Text

Pilgrim - Submittal of Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for January 1 Through December 31, 2014
	ML15138A373
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	05/13/2015
From:	Perkins E; Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	2.15.034
	Download: ML15138A373 (79)
	v • d • e

S"Entergy Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station600 Rocky Hill RoadPlymouth, MA 02360May 13, 2015U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk11555 Rockville PikeRockville, MD 20852

SUBJECT:

Entergy's Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report forJanuary 1 through December 31, 2014Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationDocket No. 50-293License No. DPR-35LETTER NUMBER 2.15.034

Dear Sir or Madam:

In accordance with Pilgrim Technical Specification 5.6.3, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.submits the attached Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for January 1 throughDecember 31, 2014.This letter contains no new regulatory commitments.

Should you have any questions concerning the content of this letter, please contact me at(508) 830-8323.

Sincerely, Everett (Chip) PerkinsManager, Regulatory AssurancEP/rmb

Attachment:

Pilgrim's Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for January 1 throughDecember 31, 2014 PNPS Letter 2.15.034Page 2 of 2cc: Mr. Daniel H. DormanRegional Administrator, Region 1U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2100 Renaissance Boulevard, Suite 100King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation One White Flint North11555 Rockville PikeRockville, MD 20852NRC Senior Resident Inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationMs. Nadiyah Morgan, Project ManagerOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-8C2AWashington, DC 20555Mr. John Giarrusso Jr.Planning, Preparedness

& Nuclear Section ChiefMass. Emergency Management Agency400 Worcester RoadFramingham, MA 01702 ATTACHMENT ToPNPS Letter 2.15.034PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATIONANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT PILGRIM NUCLEARPOWER STATIONFacility Operating License DPR-35Annual Radioactive EffluentRelease ReportJanuary 1 through December 31, 2014ft~e SEntergyPILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATIONFacility Operating License DPR-35ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTRELEASE REPORTJANUARY 01 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014Prepared by:Reviewed by:Reviewed by:K. J (.j%,j k" IVSenior HPTChemistry Specialist GPW. Blankenbiller Chemistry ManagerdZ'aeX e.Lf/2q//i A. ZeceRadia~on Protection ManagerPage 2 SECTION1.02.02.12.22.33.04.04.14.24.35.06.06.16.27.08.09.010.0APPENDIX AAPPENDIX BAPPENDIX CAPPENDIX DPilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportJanuary-December 2014TABLE OF CONTENTSSECTION TITLEEXECUTIVE SUMMARYRADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT DATASupplemental Effluent Release DataGaseous Effluent DataLiquid Effluent DataMETEOROLOGICAL DATAMAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL DOSESDoses From Noble Gas ReleasesDoses From Gaseous Effluent ReleasesDoses From Liquid Effluent ReleasesOFFSITE AMBIENT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS PERCENT OF ODCM EFFLUENT CONTROL LIMITSGaseous Effluent ReleasesLiquid Effluent ReleasesRADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL DATAOFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL REVISIONS PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM REVISIONS REFERENCES Meteorological Joint Frequency Distributions Onsite Groundwater Monitoring ProgramCorrections to Previous Effluent ReportsChanges to PNPS Offsite Dose Calculation ManualPAGE588891920202228343737404345464748697576Page 3 Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportJan-Dec 2014LIST OF TABLESTABLE TABLE TITLE PAGE2.1 Supplemental Information 102.2-A Gaseous Effluents

-Summation of All Releases 112.2-B Gaseous Effluents

-Elevated Releases 122.2-C Gaseous Effluents

-Ground Level Releases 142.3-A Liquid Effluents

-Summation of All Releases 162.3-B Liquid Effluents 174.1 Maximum Doses from Noble Gas Releases During 2014 214.2-A Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Gaseous Effluents 23Jan-Mar 20144.2-B Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Gaseous Effluents 24Apr-Jun 20144.2-C Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Gaseous Effluents 25Jul-Sep 20144.2-D Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Gaseous Effluents 26Oct-Dec 20144.2-E Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Gaseous Effluents 27Jan-Dec 20144.3-A Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Liquid Effluents 29Jan-Mar 20144.3-B Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Liquid Effluents 30Apr-Jun 20144.3-C Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Liquid Effluents 31Jul-Sep 20144.3-D Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Liquid Effluents 32Oct-Dec 20144.3-E Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Liquid Effluents 33Jan-Dec 20145.0 Average TLD Exposures by Distance Zone During 2014 366.1 Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limits for Gaseous Effluent 38Releases During 20146.2 Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limits for Liquid Effluent Releases 41During 20147.0 Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments 44A-1 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and Speeds for the 4833-ft Level of the 220-ft TowerA-2 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and Speeds for the 58220-ft Level of the 220-ft TowerPage 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARYPILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATIONANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORTJANUARY 01 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014INTRODUCTION This report quantifies the radioactive

gaseous, liquid, and radwaste

releases, and summarizes thelocal meteorological data for the period from January 01 through December 31, 2014. Thisdocument has been prepared in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Pilgrim NuclearPower Station (PNPS) Technical Specifications and Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.21,"Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Material in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants".

Thisdocument has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of PNPS Technical Specifications section 5.6.3.The quantity of radioactive material released from PNPS was determined from sample analysesand continuous on-line monitoring of gaseous releases from the main stack, reactor building vent,turbine building, and various decontamination facilities, and liquid releases into the discharge canal.The quantity and volume of radioactive waste shipped offsite from PNPS for processing and burialwere determined from data contained on the radwaste shipping documentation.

Themeteorological data were obtained from monitoring instruments located on the 220-footmeteorological tower located at Pilgrim Station.GASEOUS EFFLUENTS Gaseous radioactive releases for the reporting period are quantified in Tables 2.2-A, 2.2-B, and2.2-C. Radioactive noble gases released during the period totaled 1.7 Curies. Releases ofradioactive iodines and particulates with half-life of greater than 8 days totaled 0.0015 Curies,tritium releases totaled 90 Curies, and carbon-14 totaled 8.3 Curies. No gross alpha radioactivity was detected in gaseous effluents.

Noble gases released in gaseous effluents resulted in a maximum total body dose of 0.000069mrem, with a corresponding skin dose of 0.00038 mrem. The release of radioactive particulates,

iodines, tritium, and carbon-14 in gaseous effluents from PNPS during the reporting period resultedin a total body dose to the maximum-exposed hypothetical individual of about 0.045 mrem. Themaximum hypothetical dose to any organ from radioactive particulates,

iodines, tritium, and carbon-14 was about 0.088 mrem. The maximum, hypothetical total body dose from the combined releaseof all airborne radioactivity in gaseous effluents was 0.045 mrem.The maximum individual doses from gaseous radioactive effluents were compared to theapplicable ODCM dose limits. Noble gas doses were less than 0.0048% of the corresponding 1OCFR50 dose objectives.

Maximum doses resulting from releases of particulates,

iodines, tritium,and carbon-14 in gaseous effluents were less than 0.58% of corresponding 10CFR50 objectives.

Page 5 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Liquid radioactive releases for the reporting period are quantified in Tables 2.3-A and 2.3-B. Onedischarge of liquid effluents containing radioactivity occurred during the reporting period. Thisdischarge contained 0.0039 Curies of tritium, and 0.0000075 Curies of fission and activation products.

The resulting maximum total body dose was 0.00000029 mrem, with a corresponding organ dose of 0.00000087 mrem. All doses from liquid discharges were less than 0.00002%

ofcorresponding 10CFR50 objectives.

METEOROLOGICAL DATAMeteorological joint frequency distributions are listed in Appendix A. Data recovery for the entireannual period was 100% for the 33-ft and 100% for the 220-ft levels of the tower. Thepredominant wind direction was from the south-southwest, which occurred approximately 15% ofthe time during the reporting period. The predominant stability class was Class D, which occurredabout 44% of the time during the reporting periodOFFSITE AMBIENT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS Ambient radiation exposure was evaluated to complete the assessment of radiological impact onhumans. A small number of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) indicated an elevation inambient radiation exposure on Entergy property in close proximity to the station, when compared tobackground levels in the region. This elevation is due to nitrogen-16 contained within the plantsteam system, as opposed to radioactive effluent released from the plant. The dose to themaximum-exposed member of the public at the PNPS Health Club, even though they are within theowner-controlled area, was estimated as being about 1.3 mrem during 2014. There was nomeasurable increase during 2014 in ambient radiation measurements at the location of the nearestresident 0.8 km southeast of PNPS.COMBINED DOSE IMPACTThe collective total body dose to a maximum-exposed hypothetical member of the public fromairborne radioactivity, liquid-borne radioactivity, and ambient radiation exposure resulting fromPNPS operation during 2014 was calculated as being about 0.57 mrem. This amount is about0.11% of the typical dose of 300 to 400 mrem received each year by an average person from othersources of natural and man-made radiation.

Although this calculated collective dose occurs to amaximum-exposed hypothetical individual, it is also well below the NRC dose limit of 100 mrem/yrspecified in 10CFR20.1301, as well as the EPA dose limit of 25 mrem/yr specified in 40CFR190.

Both of these limits are to be applied to real members of the general public, so the fact that thedose to the hypothetical maximum-exposed individual is within the limits ensures that any dosereceived by a real member of the public would be smaller and well within any applicable limit.RADIOACTIVE SOLID WASTE DISPOSALSolid radioactive wastes shipped offsite for processing and disposal during the reporting period aredescribed in Table 7.0. Approximately 630 cubic meters of solid waste, containing almost 682Curies of radioactivity, were shipped during the reporting period.Page 6 ONSITE GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAMIn response to the Nuclear Energy Institute Groundwater Protection Initiative, Pilgrim Stationinstituted a groundwater monitoring program during 2007. Four monitoring wells were installed onsite during the fourth quarter of 2007, and the first samples were collected in late November2007. Additional sampling wells were added in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014. As of the endof 2014, samples are being collected from a total of 23 monitoring wells. Low levels of tritium, aradioactive isotope of hydrogen, were detected in several of these onsite wells. No other plant-related radioactivity was detected in the groundwater samples.

The average concentration oftritium detected in these onsite monitoring wells during 2014 was well below the voluntary communications reporting level established by the EPA Drinking Water Standard of 20,000 pCi/L.Although the EPA Standard provides a standard for comparison, no drinking water sources areaffected by this tritium.

The maximum hypothetical dose resulting from tritium in groundwater presumed to enter Cape Cod Bay is calculated to be 0.0000000050 mrem/yr.

Results of thegroundwater monitoring program are presented in Appendix B.CONCLUSION The PNPS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual contains effluent controls to limit doses resulting fromreleases of radioactivity to the environment.

None of the effluent controls associated with liquid orgaseous effluents were exceeded during the reporting period, as confirmed by conservative doseassessments performed at weekly and monthly intervals.

Conformance to the PNPS ODCMeffluent control limits ensures that releases of radioactivity in liquid and gaseous effluents are keptas low as reasonably achievable in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I. Compliance withthe ODCM also demonstrates that requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency's nuclearfuel cycle standard, 40CFR190.10, Subpart B, have been met. Based on the dose assessment results for 2014, there was no significant radiological impact on the general public from PNPSoperation.

Page 7 2.0 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT DATARadioactive gaseous and liquid releases for the reporting period are given in the standard formatpresented in Tables 1A, 1B, lC, 2A, 2B, and Supplemental Information table from NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21 (Reference

1) format.2.1 Supolemental Effluent Release DataSupplemental information related to radioactive gaseous and liquid releases for the reporting period are given in the standard NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21 format in Table 2.1.2.2 Gaseous Effluent DataGaseous radioactivity is released from Pilgrim Station to the atmosphere from the main stack,reactor building vent, turbine building, and various decontamination facilities.

Combined gaseouseffluent releases from all release points are summarized in Table 2.2-A. No alpha activity wasdetected on any of the particulate filters collected during the reporting period. The total gaseousreleases for various categories of radionuclides, as well as the corresponding average releaserates, can be summarized as follows:* Noble gases: 1.68 Ci, 0.0532 gCi/sec* lodines and particulates with 0.00149 Ci, 0.0000473

ýiCi/sechalf-life greater than 8 days* Tritium:

90.1 Ci, 2.86 iiCi/sec* Carbon-14:

8.33 Ci, 0.264 uCi/secEffluent releases from the main stack are detailed in Table 2.2-B. The main stack is 335 feet tall,and represents an elevated release point with a total height of approximately 400 feet above sealevel. The main stack is located about 700 feet west-northwest of the reactor building.

Ground-level effluent releases are detailed in Table 2.2-C. Data in this table include releases fromthe reactor building vent, turbine building, and assorted equipment decontamination facilities (e.g.,hot machine shop, carbon dioxide pellet decon trailer, plastic media decon trailer, etc.) used duringthe period. Due to the close proximity of the reactor building, all of these release points areconsidered to be mixed-mode/ground level release points.Following the revision of Regulatory Guide 1.21 in 2009, the nuclear industry re-assessed theirgaseous effluent releases in accordance with the new definition of "principal radionuclide".

Underthis new definition, any radionuclide that contributed greater than 1% of the effluent dosecalculated to demonstrate compliance with 1OCFR50 Appendix I, or contributed more than 1% ofthe total activity for that type of effluent

release, would be classified as a principal radionuclide.

Although Carbon-14 (C-14) had been exempted from gaseous effluent calculations in the 1970s,industry assessments in 2009 revealed that Carbon-14 would qualify as a principal radionuclide.

Based on this 2009 re-assessment, licensees were required to begin reporting C-14 gaseouseffluents in the Annual, Radioactive Effluent Release Report beginning with calendar-year 2010.Carbon-14 releases for 2014 are summarized in Tables 2.2-A through 2.2-C, and the doseconsequences from C-14 are incorporated into the dose assessments documented in Section 4.2of this report.Page 8 Table 3.1-2 of the PNPS ODCM requires that if any of the gaseous effluent monitors areinoperable for more than 30-days, such events are to be reported in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report with an explanation of why the affected monitor was not returned tooperable status in a timely manner. During 2014 the Turbine Building Gaseous Effluent Monitoring System (GEMS, unit C-3003) was inoperable from 01-Jan-2014 through 16-Feb-2014 (47 days).During 2014, the Feed Pump Gaseous Effluent Monitoring System (GEMS, unit C-3004) wasinoperable from 01-Jan-2014 through 14-Aug-2014 (226 days). During each of these periods ofinoperability, compensatory sampling activities were performed during the duration of theinoperability, including manually sampling the effluent release points twice per week for noblegases, and continuous sampling of the effluent release points twice per week for particulates andradioiodines.

In both of these situations, repairs to each of the monitors were delayed due todifficulty in obtaining replacement components necessary to fix the monitor.

Appendix C of thisreport also contains details about inoperable effluent monitors during the 2012 and 2013 reporting periods.2.3 Liquid Effluent DataLiquid radioactivity is released from PNPS to Cape Cod Bay via the circulating water discharge canal. These effluents enter Cape Cod Bay at the outfall of the canal, which is located about 1100feet north of the reactor building.

Liquid effluent releases are summarized in Table 2.3-A. Detailed breakdowns for individual radionuclides are listed in Table 2.3-B. There was one discharge of liquid effluents containing radioactivity during the reporting period. Total releases for the various categories of radionuclides, as well as their corresponding mean concentrations, can be summarized as follows:* Total Effluent Volume: 22,800 Liters* Total Dilution Volume: 614 billion Liters* Fission/Activation products:

0.00000750 Ci, 0.0000000000000122 1iCi/mL* Tritium:

0.00387 Ci, 0.00000000000630 IpCi/mL* Dissolved/entrained noble gases: 0.00 Ci, 0.00 jiCi/mLPage 9 Table 2.1Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportSupplemental Information January-December 2014FACILITY:

PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATIONLICENSE:

DPR-351. REGULATORY LIMITSa. Fission and activation gases: 500 mrem/yr total body and 3000 mrem/yr for skinat site boundaryb,c. lodines, particulates with half-life:

1500 mrem/yr to any organ at site boundary>8 days, tritiumd. Liquid effluents:

0.06 mrem/month for whole body and0.2 mrem/month for any organ(without radwaste treatment)

2. EFFLUENT CONCENTRATION LIMITSa. Fission and activation gases: 10CFR20 Appendix B Table IIb. lodines:

1OCFR20 Appendix B Table IIc. Particulates with half-life

> 8 days: 1OCFR20 Appendix B Table IId. Liquid effluents:

2E-04 pCi/mL for entrained noble gases;1OCFR20 Appendix B Table II values for all otherradionuclides

3. AVERAGE ENERGY Not Applicable

4. MEASUREMENTS AND APPROXIMATIONS OF TOTAL RADIOACTIVITY

a. Fission and activation gases: High purity germanium gamma spectroscopy for allb. lodines:

gamma emitters; radiochemistry analysis for H-3,c. Particulates:

Fe-55 (liquid effluents),

Sr-89, and Sr-90d. Liquid effluents:

5. BATCH RELEASES Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Dec2014 2014 2014 2014 2014a. Liquid Effluents

1. Total number of releases:

N/A 1 N/A N/A 12. Total time period (minutes):

N/A 1.44E+03 N/A N/A 1.44E+033. Maximum time period N/A 1.44E+03 N/A N/A 1.44E+03(minutes):

4. Average time period (minutes):

N/A 1.44E+03 N/A N/A 1.44E+035. Minimum time period (minutes):

N/A 1.44E+03 N/A N/A 1.44E+036. Average stream flowduring periods of release ofeffluents into a flowing stream(Liters/min):

b. Gaseous Effluents None None None None None6. ABNORMAL RELEASESa. Liquid Effluents None None None None Noneb. Gaseous Effluents None None None None NonePage 10 Table 2.2-APilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportGaseous Effluents

-Summation of All ReleasesJanuary-December 2014Est.RELEASE PERIOD Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Dec Total2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 ErrorA. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASESTotal Release:

Ci NDA NDA NDA 1.68E+00 1.68E+00Average Release Rate: ViCi/sec N/A N/A N/A j 2.13E-01 5.32E-02

_+/-22%Percent of Effluent Control Limit* .....B. IODINE-131 Total Iodine-131 Release:

Ci 3.91 E-05 7.04E-05 9.16E-05 5.25E-05 2.54E-04Average Release Rate: latCi/sec 4.96E-06 8.93E-06 1.16E-05 6.66E-06 8.04E-06

+/-20%Percent of Effluent Control Limit* .....C. PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES

> 8 DAYSTotal Release:

Ci 2.41E-05 5.27E-05 2.11E-04 1.79E-05 3.05E-04Average Release Rate: ltCi/sec 3.05E-06 6.68E-06 2.67E-05 2.26E-06 9.68E-06Percent of Effluent Control Limit* .NANDGross Alpha Radioactivity:

Ci NDA NDA NDA NDA NDAD. TRITIUMTotal Release:

Ci 2.32E+01 2.38E+01 2.07E+01 2.23E+01 9.01E+01Average Release Rate: pCi/sec 2.95E+00 3.02E+00 2.62E+00 2.83E+00 2.86E+00

_+/-20%Percent of Effluent Control Limit* .....E. CARBON-14 Total Release:

Ci 2.14E+00 2.01 E+00 2.04E+00 2.15E+00 8.33E+00Average Release Rate: pCi/sec 2.71 E-01 2.55E-01 2.59E-01 2.73E-01 2.64E-01 N/APercent of Effluent Control Limit* .....Notes for Table 2.2-A:* Percent of Effluent Control Limit values based on dose assessments are provided in Section 6 of this report.1. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.

2. LLD for airborne gross alpha activity listed as NDA is 1 E-1 1 pCi/cc.3. N/A stands for not applicable.

Page 11 Table 2.2-BPilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportGaseous Effluents

-Elevated ReleaseJanuary-December 2014CONTINUOUS MODE RELEASES FROM ELEVATED RELEASE POINTNuclide Released I Jan-Mar 2014 Apr-Jun 2014 Jul-Sep 2014 Oct-Dec 2014 Jan-Dec 20141. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES: CiAr-41 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Kr-85 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Kr-85m 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Kr-87 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00Kr-88 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00Xe-131m 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Xe-133 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Xe-133m O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Xe-135 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00Xe-135m O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Xe-137 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Xe-138 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00Total for Period 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+002. IODINES:

Ci1-131 2.92E-07 2.69E-06 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.98E-061-133 0.OOE+00 6.83E-06 1.97E-06 0.OOE+00 8.80E-06Total for Period 2.92E-07 9.52E-06 1.97E-06 0.OOE+00 1.18E-053. PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES

> 8 DAYS: CiCr-51 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Mn-54 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Fe-59 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Co-58 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00Co-60 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.00E+00Zn-65 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Sr-89 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00Sr-90 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Ru-103 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Cs-1 34 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Cs-1 37 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Ba/La-140 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Total for Period 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3.31 E-02 1.08E-014. TRITIUM:

CiH-3 1.23E-02 2.87E-02 3.40E-02 3.31E-02 i1.08E-01

5. CARBON-14:

CiC-14 2.07E+00 1.95E+00 1.98E+00 2.09E+00 8.08E+00Notes for Table 2.2-B:1. N/A stands for not applicable.

2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.

3. LLDs for airborne radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows:Fission Gases: 1 E-04 pCi/cclodines:

1 E-12 pCi/ccParticulates:

1E-1i1 pCi/ccPage 12 Table 2.2-B (continued)

Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportGaseous Effluents

-Elevated ReleaseJanuary-December 2014BATCH MODE RELEASES FROM ELEVATED RELEASE POINTNuclide Released I Jan-Mar 2014 Apr-Jun 2014 Jul-Sep 2014 Oct-Dec 2014 Jan-Dec 20141. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES: CiAr-41 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AKr-85 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AKr-85m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AKr-87 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AKr-88 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe-131m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe- 133 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe-133m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe-135 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe-135m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe-137 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe- 138 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATotal for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A2. IODINES:

Ci1-131 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1-133 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATotal for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A3. PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES

> 8 DAYS: CiCr-51 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMn-54 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AFe-59 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACo-58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACo-60 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AZn-65 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASr-89 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASr-90 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ARu-103 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACs-134 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACs- 137 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABa/La- 140 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATotal for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A4. TRITIUM:

CiH-3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A5. CARBON-14:

CiC-14 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ANotes for Table 2.2-B:1. N/A stands for not applicable.

2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.

3. LLDs for airborne radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows:Fission Gases: 1E-04 pCi/cclodines:

1 E-12 pCi/ccParticulates:

1 E-1 1 pCi/ccPage 13 Table 2.2-CPilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportGaseous Effluents

-Ground-Level ReleaseJanuary-December 2014CONTINUOUS MODE RELEASES FROM GROUND-LEVEL RELEASE POINTNuclide Released I Jan-Mar 2014 Apr-Jun 2014 Jul-Sep 2014 Oct-Dec 2014 Jan-Dec 20141. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES: CiAr-41 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Kr-85 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00Kr-85m 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Kr-87 O.00E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.00E+00 O.OOE+00Kr-88 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00Xe-131m 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Xe-133 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 8.31E-01 8.31E-01Xe-133m 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Xe-135 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 8.48E-01 8.48E-01Xe-135m O.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Xe-137 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Xe-138 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Total for period 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 1.68E+00 1.68E+002. IODINES:

Ci1-131 3.88E-05 6.78E-05 9.16E-05 5.25E-05 2.51E-041-133 1.34E-04 2.16E-04 3.23E-04 2.51 E-04 9.24E-04Total for period 1.73E-04 2.84E-04 4.15E-04 3.03E-04 1.17E-033. PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES

> 8 DAYS: CiCr-51 0.OOE+00 9.87E-06 0.00E+00 9.96E-06 1.98E-05Mn-54 0.OOE+00 3.26E-05 5.29E-06 O.OOE+00 3.79E-05Fe-59 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Co-58 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Co-60 4.25E-06 9.34E-06 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.36E-05Zn-65 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Sr-89 0.OOE+00 8.70E-07 1.32E-05 2.72E-06 1.68E-05Sr-90 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Ru-103 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Cs-134 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Cs-137 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Ba/La-140 1.98E-05 0.OOE+00 1.92E-04 5.17E-06 2.17E-04Total for period 2.41 E-05 5.27E-05 2.11 E-04 1.79E-05 3.05E-044. TRITIUM:

CiH-3 2.32E+01 2.38E+01 2.06E+01 2.23E+01 9.OOE+015. CARBON-14:

CiC-14 6.41E-02 6.02E-02 6.12E-02 6.52E-02 2.51E-01Notes for Table 2.2-C:1. N/A stands for not applicable.

2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.

3. LLDs for airborne radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows:Fission Gases: 1E-04 pCi/cclodines:

1 E-12 piCi/ccParticulates:

1E-1i1 pCi/ccPage 14 Table 2.2-C (continued)

Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportGaseous Effluents

-Ground-Level ReleaseJanuary-December 2014BATCH MODE RELEASES FROM GROUND-LEVEL RELEASE POINTNuclide Released I Jan-Mar2014 Apr-Jun2014 Jul-Sep2014 Oct-Dec2014 Jan-Dec2014

1. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES: CiAr-41 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AKr-85 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AKr-85m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AKr-87 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AKr-88 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe-131m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe- 133 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe-133m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe-135 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe-135m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe- 137 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe- 138 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATotal for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A2. IODINES:

Ci1-131 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1-133 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATotal for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A3. PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES

> 8 DAYS: CiCr-51 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMn-54 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AFe-59 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACo-58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACo-60 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AZn-65 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASr-89 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASr-90 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ARu-1 03 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACs-1 34 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACs-1 37 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABa/La- 140 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATotal for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A4. TRITIUM:

CiH-3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A5. CARBON-14:

CiC-14 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ANotes for Table 2.2-C:1. N/A stands for not applicable.

2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.

3. LLDs for airborne radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows:Fission Gases: 1 E-04 pCi/cclodines:

I E-12 iCi/ccParticulates:

1E-1i1 pCi/ccPage 15 Table 2.3-APilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportLiquid Effluents

-Summation of All ReleasesJanuary-December 2014Est.RELEASE PERIOD Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Dec Total2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 ErrorA. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTSTotal Release (not including N/A 7.50E-06 N/A N/A 7.50E-06tritium, gases, alpha): CiAverage Diluted Concentration N/A 4.89E-14 N/A N/A 1.22E-14

+/-12%During Period: pCi/mLPercent of EffluentConcentraton Efflt* N/A 1.47E-06%

N/A N/A 3.68E-07%

Concentration Limit*B. TRITIUMTotal Release:

Ci N/A 3.87E-03 N/A N/A 3.87E-03Average Diluted Concentration N/A 2.52E-11 N/A N/A 6.30E-12During Period: pCi/mL +/-9.4%Percent of EffluentI Concentrton Elimt* N/A 2.52E-06%

N/A N/A 6.30E-07%

Concentration Limit*C. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASESTotal Release:

Ci N/A NDA N/A N/A NDAAverage Diluted Concentration N/A NDA N/A N/A NDADurinn Period: gCi/mL +/-16%Concentron limit N/A O.OOE+00%

N/A N/A O.OOE+00%

Concentration Limit*D. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY Total Release:

Ci N/A NDA N/A N/A NDA +/-34%E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED PRIOR TO DILUTIONWaste Volume: Liters N/A 2.28E+04 N/A N/A 2.28E+04

+/- 5.7%F. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING PERIODDilution Volume: Liters 1.52E+11 I1.53E+11 I1.55E+11 1.55E+11 6.14E+11

+/- 10%Notes for Table 2.3-A:* Additional percent of Effluent Control Limit values based on dose assessments are provided in Section 6 ofthis report.1. N/A stands for not applicable.

2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.

3. LLD for dissolved and entrained gases listed as NDA is 1E-05 gCi/mL.4. LLD for liquid gross alpha activity listed as NDA is 1E-07 pCi/mL.Page 16 Table 2.3-BPilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportLiquid Effluents January-December 2014CONTINUOUS MODE RELEASESNuclide Released Jan-Mar 2014 Apr-Jun 2014 Jul-Sep 2014 Oct-Dec 2014 Jan-Dec 20141. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS:

CiCr-51 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMn-54 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AFe-55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AFe-59 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACo-58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACo-60 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AZn-65 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AZn-69m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASr-89 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASr-90 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AZr/Nb-95 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMo/Tc-99 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAg-110m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASb-124 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1-131 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1-133 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACs-1 34 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACs-1 37 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABa/La-140 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACe-141 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATotal for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A2. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES: CiXe-1 33 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AXe-1 35 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATotal for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ANotes for Table 2.3-B:1. N/A stands for not applicable.

2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.

3. LLDs for liquid radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows:Strontium:

5E-08 pCi/mLlodines:

1E-06 pCi/mLNoble Gases: 1E-05 pCi/mLAll Others: 5E-07 pCi/mLPage 17 Table 2.3-B (continued)

Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportLiquid Effluents January-December 2014BATCH MODE RELEASESNuclide Released Jan-Mar 2014 Apr-Jun 2014 Jul-Sep 2014 Oct-Dec 2014 Jan-Dec 20141. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS:

CiNa-24 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Cr-51 N/A O.00E+00 N/A N/A 0.00E+00Mn-54 N/A 2.21 E-06 N/A N/A 2.21 E-06Fe-55 N/A 0.00E+00 N/A N/A 0.00E+00Fe-59 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.00E+00Co-58 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Co-60 N/A 4.64E-06 N/A N/A 4.64E-06Zn-65 N/A 0.00E+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Zn-69m N/A O.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Sr-89 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Sr-90 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Zr/Nb-95 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Mo/Tc-99 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.00E+00Ag-11Om N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Sb-124 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+001-131 N/A 0.00E+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+001-133 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Cs-1 34 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Cs-1 37 N/A 6.39E-07 N/A N/A 6.39E-07Ba/La-1 40 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Ce-141 N/A 0.00E+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Ce-144 N/A 0.OOE+00 N/A N/A 0.OOE+00Total for period N/A 7.50E-06 N/A N/A 7.50E-062. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES: CiXe-1 33 N/A NDA N/A N/A NDAXe-135 N/A NDA N/A N/A NDATotal for period N/A NDA N/A N/A NDANotes for Table 2.3-B:1. N/A stands for not applicable.

2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.

3. LLDs for liquid radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows:Strontium:

5E-08 pCi/mLlodines:

1 E-06 ptCi/mLNoble Gases: 1E-05 pCi/mLAll Others: 5E-07 pCi/mLPage 18 3.0 METEOROLOGICAL DATAMeteorological data are summarized for the reporting period in Appendix A, in the standard jointfrequency distribution format as given in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21.The predominant meteorological conditions observed during the annual reporting period can besummarized with their corresponding frequencies as follows:* Stability Class: Class D, 44%* 33-ft Wind Direction (from): South-southwest, 16%* 33-ft Wind Speed: 3.5-7.5 mph, 55%* 220-ft Wind Direction (from): South-southwest, 15%* 220-ft Wind Speed: 12.5-18.5 mph, 38%Joint data recovery for both the 33-ft level and 220-ft level of the tower was 100%, which met the90% annual data recovery goal specified by the NRC.Page 19 4.0 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL DOSESDoses to the maximum exposed individual resulting from radionuclides in effluents released offsitewere calculated using methods presented in the PNPS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM,Reference 2), NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Reference 3), NRC Regulatory Guide 1.111(Reference 4), and the Pilgrim Station Unit 1 Appendix I Evaluation (Reference 5). Maximumindividual doses are calculated separately for: (1) noble gases in gaseous effluents, (2)particulates,

iodines, and tritium in gaseous effluents; and, (3) liquid effluents.

Maximumconsumption and use factors for various pathways from Table E-5 of the PNPS ODCM are used forcalculating the doses to the maximum exposed individual.

Information related to liquid and gaseous effluent releases are summarized Section 2 of this report.These effluent release data were used as input to computer programs to calculate the resulting doses. PNPS ODCM methodologies were used to calculate the dose contributions to the variousorgans in each age class from major exposure pathways.

4.1 Doses From Noble Gas ReleasesGaseous effluent release data presented in Tables 2.2-A, 2.2-B, and 2.2-C from this effluentrelease report were used as input to a dose assessment computer program to calculate radiation doses. These data include gaseous releases from the PNPS main stack, reactor building vent, andturbine building roof exhausters.

Meteorological data obtained from the PNPS 220-footmeteorological tower during the 10-year period from 1994 through 2003 were used as input to the"AEOLUS-3" computer program (Reference 6). This program was used to calculate the annualaverage atmospheric dispersion and deposition factors used in the dose assessment computerprogram to calculate maximum individual doses.The maximum individual doses resulting from radioactive noble gases released in gaseouseffluents are presented in Table 4.1 according to specific receptor locations.

This table includes allnoble gas doses for the individual calendar quarters and total calendar year.Noble gases released in gaseous effluents from PNPS during 2014 resulted in a maximum totalbody dose of 0.000069 mrem. The maximum skin dose was 0.00038 mrem. Both of these dosesoccurred to a hypothetical individual, assumed to be present 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months per day, 365 days per year,at the site boundary location yielding the highest dose (0.64 km ESE of the Reactor Building).

Forthe more "realistic" individuals at offsite locations, the maximum total body dose was 0.000054mrem (nearest residence, 0.80 kilometers ESE from the Reactor Building),

while the maximum skindose was 0.00026 mrem (nearest residence, 0.80 kilometers ESE from the Reactor Building).

Page 20 Table 4.1Maximum Doses From Noble Gas Releases During 2014(a)Gamma Beta TotalRelease Air Dose Air Dose Body Dose Skin DosePeriod mrad/period mrad/period mrem/period mrem/period (location)

(location)

Jan-Mar 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00(0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE)0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Apr-Jun (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE)0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00Jul-Sep (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE)Oct-Dec 1.07E-04 4.75E-04 6.91 E-05 3.77E-04(0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE)Jan-Dec 1.07E-04 4.75E-04 6.91 E-05 3.77E-04(0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE)(a) All directions and distances are with respect to the reactor building vent.Page 21 4.2 Doses From Gaseous Effluent ReleasesGaseous effluent release data presented in Tables 2.2-A, 2.2-B, and 2.2-C from this effluentrelease report were used as input to a dose assessment computer program to calculate radiation doses. These data include gaseous releases from the PNPS main stack, reactor building vent, andturbine building roof exhausters.

Meteorological data obtained from the PNPS 220-footmeteorological tower during the 10-year period from 1994 through 2003 were used as input to the"AEOLUS-3" computer program (Reference 6). This program was used to calculate the annualaverage atmospheric dispersion and deposition factors used in the dose assessment computerprogram to calculate maximum individual doses.The maximum individual doses resulting from radioactive particulates, radioiodines, tritium andcarbon-14 released in gaseous effluents are presented in Tables 4.2-A through 4.2-E. Thesetables cover the individual calendar quarters and the total calendar year, respectively.

Dosesresulting from releases of noble gases are addressed independently in the PNPS ODCM.Therefore, none of these tables for maximum individual doses include any dose contribution fromnoble gases. The presentation and analysis of doses resulting from noble gases are addressed inSection 4.1 of this report.Tables 4.2-A through 4.2-E summarize the maximum total body and organ doses for the adult,teen, child, and infant age classes resulting from the major gaseous exposure pathways.

Thesetables present the dose data according to specific receptor location and the exposure pathwaysassumed to occur at that location.

For example, the second column of the tables presents theinformation for the hypothetical maximum-exposed at the most restrictive site boundary

location, where only inhalation and ground deposition exposure pathways are assumed to occur. Since thisis a shoreline location controlled by Entergy, the other pathways of garden vegetable production, milk production, and meat production are assumed not to occur. Doses for other offsite locations not under Entergy control, where other exposure pathways can and do occur, are presented insubsequent columns of the tables, and represent the potential maximum doses to individuals atthese locations.

For consistency, all distances listed in the first row of Tables 4.2-A through 4.2-Eare measured from the Reactor Building Vent. However, doses at the specific receptor locations are calculated based on the actual distances from the applicable release points (PNPS main stack,reactor building vent, and turbine building roof exhausters).

Radioactivity (particulates, radioiodines,

tritium, and carbon-14) released in gaseous effluents fromPNPS during 2014 resulted in a maximum total body dose of 0.045 mrem (child age class atnearest garden location, 0.84 kilometers SE from the Reactor Building),

while the maximum organdose was 0.088 mrem (child bone at nearest garden location, 0.84 kilometers SE from the ReactorBuilding).

Carbon-14 contributed 0.017 mrem (39%) of the 0.045 mrem child total body dose, and0.087 mrem (99%) of the 0.088 mrem child bone dose at the location of the nearest garden.Page 22 Table 4.2-AMaximum Individual Organ Dose at Receptor Location

-- mremFrom Gaseous Release Period: Jan-Mar 2014Receptor:

Bound Resident Garden Cow/Goat Cow/Meat MeatDirection:

ESE ESE SE WSW W SDistance1: 0.33 km 0.80 km 0.84 km 3.97 km 5.77 km 3.80 kmPathway2:

DI DI DIV3 DIVCG3 DIVCM3 DIVM3Age Class: AdultBone 2.15E-04 1.45E-04 5.77E-03 2.34E-03 2.05E-03 3.55E-03GI-LLI 2.72E-03 1.78E-03 5.75E-03 8.53E-04 6.40E-04 9.89E-04Kidney 2.72E-03 1.78E-03 5.75E-03 8.53E-04 6.40E-04 9.88E-04Liver 2.72E-03 1.78E-03 5.75E-03 8.52E-04 6.40E-04 9.88E-04Lung 2.72E-03 1.78E-03 5.75E-03 8.52E-04 6.40E-04 9.88E-04Thyroid 2.83E-03 1.85E-03 6.01E-03 9.29E-04 6.81E-04 1.01E-03T.Body 2.72E-03 1.78E-03 5.75E-03 8.52E-04 6.40E-04 9.88E-04Age Class: TeenBone 3.08E-04 2.07E-04 9.34E-03 3.93E-03 3.09E-03 5.01 E-03GI-LLI 2.76E-03 1.81E-03 6.95E-03 1.23E-03 8.71E-04 1.30E-03Kidney 2.76E-03 1.81 E-03 6.95E-03 1.23E-03 8.71E-04 1.30E-03Liver 2.76E-03 1.81E-03 6.95E-03 1.23E-03 8.71E-04 1.30E-03Lung 2.77E-03 1.81 E-03 6.95E-03 1.23E-03 8.71E-04 1.30E-03Thyroid 2.90E-03 1.90E-03 7.19E-03 1.34E-03 9.30E-04 1.31 E-03T. Body 2.76E-03 1.81 E-03 6.95E-03 1.23E-03 8.71E-04 1.30E-03Age Class: ChildBone 4.25E-04 2.86E-04 2.23E-02 9.47E-03 7.26E-03 1.16E-02GI-LLI 2.47E-03 1.61 E-03 1.15E-02 2.53E-03 1.81 E-03 2.72E-03Kidney 2.47E-03 1.61 E-03 1.15E-02 2.53E-03 1.81E-03 2.72E-03Liver 2.47E-03 1.61E-03 1.15E-02 2.53E-03 1.81E-03 2.72E-03Lung 2.47E-03 1.62E-03 1.15E-02 2.53E-03 1.81E-03 2.72E-03Thyroid 2.64E-03 1.72E-03 1.18E-02 2.75E-03 1.92E-03 2.74E-03T.Body 2.47E-03 1.61E-03 1.15E-02 2.53E-03 1.81E-03 2.72E-03Age Class: InfantBone 3.13E-04 2.11E-04 1.76E-04 5.94E-03 4.13E-03 7.92E-05GI-LLI 1.44E-03 9.40E-04 6.99E-04 1.59E-03 1.04E-03 5.24E-05Kidney 1.44E-03 9.40E-04 7.OOE-04 1.59E-03 1.04E-03 5.24E-05Liver 1.44E-03 9.40E-04 7.OOE-04 1.59E-03 1.04E-03 5.24E-05Lung 1.44E-03 9.43E-04 7.02E-04 1.59E-03 1.04E-03 5.25E-05Thyroid 1 .59E-03 1.04E-03 7.74E-04 2.07E-03 1.29E-03 5.60E-05T.Body t_1 .44E-03 9.40E-04 6.99E-04 1.59E-03 1.04E-03 5.24E-05Distances are measured with respect to the reactor building vent.2 Pathway designations are as follows:D = Deposition (Ground Plane) I = Inhalation V = Vegetable GardenC = Cow Milk G = Goat Milk M = Meat3 Doses are conservative since it is unlikely for vegetables to be grown outside or for animals to befed on pasture during winter months.Page 23 Table 4.2-BMaximum Individual Organ Dose at Receptor Location

-- mremFrom Gaseous Release Period: Apr-Jun 2014Receptor:

Bound Resident Garden Cow/Goat Cow/Meat MeatDirection:

ESE ESE SE WSW W SDistance1: 0.33 km 0.80 km 0.84 km 3.97 km 5.77 km 3.80 kmPathway2:

DI DI DIV DIVCG DIVCM DIVMAge Class: AdultBone 2.02E-04 1.36E-04 5.43E-03 2.19E-03 1.92E-03 3.34E-03GI-LLI 2.78E-03 1.82E-03 5.81 E-03 8.34E-04 6.21 E-04 9.53E-04Kidney 2.78E-03 1.82E-03 5.79E-03 8.34E-04 6.21 E-04 9.52E-04Liver 2.78E-03 1.82E-03 5.79E-03 8.34E-04 6.21 E-04 9.52E-04Lung 2.80E-03 1.83E-03 5.80E-03 8.34E-04 6.21 E-04 9.52E-04Thyroid 2.97E-03 1.94E-03 6.25E-03 9.69E-04 6.93E-04 9.82E-04T.Body 2.78E-03 1.82E-03 5.79E-03 8.34E-04 6.20E-04 9.52E-04Age Class: TeenBone 2.89E-04 1.95E-04 8.78E-03 3.69E-03 2.90E-03 4.71E-03GI-LLI 2.82E-03 1.85E-03 6.97E-03 1.19E-03 8.40E-04 1.24E-03Kidney 2.82E-03 1.85E-03 6.96E-03 1.19E-03 8.40E-04 1.24E-03Liver 2.82E-03 1.85E-03 6.96E-03 1.19E-03 8.40E-04 1.24E-03Lung 2.84E-03 1.86E-03 6.96E-03 1.19E-03 8.40E-04 1.24E-03Thyroid 3.06E-03 2.OOE-03 7.38E-03 1.39E-03 9.45E-04 1.27E-03T.Body 2.82E-03 1.85E-03 6.96E-03 1.19E-03 8.40E-04 1.24E-03Age Class: ChildBone 3.99E-04 2.69E-04 2.1OE-02 8.90E-03 6.82E-03 1.09E-02GI-LLI 2.52E-03 1.65E-03 1.14E-02 2.43E-03 1.73E-03 2.59E-03Kidney 2.52E-03 1.65E-03 1.14E-02 2.43E-03 1.73E-03 2.59E-03Liver 2.52E-03 1.65E-03 1.14E-02 2.43E-03 1.73E-03 2.59E-03Lung 2.54E-03 1.66E-03 1.14E-02 2.43E-03 1.73E-03 2.59E-03Thyroid 2.81E-03 1.83E-03 1.20E-02 2.81E-03 1.93E-03 2.63E-03T.Body 2.52E-03 1.65E-03 1.14E-02 2.43E-03 1.73E-03 2.59E-03Age Class: InfantBone 2.94E-04 1.98E-04 1.65E-04 5.58E-03 3.88E-03 7.44E-05GI-LLI 1.46E-03 9.59E-04 7.13E-04 1.52E-03 9.87E-04 5.23E-05Kidney 1.47E-03 9.60E-04 7.14E-04 1.52E-03 9.89E-04 5.23E-05Liver 1.47E-03 9.60E-04 7.14E-04 1.52E-03 9.89E-04 5.23E-05Lung 1.48E-03 9.66E-04 7.19E-04 1.52E-03 9.87E-04 5.26E-05Thyroid 1.73E-03 1.13E-03 8.39E-04 2.38E-03 1.44E-03 5.85E-05T.Body 1.46E-03 9.59E-04 7.14E-04 1.52E-03 9.88E-04 5.23E-0512Distances are measured with respect to the reactor building vent.Pathway designations are as follows:D = Deposition (Ground Plane) I = Inhalation V= Vegetable Garden= MeatC = Cow MilkG = Goat MilkNPage 24 Table 4.2-CMaximum Individual Organ Dose at Receptor Location

-- mremFrom Gaseous Release Period: Jul-Sep 2014Receptor:

Bound Resident Garden Cow/Goat Cow/Meat MeatDirection:

ESE ESE SE WSW W SDistance1: 0.33 km 0.80 km 0.84 km 3.97 km 5.77 km 3.80 kmPathway2: DI DI DIV DIVCG DIVCM DIVMAge Class: AdultBone 2.07E-04 1.39E-04 5.56E-03 2.23E-03 1.96E-03 3.40E-03GI-LLI 2.43E-03 1.59E-03 5.20E-03 7.89E-04 5.96E-04 9.27E-04Kidney 2.42E-03 1.58E-03 5.18E-03 7.89E-04 5.96E-04 9.25E-04Liver 2.42E-03 1.58E-03 5.18E-03 7.89E-04 5.96E-04 9.25E-04Lung 2.44E-03 1.60E-03 5.19E-03 7.89E-04 5.96E-04 9.26E-04Thyroid 2.68E-03 1.75E-03 5.81E-03 9.69E-04 6.92E-04 9.65E-04T.Body 2.42E-03 1.58E-03 5.18E-03 7.88E-04 5.96E-04 9.25E-04Age Class: TeenBone 2.96E-04 1.99E-04 8.98E-03 3.76E-03 2.95E-03 4.79E-03GI-LLI 2.46E-03 1.61E-03 6.31E-03 1.14E-03 8.16E-04 1.22E-03Kidney 2.46E-03 1.61 E-03 6.29E-03 1.15E-03 8.16E-04 1.22E-03Liver 2.45E-03 1.61E-03 6.29E-03 1.14E-03 8.15E-04 1.22E-03Lung 2.49E-03 1.63E-03 6.31E-03 1.14E-03 8.16E-04 1.22E-03Thyroid 2.79E-03 1.82E-03 6.87E-03 1.41E-03 9.54E-04 1.25E-03T.Body 2.45E-03 1.61E-03 6.29E-03 1.14E-03 8.15E-04 1.22E-03Age Class: ChildBone 4.09E-04 2.75E-04 2.15E-02 9.06E-03 6.94E-03 1.11E-02GI-LLI 2.20E-03 1.44E-03 1.05E-02 2.37E-03 1.71 E-03 2.57E-03Kidney 2.20E-03 1.44E-03 1.05E-02 2.38E-03 1.71 E-03 2.57E-03Liver 2.20E-03 1.44E-03 1.05E-02 2.38E-03 1.71 E-03 2.57E-03Lung 2.23E-03 1.46E-03 1.05E-02 2.37E-03 1.71 E-03 2.57E-03Thyroid 2.60E-03 1.70E-03 1.13E-02 2.88E-03 1.97E-03 2.62E-03T.Body 2.19E-03 1.44E-03 1.05E-02 2.37E-03 1.71E-03 2.57E-03Age Class: InfantBone 3.01E-04 2.03E-04 1.69E-04 5.68E-03 3.95E-03 7.57E-05GI-LLI 1.28E-03 8.38E-04 6.24E-04 1.49E-03 9.80E-04 4.76E-05Kidney 1.28E-03 8.38E-04 6.24E-04 1.50E-03 9.82E-04 4.76E-05Liver 1.28E-03 8.38E-04 6.24E-04 1.50E-03 9.82E-04 4.76E-05Lung 1.31 E-03 8.56E-04 6.37E-04 1.49E-03 9.80E-04 4.83E-05Thyroid 1.65E-03 1.08E-03 8.01 E-04 2.64E-03 1.57E-03 5.63E-05T.Body 1.28E-03 8.37E-04 6.23E-04 1.49E-03 9.81E-04 4.76E-05Distances are measured with respect to the reactor building vent.2 Pathway designations are as follows:D = Deposition (Ground Plane) I = Inhalation V = Vegetable GardenC = Cow Milk G = Goat Milk M = MeatPage 25 Table 4.2-DMaximum Individual Organ Dose at Receptor Location

-- mremFrom Gaseous Release Period: Oct-Dec 2014Receptor:

Bound Resident Garden Cow/Goat Cow/Meat MeatDirection:

ESE ESE SE WSW W SDistance1: 0.33 km 0.80 km 0.84 km 3.97 km 5.77 km 3.80 kmPathway:

DI DI DIV3 DIVCG3 DIVCM3 DIVM3Age Class: AdultBone 2.19E-04 1.47E-04 5.87E-03 2.36E-03 2.06E-03 3.58E-03GI-LLI 2.61E-03 1.71E-03 5.59E-03 8.41E-04 6.34E-04 9.83E-04Kidney 2.61E-03 1.71E-03 5.59E-03 8.41E-04 6.34E-04 9.83E-04Liver 2.61E-03 1.71 E-03 5.58E-03 8.41E-04 6.34E-04 9.83E-04Lung 2.61 E-03 1.71 E-03 5.58E-03 8.41 E-04 6.34E-04 9.83E-04Thyroid 2.79E-03 1.82E-03 5.96E-03 9.46E-04 6.90E-04 1.01E-03T.Body 2.61 E-03 1.71 E-03 5.58E-03 8.41 E-04 6.34E-04 9.83E-04Age Class: TeenBone 3.13E-04 2.1OE-04 9.49E-03 3.96E-03 3.11E-03 5.05E-03GI-LLI 2.65E-03 1.74E-03 6.77E-03 1.22E-03 8.66E-04 1.29E-03Kidney 2.65E-03 1.74E-03 6.77E-03 1.22E-03 8.67E-04 1.29E-03Liver 2.65E-03 1.74E-03 6.77E-03 1.22E-03 8.66E-04 1.29E-03Lung 2.65E-03 1.74E-03 6.77E-03 1.22E-03 8.66E-04 1.29E-03Thyroid 2.88E-03 1.88E-03 7.12E-03 1.37E-03 9.47E-04 1.31E-03T.Body 2.65E-03 1.74E-03 6.77E-03 1.22E-03 8.66E-04 1.29E-03Age Class: ChildBone 4.32E-04 2.90E-04 2.27E-02 9.56E-03 7.32E-03 1.17E-02GI-LLI 2.37E-03 1.55E-03 1.13E-02 2.52E-03 1.81E-03 2.72E-03Kidney 2.37E-03 1.55E-03 1.13E-02 2.52E-03 1.81 E-03 2.72E-03Liver 2.37E-03 1.55E-03 1.13E-02 2.52E-03 1.81E-03 2.72E-03Lung 2.37E-03 1.55E-03 1.13E-02 2.52E-03 1.81E-03 2.72E-03Thyroid 2.64E-03 1.73E-03 1.18E-02 2.82E-03 1.96E-03 2.75E-03T.Body 2.37E-03 1.55E-03 1.13E-02 2.52E-03 1.81E-03 2.72E-03Age Class: InfantBone 3.18E-04 2.14E-04 1.79E-04 5.99E-03 4.17E-03 7.99E-05GI-LLI 1.38E-03 9.05E-04 6.74E-04 1.58E-03 1.04E-03 5.11E-05Kidney 1.38E-03 9.06E-04 6.74E-04 1.59E-03 1.04E-03 5.11E-05Liver 1.38E-03 9.05E-04 6.74E-04 1.59E-03 1.04E-03 5.11E-05Lung 1.38E-03 9.06E-04 6.74E-04 1.58E-03 1.04E-03 5.11E-05Thyroid 1.63E-03 1.06E-03 7.92E-04 2.25E-03 1.38E-03 5.69E-05T.Body 1.38E-03 9.05E-04 6.74E-04 1.58E-03 1.04E-03 5.11E-05123Distances are measured with respect to the reactor building vent.Pathway designations are as follows:D = Deposition (Ground Plane) I = Inhalation C = Cow Milk G = Goat Milk K= Vegetable Garden1 = MeatDoses are conservative since it is unlikely for vegetables to be grown outside or for animals to befed on pasture during winter months.Page 26 Table 4.2-EMaximum Individual Organ Dose at Receptor Location

-- mremFrom Gaseous Release Period: Jan-Dec 2014Receptor:

Bound Resident Garden Cow/Goat Cow/Meat MeatDirection:

ESE ESE SE WSW W SDistance1: 0.33 km 0.80 km 0.84 km 3.97 km 5.77 km 3.80 kmPathway2: DI DI DIV3 DIVCG3 DIVCM3 DIVM3Age Class: AdultBone 8.42E-04 5.66E-04 2.26E-02 9.12E-03 7.99E-03 1.39E-02GI-LLI 1.05E-02 6.90E-03 2.23E-02 3.32E-03 2.49E-03 3.85E-03Kidney 1.05E-02 6.89E-03 2.23E-02 3.32E-03 2.49E-03 3.85E-03Liver 1.05E-02 6.89E-03 2.23E-02 3.32E-03 2.49E-03 3.85E-03Lung 1.06E-02 6.92E-03 2.23E-02 3.32E-03 2.49E-03 3.85E-03Thyroid 1.13E-02 7.36E-03 2.40E-02 3.81E-03 2.76E-03 3.96E-03T.Body 1.05E-02 6.89E-03 2.23E-02 3.32E-03 2.49E-03 3.85E-03Age Class: TeenBone 1.21 E-03 8.11E-04 3.66E-02 1.53E-02 1.21 E-02 1.96E-02GI-LLI 1.07E-02 7.00E-03 2.70E-02 4.78E-03 3.39E-03 5.05E-03Kidney 1.07E-02 7.OOE-03 2.70E-02 4.78E-03 3.39E-03 5.05E-03Liver 1.07E-02 7.OOE-03 2.70E-02 4.78E-03 3.39E-03 5.05E-03Lung 1.08E-02 7.04E-03 2.70E-02 4.78E-03 3.39E-03 5.05E-03Thyroid 1.16E-02 7.60E-03 2.86E-02 5.51E-03 3.78E-03 5.15E-03T.Body 1.07E-02 6.99E-03 2.70E-02 4.78E-03 3.39E-03 5.05E-03Age Class: ChildBone 1.66E-03 1.12E-03 8.75E-02 3.70E-02 2.83E-02 4.52E-02GI-LLI 9.56E-03 6.26E-03 4.46E-02 9.85E-03 7.06E-03 1.06E-02Kidney 9.56E-03 6.26E-03 4.46E-02 9.86E-03 7.06E-03 1.06E-02Liver 9.55E-03 6.25E-03 4.46E-02 9.86E-03 7.06E-03 1.06E-02Lung 9.61 E-03 6.29E-03 4.46E-02 9.85E-03 7.06E-03 1.06E-02Thyroid 1.07E-02 6.98E-03 4.69E-02 1.13E-02 7.79E-03 1.07E-02T.Body 9.55E-03 6.25E-03 4.46E-02 9.86E-03 7.06E-03 1.06E-02Age Class: InfantBone 1.23E-03 8.25E-04 6.89E-04 2.32E-02 1.61 E-02 3.09E-04GI-LLI 5.56E-03 3.64E-03 2.71E-03 6.18E-03 4.04E-03 2.03E-04Kidney 5.56E-03 3.64E-03 2.71E-03 6.19E-03 4.05E-03 2.03E-04Liver 5.56E-03 3.64E-03 2.71E-03 6.19E-03 4.05E-03 2.03E-04Lung 5.61E-03 3.67E-03 2.73E-03 6.18E-03 4.04E-03 2.04E-04Thyroid 6.60E-03 4.31 E-03 3.20E-03 9.35E-03 5.68E-03 2.28E-04T.Body 5.56E-03 3.64E-03 2.71E-03 6.18E-03 4.04E-03 2.03E-0412Distances are measured with respect to the reactor building vent.Pathway designations are as follows:D = Deposition (Ground Plane) I = Inhalation VC = Cow Milk G = Goat Milk M= Vegetable Garden= Meat3 Doses are conservative since it is unlikely for vegetables to be grown outside or for animals to befed on pasture during winter months.Page 27 4.3 Doses From Liquid Effluent ReleasesLiquid effluent release data presented in Tables 2.3-A and 2.3-B were used as input to the doseassessment computer program to calculate radiation doses. The maximum individual dosesresulting from radionuclides released in liquid effluents are presented in Tables 4.3-A through 4.3-E. These tables cover the individual calendar quarters and the total calendar year, respectively.

Tables 4.3-A through 4.3-E summarize the maximum total body and organ doses for the adult,teen, and child age classes resulting from the major liquid exposure pathways.

NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 does not recognize the infant age class as being exposed to the liquid effluentpathways.

Therefore, doses for this age class are not included in any of the tables.It should be noted that doses calculated for the entire year might not equal the sum of the dosesfor the individual quarters.

Doses from liquid effluents are based on the concentration (activity divided by volume) of radionuclides released in the effluent, as prescribed by the NRC inRegulatory Guide 1.109. If a larger proportion of activity is released with a relatively smallervolume of dilution water during a given quarter, the resulting concentration for that quarter will behigher than concentrations from other quarters.

This will result in a proportionally higher dose forthat quarter.

However, when that quarters activity values are included in the annual sum, anddivided by the total annual dilution flow, the resulting dose contribution will be smaller.

In such asituation, the annual dose will actually be less than the sum of the individual quarterly doses.Radioactivity released in liquid effluents from PNPS during the reporting period resulted in amaximum total body dose (adult age class) of 0.00000029 mrem. The maximum organ dose (adultage class, GI-LLI) was 0.00000087 mrem.Page 28 Table 4.3-AMaximum Individual Organ Doses -- mremFrom Liquid Release Period: Jan-Mar 2014Age Class Organ Dose -mrem *Organ Adult Teen I ChildBone 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00GI-LLI 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00Kidney 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Liver 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Lung 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Thyroid 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00T.Body 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0 .OOE+00* These doses are conservative since the same usage factor was applied for each quarter.In reality, it is unlikely that anyone would be swimming or boating during the entire year.However, the resulting dose is considerably lower than those from other pathways anddoes not contribute much to the total dose.Page 29 Table 4.3-BMaximum Individual Organ Doses -- mremFrom Liquid Release Period: Apr-Jun 2014Age Class Organ Dose -mremOrgan Adult Teen ChildBone 5.28E-08 2.14E-07 6.49E-08GI-LLI 8.67E-07 7.17E-07 2.39E-07Kidney 6.18E-08 2.21E-07 6.15E-08Liver 1.49E-07 3.03E-07 1.34E-07Lung 4.15E-08 2.02E-07 4.59E-08Thyroid 3.87E-08 1.98E-07 4.32E-08T.Body 1.43E-07 2.89E-07 1 .44E-07Page 30 Table 4.3-CMaximum Individual Organ Doses -- mremFrom Liquid Release Period: Jul-Sep 2014Age Class Organ Dose -mremOrgan Adult Teen ChildBone 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00GI-LLI 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Kidney 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Liver 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Lung 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Thyroid 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00T.Body 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00Page 31 Table 4.3-DMaximum Individual Organ Doses -- mremFrom Liquid Release Period: Oct-Dec 2014Age Class Organ Dose -mrem *Organ Adult Teen ChildBone O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00GI-LLI 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Kidney O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00Liver 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00Lung 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00Thyroid 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00T.Body 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00* These doses are conservative since the same usage factor was applied for each quarter.In reality, it is unlikely that anyone would be swimming or boating during these months.However, the resulting dose is considerably lower than those from other pathways anddoes not contribute much to the total dose.Page 32 Table 4.3-EMaximum Individual Organ Doses -- mremFrom Liquid Release Period: Jan-Dec 2014Age Class Organ Dose -mrem *Organ Adult Teen ChildBone 5.27E-08 2.14E-07 6.47E-08GI-LLI 8.66E-07 7.16E-07 2.39E-07Kidney 6.17E-08 2.21E-07 6.14E-08Liver 1.49E-07 3.02E-07 1.34E-07Lung 4.14E-08 2.01 E-07 4.58E-08Thyroid 3.87E-08 1.98E-07 4.32E-08T.Body 1.43E-07 2.89E-07 1.44E-07* These doses are conservative since the same usage factor was applied for each quarter.In reality, it is unlikely that anyone would be swimming or boating during the entire year.However, the resulting dose is considerably lower than those from other pathways anddoes not contribute much to the total dose.Page 33 5.0 OFFSITE AMBIENT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS The PNPS ODCM does not contain control limits related specifically to offsite ambient radiation exposure.

However, Regulatory Guide 1.21 (Reference

1) recommends calculation of ambientradiation exposure as part of the overall assessment of radiological impact on man.Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are located at 83 sites beyond the boundary of the PNPSrestricted/protected area. A number of these TLDs are located within the site boundary, onEntergy property in close proximity to the station proper. The TLDs are collected on a quarterly basis and used to calculate the ambient radiation exposure in milliRoentgen (mR) over theexposure period. These TLDs are grouped into four zones of increasing distance from the station.Average exposure values for each of these zones were calculated for each calendar quarter andthe total year. The average exposure values (mR) for the four zones are presented in Table 5.0.In addition to responding to ambient radiation

exposure, TLDs will also record radiation resulting from noble gases (plume and immersion exposure),

particulate materials deposited on the ground,cosmic rays from outer space, and from naturally-occurring radioactivity in the soil and air.Typically, the exposure from cosmic rays and other natural radioactivity components is about 40 to70 mR/year.

As calculated in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of this report, the ambient radiation component of doses from PNPS effluent emissions are below 1 mrem/yr and would not be discernible abovethe natural radiation exposure levels.The major source of ambient radiation exposure from PNPS results from high-energy gamma raysemitted from nitrogen-16 (N-16) contained in steam flowing through the turbine.

Although the N-16is enclosed in the process lines and turbine and is not released into the environment, the ambientradiation exposure and sky shine from this contained source accounts for the majority of theradiation dose, especially in close proximity to the station.

Other sources of ambient radiation exposure include radiation emitted from contained radioactive materials and/or radwaste at thefacility.

Despite these sources of ambient radiation exposure at PNPS, increases in exposure fromambient radiation are typically not observable above background levels at locations beyondEntergy controlled property.

The average exposure values presented in Table 5.0 appear to indicate an elevation in ambientexposures in Zone 1, those TLDs within 2 miles of PNPS. Most of this elevation is due toincreases in exposure levels measured at TLD locations on Entergy property in close proximity tothe station proper. For example, the annual exposure at TLD location OA, located at the OverlookArea near the PNPS Health Club (I&S Building),

was 173 mR for the entire year. This location isimmediately adjacent to the station proper and overlooks the turbine building, therefore receiving the highest direct ambient and sky shine exposure.

When the near-site TLDs (those located within0.6 km of the Reactor Building) are removed from the calculation of averages, the mean annualexposure in Zone 1 falls from 72.6 +/- 23.1 mR/yr to 62.2 + 8.1 mR/yr. Such a corrected dose is notstatistically different from the Zone 4 average of 60.0 +/- 7.7 mR/yr, and is indicative of naturalbackground radiation.

Although the annual exposure at TLD location OA was 113 mR above the average Zone 4exposure, members of the general public do not continuously occupy this area. When adjusted forsuch occupancy, a hypothetical member of the public who was at this location for 40 hours4.62963e-4 days 0.0111 hours 6.613757e-5 weeks 1.522e-5 months peryear would only receive an incremental dose of 0.52 mrem over natural background radiation levels. At the nearest residence 0.8 kilometers (0.5 miles) southeast of the PNPS ReactorBuilding, the annual exposure was calculated as being 65.8 +/- 8.6 mR (based on continuous occupancy at this location),

which compares quite well to the Zone 4 annual average background radiation level of 60.0 +/- 7.7 mR. Statistically, there is no difference between these two values.Page 34 It must be emphasized that the projected ambient exposures discussed on the previous page arecalculated to occur to a maximum-exposed hypothetical individual.

Even though conservative assumptions are made in the projection of these dose consequences, all of the projected dosesare well below the NRC dose limit of 100 mrem/yr specified in 1OCFR20.1301, as well as the EPAdose limit of 25 mrem/yr specified in 40CFR190.

Both of these limits are to be applied to realmembers of the general public, so the fact that the dose to the hypothetical maximum-exposed individual is within the limits ensures that any dose received by a real member of the public wouldbe smaller and well within any applicable limit.In 1994, Pilgrim Station opened the old training facility (I&S Building) overlooking the plant as ahealth club for its employees.

This site is immediately adjacent to the protected area boundarynear monitoring location OA and receives appreciable amounts of direct ambient and sky shineexposure from the turbine building.

Although personnel using this facility are employees ofEntergy, they are considered to be members of the public. Due to their extended presence in thefacility (500 hr/yr, assuming utilization of the facility for 2 hr/day, 5 days a week, for 50 weeks/yr),

these personnel represent the most conservative case in regards to ambient radiation exposure toa member of the public within the PNPS owner controlled area. Their annual incremental radiation dose above background during 2014 is estimated as being about 1.3 mrem, based on the averageexposure measured by the TLD in the building.

The exposures measured by the TLD located in the health club would also include any increase inambient radiation resulting from noble gases and/or particulate activity deposited on the groundfrom gaseous releases.

However, they would not indicate any internal dose received by personnel in this facility from inhalation of small amounts of PNPS-related radioactivity contained in the air.An environmental air sampler located immediately adjacent to the health club did not indicate anyPNPS-related activity during 2014. Dose calculations performed in the same manner as thoseoutlined in Section 4.2 for airborne effluent releases yielded a projected total body dose to themaximum-exposed individual (500 hr/yr exposure) of about 0.0022 mrem, resulting from inhalation.

Again, it must be emphasized that the above-described exposures were received by personnel whoare employees or contractors of Entergy, accessing areas or facilities on property under theownership and control of Entergy.

Since this exposure was received within the owner-controlled area, it is not used for comparison to the annual dose limit of 25 mrem/yr specified in 40CFR1 90.This regulation expressly applies to areas at or beyond the owner-controlled

property, and is notapplicable in this situation.

As stated earlier, TLDs at and beyond the site boundary do not indicateelevated ambient radiation levels resulting from the operation of Pilgrim Station.Although some of the TLDs in close proximity to PNPS indicate increases in exposure levels fromambient radiation, such increases are localized to areas under Entergy control.

For members ofthe general public who are not employed or contracted with Entergy and are accessing Entergycontrolled areas (e.g., parking lots, etc.), such increases in dose from ambient radiation exposureare estimated as being less than 1.3 mrem/year.

Page 35 Table 5.0Average TLD Exposures By Distance Zone During 2014Average Exposure

+/- Standard Deviation:

mR/ eriodExposure Zone 1* 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4Period 0-3 km 3-8 km 8-15 km >15 kmJan-Mar 17.9 +/- 5.5 14.3 +/- 2.1 13.9 +/- 1.3 14.6 +/- 1.6Apr-Jun 18.0 +/- 5.4 14.2 +/- 2.0 13.7 +/- 1.9 14.3 +/- 2.2Jul-Sep 19.0 +/- 6.7 15.1 +/- 2.0 15.0 +/- 1.6 16.0 +/- 2.3Oct-Dec 17.6 +/- 5.4 14.4 +/- 2.4 13.6 +/- 1.8 15.2 +/- 1.6Jan-Dec 72.6 +/- 23.1** 58.1 +/- 8.4 56.1 +/- 6.7 60.0 +/- 7.7Zone 1 extends from the PNPS restricted/protected area boundary outward to 3 kilometers (2 miles), and includes several TLDs located within the site boundary.

When corrected for TLDs located within the site boundary, the Zone 1 annual average iscalculated to be 62.2 +/- 8.1 mR/yr.Page 36 6.0 PERCENT OF ODCM EFFLUENT CONTROL LIMITSThe PNPS ODCM contains dose and concentration limits for radioactive effluents.

In addition, theeffluent controls specified ensure that radioactive releases are maintained as low as reasonably achievable.

The percentage of the PNPS ODCM Control limit values were determined from dosescalculated in Section 4, the effluent releases summarized in Section 2, and the ODCM Controllimits/objectives listed in Tables 6.1 and 6.2.The percent of applicable control limit values are provided to supplement the information providedin the Section 2 of this report. The format for the percent of applicable limits is modified from thatprescribed in Regulatory Guide 1.21 (Reference

1) to accommodate the Radioactive Effluents Technical Specifications (RETS) that became effective March 01, 1986. The percentages havebeen grouped according to whether the releases were via liquid or gaseous effluent pathways.

6.1 Gaseous Effluent ReleasesDose-based effluent controls related to exposures arising from gaseous effluent releases arepresented in Table 6.1. The maximum quarterly air doses and annual whole body doses listed inTable 4.1 were used to calculate the percentage values shown in Table 6.1. All doses resulting from noble gas exposure were a small percentage of the applicable effluent control.Organ dose limits for the maximum-exposed individual from radioactive particulates,

iodines, andtritium from the PNPS ODCM are also shown in Table 6.1. The maximum quarterly and annualorgan doses from Tables 4.2-A through 4.2-E were used to calculate the percentages shown inTable 6.1. The resulting organ doses from Pilgrim Station's gaseous releases during 2014 were asmall percentage of the corresponding effluent control.Page 37 Table 6.1Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limitsfor Gaseous Effluent Releases During 2014A. Instantaneous Dose Rate Limit -Noble GasesPNPS ODCM Control 3.3.1.aLimit: 500 mrem/yr Total Body DosePeriodJan-DecValue -mrem/yr6.91 E-05Fraction of Limit1.38E-05%

.... .. ..... .....................................................

...... ..........

B. Instantaneous Dose Rate Limit -Noble GasesPNPS ODCM Control 3.3.1 .aLimit: 3000 mrem/yr Skin DosePeriodJan-DecValue -mrem/yr3.77E-04Fraction of Limit1.26E-05%

C. Instantaneous Dose Rate Limit -Particulates,

lodines,

& TritiumPNPS ODCM Control 3.3.1.bLimit: 1500 mrem/yr Organ DosePeriod Value -mrem/yr Fraction of LimitJan-Dec 8.75E-02 5.83E-03%

D. Quarterly Dose Objective

-Noble Gas Gamma Air DosePNPS ODCM Control 3.3.2.aObjective:

5 mrad Gamma Air DosePeriod Value -mrad Fraction of LimitJan-Mar 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

Apr-Jun 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

Jul-Sep 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

Oct-Dec 1.07E-04 2.13E-03%

E. Annual Dose Objective

-Noble Gas Gamma Air DosePNPS ODCM Control 3.3.2.bObjective:

10 mrad Gamma Air DosePeriod Value -mrad/yr Fraction of LimitJan-Dec 1.07E-04 1.07E-03%

Page 38 Table 6.1 (continued)

Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limitsfor Gaseous Effluent Releases During 2014F. Quarterly Dose Objective

-Noble Gas Beta Air DosePNPS ODCM Control 3.3.2.aObjective:

10 mrad Beta Air DosePeriod Value -mrad Fraction of LimitJan-Mar 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

Apr-Jun 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

Jul-Sep 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

Oct-Dec 4.75E-04 4.75E-03%

G. Annual Dose Objective

-Noble Gas Beta Air DosePNPS ODCM Control 3.3.2.bObjective:

20 mrad Beta Air DosePeriod Value -mrad/vr Fraction of LimitJan-Dec 4.75E-04 2.37E-03%

H. Quarterly Dose Objective

-Particulates,

lodines, Tritium, and Carbon-14 PNPS ODCM Control 3.3.3.aObjective:

7.5 mrem Organ DosePeriod Value -mrem Fraction of LimitJan-Mar 2.23E-02 2.98E-01%

Apr-Jun 2.1OE-02 2.80E-01%

Jul-Sep 2.15E-02 2.86E-01%

Oct-Dec 2.27E-02 3.02E-01%

Annual Dose Objective

-Particulates,

lodines, Tritium, and Carbon-14 PNPS ODCM Control 3.3.3.bObjective:

15 mrem Organ DosePeriod Value -mrem/yr Fraction of LimitJan-Dec 8.75E-02 5.83E-01%

Page 39 6.2 Liquid Effluent ReleasesLiquid effluent concentration limits and dose objectives from the PNPS ODCM are shown in Table6.2, The quarterly average concentrations from Table 2.3-A were used to calculate the percentconcentration limits. The maximum quarterly and annual whole body and organ doses from Tables4.3-A through 4.3-E were used to calculate the percentages shown in Table 6.2. The resulting concentrations, as well as organ and total body doses from Pilgrim Station's liquid releases duringthe reporting period were a small percentage of the corresponding effluent controls.

Page 40 Table 6.2Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limitsfor Liquid Effluent Releases During 2014A. Fission and Activation Product Effluent Concentration LimitPNPS ODCM Control 3.2.1Limit: 10CFR20 Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 ValuePeriodJan-MarApr-JunJul-SepOct-DecJan-DecValue -PCi/mLO.OOE+004.89E-14O.OOE+00O.OOE+001.22E-14Fraction of Limit0.OOE+00%

1.47E-06%

0.OOE+00%

3.68E-07%

B. Tritium Average Concentration LimitPNPS ODCM Control 3.2.1Limit: 1.OE-03 piCi/mLPeriodJan-MarApr-JunJul-SepOct-DecJan-DecValue -LICi/mL0.OOE+002.52E-1 10.OOE+000.OOE+006.30E- 12Fraction of Limit0.OOE+00%

2.52E-06%

0.OOE+00%

6.30E-07%

C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Concentration LimitPNPS ODCM Control 3.2.1Limit: 2.OE-04 jiCi/mLPeriodJan-MarApr-JunJul-SepOct-DecJan-DecValue -LtCi/mL0.OOE+000.OOE+000.OOE+000.OOE+000.OOE+00Fraction of Limit0.OOE+00%

0.OOE+00%

Page 41 Table 6.2 (continued)

Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limitsfor Liquid Effluent Releases During 2014D. Quarterly Total Body Dose Objective PNPS ODCM Control 3.2.2.aObjective:

1.5 mrem Total Body DosePeriod Value -mrem Fraction of LimitJan-Mar 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

Apr-Jun 2.89E-07 1.93E-05%

Jul-Sep 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

Oct-Dec 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

E. Annual Total Body Dose Objective PNPS ODCM Control 3.2.2.bObjective:

3 mrem Total Body DosePeriod Value -mrem Fraction of LimitJan-Dec 2.89E-07 9.62E-06%

F. Quarterly Organ Dose Objective PNPS ODCM Control 3.2.2.aObjective:

5 mrem Organ DosePeriod Value -mrem Fraction of LimitJan-Mar O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

Apr-Jun 8.67E-07 1.73E-05%

Jul-Sep O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

Oct-Dec 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00%

G. Annual Organ Dose Objective PNPS ODCM Control 3.2.2.bObjective:

10 mrem Organ DosePeriod Value -mrem Fraction of LimitJan-Dec 8.66E-07 8.66E-06%

Page 42 7.0 RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL DATARadioactive wastes that were shipped offsite for processing and disposal during the reporting period are described in Table 7.0, in the standard NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21 format.The total quantity of radioactivity in Curies and the total volume in cubic meters are summarized inTable 7.0 for the following waste categories:

Spent resins, filter sludges, and evaporator bottoms;* Dry activated wastes, contaminated equipment, etc.;* Irradiated components, control rods, etc.; and,° Other.During the reporting period approximately 67.4 cubic meters of spent resins, filter sludges, etc.,containing a total activity of about 680 Curies were shipped from PNPS for processing anddisposal.

Dry activated wastes and contaminated equipment shipped during the period totaled 543cubic meters and contained 1.66 Cures of radioactivity.

There were no shipments of irradiated components during the reporting period. Other wastes (contaminated oil and water) totaled 19.2cubic meters and contained 0.016 Curies of radioactivity.

There were no shipments of irradiated fuel during the reporting period.Estimates of major radionuclides, those comprising greater than 1% of the total activity in eachwaste category

shipped, are listed in Table 7.0. There were 23 shipments to Energy Solutions' Bear Creek Facility in Oak Ridge, TN; 5 shipments to Energy Solutions' Gallaher Road Facility inKingston, TN; and 4 shipments to Energy Solutions Erwin Resin Solutions' Facility in Erwin, TN.Page 43 Table 7.0Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationAnnual Radioactive Effluent Release ReportSolid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments January-December 2014A. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not irradiated fuel)1. Estimate of volume and activity content by type of wasteJan-Dec 2014Typeof waste Volume -m' Curies Total Errora. Spent resins, filters, filter sludges, 6.74E+01 6.80 E+02 +/- 25%evaporator

bottoms, etc.b. Dry activated waste, contaminated 543 E+02 1.66 E+00 +/- 25%equipment, etc.c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 N/Ad. Other (describe):

1.92E+01 1.65E-02 N/A2. Estimate of major nuclide composition by type of waste'Type of waste Radionuclide

[ Abundance Total Errora. Spent resins, filters, filter sludge's, Mn-54 18.58% +/- 25%evaporator

bottoms, etc. Fe-55 39.31% +/- 25%Co-58 1.03% +/- 25%Co-60 30.00% +/- 25%Zn-65 7.83% +/- 25%b. Dry activated waste, contaminated H-3 9.76% +/- 25%equipment, etc. C-14 1.34% +/- 25%Mn-54 2.76% +/- 25%Fe-55 60.24% +/- 25%Co-60 18.11% +/- 25%Ni-63 1.23% +/- 25%Zn-65 3.97% +/- 25%Cs-137 1.08% +/- 25%c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. I N/A N/A N/Ad. Other (describe):

Contaminated oil and water Mn-54 5.13% +/- 25%Fe-55 69.86% +/- 25%Co-60 17.17% +/- 25%Ni-63 1.47% +/- 25%Zn-65 4.15% +/- 25%Cs-137 1.23% +/- 25%'"Major" is defined as any radionuclide comprising

>1% of the total activity in the waste category.

3. Solid Waste Disposition Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination 2 Tractor-trailer Energy Solutions, Bear Creek Facility2(Hittman Transport)

Oak Ridge, TN5 Tractor-trailer Energy Solutions, Gallaher Road Facility(Hittman Transport)

Kingston, TN4 Tractor-trailer Energy Solutions, Erwin Resin Solutions, 2(Hittman Transport)

Erwin, TN2 This processor provides volume reduction services for dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etcRemaining radioactive wastes will be shipped to Envirocare, Inc. in Clive, UT for final disposal.

B. IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS

& DISPOSITION Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination None N/A N/APage 44 8.0 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL REVISIONS The PNPS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) was not revised during the calendar year of2014. Information regarding revisions to the ODCM can be found attached as Appendix D of thisreport.Page 45 9.0 PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM REVISIONS The following list summarizes changes made during 2014 to various procedures related to theProcess Control Program (PCP):EN-RW-1 02, "Radioactive Shipping Procedure",

Rev. 11:* Step 5.1[9](e):

inserted the word "Radioactive" and corrected grammatical error (changed"affects" to "effects")

Step 5.1[11]:

revised step to correct Type B Package types* Step 5.1[12]:

added step for Grand Gulf shipment of waste for free release* Steps 5.2[14] and 5.2[14](b):

corrected procedure reference

Step 5.2[15]:

flow charts are redrawn (no content change) in Microsoft Visio format toenhance editing capability

Step 5.2[18]:

corrected regulatory reference

Step 6.0[5]: corrected procedure reference

Section 8.0: updated site-commitments for Grand Gulf, W3 and RBS per Commitment Review response from GGNS and RBS* Attachment 9.1: added field for document package completion

Attachment 9.1: added field for disposition of Emergency Response information

Attachment 9.1 expanded parenthetical in Waste Profile Form to include other companies and deleted empty rows.* Attachment 9.9 and 9.14: field for recording shipment number is reworded so as to beconsistent with other attachments EN-RW-104, "Scaling Factors",

Rev.10:* This is a complete rewrite of the procedure in order to bring the format into compliance withEN-AD-101-01 and to add instructions for using the new version (version 9.0) of RADMANsoftware.

No change bars are used.EN-RW-105, "Process Control Program",

Rev.4:* Editorial revision to address the issue identified in CR-HQN-2013-00858, CA-02 (Develop adraft procedure that includes instructions for vendors processing waste still owned byEntergy to comply with the PCP program.)

Reworded Step 5.1[1](b) to improve clarity:

inserted text "processed on-site OR off-site byvendors"EN-RW-1 06, "Integrated Transportation Security Plan", Rev. 3:" Total rewrite in order to accomplish the following:

o Bring the procedure into compliance with EN-AD-101-01 o Incorporate changes required by recent revision of 10CFR37o Correct internal section references

" The primary change involves replacing section 5.6 for Quantities of Concern in Rev. 2 witha new section 5.7 for Category 1 and Category 2 Quantities in Rev. 3Page 46

10.0 REFERENCES

1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity inSolid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents fromLight-Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants",

Regulatory Guide 1.21, Revision 1, June 1974.2. "Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Offsite Dose Calculation Manual",

Revision 10, May 2009.3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from RoutineReleases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10CFR50Appendix I", Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1, October 1977.4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport andDispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors",

Regulatory Guide 1.111, July 1977.5. Boston Edison Company, "Pilgrim Station Unit 1 Appendix I Evaluation",

April 1977.6. Entech Engineering Inc., P100-R19, "AEOLUS-3

-A Computer Code for the Determination ofAtmospheric Dispersion and Deposition of Nuclear Power Plant Effluents During Continuous, Intermittent and Accident Conditions in Open-Terrain Sites, Coastal Sites and Deep-River Valleys"Page 47 APPENDIX AMeteorological Joint Frequency Distributions TABLE TABLE TITLE PAGEA-1 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and Speeds for the 4833-ft Level of the 220-ft TowerA-2 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and Speeds for the 58220-ft Level of the 220-ft TowerPage 48 Table A-1Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and SpeedsFor the 33-ft level of the 220-ft TowerJan-Mar 2014Class A Freq 0.070mph N NN"El E ENE E ESE SE ISSE I S IsWsv v I wl W IvNvv NW INNW[ TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 63.5-7.5 6 18 6 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 39 22 17 1277.5-12.5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 4 0 1812.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTALI 8 [201 6 4 6 0 0 0 0 I0 2 0 112 48 26 19 151Class B Fre 0.023mph I NNEI NE ENE E ESE I SE SSE I S IjsSWv SW Iwsw W IWNWv NW IINNW[ TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 33.5-7.5 2 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 2 2 2 277.5-12.5 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 5 1 3 2012.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTA, 3 [7 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 112 1 8 3 T-5 50Class C Frec 0.040mphN. I NNE E INENEI E ESEI SE ISSE S I SSW I SVV IWsv V IWN0v0 0 I0NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 83.5-7.5 1 4 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 5 13 8 1 4 417.5-12.5 4 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 3612.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 118.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL I7 10 4 5 00 0 0 1 4 1 4 I 4 I8 I 16 4 IT I 86Class D Fr e 0.491 -- ENE IE INph NE ENE E ESE SE ISSE S ISSWI SW IWSWv W IVWNWV N I NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 9 11 6 3 5 7 3 2 4 2 14 24 11 10 6 1 1183.5-7.5 23 25 14 11 10 7 10 7 41 69 57 101 131 50 48 17 6217.5-12.5 20 44 10 4 1 2 2 1 20 42 20 11 63 29 20 6 29512.5-18.5 5 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 0 1 2 2618.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL I 57 89 32 18 16 1 6 1 15 i 10 [ 67 j115 1 94 1136 1 205 1 89[ 75 1 261 1060Page 49 Table A-1 (continued)

Jan-Mar 2014Class E Frq 0.320mph I N I NNE INE IENE E I ESE SE I SSE I S I SSW I SW S I WSN I W I WNW INW I NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20.95-3.5 4 5 1 1 2 5 7 28 22 21 27 32 14 15 15 11 2103.5-7.5 4 11 0 3 17 11 11 22 20 41 59 114 65 17 12 3 4107.5-12.5 2 8 2 3 0 0 4 10 10 11 4 2 3 4 1 0 6412.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 518.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 10 24 3 7 1191 16 1221 61 155 1 75 191 1 148 182 1 36 128 1 14 691Class F Fr 0 0.050mph N [ NNE I NEI ENE [ EI ESEISE]I SSE [I S ISW ]I W WS IW WNW [ NW I]NNWI TOTAL_Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 7 5 5 14 22 8 5 0 0 693.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 3 5 17 5 0 0 0 0 397.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL I0 0 0 0 0] 2 [ 4 113 9 I10 31I 27 8 5 0 I0I 109Class G Fre 0.006mh N jNNE NE ENE E jESE I SE SSE S ISSWISW WSWIWIWNWINW INNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 93.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 47.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 0I 00 0 0 1o o o 0 2 01212 4 2 1110 I0 o l 13Class All Fre 1.000mph N [NNE]I NEIj ENE I El IESE I SEl1 I SS IS lS ISWIWSW I WIWNW1INW I NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20.95-3.5 16 20 8 4 7 14 12 37 33 30 56 80 35 33 23 15 4233.5-7.5 36 62 23 23 33 18 25 36 65 115 140 225 224 116 85 43 12697.5-12.5 28 59 16 11 2 2 6 12 35 56 27 16 77 48 27 12 43412.5-18.5 5 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 3 0 0 0 1 2 3218.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 8 5 150 1 49 1 38 1421 34 1431 861 1381 206 12271 321 1 13361 97 1 136 1 72 2160Page 50 Table A-1 (continued)

Apr-Jun 2014Class A Frec: 0.115a N' I NNE I NE ENEI E IESEI SE SSE S IssE[ IsSWl svv W swl W IwNw NW I NNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 9 10 6 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 423.5-7.5 16 23 41 19 15 8 13 1 2 6 2 3 6 10 5 5 1757.5-12.5 3 2 14 0 0 0 0 4 3 3 0 0 0 1 3 2 3512.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 128 35 61 23 23 8 13 5 5 I9 2 I3 6 112 110 1 9 252Class B Frec 0.037mph I IN NE NE IENE E IESEI SE ISEISSI S Iw SW IWS W IWNWI NW INNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 153.5-7.5 1 1 8 5 6 2 3 0 6 2 6 3 2 3 2 0 507.5-12.5 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 1412.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 118.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 1 14 113 6 9 2 3 0 7 12 6 1 3 3 4 1 4 13I 80Class C Fre: 0.053mph I N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S ISSW SW IWSW W IWNWv NW INNWl TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 4 1 5 4 5 2 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 2 343.5-7.5 0 2 13 6 6 5 3 3 1 5 6 1 2 0 2 2 577.5-12.5 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 1 0 0 0 2 0 2212.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 218.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 1 4 I3 I27 10 I 11 I7 I5 4 7 I13 7 I3 2 I2 6 I4I 115Class D Fre0 0.365aMh I N NNENEI ENEIE I ESE S SE ISIS ISSW ISW IWsI W IWINW INNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.95-3.5 11 17 25 24 26 28 24 15 16 9 10 3 5 6 9 12 2403.5-7.5 13 24 30 18 18 23 32 23 31 74 30 12 22 19 10 1 3807.5-12.5 5 7 2 1 2 0 0 0 25 92 5 1 10 4 11 0 16512.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 1118.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 29 48 1 57 44 46 51 56 38 76 [181 46 16 37 29 30 13 797Page 51 Table A-1 (continued)

Apr-Jun 2014Class E F! 0.295mph I NINNEI NE I ENEI E ESEI SE SSEI S ISSWvl SW IVsvv W IVNVI NW I NNWl TOTALCalm-0.95 0 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 90.95-3.5 9 9 11 27 17 10 22 22 14 12 13 23 18 22 15 8 2523.5-7.5 13 10 5 5 8 6 4 13 7 58 45 40 34 21 19 11 2997.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 32 28 1 0 4 5 1 7912.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 618.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 122 22 16 34 26 16 31 35 30 103 1 86 1 64 1 53 1 48 1 39 1 20 1 645Class F F r: 0.099mph IN NNEI NE ENE[ E ]E SEl SE SISS S I S IWSWI W INW NW INNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 30.95-3.5 0 2 1 3 0 3 3 4 1 3 17 41 15 3 4 2 1023.5-7.5 0 2 7 2 1 0 1 1 1 6 43 20 1 1 3 2 917.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 13 1 0 0 0 0 2112.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 0 4 8 15 2 414 1 5 12 1161731631161 4 14 217Class G Fre: 0.036mph N NNE I NE ENE I E ESE I SE ISSEI S ISSWvl SW IVSV VV IVNWl NW JNNWv TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 11 19 4 1 0 0 413.5-7.5 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 17 2 0 0 0 0 237.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 1412.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 0 I 0 I3 I1 0I 0 I0 I 1 5 142121 4 I 1 0I0I 78Class All Fre: 1.000mph IN NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S ISSWl SW Iwswl W IvNwl NW INNWl TOTALCalm-0.95 0 3 0 3 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 130.95-3.5 33 41 51 64 59 43 51 42 32 30 51 88 43 36 34 28 7263.5-7.5 43 62 104 57 55 44 56 41 48 152 149 81 67 54 41 21 10757.5-12.5 8 10 27 1 2 0 5 4 36 149 61 3 10 9 21 4 35012.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 2018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 84 116182I 125 I118 I 88 112 I87 128 I339 I262I 173 121I 100 J 96 [ 53 2184Page 52 Table A-1 (continued)

Jul-Sep 2014Class A Fr 0.074mph I N INNEI NE ENE E IESEI SE ISSEI S SSW SW w W WIW NW I NWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 12 16 18 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 6 4 753.5-7.5 8 27 14 7 10 0 0 0 3 3 1 2 7 0 0 3 857.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 412.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 20 43 32 11 18 0 I0 I0 3 I 6 2 2 I 8 I I 6I 7I 164Class 13 Freq 0.031mph N NNE NE I ENE E ESE SE SSE S ISSWl SW Iwswl W IwNwl NW INNwl TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 8 5 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 7 343.5-7.5 0 3 1 1 1 0 2 3 5 6 0 3 2 0 0 0 277.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 712.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 8 I89 2 3 i0 2 3 5 112 1I 3 I2 1I 68Class C Freq 0.055raph I [ NNE N ENEI E EE SE SSE S I SSW IWsW l W IWNWl NW INNW[ TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 3 6 9 3 4 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 4 4 8 493.5-7.5 0 2 0 3 2 1 0 1 10 23 5 2 3 1 2 1 567.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 1612.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTA 3 I8 I I 6 2 2 1 11 38 7 3 5 1 5 6 9 121Class D 0.377Mph.I INNNE1 NE [ENEI E IEESEIS I SSEI S ISSW ISW IWSwl W IWNWI NW INNW[ TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.95-3.5 23 45 45 34 23 19 12 10 7 8 11 2 9 7 18 18 2913.5-7.5 6 32 9 1 3 17 21 3 64 245 49 16 9 7 3 3 4887.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 47 3 0 0 1 0 0 5212.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 1 29 77 54 35 26 36 34 13 72 300 63 18 I 18 15] 21 1 I 832Page 53 Table A-1 (continued)

Jul-Sep 2014Class E Freq 0.294mph IN INNEI NE IENEI EIESEI SE ISSE S ISSWl SW Iwsw_ W IWNWINW I Nvvl TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 0 0 5 270.95-3.5 17 22 19 20 21 15 19 23 40 27 14 35 27 18 17 13 3473.5-7.5 4 3 0 0 0 5 1 3 15 119 62 29 10 2 5 1 2597.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 1712.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 21 25 19 1 20 1 21 21 22 29 58 1162 1 84 [ 67 1 40 2O[ 22 1 19 650Class F Fre: 0.127mph ININNE INE I ENE I E ESE SE SSE [S Isvl SSW IVsW v IW W WNW[ NW INNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 100.95-3.5 1 0 0 4 1 2 1 4 22 40 42 46 13 1 2 1 1803.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 67 1 0 0 0 0 907.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 112.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 1 0 1 4 1 2 1 5 24 62 1113 148 13 1 2 -1 1 281Class G Frec 0.042mph IN'INNE NEIENE EIESEI SE ISSEI S ISSWI SW IWSWI W IWNWI NW INNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 20.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 25 27 2 1 0 0 603.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 0 0 0 0 0 307.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL ' 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 154 271 3 I2 0 0 92Class All Fre: 1.000mph IN INNE I N IENEIEIE ESEI SSE IS I S I SSW ISW SWIV W IVNWIVlW INNWvI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 4 4 5 6 4 4 2 1 5 400.95-3.5 64 94 99 66 59 37 34 37 69 81 93 111 54 38 49 51 10363.5-7.5 18 67 24 12 16 23 24 10 98 418 213 53 31 10 10 8 10357.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 82 12 0 0 1 0 0 9712.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL I82 161 I124 78 75 I61 61 51 173 1 586 1 324 1 168 1 89 I51 60 1 64 1 2208Page 54 Table A-1 (continued)

Oct-Dec 2014Class A Freq: 0.026_L _ph I N I IE NE IENEI E ESE I SSEI S [SSW ISW IWSwl W IWNWl NW INNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 43.5-7.5 4 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 8 7 5 427.5-12.5 0 3 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1112.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 17 16 121 1 2 0 11 0 01 0 3 1 181 [6 16 57Class B Fre: 0.031L.np I N INNNEI NE IENE I E IESE SE ISSE I S ISSW SW IWSW] W IWNW]NW W [NNW TTOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 33.5-7.5 1 9 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 3 3 11 4 5 2 457.5-12.5 1 6 7 1 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2112.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 12 115 19 2 14 10 0 1 13 13 14 1 11 4 15 12 69Class C Freq 0.054mph N NNE I NE ENE E ESE SE SSE I S I SW Iwswl W IwNwl NW INNWl TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 103.5-7.5 0 14 12 4 0 0 1 1 0 1 6 11 10 8 8 5 817.5-12.5 1 10 3 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 2612.5-18.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 218.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL I [1 27 16 10 1 1 3 2 I0 1 1 6 1 11 I10 14 1 10 6 119Class D Fre: 0.542mph I N [NNEI NE IENEI E IESEI SE SSEI S I SSW WSWI W IWNwNWINNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10.95-3.5 12 9 9 11 8 4 18 10 16 9 4 11 9 7 11 7 1553.5-7.5 27 71 37 21 27 9 20 22 51 93 58 82 139 90 63 12 8227.5-12.5 6 41 10 6 5 8 0 0 11 51 24 3 11 18 8 2 20412.5-18.5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1418.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 45 1121 56 1 40 1 40 1 21 1 38 35 79 161 86 1 96 11591115 1 82 1 22 1196Page 55 Table A-1 (continued)

Oct-Dec 2014Class E F 0.284mph IN INNEI NE IENEI E IESEI SE ISSEI S ISSW IWSW I W IWNWI NW INNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.95-3.5 3 9 4 5 3 3 12 23 20 25 31 29 10 18 8 6 2093.5-7.5 0 5 2 7 4 6 7 25 57 46 51 94 55 20 3 1 3837.5-12.5 0 0 3 2 1 1 0 1 2 14 2 0 2 0 0 0 2812.5-18.5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 618.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 3 14 9 16 8 10 19 50 82 86 84 1123 67 38 1 7 627Class F Fr 0.055mph IN INNE N ENEI E 1 ESE SE I SS Is SW sw I W IwNwI NW INNw[ TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 20.95-3.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 10 6 11 12 17 8 2 0 0 713.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 38 4 1 0 0 0 487.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012,5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 7 15 1 50 1 22 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 121Class G Fr. 0.009mph I N E INEI IESE SE SSEI S ISSWI SW IWSWI W IwNwI NWINNwlTOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 1 0 0 0 113,5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 87.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012,5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 16 1 1 10 0 I0 19Class All Fre 1.000mph N NNE NE ENEI IESEI SE ISSE S ISSWl SW IwswI W IwNwl NW INNwl TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 40.95-3.5 16 21 17 17 13 9 33 43 42 45 51 64 28 29 21 14 4633,5-7.5 32 102 56 35 32 17 28 49 110 144 164 197 222 130 86 25 14297.5-12.5 8 60 24 15 9 13 0 3 13 67 26 3 15 22 9 3 29012,5-18.5 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 3 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 2218.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 56 1185 97 71 54 3 61 99 169 266 241 265 265 181 116 43 2208Page 56 Table A-1 (continued)

Jan-Dec 2014Class A Freq 0.071mph N NNE NE ENE E [ESE SE SSE S JsS SWV I I W W IWV NWI NW I NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 23 29 25 8 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 8 9 1273.5-7.5 34 71 65 32 30 8 13 1 5 9 5 8 27 57 34 30 4297.5-12.5 4 5 15 0 2 2 0 5 3 6 1 0 6 9 8 2 6812.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL I61 105 1051 40 148 [10 [13 I6L 8 15 6 1 8 1 34 74 50 I411 624Class B Freq 0.030mph. I INNE] NE ENEI E ESE SE ISSEI S Is v SSW I SW IWSW W IWNWv NWv INNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 8 8 12 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 9 553.5-7.5 4 17 13 10 9 4 5 3 12 9 10 9 22 9 9 4 1497.5-12.5 2 9 10 2 2 2 0 1 2 17 1 0 4 5 1 4 6212.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 118.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 114 134 135 14 117 5 4 114 27111 10 1 28 17 14 117 267Class C Fre 0 0.050mph N NNE NE IENE[ E ESEI SE ISSEI S SSW SW IWSW [ W IWV[ N W IvNNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 9 9 16 7 10 4 6 1 0 3 1 3 2 9 10 11 1013.5-7.5 1 22 25 15 8 6 4 6 12 29 18 19 28 17 13 12 2357.5-12.5 5 15 15 9 0 0 0 1 8 23 5 3 3 6 3 4 10012.5-18.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 518.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 115 48 56 31 18 110 10 8 122 56 124 125 133 [32 ]26 127I 441Class D Fre1 0.443mph I N INNENE1 E I E ESE SE I SSW SW IWSWv W IVWNWv NW vNNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 30.95-3.5 55 82 85 72 62 58 57 37 43 28 39 40 34 30 44 38 8043.5-7.5 69 152 90 51 58 56 83 55 187 481 194 211 301 166 124 33 23117.5-12.5 31 92 22 11 8 10 2 1 57 232 52 15 84 52 39 8 71612.5-18.5 5 9 2 2 0 0 0 3 7 16 4 0 0 0 1 2 5118.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 1160 335 199 137] 128 124 143 96 294 757 289 266 419 248 208 82 3885Page 57 Table A-1 (continued)

Jan-Dec 2014Class E Freq 0.298mph I E I NEE IEI I E IESE I SE I S s s III v vWNW I NW I NNWv TOTALCalm-0.95 0 3 0 2 1 1 2 5 4 4 4 3 4 1 0 5 390.95-3.5 33 45 35 53 43 33 60 96 96 85 85 119 69 73 55 38 10183.5-7.5 21 29 7 15 29 28 23 63 99 264 217 277 164 60 39 16 13517.5-12.5 2 8 5 5 1 1 9 11 15 69 39 3 5 8 6 1 18812.5-18.5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1718.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 1 56 1 85 ]47 I 7L 4 I463 1 94 1 175 12251 426 1 345 1 402 12421 142 11001 60 1 2613Class F Fre : 0.083mph__ N ILNNE]NEIENEI E IESEJ SE ISSE IS I SSW SW IWSW IWIWNWINWINNWJ TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 3 3 0 1 1 0 150.95-3.5 1 3 2 8 1 8 6 25 34 59 85 126 44 11 6 3 4223.5-7.5 0 2 7 2 1 0 4 8 6 35 165 30 2 1 3 2 2687.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 14 1 0 0 0 0 2312.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 5 10 I 10 i3 I9 10 34 ]42 ]103 267 160 146 13 110 15 728Class G gre: 0.023mph N INNE NE ENE I E LESEISE ISSEJ S ]SSW ISWIWSWIWIWNWINWINNWI TOTAL_Ca1m-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 20.95-3.5 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 11 41 54 8 2 0 0 1213.5-7.5 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 2 57 2 0 0 0 0 657.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 1412.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 0 I0 10 3 11 0 I2 0[313 112 56 9W 3 0 oT 202Class All Fre: 1.000mph__ N N EE E E S ESE S SW S S WWN IN TOTAL_Calm-0.95 0 3 1 3 2 2 3 6 5 6 7 6 5 3 1 6 590.95-3.5 129 176 175 151 138 103 130 159 176 186 251 343 160 136 127 108 26483.5-7.5 129 293 207 127 136 102 133 136 321 829 666 556 544 310 222 97 48087.5-12.5 44 129 67 27 13 15 11 19 86 354 126 22 102 80 57 19 117112.5-18.5 5 11 2 4 0 0 0 3 20 22 4 0 0 0 1 2 7418.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 307 6 612 1452 312 1289 1 222 1277 1 323 16081 1397 1 10541 927 1811 1 529 14081 232 1 8760Page 58 Table A-2Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and SpeedsFor the 220-ft level of the 220-ft TowerJan-Mar 2014Class A Freq 0.070mr h INNNE NE ENEI E I ESE SE [SSEI S ISSW] SW IVWSWv VW IVN NW INNWv TOTALCaim-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03,5-7.5 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 4 147.5-12.5 5 5 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 14 7 4 4712,5-18.5 3 2 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 19 6 4 4518.5-24 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 14 5 3 35>24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 10TOTAL 171 7 1 6 1 4 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 11r.6 561523115 1 151Class B Freq 0.023mph N NNEI NE IE E ESE I SE ISSE I S ISSWvl SW IWSWv W IWVvl NW IWNW- TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03,5-7.5 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 77.5-12.5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1112,5-18.5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 918.5-24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 2 9>24 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 2 14TOTAL I7 I1 4 3 1 1 0I 2 0 0I 1 1 117 7 [ 6 5 1 0Class C Freq 0.040p h INNNENE ENE E I E SE I SSE I SSWISW I WSW I W IWNWv NWINNWv TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03,5-7.5 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 107.5-12.5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 4 0 0 1112,5-18.5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 3 7 3 0 3 2518.5-24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 3 0 2 13>24 7 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 3 1 5 27TOTAL 12 1 1 2 6 1 0 0 12 3 4 1 4 10113 1 [14 [3 1 866Class D Freq 0.491mh N NNE [E I EN[ E I....E..

ESE] SE JSSE I S ~ ~~ I S WISI W IWNW [ NW [ NNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 2 143,5-7.5 4 6 3 0 4 3 2 0 1 4 3 9 13 3 2 1 587.5-12.5 5 7 8 4 5 4 5 4 18 39 44 33 22 7 9 0 21412,5-18.5 4 5 6 3 2 4 4 5 19 63 38 59 76 45 21 12 36618.5-24 25 5 2 5 1 2 5 3 2 22 12 9 43 28 30 9 203>24 49 11 9 3 4 0 0 0 3 5 4 1 19 37 28 32 205TOTAL 88 35 30 1 15 14 [ 17J 12 44 133 1011 114 173 1120 [ 91 56I 1060Page 59 Table A-2 (continued)

Jan-Mar 2014Class E Freq 0.320mph I N I NNE INE IENEI E I ESE I SE I SSE I S I SSVW ISVV WSW I WV .NW I NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 93.5-7.5 3 2 2 1 4 5 6 3 8 6 6 3 8 11 5 8 817.5-12.5 0 6 1 1 8 3 7 7 20 16 18 27 33 12 5 4 16812.5-18.5 7 2 1 6 5 8 9 10 19 17 38 55 71 20 17 10 29518.5-24 6 2 0 0 5 0 7 12 11 15 8 9 9 11 4 1 100>24 11 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 5 2 1 0 3 8 2 1 38TOTAL I 30 1 12 1L5 11 1231 17 1 291 32 163 1 57 1 72 95 112 62 34 I2 691Class F Freq 0.050mph I N I NNE INE I ENE I E ESE SE I SSE I S I SSW I SW s I W I W WNW I NNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.95-3.5 3 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 163.5-7.5 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 1 2 4 0 5 6 3 2 347.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 3 2 5 5 2 2 2 3112.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 1 5 2 4 0 0 0 2118.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 4I 2 0 12 I4 ll 110 1 7 113 I7 1 9 6 I I 109Class G Fre: 0.006raph N NNE N NE I ENE E ESE SE SSE I SSW I SW I WSW IW WNW NW I NNW I TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 43.5-7.5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 47.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 212.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 318.5-24 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 0oI 1 0 0 1 0 110 2 2 2 2 2 0 101 13Class All Frec 1.000aph I N INNEINE I ENE E I ESE ISEI SSE IS IS SW I SW I WSW I WI WNW NW I I TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.95-3.5 7 3 2 0 2 5 2 0 3 4 3 4 1 1 3 3 433.5-7.5 12 10 11 2 9 10 11 8 11 12 14 13 29 27 13 16 2087.5-12.5 11 19 13 7 17 8 13 12 46 59 66 73 66 39 24 11 48412.5-18.5 17 9 7 10 8 16 15 20 45 83 84 119 169 87 46 29 76418.5-24 40 7 2 5 6 2 16 19 14 38 22 18 64 56 40 17 366>24 71 11 12125 0 0 0 8 8 5 2 25 58 37 40 294TOTAL I158 1 59 1471 36 1481 41 157 1 59 11271 204 11941 229 13541 268 11631116I 2160Page 60 Table A-2 (continued)

Apr-Jun 2014Class A Fre 0.115mph N N NE NE IENEI E IESEI SSEI S IT vv SW IWSW WVV I NW INNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.5-7.5 1 7 8 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 247.5-12.5 11 4 14 6 18 4 0 1 1 1 2 2 0 4 2 8 7812.5-18.5 16 10 20 4 4 10 13 0 5 1 1 0 8 6 3 7 10818.5-24 4 4 7 0 0 0 2 5 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 30>24 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 12TOTAL 37 125 149 113 24 15 15 6 8 5 3 2 I8 ] 110 122 252Class B Fr 0 0.037mphLI N ]NNEI NE IENEI E ESE I SE I SSE I S SSW SW [WSWI W VWNWI NW I NNWv TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.5-7.5 1 1 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 117.5-12.5 1 1 3 0 2 7 0 0 3 0 3 1 1 1 0 2 2512.5-18.5 0 0 3 0 2 1 4 0 5 1 5 0 2 2 2 0 2718.5-24 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 11>24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 6TOTAL 4 2 12 1 7 8 4 0 8 9 9 i1 I5 I5 31 2I 80Class C Fre 0.053mph IN INNE NE ENE E ESE SE LSSE S I SSW I vSW[WSWlWIvWNWv NW INNWv TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.5-7.5 1 2 5 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 157.5-12.5 1 1 2 2 3 4 7 1 1 3 1 2 0 1 1 4 3412.5-18.5 2 0 14 3 3 2 1 0 5 5 6 1 1 0 2 0 4518.5-24 0 0 5 2 2 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 16>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5TOTAL I4 I3 26 8 7 8 3 9 10 7 4 1 [1 7 I6 115Class D FrO 0.365aph IN NNE N NE lESEl SE ISSE IS ISSW IVWWSWlW IWNWv NW INNWv TOTALCaim-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 123.5-7.5 11 1 15 6 12 27 11 8 4 5 3 0 2 4 9 7 1257.5-12.5 6 9 20 11 5 21 20 13 17 23 19 5 2 5 3 7 18612.5-18.5 1 11 18 13 6 15 23 13 28 58 19 6 10 14 5 2 24218.5-24 10 6 2 7 7 2 4 17 12 68 10 3 4 10 7 5 174>24 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 14 2 0 4 5 16 0 58TOTAL 140 28 58] 38 31 67 [58 52 67 168 1 5 1 14 [ 22 38 40I 22 797Page 61 Table A-2 (continued)

Apr-Jun 2014Class E Freq 0.295mph N N] NNE NE ENE I E I ESE I SE SSE I S I S SW I SW I WSW I WNW I NW I NNW [ TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.95-3.5 1 1 4 3 5 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 293.5-7.5 5 5 10 2 6 16 8 4 9 8 3 2 2 5 6 3 947.5-12.5 8 4 5 1 4 15 13 14 10 17 4 3 4 8 9 7 12612.5-18.5 11 4 1 0 0 5 6 12 12 33 16 17 22 46 22 11 21818.5-24 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 4 32 31 3 5 13 14 7 122>24 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 15 9 0 0 5 11 5 55TOTAL I 32 14 120 6 1151 39 136 1 37 142 1 107 164 1 26 134 7I 8 162 I 33 I 645Class F Freq 0.099mph N N NE I E I Es I ES I SSE I ssW I sW I WSW W I WNW NW NNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 83.5-7.5 3 4 2 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 3 0 1 4 1 1 297.5-12.5 1 2 1 0 0 1 4 1 3 6 7 4 7 11 9 2 5912.5-18.5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 6 11 16 17 11 5 7718.5-24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 7 7 0 2 1 32>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 2 12TOA 7 7 3 I3 1 [1 2 7 I7 19 133 122 131 1 33 23 11 217Class G Freq 0.036mph N ~NNE NE1 ENE [SESEISSE SISSW ISW]WSW IW IWNW INW jNNWI TOTAL_Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 113.5-7.5 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 4 0 1 3 1 207.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 6 3 0 0 1612.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 3 0 1 1 1318.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 4 0 0 0 1 17>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1TOT I 1 313 123 111 1 1 2 111 6 114 1 19I9 1 5 4 6I 78Class All Freq 1.000mph N NN[ NE ENEIE[SE SsEISS S ]SSW SW WS NWIN N TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.95-3.5 1 3 8 6 8 5 3 6 4 3 3 2 1 3 0 4 603.5-7.5 23 22 44 15 26 47 22 15 15 17 9 7 6 16 19 15 3187.5-12.5 28 21 45 20 32 52 44 31 35 51 37 21 20 33 24 30 52412.5-18.5 32 26 56 20 15 33 47 27 58 101 55 41 62 85 46 26 73018.5-24 22 10 17 10 9 2 8 29 19 117 60 17 17 23 24 18 402>24 19 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 11 35 20 0 4 10 36 9 149TOTAL 1125 [ 82 711111 1901 1396 1 1421 324 I111 8 11101 170 11491 102 2184Page 62 Table A-2 (continued)

Jul-Sep 2014Class A Freq: 0.074mp.h N .INNEI NE IENEJ E IJESE SE ISSE S [SSW] SW IWSWv W IVVV[ NW N INW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.5-7.5 5 8 5 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 3 3 377.5-12.5 13 12 6 6 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 3 0 2 5112.5-18.5 17 9 3 7 10 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 3 1 1 0 5718.5-24 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 6 19>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL I41 30 14 19 15 I0 I0 I1 5 3 I 2 0 10 I9 4 I l 164Class B Freq 0.031CaLm-.g5 N I NNE NE ENE 0EESEI SE SSE 0S ISSWISWJWSW WIWNW NW INNW TOTAL._Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.5-7.5 8 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 187.5-12.5 3 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 5 1912.5-18.5 2 1 1 2 1 0 2 0 8 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 2418.5-24 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 7>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 113 5 6 4 1 I1 3 2 110 6 2 2 2 1 2 12 71 68Class C Freq 0.055_mh. N NNE I NE I ENE E ESE SE SSE S I SSW VSW IWSWv I W IVNWI NW I NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5-7.5 2 4 5 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 2 4 257.5-12.5 1 1 4 3 3 1 2 1 3 5 1 1 2 4 0 4 3612.5-18.5 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 13 17 3 2 1 2 1 2 4618.5-24 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 11>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2TOTAL 4 71 9 I 3 1 4 2 18 29 7 3 3 9 4 11 121Class D Fre_ 0.377_____l N INNE INE IENE I __IES_ SE ISSE I SI SSW ILSW IWSWJIW IWNWI NW [NNWj TOTAL_Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 5 3 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 183.5-7.5 13 16 17 9 11 12 3 1 3 9 11 2 1 2 7 3 1207.5-12.5 5 13 23 8 6 9 19 11 15 39 26 7 1 4 3 10 19912.5-18.5 10 12 9 16 4 3 11 1 41 170 31 10 10 3 4 10 34518.5-24 17 9 0 0 9 3 6 0 4 71 5 0 1 7 4 3 139>24 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 11T9OTA 154] 53150137132 39 13 63 1289 74 I 19 13 1 21 1 1 1 2 32TOTAL 4ý5 --3 3 3Page 63 Table A-2 (continued)

Jul-Sep 2014Class E Freq 0.294ph I N INEI I ENE E I ESE I SE I SSE I N SSN WS I WSv I v I WNW NW I NNW I TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10.95-3,5 2 0 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 173.5-7.5 3 4 7 6 7 23 10 4 1 2 2 3 3 0 2 3 807.5-12,5 12 11 10 12 14 7 9 7 14 22 3 8 10 11 13 8 17112.5-18.5 10 0 2 2 9 2 3 20 8 60 46 17 23 25 12 7 24618.5-24 3 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 1 54 30 6 1 7 3 7 117>24 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 3 18TOTAL 35 j 15 121 1 22 1351 35 1241 32 124 144 188 1 34 138 1 44 31 1 28 1 650Class F Freq 0.127N ph N NE NE E I ESE ISES I s SE ISSW SW WSW W WNW I N]NWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3,5 2 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 103.5-7.5 2 0 1 1 1 7 5 6 1 5 0 1 2 0 1 0 337.5-12,5 1 1 0 0 1 4 7 9 12 10 5 4 6 8 15 5 8812.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12 9 23 29 15 6 27 5 0 13118.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 1 0 0 0 2 19>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 5 1 12 I1 3 11 120 27 24 40 48 21 14 35 21 8 281Class G Freq 0.042... NhI N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW I Wv WNW NW NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3,5 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 83.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 4 3 5 2 1 1 0 217.5-12,5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 7 11 14 5 2 0 4412.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 3 2 4 3 2 0 1918.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 1 I 0 0 2I0 LLL 1213 7 8 1 31 18 121 1 9 I 1 92Class All Freq 1.000n .I NNI NIIE NEIE ESE I SSE S S IsW I WSW IW IWNW INW INNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10.95-3.5 10 4 4 8 5 4 4 1 3 1 3 0 2 1 1 3 543.5-7.5 33 35 38 25 22 42 20 11 8 20 19 11 8 10 18 14 3347.5-12.5 35 38 45 30 26 22 39 31 48 78 42 32 39 36 33 34 60812.5-18.5 40 23 15 28 24 5 22 36 84 276 112 47 49 62 25 20 86818.5-24 26 11 0 1 13 4 7 1 8 138 53 7 3 15 7 18 312>24 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 4 0 0 5 1 5 31TOTAL 1153 1 111 11021 92 1901 78 j 921 80 1151 1 519 12341 97 11011 129 1 85 ] 94 1 2208Page 64 Table A-2 (continued)

Oct-Dec 2014Class A Freq 0.026Nph I N I N E [ENE E EIsE s S IssSW I SW Ivswl W IvvWI Nv TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.5-7.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 37.5-12.5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 1 2 1512.5-18.5 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 5 3 2218.5-24 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 9>24 1 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 8TOTAL I8 2 5 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 7 112 110 1 5 57Class B 0.031mph IN INNNE NE IENEl E IESEI SE ISSEI S ISSWI SW IWSWI W IWNWI NW INNWI TOTALCaim-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.5-7.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.5-12.5 0 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 1 1 0 1812.5-18.5 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 5 2 1 0 1818.5-24 0 5 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 16'24 2 6 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 16TOTAL 15f 112 18 12 14 14 l0 l0 1 1 13 15 10 15 16 13 I 69Class C 0.054mph NNE I NEI ENEI E EISE SEI SSE SSSW Is SWl Iwsw W INW NNw IN.wlTOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.5-7.5 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 47.5-12.5 0 0 3 1 2 1 3 0 0 1 1 8 6 2 6 1 3512.5-18.5 2 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 4 3 5 0 3018.5-24 0 7 4 8 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 27>24 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 23TOTAL I 8 21 I12 I [12I 1 I I2 1 4 1. 0 11 3112[1I15 I 119Class D Freq 0.542mph I N INNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S ISSW SW Iwswl W IwNwl NW I NW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43.5-7.5 4 3 3 12 6 6 5 4 4 3 5 5 1 1 5 3 707.5-12.5 5 8 12 6 8 4 14 6 19 24 29 23 17 16 6 6 20312.5-18.5 12 22 10 9 8 6 17 14 23 87 64 32 79 80 40 9 51218.5-24 13 21 11 21 6 10 5 5 3 32 19 2 24 37 29 14 252>24 41 19 10 8 6 0 0 4 0 8 0 0 1 21 20 17 155TOTAL 177 74 46 6 34 26 41 I33 I5 154 117 62 122 155 100 49 1196Page 65 Table A-2 (continued)

Oct-Dec 2014Class E Freq 0.284mph IN INNE NE I ENEI ESE SEI SSE I S ISSW I SW IWSWv W I[WNW NW INNWvI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 123.5-7.5 5 4 9 2 1 1 4 4 6 12 4 7 2 7 6 3 777.5-12.5 1 4 1 3 4 7 7 13 9 25 28 13 14 23 5 5 16212.5-18.5 1 1 0 4 4 3 5 41 25 32 29 52 59 34 12 3 30518.5-24 2 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 20 4 5 10 8 1 0 59>24 0 0 2 5 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 12TOTAL I 9 1 13 14 1 7 13 13 1616 0 43 91 668 7 I 85 75 I24 I 11 I 627Class F Fre( 0.055mph [N NNE I __ ENE E ESE SE SSE I SSW I SW IVsv VVIW J IwNW I NNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 33.5-7.5 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 3 1 3 2 1 0 3 227.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 0 2 4 1 5 12 2 2 3712.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 10 3 2 8 15 15 3 0 0 5918.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 14 12 10 11 2 16 117 1 4 1 7 13 119 122 1 12 61 121Class G F1eq 0.009mph N NNEI NE ENE E ESE SE ISS S I I SW Ivsv W WNW NW NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 23.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 67.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 412.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 718.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 0101010101010 11 21017121210 0151 19Class All Freq 1.000mp I N INNEI NE ENEI E ESEI SE I SSE S ISSWvl SW IWSWv IV IW NwI NW I NNWl TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 3 3 1 1 1 2 0 3 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 213.5-7.5 12 10 14 15 8 7 9 10 12 18 10 15 7 11 12 13 1837.5-12.5 9 12 18 11 16 16 27 23 28 52 63 52 49 60 21 17 47412.5-18.5 21 27 18 16 12 9 25 65 53 122 111 104 166 126 63 15 95318.5-24 16 35 20 34 7 12 6 8 5 52 23 7 37 46 39 16 363>24 50 37 14 13 12 1 0 4 1 9 0 0 1 29 22 21 214TOTAL I 111 124 85 90 56 I47 67 I113 100 I 254 209 178 260 274 157 I83I 2208Page 66 Table A-2 (continued)

Jan-Dec 2014Class A Freq 0.071mph I N NNE NE ENE E IESE SE SSE S NSS SN I I I W IWvWv NW I NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.5-7.5 8 15 17 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 5 9 787.5-12.5 32 21 24 12 23 5 0 1 2 2 3 3 10 27 10 16 19112.5-18.5 39 21 25 13 15 13 13 1 8 3 1 0 21 30 15 14 23218.5-24 17 5 7 2 1 1 2 6 3 4 1 0 10 15 7 12 93>24 7 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 10 2 30TOTAL 103 64 74 36 45 2 15 8 13 9 I 6 3 I41 87 47 1 53 I 624Class B Freq 0.030mph N NNE NE ENE I E ;ESEl SE ISSE S I SSW SW IjWSW WNWJ NW NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.5-7.5 10 4 9 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 2 1 377.5-12.5 5 2 7 3 5 10 1 1 5 1 4 8 8 3 2 8 7312.5-18.5 6 2 5 2 3 2 6 0 14 4 8 1 14 5 5 1 7818.5-24 2 6 7 2 0 1 0 3 0 7 3 0 4 1 4 3 43>24 6 6 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 6 4 4 36TOTAL 129 20 30] 10 13 14 7 4 19] 16 15 9 [28 19 17 17I 267jClass C Freq 0.050ph N [NNE IEENE E ESESEI s SSEI S sswI sWvvW IvWsw [W Iv NW vNNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5-7.5 4 8 11 4 4 1 1 0 1 0 2 2 1 5 4 6 547.5-12.5 2 2 9 7 8 6 12 2 4 9 3 16 9 11 7 9 11612.5-18.5 7 4 19 6 3 2 2 2 20 24 13 10 13 8 8 5 14618.5-24 2 7 9 11 2 0 1 4 3 10 3 0 3 3 5 4 67>24 13 10 1 5 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 3 8 5 8 57TOTAL 128 32 49 33 ]17 9 16 I8 .30 1I44 T21 J 29 [ 29 [ 35 129 32 441Class D Freq 0.443mph I N [NNE NE IENE] I ESE SE I SSE S IssW I SW IWSW I [vWNWI NWv NNW TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 8 6 5 5 4 4 1 1 4 0 2 3 0 0 1 4 483.5-7.5 32 26 38 27 33 48 21 13 12 21 22 16 17 10 23 14 3737.5-12.5 21 37 63 29 24 38 58 34 69 125 118 68 42 32 21 23 80212.5-18.5 27 50 43 41 20 28 55 33 111 378 152 107 175 142 70 33 146518.5-24 65 41 15 33 23 17 20 25 21 193 46 14 72 82 70 31 768>24 106 30 20 11 10 1 0 4 7 27 6 1 24 68 64 50 429TOTAL I259 190 184 146 114 1 136 155 1 110 224 744] 346 1 209 1 330 [ 334 1 249] 155I 3885Page 67 Table A-2 (continued)

Jan-Dec 2014Class E Fre: 0.298mph N I NNE INEIENEI E[ I SE I SE I SSE I S I SSW I SW I WSW_ I W I VWNW I I VNNW I TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20.95-3.5 6 3 7 6 8 8 3 4 2 4 5 2 2 4 2 1 673.5-7.5 16 15 28 11 18 45 28 15 24 28 15 15 15 23 19 17 3327.5-12.5 21 25 17 17 30 32 36 41 53 80 53 51 61 54 32 24 62712.5-18.5 29 7 4 12 18 18 23 83 64 142 129 141 175 125 63 31 106418.5-24 17 4 1 2 9 1 10 18 18 121 73 23 25 39 22 15 398>24 17 0 3 8 3 0 4 0 11 24 14 0 3 14 13 9 123TOTAL J106 I 5 160 56 1 86 1 104 1105 161 1172 1 399 12901 232 1281 [ 259 1151 ] 97 2613Class F Freq 0.083mh N NNE_ NE_ EN E_ ES-EISEIS-SIW WS IWIWWIN N TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.95-3.5 6 2 1 1 3 2 5 4 3 1 3 0 1 2 1 2 373.5-7.5 9 6 3 3 2 10 10 15 4 12 8 4 10 11 5 6 1187.5-12.5 2 3 1 0 1 7 15 15 23 21 18 14 23 33 28 11 21512.5-18.5 2 1 0 0 0 0 10 27 19 29 48 43 41 47 16 5 28818.5-24 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 8 22 8 7 0 2 3 57>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 2 12TOAL 20 112 15 14 7I 19 44 J 62 150 1 73 11071 69 182 1 93 152 I 29 1 728Class G Freq 0.023N [ N NNE INE IENE IE IESE ISE SSE IS I SW SWI WSW W I WNW ]NWI NNW ITOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.95-3.5 1 1 2 3 1 2 0 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 0 4 253.5-7.5 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 6 4 9 5 2 4 5 517.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 2 9 18 21 8 2 1 6612.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 2 11 9 7 3 3 1 4218.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 4 0 0 0 1 17>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1TOTAL I2 4 I3 4 I2 3I3 7 112 I1 36 41 134 114 9 1 121 202Class All Freq: 1.000m h N [NNEINE IENE I EESEI SE] SSE I S ISSW [SWIWSWIW IWNW INW INNWI TOTALCalm-0.95 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.95-3.5 21 13 15 15 16 16 9 10 11 9 11 6 4 7 4 11 1783.5-7.5 80 77 107 57 65 106 62 44 46 67 52 46 50 64 62 58 10437.5-12.5 83 90 121 68 91 98 123 97 157 240 208 178 174 168 102 92 209012.5-18.5 110 85 96 74 59 63 109 148 240 582 362 311 446 360 180 90 331518.5-24 104 63 39 50 35 20 37 57 46 345 158 49 121 140 110 69 1443>24 149 48 27 25 17 2 4 4 20 58 29 2 30 102 96 75 688TOTAL I 547 1 376 14051 289 12841 305 13451 360 1520 I 1301 1821 I 592 18251 841 15541 395 1 8760Page 68 APPENDIX BResults of Onsite Groundwater Monitoring ProgramIn response to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Groundwater Protection Initiative, Pilgrim Stationinstituted a groundwater monitoring program during 2007. Four monitoring wells were installed inside the protected area fence during the fourth quarter of 2007. The first samples were collected in November 2007. Since these are onsite wells, they are not considered part of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP), and data from these wells are being reported in theannual Radiological Effluent Release Report. Two pre-existing wells were incorporated into thegroundwater monitoring program in early 2008. Additional wells were added to the program in2010 (12 wells), 2011 (2 wells), 2012 (1 well), 2013 (3 wells), and 2014 (1 well). A total of 23 wellsare being sampled on a routine basis.In addition to sampling the onsite monitoring wells, samples of surface water are collected from twolocations in the PNPS Intake Canal. These locations are along the shoreline in the same direction as the groundwater flow gradient.

All samples collected are analyzed for tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, and also forgamma emitting radionuclides.

In accordance with industry practice established under the NEIinitiative, lower limits of detection (LLDs) used for analysis of REMP samples were used whenassessing these samples for the presence of radioactivity.

Low levels of tritium were detected inthe many of the onsite wells. Although gamma spectroscopy indicated the presence of naturally-occurring radioactivity, such as Potassium-40 and radon daughters from the uranium/thorium decaychains, there was no indication of any plant-related radioactivity in the groundwater

samples, otherthan tritium.

Such levels of natural radioactivity are expected as these radionuclides are dissolved into the groundwater from the rocks and soil. The fact that these low levels of naturally-occurring radioactivity can be detected demonstrates the ability of the gamma spectroscopy analyses todetect radioactivity in groundwater.

Analyses are also performed for hard-to-detect radionuclides, including Iron-55, Nickel-63, Strontium-89, and Strontium-90 on a less frequent basis. These hard-to-detect radionuclides were also non-detectable in all of the wells sampled and analyzed during2014.A summary of the results of the tritium analyses conducted in 2014 are presented in the following table. In this table, a value of "NDA < xx" in the columns indicates that no activity was detected inthe sample when analyzed to the minimum-detectable level following the "<" sign. For example,the sample collected from MW201 on 13-Jan-2014 contained no detectable

tritium, and a minimumdetectable concentration of 389 pCi/L was achieved on that sample. The achieved sensitivity of389 pCi/L is well below the required REMP LLD of 3000 pCi/L, and no tritium was detected evenwhen counted to this more sensitive level of detection.

No plant-related radioactivity (other thantritium) was detected in any of the monitoring wells, and no tritium or plant-related radioactivity wasdetected in surface water samples collected from the intake canal.Page 69 Number of Minimum MaximumMonitoring Well ID Date Samples Positive Concentration Concentration Results pCiIL pCi/LMW201 Nov-2007 27 1 NDA < 311 396MW202 Nov-2007 5 0 NDA < 353 NDA < 387MW202-1 Apr-2010 5 3 NDA < 405 1740MW203 Nov-2007 Well decommissioned in 2013 during construction of ISFSI padMW204 Nov-2007 4 0 NDA < 366 NDA < 406MW205 Apr-2010 50 23 NDA < 349 1520MW206 Apr-2010 27 6 NDA < 339 1080MW207 Apr-2010 4 0 NDA < 365 NDA < 399MW208-S Apr-2010 4 0 NDA < 364 NDA < 394MW208-1 Apr-2010 4 0 NDA < 365 NDA < 387MW209 Aug-2010 52 52 380 1610MW210 Aug-2010 4 0 NDA < 371 NDA < 406MW211 Aug-2010 52 52 616 1440MW212 Aug-2010 4 3 NDA < 368 624MW213 Aug-2010 4 0 NDA < 366 NDA < 393MW214 Aug-2010 4 0 NDA < 338 NDA < 401MW215 Dec-2011 27 27 667 1280MW216 Sep-2012 52 52 1050 6610MW217 Dec-2011 4 0 NDA < 362 NDA < 391MW218 Nov-2013 52 52 1070 4730MW219 Dec-2013 53 53 591 20000MW220 Dec-2014 Well installed late Dec-2014; first sample collected 15-Jan-2015 MW3 Jul-1987 4 0 1 NDA < 358 1 NDA < 395MW4 Jul-1997 Well decommissioned in 2013 during installation of MW4RMW4-R Nov-2013 14 7 NDA < 339 581All Wells -- 456 331 NDA < 311 20000Intake Canal West -- 51 0 NDA < 311 NDA < 416Intake Canal East -- 4 0 NDA < 368 NDA < 427Concentrations of tritium detected in the onsite wells ranged from non-detectable at less than 311pCi/L, up to a maximum concentration of 20,000 pCi/L. The average concentrations from theseonsite wells are well below the voluntary communication reporting level of 20,000 pCi/L asestablished by the EPA Drinking Water Standard.

Although the EPA Standard provides a baselinefor comparison, no drinking water sources are affected by this tritium.

All of the affected wells areonsite, and the general groundwater flow pathway is under Pilgrim Station and out into the saltwater of Cape Cod Bay. As such, there is no potential to influence any off-site drinking water wells.Even if worst-case assumptions were made and the water from monitoring well MW219 (averageconcentration

= 4314 pCi/L) was consumed as drnking water for an entire year, the maximum doseconsequence would be less than 0.35 mrem/yr.

In actuality, any dose consequence would bemuch less than this, as any tritium-laden water potentially leaving the site would be diluted into theseawater of Cape Cod Bay before being incorporated into any ingestion pathways.

No drinkingwater ingestion pathway exists at the Pilgrim Station site.Page 70 Although there are no indications that the groundwater containing detectable tritium is actuallymigrating

offsite, a bounding calculation was performed to assess the potential dose impact ofsuch a scenario.

Based on the tritium concentrations detected during 2014, the annual averageconcentrations of tritium in groundwater in the four monitoring wells most closely adjacent to theshoreline (MW204, MW205, MW202, and MW201) were used to estimate potential tritiummigration into the intake bay. Hydrological characteristics of the compacted backfill in the vicinity ofthese wells were measured in 2010 and indicate the hydraulic conductivity ranges from 0.002cm/sec to about 0.006 cm/sec. When coupled with the hydraulic slope of 0.014 and averageporosity of 0.3, the flow velocity was calculated as being between 0.08 and 0.23 meters per day.Using an assumed horizontal shoreline interface area 236 meters long by 3 meters deep that couldpotentially transmit groundwater into the intake bay, the annual discharge of groundwater would beabout 12.5 million Liters of water per year. Assuming this volume of 12.5 million liters contained the segment-weighted average concentration of 430 pCi/L, the annual discharge of tritium into theintake bay under this hypothetical scenario would be 0.00538 Curies. This activity represents lessthan 0.006% of the annual airborne effluent of tritium released from the reactor building vent (seeTable 2.2-C). Such airborne effluents can be washed down to the ground surface duringprecipitation events and infiltrate into the ground, thereby introducing tritium into the groundwater.

In the hypothetical scenario described above, the 0.00538 Curies of tritium entering the intake baywould be further diluted into the circulating water flow of the plant. As documented in Table 2.3-A,the total volume of circulating water flow during 2014 was 614 billion Liters, yielding an effective concentration of tritium in the intake bay of about 0.0088 pCi/L. Such a concentration would bewell below the detection sensitivity of about 450 pCi/L used to analyze water collected from thedischarge canal as part of the radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP). Thecalculated dose to the maximum-exposed member of the public from such a hypothetical releasewould be 0.0000000050

millirem, resulting from ingestion of tritium incorporated into fish andshellfish.

Since the tritium would be incorporated into seawater, there is no drinking wateringestion pathway in the described scenario.

The following table lists the hydrological characteristics in the vicinity of each of the monitoring wells used to estimate tritium migration.

Predicted flow velocities, annual discharge volumes,average tritium concentrations, and hypothetical tritium discharges are listed for each shoreline segment represented by each monitoring well. Although all four samples collected from monitoring well MW204 indicated no detectable

activity, for purposes of conservatism the well was assumed tocontain tritium at the average of the detection limits achieved on the four quarterly samples.Page 71 Shoreline Segment Number 1 2 3 4Monitoring Well Number MW204 MW205 MW202 MW201Hydraulic Conductivity

-cm/sec 1.99E-03 4.27E-03 3.13E-03 5.64E-03Hydraulic Slope 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014Porosity 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300Flow Velocity

-m/day 8.02E-02 1.72E-01 1.26E-01 2.27E-01Flow Velocity

-ft/yr 9.61E+01 2.06E+02 1.51E+02 2.72E+02Length of Shoreline Segment -m 61.0 38.1 45.7 91.4Thickness of Water Layer -m 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Volumetric Discharge

-m3/day 4.40E+00 5.90E+00 5.19E+00 1.87E+01Volumetric Discharge

-Liter/yr 1.61 E+06 2.16E+06 1.90E+06 6.84E+06Annual Average H-3 Concentration

-pCi/L 3.81 E+02 5.08E+02 5.85E+02 3.74E+02Annual Segment Tritium Discharge

-Ci/yr 6.13E-04 1.10E-03 1.11E-03 2.56E-03Total Volumetric Discharge

-L/yr 1.25E+07Total H-3 Discharge

-Ci/yr 5.38E-03Annual Circulating Water Flow -Liter/yr 6.14E+11Discharge Canal H-3 Concentration

-Ci/L 8.75E-15Discharge Canal H-3 Concentration

-pCi/L 8.75E-03Max. Indiv. Dose Factor -mrem/yr per Ci/L 5.73E+05Maximum Individual Dose -mrem/yr 5.01 E-09In April 2013, an internal inspection of the neutralizing sump discharge line identified a separation in the line approximately 5-feet below the ground surface where the line exits the foundation of thebuilding.

The inspection also identified two additional anomalies in the line closer to where itterminates in Catch Basin #10. The locations of the line separation and the two anomalies wereexcavated in July 2013 to inspect the condition of the line and collect soil samples for radioactivity analyses.

The line was found to be intact at the two anomalies, and soil samples collected in thevicinity of these anomalies was non-detectable for plant-related radioactivity, including tritium,gamma emitters, and hard-to-detect radionuclides.

However, in the soil immediately adjacent tothe line separation, low levels of plant-related gamma activity were identified in the soil. Tritiumwas also detected in the water contained in the soil at this location, at concentrations lower thanthat assumed to have leaked from the line during the March discharge.

All of the radiological survey information was entered into Pilgrim Station's 10CFR50.75(g) decommissioning

database, and another voluntary notification was made to the NRC and interested stakeholders.

Because theneutralizing sump discharge line was still intact at the location of the separation, it was determined that most of the volume discharged during the four permitted releases in March 2013 would havecontinued to flow down the line to Catch Basin #10, as originally intended.

The original boundingcalculation assuming over 38,000 gallons of contaminated water entering the groundwater wasvery conservative, as the actual volume entering the soil at the line separation was much smaller,most likely less than a few hundred gallons.

Increased well sampling throughout 2013 atmonitoring wells downgradient of the line separation have not identified any increased concentrations of tritium, and no gamma activity has been identified in any well samples.

Thegamma nuclides identified tend to chemically bind to the soil particles, and likely moved only a fewinches from the location of the separation.

This would explain why the activity would not reach thegroundwater at a depth of about 18-feet below the ground surface, or 13-feet below the lineseparation.

Since there is no evidence of this gamma activity having entered the groundwater, noingestion exposure pathways exist for this radioactivity.

Page 72 Additional excavations were performed during 2014 in the vicinity of neutralizing sump discharge line separation, and confirmed that the highest concentrations were immediately adjacent to theseparation, and had migrated only a few feet horizontally or vertically from the separation.

Theadditional soil survey results were entered into the 10CFR50.75(g) decommissioning database.

Based on the lower concentrations observed during the 2014 soil sampling

efforts, it wasdetermined that the assessments and bounding calculations performed during 2013 wereconservative, and the actual impact would have been less than that assessed in 2013.Due to these events involving the neutralizing sump discharge line, two new wells were installed inNovember and December of 2013 to further characterize the movement of tritiated water along thewest side of the building.

MW218 was installed downgradient of the line separation to monitor forradioactivity entering the groundwater from this location.

MW219 was installed immediately adjacent to Catch Basin #10 to monitor for any potential leakage from this catch basin. Tritiumresults from these wells are listed in the earlier table. In the case of MW218 downgradient of theneutralizing sump discharge line separation, the tritium concentrations during 2014 ranged from1070 pCi/L to 4730 pCi/L. The concentrations in this well immediately downgradient of the lineseparation are significantly less than the concentration of tritium contained in the permitted discharges during 2013. Based on these results, it does not appear that any significant fraction ofthe discharges actually made it to the groundwater.

In October 2013, a temporary discharge hose was put into place to facilitate continued permitted discharges from the neutralizing sump, since the original discharge line was isolated in March-2013. One such discharge was made in October, and three discharges occurred in December, thelatest on 20-Dec-2013, about 9-days after MW219 was installed.

The sample collected on 30-Decfrom MW219, approximately 10-days following the permitted discharge into Catch Basin #10,indicated a tritium concentration of 69,000 pCi/L. The time delay between the permitted discharge and the elevated tritium result is consistent with the groundwater moving about 4-feet from thecatch basin to the well at a rate of about 6-inches/day.

The information surrounding this event wasentered into Pilgrim Station's 10CFR50.75(g) decommissioning

database, and another voluntary notification was made to the NRC and interested stakeholders.

No elevated tritium concentrations have been detected at additional wells downgradient of MW219, indicating that the concentration of 69,000 pCi/L is very localized in the vicinity of MW219, and becomes diluted within a shortdistance of Catch Basin #10. The first sample collected from MW219 during 2014 yielded aconcentration of 20,000 pCi/L, indicating the very localized nature of this event and the rapidreduction in concentrations through time. By the fourth quarter of 2014, tritium concentrations inMW219 were ranging between 591 and 1240 pCi/L.An internal inspection of Catch Basin #10 was performed in 2014 and determined that there wassome degradation in the grout seal around the invert pipes entering and exiting the catch basin.An inspection was also performed of Catch Basin #11, which receives the discharge from CatchBasin #11 before ultimately entering the PNPS Discharge Canal. Similar degradation was found inthe grout at this catch basin, and the degraded grout in each catch basin was repaired in 2014. Asa follow-up activity related to the degraded grout, additional soil excavations were performed in thevicinity of both catch basins to determine if any residual plant-related activity existed.

Fiveexcavations were performed at each of the two catch basins. Although several soil samplescollected near Catch Basin #10 indicated some low-level Cs-1 37 and tritium, none of the samplescollected near Catch Basin #11 indicated the presence of plant-related radioactivity.

Theconcentrations of tritium in the soil samples at Catch Basin #10 ranged from non-detectable at lessthan 540 pCi/L, up to a maximum concentration of 2460 pCi/L. Such concentrations are consistent with the tritium concentrations detected in MW219 immediately adjacent to Catch Basin #10. Anevaluation of the soil radioactivity determined that there was no need for immediate remediation ofthe area around Catch Basin #10, and all of the soil analyses were entered into Pilgrim Station's 10CFR50.75(g) decommissioning database.

Page 73 A bounding calculation was performed in 2014 to assess the potential dose impact from leakageoccurring from Catch Basin #10. It is assumed that 280 gallons of water containing tritium at aconcentration of 550,000 pCi/L leaked from the catch basin from the discharges that occurred inDec-2013.

Based on groundwater flow rates, it would take approximately 18-months for this tritiumto reach the saltwater environment at the Pilgrims Station Intake Canal. Over that time period, thetritium would be diluted by the groundwater flowing through the area, resulting in a maximumdiluted concentration of about 170 pCi/L upon entry into the seawater.

Since there are no drinkingwater wells affected by the presumed leak of this wastewater to the groundwater, the dose impactwas determined from ingestion of contaminated fish and shellfish that accumulated tritium from theseawater after it had passed through the circulating pumps. Using such worst-case assumptions, the calculated dose from this event was estimated at 0.0000000050 mrem/yr.In conclusion, the only radionuclide detected in groundwater during the 2014 monitoring effort thatis attributable to Pilgrim Station operations is tritium.

Although some soil samples near theseparation in the underground discharge line from the neutralizing sump indicated the presence oflow-level gamma radioactivity, such activity has not been detected in the groundwater andindicates the radioactivity is immobile and confined to the soil. Even in the case of the threereportable events that occurred in 2013 and subsequent sample results in 2014, the total doseimpact to a maximally-exposed member of the public would have been much less than 1 mrem/yr.Page 74 APPENDIX CCORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS EFFLUENT REPORTSTable 3.1-2 of the PNPS ODCM requires that if any of the gaseous effluent monitors areinoperable for more than 30-days, such events are to be reported in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (ARERR),

with an explanation of why the affected monitor was notreturned to operable status in a timely manner. During a review of the ARERRs for 2012 and2013, it was identified that such instances were not included in the annual reports.During 2012 the Turbine Building Gaseous Effluent Monitoring System (GEMS, unit C-3003) wasinoperable from 27-Feb-2012 through 06-Apr-2012 (40 days). During 2012, the Feed PumpGaseous Effluent Monitoring System (GEMS, unit C-3004) was inoperable from 14-May-2012 through 24-Jun-2012 (42 days), and again from 16-Aug-2012 through 31-Dec-2012 (138 days).During each of these periods of inoperability, compensatory sampling activities were performed during the duration of the inoperability, including manually sampling the effluent release pointstwice per week for noble gases, and continuous sampling of the effluent release points twice perweek for particulates and radioiodines.

In both of these situations, repairs to each of the monitorswere delayed due to difficulty in obtaining replacement components necessary to fix the monitor.During 2013 the Turbine Building GEMS, unit C-3003, was inoperable from 22-Jan-2012 through31-Dec-2013 (344 days). Also during 2012, the Feed Pump GEMS, unit C-3004, was inoperable for the entire year from 01-Jan-2013 through 31-Dec-2013 (365 days). During each of theseperiods of inoperability, compensatory sampling activities were performed during the duration of theinoperability, including manually sampling the effluent release points twice per week for noblegases, and continuous sampling of the effluent release points twice per week for particulates andradioiodines.

In both of these situations, repairs to each of the monitors were delayed due todifficulty in obtaining replacement components necessary to fix the monitor, and issues related toscheduling the repairs in the station work plan due to higher priority tasks.Page 75 APPENDIX DCHANGES TO PNPSOFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUALNo revisions were made to the PNPS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) during calendaryear 2014.Page 76

ML15138A373

Contents

Text

SUBJECT:

Dear Sir or Madam:

Attachment:

10.0 REFERENCES

Navigation menu

ML15138A373

Text

SUBJECT:

Dear Sir or Madam:

Attachment:

10.0 REFERENCES

Navigation menu

Search