ML20027D447

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Affidavit of Wj Rhoades Correcting Response to Hearing Question on Leak Rates.Leak Rate Sys Capable of Detecting 1 Gpm Per Hour.Tech Specs Will Require Shutdown for Unidentified Leakage of 5 Gpm.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20027D447
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/01/1982
From: Rhoades W
PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20027D445 List:
References
NUDOCS 8211040312
Download: ML20027D447 (7)


Text

.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD In the Matter of

)

)

PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT

)

COMPANY

)

)

Docket Nos. 50-387 AND

)

50-388

)

ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE,

)

INC.

)

)

(Susquehanna Steam Electric

)

Station, Units 1 and 2)

)

AFFIDAVIT OF WALTER J.

RHOADES County of Lehigh

)) ss:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

)

Walter J. Rhoades, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says as follows:

1.

I am Nuclear Group Supervisor Mechanical, Nuclear Plant Engineering Department, Pennsylvania Power & Light Company.

A summary of my professional qualifications has previously been included in the record of this proceeding following Tr. 1938.

I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein and believe them to be true and correct.

2.

During the evidentiary hearing before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board in this proceeding, I testified concerning 8211040312 821102 PDR ADOCK 05000 Of G

the steps which Applicants have undertaken to mitigate the effects of Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking at Susquehanna.

Part of that testimony cited to the continuous on-line leak detection system.

3.

In response to a question from the Licensing Board to describe how the leak detection system works, I gave the following response:

Essentially the detection system works by accumulating leakage in a certain area, and once the leakage -- the unidentified leakage increases by more than one gpm per hour in any given hour, or the unidentified leakage of five gpm in a 24-hour period increases beyond the background leakage, then the plant is by technical specifications shut down, and we go in to perform inspections for any leakage that may have occurred to ascertain what the unidentified leakage is.

Tr. 1940-41.

4.

My oral response concerning the one gpm per hour unidentified leak rate change was and is in error.

My answer to the Licensing Board's question should have made three points:

a.

The leak detection system is capable of detecting leakages of 1 gpm per hour; b.

The technical specifications will require plant shutdown for unidentified leakage of 5 gpm; and c.

The technical specifications will require plant shutdown if unidentified leadage increases by 2 gpm or more in a four-hour period.

--m 5.

The first point is consistent with the FSAR 55.2.5 and Applicants' design of the leak detection system.

That system is described in detail in the cited FSAR section.

The latter two points are consistent with the Staff's recommendations in NUREG-0313, Rev.

1,

" Technical Report on Material Selection and Processing Guidelines for BWR Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping" (July 1980),

p.

8.

Applicants had previously gone on record as stating that the leak detection system conforms to the require-ments of NUREG-0313.

See letter from Calhoun to Schwencer, dated September 15, 1981, following Tr. 1935, and my testimony to the Licensing Board, para. 4, following Tr. 1939.

6.

The Technical Specifications for Susquehanna do not presently include a limit on increases in unidentified leak rate.

They do, however, provide the following limitations:

3.4.3.2.

Reactor coolant system leakage shall be limited to:

a.

No PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE.

b.

5 gpm UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE.

c.

25 gpm total leakage averaged over any 24-hour period.

d.

1 gpm leakage at a reactor coolant system pressure of 1000 i 10 psig from any reactor coolant system pressure isolation valve specified in Table 3.4.3.2-1.

In order to be consistent with NUREG-0313, Rev.

1, these techni-cal specifications should contain an additional technical speci-fication limiting the increase in unidentified reactor coolant i

system leakage to 2 gpm within a four-hour period.

Applicants are currently preparing the documentation to amend the technical specifications accordingly.

An appropriate application will be submitted after required internal reviews have been completed.

__h h

as-Walter J./ iioades R

Sworn to and subs bed before me this day of November, 1982.

b b l+1 l)

}

NOTARY PUBLIC MARTHA C. BART0, Notary Public Allentown, Lehigh County, Pa.

MyCommission Expires Jan.13,1986

November 2, 1982 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD In the Matter of

)

)

PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

)

)

Docket Nos. 50-387 and

)

50-388

)

ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.

)

)

(Susquehanna Steam Electric Station,

)

Units 1 and 2)

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that copies of the foregoing " Applicants' Response to Appeal Board's October 26, 1982 Order" were served by deposit in the United States Mail, First Class, postage prepaid, this 2nd day of November, 1982, to all those on the attached Service List.

I' l'%

'Li AV

-r AY E.

SILBERG l

DATED:

November 2, 1982

.. -.. i__,

7

-.s.

'N s,'

y N',

's ' UNITED STATES 10F AMERICA e

~

, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

~~

IBEFORE TE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING UPEAL"EOARD[

In the Matter of

)

)

(

PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

)

s, r

)

AND

)

Docket Nos. 50-387-N

)

50-388 ALLEGEENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. )

s

)

)

(Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, )

Units 1 and 2)

)

SERVICE LIST Sacratary of the Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Board Panel Washington, D.C.

20555 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Thomas S. Moore, Esquire l ' Administrative Judge Docketing and Servic'e Section U Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of the Secretary Appeal Board U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S.. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20555 Stephen F.

Eilperin, Esquire Dr. John H. Buck Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing s

Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Appeal Board U.S. -Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington,'D.C.

20555 Susquehanna Environmental Advocates James P.

Gleason, Esquire e/o Gerald Schultz, Esquire Administrative Judge Post Office Box 1560 513 Gilmoure Drive Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania 18703 Silver Spring, Maryland 20901 Mr. Thomas J.

Halligan, Correspondent Mr. Glenn C.

Bright The Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers Administrative Judge Post Office Box 5 Atomic Safety and Licensing Scranton, Pennsylvania 18501 Board Panel U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ms. Colleen Marsh Washingron, D.C.

20555 Box 558 A, R. D.

  1. 4 Mt. Top, Pennsylvania 18707 Dr. Paul W.

Purdom Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal 245 Gulp Hills Road Board Panel Radnor, Pennsylvania 19087 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Robert,W. Adlor, Egquiro Department of Environmental R2courc33 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 505 Executive House

' Post Office Box 2357 Hurrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 James M.

Cutchin, IV, Esquire Office of the Executive Legal Director U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 DeWitt C. Smith Diractor Psnnsylvania Emergency Management Agency Transportation and Safety Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. Thomas M.

Gerusky, Director Bureau of Radiation Protection Department of Environmental Resources Comr.onwealth of Pennsylvania Post Office Box 2063

,Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Dr. Judith H.

Johnsrud Co-Director Environmental Coalition on Nuclear Power 433 Orlando Avenue State College, Pennsylvania 16801 e

J