ML16211A356

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:59, 29 March 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station,Units 1 and 2, Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Request for Order Approving Indirect Transfer of Control
ML16211A356
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/29/2016
From: Tanya Hood
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Sgarro R R
Talen Energy
Hood T E, NRR/DORL/LPL1-2, 415-1387
References
CAC MF8056, CAC MF8057, PLA-7500
Download: ML16211A356 (1)


Text

From:Hood, TanyaTo:"Sgarro, Rocco R"Cc:Ennis, Rick; Broaddus, Doug; "McIntosh, Richard Wayne"Subject:SUSQUEHANNA - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: REQUEST FOR ORDER APPROVINGINDIRECT TRANSFERDate:Friday, July 29, 2016 9:18:00 AM

SUBJECT:

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 -ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: REQUEST FOR ORDER APPROVING INDIRECT TRANSFER OF CONTROL (CAC NOS. MF8056 AND MF8057) Dear Mr. Sgarro:

By letter dated June 29, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management SystemAccession No. ML16181A414), Susquehanna Nuclear, LLC (the licensee) submitted a request for Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technicalinformation in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1387.

Tanya E. Hood Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch I-2Division of Operating Reactor LicensingOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission(301)415-1387