|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20209H6691999-07-12012 July 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirement for Licensees to Update Inservice Insp & Inservice Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Adition & Addenda of ASME BPV Code ML20203G6131998-01-26026 January 1998 Affidavit of RG Byram Justifying That Redacted Portions of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditings Interim Rept 739459-97,dtd 971015 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure ML20203G6031997-12-0404 December 1997 Affidavit of RG Byram Justifying That Redacted Portions of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditings Rept 739459-1-97,dtd 971201 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure PLA-4330, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control1995-06-0808 June 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control PLA-4193, Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-9-2 Submitted Ocre Requesting That NRC Revise Regulations to Provide Public Access to Info Held by Licensees But Not Submitted to Nrc.Urges NRC to Deny Ocre Petition in Entirety1994-08-31031 August 1994 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-9-2 Submitted Ocre Requesting That NRC Revise Regulations to Provide Public Access to Info Held by Licensees But Not Submitted to Nrc.Urges NRC to Deny Ocre Petition in Entirety ML20046A9531993-07-20020 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rule ML20045F7971993-06-21021 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Supports Rule in Part & Opposes Rule in Part ML20045D7461993-06-21021 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Disagrees W/Maintaining 100% Rate for Contractor & Vendor Employees ML20044F8361993-05-24024 May 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rules ML20044F7511993-05-24024 May 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. PLA-3744, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant.Expresses Concerns of Potential for Inconsistent & Inappropriate Application by Individual NRC Inspectors & Examiners1992-03-0909 March 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant.Expresses Concerns of Potential for Inconsistent & Inappropriate Application by Individual NRC Inspectors & Examiners PLA-3568, Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986 -1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a1991-04-0808 April 1991 Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986 -1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a PLA-3462, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Proposed Rule,W/Enhancements Recommended by Numarc,Will Provide More Stable Basis for Util Planning & Development of Future Power Plants1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Proposed Rule,W/Enhancements Recommended by Numarc,Will Provide More Stable Basis for Util Planning & Development of Future Power Plants ML19332G5261989-12-0606 December 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Industry Has Made Substantial Progress Re Maint Performance as Indicated by Respective Performance Indicators,Commission Insps & Plant Conditions PLA-3175, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants1989-03-29029 March 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V4001989-03-0202 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Program at Nuclear Plants.Proposed Maint Rule Has Potential to Significantly Undermine Util Initiatives & Direct Limited Resources Away from Real Improvements in Maint PLA-3157, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule Not Needed & Will Not Serve to Increase Commission Ability to Ensure Nuclear Plants Reliably Maintained1989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule Not Needed & Will Not Serve to Increase Commission Ability to Ensure Nuclear Plants Reliably Maintained PLA-3118, Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Rule1988-11-17017 November 1988 Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Rule ML20247N7531988-07-28028 July 1988 Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Requesting NRC Action to Review Undue Risk Posed by BWR Thermal Hydraulic Instability.Nrr Should Issue Order Requiring All GE BWRs to Be Placed in Cold Shutdown for Stated Reasons PLA-3019, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Nrc Does Not Fully Appreciate Impact of Rule as Written.Encourages Commission to Abandon Rulemaking1988-04-15015 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Nrc Does Not Fully Appreciate Impact of Rule as Written.Encourages Commission to Abandon Rulemaking PLA-2726, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Rulemaking to Enhance Levels of Engineering & Accident Mgt Expertise on Shift1986-09-25025 September 1986 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Rulemaking to Enhance Levels of Engineering & Accident Mgt Expertise on Shift ML20138A9521985-10-0909 October 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20027D4441982-11-0202 November 1982 Response to Aslab 821026 Order Requesting Info on RCS Leak Rate Detection.Util Preparing Tech Spec to Limit Increase in Unidentified RCS Leakage to 2 Gpm within 4-h Period ML20027D4471982-11-0101 November 1982 Affidavit of Wj Rhoades Correcting Response to Hearing Question on Leak Rates.Leak Rate Sys Capable of Detecting 1 Gpm Per Hour.Tech Specs Will Require Shutdown for Unidentified Leakage of 5 Gpm.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069D8321982-09-0909 September 1982 Original Signature Page to Sh Cantone Affidavit.Svc List Encl ML20027B2291982-09-0909 September 1982 Stipulation of Withdrawal of Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions Re Supply of TLD ML20065A9541982-09-0909 September 1982 Affidavit of Sh Cantone Re Dosimetry for Emergency Workers at Plant.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20027B2231982-09-0909 September 1982 Motion to Withdraw Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions to Initial Decision,Contingent Upon Approval of Util & Commonwealth of PA 820909 Stipulation ML20027B2351982-09-0808 September 1982 Affidavit of AL Belser & Rj Hippert Responding to Questions in Aslab 820820 Order & Supporting Stipulation Withdrawing Exceptions.When Stipulated Number of Dosimeters Available, Emergency Workers Will Be Protected.W/Certificate of Svc ML20027B2331982-09-0808 September 1982 Affidavit of Ma Reilly Responding to Question in Aslab 820820 Order & Supporting 820909 Stipulation. TLD Necessary to Document Exposure of Officials Helping Contaminated Evacuees ML20063A4041982-08-18018 August 1982 Petition for Reconsideration of Commission 820809 Order Rendering ASLB Initial Decision Effective.Exceptions to Decision Require Resolution.Commission Order Premature. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062J6391982-08-13013 August 1982 Order Directing Parties to Identify Person Presenting Arguments at 820908 Hearing in Bethesda,Md.Response Requested No Later than 820831 ML20058J6651982-08-0909 August 1982 Order Rendering ASLB 820412 Decision Authorizing OL Issuance Effective.Full Power OL Not Yet Authorized ML20054L5081982-07-0606 July 1982 Brief Opposing Commonwealth of PA 820428 & Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 820421 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Pa Fails to Prove Dosimetry Issue Timely Raised. Citizens Failed to Comply W/Procedure.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054L2841982-07-0202 July 1982 Brief Opposing Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision Authorizing OL Issuance.Commonwealth Fails to Justify License Condition Imposition Re Availability of Dosimetry.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J5611982-06-25025 June 1982 Brief Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Danger 820421 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Exceptions Fail to Comply W/Commission Regulations & Raise Issues Not Presented Before Aslb.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D2191982-05-28028 May 1982 Brief Supporting Commonwealth of PA Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D0801982-05-28028 May 1982 Brief in Support of Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision Authorizing Issuance of Ols.Shortage in Supply of Dosimeters for Emergency Workers Clear & Uncontroverted. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052B7461982-04-28028 April 1982 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A2751982-04-21021 April 1982 Exceptions to ASLB Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054C6551982-04-15015 April 1982 Response Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 820402 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Requirements for Reopening Record Not Met.No Showing That Allegations Raise Significant Safety Issues.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050D4191982-04-0202 April 1982 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Based on Important New Info & Recommendations to NRC Commissioners & Congress.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C2701982-03-26026 March 1982 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Emergency Evacuation Plan ML20042C2781982-03-26026 March 1982 Motion for Order That Applicants Conduct Complete Retest of Emergency Plan W/All 20 Communities Participating.Testimony on Contentions 6 & 20 Should Be Reviewed to Identify Perjury by Fema,Applicants & State of Pa.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069B0301981-12-22022 December 1981 Reply to Parties' Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039B0791981-12-16016 December 1981 Proposed Transcript Corrections.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M2141981-12-0909 December 1981 Proposed Transcript Corrections ML20039A1951981-12-0909 December 1981 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law ML20038C0131981-12-0303 December 1981 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20038A8891981-11-17017 November 1981 Motion to Take Official Notice of Existence & Content of Listed Documents Relevant to Contention 21.Validity of Info in Documents Could Be Subj to Dispute.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence 1999-07-12
[Table view] Category:STIPULATIONS/AGREEMENTS
MONTHYEARML20027B2291982-09-0909 September 1982 Stipulation of Withdrawal of Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions Re Supply of TLD 1982-09-09
[Table view] |
Text
-- - .
t UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1
l BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD l In the Matter of:
PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO. :
and :
ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE : Docket Nos. 50-387 INC. (Susquehanna Steam Electric : 50-388 Station, Units 1 and 2)
STIPULATION OF WITHDRAWAL OF EXCEPTIONS This Stipulation is entered into this 9th day of September, 1982, by and between Pennsylvania Power & Light Company and Allegheny Electric Cooperative (" Applicants") and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (" Commonwealth").
1 WHEREAS, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board issued an Initial Decision in this operating license proceeding, LB P , 15 NRC (1982) (" Initial Decision"), authorizing the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation to issue Applicants an operating license for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 (the " Facility"); and, l WHEREAS, the Commonwealth timely filed exceptions to the Initial Decision on April 28, 1982, asserting that no full power operating license should be issued for the Facility until adequate numbers of self-reading and permanent record (thermo-luminescent) dosimeters are available for distribution to all offsite emergency workers identified in the state and county i
emergency plans as requiring dosimetry; and, 8209160557 820909
{DRADOCK 05000387 '
PDR
~
. . WilER EAS , in the interest of reaching an amicable resolution of this dispute acceptable to both parties, con-sistent with the policy of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission favoring settlement, Applicants and the Commonwealth have negotiated a settlement of this dispute, the terms of which are outlined below.
NOW, TIIEREFORE , Applicants and the Commonwealth, each intending to be legally bound hereby, agree and stipulate as follows:
- 1. Applicants shall pay for a minimum of 3,192 thermoluminescent ("TLD") dosimeters, on an annual basis, for the entire operating life of the Facility, for use by offsite ernergency workers responding to a radiological incident at the Facility. The model and manufacturer of the TLDs shall be specified by the Commonwealth. This provision shall include maintenance and reading of all TLDs, whenever necessary, by the vendor. For purposes of this paragraph, the " operating life of the Facility" shall terminate 180 days after the last fuel assembly is removed from the reactor vessels at the Facility.
In the event that the number of emergency workers requiring TLDs increases, Applicants shall pay for such additional numbers of TLDs, not to exceed 3,300. The Commonwealth shall provide Applicants with an annual statement of the number of TLDs required. Such TLDs shall be comparable to those currently i available for $3.50 each. The Commonwealth and/or county L
.aa.-. _ r m.~s z. - -_. .x-. = - - - ~ _ . . . ._e - , -. e .w+.
i , .
- 3'-
emergency management agencies shall be responsible for control, inventory (including any losses therefrom) and distribution of
- TLDs for offsite emergency workers, in accordance with the l
procedures established in the Commonwealth of pennsylvania's Disaster Operations plan, Annex E, Nuclear Facility Incidents.
Applicants shall pay for the first annual supply of 3,192 TLDs within thirty (30) days after they are ordered by the Commonwealth. In the event that legislation is passed by the pennsylvania Legislature and signed by the Governor of the Commonwealth of pennsylvania which provides for the assessment I of annual fees against nuclear power reactors, and in the event i
- that funds obtained from such fees are actually spent by the i
l Commonwealth to provide TLDs for any other nuclear power plant in the Commonwealth for any fiscal year, the obligations of this paragraph shall be waived for that fiscal year.
- 2. Applicants shall provide the Commonwealth with adequate funds to purchase 2,300 CD V-730 dosimeters (self-reading 0-20 R) for use by emergency workers in the plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone for the Facility. For purposes of this paragraph, " adequate funds" shall constitute the lesser of $187,500 or the actual cost to the Commonwealth to purchase 2,500 CD V-730 dosimeters. Transfer of such funds l shall be accomplished within 30 days after the Commonwealth l
orders 2,500 CD V-730 or equivalent dosimeters. The Common-wealth and/or county emergency management agencies shall be
responsible for the control, inventory, distribution, repair, maintenance, and replacement of such dosimeters, as necessary, in accordance with procedures established in the Commonwealth _of
~
Pennsylvania's Disaster Operations Plan, Annex E, Fixed Nuclear Facility Incidents.
- 3. Adequate supplies of CD V-742 dosimeters (self-reading 0-200 R) are currently available for use by emergency wor'ters responding to a radiological incident at the Facility.
- 4. The parties agree that the dosimetry identified in paragraphs 1 through 3 of this Stipulation are adequate to l
' provide reasonable assurance that the health and safety of emergency workers responding to a radiological emergency at the Facility will be protected. The parties estimate that TLDs will be available within two weeks and self-reading 730 dosimeters The parties within six to nine months after they~are ordered.
believe that pending distribution of TLDs and 730 dosimeters, compensatory measures provide adequate protection of emergency workers.
- 5. Applicants waive their right to argue that dosimetry less than that provided for in paragraphs 1 through 3 above are adequate to provide reasonable assurance that the health and safety of emergency workers responding to a radiological emergency at the Facility will be protected.
i
- y 5-G. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Stipulation shall not become effective until the following have occurred:
a) The Commonwealth has filed a motion withdrawing its ..
exceptions in this proceeding; b) The Appeal Board, grants the Commonwealth's motion; c) The Appeal Board does not raise sua sponte within-thirty days of the date hereof any dosimetry issues set forth in the Commonwealth's exceptions..to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Initial i
Decision.
- 7. The Commonwealth's withdrawal of its exceptions in this proceeding shall not be construed as a waiver by the Common-wealth of its right to take any action otherwise available at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Stipulat16'n at any time in the future.
IN WITNESS WilEREOF, the parties have executed this Stipulation by their counsel of record in this proceeding this Oth day of September, 1982. ,
FOR PENNSYLVANI A POWER & LIGilT COf.1PANY AND ALLEGilENY ELECTitIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
/ _
q
, .- r- / , ,
' ~~
/ BRYAN A. SNAPP, Esquire ..
' Pennsylvania Power & Light Company FOR Tile C \iMCNWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v ;
' ROBERT W. ADLER, Esquire Assistant Counsel L . _ _ _ - __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _