ML17347A731

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1987 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept Turkey Point Plant Units 3 & 4. W/880428 Ltr
ML17347A731
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1987
From: Conway W
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
L-88-172, NUDOCS 8805030163
Download: ML17347A731 (70)


Text

AC CELERATZDDISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

(

pFo9 ~$ /

ACCESSION NBR:8805030163 DOC.DATE: 87/10/31 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET g FACIL:50-250 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 3, Florida Power and Light C 05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 4, Florida Power and Light C 05000251 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CONWAY,W.F. Florida Power & Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION 6

SUBJECT:

"1987 Annual Radiological Environ Operating. Rept Vu~Xay ~~ ~/

Point Plant Units 3 6 4." W/880428 ltr.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE48D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: 50.36a(a)(2) Semiannual Effluent Release Reports NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-2 LA 1 0 PD2-2 PD 5 5 EDISON,G 1 1 INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA

'1 ARM TECH ADV NRR/DREP RPB 10

@E RGN2/ASS/EPRPB 1

1 4

1 1

1 1

4 1

1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB NRR/DEST/PSB 8D NRR/PMAS/I LRB12 RGN2 FILE 02 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 EXTERNAL: BNL TICHLER, J03 1 1 LPDR NRC PDR 1 1 880S>0 A TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 'ENCL 21

P. O. B 000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408-0420 ply~

APRIL 28 1S88 L-88-172 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 1987 Annual Radiological Environmental 0 eratin Re ort This letter transmits the subject report in accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.4.b for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 ~

Should there be any questions on this information, please contact us.

Very truly yours, W. F. nway Acting Group Vice President Nuclear Energy WFC/TCG/gp Attachment cc: Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant TCG.EOR an FPL Group company

'0 V C

'i I

e 1987 RADIOLOGICAL OPERATING REPORT KUREGH'OINT PZtÃZ UNIT NOS. 3 AND 4 License Nos. DPR-31, DPR-41 Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251 Data Suhmitted By: Florida DHRS Report Prepared:

Report Reviewed:

p%9 jl 8805030ib3 87i23i PDR ADOCK 05000250 R DCD

1987

'IURKEY POINTS EKANT UNITS NOS. 3 AND 4 TM3LE OF CXKHWIS DESCRIPTION INTROIXJCTION RADIOIDGICAL MONITORING HKGRAM DISCUSSION AND RADIOIDGICALMONZIORING PKjGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

TABLE 1 DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA TABLE 1A ANALYSES WZXH IIZs ABOVE TABZE 4.12-3 DEZlXTION CAPABIIZTI1% TAlKE 1B IAND USE CENSUS TABLE 2 KEY 10 SRIPIZ IDCt TZONS ATZACHMEÃZ A RADIOIOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FIDRIDA POWER AND ZZGHZ COMPANY'S TURKEY POINTS SITE FIRST QUtQKl&, 1987 SECOND QUAINTER, 1987

'IHIRD QUtQKER, 1987 HX3RHi QUtQGKR, 1987 RESULTS FRQN 'IHE PROGRAM, 1987 ATXACHMENZ C

1987

'IURE1VZ POINTS PI2ÃZ UNITS NOS. 3 AND 4 I. INTROIXJCFION This report is submitted pursuarrt to Specification 6.9 of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Technical Specifications. The Annual Radiological Errvironmental Operating Report provides information, sun+aries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Envirormental Nonitoring Program for the calendar year indicated. %his report covers surveillance activities meeting the regcdrements of Unit No. 3 and Unit No. 4. Technical Specifications.

II. RADIOZOGICAL A. Pu~e: %he purpose of the radiological environmental monitorirg of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation. 'Ihe radiological environmental monitoring program also supplements the radiological effluent monitorirg proc ram by verifying that the measureable concentrations of radioactive materials arxl levels of radiation are not higher than expected on errvirormental exposure pathways.

B. Descri ion: Ihe Radiological Enviroranental Honitoring Progrmn for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted pursuant to Technical Specifications 4.12 of Turkey Poirrt Units 3 & 4 Technical Specifications.

le locations encles o

a. Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 21 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TID's) . TID's are collected and analyzed cuarterly.
b. Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations. Samples are collected and analyzed wee3Q.y. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta,
c. Surface water samples are collected fram three locations.

Samples are collected arxl analyzed monthly. Analyses d

d. Shoreline sedimerrt samples are collected fram three locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Sediment samples are analyzed by ganaoa isotopic meamuxments.

1987 ANNUAL RADIOIOGICAL OPERATE% REPORP KUER1H'OINTS PIANT UNITS NOS. 3 AND 4

e. Fish and ingrate samples are each collectai fram the two locations coincidirg with two of the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Fish and irrvertebrate samples are analyzed
f. Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected fram ttu~

locations. Samples are collects and analyzed monthly.

Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2. Anal ical nsibili Radiological errvironmental monitoring for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) . Samples are collected and analyzed by HBS personnel. Samples are analyzed at the HBS Envirorunental Radiation Contxol Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.

Monitor'nnual Sunna'ravides a sugary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period. Deviations fram the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples nat meeting the specified "A PRIORI" IZO, if any, are noted and explained in Tables 3A and 1B respectively. Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.

D. ?and Use Census: A land use census aut to a distance of 5 miles radius fmm the Turkey Point Plant is conducted annually to deteraune the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census Rzamazy.

No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose cananitrnent greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census+

No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose carnmitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 4 greater than locations in the radiological errvirormental curtly being monitoring program were sampled identified by the land use census.

E. Interlaborato ison %he State of Florida Enviroranental Radiation Contml Zaboratory participates in the Enviramnental Radioactivity Laboratory Intezmanparison Studies Program conducted by the Environmental Prat~ion Agency. Results fmm the Interlaboratory Garnparison Program are pravided in Attachment C.

(2)

1987 ANNUAL RADIOIOGICAL OPERATjXG REPORC TURK12l XOIÃZ PIANOS UNITS NOS. 3 AND 4 III.

A. Re rt'f DISCUSSION AND 1ÃZEZHKZATION OF RESULTS Results: %he Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information recpired by the Turkey Point Units 3 6 4 Technical W

made for the nuclides recpired by Technical Specifications, Table 4.12-2, for all samples specified by Table 4.12-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not reland t939tati99228 operation23 'Iheyg include2)gclides such as K, Kh, "Ra, Ra, 7Be, U, U, and Pb which are camnen in the Florida envirormant.

B. In retation of Results

1. D~ Radiation: The results for direct radiation monitoring locations. %he exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attribubK to effluents fram the plant. %he measured expomum rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the pmoperational surveillance program. Direct radiation monitoring remits are suomarized in Table 1.
2. Air Particulates dioiodine: Results of gross beta radioiodine was detected. During one sampling period, third charter, Cs-137 was detected at all sampling locations. She highest value was .0174 of the reporting level identified in the Technical Specification. %he other identified isotopes are naturally occurring and were found at levels consistent with

1987 TURKEY FOIE PZtÃZ UNITS NOS. 3 AND 4

3. Surface Water: Lhe results for radioactivity measmmnents in Tritium was reported as present in 15 of 18 of the surface water samples collected fram Site T-81. Khese results are consistent with the known subsurface interchange that occurs and the pressure gradients caused by the flow of aquifer subsurface waters in South Florida. The highest reported tritium is less than 6% of the concentration of tritium that is pernu.tted in canaaunity drinking water sy ~ns and less than 4%

of the reporting value specified by Technical Specifications Table 4.12-2.

4.

radioactivity measurements surveillance program.

('.~

Waterborne Sediment and Food Products:

in waterborne Lhe results for segment and p

(

fish

(

One fish sample, of four collected, had a positive Cs-137 value reported. 'Ihe maximum value is 74 of the table 4.12-3 IZD and is about .5% of the table 4.12-2 reporting levels. Although the reported concentration was very lear, fubum samples will be closely evaluated to detemnine any trends which might be attributed to station operation. Results for the watedmrne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are summarized in Table 1.

5. Broad Ieaf V etation: Lhe ~ts for radioactivity C. Conclusions

'Ihe data obtained through the Turkey Point Plant Radiological Environmental Honitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and conce~wtions of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased. 'Ihe

'((

the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units Nos. 3 & 4, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (AI2QQ.)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.

(4)

Page 1 of 7 Name of Facility Point Unit Nos. 3 and 4 DocIM No. (s) 50-250 and 50-251 Zocatian of Facility Dade Florida Rexartixg Period Z 1 December 31 1987 (Oaunty, State)

Medium or Type and Zawer Limit All Indicator Zocatian with Higtmst Oontml Zocag.ans Number of Pathway Sailed Total Number of Zocatiang Annual Mean Mean (f) Nanxxxxtine (Unit of of Analyses Detection a

Mean (f) Name Mean fb Range RE/)OKted.

Perfarmxi (IXD) Range Distarxoe & Range Directian Rate 5. 6 (82/82) NW-10 7.8 (3/3)

(micro-~) Export@

82 4.2 8. 1 10 miles, NW 7.4 8.1 AIRBORNE Radioigdines 13 I 0.024 < MQA (pCi/m ) 260 Gross Beta 0.0025 0.012 (260/260) T-58 0. 013 (52/52) 0.012 (52/52) 0 260 0.004 0.026 1 mile, NW 0.004 0.024 0.004 0.023 Gama'sotopic Cczoposite; 20 0.0052 0.132 (20/20) T-72 0.147 (4/4) 0.140 (4/4) 0.019 0.161 < 1 mile, WSW 0.124 0.161 0.124 0.160 137 T-72 0.00066 0.0031 (5/20) 0.0035 (1/4) 0.0032 (1/4) 0.0027 0.0035 < 1 mile, WSW 210~ 0.043 (1/20) T-64 0. 043 (1/4) 0. 043 (1/4) 22 miles, NNE 40K 0. 012 0.021 (1/20) T-58 0.021 (1/20) < MIR 1 mile, NW 134Cs 0.00069 < MQA

Page 2 of 7

'QQ3XZ 1 Name of Facility Point Unit Nos. 3 and 4 Docket No. (s) 50-250 and 50-251 location of Facility Dade Florida Reporting Period . Z 1 December 31 1987 (Oauaty, State)

Medium ar Type and sawer Limit A11. Indicator Iocatian with Highest Carrtml local.ons Nuaher of Pathway Sanpled Total %saber af a lacatiang Annual Smn Bean (f) Nanvxrtine (Unit of of Analyses Detectian =

Mean (f) Name Mean fb Range E~cted.

Perfarmed (IZD) Range Distanm & Range Direction WATERBORNE Surface Water Tritium 230 440 (16/42) T-81 470 (15/18) 42 120-1040 6 miles, S 140-1040 40K 60 280 (42/42) T-81 300 (18/18) 260 (12/12) 110-400 6 miles, S 240-400 170-320 54M < MDK < MQA.

59F < MQA. < MER 58~ < MQK < MIR 60~ < MQK < MQA 65 < <

MDA. MQK 95Z ~Nb < MQA, < MDK 131I < MER < KR 134~ < MCA < MDA. 0 137 < KR < MER 140~ ~ < MQL < MR

0 e

Page'3 of 7 RADIOZOGZCAL MMCKRENG PBOGRM ANNUAL S(%%96K Name of Facility Point Unit Nos. 3 and 4 Docket No. (s) 50-250 and 50-251 Zocatian of Facility Dade Florida Exporting Period Z 1 December 31 1987 (Oounty, State)

Medium ar Type and Zanier Limit All Indicator Zocatian with H~mst Oantrol Zocagians Number of Pathway Sanpled Total Number of Zocatiang Annual Mean Ken (f) Nanmut~

(Unit of of Analyses Detectian a

Sean (f) Name Mean fb Range E~mrted Perfarzaed (LTD) Range Distarme & Raa3e Direction NATl&BORNE Sedhnent Gamma Isotcpic (pO'/kg. ~) 6 Be 100 220 (4/6) T-67 380 (1/2) 380 (1/2) 120-380 13-18 miles, N/NNE 4'Z 140 690 (6/6) T-67 660 (2/2) 660 (2/2) 390-1300 13-18 miles, 530-1300 530-1300 N/NNE 137 T-67 39 (3/6) 50 (2/2) 50 (2/2) 13-88 13-18 miles, 13-88 13-88 N/NNE 226~ 49 720 (6/6) T-42 780 (2/2) 760 (2/2) 280-1010 < 1 mile, ENE 760-810 500-1010 228~ 120 (3/6) T-67 135 (2/2) 135 (2/2) 100-170 13-18 miles, 100-170 100-170 N/NNE 232 T-67 52 93 (4/6) 118 (2/2) 118 (2/2)41-166 13-18 miles,70-166 70-166 N/NNE 23'U 84 (3/6) T-42 99 (2/2)53-110 < 1 mile, ENE 88-110

Page 3a of 7 Name of Facility Point Unit Nos. 3 and 4 Docl& No. (s) 50-250 and 50-251 Zocaticn of Facility Dade Florida Reporting Period Z 1 Deaxher 31 1987 (Oaunty, State)

Medium ar Type and Iramr Limit, A11 Indicator Zocatian with Highest Cbcxtml Zocag.ans Number of Pathway Sanded Total %sober of a Zocatiang Annual Mean b Mean (f) Nanraut~

(Unit of of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Name Dist-mac Mean f Range Reported (LZD) Range & Range Direction NLTlKBORNE (cont'd) 238 T"42 550 (6/6) 610 (2/2) 560 (2/2) 240-740 < 1 mile, EWE 600-620 440-680 58Co < MR < MR 60~ < MR < MR 134~ 14 < MR < MBA

Page 4 of 7 RAQIOIlXKCALMSIZIURING XSCXKAM ANKIALStl%RHY Name of Facility Poirxt Unit Nos. 3 and 4 Docket No. (s) 50-250 and 50-251 Iocatiarx of Facility Dade Florida Reparting Period J 1 Deoember 31 1987 (Oourxty, State)

Medium ar Type and Immr Limit, All Indicator Iocatian with Highest Oarxtml Zo~ions Number of Total of Iocatiang AnnUal Mean Sean (f) Nanrnxtine Pathway San@led (Unit of Number of Analyses Detection a

Mean (f) Name Mean fb Range R@xxrted Perfcumxi (IXD) Range Distarxm 6 Range Direction INGESTION Crustacea Gamma Isotopic (pCi/kg, wet) 4 40K 130 1650 (4/4) T-81 1750 (2/2) 1550 (2/2) 1550-1800 6 miles, S 1700-1800 1500-1600 226 T-67 20 430 (4/4) 530 (2/2) 530 (2/2)90-970 13-18 mlles~ 90-970 90-970 N/NNE 228Ra 170 (2/4) T-67 210 (1/2) 210 (1/2) 130-210 13 18 m11esq N/NNE 54M < MR < MIR 59F 16 < MR < MIR 58~ < KR < MR 60Co 19 < MR < MIR 65 < MR 17 < MR 134~ < MR < MIR 137 < KR < KR

Page 5 of 7 Name of Facility Point Unit. Nos. 3 and 4 DocIaet No. (s) 50-250 and 50-251 Zocatian of FaMity Dade Florida Reporting Period J 1 Deceoker 31 1987 (County, State) taedium ar PathMay Sampled Type and Total Number Zower of Limit All Indicator a Iocatiang

'ocatianAnnualwith HigtM st Mean b Qxrtml Iocagians Number of (Unit of of Analyses Detectian Mean (f) Name Mean Range Reported Range Distarxm & Range Directian INGESTION (cont'd)

Fish (pCi/kg, wet) Gamma Isotopic 4

40 T-67 130 2350 (4/4) 2400 (2/2) 2400 (2/2) 2300-2500 13-18 miles 2300-2500 2300-2500 N/NNE 137 T-81 11 (1/4) 11 (1/2) 6 mile, S 226 56 (3/4) T-81 18 67 (2/2) 34 (1/2) 34-72 6 miles, S 62-72 54M < MIR < KR 59F 16 < MR < MIR 58Co < MR < MR ,0 60Co 10 < MDA < MIR 65Z 17 < MQK < MR 134Cs < MIR < MIR

Page 6 of 7 RADIOIOGICALlKHZHXGNG E%UGRM MNKK S%%5AEK Name of Facility Poirrt Unit Nos. 3 and 4 Dodcet No. (s) 50-250 and 50-251 location of Facility Dade Florida Reporting Period J 1 December 31 1987 (Oourrty', State)

Medium or Type and Ixxmr Limit. All Indicator Zocaticn with Higtmst Oontrol locations Number of PathMay Sanpled Total Number of a Locating Annual Mean Mean (f) Nonraxtine (Unit of of Analyses Detection Man (f) Name Dist-uxa &

Mean f Range Reported Pexfarznaf (ILD) Range Directian INCBHTION (cont'd)

Broad Leaf Gamm Isotopic Vegetation 36 (pCi/kg, wet) 71 1350 (36/36) T-40 1600 (12/12) 1010 (12/12) 470-2960 3 miles, W 680-2960 470-1260 40K 100 3980 (36/36) T-67 4200 (12/12) 4200 (12/12) 1800-6700 13-18 miles~ 2900-6700 2900-6700 137 T-40 147 (32/36) 246 (12/12) 45 (8/12)13-507 3 miles, W 30-507 13-105 131I < MBA. < MDA 0 134Cs < MBA. < MDA

Page 7 of 7 TABLE 1

a. 'Ihe IZD is an "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a 'net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95~ probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.

attachment B for the individual samples have been corre~x1 to the time of sample collection.

parentheses (f) .

c. Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.
d. Results are bac~ upon the average net response of two TIDs.

('Ihermoluaunescent dosimeters) .

MM. refers to mdnhaum detectable activity.

ge 1 of 1 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT, UNIT NOS. 3 6 4 EVIATIONS SSING DATA

~ca~tio Desc tion o ob em v at'o s Corrective Aetio 12/15/86 SW-10 TLD's 6 utility pole Failure to provide continuous Replaced TLD's upon to mount was removed, TLD's exposure monitoring at this discovery of situation.

03/17/87 not found; location for the First Quarter 1987.

03/17/87 NW-10 TLD's stolen during Failure to provide continuous Replaced TLD's upon to sampling period. exposure monitoring at this discovery of situation.

06/16/87 location for the Second Quarter 1987

1987 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT~ UNIT NOS. 3 & 4 TABLE 1B A YSES WI LLDs BO B 2-3 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 87 12 31 87 gate am e Locat o ad onuc ab e 4 12- LLD eason or Deviation The values specified in Table 4.12-3, Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

1987 TURKEY POIPZ PUTZ UNITS NOS. 3 AND 4 TABIZ 2

. IAND USE CENSUS DISZANCE TO NEAREST (a, b) 5/87 Milk (c) 5/87 5/87 Sector Animal Residence Garden (d)

N L (e) 2.1/350 (g) L 0 (f) 0 0

ESE SE L (g)

L L L L

L L L

L 1. 6/303 3. 9/303 L 3.7/311 3.6/309 L L (g) 4.5/328

1987 ARCUAL RADIOICGICAL OPERATING REPORT TURIN'Y POINZ PIARZ UNITS NOS. 3 AND 4 T2QKE 2 ~

IAND USE CENSUS (a) All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius fram the Turkey Point Plant (b) 'lhe following format is used to denote the location:

distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)

For exanple, a residence located in the north sector at a distance of 2.1 miles bearing 350 degrees is recorded as 2.1/350.

(c) Potential milk animal locations.

l (d) Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.

(e) L denotes that the sector area is predcmunantly a land area- unoccupied by the category type.

(f) 0 denotes that, the ~r area is predominantly an ocean area.

(g) Non-residential occupied buildings in this sector include the following:

Sector Distance Description N 1.8/349 24-hour Security Staffing building S 4. 9fL71 Small building/boat dock-not considered a residence 4.5/327 2 mobile homes used for field offices 1.8/345 Security booth at park entrance

1987 ANNUAL RADIOIDGICAL OPERATING REPORT

'IURH1'Y EOIFZ PZANT UNITS NOS. 3 AND 4 ATZACHMENT A KEY TO SAMPLE IDCATIONS

0 f

kAOIOLOG ICAL NVIRUNtNTAL SURVf ILLAlfE TURKfY POINT PLANT Key to Staple Locotions les RIP e Collection Approximate Direction Pathway Locat ion'escription Staples'ol lected Frequency Oi stonce (~i ) hector DlkfCT RN) IATION N-l Convoy Point TLO Quarterly DIRECT RN) IATION N-5 North of Hoody Dr. TLO Quarterly DlkfCT RADIATION N-10 Old Cutler Rd. at TLO Quarter ly.,

.S.M. 81th Ave.

DIRECT RADIATION 'NIQ-I Turkey Point Quarterly fntrance Road DlkfCT RADIATION NN-IO Burr Rd. at Hainlin TLD Quarterly Hil I Dr.

DlkfCT RADIATION N/itN-I Turkey Point TLD Quarterly Entrance Road DIRECT RADIATION .NM-5 i Dolan's Fana on TLD Quarterly King's lligh~ay O IkfCT RAO IAT ION Sl-IO Intersection of Fanw TLO Quarterly lu Li te kd. aixl Coconut Pole Or.

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIkOQtHTAL SURYEILLAICE TURKEY POINT PLANT Key to Sample Locations Sawple Col lection Approximate Direct Ion Path~ay Location Description Samples Collected Frequency Ui stance (ei les) Sector DIRECT RAOIATION il/IJN-5 Palw Drive at 'LD quarterly Tallahassee Rd.

DIRECT khA IATION 1ISI-10. Iloaestead near vehicle TLD Quarterly inspection station 0 lkECT RAD IAT lON On site near cooling TLD quarterly Cower I DIRECT RADIAT]ON II-10 Florida City near TLD Quarterly fire tower DIRECT RADIATION II'-10 Old llawk aissile site :TLD quarter ly south of Florida CICy DIRECT RADlATlON SQ/SSII-1 On site near land TLD quarterly utilizaiton offices I

DIRECT RAI) IATION SM-1O . . U.S. 1 south of TLD quarter ly Iu Florida C ity OIRECT RADIATION . SSM/hQ-5 On site, southeast TLD quarter ly corner uf cooling canals

f RADIOLOGICAL HVIROQKNTAL SURVEILLANCE TNKEY POINT PLANT Key to Saople Locations zap e Col lect! on Approxiaoce Uirect ion Pathway Location Description Staples Col lected frequency Distance (si les) Sector DIRECT RADIATION SSQ-IO At Car4 Sound Bridge TLD Quarterly DIRfCT RADIATION S-5 .

On site, south end of I

TLD Quarterly cooling canals DIRKT RADIAZIN ~ S-10 Car4 Soun4 Rd. at . TLD Quarterly 10 Steaaboat Greek DIRKT RADIATION . SSE /S-I Turtle Point TLD Quarterly SSE D IRKT RADIATION SSf -,10 Ocean Reef TLD Quarterly AIRBORNE T51 lloiestead Bayfront R<ioiodine l~ekIV Park  : and particulates AIRBORNE T57 Tree Nursery Radi oi o4i ne 316th Street and particulates AIRBORNE , T5B Turkey Point Radi oiodine Meekly Entrance Rd. an4 particulates

RAD IULOG IC AL E NV IRUQt'NTAL.SURYE ILLA@E TURKEY NINT PLANT

..Key to Staple Locations sap e Col lection Approxiwate Ilirect ion Pathway Location Oescription Staples Col lected Frequency UIstance (miles) Sector AIRBORNE T64* Natoea Substat ion Radioiodine Meekly 22 and particulates AIRBORNE T72 Turkey Point Boy R+ioiodine Meekly MSM Scout Cheap and particulates MATERBORNf TI2 Biscayne Bay, at Surface water Nonthly CNE Turkey Point Sediaent fry Seai-shoreline annually MATERBORNE T67 Qi scayne Bay, Sur face wa ter ilonthly 13-18 H NNE vicinity of Cutler Plant, north Sediaent fry Saai-to Hatheson tlaaeock shoreline annually Park MATERBORNE Card Sound. near Surface water Nonthly oouth uf old discharge canal Sedlaent freya Seal-shorel ine annual Iy

~ I)ennle5 control s

ItADIOLOGICAL EHVIkOQtNIAL SUklE ILLAIC t llNKEY PUINI PLAMI Key to Smple locations Soap e Col lection Approximate Uirection Pathway Location Oescription Staples Col lectea Frequency Uistance (ei les) Sector FOOD PkDDlLIS 161>> 'lscayne Say, vicinity C rustycea Seai- I3-Iu N, NNE of Cutler Plant north annual ly to lktheson II eaock Park Sea I-annual ly FOUI) PNOOIKlS Card Sound, vicinity Crustacea Seel-of Turkey Point ~ nnual ly Facility Fish Soai-

~ nnual ly FOOD PNDIIICIS South uf Pale Or. Broad 'leaf monthly on SQ ll lt1 St. vegotatipn eatension FOOD PNODXIS ill. Pals Or. Most of old broad leaf Nuntnly missile site near vegetation

~

, tAe site ho~dary FOOD ykDDlLIS 'l6l Near Siscayne $ 4y. Broad leal iiunthly I3-IS N, NNt vicinity ut Cutler vegetation Plant north to Hatheson Ilaaeock I'ark

ill

~ ~ ~

~ '

~

~

~

~

C g

f e see C

. I

'Xe

~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ C ~ II r ~ k

~ ~

i e~e~e~e~e~

i ~ I i,. i I I

~e~e T, I, I

++

~ ~

++.'~ .++ I

~ \e g.&LAN ,+(

~ ~ ~ ~

+Q -+++. ~

~~

~e ee ~ 4 f-+. ~ ' I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ."~<'i -w

.+. +.+. ~

~ ~ ~

'.+.+++ .+++.

'>>64

. ~ I e e >g ge

~ I ~ tet etI W,++ ~+

-.-i@

~ ~

Li .'-'e

~

t~i ~t .',.". gggP%

~@C CP'~ganaa

~

r

~ r ~, l e

.'i'i.

'I r

~ I ~

e T-67 . ~ eeh ~

wr CI r 4re ~ $

e', ~~ r IC

'e N-10 ~ ~

NNM-10 we

~ ~, ~I ~

'I Igt tN-10 h'r

'h,, ~

N-5

~ t QN 10

~ ~

~ C

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~

I I) ~ ~ I I

t r hl

~~ C ~a tweed

-.r.~-~ F-L4 ~

l

~ ~ I Ikt.~~

~

r'

/

y WSM-10 CI'

'.i.~

e

~e

~~ ~ I

'IC P.

~

~ ~ ~ ~ -r'ENERAL

~

I.

~ggs

~

.r W ~

SS& 10 I IIGHW7 FLORlDh COUNT'.

~L-'ADE ESM 10 A a1 ~ e ceo% ee e ~

1987 ANNUAL RADIOIDGICAL OPERATING REPORT

'IUD.'Y POINZ PI2Ã2 UNITS NOS. 3 AND 4 ATIACHMENT B RADIOIDGICAL SURV1!ZLLANCE OF FIORIDA POW1% AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE 1987 First Quarter, 1987 Second Quarter, 1987 third Quarter, 1987 Fourth Quarter, 1987

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE First Quarter, 1987 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling First Quarter, 1987 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 21 4D
2. Airborne
2. a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*
3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Monthly 12 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 3
4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation Total: 202
  • Includes DOE split samples.

NOTE: . Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

TURKEY POINT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING First Quarter, 1987

1. DIRECT RADIATION TLDs - (micro-R/hour)

Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 12-15-86 Site Collection 03-17-87 N-1 5.5 + 0. 3 (A)

N-5 6.0 + 0.3 N-10 5.4 + 0.3 NNW-1 6.1 + 0.3 NNW-10 6.4 + 0.3 NW/WNW-1 5.3 + 0.3 NW-5 5.7 + 0.3 NW-10 7.8 + 0.4 W/WNW-5 5.2 + 0.3 WNW-10 6.8 + 0.4 W-1 5.4 + 0.3 W-10 6.7 + 0.4 WSW-10 5.2 + 0.3 SW/SSW-1 5.0 + 0.3 SW-10 (B)

SSW/SW-5 5.4 + 0.3 SSW-10'-5 5.7 + 0.3 5.0 + 0.3 S-10 5.8 + 0.3 SSE/S-1 5.0 + 0.3 SSE-10 4.7 + 0.2 Notes:

A. The result for site N-1 is based on only one dosimeter because the other was not returned for analysis due to a procedural error.

B. The dosimeters for site SW-10 were missing when col-lection was attempted. The utility pole upon which they were mounted had been removed. Efforts to locate the missing dosimeters were not. successful. New dosimeters were deployed on a new pole at this location.

C. These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed.

D. Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

2.a IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS ( Ci/m 3 )

Collection Sam le Site Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 01-06-87 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 01-12-87 <0. 03 <0.03 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 01-19-87 <0. 02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.03 <0.02 01-27-87 <0. 02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 02-02-87 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 02-10-87 <0. 03 <0.03 <4.03 <0.03 <0.03 02-17-87 <0. 02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 02-24-87 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 03-03-87 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 03-10-87 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 02 03-17"87 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0. 02 03'-24-87 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 03-31-87 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ( Ci/m 3 )

Collection Sam le Site Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 01-06-87 "0. 012 + 0.002 0.013 + 0. 002 0. 015 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 01-12-87 0.010 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0. 015 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 01-19-87 0.011 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0. 011 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 01-27-87 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0. 015 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 02-02-87 0.014 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 *0.015 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 02-10-87 0.008 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 *0.010 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 02-17-87 0.012 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 *0.018 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 02-24-87 0.009 + 0.001 0. 013 + 0.002 *0.010 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 03-03-87 0.010 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 03-10-87 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 03-17-87 0.020 + 0.002 0.026 + 0.003 0.024 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.024 + 0.002 03-'24-87 0.011 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 03-31-87 0.009 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 Means: 0.011 + 0.001 0.014 + 0.001, 0.014 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 0.014 + 0.001 DOE split samples.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES ( Ci/m 3 )

First Quarter, 1987 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 T51 0. 109 + 0. 009 <0.014 <0.0007 <0.0007 <0.034 T57 0.121 + 0.009 <0.015 <0.0007 <0.0008 <0.029 T58 0.137 + 0.009 0.021 + 0.007 <0.0007 <0.0007 <0.062 T64 0.147 + 0.009 <0.023 <0.0008 <0.0006 0.043 + 0.017 T72 0.154 + 0.009 <0.023 <0.0009 <0.0007 <0.030

3 ma SURFACE WATER ( Ci/1)

Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

T42 01-12-87 <260 180 + 50 <4 <11 <4 <5 <9 <9 <5 <4 <5 <8 02-16-87 <180 280 + 50 <4 <9 <4 <6 <9 <8 <6 <5 <4 <8 03-17-87 <180 180 + 50 <4 <9 <4 <5 <8 <8 <5 <5 <5 <6 T67 01-12-87 <260 170 + 50 <4 <7 <4 <5 <10 <7 <5 <5 <5 <3 02-17-87 <180 230 + 50 <4 <10 <5 <3 <9 <7 <5 <6 <5 <7 03-17-87 <180 270 + 50 <4 <11 <3 <4 <10 <8 <5 <5 <5 <8 T81 01-12-87 (C) 430 + 80 260 + 50 .<3 <9 <4 <4 <9 <9 <6 <4 <5 <8 01-12-87 (D) 590 + 80 240 + 50 <4 <9 <4 <5 <11 <7 <5 <5 <5 <7 02-16-87 (C) 240 + 60 250 + 50 <4 <8 <3 <5 <7 <7 <5 <5 <4 <8 02-16-87 (D) 300 + 60 270 + 50 <5 <11 <3 <5 <ll <7 <5 <4 <5 <7 03-17-87 (C) 310 + 60 270 + 50 <4 -<11 <5 <4 <10 <7 <5 <4 <4 <5 03-17-87 (D) 140 + 60 290 + 50 <5 <10 <4 -

<5 <9 <8 <6 <5 <5 <6 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct. measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

(C) Collected at the normal location in the old discharge canal about 200 feet west of the mouth.

(D) Collected at a comparison location at the mouth of the old discharge canal on the south side of the prominent embankment in this area.

3.b SEDIMENT ( Ci/k dr wei ht)

Sample Collection Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Others Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 T42 01-09-87 210 + 60 . 390 + 70 <12 <11 <11 <12 Ra-226: 760 + 30 U-235: 88 + 9 U-238: 620 + 90 T67 01-12-87 380 + 70 1300 + 100 <ll <13 <13 - 13 + 4 Ra-226: 1010 + 20 Ra-228: 170 + 20 Th-232: 166 + 8 U-238: 680 + 90 T81 01-09-87 160 + 60, 700 + 90 <10 <12 <13 15 + 4 Ra-226: 990 + 30 Ra-228: 100 + 20 Th-232: 94 + 9 U-235: 53 4 U-238: 740 + 90 4.a.l CRUSTACEA Blue Crab ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Ra-226 Ra-228 Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 T67 03-17-87 - 1600 + 200 <16 <34 <13 <18 <28 <19 <15 970 + 20 210 + 50 T81 02-12-87 1800 + 100 <12 <35 <11 <12 <31 <14 <12 450 + 30 130 + 30 4.a.2 FISH Mixed S ecies ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 03-16-87 2500 + 100 <9 <27 <9 <13 <27 <12 <12 34 + 9 <40 T81 02-19-87 2300 + 100 <9 <38 <12 <12 <28 <11 <12 62 + 8 <60

4.b.1 BROADLEAF VEGETATION Brazilian Pe er - ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 T40 01-12-87 1630 +* 60 3600 + 100 <13 <8 212 + 8 02-17-87 1270 + 60 3600 + 100 <12 135 + 7 03-17-87 2690 + 90 1800 + 100 -

<14 <8 166 + 8 T41 01-12-87 1620 + 70 2900 + .100 <13 <8 116+ 7 02-17-87 1550 + 80 3000 + 100 <13 <9 105 + 8 03-17-87 2120 + 80 3900 + 200 <17 <11 91+7 T67 01-12-87 1470 + 70 3800 + 100 <13 <9 98+7 02-17-87 1010 + 70 4500 + 200 <13 <12 22+ 6 03-17-87 860 + 60 3700 + 100 <15 <9 13+5

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE Second Quarter, 1987 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 1987 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 21 40
2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*
3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Monthly 12 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 0
4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 0 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Monthly 10*

Vegetation Total: 196

  • Includes DOE split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable"'ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

TURKEY POINT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Second Quarter, 1987 DIRECT RADIATION TLDs (micro-R/hour)

Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 03-17-87 Site Collection 06-16-87 N-1 4.9 + 0.3 N-5 5.8 + 0.3 N-10 5.3 + 0.3 NNW-1 6.2 + 0.3 NNW-1,0 6.3 + 0.3 NW/WNW-1 5.1 + 0.3 Nw-5 4.9 + 0.3 Nw-10 (A) w/wNw-5 4.9 + 0.3 WNW-10 6.7 + 0.4 W-1 5.2 + 0.3 W-10 6.7 + 0.4 WSW-10 4.9 + 0.3 sw/ssw-1 4.9 + 0.3 Sw-10 4.2 + 0.2 ssw/sw-5 5.5 + 0.3 Ssw-10'-5 5.8 + 0.3 5.3 + 0.3 S-10 5.7 + 0.3 SSE/S-l 4.5 + 0.2 SSE-10 4.2 + 0.2 Notes:

(A) The dosimeters for site NW-10 were missing when col-lection was attempted. The holder was found upside down. Tampering is suspected as the cause. A search for the missing dosimeters was riot successful.

These results have been determined with the assumptionto that fading is negligible, although detailed testing confirm this has not been completed.

(C) Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

2.a IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS ( Ci/m 3 )

Collection Sam le Site Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 04-07-87 <0.05(A) <0.02 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 02 04-14-87 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 04-21-87 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.04 04-28-87 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 05-05-87 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-12-87 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-18-87 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 05-26-87 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 06-02-87 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 06-08-87 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 06-16-87 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 06-23-87 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 06-30-87 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 < 0.'02 (A) The air pump had failed during this sample. The equipment is estimated to have run for 105 hours0.00122 days <br />0.0292 hours <br />1.736111e-4 weeks <br />3.99525e-5 months <br /> out of the 166 total hours for this sampling interval.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ( Ci/m 3 )

Collection Sam le Site Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 04-07-87 (A0.017 + 0.003 0.017 + 0. 002 0. 020 + 0.002 0.016 + 0. 002 0. 018 + 0. 002 04-14-87 0.019 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 0. 019 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0.023 + 0.002 04-21-87 0.015 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0. 012 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 04-28-87 0.021 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0. 018 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 05-05-87 0.017 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 *0.023 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0.023 + 0.002 05-12-87 0.012 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 *0.010 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 05-18-87 0.015 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 *0.015 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 05-26-87 0.010 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 *0.010 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 06-02-87 0.006 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 06-08-87 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 06-16-87 0.014 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 06-23-87 0.008 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0 ..014 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 06-30-87 0.009 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 Means: 0.013 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 0.014 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 0.015 + 0.001

  • DOE split samples.

(A) The air pump had failed during this sample. The equipment is estimated to have run for 105 hours out of the 166 total hours for this sampling interval.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES ( Ci/m 3 )

Quarter, 1987 Sample Be-7'econd Site K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 T51 0.129 + 0.009 <0. 022 <0.0009 <0.0008 T57 0.123 + 0.009 <0.024 <0.0009 <0.0006 T58 0.120 + 0.009 <0.017 <0.0009 <0.0005 T64 0.124 + 0.010 <0.024 <0.0008 <0.0007 T72 0.161 + 0.011 <0.022 <0.0008 <0.0007

3.a SURFACE WATER ( Ci/1)

Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

T42 04-13-87 05-11-87

<190

<190 340 + 50 340 + 50

<5

<5

<8 ll <4

<5

<4

<4

<12

<9

<7

<6 <5

<4

<5

<4

<5

<7

<8 06-15-87 120 + 60 330 + 50 <4 <11 <5 <5 <12 <8 <6 <6 <4 <6 T67 04-13-87 <190 280 + 50 <4 <ll <5 <7 <10 <9 <6 <5 <5 <6 05-11-87 <190 260 + 60 <5 <8 <4 <5 <12 <6 <5 <5 <5 <8 06-16-87 <180 290 + 50 <5 <11 <4 <4 <10 <6 <8 <3 <5 <6 T81 04-13-87 (C) 810 + 70 360 + 50 <4 <10 <5 <4 <11 <8 <8 <6 <4 <8 04-13-87 (D) 1040 + 70 350 + 50 <5 <8 <4 <4 <10 <9 <8 <4 <5 <7 05-11-87(C) <190 290 + 50 <5 <9 <5 <6 <10 <7 <6 <4 <4 <7 05-11-87(D) <190 370 + 50 <5 <11 <4 <5 <10 <7 <5 <5 <4 <7 06-15-87(C) 500 + 60 330 + 50 <5 <10 <5 <5 <9 <8 <7 <5 <5 <5 06-15-87(D) 950 + 70 340 + 50 <3 <11 <5 <4 <10 <8 <8 <4 <5 <6 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

(C) Collected at the normal location in the old discharge canal about 200 feet west of the mouth.

(D) Collected at a comparison location at the mouth of the old discharge canal on the south side of the prominent embankment in this area.

4.b. 1 BROADLEAF UEGETATION Brazilian Pe er Cilk wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 T40 04-13-87 2310 + 80 2900 + 100 <16 <9 182 + 8

  • 05-11-87 680 + 50 3600 + 200 <10 30+5 06-16-87 1020 + 70 4000 + 200 <17 <12 112 + 7.

T41 04-13-87 1930 + 80 3000 + 100 <16 <11 83+6 05-11-87 1480 + 80 3900. + 200 ,

<12 <11 254 + 10 06-16-87 830 + 60 5500 + 200 <27 <10 23+5 T67 04-13-87 1200 + 70 3900 + 200 <16 <12 31+5 05-11-87 1630 + 70 2500 + 100 <10 <9 42+5 06-16-87 470 + 60 6700 + 200 <24 <11 19+5

  • DOE split sample.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANYsS TURKEY POINT SITE Third Quarter, 1987 Office of Radiation Control Florida'epartment of Health and Rehabilitative Services

TURKEY POINT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Third Quarter, 1987 DIRECT RADIATION TLDs micro-R/hour Each result 'is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 06-15-87 Site Collection 09-23-87 N-1 5.2 + 0.3 N-5 6.1 + 0.3 N-10 5.8 + 0.3 NNW-1 6.5 + 0.3 NNW-10 6.5 + 0.3 NW/WNW-1 5.5 + 0.3 Nw-5 5.7 + 0.3 Nw-10 8.1 + 0.4 W/WNW-5 5.4 + 0.3 WNW-10 6.8 + 0.4 W-1 5.6 + 0.3 W-10 7.3 + 0.4

'SW<<10 5.0 + 0.3 Sw/SSW-1 5.1 + 0.3 Sw-10'. 5.0 + 0.3 SSW/SW-5 5.7 + 0.3 SSW-10 5.8 + 0.3 S-5 5.2 + 0.3 S-lo 5.5 + 0.3 SSE/S-1 5.1 + 0.3 SSE-10 5.2 + 0.3 Notes:

~

.p.

(A) 'hese results. have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed.

\ ~

Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13.

and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

e,. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS ( Ci/m 3 )

Collection Sam le Site Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 07-07-87 <0. 02 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0. 02 <0.03 07-14-87 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 07-21-87 <0. 02 <0. 03 <0.03 <0. 02 <0.02 07-28-87 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0.03 <0. 03 <0.03 08-04-87 <0. 02 <0. 03 <0.02 <0. 02 <0. 02 08-10-87 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0.03 <0. 03 <0. 03 08-18-87 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 08-25-87 <0.03 <0. 03 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 03 09-01-87 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 09-09-87 <0.03 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 09-15-87 <0.03 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 <0 03 09-22-87 <0.04 <0. 04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 09-29-87 <0.04 <0. 04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ( Ci/m3 )

0 Collection Sam le Site Da'e T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 07-07-87 0. 009 + 0. 002 0.011 + 0.002 0.007 + 0. 002 0.008 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 07-14-87 0. 016.,+'.>9~ 002 0.012 + 0.002 0.017 + 0. 002 0.014 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 07-21-87 0. 014 '+',0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0. 002 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 07-28-87 0.020 +'0 '02 0.017 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.023 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 08-04-87 0.012 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 *0.009 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 08-10-87 0.022 + 0.002 0.022 + 0.002 *0.018 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 08-18-87 0.013 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 *0.016 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 08-25-87 0.014 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 *0.011 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 09-01-87 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 09-09-87 0.006 + 0.001 0.006 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.001 0.006 + 0.001 0.007 + 0.001 09-15-87 0.006 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.002 09-22-87 0.008 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.004 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.002 09-29-87 0.005 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.902 0.004 + 0.001 0.008 + 0.002 0.004 + 0.001 Means: 0.012 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 DOE split samples.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES ( Ci/m 3 )

Third Quarter, 1987 Sample 1 Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 T51 0.122 + 0.011 <0.026 <0. 0010 0.0030 + 0. 0005 T57 0.120 + 0.010 <0.026 <0.0009 0.0027 + 0.0005 T58 0.122 + 0.011 <0.017 <0.0009 0.0030 + 0.0004 T64 0.130 + 0.009 <0.028 <0.0011 0.0032 + 0.0005 T72 0.124 + 0.010 <0.025 <0.0009 0.0035 + 0.0005

3.a SURFACE WATER - ( Ci/l)

Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

T42 07-13-87 <180 270 + 50 <3 <11 (4 <5 <9 <9 <8 <4 <5 <6 08-17-87 <190 350 + 50 <5 <11 <3 <5 <11 <6 <7 <4 <4 <5

<190 '9-15-87 390 + 60 <3 <11 <5 <4 <10 <8 <8 . <4 <5 <6 T67 07-14-87 <180 320 + 40 <4 <10 <4 <4 <9 <9 <11 <5 (4 <6 08-17-87 <190 320 + 50 <4 <10 <4 <4 <10 <8 <8 <4 <5 <7 09-14-87 <190 290 + 50 <5 <10 <5 <6 <11 <8 <10 <5 <5 <8 T81 07-15-87 380 + 60 400 + SO <5 <9 <5 <4 <9 <6 <14 (4 <5 <9 08-17-87 320 + 60 390 + 50 <3 <12 <4 <5 <11 <8 <8 <5 <4 <7 09-15-87 370 + 60 300 + 50 <5 <11 <5 <5 <10 <8 <10 <5 <4 <5 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or, daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

3.b SEDIMENT ( Ci/k , dr wei ht)

Sample Collection Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Others Site Date Be-7 K-40 T42 07-21-87 <150 700 + 100 <14 <16 <12 <13 Ra-226: 810 + 50 Ra-228: <73 Th-232: 41+ 9 U-235: 110 + 10 U-238: 600 + 100 T67 07-21-87 <140 530 + 80 <10 <15 <13 88 + 8 Ra-226: 500 + 30 Ra-228: 100 + 20 Th-232: 70 + 21 U-235: <190 U-238: 440 + 80 T81 07-21-87 120 + 50 520 + 70 <8 <10 <12 <10 Ra-226: 280 + 20 Ra-228: <60 Th-232: <80 U-235: <150 U-238: 240 + 60 4.a.l CRUSTACEA Blue Crab ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Ra-226 Site Date .

K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 T67 Collection attempts in August were not, successful. Additional attempts will be made.

T81 07-28-87 1700 + 100 <10 <27 <10 <13 <28 <13 <11 220 + 20 4.a.2 FISH Mixed S ecies ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-236 T67 Collection attempts in August were not successful. Additional attempts will be made.

T81 07-10-87 '300 + 100 <10 <28 <10 <$ 2 <28 <11 . 11 + 5 72 + 9

4.b.l

~ ~ BROADLEAF VEGETATION Brazilian Pe er - ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 T40 07-14-87 1230 + 100 4900 + 200 <35 <12 507 + 15 08-17-87 1400 + 90 4600 + 200 <25 <13 501 + 16 09-15-87 1210 + 90 5300 + 200 <28 <13 348 + 12 T41 07-14-87 1080 + 80 4000 + 200 <26 <11 71+7 08<<17-87 950 + 60 4100 + 200 <18 <10 119 4 9 09-15-87 1290 + 80 3900 + 200 <28 <12 194 + 10 T67 07-14-87 1200 + 80 2900 + 200 <25 <13 29+ 6 08<<17-87 1150 + 70 3800 + 200 <19 <11 <13 09-14-87 770 + 70 5300 + 200 <25 <13 <10

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE Fourth Quarter, 1987 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specification's Sampling Fourth Quarter, 1987 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 21 42
2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*
3. Waterborne '3 3.a Surface Water Monthly 9 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 0 0 4.

~ Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates

~

4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish

~

Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.1 Broadleaf Monthly 10*

Vegetation Total: 197

  • Includes DOE split samples.

NOTE: 'Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

TURKEY POINT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Fourth Quarter, 1987 DIRECT RADIATION TLDs (micro-R/hour)

Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 09-23-87 Site Collection 12-09-87

'N-1 4.9 + 0.3 N-5 5.7 + 0.3 N-10 5.3 + 0.3 NNW-1 6.0 + 0.3 NNW-10 6.2 + 0.3 NW/WNW-1 .4.9 + 0.3 NW-5 5.4 + 0.3 NW-10 7.4 + 0.4 W/WNW-5 5.0 + 0.3 WNW-10 6.2 + 0.3 W-1 5.4 + 0.3 W-10 6.5 + 0.3 WSW-10 4.8 + 0.3 SW/SSW-1 4.6 + 0.2 SW-10 4.8 + 0.3 SSW/SW-5 5.4 + 0.3 SSW<<10 5.8 + 0.3 S-5 4.8 + 0.3 S-10 5.3 + 0. 3 << (C)

SSE/S-1. 5.0 + 0.3 SSE-10 4.9 + 0.3 (A) These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been complete'd.

Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

(C) The results for site S-10 are based on a single dosimeter.

The reading from one of the two dosimeters was lost due to a malfunction of the TLD reader.

IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY. AIR FILTERS ( Ci/m 3 )

Collection Sam le Site Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 10-06-87 <0.04 <0.03 <0.04 <0. 04 <0.03 10-13-87 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0. 04 <0.04 10-20-87 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0. 04 <0.03 10-28-87 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 <0.03 11-03-87 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.03 <0.04 11-10-87 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0.03 11-17-87 <0.02 <0.03 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0.02 11-23-87 <0.04 <0.04 <0. 04 <0. 04 <0.04 11-30-87 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0. 03 12"08-87 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0. 02 12-15-87 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 12-22-87 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 12-29-87 <0.03 <0.03 <0.04 <0.03 <0.04

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ( Ci/m 3 )

Collection Sam le Site Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 10-06-87 0.010 + 0 .002 0.009 + 0 .002 0.012 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 10-13-87 0.007 + 0 .002 0.008 + 0 .002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 10-20-87 0.011 + 0 .002 0.010 + 0 .002 0.010 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.001 10-28-87 0.014 + 0 .002 0.016 + 0 .002 0.015 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 11-03-87 0.009 + 0 .002 0.007 + 0 .002 *0.008 + 0. 002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 11-10-87 0.008 + 0 .002 0.005 + 0 .001 *0.008 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.001 0.004 + 0.001 11-17-87 0.008 + 0 .002 0.008 + 0 .002 *0.010 + 0. 002 0.011 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 11-23-87 0.012 + 0 .002 0.010 + 0 .002 *0.016 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 11-30-87 0.007 + 0 .002 0.005 + 0 .002 0.007 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 12-08-87 0.016 + 0 .002 0.020 + 0 .002 0.023 + 0.002 0.023 + 0;002 0.020 + 0.002 12-15-87 0.017 + 0 .002 0.015 +: .002 0 0.016 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 12-22-87 0.015 + 0 .002 0.012 + .002 0 0.013 + 0. 002 0.013 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 12-29-87 0.007 + 0 .002 0.007 + .002 0 0.004 + 0.001 0.008 + 0.002 0.007 + 0. 002 Means: 0.011 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001

  • DOE split samples.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES '- ( Ci/m 3 )

Four th Quar ter, 198 7.

Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 T51 0.153 + 0.010 <0.018 <0.0007 <0.0008 T57 0.163 + 0.011 <0.014 <0.0009 <0.0007 T58 0.156 + 0.011 <0.017 <0.0009 <0.0008 T64 0.160 + 0.010 <0.018 <0 .0009 <0.0008 T72 0.148 + 0.010 <0.016 <0.0008 <0.0007

3.a SURFACE WATER ( Ci/1)

Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

T42 10-14-87 <190 110 + 40 <5 <10 <5 <5 <7 <8 <15 <5 <4 <7 11-16-87 <190 240 + 50 <5 <8 <5 <4 <9 <8 <6 <5 <5 <5 12-14-87 <190 280 + 50 <3 <8 -<4 <5 <10 <7 <6 <4 <5 <8 T67 1G-12-87 <190 190 + 50 '<5 <10 <5 <5 <8 <8 <17 <6 <4 <9 11-16-87 '190 240 + 50 <4 <10 <5 <3 <10 <10 <7 <5 <5 <6 12-14-87 <190 260 + 50 <4 <10 <5 <4 <9 <8 <6 <5 <4 <7 T81 10-13-87 330 + 60 310 + 50 <5 <9 <4 <3 <8 <11 <12 <5 <5 . <9 11-16-87 <190 260 + 50 <4 <9 <5 <4 <10 <8 <6 <6 <4 <9 12-14-87 380 + 60 280 + 50 <4 <9 <3 <5 <9 <7 <6 <5 <4 <7 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140,- whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

4.a.l CRUSTACEA Blue Crab ( Ci/k , wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 T67 10-26-87 1500 + 100 <10 <23 <9 <13 <21 <11 <9 90 + 10 4.a.2 FISH Mixed S ecies -' Ci/k , wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Ca-134 Ca-137 Ra-226 T67 10-07-87 2300 + 100 <10 <32 <14 <10 <26 <14 <11 <31

4.b.1 BROADLEAF VEGETATION Brazilian Pe er ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 T40 10-14-87 1810 + 80 4100 + 200 <25 <11 376 + 12

  • 11-16-87 1730 + 70 4400 + 200 <13 <9 87+ 7 12-14-87 1920 + 70 4300 + 100 <12 <8 300 + 10 T41 10-14-87 1560 + 80 4100 + 200 <23 <13 194 + 10 11-16-87 970 + 50 3500 + .100 <8 <6 29+4 12-14-87 1880 + 70 3800 + 100 <ll <7 111 + 6 T67 10-12-87 470 + 60 4600 + 200 <25 <13 <13 11-16-87 650 + 60 4800 + 200 <13 <10 <12 12-14-87 1260 + 60 4000 + 200 <11 <10 105 + 7
  • - DOE split sample.

1987 ANNUAL RADIOIDGICAL OPERATING REEORP

'Q3RMH'OINT UNITS NOS. 3 AND 4 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FBQM %HE INXZBZABORMQRY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1987

FLORIDA DEPT OF HRS EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1987 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level FILTER Alpha 04 10 87 14 pCi/F 0.118 13.33 -0.23 FILTER Beta 04 10 87 43 pCi/F 0.118 41.33 -0.58 FILTER Cs-137 04 10 87 8 pCi/F 0.118 9.67 0.58 FILTER Sr-90 04 10 87 17 pCi/F 0.395 16.33 -0.77 FOOD I-131 01 30 87 78 pCi/Kg 0.370 72.00 -1.30 FOOD Cs-137 01 30 87 84 pCi/Kg 0.118 78.67 -1.84 FOOD K. 01 30 87 980 pCi/Kg 0.725 940.00 -1.41 FOOD Sr-90 01 30 87 49 pCi/Kg 0.118 24.00 -4.33 MILK I-131 10 31 86 49 pCi/L NDP MILK I-131 06 26 87 pCi/L NA MILK Cs-137 10 31 86 39 pCi/L NDP MILK Cs-137 06 26 87 pCi/L NA MILK K 10 31 86 1565 mg/L NDP MILK K 06 26 87 pCi/L NA MILK Sr-89 10 31 86 pCi/L NDP MILK Sr-89 06 26 87 pCi/L NA MILK Sr-90 10 31 86 0 pCi/L NDP MILK Sr-90 06 26 87 pCi/L NA WATER Alpha 01 23 87 11 pCi/L 0. 000 9.00 -0.69 WATER Alpha 03 20 87 3 pCi/L 0. 118 4.33 0.46 WATER Alpha 05 22 87 11 pCi/L 0. 118 9.67 -0.46 WATER Beta 01 23 87 10 pCi/L 0. 118 12.66 0.92 WATER Beta 03 20 87 13 pCi/L 0.237 16.66 1.27 WATER Beta 05 22 87 7 pCi/L '0.000 8.00 0.34 WATER Cr-51 06 05 87 pCi/L NA WATER Co-60 02 06 87 50 pCi/L 0. 237 51. 00 0. 34 WATER Co-60 06 05 87 pCi/L NA WATER Zn-65 02 06 87 91 pCi/L 0. 474 95.00 1. 38 WATER Zn-65 06 05 87 pCi/L NA WATER Ru-106 02 06 87 100 pCi/L 0.711 95.33 -1. 61 WATER Ru-106 06 05 87 pCi/L NA WATER Cs-134 02 06 87 59 pCi/L 0.237 54.33 -1.61 WATER Cs-134 06 05 87 pCi/L NA WATER Cs-137 02 06 87 87 pCi/L 0.355 87.33 0. 11 WATER Cs-137 06 05 87 pCi/L NA WATER H-3 02 13 87 4209 pCi/L 0. 098 4336.66 0.53 WATER H-3 06 12 87 2895 pCi/L 0. 066 2840.00 -0.26 WATER Sr-89 01 09 87 25 pCi/L 0. 237 23.33 -0.58 WATER Sr-89 05 08 87 pCi/L NA WATER Sr-90 01 09 87 25 pCi/L 4.855 21. 00 -4.62 WATER Sr-90 05 08 87 pCi/L NA

NOTES:

Normal.: Normalized 'range. As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Lab-ange oratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982",

Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, P. 0. Box 15027, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89114.

EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.

N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value. As defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.

NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been re-ceived from EPA, Las Vegas.

(1) Cause: "Poor chemical recovery of strontium carrier. Corrective ac-tion: Try to improve chemical recovery.

(2) Cause: Unknown. Corrective action: None at this time.

FLORIDA DEPT. OF HRS EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA July through December, 1987 Media Nuclide MontCol lection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N .D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level FILTER Alpha AUG 08 28 87 10 pCi/F 0.237 10.00 0. 00 FILTER Beta AUG 08 28 87 30 pCi/F 0.237 28.00 -0. 69 FILTER Cs-137 AUG 08 28 87 10 pCi/F 0.000 10.00 0. 00 FILTER Sr-90 AUG 08 28 87 10 pCi/F 0.395 8.33 -1. 92 FOOD I-131 JUL 07 31 87 80 pCi/Kg 0.222 81.67 0.36 FOOD Cs-137 JUL 07 31 87 50 pCi/Kg 0.237 54.67 1.62 FOOD K JUL 07 31 87 1680 mg/Kg 0.635 1743.33 1.31 FOOD Sr-89 JUL 07 31 87 20 pCi/Kg 0.118 15.33 -1.62 FOOD Sr-90 JUL 07 31 87 30 pCi/Kg 0.395 24.67 -6.16 MILK I-131 JUN 06 26 87 59 pCi/L 0.493 61.67 0.77 MILK Cs-137 JUN 06 26 87 74 pCi/L 0.592 77.33 1.15 MILK K JUN 06 26 87 1525 mg/L 0.546 1573.33 1.10 MILK Sr-89 JUN 06 26 87 69 pCi/L 0.118 56.33 -4.39 MILK Sr-90 JUN 06 26 87 35 pCi/L 0.395 29.66 -6.16 WATER Alpha JUL 07 24 87 5 pCi/L 0.118 4.33 -0.23 WATER Alpha SEP 09 18 87 4 pCi/L 0.000 3.00 -0.35 WATER Alpha NOV 11 20 87 7 pCi/L 0.000 6.00 -0.35 WATER Beta JUL 07 24 87 5 pCi/L 0.237 7.00 0.69 WATER Beta SEP 09 18 87 12 pCi/L 0.237 13.00 0.35 WATER Beta NOV 11 20 87 19 pCi/L 0.118 21.67 0.92 WATER Cr-51 JUN 06 05 87 41 pCi/L 0.711 36.33 -1.61 WATER Cr-51 OCT 10 09 87 70 pCi/L 0.829 64.67 -1.85 WATER Co-60 JUN 06 05 87 64 pCi/L 0.118 66.67 0. 92=

WATER Co-60 OCT 10 09 87 15 pCi/L 0.118 15.67 0.23 WATER Zn-65 JUN 06 05 87 10 pCi/L 0.355 11.33 0.46 WATER Zn-65 OCT 10 09 87 46 pci/L 0.592 44.00 -0.69 WATER Ru-106 JUN 06 05 87 75 pCi/L 1.351 76.67 0.58 WATER Ru-106 OCT 10 09 87 61 pCi/L 0.829 61.67 0.23 WATER Cs-134 JUN 06 05 87 40 pCi/L 0.237 36.66 -1.15

.WATER Cs-134 OCT 10 09 87 25 pCi/L 0.118 23.33 -0.58 WATER Cs-137 JUN 06 05 87 80 pCi/L 0.592 79.00 -0.34 WATER Cs-137 OCT 10 09 87 51 pCi/L 0.474 50.00 -0.35 WATER H-3 OCT 10 16 87 4492 pCi/L 0.079 4713.33 0.85 WATER I-131 AUG 08 07 87 48 pCi/L 0.099 49.33 0.38

. WATER I-131 DEC 12 04 87 26 pCi/L 0.197 25.00 -0.29 WATER Sr-89 MAY 05 08 87 41 pCi/L 0.118 37.33 -1.27 WATER Sr-90 MAY 05 08 87 20 pCi/L 0.000 19.00 -1.15

NOTES:

Normal.: Normalized range.

~ ~ As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Lab-Range oratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982",

Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, P. 0. Box 15027, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89114.

EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.

N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value. As defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.

NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been re-ceived from EPA, Las Vegas.

Action Level:

Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of strontium carrier. Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier.

(2) Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of strontium carrier. Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier.

Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of strontium 0 carrier. Corrective action: Try strontium carrier.

to improve purity of isolated