ML17349A768

1992 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for Turkey Point Plant,Units 3 & 4. W/930326 Ltr

ML17349A768
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	12/31/1992
From:	Plunkett T FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-93-071, L-93-71, NUDOCS 9303310247
Download: ML17349A768 (115)

Text

ACCEI ERA D DOCUMENT DIST UTION SYSTEM REGULA Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIO YSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9303310247 DOC.DATE: 92/12/31 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-250 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 3, Florida Power and Light C 05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 4, Florida Power and Light C 05000251 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION PLUNKETT,T.F. Florida Power a Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION RI

SUBJECT:

"1992 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for Turkey Point Plant, units 3 6 4." W/930326 ltr. D DZSTRZBUTZON CODE'E2SD COPZES RECEZVED'LTR TITLE: Environmental Monitoring Rept (per Tech Specs)

L ENCL L SZZE: 70 NOTES- gag Sqv(ron Rp5 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME, LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-2 LA 3 3 PD2-2 PD 1 1 RAGHAVAN,L 1 1 D INTERNAL: NRR/DRSS/PRPB11 2 2 REG FILE 01 1 1 Di RGN2 DRSS/RPB 1 1 N2 ILE 02 1 1 EXTERNAL EGSG SIMPSON i F 2 2 NRC PDR 1 1 R )

D NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM PI-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 13 ENCL 13

0 H

k

0 MAR 2 R 1993 L-93-071 10 CFR 50.36 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 1992 Annual Radiological Environmental 0 eratin Re ort Attached is the 1992 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4, as required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.3.

Should there be any questions regarding this information, please contact us.

Very truly yours, T ~ F. Plunkett Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear TFP/JEK/jk Attachment cc: Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Ross C. Butcher, Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant

,'ar303310247 'P2123i PDR ADOCK 05000250 R PDR en'FPL Group company

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT UNITS 3 & 4 LICENSE NOS. DPR-31, DPR-41 DOCKET NOS. 50-250, 50-251 DATA SUBMITTED BY: FLORIDA DHRS PREPARED BY: 2m' REVIEWED BY:

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT UNZTS 3 & 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE Introduction Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program TABLE 1 Annual Summary TABLE 1A Analyses with LLDs Above Table 4.12-1 TABLE 1B Detection Capabilities Land Use Census TABLE 2 Key to Sample Locations ATTACHMENT A Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power ATTACHMENT B and Light Company's Turkey Point Site First Quarter, 1992 Second Quarter, 1992 Third Quarter, 1992 Fourth Quarter, 1992 Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison ATTACHMENT C Program, 1992 REPORT/RADENVOP,PTN

r 4 f

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The data obtained through the Turkey Point Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples is not increasing.

These measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, during the surveillance year, is well within the limits established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.

Although certain aspects of the program were affected by the passage of Hurricane Andrew, the program was fully restored to the technical specification requirements prior to the'restart of Unit 4.

REPORT/RADENVOP.PTN

1 1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3. & 4 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9 of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Technical Specifications. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated.

This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit 3 and Unit 4 Technical Specifications.

II'ADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A. ~PU1" OSS The purpose of the radiological environmental monitoring program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation. The radiological environmental monitoring program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that, the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.

B. Pro ram Descri tion The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted pursuant to Technical Specifications 3/4.12 of Turkey Point Unit 3 & 4 Technical Specifications.

1. Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies:

a. Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 21 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly.

Hurricane Andrew destroyed more than two-,thirds of the TLD locations, 13 of the 21 TLD pairs were recovered by September 2nd. As of September 14th, the TLD portion of the REMP was fully restored.

The restoration involved relocation; for the most part, the new location is within a hundred yards of the pre-storm location.

REPORT/RADENVOP.PTN

C I 0

0 1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4

b. Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

Hurricane Andrew destroyed 4 of the 5 air sampling stations; however, 2 of the 5 particulate filters were recovered and 3 of the 5 iodine sampling cartridges were recovered. By September 9th, 3 of the 5 air sampling stations were operational. The air sampling program was fully restored by September 19th.

Note: The remaining four portions of the program, listed below, were not affected by the storm.

C~ Surface water samples are collected from three locations. Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

d. Shoreline sediment samples are collected from three locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic mea'surements.

e. Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from the two locations coinciding with two of the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

f. Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations. Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed, by gamma isotopic measurements.

Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2. Analytical Responsibility:

Radiological environmental monitoring for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS).

Samples are collected and analyzed by HRS personnel.

REPORT/RADENVOP.PTN (2)

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 Samples are analyzed at the HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.

C. Anal tical Results Table 1, Environmental Radicle ical Monitorin Procrram Annual ~Summar provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period.

Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, noted and explained in Tables lA and 1B respectively.

if any, are Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.

D. Land Use Census A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the Turkey Point Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census

~summan No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.

No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 204 greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.

E. Interlaborator Com arison Pro ram The State of Florida HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory participates in the Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency. Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program are provided in Attachment C.

III. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A. Re ortin of Results The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by the Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Technical REPORT/RADENVOP.PTN (3)

l 1 4

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 Specifications. Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by Technical Specifications, Table 3.12-2, for all samples specified by Table 3.12-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation. These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, and Be-7 which are common in the Florida environment.

B. Inter retation of Results

1. Direct Radiation:

The results for direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for -the specified locations. The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that. were observed during the preoperational surveillance program. ,Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

2. Air Particulates/Radioiodine:

Results of gross beta measurement are consistent with past measurements. No radioiodine was detected. The only identified isotope is cosmic-ray produced Be-7 at levels consistent with past measurements.

3. Waterborne; Surface Water:

The results for radioactivity measurements in surface water samples are consistent with past measurements.

Tritium was reported as present in the surface water samples collected from sites T-81 and T-42. These results are consistent with the known subsurface interchange that occurs between the closed cooling canal and its surrounding waters, and the pressure gradients caused by the flow of aquifer subsurface waters in South Florida. The highest reported tritium is less than 1% of the reporting value specified by Technical Specifications, Table 3.12-2.

4. Waterborne; Sediment, and Food Products:

4.1 Sediment

The results are consistent with past measurements; other than one indication of Cs-137 at the conrol location at less than 44 of the Table 4.12-1 LLD, only naturally occurring radionuclides were detected.

REPORT/RADENVOP o PTN (4)

l 4

4

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 4.2 Food Products: The results are consistent with past measurements; other than one indication of Cs-137 at location T-81 at less than 14 of the Table 3.12-2 reporting level, only naturally occurring radionuclides were detected.

5. Broad Leaf Vegetation:

The results for radioactivity measurements are consistent with past measurements.. Cs-137 was detected, as in the past, in samples collected from all locations. The maximum value, occurring at the control location, is about 224 of the Table 3.12-2 reporting level. No other fission products were detected.

C. Conclusions The data obtained through the Turkey Point Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased. The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)>>

criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.

REpoRT/RADENvop. pTN (5)

l I

0

TABLE Pag of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 & 4 , Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida , Reporting Period -=Januar 1 - December 31 1992 (County, State)

PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD UNITS: MICRO R/hr Location with Highest Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Annual Mean Total Number of Locations Name Mean f Control Location of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Distance & Mean (f)

Performed (LLD) Range Direction Range Range Exposure Rate, 84 4.9 8.2'W-10mi.,

5.9 (72/84) 10 NW

8. 0 (4/4) 7.9 8.2

7. 0 (4/4) 6.9 7.3 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3: 1/RADENVOP. PTN

TABL Pa of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 & 4 , Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida , Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1992 (County, State)

PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS: PICO Ci/M Location with Highest Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Annual Mean Total Number of Locations Name Mean f Control Locations of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Distance & Mean (f)

Performed (LLD) Range Direction Range Range

'"I 243 0.024 <MDA <MDA Gross Beta, 246 0.0025 0.013 (242/246) T-71 0 '14 (47/47) 0. 012 (51/51) 0.003 0.045 0. 5 mi., NNE 0.003 0.045 0.004 0.022 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20 7

Be 0.0052 0.1118 (20/20) T-58 0~ 1195 (4/4) 0. 1122 (4/4) 0.0731 0.1425 1 mi., NW 0. 1027 0. 1413 0. 0995 0. 1322 134 Cs 0.00069 <MDA <MDA 137 Cs 0.00066 <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

t 0

4

TABL Pa of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 & 4 , Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida , Reporting Period Janua 1 - December 31 1992 (County, State)

PATHWAY WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER UNITS: PICO Ci/LITER Location with Highest Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Annual Mean Total Number of Locations Name Mean f b Contxol Locatiog of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Distance & Mean (f)

Performed (LLD) Range Direction Range Range Tritium, 36 230 183 (7/36) T-81 183 (7/12) <MDA 115 288 6 mi., S 115 288 Gamma Isotopic, 36 40 60 263 (36/36) T-81 286 (12/12) 237 (12/12) 91 379 6 mi., S 203 351 148 345 54 Mn <MDA <MDA 59 Fe <MDA <MDA 58 Co <MDA <MDA 60

<MDA <MDA 65 Zn <MDA <MDA 95 Zr-Nb <MDA <MDA 131

<MDA <MDA 134 Cs <MDA <MDA 137

<MDA <MDA 140 Ba-La <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3 1/RADENVOP.PTN

l 0

TABL Pa of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 & 4 , Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida , Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1992 (County, State)

PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, DRY Location with Highest T e and Tota1 Number Lower of Limit All Indicator Locations Name

,Annual Mean Mean f b Control Locations of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Dms ance & Mean (f)

Performed (LLD) Range Direction Range Range Gamma Isotopic, 6 7

Be 100 276 (3/6) T-42 379 (1/2) 113 (1/2) 113 379 <1 mi., ENE 4'K 140 286 (6/6) T-42 390 (2/2) 238 (2/2) 213 445 <1 mi., ENE 334 445 213 262 52 50 (6/6) T-81 56 (2/2) 49 (2/2) 40 69 6 mi., S 44 69 44-54 226 Ra 49 407 (6/6) T-42 726 (2/2) 179 (2/2) 111 761 <1 mi., ENE 692-761 111-247 58 Co <MDA <MDA 60 Co 12 <MDA <MDA 134 Cs 14 <MDA <MDA 137 Cs 12 7 (1/6) 7 (1/2)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

TABLE Pag of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 8 4 , Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida , Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1992 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Type and Lower Limit All Indicator ,Annual Mean f b Total Number of Locations Name Mean Control Locatio~

of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Dms ance & Mean (f)

Performed (LLD) Range Direction Range Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 K 130 -

1852 (4/4) T-81 1711 (2/2) 1994 (2/2) 1640 2182 6 mi., S 1640 1782 1806 2182 226 Ra 20 337 (3/4) T-81 458 (2/2) 94 (1/2) 94 701 6 mi., S 215 701 228 Ra 66 (2/4) T-81 73 (1/2) 58 (1/2) 58 73 6 mi., S 54 Mn <MDA <MDA 59F 16 <MDA <MDA 58 Co <MDA <MDA 60 19 <MDA <MDA 65 Zn 17 <MDA <MDA 134 Cs <MDA <MDA 137 Cs <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

I 4

I

TABLE Pag of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 & 4 , Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida , Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1992 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: FISH UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Type and Total Number Lower of Limit All Indicator Locations Name

,Annual Mean Mean f b Control ~tions of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Dms ance & Mean (f)

Performed (LLD) Range Direction Range Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 130 2562 (4/4) T-81 2458 (2/2) 2666 (2/2) 2255 2975 6 mi., S 2255 2662 2357 2975 137 Cs 17 (1/4) T-81 17 (1/2) <MDA 6 mi. S 54M <MDA <MDA 59F 16 <MDA <MDA 58 Co <MDA <MDA 60 10 <MDA <MDA 65Z 17 <MDA <MDA 134 Cs <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

TABLE Pa of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 & 4 , Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida i Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1992 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Type and Total Number Lower of Limit All Indicator Locations Name

,Annual Mean Mean f 1 Control Loca@.ons of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Dxs ance & Mean (f)

Performed (LLD) Range Direction Range Range Gamma Isotopic, 36 7

Be 71 1090 (36/36)

'- T-41 1398 (12/12) 1036 (12/12) 384 4125 2 mi., W/NW 634 4125 422 1899 40K 100 3742 (36/36) T-40 4020 (12/12) 3737 (12/12) 2058 6618 3 mi., W 2702 6618 2058 5248 137 Cs 108 (30/36) T-41 137 (11/12) 141 (8/12) 13 442 2 mi., W/NW 37 407 13 442 131

<MDA <MDA 134 Cs <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3sl/RADENVOP.PTN

TABL Pa of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Docket No.gs Turke Point Units 3 a 4 50-250 an 50-251 Location of Faci 1 y Da e F ori a Coun y, S a e Reporting Period Janua 1 - December 31 1992 NOTES a~ The LLD is an "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system backaround that will blank be detected with 954 probability with onZy 5% probability of falsely conjkuding that a observation represents a real signal. 'g'p.i LLDs in this column are at time of measurement. MDAs reported in individual samples have been corrected to the timeThe of sample collection.Attachment B for the

b. Mean and range based upon detectable measurements onlv. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).

co Specific identifying -information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.

d Results are based upon the average net response of two TLDs. (Thermoluminescent dosimeters).

MDA -refers to minimum detectable activity.

HP3cl/RADENVOP PTN

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTq UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 1 Page 1 of 4 DEV1ATIONS/MISSING DATA A) Pathway: Direct Radiation Location: SSE-SE-1 (1 mi. Southeasterly)

Date: 3/24/92 to 6/16/92 Deviation: Failure to continuously monitor direct exposure at this location.

Description TLDs for this location were missing; empty of Problem: holder was found.

Corrective Replaced TLDs at, time of discovery.

Action:

B) Pathway: Airborne Location: T-72 ((1 mile, WSW)

Date: 3/30/92 to 4/7/92 Deviation: Failure to continuously provide air sampling at this location.

Description Electrical failure, power outage at sampling of Problem: site. Estimated to have run for 147 hours0.0017 days <br />0.0408 hours <br />2.430556e-4 weeks <br />5.59335e-5 months <br /> out of the 214 hours0.00248 days <br />0.0594 hours <br />3.53836e-4 weeks <br />8.1427e-5 months <br /> of this period.

Corrective Contacted utility to restore service.

Action:

Hp3:1/RADENvop.pTN

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTi UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 1 Page 2 of 4 DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA C) Pathway: Direct Radiation Location: NNW-2 (2 miles, NNW)

Date: 9/16/92 to 12/16/92 Deviation: Failure to provide continuous monitoring of direct radiation.

Description TLDs were missing when collection was of Problem: attempted.

Corrective Replaced TLDs at time of discovery.

Action:

D) Pathway: Direct Radiation Location: SW-8 (8 miles, SW)

Date: 9/16/92 to 12/16/92 Deviation: Failure to provide continuous monitoring of direct radiation.

Description TLDs were missing when .collection was of 'Problem: attempted.

Corrective Replaced TLDs at time of discovery.

Action:

0 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

t 1992 ANNUAL RADZOLOGZCAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTq UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 1 Page 3 of 4 DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA (Note: The Remaining are Hurricane Related)

E) Pathway: Direct Radiation Location: S-5 Date: Third Quarter Deviation: Failure to meet "Once per Calendar Quarter" sampling criteria at this location.

Description Hurricane damage to dirt road impeded access of Problem: to this remote location.

Corrective Periodic checking on accessibility; once roadway Action: was opened, collected TLD/deployed replacement.

F) Pathway: Direct Radiation Location: N 10I SSW-10 NNW li NNW (Sector 10I and W/WNW 5I distance W 10I SW/SSW 1(

(miles) is the location name.)

Date: 6/16/92 to 9/16/92 Deviation: Failure to continuously monitoring direct radiation at these locations.

Description Hurricane Andrew destroyed sampline equip-of Problem: ment; TLDs either not found or found damaged.

Corrective Replaced TLDs.

Action:

HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTi UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 1 Page 4 of 4 DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA (Note: The Remaining are Hurricane Related)

G) Pathway: Airborne Deviation: Failure to provide continuous air sampling.

Description Hurricane damage destroyed the sampling of Problem: equipment Location: 1) T-57 (4 miles, NW), 8/24/92 to 9/9/92 Date: Established alternate sampling location Corrective T-52 (7 miles, W) .

Action:

2) T-58 (1 mile, NW), 8/24/92 to 9/9/92 established temporary power source until permanent power was available.

3) T-72 ((1 mile, WSW), 8/24/92 to 9/14/92, established temporary power source until permanent power was available.

4) T-51 (2 miles, NNW), 8/24/92 to 9/18/92, ran power lines to existing spare sampling hut to establish this as an alternate location.

HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTq UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 1B ANALYSES lifITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4

'2-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1/1/92 12/31/92 The values specified in Table 4.12-1, Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTi UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS Distance to Nearest a b 6/92 Milk (c) 6/92 6/92 Sector Animal Residence Garden (d)

N L (e) 2.1/350 (g)

NNE 0 (f) 0 NE 0 ENE ESE SE SSE L L SSW L L L SW L WSW L L L 3.6/302 (?1) L L 3.8/305 NNW L (e) 4.0/328 HP3:1/RADENVOP ~ PTN

/,

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTi UNITS 3 6 4 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS NOTES

a. All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the Turkey Point Plant.

b. The following format is used to denote the location:

distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)

For example, a residence located in the north sector at a distance of 2.1 miles bearing 350 degrees is recorded as 2.1/350.

c. Potential milk animal locations.

d. Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.

e. L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.

f. 0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an ocean area.

g. Non-residential occupied buildings in these sectors include the following:

Sector Distance N 1.8/349 24-hour Security Staffing Building NNW 4.5/327 Mobile homes used for field offices NNW 1.8/345 Security booth at park entrance

h. This house, vacant since construction years ago, became occupied in May; Hurricane Andrew destroyed the home.

HP3:1/RADENVOPiPTN

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTi UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTi UNITS 3 & 4 E

I I

. Osyoeocen<

o N-1 T-51 B

I S

C A

I~ ~

Y N

~ %

E B

A

~'.: HW WNW-1, Y A' 4 a

NNW-1 c

4 MC

+lM

'~~9 -1 C~>> +5% ~ S% ~ 'Ifl~s Tully polnc cuoua<<o'~

~

T-42 SOSSSS ~ ahaeg

//..~

~ ~ B 72

~J I S

,/ C

~ ~ .

A c Y N

E B

i ~

I SW/SSW-

'-; 'j SSE /S-1 ufo Point A

Y Turkey Point Sampling Locations BEFORE HURRICANE ANDREW Plant Site Area

I ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~

~

I I 1

I

/

/

>> It I%i W

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONHENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT~ UNITS 3 & 4 ni 64 12 miles t', T-67 f4l ~ f N -10 144 Cf NNW 044I44 8

NW-10

/ltAIOsl~

T~TO N-5

~ ICCAT4C

~ CSIf,

~ OWCICA4

~ ~ IIATCSC AA

~ ~ ~

A ~AAC 4 B NW-5 T-57

/ T-4 O

'IIWWW f IAASAAA fATWSe Sw S~T S

~ AA MODEL LAHD CANAL OAOT CO eeOA 4 CAW 44 WSW-10 SSW/SW-5 S-5 T-81

~ lt4

~~v o

8 SSE-10 SW-10 CI Iie+CII 440 C

a SSW-10 I

n ~ 'S 10 e

""'~/ /

Turkey Point Sampling Locations BEFORE HURRICANE ANDREW

0 1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTg UNITS 3 6 4 T g4 12 miles 8, T-67 4 P ~

ttt Sl . N-10 tof St C4llof llf444 NNW-10 044f4 ~

I NW -10 f4441 N-7

~ ~

t>wO4t O4

~ CCAtff(

~

~

a4sllll40 4 4'I lO4 44 4 ~ ~

tf44 WNW-10 NW-5 T-52 W-5

/ T-40 4w

~ aof l

4W ~ 44 W-9 Stf tCw Sw ttt S

~

OA WSW-8 II I, I MODEL LAND CANAL DaOS CO w044 C4w 4O

., ('f K5'SW-5" J

SW-8  ! (S-5 I

4 T-81 ~ It c

~

OlOI4 I

WSw44 V

( ~ C f 44 4 SSE-10 ts Cfaa4fff Cf44 I

4 C~

I 4 I

~ ~

fgl1 SSW-10 I .c"

/

S-10 I I I Ae

"'"-I .

/ /'~

Turkey Point Sampling Locations AFTER HURRICANE ANDREW

1992 0 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTq UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A Page 1 of 5 PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION, TLD LOCATIONS BEFORE HURRICANE ANDREW SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion N-1 N 1 Convoy Point N-5 N 6 North of Moody Drive N-10 N 12 Old Cutler Rd. at S.W. 87 Avenue NNW-1 NNW (1 Turkey Point Entrance Rd.

NNW-10 NNW 9 Burr Rd. at Hainlin Mill Dr.

NW/WNW-1 WNW 1 Turkey Point Entrance Rd.

-5 NNW 4 Dolan's Farm on Kings Hwy.

-10 NW 10 Intersec Farm Lite & Coconut Palm

/WNW-5 W 5 Palm Dr. at Tallahassee Rd.

WNW-10 WNW 9 Homestead near Vehicle Inspect. Station W-1 W 1 On-Site near Cooling Tower W-10 W 10 Florida City near Fire Tower WSW-10 WSW 12 Old Hawk Missile Site, South of Florida City SW/SSW-1 SSW 1 On-Site near Land Utilization Offices SW-10 SW 10 U.S. 1 South of Florida City SSW/SW-5 SSW 5 On-Site, Southeast Corner of Cooling Canals SSW-10 SSW 10 At Card Sound Bridge S-5 S 5 On-Site, South End of Cooling Canals S-10 S 10 Card Sound Road at Steamboat Creek SSE/S-1 SSE 1 Turtle Point SSE-10 SSE 8 Ocean Reef HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTi UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A Page 2 of 5 PATHWAY I I I I I D RECT RAD AT ON I TLD LOCAT ONS AFTER HURR CANE ANDREW SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY Location Name Descri tion N-2 Convoy Point, Parking Area N-7 Black Point Marina Parking Lot N-10 Old Cutler Rd. approx. 196th Street NNW-2 East End North Canal Road NNW-10 Bailes Road & U.S. g1 NW-1 Turkey Point Entrance Road Mowry Drive & 117th Avenue Newton Road, North of Coconut Palm Drive Homestead Middle School W-1 On-Site, North Side of Discharge Canal W-5 Palm Drive & Tallahassee Road W-9 Card Sound Road, 0.6 mile from U.S. g1 WSW-8 Card Sound Road, 3.4 miles from U.S. g1 SW-1 On-Site near Land Utilization Offices SW-8 Card Sound Road, 5 miles from U.S. g1 SSW-5 On-Site, Southwest Corner of Cooling Canals SSW-10 Card Sound Road, west side of Toll Plaza S-5 On-Site, South East Corner of Cooling Canals S-10 Card Sound Road at Steamboat Creek SSE-1 Turtle Point SSE-10 Ocean Reef Control Natoma Substation NNE-22 The location name is the direction sector approximate distance (miles)

HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTq UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A Page 3 of 5 PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: WEEKLY Before Hurricane Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector Descri tion T-51 NNW 2 Homestead Bayfront Park T-57 NW 4 Tree Nursery on 316th Street T-58 NW 1 Turkey Point Entrance Road T-72 WSW (1, Turkey Point Boy Scout Camp ntrol:

T-64 NNE 22 Natoma Substation After Hurricane Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector Descri tion T-52 Florida City Substation Interim Alternate to T-51 T-58 NW 1 Turkey Point Entrance Road T-71 NNE 0.5 Florida City Sutstation Interim Alternate to T-57 T-72 WSW Turkey Point Boy Scout Camp Control:

T-64 NNE 22 Natoma Substation HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

~,'I 1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTi UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A Page 4 of 5 Locations Not Affected by Hurricane PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)

SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: MONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector Descri tion T-42 ENE <1 Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point T-81 S 6 Card Sound, near Mouth of Old Discharge Canal ntrol:

67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector Descri tion T-42 ENE <1 Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point A1A T-81 S 6 Card Sound, near Mouth of Old Discharge Canal Control:

T-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT@ UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A Page 5 of 5 Locations Not Affected by Hurricane PATHWAY INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion T-81 Card Sound Vicinity of Turkey Point Facility Control:

-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Park, North to Matheson Hammock Park SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: MONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector Descri tion T-40 South of Palm Dr. on S.W. 117th Street Extension T-41 Palm Dr., West of Old Missile Site near Plant Site Boundary Control:

T-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Park, North to Matheson Hammock Park HP3: 1/RADENVOP PTN

1992 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTi UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT B RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'8 TURKEY POINT SITE 1992 First Quarter, 1992 Second Quarter, 1992 Third Quarter, 1992 Fourth Quarter, 1992 HP3:1/RADENVOP,PTN

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE First Quarter, 1992 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling First Quarter, 1992 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 21 42

2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Monthly 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually

4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Monthly 10*

Vegetation Total: 202

• Includes NRC split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error- term.

Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 954 confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

DIRECT RADIATION TLDs micro-R hour Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 12-03-91 Site Collection 03-24-92 N-1 (A) 6.4 + 0.3 N-5 6.1 + 0.3 N-10 5.9 + 0.3 NNW-1 6.2 + 0.3 NNW-10 6.4 + 0.3 NW/WNW-1 5.1 + 0.3 NW-5 5.7 + 0.3 NW-10 8.2 + 0.4 W/WNW-5 5.0 + 0.3 WNW-10 6.6 + 0.3 W-1 6.3 + 0.3 W-10 7.0 + 0.4 WSW-10 5.0 + 0.3 SW/SSW-1 5.1 + 0.3 SW-10 5.1 + 0.3 SSW/SW-5 6.1 + 0.3 SSW-10 6.1 + 0~3 S-5 5.5 + 0.3 S-10 6.2 + 0-3 SSE/S-1 5.9 + 0.3 SSE-10 4.9 + 0.3 (A) The dosimeters at site N-1 had fallen off of the pole on which they were mounted. They were found at the base of the pole sometime near the beginning of March by the staff at that site.

The dosimeters had been kept in a desk drawer after they were found.

1 2.a IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS Ci m3 Collection Sam le Site Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 01-07-92 <0.02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 01-13-92 <0.04 <0. 04 <0. 04 <0.04 <0.04 01-21-92 <0.01 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 01-28-92 <0.05 <0.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 02-04-92 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 02-11-92 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 02-18-92 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 02-25-92 <0.02 <0.02 <0;02 <0.02 <0.02 03-03-92 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 03-10-92 <0.02 <0,. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 03-18-92 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 03-24-92 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 03-30-92 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.03 <0.04

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA Ci m3 Collection Sam le Site Date T57 T58 T64 T72 01-07-92 0. 011 + 0. 002 0.011 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002, 01-13-92 0.016 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 01-21-92 0.012 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.001 0.017 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.013 +, 0.002 01-28-92 0.013 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 02-04-92 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 *0.009 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 02-11-92 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 *0.011 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 02-18-92 0.005 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 *0.007 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 02-25-92 0.004 + 0.001 0.008 + 0.002 *0.007 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.001 0.007 + 0.002 03-03-92 0. 015 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0. 002 0.012 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 03-10-92 0. 011 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 03-18-92 0.016 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 03-24-92 0.015 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 03-30-92 0.021 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.019 + 0.002 Means: 0.012 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0-012 + 0.001

• NRC split samples.

AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF UARTERLY COMPOSITES Ci m First Quarter, 1992 Sample Site Be-7 K-4 0 Cs-134 Cs-137 T51 0. 1423 + 0. 0115 <0.0184 <0. 0011 <0.0010 T57 0. 1270 + 0. 0124 <0.0155 <0. 0008 <0.0012 i'58 0. 1413 + 0. 0126 <0 '153 <0.0009 <0.0009 T64 0.1322 + 0.0122 <0 '208 <0.0008 <0.0010 T72 0.1425 + 0.0124 <0.0181 <0.0014 <0.0007

3.a SURFACE WATER Ci l Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140

.(A) (B)

T42 01-10-92 <147 213 + 32 <3 <ll <4 <5 <9 <7 <7 <4 <6 02-12-92 <135 274 + 34 <4 <8 <4 <4 <7 <6 <9 <3 <4 <4 03-19-92 <133 356 + 39 <5 <10 <4 <5 <9 <8 <8 <4 <4 <5 T67 01-10-92 <147 185 + 30 <4 . <7 <4 <4 <9 <8 <5 <4 <4 <5 02-13-92 <135 290 + 35 <3 <10 <4 <5 <8 <7 <7 <5 <4 03-24-92 <133 265 + 36 <4 .

<9 <4 <5 <9 <8 <5 <4 <5 T81 01-10-92 <147 340 + 43 <3 <10 <4 <5 <9 <9 <8 <4 <5

'02-12-92 <151 254 + 36 <4 <11 <3 <4 <8 <7 <9 <4 <5 <4 03-19-92 171 + 45 258 + 34 <4 <9 <4 <5 <7 <7 <10 <5 <5 <7 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the g-eater sensitivity for a given sample.

0 3.b SEDIMENT Ci k dr wei ht Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 T42 01-02-92 <213 334 + 77 <12 <13 <11 <12 692 + 20 40 + 20 T67 01-06-92 <76 213 + 42 <7 <8 <9 7 + 3 247 + 31 44+9 T81 01-03-92 <122 223 + 53 <9 <12 <8 <8 202 + 8 44+ 14 4 a.1 CRUSTACEA Blue Crab Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 01-28-92 1806 + 116 <9 <23 <8 <11 <23 <9 <10 94+7 58 + 13 T81 01-23-92 1640 + 150 <14 <36 <14 <16 <32 <15 <14 701 + 15 ND 4.a.2 FISH Mixed S ecies Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 02-03-92 2357 + 125 <9 <26 <9 <12 <26 <10 <10 ND ND T81 02-05-92 2255 + 127 <9 <28 <9 <14 <25 <10 <12 ND ND ND Non-detectable.

4.b. BROADL AF VZG ATION azi ian Pe er 'i k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-4 0 ~X-13 Cs-134 Cs-137

'I T40 01-10-92 859 + 64 5011 + 170 <13 77+ 7

• 02-13-92 1137 + 74 4762 + 168 <18 <13 34+ 5 03-24-92 1385 + 63 3232 + 130 <10 <10 73+ 7 T41 01-10-92 1171 + 78 3394 + 159 <16 <13 141 + 10 02-13-92 1086 + 67 2484 + 124 <16 115 + 8 03-24-92 2116 + 86 3183 + 133 <10 <8 103 + 8 T67 01-10-92 1062 + 76 2058 + 127 <17 <10 442 + 16 02-13-92 1213 + 81 2276 + 130 <21 <9 330 + 14 03-24-92 1100 + 72 2115 + 118 <12 <9 262 + 11

• NRC split sample.

0 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE Second Quarter, 1992 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Rehabilitative Services Health'nd

TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 1992 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 21 40

2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Monthly 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually t 4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1 Crustacea 4.a.2 Fish 4.b Food Products 4.b.1 Broadleaf Vegetation Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 0

0 Total: 192

• Includes NRC split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error'erm.

Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95~ confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

0,

'IRECT RADIATION TLDs micro-R hour Each result is the average net response of '.wo dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 03-24-,92 Site Collection 06-16-92 N-1 (A) 5.6 + 0.3 N-5 6.1 + 0.3 N-10 5.9 + 0.3 NNW-1 5.6 + 0.3 NNW-10 6.2 + 0.3 NW/WNW-1 5.2 + 0.3 NW-5 5.5 + 0.3 NW-10 7.9 + 0.4 W/WNW-5 5.2 + 0.3 WNW-10 6.5 + 0.3 W-1 6.3 + 0.3 W-10 6.9 + 0,4 WSW-10 5.1 + 0.3 SW/SSW-1 5.0 + 0.3 SW-10 5.1 + 0.3 SSW/SW-5 6.0 + 0.3 SSW-10 6.1 + 0.3 S-5 5.1 + 0.3 S-10 (B) 5.7 + 0.3 SSE/S-1 ( C)

SSE-10 5.0 + 0.3 (A) This result is significantly lower, than the long-term average value of 6.5 micro-R per hour for nine previous quarterly measurements at site N-1. This difference is believed to be due to the fact that these dosimeters had to be moved to a slightly different location at that site at the, beginning of this sample.

(B) The dosimeters for site S-10 were found lying on the ground at the base of the utility pole upon which they had been deployed.

They had apparently fallen from their holder, or they.may have been removed from the holder by someone. Although we do not know how long these dosimeters were out of place, the result t

obtained is normal for this site.

(C) The dosimeters for site SSE/S-l were missing when collection was attempted. A search of the area produced only the empty plastic containers in which the dosimeters had been deployed.

2.a IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILT RS Ci m Sam le Site Collection Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 04-07-92 <0.02 <0 02

~ <0.02 <0. 02 <0. 03 (A) 04-16-92 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 04-21-92 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 04-29-92 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-06-92 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 05-15-92 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 e 05-22-92 05-28-92

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.03 06-03-92 <0.03 <0. 04 <0. 03 <0.03 <0. 03 06-10-92 <0.03 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 06-16-92 <0.03 <0.03 <0.04 <0.03 <0. 04 06-22-92 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 06-29-92 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 (A) There was a power outage in the mid-part of this sample.

equipment is estimated to have run for 147 hours0.0017 days <br />0.0408 hours <br />2.430556e-4 weeks <br />5.59335e-5 months <br /> out of The the 214 total hours for this sampling interval.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA Ci m3 Collection Sam le Site Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 04-07-92 0.017 + 0.002 0.019 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 0. 019 + 0. 002 (A0.017 + 0.002 04-16-92 0.010 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.002 04-21-92 0.008 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 04-29-92 0.015 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 05-06-92 05-.15-92 0.020 + 0.002 0. 018 + 0. 002 *0.018 + 0.002 0 '20 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 *0.020 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 05-22-92 0.011 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 *0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 05-28-92 0.017 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 *0.021 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 06-03-92 0.012 + 0.002 0. 013 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.019 + 0. 002 0.008 + 0.002 06-10-92 0.005 + 0.001 0.005 + 0.001 0.008 + 0.002 0.008 + 0. 002 0.008 + 0.002 06-16-92 0.003 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.002 <0.005 0.004 + 0.002 <0.007 06-22-92 0.010 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.004 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 06-29.-92 0.012 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.001 0.008 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.001 Means: 0.012 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 NRC split samples.

(A) There was a power outage in the mid-part of this sample. The equipment is estimated to have run for 147 hours0.0017 days <br />0.0408 hours <br />2.430556e-4 weeks <br />5.59335e-5 months <br /> out of the 214 total hours for this sampling interval.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF UARTERLY COMPOSITES Ci m3 Second Quarter, 1992 Sample Site Be-7 K-4 0 Cs-134 Cs-137 T51 0.1069 + 0.0108 <0. 0213 <0.0007 <0.0008

.T57 0.1039 + 0.0106 <0.0198 <0.0011 <0.0011 T58 0.1050 + 0.0111 <0.0159 <0.0005 <0.0006 T64 0.1155 + 0.0106 <0.0207 <0.0014 <0.0008 T72 0.1138 + 0.0114 <0.0167 <0.0013 <0.0011

3.a SURFACE WATER Ci l Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

T42 04-20-92 <137 294 + 42 <5 <8 <4 <4 <10 <7 <5 <4 <3 <6 05-08-92 <134 379 + 44 <4 <9 <4 <5 <8 <6 <6 <5 <4 <7 06-12-92 <132 304 + 35 <5 <8 <4 <4 <8 <7 <7 <4 <4 <8 T67 04-17-92 <137 209 + 41 <4 <8 <4 <4 <8 <8 <5 <5 <4 05-12-92 <134 345 + 37 <3 <8 <5 - <5 <8 <5 <5 <5 <5 <7 06-12-92 <132 265 + 36 <5 <8 <3 <4 <10 <7 <7 <4 <5 <4 T81 04-20-92 149 + 46 313 + 40 <4 <10 <4 <4 <8 <6 <5 <6 <4 <4 05-08-92 115 + 44 305 + 35 <4 <10 <4 <5 <8 <7 <7 <4 <4 06-12-92 175 + 45 288 + 35 <4 <11 <3 <5 <12 <6 <7 <5 <4 <5 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or'ased on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

4 4.b.l BROADLEAF VEGETATION Brazilian Pe er Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 -40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 T40 04-17-92 923 + 28 4006 + 60 <11 <4 41+ 3

• 05-12-92 492 + 45 3811 + 142 <7 <10 25+4 06-17-92 800 + 74 3679 + 166 <16 <13 36+7 T41 04-17-92 4125 + 109 2677 + 124 <16 <10 132 + 9 05-12-92 1203 + 63 3686 + 141 <8 <8 75+ 7 06-17-92 897 + 75 3180 + 141 <16 <8 407 + 13 T67 04-17-92 892 + 69 4391 + 169 <18 <13 <13 05-12-92 448 + 51 '908 + 161 <11 <12 27+ 6 06-17-92 1252 + 74 3529 + 151 <13 23+ 5

• The NRC split sample which is normally collected at site T40 in May each year was collected in February this year.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE Third Quarter, 1992 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Third Quarter, 1992 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 21 28

2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 48 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 49*

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Monthly 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually

4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.1 Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation Total: 146

• Includes NRC split samples.

NOTE Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement, system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" "(ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 954 confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

0 DIRECT RADIATION TLDs micro-R hour Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 06-16-92 Site Collection 09-16-92 N-1 6 ' + 0.4 N-5 6.2 + 0.3 N-10 '(A)

NNW-1 (A)

NNW-10 (A)

NW/WNW-1 5.2 + 0.3 NW-5 5.7 + 0.3 NW-10 7-9 + 0' W/WNW-5 (A)

WNW-10 6.7 + 0.4 W-1 6.4 + 0.3 W-10 (A)

WSW-10 F 1 + 0.3 SW/SSW-1 (A)

SW-10 5~1 + 0.3 SSW/SW-5 5.9 + 0.3 SSW-10 (A)

S-5 (B)

S-10 6.2 + 0.3 SSE/S-1 5.6 + 0.3 SSE-10 F 1 + 0.3 (A) These dosimeters were missing as a result of Hurricane Andrew.

(B) The dosimeters at site S-5 were not recovered in September because the access road to this site was washed out by Hurricane Andrew. These dosimeters were recovered on 10-27-92, after the road was repaired. The uncorrected total net exposure rate for these dosimeters, including their transit to the lab in Orlando for analysis, was 5.4 + 0.3 micro-R per hour. Control dosimeters were not available to accompany the field dosimeters back to the lab; however, ASSUMING a typical control dosimeter exposure rate, the corrected exposure rate for the time that these field dosimeters were at site S-5 is 5.3 + 0.3 micro-R per hour.

2.a IOD N 3 N WEEKL A F T S Ci m3 Sam le Site 0 Collection Date 07-07-92 07-13-92 T51

<0. 03

<0 02

~

, T57

<0.03

<0. "z3 T58

<0;03

<0.02 T64

<0. 03

<0.02 T72

<0.03

<0.02 07-20-92 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 07-27-92 <0 ~ 02 <0.02 <0 '2 <0. 02 <0.02 08-04-92 08-11-92

<0. 02

<0. 03

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02

<0.03

<0 '2

<0.03 08-18-92 08-24-92

<0.02

<0.05(A)

<0.02

<0.05(B)

<0 '2 <0.03 <0.03 (C) (D) <0.04(A) 09-02-92 (E) (E) (E) <0.02(D) (E) 09-09-92 (E) (E) (E) <0.03 (E) 09-17-92 (E) (E) <0. 03 (F) <0.03 (E) 09-24-92 09-29-92 (E)

(E)

(E)

(E)

<0. 05 (G)

<0. 02 (H)

<0

<0

'2

'3 <0. 02

<0.02 (A) The filter cartridges from sites T51 and T72 were recovered on 09-02-92 after the sites were destroyed by Hurricane Andrew on 08-24-92. Both of these cartridges were found saturated with water.

filter cartridge

~ (B)

(C)

The after this site This cartridge The from site T57 was recovered was destroyed by Hurricane Andrew was found in a dry condition.

filter cartridge from site T58 was NOT recovered after on 09-02-92 on 08-24-92.

this site was destroyed by Hurricane Andrew on 08-24-92.

(D) Site T64 was not visited in the week of 08-24-92 due to the impact of Hurricane Andrew. The cartridge which was installed on 08-17-92 was collected on 09-02-92. Based on the volume of air collected, 'this equipment is believed to have operated for essentially the entire two-week interval.

(E) There were no samples from these sites due to the destruction caused by Hurricane Andrew.

I h (F) This sample site has been re-established at the FP&L'ellness Center near the entrance to the Turkey Point Plant former location can be rebuilt.

until the This new location is subject to a lot of pedestrian traffic and to lengthy power outages while other equipment is being worked on. This sample had a very low volume due to a low flowrate setting.

(G) This sample had a low collected volume, and the gas meter had been knocked over onto its side.

~ (H) This sample was found with an average air flowrate much lower than that measured at the end. A power outage is suspected to have occurred.

I

1

• 2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA Ci m3 Collection Sam le Site Date T57 T58 T64 T72 07-07-92 0. 021 + 0 ~ 002 0. 021 + 0. 002 0. 021 + 0. 002 0. 021 + 0.002 0.023 + 0 ~ 002 07-13-92 0. 015 + 0. 002 0.023 + 0.003 0.018 + 0.002 0.022 + 0.002 0.016 + 0. 002 07-20-92 0. 015 + 0. 002 0.013 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0. 013 + 0. 002 07-27-92 0. 016 + 0. 002 0.014 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.019 + 0.002 0. 018 + 0.002 08-04-92 0. 015 + 0. 002 0.012 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0. 018 + 0-002 08-11-92 0. 011 + 0. 002 0.008 + 0.002 *0.010 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0. 092 08-18-92 0. 010 + 0. 002 0.011 + 0.002 *0.011 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.009 + 0. 002 08-24-92 (A) (A) (B*0.010 + 0.002 (C) (A) 09-02-92 (D} (D} (D} (C0.010 + 0.001 (D) 09-09-92 (D) (D) (D) 0.013 + 0.002 (D) 09-17-92 (D) (D) (E0.016 + 0.006 0.016 + 0.002 (D) 09-24-92 (D) (D) <0.008(F) 0.008 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.001 09-29-92 (D) (D) (G0.011 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 Means: 0.015 + 0.001 0.015 + 0.001 0.014 + 0.001 0.014 + 0.001 0.014 + 0.001 NRC split samples.

(A) The particulate filters from sites T51, T57, and T72 were NOT recovered after these sites were destroyed by Hurricane Andrew on 08-24-92.

(B) The particulate filters from site T58 were not found on 09-02-92 when this site was first visited by HRS after it was destroyed by Hurricane Andrew on 08-24-92. However, both the HRS and NRC particulate filters were later found amidst the debris by Fp&L employees who forwarded these filters to us.

(C) Site T64 was not visited in the week of 08-24-92 due to the impact of the hurl "ane.

The particulate filter which was installed on 08-17-92 was collected on 09-02-92.

Based on the volume of air collected, this equipment is believed to have operated for essentially the entire two-week interval.

(D) There were no samples from these sites due to destruction caused by Hurricane Andrew.

(E) This sample site was re-established at the FP&L Wellness Center near the entrance to the Turkey Point Plant until the former location can be rebuilt. This new location is subject to a lot of pedestrian traffic and to lengthy power outages while other equipment is being worked on. This sample had a very low volume due to a low flow-rate collected volume, setting.'F)

This sample had a low and the gas meter had been knocked over onto its side.

(G) The average flowrate for this sample was much lower than that measured at the end of the sample. A power outage is suspected to have occurred.

2.b IR PARTICULAT S GAMMA SCANS 0 U CO 0 S Ci Third Quarter, 1992 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 T51 0.0847 + 0.0174 <0. 0298 <0.0021 <0.0023 T57 0.0731 + 0.0167 <0.0377 <0.0017 <0.0013 T58 0 '027 + 0.0146 <0.0258 <0.0010 <0.0015 T64 0.0985 + 0.0106 <0.0162 <0.0012 <0.0009 T72 0.0875 + 0.0078 <0.0156 <0.0009 <0.0006

3.a SURFACE WATE Ci l Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Pe-59 Co-56 Co-60 30-65 Nb-95 3-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

T42 07-21-92 <141 317 + 38 <4 <8 <3 <5 <7 <7 <5 <4 <4 <6 08-18-92 <135 372 + 41

<4 <8 <4 <5 <10 <5 <5 <4 <3 09-09-92 <151 91 + 36 <5 <9 <3 <5 <6 <8 <7 <5 <4 <6 T67 07-21-92 <141 202 + 34 <3 <8 <3 <5 <9 <6 <5 <3 <3 <4 08-17-92 <135 232 + 36 <3 <11 <3 <4 <8 <5

'7

<9 <4 <4 <5 09-09-92 <175 148 + 36 <4 <10 <5 <6 <9 <9 =

<7 <4 <4 T81 07-21-92 257 + 50 253 + 35 <3 <8 <3 <5 <10 <7 <6 <5 <5 I

I 08-14-92 288 + 49 275 + 37 <4 <7 <4 <5 <10 <6 <6 <4 <3 <5 09-09-92 <159 203 +.35 <3 <8 <4 <5 <9 <6 <7 <4 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

0 0

3.b SEDIMENT Ci k dr wei ht 0

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 T42 07-10-92 379 + 65 445 + 95 <12 <14 <14 <13 761 + 25 49 + 20 T67 07-10-92 113 + 29 262 + 50 <6 <7 <8 <7 111 + 9 54 + 13 T81 07-09-92 337 + 59 238 + 57 <11 <9 <11 <9 431 + 17 69 + 18 4.a.l CRUSTACEA Blue Crab Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 Third quarter attempts to collect this sample were not successful. Efforts continue.

T81 Third quarter attempts to collect this sample were not successful. Efforts continue.

4 a.2 FISH Mixed S ecies Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 Third quarter- attempts to collect this sample were not successful. Efforts continue.

T81 Third quarter attempts to collect this sample were not successful. Efforts continue.

4.b.l BROADLEAF VEGETATION Braz lia Pe er Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection 0 J-1L~ ~Cs- 34 ~s-137 Ra-226 T40 07-21-92 1016 + 59 3344 i 126 <9 <10 15 + 5 43 + 8 08-17-92 1190 + 64 2928 + 125 <9 <8 44 + 6 ND 09-09-92 1268 + 154 6618 i 386 <35 <29 138 + 19 ND T41 07-21-92 1161 + 72 3908 + 152 <10 <9 172 + 9 ND 08-17-92 942 + 63 3562 + 142 <11 <9 157 + 9 ND 09-09-92 1235 + 123 3040 + 227 <25 <20 <25 ND

<10 21 + 5 ND 08-17-92 1899 + 82 3581 + 148 <11 <10 13 + 4 ND 09-09-92 422 + 139 4988 + 366 <38 <33 <51 ND Note: Other species of green leafy vegetation were added to the Brazilian pepper for the samples collected on 09-09-92 because sufficient quantities of only Brazilian pepper were not available due to damage to the pepper trees caused by Hurricane Andrew.

ND Non-detectable.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE Fourth Quarter, 1992 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 1992 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 22 38

2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 65

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Monthly 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually

4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.1 Broadleaf Monthly 10*

Vegetation Total: 191

• Includes an NRC split sample.

yl NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background. of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Measurement results that, are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95~ confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

0 fg'

~ 1 ~ DIRECT RADIATION TLDs micro-R hour Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 09-16-92 Site Collection 12-16-92 N-2 6.5 + 0.3 N-7 (A) 6.0 + 0.3 N-10 5.6 + 0.3 NNW-2 (B)

NNW-10 6.2 + 0.3 NW-1 6.2 + 0.3 NW-5 5.5 + 0.3 NW-10 8.0 + 0.4 WNW-10 6.9 + 0.4 W-1 4.9 + 0.3 W-5 (A) 5.8 + 0.3 W-9 5.3 + 0.3 WSW-8 5.4 + 0.3 SW-1 6.2 + 0.3 SW-8 (B)

SSW-5 (G)

SSW-10 5.5 + 0.3 S-5 (D) 5.5 + 0.3 S-10 5.8 + 0.3 SSE-1 5.3 + 0.3 SSE-10 5.1 + 0.3 NNE-22 6.9 + 0.4 (A) These results are each based on a single dosimeter due to anomalous responses from the other dosimeters at these sites.

(B) These dosimeters were missing when collection was attempted.

(C) Due to access difficulties and reconstruction operations after Hurricane Andrew, dosimeters were not deployed at this site during this quarter.

(D) Due to access difficulties and reconstruction operations after Hurricane Andrew, the dosimeters for the third quarter, 1992, were not recovered from this site until 10-27-92. The new dosimeters for the fourth quarter, 1992; were not deployed at this site until 10-30-92.

~ I 2~a IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS Ci m3 Sam le Site Collection Date T52 T58 T64 T71 T72 10-06-92 <0. 04 <0. 05 <0.04 <0.04 <0. 04 10-13-92 <0. 05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 10-20-92 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03(A) <0.03 10-27-92 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.04 <0.03 <0.04(B) 11-02-92 <0. 04 <0. 04 <0. 04 <0.04 <0.04 11-10-92 <0. 03 <0.03 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 11-17-92 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03(C) <0.03 11-23-92 <0 '2 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 (D) 12-01-92 <0. 01 <0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 12-07-92 <0.01 <0.01 <0 01 <0.01 <0.01 12-15-92 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 12-21-92 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 12-29-92 <0.01 <0.01 <0-01 <0.01 <0.01 t

(A) This sample had a low collected volume due to a power outage.

The equipment is estimated to have run for 141 hours0.00163 days <br />0.0392 hours <br />2.331349e-4 weeks <br />5.36505e-5 months <br /> out of the 170 total hours for this sampling interval.

(B) The gas meter was laid flat during this sample interval with intentions to avoid having equipment. It was it fall over and strike the other discovered at the end of this sample that the gas meter does not operate properly when lying down.

The air volume for this sample is estimated based on flow rate measurements.

(C) This sample had a low collected volume due to a power outage.

The equipment is estimated to have run for 143 hours0.00166 days <br />0.0397 hours <br />2.364418e-4 weeks <br />5.44115e-5 months <br /> out of the 167 total hours for this sampling interval.

(D) This filter was found to be saturated with water when it was collected. This is believed to be due to inhalation of rain water into the sampling equipment. Improvements were made to the rain shield at this site after collection of. this sample.

air sample site T52 is now being temporarily used as a t

Supplementary substitute for Technical Specifications site T57, which was destroyed by Hurricane Andrew.

Supplementary air sample site T71 is now being temporarily used as a substitute for Technical Specifications site T51, which was destroyed by Hurricane Andrew.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA Ci m3 0

Collection Sam le Site Date T52 T58 T64 T71 T72 10-06-92 0-005 + 0.002 0.004 + 0.002 0. 009 + 0. 002 0.006 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.002 10-13-92 0-013 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0-002 0.009 + 0.002 10-20-92 0.020 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 (A0.016 + 0.002 0-014 + 0.002 10-27-92 0.025 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 0.025 + 0.003 0 '19 + 0.002 (B0.019 + 0.002 11-02-92 0. 011 + 0. 002 0.010 + 0.002 0. 015 + 0. 002 0.007 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 11-10-92 0.009 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0. 012 + 0. 002 0.008 + 0.002 (CO-010 + 0.002 11-17-92 0.011 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 (DO.Oll + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 11-23-92 0.006 + 0.002 0.004 + 0.002 0.010 + 0".002 0.003 + 0.001 <0.005(E) 12-01-92 0. 012 + 0. 002 0.016 + 0.002 0.015"+ 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 12-07-92 0. 030 + 0. 003 0.018 + 0.003 0.026 + 0.003 0.020 + 0.002 0.024 + 0.003 12-15-92 0.015 +" 0 002 0.013 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 12-21-92 0.045 + 0. 003 0.014 + 0.002 0.027 + 0.002 0.009 +- 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 12-29-92 0.016 + 0. 002 0.007 + 0.001 0.009 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.001 0.006 + 0.001 Means: 0.017 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.015 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001

• NRC split samples'were not collected this quarter due to the impact of Hurricane Andrew.

(A) This sample had a low collected volume due to a power outage. The equipment is esti-mated to have run for 141 hours0.00163 days <br />0.0392 hours <br />2.331349e-4 weeks <br />5.36505e-5 months <br /> out of the 170 total hours for this sampling interval.

(B) The gas meter was laid flat during this sample interval with intentions to avoid having it fall over and strike the other this sample that the gas meter does not equipment. It was discovered at the end of operate properly when lying down. The air volume for this sample is estimated based on flow rate measurements.

(C) This particulate filter had a "washed out" appearance. This is believed to be due to rainwater striking the filter.

(D) This sample had a low collected volume due to a power outage. The equipment is esti-mated to have run for 143 hours0.00166 days <br />0.0397 hours <br />2.364418e-4 weeks <br />5.44115e-5 months <br /> out of the 167 total hours for this sampling interval.

(E) This filter was found to be saturated with water when it was collected. is believed to be due to inhalation of rain water into the sampling equipment. This Improve-ments were made to the rain shield at this site after collection of this sample.

Supplementary air sample site T52 is now being temporarily used as a substitute for Technical Specifications site T57, which was destroyed by Hurricane Andrew. Supplementary air sample site T71 is now being temporarily used as a substitute for Technical Specifications site T51, which was destroyed by Hurricane Andrew.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF UARTERLY COMPOSITES Ci m3 Fourth Quarter, 1992 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 T52 0.1225 + 0. 0121 <0.0171 <0.0010 <0.0009 T58 0.0963 + 0.0102 <0.0106 <0.0013 <0.0006 T64 0.1289 + 0.0127 <0.0169 <0.0013 <0.0010 T71 0.1027 + 0.0112 <0.0186 <0.0010 <0.0007 T72 0.1097 + 0.0109 <0.0140 <0.0009 <0.0009 Supplementary air sample site T52 is now being temporarily used as substitute for Technical Specifications site T57, which was destroyed by Hurricane Andrew. a Supplementary site T71 is now being temporarily used as a substitute for Technical Specifications air site sample T51, which was destroyed by Hurricane Andrew.

3-a SURFACE WATER Ci 1 Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

T42 10-27-92 <123 . 291 + 39 <5 <7 <4 <4 <8 <9. <6 <4 <7 11-19-92 <131 106 + 28 <4 <7 <3 <5 <7 <7 <6 <4 <5 12-11-92 <129 209 + 33 <3 <9 <4 <5 <8 <7 <6 <4 <5 I

T67 10-27-92 <123 249 + 37 <3 <10 <4 <4 <9 <7 <7 <3 <4 <4 11-19-92 <131 204 + 31 <4 <9 <4 <4 <10 <7 <6 <3 ~

<4 <6 12-11-92

/ <129 246 + 38 <4 <7 <4 <8 <8 <7 <4 <5 <6 T81 10-27-92 <123 315 + 35 <5 <8 <3 <6 <9 <5 <6 <5 <4 <7 11-19-92 <131 275 + 37 <4 <7 <4 <4 <10 <7 <9 <4 <4 <7 12-11-92 129 + 42 351 + 38 <4 <9 <4 <5 <8 <7 <8 <4 <3 <7 (A) These tabulated LLD values for'r/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, (B) either based on direct measurement '.f Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

0 CRUSTACEA Blue Crab Ci k wet wei ht 0

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 11-03-92 2182 + 247 <30 <53 <27 <29 <65 <29 <31 ND ND T81 10-21-92 1782 + 141 <13 <34 <13 <15 <26 <14 <13 215 + 16 73 + 34 4.a.2 FISH Mixed S ecies Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 12-10-92 2975 + 147 <9 <27 <12 <16 <25 <12 <13 ND ND T81 12-10-92 2662 + 130 "<9 <25 <8 <13 <22 <10 17 + 4 ND ND 4.b.1 BROADLEAF VEGETATION Brazilian Pe er Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 T40 10-26-92(A) 573 + 57 4912 + 174 <13 <12 48+7

• 11-20-92(A) 384 + 48 2702 + 169 <25 <12 <12 12-11-92 929 + 69 3238 + 146 <13 <10 43+5 T41 10-26-92(A} 1197 + 78 4926 + 185 <12 <11 73+8 11-20-92(A) 1004 + 93 4234 + 207 <32 <13 37+ 6 12-11-92(A) 634 + 114 3351 + 249 <35 <23 100 + 15 T67 10-27-92 (A} 820 + 67 5248 + 185 <15 <10 < i'2'10 11-19-92 1229 + 64 4727 + 150 <20 <9 12-11-92 781 + 61 4375 + 170 <18 <10 14+6

• NRC split sample'. ND Non-detectable.

(A) The Brazilian pepper for these samples was supplemented with mixed species of green leafy vegetation due to a lack of sufficient Brazilian pepper after Hurricane Andrew.

I I 1992 0 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANTg UNITS 3 6 4 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1992 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PTN

FLORIDA DEPT'F HRS EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1992 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level FILTER Alpha 03 27 92 7 pCi/F 0.118 9.33 0.81 FILTER Beta 03 27 92 41 pCi/F 0.236 41.00 0.00 FILTER Cs-137 03 27 92 10 pCi/F 0.000 66.00 19.40 FILTER Sr-90 03 27 92 15 pCi/F 0.236 12.67 -0.81 MILK I-131 04 24 92 78 pCi/L 0.148 79.33 0.29 MILK Cs-137 04 24 92 39 pCi/L . 0.354 42.33 1.15 MILK K 04 24 92 1710 mg/L 0.453 1630.67 -1.60 MILK Sr-89 04 24 92 38 pCi/L 0.591 17.00 7 27

~

MILK Sr-90 04 24 92 29 pCi/L 0.827 31.33 0. 81 WATER Alpha 01 31 92 30 pCi/L 0.148 23.00 -1.52 WATER Alpha 05 15 92 15 pCi/L 0.236 18.67 1.27 WATER Beta 01 31 92 30 pCi/L 0.354 35.67 1.96 t

WATER Beta 05 15 92 44 pCi/L 0.236 52.00 2.77 WATER Co-60 02 14 92 40 pCi/L 0.473 40.67 0.23 WATER Co-60 06 05 92 20 pCi/L 0.000 20.00 0.00 WATER Zn-65 02 14 92 148 pCi/L 0.197 149.00 0.12 WATER Zn-65 06 05 92 99 pCi/L 0.295 103.00 0. 69 WATER Ru-106 02 14 92 203 pCi/L 0.059 194.67 -0.72 WATER Ru-106 06 05 92 141 pCi/L 0.253 138.00 -0.37 WATER Ba-133 02 14 92 .76 pCi/L 0 '48 73.00 -0.65 WATER Ba-133 06 05 92 98 pCi/L 0 '77 94.67 -0.58 WATER Cs-134 02 14 92 31 pCi/L 0 '36 29.00 -0.69 WATER Cs-134 06 05 92 15 pCi/L 0 '18 14.33 -0.23 WATER Cs-137 02 14 92 49 pCi/L 0.236 51.33 0.81 WATER Cs-137 06 05 92 15 pCi/L 0.118 15.33 0.12 WATER H-3 02 21 92 7904 pCi/L 0.202 8043.33 0.31 WATER H-3 06 19 92 2125 pCi/L 0.160 2235.67 0.55

'WATER I-131 02 07 92 59 pCi/L 0.098 60 '3 0.38 WATER Sr-89 01 17 92 51 pCi/L 5.396 27.00 -8.31 Sr-89

'8 WATER 05 92 29 pCi/L 0.236 27.00 -0.69 WATER Sr-90 01 17 92 20 pCi/L 0 '45 24.33 1.50 WATER Sr-90 05 08 92 8 pCi/L 0.118 7.67 -0.12

e' NOTES:

Normal.: Normalized range. As defined in "Environmental Range Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, P. O. Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478.

EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.

N. D. K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.

NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegas.

ACTION LEVEL:

Cause: An incorrect efficiency file was used to calcu-late the results.

Corrective Action: Check the final printout from the gamma spectrometer more carefully.

(2) Cause: An incorrect date for beginning of the yttrium ingrowth was used in the calculations.

Corrective Action: Point out to the new chemist the significance of the ingrowth date and stress its importance in the calculation of the data.

(3) Cause: A short term glitch in the proportional counter produced very erroneous data.

Corrective Action: Check the proportional counter printout for obvious glitches.

fg

'I 0

0

FLORIDA DEPT. OF HRS EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA July through December, 1992 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Uni ts Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level FILTER Alpha 08 28 92 30 pCi/F 0.074 33.33 0.72 FILTER Beta 08 28 92 69 pCi/F 0.059 72. 67 0. 64-FILTER Cs-137 08 28 92 18 pCi/F 0.000 21. 00 1. 04 FILTER Sr-90 08 28 92 25 pCi/F 0.000 22.00 -1. 04 MILK I-131 09 25 92 100 pCi/L 0.059 97.33 -0.46 MILK Cs-137 09 25 92 15 pCi/L 0.236 16.00 0.35 MILK K 09 25 92 1750 mg/L 0.262 1660.00 1 ~ 77 MILK Sr-89 09 25 92 15 pCi/L 0.118 10.67 -1. 50 MILK Sr-90 09 25 92 15 pCi/L 0.118 11.33 -1.27 WATER Alpha 09 18 92 45 pCi/L 0.107 52.00 1.10 WATER Beta 09 18 92'0 50 pCi/L 0.709 47.00 -1.04 WATER Co-60 09 92 10 pCi/L 0.118 10.33 0.12 WATER Zn-65 10 09 92 148 pCi/L 0.158 152.00 0.46 WATER RU-106 10 09 92 175 pCi/L 0.492 167.33 -0.74 WATER Ba-133 10 09 92 74 pCi/L 0.253 71.00 -0 ..74 WATER Cs-134 10 09 92 8 pCi/L 0.118 6. 67 -0.46 WATER Cs-137 10 09 92 8 pCi/L 0.118 8. 33 0.12 WATER H-3 10 23 92 5962 pCi/L 0.078 5584.67 -1.10 ATER I-131 08 07 92 45 pCi/L 0.098 43.67 -0.38 ATER Sr-89 09 11 92 20 pCi/L 0.236 14.33 -1.96 WATER Sr-90 09 11 92 15 pCi/L ~

. 0. 118 10.67 -1.50

NOTES:

Normal.: Normalized range. As defined in the "Environmental Range Radioactivity Laboratory Intercompazison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Agency, P. O. Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478. EPA-600/4-91004, February, 1981.

N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.

NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegas.

Action Level: None.

r,

\ ~ p

t. k ~,

p/i C

h.

l v

~ig k