|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20209H6691999-07-12012 July 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirement for Licensees to Update Inservice Insp & Inservice Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Adition & Addenda of ASME BPV Code ML20203G6131998-01-26026 January 1998 Affidavit of RG Byram Justifying That Redacted Portions of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditings Interim Rept 739459-97,dtd 971015 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure ML20203G6031997-12-0404 December 1997 Affidavit of RG Byram Justifying That Redacted Portions of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditings Rept 739459-1-97,dtd 971201 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure PLA-4330, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control1995-06-0808 June 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control PLA-4193, Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-9-2 Submitted Ocre Requesting That NRC Revise Regulations to Provide Public Access to Info Held by Licensees But Not Submitted to Nrc.Urges NRC to Deny Ocre Petition in Entirety1994-08-31031 August 1994 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-9-2 Submitted Ocre Requesting That NRC Revise Regulations to Provide Public Access to Info Held by Licensees But Not Submitted to Nrc.Urges NRC to Deny Ocre Petition in Entirety ML20046A9531993-07-20020 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rule ML20045F7971993-06-21021 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Supports Rule in Part & Opposes Rule in Part ML20045D7461993-06-21021 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Disagrees W/Maintaining 100% Rate for Contractor & Vendor Employees ML20044F8361993-05-24024 May 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rules ML20044F7511993-05-24024 May 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. PLA-3744, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant.Expresses Concerns of Potential for Inconsistent & Inappropriate Application by Individual NRC Inspectors & Examiners1992-03-0909 March 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant.Expresses Concerns of Potential for Inconsistent & Inappropriate Application by Individual NRC Inspectors & Examiners PLA-3568, Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986 -1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a1991-04-0808 April 1991 Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986 -1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a PLA-3462, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Proposed Rule,W/Enhancements Recommended by Numarc,Will Provide More Stable Basis for Util Planning & Development of Future Power Plants1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Proposed Rule,W/Enhancements Recommended by Numarc,Will Provide More Stable Basis for Util Planning & Development of Future Power Plants ML19332G5261989-12-0606 December 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Industry Has Made Substantial Progress Re Maint Performance as Indicated by Respective Performance Indicators,Commission Insps & Plant Conditions PLA-3175, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants1989-03-29029 March 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V4001989-03-0202 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Program at Nuclear Plants.Proposed Maint Rule Has Potential to Significantly Undermine Util Initiatives & Direct Limited Resources Away from Real Improvements in Maint PLA-3157, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule Not Needed & Will Not Serve to Increase Commission Ability to Ensure Nuclear Plants Reliably Maintained1989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule Not Needed & Will Not Serve to Increase Commission Ability to Ensure Nuclear Plants Reliably Maintained PLA-3118, Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Rule1988-11-17017 November 1988 Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Rule ML20247N7531988-07-28028 July 1988 Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Requesting NRC Action to Review Undue Risk Posed by BWR Thermal Hydraulic Instability.Nrr Should Issue Order Requiring All GE BWRs to Be Placed in Cold Shutdown for Stated Reasons PLA-3019, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Nrc Does Not Fully Appreciate Impact of Rule as Written.Encourages Commission to Abandon Rulemaking1988-04-15015 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Nrc Does Not Fully Appreciate Impact of Rule as Written.Encourages Commission to Abandon Rulemaking PLA-2726, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Rulemaking to Enhance Levels of Engineering & Accident Mgt Expertise on Shift1986-09-25025 September 1986 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Rulemaking to Enhance Levels of Engineering & Accident Mgt Expertise on Shift ML20138A9521985-10-0909 October 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20027D4441982-11-0202 November 1982 Response to Aslab 821026 Order Requesting Info on RCS Leak Rate Detection.Util Preparing Tech Spec to Limit Increase in Unidentified RCS Leakage to 2 Gpm within 4-h Period ML20027D4471982-11-0101 November 1982 Affidavit of Wj Rhoades Correcting Response to Hearing Question on Leak Rates.Leak Rate Sys Capable of Detecting 1 Gpm Per Hour.Tech Specs Will Require Shutdown for Unidentified Leakage of 5 Gpm.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069D8321982-09-0909 September 1982 Original Signature Page to Sh Cantone Affidavit.Svc List Encl ML20027B2291982-09-0909 September 1982 Stipulation of Withdrawal of Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions Re Supply of TLD ML20065A9541982-09-0909 September 1982 Affidavit of Sh Cantone Re Dosimetry for Emergency Workers at Plant.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20027B2231982-09-0909 September 1982 Motion to Withdraw Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions to Initial Decision,Contingent Upon Approval of Util & Commonwealth of PA 820909 Stipulation ML20027B2351982-09-0808 September 1982 Affidavit of AL Belser & Rj Hippert Responding to Questions in Aslab 820820 Order & Supporting Stipulation Withdrawing Exceptions.When Stipulated Number of Dosimeters Available, Emergency Workers Will Be Protected.W/Certificate of Svc ML20027B2331982-09-0808 September 1982 Affidavit of Ma Reilly Responding to Question in Aslab 820820 Order & Supporting 820909 Stipulation. TLD Necessary to Document Exposure of Officials Helping Contaminated Evacuees ML20063A4041982-08-18018 August 1982 Petition for Reconsideration of Commission 820809 Order Rendering ASLB Initial Decision Effective.Exceptions to Decision Require Resolution.Commission Order Premature. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062J6391982-08-13013 August 1982 Order Directing Parties to Identify Person Presenting Arguments at 820908 Hearing in Bethesda,Md.Response Requested No Later than 820831 ML20058J6651982-08-0909 August 1982 Order Rendering ASLB 820412 Decision Authorizing OL Issuance Effective.Full Power OL Not Yet Authorized ML20054L5081982-07-0606 July 1982 Brief Opposing Commonwealth of PA 820428 & Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 820421 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Pa Fails to Prove Dosimetry Issue Timely Raised. Citizens Failed to Comply W/Procedure.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054L2841982-07-0202 July 1982 Brief Opposing Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision Authorizing OL Issuance.Commonwealth Fails to Justify License Condition Imposition Re Availability of Dosimetry.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J5611982-06-25025 June 1982 Brief Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Danger 820421 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Exceptions Fail to Comply W/Commission Regulations & Raise Issues Not Presented Before Aslb.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D0801982-05-28028 May 1982 Brief in Support of Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision Authorizing Issuance of Ols.Shortage in Supply of Dosimeters for Emergency Workers Clear & Uncontroverted. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D2191982-05-28028 May 1982 Brief Supporting Commonwealth of PA Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052B7461982-04-28028 April 1982 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A2751982-04-21021 April 1982 Exceptions to ASLB Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054C6551982-04-15015 April 1982 Response Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 820402 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Requirements for Reopening Record Not Met.No Showing That Allegations Raise Significant Safety Issues.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050D4191982-04-0202 April 1982 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Based on Important New Info & Recommendations to NRC Commissioners & Congress.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C2781982-03-26026 March 1982 Motion for Order That Applicants Conduct Complete Retest of Emergency Plan W/All 20 Communities Participating.Testimony on Contentions 6 & 20 Should Be Reviewed to Identify Perjury by Fema,Applicants & State of Pa.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C2701982-03-26026 March 1982 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Emergency Evacuation Plan ML20069B0301981-12-22022 December 1981 Reply to Parties' Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039B0791981-12-16016 December 1981 Proposed Transcript Corrections.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M2141981-12-0909 December 1981 Proposed Transcript Corrections ML20039A1951981-12-0909 December 1981 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law ML20038C0131981-12-0303 December 1981 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20038A8891981-11-17017 November 1981 Motion to Take Official Notice of Existence & Content of Listed Documents Relevant to Contention 21.Validity of Info in Documents Could Be Subj to Dispute.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence 1999-07-12
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20027B2231982-09-0909 September 1982 Motion to Withdraw Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions to Initial Decision,Contingent Upon Approval of Util & Commonwealth of PA 820909 Stipulation ML20063A4041982-08-18018 August 1982 Petition for Reconsideration of Commission 820809 Order Rendering ASLB Initial Decision Effective.Exceptions to Decision Require Resolution.Commission Order Premature. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052B7461982-04-28028 April 1982 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C2781982-03-26026 March 1982 Motion for Order That Applicants Conduct Complete Retest of Emergency Plan W/All 20 Communities Participating.Testimony on Contentions 6 & 20 Should Be Reviewed to Identify Perjury by Fema,Applicants & State of Pa.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20038A8891981-11-17017 November 1981 Motion to Take Official Notice of Existence & Content of Listed Documents Relevant to Contention 21.Validity of Info in Documents Could Be Subj to Dispute.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20011A2321981-10-0101 October 1981 Support for Contention 4 & Position on New Contentions. Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 4 Should Be Denied Since Util Cancellation of Unit 2 May Be Best Solution.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20011A2121981-09-30030 September 1981 Appeal of ASLB 810924 Memorandum & Order,Section 5,granting Applicant Motion for Summary Disposition of Portion of Contention 2 Re Magnitude of Doses from Releases of Radioactive Matl.No Basis to Decision.W/Certificate of Svc ML20010J6231981-09-30030 September 1981 Response Supporting NRC 810911 Motion for Summary Disposition of Portion of Contention 1 Re Radiological Health Effects of Isotopes Other than Rn-222 & Tc-99.Health Effects Adequately Addressed in Fes ML20010H7931981-09-22022 September 1981 Answer Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 810912 Notice of Appearance for Purposes of Presenting Direct Testimony & Motions Before Aslb.Consolidation of Contentions Unnecessary.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20140B1981981-09-10010 September 1981 Response Supporting Applicants 810828 Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 1 Re Fuel Cycle Doses.Also Moves for Summary Disposition of Portion of Contention 1 Re Radiological Health Effects of All Isotopes ML20140B1931981-09-10010 September 1981 Answer Opposing Susquehanna Environ Advocates 810822 Motion for Allowance of New Contention.Motion Is Untimely & Balancing Factors Do Not Weigh in Intervenors Favor. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20140B1651981-09-10010 September 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 14 Re cost-benefit Balance.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists & NRC Entitled to Favorable Decision as Matter of Law ML20010G2271981-09-0808 September 1981 Comments on Susquehanna Environ Advocates 810831 Filing on Expert Witnesses.Filing Inadequate & Fails to Meet ASLB 810814 Mandate.Reserves Right to Seek Relief If Intervenor Files Testimony.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20010G2981981-09-0808 September 1981 Response to ASLB 810814 Memorandum & Order,Filing Qualifications,Identities,Subj Matter & Substance of Testimony of Expert Witnesses for Contentions 2,6,9,11,14,20 & 21.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20140B4381981-09-0202 September 1981 Answer to Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 810827 Filing. Applicants Oppose Several Motions & Arguments.Allegations Re Chlorine Portion of Contention 2 Are Moot.No Valid Reason for Addl Prehearing Conference.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010F4541981-08-31031 August 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 7C Re BWR Core Spray Nozzle Cracking.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20010F5411981-08-31031 August 1981 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue to Be Heard Re Contention 7B.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010F4741981-08-31031 August 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 7B Re Cracking of Stainless Steel Piping in BWR Coolant Water Environ Due to Stress Corrosion.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists ML20010F4431981-08-31031 August 1981 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue to Be Heard Re Contention 7C.Related Correspondence ML20005B7991981-08-28028 August 1981 Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Portion of Contention 1 Re Magnitude of Radioactive Doses That Will Be Imparted on Public by Release of All Isotopes During Fuel Cycle.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20005B8241981-08-28028 August 1981 Statement of Matl Fact as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue,Supporting Applicants Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1 Re Fuel Cycle Doses.Related Correspondence ML20010F4001981-08-27027 August 1981 Response in Opposition to ASLB 810814 Directives & Motions on Testimony & Public Hearings Conference.Date That Correspondence Is Required to Be Mailed Is Incorrect & Only Two Aspects of Contention 2 Are Listed for Consideration ML20010C9811981-08-19019 August 1981 Statement of Issues for Commonwealth of PA Participation,Per ASLB 810727 Memorandum & Order.Particular Interest Shown in Contentions 5,7(D),11 & 21.Related Correspondence ML20010C8631981-08-18018 August 1981 Renewed Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 17.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact to Be Heard.Applicants Are Entitled to Favorable Decision as Matter of Law ML20010C8671981-08-18018 August 1981 Memorandum Supporting Applicants' 810818 Renewed Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 17.Michaelson Affidavit Sufficiently Addresses Issues & Constitutes Adequate Basis for Granting Motion ML20010C9491981-08-18018 August 1981 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Geniune Issue to Be Heard Re Contention 17.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010C0771981-08-13013 August 1981 Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Which Questions Magnitude of Facility Low Level Radioactive Releases.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010C1471981-08-13013 August 1981 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue to Be Heard Re Contention 2 on Source Term ML20010C9781981-08-10010 August 1981 Memorandum of Law in Response to Applicants' 810727 Ltr.All Parties in Proceeding Have Right to Present Rebuttal Evidence.Related Correspondence ML20010B3971981-08-0707 August 1981 Memorandum in Support on 810807 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1 Re Quantity of Rn-222 to Be Released During Fuel Cycle ML20010B4091981-08-0707 August 1981 Statement of Matl Fact as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue Re Contention 1 Concerning Rn-222 ML20010B4041981-08-0707 August 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1 Re Rn-222. Issue Should Not Be Relitigated Under Accepted Principles of Collateral Estoppel & Stare Decisis.No Genuine Issue to Be Heard ML20009H2281981-08-0404 August 1981 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue to Be Heard in Support of Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 7(a).Related Correspondence ML20009H2301981-08-0404 August 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 7(a).No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20009G9951981-08-0303 August 1981 Memorandum Supporting Applicant Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 3.Assertions Refuted in Jm Vallance Affidavit & Some Assumptions Are Contrary to Aslab Rulings ML20009H0251981-07-30030 July 1981 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 3.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists & Applicants Are Entitled to Decision as Matter of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20009F8371981-07-28028 July 1981 Statement of Matl Fact as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue to Be Heard Re Contention 11 on Onsite Storage of Spent Fuel ML20009F8431981-07-28028 July 1981 Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 11 Re Onsite Storage of Spent Fuel.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists.Motion Supported by C Herrington & DW James Affidavits.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19345G8391981-04-0909 April 1981 Answer Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Danger 810327 Motion Requesting Hearing on Applicants' 801223 SNM License Application.Motion Does Not Comply W/Commission Regulations. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19290G6301980-11-24024 November 1980 Request to Deny Applicants' Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Re Chlorine Due to Studies Demonstrating Relationship Between Cancer Rates & Chlorinated Compounds in Drinking Water.W/Certificate of Svc ML18030A4731980-11-0606 November 1980 Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Re Health Effects of Discharged Chlorine.Responses Due within Three Wks from Present Filing ML18030A4131980-11-0606 November 1980 Statement of Matl Facts Re Absence of Issue to Be Heard,In Support of Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 on Health Effects of Discharged Chlorine ML18030A0181980-11-0606 November 1980 Pleading in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Re Health Effects of Discharged Chlorine.Issue Narrowed by Intervenor/Sponsor Via Response to NRC Interrogatories.W/Certificate of Svc ML18030A1621980-10-29029 October 1980 Response in Opposition to Environ Coalition on Nuclear Power Petition for Commission Review of ALAB-613.Intervenor Petition Sets Forth Nothing Which Warrants Different Conclusion.Certificate of Svc Encl ML18030A1591980-10-27027 October 1980 Statement of Matl Facts Re Absence of Genuine Issue to Be Heard,In Support of Summary Disposition of Contention 16 on Cooling Tower Discharge.Sys Designed to Evaporate Water Daily from Towers W/O Radioactive Releases ML18026A3101980-10-10010 October 1980 Response in Opposition to Applicant Request Re Interrogatories on Safety Issues.Environ Phase Must Take Priority Over safety-related Discovery Per ASLB 791030 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML18030A1401980-08-22022 August 1980 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which No Genuine Issue Exists to Be Heard in Support of Request for Summary Disposition of Ozone Portion of Contention 17.Max Ground Level Ozone Concentrations Near Lines Will Be Far Below Allowable Limit ML18030A1431980-08-22022 August 1980 Request for Free Hearing Transcripts Per 800725 Fr Notice Re Procedural Assistance Change in Adjudicatory Licensing Proceedings.Prior Denials Damaged Ability to Properly Litigate Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML18030A4411980-08-22022 August 1980 Request for Summary Disposition of Portion of Contention 17 Dealing W/Ozone.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists to Be Heard.Responses Due in Three Wks ML18026A3001980-06-13013 June 1980 Response to Aslab 800521 Memorandum & Order ALAB-593, Requesting Environ Coalition on Nuclear Power to Inform Aslab of Extent of Relief Sought.Intervenor 800530 Request Must Be Dismissed as Moot.Certification of Svc Encl 1982-09-09
[Table view] |
Text
-
8 August 31, 1981 UNITF3 STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR iEGULATORY COMMISSION
(
$J!IkNo' -
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOA Tn f '
Y~
f9 In the Matter of ) 091981 m .
PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
)
)
( Muy*
) </-
and ) Docket Nos. 54I p
) 50-ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. )
) y &s (Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2)
)
)
g, K' i 4
crc.,., ; -
' ggg, > 3 I APPLICANTS' STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS { Eh d t'2 A- '
AS TO WHICH THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE P;.;c,;;;[h*cta IC8 TO BE HEARD (CONTENTION 7B) b T' M
~
o Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. S 2.749(a) Applicants state, in support of their Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 7B in this proceeding, that there is no genuine issue to be heard with respect to the following material facts:
- 1. In boiling water reactors ("BWR's ") , intergranular stress corrosion cracNing ("IGSCC") has occurred in the heat affected zones ("HAZ") adjacent to weids in the austenitic stainless steel piping systems that recirculate the reactor coolant and provide the redundant emergency cooling capacity.
Affidavit of Joseph C. Lemaire in Support of Summary Disposition of Contention 7B ("Lemaire 7B Af f. ") , paras . 6, 8. Cracking is associated with material that is highly stressed and has been weld-sensitized. Id., para. 6.
S$y';
$5?AE8EROhS8gi,.
PDR
t
- 2. Austenitic stainless steels are used extensively in the piping systems of BWR's such as the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station ("Susquehanna"). T.s this piping, the observed incidence of stress corrosion cracking has been extremely low.
Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 8. Only 267 out of approximately 34,000 austenitic stainless steel Type 304 piping weld HAZ in BWR's built by General Electric Company ("GE") have experienced IGSCC in 400 BWR reactor-years of service experience. Id., para. 11.
Nonetheless, the problem was thoroughly investigated by a GE Task Force and is well understood. Id., paras. 3, 8.
- 3. A study of cracking incidents for Type 304 stainless steel piping in GE BWR's indicates that the incidence of cracking decreases sharply with increasing pipe size. Cracking is generally confined to relatively low flow or intermittent flow systems, and cracks are generally located in areas immediately adjacent to welds attaching the piping to elbows or fittings.
This pattern shows that the susceptible nature of the material is caused by the welding process. Lemaire 7B Aff., paras. 12, 13.
- 4. For IGSCC to occur in steel in contact with pure, high temperature water such as used in Susquehanna three concurrent conditions have to exist: (1) tensile stress in excess of the local yield stress; (2) suitable environmental conditions (i.e., dissolved oxygen); and (3) a susceptible material. Stress corrosion will not occur if any one of these three conditions is absent or reduced below a critical value. Lemaire 7B Aff.,
para. 14.
i Stress State
- 5. A critical plastic strain is necessary for IGSCC,
- and the probability of cracking increases with increasing stress above the yield stress. Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 15.
- 6. Occasionally, there is a combination of unanticipated stresses which particularly affect small-diameter, low-flow pipes.
Lemaire 7B Aff., paras. 15-17. The piling up of these stresses, together with unique mechanical characteristics of the welded joint, can produce pipe cracking. Id., para. 18. Cracking
is only observed in very highly stressed lines. Id., para. 19.
Material Condition
- 7. In addition to the stress state, the material condition plays a major role in determining susceptibility to attack. Lemaire 7B Af f. , para. 21. Material susceptibility results from one or both of the following:
- a. Sensitization: A change in grain boundary composition due to very high temperature exposure such as may occur during welding or through improper heat treatment, or
- b. Cold Work: A high degree of plastic deformation of the material. Id., para. 27.
- 8. IGSCC has been found to occur in the theoretically most susceptible material, Type 304 stainless steel cold worked i from weld preparation, sensitized from welding, and subjected to welding residual stresses. Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 21. Other
stainless steel materials, such as duplex (high ferrite) stainless steel and austenitic stainless alloys with low carbon content,ars
! less susceptible to sensitization and IGSCC, Id., paras. 22, 23.
1 I
- l
, _ , _ _ _ . - _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ . . . , _ , . . . . _ . .
I e e Environment
- 9. Examination of the BWR environment has shown that chemistry excursions have not been a major factor in the observed attack, but that attack of highly stressed weld HAZ's is possible in high purity reactor water after long periods of time. Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 24. The frequency of IGSCC incidents correlates well with the number of plant start-up and shut-down cycles. Oxygen and peroxide dissolved in the water are high during part of these cycles and are substances which promote IGSCC. Id., paras. 26, 27.
Minimization of IGSCC Potential
- 10. The following actions will decrease the potential for IGSCC by reducing one or more of the three factors necessary for IGSCC to occur:
- 1. Control of stress. If the total magnitude of stress can be controlled to an amount below yield, IGSCC is not likely to occur.
- 2. Solutior._ heat treatment. Solution heat-treated material is essentially immune to IGSCC.
- 3. Controls in cold work, heat input for welding, control of censitization, and crevice formation.
- 4. Controlled environment with extremely low levels of dissolved oxygen. Id., paras. 28, 32.
Solution Heat Treatment
- 11. Fully solution heat treated material has been shown to be immune to IGSCC in laboraivry and in-reactor surveillance testa. Therefore, a very straight forward approach to prevention of pipe cracks is to solution heat treat piping after fabrication is l 1
complete. Solution heat treatment has been qualified as a method for preventing IGSCC. Lemaire 7B Aff., paras. 33, 37.
At Susquehanna, the recirculation system riser piping shop welds have received solution heat treatment. Affidavit of Walter J.
Rhoades in Support of Summary Disposition of Contention 7B
("Rhoades Af f. ") , para. 7.
Corrosion Res,istant Cladding
- 12. Corrosion resistant cladding consists of an austenitic stainless steel weld metal containing more than 8% ferrite in the final fabricated condition. Corrosion resistant cladding has been qualified as an effective method for preventing IGSCC; weld metal with 8% or greater ferrite when sensitized by the welding process is not susceptible to stress corrosion. Lemaire 7B Aff., paras. 34-37. At Susquehanna, low carbon, corrosion resistant cladding was applied to that portion of the recirculation system riser piping which was field-welded. The HAZ which will come into contact with the reactor coolant also received solution heat treatment. Rhoades Aff., para. 8.
Ferrite Control
- 13. Weld metal with sufficient ferrite level is not susceptible to IGSCC, whereas low ferrite ((5 %) weld metal can crack by IGSCC. Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 39. All weld metal and all type 304 and type 316 castings in the reactor coolant pressure boundary at Susquehanna have at least five percent ferrite content. This level of ferrite should effectively provide immunity from the initiation of IGSCC. Rhoades Aff., para. 9.
Limited Carbon Type 304 Stainless Steel
- 14. A change in the basic alloy chemistry can provide a significant increase in stress corrosion resistance. In particular, the kinetics of carbide precipitation during welding can be reduced by the presence of lower carbon, such as found in Type 304 L stainless steel or limited carbon Type 304 stainless steel with .030% maximum carbon. Lemaire 7B Af f , para. 40. At Susquehanna, susceptible materials have been replaced, where practical, with materials that are substantially less susceptible to IGSCC. Specifically, the recirculation system discharge valve bypass lines, all piping in the head spray system, much of the piping in the core spray system, almost all the piping in the reactor water cleanup system, and all the piping in the instrument piping and bottom drain, were replaced with Type 304 L stainless steel or with limited carbon Type 304 stainless steel having a maximum carbon content of .03%. Rhoades Aff., para. 10. Also, the control rod drive hydraulic return line, which was Type 304 stainless steel, was removed and the design modified. Rhoades Aff., para. 12.
Residual Stress Improvement
- 15. During the welding process, tensile residual stress is induced in the HAZ, which can combine with other stresses to cause IGSCC. This stress can be greatly reduced by a process known as Induction Heating Stress Improvement (IHSI) , which is applied to piping after it is fully erected. Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 38.
At Susquehanna, welds in all significant piping constituting the reac'_or coolant pressure boundary not replaced by IGSCC resis-tant material will receive IHSI treatment and/or augmented .
! in-service laspection. Rhoades Aff., para, 11.
ASME Code Compliance j 16. The original pipe components used at Susquehanna j have been designed in accordance with the ASME Code .,uich requires the design stresses to be below specified values. This limits the extent of potential cracking since high stress is required to l produce IGSCC. Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 43.
j Controlled Environment
- 17. The margin against IGSCC can be increased by 1
reducing the oxygen content of the water during startup and shutdown conditions, which can be achieved using continuous vacuum deaeration. Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 26. At Susquehanna, oxygen levels during start-up, hot standby and shutdown conditions will be reduced by the use of a mechanical vacuum deaerator.
1 l This deaerator is expected to maintain an oxygen content of less 1
than .25 ppm during start-up, hot standby and shutdown. Without i this deaerator, the oxygen levels would increase to about 8 ppm.
Rhoades Aff., para. 5.
- 18. An aqueous environment containing dissolved oxygen becomes more aggresive in a crevice. Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 27.
) At Susquehanna, the recirculation system inlet thermal sleeve and i safe-ends were redesigned to eliminate crevices. Rhoades Aff.,
para. 6.
Leak Before Break
- 19. Even where IGSCC does occur, it is unlikely to cause sudden, brittle-type fracture because of the high ductility of austenitic stainless steel piping. Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 9.
.. o O
No piping severance has ever resulted from IGSCC. All instances
, of ICSCC in operating BWR's have resulted in small detectable leakage or nondestructive detection prior to leakage. Id.
Susquehanna has a continuous on-line leak detection system capable of sensing small leaks and small leak changes. Rhoades Aff.,
para. 13. The leak before break principle has been verified in operating plant experience and detailed laboratory analyses.
Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 10.
- 20. The extensive program at Susquehanna to eliminate stainless steel pipe cracking has been developed and implemented since 1975, is based on a full understanding of the causes of cracking, and is directed towards minimizing each of the major factors contributing to IGSCC. Lemaire Aff., para. 44; Rhoades Aff.,
para. 4. Because of the implementation of this program, the possibility of stainless steel cracking at Susquehanna should be effectively eliminated. Rhoades Aff., para. 14. The empirical observa cion of leak before pipe breck and the installation of a leak detection system at Susquehanna assure that any cracking that may occur will be detected and corrected before pipe rupture can take place. Lemaire 7B Aff., para. 45.
Dated: August 31, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By M M " Mr7 Jay E. Silberd ,'
, Matias F. Travieso-Diaz
, Counsel for Applicants 1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036 (202) 822-1000
. o ,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY )
)
and ) Docket Nos. 50-387
) 50-388 ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. )
)
(Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, )
Units 1 and 2) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that copies of the foregoing " Applicants' Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 7B", " Appli': ants ' '
Statement of Material Facts As To Which There Is No Genuine Issue To Be Heard (Contention 7B)"," Affidavit of Joseph C. Lemaire in Support of Summary L5.sposition of Contention 7B" and " Affidavit of Walter J.
Rhoades in Support of Summary Disposition of Contention 7B", were served by deposit in the U. S. Mail First Class, postage prepaid, this 31st day of August, 1981 to all those on the attached Service List.
M' D Matias F. Travieso-Diaz Dated: August 31, 1981.
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA .
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1
3EFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY )
)
AND ) Docket Nos. 50-387 l'
) 50-388 ALLEGHINY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. )
)
(Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, )
Units 1 and 2)
)
SERVICE LIST acrotary of the Commission Dr. Judith H. Johnsrud S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Co-Director
>shington , D. C . 20555 Environmental Coalition on Nuclear Power (ministrative Judge James P. Gleason 433 Orlando Avenue 1 Gilmoure Drive State College, Pennsylvania 16801
,1 var Sp' ring, Maryland 20901 Susquehanna Environmental Advocates
. GlGnn O. Bright c/o Gerald Schultz, Esquire omic Safety and Licensing Post Office Box 1560 Soard Panel Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania 18703 S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ishington, D. C. 205.55 Mr. Thomas J. Halligan, Correspondag
,,,, The Citizens Against Nuclear Dangerc
. Paul W. Purdom Post Office Box 5 5 Gulph Hills Road Scranton, Pennsylvania 18501 fnor, Pennsylvania 19087 Ms. Colleen Marsh
,:mic Safety and Licensing Box 558 A, R. D. j4 Scard Panel Mt. Top, Pennsylvania 18707 S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ishington, D. C. 20555 Jessica H. Laverty, Esquire Office of the Executive Legal
-koting and Service Section Director I'ica of the Secretary
~
U' S: Nuclear Regulatog Commission S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20ssa shington, D. C. 20555
i
,___m____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .
shor W. M'er, Esquire Mr. Thomas M. Gerusky, Director spartmenc of Environmental Resources Bureau of Radiation Protection
- =onwaalth of Pennsylvania De, car cent of E".vironmental 25 Executive Ecuse Resources as: Office Box 2357 Cor..monwealth of Pennsylvania Errisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Post Office Box 2063 ames 10. Cucchin, IV, Esquire ffico of the Encutive Legal Atomic Safety and L' censing Appeal Director Board Panel e S. Nuclear Regulatory Cor: mission U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissi@
ashington, D. C. 2'0555 Washington, D. C. 20555
@Witt C. Smith irector ennsylvania Emergency Management A'gency acasportation and Safety Building gr:-isburg, ' Pennsylvania 17120 l
o 1
e
S O
1' e
4
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ __ _