Letter Sequence Request |
---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, ... further results|Request]]
- Acceptance, Acceptance, Acceptance
Results
Other: BVY 06-065, 2006/07/27-Vermont Yankee License Renewal Application, Amendment 6, BVY 06-077, 2006/08/10-Vermont Yankee - License Renewal Application, Amendment 9, BVY 06-095, E-mail: (PA-LR) Copy of SAMA Response, ML061040142, ML061740035, ML061740572, ML061770071, ML061920474, ML062680034, ML063120067, ML063420178, ML070230041, ML070710215, ML071430101, ML071840778, ML071840890
|
MONTHYEARML0617705932006-04-10010 April 2006 State of Vermont, Environmental Radiation Surveillance Report, 2005 Summary. Vermont Department of Health Office of Radiological Health Project stage: Request ML0610401422006-04-12012 April 2006 2006/04/12 - Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process for License Renewal for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Project stage: Other ML0617701692006-04-27027 April 2006 VYNPS Emergency Diesel DG-1-1A Preventative Maintenance Logs Project stage: Request ML0625400452006-04-27027 April 2006 Email: (PA) Request for Additional Information to Support the Staff'S Severe Accident Mitigation Alternative Review for Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Project stage: RAI ML0618804492006-05-23023 May 2006 VYNPS Public Service Board Testimony for Hydrogen Storage, Parking Area, and Security Barrier System Project stage: Request ML0617301862006-05-24024 May 2006 VYNPS, DR-53 Location Exposure Rate Status-Pre Power Up, Pre and Post Shield Project stage: Request ML0618802112006-05-24024 May 2006 VYNPS Archeological Sensitivity of Assessment, Proposed Gas Storage Area and Access Road January 17, 2001 Project stage: Request ML0617704052006-05-25025 May 2006 VYNPS Used Oil Management and Furnace Operation Summary, 2006 Project stage: Request ML0617701802006-05-25025 May 2006 VYNPS Diesel Fuel Oil Analyses Project stage: Request ML0616400652006-05-26026 May 2006 Massachusetts Attorney General'S Request for a Hearing and Petition for Leave to Intervene with Respect to Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc.'S Application for Renewal of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Operating License and Petition. Project stage: Request ML0615205062006-06-0101 June 2006 Request for Additional Information Regarding Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Project stage: RAI ML0618400362006-06-0606 June 2006 VYNPS Environmental Scoping Open House Transcript Re. LRA Environmental Review, Pages 1-7 Project stage: Request ML0619204742006-06-0707 June 2006 Comment (17) of E. Stamas on Environmental Scoping Process for Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, License Renewal Project stage: Other ML0618400292006-06-0707 June 2006 VYNPS Scoping Mtg Evening Transcript Re. LRA Environmental Review, Pages 1-143 Project stage: Request ML0618400332006-06-0707 June 2006 VYNPS Scoping Mtg Afternoon Transcript Re. LRA Environmental Review, Pages 1-116 Project stage: Request ML0617904762006-06-0707 June 2006 2006/06/07-Slides Used During the Scoping Meeting for VYNPS License Renewal Project stage: Meeting ML0617400352006-06-22022 June 2006 Comment (2) of Thomas Matsuda on the Environmental Scoping Process for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application Project stage: Other ML0618406152006-06-23023 June 2006 NRC Public Meeting to Discuss the Environmental Scoping Process of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, License Renewal Application, Feedback Project stage: Meeting ML0617700712006-06-23023 June 2006 Comment (12) of Sunny Miller on the Environmental Scoping Process for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application Project stage: Other ML0617405722006-06-23023 June 2006 Comment (9) of Jon Block, on Behalf of Citizens Awareness Network, on the Environmental Scoping Process for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application Project stage: Other ML0619204952006-07-11011 July 2006 2006/07/11-Summary of Public Scoping Meeting Conducted Related to the Review of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, License Renewal Application Project stage: Meeting ML0617303972006-07-11011 July 2006 2006/07/11-Summary of Environmental Site Audit Related to the Review of the License Renewal Application for Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Project stage: Approval BVY 06-065, 2006/07/27-Vermont Yankee License Renewal Application, Amendment 62006-07-27027 July 2006 2006/07/27-Vermont Yankee License Renewal Application, Amendment 6 Project stage: Other BVY 06-071, 2006/08/01-Vermont Yankee Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Application, Amendment 72006-08-0101 August 2006 2006/08/01-Vermont Yankee Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Application, Amendment 7 Project stage: Response to RAI ML0623701022006-08-10010 August 2006 Letter from Us Fws Re Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Project stage: Request BVY 06-077, 2006/08/10-Vermont Yankee - License Renewal Application, Amendment 92006-08-10010 August 2006 2006/08/10-Vermont Yankee - License Renewal Application, Amendment 9 Project stage: Other ML0626800342006-09-19019 September 2006 2006/09/19-Vermont Yankee License Renewal Application, Amendment 13 Project stage: Other BVY 06-086, License Renewal Application, Amendment 13, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Analysis of Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives2006-09-19019 September 2006 License Renewal Application, Amendment 13, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Analysis of Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Project stage: Response to RAI ML0629901552006-10-20020 October 2006 2006/10/20-Vermont Yankee - License Renewal Application, Amendment No. 18, Response to Request for Clarification of SAMA RAI Responses Project stage: Request BVY 06-095, E-mail: (PA-LR) Copy of SAMA Response2006-10-20020 October 2006 E-mail: (PA-LR) Copy of SAMA Response Project stage: Other ML0630305762006-10-30030 October 2006 Issuance of Environmental Scoping Summary Report Associated with the Staff'S Review of the Application by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. for Renewal of the Operating License for Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Project stage: Approval BVY 06-099, 2006/11/06-Vermont Yankee License Renewal Application, Amendment 21 Response to Request for Clarification of SAMA RAIs2006-11-0606 November 2006 2006/11/06-Vermont Yankee License Renewal Application, Amendment 21 Response to Request for Clarification of SAMA RAIs Project stage: Request ML0701704722006-12-0101 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - NPDES Water Permit Program in New England Project stage: Request ML0634201782006-12-0404 December 2006 2006/12/04-Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, License Renewal Application, Amendment 22, Clarification of Aging Management Program and Environmental Report Items Project stage: Other ML0631200672006-12-12012 December 2006 2006/12/12-Request Initiation of an Essential Fish Habitat Consultation Regarding License Renewal of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Project stage: Other ML0631100072006-12-13013 December 2006 2006/12/13-Notice of Availability of the Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 30 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants (Geis) Regarding Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Project stage: Draft Other ML0701701262006-12-14014 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - American Shad Passage on the Connecticut River Project stage: Request ML0701705282006-12-14014 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web References - Shortnose Sturgeon Acipenser Brevirostrum Project stage: Request ML0701702332006-12-14014 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - Cdep Dwarf Wedge Mussel Project stage: Request ML0701706412006-12-14014 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - Water Temperature and Gulf of Maine Atlantic Salmon Project stage: Request ML0701705062006-12-14014 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Public Health Fish Consumption Advisory, Search Results for the Water Body of Connecticut River Project stage: Request ML0701705972006-12-14014 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - Vermont Climate Summary Project stage: Request ML0701704672006-12-15015 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Project stage: Request ML0701702242006-12-15015 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - Dwarf Wedge Mussel Fact Sheet Project stage: Request ML0701705842006-12-15015 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web References - the Natural History of River Herrings Project stage: Request ML0701606502006-12-15015 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - Usfws 2004 Connecticut River Migratory Fish Counts Project stage: Request ML0701606522006-12-15015 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - Usfws 2005 Connecticut River Migratory Fish Counts Project stage: Request ML0701702672006-12-15015 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - Fish Passage Schedule Project stage: Request ML0701704482006-12-15015 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - Natural Resources in the Connecticut River Watershed - Federally Endangered or Threatened Species Project stage: Request ML0701707002006-12-15015 December 2006 VYNPS - SEIS Web Reference - Fish Facts Project stage: Request 2006-05-23
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Legal-Brief
MONTHYEARML12066A1802012-03-0606 March 2012 Petitioners Reply Brief 11-1168, on Petition for Review of a Decision of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Joint Reply Brief of Vermont Dept. of Public Service and New England Coalition, Inc Information Notice 2010-26, 2010/12/21-NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-262010-12-21021 December 2010 2010/12/21-NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 ML1035703562010-12-13013 December 2010 Supplement to New England Coalition'S Petition for Commission Review of ASLBP Memorandum and Order (Ruling on New England Coalition Motion to Reopen and Proffering New Contention) ML1032607072010-11-22022 November 2010 NRC Staff'S Answer in Opposition to New England Coalition'S Petition for Review of Licensing Board Memorandum and Order LBP-10-19 ML1032104212010-11-12012 November 2010 Petition for Commission Review of ASLBP Memorandum and Order (Ruling on New England Coalition Motion to Reopen and Proffering New Contention) ML0921706402009-08-0303 August 2009 the States of New York, Connecticut, and Massachusetts V. USNRC and Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc., 08-3903ag(L) - Federal Respondents Brief (Entergy) ML0835900282008-12-23023 December 2008 Vermont Yankee - NRC Staff'S Reply to Vermont Department of Public Service'S Answer to NRC Staff'S Petition for Review of LBP-08-25 ML0834602262008-12-10010 December 2008 Vermont Yankee - NRC Staff'S Answer in Opposition to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Petition for Review of LBP-08-25 ML0834703372008-12-0202 December 2008 Petition for Review of LBP-08-25 ML0820501042008-07-15015 July 2008 New England Coalition, Inc. Supplemental Prehearing Reply Brief ML0819704832008-07-0909 July 2008 DPS Brief in Response to the Board'S June 27, 2008 Order Seeking the Parties' Position on Three Legal Issues ML0819704812008-06-0909 June 2008 New England Coalition, Inc. Supplemental Prehearing Brief ML0817500352008-05-13013 May 2008 Entergy'S Initial Statement of Position on New England Coalition Contentions ML0817500382008-05-12012 May 2008 Exhibits to Entergy'S Direct Testimony on NEC Contention 4 - Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Includes Exhibits E4-02 Through E4-29, Volume 1 ML0817500392008-05-12012 May 2008 Exhibits to Entergy'S Direct Testimony on NEC Contention 4 - Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Includes Exhibits E4-30 Through E4-42, Volume 2 ML0817500362008-05-12012 May 2008 Exhibits to Entergy'S Direct Testimony on NEC Contention 2 - Environmentally Assisted Fatigue - Includes Exhibits E2-02 Through E2-20, Volume 1 ML0803806322008-01-18018 January 2008 2008/01/18-Answer of Crorip and Nancy Burton to the Petition by Nuclear Information and Resource Service Et Al. to Suspend License Renewal Reviews for Oyster Creek, Indian Point, Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plants Pending Inves ML0803005302008-01-18018 January 2008 2008/01/18-State of New York'S Response in Support of the Petition to Suspend License Renewal Reviews for Oyster Creek, Indian Point, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plants Pending Investigation of NRC Staff Review Process. ML0803005312008-01-18018 January 2008 2008/01/18-Answer of the Vermont Department of Public Service to the Petition by Nuclear Information and Resource Service Et Al to Suspend License Renewal Review For...Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plants Pending Investigation of NRC Staff R ML0802205872008-01-14014 January 2008 2008/01/14-Errata to Petition to Suspend License Renewal Reviews for Oyster Creek, Indian Point, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plants Pending Investigation of NRC Staff Review Process and Correction of Deficiencies ML0800904272008-01-0303 January 2008 2008/01/03-Petition by Nirs Et. Al., to Suspend License Renewal Reviews for Oyster Creek, Indian Point, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plants, Pending Investigation of NRC Staff Review Process and Correction of Deficiencies ML0732503512007-11-0808 November 2007 Commonwealth of Massachusetts V. United States and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Nos 07-1482; 07-1483; Reply Brief for Petitioner Commonwealth of Massachusetts ML0730502172007-10-31031 October 2007 Commonwealth of Massachusetts V. NRC, No. 07-1482 ML0724904972007-08-22022 August 2007 Commonwealth of Massachusetts V. USNRC; Nos. 07-1482 and 07-1483; Brief for Petitioner ML0704500362007-02-0606 February 2007 Entergy'S Reply to New England Coalition'S Brief on Review of LBP-06-20 ML0703800522007-02-0606 February 2007 Vermont Yankee - NRC Staff Reply Brief in Response to CLI-07-01 ML0704500332007-02-0505 February 2007 Appellee New England Coalition'S Reply Brief ML0703302172007-01-29029 January 2007 Appellee New England Coalition'S Brief ML0703706102007-01-29029 January 2007 Entergy'S Brief on Review of LBP-06-20 ML0703000322007-01-29029 January 2007 NRC Staff Brief in Response to CLI-07-01 ML0634706192006-12-0707 December 2006 Joint Submittal of Proposed Protective Order and Confidentiality Agreement Regarding Proprietary Documents ML0631700512006-11-0303 November 2006 Entergy'S Objections to New England Coalition'S Proposed Hearing Transcript Corrections ML0629903302006-10-20020 October 2006 New England Coalition, Inc.'S Opposition to Entergy'S Petition for Interlocutory Review of LBP-06-20 Admitting New England Coalition'S Contention 1 ML0629603202006-10-20020 October 2006 Vermont Yankee - NRC Staff Answer to Entergy'S Petition for Interlocutory Review of LBP-06-20 ML0629300382006-10-13013 October 2006 Entergy'S Brief in Opposition to the Massachusetts Attorney General'S Appeal of LBP-06-20 ML0628904532006-10-13013 October 2006 Vermont Yankee - NRC Staff Brief in Opposition to Massachusetts Attorney General'S Appeal of LBP-06-20 ML0629205442006-10-10010 October 2006 Entergy'S Petition for Interlocutory Review of LBP-06-20 Admitting New England Coalition'S Contention 1 ML0628601562006-10-0303 October 2006 Massachusetts Attorney General'S Notice of Appeal of LBP-06-20, with Accompanying Brief ML0627603902006-09-25025 September 2006 Entergy'S Response to New England Coalition'S Letter to Board ML0617700392006-06-14014 June 2006 New England Coalition'S Response to the Statements of Position of Entergy and NRC Staff, with Declaration of Dr. Joram Hopenfeld in Support of New England Coalition'S Response to the Statements of Position of Entergy and NRC Staff ML0616700922006-06-14014 June 2006 NRC Staff'S Response to the Initial Statements of Position Filed by Other Parties ML0614203882006-05-17017 May 2006 NRC Staff'S Initial Statement of Position Concerning NEC Contention 3 ML0614203692006-05-17017 May 2006 Nrc'S Staff Initial Statement of Position Concerning NEC Contention 4 ML0609000062006-03-30030 March 2006 Vermont Yankee - NRC Staff'S Answer to New England Coalition'S Brief on the Legal Scope of New England Coalition Contention 4 ML0606502992006-02-21021 February 2006 Entergy'S Response to the New England Coalition'S Brief on the Scope of Modified Contention NEC 4 ML0605301562006-02-21021 February 2006 Vermont Yankee - NRC Staff'S Response to New England Coalition'S Brief Concerning the Scope of NEC Contention 4 ML0605401782006-02-14014 February 2006 New England Coalition'S Brief on the Scope of Its Contention Regarding Inadequate Analysis of the Vermont Yankee Alternate Cooling System Performance Under Conditions of Extended Power Uprate ML0534100082005-12-0202 December 2005 Vermont Yankee - NRC Staff'S Answer to Vermont Department of Public Service'S Third Motion to Compel ML0530002512005-10-21021 October 2005 NRC Staff Response to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board'S Order of September 30, 2005, Regarding Vermont Department of Public Service'S First Motion to Compel 2012-03-06
[Table view] |
Text
h /3&73-DOCKETED USNRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA February 5, 2007 (4:58pm)
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Before the Commission
)
In re: ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, LLC)
& ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. )
) No. 50-271-LR (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station) ) CLI-07-01 APPELLEE NEW ENGLAND COALITION'S REPLY BRIEF Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ("Entergy"), and the NRC Staff ("the Staff') construe 10 C.F.R. § 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(B) contrary to its plain language, rendering merely pro forma and effectively nullifying Entergy's obligation, here, to provide meaningful information. Respectfully, the Commission should reject this interpretation, whereby Entergy's assessment of thermal discharge impacts might supply little if any information relevant to the NRC's ultimate evaluation of this issue under NEPA.
A. Entergy cannot satisfy its obligation to assess heat shock with defective information.
The NRC Staff and Entergy argument that Entergy has satisfied its 10 C.F.R. § 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(B) obligation to assess heat shock by submitting an annulled Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (VANR) action reflects a misunderstanding of Vermont law. More importantly, it leads to the absurd e Al 44-fe CY c
op result-that Entergy can meet its assessment obligation with defective information, which could ultimately compromise the validity of the NRC's EIS for the license renewal. As explained in detail in NEC's opening brief, Entergy's permit amendment is a legal nullity and has been found substantively defective by a Vermont court with jurisdiction specific to such VANR action. The Vermont Environmental Court has taken it under de novo review, and found the VANR's supporting analysis questionable enough to justify a stay.'
Entergy is in the midst of the Vermont NPDES permitting process. It has not yet obtained the "316(a) variance" or "equivalent State permits and supporting documentation" required by § 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(B). Entergy cannot satisfy its heat shock assessment obligation merely by certifying that iti hopes to obtain the necessaryVermont variance or equivalent permits and supporting documents at sQme point .i the future. Yet this is essentially what it proposes to do in relying upon the ,defective, stayed, and vacated March 30, 2006 VANR action.,,,j Incredibly, NRC Staff apparently sanctions this hollow process.
However, Staffs ,position,is self defeating, keeps relevant information from the public, and undermines the NEPA process. Indeed, delaying the provision of relevant information can only delay the licensing and NEPA Under Vermont law, a stay issues upon demonstration of the same stringent elements as a preliminary injunction. See, NEC Brief, Exhibit 4, In Re Entergy Nuclear/ Vermont Yankee Thermal Dischargepermit amendment, Decision and Order on Motion to Stay of Permit Amendment Pending Appeal, Docket No. 89-4-06 (August 28, 2006).
2
process. And, 10 C.F.R. § 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(B) calls for relevant and meaningful information.
B. NRC's Contention 1 is "moot" only if Entergy amends its License Renewal Application.
A State of Vermont denial of the NPDES permit amendment for this discharge will not, standing alone, moot NEC's Contention,1. Entergy's Environmental Report must assess its "proposed action." Contention 1 is therefore "moot" only when Entergy revises its License Renewal Application to retract its current proposal to increase thermal discharge into the Connecticut River through 2032.
C. The NRC must assess cumulative impacts of Entergy's thermal discharge.
Whether the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources' ana lysis underlying its action here is adequate to ultimately inform the NRC's EIS is-not at all evident. NRC must assess the cumulative impact of Entergy's, "rolling" NPDES permit over the full proposed period of extended operation.2 "Conclusions relative to the overall environmental impacts including cumulative impacts will be left entirely to-each site-specific SEIS.".
Environmental Review for Renewal of Nuclear Power Plant Operating Licenses, 61 FR 28467, *28470 (Junei 5, 1996). Further, the dissent below 2 Contrary to what Entergy and the Staff suggest, an NPDES permit is hot~equivalent:to.the analysis required by NEPA. Indeed, the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) performsNEPA impact assessments when it issues NPDES permits to new sources. See, 40 C.F.R. § 6.604.
3
correctly notes that cumulative impacts of a thermal discharge are not specific to Category 1.3 NEPA requires that NRC 'consider all foreseeable direct and indirect impacts of Entergy's "proposed action," and the cumulative impacts of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions. 40 C.F.R. §§ 1508.8, 1508.7.4. Direct impacts are defined as those impacts "which are caused by the action and occur at the same time and place." 40 C.F.R. § 1508.8(a).
Indirect impacts include those impacts "which are caused by the action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable." 40 C.F.R. § 1508.8(b). Cumulative impacts refer to the "impact on the environment which results from the incremental-impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency or person undertakes such action. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time." 40 C.F.R. § 1508.7.
Section 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(B) must be read consistently with NEPA. This obligates Entergy to provide a CWA § 316 variance, or "equivalent state permits and supporting documents," or to assess "impacts" of heat shock.
Impacts of heat shock include its direct, indirect and cumulative impacts.
Importantly, Entergy's further application obligations require it to submit 3
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations,Inc. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station), LBP-06-20, 64 NRC 131 (2006)("Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Standing, Contentions, Hearing Procedures, State Statutory Claim, and Contention Adoption)"), dissenting opinion.
4
relevant and material information on the broader issue of its thermal discharge. 10 C.F.R. § 51.45.4 To overstate the breadth ofCategory 1 impacts, and understate the breadth of Category 2, fails to meet these obligations.
VI. CONCLUSION.
Entergy's petition should be denied and the ASLB's admission of NEC's Contention 1 affirmed.
February 5, 2007 New England Coalition by:L Ronald A. Shems' Karen Tyler SHEMS DUNKIEL KASSEL & SAUNDERS PLLC For-the firm Attbrneys for NEC
' The narrow requirement of § 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(B) should not be construed to override the broader requirements of section § 51.45. Section 51.45 is not surplusage, and should be given effect.
5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Commission In the Matter of )
)
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC ) Docket No. 50-271-LR and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ) CLI-07-01 (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Clara Cavitt, hereby certify that copies of APPELLEE NEW ENGLAND COALITION'S REPLY BRIEF in the above-captioned proceeding were served on the persons listed below, by U.S. Mail, first class, postage prepaid; by Fed Ex overnight to Judge Elleman; and, where indicated by an e-mail address below, by electronic mail, on the 5th day of February, 2007.
Administrative Judge Office of the Secretary Alex S. Karlin, Esq., Chairman Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop: O-16C1 Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: secyvnrc.gov; hearingdocket@nrc.gov E-mail: ask2@nrc.gov Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Administrative Judge Mail Stop: O-16C1 Thomas S. Elleman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and, Licensing Board Panel Washington, DC 20555-0001 5207 Creedmoor Road, #101 Raleigh, NC 27612 Sarah Hofmann, Esq.
E-mail: elleman@eos.ncsu.edu Director of Public Advocacy Department of Public Service Administrative Judge 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel E-mail: sarah.hofmann@state.vt.us Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mitzi A. Young, Esq.
Washington, DC 205'55-0001 Steven C. Hamrick, Esq.
E-mail: rew@nrc.gov Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop 0-15 D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: may@nrc.gov; schl@nrc.gov
Diane Curran, Esq. David R. Lewis, Esq.
Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP Matias F. Travieso-Diaz 1726 M Street NW, Suite 600 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Washington, DC 20036 2300 N Street NW E-mail: dcurran(harmoncurran.com Washington, DC 20037-1128 E-mail: david.lewisgpillsburylaw.com Callie B. Newton, Chair matias.travieso-diaz@pillsburylaw.com Gail MacArthur Lucy Gratwick Honorary Gregory B. Jaczko, Commissioner Marcia Hamilton Mail Stop 0-16 G15 Town of Marlboro Selectboard U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Coinniission P.O. Box 518 Washington, DC 20555 Marlboro, VT 05344 cmriaczko@nrc.gov E-mail: cbnewton@sover.net; marcialynn(@evl .net Honorary Dale E Kline, Chairman Marcia Carpentier, Esq. Mail Stop 0-16 G15 Jonathan M. Rund, Esq. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Washington, D.C. 20555 Mail Stop T-3 F23 chairman@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Honorary Peter B. Lyons, Commissioner E-mail mnxc7@nrc.gov; Jmr3@nrc.gov Mail Stop 0-16 G15 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq. Washington, D.C. 20555 National Legal Scholars Law Firm cmrlyonsgnrc. gov 84 East Thetford Road Lyme, NH 03768 Honorary Jeffrey S. Merrifield, Commissioner E-mail: aroisman@nationallegalscholars.com Mail Stop 0-16 G15 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Matthew Brock, Esq. Washington, D.C. 20555 Assistant Attorney General cmarmerrifieldgnrc.gov Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General Environmental Protection Division Honorary Edward McGaffigan Jr., Commissioner One Ashburton Place, Room 1813 Mail Stop 0-16 G15 Boston, MA 02108-1598 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission E-mail: matthew.brock@ag0.state.ma.us Washington, D.C. 20555 cnrmcgaffigangnrc.org Dan MacArthur, Director Town of Marlboro Jennifer J. Patterson, Esq.
Emergency Management Office of the New Hampshire Attorney General P.O. Box 30 33 Capitol Street Marlboro, VT 05344 Concord, NH 03301 E-mail: dmacarthurligc.org E-mail: Jennifer.patterson@doj.nh.gov
SHEMS DUNKIEL KASSEL & SAUNDERS, PLLC By: 1A /?AY Clara Cavitt, Administrative Assistant for Ronald A. Shems Karen Tyler 91 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 802 860 1003 802 860 1208 (fax).
rshems@sdkslaw.com ktyler@sdkslaw.com Attormeys for New England Coalition, Inc.