ML17355A332

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:11, 18 June 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1998 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for Turkey Point Plant Units 3 & 4. with 990507 Ltr.Pages 7/11 - 11/11 (2nd Quarter), 7/12 - 12/12 (3rd Quarter) & 8/12 - 12/12 (4th Quarter) of Incoming Submittal Not Included
ML17355A332
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1998
From: Baily P, Hovey R
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-99-96, NUDOCS 9905170101
Download: ML17355A332 (113)


Text

REGULA-.Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIC SYSTEM (RIDS)ACBZSY~PT.NBR:9905p70101 DOC.DATE: 98/12/31 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET I FACZLP6-250 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 3, Florida Power and Light C 05000250'0-251 Turkey Pointi,Plant, Unit 4, Florida Power and Light C 05000251 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BAILY,P.G; Florida Power E Light Co.HOVEY,R.J.

Florida Power S Light Co.geYr~no Dyed~~.@g RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

"1998 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for Turkey Point Plant Units 3 S 4." With 990507 ltr.DISTRIBUTION CODE: C001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: T TITLE: Licensing Submittal:

Environmental Rept Amdt 6 Related Correspondence E NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME JABBOUR,K COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME COPIES LTTR ENCL INTE NUDOCS-ABSTRACT RGN2 DRS/RSB 1 1 1 1.1 LA OGC/HDS3 1 1 1 0 EXTERNAL: NOAC 1 1 NRC PDR D N NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE"TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD)ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 8 ENCL 7 0 4 I e~'NAY 0 759sO L-99-96 10 CFR 50.36b U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos.50-250 and 50-251 1998 Annual Radiological Envi Attached is the 1998 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4, as required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.3.Should there be any questions or comments r'egarding this information, please contact us.Very truly yours, R.J.Hovey Vice President Turkey Point Plant SM Attachment cc: Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Sr.Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant 9'rr05i 70 iOI 98i23i f PDR ADQCK 05000250 PDR R lP v&~gooi an FPL Group company 1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT UNITS 3 8c 4 LICENSE NOS.DPR-31, DPR-41 DOCKET NOS.50-250, 50-251 Data Submitted by: Florida DOH Prepared by: Reviewed by: I<pp)q~iol 0

1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE Introduction Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary Deviations

/Missing Data Analyses with LLDs Above Required Detection Capabilities Land Use Census TABLE 1 TABLE 1A TABLE 1B TABLE 2 ATTACHMENT A Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power and Light Company's Turkey Point Site First Quarter, 1998 Second Quarter, 1998 Third Quarter, 1998 Fourth Quarter, 1998 Results from the lnterlaboratory Comparison Program, 1998 ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C

1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The data obtained through the Turkey Point Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples are not increasing.

These measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units 3 8 4, during the surveillance year, is well within the limits established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.The sampling period was from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998.Additionally, supplemental samples collected by the State of Florida, DOH, do not indicate adverse trends in the radiological environment.

I J 0 1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3 8c 4 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9 of Turkey Point Units 3 8 4 Technical Specifications.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated..This report covers surveillance activities described in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM)meeting the requirements of Unit 3 and Unit 4 Technical Specifications.

(RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A.Pur~oe The purpose of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those.exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to.the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation.

The radiological Environmental Monitoring Program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted pursuant to Control 5.1 of Turkey Point Unit 3 8 4 ODCM..Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies:

a.Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 21 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly.

b.Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed weekly.Analyses include iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

c.Surface water samples are collected from three locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed monthly.Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3 8c 4 d.e.Shoreline sediment samples are collected from three locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples.Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations coinciding with two of the locations for surface water samples.Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed monthly.Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2.Analytical Responsibility:

Radiological environmental monitoring for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health (DOH).Samples are collected and analyzed by DOH personnel.

Samples are analyzed at the DOH Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.Table 1, Environmental Radiolo ical Monitorin Pro ram A'nnual Summa provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period.Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified"A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively.

Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.Land Use Census A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the Turkey Point Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation, in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors.A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year'is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census Summa 0

1998'NNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway)20%greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.Interlaborato Com arison Pro ram The intercomparison program, for 1998, consisted of samples provided through the EPA Safe Drinking Water Program and Department of Energy QAP Program.The EPA program consisted of one round of Water samples.The results are listed in ATTACHMENT C, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM.The DOE-QAP consisted of two rounds of Air Filter, Water, Soil, and Vegetation matrices.The samples were analyzed using the methods applicable to the REMP (gamma spectroscopy, Gross Beta, and Tritium for water).The results for nuclides associated with the REMP are listed as the last two pages of ATTACHMENT C, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM.Please note that although our laboratory participated in the analysis for alpha in water, the results of this analysis are not used to support Turkey Point's Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.

1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3 5 4 III.DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A.The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by Control 1.4 of ODCM.Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by ODCM Table 5.1-2, for all samples specified by Table 5.1-1.In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation.

These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, and Be-7 which are common in the Florida environment.

B.In er re tion of Resul Direct Radiation:

The results of direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations.

The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant.The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the preoperational surveillance program.Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.2.Air Particulates/Radioiodine:

Results of gross beta measurement are consistent with past measurements.

No radioiodine was detected..

The only identified isotopes, are cosmic-ray produced Be-7 and naturally occurring Pb-210 at levels consistent with past measurements.

3.Waterborne, Surface Water: The results of radioactivity measurements in surface water samples are consistent with past measurements.

Tritium was reported as present in 4 of the 36 surface water samples collected.

These results are consistent with the known subsurface interchange that occurs between the closed cooling canal and its surrounding waters, and the pressure gradients caused by the flow of aquifer subsurface waters in South Florida.The highest reported tritium is less than 2%of the reporting value specified by ODCM.Table 5.1-2.4, Waterborne, Sediment: The results are consistent with past measurements.

In addition to cosmic-ray produced Be-7 and naturally occurring isotopes, Cesium-137-.was identified in 1 of the 6 samples collected.

The result is less than 13%of the required LLD specified in ODCM Table 5.1-3

1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3 5.4 P 5.Waterborne, Food Products: I The results are consistent with past measurements; only naturally occurring radionuclides were detected.Broad Leaf Vegetation The results of radioactivity measurements are consistent with past measurements.

Cs-137 was detected, as in the past, in samples collected from-the indicator and control locations.

The maximum concentration reported was less than 15/o of the reporting level specified by ODCM Table 5.1-2.No other fission products were detected.Conclusions The data obtained through the Turkey Point Plant Radiological Environmental

'onitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased.

Additionally, supplemental to the ODCM program, sampling of the direct exposure, inhalation, and ingestion pathways, performed by DOH, does not show adverse trends in levels of radiation and radioactive materials in unrestricted areas.The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units 3 8 4, during the surveillance.

year, are well within"as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.

i/

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

M fF illy*i Ui II,D k M().~0-I 0-Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1998 (County, State)PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

TLD UNITS: micro-R/hr Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)Page1 of 8 Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of Detection'LLD)

All Indicator Distance 8 Locations Direction Mean (f)Range Range Control Locations Mean (f)'ange Exposure Rate, 88 5.1 (84/84)3.9-7.6 NW-10 10 mi., NW 7.3 (4/4)7.0'7.6 5.5 (4/4)5.3-5.9 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turk Point Units 3&4, Docket No(s).50-250 8 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1998 (County, State)PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS: Ci/m'ocation with Highest Annual Mean Name'Mean (f)'age 2 of 8 Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed'>>I 260 Lower Limit of Detection'LLD) 0.024 All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range<MDA Distance&Direction Range Control Locations Mean(f)Range<MDA Gross Beta, 260 0.0025 0.013 (205/208)0.004-0.024 T-72<1 mi., WSW 0.013 (51/52)0.006-0.024 0.014 (52/52)0.005-0.026 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20'Be 134CS 137Cs 210Pb 0.0052 0.00069 0.00066 0.1266 (16/1 6)0.0811-0.1498<MDA<MDA 0.0146 (1 6/1 6)0.0084-0.0191 T-72<1 mi WSW T-51 2 mi., NNW 0.1332 (4/4)0.1032-0.1498 0.0161 (4/4)0.0145-0.0176 0.1292 (4/4)0.1068-0.1473<MDA<MDA 0.01 40 (4/4)0.0114-0.0160 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0

TA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

.3 ty tty I 0 I 3)I.0 I tM t)~0-50-'Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1998 (County, State)PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SURFACE WATER UNITS: Ci/L Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)'age 3 of 8 Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Tritium, 36 Gamma Isotopic, 36 40K Lower Limit of Detection'LLD) 230 60 All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range 271 (4/24)162-407 274 (24/24)153-324 Distance 8 Direction T-81 6mi.,S T-81 6mi., S Range 271 (4/24)162-407 289 (l2/12)232-350 Control Locations Mean (f)'ange<MDA 149 (12/12)65-287 Mn Fe Co Co~Zn"Zr-Nb 131i 134Cs 137CS'"Ba-La 4<MDA 8<MDA 4<MDA 4<MDA 8<MDA 7<MDA 5<MDA 5<MDA 5<MDA 11<MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA ENVIRONMENTAl RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

N tt ttt t Vi ttt.D tttltt.~tt Otter Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1998 (County, State)PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLI ECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: Ci/k DRY Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)'age 4 of 8 Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of All Indicator Detection'LLD)

Locations Mean (f)Range Distance 8 Direction Range Control Locations Mean (f)'ange Gamma isotopic, 6 13?C"Be 40K 210P b"'Ra 238U 58Co 60Co 134CS 12 100 140 49 12 14 22 (1/4)304 (4/4)166-532 396 (3/4)232-506 830 (4/4)473-1130 702 (4/4)605-892 610 (4/4)409-1117<MDA<MDA<MDA T-42<1 rni., ENE T-81 6mI., S T-81 6 rni., S T-42<1 mi., ENE T-81 6mi., S T-42<1 mi., ENE 22 (1/4)349 (2/2)166-582 451 (1/2)1124 (2/2)1119-1130 758 (2/2)625-892 763 (2/2)409-1117<MDA<MDA 255 (2/2)249-261<MDA 145 (1/2)<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0

~Ie ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 8 4, Docket No(s).50-250 8 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1998 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

CRUSTACEA UNITS: Ci/k WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)Page 5 of 8 Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Gamma Isotopic, 4 4'K 226Ra Ra 59Fe 56co Co Zn 134CS 137C Lower Limit of Detection'LLD) 130 20 16 19 17 All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range 1296 (2/2)979-1612 856 (1/2)1105 (1-2)<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA Distance&Direction T-81 6mi., S T-81 6mi., S T-81 6mi., S Range 1296 (2/2)979-1612 856 (1/2)1105 (1-2)Control Locations Mean (f)'ange'1016 (2/2)948-1084<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 l/

TA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3&4, Docket No(s).50-250 8 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period J nua 1-Dec mber31 1998 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

FISH UNITS: Ci/k WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)Page 6 of 8 Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Gamma Isotopic, 4'Be 40K 210Pb Ra Mn"Fe~co 60Co Zn 134Cs n7Cs Lower Limit of Detection'LLD) 130 16 10 17 All Indicator I ocations.Mean (f)Range<MDA 1835 (2/2)1798-1872<MDA 377 (1/2)<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA Distance&Direction T-81 6mi., S T-81 6mi., S Range 1835 (2/2)1798-1872 377 (1/2)Control Locations Mean(f)Range 140 (1/2)1825 (2/2)1379-2271 255 (1/2)<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA,<MDA<MDA<MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 lp ENYIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 8 4, Docket No(s).50-250 8 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1998 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: Ci/k WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)'age7of 8 Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Gamma Isotopic, 36 Be 40K 137C~co 210pb 131i 134Cs Lower Limit of Detection'LLD) 100 All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range 1515 (24/24)692-2370 3360 (24/24)1701-5605 108 (24/24)32-294<MDA 789 (3/24)570-l001<MDA<MDA Distance S.Direction T-40 3mi., W T-41 2 mi., W/NW T-41 2 mi., W/NW-T-40 3mi., W Range 1648 (12/12)1067-2370 3770 (12/1 2)2260-5608 136 (12/1 2)32-294 795 (1/12)Control Locations Mean (f)" Range 1305 (12/12)912-1806 3445 (12/12)2058-5143 25 (7/12)15-46<MDA 817 (3/1 2)608-950<MDA<MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 0 TAO ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

)y)y)))y)u)3,~y M)).~)50-Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Janua 1-Decem er31 1998 (County, State)NOTES Page 8 of 8 The LLD is an"a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95%probability with only 5%probability of falsely concluding that a blank obser vation represents a real signal.LLDs in this column are at time of measurement.

The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.

b.Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only.Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).c.Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.d.-Results were based upon the average net response of two TLDs.(Thermoluminescent dosimeters).

MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.

~r 1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 TABLE 1A DEVIATIONS MISSING DATA There were no deviations trom the sampling schedule.All samples were analyzed and the results included in Table 1.

1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3 8c 4 TABLE 1B ANALYSIS WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1/1/98-12/31/98 The values specified in ODCM Table 5.1-3, Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

gr 1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS Dis nce o Neares a b Sector NNE NE ENE~ESE SE SSE SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 6/98 Milk (c)Animal L (e)0 (I)0 0 0 0 0 6/98 Residence L (g)0 0 0 0~L L 4.8/285 3.7/316 (g)4.4/337 (g)6/98 Garden (d)0 0 0 0 4.4/306 4.5/332

1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONNIENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3 8t 4 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS NOTES All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the Turkey Point Plant.The following format is used to denote the location: distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)For example, a residence located in the north sector at a distance of 2.1 miles bearing 350 degrees is recorded as 2.1/350.Potential milk animal locations.

Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an ocean area.Non-residential occupied buildings in these sectors include the following:

Sector~Dts ance~Descri tion N 1.8/349 24-hour Security Staff Building NW 3.5/304 24-hour Security Staffing NNW 1.8/345 Security booth at park entrance

1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 ATTACHMENT KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS

\~1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 NEAR SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS jl!,: Q%'A7>f<f F 8'i<~<~<f (8~Q 4~~~~RN>!q j~@~j$~~~~~~~~

~I 1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 DISTANT REMP SAMPLING LOCATIONS\~~1':.;:Peiiine',T 6:4'P.T'67,:,,:.:::::,::,.,"Pj

'.Cutler Ridge~'-10:""'"'""'""'iscayrie'Djy':..'".:..'.,:,.',:..".":."':@W~Homesieai:.T.->.

.
..-..............,...,...,, glhott Key.::.,::::,~:.::...,.g5:: TgP:.'..:::;:.'~':

.'R'~:.~:::;

~;r,a'..'e'Q p q, p.".: gf 9 r.....,i.i..

L~~~:::../MAL:.sag.q.::.:.:<'.,',"...'."...!::::,::hajj:,'::::;:::;:::::;;::::

'::::,::::;",::,:::::

.:: '...: ',':.:: '::.,": ':.":;Old'.Rhode's:.'Key;.'.,::.'::,.::,:,'.::::::.:;:::.:::::

'::::::,'::: '.:::::.:.::::

.'iir'tie Haibor.",Channel:::,':::::::::::

...':,:::::.SSIN-10 IaineBSZiiin'd

/""':: "::: "'"""'"'"'"""'"""'"'.::.Q.~,'..:,."."..

':::.:.',".::.::..:

':,:.::.:.,.'"::,'::.:;.,:::.:,::,;.::.::;,.:'.;:,;:.::..:

.;-::;.:,:;Key>Larjo"..':..';;."..::,';:,',."..;.'.

':;,":.,",-;:,.:,:,'.,:..':.

~~~

1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3 8c 4 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 1 OF 4 PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

QUARTERLY Location"~Nme N-2 N-7 N-10 NNW-2 NNW-10 NW-1 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-10 W-1 W-5 W-9 WSW-8 SW-1 SW-8 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 SSE-1 SSE-10~Con rel NNE-22~Deecn ion Convey Point, Parking Area Black Point Marina Parking Lot Old Cutler Rd.approx.196th Street East End North Canal Road Bailes Road 8 U.S.¹1 Turkey Point Entrance Road Mowty Drive 8 117th Avenue Newton Road, North of Coconut Palm Drive Homestead Middle School On-Site, North Side of Discharge Canal Palm Drive&Tallahassee Road Card Sound Road, 0.6 mile from U.S.¹1~Card Sound Road, 3.4 miles from U.S.¹1 On-Site near Land Utilization Offices Card Sound Road, 5 miles from U.S.¹1 On-Site, Southwest Corner of Cooling Canals Card Sound Road, west side of Toll Plaza On-Site, South East Corner of Cooling Canals Card Sound Road at Steamboat Creek Turtle Point Ocean Reef Natoma Substation

'The location name is the direction sector-approximate distance (miles)

'F 1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 ATTACHMENT A Page 2 of 4 PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

WEEKLY Location~Nme T-51 T-57 T-58 T-72 Direction Sector NNW NW NW WSW Approximate Distance~miies~Descri iion Entrance Area to Biscayne National Park SW 107th Avenue at Mowry Canal Turkey Point Entrance Road Just before entrance to Land Utilization's access gate.Control: T-64 NNE 22 Natoma Substation

~~

1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 ATTACHMENT A Page 3 of 4 PATHWAY'ATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

MONTHLY Location~Nm T-42 , T-81 Direction~ec gr ENE Approximate Distance~miles~Descri iion Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point Card Sound, near Mouth of OldQischarge Canal Control: T-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

SEMI-ANNUALLY Location Name T-42 T-81 Direction Sector ENE Approximate Distance~miles~Descri iion Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point Card Sound, near Mouth of Old Discharge Canal~Con roi: T-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park

~w 1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 ATTACHMENT A Page 4 of 4 PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

SEMI-ANNUALLY Location Name T-81 Direction~Sc or Approximate Distance~miles~De cri tion Card Sound Vicinity of Turkey Point Facility'ontrol: T-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park SAMPLES COLLECTED:

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION t SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

MONTHLY Location Name T-40 T-41 Direction~Sec or W WNW Approximate Distance~miles 3~De seri ion South of Palm Dr.on S.W.117th Street Extension Palm Dr., West of Old Missile Site near Plant Site Boundary~Con roi: T-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park 1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 ATTACHMENT B RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE 1998 First Quarter, 1998 Second Quarter, 1998 Third Quarter, 1998 Fourth Quarter, 1998

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT SITE FIRST QUARTER 1998 BUREAU OF RADIATION CONTROL

~~

TURZSY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling First Quarter, 1998 Sam leT e Number of Coltectton

~Pre cene Locations Sam ted~Sam ies 1.Direct Radiation Quarterly 22 22 2.Airborne 2.a.Air Iodines 2.b.Air Particulates Weekly Weekly 65 65 3.Waterborne 3.a.Surface Water 3.b.Shoreline Sediment Monthly Semiannually 3 4.Ingestion 4.a.Pish and Invertebrates 4.a.1;Crustacea 4.a.2.Pish Semiannually Semiannually 4.b.Food Products Broad Leaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 174 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

~N 1.DIRECT RADIATI N-TLDs-R/hour Sample Site N-2 N-7 N-10 NNW-2 NNW-10 NW-1 NW-5 NW-10 Deployment 16-Dec-97 Collection 17-Mar-98 5.9+0.4 5.0+0.4 4.7+0.4 4.5+0.3 5.6&0.4 6.3+0.5 4.6 k.0.3 7.6&0.5 Sample Site WSW-8 SW-1 SW-8 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 Deployment 16-Dec-97 Collection 17-Mar-98 5.5&OA (A)4.6+0.4 4.7*0.4 (A)4.7*0.4 4.9+0.4 4.9+0.4 (A)5.7+0.4 VIV-10 W-1 W-5 W-9 6.5 6 0.5 6.5&0.5 5.1+0.3 5.0+0.4 SSE-1 SSE-10 NNE-22 4.5+0.3 5.4+0.4 (B)5.5+0.4 (A)-The dosimeter for sites WSW-8, SW-8 and S-5 were found on the ground when collection was attempted.

We suspect wind blew the tld cages off the utility pole.The TLD cages were remounted on utility poles and new dosimeters were deployed.(B)-The dosimeter for site SSE-10 was found in the bushes upon collection.

We suspect wind blew the TLD cage off the utility pole.The cage was remounted and a new dosimeter was deployed.

I~

T57 2:a.IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES

-i/m'ollection Date T51 T58 T64 T72 05-Jan-98 12-Jan-98 20-Jan-98 26-Jan-98<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02 03-Feb-98 09-Feb-98 16-Feb-98 23-Feb-98<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.03<0.03<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.01 02-Mar-98 10-Mar-98 17-Mar-98 23-Mar-98 30-Mar-98<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.04<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02 2:b.l.AIR PARTI ATE-R S BETA-Ci/m'ollection Date 05-Jan-98 12-Jan-98 20-Jan-98 26-Jan-98 Sam le Site T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 0.006+0.002 0.006+0.002 0.006+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.008 a 0.002 0.007+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.019+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.020+0.002 0.016 a 0.002 0.015&0.002 0.014+0.002 0.007&0.002 0.013+0.002 0.013&0.002 03-Feb-98 0.011+0.002 0.016 a 0.002 0.019+0.002 0.014 a 0.002 0.016 a 0.002 09-Feb-98 0.011 a 0.002 0.014+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.016+0.002 0.009 a 0.002 16-Feb-98 0.013+0:002 0.013+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.015+0.002-.0.012+0.002 23-Feb-98 0.009+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.011+'0.002 0.010+0.002 0.014+0.002 02-Mar-.98 0.017+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.01'4+0.002 0.016+0.002 0.015+0.002 10-Mar-98 0.016+0.002 0.019+0.002 0.018+0.002 0.020+0.002 0.019+0,002 23-Mar-98 30-Mar-98 Mean: 0.010+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.013+0.001 0.013+0.001 17-Mar-98 0.019+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.012+0.001 0.015+0.003 0.019+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.014+0.001 0.013+0.001 2.b.2.AIR PARTIC ATES AMMA ANALYSIS F UARTERLY C MPQSITES i/m'~i*998~Sem ie Site T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 K-40 Be-7 Cs-134 0.1395&0.0107<0.0116<0.0008 0.1465&0.0107<0.0131<0.0007 0.1401&0.0104<0.0157<0.0008~C-1 37<0.0008<0.0008<0.0006 0.1473+0.0097<0.0143<0.0013<0.0007 Pb-210 0.0145&0.0033 0.0191 6 0.0029 0.0124+0.0031 0.0133+0.0032 0.1498&0.0102<0.0175<0.0008<0.0010 0.0123+0.0030 3.a.SURFACE WATER-Ci/L Sample Collection Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zr-95 Zn-65 Nb 95 (A)Ba-140 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La 140 (B)T42 23-Jan-98<145 201+30<3<3<7<4 13-Feb-98<163 172+26<4<4<9<4 06-Mar-98<153 273+29<4<4<9<4<<7<7<6<4<9<7<12<4<9<6<13<4<5 T67 22-Jan-98<145 109+26<3<4<10<3<8<7<7<4 18-Feb-98<163 73+25<4<3<7<3<8<6.<9<4 04-Mar-98<154 122+26<4<4<7<4<7<7<15<4<5<6 T81 23-Jan-98<145 13-Feb-98<163 03-Mar-98 162+50 331+32<3<4<7<4<8<7<7<4 232+28<4<4<8<4<9<7<12<5 243+30<4<4<10<5<9<7<14<4<5<6<6<8 (A)-These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B)-These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

3.b.SHORELINE SEDIMENT-Ci/k d wei ht Sample Site T42 T67 T81 Collection Date 14-Jan-98 13-Jan-98 08-Jan-98 Be-7 K-40 Co-38 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Rs-226 V-238 212+46 232+39<10<10<10<11 1119+459 687+15 1117+189<77 249+32<7<6<8<7<531 143+8<299 532+85<237<15<15<17<13 473+179 892+20 428+180 4.a.1.CRUSTACEA-Blue Crab S ider Crab-Ci/k wet wei ht Sample Site T67 T81 Collection Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 This sample has not yet been collected.

This sample has not yet been collected.

Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 4.a.2.FISH-Man ove Sna er-Ci/k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 Other T67 16-Jan-98 1379+173<19<20<38<24<46<23<17<336<69'e-7: 140+44 Pb-210: 259+11 T81 This sample has not yet been collected.

4.b.BROAD LEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian Pe er-Ci/k wet wei ht Sample Site T40 Collection Date 23-Jan-98 Be-7 K-40 1-131 2264+97 1701+108<19 Cs-134<12.34+8<801 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226<281 04-Mar-98 2313+46 2918+58<17 17-Feb-98 2370+97 2379+124<24<11 60+8<800 58&3 795+150<156 T41 23-Jan-98 1521+82 5608+182<17 17-Feb-98 2288+106 3899+155<24 04-Mar-98 1925+90 3959+139<32<12<12<9 200+11 61+6<814<274<695<231 55+7 1001+318<252 T67 22-Jan-98 1099+79 4516+163<20 17-Feb-98 1806+100 3754+154.<23 04-Mar-98 1742+85 3889+148<31<12<13<9 31+6 892+266<243 15+6<767<274<10<699<724 Ee FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT SITE SECOND QUARTER 1998 BUREAU OF RADIATION CONTROL

~~e0 TP QR9$-2TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 1998 Number of L~il d S 1.Direct Radiation Quarterly 22 22 2.Airborne 2.a.Air Iodines 2.b.Air Particulates Weekly Weekly 65 65 3.Waterborne 3.a.Surface Water 3.b.Shoreline Sediment Monthly Semiannually 3 0 4.Ingestion 4.a.Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l.Crustacea 4.a.2.Fish 4.b.Food Products Broadleaf Vegetation Semiannually Semiannually Monthly Total: 173 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

~r TP QR98-2 1: DIRECT RADIATION-TLDs-R/hour Sample Site N-2 N-7 N-10 NNW-2 NNW-10 NW-1 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-10 W-1 W-5 Deployment 17-Mar-98 Collection 23-Jun-98 5.7+0.4 4.5+0.3 4.9+0.4 4.5+0.3 5.1+0.4 6.8+0.5 4.5*0.3 7.6&0.6 6.0&0.4 6.5&0.5 4.9+0.4 Sample Site W-9 WSW-8 SW-1 SW-8 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 SSE-1 SSE-10 (B)NNE-22 Deployment 17-Mar-98 Collection 23-Jun-98 4.5+0.3 4.7+0.3 5.0+0.4 4.5+0.3 4.8*0.4 4.7+0.3 4.5+0.3 5.4+0.4 4.6&0.3 5.4+0.4 5.4+0.4 2.a.IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES

-Ci/m'ollection Date T51 T57 T58 T64 07-Apr-98 13-Apr-98 20-Apr-98 27-Apr-98<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02,<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03 04-May-98 11-May-98 18-May-98 26-May-98<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.01 01-Jun-98 08-Jun-98 15-Jun-98 23-Jun-98 30-Jun-98<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02 2ofll TP QR98-2 2.b.l.AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA-Ci/m'ollection Date T51 T57 Sample Site T58 T64 T72 07-Apr-98 0.009*0.002 0.013+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.006+0.002 13-Apr-98 0.019+0.003 0.014+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.021+0.003 0.019+0.002 20-Apr-98 0.016+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.020+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.016+0.002 27-Apr-98 0.014+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.017+0.002 0.019+0.002 0.017+0.002 04-May-98 0.014+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.015+0.002 11-May-98 0.015+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.017+0.002 0.026+0.003 0.016+0.002 18-May-98 0.012+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.013+0.002 26-May-98 0.023+0.002 0.018+0.002 0.017+0.002 0.021+0.002 0.021+0.002 01-Jun-98 0.006+0.002 0.009+0.002<0.006 0.009+0.002<0.006 08-Jun-98 0.009+0.002 0.006+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.009+0.002 15-Jun-98 0.019+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.018+0.002 0.014 t 0.002 0.015+0.002 23-Jun-98 0.009+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.013+0.002 30-Jun-98 0.018+0.002 0.016+0.002 0.020+0.002 0.018+0.002 0.024+0.003 Mean: 0.014+0.001 0.013+0.001<0.014 0.015+0.001<0.015 2.b.2.AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF UARTERLY COMPOSITES Ci/m'~d*9N~Sem ie Site T51 Be-7 0.1441+0.0113 K-40 Cs-134<0.0135<0.0007 Cs-137<0.0009 Pb-210 0.0152&0.0032 T57 T58 T64 T72 0.1249+0.0105 0.1412+0.0097 0.1460+0.0104 0.1416+0.0130<0.0161<0.0008<0.0008<0.0158<0.0009<0.0007<0.0152<0.0010<0.0007<0.0176<0.0009<0.0008 0.0166 6 0.0028 0.0158+0.0040 0.0153 6 0.0032 0.0171+0.0038 3 ofll TP 8-2 3.a.SURFACE WATER-Ci/L Sample Collection Site Date C T42 14-Apr-98<150 14-May-98<146 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 271+32<4<4<6<4<8 Zr-95 Nb-95 (A)<7 344+31<4<4<7<4<7<6<5 10-Jun-98<151, 374+37<5<3<10<5<7 I-131 Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 La 140 (B)<4<3<4<6<4<4<5<10<4<4<7 T67 15-Apr-98<150 65+9<1<1<2<1<2<2<3<1 15-May-98-<146 184+29<4<5<8<4<7<6<7<3 11-Jun-98<151 247+35<3<4<8<4<8<8<10<4<4<4<6<6 T81 14-Apr-98<150 306+13<1<1<3<1<3<2<3<1'4-May-98<146 314+38<3<3<8<4<8<6<7 10-Jun-98<151 260+33<4<4<8<4<6<6<11<4<4 (A)-These tabulated LLD values for ZrlNb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B)-These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140'or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.4 of 11 TP 98-2-3.b.SHORELINE SEDIMENT-Ci/k d wei ht Sample Site Collection Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 These samples were previously collected.

Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 U-238 4.a.1.CRUSTACEA-Blue Crab-Ci/k wet wei ht Sample Site Collection Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 T81 08-Apr-98 08-Apr-98 948+233<24<25<30<27<47<30<22<408<81 1612+197<21<22<53<26<47<23<24 856+205<105 4.a.2.FISH-Lookdown Jack-i/k wet wei ht Sample Site Collection Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T81 29-Apr-98 1872+135<13<16<34<16<33<15<13 377+97<62 5 of 11

TP 8-2 4.b.BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian Pe er-Ci/k wet wei ht Sample Site Collection Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 T40 16-Apr-98 14-May-98 11-Jun-98 1612+74 4073&157<15 1190+75 3685+146<20 1067+67 2277+123<18<10<12 35+7 84+8 95+10<742<782<713<261<257<260 T41 16-Apr-98 1083+71 5255+167<16 14-May-98 692+68 2875+136<17 11-Jun-98 752+82 3837+147<23<13<12<12 55+8<766 147+12 ,<689 234+12<776<265<238<258 T67 15-Apr-98 1566+85 2269+119<20 15-May-98 912+64 5143+172<16 11-Jun-98 1077+89 2396+133<24<14<12 46+6 950.+273<12<714 22+8.608+255<277<245<294 6 of11

~~

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT SITE THIRD QUARTER 1998.BUREAU OF RADIATION CONTROL

TP QR98-3 TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Third Quarter, 1998 am leT e Number of~otlection F~re cene Locations Sam ted~Sam les 1.Direct Radiation Quarterly 22 22 2.Airborne.2.a.Air Iodines'.b.Air Particulates Weekly Weekly 65 65 3.Waterborne 3.a.Surface Water 3.b.Shoreline Sediment Monthly Semiannually 3 4.Ingestion 4.a.Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1.Crustacea 4.a.2.Fish Semiannually Semiannually 2.2 4.b.Food Products Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly 3 Total: 177 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection ((LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%confidence) for the true activity in the sample.1 of12

TP QR98-3 1.'IRECT RADIATI N-TLDs-R/hourSample Site N-2 N-7 N-10 NNW-2 NNW-10 NW-1 NW-5 NW-10 WI'AV-10 W-1 W-5 W-9 Deployment 23-Jun-98 Collection 23-Se-98 5.0+0.4 4.3+0.3 4.6+0.3 4.0+0.3 4.9+0.4 6.0+0.4 3.9+0.3 7.0+0.5 5.9+0.4 5.9+0.4 4.8&0.4 4.2+0.3 Sample Site WSW-8 SW-1 SW-8 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 SSE-1 SSE-10 NNE-22 Deployment 23-Jun-98 Collection 23-Se-98 4.6&0.3 4.2+0.3 4.1+0.3 44+03 4.3+0.3 4.3*0.3 5.2+0.4 4.3+0.3 5.3+0.4 5.3+0.4 2.a.IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR ARTRID ES-Ci/m'am le Site Collection Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 06-Jul-98 13-Jul-98 20-Jul-98 27-Jul-98 03-Aug-98 10-Aug-98 17-Aug-.98 24-Aug-98 31-Aug-98 08-Sep-98 14-Sep-98 21-Sep-98 28-Sep-98<0.03<0.01<0.03<0.01<0.02<0.02'0.02

<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.06<0.01<0.01<0.03<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02 2 of 12 4

TP QR98-3 2.b.l.AIR PARTIC ATE-ROSS BETA-i/m'06-Jul-98 13-Jul-98 20-Jul-98 27-Jul-98 03-Aug-98 10-Aug-98 17-Aug-98 24-Aug-98 31-Aug-98 08-Sep-98 14-Sep-98 21-Sep-98 28-Sep-98 Mean: 0.012+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.019+0.002 0.017&0.002 0.009&0.002 0.005+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.018+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.012+0.001 0.018+0.003 0.014+0.002 0.006+0.002 0.019&0.002 0.018+0.002 0.005+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.014 6 0.002 0.012+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.009+0.002<0.014 (A)<0.012 Collection Date T51 T57 Sam le Site T58 0.018+0.003 0.011+0.002 0.012+0.003 0.017+0.002 0.018+0.002 0.008~0.002 0.009+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.022+0.002 0.017+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.014+0.001 T64 T72 0.020+0.003 0.017+0.003 0.015+0.002 0.013*0.002 0.010+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.020+0.002 0.019+0.002 0.019+0.003 0.016+0.002 0.008&0.002 0.011+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.020+0.002 0.018+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.007+0.002.0.013+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.014+0.001 0.013+0.001 (A)-The air pump failed during the sampling period.The pump is estimated to have run 49 out of 175 hours0.00203 days <br />0.0486 hours <br />2.893519e-4 weeks <br />6.65875e-5 months <br /> during the sampling interval.2.b.2.AIR PARTI ATES-AMMA ANALY I F ARTERLY COMPOSITES Ci/m~Third uarter 1998~Sam le ite T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 Be-7 0.0811 6 0.0094 0.0916+0.0104 0.1042&0.0109 0.1068+0.0081 K-40 Cs-134<0.0201<0.0009 Cs-137<0.0005 Pb-210 0.0176&0.0028<0.0198<0.0009<0.0006 0.0120+0.0034<0.0132<0.0006<0.0008<0.0195<0.0008<0.0006 0.0160&0.0033 0.0160+0.0034 0.1032&0.0094<0.0162'0.0012<0.0007 0.0127 6 0.0028 3 of12

TP 8-3-3.a.SURFACE WATER-Ci/L Sample Collection Site Date H-3 Zr-95 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65~95 I-131 (A)Cs-134 Ba-140 Cs-137 La-j40 P)T42 15-Jul-98<152 17-Aug-98<144 09-Sep-98<144 T67 16-Jul-98<152 327+32<4<4<8<5 316+34<3<4<10<<4 287+33<4<4<8<4 162+31<4<4<8<5<7<6<8<13<7<5<4<6<4 18-Aug-98<144 10-Sep-98<144 T81 15-Jul-98 407+.54 17-Aug-98 348+51 09-Sep-98 165+47 287+32 216+32 349+33 350+33<3<4<6<4<8<8<<6<3<4<8<4<7<7<12<3<4<9<5<8<6<7<4<4<7<5<9<6 299+33<4<4<9<4<9<<8<14<5<4<5<4<4<6<6<8 (A)-These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B)-These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.4 of 12 4

TP 98-3-3.b.SEDIMENT-Ci/k d wei ht Sample Site Collection Date Be-7 K-40 T42 09-Jul-98 304+71 506+69 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 U-238<12<12<14 22+5 1130+252 605+18 409+139 T67 T81 14-Jul-98<77 261+41 09-Jul-98 166+44 451+72<7.<7<7<8<623<32<313<12<10<12<11 599&221 625+17 484+149 4.a.l.CRUSTACEA-Blue Crab-Ci/k wet wei ht Sample Site T67 T81 Collection Date 31-Aug-98 27-Aug-98 K-40 Mn-54 Qo-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 1084+134<17<22<50<16<46<20<20<363<75 979+147<22<28<62<24<52<23<22'105+239<102 4.a.2.FISH-Man rove Sna er Bass Perch-Ci/k wetwei ht Sample Site T67 T81 Collection Date 27-Aug-98 26-Aug-98 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137'a-226 Ra-228 2271+210<18<26<59<20<47<20<22<337<85 1798+208<23<21<51<24<50<19<23<471<101 5 of12

TP 8-3.4.b.BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian Pe er-Ci/k wet wei ht Sample Site T40 Collection Date 16-Jul-98 Be-7 K-40 I-131 1160+94 2431+140<24 Cs-134<13 Cs-137 111+11 Pb-210<858 Ra-226<331 19-Aug-98 1572+88 2238+124<11<12 85+9<706<289 T41 T67 10-Sep-98'6-Jul-98 19-Aug-98 10-Sep-98 16-Jul-98 18-Aug-98 935+71 1048+69 3397&160 2058+113<18 1378+92 2148+138<22 812+28 2989+52 1527+83 3969+147<13 1392+71 3684+146<18<10<12<13<8 80+12 294&5 211+12 76+9 25+5<856<265<719<641<766<630<305<95<259<228<230 10-Sep-98 978+69 2358+124<16<10 21+6<698<245 6 of12

PI.ORIDA DEPARTMENT OP RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT SITE FOURTH QUARTER 1998 BUREAU OF RADIATION CONTROL TP QR98-4 TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 1998 am leT e Number of~oltectionF~re cene Locations Sam ted~Sam les 1.Direct Radiation Quarterly 22 22 2.Airborne 2.a.Air Iodines 2.b.Air Particulates Weekly Weekly 65 65 3.Waterborne 3.a.Surface Water 3.b.Shoreline Sediment Monthly Semiannually 3 0 4.Ingestion 4.a.Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l.Crustacea 4.a.2.Fish Semiannually Semiannually 0~.4.b.Food Products Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 170 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection ((LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%confidence) for the true activity in the sample.1 of12

TP QR98-4 1.DIRECT RADIATION-TLDs-R/hour Sample Site N-2 N-7 N-10 NNW-2 NNW-10 NW-1 NW-5 NW-10~Deployment 23-Sep-98 Collection 16-Dec-98 5.3+0.4 4.8&0.4 4.6+0.3 4.1+0.3 5.1+0.6 5.8+'0.4 4.3+0.3 7.0+0.5 Sample Site: WSW-8 SW-1 SW-8 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 Deployment 23-Sep-98 Collection 16-Dec-98 5.0+0.4 4.4+0.3 4.2+0.3 4.4+0.3 4.5+0.3 4.3+0.3 5.3+0.4 WNW-10 W-1 W-5 W-9 5.8+0.4 5.9+0.4 4.4+0.3 4.5+0.3 SSE-1 SSE-10 NNE-22 4.2+0.3 5.1+0.4 5.9+0.4 2 of 12

TP QR98-4 0 2.a.IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRID ES-i/m'am le Site Collection Date 05-Oct-98 13-Oct-98 20-Oct-98 26-Oct-98 T51.<0.02<0.03<0.02 T57<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.01.T58<0.02<0.03<0.02 T64<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.01 T72<0.02<0.03~<0.02<0.01 02-Nov-98 09-Nov-98<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02 16-Nov-98 23-Nov-98 30-Nov-98'0.02<0.04<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03'0.03 07-Dec-98 14-Dec-98 21-Dec-98 28-Dec-98<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02 e 3 of12

TP QR98-42.b.1.AIR PARTICULATE

-RO S BETA-Ci/m'am le Site Collection

'ate T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 05-Oct-98 0.010+0.002 0.010+0.003 0.011+0.002 0.009+0.002 13-Oct-98 0.005+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.008+0.002 20-Oct-98 0.010+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.010+0.002 26-Oct-98 0.010+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.010+0.002 02-Nov-98 0.019+0.002 0.017+0.002 0.019+0.002 0.017+0.002 0.019+0.pp2 09-Nov-98 0.017+0.002 0.016+0.002,0.020

+0.003 16-Nov-98 0.011+0.002 0.011 a 0.002 0.010 a 0.002 0.017+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.016+0.002 0.016+0.002 23-Nov-98 0.006+0.002 0.006+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.005+0.002 0.008+0.002 30-Nov-98 0.010+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.013*0.002 0.017+0.002 0.012+0.002'7-Dec-98 0.011+0.002 0.009+0.002 14-Dec-98 0.009+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.006+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.010+0.002 21-Dec-98'.016+0.002 0.016+0.002 0.018+0.002 0.021+0.002 0.021+0.002 28-Dec-98 0.006+0.002 0.004+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.009+0.002 Mean: 0.011+0.001 0.010+0.001 0.011+0.001 0.011+0.001 0.012 a 0.001 2.b.2.AIR PARTICULATES

-AMMA ANALYSIS OF ARTERLY C MPOSITE Ci/m'ourth uarter 1 8~Sem ie Site T51 T57 Be-7 0.1264+0.0091 0.1223+0.0100 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137<0.0152<0.0009<0.0008 Pb-210 0.0170&0.0024<0.0190<0.0010<0.0006'.0137 6 0.0023 T58 T64 T72 0.1317&0.0107<0.0125<0.0011<0.0007 0.0084 6 0.0029 0.1165&0.0103<0.0168<0.0008<0.0008 0.0114+0.0029 0.1380+0.0106<0.0219<0.0009<0.0009 0.0133+0.0030 4 of 12

0 TP 8-4.3.a.SURFACE WATER-Ci/L.Sample Site Collection Date Zr-95 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb 95 I-131 (A)Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 (13)T42.15-Oct-98<145 156'30<4<4<7<4<6<6<6 10-Nov-98<148 213+29<6<6<11<6<11<10<12<4<6<4<6 03-Dec-98<145 174+29<5<4<8<4<10<7<20<5<10 T67 15-Oct-98 12-Nov-98<145-139+32<147 92 6 28<3<4<6<4<9<7<7<3<4.<9<3-<6<7<7<4<6 09-Dec-98<145 89+24<3<3<9<2<8<7<12<3 T81 14-Oct-98<145 301+35<3<4<7<4<6<7<6<6 10-Nov-98<148 239+31<3<4<7<3<8<8<9 03-Dec-98<146 246+31<2<5<9<4<6<6<19 (A)-These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.<4<4<8 (B)-These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.5 of12

I TP Q 98-4 3.b.SEDIMENT-Ci/k d wei ht Sample Site Collection Date Be-7, K-40 Co-58 Co-60 These samples were previously collected.

Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 U-238 4.a.l.CR STA EA-Ci/k wetwei ht Sample Site Collection Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 These samples were previously collected.

4.a.2.FISH-Ci/k wet wei ht Sample Site Collection Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228.These samples were previously collected.

6 of 12

0 4.b.BROAD LEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian Pe er-Ci/k wet wei ht Sample Site Collection Date Be-7 K-40 1-131-T40 15-Oct-98 12-Nov-98 09-Dec-98 15-Oct-98 12-Nov-98 09-Dec-98 1713+97 4741+180<20 1394+79 3294+138<26 1741+84 3524+137<20 3408+151<16 2260+122'27 T41 2004+91 837+64 1761+40 3493 6 69<9 15-Oct-98 1669+100 4040+180<18 T67 12-Nov-98 1370+74 2811+129<23 09-Dec-98 1454+82 4704+196<24 7 of12 Cs-134<14<14<10<14'15<15<13 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 188+12<857<287 41+8<899<324<243 84+9<697 108+9*<787 170+9<879<258<351 32+3.-570+142<116<294<13<909<357 16+5<1014<15<829<294 L

1998 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3&4 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1998 L

FLORIDA DEPT'F HEALTH-EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1998 WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER Alpha Beta H-3 I-131 Sr-89 Sr-90 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-133 Media Nuclide Collection Mon Day Yr 01 30 98 01 30 98 03 13 98 02 06 98 01 16 98 01 16 98 06 05 98 06, 05 98 06 05 98 06 05 98 06 05 98 EPA Known 30.5 3.9 2155 104.9 8 32 12.104 31 35 40 Units pCi/L pci/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L Normal.Range 0.241 0.071 0.144 0.146 0.000 0.118 0.118 0.295 0.000 0.118 0.354 Mean of Analyses 9.77 7.30 2066.33 103.97 6.00 27.33 12.33 112.00 29.00 3'7.67 37.00 N.D.K.Action Level-4.73 1 1.18-0.44-0.15-0.69-1.62 0.12 1.39-0.69 0'2-1.04 NOTES: Normal.: Normalized range.As defined in"Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Xntercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981-1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, P.O.Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478.

EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: NA: No data provided.No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.,Not-available..Report containing th's data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegas.ACTXON LEVEL: (1)Cause: No cause for the low result can be found.However, the graph of 0 responding labs vs.nornamlized deviaton of the mean from the known value given on page 9 of EPA's report for this cross-check (copy attached)shows most laboratories reported a value lower than the known value.Furthermore, the second graph on page 9, responding labs vs.normalized deviation of the mean from the grand average, shows that the laboratories agree fairly well with each other.Action: None at this time.

I~0~t~t'~t t~~~~t~~~~II~~~I~~~I~I~I~I o~~1~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~IIl t~~'~'~~~~~~~~~

DOE-QAP 48 RESULTS No.Reported Reported EML Test Radionuclide Value Error Value Matrix: AI Air Filter Bq/filter EML~Re orled Error EML Evaluation GROSS BETA MN54 CO57 CO60 SB125 CS134 CS137 CE144 Matrix: WA Water Bq/I H3 1 MN54 1 CO60 1 CS137 2.300 5.950 10.180 8.960 11.100 17.100 12.700 7.700 240.100 63.500 15.000 51.500 0.040 1.960 0.300 0.080 5.44 0.485 0.040 11.110 0.846 0.070 9.090 0.732 0.300 12.160 1.151 0.100 19.740 1.380 0.100 11.860 0.957 0.100 8.210 0.796 4.800 218.300 6.505 0.600 57.000 1.900 0.300 13.600 1.200 0.600 46.000 1.700 1.173 1.094 0.916 0.986 0.913 0.866 1.071 0.938 1.100 1.114 1.103 1.120 A A A A A A A A A A A A Matrix: VE Vegetation Bq/kg 1 K40 757.000 1 CO60 11.100 1 CS137 186.000 10.000 0.500 1.000 707.500 24.987 10.575 0.206 181.500 7.141 1.070 1.050 1.025 A A A Matrix: SO Soil Bq/kg 1 K40 1 CS137 313.000 325.000 6.000 313.500 10.150 1.000 329.500 9.260 0.998 0.986 A A Evaluation:

A=Acceptable, W=Acceptable with Warning, N=Not Acceptable

DOE-QAP 49 RESULTS No.Test Radionuclide Reported Value Reported EML Error Value EML~Re orted Error EML Evaluation Matrix: Al Air Filter Bq/filter GROSS BETA" 2.080 MN54 5.250 CO60.8.630 SB125 7.300 CS137 23.830 Matrix: WA Water Bq/I 0.070 2.160 0.070 0.050 4.920 0.400 0.050 9.160 0.580 0.200 8.890 0.550 0.100 22.470 1.030 0.963 1.067 0.942 0.821 1.061 A A A W A H3 84.080 MN54 36.400 CO60 51.300 NI63 95.230 CS137'2.700 Matrix: VE Vegetation Bq/kg 3.100 76.200 0.500 32.400 0.400 49.400 0.670 95.700 0.600 50.000 2.900 1.400 1.200 0.900 1.700 1.103 1.123 1.038 0.995 1.054 A A A A A 1 K40 499.000 1 CO60 20.200 1 CS137 402.000 Matrix: SO Soil Bq/kg 9.000 460.000 20.000 0.500 20.000 1.000 2.000 390.000 20.000 1.085 1.010 1.031 A A A K40 CS137 332.00 945.000 6.000 314.000 13.000 2.000 954.000 38.000 1.057 0.991 A A Evaluation:

A=Acceptable, W=Acceptable with Warning, N=Not Acceptable cM P'lrp