ML17354A921
| ML17354A921 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1997 |
| From: | Hovey R FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| L-98-102, NUDOCS 9805150093 | |
| Download: ML17354A921 (92) | |
Text
CATEGORY 1
'EGULAT INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIO&STEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9805150093 DOC.DATE: 97/12/31 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACXL:50-250 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 3, Florida Power and Light C 05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 4, Florida Power and Light C 05000251 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFXLXATXON OVEY,R.J.~ ~ Florida Power E Light Co.
RECIP.NAME
~ RECIPIENT AFFILIATION ~~Vi~'S
SUBJECT:
"197 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept." W/980507 ltr. C A
D1STRIBUTION CODE: C001D COP1ES RECEIVED: LTR i TITLE: Licensing Submittal: Environmental Rept Amdt ENCL 1Related S1ZE:
Correspondencep NOTES:
RECXPIENT COPIES RECXPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL JABBOUR,K 1 1 INTERNAL: 1 1 NUDOCS -ABSTRACT 1 1 OGC HDS3 1 0 RGN2 DRS/RSB 1 1 EXTERNAL: NOAC 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 D
U NOTE TO ALL URIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD) ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 7 ENCL 6
I L-98-102 10 CFR 50.36b U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 1997 Annual Radiological Attached is the 1997 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4, as required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.3.
Should there be any questions or comments regarding this information, please contact,us.
Very truly yours, R. J. Hovey Vice President Turkey Point Plant SM Attachment cc: L. A. Reyes, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC T. P. Johnson, Sr. Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant t
I ie05<50093 97X23<005000250 g((
PDR ADQCK R PDRQ an FPL Group company
~ ~ 4 r
0 E II UI t
1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT UNITS 3 Bc 4 LICENSE NOS. DPR-3'I, DPR-41 DOCKET NOS. 50-260,60-261 Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 8a 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE Introduction Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program TABLE 1 Annual Summary Deviations/Missing Data TABLE 1A Analyses with LLDs Above Required Detection TABLE 1B Capabilities Land Use Census TABLE 2 Key to Sample Locations ATTACHMENTA Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power and ATTACHMENT B Light Company's Turkey Point Site First Quarter, 1997 Second Quarter, 1997 Third Quarter, 1997 Fourth Quarter, 1997 Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison ATTACHMENT C Program, 1997
1997
'NNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
The data obtained through the Turkey Point Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples are not increasing. These measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, during the surveillance year, is well within the limits established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. The sampling period was from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997.
Additionally, supplemental samples collected by the State of Florida, Department of Health, do not indicate adverse trends in the radiological environment.
1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 8 4 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9.1.3 of Turkey Point Units 3 8 4 Technical Specifications. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated. This report covers surveillance activities described in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) meeting the requirements of Unit 3 and Unit 4 Technical Specifications.
RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALMONITORING PROGRAM A. ~Pur ose The purpose of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program also supplements the radiological eNuent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the eNuent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.
Pro ram Descri tion The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted pursuant to Control 5.1 of Turkey Point Unit 3 8 4 ODCM.
Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies:
Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 21 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly.
Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.
Surface water samples are collected from three locations.
Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.
~
I 0
1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 Shoreline sediment samples are collected from three locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.
Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations coinciding with two of the locations for surface water samples.
Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.
- f. Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations.
Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.
Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.
- 2. Analytical Responsibility:
Radiological environmental monitoring for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health (DOH). Samples are collected and analyzed by DOH personnel.
Samples are analyzed at the DOH Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.
Anal tical Results Table 1, Environmental Radiolo ical Monitorin Pro ram Annual Summa provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period., Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.
Land Use Census A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the Turkey Point Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation, in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2 Land Use Census Summa
1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.
No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20% greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.
Interlaborato Com arison Pro ram The Interlaboratory Comparison Program is being changed.
Prior to 1997, the Department of Health Laboratory, performing our analyses, participated in the EPA sponsored program. This program consisted of air filters, milk; and water samples. The results were reported in ATTACHMENTC, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY.COMPARISON PROGRAM.
The EPA Interlaboratory Comparison program relative to nuclear power plant environmental monitoring programs was discontinued. The EPA program did continue, however, in support of the Safe Drinking Water Program(SDWP); the State laboratory, being a Certified SDWP laboratory, continued to receive, and analyze, water samples.
Since 1990, the State Laboratory has participated in the Department of Energy's Interlaboratory Comparison Program ( the "DOE-QAP" program). This program consists of air filters, water, soil, and vegetation.
For the reports covering calendar year 1997, and proposed for calendar year 1998, the results of participating in the DOE-QAP will be included with the results of the EPA water samples in ATTACHMENTC, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON PROGRAM. Note that the right most columns, QAP45 and QAP46 Evaluation, are the result of the last intercomparison results for comparison to the most recent evaluation shown in the second from right column.
4 The future of both the EPA and DOE programs past the end of 1998 is uncertain.
FPL is in the process of identifying a new suitable interlaboratory comparison program. The program will be described in the ODCM and the results will be incorporated in ATTACHMENTC, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM.
1997
~ ~
'NNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 III. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A. Re ortin of Results The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by Control 1.4 of ODCM.
Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by ODCM Table 5.1-2, for all samples specified by Table 5.1-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation. These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, and Be-7 which are common in the Florida environment.
B. Inter retation of Results Direct Radiation:
The results of direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations. The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the preoperational surveillance program. Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.
Air Particulates/Radioiodine:
Results of gross beta measurement are consistent with past measurements. No radioiodine was detected. The only identified isotopes are cosmic-ray produced Be-7 and naturally occurring Pb-210 at levels consistent with past measurements.
Waterborne, Surface Water:
The results of radioactivity measurements in surface water samples aie consistent with past measurements. Tritium was reported as present in 5 of the 36 surface water samples collected. These results are consistent with the known subsurface interchange that occurs between the closed cooling canal and its surrounding waters, and the pressure gradients caused by the flow of aquifer subsurface waters in South Florida. The highest reported tritium is less than 3% of the reporting value specified by ODCM Table 5.1-2.
Waterborne, Sediment:
The results are consistent with past measurements. The only identified isotopes are cosmic-ray produced Be-7 and naturally occurring isotopes.
(4)
1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGIGALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4
- 5. Waterborne, Food Products:
The results are consistent with past measurements; only naturally occurring radionuclides were detected.
Broad Leaf Vegetation The results of radioactivity measurements are consistent with past measurements. Cs-137 was detected, as in the past, in samples collected from the indicator and control locations. The maximum concentration reported was less than 17% of the reporting level specified by ODCM Table 5.1-2. No other fission products were detected.
Conclusions tl The data obtained through the Turkey Point Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program veriTies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased.
Additionally, supplemental to the ODCM program, sampling of the direct exposure, inhalation, and ingestion pathways, performed by DOH, does not show adverse trends in levels of radiation and radioactive materials in unrestricted areas. The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units 3 8 4, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)"criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.
0 ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
e1 of8 I
I Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1997 (County, State) ~
PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD UNITS: micro-R/hr Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)'
All Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance &. Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Range Direction ~
Range Mean (f)" Range Exposure 5.74 (84/84) NW-10 7.54 (4/4) 5.74 (4/4)
Rate, 88" 4.34 - 7.82 10 mi., NW 7.15 - 7.82 5.60 - 6.01 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0
e2of8 ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility Turke Poin Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1997 (County, State)
PATHWAY: AIRBORNE pCi/m'ocation SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS:
Name'ean with Highest Annual Mean (f)"
All Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance &. Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Range Direction Range Mean (f)'ange 131 I 2 6Q 0.024 <MDA <MDA Gross Beta, 260 0.0025 0.012 (207/208) T-72 . 0.013 (52/52) 0.013 (52/52)
Q,QQ4 - 0.029 (1 mi., WSW 0.005 - 0.029 0.005 - 0.021 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20
'Be 0.0052 0.1166 (16/16) T-58 0.1284 (4/4) 0.1199 (4/4) 0.0790 - 0.1502 1 mi, NW 0.0993 - 0.1502 0.1095 - 0.1303 134CS 0.00069 (MDA CMDA 137Cs 0.00066 (MDA (MDA 210Pb 0.0116 (16/16) T-58 0.0125 (4/4) 0.0102 (4/4) 0.0064 - 0.0174 1 rni., NW 0.0081 - 0.0174 0.0054 - 0.0139 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0
P
.~
I I
e 3 of 8 ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility Tvrke Point Uni s 3 5. 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1997 (County, State)
PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER UNITS: pCi/L (f)'o Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean All Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance tk Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Range Direction Range Mean (f)'ange Tritium, 36 230 343 (5/24) T-81 343 (5/12) <MDA 117 - 800 6mi., S 117 - 800 Gamma Isotopic, 36 40K 60 278 (24/24) T-81 285 (12/12) 181 (12/12) 122 - 373 6mi., S 179 - 373 91 - 285
'4Mn < MDA < MDA 59Fe <MDA <MDA 58Co < MDA <MDA
~Co <MDA <MDA "Zn <MDA <MDA
<MDA < MDA 134CS < MDA < MDA 137Cs <MDA < MDA
'408a-La <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0
e4of8 ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 &. 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1997 (County, State)
PATHWAY'ATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED'HORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: pCi/kg, DRY Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)
All Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance & Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Range Direction Range Mean (f)'ange Gamma Isotopic, 6 137CS 12 <MDA < MDA 7Be 100 379 (3/4) T-81 452 (2/2) 147 (1/2) 234 - 532 6mi., S 372- 532 4'K 140 314 (4/4) T-81 314 (2/2) 258 (1/2) 205 - 424 6mi., S 279 - 349 210Pb 803 (3/4) T-42 1062 (1/2) < MDA 500 - 1062 <1 mi., ENE 226Ra 49 771 (4/4) T-81 802 (2/2) 113 (1/2) 605 - 999 6mi., S 605 - 999 238U 631 (3/4) T-42 709 (2/2) <MDA 476 - 713 <1 mi., ENE 704 - 713 58Co < MDA <MDA 60Co < MDA <MDA 134Cs 14 < MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 PATHWAY: INGESTION
'r I
e 5 of 8 ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 &. 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 &. 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1997 (County, State)
SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA UNITS: pCi/kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)
All Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance & Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Range Direction Range Mean (f) Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 130 1 1 1 1 (2/2) T-81 1111 (2/2) 1392 (2/2) 1110 - 1112 6mi., S 1110 - 1112 1366 - 1417
>>0Ra 20 384 (1/2) T-81 384 (1/2) < MDA 6mi., S
'4Mn < MDA <MDA "Fe 16 <MDA <MDA 58Co < MDA <MDA
~Co 19 < MDA < MDA "Zn 17 <MDA <MDA 134CS
<MDA <MDA 137CS < MDA < MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0
e 6of8 ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility Turke Poin Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1997 (County, State)
PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: FISH UNITS: pCi/kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean All Indicator (f)'ype and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance &. Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Range Direction Range Mean (f)'ange Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 130 2354 (2/2) T-81 2354 (2/2) 2148 (2/2) 2232 - 2475 6 mi., S 2232 - 2475 2099 - 2196 54Mn < MDA <MDA 59Fe 16 <MDA < MDA 59Co < MDA <MDA
~Co 10 < MDA <MDA "Zn 17 < MDA <MDA 134Cs <MDA <MDA 137CS
<MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0
~ .~
e7of8 ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNLIAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility Turke Point Uni s 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1997 (County, State)
PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: pCi/kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean (f)"
All Indicator Type and Total Number Lower Limit of Locations Distance &. Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Range Direction Range Mean (f)'ange Gamma Isotopic, 36 7Be 71 1904 (24/24) T-40 1972 (12/12) 1289 (12/12) 661 - 3752 3 mi., W 9'I1 - 3292 870 - 1928 40K 100 3764 (24/24) T-41 4327 (12/12) 3278 (12/12) 1505 - 5633 2 mi., W/NW 2235 - 5633 1855 - 4746 137( s 93 (24I24) T-41 129 (12/'l2) 16 (5/12) 30- 330 2 mi., W/NW 40- 330 9 - 20 58Co (MDA <MDA 210Pb 642 (5/24) T-40 704 (2/12) 657 (5/12) 437 - 900 3mi., W 508 - 900 452 - 873 131I (MDA <MDA 134Cs <MDA < MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0
I I
I ge8of8 ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility Turke Point Units 3 &. 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 &. 50-251 Location of Facility Dade Florida, Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1997 (County, State)
NOTES ar The LLD is an "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95/ probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.
LLDs in this column are at time of measurement. The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.
Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).
C. Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.
- d. Results were based upon the average net response of two TLDs. (Thermoluminescent dosimeters).
MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.
1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 8c 4 TABLE 1A DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA A) Pathway: Direct Exposure - TLDs Location: NW-5, 5 miles NW Dates: 12/04/96 to 03/19/97 Deviation: Failure to provide continuous monitoring.
Description of TLDs were missing when collection was attempted.
Problem:
Corrective Replaced TLDs.
Action:
B) Pathway: Direct Exposure - TLDs Location: NNW-10, 10 miles NNW NW-5, 5 miles NW WNW-10, 10 miles WNW Dates: 03/18/97 to 06/04/97 Deviation: Failure to provide continuous monitoring.
Description of TLDs were missing when collection was'attempted.,
Problem:
Corrective Replaced TLDs.
Action:
1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 8a 4 TABLE 1 B ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1/1/97- 1 2/31/97 The values specified in ODCM Table 5.1-3, Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.
1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 8c 4 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS Dis ance to Nearest a b 6/96 Milk (c) 6/96 6/96 Sector Animal Residence Garden (d)
L (e) L (g)
NNE 0 (f) 0 NE ENE ESE SE 0 SSE SSW SW WSW W
WNW 4.8/285 NW 3.7/316 (g) 4.4/306 NNW 4.4/337 (g) 4.5/332
1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 8c 4 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS NOTES All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the Turkey Point Plant.
The following format is used to denote the location:
distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)
For example, a residence located in the north sector at a distance of 2.1 miles bearing 350 degrees is recorded as 2.1/350.
Potential milk animal locations.
Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.
L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.
0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an ocean area.
Non-residential occupied buildings in these sectors include the following:
~Sec or Distance ~Descri tion N 1.8/349 24-hour Security Staff Building NW 3.5/304 24-hour Security Staffing NNW 1.8/345 Security booth at park entrance
0 4
1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENTA KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS
~ ~
0'
~ ~ r ~
r ~
a4
.Y
1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 8a 4 DISTANT REMP SAMPLING LOCATIONS
- .: ':::::1'eiiinF:T44~( TAT"'::,::.::...;:::,,,::,,:,,,:,'.,',':.'.:::,:,'.";
. ".:::Sojith9ihsmCaei ts.
- Kutlez:Rxd~~e':." ".'.l U:::::":"::::;::::.::::.:.::.::.':::,:.,:-,
- .::.:,'",.", ~ ." ':;.-:,','::,':.:::,':: Biscijiri e'Xcj'i ':::::::':":-::::.'::;::.'.::.'.
.. ...',,.........;.;,....,.,-...,,,...,,:Sands Key;:;::::;:.::::::.:,.
- ~7)
'L
>~Cg l.......:,:,,:,.evs.:.
1Homesteid'~~ '
g5 . j'gg ..;...:i:.': rR:..::.::::i::-:.:r.i ~ .'>::::ip,::,';.;":i::::.~:;::.
8-9 .:::..:::.:..::. -:;.::.::'::::.:~
- .. ~':SSP/-5:.:::j'. ::':;-"::::::;: ':;::;;:::,,: .'::.:':.-': ';:;:'::;::
'r
'<Id'Rho e's:Key's
':.:,::,:::::::::.,"..".:::.'.:2ii'r&Egibor.;Chai I'::::.'.,
n'eL::::.: .:.:: .::.'::: .'
4
~ '
1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENTA Page 1 of 4 PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY Location <'>
Name ~Descri tion N-2 Convey Point, Parking Area N-7 Black Point Marina Parking Lot N-10 Old Cutler Rd. approx. 196th Street NNW-2 East End North Canal Road NNW-10 Bailes Road 8 U.S. ¹1 NW-1 Turkey Point Entrance Road NW-5 Mowry Drive 8 117th Avenue NW-10 Newton Road, North of Coconut Palm Drive WNW-10 Homestead Middle School W-1 On-Site, North Side of Discharge Canal W-5 Palm Drive 8 Tallahassee Road t
W-9 Card Sound Road, 0.6 mile from U.S. ¹1 WSW-8 Card Sound Road, 3.4 miles from U.S. ¹1 SW-1 On-Site near Land Utilization Offices SW-8 Card Sound Road, 5 miles from U.S. ¹1 SSW-5 On-Site, Southwest Corner of Cooling Canals SSW-10 Card Sound Road, west side of Toll Plaza S-5 On-Site, South East Comer of Cooling Canals S-10 Card Sound Road at Steamboat Creek SSE-1 Turtle Point
. SSE-10 Ocean Reef Control NNE-22 Natoma Substation
'The location name is the direction sector - approximate distance (miles)
1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 8a 4 ATTACHMENTA Page 2 of 4 PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: WEEKLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector ~miles ~Descri ion T-51 NNW Entrance Area to Biscayne National Park T-57 NW SW 107th Avenue at Mowry Canal T-58 NW Turkey Point Entrance Road T-72 WSW Just before entrance to Land Utilization's access gate.
s
~Con roi:
T-64 NNE 22 Natoma Substation
1997 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 5. 4 ATTACHMENTA Page 3 of 4 PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)
SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: MONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name ~Sec or ~miles ~Desert ion T-42 ENE Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point T-81 Card Sound, near Mouth of Old Discharge Canal
~Con rol:
T-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name ~Sec r ~miles ~Desert tion T-42 ENE Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point T-81 Card Sound, near Mouth of Old Discharge Canal
~Con rol:
T-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park
1997 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 8a 4 ATTACHMENTA Page 4 of 4 PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector ~miles ~Desori tion T-81 S Card Sound Vicinity of Turkey Point Facility
~Con rol:
T-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park SAMPLES COLLECTED'ROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY'ONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name ~Sec or ~miles ~Desori tion T-40 W South of Palm Dr. on S.W. 117th Street Extension T-41 WNW Palm DrWest of Old Missile Site near Plant Site Boundary Control:
T-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park
1997
.ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 L 4 RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE 1997 First Quarter, 1997 Second Quarter, 1997 Third Quarter, 1997 Fourth Quarter, 1997
0 RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT'S TURKEY POINT SITE FIRST QUARTER 1997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL
~ ~
0
TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling First Quarter, 1997 Number of Qggf~c QEQQC119v 5gm~e
- 1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 22 21
- 2. Airborne 2.a. Air Iodines Weekly 60 2.b. AirParticulates Weekly 60
- 3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Monthly 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually
- 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2. Fish Semiannually 4.b, Food Products Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 164 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are rgg significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection
(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.
Sample Deployment 04-Dec-96 Sample Deployment 04-Dec-96 Site Collection 19-Mar-97 Site Collection 11-Mar-97 N-2 5.41 & 0.42 WSW-8 4.98 0.40 N-7 4.64 + 0.37 N-10 5.04 + 0.40 SW-I 4.67 0.37 SW-8 4.72 0.38 NNW-2 4.46 & 0.36 NNW-10 5.72 + 0.44 SSW-5 -
4.62 0.36 SSW-10 4.74 ~ 0.38 NW-1 4.74 + 0.38 NW-5 (A) S-5 4.51 6 0.35 NW-10 7.74 & 0.58 S-10 5.59 ~ 0.44 WNW-10 6.09 & 0.47 SSE-1 4.65 ~ 0.36 SSE-10 5.57 ~ 0.44 W-1 6,32 & 0.49 W-5 5.02 6 0.40 NNE-22 5.71 6 0.45 W-9 4.63 + 0.37 (A) - The dosimeter for site NW-5 was missing when collection was attempted.
Collection Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 07-Jan-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 15-Jan-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 21-Jan-97 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 28-Jan-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 04-Feb-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 12-Feb-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.02 <0.01 17-Feb-97 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 25-Feb-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 04-Mar-97 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 11-Mar-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 18-Mar-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 25-Mar-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
Sample Site Collection T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 Date 07-Jan-97 0.006-0.002 0.004-0.002 0.005+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.005~0.001 15-Jan-97 0.006+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.006+0.002 21-Jan-97 0.016+0.003 0.017+0.003 0.020+0.003 0.017+0.003 0.015s0.002 28-Jan-97 0.009+0.002 0.01&0.002 0.010+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.010-0.002 04-Feb-97 0.006+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.012-0.002 0.00640.002 12-Feb-97 0.009~0.002 0.01(H:0.002 0.005+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.006a0.002 17-Feb-97 0.007+0.003 0.008+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.015s0.002 0.011+0.002 25-Feb-97 0.008+0.002 0;006+0.002 0.010~0.002 0.011~0.002 0.006+0.001 04-Mar-97 0.009+0.002 0.005+0.002 0.007~0.002 0.007+0.002 -
0.006+0.002 11-Mar-97 0.009+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.014+0.002 18-Mar-97 0.014+0.002 0.016+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.01'.002 0.01&0.002 25-Mar-97 0.015+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.021+0.002 0.015-0.002 Mean: 0.010 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 0.012 ~ 0.001 0.009 ~ 0.001 t
~e- Q=13Z ZhÃ2 T51 0.1212 + 0.0106 <0.0234 <0.0012 <0.0008 0.0098 + 0.0024 TS7 0.1212 + 0.0102 <0.0193 <0.0012 <0.0010 <0.0075 TS8 0.1474 + 0.0111 <0.0196 <0.0009 <0.0009 0.0127 + 0.0026 T64 0.1245 & 0.0046 <0.0077 <0.0004 <0.0004 0.0104 + 0.0013 T72 0.1142 + 0.0092 <0.0200 <0.0006 <0.0007 0.0064 4 0.0029
F WTF Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 MSL Id~ C~ ~S LL3l Q=12 QM (A) (B)
T42 08-Jan-97 <140 268 + 32 <3 <2 <7 <4 <6 <6 <4 <4 20-Feb-97 <145 287 +32 <3 <4 <8 <7 <9 <7 <4 12-Mar-97 <140 335+43 <3 <4 <8 <9 <6 <10 <3 T67 08-Jan-97 <140 91 +25 <3 <4 <7 <4 <8 <6 <7 <4 <4 <5 21-Feb-97 <145 112+ 27 <4 <3 <7 <4 <7 <7 <9, <4 <4 <6 18-Mar-97 <140 <69 <4 <8 <6 <7 <4 <4 T81 08-Jan-97 257 + 48 277 + 32 <4 <4 <7 <4 <8 <7 <7 <4 <4 21-Feb-97 117 + 46 284 + 31 <4 <3 <9 <4 <8 <6 <8 <4 <4 <7 12-Mar-97 383 + 50 264 + 33 <3 <5 <11 <4 <6 <8 <12 <4 <4 <5 (A) - These tabulated LLD values for ZrlNb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.
(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.
FN W Sample Collection Ba2 IBQ QHE MQ Q =12 MZ PhEl Ra-226 L~B T42 13-Feb-97 234 + 86 205 + 55 <12 <9 <12 <13 1062 + 344 775 + 18 713 + 305 T67 14-Feb-97 <92 <141 <6 <6 <6 <7 <503 113 +7 <275 T81 13-Feb-97 532 + 76 279 +68 <14 <13 <12 <11 846 + 192 999 + 20 476 + 171 w w Sample Collection ~4 ld~ ~~~~ C'~~ C:~ 3M~- 2< Jh&ZL T67 12-Feb-97 1366 + 174 <18 <22 <49 <19 <34'23 <23 <330 T81 Efforts to collect this sample have been unsuccessful. We will continue our attempts.
4 e w Sample Collection ~4 hid~ Qg-'J[ Eee Ca-69 ~6 Gs-i'8 C~
Siie =
~gg T67 06-Mar-97 2196 + 124 <11 <13 <26 <14 <29 <13 <205 <46 T81 Efforts to collect this sample have been unsuccessful. We will continue our attempts.
~
VF 0 .
w I
we'ample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 T40 08-Jan-97 1501 + 86 2425 + 156 <15 <13 45+ S <850 <340 24-Feb-97 2551 + 109 3257+ 146 <15 <10 82+ S <884 <324 18-Mar-97 1006 + 75 3415 + 152 <17 <10 51+ S <668 <241 T41 08-Jan-97 1404 + 83 5477 + 174 <15 <10 50+8 <773 <234 24-Feb-97 1561 + 90 3193 & 149 <15 <11 172 + 10 795 + 234 <268 18-Mar-97 661 + 73 5633 + 166 <18 <10 61+8 <590 <231 T67 08-Jan-97 1105 + 89 3551 + 169 <12 <15 <13 <851 <32S 21-Feb-97 1355 + 36 3214 + 62 <4 <5 474 + 96 <118 18-Mar-97 952 + 73 4746 + 155 <17 <10 <10 <675 <240
FL,ORIDA DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT SITE SECOND QUARTER 1997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL
TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 1997 Number of
. Galhdian ErugmcC, Snmphs
- 1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 22 19
- 2. Airborne 2.a. Air Iodines Weekly 70 2.b. Air Particulates Weekly 70
- 3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Monthly 9 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 0
- 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l. Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2. Fish Semiannually 4.b. Food Products Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 179 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are ~ significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection
(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.
Sample Deployment 04-Dec-96 Sample Deployment 18-Mar-97 Site Collection 19-Mar-97 Site Collection 04-Jun-97 5.02 + 0.38
'SW-8 N-2 5.20 & 0.40 N-7 4.60 & 0.35 SW-1 4.83 ~ 0.37 N-10 4.74 + 0.36 SW-8 4.68 ~ 0.36 NNW-2 4.42 & 0.34 SSW-5 4.80 a 0.37 NNW-10 (A) SSW-10
- 4.34 0.33 NW-1 4.59 ~ 0.35 S-5 -
4.72 0.36 NW-5 . (A) S-10 5.26 + 0.40 NW-10 7.43 0.56 SSE-1 4.45 ~ 0.34 WNW-10 (A) SSE-10 (B) 5.33 ~ 0.41 W-1 '.16&0.46 NNE-22 5.60 ~ 0.42 W-5 5.01 6 0.39 W-9 4.50 + 0.35 (A) - The dosimeters for'sites NNW-10, NW-5, and WNW-10 were missing when collection was attempted.
(B) - The dosimeter for SSE-10 was found lying on the ground upon collection.
'/ 3 Collection Date.
01-Apr-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 08-Apr-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 15-Apr-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 22-Apr-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 29-Apr-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-May-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 13-May-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 21-May-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 27-May-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 02-Jun-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 10-Jun-97 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 16-Jun-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 23-Jun-97 <0.01 <0.01, <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 30-Jun-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
Sample Site Collection T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 Date 01-Apr-97 0.013+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.017+0.003 0.014+0.002 0.015+0.002 08-Apr-97 0.018 + 0.002 0.018 a 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.019 + 0.003 0.020 ~ 0.002 15-Apr-97 0.015 + 0.002 0.013&0.002 0.019&0.003 0.01360.002 0.017-0.003 22-Apr-97 0.019 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 0.015 ~ 0.002 29-Apr-97 0.011 + 0.002 0.017 ~ 0.002 0.017 + 0.003 0.012 + 0.002 0.021 ~ 0.002
=05-May-,97 0.013 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.009 a 0.002 13-May-97 0,015 6 0.002 0.012 & 0.002 0.015 & 0.002 0.013 6 0.002 0.018 & 0.002 21-May-97 0.011 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002
,27-May-97 0.012 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 02-Jun-97 0.007+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.005+0.002 0.011+0.002 10-Jun-97 0.007 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 16-Jun-97 0.009+0.002 0.006~0.002 0.013+0.003 0.015+0.002 0.012+0.003 23-Jun-97 0.013 + 0.002 0.013 ~ 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 30-Jun-97 0.015 ~ 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 Mean: 0.013 +'0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.014 + 0.001 0.013 ~ 0.001 0.014 + 0.001
'/ 3 S unpl~e ~e- ~4 Cs=U4 ~Q.
T51 0.1236 + 0.0100 <0.0109 <0.0008 <0.0008 0.0092 & 0.0030 T57 0.1275 + 0.0095 <0.0119 <0.0010 <0.0007 0.0104 + 0.0030 T58 0.1502 + 0.0102 <0.0179 <0.0008 <0.0008 0.0119 + 0.0024 T64 0.1154 & 0.0104 <0.0160 <0.0008 <0.0009 0.0110 & 0.0033 T72 0.1168 & 0.0104 <0.0146 <0.0008 <0.0008 0.0159 & 0.0032
~ 4 S F FW F.-
Sample Collection Zr Ba-140
~te Dk3 ~40 htWK G~k L131 M4 CMZ (A) (B)
T42 10-Apr-97 <145 342 + 37 <3 <3 <8 <5 <9 <6 <4 <4 <4.
l 07-May-97 <147 366 + 38 <4 <4 <5 <4 <7 <7 <8 . <4 <4 12-Jun-97 <148 303 + 33 <3 <5 <9 <5 <9 <8 <12 <4 <3 T67 28-Apr-97 <144 285 +41 <4 <3 <7 <3 <7 <4 <6 12-May-97 <147 279+ 30 <3 <4 <8 <4 <7. <7 <7 <4 <4 <5 13-Jun-97 <148 156 + 26 <4 <3 <9 <4 <7 <8 <11 <4 <4 <5 T81 10-Apr-97 <145 347 + 40 <3 <4 <8 <4 <8 <8 <7 <4 <4 <5 07-May-97 <147 373 + 31 <4 <4 <9 <3 <10 <7 <8 <4 <4 <5 12-Jun-97 <148 295 + 32 <3 <4 <8 <5 <8 <8 <12 <4 (A) - These tabulated LLD values for ZrlNb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.
(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140.or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.
,TA F - lue b S der w 4 Sample Collection Rl+ CK9 ELK QES ZILCH Q=lB 6<4131 LiL22L LiL228 S$ $
T&1 20-May-97 1110 + 161 <19 <19 <31 <23 <50 <16 <26 384 + 174 <100 4a. Ff. -1.o k low ac w we t Sample Collection
~le UB!L. hh='3 QdE LK Qd9 ~ Q-18 QUQ MK Lt&22L T&1 09-May-97 2475 + 223 <21 <22 <53 <23 <48 <19 <25 <350 <58 D F FVFxFT I - 7'n Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 T40 28-Apr-97 911 + 60 2928 + 125 <11 <8 41+6 <553 <220 13-May-97 1305 + 70 3414+ 133 <15 48+7 <63&
13-Jun-97 1825 + 95 3301 + 129 <25 , <10 56 + 8 508 + 229 <221 T41 28-Apr-97 1204+ 92 4106+ 160 <15 <12 330+ 13 <841 <293 12-May-97 981 + 89 4495 + 153 <19 240 + 11 <656 <241 13-Jun-97 1234 + 66 2235 + 96 <20 <8 40+6 <540 <164 T67 28-Apr-97 1403 + 85 4293 + 165 <14 <13 <16 <1465 <288 12-May-97 1006 + 28 1855 + 47 9+3 799 + 146 <101 13-Jun-97 1453 + 84 2117 + 114 <25 <10 17+6 <651 <261
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT SITE THIRD QUARTER 1997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL
TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Third Quarter, 1997 Number of Culh~ Zmquarzz. Samphz
- 1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 22 22
- 2. Airborne 2.a. Air Iodines Weekly 5 60 2.b. AirParticulates Weekly 5 60
- 3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Monthly 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually
- 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l. Crustacea Semiannually 4.a,2. Fish Semiannually 4.b. Food Products Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 163 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are ~ significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection
(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.
Sample Deployment 03-Jun-97 Sample Deployment 03-Jun-97 Site Collection 23-Sep-97 Site Collection 23-Sep-97 N-2 5.46 & 0.40 WSW-8 5.61 & 0.41 N-7 4.97 + 0.37 N-10 4.69 + 0.34 SW-1 4.74 + 0.35 SW-8 4.85 & 0.36 NNW-2 4.39 + 0.32 NNW-10 5.33 + 0.39 SSW-5 4.86 + 0.36 SSW-10 4.82 + 0.36 NW-1 4.49 & 0.33 NW-5 4.35 6 0.32 S-5 4.49 + 0.34 NW-10 7.15 & 0.52 S-10 5.36 + 0.39 WNW-10 6.14 & 0.45 SSE-1 4.48 + 0.33 SSE-10 5.71 & 0.42 W-1 6.28 + 0.46 W-5 4.93 + 0.36 NNE-22 5.64 6 0.41 W-9 4.70 + 0.35 Collection Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 07-Jul-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 14-Jul-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 21-Jul-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 28-Jul-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 04-Aug-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 11-Aug-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.02 <0.01 <0.01 18-Aug-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 27-Aug-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 02-Sep-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 08-Sep-97 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 15-Sep-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 . <0.01 23-Sep-97 <0.02 <0.02, <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
~ t 0
Sample Site Collection T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 Date 07-Jul-97 0.009 + 0.002 '0.010 + 0.002 0.016* 0.002 0.016* 0.002 0.013 a 0.002 14-Jul-97 0.010 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 21-Jul-97 0.007 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.011 & 0.002 0.012 & 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 28-Jul-97 0.011 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 04-Aug-97 0.008 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 11-Aug-97 0.014 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.003 0.013 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 18-Aug-97 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 27-Aug-97 0.007 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.001 0.007 + 0.001 0.006 + 0.001 0.008 + 0.002 02-Sep-97 0.007+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.010+0.002 08-Sep-97 0.004 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 15-Sep-97 0.008 + 0.002 0.013 & 0.002 0.014 & 0.002 0.012 & 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 23-Sep-97 0.004 + 0.001 0.006 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.001 0.008 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 Mean: 0.008 + 0.001 0.008 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 142 Lll. ~Q Ph21Q T51 0.0973 + 0.0083 <0.0151 <0.0009 <0.0011 0.0078 + 0.0022 T57 0.0790 & 0.0098 <0.0209 <0.0009 <0.0007 0.0091 + 0.0022 T58 0.0993 + 0.0092 <0.0192 <0.0009 <0.0011 0.0081 + 0.0026 T64 0.1095 & 0.0099 <0.0182 <0.0007 <0.0008 0.0054 6 0.0024 T72 0.1062 + 0.0091 <0.0204 <0.0010 <0.0011 0.0132 + 0.0032
Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 .
~e UH X%4 HQk ME Bd2 Q.E ZnC Hh5 L131 M2 MZ LvM (A) (B)
T42 23-Jul-97 <147 214 + 30 <3 <4 <7 <5 <8 <8 <4 <7, 20-Aug-97 <147 312 + 34 <4 <4 <8 <5 <8 <6 <7 <4 <4
<166 237 + 31 <4 <4 <7 <5 <8 <5 <6 <4
<5'3-Sep-97
~
T67 24-Jul-97 <147 209 + 30 <4 <4 <7 <6 <8 <7 <8 <4 <5 <5 20-Aug-97 <147 221 + 16 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <3 <3 17-Sep-97 <166 196 + 25 <4 <4 <7 <5 <8 <7 <7 <5 <6 T81 24-Jul-97 800 + 60 286 + 32 <3 <3 <7 <6 <7 <8 <10 <4 <4 <6 20-Aug-97 <147 303 + 37 <3 <3 <9 <5 <10 <6 <8 <5 <4 <4 17-Sep-97 <166 267 + 15 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <3 <3 <2 (A) - These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.
(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.
F
~
~
Sample Collection
~Dte ME CQQ &12 MZ BHJ9. EQ26 IL23E T42 18-Jul-97 <141 424 + 59 <1 1 <12 <14 <13 <461 705 & 17 704 + 141 T67 11-Jul-97 147 + 46 258+ 40 <8 <8 <8 <8 -- <584 <35 <301 T81 17-Jul-97 372 + 74 349 + 62 <12 <12 <10 <12 500 + 204 605 + 16 <345 e i Sample Collection hfdf ME M. Qd8 ~ CM~ MZ LQ26 ~2E.
T67 This sample has not yet been collected.
T81 This sample has not yet been collected.
Sample Collection
+3a~e hb~h ME M ~ LC MZ4 9=132 L826 Jkaa28 T67 This sample has not yet been collected.
T81 This sample has not yet been collected.
, ~
UF 7 e'ample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 T40 . 24-Jul-97 2125 + 88 3504 + 134 <16 38' <639 <212 21-Aug-97 1795 + 75 5076 + 145 <15 <10 56' <642 <215 17-Sep-97 3187 + 101 4305 + 141 <20 <9 105+8 900+317 <236 T41 24-Jul-97 1494+72 4375+146 <17 <10 <624 21-Aug-97 2189 + 37 5052 + 66 <6 51+3 437 + 94 <94 17-Sep-97 3752 + 111 4833 + 158 <22 <12 129 + 10 570 + 269 <264 T67 24-Jul-97 1928 + 75 2753 + 113 <18 20+5 <653 <218 20-Aug-97 1185 + 61 4645 + 134 <15 <10 <10 <559 <184 17-Sep-97 1630 + 73 3764 + 132 <14 <9 18 +6 452 + 179 <217
4 e
FI.ORIDA DEPARTMENT OP RADIOLOGICALSURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT SITE FOURTH QUARTER.1 997 BUREAU OF RADIATIONCONTROL
TP QR97-4 TURKEY POINT SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 1997 Number o f QQQ<~ +cq1i~v Bara~
- 1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 22 22
- 2. Airborne 2,a. Air Iodines Weekly 70 2.b. Air Particulates Weekly 70
- 3. Waterborne
'3.a. Surface Water Monthly 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually
- 4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a1. Crustacea Semiannually 2 2 4.a.2. Fish Semiannually 2 2 4.b. Food Products Broad Leaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 1S4 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are ~ significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection
(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.
~ ~
TP QR97-4 Sample Deployment 23-Sep-97 Sample Deployment 23-Sep-97 Site Collection 16-Dec-97 Site Collection 16-Dec-97 N-2 5.36 ~ 0.40 WSW-8 4 98 0.38 N-7 4.57- 0.35 N-10 4.83 & 0.37 SW-1 4.91 ~ 0.38 SW-8 4.38 0.34 NNW-2 443 ~ 0.34 NNW-10 5.61 ~ 0.43 SSW-5 4.73 ~ 0.37 SSW-10 4.80 0.37 NW-1 4.73 0.36 NW-5 4.42 & 0.34 S-5 4.61- 0.36 NW-10 7.82 ~ 0.58 S-10 5.47 ~ 0.41 WI'PV-10 . 6.33 & 0.48 SSE-1 4.66 + 0.36 SSE-10 5.85 OA4 W-1 6.51 - 0.49 W-5 5.04- 0.39 NNE-22 6.01 + 0.45 W-9 (A) 5.36 0.41 (A) TLD was found on the ground at the time of collection.
( e ~
TP QR97-4 Sample Site Collection Date TSI T57 T58 T64 T72 01-Oct-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 09-Oct-97 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0.03 13-Oct-97 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.02 <0.04 20-Oct-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 28-Oct-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 04-Nov-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 13-Nov-97, <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 18-Nov-97 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.04 <0.03 26-Nov-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 01-Dec-97 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 08-Dec-97 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 15-Dec-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 22-Dec-97 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 29-Dec-97 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02
~
4 % y
TP QR97-4 Sample Site Collection Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 01-Oct-97 0.008 + 0;002 0.005 ~ 0.001 0.006 ~ 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 0.009 ~ 0.002 09-Oct-97 0.023 ~ 0.002 0.024 ~ 0.002 0.024 + 0.002 0.020 ~ 0.003 0.029 ~ O.QQ3 13;Oct-97 0.018 ~ 0.003 0.019 ~ 0.003 0.026 ~ 0.004 0.019 ~ 0.002 0.02p ~ p.pp4 20-Oct-97 0.013 a 0.002 0.015 s 0.002 0.015 ~ 0.002 0.016 ~ 0.003 Q.p13 ~ p.pp2 28-Oct-97 0.015 + 0.002 0.016 0.002 ~ 0.019 - 0.002 0.019 ~ 0.002 0.015 ~ 0.002 04-Nov-97 0.014 ~ 0.002 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 0.018 0.002 13-Nov-97 p.p16 ~ p.pp2 0.016 ~ 0.002 0.019 ~ 0.002 0.019 0.002 0.017 0.002 18-Nov-97 0.015 + 0.003 0.019 a 0.003 0.018 + 0.003 0.013 0.003 p.p16 ~ p pp3 26-Nov-97 0.016~0.002 0.016~0.002. 0.019+0.002 0.016-0.002 0.015~0.002 01-Dec-97 0.012 ~ 0.003 0.012 ~ 0.003 <0.008 0.014 ~ 0.003 0.010- 0.003 08-Dec-97 0.020 ~ 0.002 0.020 ~ 0.002 0.018 ~ 0.002 0.015 0.002 0.023 ~ 0.002 15-Dec-97 0.012~0.002 0.012+0.002 0.008-0.002 0.009~0.002 0.012 0.002 22-Dec-97 0.011 ~ 0.002 0.015 ~ 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.015 ~ 0.002 0.016 0.002 29-Dec-97 0.009 ~ 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.008 ~ 0.002 0.009 ~ 0.002 p.pp8 ~ p.pp2 Mean: 0.014 a 0.001 0.015 0.001 <0.015 0.015 ~ 0.001 0.016 + 0.001 M4 CM Ph29 T51 0.1147 0.0090 <0.0153 <0.0008 <0.0006 0.0159 ='.0026 T57 0.1030 ~ 0.0096 <0.0125 <0.0009 <0.0009 0.0136 0.0031 T58 0.1166 ~ 0.0095 <0.0172 <0.0010 <0.0009 0.0174 ~ 0.0024 T64- 0.1303 0.0103 <0.0171 <0.0009 <0.0007 0.0139 0.0032 T72 0.1278 ~ 0.0103 <0.0,179 <0.0010 <0.0007 0.0131 0.0022
1997 AFQIUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 8a 4 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1997
I EML 691 QAP 9703 July 1,$ 997 QAP 46 R ults by Labaratory Pl ac c.b.
d Lab: FL Florida Dept of Health 8 Rehab. S rv., Orlando e ICo.
Test Radio-nuclide Reported, Reported Value 'rror ~
E L Va ue EML Error ML QAP 45 Evaluation Evaluation Matrix: AI Bqlfifter 1 AM241. 1.000 0.050 0 I 52 ~,0.013 6.579 .N CE144 A
18.200 0.200 1 CO 57 12.660 .0,060
- 15) 00 1.000 1.159 Vl
~
'O60 10 1.000 1.171 Vf N 1 5.950 0.090,. 10 0.300 1.188 Vl W 1 CS134 11.160 ... 0.090 80 1.000 1.026 A W CS'f37 10.500 0.100 B.yo 0 o,eoo 1.207 W GA 1 W
1 0.960 0.020 0.96 0 0.050 1.000 A N 1 GB 2 0.590, 0.010 0.$ 50 0.030 1.31'f A MN 54, 9.800 0.'IOO A
7.(20 0.600 1.286 W N 1 PU238 0.065 0.004 0.100 0.006 0.649 Vt
- 1. PU239 A 0.083 0.004 0.'f19 0.006 0.699 .VI 1 SB125 12.800 , 0.500 12.330 1,000 1.038 A
'238
~
1 0.800 0.200 0.105 ~
0.004 7.656 -N-Matrix: SO Bq/Rg .
.1 AM241 5.000 0.500 5.IIBO 0.500 0.880 A CS137 841.000 A
2.000 14.100 1.019 A A K 40-341.000 6.000 334 50 7.140 1.020 A A 1 PU238 0.238 0.240 0.$ 30 0.111 OA49 W 1 PU239 147.374 4.190 134.) 30 17.100 1.092 A 1 U 238 34.700 3.700 A
30 2,500 0.818 A Matrix: VE Bqlkg I
AM241 CO 60 2.300 . 0.500 . 1.183 0.113 1.944 iW A 14.500 0.600 12,5PO 0,320 1.160 A A CS137 219.000 1.00D 189.280 7.270 1.157 A K 40 953.000 13.000 811.50D 12.200 1.'f74 A Matnx: NA 1 CO 60 97.6DO 0.800 90.850 1.150 1.074 A
'f CS134 22.500 0.400 20,550 0.310 1,095 A 1' CS137 79.400 GA 1 o.eoo
'f 9.000 69,780 1,230 1.138 A N 1332.000 1130.0do , 'fo.ooo 1.170 A W 1 GB 2 643.000 9.000 744.000 10.000 0.860 A A 1 H 3 228.000 2.000 250.300 4.200 0.911 A A 1 MN 54 24.300 0.300 20.850 0.310 1.165 W W 1 PU238 1.310 0.021 f.291 0.063 1.015 A W 1 PU239 0.815 0.014 0.850 0.050 0.959 A W Values for elemental uranium are reported in p Iter, g, ormL Evaluation: A=Acceptable, W=Acceptable With Wamiq g, N=Not Acceptable 0
pCVg or mL ~ Bq x 0.027
4 I ~
k 0
~ ~
y ~
e Q ~ ~
~ e ~
~ ~ 0 ~
~ ~ e ~
~ ~ . l- ~ e ~ . ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ I '
~ ~ ~
s ~
I ~ I I t I I I I III le ~
I II ~ II I ~
~ I ~ I I ~ ~
I ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ I e
~ I ~ I I I ~ I I ~ I I
~ ' I I II I I I e I
~ I I ~
~ ~ Ie I I '
~ I ~ I I II~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ I I tt ~ I t I I '
~ I I II I I I I I II I II I ~
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ e I I e ~ I
~ o ~ ~
~ ~ ~ e ll ~ I ~
I ~ ~ I ~
~
~ ei ~ II I Il I~ I ~
II I I
~ : III ~ I III III
~
I ~ III I III ! I I ~ I e ~
~ ~ A ~ ~
I II ' I
~ ~ I I II ~ II
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ III ~ I III I II ~ I III I I II e ~
~ ~ I I ~ ~ II I~ I II ~ ~ III ~ II
~ I I ~ li I~
~ ' I et III I~ I Ill ~ ~ I I III
~ III
~
II I ~ II ~ II '. lI ~
I
~ ~
~, ~ I ~ ' r. ~ a ~ ~ ~ I I
~, ~ ~ ~ ~ '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e l ~ ~
~ ~
FLORIDA DEPT OF HEALTH - EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM January through June, 1997 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level WATER Co-60 06 06 97 18 pCi/L 0.118 18.67 0.23 WATER Zn-65 06 06 97 100 pCi/L 0.236 104.33 0.75 WATER Cs-134 06 06 97 22 pCi/L 0.236 21.33 -0.23 WATER Cs-137 06 06 97 49 pCi/L 0.118 52.67 1.27 WATER Ba-133 06 06 97 25 pCi/L 0.354 23.67 -0.46 WATER Sr-89 01 17 97 12 pCi/L 0.000 5.00 -2.42 WATER Sr-90 01 17 97 25 pCi/L 0.473 21.33 -1027 WATER Alpha 01 31 97 5.2 pCi/L 0.177 6.47 0.44 WATER Beta 01 31 97 14.7 pCi/L 0.319 17.90 1.11 WATER I-131 02 07 97 86 pCi/L 0.131 83'. 67 -0.45 WATER H-3 03 07 97 7900 pCi/L 0.043 7332.33 -1.24 NOTES:
Normal.: Normalized range. As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, P. 0. Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478.
EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.
N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.
NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.
NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegas.
FLORIDA DEPT. OF HEALTH EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA July through December, 1997 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level WATER Alpha 07 18 97 3.1 pCi/L 0.142 4.70 0.55 WATER Alpha 10 31 '97 14.7 pCi/L 0.177 7.37 -2.54 WATER Beta 07 18 97 15.1 pCi/L 0.071 17.17 0.72 WATER Beta 10 31 97 48.9 pCi/L 0.354 53.40 1.56 WATER Co-60 11 07 97 27 pCi/L 0.118 28.33 0.46 WATER Zn-65 11 07 97 75 pCi/L 0.222 80.33 1.15 WATER Ba-133 11 07 97 99 pCi/L 0.177 92.33 -1.15 WATER Cs-134 11 07 97 10 pCi/L 0.000 10.00 0.00 WATER Cs-137 11 07 97 74 pCi/L 0. 1'18 77.67 1.27 WATER H-3 08 08 97 11010 pCi/L 0.519 10485.00 -0.83 WATER I-131 09 19 97'7 10 pCi/L 0.295 11.33 0.38 WATER Sr-89 11 97 44 pCi/L 0.354 36.00 -2.77 WATER Sr-90 07 ll 97 16 pCi/L 0.236 13.00 -1.04 NOTES:
Normal.: Normalized range. As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Xntercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Agency, P. 0.
U.'. Environmental Protection Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478.
EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.
N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.
NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.
li NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegas.
>f I'P
Addendum to Attachment C-Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program 1997 Ex Iana ion of Cam arison Evalua ion In icators This quality assurance program is maintained for the requirement of a DOE contract.
The DOE contract required the performance testing of plutonium and tritium. The matrixes required were air, water and soil for plutonium and water for tritium.
Plutionium analysis is not required for the Nuclear Power Plant Program.
The preceeding results, other than tritium, are from gamma spectroscopy analysis; the other analytical methods are not applicable to the Nuclear Power Plant REMP.
NOTE: At the low levels present in EML samples, Americium-241 and Uranium-238 cannot be quantified using gamma spectroscopy.
QAP 46, Air Filters (AI)
The Warnings are due to sample geometry. The calibrated filter geometry is a 47 mm filter, the size of the filters used in the field on our air pumps. The EML filter is 70 mm in diameter. Review of the analysis process indicated that a different efficiency file is more suited to use for this QAP sample. An efficiency file specific to this filter size was used to calculate the activity of the QAP 47 air filters; this corrected all but one Warning. The Warning evaluation for Cs-134, is still under investigation.
QAP 46 tk 47 The Warnings for Mn-54 in Water (WA) are due to calibration methodology. Because the error is a slight positive bias, it is felt the conservative approach is not to recalibrate the system.
QAP 47 Gross Alpha 5 Gross Beta The Gross Alpha ( GA ) tk Gross Beta ( GB ) analysis is not required for the Nuclear Power Plant Program.
'I