ML17331A117: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:l'indianaMichiganPowerCompanyP.O.8ox16631Columbus,
{{#Wiki_filter:l'indiana Michigan Power Company P.O.8ox 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 Z INDIANA NICHIGAN POWER AEP:NRC:1184A
OH43216ZINDIANANICHIGANPOWERAEP:NRC:1184A
Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos.50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.DPR-58 and DPR-74 NRC INSPECTION
DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74NRCINSPECTION
REPORT NOS.50-315/930010 (DRSS)AND 50-316/930010 (DRSS);REPLY TO A NOTICE OF VIOLATION U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
REPORTNOS.50-315/930010
(DRSS)AND50-316/930010
(DRSS);REPLYTOANOTICEOFVIOLATION
U.S.NuclearRegulatory
Commission
Commission
Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington,
Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20005 ATTN: A.BE Martin March 29, 1993 Dear Mr.Martin: This letter is in response to Mr.Charles E.Norelius'etter
D.C.20005ATTN:A.BEMartinMarch29,1993DearMr.Martin:ThisletterisinresponsetoMr.CharlesE.Norelius'etter
dated March 4, 1993, which forwarded a Notice of Violation that resulted from the enforcement
datedMarch4,1993,whichforwarded
aNoticeofViolation
thatresultedfromtheenforcement
conference
conference
conducted
conducted on March 2, 1993.The Notice of Violation attached to Mr.Norelius'etter
onMarch2,1993.TheNoticeofViolation
attachedtoMr.Norelius'etter
identified
identified
twoseveritylevelIVviolations
two severity level IV violations
fortheshipmentofanemptyboxthatexceededDepartment
for the shipment of an empty box that exceeded Department
ofTransportation
of Transportation (DOT)-contact dose rate limits and failure to ensure the limits were met prior to shipment.Our response to the Notice of Violation is provided in the attachment
(DOT)-contactdoseratelimitsandfailuretoensurethelimitsweremetpriortoshipment.
to this letter.Sincerely, I E.E.Fi.tzp rick Vice President eg Attachment
OurresponsetotheNoticeofViolation
CC: A.A.Blind-Bridgman J.R.Padgett G.Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector-Bridgman NFEM Section Chief A.B.Davis=Region--III
isprovidedintheattachment
APR 1 g3
tothisletter.Sincerely,
IE.E.Fi.tzprickVicePresident
egAttachment
CC:A.A.Blind-BridgmanJ.R.PadgettG.CharnoffNRCResidentInspector
-BridgmanNFEMSectionChiefA.B.Davis=Region--III
APR1g3
   
   
Attachment
Attachment
toAEP:NRC:1184A
to AEP:NRC:1184A
ResponsetoNoticeofViolation
Response to Notice of Violation
   
   
Attachment
Attachment
toAEP:NRC:1184A
to AEP:NRC:1184A
Page1NRCViolation:
Page 1 NRC Violation:
A."10CFR71.5(a)requiresthatlicensees,
A."10 CFR 71.5(a)requires that licensees, who transport licensed material outside the confines of their plants or deliver licensed material to a carrier for transport, comply with the applicable
whotransport
licensedmaterialoutsidetheconfinesoftheirplantsordeliverlicensedmaterialtoacarrierfortransport,
complywiththeapplicable
requirements
requirements
oftheregulations
of the regulations
appropriate
appropriate
tothemodeoftransport
to the mode of transport of the Department
oftheDepartment
of Transportation (DOT)in 49 CFR Part 170-189.49 CFR 173.427(e)
ofTransportation
requires that an empty package that previously
(DOT)in49CFRPart170-189.49CFR173.427(e)
contained radioactive
requiresthatanemptypackagethatpreviously
materials and has been emptied comply with the requirements
contained
of 49 CFR 173.421(b)
radioactive
that states that radiation levels at any point on the external surface of the package do not exceed 0.5 millirem per hour.Contrary to the above, on January 26, 1993, an empty package was delivered to a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee with external radiation levels of 180 millirem per hour over a small area of the package.This is a Severity Level IV problem (Supplement
materials
V).(1)Reason for Violation The licensee has concluded that the pre-shipping
andhasbeenemptiedcomplywiththerequirements
dose rate survey of container QG-27 was inadequate.
of49CFR173.421(b)
The contributing
thatstatesthatradiation
causes of this violation were that the dose rate meter used for the survey was not optimally suited for surveying an empty container and the location of the small, localized source increased the difficulty
levelsatanypointontheexternalsurfaceofthepackagedonotexceed0.5milliremperhour.Contrarytotheabove,onJanuary26,1993,anemptypackagewasdelivered
of detection.
toavendorinOakRidge,Tennessee
withexternalradiation
levelsof180milliremperhouroverasmallareaofthepackage.ThisisaSeverityLevelIVproblem(Supplement
V).(1)ReasonforViolation
Thelicenseehasconcluded
thatthepre-shipping
doseratesurveyofcontainer
QG-27wasinadequate.
Thecontributing
causesofthisviolation
werethatthedoseratemeterusedforthesurveywasnotoptimally
suitedforsurveying
anemptycontainer
andthelocationofthesmall,localized
sourceincreased
thedifficulty
ofdetection.
(2)Corrective
(2)Corrective
ActionsTakenandResultsAchievedOnJanuary27,1993,thelicenseeinformedtheNRCofnotification
Actions Taken and Results Achieved On January 27, 1993, the licensee informed the NRC of notification
fromavendorinOakRidge,Tennessee,
from a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, that a sea van, manifested
thataseavan,manifested
as Radioactive
asRadioactive
Material Excepted Package Empty Packaging, UN2910, had been received with dose rate surveys indicating
MaterialExceptedPackageEmptyPackaging,
external radiation levels that exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.On January 29, 1993, a representative
UN2910,hadbeenreceivedwithdoseratesurveysindicating
of the licensee arrived at the vendor's facility to investigate
externalradiation
the apparent violation.
levelsthatexceededthe0.5milliremperhourallowable
The vendor had removed, measured, and disposed of the particle the previous day.Consequently, the licensee was unable to verify the dose rates on the sea van.  
limit.OnJanuary29,1993,arepresentative
ofthelicenseearrivedatthevendor'sfacilitytoinvestigate
theapparentviolation.
Thevendorhadremoved,measured,
anddisposedoftheparticlethepreviousday.Consequently,
thelicenseewasunabletoverifythedoseratesontheseavan.  
   
   
Attachment
Attachment
toAEP:NRC:1184A
to AEP:NRC:1184A
Page2(3)Preventive
Page 2 (3)Preventive
ActionsTakenToAvoidFurtherViolations
Actions Taken To Avoid Further Violations
Preventive
Preventive
actionstakentopreventrecurrence
actions taken to prevent recurrence
ofasimilareventincludeindependent
of a similar event include independent
surveysofalloutgoingshipments
surveys of all outgoing shipments of radioactive
ofradioactive
material and enhancement
materialandenhancement
of procedures
ofprocedures
pertaining
pertaining
toshipmentofradioactive
to shipment of radioactive
material.
material.The policy of independent
Thepolicyofindependent
surveys for all outgoing shipments of radioactive
surveysforalloutgoingshipments
material was initiated on February 1, 1993.On February 18, 1993, a policy memorandum
ofradioactive
was distributed
materialwasinitiated
to all radiation protection
onFebruary1,1993.OnFebruary18,1993,apolicymemorandum
wasdistributed
toallradiation
protection
department
department
personnel
personnel outlining standards for shipment of radioactive
outlining
material.The procedure, Preparation
standards
of Radioactive
forshipmentofradioactive
Shipments, 12 THP 3150.RMC.202, was revised to include independent
material.
surveys of all outgoing radioactive
Theprocedure,
material shipments, utilization
Preparation
of optimal instrumentation
ofRadioactive
for surveys, and a checklist for"empty package" shipments.
Shipments,
This procedure revision was completed on March 1, 1993.Training for selected radiation protection
12THP3150.RMC.202,
personnel on the description
wasrevisedtoincludeindependent
of the event, selection and use of optimal equipment for surveys, and proper survey methodologies
surveysofalloutgoingradioactive
will be completed by March 31, 1993.(4)Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved Full compliance
materialshipments,
will be achieved on March 31, 1993, with the completion
utilization
of scheduled training for selected radiation protection
ofoptimalinstrumentation
forsurveys,andachecklist
for"emptypackage"shipments.
Thisprocedure
revisionwascompleted
onMarch1,1993.Trainingforselectedradiation
protection
personnel
onthedescription
oftheevent,selection
anduseofoptimalequipment
forsurveys,andpropersurveymethodologies
willbecompleted
byMarch31,1993.(4)DateWhenFullComlianceWillBeAchievedFullcompliance
willbeachievedonMarch31,1993,withthecompletion
ofscheduled
trainingforselectedradiation
protection
personnel.
personnel.
B.49CFR173.475requires,
B.49 CFR 173.475 requires, in part, that before each shipment of any radioactive
inpart,thatbeforeeachshipmentofanyradioactive
material package, the shipper ensure by examination
materialpackage,theshipperensurebyexamination
or appropriate
orappropriate
tests, that the external radiation levels are within allowable limits.Contrary to the above, on January 26, 1993, an empty package was shipped without the shipper ensuring by appropriate
tests,thattheexternalradiation
surveys that external radiation levels were within applicable
levelsarewithinallowable
limits.Specifically, the departure survey failed to detect a radiation level of 180 millirem per hour, which exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.This is a Severity Level XV problem (Supplement
limits.Contrarytotheabove,onJanuary26,1993,anemptypackagewasshippedwithouttheshipperensuringbyappropriate
surveysthatexternalradiation
levelswerewithinapplicable
limits.Specifically,
thedeparture
surveyfailedtodetectaradiation
levelof180milliremperhour,whichexceededthe0.5milliremperhourallowable
limit.ThisisaSeverityLevelXVproblem(Supplement
V)."  
V)."  
Attachment
Attachment
toAEP:NRC:1184A
to AEP:NRC:1184A
Page3(1)ReasonforViolation
Page 3 (1)Reason for Violation The licensee has concluded that the pre-shipping
Thelicenseehasconcluded
dose rate survey of container QG-27 was inadequate.
thatthepre-shipping
The contributing
doseratesurveyofcontainer
causes of this violation were that the dose rate meter used for the survey was not optimally suited for surveying an empty container and the location of the small, localized source increased the difficulty
QG-27wasinadequate.
of detection.
Thecontributing
causesofthisviolation
werethatthedoseratemeterusedforthesurveywasnotoptimally
suitedforsurveying
anemptycontainer
andthelocationofthesmall,localized
sourceincreased
thedifficulty
ofdetection.
(2)Corrective
(2)Corrective
ActionsTakenandResultsAchievedOnJanuary27,1993,thelicenseeinformedtheNRCofnotification
Actions Taken and Results Achieved On January 27, 1993, the licensee informed the NRC of notification
fromavendorinOakRidge,Tennessee,
from a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, that a sea van, manifested
thataseavan,manifested
as Radioactive
asRadioactive
Material Excepted Package Empty Packaging, UN2910, had been received with dose rate surveys indicating
MaterialExceptedPackageEmptyPackaging,
external radiation levels that exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.On January 29, 1993, a representative
UN2910,hadbeenreceivedwithdoseratesurveysindicating
of the licensee arrived at the vendor's facility to investigate
externalradiation
the apparent violation.
levelsthatexceededthe0.5milliremperhourallowable
The vendor had removed, measured, and disposed of the particle the prevt.ous day.Consequently, the licensee was unable to verify the dose rates on the sea van.(3)Preventive
limit.OnJanuary29,1993,arepresentative
Actions Taken To Avoid Further Violations
ofthelicenseearrivedatthevendor'sfacilitytoinvestigate
theapparentviolation.
Thevendorhadremoved,measured,
anddisposedoftheparticletheprevt.ous
day.Consequently,
thelicenseewasunabletoverifythedoseratesontheseavan.(3)Preventive
ActionsTakenToAvoidFurtherViolations
Preventive
Preventive
actionstakentopreventrecurrence
actions taken to prevent recurrence
ofasimilareventincludeindependent
of a similar event include independent
surveysofalloutgoingshipments
surveys of all outgoing shipments of radioactive
ofradioactive
material and enhancement
materialandenhancement
of procedures
ofprocedures
pertaining
pertaining
toshipmentofradioactive
to shipment of radioactive
material.
material.The policy of independent
Thepolicyofindependent
surveys for all outgoing shipments of radioactive
surveysforalloutgoingshipments
material was initiated on February 1, 1993.On February 18, 1993, a policy memorandum
ofradioactive
was distributed
materialwasinitiated
to all radiation protection
onFebruary1,1993.OnFebruary18,1993,apolicymemorandum
wasdistributed
toallradiation
protection
department
department
personnel
personnel outlining standards for shipment of radioactive
outlining
material.The procedure, Preparation
standards
of Radioactive
forshipmentofradioactive
Shipments, 12 THP 3150.RMC.202, was revised to include independent
material.
surveys of all outgoing radioactive
Theprocedure,
material shipments, utilization
Preparation
of optimal instrumentati.on
ofRadioactive
for surveys, and a checklist for"empty package" shipments.
Shipments,
This procedure revision was completed on March 1, 1993.  
12THP3150.RMC.202,
wasrevisedtoincludeindependent
surveysofalloutgoingradioactive
materialshipments,
utilization
ofoptimalinstrumentati.on
forsurveys,andachecklist
for"emptypackage"shipments.
Thisprocedure
revisionwascompleted
onMarch1,1993.  
Attachment
Attachment
toAEP:NRC:1184A
to AEP:NRC:1184A
Page4Trainingforselectedradiation
Page 4 Training for selected radiation protection
protection
personnel on the description
personnel
of the event, selection and use of optimal equipment for surveys, and proper survey methodologies
onthedescription
will be completed by March 31, 1993.(4)Date When Full Com lienee Will Be Achieved Full compliance
oftheevent,selection
will be acnieved on March 31, 1993, with tne completion
anduseofoptimalequipment
of scheduled training for selected radiation protection
forsurveys,andpropersurveymethodologies
willbecompleted
byMarch31,1993.(4)DateWhenFullComlieneeWillBeAchievedFullcompliance
willbeacnievedonMarch31,1993,withtnecompletion
ofscheduled
trainingforselectedradiation
protection
personnel.  
personnel.  
'I  
'I  
ACCELERATED
ACCELERATED
DOCUMENTDISTRIBUTION
DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEMREGULATORY
SYSTEM REGULATORY
INFORMATION
INFORMATION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSION
SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9304020176
NBR:9304020176
DOC.DATE: 93/03/29 NOTARIZED:
DOC.DATE:
NO DOCKET FACIL:5G-315
93/03/29NOTARIZED:
Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 50-316 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M 05000316 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
NODOCKETFACIL:5G-315
DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaM05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION
FITZPATRICK,E.
FITZPATRICK,E.
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly
Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME
Indiana&MichiganEleRECIP.NAME
'ECiPIENT AFFILIATION
'ECiPIENT
AFFILIATION
MARTIN,A.B.
MARTIN,A.B.
DocumentControlBranch(Document
Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)SUBJECT: Responds to NRC 930304 ltr re violations
ControlDesk)SUBJECT:RespondstoNRC930304ltrreviolations
noted in insp repts 50-315/93-10
notedininsprepts50-315/93-10
&50-316/93-10.Corrective
&50-316/93-10.Corrective
actions:training
actions:training
forselectedradiation
for selected radiation protection
protection
personnel on event&use of optimal equipment for surveys will be completed by 930331.DISTRIBUTION
personnel
CODE: IE06D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
onevent&useofoptimalequipment
ENCL SIZE: TITLE: Environ&Radiological
forsurveyswillbecompleted
(50 DKT)-Insp Rept/Notice
by930331.DISTRIBUTION
of Violation Respons NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 LA DEANiW INTERNAL: AEOD/ANDERSON,R
CODE:IE06DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR
NMSS/SGTB 4E4 NRR/DRIL/RPEB10
ENCLSIZE:TITLE:Environ&Radiological
(50DKT)-Insp
Rept/Notice
ofViolation
ResponsNOTES:RECIPIENT
IDCODE/NAME
PD3-1LADEANiWINTERNAL:
AEOD/ANDERSON,R
NMSS/SGTB
4E4NRR/DRIL/RPEB10
NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
OGC/HDS2RES'GN3FILE01EXTERNAL:
OGC/HDS2 RES'GN3 FILE 01 EXTERNAL: EG&G SIMPSON,F NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 0 1-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD AEOD/DSP NRR/DREP/PRPB10
EG&GSIMPSON,F
NSICCOPIESLTTRENCL101-1111111111111112211RECIPIENT
IDCODE/NAME
PD3-1PDAEOD/DSPNRR/DREP/PRPB10
NRR/PMAS/ILRB12
NRR/PMAS/ILRB12
OEDREGLE02RGN3SS/RPBRGN4MURRAY,BNRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL11112211111,1111111NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
OE D REG LE 02 RGN3 SS/RPB RGN4 MURRAY,B NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTEICONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMPl-37(EXT.504-2065)
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.504-2065)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION
TOELIMINATE
LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEEDl TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL 21
YOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTION
LISTSFORDOCUMENTS
YOUDON'TNEEDlTOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR22ENCL21
   
   
indianaMichiganPowerCompanyP.O.Box16631'oinmbos
indiana Michigan Power Company P.O.Box 16631'oinmbos
OH4321F~R-INDIANANICHIGAMPOWMAEP'NRO'1184A
OH 4321F~R-INDIANA NICHIGAM POWM AEP'NRO'1184A
DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2Docket,.Nos.
Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket,.Nos.
50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74NRCINSPECTION
50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.DPR-58 and DPR-74 NRC INSPECTION
REPORTNOS.50-315/930010
REPORT NOS.50-315/930010 (DRSS)AND 50-316/930010 (DRSS);REPLY TO A NOTICE OF VIOLATION U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
(DRSS)AND50-316/930010
(DRSS);REPLYTOANOTICEOFVIOLATION
U.S.NuclearRegulatory
Commission
Commission
Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington,
Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20005 ATTN: A.B.Martin March 29, 1993 Dear Mr.Martin: This letter is in response to Mr.Charles E.Norelius'etter
D.C.20005ATTN:A.B.MartinMarch29,1993DearMr.Martin:ThisletterisinresponsetoMr.CharlesE.Norelius'etter
dated March 4, 1993, which forwarded a Notice of Violation that resulted from the enforcement
datedMarch4,1993,whichforwarded
conference, conducted on March 2, 1993.The Notice of Violation attached to Mr.Norelius'letter identified
aNoticeofViolation
two severity level IV violations
thatresultedfromtheenforcement
for the shipment'f an empty box that exceeded Department
conference,
of Transportation (DOT)contact dose rate limits and failure to ensure the limits were met prior to shipment.Our response to the Notice of Violation is provided in the attachment
conducted
to this letter.Sincerely, E.E.Fitzp rick Vice President eg Attachment
onMarch2,1993.TheNoticeofViolation
CC: A.A.Blind-Bridgman J.R.Padgett G.Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector-Bridgman NFEM Section Chief A.B.Davis-Region III 020034 9304020176
attachedtoMr.Norelius'
930329 PDR ADQCK 050003l5 6 PDR>py<I]  
letteridentified
twoseveritylevelIVviolations
fortheshipment'fanemptyboxthatexceededDepartment
ofTransportation
(DOT)contactdoseratelimitsandfailuretoensurethelimitsweremetpriortoshipment.
OurresponsetotheNoticeofViolation
isprovidedintheattachment
tothisletter.Sincerely,
E.E.FitzprickVicePresident
egAttachment
CC:A.A.Blind-BridgmanJ.R.PadgettG.CharnoffNRCResidentInspector
-BridgmanNFEMSectionChiefA.B.Davis-RegionIII0200349304020176
930329PDRADQCK050003l56PDR>py<I]  
Attachment
Attachment
toAEP:NRC:1184A
to AEP:NRC:1184A
ResponsetoNoticeofViolation
Response to Notice of Violation
Attachment
Attachment
toAEP:NRC:1184A
to AEP:NRC:1184A
Page1NRCViolation:
Page 1 NRC Violation:
"10CFR71.5(a)requiresthatlicensees,
"10 CFR 71.5(a)requires that licensees, who transport licensed material outside the confines of their plants or deliver licensed material to a carrier for transport, comply with the applicable
whotransport
licensedmaterialoutsidetheconfinesoftheirplantsordeliverlicensedmaterialtoacarrierfortransport,
complywiththeapplicable
requirements
requirements
oftheregulations
of the regulations
appropriate
appropriate
tothemodeoftransport
to the mode of transport of the Department
oftheDepartment
of Transportation (DOT)in 49 CFR Part 170-189.49 CFR 173.427(e)
ofTransportation
requires that an empty package that previously
(DOT)in49CFRPart170-189.49CFR173.427(e)
contained radioactive
requiresthatanemptypackagethatpreviously
materials and has been emptied comply with the requirements
contained
of 49 CFR 173.421(b)
radioactive
that states that radiation levels at any point on the external surface of the package do not exceed 0.5 millirem per hour.Contrary to the above, on January 26, 1993, an empty package was delivered to a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee with external radiation levels of 180 millirem per hour over a small area of the package.This is a Severity Level IV problem (Supplement
materials
V).(1)Reason for Violation The licensee has concluded that the pre-shipping
andhasbeenemptiedcomplywiththerequirements
dose rate survey of container QG-27 was inadequate.
of49CFR173.421(b)
The contributing
thatstatesthatradiation
causes of this violation were that the dose rate meter used for the survey was not optimally suited for surveying an empty container and the location of the small,, localized source increased the difficulty
levelsatanypointontheexternalsurfaceofthepackagedonotexceed0.5milliremperhour.Contrarytotheabove,onJanuary26,1993,anemptypackagewasdelivered
of detection.
toavendorinOakRidge,Tennessee
withexternalradiation
levelsof180milliremperhouroverasmallareaofthepackage.ThisisaSeverityLevelIVproblem(Supplement
V).(1)ReasonforViolation
Thelicenseehasconcluded
thatthepre-shipping
doseratesurveyofcontainer
QG-27wasinadequate.
Thecontributing
causesofthisviolation
werethatthedoseratemeterusedforthesurveywasnotoptimally
suitedforsurveying
anemptycontainer
andthelocationofthesmall,,localized
sourceincreased
thedifficulty
ofdetection.
(2)Corrective
(2)Corrective
ActionsTakenandResultsAchievedOnJanuary27,1993,thelicenseeinformedtheNRCofnotification
Actions Taken and Results Achieved On January 27, 1993, the licensee informed the NRC of notification
fromavendorinOakRidge,Tennessee,
from a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, that a sea van, manifested
thataseavan,manifested
as Radioactive
asRadioactive
Material Excepted Package Empty Packaging, UN2910, had been received with dose rate surveys indicating
MaterialExceptedPackageEmptyPackaging,
external radiation levels that exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.On January 29, 1993, a representative
UN2910,hadbeenreceivedwithdoseratesurveysindicating
of the licensee arrived at the vendor's facility to investigate
externalradiation
the apparent violation.
levelsthatexceededthe0.5milliremperhourallowable
The vendor had removed, measured, and disposed of the particle the previous day.Consequently, the licensee was unable to verify the dose rates on the sea van.  
limit.OnJanuary29,1993,arepresentative
ofthelicenseearrivedatthevendor'sfacilitytoinvestigate
theapparentviolation.
Thevendorhadremoved,measured,
anddisposedoftheparticlethepreviousday.Consequently,
thelicenseewasunabletoverifythedoseratesontheseavan.  
Attachment
Attachment
toAEP:NRC:1184A
to AEP:NRC:1184A
Page2(3)Preventive
Page 2 (3)Preventive
ActionsTakenToAvoidFurtherViolations
Actions Taken To Avoid Further Violations
Preventive
Preventive
actionstakentopreventrecurrence
actions taken to prevent recurrence
ofasimilareventincludeindependent
of a similar event include independent
surveysofalloutgoingshipments
surveys of all outgoing shipments of radioactive
ofradioactive
material and enhancement
materialandenhancement
of procedures
ofprocedures
pertaining
pertaining
toshiprpent
to shiprpent of radioactive
ofradioactive
material.The policy of independent
material.
surveys for all outgoing shipments of radioactive
Thepolicyofindependent
material was initiated on February 1, 1993.On February 18, 1993, a policy memorandum
surveysforalloutgoingshipments
was distributed
ofradioactive
to all radiation protection
materialwasinitiated
onFebruary1,1993.OnFebruary18,1993,apolicymemorandum
wasdistributed
toallradiation
protection
department
department
personnel
personnel outlining standards for shipment of radioactive
outlining
material.The procedure, Preparation
standards
of Radioactive
forshipmentofradioactive
Shipments, 12 THP 3150.RMC.202, was revised to include independent
material.
surveys of all outgoing radioactive
Theprocedure,
material shipments, utilization
Preparation
of optimal instrumentation
ofRadioactive
for surveys, and a checklist for"empty package" shipments.
Shipments,
This procedure revision was completed on March 1, 1993.Training for selected radiation protection
12THP3150.RMC.202,
personnel on the description
wasrevisedtoincludeindependent
of the event, selection and use of optimal equipment for surveys, and proper survey methodologies
surveysofalloutgoingradioactive
will be completed by March 31, 1993.(4)Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved Full compliance
materialshipments,
will be achieved on March 31, 1993, with the completion
utilization
of scheduled training for selected radiation protection
ofoptimalinstrumentation
forsurveys,andachecklist
for"emptypackage"shipments.
Thisprocedure
revisionwascompleted
onMarch1,1993.Trainingforselectedradiation
protection
personnel
onthedescription
oftheevent,selection
anduseofoptimalequipment
forsurveys,andpropersurveymethodologies
willbecompleted
byMarch31,1993.(4)DateWhenFullComlianceWillBeAchievedFullcompliance
willbeachievedonMarch31,1993,withthecompletion
ofscheduled
trainingforselectedradiation
protection
personnel.
personnel.
49CFR173.475requires,
49 CFR 173.475 requires, in part, that before each shipment of any radioactive
inpart,thatbeforeeachshipmentofanyradioactive
material package, the shipper ensure by examination
materialpackage,theshipperensurebyexamination
or appropriate
orappropriate
tests, that the external radiation levels are within allowable limits.Contrary to the above, on January 26, 1993,, an empty package was shipped without the shipper ensuring by appropriate
tests,thattheexternalradiation
surveys that external radiation levels were within applicable
levelsarewithinallowable
limits.Specifically, the departure survey failed to detect a radiation level of 180 millirem per hour, which exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.This is a Severity Level IV problem (Supplement
limits.Contrarytotheabove,onJanuary26,1993,,anemptypackagewasshippedwithouttheshipperensuringbyappropriate
surveysthatexternalradiation
levelswerewithinapplicable
limits.Specifically,
thedeparture
surveyfailedtodetectaradiation
levelof180milliremperhour,whichexceededthe0.5milliremperhourallowable
limit.ThisisaSeverityLevelIVproblem(Supplement
V)."  
V)."  
Attachment
Attachment
toAEP:NRC:1184A
to AEP:NRC:1184A
Page3(1)ReasonforViolation
Page 3 (1)Reason for Violation The licensee has concluded that the pre-shipping
Thelicenseehasconcluded
dose rate survey of container QG-27 was inadequate.
thatthepre-shipping
The contributing
doseratesurveyofcontainer
causes of this violation were that the dose rate meter used for the survey was not optimally suited for surveying an empty container and the location of the small, localized source increased the difficulty
QG-27wasinadequate.
of detection.
Thecontributing
causesofthisviolation
werethatthedoseratemeterusedforthesurveywasnotoptimally
suitedforsurveying
anemptycontainer
andthelocationofthesmall,localized
sourceincreased
thedifficulty
ofdetection.
(2)Corrective
(2)Corrective
ActionsTakenandResultsAchievedOnJanuary27,1993,thelicenseeinformedtheNRCofnotification
Actions Taken and Results Achieved On January 27, 1993, the licensee informed the NRC of notification
fromavendorinOakRidge,Tennessee,
from a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, that a sea van, manifested
thataseavan,manifested
as Radioactive
asRadioactive
Material Excepted Package Empty Packaging, UN2910, had been received with dose rate surveys indicating
MaterialExceptedPackageEmptyPackaging,
external radiation levels that exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.On January 29, 1993, a representative
UN2910,hadbeenreceivedwithdoseratesurveysindicating
of the licensee arrived't the vendor's facility to investigate
externalradiation
the apparent violation.
levelsthatexceededthe0.5milliremperhourallowable
The vendor had removed, measured, and disposed of the particle the previous day.Consequently, the licensee was unable to verify the dose rates on the sea van.(3)Preventive
limit.OnJanuary29,1993,arepresentative
Actions Taken To Avoid Further Violations
ofthelicenseearrived'tthevendor'sfacilitytoinvestigate
theapparentviolation.
Thevendorhadremoved,measured,
anddisposedoftheparticlethepreviousday.Consequently,
thelicenseewasunabletoverifythedoseratesontheseavan.(3)Preventive
ActionsTakenToAvoidFurtherViolations
Preventive
Preventive
actionstakentopreventrecurrence
actions taken to prevent recurrence
ofasimilareventincludeindependent
of a similar event include independent
surveysofalloutgoingshipments
surveys of all outgoing shipments of radioactive
ofradioactive
material and enhancement
materialandenhancement
of procedures
ofprocedures
pertaining
pertaining
toshipmentofradioactive
to shipment of radioactive
material.
material.The policy of independent
Thepolicyofindependent
surveys for all outgoing shipments of radioactive
surveysforalloutgoingshipments
material was initiated on February 1, 1993.On February 18, 1993, a policy memorandum
ofradioactive
was distributed
materialwasinitiated
to all radiation protection
onFebruary1,1993.OnFebruary18,1993,apolicymemorandum
wasdistributed
toallradiation
protection
department
department
personnel
personnel outlining standards for shipment of radioactive
outlining
material.The procedure, Preparation
standards
of Radioactive
forshipmentofradioactive
Shipments, 12 THP 3150,RMC.202, was revised to include independent
material.
surveys of all outgoing radioactive
Theprocedure,
material shipments, utilization
Preparation
of optimal instrumentation
ofRadioactive
for surveys, and a checklist for"empty package" shipments.
Shipments,
This procedure revision was completed on March 1, 1993.  
12THP3150,RMC.202,
wasrevisedtoincludeindependent
surveysofalloutgoingradioactive
materialshipments,
utilization
ofoptimalinstrumentation
forsurveys,andachecklist
for"emptypackage"shipments.
Thisprocedure
revisionwascompleted
onMarch1,1993.  
Attachment
Attachment
toAEP:NRC:1184A
to AEP:NRC:1184A
Page4Trainingforselectedradiation
Page 4 Training for selected radiation protection
protection
personnel on the description
personnel
of the event, selection and use of optimal equipment for surveys, and proper survey methodologies
onthedescription
will be completed by March<<31, 1993.(4)Date Vhen Full Com liance Vill Be Achieved Full compliance
oftheevent,selection
will be achieved on March 31, 1993, with the completion
anduseofoptimalequipment
of scheduled training for selected radiation protection
forsurveys,andpropersurveymethodologies
willbecompleted
byMarch<<31,1993.(4)DateVhenFullComlianceVillBeAchievedFullcompliance
willbeachievedonMarch31,1993,withthecompletion
ofscheduled
trainingforselectedradiation
protection
personnel.
personnel.
}}
}}

Revision as of 08:37, 6 July 2018

Responds to NRC 930304 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-315/93-10 & 50-316/93-10.Corrective Actions:Training for Selected Radiation Protection Personnel on Event & Use of Optimal Equipment for Surveys Will Be Completed by 930331
ML17331A117
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 03/29/1993
From: FITZPATRICK E
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: MARTIN A B
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
AEP:NRC:1184A, NUDOCS 9304020176
Download: ML17331A117 (18)


See also: IR 05000315/1993010

Text

l'indiana Michigan Power Company P.O.8ox 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 Z INDIANA NICHIGAN POWER AEP:NRC:1184A

Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos.50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.DPR-58 and DPR-74 NRC INSPECTION

REPORT NOS.50-315/930010 (DRSS)AND 50-316/930010 (DRSS);REPLY TO A NOTICE OF VIOLATION U.S.Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20005 ATTN: A.BE Martin March 29, 1993 Dear Mr.Martin: This letter is in response to Mr.Charles E.Norelius'etter

dated March 4, 1993, which forwarded a Notice of Violation that resulted from the enforcement

conference

conducted on March 2, 1993.The Notice of Violation attached to Mr.Norelius'etter

identified

two severity level IV violations

for the shipment of an empty box that exceeded Department

of Transportation (DOT)-contact dose rate limits and failure to ensure the limits were met prior to shipment.Our response to the Notice of Violation is provided in the attachment

to this letter.Sincerely, I E.E.Fi.tzp rick Vice President eg Attachment

CC: A.A.Blind-Bridgman J.R.Padgett G.Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector-Bridgman NFEM Section Chief A.B.Davis=Region--III

APR 1 g3

Attachment

to AEP:NRC:1184A

Response to Notice of Violation

Attachment

to AEP:NRC:1184A

Page 1 NRC Violation:

A."10 CFR 71.5(a)requires that licensees, who transport licensed material outside the confines of their plants or deliver licensed material to a carrier for transport, comply with the applicable

requirements

of the regulations

appropriate

to the mode of transport of the Department

of Transportation (DOT)in 49 CFR Part 170-189.49 CFR 173.427(e)

requires that an empty package that previously

contained radioactive

materials and has been emptied comply with the requirements

of 49 CFR 173.421(b)

that states that radiation levels at any point on the external surface of the package do not exceed 0.5 millirem per hour.Contrary to the above, on January 26, 1993, an empty package was delivered to a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee with external radiation levels of 180 millirem per hour over a small area of the package.This is a Severity Level IV problem (Supplement

V).(1)Reason for Violation The licensee has concluded that the pre-shipping

dose rate survey of container QG-27 was inadequate.

The contributing

causes of this violation were that the dose rate meter used for the survey was not optimally suited for surveying an empty container and the location of the small, localized source increased the difficulty

of detection.

(2)Corrective

Actions Taken and Results Achieved On January 27, 1993, the licensee informed the NRC of notification

from a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, that a sea van, manifested

as Radioactive

Material Excepted Package Empty Packaging, UN2910, had been received with dose rate surveys indicating

external radiation levels that exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.On January 29, 1993, a representative

of the licensee arrived at the vendor's facility to investigate

the apparent violation.

The vendor had removed, measured, and disposed of the particle the previous day.Consequently, the licensee was unable to verify the dose rates on the sea van.

Attachment

to AEP:NRC:1184A

Page 2 (3)Preventive

Actions Taken To Avoid Further Violations

Preventive

actions taken to prevent recurrence

of a similar event include independent

surveys of all outgoing shipments of radioactive

material and enhancement

of procedures

pertaining

to shipment of radioactive

material.The policy of independent

surveys for all outgoing shipments of radioactive

material was initiated on February 1, 1993.On February 18, 1993, a policy memorandum

was distributed

to all radiation protection

department

personnel outlining standards for shipment of radioactive

material.The procedure, Preparation

of Radioactive

Shipments, 12 THP 3150.RMC.202, was revised to include independent

surveys of all outgoing radioactive

material shipments, utilization

of optimal instrumentation

for surveys, and a checklist for"empty package" shipments.

This procedure revision was completed on March 1, 1993.Training for selected radiation protection

personnel on the description

of the event, selection and use of optimal equipment for surveys, and proper survey methodologies

will be completed by March 31, 1993.(4)Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved Full compliance

will be achieved on March 31, 1993, with the completion

of scheduled training for selected radiation protection

personnel.

B.49 CFR 173.475 requires, in part, that before each shipment of any radioactive

material package, the shipper ensure by examination

or appropriate

tests, that the external radiation levels are within allowable limits.Contrary to the above, on January 26, 1993, an empty package was shipped without the shipper ensuring by appropriate

surveys that external radiation levels were within applicable

limits.Specifically, the departure survey failed to detect a radiation level of 180 millirem per hour, which exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.This is a Severity Level XV problem (Supplement

V)."

Attachment

to AEP:NRC:1184A

Page 3 (1)Reason for Violation The licensee has concluded that the pre-shipping

dose rate survey of container QG-27 was inadequate.

The contributing

causes of this violation were that the dose rate meter used for the survey was not optimally suited for surveying an empty container and the location of the small, localized source increased the difficulty

of detection.

(2)Corrective

Actions Taken and Results Achieved On January 27, 1993, the licensee informed the NRC of notification

from a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, that a sea van, manifested

as Radioactive

Material Excepted Package Empty Packaging, UN2910, had been received with dose rate surveys indicating

external radiation levels that exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.On January 29, 1993, a representative

of the licensee arrived at the vendor's facility to investigate

the apparent violation.

The vendor had removed, measured, and disposed of the particle the prevt.ous day.Consequently, the licensee was unable to verify the dose rates on the sea van.(3)Preventive

Actions Taken To Avoid Further Violations

Preventive

actions taken to prevent recurrence

of a similar event include independent

surveys of all outgoing shipments of radioactive

material and enhancement

of procedures

pertaining

to shipment of radioactive

material.The policy of independent

surveys for all outgoing shipments of radioactive

material was initiated on February 1, 1993.On February 18, 1993, a policy memorandum

was distributed

to all radiation protection

department

personnel outlining standards for shipment of radioactive

material.The procedure, Preparation

of Radioactive

Shipments, 12 THP 3150.RMC.202, was revised to include independent

surveys of all outgoing radioactive

material shipments, utilization

of optimal instrumentati.on

for surveys, and a checklist for"empty package" shipments.

This procedure revision was completed on March 1, 1993.

Attachment

to AEP:NRC:1184A

Page 4 Training for selected radiation protection

personnel on the description

of the event, selection and use of optimal equipment for surveys, and proper survey methodologies

will be completed by March 31, 1993.(4)Date When Full Com lienee Will Be Achieved Full compliance

will be acnieved on March 31, 1993, with tne completion

of scheduled training for selected radiation protection

personnel.

'I

ACCELERATED

DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION

SYSTEM REGULATORY

INFORMATION

DISTRIBUTION

SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9304020176

DOC.DATE: 93/03/29 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET FACIL:5G-315

Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 50-316 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M 05000316 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION

FITZPATRICK,E.

Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME

'ECiPIENT AFFILIATION

MARTIN,A.B.

Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)SUBJECT: Responds to NRC 930304 ltr re violations

noted in insp repts 50-315/93-10

&50-316/93-10.Corrective

actions:training

for selected radiation protection

personnel on event&use of optimal equipment for surveys will be completed by 930331.DISTRIBUTION

CODE: IE06D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR

ENCL SIZE: TITLE: Environ&Radiological

(50 DKT)-Insp Rept/Notice

of Violation Respons NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 LA DEANiW INTERNAL: AEOD/ANDERSON,R

NMSS/SGTB 4E4 NRR/DRIL/RPEB10

NUDOCS-ABSTRACT

OGC/HDS2 RES'GN3 FILE 01 EXTERNAL: EG&G SIMPSON,F NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 0 1-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD AEOD/DSP NRR/DREP/PRPB10

NRR/PMAS/ILRB12

OE D REG LE 02 RGN3 SS/RPB RGN4 MURRAY,B NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.504-2065)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION

LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEEDl TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL 21

indiana Michigan Power Company P.O.Box 16631'oinmbos

OH 4321F~R-INDIANA NICHIGAM POWM AEP'NRO'1184A

Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket,.Nos.

50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.DPR-58 and DPR-74 NRC INSPECTION

REPORT NOS.50-315/930010 (DRSS)AND 50-316/930010 (DRSS);REPLY TO A NOTICE OF VIOLATION U.S.Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20005 ATTN: A.B.Martin March 29, 1993 Dear Mr.Martin: This letter is in response to Mr.Charles E.Norelius'etter

dated March 4, 1993, which forwarded a Notice of Violation that resulted from the enforcement

conference, conducted on March 2, 1993.The Notice of Violation attached to Mr.Norelius'letter identified

two severity level IV violations

for the shipment'f an empty box that exceeded Department

of Transportation (DOT)contact dose rate limits and failure to ensure the limits were met prior to shipment.Our response to the Notice of Violation is provided in the attachment

to this letter.Sincerely, E.E.Fitzp rick Vice President eg Attachment

CC: A.A.Blind-Bridgman J.R.Padgett G.Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector-Bridgman NFEM Section Chief A.B.Davis-Region III 020034 9304020176

930329 PDR ADQCK 050003l5 6 PDR>py<I]

Attachment

to AEP:NRC:1184A

Response to Notice of Violation

Attachment

to AEP:NRC:1184A

Page 1 NRC Violation:

"10 CFR 71.5(a)requires that licensees, who transport licensed material outside the confines of their plants or deliver licensed material to a carrier for transport, comply with the applicable

requirements

of the regulations

appropriate

to the mode of transport of the Department

of Transportation (DOT)in 49 CFR Part 170-189.49 CFR 173.427(e)

requires that an empty package that previously

contained radioactive

materials and has been emptied comply with the requirements

of 49 CFR 173.421(b)

that states that radiation levels at any point on the external surface of the package do not exceed 0.5 millirem per hour.Contrary to the above, on January 26, 1993, an empty package was delivered to a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee with external radiation levels of 180 millirem per hour over a small area of the package.This is a Severity Level IV problem (Supplement

V).(1)Reason for Violation The licensee has concluded that the pre-shipping

dose rate survey of container QG-27 was inadequate.

The contributing

causes of this violation were that the dose rate meter used for the survey was not optimally suited for surveying an empty container and the location of the small,, localized source increased the difficulty

of detection.

(2)Corrective

Actions Taken and Results Achieved On January 27, 1993, the licensee informed the NRC of notification

from a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, that a sea van, manifested

as Radioactive

Material Excepted Package Empty Packaging, UN2910, had been received with dose rate surveys indicating

external radiation levels that exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.On January 29, 1993, a representative

of the licensee arrived at the vendor's facility to investigate

the apparent violation.

The vendor had removed, measured, and disposed of the particle the previous day.Consequently, the licensee was unable to verify the dose rates on the sea van.

Attachment

to AEP:NRC:1184A

Page 2 (3)Preventive

Actions Taken To Avoid Further Violations

Preventive

actions taken to prevent recurrence

of a similar event include independent

surveys of all outgoing shipments of radioactive

material and enhancement

of procedures

pertaining

to shiprpent of radioactive

material.The policy of independent

surveys for all outgoing shipments of radioactive

material was initiated on February 1, 1993.On February 18, 1993, a policy memorandum

was distributed

to all radiation protection

department

personnel outlining standards for shipment of radioactive

material.The procedure, Preparation

of Radioactive

Shipments, 12 THP 3150.RMC.202, was revised to include independent

surveys of all outgoing radioactive

material shipments, utilization

of optimal instrumentation

for surveys, and a checklist for"empty package" shipments.

This procedure revision was completed on March 1, 1993.Training for selected radiation protection

personnel on the description

of the event, selection and use of optimal equipment for surveys, and proper survey methodologies

will be completed by March 31, 1993.(4)Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved Full compliance

will be achieved on March 31, 1993, with the completion

of scheduled training for selected radiation protection

personnel.

49 CFR 173.475 requires, in part, that before each shipment of any radioactive

material package, the shipper ensure by examination

or appropriate

tests, that the external radiation levels are within allowable limits.Contrary to the above, on January 26, 1993,, an empty package was shipped without the shipper ensuring by appropriate

surveys that external radiation levels were within applicable

limits.Specifically, the departure survey failed to detect a radiation level of 180 millirem per hour, which exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.This is a Severity Level IV problem (Supplement

V)."

Attachment

to AEP:NRC:1184A

Page 3 (1)Reason for Violation The licensee has concluded that the pre-shipping

dose rate survey of container QG-27 was inadequate.

The contributing

causes of this violation were that the dose rate meter used for the survey was not optimally suited for surveying an empty container and the location of the small, localized source increased the difficulty

of detection.

(2)Corrective

Actions Taken and Results Achieved On January 27, 1993, the licensee informed the NRC of notification

from a vendor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, that a sea van, manifested

as Radioactive

Material Excepted Package Empty Packaging, UN2910, had been received with dose rate surveys indicating

external radiation levels that exceeded the 0.5 millirem per hour allowable limit.On January 29, 1993, a representative

of the licensee arrived't the vendor's facility to investigate

the apparent violation.

The vendor had removed, measured, and disposed of the particle the previous day.Consequently, the licensee was unable to verify the dose rates on the sea van.(3)Preventive

Actions Taken To Avoid Further Violations

Preventive

actions taken to prevent recurrence

of a similar event include independent

surveys of all outgoing shipments of radioactive

material and enhancement

of procedures

pertaining

to shipment of radioactive

material.The policy of independent

surveys for all outgoing shipments of radioactive

material was initiated on February 1, 1993.On February 18, 1993, a policy memorandum

was distributed

to all radiation protection

department

personnel outlining standards for shipment of radioactive

material.The procedure, Preparation

of Radioactive

Shipments, 12 THP 3150,RMC.202, was revised to include independent

surveys of all outgoing radioactive

material shipments, utilization

of optimal instrumentation

for surveys, and a checklist for"empty package" shipments.

This procedure revision was completed on March 1, 1993.

Attachment

to AEP:NRC:1184A

Page 4 Training for selected radiation protection

personnel on the description

of the event, selection and use of optimal equipment for surveys, and proper survey methodologies

will be completed by March<<31, 1993.(4)Date Vhen Full Com liance Vill Be Achieved Full compliance

will be achieved on March 31, 1993, with the completion

of scheduled training for selected radiation protection

personnel.