|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20211H7921999-08-13013 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 126 to License DPR-54 ML20198G8271997-08-22022 August 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 125 to License DPR-54 ML20059G9621990-09-10010 September 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 115 to License DPR-54 ML20247B3611989-07-17017 July 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 112 to License DPR-54 ML20245E1161989-06-20020 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 111 to License DPR-54 ML20245A1991989-06-0909 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 110 to License DPR-54 ML20248B6321989-06-0505 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 108 to License DPR-54 ML20248B9361989-06-0505 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 107 to License DPR-54 ML20248B9621989-06-0505 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 109 to License DPR-54 ML20247P1761989-05-30030 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Accepting Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.2 Re on-line Testing of Reactor Trip Sys ML20247M9231989-05-23023 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 106 to License DPR-54 ML20247K7261989-05-23023 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 105 to License DPR-54 ML20247K6871989-05-16016 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 104 to License DPR-54 ML20246F4671989-05-0404 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Re Inservice Testing Program & Requests for Relief Re ASME Class 1,2 & 3 Pumps & Valves.Program Acceptable ML20245F9041989-04-18018 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 103 to License DPR-54 ML20248E9371989-03-29029 March 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 102 to License DPR-54 ML20155D3131988-09-28028 September 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 100 to License DPR-54 ML20151L5511988-07-14014 July 1988 Redistributed Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 99 to License DPR-54 ML20151A2771988-07-13013 July 1988 SER Supporting Util Actions to Prevent Failure of Ammonia Tanks Which May Result in Incapacitation of Control Room & Technical Support Ctr Personnel ML20195C5571988-06-0808 June 1988 SER Supporting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 1) Re Equipment Classification (Reactor Trip Sys Components) ML20195C9311988-06-0808 June 1988 SER Accepting Util Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 2) Re Vendor Interface Programs (Reactor Trip Sys) ML20150F2851988-03-28028 March 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Resolution of Tdi Diesel Engine Vibration Problems at Facility ML20148J8611988-03-17017 March 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 98 to License DPR-54 ML20153B2911988-03-15015 March 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 97 to License DPR-54 ML20055E3041988-02-12012 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 871223 & 880111 Proposed Changes to Tech Specs,Including Reducing Lower Limits of Detection for Liquid Radioactive Effluents ML20149L6961988-02-12012 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 95 to License DPR-54 ML20149L2761988-02-0909 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 94 to License DPR-54 ML20148C7321988-01-0505 January 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 93 to License DPR-54 ML20237B4141987-12-0707 December 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 92 to License DPR-54 ML20236X1771987-12-0303 December 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 91 to License DPR-54 ML20236X1111987-11-13013 November 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 90 to License DPR-54 ML20236Q2461987-11-10010 November 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util & Related Submittals Re Design Mods to Emergency Electrical Distribution Sys (Ref Tdi Diesel Generators) ML20236J2671987-11-0303 November 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 89 to License DPR-54 ML20245C7051987-10-27027 October 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 87 to License DPR-54 ML20245C7831987-10-27027 October 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 88 to License DPR-54 ML20236G8791987-10-23023 October 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 86 to License DPR-54 ML20236D1361987-10-23023 October 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 870826 Request to Use Repair & Replacement Program Contained in ASME Section XI 1983 Edition Including Addenda Through Summer 1983 ML20238D4151987-09-0303 September 1987 Evaluation of Engineering Rept ERPT-E0220 Re Reactor Regulation of Util Approach to Compliance W/Reg Guide 1.75 for New Diesel Generator Installation at Plant.Licensee Approach to Demonstrating Compliance Acceptable ML20238B1771987-08-27027 August 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 85 to License DPR-54 ML20236E3731987-07-24024 July 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Existing & Proposed Mods to Meteorological Program & W/Planned Improvements,Facility Will Satisfy Min Meteorological Emergency Preparedness Requirements of 10CFR50.47 & 10CFR50,Apps E & F ML20205T3021987-03-31031 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 84 to License DPR-54 ML20205R7871987-03-26026 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Concluding Util 831104 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.2, Reactor Trip Sys Reliability On-Line Testing Permits on-line Functional Testing of Sys,Including Diverse Trip Features of Reactor Trip Breakers ML20205C3951987-03-13013 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events (10CFR50.61).Util 860123 Submittal Re Matl Properties & Fast Neutron Fluence of Reactor Vessel Acceptable ML20206B6561987-03-13013 March 1987 Corrected SER Re Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events (10CFR50.61).Util 860123 Submittal Re Matl Properties & Fast Neutron Fluence of Reactor Vessel Acceptable ML20205J0971987-03-11011 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Sys Selected for Facility Sys Review & Test Program.Sys Constitutes Adequate Scope for Sys Review & Test Program ML20211P2601987-02-19019 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 860116 Request for Amend to License DPR-54,redefining Fire Area Boundaries Required to Be Operable to Separate safety-related Fire Areas & Reassessing Adequacy of Components in Fire Area Assemblies ML20210D1011987-02-0303 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Issuance of Amend 83 to License DPR-54 ML20215N6881986-11-0404 November 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.4 Re Improvements in Maint & Test Procedures for B&W Plants ML20212N4351986-08-13013 August 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 82 to License DPR-54 ML20206F9071986-05-19019 May 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Request for Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Subsection Iii.L Re Capability to Achieve Cold Shutdown in 72 H 1999-08-13
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20211H7921999-08-13013 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 126 to License DPR-54 ML20195D1901999-05-0606 May 1999 Annual Rept ML20195H8571998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Rept for Smud. with ML20155D4801998-10-27027 October 1998 Amend 3 to Rancho Seco DSAR, Representing Updated Licensing Basis for Operation of Permanently Shutdown & Defueled Rancho Seco Nuclear Facility During Permanently Defueled Mode ML20248C4301998-05-0606 May 1998 Annual Rept, Covering Period 970507-980506 ML20249A7831997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Smud Annual Rept ML20198G8271997-08-22022 August 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 125 to License DPR-54 ML20217D3271997-07-30030 July 1997 Update of 1995 Decommissioning Evaluation for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ML20140A6371997-05-0606 May 1997 Annual Rept, Covering Period 960507-970506 ML20140G4481997-05-0101 May 1997 Part 21 Rept Re Potential Defect in Component of Dsrv & Dsr Enterprise Standby Diesel Generator Sys.Recommends That Springs Be Inspected on Periodic Basis,Such as During Refueling Outages ML20137W8151997-03-20020 March 1997 Amend 1 to Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20141J2711996-12-31031 December 1996 Smud 1996 Annual Rept ML20138L1231996-11-13013 November 1996 Smud Rancho Seco Incremental Decommissioning Action Plan, Rev 0,961113 ML20129E7151996-10-14014 October 1996 Defueled SAR for Rancho Seco ML20059H6821994-01-17017 January 1994 Revised Rancho Seco Quality Manual ML20058K3841993-12-0909 December 1993 Part 21 Rept Re Potential Defect in Component of Dsrv & Dsr Enterprise Standby DG Sys,Regarding Potential Problem W/ Subcover Assembled Atop Power Head ML20056E5171993-08-31031 August 1993 Technical Review Rept, Tardy Licensee Actions ML20059K1981993-05-0606 May 1993 Annual Rept, Covering Period from 920501- 930506,consisting of Shutdown Statistics,Narrative Summary of Shutdown Experience & Tabulations of Facility Changes, Tests & Experiments,Per 10CFR50.59(b) ML20128C9641993-02-0202 February 1993 Informs Commission of Status of Open Issues & Progress of Specified Facilities Toward Decommissioning ML20127H2301993-01-15015 January 1993 Part 21 Rept Re Potential Defeat in Component of Dsrv & Dsr Enterprise Standby DG Sys.Starting Air Distributor Housing Assemblies Installed as Replacement Parts at Listed Sites ML20126B0421992-12-17017 December 1992 Final Part 21 Rept Re Potential Problem W/Steel Cylinder Heads.Initially Reported on 921125.Caused by Inadequate Cast Wall Thickness at 3/4-inch-10 Bolt Hole.Stud at Location Indicated on Encl Sketch Should Be Removed ML20125C7161992-12-0707 December 1992 Part 21 Rept Re Possibility for Malfunction of Declutching Mechanisms in SMB/SB-000 & SMB/SB/SBD-00 Actuators. Malfunction Only Occurs During Seismic Event.Balanced Levers May Be Purchased from Vendor.List of Affected Utils Encl ML20127P5861992-11-23023 November 1992 Followup to 921005 Part 21 Rept Re Potential Defect in SB/SBD-1 Housing Cover Screws.Procedure Re Replacement of SBD-1 Spring Cover Bolts Encl.All Fasteners Should Be Loosened & Removed.List of Affected Utils Encl ML20126E6771992-08-0303 August 1992 Rev 7 to Rancho Seco Quality Manual NL-90-451, Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1990 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station1990-10-31031 October 1990 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1990 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ML17348B5061990-10-0909 October 1990 Part 21 Rept Re Zener Diode VR2 on Power Supply Board 9 1682 00 106 Possibly Being Installed Backwards ML20059G9621990-09-10010 September 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 115 to License DPR-54 NL-90-443, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1990 for Rancho Seco1990-08-31031 August 1990 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1990 for Rancho Seco ML20217A5711990-08-28028 August 1990 Final Engineering Rept,Assessment of Spent Fuel Pool Liner Leakage NL-90-439, Monthly Operating Rept for Jul 1990 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station1990-07-31031 July 1990 Monthly Operating Rept for Jul 1990 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ML20055F8591990-07-16016 July 1990 Special Rept 90-11:on 900613,06,25,18,21 & 28,fire Barriers Breached More than 7 Days & Not Made Operable in 14 Days. Corrective Actions:Operability of Fire Detectors Verified on One Side of Breached Barriers NL-90-423, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1990 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station1990-06-30030 June 1990 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1990 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ML20055C6291990-05-21021 May 1990 Special Rept 90-08:on 900419,fire Pump Batteries Inoperable When Surveillance Procedure SP.206 Not Performed by Due Date.Caused by Test Frequency Incorrectly Changed from Weekly to Monthly.Surveillance Schedule Revised ML20055C6301990-05-21021 May 1990 Special Rept 90-09:on 900424,25,30,31 & 0502,fire Barriers Inoperable for More than 7 Days,Per Tech Spec 3.14.6.2 Requirement.Hourly Fire Watches Established & Penetrations & Doors Returned to Operable Status ML20058B6521990-05-0404 May 1990 Rev 0 to ERPT-M0216, Property Loss Study for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station in Long Term Defueled Mode ML20248E0121989-09-13013 September 1989 Supplemental Part 21 Rept Re Potential Problem W/Six Specific Engine Control Devices in Air Start,Lube Oil, Jacket Water & Crankcase Sys.Initially Reported on 890429. California Controls Co Will Redesign Valve Seating NL-89-634, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1989 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station1989-08-31031 August 1989 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1989 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station NL-89-598, Monthly Operating Rept for Jul 1989 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station1989-07-31031 July 1989 Monthly Operating Rept for Jul 1989 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ML20247B3611989-07-17017 July 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 112 to License DPR-54 NL-89-556, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1989 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Station1989-06-30030 June 1989 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1989 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Station ML20245E1161989-06-20020 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 111 to License DPR-54 ML20245B6651989-06-15015 June 1989 Part 21 Rept 150 Re Potential Defect in Component of Dsr Standby Diesel Generator.Cause of Failure Determined to Be Combination of Insufficient Lubrication to Bushings.Listed Course of Action Recommended at Next Scheduled Engine Maint ML20245A1991989-06-0909 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 110 to License DPR-54 ML20248B9361989-06-0505 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 107 to License DPR-54 ML20248B6321989-06-0505 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 108 to License DPR-54 ML20248B9621989-06-0505 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 109 to License DPR-54 NL-89-517, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1989 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station1989-05-31031 May 1989 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1989 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ML20247P1761989-05-30030 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Accepting Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.2 Re on-line Testing of Reactor Trip Sys ML20247N7491989-05-30030 May 1989 Special Rept 89-13:on 890328-29,specific Activity of Primary Sys Exceeded Limits in Administrative Procedure & Chemistry Control Commitment.Possibly Caused by Power Reduction.Isotopic Analysis Continued ML20247K7261989-05-23023 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 105 to License DPR-54 1999-08-13
[Table view] |
Text
_ . . _ . . _ _ _ _
2
/ o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r, e WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555
/
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO. 75 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-54 SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT RANCHO SECO NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-312
- 1. INTRODUCTION A. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action would amend Sections 4.18.5.1.d and 6.9.5 of Appendix A of the facility Technical Specifications. These sections prescribe regulatory requirements applicable to fire hoses and the submission of certain reports.
~
B. BACKGROUND INFORMATION i
, By letter dated October 29, 1984, the licensee requested amendment of the facility Technical Specifications to correct certain apparent errors relating to fire hose qualification requirements and report-ing requirements. This evaluation addresses the acceptability of the items comprising this request.
j II. EVALUATION 1 Specification 4.18.5.1.d. This specification presently requires that I
' each three years, all fire hose be removed and replaced with "...new equivalent NFPA tested and approved hose." The licensee proposes that
- this be changed to require that the hose be removed and replaced each i
three years with "... hose that meets or exceeds NFPA guidelines or recommendations." The licensee bases this request on the statement that the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) does not test and approve i hoses - but rather merely establishes guidelines and recommendations. We have reviewed the NFPA guidelines applicable to fire hoses (NFPA Standards 1961-1979, " Standard for FIRE HOSE" and 1962-1979, " Standard for the Care Use, and Maintenance of Fire Hose including Connections and Nozzles"). As a result of this review, we note that Appendix A to each of these standards states in part:
"The National Fire Protection Association does not apprqve, inspect or certify any installations, pro:edures, equipment or idaterials nor does it. approve testing laboratories." }.
Based on this statement, we conclude the NFPA is a standards organization, as stated by the licensee - not a testing or approving organization as inferred by the present specification. Accordingly, we 8509170389 850909 PDR ADOCK 05000312 p PDR
j . .
l find the proposed revision to this specification appropriate and, because '
l it does not reduce the present level of safety, we find the proposed change acceptable.
Specification 6.9.5 - Addressee. The licensee proposes to change the i
addressee for the reports required by this specification from " Director ,
of the Regulatory Operations Regional Office" to " Regional Administrator i Region V Office". Since this proposed change would revise the title of i
the addressee to reflect the current NRC organization and organizational titles, we conclude this is an editorial change that is appropriate and l
acceptable.
S >ecification 6.9.5 - Items M and O. The licensee proposes to delete taese items from this specification on the basis that they are not appropriate for inclusion in the category of "Special Reports", and
{
because the 30-day submittal schedules included as editorial notes in
- this specification do not agree with the semi-annual requirement stated in the basic specifications establishing the reporting requirements. The items in question are reports of changes to the Land Use Census and reports of events where the limits of the radioactive Liquid Holdup Tanks
+
2 Regarding this request, we note that the characteristic comon to j "Special Reports" in the licensee's specifications is that such reports are to be made within a specified fixed time following an event. The items proposed for deletion from this Section by the licensee, however, do not fit this description. In both cases, the basic specifications (3.23 for Item M and 3.17.3 for Item 0) state the required information is to be included in the "...next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release ,
Report." In addition, it is clear the 30-day report requirement included as an editoriil note in Specification 6.9.5 does not agree with the l semiannual requirements given in the basic specifications.
Therefore, because the items proposed for deletion from Specification 6.9.5, "Special Reports", do not fit the definition of items requiring a special
! report, and because the 30-day report statement in Section 6.9.5 does riot agree with the requirement stated in the basic specifications, we conclude the original inclusion of these items in Specification 6.9.5 was the result of an
] error. Accordingly, we conclude the deletion of these two items is an j editorial correction and is acceptable.
j Specification 6.9.5. - Item N. The licensee proposes to change the report 1
period for this item (which relates to Fuel Cycle Oose), from 60 days to 30 i days and change the referenced section of the Technical Specifications from l
Section 4.25 to 3.25. Based on our review of Sections 3.25 and 4.E5 of the
! facility Technical Specifications, we conclude the present entriesi are in error and the changes proposed by the licensee would correct theser errors.
Accordingly, we find these proposed changes acceptable.
,7.._ . . _ . - - _ _ _ - - . . _ . . . . . - . _ - , _ _ _ _ . . , _ , - . , _ _ - . . _ ~ _ . , __
_m-. - . , . , - __. __.m__., .-m,_,m_-~ ,- . _ . , . _ . _ . -
- - - -. - _ - - . . - _ = . _ _ .-_ .. -. ._. - - - .. ._ ._.
j . .
4
~ 3-t i
j III. ENVIR0 MENTAL CONSIDERATION ,
l i This amendment involves a change in surveillance requirements and also e relates to changes in recordkeeping, reporting, or administrative <
- procedures or requirements. We have determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and
that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative '
occupational radiation exposure. The Comission has previously issued a l 3
proposed finding that this amendment involves no significant hazards :
1 consideration and there has been no public connent on such finding.
i i' Accordingly, categorical exclusion this amendment set forth inmeets the 10 CFR eligibility) 51.22(c (9) and criteria (10). for .
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or
- environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the i
)
, i issuance of this amendment. ' '
IV. CONCLUSION We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that (1) -
there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public e will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such j activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to comon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public. !
l Date: September 9, 1985 1
Principal Contributor:
G. Zwetzig , !
1 !
l !
.i I
i :
1 !
t -
l -
i y !
I t !
t
\- l i
4 i
! [
1 l l
_. - . . . . , . _ . .