ML18030A441
| ML18030A441 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 08/22/1980 |
| From: | Silberg J ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008260487 | |
| Download: ML18030A441 (2) | |
Text
A ust 22, 1980 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~CCKppp~
Ups UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
~~RC Ojjjge g N
~OCjfpfjgg~ ~~CfggfJJ jfj'raegjf Se BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of PENNSYLVANIA POWER
& LIGHT COMPANY and ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC.
(Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2)
)
)
)
Docket Nos.
50-38
)
-388
)
)
)
)
)
)
APPLICANTS 'OTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY
DISPOSITION OF CONTENTION 17 (OZONE)
Pennsylvania Power
& Light Company and Allegheny Electric Cooperative Inc.
("Applicants" ) move the Atomic Safetv and Licensing Board, pursuant to 52.749 of the Commission's Rules of Practice (10 C.F.R.'2.749) and the Special Prehearing Conference Order of March 6,
- 1979, LBP-79-6, 9
NRC 291, 328, for summary disposition in Applicants'avor of that portion of Contention 17 in this proceeding which alleges that the 500 kV transmission lines to be utilized by Applicants for transmitting the power generated by the Susquehanna facility "generate dangerous levels of ozone that will cause more injury to vegetation than any other pollutant, and can also have harmful effects on human health."
As grounds for their Motion, Applicants allege that there is no genuine issue of material fact to be heard 80 0826 0 4 8 >
with respect to the quoted portion of Contention 17 and that Applicants are entitled to a decision in their favor on it as a
matter of law.
This Motion is supported by the Applicants'tatement of Material Facts as to Which There Xs no Genuine Xssue to be Heard (Ozone),
the Applicants'rief in. Support of Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 17 (Ozone),
and the Affidavit of Robert F.
Lehman in Support of Summary Disposition of Ozone Contention, all filed simultaneously herewith, together with all pleadings and other papers in this proceeding.
As set forth in the March 6, 1979, Special Prehearing Conference
- Order,
~su ra, 9
NRC at 328, responses to this Motion are due three weeks from its filing, date.
Dated:August 22, 1980.
Respectfully submitted,
- SHAW, PXTTMAN, POTTS 6
TROWBRXDGE Ja ilber Ma i s
. Travieso-Diaz Counsel for Applicants 1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 331-4 100