ML061120002

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:40, 13 July 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed License Renewal Interim Staff Guidance LR-ISG-2006-01: Plant-Specific Aging Management Program for Inaccessible Areas of Boiling Water Reactor Mark I Steel Containment Drywell Shell
ML061120002
Person / Time
Site: PROJ0690
Issue date: 05/03/2006
From: Gillespie F
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRB
To: Lochbaum D, Marion A
Nuclear Energy Institute, Union of Concerned Scientists
tran, l., NRR/DLR/RLRB, 415-4103
Shared Package
ml061120001 List:
References
LR-ISG-2006-01
Download: ML061120002 (9)


Text

May 3, 2006Mr. Alex MarionNuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006-3708

SUBJECT:

PROPOSED LICENSE RENEWAL INTERIM STAFF GUIDANCE LR-ISG-2006-01:PLANT-SPECIFIC AGING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR INACCESSIBLE AREAS OF BOILING WATER REACTOR MARK I STEEL CONTAINMENT DRYWELL SHELL

Dear Mr. Marion:

This letter provides you an opportunity to comment on the proposed License Renewal InterimStaff Guidance (LR-ISG) (Enclosure 1), which clarifies the license renewal guidance documents (LRGDs) regarding inaccessible areas of boiling water reactor Mark I steel containment drywellshells. We discussed the need for this LR-ISG with you during the public telephone conferences on January 31, 2006, and April 19, 2006, as well as at a public meeting on March 23, 2006.The current LRGDs require additional detail to address inaccessible areas of the Mark I steelcontainment drywell shell, an important safety-related structural component that is within thescope of license renewal. These are areas where visually inspecting the outside of the drywell shell is impractical because the distance between the steel containment drywell shell and the surrounding concrete structure is too small. Past operating experience with Mark I steel containments indicates that when water is discovered in the bottom outside areas of the drywellshell (for example in the sand-pocket area), the most likely cause is seepage through these inaccessible spaces. The staff issued numerous requests for additional information (RAIs) to previous and currentlicense renewal applicants to obtain the information needed to perform its review regarding this issue. The proposed LR-ISG will provide guidance on the information that should be includedin these applications, reducing the number of RAIs issued to the applicants. Specifically, the staff has determined that applicants for license renewal for a plant with a boiling water reactorMark I steel containment should provide a plant-specific aging management program to address the potential loss of material due to corrosion in the inaccessible areas of the Mark I steel containment drywell shell for the period of extended operation.

A. Marion-2-The staff has also enclosed for your information a copy of the Federal Register Notice relatingto this proposed LR-ISG (Enclosure 2). The staff is requesting your comments on this proposed LR-ISG within 30 days following the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Linh Tran at 301-415-4103.An identical letter was sent to Mr. David Lochbaum at the Union of Concerned Scientists forcomment.Sincerely,/RA/Frank P. Gillespie, DirectorDivision of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationProject No. 690

Enclosures:

1. Proposed LR-ISG-2006-01
2. Federal Register Noticecc w/encls: See next page May 3, 2006Mr. David LochbaumUnion of Concerned Scientists 1707 H Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006-3919

SUBJECT:

PROPOSED LICENSE RENEWAL INTERIM STAFF GUIDANCE LR-ISG-2006-01:PLANT-SPECIFIC AGING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR INACCESSIBLE AREAS OF BOILING WATER REACTOR MARK I STEEL CONTAINMENT DRYWELL SHELL

Dear Mr. Lochbaum:

This letter provides you an opportunity to comment on the proposed License Renewal InterimStaff Guidance (LR-ISG) (Enclosure 1), which clarifies the license renewal guidance documents (LRGDs) regarding inaccessible areas of boiling water reactor Mark I steel containment drywellshells. We discussed the need for this LR-ISG with you during the public telephone conferences on January 31, 2006, and April 19, 2006, as well as at a public meeting on March 23, 2006.The current LRGDs require additional detail to address inaccessible areas of the Mark I steelcontainment drywell shell, an important safety-related structural component that is within thescope of license renewal. These are areas where visually inspecting the outside of the drywell shell is impractical because the distance between the steel containment drywell shell and the surrounding concrete structure is too small. Past operating experience with Mark I steel containments indicates that when water is discovered in the bottom outside areas of the drywellshell (for example in the sand-pocket area), the most likely cause is seepage through these inaccessible spaces. The staff issued numerous requests for additional information (RAIs) to previous and currentlicense renewal applicants to obtain the information needed to perform its review regarding this issue. The proposed LR-ISG will provide guidance on the information that should be includedin these applications, reducing the number of RAIs issued to the applicants. Specifically, the staff has determined that applicants for license renewal for a plant with a boiling water reactorMark I steel containment should provide a plant-specific aging management program to address the potential loss of material due to corrosion in the inaccessible areas of the Mark I steel containment drywell shell for the period of extended operation.

D. Lochbaum-2-The staff has also enclosed for your information a copy of the Federal Register Notice relatingto this proposed LR-ISG (Enclosure 2). The staff is requesting your comments on this proposed LR-ISG within 30 days following the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Linh Tran at 301-415-4103.An identical letter was sent to Mr. Alex Marion at the Nuclear Energy Institute for industrycomment.Sincerely,/RA/Frank P. Gillespie, DirectorDivision of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationProject No. 690

Enclosures:

1. Proposed LR-ISG-2006-01
2. Federal Register Notice A. Marion-2-The staff has also enclosed for your information a copy of the Federal Register Notice relatingto this proposed LR-ISG (Enclosure 2). The staff is requesting your comments on this proposed LR-ISG within 30 days following the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Linh Tran at 301-415-4103.An identical letter was sent to Mr. David Lochbaum at the Union of Concerned Scientists forcomment.Sincerely,/RA/Frank P. Gillespie, DirectorDivision of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationProject No. 690

Enclosures:

1. Proposed LR-ISG-2006-01
2. Federal Register Noticecc w/encls: See next pageAdams Accession Nos.: ML061120001-PKG, ML061120002-Ltrs w/ Encl. 1 ML061120003-FRN w/ attachmentsE:\Filenet\ML061120002.wpdOFFICEPM:DLRLA:DLRTR:EGCB:DEBC:EGCB:DEBC:DLROGC NLOD:DE D:DLRNAMELTranYEdmondsHAsharRKarasJZimmermanJMooreMMayfieldFGillespie(PTKuo for)DATE 04/24/0604/ 24 /0604/ 25 /0604/ 25 /0605/ /0605/ 2 /0604/ 25 /0605/ 3 /06OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Letter to Alex Marion (identical sent to David Lochbaum) from Frank Gillespie dated May 3, 2006

SUBJECT:

PROPOSED LICENSE RENEWAL INTERIM STAFF GUIDANCE LR-ISG-2006-01: PLANT-SPECIFIC AGING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR INACCESSIBLE AREAS OF BWR MARK I STEEL CONTAINMENT DRYWELL SHELL HARD COPYDLR R/FE-MAIL:JFairRWeisman AMurphy RPettis GGalletti CLi GBagchi SSmith (srs3)

SDuraiswamy YL (Renee) Li RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDci RidsNrreEemb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDeEqva RidsNrrDss RidsNrrDnrl RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrAdes DLR Staff


CJulian RGardnerMFarberMModes LKozak HAshar JMa DJeng PROPOSED LICENSE RENEWAL INTERIM STAFF GUIDANCE LR-ISG-2006-01:

PLANT-SPECIFIC AGING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR INACCESSIBLE AREAS OFBOILING WATER REACTOR MARK I STEEL CONTAINMENT DRYWELL SHELL IntroductionLine Item II.B1.1-2 of NUREG-1801, Volume 2, Revision 1, includes a provision for agingmanagement of the Mark I steel containment drywell shells. However, the line item requires additional detail to address the inaccessible areas of the Mark I steel containment drywell shells. Specifically, the line item does not provide guidance when the distance between the steel drywell shell and the surrounding concrete structure is too small for the successful performance of visual examination.All Mark I containments are free-standing steel construction, except for Brunswick, Units 1 and 2.The Brunswick Mark I containment is a reinforced concrete drywell with a steel liner. A drywell shell is a free-standing steel structure with no concrete backing, whereas the steel liner of a drywell is a leak-tight membrane in direct contact with the concrete containment. Historical BackgroundInformation Notice (IN) 86-99, "Degradation of Steel Containments," dated December 8, 1986,described an event related to the degradation of the drywell shell at Oyster Creek NuclearGenerating Station. IN 86-99, Supplement 1, dated February 1991, explained that the mostlikely cause of corrosion of the drywell shell in sand-pocket areas (near the bottom of the drywell) and in the spherical portion of the drywell at higher elevations, was the water in the gap between the drywell and the concrete shield. The source of water was noted as leakage through the seal between the drywell and the refueling cavity. The IN supplement also noted that ultrasonic testing (UT) discovered minor corrosion in the cylindrical portion of the drywell. DiscussionGeneric Letter (GL) 87-05, "Request for Additional Information-Assessment of LicenseeMeasures to Mitigate And/Or Identify Potential Degradation of Mark I Drywells," requested additional information regarding licensee actions to mitigate and/or identify potential degradation of boiling water reactor Mark I drywells. As a result, most licensees performed UTof their carbon steel drywell shells adjacent to the sand pocket region. In addition, many licensees established leakage monitoring programs for drain lines to identify leakage that may have resulted from refueling or spillage of water into the gap between the drywell and the surrounding concrete.UT performed as a result of GL 87-05 provided a set of data points to determine the drywellshell thickness that could be compared to the nominal/minimum fabrication thickness and the minimum thickness required to withstand the postulated loads. These UT measurements taken during the 1987-1988 time frame fall approximately near the mid-point of the current 40-yearoperating license period for most plants with Mark I steel containments. The drywell shell is a passive, long-lived structure within the scope of license renewal that issubject to aging degradation. Pursuant to 10 CFR 54.21, the applicant must demonstrate thatthe effects of aging will be adequately managed so that the intended function will be maintainedconsistent with the current licensing basis for the period of extended operation. On the basis of license renewal application reviews and industry operating experience, the NRCstaff determined that a plant-specific aging management program (AMP) is needed to address the potential loss of material due to corrosion in the inaccessible areas of the Mark I steel containment drywell shell for the period of extended operation.Proposed ActionIn addressing Line Item II.B1.1-2 of NUREG-1801, Volume 2, Revision 1, applicants for licenserenewal for plants with a Mark I steel containment should provide a plant-specific AMP that addresses the potential loss of material due to corrosion in the inaccessible areas of the Mark I steel containment drywell shell for the period of extended operation.In conducting the aging management review of the drywell shell, the applicant should considerthe following:(1)Develop a corrosion rate that can be reasonably inferred from past UT examinations orestablish a corrosion rate using representative samples in similar operating conditions, materials, and environments. If degradation has occurred, provide a technical basis using the developed or established corrosion rate to demonstrate that the drywell shellwill have sufficient wall thickness to perform its intended function through the period ofextended operation.(2)Demonstrate that UT measurements performed in response to GL 87-05 did not showdegradation inconsistent with the developed or established corrosion rate. (3)Where degradation has been identified in the accessible areas of the drywell, provide anevaluation that addresses the condition of the inaccessible areas for similar conditions.(4)To assure that there are no circumstances that would result in degradation of the drywell,demonstrate that moisture levels associated with accelerated corrosion rates do not exist in the exterior portion of the drywell shell, i.e., (1) the sand pocket area drains and/or the refueling seal drains are monitored periodically; (2) the top of the sand pocket area is sealed to exclude water accumulation in the sand pocket area; and/or alarms are used to monitor regions for moisture/leakage.(5)If moisture has been detected or suspected in the inaccessible area on the exterior ofthe drywell shell: (a)Include in the scope of license renewal any components that are identified as asource of moisture, such as the refueling seal, and perform an aging management review. (b)Identify surface areas requiring examination by implementing augmentedinspections for the period of extended operation in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)Section XI IWE-1240 as identified in Table IWE-2500-1, Examination Category E-C. (c) Use examination methods, that are in accordance with ASME Section XI IWE-2500,which specifies:(i) surface areas accessible from both sides shall be visually examined using a VT-1 visual examination method,(ii)surface areas accessible from one side only shall be examined for wall thinningusing an ultrasonic thickness measurement method,(iii)when ultrasonic thickness measurements are performed, one foot square gridsshall be used, and(iv) ultrasonic measurements shall be used to determine the minimum wall thickness within each grid. The location of the minimum wall thickness shall be marked such that periodic reexamination of that location can be performed.(d)Demonstrate through use of augmented inspections performed in accordance withASME Section XI IWE that corrosion is not occurring, or that corrosion is progressing so slowly that the age-related degradation will not jeopardize theintended function of the drywell shell through the period of extended operation. (6)If the intended function of the drywell shell cannot be demonstrated for the period ofextended operation (i.e., wall thickness is less than the minimum required thickness),

identify actions that will be taken as part of the aging management program to ensurethat the integrity of the drywell shell will be maintained through the period of extendedoperation.