had four telephone operators, a unit supervisor, a technical representative and a status board maintenance person. Periodic briefings were given to dissemination staff by the Unit Supervisor, WEIC Manager and Assistant Manager.
The Rumor Control staff secured information on current events by observing the status. board and receiving copies of news releases, and by monitoring a closed ciicuit television located in the dissemination room.
The Rumor Control staff did provide best available information to callers in a prompt manner. When staff received calls of a. technical nature, or on areas on which they had no information, they sought the unit supervisor. See S90-10 (page 74) 75
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE regarding timeliness of information provided to Rumor Control. Of the 30 calls received during the exercise, 28 were answered correctly.
Message logs were kept of all inquiries both from the media and the public.
Past Issues Examined: S89-5g : None. (see Appendix A for details).
Current'xercise Issues: None.
Objective f16: Demonstrate the ability to make the decision to recommend the use of KI to Emergency Workers and institutionalized persons, based on predetermined criteria, as well as to distribute and administer it once the decision is made, radioiodine releases.
if necessitated by Evaluation:
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington demonstrated the ability to make the decision to recommend KI to EWs.
At the plant, initial readings in containment and on the turbine deck and a release of radioactive material at 1010 prompted the SS RM to recommend that KI be taken by the SS EWs. The decision was made at 1018. The three SS teams were instructed to take KI at 1023 and all three teams confirmed the simulated ingestion of KI. At 1057, the DOE offsite Technical Director instructed the DOE team to take KI.
The decision to recommend KI for state and county EWs rests with the State Health Officer. The Executive Group at the WA EOC heard the SS recommendation to take'I at 1018. They were confused by this recommendation because the plume information they had received indicated that little or no iodine was present at that time. At 1035, the decision was made to recommend KI for state and county workers for "psychological reasons" and for the sake of consistency of PAs. We note that the 76
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE instruction to take KI was not received by the WA field teams until much later (see discussion on page 50-51). No discussion of institutional use of KI was noted.
WA FT f1 simulated the administration of KI to'ach of the 3 members within one minute of the time the request to take KI was received at 1151. The team noted the time and used the standard form in their kits to record the necessary, information. The team's kits were examined and found to contain an adequate supply of KI with an expiration date of October 1990. .About 20 minutes prior to the instruction to take KI, the team had discussed whether or not KI should be taken. However they concluded that they had no basis for this given that they had not found any detectable radiation levels nor confirmation that the reported release contained any radioiodine.
WA FT g2 was directed to take Kl at 1230. At this time the team had not encountered the plume and they delay'ed taking KI until they first, encountered the plume at about 1235. The time and dose were recorded on the proper form.
The MUDAC received data that indicated that iodine was present in the release. Dose projections were made and verbally passed on to the State EOC. An initial calculation indicated about 5 rem to the thyroid at the site boundary. Another calculation indicated 25 rem. The State's Protective Action Guide for administrating KI is expressed as a radioiodine air concentration (1.4 x 10 'Ci/cc).
The federal PAG is 25 rem to the thyroid (adult).
The dose projection systems produces projected child thyroid doses, not calculated adult thyroid exposures.
Past Issues Examined: There were no past. issues for this objective.
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g12 KI decision process. ARCA ( J.10. f) .
(S90-11) 77
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE I
Evaluation The State's KI decision process was not followed.
The State's PAG for KI is not expressed as a projected dose to the thyroid. The State'. dose projection system does not produce projected doses for adult thyroid exposure.
Recommendation:Revise State PAG (Table 2, Appendix A, DOH procedures) for KI exposure to include a projected dose figure for thyroid (expressed as an adult exposure). Develop a process for converting current child thyroid dose projections into adult dose projections. Revise KI decision process.
Revise plans. Train staff.
Objective f26: Demonstrate the ability to identify the need and call upon Federal and other outside support agencies assistance.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: The State of Washington demonstrated the ability to identify the need for and call upon federal and other outside agencies support.
At the WA EOC, the, executive group recognized the need for federal assistance at about 1135. The Assistant Director of WA DEM called FEMA Region X (represented by the control cell) at 1148 and requested five monitoring teams, three mobile laboratories and three aerial monitoring planes.
A message back to the WA EOC indicated that these resources would be available to the state by 1200 the following day.
We note that the WA EOC also requested aircraft support from WSP and the Washington National Guard (WNG). The WSP plane was used to take key people to Richland, and the WNG planes remained on standby at Olympia airport..
Washington DOH needs to recognize that DOE field teams will not enter the plume. This may impact how WA field teams are deployed (e.g. use DOE FTs for confirming absence of radiation in areas of non-deposition).
78
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR WASHINGTON STATE Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for. this objective.
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue f13: Use of Federal technical assistance. ARCA (S90-12) (C.Z..a).
Evaluation: DOE-RL field team procedures prohibit FT members from entering the plume. This 'may impact how WA field teams are deployed (e.g. use DOE FTs for confirming absence of radiation in areas of non-deposition).
Recommendation:Review and revise procedures to indicate that technical federal assistance (radiological monitoring teams) has restrictions [for plume monitoring] on the mission that they will accept.
Train staff.
79
2 2 EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR BENTON/FRANKLIN COUNTIES Objective gl: Demonstrate the ability to monitor, understand and use emergency classification levels (ECL) through the appropriate implementation of emergency functions and activities corresponding to ECLs as required by the scenario. The four ECLs are:
Notification of Unusual Event, Alert, Site Area Emergency (SAE) and General Emergency (GE).
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability to monitor, understand and use emergency classification levels (ECL) through the appropriate implementation of emergency functions and activities corresponding to ECLs as required by the scenario.
The EOC was notified by the Supply System (SS) of the ECLs as follows:
NOUE 0830 ALERT 0849 SAE 1008 GE 1022 ECLs were announced in the EOC and also displayed on the status boards so that all staff were aware of the current ECL. The ECL functions and activities were implemented in a manner consistent with their plan.
Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
Current Exercise Issues: None.
Objective g2: Demonstrate the ability to fully alert, mobilize and activate personnel for both facility and field-based emergency functions.
Evaluation: Met.
80
EXERCISE EVALUATION, FOR B/F COUNTIES Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability to fully alert, mobilize; and activate personnel for both facility and field-based emergency functions.
'At the B/F EOC Calls to notify offsite response organizations were completed by the 911 dispatch center using the written call list specified in the County procedures. The staff was alerted in a timely manner; calls were completed in 10 minutes for initi'al notification (NOUE) and eight minutes for activation call out (Alert).
As specified in the County procedures, three Commissioners were automatically dispatched to other locations. One Commissioner and support staff were sent, to the JIC and two were sent to the EOF.
In the Field Emergency field personnel consisted of the FC Sheriff's department, school evacuation units, mobility impaired evacuation units, Columbia River route alerting units, and WA Department of Wildlife route alerting units.
Calls to notify offsite organizations were coipleted by the 911 dispatcher in the B/F EOC using the written call list as specified in the B/F procedures (IP-1). The WA Department of Wildlife agents did not receive notification from the WSP in Yakima, who were merely simulating all notifications and response functions. Instead the agents established contact with the FC Sheriff's dispatch for instructions to begin route alerting of the Wahluke wildlife area. All other field staff were alerted in a timely manner and mobilized promptly.
All relevant functions and activities were implemented in a manner that was consistent. with the organization's emergency plan and procedures.
Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
EXERCZSE EVALUATZON FOR B/F COUNTZES Current Exercise Zssues: None.
Objective g3: Demonstrate the ability to=direct, coordinate and control emergency activities.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: nton B en and Franklin Counties "demonstrated the ability to direct, coordinate, and contro l emergency activities.
The Emergency Chairman in the B/F EOC was effectively in 'charge of emergency response. The Decision Group was fully involved in the decision making process. This group consisted of the Emergency Chairman, one County Commissioner and the Emergency Management Directors of Benton and Franklin Counties. Periodic briefings were held by the Chairman to update staff on the status of the emergency. The Emergency Chairman effectively coordinated all PA decisions as well as the implementation of the decisions with the EOF, WA EOC, and ZZC. During the during the EOC briefings, the Chairman. failed to emphasize that the PAs were County decisions and not the utility recommendations. There was only one EOC staff briefing (at 1210) in which a representative of each agency updated the other EOC staff on their agency's emergency response activities.
Separate message logs were kept for all incoming and outgoing messages and transmissions. Copies of the plan and procedures were available to and used by the EOC staff.
Past Zssues Examined: ~ There were no past issues for this objective.
82
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g1: Inadequate briefings. ARCA (A.2.a).
(C90-12)
Evaluation: The Emergency Chairman did not emphasize that actions discussed during his briefings were the Counties'As, not the utility's recommendations.
With one exception, the Chairman did not provide for two way briefings in which -agency staff could report on the responses of their agencies.
Recommendation:Two way.briefings should be provided on a regular basis. Review and appropriate. Train staff.
revise procedures,
. if Objective f4: Demonstrate the ability to communicate with all appropriate locations, organizations and field personnel.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability to communicate with all appropriate locations, organizations and field personnel.
At the B/F EOC The EOC had the following communications equipment:
five telephone lines and a facsimile machine. In the Communications Center adjacent to the EOC there were VHF/UHF public. service radios, ham radio, HF, VHF, and UHF digital teletype machine, an EBS radio and a CHEM net radio. This equipment was available to communicate with the EOF, WA EOC, County public safety organizations, WSP, ham radio net, state CHEMNET, DOE and various support agencies..
The primary communications systems were able to handle traffic without delay. Backup radio systems were not used during the exercise but were tested and all worked in a satisfactory manner.
We note that the CB radio mentioned in the County 83
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES plan was not available at the EOC.
In the Field Field radio communications were by two way radio on the FC Sheriff Department net and School District 81 transportation net. Telephone communication between the EOC and the field dispatch centers was available and used.
Past Issues Examined: ~~v A
- C88-2; for details).
- None. (see Appendix Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g2: No CB radio in the B/F EOC. ARFI (F).
Evaluation: The Plan specifies a CB radio in the EOC. The CB radio is missing.
Recommendation:Add CB radio to the EOC communications equipment or delete plan reference.
t Objective g5:
Evaluation:
Demonstrate the adequacy of facilities, equipment, displays and other materials to support emergency operations.
Met.
Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the adequacy of facilities, equipment, displays and other materials to support emergency operations.
The physical facility and components at the EOC are sufficient to support emergency operations.
Adequate office equipment and administrative supplies were available. Sleeping and complete kitchen facilities were not available and deemed not necessary since the EOC is outside the 10 mile EPZ. Off duty staff can leave the facility and food can be sent out for.
Adequate maps were available. The following maps, status boards and displays were used during the 84
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES exercise:. plume EPZ, evacuation routes, ingestion EPZ, ECL status, PA decisions, incident status log and wind speed and direction. ~ The data/dose projection chart was not used during the exercise but was demonstrated during the participants meeting on 9/13/90. All displays were updated in a
.timely manner. The relevant functions and activities were conducted in accordance with the plan.
Past, Issues Examined: ~v : CSS-3; PP" for details).
Current Exercise Issues: None.
Objective g6: Demonstrate the ability to continuously'monitor and control Emergency Worker exposure.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability to continuously monitor and control Emergency Worker exposure at, all observed field locations.
EWs are responsible for self monitoring. All EWs reviewed appropriate procedures and carried the correct dosimetry.
The EW kits which contained the dosimetry were well thought out and conveniently put together. The kit was contained in a 5" x 8" 3-ring binder.
tabs for instructions, maps, record keeping card It had and a plastic envelope containing one 0-20 R dosimeter', one TLD, one bottle of KI tablets and a reference sheet on KI.
The Wildlife Agents procedures (IP-14) are inconsistent in terms of what to do when 5 r dose is reached. Pg 4, item 11 of IP-14 tells the agent to report to an EW Center if a 5 r dose is reached.
Pg 5 item 4 tells the agent to pick up a EW kit and follow procedure IP-19. IP-19 tells EWs to call the EOC for further instructions if a 5 r dose is 85
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES reached. IP-14 should their post until they have
~ tell ENs to abandon received authorization from the EOC.
Past Issues Examined: Resolved: C88<<4; Unresolved: None. (.see Appendix A for Details).
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g3: Inconsistent EN procedures. ARCA (K.3.a).
(C90-13)
Evaluation: The Wildlife Agents procedures (IP-14) are inconsistent in terms of what to do when 5 r dose is reached. Pg 4,. item 11 of IP-14 tells 'agent to report to a EW Center if a 5 r dose is'reached.
5 item 4 tells the agent to pick up a EW kit and Pg follow procedure IP-19. IP-19 tells ENs to call the EOC for further instructions reached.
if a 5 r dose is This is the correct instruction.
Recommendation:Revise IP-14 to make it consistent with IP-19.
Objective f11: Demonstrate the ability to make appropriate Protective Action Decisions, based on projected or actual dosage, EPA PAG's, availability of adequate shelter, evacuation time estimates and other relevant factors.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability to make appropriate Protective Action Decisions.
The Decision Group consisted of the Emergency Chairman, County Commissioners and the Emergency Management Directors of Benton and Franklin Counties. This group made three PA decisions.
Based on the first PAR from the EOF at 1008, the decision for evacuation of the Columbia River (PAD 86
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES
¹1) was made at 1014., When the ECL status changed from Site Area Emergency to General Emergency, PAD
¹2 was adopted. This involved, in addition to continuation of PAD ¹1, the sheltering in Section 2 from 0 to 5 miles and use of KI by EWs. Finally, PAD ¹3 was issued which involved evacuation, of Section 1, 0 to 5 miles, Section 2, 0 to 10 miles, and the evacuation of the three schools within the EPZ.
Preplanned PAs concerning institutionalized, transit dependent and handicapped persons were implemented as per procedures. The Decision Group also considered such relevant factors as economic effects of PAs in its decision making process.
Price Anderson Act information was given to EOC staff for their use.
We note- that the Decision Group did not have representatives from the FC Sheriff or BC Sheriff's offices or from the Health Department as indicated in IP-2, Attachment B of the B/F procedures.
Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
Current Exercise Issues: None.
Objective ¹12: Demonstrate the ability to initially alert the public within the 10-mile EPZ and begin dissemination of an instructional message within 15 minutes of a decision by appropriate state and/or officials.
Evaluation:, Met.
Benton & Franklin Counties will demonstrate route alerting along the Columbia River (at least four boats will be targets for alerting); Benton 6 Franklin Counties will activate the four sirens (to be in sequence and within 15 minutes from receipt of with SAE) and broadcast the exercise EBS message; radio station KONA will broadcast its normal test EBS message upon request of the B/F EOC; the Department of Wildlife will demonstrate alerting (as described in IP-14) and City of Richland will not be expected to perform route alerting of the Horn 87
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES Rapids areas.
Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability to initially alert the public within the 10-mile EPZ and begin dissemination of an instructional message within 15 minutes of a decision by appropriate officials. Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability to perform route alerting along the Columbia River within 45 minutes.
At the B/F EOC The County's procedures require them to broadcast an instructional message to the public within 15 minutes of making a protective action decision.
PAD gl (See Table 5 for the content of the three PADs issued during the exercise) was made at 1014 at the B/F EOC. The sirens were activated at 1017.
At 1029 EBS fl was issued.
PAD g2 was made at 1044. EBS g2 was broadcast by KONA at 1049. No mention of the ORV Park closure was included in this message.
PAD g3 was made at 1124 in the B/F EOC. EBS g3 was broadcast at 1134.
The County met the 15 minute criterion (time from decision to EBS broadcast) for all three PAs.
FEMA noted some discussion and confusion between the Communications Center, the PIO, and the Emergency Chairman . over siren activation confirmation. There was some discussion and confusion on whether the EBS broadcast should be postponed until siren activation confirmation was received. The County dispatch procedures contain a step that calls for confirmation that the sirens have sounded. There is no mention of this requirement in the County PIO procedures. The County PIO has the responsibility for effecting the EBS broadcast. The four sirens are designed to alert the transients on the Columbia River within five miles of the WNP-2 facility.
88
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES In the Field The Hanford Patrol flight-, crew was notified to perform route alerting along the Columbia River at 1012. Using the DOE helicopter, route alerting along the River was demonstrated by contacting four boats identified as exercise participants and informing these individuals that due to the accident at WNP-2 they should return to their launch point and tune to 610 AM .for 'EBS instructions. Columbia River route alerting was completed at 1039, well within the 45 minute time frame allowed for notification in low population areas.
The Hanford Patrol and the Benton County Sheriff's Office mobilized and deployed boats as part of the Columbia River route alerting process. The purpose of the boats is to establish access control on the river at the 10 mile points on the north and south side of the plume EPZ.
Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g4: Siren and EBS activation Procedural inadequacies..
(C90-14) ARCA (E.6).
Evaluation: There are . inconsistencies between the dispatch procedures (IP-1) and the PXO procedures (IP-8).
The Emergency Chairman's procedures (IP-4) are not specific regarding siren activation and EBS broadcasts. FEMA notes that the siren activation is only for the Columbia River alerting. All appropriate procedures should be revised to ind'icate that a time will be specified for the activation of the sirens and EBS broadcast and that the responsible parties will ensure that both the siren activation and the broadcast. of the EBS message are in effect at the specified time.
89
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES Recommendation:Revise procedures to ensure consistency regarding EBS implementation. Train staff.
Objective $ 13: Demonstrate the ability to coordinate the formulation and dissemination of accurate information and instructions to the public in a timely fashion after the initial alert and notification has occurred.
Evaluation: Met.
Benton and Franklin Counties will broadcast appropriate EBS messages in both English and Spanish.
Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability to coordinate the formulation and dissemination of accurate information and instructions to the public 'in a timely fashion after the initial alert and notification had occurred.
B/F EOC is the location where public instructions are formulated and disseminated. EBS messages were produced in both English and Spanish after PADs were announced by the Emergency Chairman.
The text of EBS g2 required employers (mostly farmers) to shelter employees indoors; The capability to effect shelter of the employees may not exist during the harvest season. Evacuation may be a more appropriate instruction since sufficient inside space may be lacking in many farm areas.
The English language EBS texts were complete and consistent with the PADs. However, EBS g3 'in Spanish was not consistent with PADs identified in the English version of PAD g3. The Spanish version omitted the following information: Items to take with you when evacuating; warn others who may not have heard the instructions of the need to evacuate; secure homes and businesses; what actions to take if you need transportation'ssistance; Actions to take while evacuating; Services provided at Red Cross Shelters.
90
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES Past Issues Examined: $ ~~v : C88-5; C88-7; Appendix A for details) .
C89-1; (see Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g5: Inappropriate EBS Instructions. ARCA (E.7).
(C90-15)
Evaluation: PAD g2 required residents to shelter themselves and their employees, if appropriate. The prescripted shelter text of the EBS message advises persons, who have family or employees outdoors, to direct those persons to come indoors. Evacuation may be a more appropriate instruction since sufficient inside space may be lacking in many areas.
Recommendation:Revise EBS message text regarding sheltering (part 7). 'EMA recommends that the following sentence be substituted for the current second sentence in part 7: "If you have family or employees who are out-of-doors and who do not have immediate access to shelter, direct them to evacuate the area". In other words, the text should advise persons to evacuate [for a shelter PA]
shelter is not available.
if immediate access to Issue g6: Incomplete Spanish EBS message. ARCA (E.5).
(C90-16)
Evaluation: The Spanish version of EBS g3 omitted the following information: Items to take with you when evacuating; warn others who may not have heard the instructions of the'need to evacuate; secure homes and businesses; what, actions to take if transportation assistance; Actions to take while you need evacuating; Services provided at Red Cross Shelters. It is not clear to FEMA whether the blocks on. the message form were not checked or whether the spokesperson misread the text.
Recommendation:Prerecording EBS messages (in order to eliminate possible reading or preparation errors). Revise plan and procedures. Train staff.
91
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTXES Objective gl4: Demonstrate the ability to brief the media in an accurate, coordinated, and timely manner.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability to brief the media in an accurate, coordinated, and timely manner.
Press releases from the SS and the State were received and available in the,EOC. The press releases received (faxed copies) from the JIC were sometimes incomplete and garbled and were not consistently available for others to view in the EOC. E.
Benton and Franklin Counties participated in the three press briefings which were held at the SS JXC. The County Commissioner, who was the spokesperson for the counties, did an excellent job of summarizing- the Counties responses to the emergency. He was able to provide details on what actions had been taken, and the times that began or had been completed. See Table 7a these'ctions for a synopsis of the three JXC press briefings.
The JIC served as a central point where information from various sources was coordinated, and where designated spokesperson briefed the media. The JXC is the location where the Benton and Franklin Counties press releases are prepared and disseminated. The JIC is also a location where telephone teams answer questions from the media and the public.
Benton and Franklin County PIOs stationed at the JIC effectively coordinated the formulation and dissemination of public information. The JIC staff had access to current and accurate information and produced six press releases during the exercise.
The staff at the JXC obtained information from the PXO at the County EOC. Prescripted information releases were utilized to formulate the news releases. Protective actions were appropriately supported by specific instructions and related information. Before issuing news releases, the 92
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES PIOs received authorization to release the information from the Emergency Chairman and the PIO at the B/F EOC.
A log was maintained by the PIOs at the JIC, but this log did not reflect all of the times at which
'news releases were issued.
The answers provided in response to the calls placed to the JIC media team were for the most part
'accurate. The responses appeared to be reasonable and would not have caused additional uncertainty on the part of the media callers.
Past Issues Examined: ~~v : C89-2; A for details).
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g7: Incomplete PIO log at the JIC. ARCA (Q.3.a).
(C90-17)
Evaluation: A log was maintained by the PIOs at the JIC, but this log did not reflect all of the times at which news releases were issued.
Recommendation:Train staff.
Objective f15: Demonstrate the ability to establish and operate rumor control in a coordinated and timely fashion.
Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability to establish and operate rumor control in a coordinated and timely fashion.
The JIC had two phone numbers dedicated to the Rumor Control function. These numbers were publicized during news conferences and in press releases. Ten or more phone lines were available for rumor control use, but only four were used for the exercise.
93
EXERCISE EUALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES The JIC/Rumor Control staff secured information on r nt events by observing press conferences on closed circuit TV, reading press releases issueed b y the various organizations involved in the emergency response, listening to briefings by the Information Manager, and reading the status board posting.
The Rumor Control staff at the JIC did provide ava1'lable a and responsive information to callers in a prompt manner. Most, of the calls were a nswered rrectly Calls asking for transportation as sistance were referred to the B/F EOC. C. The largest source of error among the responses to the calls was the failure of the Rumor Control staff to adequately dispel the rumor that the protestors were terrorists who were responsible for the escalation of the emergency beyond the ALERT level.
FEMA notes that this rumor was the onsite response organization's responsibility.
Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
Current Exercise Issues: None.
Objective f16: Demonstrate the ability to make the decision to recommend the use of KI to Emergency Workers and institutionalized persons, based on predetermined criteria, as well as to distribute and administer it once the decision is made, radioiodine releases.
if necessitated y Evaluation: Met.
Narrative Summary:. Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the capabilities to distribute and administer KI. Some of the EWs did not receive the recommendation to administer KI. FEMA notes that, the State of Washington has the responsibility for decision making regarding KI.
F ran kl'ounty z.n Sheriff's deputies received the instruction to take KI at about 1128. p procedures were demonstrated by both mobile units.
94
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES Other EWs (with the exception of WA field teams, which are discussed in the state section of this report), did not take KI. The Columbia River route alerting, team completed their required actions prior to the KI decision. The remaining EWs (Washington State Department of Wildlife, Benton and Franklin County school and mobility impaired bus drivers) never received the KI notification.
This was the result of the failure of the transportation coordinator, and in the case of the Wildlife Agents, the WSP, to notify these people to take KI. Interviews with these EWs revealed that they were familiar with KI procedures, including recommended dosage and potential side effects.
Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g8: Some EWs did not receive KI instructions. ARCA (C90-18) (J.10.e).
Evaluation: Benton and Franklin Counties school and mobility impaired bus drivers never received the KI notification. The Transportation Coordinator's procedure (IP-5) states that the Transportation Coordinator is the main point of contact with the school districts, including the transportation supervisors of the school districts. Attachment B of IP-5 does contain a- note that requests the Transportation Coordinator to confirm that ?us drivers have taken their KI. This attachment does not contain a specific step requiring the Transportation Coordinator to advise -the bus driveis through the school districts that they should take KI. An overall interpretation of IP-5 is that it is implied that the Transportation Coordinator should do so.
Recommendation:Review & revise procedures to include a specific step requiring the Transportation coordinator to advise the school districts'us drivers to take KI when a KI decision is made. Train staff.
95
0
~
~
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES Objective gl8: Demonstrate the ability and resources necessary to implement appropriate Protective Actions for the impacted permanent and transient plume EPZ population (including transit-dependent persons, special needs populations, handicapped persons and institutionalized persons).
Evaluation: Met.
Scenario will call 'for two mobility impaired persons to request transportation assistance. B/F EOC wil1 dispatch resources to the requested location and simulate the transport to EWAC (no persons will be moved, vehicle will run route to EWAC).
Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability and resources necessary to implement appropriate Protective Actions for the impacted permanent plume EPZ population. FEMA recommends that additional planning be conducted in order to be able to provide prompt evacuation of mobility impaired persons. . FEMA also recommends that the data base of mobility impaired persons be updated.
At the B/P ROC The Transportation Coordinator at the B/F EOC activated the system for assessing and providing transportation support to handicapped, transit-dependent, institutionalized, and special needs groups. In a real emergency, the Transportation Coordinator would use Attachment E of IP-5 to call and assess the needs of the known mobility impaired person'. For this exercise, calls were made to and from the control cell. Delays were encountered in calling the Control Cell because of the number of lines available. When a valid request came in, the Transportation Coordinator requested transportation assistance from the appropriate school district.
FEMA notes that the requests for assistance (per the extent of play agreement) were to represent actual mobility impaired persons from the existing data base. Communications with emergency workers in the field was from the Transportation Coordinator through the Bus Transportation Supervisor by telephone, then from the Bus Supervisor to the drivers via two-way radio.
96
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES In the Field At 1049 Pasco School District g1. Transportation Dispatch was notified by B/F EOC to be on alert for evacuation of special populations. Six wheelchair/lift buses were available and ready to
'be put into service. All district bus drivers are routinely cross-trained to operate these special buses. Office and vehicle maintenance personnel are also authorized drivers. At least six drivers were available onsite at the time of the call. This school district transports five wheelchair students on a daily basis. A current, roster of all drivers and phone numbers was available..
The B/F EOC Transportation Coordinator requested a Mobility Impaired (MI) bus be dispatched at 1118 to pick up a MI resident. The 'esident to be transported needed a stretcher which made it an inappropriate referral because the buses are not designed to carry stretchers. The bus driver realized the problem and raised the question with the bus dispatcher. It was decided that the bus could be used to carry a stretcher. In the process of trying to locate the address, it was determined from the family that the resident had died one and a half years previously. In accordance with the extent of play agreement, it was assumed that the pickup was made and the bus transported the simulated evacuee to Stevens EWAC.
A second bus was,dispatched to another MI location.
The second address was not found,'probably because of a 'ontrol cell error. However, another individual on the Special Needs Population List, whose address was near that, provided (as part of the exercise), was known to the bus driver to have moved out of the area about a year ago. Once again
,it was assumed that the pickup had been made, and the process of transporting this resident to Stevens EWAC was then simulated.
We noted that the Pasco School District bus dispatcher indicated that she doesn', remember ever seeing the B/F emergency plan and did not have a copy of the plan or checklist available (IP-18, Evacuation Transportation Function). She stated that she was not aware of PADs nor did she ask for situation updates. On the other hand, no 97
0 EXERCISE 'EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES information was offered by the B/F EOC Transportation Coordinator.
The Special Needs Population Data Base needs to be available to the bus dispatchers and drivers to insure verified special instructions are available to all concerned. Simple route maps or directions used in conjunction with the addresses would have prevented delays and confusion during this exercise. For example, the driver encountered one lane bridge with unknown weight capacity, and an area with no obvious house numbers on homes.
Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g9: Incomplete plans for Nobility Impaired persons.
(C90-19) ARCA (J.10.d & g).
Evaluation: Exercise play demonstrated that the Special Needs Database (IP-5 Attach. E) was inaccurate since listed at least two people who no longer lived in it the area. Exercise play demonstrated that the bus drivers had some difficulty finding addresses and that route instructions and maps would improve the ability of the school district to provide timely evacuation.
Recommendation:Review and update the Special Needs Population Data Base (FEHA notes that annual updates of the data base including verification are required). Develop maps and route instructions for the bus drivers to follow when locating and transporting mobility impaired persons. Revise procedures. Train Staff.
Issue g10: No procedures for bus dispatcher. ARFI Evaluation: We noted that the Pasco School District bus dispatcher indicated that she doesn't remember ever seeing the B/F emergency plan and did not have a copy of the plan or checklist available (IP-18, Evacuation Transportation Function). She stated that she was not aware of FADs nor did she ask for 98
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES situation updates. On the other hand, no information was offered by . the B/F EOC Transportation Coordinator.
Recommendation:Provide proper procedures.
Objective f19: Demonstrate the ability and resources necessary to implement appropriate Protective Actions for school children within the plume EPZ.
Evaluation: Met.
B/F EOC will dispatch a bus to one school to demonstxate driver's knowledge of route, ENAC location, EW kit and communication procedure.
Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties demonstrated the ability and resources necessary to implement appropriate Protective Actions for school children within the plume EPZ.
At the B/F EOC The B/F EOC Transportation Coordinator contacted the three schools in the plume EPZ and the School Bus Supervisor and placed them on alert at about 0850.
staff It needed was to determined be moved that 380 from these students and schools if there was a PA. Resources available included 40 buses with capacity for 2,800 riders plus eight specially equipped buses. The Transportation Coordinator was instructed to notify the school of the order to evacuate at 1100. The Cooxdinator got through to Edwin Markham School at about 1104. The other two schools (Country Christian and Country Haven) could not be reached until 1126 because the control cell number used to simulate calls to these schools was busy until that time. Communication to the Bus Supervisor was not a problem, nor was communication from the Supervisor to the drivers.
In the Field One bus was driven to Edwin Markham school and from there to Stevens ENAC, simulating the evacuation of students . At 10SO the Pasco School District gl 99
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNT1'ES Bus Garage received a call from the B/F EOC asking for a bus to be sent to Edwin Markham School to standby for possible evacuation of. students. At 1101, the bus driver made a radio check in his bus and then left for the school. The bus arrived at Edwin Markham at 1122, departed at 1127 and arrived at Isaac Stevens ENAC at 1153.
The Bus Dispatcher did not have access to a complete set of B/F County procedures and checklists. She was not aware of any 'lant conditions or PADs in effect (See Objective f18).
The attendance at the three schools in the EPZ is such that 12 buses can evacuate all students in one sweep. At least 40 buses were available on the day of the exercise.
Arrangements were made with FC Sheriff's Office (FCSO) to dispatch traffic control assistance to Edwin Markham School. Given the resources available to FCSO, and competing. requirements for staff at ACPs, river closure points, evacuation verification routes as well as normal police activities, it is questionable whether or not there would be adequate staff to assist in traffic control at Edwin Markham School.
Past Issues Examined: There were no past issues for this objective.
Current Exercise Issues: None.
Objective f20: Demonstrate the organizational ability and resources .necessary to control evacuation traffic flow and to control access to evacuated and sheltered areas.
Evaluation: Met.
City of Richland will deploy resources for closure of the Columbia River access; Franklin County will deploy resources for closure of the Columbia River at Ringold and Selph Landing; the two Franklin County vehicles will be redeployed to two access control points; and the two Franklin County vehicles will demonstrate evacuation verification patrol.
100
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES Narrative Summary: Benton and Franklin Counties (Sheriff's Offices as well as the Richland Police and WSP) demonstrated the organizational ability and resources necessary t trol evacuation traffic flow and to control access to evacuated and sheltered'reas with some exceptions.
The extent of play called for two FCSO officers to close the Columbia River access at Ringold and Selph landing. The RPD was to close the landing at Leslie Grove Park. All other ACP responsibilities were to bee simulated. After accomplished successfully.
These tasks were in thee performing above tasks, the FCSO officers were successfully redeployed to ACP F5 and F6. This involved travel across the plume path. Officers reported dosimeter readings to the B/F EOC.
The B/F procedures (IP-6) do not detail routes or the resources required to perform evacuation verification. As a result, it would be necessary to take time away from operations duties (during an emergency) to plan routes, determine necessary resources, prepare instructions and assignments, etc. The task of determining evacuation verification routes could be accomplished more effectively by pre-incident planning. This planning should address assistance to special populations (schools), possible alerting of farm field workers, areas of traffic congestion as well as locating transit-dependent persons. FEMA notes that the agencies performing these activities do not necessarily have to be public safety agencies.
FEMA notes that the WA Department of Wildlife entss agen did accomplish their assigned responsibility to establish access control for the Wahluk e wildlife area and that the Richland Police Department did promptly establish access control at Th e R'l the Leslie Grove Park (Columbia River closure).
xc a nd Police Department also dispatched (simulated) officers to evacuate the OR 0 V p ark without benefit of a protective action decision or coordinated EBS broadcast.
Past Issues Examined: gg.~v~: C88-9; 101
EXERCISE EVALUATION FOR B/F COUNTIES A for details) .
Current Exercise Issues:
Issue g11: Incomplete evacuation verification procedures.
(C90-20) ARCA (J.10.j).
Evaluation: Benton and Franklin Counties'rocedures do not specify evacuation verification routes. As a result, it is necessary to take time avay from operations duties and plan routes to provide observations on the status of the evacuation PAD.
The task of determining evacuation routes could be accomplished more effectively by pre incident planning.
Recommendation:Develop procedures for evacuation Revise procedures. Train staff.
verification'rocess.
C) 102
Page No.
12/07/90 3.1
SUMMARY
LISTING OF EXERCISE INADEQUACIES
'NP-2 EXERCISE -- WA STATE ISSUES DATE OF EXERCISE: 09/11/90 COMMITMENT DAT1 TRAC 0 OBJET LEVEL INADEQUACY FEMA RECOMMENDATION FOR CORRECTION S90-1 ARCA WA EOC was addressing requests Review and revise procedures, 09/30 / 91 for dose data to the MUDAC "
if appropriate. Train staff.
Coordinator. DOII procedures specify that communication with the EOF should be through the REM or RM (see Fig. 4-2 of DO)I procedures). A.2,a S90-2 4 ARCA For a period of time, fax Purchase equipment and data 09/30 / 91 messages from the EOF were not lines. Revise procedures and being received by the WA EOC. train staff.
The problem may have been due to the fact that the communications link consists of' single party line which links the EOF to many locations. There should be a dedicated system between the EOF and the state and local EOCs to allow for timely data transfer.
S90-3 7 ARCA The field teams did not report Train staff to follow DO)l 09/30 / 91 window open readings along procedures which instruct FTs with window closed readings to obtain open and closed while determining the window readings.
parameters of the plume until
page No.
12/07/90 3.1 SUHHARY LISTING OF EXERCISE INADEQUACIES WNP-2 EXERCISE -- WA STATE ISSUES DATE OF EXERCISE: 09/11/90 COhlhl I THENT DATE TRAC ¹ OBJ¹ LEVEL INADEQUACY ,FEHA RECOHHENDATION FOR CORRECTION the FTC requested them to do So.
S90-4 7 ARCA There is no procedure Revise procedures and train 09/30 / 91 instructing DON field teams to staff.
obtain ground level and waist level measurements (open and closed window) for ground deposition. PLANNING ISSUE S90-5 10. DEF Dose projections and field Assign an EOF staff member the 09/30 / 91 data collected were not sent task of providing hard copy to the WA EOC in an adequate data to the WA EOC until the WA and timely manner. Only 2 of Administrative Liaison arrives 17 dose projections were faxed at the EOF. Train the to the WA EOC. One of the Administrative Liaison to dose projections which was not continue this flow of data to sent to the EOC would have the EOC after arriving at the provided information that EOF.
would have justified taking PAs beyond 10 miles. Only 2 of Revise SS notification form to 10 plume location maps were provide integrated dose sent to the WA EOC. (I.10) projections for 5 and 10 miles (whole body and thyroid) for all default release durations.
Demonstrate capabilities in a remedial drill.
Page No.
12/07/90 3.1
SUMMARY
LISTING OF EXERCISE INADEQUACIES HNP-2 EXERCISE -- WA STATE ISSUES DATE OF EXERCISE: 09/11/90 COMMITMFNT DATE TRAC 0 OBJET LEVEL INADEQUACY FEMA RECOMMENDATION FOR CORRECTION S90-6 10 DEF .The WA EOC Radiological Review assignments for staff 09 /30/ 91 Assessment Group did not assigned to the RAG and EOF.
demonstrate an understanding Develop a system for certifying of'he RAG dose, projections that these people adequately sent by the EOF. understand the dose projection-State Decision Makers were not system in use.
briefed on the basis of the dose projection or that the Demonstrate capabilities -in a basis was different than that remedial drill.
specified by State procedures.
WA dose assessment staff at the EOF did not understand the basis for the final dose assessment based on field data. An air sample point from the trailing edge of the plume was used as the basisto support existing PAs.
This projection did not reflect thecorrect integrated dose at -10 miles. (I.S)
S90-7 10 DEF Inadequate dose projection Es tab 1 i sh appropriate re l ease 09/ 30/ 91 systems. The BEDPS defaul t time durations. Revise projections were based on real procedures to include these elapsed time (time of release defaults and to. require the
Page No.
12/07/90 3,1
SUMMARY
LISTING OF EXERCISE INADEQUACIES WNP-2 EXERCISE -- MA STATE ISSUES DATE OF EXERCISE: 09/11/90 COMMITMENT DATE TRAC 0 OBJET LEVEL INADEQUACY FEMA RECOMMENDATION FOR CORRECTION to time'of calculation). operator to produce dose Integrated dose from these projections consistent with the pro)ections were interpreted chosen release defaults.
as total dose of the release.
(I.10) Train staff with accident assessment and PAR duties to ensure that the dose pro)ections are presented in the context of the release default and that comparisons between dose projections are made on a consistent basis.
Demonstrate capabilities in a remedial drill.
S90-8 14 ARCA Inadequate media briefing. IIold press briefings early and 09/ 30/ 91 Only one .press briefing was often. Train staff.
held by the state. The manner in which PR 44 was discussed and then recalled with no replacement provided could have confused the media.
Inaccurate information was provided to the media during the briefing. (G.3.a)
S90-9 14 ARCA Inadequate information and Review boilerplate releases and 09/30 / 91
Page No.
12/07/90 3.1
SUMMARY
LISTING OF EXERCISE INADEQUACIES WNP-2 EXERCISE -- WA STATE ISSUES DATE OF EXERCISE: 09/11/90 COMMITMENT DATE TRAC s OBJs LEVEL INADEQUACY FEMA RECOMMFNDATION FOR CORRECTION instructions. PR*S4 was EBS message texts and revise recalled. PR S5 was issued in Train staff. if'ppropriate.
its place (but not actually given to the media). However it was confusing and PR S4 was necessary to fully understand PR S5. The EBS message by the state could have been taken 1'or a recommendation when in i'act
'E.7; it was an advisory.
G.4.a)
S90-10 14 ARCA The dissemination group was Train staff to update 09/30 /91 still being told by their dissemination group as soon as supervisor that evacuation was possible after a new PA or being considered when it had other relevant information 5s actually been include as part available.
S90-11 16 ARCA The State's PAG for KI is not Revise state PAG for KI 09/30 /91 expressed. as aprojected dose exposure to include a projected to the thyroid. .The dose dose for thyroid (expressed as projection system used by the an adult exposure). Develop a state does not produce process for converting current projected doses for adult child thyroid dose projections thyroid exposure. This should into adult dose projections.
be the criteria on which KI Revise KI decsion process.
decisions for (adult) EWs Revise plans and train staff.
Page No.
12/07/90 3.1
SUMMARY
LISTING OF EXERCISE INADEQUACIES WNP-2 EXERCISE -- WA STATE ISSUES DATE OF EXERCISE: 09/11/90 COMMITMENT DATE TRAC 0 OBJET LEVEL INADEQUACY FEMA RECOMMENDATION FOR CORRECTION should be based. (J10.e).
S90-12 26 ARCA Since DOE field teams wi)l not Review and revise DON 09/ 30/ 91 enter the plume, this may .procedures to indicate that impact how WA field teams are federal rad monitoring teams deployed. For example, DOE have restrictions on the type teams instead oi WA teams of mission they can accept.
could be used for confirming Train staff.
the absence of radiaition in areas of non-deposition.
(C.i.a)
Page No.
12/07/90 3.2
SUMMARY
LISTING OF EXERCISE INADEQUACIES WNP-2 EXERCISE -- B/F COUNTY ISSUES DATE OF EXERCISE: 09/11/90 COMMITMENT DATE TRAC 0 OBJET LEVEL INADEQUACY FEMA RECOMMENDATION FOR CORRECTION C90-12 ARCA The Emergency Chairman at the Provide two-way briefings on a 06/30/91 B/F EOC did not emphasize that regular basis. Review and actions discussed during his revise procedures, if briefings were County PAs, not appropriate.
utility recommendations.
During only one briefing were agency staff asked to report on their agencies'esponse actions. (A.2.a)
In a ll/9/90 -letter, the Counties said that appropriate training would be conducted by 6/30/91.
C90-13. 6 ARCA The Wildlife Agent procedures (IP-14) are inconsistent in Revise IP-14 to make consistent with IP-19.
it 12/31/90 terms of what to do when 5 r dose is reached. Pg 4, item The Counties said that IP-14 ll tells the to an EW Center agent to report if a 5 r dose will be revised by 12/31/90.
is reached. Pg 5 item 4 tells agent to pick up an EW kit and follow procedure IP-19. IP-19 tells EWs to call the EOC for further instructions ii a 5 r dose is reached. This is the correct instruction. (K.3.a)
Page No.
12/07/90 3.2
SUMMARY
LISTING OF EXERCISE INADEQUACIES WNP-2 EXERCISE .-- B/F COUNTY ISSUES DATE OF EXERCISE: 09/11/90 COMMITMENT DATE TRAC 0 OBJET LEVEL INADEQUACY FEMA RECOMMENDATION FOR CORRECTION C90-14 12 ARCA The County dispatch procedures Revise IP-4 and IP-S, as well 12/31/90 require confirmation that as any other applicable sirens have sounded. There is procedures, to indicate that a no mention of this requirement time will be specified, for in the County PIO procedures. siren activation and EBS During the exercise, the broadcast and that the dispatch office requested that responsible parties will ensure EBS transmission be delayed that both the siren activation until confirmation of siren and EBS message are in effect sounding had been at the specified times.
caused confusion in tho received.'his EOC since there was no mention The Counties said that IP-8 of this requirement in the will be revised by 12/31/90.
staff's procedures. (E.6)
C90-15 13- ARCA The shelter text of the B/F FEMA recommends that the 12/31/90 EBS message advises persons following sentence be who have families or employees substituted for the current outdoors to direct those second sentence in part 7 of people to come inside (to the EBS text". "IF YOU IlAVE shelter). Evacuation may be a FAMILY OR EMPLOYEES WllO ARE more appropriate instruction OUT-OF-DOORS AND WIIO DO NOT for these people in some cases 11AVE IMMEDIATE ACCESS TO since there may be SUELTER, DIRECT TIIEM TO insufficien't indoor space EVACUATE TIIE AREA".
convenient to these people.
(E.7) The Counties said that .the FBS
Page No.
12/07/90 3.2
SUMMARY
LISTING OF EXERCISE INADEQUACIES WNP-2 EXERCISE -- B/F COUNTY ISSUES DATE OF EXERCISE: 09/ll/90 COMMITMENT DATE TRAC 0 OBJET LEVEL INADEQUACY FEMA RECOMMENDATION FOR CORRECTION form would be revised by 1 2/31 /90 .
C90-16 13 ARCA The Spanish version of the EBS Prerecord EBS messages to 06/30/91 f3 omitted several oi'he eliminate preparation and boilerplate instruction (what reading errors. Revise to take with you when procedures, train staff.
evacuating...etc) that were included in the English The Counties said that they version. It is not clear will conduct a feasibility whether the blocks on the study on the use of'rerecorded message form were not checked EBS messages and make a or whether the reader misread decision by 6/30/91.
the text over the air. (E.7)
C90-17 13 ARCA Although a log was maintained Train staff. 06/30/91 by the County PIOs at the JIC it did not reflect all of the The Counties said that times at which news releases appropriate training will be were issued. (G.3.a) conducted by 6/30/91.
C90-18 16 ARCA B/F school and mobility Revise procedure IP-5. 12/31/90 impaired bus drivers did not receive the KI notification The Counties said that IP-5 given to other EMs. IP-5 for will be revised by 12/31/90.
the Transportation Coordinator does not contain a specific
Page No.
12/07/90 3.2
SUMMARY
LISTING OF EXERCISE INADEQUACIES WNP-2 EXERCISE -- B/F COUNTY ISSUES DATE OF EXERCISE: 09/11/90 COMMITMENT DATF.
TRAC 4 OBJET LEVEL INADEQUACY FEMA RECOMMENDATION FOR CORRECTION step 'requiring the Transportation Coordinator to advise the bus drivers (through the school districts) to take KI. An overall interpretation of IP-5 is that it is implied that this person should do so. (J.10.e)
C90-19 16 ARCA The Special Needs database Review and update the Special 06/30/91 (IP-5 Attachment E) used Needs Population database during the exercise was out of annually as required by FEMA date and did not reflect the guidance.
status of mobility impaired people in the area. (J.10 ' The Counties said that the g) disabled person database would be updated by 6/30/91.
C90-20 20 ARCA B/F procedures do not specify Preplan evacuation verification 06/30/91 the routes to be used for routes. Revise procedures.
evacuation verification. .It Train staff.
is necessary to take time away from operations duties and The Counties said that they plan routes to provide would preplan evacuation observations on the status of verification. routes by 6/30/91.
the evacuation PAD. (J.10.))
Page No.
12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF, ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS {TRUE/FALSE)
S84-1 ARCA 09/11/90 No range of default values 9/18/86 exercise comments: ~ F exists for use with the EDPS. Procedure 13.8.1 does not
{1.7; 1.10) appear to contain default values. or specific references of where to locate default values. The 1l.P./Dose Projectionist said that the EDPS has a 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> default time for integrating the dose projection. However clear if it is not there were default, design basis release values for different accident scenarios upon which dose-projections could be made..
9/13/88 exercise comments: The methodology remains inflexible for modifying the source term for different accident scenarios. It allows two different nuclide mixes dependent on a- filtered or non-filtered release which may not be representative of the actual source term.
9/11/90 Evaluator comment: The above comments are still valid. The main EDPS has a
page No.
12/0'l/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/ll/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE MA STATE ISSUES DATE. EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSFD TRAC LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMHENTS (TRUE/FALSE) single 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> default value.
The backup EDPS has the flexibility for entering release duration times, however no reference default values were used during the exercise. Instead, real time (from start of release to time of. calculation) was used for most dose pro)ections.
S86-4 ARCA 09/11/90 The media was not briefed in a During the Feb 28 Mar 1, .F.
timely manner . Delays were 1989 ingestion exercise, the attributed to to lack of WEIC never released control of, management supervision by the the PI function to the JIC per production manager. procedures. Consequently, the (G.3.a;G.4.a) JIC did not have the opportunity to issue any press releases. Although the press releases issued by the WEIC were timely, the press release function must be demonstrated at the JIC as well.
In a 6/28/90 letter, the state indicated that additional training has been conducted on this -issue. In the 9/ll/90 exercise, FEMA will evaluate the capabilities of the MEIC an'd the JIC as a single unit acting for the state.
Page No.
)2/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESUI.TS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC I . LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY -
COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) 9/)l/90 exercise comment: The State did not brief the media in a timely manner. Only one press conference was held.
S86-6 ARCA 09/li/90 The State JIC team refused to During the Feb 28 March 1, ~ F take the State's PIO 1989 ingestion exercise, FEMA responsibilities until observed that "the State JIC FEMA/NRC arrived at the JIC. team either did not seek to The State JIC team acted in a assume the State's PIO coordination of emergency responsibilities (per -10.2-13) response role instead or the WEIC failed to initiate the State's response oi'eporting this action." Therefore this actions to the media. (A.3; remains an open item.
G.3.a; G.4.a) 9/ll/90 exercise comment: The State JIC team did not participate in this exercise, therefore this issue was not evaluated.
S86-7 ARCA 09/11/90 Field teams had incomplete During the 9/88 plume kits, a radio that did not exercise, the FEMA evaluator work and some members were not reported that the EW kits wete certified for respirator use. complete, but that some team (I') members were still not certified for respirator use.
This item is therfore only
page No.
12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC 0 LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY* COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) partially complete.
In a 6!28/90 letter, the state said that respirator certification has been completed a'nd is an ongoing operation. DOll/DRF will not send uncertified staff on the field teams.
9/il/90 exercise comment: The evaluator observed up-to-date list of md team members certified to wear respiratory protection; =one team member held a current HazMat card for SCBA.
S86-8 ARCA 09/11/90 Current instructions for EWs During the 9/88 plume do not facilitate efficient exercise, FEMA found that the replacement of workers whose dosimetry available to EWs was doses are approaching 5 rem. still inadequate; of only a 0 - 1.00 R it consisted Instructions require the PSO to either abandon the post or instrument. These instruments receive authorization for also seemed to drift higher dose. significantly from a givien reading.. (See S88-3 for Current instruments provided further discussion of
Page No.
12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESUI.TS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/ll/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSFD TRAC LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) to WSP do not allow accurate dosimetry) detection of low doses.
(K.3.a; K.3.b) In a 6/28/90 letter, the state said that new dosimetry has been obtained.
9/11/90 exercise comment: All EWs had 0 to 20 R instruments.
S86-9 ARCA 09/li/90 A single field measurement was During the 9/88 exercise, FEMA .P.
used as the basis for a PAR observed that "The PAR to even though there were five shelter ... was based on a field teams available to take dose projection using counting measurements. (I.10) results from one air sample.
This sample was not representative of the true plume characteristics since the sample was taken very close to.the plant." The MUDAC requested a dose rate projection at approximately the same time that another sample report was received from the other field team.
This sample would have been more representative oi'odine concentrations in populated areas since it was taken over
page No.
12/0'I/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING .9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC S LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) 5 miles from the plant.
A 6/2S/90 letter from the state said that annual training stresses the importance of [more than one air sample].
9/li/90 exercise comment: The final MUDAC decsions were supported by the incorrect use of a single air sample. The total integrated dose based on this sample was incorrect.
SSG-10 ARCA 09/11/90 Because of- the assumptions by SSprocedure 13.11.14 (Rev. 1.) .T.
MUDAC that the unmonitored does not address FEMAs release pathway and source recommendations.
term would continue to produce low radiation field A 6/26/90 letter from the measurements, the FTC did not state indicated that SS EW request dosimeter readings. dose is- monitored by the However, the FTC and MUDAC workers themselves, and the PADG did not express concern Field Team Coordinator. SS or interest in the exposure procedure 13.11.14 reminds the that EWs might receive while FTC to check status of EW staffing ACPs over a 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> exposure. DOll/DRP shii't. coordinators have trained Procedure l3.11.14 in place at their field teams and county
Page No.
12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR 'ISSUE CLOSFD TRAC LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) the time did not assign any EWs. The Dept. of Ecology has group responsibility to track responsibility to train their and estimate dose commitment staff.
for field personnel. (K.3.a; K.3.b) 9/11/90 exercise comment:
Dose was effectively managed by WA-1 and WA-2 field teams.
Team members estimated their dose after passing through the plume; dose was also requested from MUDAC. EOF provided plant status messages and recommended that FTs take KI.
S87-1 ARCA 09/11/90 When the RM made PARs which In a 6/28/90 letter, the state .F.-
extended the evacuation and said that the EFSEC procedure sheltering areas, the County checklist (10.13.2.e) and the was not aware that these PARS DEM Assistant Director EOC were dif'ferent from those procedure checklist (10.3 developed by MUDAC. The B-1(c) 11/14/89) both address County was not aware that this FEHA's recommendation that the PAR was not the "unified PAR" RM should ensure that ofi'-site anticipated pet their plan. representatives are aware of (I.io; J.7). the issues supporting 'the RH's decision on the EOF PAR.
9/11/90 exercise comment: The first MUDAC PAR, prepared by the SS and DOE before the State arrived, was modified by the REM with the RM's support.
Page No.
12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE MA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC I LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE)
In accordance with EPIP 13.11.7, the REM informed the MUDAC coordinator of the change in PAR. The RM did not inform offslte authorities during the CRASIS call of the=
SS change in the MUDAC PAR as required by EPIP 13.14.2 S87-2 ARCA 09/11/90 The PADG focused on the In a 6/28/90 letter, the state .T.
primary PAR areas and said that training on sometimes missed automatic automatic PARs will be PARs which should have been conducted and automatic PARs included, based on the are included in the DEM decision for the primary PAR. Assistant Director EOC (E.4) procedures.
9/11/90 Evaluator Comment:
The MUDAC procedures now assign automatic PARs to the REM; These PARs were initiated by the REM.
S87-3 ARCA 09/ll/90 At one point dur1ng the PAR In a 6/28/90 letter, the state .F.
development process, the plume said that all plume maps in center line appeared to be use have been revised to
'near the boundary of Sections change division lines to I 8 II. Hhen PARs were coincide with ma)or roads or
page No.
12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/ll/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) developed for distances beyond streets. Training will be 10 miles, both sections were conducted during July and.
included, resulting in an August, 1990.
affected area of about 180 degrees. In reality the 9/11/90 Evaluator comment:
af'fected area was much The new maps (dated July, smaller. (I.10; J.9) 1990) were in place. However, the large map is still used to plot the field monitoring data. "Neon" type tape placed on the new sector boundaries might be useful.
S87-10 ARCA 09/11/90 At least 5 examples of During the March, 1989 .F incomplete or incorrect ingestion exercise, the number information were noted in the of press release issued by the WEIC press releases and the WEIC was adequate. However press conference.(G.3.a) the content of the releases was not adeq'uate to )ustify the rationale for PAs and the associated health risks. The press release associated with PAD f7 did not address the instructions for return, although the PAD did. Other examples of incorrect information are described in the exercise report.
In a 6/28/90 letter, the state
Page No. 10
]2/07/90 APPENDIX A:.RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP"2 EXFRCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CI.OSED TRAC LEVEI. TESTED INADE(}UACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) said that PIO staff have received additional training regarding the use of timely and accurate information in news releases and press briefings. Boilerplate health related background information has been developed to avoid providing inaccurate or misleading health information to the public.
9/11/90 exercise comment:
Five news releases were prepared and issued by the WA WEIC. These contained accurate information as far as they went. PR f4 reflected an incomplete effective zone for the agricultural advisory and was supplanted by PR $ 5. At only press brief.ing held, 'he PR $ 4 was issued, then recalled with the comment that PR t5 would replace it. No other PRs were handed out to the press. As it turned only did the press not'et out,'ot PR C4, PR $ 4 was necessary in order to understandPR 45 since this release made reference to
Page No.
12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC 4 LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE)
PR f4.
Only 1 press briefing was held. It was originally scheduled for 1200, but it kept being postponed every 15 to 30 minutes until it was finally held at 1337. .See discussion of the briefing under Objective 13/14 in the exercise report.
S88-2 ARCA 09/11/90 The WSP dispatch at Yakima In a 6/28/90 letter, the state .F.
waited 27 minutes to notify said that they will do Fish and Game to begin route additional training to alert alerting. (E.6) WSP of the need to quickly alert the Department of Fisheries and WIldlife of the need to perform route alerting and provide access control at Ringold fish hatchery.
9/11/90 exercise comment: FBG agent did not receive any message from WSP to procedd with evacuation. Agents proceeded with notification based on hearing the sirens.
Apparently, WSP thought that
page No. 12 12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) all calls were to be simulated and therefore did not actually place a call to the FAG agent.
S88-3 'RCA 09/ll/90 Fish and Game agents did not 9/11/90 exercise comment: All .T.
carry proper dosimetry. WA EWs had proper dosimetry, Agents carried one 0 to 100 R with the exception of one Fish dosimeter.(K.3a). and Game agent whose 0-20 R unit was defective and had been returned to the State for repair.
ARCA 09/11/90 Dose projections which In a 6/28/90 letter, the state .F.
supported PARs were not sent said that it is the normal to the B/F County EOC. {I.10). procedure to send dose projection data to the state and county EOCs.
9/11/90 exercise comment:
Only 2 of 10 data point reports and 2 of 17 dose projections were sent offsite.
S88-5 ARCA 09/11/90 Dose and ground deposition 9/11/90 exercise comment: The .F.
projections were based on data field data collected was not from a single air sample even properly evaluated in terms of
Page No. 13 12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) though there were four samples available in the MUDAC.
were it came from and the time of collection when the data (I.io). were used to provide dose projections. In addition, the dose projections were not
\
compared in order to understand the differences.
The air sample obtained about 1340 which was used to calculate the dose at 10 miles was collected after the plume had passed. The iodine concentration would not have represented the release iodine concentration. Further discussion is contained under Objective 410 of the exercise report.
S88-6 ARCA 09/11/90 The PAR for milk herds was In a 6/28/90 letter, the state .T.
inconsistent with the PAR for said that annual training people. (I.10). stresses the importance of consistency in PARs.
9/11/90 exer cise comment:
Care was taken at the WA EOC to ensure that PARs for people and livestock were consistent.
Page No. 14 12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR I SSUE CLOSED TRAC LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE)
S08-7 ARCA 09/Ji/90 The hot line used at the Kiona In a 6/28/90 letter, the state .F.
Benton EWAC did not allow for said that new procedures are contamination control. (3.12). in development that will resolve this issue. Training will be given to K-B EWAC staff. Correction can be observed during the next K-B EWAC drill.
S009-1 OTUR 09/11/90 Procedur es for State EBS This other issue was generated .F.
actions are not integrated. out of S84-1 and S86-5. These Individual procedures for issues. have been closed out monitoring EBS by DAG and WSP and replaced by this issue do not specify to whom the which more accurately reflects results of the monitoring the status of current WA should be reported. The procedures.
procedure for the DCD/DEM Assistant Director does not In a 6/28/90 letter, the state direct that EBS message text said that this issue will be be acquired i'rom the EOC addressed in revisions to supervisor in a timely 10.18. Commitment date for fashion. Procedures do not correction is August 1990.
specify 'use of WEIC to prepare EBS messages. WEIC procedures 9/11/90 exercise comment:
do not call for EBS messages Procedures i'or State EBS to be available to all WEIC actions are still not dissemination points. integrated. There was no way
page No. 15 12/0'7/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/ll/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) to monitor the B/F County EBS messages at the WA EOC.
Although State procedures currently assign two people the ressponsibility to monitor EBS broadcasts (WSP and State rep. to B/F EOC), no report was available at the WA EOC.
S89-2 ARCA 09/11/90 MUDAC had 4 different map In a 6/28/90 letter, the state .F.
displays of the EPZ. This said that the decision has makes data collection and been made to use the reporting difficult. (U.3; Washington State Search and H.4) Rescue Grid as the standard map display for the MUDAC.
New aerial photos will be taken and staff will be trained. Target completion date is 1/91.
S89-3 ARCA 09/11/90 1.a: WEIC. manager did not In a 6/28/90 letter, WA .F.
release control of the public responded as follows:
information function to the JIC after the JIC was i.a: see discussion under operational. S86-4.
1.b: Coordination of press 1.b: State PIOs have received releases was accomplished additional training on this after they were distributed, . issue.
Page No. 16 12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) not-before as specified in 1.c: Training will be given to procedures. (G.4.b) DOA staff describing educational materials used and 1.c: Educational material was how these are to be not distributed to farmers and distributed.
processors in the IPZ. EBS messages are an inappropriate FEMA notes that DOA procedure means to alert and inform 10.6 has not been revised commercial agricultural since 1986. This procedure operations. (J.ll) requires DOA to issue embargo notices. Until this procedure i.d: Press releases did not and other procedures are explain the basis for the IPZ revised to reflect the issues PARs being recommended. raised here and in S89-1 (see FEMA report for the 1989 ingestion pathway exercise, pg. 88) a table top drill should not be scheduIed.
1.d: Additional boilerplate messages have been developed to deal with health effects, DOII, ingestion and re-entry issues. These will be included in a kit to be distributed during the fall exercise.
S89-4 ARCA 09/ll/90 Spokespersons at the JIC did In a 6/28/90 letter, the state .F.
not present information in an said that state PIOs have accurate manner. (G.4.a) received additional training
page No. 17 12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/'11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE WA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC 0 LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FALSE) on this issue. Boilerplate information has been developed and will be part of an information packet to be used during the 9/90 exercise.
Displays recommended by FEMA for ingestion use remain under development. Expected commitment date is 6/91.
9/11/90 exercise comment: No information packets were handed out to the media who came to the WEIC news conference.'nformation available at this conference was limited and not entirely (See discussion in 'ccurate.
the 9/11/90 exercise report).
S89-5 ARCA 09/11/90 Status boards in the WEIC were The state indicated (6/28/90 not properly maintained: they letter) that the state PIO often contained out of date staff have received additional information. (G.4.c) training on this issue.
9/11/90 exercise comment: The WEIC demonstrated the ability to mainatin status boards in
Page No. 18
]2/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/IJ/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE MA STATE ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CI,OSED TRAC 0 LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS fTRUE/FALSE) the Dissemination Section. A specific status board staff person was assigned to post all significant events and actions on the board for the use of the media/public concern phone teams. There was a problem in that the Rumor Control section did not always receive current informationin a timely manner.
See issue under objective 13/14 of the exercise report for discussion of this separate issue.
Page No.
12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/11/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE B/F COUNTY ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CLOSED TRAC LEVEI. TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FAISE)
C88-2 ARCA 09/11/90 During school evacuation route 9/11/90 exercise comment: The .T.
driving, the bus driver did school evacuation bus driver "not turn on his radio. (F.l) performed a radio check prior to departing the Pasco School Dist. fl bus garage. The radio was functional and was monitored by the driver during the trip to Edwin Markham school.
C88-3 ARCA 09/11/90 The weather status board, 9/il/90 exercise comment: The specified in IP-2 of the evacuation route maps used Bi-County procedures was not during the exercise did show in use at the EOC. The=- ,the river ACPs. The weather Barricade and Evacuation route status/dose projection chart map does not show the three (an overhead graphic).was river launch areas that demonstrated during the require closure during a river participan'ts meeting on evacuation. (U.3) 9/13/90.
C88-4 ARCA 09/11/90 EWs were not carrying proper 9/11/90 exercise comment: All .T.
dosimetry. Each carried one EWs, including Sheriff's unit with range of 0 to 100 R. Deputies, carried proper This does not meet federal dosimetr y.
criteria outlined in REP-2, pp. 5-7.
Wa Page No.
12/07/90 APPENDIX A: RESULTS OF ISSUES TESTED DURING 9/ll/90 WNP-2 EXERCISE B/F COUNTY ISSUES DATE EVALUATOR ISSUE CIOSED TRAC 0 LEVEL TESTED INADEQUACY COMMENTS (TRUE/FAI,SE)
ARCA 09/11/90 AS broadcast, EBS meesage 44 9/il/90 exercise comment: The .T.
and $ 5 contained incomplete B/F EOC PIOs effectively used sheltering and ad hoc prescripted boilerplate text respiratory protection to provide complete and information, although this consistent information on information was correctly sheltering.
stated in the text from which the Commissioner @as reading.
(E.7)
C88-7 ARCA 09/11/90 The Bi-County procedures were 9/11/90 exercise comment: The .T.
not consistent with observed. County has revised their play during the exercise procedures to set the time regarding the beginning of the criterion for broadcast of the 15 minute period for broadcast EBS mes'sage at 15 minutes oi the EBS message. (E.5) after the emerge'ncy chairperson makes the decision to implement the PAD.
C88-9 ARCA 09/11/90 IP-6 does not list the 9/11/90 exercise comment: The .T.
Franklin County river access present B/F procedures (IP-6, points. (J.10.g) & IP-13 and IP-6 Attch. 11) list the Ringold and Selph landing closure points.
Attachment M does not )ist the two river ACPs but a 7/9/90 letter from the Counties states that this will be
~L 0