ML18030A473

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of Contention 2 Re Health Effects of Discharged Chlorine.Responses Due within Three Wks from Present Filing
ML18030A473
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/06/1980
From: Silberg J, Traviesodiaz
ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML18030A019 List:
References
NUDOCS 8011130334
Download: ML18030A473 (2)


Text

tNovember 6, <0 cc;; .-~

UNITED STAT"S OF AMERICA

"-7liC S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING In the Matter of )

)

PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LZGHT COi~EPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-387~

and ) 50-388, ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. )

)

(Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, )

Units 1 and 2) )

APPLICANTS'OTION -FOR SUi~lMARY DISPOSITION OF CONTENiTION 2 (CHLORINE)

Pennsylvania Power 6 Light Company and Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Znc. ("Applicants" ) move the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, pursuant to g2.749 of the Commission's Rules of Practice (10 C.F.R. $ 2.749) and the Special Prehearing Conference Order, LBP-79-6, 9 NRC 291, 328 (March 6, 1979), for summary dis-position in Applicants'avor of that portion of Contention 2 in this proceeding which alleges that the health effects of chlorine discharged into the Susquehanna River have not been adequately assessed. As grounds for their Motion, Applicants allege that there is no genuine issue of material fact to be heard with respect to this aspect of Contention 2 and that Applicants are entitled to a decision in their favor on it as a matter of law.

This Motion is supported by the Affidavit of James Rios In Support of Summary Disposition of Contention 2 (Chlorine), Appli-cants'tatement of Material Facts As To Which There Zs No Genuine Issue 'To Be Heard (Contention 2-Chlorine), and Applicants Brie In Support of Motion For Summary Disposition Of Contention 2 (Chlorine),

all filed simultaneously herewith, together with all pleadings and other papers in this proceeding.

As set forth in the Special Prehearing Conference Order, supra, 9 NRC at 328, responses to this Motion are due three weeks from its filing date.

Respectfully submitted,,

SHAW~ P ITTMAN~ POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By J z.lb rg M t' .

. Travieso-Diaz r

Counsel for Applicants

~

~

1800 M Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20036 (202) 331-4100 Dat d: November 6, 1980