ML20054L284

Brief Opposing Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision Authorizing OL Issuance.Commonwealth Fails to Justify License Condition Imposition Re Availability of Dosimetry.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML20054L284
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	07/02/1982
From:	Silberg J ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:	NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
References
NUDOCS 8207070342
Download: ML20054L284 (33)

Text

_______ ___ _ _.

Ja e

yOOY

-,.m.,-

u. 1_ D

,,,,. 1.s

2. n. n ur nc.c r._ u n O P r iJ a.?. "_ O Q '

G" p.'/ t..t. T. O r' T C A,*

T "u _.'. R.,

7.

M. ia' m..

a.

1

,: r.,,,. = ;... r,~,.., 3.

=o,a c,c

. ~

uv

u.. - t.

c..,.,

_. r ye__._.....-

u- -*.s-._ - - -

u. n.c -.

n. c

+.

.,e...

.~..

s i

W,,. Y t. 4 1 L 's C. 9

%CI.

Db, C/

J

., sz1avi i f-J,4 L rs o Li,b,..,

m J

)

s

)00-30c

,.,q,.v v...- ;'..~.. a.m777 T ' %' G. )

v,

+ C

.s.

v G.p r., G

. j

\\~,

t s.

.a u.s

)

2, 7 ;.--t

.,,c.,=.,

.z.= i c.a, )

.. c- -._t,...

a

.; *i n.

w,..~.

]

.,JJ e.

)

7., L I J D.._... c.,

.. _.,. -. - 1 1 V a, t- _..,,

, ' ' ' b. !

J E.1LE

..m c..,,..>..,,rm.

r... 7.. r_,.e.

n;

,.u2a

? T V X,?.. A' ~.~.

...'TT._.%.. - -. - - -

mr.: _.s....., :.c.

.r.

s c,.

v

i. ~ n 1 * ( 7 [t C n ' ' n. c n.1

.f n.

y :-

~q o-w 2

2 F207070342 820702 PDR ADOCK 05000387 O

^

we (n ia O

pop

y

• y s

e

/

e e

1

\\

J f

!?

8.

\\,,

f

.j

\\

. l 4, m

. n,, t, O.F c y 7., e s2-

/

s

• .l

/

4 *: /

/

/

-p,,,

. /

Table of Citstions'..........i................................i1 1

1.

I N T Ts O D U CT I O N................ :........ '................... 1

+

4 c m,, r.. e.., v 0 n.. e c. D, m:: t,.

v.t 0 t.w p..u.............z c, t.r w..e,f.v.,,. n. m ~e t, n.u.

.t I.

wa.

.11 m.

~

m 5

-^..

'" ". I'.

M...~'P.rIO"...c..........................................1),,

T.T.I.

i.

r#

.p

)

r y. G n n 'a o n... r'. ~.~ ".. 11 4

n.

..c C c ~.i.; o n. w e. a' %. '.e.D'.cc ~..=.

n

-r a.

B.

The Comonwer.lth's Substantive Ex.ceptions......

15 3i 7.

T.

c.,Jt..' C' LT ' a.C3A.............................................

26 CT s

v F

Y h

.)

I J

A a

1 A w

s 4

y e

.t J

4 8

mg

)

4 I

.,- a

• g*

l t

s s.,

l r

d F

\\'

r o

o

-~/-

?

,/

y f

.s

-w

.W

~n f r i

4

~

2 I

h

• f J

, A n

')

-r'

~/

e e

js_

~

(,

.P

\\'

~ '

p t'

... ~..

s 1.

r s

=

u.

a. \\

m

(

/

.,g

,e y>

g y.-

. t,n.

r

/

E.,

p-s,:

j j

t.a s

^

d

+-

g me eu.

f.

I d,/

'y k

e i

s'

..f..

y A

l l

f e

F l

%r

/

C.-

{}/

s=,'**

2 y

a,a M

f,l '

c s-

.I..-

,I.

e

t.

e 4

0

-m--c.

~.n* n.

c,.1 2... i u ' S rt n-m m.,, p rr...,.

1 u.

.-u _.u.... -

a_

C ec...e.w e a l t h Ed i.s o n C o. (Zion Station, Units 1 z.n o 2), ALAB-516, 12 !;.R.C.

419 (1930) 25 P o r t.l a n d. General E l e_c t r i c..

C o m o a n y--

(Trojan

. Nuclear Plant), ALAB-531, 9 ';. R. C.

263 (1979) 24

... r. c. n.

,._, m c <.

p,A, u,,...-.

s.

u.,_,..-_

._m o.-

t u r a l

.?ccurces Defence Council, I.c.,

435 U.S. 519 (1978) 21 V__i r_ c..i._n_ i a__ E ' : c t _r_i_c.

a n d P o w e r C o m o_a_n y ( ;or th

_ ;... u,. "uc'a.

o. c '< o_ - S u- * " i. o n,

'm*. u' ',. c 1 '. ~A

9. ),

m m.

A L.'.? - 5 7 3, 11 !;.R.C.

89 (1960) 24-25 L. - -

w.

.s a e v

?) C. F..:.. ; 50.47 pacsih i.-

c...r....

c. ~./::g,)

s, te 1.

M'.scellanecas c.

4., m.-uta=

th.s.

E.P,,

,,,, r i t e r l a,or, reparation s

/

nr-r.. ; -. O.'L 0 :. r, a 1

,.,a

-a_1C,.,

Ce 3,,-4 r

.,..,e4.C;,

...v

.w v

.s

=_ g.,.r -,: r.. o e e

.i.n

.c.

o +.

. _1

.r& 3 u,A p

u

.m

.r...

m. v...e. n.

n v-4

oyy t w

-r

~

c..i.C 'a' i

• r.a.{ p r. e 7 p. g ? < t *- O.I.a m6 u -, H

• n t.i e

{

4-r=

u-y. - - [.a 1

$.)')

' C k,

s.

• 7

• ( Y. Oe ',' ra. *

.....4."

~

f

r 1,

e

., }

J

.= " -=

L )--

4 g.

7--

m.

m

e

,19c,

.s a a u

~,

c.c. c a. C /.

. 4... r c D w,.,,,...e u:

,,.,,,y v.4 1

..1: a SUCLEl.R REGULATORY COMMISSION

- _-.v.

a n d L i..c e.n s.i n c /2 0n" 11 Roard

- - - -L e. ~ c r c.-.

t h e.'. t o n i ;

'et c

. p 1n u20

,,a.

C G

)

c rd y,,% s.uv n C,v,.,

~.4 0.,. D u _ m, t

-n LJ 7 p..un v,7 r>.. r.;.,

e s 1.;1,.

n, rs...,

w i.r, u

w u s

i.. e 2.

=s

+r,u

.a A

n - en

)

Dv"OvO T T.? ".

'J L" v v 2S Cat'.Dr,." T'V a',

PL

• r,f

,y

.O. r.p ( '"1. \\.r b'=

• T A.sL a

4 1 Rv It a sa a,.

s.

au.

u <. c a., r,nc.ri c

--i

.m. m u -. n.n, i, c

z.,.3,t.

....m...~

v.

v a..

<1n:.o.-

1 e r.,a n

L w

6 s

4v

h.,,.....,. m, b.,,

y I, / *.

iD, d h. fe (*

4A

• - f 'u b a A 1

.4

'd.T I'.J &

w 9

,-].'% e e a r* y r p

~..ralsp ym ? p. ? e

,p on;

• .7*

r +,.

a.

.% O v.

%. O.,

r-as..

s a

r3 p

.', i.-.

.,,3 v,

b.

p'i... s. s 2 La 1..% t i n s

1.,.

n.w JC1 IO..,,

c. n i. -.,, 12, 1 G. E ~',

'.h. a.

<t.

~... a' ~

.n' # c. * ":.".. n".

"a i ". c n.c i...,~

~

On :rd in this aroceedina. ( " L i c e n c i n a.

Board") issued an Initial 4 k.10 r im.....y-a m; c..a uu+

C L..- o u ;..

c_ O n a, ? u l' O..c,

4 h. 4 n

-,,ha i

m,.-,,c.-.,,

.3. r u, _:.Cn C.#

O u r '.'.:. & 4. a.. - 1 1. r_'.'i c c._ c-

. 0 *.

4. l o...

i -

S m _ u"n G '.* s ", u n.'4 a q ". 4 u o

i w

~

7.lectric Station, Unitt 1 and 2.M On April 28, 19 E, the I n. r n.

r s _.., n -.;,..

1. u g. n s),

1. _ h.,

O.r

-,u.s....c y... n...

p c..

c.J t uv,

,.. 4 i

.___--.m__._--

4 f5

• p p*,

u gpq

• g

.=r

'4

.7.,f"d v

'.%'3 W u s.%.."Av..e 4.m th

=..*J

.I f

(*.

. u.'. f%

..u.e.

. K

.h d'

g u.4-u 'l.

. y m

-., ep E.e..-e

+., "

e. n f,v,j.

. 2 u. t 4;. 7 m

s.-.

, u

_ [) f

~;

m

~

E e-g.

., (;-t.

uy

... e~ '.te

./' g; u. e.."t,,s..

i.,. r-.

4 i. w

4....'

. + - +

3. )_ U I. e

1--

-.... - _ - _ _ - _ ~

_ _. _... ~ _... _... -

5 i

I 4

e o

j i

1

}

1 1

4. x,.,. c _ (, A - - -

c.

n

,- ; A.4 i

,.- r.._. ; u q. 4. 2 n c, w

~.

A.

w... -.

c 4.

3 o u

,... r e g 3 q u u s.. n fu u

......i g vt

_v J

.i aO s". F. F..

r, 7.'I'.5('.'.)o

.f.i l o. #

.#. 4 ' ' o.

e.v. e' c. o "u i '..c

'o t h r.2 I - i '- i c. l f

.na

. ~

a a

l t

9/

J' n u 1... aa A o.1

.t.. G c3. 1 c. 3 1' 1 4.

04.

s c

"/

m..)..

O,,, n y 1 C n..;.

n _-., 4. c, 4 v u. --

a n

A q

u s y t

4 J" p% e.

o & f....4 b c f &.m -.* c._==. r (t

.+orp.n.ya r.

f

.c.. s om..1. i f_. c.,=

o.

A g S. m...m + r }.

4

..8

. es

m. qm ts e

.a.

u n.

Ar.alicante e n.c a s e the Commonwealth 's exceu. tions and rec.oect-i I

r

.- 1

n. p... i

• A.. e,. *u

• gny

.S. n a n n i c. a.

a o,,

t f

a l

I i

- r. w., m.., ;,

i ;-.., T. r s.3 73,3 p-n..

.v r..,- c....).

..r rm.

.. w~n 1r.

.J.

...u

. m 1

r." O

,, n u

.- c. o. m.. A

.A.. s.

s O..r..O n w o, l " h ' o c.v. - c_ r,; *c l' O G.e.,.i "

1' e An nn a

c

.(

a n.

a a

u _, r 4 S.w.. G C n., p p4 i n D.3 b.". 4.Ch n C-i e i. e..c. i.-.. n_ L, L1

.u

+. 3 e n..n.

es c-4 a a m.e.... E y

.(

ou_

f t..

i n '.' O l v t. d and the O'lideDCO prGEOnted.

Tne proceeding included i

I

t../ O U.i.7 tinct ' ~ ' ".L~ n C / Dlanni"." COntentiCnC.

Contention 6r r

I

._ -. a i 4-- -_p p.

H 4 n. n

~'.s-a.2.

1 pp., h c_.,

r. {.n. g

(' y.. 4.' n.

n_ g o,. ps*jp.

,4 C,_, a.7 v.

i t

-vu s

ut 3

n_..,, L,,. 4 C R, - -a v. i - c.:, a.. m..

,-. m u l

..,.t,.t,_

4.,. c c.

, 'L u.

m. c.

w n

c

• mm

. v m.~

t

,,... ;n m.v; y 1 m,. i e

.c, s

EdOCur tOly ICC00ht f C '.- nErrCW rO8d3 b

/.. --

b. - *.b. r_. r L Ls..4 4 44 0., S.

. J. c e. ec

-,J i

t n rJ (.c '

c,.

c =.

1 m

, 4... n.t. u b.

. u. u.

r e

a v<

.1

=u e

n u L ; C, 0,;.

C c.7 y.

3. t w. 4 n

r.

i

(,,. 0..

.. n m.. _ O G A

1 i

j 1*

.u w

r.. u 1 a u.; C) m oaua.C

On,f r.

s.

.u n'.,

-.,,,.n..

. s v.

l

.-&..c...c..+,

r,.,..i &w.4.. G %. w

.a-

_.. -.1 e s

.1.. A b,

7/

' ' ). n,. c, 4. o r..-

,.o.

.s.

v u

. e s

e.u u.s

... ~

._.4.,.

e.

1.

, d. n. 4-w.e

.'e.v.4., L [

4.

c - - n e i. o i ps..

O t

.',v 1,...

?. n.. t s

-)w..g-..

r 3r..

fys-u.

u J :... : y. 4. C, n.

n-

u...,.. '.

-r, c c.9..

,,,.,-4.,r

.. w ',

.ut',-

-. ~

n u

.x v.s

,s

.J

. a a

. +,,. c.. r e_.,- s.L.--

f-

..w. ; -,.. 9 c,, (, A ; -., r.,

r:

a.v

(.. i J,- -

u.m.

-. c.

u'.=

] :..4

• . ' r.q.v 7nn -. -> :=

---1.

? "w g t ( *- a. ] 7

• ' '. ",.'. g.e s.

. v

, r w*

P L, n,.*.

.:.;u4 3-.

1 [

pC

%. 2..c r 1.C

.-.n. A

< - ~

...n'..

n....

., w q.' m ". 1. p.:.

(+..

p*

z. t,.

-..m..--.

8

, v.

a o u.

-~

. b. p '

• O. O 7

b e-.

n*

y

.e.,rI..

..S.i,,.'.'

(= v 7,. e.

...1

.r.. r, #

e

.'b.

r

.s L vA 4

u.

g

--.t y

g p

a.

=,. e 9.

t.,-,

s t

p

--p

_.\\.-.

o. j i

.r s

h V

.h' gW

)--ee--y.

---e------

e e

. 6m..

.c. 1.f 4 11 4-e c.,, C *w l O.-

~ o b, 7. 4 n

.u.

m

.w..

.a m

c.u c<a en,.

c -.

a.. e.

t m

..,c a -.

ct a.

e... c.

< -..u m

trd c.

The emergency plan ccntained insufficient infor.mation en "the training of or the 2decuacv of raalc. tion nazarc sate-guares,.or o f f - s i t e e'-. O r c. en c v, wo r k e r S.1/

• e. v G' e -

.c.'-.'1

• • v.'.

o #.

C o.. 4 ' c_

'u t o '.

O' 4

• /

y2p s

u.

u o.

._. c The C*.e r *.* G C C V. D.lan D.rODOSed b' tis e A*DlicantC 12.

. Suff1CiOnt to aC5ure 2.

not

.L:cm7t notification and evacuation of L

all areas in which persons ray be exposed to r c.m. c m i o n o c s c-n in excess of r,u 1' m +.f e n

~%-.,c n.. m-, :

+rg

%.,. +..,.. ; e. 4. c.

A m s

.m s

.u-

.;...~

was.

r.

..gsa

. um w

.. 3 s n n..e.,}

c_, y e n e.. v.,-

e.,.. a. v. v ;.4. m<.

to.

w %.. p c

public rnd Protective Action Guides.

apeciJ1'Caily*

c a.

The plan fails to account sde-A,,, v..f c n

_.,.. r o....

. e

.nc

.vr a - :.

m nyerce went3.l e r c o n c i r :. c n c in t.ne 4

vicinity of the site.

b.

There ir considerable quection of the 'hiliry of ?cnns/1vani.?'c Office of Radiologict.1 Health to fulfill its ccsicned functions in the event of an emergene.t.

The ers e n r c. a.

p;r.ns. o

,s,.

o.F u u.. u

.s s. zu s ac s

-L.

e- %,

au

~u au a

n

,p,.. w l.4

... c

.4.,, s t.. c., * - 4e o

2.rc.

c6 gn,. l o ov.

c t. u uy u

,u nAv vo

-.1.

'I u.1'

• C L u " ^ ^s a^ u

.v M

.. O U '~ a

- r

e. O e a-

^ ay ae s

e r.,, _.,

c, m e :. c'. u n 's.

m' 'u w s t..1. p a*.*

v m

..m

.-- a.e m, b ' *

r. # # i U,.m 4

c, r 1 1 *.

t.

M.. C..c '.:

w

-v y

& u -

7:

A..s..,. ; n

'9.,,, i v. 3~

...c o y,v )..

a r

v s

....,uc...,a

, s e f e~

g,a. ne. s-4 e.J a.

~..e,.-

'r _ _m_.

w m

. r.a.

w.

..w

. s a.w s-w.

r* v..

..b.

f nUE A"

• .b. C2

[,7.. f.s%) ?.? (_, I..

U. e 9 v2 1 C 6.'

-.../,.*9, p

e w

. ~

r. e.C., *,-.

• Cgb.s. b.

, 4. e..J 4.*

ea b-~

L

-e.r

.,e e i., a e-stuu s'26 vs a u.. % C., w w

.. sky

-~ 4 2

w e *- CL. 'w.l J.'#.3~

.r V 3 'm.1..' V L

-^

'..*.rJ

-...L.'s.

w 6 s.,

(rrs..

2

b. c ; *

.s m..

1 J." C. 7 + : )

l

• C

.v bV A... w l

l 1

em 8 agg i

1

r_

l 1

e e

e u.., c

.r..- 4... ; n D u:.,3 4

..,:... _( * *.. 2

.t.

s s

..n. ;,,. b.. n.

4,

.. -, n n o.. 2

.3r v

- '. $ n __ c :

4.

,, v n u,.. 4 4 r.,,.

.'1. t sa r Os d.

,m;.. m. O.n.

r-k.,.,

c.

J r.,

->q e

.,s,,....,-.

,._ us m.

rn~.. ;6./ -.

... 1..s.. m3. w. u +., %.. n

-,., r.. c.m3

,m, _ m.. a.c. t.

_r.r ~. r n c a...>

.. m c

..g 1 ": w.i.

5.

a..,,. o n s. n. u.i. a.

c.,11 e a' o

. ".. c c 's. u,.a =. r h e #.

1 0 C. t". P..

a o

w in that certain of the recc.m endations and guidance 30.'7(b)

S

( c,.,

i_r.lo,- J.'f u.

r, s.,1. { C. tz ?

c; 6. n f s

m. e m.,.

• A m.5 o<<rr A.

v,v u u _

m p

g 2

u

. um

.s.

.v g,;,, :

a,w

. ;._.1 & w

o. r.).,.. u, a

g a t, n.. n.e.

& u

.e LL

/.

- y 4

uu

..u-

- 1 ;. _.

_ cJ 4O

.,C 4,. m

. nr

. c j

..v...w

-o n.... C;. a:.-.

.a 4 f..

,-.c..,,,n..L,.,.

7,.-. g. :.

~a..

. s

. 3-c.4 e L, 4, -.i L-r,ia

1. -.o,.

a s

,1. _. D C 1..,J.s...,

- -,c-l.:q,., i. -

e C.

ma.n 2.4

i..

v ms irr4. O 's.. r *.. Os 'T

..'.I * *)

' n c ;~. ',. v' 'w

'w' O P_ 4 b. o.

.i

.m 4

-. n... ).;. C.#

L' '*

'.'h..^_

m'..'.'o'u't"

O.#

u. n.. c

.a,

, ; -<a

.v. - - _ 7 o; cr a.._,,J -, < :. e

s. 0-

.--.".r-.

a

-, r p. +. a. r. 1 o g..,.1 c.~.. c..+- ~ n.,s ~.,/ i n. 4. ' a g-b. s.4. C D.

c

~

l'u,ld.,L-a.

n.

u..

1.,c u. u ;., c_ C

,s

-.v u.

c u

.~s.u -. C '~. ' '* "u u~ t* u' ' '~ 0 ~* O.'*

c_.,-,.,,.

, - ue,

..s.

u

&.>w.

e,

y p s,s s n. y ( A.

..m.'

p? e

.k

.od. bdd b

e 4

6. %

,m bd be a.

.s u'

.&s. 4 m.-. -

.'l...

y.

q

& i

• 3

e. 7

(.,6 uu G L ;_, r.-.s v

n.. h.*L.j,, Co g b. a t L, a. L. L.,.

...t

, n

c. '

,.n s.

o wv

.u

.4A-,-

4

. ~.:L -. a. 3 w.. '1.

't 1

, Us 4_ L..p 4

a_,. 2 o;

,J...... u _,

g u

a

s. n.

p = ps c_

'. i o%n i

-.s /

g L c c (A y r c.+.

e. e

-3 4

n s

au 4

i., n. 4

4..e,

_g.

7 b.

'n

-1

- ~

.n..e c o.n.,.y I;-43_

v..-

u 7

a s.

a.

s

&. g e.., v,.,2u.i p... ~ n_

.a.

c.,. t,.

.. r.s+....,

4 p

,.,.4_ _ Cs n.

• _ -;.uc e..s.

. _ - -. v'..... 4 4.1 r.

, i a. u e.',,.

.r

) g 3..

,G g, 3.

n

- - u1 u.

-v r

6 u s w.

i g.c

_2 g n -.., -...., _ e,

s

-_. ; c.- a.-

n.

p..-;.,

m.

-n e-

.a

. um T..

4.-

.. l -- ',-

-~

s.

r

.- ' - r i

s

.t,

,vs.

w L

.r.,,_

s.

f-

,.. 4.

,_c-

,/."'%

u.*.

i f

r s -._..

p

. v -.. w..

g wv.

.A ya g.m.

m

~

..a. -.

m.g-

.i.

G 9%

D sE P

_Ae p.

.g

. *. =

,t

..p q

4M

.e s2 f " ~I,w*')

.c.s.,,. _ -.

~. :'

~, m v..

~,

7 -,~,

. ;m.

{>s j

s.

. ^ C u, t

. ~.

^,_#..

~'

n,

,y 8

• -*h.;

met /

in U ' REC-0654 7/ had not men 8

A reviee of the tiro contentions shows th s" nei.her had any explicit reference to the adequacy of the supplies of emergenc" workers, the topic of the dr.isctry for off-site 2

Commonwealth's exce.ntions.

There is however lancuace in r

r Contentions 6 and 20 challengin~ the treatment of docimetry in u

. o +. a..v. i. o n. 6(") ~.'. n "w=.4. n n d * %.-

c..,. c - - o. n c. ": n 'u' ".. c..

~".v.c,

.. w s. n.

1 w

w u l ' n ;t'.

.io.4

-k..=".

e c

7/

MUREG-0554/FE & REP-2, " Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Ndiological Energenc3 Responce Plans and Prcpar2dness in Support cf Nucl:ar Fewer Plants," Rev. 1 (Noved er 1950) (Staff Ex. 7).

_E_ /

Contention 20 readc as follows:

The

.orgcnc;. evacuation plans submitted bv Lunrne Countv and the a

C ~... o =. 1 *. h.

r; # P a n. n.=. v ' ", m' "i.'m' o.n o ".

d comnly with the o.lannir.g standards of 10 e.

CFR 50.47(b) in that the recommendations

.w :u. o s u ;.

have not been anu guicance o.c

- 4., h._. ~. C *n.. r,..

cm-4c4 3C

.c c

n, t

%c, 4. l e f. 4 e C c.-2 2

-- c c

nor haO CompliinCe beer de2OnStrated through CCme Otw.9r aCCepC3C2G a,.terna-t.i.* e

.'.s. n. r_ a -.

c 4.

C

.a n 6

.%s CA4 4. e G

.f %

k

-4.

o

.9.].

n. 4 ".)

lp L..f. c '.

"c - C ;.S {. G.-.,

c.1.1' +j+ v%,.p.

4 J

nm uu o

v o

o.

. i o

c e,.,..u., n l' Ou.

ug.... ~n e

...:., -,-, u s

..at..

t.,,1 s t.

e.

..r. :

5 -..o

.. - L.)

v.

-,.n s

2_

u f---

Licer. sing Boar d in order to make the contention specific and litigabic.

The attachment, a 19-pcge compendiur of alleged q, L w w..,,,, 2. t c i,

u t. n %m ~.. n ~.. v,,. r, " h.. a r. o" 7 ".. a.. e

" o ", "% ;

.o _.. c, a a v y" w

o v

. u

~

m.

m o-w w. c' D " O " u^.7 c. A i" ' " G.l.' 'u' u'."s 'u' "

P..'. " 2.1, '031.

u y o ". c.a. *o 1

.n 2

v...-,

y -

-.s

.-17:

as

'"' '%,ut p h.. e g pm P.-, * {. n n ~ c.n. 4 7 1

.'.yQn*

p I.e.

h#.,e */ 6, 1 C, u.'

V. (s* 8..i e e.

.f. s- {

em u

C

.v.

~.... v u

uu oc

• h....4.

-.. 4 e r V C.*'. v^ " ' "a 4

L C + c... u 4 n n. v;-

b 2.:

- e.

.w

c. c

%1

- 1 0.,,.-.,.-e s.

..u,..

--v.

, - - - 2cu

-y<.

a

.c.;..; t.f. i o.f e

.4

. L.. C-u :w=

r

+

. v 'n

'_ i, i c 6: 1

• n,c-...- L.

e uc T. e. +w. n_ r r6 L ;, u.

0.,...,.

4-s o

v.

.ua.

.- e a

u 3 v

-.4 4.- g m 4, r-Le c

..44:.4 c_ A.

x...

c u

m. v.b.

i.3 u

.e. -., s e.. i r n.,

+w:

u,. 7.,

...a ovu s

-37.- - u

...t.

ns s

am e

u.,. v v,,._ n

.f,p_

._,, ; y p. - n - ;

U a L, ys.o.,

n...?, 2uA9 e n :

n

. y.,

n..

& c. n m.u

..a

.gy ep y

v

.a

~

s w

w >... '.r 3 p e n.. 4. O U., ~..

n

.s

. 1 r

k.

a. <, m. e ;

e. L

..;-.,%~

.n o,, ~ o..+

w J n

u I. u.

p

.e u.

A-v o....u n

jyt" a

& b. c.

In4L 4e7 Q c '* i e #* *" C p' i

-O

.s o ;;. ; a - U 0 ; 's.

...- s a L, b.,, u

---.,.e a r -.

4."

O.

7)

.r v u w, r..v.La n3

-c s s

The [ emergency] plan [ proposed by Applicants] includes insufficient information with respect to the adequacy of radiation hazard safe-cuards to protect local emergency units which may be required to participate in emergency evacuation procedures (emphasis added).

Paragraph 5(b) of Attachment A to Contention 20 stated UUREG-0654 REV. 1 (H. 10, p.

j

54) recommends that "each organiza-i tion shall make provisions to

)

inspect, inventory and opera-l ticnally check emergency equip-ment /inctruments at least once each calendar quarter and after each use.

There shall be sufficient reserves of instrument / equipment to replace those that are removed from cmergency kits for calibration or repair."

The State plan does not meet this reccamendation since it does not mention innpection, inventory, or cher;

of such equipment, nor doer it mention reserves Initial Decision, at 98 n.36.

Paragraph 8(a) of Attachment A to Ccntention 20 referred to Evaluation Criterion K.3.b of

• UREG-0654,1*/ alleging:

_9_/

Evaluation Criterien E.3.b states:

Each organization shall ensure that dosimeters are read 2: acercoriate

or m~ain-trequencies anc provice taining dose records for emergency workers involved in any nuclear accident.

c/.

...,.m. - - u t b,.

av te aw v

-g-

No mention of how this should be done in (the Stcte or Lurerne County) plans.

In State olans it ic generally stated that

.the Department of Envircnmental Resources shall be in charc.e of radiological protective and health matters but nothina., c.aecific.

Initial Decision, at 106 n.52.

In all three cases, the language concer ns the cmergency plans, and not the hardware i n e c 1': ed.

The Commonwealth did not sponsor either of these cententions.

Nor did the Commonwealth refer to the coulmetr issue when t.,a e L i c e n s t n a.

ecard a s,e. e c it to icenti v a

p2rticular "'.atterc on which it desired to participate.10/

It did, however, present direct testimony on Contentions 6 10.e On Auguct 12, 1981, the Cortonwealth filed a " Statement cf Pocitlens basea on Information Availabic :. c of August 10,

,c.e_lo in v,.n on it i n c i c a t e c.

it wou,_c introduce emergency plannina. t.sctimony but identified neither of the emer encv

.r s

.olannina. contentions as "cententions in which it has a.carticu-cc a docunant

~~Id.

at 3.

Filed with the Statement of Positions 1 :. r interest."

ntitled "Conenwealth Corr ents Regcrding Contention 20 in Consideration of Draft State Plan, Februarv 23, 1951, Draft Lucerne County Plan, August 1931", dated August 20, 1961.

Although this document reparately addrecsed each of the subiscuec of Contention 20, it mde no 7.ention of dosimetry a u.... &. 4..- A

,s.

.c... 3.1 4. e3. c.

C,3.

n gu.r 1 c. c i,

u k.. e w% -. ~.. c...,. 7 t 'r, n

n n -

~. u

~.. -.. -,

u:

~., c

~

-3_in_

• u n

_.. ; e.. :. q, +, m..., w... u

n..r v e

t (Le.

n.r. e,A Us

.. u c _ =. cs,,

t.

.swm m

. sa

.~s w -.u.1u;

a e

o1 n

t. p 4-

...e>

1 e. L + o

.,a r:., a w l. g...:, e c.

t, a-.

rf 3 r.

wp -

nu a

na

.sv.

.x. - s L. 2 c_.s.

.v n e o l.'o_ #.

"a v^ ' o_ n '. # r.. ".

n. '.c r.1 c i l,... v.. w.&.

.,. A s

A s

7... -.. c lg,.i c..

w v

A m

s my f_- ~ 2 e_ " C '; ~> l ".'. 4. ;

S c u a. c.

r

. 3 n.

e t...2

.-~:

o y

T v

.=,e

}_ _._

i I

1 4

I c.nd 20,11/

did Applicants ^~/ a'nd th e ';RC S ta f f. ^ ~ '/

i?

11 l-as Intervenors presented no direct testin:ny on those contentions.

[

l I

)

The testimony submitted by Applicants and the I

r Staff in response to these three dosimetrv.-related cubissues in i

i 4

l Contentions 6 and 20 dealt exclusively with the contents of the 4

i

ners enc"1 clan-,

nd not with the dosimeters themselves.

I I

l Swiren 6 Testi. mony at 5; Henderson 20 Testimony at 18, 40; i

5tiren 20 Testimony at 21-22, 42-43.

The Conmorwealth's r

P L

l b

i 11/

Ccmmonwealth of Pennsylvania's Testi~.ony of Adolph L.

._Belser, Kenneth R.

Lamison, Ralc.h J.

Eic..oert, John J.

Come" in i

i 2

Nsoonse to Contentions 6 and 20 " fcil. Tr. 25E6 ("PE'iA 1

1 Testimonv") (these witnesses represented the Pennsy]vania n p.r. r n ),.

u c.. m a n.u _ u s.

o.c s.

.c....n_ a..,c

w... - c_... c....... -.. _,.,

c.

.n

.r Pennsylvania staff Testimeny of s:a rg a r e t A.

Reilly in Respan.se to Cententions 6b, 20[5][b], 20 [6) [si, E [6)[b), 2c [6) [c),

l j

20[7][a], 20 [7] [i), 20 [7] [k) (1) (Emcr e :V Planninc - Bureau of

(

7.2diation Protection), fcll. Tr. 242-l 1

t

_1_2_./

" Applicants' Testimonv of Sc ::. 2.

McCandless on Contentien 62,"

foll. Tr. 2250; "Appi; cants' Testimony of Henderson on Contention 6(b)," fall Tr. 2339; i

i 3 r c. n I

"'cplicants' Testimonv. of Oran h.

Henderson on Contention 6(c)," fell. Tr.

2358; ";pplicants', Testimony of Steven H.

ol1

.:, o.;,.

n f.-.,,1. : v, a n 5.

g a n i n 6-(,u.,s n

1 Lc-.

onu. c, Lon4

. ew i,

.n.a u

1 79cti ony cf Oran K.

ionderson on Con:ention 20,"

foll. Tr.

?.,s n' 6 ( n.ri. O A n.r.e.> c -

.? q

..p.o

4. "..o n " " '.

uum o

)

k 4

.,. _. _1, - a um

._.s gng.u n c

• cA, a t, q u.

ch..m..~..3.-

1ai n _, ; - u i. v a ;.neu n 2.4

,y 0-q u

g v

m_

_-v

^ :: ',,- " '. e.c. 'u l'.... - -'. 'y' r,

3..,, e-,,..:- 1. n. ; r.

( c O n - c-4. ;au.on oj,n c _w -1.

Tr.

u es 4.

~

w i. ;

j

~...g

..,2

.v..= ". 3..m.4 n "

M' y~o i v "v.. e. t'. s e c=. ' N.... ~: c_.'. ;"

k r #

... U C t=

J.

Sw4.En o.'

n#

c

~

w v 2.

r" r.. i:1G o.n.

Q.c r C.4 - c.

r... n e. e.; c q..; -> 1.. m,n 3.4.n. ~y F o r,,.- c. m.. w. g n.

6,n f.c.1 1.

1

.s uu

. s v

l

_. mv_

. c 'm.i..=_.r. c#

~_%m

( " w ;. n.,.. t; %.iuop.e,ns,,.

n _ = _:. 3,... g :.

v m

m

-.m;

.U. <..r. y- -. g m-. n_.. :.

n,g,a; e m.. e._ : # c 4...

e p.

.s.

~ e n n j, O r. A c. v - 1_

?..,_,_r-..:*.-.

.s

: :.r.ing -- Contention 20,"

foll. Tr. 2671 ("Swiren 20

..%,..4,-

,,,g

.,c.<.,_

.,....<... m...,n 3,.

%.og<_-_,.

v,.

1

...b

..c_,..

P-"-

....j i..e; w.

.....v..y 4

v

?,$-_>..*._.

L" r ' * " *s' 4.

r es t 4 *

• 4.1 L"! r # r_. u c..- -.

~~

• vu sm.

• 3.,s.

u'm 4 - n_ 4u uq. i.

-3. A

k..

5. h. ; s

_e =. u u-3

."c.'.

u"rJ L'. *.E 1,

L _ ' '.. ';

• 4 '.t#1

's C. #.'m

.4 4.k. r_

I * *. *',..e.. n 7.

1 L....-.f_,

-.4

,_ ~.. n, y.

7_, o.,. ':

.a-J m.

.uL v

(

+ - r-e.-. m. : z_. '. _.,.'. _.,.

T. 4.~. c n.e..~.

n.c

..>c-y, c,

1. } c A

__c l

....'...a.y

-c l.1

- r.

~. e, ;,..

9..~ 0.2.i - C't 3'.

I v

e-r

~_.3 a u v-s au

.. w va 1

1 i

i f

n

- - - - ~ _.. _ _ _ - _ - - _. _ -, _

o testimony, however, went beyond the wording of the contentions and in passing mentioned the actual acailability of the dosimetera.

PEMA Testimony at 19-20, 32.

Of the 59 pages of written testimony submitted by the Commonwealth, Only two sentences discussed the availability of dosimeters.14/

At the evidentiary hearincr one of the Common'.aalth's witnesses orally repeated the substance of these two sentences and was asked one cuestion about it on cross-examination.

Tr. 2607, 2625 (Belser).

The Staff's Federal Emergency :tanagement Agency

(" FEMA") witness presented some additional oral testimony in response to the Commonwealth's oral testimony, was asked a few cuections by Applicants and the Licensing Board, and was cross-examined by the Commonwealth.

1*/

The sentence; read as followr:

Although a partial predistribution by PE!iA of the CD V-730s [one of the two types of self-reading c,.

,..:.,, e < - 1;e+e. :,

+u.m a

e

... u Commonwealth 's plan] will be made, the Cormonwealth does not have a supply of TLDs that can be predis-u u..:

-.-umuv uO u.u. n. e. m.,, + l n e

,u

- ; u,, ue; v-..m

=

u e

u time.

A rea.uest has been made by PEMA to the Federal Emergency anagement Agency in Washington to provide the 730's and TLDs needcd for predistribution (including a reserve run.olv) tc affected counties around Ell nuclear

• n h_ ' s s, y l "v - a. *4 *

,+% : %a 4 a+a n

,:-iew c,.

w c

u.

-wu4

.+w.

A' O.

- ;.p

• r*'.

m s.

,4.

- u.e t.a s

. r.a ;

n

.v a-t* ~,

s C-

o 9

I' r. 2672-3, 2676-9, 2690-1, 2698-2700 (Swiren).

Such is the

" ex t-3 n s i v e " evidence on this issue Comoare Commonwealth Brief u

5.

4 It was only after the hearing was completed that the Commonwealth for the first time suggested that a license conaition for dosimetry sup lies should be impcsed.

The Cocmenwealth's "Lroposed findings called for a condition that:

do full power operating licence shall be issued until the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, in concultation with the Federal E::.e r o e n cv. Manacement Ac.oncv finds s

.u rhat adecuate numbers of self-reading and permanent record

(

nt.,

o1 n,4,,n..,, e,,4.)

c o.,; 1.a r.e c_ & a,

e

.m w

.w concistent with applicable federal g u id a n c te, are available for distrioution to all offsite OCOrgency Wor,de!~ ic +:n t l f lec in tD G

3,n c V plans aS s~.Ote and countV

^~

- c...,. 4. - 4 n. a.

d o c _4

.,c_.'_.... _

t ~y,,. 4 ~u n.. uw ~c w -.., q ej pa1 *

'n-in 2.

w.: "- a Ns s - d o a.i..r.*.r "j ie-"a.

4a7 e

L a

e r

..u.

s.

~

f i nd ina. s,1 A / oepcsed this condition in their 2'

their.nrococed repi'. findingn.'7/

1

' '1 "4. w. ". "; a o '.

54 u.1 w '..

n..e p a_ n.e. - n, - =.. n. 4.

o..r. C

• o.r =. 5

.e s

in/

n z

e won-n.. e,,e a._.

y s

4a

m a

j Fact cnd Conclusions of Law, dated December 7,

1981, at 17.

The Co*T.onwealth O l s o _Dr o.O O s e d two other licence Conditions

,c s. w:. u.

n...,

u n....,..

.s e c,J n_

a. n.,. c...

i 1.6/

Arrlicants' Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions 4,

-a.., u...

v..

c _c-

.4:

u. c 3., o.,,. g..,3 c.

n, uit m.a..

_.c.,.

_ ; c n,

o <.

.c..

. a

.s c..

-c.

.. Oy

~, C -,

sb,

31.

v.-

-.i, a.1 a.e.

o.c r

..,.- n.1 y.'l

.c-

.,e_ v.i...

m,3

b.. t,.

.O

,.,.,.o., o. O

1... i t.

i 7 -- e

-s,,_

.n..r.

_A__s../

.L

.~..v b*

• • D b8'

'"g f F1f."

8.

[

j

G***"]*

.g.

N L4

- a v.

v.

w.,

-. w.I"e

..[

v

.'8.".9

/] {

'^G'" " 'U G

. a,

%e

.a.-,b.+ v[ y '.,

f, n9 a

f*

s w"

-..a

=%

-s s,.. v. r

,y-

j t

i i

1

.n-v om. Cs.". a I.e I.

m u. -,.

.u t

t m.

4 1

4 The Commonwealth's five exceptions raise two I

t j

eeneral issues concerning dosimeters.

The first is crocedural i

i

-- whether the Licensing Ecard erroneously failed to rule on i

I the Commonwealth's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of 1

1 l

law on the availability of dosimeters (Exception 1).

The t

'second i.s substantive -- should the full power o.noratina j

1 licenses for Susquchanna be conditioned on the availability of 4

l 1

" adequate numbers" of dosimeters for off-site emergency workers a

i a

2 -).

(s_xceptions 3

i l

e A.

The Commonwealth's Precedural Exce_otion i

)

The Com: onwealth 's first exception states:

l (1)

The Board erred as a l

matter of law in failing to consider and to rule upon the Commonwea., tn., s proposec rinoings of fact and conclusions of law reaardina th e availability of a

dosimetry for off-site emergency I,

workers (Cor.monwealth 's Procosed J

Findings 20-29).

Initial Decision j

at 29-40.

1 l

A reading of thic exception und the Commonwealth's supporting i

i l

L brief would lead one to believe that the Licensing Board 1,

totally ignored the docimetry issue.

In fact, the Initial l

Decision included five findings relating to dosimetry.

i 1

i i

4 r

i

{ :

1

'l I

i 3

e--

._-,..--w-..-em-.m.-. -

_,-,w.m-,-r.

..w.,r--,

mm,y,

...~ - _-.

i 4

I i

~

00.

The criteria of e

I NUREG-0654 recommends that for radiation exposure control both I

i self-reading and permanent record

]

type dosimeters should be distribu-ted to emergency workers.

-(Staff l

Ex.

7, K.3.A, p.

67.)

l 91.

Although there is no

,i requirement in NRC regulations, both State and local government plans call for three dosimeters to 4

be distributed to emergency l

workers.

(Belser et al.,

ff. Tr.

,i 2586 at 9 19; Swiren Testimony, 2

Tr. pp. 2693-99.)

i i

f 92.

The State has identified l

a shortage cf dosimeters statewide.

l (Eelser Testimony, Tr. p.

2607; l

Swiren Testimony, Tr. p. 2679.)

i i

93.

In order to obtain the i

necessary number of dosimeters, the State will either have to purchase l

them er the Applicants will, or l

they will have to r"

obtained on a i

loan basis.

Anoth-alternative is to allocate the ex ; _ _ :.g limited State supply to provide an apprcxi-i mate amount of coverage.

(Swiren estimony, Tr. pp. 2672-73.)

l 8

m l

I 94.

An adequate supply of dosimeters should be distributed prior to the existence of an er.ergency.

(Ibid, pp. 2676-77.)

t Initial Decision at 71.

These findings contradict the i

Cc=monwealth': claim that the Licencing Board refused to rule en tne :ssue.

1 The Cormonwealth's ccmplaint is specifically portion of the Opinion section of the Initial i

I di ected to u I

l Decision.

At psges 39-40 of the Initial Decision, the

,1 l

l t 4

i 4

4 6

I 1

YrM--gy W ygg.

__ue<e-wwaleam y

p.ryvy wyg m 9 g e4t-A--w p..m,,

~,eewwey wp, w

--+,-<s----,--,,.v---,

m r--

--m+

i--,i--

,4e,---

1 u

w.-

o w

- + o... v.~. b~ v..' 5. ' v

.v ^ ~ " o ~ "v

.# c A"

- v...- a, 4 c c uc

.d

~.'. o c

3a

6. rA e

. s. L c..,

.4

=

1-i.a y

^*

=^

~'..c

'.u u =.... =.. '.a' c "m e.r -

n

'u t.". ";

1. i u'_.'. o_

" O m^ '. ' c..

"s ". ~ =. ~ ~... - _ ';.

.s

.f incd the issue as "Whetrer the federal governr.ent has the

tsponsibility to furnish the necessarv e q u ie' men t. "

It then st=2ted tha t the " dispute cannot be resolved here cince it presents a matter beyCnd cur domain."

It based this Conclusion er a dc t c r:a in a t i on ts..a t no contention caait witn t.ne responcl-nd m5.. u' 'w

.k. e C o...O n w o_ =_ _1 'm h.". : d a_;34 y

O.

.c.,.g... ; q q e a.;. # r_.r. a-c J

y ;

w fa110C to ralSe tne ICCue Cr itS OWn.

In One TGEpectr ADDliCOnts rec.DeCtfull.? diSac.ree 7.[ epa

'7. ;

• h.. n.

?

T. h p-

~O7v5 a x c e n -.i..o.p; an 4

T 4^

c.

.,. i.. h.

F )d E.s u D u-" Q y p e.g.;

Ls a_u s

u s

.w C Z.* 3 C n W 3 a l t h is DCO, aC ChEr3CteriZed by the Licensing Board, Whether th G feCOral goverr..Gnt has the r e SO O n S ib il i tV. to SUDpl.y 1

. c S,3L2

4. e.

4 c a.n., C" b..a r_ 'v h. n_..

t4". e-m.; _ c e_ r c

%.. c L O.-

o....n e _1

)) t

~

c

. -, (

, $ a.

.- u o.u w--

u.

.n 11CenseC O.n a r a t i n "2 GnO'l,j C be COnCitlCnea On COGimetrV belnD a

4 c^^1

4. y rs +'

• q r.

c q t

• s \\r - - y g - ;. ',. e' 4 4...

'LQ u e

--yyAlu-,

v. e. c; c,. - A 1 c. g 3 c..-

7

• m4 r

.s-~.

-a

- -. s

.,j o h

&. L. p C O....~n n vi c.*. ' *w h

• h v. +w W.e I n.4 - i G 'A e

A.

A w

L

'-.9 4 C c+. n

-a y< m ev.1 L

q., v., p

- q

.- h.. p 4 C e L1,L.

uip11 C.b -. 9i n u C*.- p.e.-

A u. rS.a

[.4 v=..=.

D

.,u 1' e E

, -* c 1a

., p r= L s. 2....;

~t m

u

.aa w.

.o-t

.c

.v m

-...a 2 2 -.4 e.

T L. n

1.. e -

+ b

.A.. O t,. c

,m.s..- n.r u. L. a t.3 4

u.4c

?. v.. e,2..n.,.

n

...p a

q.leStiOn. T4 i ch must bG CddreSSed iS UhethGr the liCOnSe l

1 C c..m... g j1 p a _,w-b

f. : 1.'L e.

p. 4

• h.. 4 3

• b.,.a el e-44 ivn r e n. Q c n_ A

h..

e-g. p a

a.....

w a m C D, e n

n ie y.~;

m; m

..v..m O

Ehe '. m i i. t e CODIentkCnC.

3 Ihi3 rC8peCIy ?.pp iCant3 e.. -,.. n.

g.:

.'q

4. b.. c.,

c'p -.. e n g a.

b...

c..

. o,

4. 'q 4.3 r

,, z., n. C._. r,. '..

4.: mo;.. -

t.

. s.)

t o.

-g.

.u.

N,i.

f.' p

'u.. % '---

b b. a

( ^w.*. *u f. N.. 'u. P *. C hQ

. ~

.On TT.

e b.. n.i.' &

$. " *y ^.-.!. w" s e.. '- ~

.Q r,.- w 9

-F

r a

s. -- b.py v -.r. e... r p

.?

06

'n.4

...s-1 p

s 4,

- 1

.].

4.

b..

& b.,

-p S*

wheyy v

,a w

w su.

w 1)~

i i

,1 1

4 1

i f,

Contenticnc 6(c) and 20, to the extent that they concern i

I docimeters, deal with the treatment of dosimetry in the energency plans.

_cince t.nere was neitner a contention nor a sua sconte issue on the adecuacy of the available dosimetry 4

s u t o. l i e c, the Licensing Board's reasoninc. correct 1v ac.olies.

c.

he Licensing Board properly restricted its decision to matters I

put in controversy by the parties and matters w. thin its sua i

l sponte jurisdiction.

10 C.F.R. S 2.760a.

As discussed above, the Commonwealth did not, in advance of the hearing, indicate 4

1

.i, any interest in the dosimetrv sun.o.lv issue.

See n.10 supra.

f The issue, correctly characterized, was "bev.ond [the Licensing Board's] domain."

Initial Decision at 39.

The Co.nonwealth's attempt to read into Contention

...i. ^..#

u' +.-

'1' 0.,.i s

.n. r1 s: c o v' c.m...- "or d o " 4 '... o. *. "u _v c " y".D.' '.,

i**

no t e w o r t.,1v tor its t a l.t u r e to olscuc.

e contention itsel,.

t I

iihile the Commonwealth discusces the lanc.uac e of the

.lanninc. r e c. u l a t :..ons anc p

,..u. R r.,, - O c a.,., 1 i.orn : s s ion, c e=e r c. e nc.y o

o is inexo.licabl-silenc when it concs to the languace of the i

)

,,,,..c,4,..

c r " r -'. ". %. - C.... o rn. o_ o _l k.

%e " " 7 0 r '. 4 c.>

c =. o-a. bv. 4s u.

c.uota icn o f 1.n n. l i c a n t s ' testimony.

Brief at S-9.

The cuoted I

c c.._ede

4..: e,:.

u,,

a. i t.

2, u w.. e m 2 e, c.. >i Q, :..:u m_ S.,;,.0_.-o

.- -.i u, n & lo*

u; c.

m.. c l,,-,.

.w tt n

.> u

. u;

-- the contents of the emergenc" Dian.

The tcsti.Tonv does not 2

( g -a

, g 1 4. h. r :- e d e, g 4-

4. e p. 4

b. y A. h.. u e..

u.. e.

4.e c.., p

u.., S 1. 4. '. j ew A_v o

-t v.

-o 6

~,

,.- n.i n A _ v;. m..

e,...S. C n r.- u.s e..*w v^ n

_

• h.. e

• • = ' "- ~c o.#

+- b.. o.

0.e. 4.. o. & c e.

3

:.w a _

wvo a-w A.

u I

...-,-.1c.,w e

i c

w p,1 o

i

_ /, _

i i

L i

i

---,,e

..-w....-__-_----r.,--..

-....e

--.-u-

-,,m..

---

,--... - -. ~, -, -., -, -....

---x---

- -. _~

._.. - - ~ -

i t

o e

l c.,.m *., <

3 4 n. r p t s. g.

. o.n..,. #,. :..

s a r t..u,.. t,. y-

..,,n -.,.,.. 3 W.

irs c '.' n. "~.~. o v e.r..m. ; b}'

L.. e "...e ".. i o.e.

n.'

g".g e~ r,. 4.~ _ > i = e n, s, v.n n V

=

e e

u o

2

'l I

A n a, t l a l D e c 151 C n D. r O.*u e r i'. CeclineO to rule on tne 1,

,I c c2.-,. 0 u.. n _,., '. h '.c.,

~. o ~s; r~' m*

.l i " _.. _ e

".c.r.44 *i c..

r. "~- c.- ~; u.m..e n " s

b. e.1 o w e

e demonstrate that had the Licensing Boarc reached the l

Carnonwealtl's cubst.sntive arguTentc, the appropriate decision i

o I,

would have been to r c J' c c t the pronoced license condition.

We 1

1 I

would rcquest that the An..neal Board do so explicitiv.

b i

1, B.

The Cormonwealth's Substanti/e Except.ons i

1 i

The Commonwealth's remainin four exceptions i.

cttach the Licensing Board'c cubstantive determinations on the i

o.- /

"1' h. oor 1F i

co.v ytior.o" i m_ '.#.

"u o

• %.h e.

m m a' y,o 1 v i.-c."u_

g ~e.,.. ' - o. r e

e -

a.

o 1

i i

l g'. 0 /

m 4h e c n.

e..v. m~ n_ t-u.i n o g.- e, n. u

..c f o.l l ow.e

.A n +-

1 l

(2)

The Board erred in

2. t n..4.,,

e O

,,Jbe" man-c4 m

u.

.o : e

.e

--r a

com.

.s k -

u... G ym n g pw pe

.r. a c.,r d 4 c V. c

&..;.. r o.= ;

s-

,.-Le

.a6 L w

w.

44 j

,= n e.t.c o. s a_ r c

- O e m.%., n A n G ko.

r a r,

- 2,,.J.. w. e C a.

v.

ou

.u m

m for e2Ch Off-Cite C=Oriency Worker,

.c A a_ r r.1 n g.: P, g g o..

cCu<.c A..74; O

o-v.

u

.. 3 wu.

Inir.ial Decision at 39.

c

(.7)

"' h. a_

. ~. ' o r u

_c ", a.m.. "-

n.

c4 n -.:..:n w, ".

W..o r e ic a,

E. d. i c.i o.. c,"

e u.

...u in the su.c.olv of docimeters for un g..c_e.f.v

,...,, e n a. A g y wqut:cg c

c: 1.n u e ;

k a

s a

g g.- I. c.i ** d

4. g 4.a t.bm e.1 T.i +~...c_.

?. y-m 3 c - i.e. p p

w

} O.., n 1'.m. n h d.mAU Oy

,- - c

}<&"....,

e.. L' j

j

.w..WIJ

,,-7 J.. n..4]

n A

. u v.r i. g c. c,,., rign o'p

.r',..

. 3. n.. e n u.i.

... qt

,n

.s-u.

. ~

.c.

5 4.iv.m'.

P.'~'.ea C, "2 e. u.nv2 C, e...- c. w n

c w.

s 6

.. N s= G,

.* D m... ;p

• h...C.

.{k#

)

. s

.GQ.

( t' f.,.N r*

e a

s u

G. S 1

~,

. f* 7.y_..,

.a

'R R *

\\s)

.. t).

-.,, i e..

,, n..- e c

A.4-n 4 L. a;

.e..:. c......,,. 3 u...

1.. -

.y u

v

.. wa A

a

....,, o. a

i., m..,.

-~.

n p )

.n.

v

1. "~.: -

L.

- _ -., - - -. - - ~. - - -.,.,.

~

i 4

- e r

F b

l the 1:.cosition of the Jor.onwealth's ultir. ate r ec.u e c t

{

i following license condition:

i 4

ndecuate numa,ers of ceir-rescinS r

i and permanent record ( th e r:r.ol um i n-t escent) dosimeters, consistent with ann.licable federal guidance are available for dictribution to all offsite emergency workers identified in state and countv i

.ans as requiring

}

emergency c,

i c r ~< ' a. a 'w r v,.

Applicante believe that imposition of this condition would be unwarranted.

1 The recpons.ibilit.y for c u c c l v. i n a dosimetry to

}

1

- workers rests with the Commonwealth.

See oft-rite er.ercencv 4

t

~

(Continued) t 9

oi. -cite emer-.

workers can

or

'j u.

" I c.=.

" "~ bv n. m. _ e e,a.,

w w

allocating the "ex;c ing limited l

ctate cupply to prov;.de an approxi-I m r.t e arno u n t of coverage." (S 93).

I.

(5)

The Board erred as a A s. 4 -.i. i g e 1 rA.,

4-c

4. n

. :.

• 3 r m

~-

n u

nw au C o ". A w. '. 'U' A o

'w* h. u^' '4' G' L. c o 'L.' d" "w ^

"r 't' '6'3' ".1 4 n "

u-

1. ; 5 w

.g

~O p

O

v. & t.

. =_,.J.; - c A o

D' C_'

v -

?

- -.g l',r.. a e _ -

.: n

-n

-u u

t. 4.t-4..y. $ h i e==

4

- O +.+.. o pl I

c..... _ ~. ' 3 l'~.*

7.**

]

At

_s.

4 w

v s

o.r.c

" i. " o..

• 17..^~'.

~'*

o_ '.r. ^ " 3' o..' i t. ;

w.

1COntirleC in t.e state and CountV.

e:r.e r G e n c.V _DlEns a3 rec.uirinc

\\

dosimetry, prior to the irsuance of l

-r..n.

en

..O-

' k.. n pn.-

_l i c. e. w u c.11 u

uu.

.e_ n m o_ 'r = r n c..d _ r_ m-,. T 1 c-C %'u' 4 C m "u o' 'u'.#O D..

I C

c-.

o o

g s -.

,.. 4 r

e Oe i._

sg O.1.

.Z.1. '. g : n '.r b 'r.

4 e-~

\\p..es0.

i. C,/

\\. g ~~a w. n.. ;. a : 1. 4-k. i -

w+

a

~

e.e.3 g o c p

[g.rAi 4-.O.*'.

1. c

".o".*~,'

.'..'. '. 4,

9. 4,

',.*) o.

S

.>,=.-._.,I."

. - ] * [*,

.. p {L-

• • rJ e. e m e-t

._m

.. r w v

y v; a

,,,,-. A {.' n.n.

--c,s a m y A'.c-

.A

..,.t.t..

.k..

4 *

,,4.

{

j' n - -.,.,.. e..

k.. t,

,,1 e.,. -

A.m g. 6

.vnu.

2-g i _.. + - -

w u

+2 w

. ' _...c_~ 4 C c -..:o n.

s o... 1 C,

.e.

a r.=..,.

c..

m.

- a.

m.. n. v 1 _m

.~}

e-m

+m a

m u p...e n.

~.

C. 4 _ s.

.m m

... u 5

e

.',e.v{

• A

{.,.,.n.g {..<

J - r e g4 a

e.

& T.

~_A i'* 4 n. A 4.. q. r J-V 6 4 -

e _7

• c.5

,~

4. o x.

O e. m j

f. y e.

.. p 4

, wt p,. e.

v

-S m

w

..v

. s.

.s r i l

I I

1 I

.~....,.,.... -.

1 I

i 1

1 lo.

Y M.., t.b o C o.....

.".'s a l *. h

.4.7

^ # # c c *u 4-

m.. o-u.<... y.,. y,

u-1 sa 70W u

e.

4 3

d 10%ine th t. t..colicants be compelled to =cet the Cc:"nonwealth 's l

4 l

i re.cpensibilitv.

If the Commonwealtb believes that certain 1

~

1 i_

costmetry is neeceu, the ac.c. r o.cr ia te recponse woulo, ce for t,e n

j commonwealth to obtain it.

This is particularly true since the 1

4 chortage perceived by the Commonwealth is not unic.ue tc 1

I

}

~

Succ.uehanna, but is statewide.20/

The Commonwealth is seeking b

o use :.h e I-pp e a l 3c a r d to compel Applicants to undertake the t

l 4

i Commonwealth's own functions.

We believe that this is inappro-i 1

'i i

}

criate, particularl" in the absence of an" indication whv tha 1

2 2

i Cc.monwealth cannot carry out its own responsibilities.

I 4

t a 1-2ic o.r m

n = o ; r,.,

i

.r r o..i

_r.. w~ _.,.L<,; e c.,

n-,

ee 2

u - -

i e

~

I emergency planning incues T.ust start with the general regula-i

\\,

I vu.

yr:o,u

-gu&.

,,,. 4 u

w ;.

u_

i u..

4 the state of onsite and offsite emergency preparedness provides l

rearonable assurance that adecuate i

protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiolog-j ical cmergency.

,e.a c. r-.,n.

s0.'7(c.'(1).

.c '...#. A c 1 c.-.. n. "..

• 4 "u u~9u4. e

c. n c_." a.l o

r c m,

m criterion are set forth in 10 C.F.R. S 50.47(b).

One of those t

standards relates to dosimetry.

1 1

r i _

.n.'.c_ o m '. a Itc'ec.-).

~..._4-H~

.0 c,.

2' o T_

_c 9.g/

T E."..L.

T = r " i.e...,. "

o x

s--

.h.e c,s

=

~..Co.-p

~. c ~ c..<.; m-.~. u

. C f,A c_ a

4. n-

s. b c.

)

,, : n.

_n.

s.

u

-w.

u u -

o m

J

..b

1..* N _$

r*

• 4 A4=

• • s-p e= h. 4 t's h p*v.$

.[

v v.. d.=

y a '.- tai ww a

..vw o_=. ct u

~.

3..S. a u.=

0 r.=

1b" pS.r%q f,. v. i..e.. p em. a 4

c 4

1 qu cr v

.~

v.

e y m a_ y u.$. Q n h a_. f -orp 5 Y. 4~ G *s 1.?

• r

&_ kup-e 4=

u

'n u :".* ~. f c cs r5

[. v *.*. n** r n \\s' n.~. ? &_ b..

C' r +.. t.n n

+

"._..n.c._.

r s-A w

s m-

--o

...r.*

e'.f"' r" O; c~. I.

O_ v.N." E 4*

• • h,O T. h.. *. O_

U. 4 ) O I U 1 ~. " w

.k Q ~C 'v" ? ** b '* P C ** C 6 ^ ' 9. *.

u v.

• • E "I'* **

9 l

6 a

b

,--,--m,-em.-n,,.-,wwr.-.,._

__,-.w

4

~

(11) Means for controll.inc radiclocical -

in an

.x.: cures,

_ emergency, are ertablished for enercency work rs.

':'he -.eans for controlling radiological exposures shall include exporure guicelines consistent with EPA Emeraenc" Worker and a

J Lifesavin-Activit.v Protection s

Action Guides.

10 C.F.R.

S 50.47(b)(ll).

It should be noted that the regula-tions do not specify what the means for controllina radioloc-s i cal..:posure" chould be.

The reasonable assurance" aspect of

. 50.47(2) is further implemented b3 the provicion that failure

.o nect thc regulator' standards does not necessarily result in Se denial of an operating license.

Instead, the Co:nmis s ion is to determine w' ether r

n.

(a) 7eplClenCles in tne D.ianS are m

not significr for the plant i r. c.u e s t i o n,

(b)

"ade~uate intc:i~ compensatorv w

actionc have b.en or will be taken " rom.otiv.r" or e

(c)

th e r e ar e othe r compelling sn.., e u,. 4 g 1 s=..

u

. _.= o ysc w

~

44a operation."

r,

-~,

c.

=e k,.>I i., 5, t1,. 3

\\u

-u v.

The rcgul..tions are thus, by their terms, cuite

?'/

guner=.1.

They do,

b. m. c c e r, refer to.45.E3-0654='

for i

-. $b" /

d' L.J A 2 g c.

g..

v s's S. m... n &.. ;u f o.-

m..a.,n. - c r_ D. m -.

g. w-* r 'g. a r u

^ /

w

-c 4

4

. y v;

.l9. 4 L s.pg2 c

s

~

.C,, O. *': 7 -

7..

M.1.,

- r

.1.= +w-i c,. a vn n.r.~-

~

_.,10 u. V.

E

-.. -y

~1 c..,

l,. r. r

~

r

/

..s N

h N'

m.

e-ha4, g O,.

n,qy

. y. -

T., oW =

p

.,M c.

r-.

8 5.

4 aM O,.-

h.

d 5.

w 4 -.

.,,,.s o A

,y

, 4 g

4.

./ e "M..,

,U A-

.,. f

.u-

,e

+

s,.'

ea

%e6 k+m p

e e

7.--A. i,.y

.1(Cf

^ e

- + g e. 4 9 3

.6 9

m s

- vJ.

ua 4

s v.. r. v; _, s s; t f.

n 1.,%-

,v.~.;.-.

'-c._m mu

., e., u c.,,A

- ^ '

m-,.

ww w+

y w a. u m*e 4.

A h-b 4.i'*, 4. f/ w ~"' j G', G ~. c w o g Lg a,.

m, M 4

p 4,

gap.g ya.,

g g

8 e-q r

1. 4 w.P-..

s y. V bgggw

.a-e a

g fg a

yeW.>ea.av

.v'._

C 2

....w.

t' P n.q b. i..n..., A y..

O... e n. %,

s y

~

4 I

i f

I I

=ppears in two of the " evaluation criteria" of NUEEG-0654.21/

K.3.a.

Each organinstion shall m:ka provicion for 24-hour-per-day ctpability to determine the doses received by emercencv cersonnel l

Invo,ved in any nuctear accicent, 2

including volunteers.

Each organization chall take provisions i

for distribution of dosimeters, i

t both nelf-reading and permanent 1

record devices.

,i I

i b.

Ecch organization shall ensure that docimeters are read at I

appropriate frequencies and provide for maintaining dose records for emergency workers involved in any l

nuclear accident.

1 I

(

NUREG-0654 at 67 (emphasis added).

This review of the substantive requirements and guiaance nftec - several points clear.

First, NRC'c regulatory I

i requirements are cet forth in general terms.

Second, failure I

to meet even these general requiremcnts does not mandate Thirc, r,nC guidance recommends speci,ic Commission action.

m 1

4 that organizations shall make provisions to distribute both l

self-readinc and nermanent record dosimeters.

This guidance a

t t

I I

i l

i (Continued) l

See, e.c.,

co. 1 1,

2.

Ccmmonwealth's references to the

[

WiiquiremenEs" an,d

" mandates" of NUREG-0654, rec, e.g.,

Brief at 3, are therefore misplaced.

23/

SUREG-0654 includes cixteen " Planning Standardc" each H which is =.ccompanied by " Evaluation Criteria."

The Planning Standards are identical to the sixtcen regulatory standards of 10 C.P.R.

9 50.47(b).

" Planning Standard E" is identical to 10

.,, w -) (,, ).

.. r.. c

.zg.4 r

s

,ss

- _ _ _ _?

p i

i L

t does not suggest that ecch e Iergency worker must have both l

6 i

kinds of dosimeters er that ecch emergency worker should have i

4 more than one self-r c r. ding docimeter.

Acainst this backcround i

t i

tne emergency plans in this proceeding should be examined.

2 i

4 Both the Commonwealth and Luzerne County plans 1

call for each emergency worker to be given three dosimeters, l

i two of which are self-reading, and one a thermoluminescent l

losimetcr ("TLD").

Comm. Ex.

8, App. 16 S V.E; Comm. Ex.

9, Annex M.

5 IV.C.S.

The plans identify the self-reading l

l docimeters as the CD V-7 4 2 (with a range of 0-200 roentgens) l I

j and the CD V-730 (with a range of 0-20 roentgens).

-Id.

i i

c.c c o r d ing to the FEMA witness, there is no requirement that 1

1 l

each emercency worker have two self-reading docimeters, l

c1though providing rwo self-readers i-not inconsistent with f

I FE:'.4 g u id a n ce.

Tr. 2693-2700 (Swiren,i.

r There is no shortage of the CD V-742.

FEMA Testimony j

at 19; Tr. 2679 (Swiren).

Statewide shortages do exist for I

cath TLD's and CD V-732.

The shortage totals some 5000 CD V-730's a.d 11,000 TLD's.

Tr.

2607 (Belser); see also to Cc:::cnwealth Brief.dj The Commonwealth or apparently has about 300 TLD's which would be available in the 2,/

At cral a r g u:. e n t bcfore the Appeal Board in the Three "21e Icland Rcstart c. r oce ed in:, counsel for the Commenuealtn I

appeared to indicate thc: the Thortage of TLD's for TMI alone I

teta.11cd 9,000.

.ppeal Board Tr. as, ao (June 24, 1922, l

,fterncen session).

' r t

. -,. - ~, - - -,

- m - w,,wn,-. _ m_

_....,--,,,--.amn,_

1 erent of an accident.

Tr. 2676 (Swiren).

Althcugh the Contonwealth requested that the Fede r al E.Serc.,ency "anac.ement

[r i

Agency

(" FEMA") make up the shortages, the FEMA witness t

tcctified that it would not be cble to do so.

Tr. 2676 (Swiren).

The dosimeter supply situation in Pennsylvania is L

clearly not perfect.

The Commonwealth rhould have an adecuate c u.c.o l.v of whatever dosimetern it deems nececsar.v and should be I

l able to predistribute those dosimeters to the coun;ies

~

l involved.

The iscuc here, however, is whether there is "reaacnable assurance that adequate protective =eacures can and

.ill be taken", 10 C.P.R.

$ 50.47(a), whether "means for controlling radiological exposurec, in an emergency" have be'en ccrcM : ned for en.ergency workers, 10 C.F.R.

S 50.47(b)(11),

and wnether any deficiencies are "not significant for the p l a r. t " or have been dealt with b"z "adea.uate ccrpensatorv

.wasures", 10 C.F.R.

S 50.47(c)(1).

One of 9e dif ficulties in addrescing these c,uestions is the relative skirpineca of the record.

'"he Cc=enweal th blancs the Licencing ilcard for "lackadaicical treatment" and far relying on "sparce, cpcculative oral testimony".

Cermonwealth Brief at 15, 18.

The reason that the record is not T.o r e complete is the Co;r.onwealth'c own failure to alert the Licensing = card and the parties in a ti:nely manner of its interect in the dosimetry cupply iscue.

The i: sue was,

l 1

i l

i j

addressed only tangentially during the evidentiary hearing.

i t

t And not until two and a half nonths after the evidentiary l

hearings cloced did the Cormonwealth first suggest that it i

3 t

believed a license condition was necessary.

As the Supreme t

I Court stated in a related context, 1

l it is still incumbent upon i

intervenors wno v4s.n to participate I

to structure their participation so I

"o th. a '-

_4 *

• b.. a 'm i ~

4"

- a *P

.y #. u l,

4 m

alerts the agency to the t

l intervenors' pocition and conten-f 4

tions.

}

i Verncnt Yankee ::aclear Power Coro.

v.

';atural Rescurces Defense l,

Council, Inc., 435 U.S.

519, 553 (1978).

The Commonwealth's S i

j 2.715(c) Sta tus should not change this obligation.

otwithstandinc the intent expretsed in the l

Ccetonwealth and Lunerne County nlans :0 provide each emergency i

l

,1 worker with two self-reading dosimetu r and a TLD, the record sup; orts a finding that th e r e exist "means for controlling radiological exposures, in an emergency" and " reasonable I

assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be 4

'.u"..

'u c ob".'.4.". ru4"monal 7

d

.n. e. c.ge-

_e o_.~ -~

o.

-c.

r.-..n r,.. n_.n.

2 v-.

m _

decimetr.v su.c.oliec ecch cuergency.crker will have a CD V-740 r

i Gelf-reading docimeter.

Both.he Com;cnwealth and the Luzerne 1

i County plans require workers to recd their self-recding 1

A...J - -.

-- n +m._ v " and &g ve_*Ord d o.r..t w + p r 3 " u,..i n.. ~e ~ c.r p-_

c.-._3...

r u

.y m.4 t

i

.. t. w

. ~

s 6

y eXpoSdres On a "COsimetrV T.SOort forr".

coo". Ex. 8

'. 0 0 t

r T 7. C. D" r 2j In y,g.

A.

s u.-. A a*

7 C

al.

C, r

' Is..r. c_ <.

(' v., i.

-.,... n,.

.w u

s 1

F r

-./.

usa

,-q==--Serwm,3--*-ey,ww---

-wise, w-mm+e+--re-

--,e--=w.---*.

--usi,--ww--ve,eu.,--

-ww

, = -

w. A x Y.

.nis should provide for the dual functions of allowing each workcr to determine hi.3 m.n doce and providing a record of accumulated expecure.25/

r.ormanent It is obvious th a t providing enly self-reading dosime-ters would not meet the guidance of 1:UREG-0654 that Each organization chall make provisions for distribution of docimeters, both r e l,. - r e a c..ing anc peritanent recora cevices. _26 liowev e r, an discunSed dove, the record-keeping function can be acccmpliched without " permanent record devices".

And the Conmonwealth does have an existing, althoua,h smalle su.ocly of

~'LD ' c which could be distributed among emergency workers.

Tr.

267:' (Swiren).

While distribution of the limited number of

~

TLL's wculd obvicauly not give each cmergency worker his own, it wou2d crovide.tno r ox imat e cove r t.c. e.

_Id.

In this connec-tion, it should be noted that the guidance of I;UREG-0654 does not state that each emergency worker shall receive both celf-reading and permane:Tt record dosimetry.

Rather, it recermends that each crganization erovide for distributinc both ac rC 4

e_.. 3 a 00e_....e_ ' p g m.

r.

_2_5_ /

While th e Ccamonwealth 's Er ief,

.O. 15, suggests that "a Icwer range dosineter than the CD-742 wo.:ld be recuired", it providoc no co.noort for this accertion.

26/

':J RE G-0 6 5 4, Ev.eluation criterion K.3.s.,

at 67

( c... a..

e.; ~e u,

.ay

~.

1 6

c il t

i t

j The Commonwealth a'rguea that Fed.:ral guidcr.ce on the L

tvoos of docimetry for emergency workers ic ambiguouc.

4 Commonwealth Brief, p.

11-13.

Apart from the fact that the i

j CcmT.cnwealth's argument is largely based on er.tra-record material,~7/ it also begs the question.

If the emergency plans 9

I i

provide "means for controlling radiological exposures, in an i

emergency", the claimed an.biguity of Federal guidance is I

irrelevant.

i i

i The Commonwealth would have the Appeal Board believe L

that without additional supplies of dccincters, the health and i

)

i cafety of emergency workers would not be reasonably assured.

[

i

_S c_.e_., _e.c.,

Cormonwealth Drief at 6.

If this were in, fact the l

cr20, the Appeal Soard uculd be juctified in imposing the

quest.ed liconse condition.

Howev J,

the Comenwealth I

k l

concecea that the docimeter shortagw _:; not unique to l

'l l

Sucquehanna, but are statewide.

PE".A hs t imony,

p.

19; Tr.

i l

2625 (Belser).

There are thr ee ot,e r a ting nuclear. clan ts in

{

L i

i

[

1 t

2~/

Subceauent to the close of the record, the Commonw alth t

f.

ah,t.;onal re;eral

+ rote in.n accing '. o r gu*cance on cocime-t

ars. to Commonwealth Brief.

'n.narentl", the 1

j Ccmmonm21th has not yet received a substancive rooly.

l t

e. 2 e s.

r. n.. 2.., f

_r l.o _1 2 2.. L,

, m c,. 3a._. G.. u n.4 w

. s c t~.,.. G o.

m l

C CP~io nw e G l th ' O Brief, p.

12, 19, alco Citc0 to C. FEV.A doCCOent which appears as a reference in the Cor~.OnWealth's Plan.

j.

I". M A - P E P - 2, " Guidance en Offsite Rergency 'tadiction l

i

. C o c. L... c. +a

• 1' e

• s m

~.*o.2-P r V.,'.

1C0^).

L,- -

bc.

..s_+...

~ ;.r.a u _+. o._e. ng c

- r_,, w e

c..

J

-. ~.

i

...,,. c.

sLv

..m not in evidence.

FE".A's witnecs tectifi:6 that while the om v,..*.

C <*.: * ~n o '.t 1 u, 4 +.

4. e.. v- ~

b... I.. y Ccn'uinlv.

J' A

b.*

a

<3.<....m..r..*

a n..

-+.

m.

u i.

.e s

.a

. _ u.

I 9 ", g p, r.e~., 4

e.._ s. ;

T. n.

..m.,.

c _c r,

• P. 4 -

.P r.v. n'

,z - a. n _m n 4-4.e, Lr 4c

_s m.

m y

.u t

I

~.:.a.,n... c a..

p

... ~,.. z a.

4a..

e

~.:. } (.,

.a -

-y g

u e

I L M 4i-t i

r 1

t i

n

---c-~.

, - - -,,----_r_

,- -, - -,,..+,- -. -~-

--.n-r,,, - -

Fenn:ylvania (and four if TM1-1 ic restarted).

Tr. 2676-7 (Swircai.

If the d e s iir.e t r v chortsge wer: indeed of the gravitv s

implied by the Con. con.realth's Brief, the Commonwealth would nurely have taken etcps to curs-the shortsge.

Yet the Con monwealth ' c January 1952 letter to FEMA, Attachment 1 to the Commantce21th's Brief, and the Brief itself fail to indicate cny steps to redrecs the chortage at there nuclear plants in the Common,calth which are already operating.

Since the impact of the Cormonwealth's propocca condition would be to prevent S u c c u e '.. a n n a fron receiving a f all power licence absent the supply of additional dosimeterc, one would s u rir.ic e that the Cormonw2alth wculd seek ocme ocuivalent action cgainst plants alread, in operation.

Yet, cuch has apparently not been the cace.

F r o.: all this, we can flirly conclude th a t the shortage of docineters does not constitute an inmediate threat to the public health and cafet.v..

In ex$ a cituation, a licence condition is not appropricte.

Licsnse conditions (like Te +.n i cal Spec i f i ce.tions ) are not to be i.npoced for every conceivable iccue.

hather, they are recerved for these matters as to which the imposition c_,

rigic conottions or limitations upon reactor operation is dee ed nccessary to obviate the pocai-c'.or...al situation or event bility of r.n r

giving rice to n 1::med ia te threat to ms,

y~.1b, ~< c

,u,~r 9. 1 m.. 5

.c r.c~y.

u

~

, e

- _ = _

._=_

1 I

j I

Portir.nd General Electr'ic Cornanv ( T r o.d)an I;uclear Plant),

ALAB-531, 9 N.R.C.

263, 273 (1979); See also Vircinia Electric f

rnd Power Company ( ;or th Anna Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 l

f and 2), ALAB-578, 11 N.R.C.

189, 217 (1950); Commonwealth r

f i

Edison _ Co. (Zion Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-616, 12 N.R.C.

419, 423 (1980) (matters not of " inen e d i a t e importance to the safe operation of the tacility" should not be incorporated into

[

t o.ceratina. licenses).

IV.

CONCLUSION l

On both procedural and substantive grounds, the Cc~.-enuc al th ha s failed to justify the imposition of a license condition concerning the availabilitv of dosimetry for distr.i-t bution off-site to emergency workers.

Such a license condition f

doec not fall within the scope of L:

'ni~ted contentions and

[

therefore was beyond the ASLE's power to impose.

The j

l Cor nonwealth has the obligation to sup.oly dosimetrv and has not P

rhoun any reacon it cannot do co.

i The ultimate issue for the Appeal Board to decide is whether the regulatory requirrments of 10 C.F.R.

S 50.47 have acen met.

Applicants respectfully submi: that the record l

I supports a finding cf a rcasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be t v. e., in the event of a radiological emergency.

i 4

P i

1 t I

i r

4

s e

f A

E

.A j.$r-i s

s, a

x s.

s

/

1 n.

s x

f.f' Y

6

../

7. n,.T.'. u~. 4 ".

%.. _'. A' v-- " a_

^t...c'.". *e, r^r

-l.'.

'm. N. ~.ct'.

- c_ _' ': ^ rn y

.v 4

v.

3

~

,. s uCETOnWealtd,3

.< C e O t l O n 3 E n C C,10

.CO U c r..' Sc.

/

s t

-r+ Ls c r.. t, w., x u.1.1,

c,.1,, 4 t e. ::

c u J.s...

u, c

.uw_

a f

c u.,~

n.i m m s i sL & S.% s,

v1Av em en t m.- 2.-('r r e, p 1

m vnvmc e

1. sV es f a s. r. t y; 9 -.

g

.-s,.y f

3

- ?/ "

,1 1' /hG~d '1.[f[

3V h

~- a

~,e;aw3s u.o.

i p

y,

. v v,a a.

f i

j s

. C O U n S e l f 0 r.2.D.D l i C i S t S s

, 00'v v

kshiNg 'bb'e"b.C. b 2 O36

'(202) 322-1000 uu.

t 3

, ce n. _ ':.G.

ud....

L G /.

y

-o 1

9 h '

l

/

/{

r

.,'t y

A.

(

c

.;/.

/

> ~.

A f'

l

,e

/

4

-f 65

}

f

/s j

h

'n r e

/

t 7,

pM g

K P

e j

.,i

. :/'

,=.

/i k

4

_ / -

,[

_W g--

,~.

m j.

o+.

/

.7 O'

I f

/

A

.i / -

,..sr=

i fd

/

f

. - j - ; ;

4 c.f' e

f*

}

)

s o

e at 8

e 9

f e

T*,**P 9*%

E4. ' *.e

.g g

'.g egg 3,

1. • g.

,e.

yg g

9-4 e.

e.s y[1

}

v L T, T ' D.s

',., '. ; i 7. n.E V

(' n.*. ' *.

• T.C. v.1 n..

T

-.a u.

t t

s-

% a ~..

)

a' tr '.*.*. p c -

'.T r *,., '

• G.r *

• O T.s,' r*

> y n r, 7.4

• (J'.7 *.* t s

s e.)

• 11:-

.,.. ' u^ p r.

r, t..,

o

.xG s.su - a

,.. ~.

s.

a 1

6 I_, (*

\\

T..

s.

..,. _ - y

/

A

)

r

...:... s..,ai 1..

x.. u a : c::.-

,,g...,.

3,

.,n w.

a 1

l i

T., r. ',. p +u

. s u.e.s

.,) l,.)'

") r ~}

• m, O

n. G;

)

Ja.-

)

D U.",. n s

rn

-. GC e n 7 p -.;

,*e7 r 1 7 iU. i l, e T

n

..as s

..s 6 e 1.

- 7, C,., n 7 b, r

vV L 4

~

• s = - p

/

A..s

%/

.c.) 4. -. &u w.i,v..,

L a,.,

us. :

m,,.zG. &

i

,c c.

• e, w

ss,

)

n

.4 M-g l

s'$

c ;

s j%m..

.f-..

4

's

..ua e,

g

- :.~

~n,os..

.-..,.312

~., u., i

., ~

c u

uo,.,,...

..~ -

m, 4-axu" u

a J.

.ar c'.. O c - 3 cr ; 1.,. r.i..,s

,., e.. a c-s,..t>i + -

a s

, 4 n

.s c

L _.

.a. -. ga s.

.a

/

• ',a,.. '., _

3...

s p 1. m -ec-,

f,.r..; _- u Tt.

(*

, s r 4-r c. v m u (,4,..

m

+ -

v.4.,

u f

..r r

~

u I

[

-.r U _< -,, -..,

u.,,s.c,.

u.,,. ;

s,. m.

, s. c.,.

, cj t,e.,. p v,

vu.j s -

v..

u o u,., 4 u

- a

u..

.2 u

eu; T

1 c +>

s b

..J sr b.

O

/

f

\\

s r/

\\-

i.

,/

)'

1

/

/

\\

t i

s

\\

,' v%,

jf ) (/ fU$

} ', g _

g., e

[

~]/

ui. s. u -.

u -

%u+

1 f

\\

u',,,

L s

se l

.L

(

I 1

i l

l l

l I

l l

l

. <> a UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD In the Matter of

)

)

PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

)

)

AND

)

Docket Nos. 50-387

)

50-388 ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. )

)

(Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, )

Units 1 and 2)

)

SERVICE LIST Secretary of the Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Board Panel Washington, D.C.

20555 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Thomas S.

Moore, Esquire Administrative Judge Docketing and Service Section Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of the Secretary Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20555 Stephen F.

Eilperin, Esquire Dr. John H. Buck Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20555 Susquehanna Environmental Advocates James P.

Gleason, Esquire c/o Gerald Schultz, Esquire Administrative Judge Post Office Box 1560 513 Gilmoure Drive Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania 18703 Silver Spring, Maryland 20901 Mr. Thomas J.

Halligan, Correspondent Mr. Glenn O. Bright The Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers Administrative Judge Post Office Box 5 Atomic Safety and Licensing Scranton, Pennsylvania 18501 Board Panel U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ms. Colleen Marsh Washington, D.C.

20555 Box 558 A, R. D.

1. 4 Mt. Top, Pennsylvania 18707 Dr. Paul W.

Purdom Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal 245 Gulp Hills Road Board Panel Radnor, Pennsylvania 19087 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

s

..e Robert W. N'dler, Esquire Department of Environmental Resources Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 505 Executive House Post Office Box 2357 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 James M. Cutchin, IV, Esquir'e Office of the Executive Legal Director U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 DcWitt C. Smith Director Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency Transportation and Safety Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. Thomas M.

Gerusky, Director Bureau of Radiation Protection Department of Environmental Resources Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Post Office Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Dr. Judith H.

Johnsrud Co-Director Environmental Coalition on Nuclear Power 433 Orlando Avenue State College, Pennsylvania 16801 i

i f

I i

..