ML062650380

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:53, 23 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Memorandum to H. Clayton from C. Pederson, OI Investigation Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant
ML062650380
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 01/15/2003
From: Pederson C
Division of Reactor Safety III
To: Clayton H
NRC/OI
References
3-2001-A-0176, 3-2002-004, 3-2002-A-0114, AITS S03-2104, FOIA/PA-2006-0113
Download: ML062650380 (1)


Text

Allegations Allegations Region III- AITS 0n3-2104.wpd __ _Pag e3 January 15, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: H. Brent Clayton Enforcement/Investigation Officer FROM: Cynthia D. Pederson, Director Division of Reactor Safety

SUBJECT:

01 INVESTIGATION KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT:

(01 CASE NO. 3-2002-004) (AMS NO. RIII-2002-A-01 14 AND Rill-2001 -A-0176), AITS NO. S03-2104 This responds to James Heller's memorandum to me dated December 18, 2002, which requested that the Security Group review the subject 01 Investigation Report to determine appropriate enforcement action and to identify any unresolved technical issues. At our request, R. Alexander extended our completion date for this project to January 20, 2003.

Conclusion:

This investigation was initiated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Investigation, Region Ill, on March 25, 2002, to determine: (1) whether contract welders failed to report fitness-for-duty (FFD) concerns about their foreman; and (2) whether a contract

'foreman deliberately failed to self-report and submit to FFD testing during a fall outage in 2001.

Additionally, on August 5, 2002, 01 was requested to determine whether a contractor mechanical and civil welding superintendent deliberately provided false information to a licensee investigator relative to being told about the FFD concern involving the foreman.

Based upon the evidence developed during their investigation, 01 did not substantiate concern (1) that identified contract welders had deliberately failed to report a FFD concern. Regarding concern (2), 01 did not substantiate that a named foreman had deliberately failed to self-report and submit to FFD testing. Regarding the August 5, 2002, issue, 01 substantiated that a

-named mechanical and civil welding contractor superintendent had deliberately failed to report an FFD concern. They found that the superintendent failed to report that several contractor personnel had smelled an odor of alcohol on a contract foreman, and that the superintendent also deliberately provided false information to 01 and licensee investigators about being informed of the FFD concern.

We concur with Ol's conclusions. Our review of 01's investigation report identified no new unresolved technical security issues. We will coordinate with the enforcement staff to prepare appropriate enforcement action, which initially could include FFD violations by both the licensee and an individual.

CONTACT: Terry Madeda, DRS (630) 829-9860 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\AITS S03-2104.wpd To receive a copy of this docunent, Indicate In the box: "C* - Copy without attachrntnenclosue *E - Copy wtth sttachnunVenciosue N" - No copy OFFICE Rill IC Rill I C RII " I ' "1 NAME TMadeda:aa JCreed CPederson DATE 01/15/03 01/15/03 01/15/03 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY