ML20010F474

Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 7B Re Cracking of Stainless Steel Piping in BWR Coolant Water Environ Due to Stress Corrosion.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists

ML20010F474
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	08/31/1981
From:	Traviesodiaz ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8109100260
Download: ML20010F474 (2)

Text

, , ,

August 31, 1981

. k -

G .

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA j@ 6,b NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION L

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARo: "O 11981 > ~Q

,  ; .31 o, . . ::i.a .

In the Matter of ) t.. d 1 PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY oi l

)

)

and ) Docke~

os. 50-387

) @; / 50-388 ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. ) ,

) < a \J s g (Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2)

)

) -

g-J [J 9~

SEP 0 9198W 12 u.k%T APPLICANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMA OF CONTENTION 7B _

Pennsylvania Power & Light Company and Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. (" Applicants") move the Atomic Safety and Licensing i Board, pursuant to S 2.749 of the Commission's Rules of Practice (10 C.F.R. S 2.749) and the Special Prehearing Conference Order of March 6, 1979, LBP-79-6, 9 NRC 291, 328, for summary disposition in Applicants' favor of Contention 7B in this proceeding,which alleges that "[t]he cracking of stainless steel piping in BWR coolant water environments due to stress corrosion has yet to be prevented or avoided".

As grounds for their Motion, Applicants allege that there is no genuine issue of material fact to be heard with respeat to Contention 7B and Applicants are entitled to a decision in their favor on it as a matter of law.

hhO 5 I 8109100260 810831 PDR ADOCK 05000387 G PDR

This Motion is supported by the Applicants' Statement of Material Facts As To Which There Is No Genuine Issue To Be Heard (Contention 7B), and the Affidavits of Joseph C. Lemaire and Walter J. Rhoades, all filed simultaneously herewith, together with all pleadings and other papers in this proceeding.

As set forth in the March 6, 1979, Special Prehearing Conference Order, supra, 9 NRC at 328, responses to this Motion are due three weeks from its filing date.

Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By /N' Jay E. Silberg Matias F. Travieso-Diaz Counsel for Applicants 1800 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D. C. 20036 (202) 822-1000 Dated: August 31, 1981.

l l.

. .