ML17328A473: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM,QjREGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM(RIDS)ESSIONNBR:9010160022 DOC.DATE:"
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM, Qj REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ESSION NBR:9010160022 DOC.DATE:" 90/09/21 NOTARIZED:
90/09/21NOTARIZED:
NO DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana&05000315 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BREWER,S.J.
NODOCKETFACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,Indiana&05000315AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION BREWER,S.J.
Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele BLIND,A.A.
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly Indiana&MichiganEleBLIND,A.A.
Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly Indiana&MichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
LER90-010-00:on 900824,10CFR50 AppRdeficiencies duetopotential lossoflocalshutdownindication panelfunction.
LER 90-010-00:on 900824,10CFR50 App R deficiencies due to potential loss of local shutdown indication panel function.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED LTR 1 ENCL SIZE TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Tncident Rpt, etc.NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 LA COLBURN,T.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:IE22TCOPIESRECEIVEDLTR1ENCLSIZETITLE:50.73/50.9 LicenseeEventReport(LER),TncidentRpt,etc.NOTES:RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LACOLBURN,T.
INTERNAL: ACNW AEOD/DSP/TPAB NRR/DET/ECMB 9H NRR/DLPQ/LHFBll NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 NRR/DST/SELB 8D RR/gg/S3?LBBD1 REG FIL~02 GN3 TILE 01 EXTERNAL EG&G BRYCE i J H NRC PDR NSIC MURPHY,G.A COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD AEOD/DOA AEOD/ROAB/DS P NRR/DET/EMEB 7E NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 NRR/DREP/PRPB11 NRR/DST/SICB 7E NRR/DST/SRXB 8E RES/DSIR/EIB L ST LOBBY WARD NSIC MAYS,G NUDOCS FULL TXT COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTBTO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
INTERNAL:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 31 ENCL 31 Indiana Michigan~Power Company Cook Nuclear Plant P.O.Box 458 Bridgman.I'Jll 49106 616 465 590t INDIANA NICHIGiAN POWER September 21, 1990 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Rockville, Maryland 20852 Operating Licenses DPR-58 Docket No.50-315Document Control Manager: In accordance with the criteria established by 10 CFR 50.73 entitled Licensee Event Re ortin S stem, the following report is being submitted:
ACNWAEOD/DSP/TPAB NRR/DET/ECMB 9HNRR/DLPQ/LHFBll NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 NRR/DST/SELB 8DRR/gg/S3?LBBD1 REGFIL~02GN3TILE01EXTERNALEG&GBRYCEiJHNRCPDRNSICMURPHY,G.A COPIESLTTRENCL1111221111111111111111331111RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDAEOD/DOAAEOD/ROAB/DS PNRR/DET/EMEB 7ENRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 NRR/DREP/PRPB11 NRR/DST/SICB 7ENRR/DST/SRXB 8ERES/DSIR/EIB LSTLOBBYWARDNSICMAYS,GNUDOCSFULLTXTCOPIESLTTRENCL111122111122111111111111NOTBTOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
90-010-00 Sincerely, A.A.Blind Plant Manager AAB:clj Attachment A'O (r HCQ (ii, Q OO.GlA cc: D.H.Williams, Jr.A.B.Davis, Region III M.P.Alexich P.A.Barrett J.E.Borggren R.F.Kroeger B.Walters-Ft.Wayne NRC Resident Inspector J.G.Giitter, NRC J.G.Keppler M.R.Padgett G.'harnoff, Esq.Dottie Sherman, ANI Library D.Hahn INPO S.J.Brewer/B.P.
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEiVASTE!CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMPl-37(EXT.20079)TOELIMINATE YOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSFORDOCUMENTS YOUDON'TNEED!FULLTEXTCONVERSION REQUIREDTOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
Lauzau B.A.Svensson/gg$
LTTR31ENCL31 IndianaMichigan~PowerCompanyCookNuclearPlantP.O.Box458Bridgman.
NRC SORM 366 (669)U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)LITY NAME (1)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 APPROVED 0M B NO.31504)104 EXPIRES: 4(30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI 500 HAS.FOAWAAD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P630), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET.WASHINGTON, DC 20503.DOCKET NUMBER (21 PA E 3 0 5 o o o3 15 icF05 10CFR50 Appendix R Deficiencies Resulting in Potential Loss of Local Shutdown Indication Panel Function i EVENT DATE (51 LER NUMBER (6)REPORT DATE (7)OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (6)MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR g@SEOUENTIAL NUMBER'/we~tcevteloN.4oc NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR PACILITY NAMES D.C.Cook, Unit 2 DOCKET NUMBER(SI 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 8 24 9090 010 0 0 09 2190 0 5 0 0 0 0 PE RATING MODE (9)POWER LEYEL 1 0 0 X~.n Pv.~v":,'p..ix cx.S.$@THIS REI'ORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE RLOUIREMENTS OF 10 cFR (): (Cneck one or more oi the follow(op) l111 50.73(e I (2)I le)50.73(e)(2)(r) 20.405(c)EOM(c1(11 50.36(cl)21 20.402(bl 20.406(e)()
I'Jll49106616465590tINDIANANICHIGiAN POWERSeptember 21,1990UnitedStatesNuclearRegulatory Commission DocumentControlDeskRockville, Maryland20852Operating LicensesDPR-58DocketNo.50-315DocumentControlManager:Inaccordance withthecriteriaestablished by10CFR50.73entitledLicenseeEventReortinSstem,thefollowing reportisbeingsubmitted:
l(l)20.40S(e I)1)I 4)20.405(el(1)(4l) 20.405(e)lllllr)20.405(c))1)(rl 50.73(el(2)(r4)60,73(e)12)(rl4)(Al 50,73(e)(2)lrBI)(61 50.73(e)(2)(xl 50.73(c)(2)ii)X 50.73(el(2)(4) 50.73(e)(2)I BI)LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)73.71(bl 73.71(cl OTHER ISpeciry in Abttrect oeiowend/n Text IIRC Form 366AJ NAME S.J.Brewer, Nuclear Safety and Licensin Section Manager TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE 614 223-2 20 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBEO IN THIS REPORT (13)CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC.TURER CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC TUREA TO NPRDS 5%MD)i SVPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)YES III yn, complete EXPECTED SIIOMISSIOII DATE)NO ABSTRACT (Limit to teOO tpecn, Ee., epproximetely Iiftnn tinpie tpece typewriven tinct)(16)EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATF.(151 MONTH DAY YEAR On August 24, 1990 with Unit One operating at 100 percent power and Unit Two in Node Six, it was discovered that the routing of cable associated with the Unit One Local Shutdown Indication (LSI)panels was not in ax)pliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R.On September 6, 1990, it was subsequently discovered that a similar condition existed for the Unit Two LSI panels.The imnediate corrective action taken was initiation of plant aedifications to bring the subject plant cabling into canpliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R.All identified areas are provided with adequate fire detection and suppression to substantially mitigate the impact of a fire on normal and LSI instrumentation.
90-010-00 Sincerely, A.A.BlindPlantManagerAAB:cljAttachment A'O(rHCQ(ii,QOO.GlAcc:D.H.Williams, Jr.A.B.Davis,RegionIIIM.P.AlexichP.A.BarrettJ.E.BorggrenR.F.KroegerB.Walters-Ft.WayneNRCResidentInspector J.G.Giitter,NRCJ.G.KepplerM.R.PadgettG.'harnoff, Esq.DottieSherman,ANILibraryD.HahnINPOS.J.Brewer/B.P.
Therefore, the event should not have presented a significant hazard to the public health and safety.NRC Form 366 (64)9)
LauzauB.A.Svensson/gg$
NAC FOAM 388A (84)9)US.NUCLEAR REGULATOAY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVED 0MB NO.31600104 EXPIRES;4/30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER AESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COL(.ECTION AEQUESTI 504)HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BUADEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P4)30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON.
NRCSORM366(669)U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)LITYNAME(1)D.C.CookNuclearPlant,Unit1APPROVED0MBNO.31504)104 EXPIRES:4(30/92ESTIMATED BURDENPERRESPONSETOCOMPLYWTHTHISINFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI500HAS.FOAWAADCOMMENTSREGARDING BURDENESTIMATETOTHERECORDSANDREPORTSMANAGEMENT BRANCH(P630),U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC20555,ANDTOTHEPAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT(31500104),
DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31600104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT'AND BUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC 20503, FACILITY NAME (1)DOCKET NUMBER (2)LEA NUMBER (Si SEQUENTIAL NVMSER REVISION NVMSER PAGE 13)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1'tEXT///moro t/NCS/4 rtr/Ir/rtd, oto 4/f)foot/HRC Forrrr 3854'4/l(7)0 5 0 0 0 3 1 5 9 0 010 0 0 OF Conditions Prior to Occurrence Unit 1 in Mode 1 at 100 percent Rated Thermal~Unit 2 in Mode 6.Descri tion of Event On August 24, 1990, it was discovered that the routing of cables associated with the Unit One Local Shutdown Indication (LSI)panels was not in ccmpliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R requirements., A postulated fire in any of three Unit One fire areas could have resulted in an inability to maintain power to the LSI panels.The following describes the analysis performed.
OFFICEOFMANAGEMENT ANDBUDGET.WASHINGTON, DC20503.DOCKETNUMBER(21PAE305ooo315icF0510CFR50AppendixRDeficiencies Resulting inPotential LossofLocalShutdownIndication PanelFunctioniEVENTDATE(51LERNUMBER(6)REPORTDATE(7)OTHERFACILITIES INVOLVED(6)MONTHDAYYEARYEARg@SEOUENTIAL NUMBER'/we~tcevteloN
Unit 1 Fire Areas 40 (Zone 41), 48 (Zone 55), and 49 (Zone 56).The area analyses performed identified that a fire in any one of these fire areas could have eliminated both the Unit 1 and Unit 2~to the Local Shutdown Indication (LSI)panels.The discrepant cable in question was cable 1-29685G (EIIS/ED-CBL3) which runs between panels 1-LSI-6 and 1-LSI-6X.A fault of this cable due to a fire would have eliminated the Unit 2 Alternate feed to the Unit 1 LSI panels.The Unit 1 normal power feed to the LSI panels was already assumed lost for a fire in'any of these areas because various cables associated with the availability of MCC 1-ABC-B would have been lost.On September 6, 1990, it was subsequently discovered that a similar condition existed for the Unit, Two LSI panels.A postulated fire in one of the Unit Two fire areas-could have resulted in an inability to maintain power to the LSI panels.The following describes the analysis performed.
.4ocNUMBERMONTHDAYYEARPACILITYNAMESD.C.Cook,Unit2DOCKETNUMBER(SI 0500030824909001000092190050000PERATINGMODE(9)POWERLEYEL100X~.nPv.~v":,'p..ixcx.S.$@THISREI'ORTISSUBMITTED PURSUANTTOTHERLOUIREMENTS OF10cFR():(Cneckoneormoreoithefollow(op) l11150.73(eI(2)Ile)50.73(e)(2)(r) 20.405(c)
Unit 2 Fire Area 29 (Zones 24, 25).The area analyses performed identified that a fire in fire zone 24 would have faulted both the Unit 1 and Unit 2 power to the LSI panels.The discrepant cable in question was cable 1-1936R (EIIS/ED-CBL3).
EOM(c1(11 50.36(cl)21 20.402(bl 20.406(e)()
This Unit 1 alternate power source to the Unit 2 LSI panels runs in fire zone 24 which also contains the Unit 2 normal source cable 2-12467 (EIIS/ED-CBL3).
l(l)20.40S(eI)1)I4)20.405(el(1)(4l) 20.405(e) lllllr)20.405(c)
Although 2-12467 also runs in zone 25, 1-1936R does not.Fire zones 24 and 25 are separated by a three-hour fire-rated wall.NRC Form 388A (84)9)  
)1)(rl50.73(el(2)
(r4)60,73(e)12)(rl4)(Al50,73(e)(2)lrBI)(6150.73(e)(2)(xl50.73(c)(2)ii)X50.73(el(2)(4) 50.73(e)(2)IBI)LICENSEECONTACTFORTHISLER(12)73.71(bl73.71(clOTHERISpeciryinAbttrectoeiowend/n TextIIRCForm366AJNAMES.J.Brewer,NuclearSafetyandLicensinSectionManagerTELEPHONE NUMBERAREACODE614223-220COMPLETEONELINEFOREACHCOMPONENT FAILUREDESCRIBEO INTHISREPORT(13)CAUSESYSTEMCOMPONENT MANUFAC.TURERCAUSESYSTEMCOMPONENT MANUFACTUREATONPRDS5%MD)iSVPPLEMENTAL REPORTEXPECTED(14)YESIIIyn,completeEXPECTEDSIIOMISSIOII DATE)NOABSTRACT(LimittoteOOtpecn,Ee.,epproximetely Iiftnntinpietpecetypewriven tinct)(16)EXPECTEDSUBMISSION DATF.(151MONTHDAYYEAROnAugust24,1990withUnitOneoperating at100percentpowerandUnitTwoinNodeSix,itwasdiscovered thattheroutingofcableassociated withtheUnitOneLocalShutdownIndication (LSI)panelswasnotinax)pliance with10CFR50AppendixR.OnSeptember 6,1990,itwassubsequently discovered thatasimilarcondition existedfortheUnitTwoLSIpanels.Theimnediate corrective actiontakenwasinitiation ofplantaedifications tobringthesubjectplantcablingintocanpliance with10CFR50AppendixR.Allidentified areasareprovidedwithadequatefiredetection andsuppression tosubstantially mitigatetheimpactofafireonnormalandLSIinstrumentation.
Therefore, theeventshouldnothavepresented asignificant hazardtothepublichealthandsafety.NRCForm366(64)9)
NACFOAM388A(84)9)US.NUCLEARREGULATOAY COMMISSION LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATION APPROVED0MBNO.31600104EXPIRES;4/30/92ESTIMATED BURDENPERAESPONSETOCOMPLYWTHTHISINFORMATION COL(.ECTION AEQUESTI504)HRS.FORWARDCOMMENTSREGARDING BUADENESTIMATETOTHERECORDSANDREPORTSMANAGEMENT BRANCH(P4)30),U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON.
DC20555,ANDTOTHEPAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT(31600104),
OFFICEOFMANAGEMENT'AND BUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC20503,FACILITYNAME(1)DOCKETNUMBER(2)LEANUMBER(SiSEQUENTIAL NVMSERREVISIONNVMSERPAGE13)D.C.CookNuclearPlant,Unit1'tEXT///morot/NCS/4rtr/Ir/rtd, oto4/f)foot/HRCForrrr3854'4/l(7)050003159001000OFConditions PriortoOccurrence Unit1inMode1at100percentRatedThermal~Unit2inMode6.DescritionofEventOnAugust24,1990,itwasdiscovered thattheroutingofcablesassociated withtheUnitOneLocalShutdownIndication (LSI)panelswasnotinccmpliance with10CFR50AppendixRrequirements.,
Apostulated fireinanyofthreeUnitOnefireareascouldhaveresultedinaninability tomaintainpowertotheLSIpanels.Thefollowing describes theanalysisperformed.
Unit1FireAreas40(Zone41),48(Zone55),and49(Zone56).Theareaanalysesperformed identified thatafireinanyoneofthesefireareascouldhaveeliminated boththeUnit1andUnit2~totheLocalShutdownIndication (LSI)panels.Thediscrepant cableinquestionwascable1-29685G(EIIS/ED-CBL3) whichrunsbetweenpanels1-LSI-6and1-LSI-6X.
Afaultofthiscableduetoafirewouldhaveeliminated theUnit2Alternate feedtotheUnit1LSIpanels.TheUnit1normalpowerfeedtotheLSIpanelswasalreadyassumedlostforafirein'anyoftheseareasbecausevariouscablesassociated withtheavailability ofMCC1-ABC-Bwouldhavebeenlost.OnSeptember 6,1990,itwassubsequently discovered thatasimilarcondition existedfortheUnit,TwoLSIpanels.Apostulated fireinoneoftheUnitTwofireareas-could haveresultedinaninability tomaintainpowertotheLSIpanels.Thefollowing describes theanalysisperformed.
Unit2FireArea29(Zones24,25).Theareaanalysesperformed identified thatafireinfirezone24wouldhavefaultedboththeUnit1andUnit2powertotheLSIpanels.Thediscrepant cableinquestionwascable1-1936R(EIIS/ED-CBL3).
ThisUnit1alternate powersourcetotheUnit2LSIpanelsrunsinfirezone24whichalsocontainstheUnit2normalsourcecable2-12467(EIIS/ED-CBL3).
Although2-12467alsorunsinzone25,1-1936Rdoesnot.Firezones24and25areseparated byathree-hour fire-rated wall.NRCForm388A(84)9)  


NRCFORM358A(589)US.NUCLEARREGULATORY COlhMISSION LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATION APPROVEDOMBNO.31500104EXPIRESI4130f92ESTIMATED BURDENPERRESPONSETOCOMPLYWTHTHISINFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST)50i)HRS.FORWARDCOMMENTSREGARDING BURDENESTIMATETOTHERECORDSANDREPORTSMANAGEMENT BRANCH(Ph)30),U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION.
NRC FORM 358A (589)US.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COlhMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVED OMB NO.31500104 EXPIRESI 4130f92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST)50i)HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (Ph)30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
WASHINGTON.
WASHINGTON.
DC20555,ANDTOTHEPAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT(31500104).
DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104).
OFFICEOFMANAGEME'NT ANDBUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC20503.FACILITYNAME(1)DOCKETNUMBER(2)LERNUMBER(5)YEAR@PSEQUENTIAL NUMBERREVISIONNUMBERPAGE(3)D.C.CookNuclearPlant,Unit1TEXTlitIrroroEoocoISroerf)od.
OFFICE OF MANAGEME'NT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.FACILITY NAME (1)DOCKET NUMBER (2)LE R NUMB E R (5)YEAR@P SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER PAGE (3)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 TEXT lit Irroro Eooco IS roerf)od.B44 oddi(ior>>I NRC form 36643)(Il)0 5 0 0 0 3]5 9 0 010 00 03 oF0 Cause of Event The condition was the result of insufficient scoping for 10CFR50 Appendix R design changes.Insufficient controls were in place to ensure that new cables added to the plant cm)plied with 10CFR50 Appendix R requirements.
B44oddi(ior>>I NRCform36643)(Il)050003]5900100003oF0CauseofEventThecondition wastheresultofinsufficient scopingfor10CFR50AppendixRdesignchanges.Insufficient controlswereinplacetoensurethatnewcablesaddedtotheplantcm)pliedwith10CFR50AppendixRrequirements.
Anal sis of Event This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73 (a)(2)(ii)(B)and 10CFR50.73 (a)(2)(ii)(C)in that the condition was outside the design basis and not covered by the plant's operating and emergency procedures respectively.
AnalsisofEventThiseventisbeingreportedinaccordance with10CFR50.73 (a)(2)(ii)(B)and10CFR50.73 (a)(2)(ii)(C)inthatthecondition wasoutsidethedesignbasisandnotcoveredbytheplant'soperating andemergency procedures respectively.
Unit 1 Fire Areas 40, 48, and 49 Analysis.a.Fire Area 40: Our Safe Shutdown System Analysis (SSSA)shows that for a fire in area 40 control room indications equivalent to those found on the LSI cabinet would be lost.Due to cable misrouting, the LSI panel indications would also have been lost.Further investigation revealed the reason that the control roan indication would have been lost is because one of the alternate sources to the CRID panels, the isolixreters, is located in this area.What the SSSA does not shcFAT is that the preferred source to the CRID panels would have been available.
Unit1FireAreas40,48,and49Analysis.
The inverters are located in fire area 41 (fire zone 42C).Therefore, normal control room indication of process rmnitoring would have been available for fire in Area 40.b.Fire Areas 48 and 49: Under conservative assumptions of loss of function for an area fire, the SSSA shows that for a fire in areas 48 and 49 both the control room and the LSI panel indications would, have been lost.However, fire areas 48 and 49 are provided with adequate suppression and detection to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.
a.FireArea40:OurSafeShutdownSystemAnalysis(SSSA)showsthatforafireinarea40controlroomindications equivalent tothosefoundontheLSIcabinetwouldbelost.Duetocablemisrouting, theLSIpanelindications wouldalsohavebeenlost.Furtherinvestigation revealedthereasonthatthecontrolroanindication wouldhavebeenlostisbecauseoneofthealternate sourcestotheCRIDpanels,theisolixreters, islocatedinthisarea.WhattheSSSAdoesnotshcFATisthatthepreferred sourcetotheCRIDpanelswouldhavebeenavailable.
NRC Form 358A ($89)  
Theinverters arelocatedinfirearea41(firezone42C).Therefore, normalcontrolroomindication ofprocessrmnitoring wouldhavebeenavailable forfireinArea40.b.FireAreas48and49:Underconservative assumptions oflossoffunctionforanareafire,theSSSAshowsthatforafireinareas48and49boththecontrolroomandtheLSIpanelindications would,havebeenlost.However,fireareas48and49areprovidedwithadequatesuppression anddetection tosubstantially mitigatetheimpactonnormalandLSIinstrumentation.
NRCForm358A($89)  


NACFORM368A)689)U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COI4MISSI ONLICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATION APPAOVEOOMBNO.31600'104 EXPIRES:4/30/92ESTIMATED BURDENPERRESPONSETOCOMPLYWTHTHISINFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST:600HRS.FORWARDCOMMENTSREGARDING BURDENESTIMATETOTHERECORDSANDREPORTSMANAGEMENT BRANCHIF@30),U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC20555,ANDTOTHEPAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT131504104),
NAC FORM 368A)689)U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COI4MISSI ON LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPAOVEO OMB NO.31600'104 EXPIRES: 4/30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 600 HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH IF@30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT 131504104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.FACILITY NAME 11I DOCKET NUMBER 12)YEAR LER NUMBER)8)Sf DUE NTIAL NUMBER IIEVISION NUMSEII PAGE (3)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 TEXT/I/more epece/4 mr)II/red.
OFFICEOFMANAGEMENT ANDBUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC20503.FACILITYNAME11IDOCKETNUMBER12)YEARLERNUMBER)8)SfDUENTIALNUMBERIIEVISION NUMSEIIPAGE(3)D.C.CookNuclearPlant,Unit1TEXT/I/moreepece/4mr)II/red.
Iree eddidone//VRC Farm 3664'4/117) o 5 o o o 3 1590 0 1 0-000 4 oF 05 Anal sis of Event Unit 2 Fire Area 29 (Zones 24 and 25)Analysis: According to our Safe Shutdown Systems Analysis, a fire in area'9 would not have eliminated process nanitoring indication in the control room for steam generators 1 and 4.The following indication would have been available in the Unit 2 control room: 2-BLP-112 2-BLP-142 2MPP-210 2-MPP-240 2-N31 SG 1 Water Level (normal range)SG 4 Water Level (normal range)1 SG 1 Pressure SG 4 Pressure Source Range Ronitoring Channel 1 2-NLP-151 or 2-NLP-153 Pressurizer Water Level 2-NPS-121 RCS Pressure (wide range)These indications could provide an indirect means of determine RCS temperature.
Ireeeddidone//VRC Farm3664'4/117) o5ooo31590010-0004oF05AnalsisofEventUnit2FireArea29(Zones24and25)Analysis:
This area is provided with adequate detection and suppression to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.
According toourSafeShutdownSystemsAnalysis, afireinarea'9wouldnothaveeliminated processnanitoring indication inthecontrolroomforsteamgenerators 1and4.Thefollowing indication wouldhavebeenavailable intheUnit2controlroom:2-BLP-112 2-BLP-142 2MPP-2102-MPP-240 2-N31SG1WaterLevel(normalrange)SG4WaterLevel(normalrange)1SG1PressureSG4PressureSourceRangeRonitoring Channel12-NLP-151 or2-NLP-153 Pressurizer WaterLevel2-NPS-121 RCSPressure(widerange)Theseindications couldprovideanindirectmeansofdetermine RCStemperature.
Conclusion In conclusion, the condition did not adversely impact the health and safety of the public due to the fact that areas 40, 48, and 49 of Unit 1 and Area 29 of Unit 2 are provided with suppression and detection to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.
Thisareaisprovidedwithadequatedetection andsuppression tosubstantially mitigatetheimpactonnormalandLSIinstrumentation.
Also, a large portion of the station normal instrumentation would remain functional since fires propagate at a finite rate rather than causing an instantaneous loss of function for an entire area.NRC Form 388A (689)
Conclusion Inconclusion, thecondition didnotadversely impactthehealthandsafetyofthepublicduetothefactthatareas40,48,and49ofUnit1andArea29ofUnit2areprovidedwithsuppression anddetection tosubstantially mitigatetheimpactonnormalandLSIinstrumentation.
NRC FORM 366A (64)9)U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVED OMB NO.3)504))04 EXPIRESI 4(30(92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI 502)HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P4)30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK RFDUCTION PROJECT (3)504)104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.FACILITY NAME O)DOCKET NUMBER (2)YEAR LER NUMBER (6)SEQUENTIAL NVMSSR REVISION NVMSER PAGE (3)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 TEXT ill mom spsso Is ssqoPsd.oss sddicionsl IYRC FomI 3664'sl (17)o s o o o 315 9 0 010 00 05 OF 0 5 Corrective Actions Unit One A plant Temporary Modification was initiated which installed a 1 ampere fuse in 1-LSI-6 on the load side of the 1-29685G cable.This way a fire in the fire areas of concern would not eliminate the ability of providing Unit 2 power to the LSI panels.Unit Two A plant Minor Modification was initiated to provide a one-hour fire enclosure around the conduit 2-12467 that exists in fire zone 24.There is suppression and detection in the area.Conduit 2-12467 was in 10CFR50 Appendix R compliance on 9/20/90.General Our program for ensuring continued 10CFR50 Appendix R compliance will be revised.It is anticipated that this revision will be in place by March 1, 1991.FB1 led nent Identification None.Previous Similar Events 050-315/90-008:
Also,alargeportionofthestationnormalinstrumentation wouldremainfunctional sincefirespropagate atafiniterateratherthancausinganinstantaneous lossoffunctionforanentirearea.NRCForm388A(689)
10CFR50 Appendix R deficiencies resulting in potential loss of auto-start of service water pumps due to incorrect implementation of design change.NR C Form 366A (64)9) l}}
NRCFORM366A(64)9)U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATION APPROVEDOMBNO.3)504))04 EXPIRESI4(30(92ESTIMATED BURDENPERRESPONSETOCOMPLYWTHTHISINFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI502)HRS.FORWARDCOMMENTSREGARDING BURDENESTIMATETOTHERECORDSANDREPORTSMANAGEMENT BRANCH(P4)30),U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC20555,ANDTOTHEPAPERWORK RFDUCTION PROJECT(3)504)104),
OFFICEOFMANAGEMENT ANDBUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC20503.FACILITYNAMEO)DOCKETNUMBER(2)YEARLERNUMBER(6)SEQUENTIAL NVMSSRREVISIONNVMSERPAGE(3)D.C.CookNuclearPlant,Unit1TEXTillmomspssoIsssqoPsd.osssddicionsl IYRCFomI3664'sl(17)osooo315900100005OF05Corrective ActionsUnitOneAplantTemporary Modification wasinitiated whichinstalled a1amperefusein1-LSI-6ontheloadsideofthe1-29685Gcable.Thiswayafireinthefireareasofconcernwouldnoteliminate theabilityofproviding Unit2powertotheLSIpanels.UnitTwoAplantMinorModification wasinitiated toprovideaone-hourfireenclosure aroundtheconduit2-12467thatexistsinfirezone24.Thereissuppression anddetection inthearea.Conduit2-12467wasin10CFR50AppendixRcompliance on9/20/90.GeneralOurprogramforensuringcontinued 10CFR50AppendixRcompliance willberevised.Itisanticipated thatthisrevisionwillbeinplacebyMarch1,1991.FB1lednentIdentification None.PreviousSimilarEvents050-315/90-008:
10CFR50AppendixRdeficiencies resulting inpotential lossofauto-start ofservicewaterpumpsduetoincorrect implementation ofdesignchange.NRCForm366A(64)9) l}}

Revision as of 08:55, 6 July 2018

LER 90-010-00:on 900824,discovered That Routing of Cable Associated W/Local Shutdown Indication Panels Not in Compliance w/10CFR50,App R.Caused by Insufficient Scoping for Design Changes.Program revised.W/901016 Ltr
ML17328A473
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 09/21/1990
From: BLIND A A, BREWER S J
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LER-90-010, LER-90-10, NUDOCS 9010160022
Download: ML17328A473 (10)


Text

ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM, Qj REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ESSION NBR:9010160022 DOC.DATE:" 90/09/21 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana&05000315 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BREWER,S.J.

Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele BLIND,A.A.

Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

LER 90-010-00:on 900824,10CFR50 App R deficiencies due to potential loss of local shutdown indication panel function.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED LTR 1 ENCL SIZE TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Tncident Rpt, etc.NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 LA COLBURN,T.

INTERNAL: ACNW AEOD/DSP/TPAB NRR/DET/ECMB 9H NRR/DLPQ/LHFBll NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 NRR/DST/SELB 8D RR/gg/S3?LBBD1 REG FIL~02 GN3 TILE 01 EXTERNAL EG&G BRYCE i J H NRC PDR NSIC MURPHY,G.A COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD AEOD/DOA AEOD/ROAB/DS P NRR/DET/EMEB 7E NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 NRR/DREP/PRPB11 NRR/DST/SICB 7E NRR/DST/SRXB 8E RES/DSIR/EIB L ST LOBBY WARD NSIC MAYS,G NUDOCS FULL TXT COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTBTO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 31 ENCL 31 Indiana Michigan~Power Company Cook Nuclear Plant P.O.Box 458 Bridgman.I'Jll 49106 616 465 590t INDIANA NICHIGiAN POWER September 21, 1990 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Rockville, Maryland 20852 Operating Licenses DPR-58 Docket No.50-315Document Control Manager: In accordance with the criteria established by 10 CFR 50.73 entitled Licensee Event Re ortin S stem, the following report is being submitted:

90-010-00 Sincerely, A.A.Blind Plant Manager AAB:clj Attachment A'O (r HCQ (ii, Q OO.GlA cc: D.H.Williams, Jr.A.B.Davis, Region III M.P.Alexich P.A.Barrett J.E.Borggren R.F.Kroeger B.Walters-Ft.Wayne NRC Resident Inspector J.G.Giitter, NRC J.G.Keppler M.R.Padgett G.'harnoff, Esq.Dottie Sherman, ANI Library D.Hahn INPO S.J.Brewer/B.P.

Lauzau B.A.Svensson/gg$

NRC SORM 366 (669)U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)LITY NAME (1)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 APPROVED 0M B NO.31504)104 EXPIRES: 4(30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI 500 HAS.FOAWAAD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P630), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET.WASHINGTON, DC 20503.DOCKET NUMBER (21 PA E 3 0 5 o o o3 15 icF05 10CFR50 Appendix R Deficiencies Resulting in Potential Loss of Local Shutdown Indication Panel Function i EVENT DATE (51 LER NUMBER (6)REPORT DATE (7)OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (6)MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR g@SEOUENTIAL NUMBER'/we~tcevteloN.4oc NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR PACILITY NAMES D.C.Cook, Unit 2 DOCKET NUMBER(SI 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 8 24 9090 010 0 0 09 2190 0 5 0 0 0 0 PE RATING MODE (9)POWER LEYEL 1 0 0 X~.n Pv.~v":,'p..ix cx.S.$@THIS REI'ORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE RLOUIREMENTS OF 10 cFR (): (Cneck one or more oi the follow(op) l111 50.73(e I (2)I le)50.73(e)(2)(r) 20.405(c)EOM(c1(11 50.36(cl)21 20.402(bl 20.406(e)()

l(l)20.40S(e I)1)I 4)20.405(el(1)(4l) 20.405(e)lllllr)20.405(c))1)(rl 50.73(el(2)(r4)60,73(e)12)(rl4)(Al 50,73(e)(2)lrBI)(61 50.73(e)(2)(xl 50.73(c)(2)ii)X 50.73(el(2)(4) 50.73(e)(2)I BI)LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)73.71(bl 73.71(cl OTHER ISpeciry in Abttrect oeiowend/n Text IIRC Form 366AJ NAME S.J.Brewer, Nuclear Safety and Licensin Section Manager TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE 614 223-2 20 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBEO IN THIS REPORT (13)CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC.TURER CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC TUREA TO NPRDS 5%MD)i SVPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)YES III yn, complete EXPECTED SIIOMISSIOII DATE)NO ABSTRACT (Limit to teOO tpecn, Ee., epproximetely Iiftnn tinpie tpece typewriven tinct)(16)EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATF.(151 MONTH DAY YEAR On August 24, 1990 with Unit One operating at 100 percent power and Unit Two in Node Six, it was discovered that the routing of cable associated with the Unit One Local Shutdown Indication (LSI)panels was not in ax)pliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R.On September 6, 1990, it was subsequently discovered that a similar condition existed for the Unit Two LSI panels.The imnediate corrective action taken was initiation of plant aedifications to bring the subject plant cabling into canpliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R.All identified areas are provided with adequate fire detection and suppression to substantially mitigate the impact of a fire on normal and LSI instrumentation.

Therefore, the event should not have presented a significant hazard to the public health and safety.NRC Form 366 (64)9)

NAC FOAM 388A (84)9)US.NUCLEAR REGULATOAY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVED 0MB NO.31600104 EXPIRES;4/30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER AESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COL(.ECTION AEQUESTI 504)HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BUADEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P4)30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON.

DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31600104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT'AND BUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC 20503, FACILITY NAME (1)DOCKET NUMBER (2)LEA NUMBER (Si SEQUENTIAL NVMSER REVISION NVMSER PAGE 13)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1'tEXT///moro t/NCS/4 rtr/Ir/rtd, oto 4/f)foot/HRC Forrrr 3854'4/l(7)0 5 0 0 0 3 1 5 9 0 010 0 0 OF Conditions Prior to Occurrence Unit 1 in Mode 1 at 100 percent Rated Thermal~Unit 2 in Mode 6.Descri tion of Event On August 24, 1990, it was discovered that the routing of cables associated with the Unit One Local Shutdown Indication (LSI)panels was not in ccmpliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R requirements., A postulated fire in any of three Unit One fire areas could have resulted in an inability to maintain power to the LSI panels.The following describes the analysis performed.

Unit 1 Fire Areas 40 (Zone 41), 48 (Zone 55), and 49 (Zone 56).The area analyses performed identified that a fire in any one of these fire areas could have eliminated both the Unit 1 and Unit 2~to the Local Shutdown Indication (LSI)panels.The discrepant cable in question was cable 1-29685G (EIIS/ED-CBL3) which runs between panels 1-LSI-6 and 1-LSI-6X.A fault of this cable due to a fire would have eliminated the Unit 2 Alternate feed to the Unit 1 LSI panels.The Unit 1 normal power feed to the LSI panels was already assumed lost for a fire in'any of these areas because various cables associated with the availability of MCC 1-ABC-B would have been lost.On September 6, 1990, it was subsequently discovered that a similar condition existed for the Unit, Two LSI panels.A postulated fire in one of the Unit Two fire areas-could have resulted in an inability to maintain power to the LSI panels.The following describes the analysis performed.

Unit 2 Fire Area 29 (Zones 24, 25).The area analyses performed identified that a fire in fire zone 24 would have faulted both the Unit 1 and Unit 2 power to the LSI panels.The discrepant cable in question was cable 1-1936R (EIIS/ED-CBL3).

This Unit 1 alternate power source to the Unit 2 LSI panels runs in fire zone 24 which also contains the Unit 2 normal source cable 2-12467 (EIIS/ED-CBL3).

Although 2-12467 also runs in zone 25, 1-1936R does not.Fire zones 24 and 25 are separated by a three-hour fire-rated wall.NRC Form 388A (84)9)

NRC FORM 358A (589)US.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COlhMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVED OMB NO.31500104 EXPIRESI 4130f92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST)50i)HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (Ph)30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.

WASHINGTON.

DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104).

OFFICE OF MANAGEME'NT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.FACILITY NAME (1)DOCKET NUMBER (2)LE R NUMB E R (5)YEAR@P SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER PAGE (3)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 TEXT lit Irroro Eooco IS roerf)od.B44 oddi(ior>>I NRC form 36643)(Il)0 5 0 0 0 3]5 9 0 010 00 03 oF0 Cause of Event The condition was the result of insufficient scoping for 10CFR50 Appendix R design changes.Insufficient controls were in place to ensure that new cables added to the plant cm)plied with 10CFR50 Appendix R requirements.

Anal sis of Event This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73 (a)(2)(ii)(B)and 10CFR50.73 (a)(2)(ii)(C)in that the condition was outside the design basis and not covered by the plant's operating and emergency procedures respectively.

Unit 1 Fire Areas 40, 48, and 49 Analysis.a.Fire Area 40: Our Safe Shutdown System Analysis (SSSA)shows that for a fire in area 40 control room indications equivalent to those found on the LSI cabinet would be lost.Due to cable misrouting, the LSI panel indications would also have been lost.Further investigation revealed the reason that the control roan indication would have been lost is because one of the alternate sources to the CRID panels, the isolixreters, is located in this area.What the SSSA does not shcFAT is that the preferred source to the CRID panels would have been available.

The inverters are located in fire area 41 (fire zone 42C).Therefore, normal control room indication of process rmnitoring would have been available for fire in Area 40.b.Fire Areas 48 and 49: Under conservative assumptions of loss of function for an area fire, the SSSA shows that for a fire in areas 48 and 49 both the control room and the LSI panel indications would, have been lost.However, fire areas 48 and 49 are provided with adequate suppression and detection to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.

NRC Form 358A ($89)

NAC FORM 368A)689)U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COI4MISSI ON LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPAOVEO OMB NO.31600'104 EXPIRES: 4/30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 600 HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH IF@30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT 131504104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.FACILITY NAME 11I DOCKET NUMBER 12)YEAR LER NUMBER)8)Sf DUE NTIAL NUMBER IIEVISION NUMSEII PAGE (3)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 TEXT/I/more epece/4 mr)II/red.

Iree eddidone//VRC Farm 3664'4/117) o 5 o o o 3 1590 0 1 0-000 4 oF 05 Anal sis of Event Unit 2 Fire Area 29 (Zones 24 and 25)Analysis: According to our Safe Shutdown Systems Analysis, a fire in area'9 would not have eliminated process nanitoring indication in the control room for steam generators 1 and 4.The following indication would have been available in the Unit 2 control room: 2-BLP-112 2-BLP-142 2MPP-210 2-MPP-240 2-N31 SG 1 Water Level (normal range)SG 4 Water Level (normal range)1 SG 1 Pressure SG 4 Pressure Source Range Ronitoring Channel 1 2-NLP-151 or 2-NLP-153 Pressurizer Water Level 2-NPS-121 RCS Pressure (wide range)These indications could provide an indirect means of determine RCS temperature.

This area is provided with adequate detection and suppression to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.

Conclusion In conclusion, the condition did not adversely impact the health and safety of the public due to the fact that areas 40, 48, and 49 of Unit 1 and Area 29 of Unit 2 are provided with suppression and detection to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.

Also, a large portion of the station normal instrumentation would remain functional since fires propagate at a finite rate rather than causing an instantaneous loss of function for an entire area.NRC Form 388A (689)

NRC FORM 366A (64)9)U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVED OMB NO.3)504))04 EXPIRESI 4(30(92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI 502)HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P4)30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK RFDUCTION PROJECT (3)504)104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.FACILITY NAME O)DOCKET NUMBER (2)YEAR LER NUMBER (6)SEQUENTIAL NVMSSR REVISION NVMSER PAGE (3)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 TEXT ill mom spsso Is ssqoPsd.oss sddicionsl IYRC FomI 3664'sl (17)o s o o o 315 9 0 010 00 05 OF 0 5 Corrective Actions Unit One A plant Temporary Modification was initiated which installed a 1 ampere fuse in 1-LSI-6 on the load side of the 1-29685G cable.This way a fire in the fire areas of concern would not eliminate the ability of providing Unit 2 power to the LSI panels.Unit Two A plant Minor Modification was initiated to provide a one-hour fire enclosure around the conduit 2-12467 that exists in fire zone 24.There is suppression and detection in the area.Conduit 2-12467 was in 10CFR50 Appendix R compliance on 9/20/90.General Our program for ensuring continued 10CFR50 Appendix R compliance will be revised.It is anticipated that this revision will be in place by March 1, 1991.FB1 led nent Identification None.Previous Similar Events 050-315/90-008:

10CFR50 Appendix R deficiencies resulting in potential loss of auto-start of service water pumps due to incorrect implementation of design change.NR C Form 366A (64)9) l