ML17229A431: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:CA,'l'K(iUKXJ.REGUDATO%TNFORMATYONDYSTRIBUTYONAYSTEM(RYDS)IACCESSIONNBR:9708050269DOC.DATE:97/07/29NOTARIZED:NOFACIL:50-389St.LuciePlant,Unit2,FloridaPower&LightCo.AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIA'TIONBENKEN,E.J.FloridaPower&.LightCo.STALL,J.A.FloridaPower&LightCo.RECIP.NAMERECIPIENTAFFILIATIONDOCKET¹05000389
{{#Wiki_filter:CA,'l'K(iUK XJ.REGUDATO%
TNFORMATYON DYSTRIBUTYONAYSTEM (RYDS)IACCESSION NBR:9708050269 DOC.DATE:
97/07/29NOTARIZED:
NOFACIL:50-389 St.LuciePlant,Unit2,FloridaPower&LightCo.AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIA'TION BENKEN,E.J.
FloridaPower&.LightCo.STALL,J.A.
FloridaPower&LightCo.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DOCKET¹05000389


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
LER97-006-00:on970630,discoveredinadequatetestingofengineeredsafetyfeaturessubgrouprelays.CausedbyinadequacyinimplementingTSrequirementsinsurveillanceprocedures.Revisedsurveillanceprocedures.W/970729ltr.DISTRIBUTIONCODE:IE22TCOPIESRECEIVED:LTRENCLSIZE:TITLE:50.73/50.9LicenseeEventReport(LER),IncidentRpt,etc..NOTES:RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD2-3PDINTERNAL:ACRSAEOD/SPD/RRABNRR/DE/ECGBNRR/DE/EMEBNRR/DRCH/HICBNRR/DRCH/HQMBNRR/DSSA/SPLB.RES/DET/EIBEXTERNAL:LSTLOBBYWARDNOACPOOREFW.NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL11111111111111111111111RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEWIENS,L.AEEPPESECENRRDE/EELBNRR/DRCH/HHFBNRR/DRCH/HOLBNRR/DRPM/PECBNRR/DSSA/SRXBRGN2FILE01LITCOBRYCEFJHNOACQUEENERFDS.NUDOCSFULLTXTCOPIESLTTRENCL1122111111111.1111~1111111NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTETHCONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMOWFN5D-5(EXT.415-2083)TOELIMINATEYOURNAMEPROMDISTRIBUTIONLISTSFORDOCUMENTSYOUDON'TNEEDlFULLTEXTCONVERSIONREQUIREDTOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:LTTR25ENCL25 FloridaPower8LightCompany,6501SouthOceanOrive,JensenBeach,FL34957July29,1997L-97-19010CFR50.73U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionAttn:DocumentControlDeskWashington,D.C.20555Re:St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ReportableEvent:97-006DateofEvent:June30,1997OperationProhibitedbyTechnicalSpecificationsduetoInadequateTheattachedLicenseeEventReportisbeingsubmittedpursuanttotherequirementsof10CFR50.73toprovidenotificationofthesubjectevent.Verytrulyyours,J.A.StallVicePresidentSt.LuciePlantJAS/EJBAttachmentcc:RegionalAdministrator,USNRCRegionIISeniorResidentInspector,USNRC,St.LuciePlant9708050269970729'DRADQCK05000$89SPDR0!llll!llll!Illl!IlllllllllllllllllllllanFPLGroupcompany NRCFORM366(4-95)U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSIONLICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)ISBBreverseforrequirednumberofdigits/charactersforeachblock)APPROVEDBYOMSNO.3'l60%(04EXPIRES04/30/SSESTIMATEDBURDENPERRESPONSEToCOMPLYWITHTHISMANDATORINFORMATIONCOLLECTIONREQUEST:60.0HRS.REPORTEDLESSONLEARNEDAREINCORPORATEDINTOTHEUCENSINGPROCESSANOFsACKToINDUSTRY.FO/r/t/ARDCOMMENTSREGARDINGBURoENEst/MATToTHEINFORMATIONANDRECORDSMANAGEMENTBRANCH(T-0F33)U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSION,WASHINGTON,DC20$6$%001ANDToTHEPAPERWORKREDUCTIONPROJECT(3160%104),OFFICE0MANAGEMENTANDBUDGET,WASHINGTON,DC20603.FACIUTyNAME(1)STLUCIEUNIT2DOCKETNUMBER(2)05000389PAGE(3)1OF4TITLE(4)OperationProhibitedbyTechnicalSpecificationsduetoInadequateSurveillanceTestingofEngineeredSafetyFeaturesSubgroupRelaysMONTH06DAYYEAR3097YEARSEQUENTIALREVISIONNUMBERNUMBER97-006-00MONTH07OAY29YEAR97FACIUTYNAMEFACIUTYNAMEN/AN/ADOCKETNUMBERDOCKETNUMBEROPERATINGMODE(9)POWERLEVEL(10)10020.2201(b)20.2203(a)(2)(i)20.2203(a)(2)(v)20.2203(a)(3)(ii)50.73(a)(2)(i)50.73(a)(2)(iii)50.73(a)(2)(viii)73.71OTHERp./y~~~~iiagm//2j';...Y@~y<a'ayr20.2203(a)(2)(iii)20.2203(a)(2)(iv)50.36(c)(1)50.36(c)(2)50.73(0)(2)(v)50.73(a)(2)(vii)SpecifyinAbstractbeloworinNRCForm366ANAMEEdwinJ.Benken,LicensingEngineerTELEPHONENUMBERBoo/udeAreaCode)(561)467-7156CAUSESYSTEMCOMPONENTMANUFACTURERREPORTABLEToNPRDSCAUSESYSTEMCOMPONENTMANUFACTURERREPORTABLEToNPRDSYES,(lfyes,completeEXPECTEDSUBMISSIONDATE).XNoEXPECTEDSUBMISSIONDATE(15)MONTHDAYYEARABSTRACT(Limitto1400spaces,i.e.,approximately15single-spacedtypewrittenlines)(16)OnJune30,1997,St.LucieUnit2wasoperatinginMode1at100percentpower.AnengineeringreviewidentifiedadeficiencyintheperformanceofEngineeredSafetyFeatures(ESF)logictestingassociatedwithtwosubgrouprelaysforthecontainmentisolationsystem.Thesubgrouprelayswererequiredtobetested'atasemi-annualfrequency,buthadinsteadbeentestedonceper18months.ThisrepresentedafailuretoperformasurveillancerequirementwithintheallowedsurveillanceintervalandthereforeaconditionprohibitedbytheplantTechnicalSpecifications.Thesubjectrelaysfunctiontosecuretheoperationofthecontainmentpurgefansandtoclosethecontainmentpurgeisolationvalvesduringactuationofacontainmentisolationsignal.Sincethesecontainmentpurgecomponentsarerequiredtobemaintainedintheirpost-accidentconfigurationduringreactoroperation,themissedtesting'wasnotsafetysignificant.Thesubgrouprelayswererecentlytestedsatisfactorilyandarecurrentlywithintheallowablesurveillanceinterval.ThefailuretotesttheESFASsubgrouprelaysattherequiredsurveillanceintervalwascausedbyaninadequacyinimplementingtheTSrequirementsintheplantsurveillanceprocedures.CorrectiveActionsinclude:1)Plantsurveillanceprocedureswillberevisedtoincludetheappropriaterequirementsforsurveillancetestingofthesubgrouprelays.2)Surveillancetestingistobeperformedinaccordancewithrevisedproceduralinstructionsandwithintheallowablesurveillanceinterval.3)LogiccircuittestproceduresarecontinuingtobereviewedatSt.LucieUnit1forproperTSimplementation.NRCFOAM366(4-95)
LER97-006-00:on 970630,discovered inadequate testingofengineered safetyfeaturessubgrouprelays.Causedbyinadequacy inimplementing TSrequirements insurveillance procedures.
NRCFORM366AI4-95)LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATIONU.S.NUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSIOST.LUCIEUNIT205000389YEARSEQUENTIALREVISION97-006-002OF4TEXTilfmorespaceisrequired,useadditionalcopiesofhlRCForm366AiI17ISt.LucieUnit2TechnicalSpecifications(TS)fortheEngineeredSafetyFeaturesActuationSystem(ESFAS)[EIIS:JEjrequirethatasubgrouprelaytestbeperformedsemi-annuallytoverifyoperabilityoftheautomaticactuationlogicforthecontainmentisolationsystem(CIS).TheUnit2UpdatedFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(UFSAR),Table7.3-9a,identifiesspecificsubgrouprelayswhichcannotbetestedwiththereactoratpowerduetothepotentialimpacttoplantoperation.Fortheserelays,surveillancetestingisperformedwhentheunitisshutdown.OnJune30,1997,adiscrepancywasidentifiedregardingtheplantTSsurveillancerequirement(TS4.3.2.1)fortheESFASsubgrouprelays,theUFSARtable7.3-9a,andcurrentplanttestingpractices.AreviewoftheplanttestingproceduresperformedbyFPLengineeringpersonneldeterminedthattwoESFASsubgrouprelays(K512AandK612A)[EIIS:JE:RLYJwerenotbeingappropriatelytestedwithinthesemi-annualperiodasrequiredbyTSandthattheserelayswerenotexemptfromtestingatpowerasdescribedintheUFSARtable.Therelayswerebeingfunctionallytestedonan18monthbasisduringperformanceoftheEngineeredSafetyFeatures(ESF)periodictestandnotona6monthfrequencyasrequired.SubgrouprelaysK512AandK612AfunctionuponreceiptofaContainmentIsolationActuationSystem(CIAS)signaltosecurethecontainmentpurgefans,HVE-8AandHVE-88[EIIS:VA:FAN),andto'closethecontainmentpurgeisolationvalvesFCV-25-1throughFCV-25-6[EIIS:VA:ISVJ.Thepurgefansandisolationvalvesaremaintainedintheirpost-accidentconfigurationwhentheUnitisatpower.St.LucieUnit2wasoperatinginMode1at100percentpowerwhenthetestingdiscrepancieswereidentified.Performanceofthe18monthintegratedESFtest,completedMay19,1997,currentlysatisfiesthesixmonthsurveillancerequirement.TheidentificationoftheESFASsubgrouprelaytestdiscrepancywasmadeduringthepreparationofanengineeringevaluationforaplantlicenseamendmentdesignedtoclarifytheplantTSwithregardtosubgrouprelaytesting.ThiswasafollowupactionbeingimplementedsubsequenttoFPL'sreviewofelectricallogiccircuittestingforSt.LucieUnit2,whichwasperformedinaccordancewiththerecommendationsofGenericLetter96-01.ThefailuretotestESFASsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Awascausedbyaninadequatesurveillancetestprocedure.SurveillanceOperatingProcedure2-0400053,"EngineeredSafeguardsRelayTest,"containstheinstructionsrequiredforverifyingtheproperfunctioningofESFrelaysasrequiredbytheplantTechnicalSpecifications.ThesurveillanceprocedureaswrittendidnotprovideaconclusivetestofoperabilityforsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Abyverifyingcomponentactuationortheoperationofoutputcontactsfromtherelays.Justificationfornotincludingtestinstructionsforthesubgrouprelaysintheprocedurewasinsufficient,inthatitwasbasedupontherequirementthatthecontainmentpurgeisolationvalvesmustremainintheirclosed(safe)positionduringpoweroperation.SincethevalvescouldnotbeopenedinModes'1through4,andthepurgefanswererequiredtobemaintaineddeenergized,itwasincorrectlyassumedthattestingforthecontainmentisolationfunctionwasnotrequiredintheseModes.
Revisedsurveillance procedures.W/970729 ltr.DISTRIBUTION CODE:IE22TCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR ENCLSIZE:TITLE:50.73/50.9 LicenseeEventReport(LER),IncidentRpt,etc..NOTES:RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD2-3PDINTERNAL:
NRCFORM366A(4-95)LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATIONU.S.NUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSIOFACILITYNAME1ST.LUCIEUNIT2TEXTflfmoreepecelerequired,ueeeddidonelcopleeofNRCForm366AJ(17)DOCKET05000389LERNUMBER(6SEQUENTIALREVISIONNUMBERNUMBER97-006-00PAGE33OF4ESFAStestingisconductedperiodicallyduringnormalplantoperationinaccordancewiththeSt.LucieUnit2TechnicalSpecificationstoverifyoperability.TSsurveillancerequirement4.3.2.1,requiresthateachESFASinstrumentchannelbedemonstratedoperablebytheperformanceoftheChannelCheck,ChannelCalibrationandChannelFunctionaltestoperationsfortheModesandatthefrequencies'escribedinTSTable4.3-2.Note2ofthistablespecifiesthatfortheautomaticactuationlogicassociatedwithCIAS,asubgrouprelaytestshallbeperformedtoincludetheenergizationordeenergizationofeachsubgrouprelayandverificationoftheoperabilityforeachrelay.ThefrequencyspecifiedbytheTSforperformanceofthissurveillanceissemi-annual(SA)~ThisconditiondoesnotapplytoSt.LucieUnit1,astheESFASinstrumentationTechnicalSpecificationsatUnit1donotcontainthesamerequirementforsemi-annualtestingoftheCIASsubgrouprelays.TheESFASactuationdeviceswhicharenottestedduringreactoroperation,duetotheirimpacttotheplant,aretestedduringscheduledreactorshutdownstoassurethattheyarecapableofperformingtheirintendedfunction.ThisisdescribedintheSt.LucieUnit2UFSAR,Table7.3-9a,whichliststheESFASactuationrelaydevicesnottestedduringnormaloperatingconditions.SubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Aarenotincludedinthetableandarecapableofbeingtestedduringpoweroperation,byverificationofoutputcontactstatususingadigitalvoltmeter(DVM).Theserelaysarethereforerequiredtobetestedonasemi-annualbasis.SubgrouprelaysK512AandK612AactuatecomponentsofthecontainmentpurgesystemuponreceiptofaCIASsignal.Specifically,therelaysfunctiontoclosethecontainmentpurgeisolationvalvesFCV-25-1,2,3,4,5and6,andtostopcontainmentpurgefansHVE8Aand8B.Therelaysarecycledduringthesemi-annualsurveillancetest,howeververificationofcomponentactuationoroutputcontactstatusisnotperformed.Althoughacompleteverificationofoperabilityfortheserelayswasnotperformedonasemi-annualbasis,therelayswerefunctionallytestedevery18monthsduringtheperformanceoftheintegratedEngineeredSafetyFeaturesPeriodicTestandhadbeensatisfactorilytestedduringthelastperformanceofthistest,completedMay19,1997.Asaresultoftheprevioussurveillance,currentsystemoperationiswithintheallowablesixmonthsurveillanceintervalandtherefore,nooperabilityconcernexists.ThefailuretopreviouslytestESFASsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Aonasemi-annualbasis,asrequiredbyTS4,3.2,1,representsaconditionprohibitedbytheplantTechnicalSpecificationsandisthereforereportableunder50.73(a)(2)(i)(B).ESFASsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Aaffectonlythecontainmentpurgecomponentspreviouslydescribed.With'theexceptionofthecontainmentisolationfunction,thecontainmentpurgesystemisanon-safetyrelatedandnon-seismicsystemusedtoprovideventilationofthecontainmentbuildingforpersonnelaccessduringshutdownandrefueling.Thesystemisnotusedatpowerandisthereforenotrequiredtooperatefollowingadesignbasisaccident.
ACRSAEOD/SPD/RRAB NRR/DE/ECGB NRR/DE/EMEB NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DRCH/HQMB NRR/DSSA/SPLB.
NRCFORM366AI4-8SILICENSEEEVENT.REPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATIONU.S.NUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSIOST.LUCIEUNIT205000389YEARSEQUENTIALREVISION97-006-004OF4TEXT(Ifmorespecsisrequired,useedditionelcopiesofNRCFarm386AiI17lThecontainmentpurgeexhaustfans,HVE-8AandHVE-88aremaintaineddeenergizedduringplantoperation.Additionally,TS3.6.1.7requiresthateachcontainmentpurgeisolationvalvebesealedclosedwhenoperatinginModes1,2,3or4.Asaresultoftheabovemeasures,thecontainmentpurgesystemismaintainedinitspost-accidentconfigurationduringpoweroperation(Modes1through4)andisnotrequiredtorepositionintheeventofanESFASactuationduringtheseModes.TheactuationofCIScomponentsbysubgrouprelaysK512AandK612AwassatisfactorilytestedduringanintegratedESFperiodicsurveillancecompletedonMay19,1997.ThefailuretotesttheESFASsubgrouprelays,K512AandK612A,atasemi-annualfrequencyisnotsafetysignificantsincethecomponentsaffectedbytheserelaysarerequiredtobemaintainedintheirpost-accidentconfigurationduringModes1through4.Plantoperatingprocedure2-0400053,"EngineeredSafeguardsRelayTest"willberevisedtoincludesurveillancetestingfortheoutputcontactstatusofsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Awhichaffectthecontainmentpurgecomponents.2.ESFASsurveillancetestingfortheUnit2containmentpurgeisolationvalvesandfanswillbeconductedinaccordancewiththerevisedprocedureandwithintheallowablesurveillanceintervalbasedonthelastsurveillancetestcompletedforthesecomponents.3.FPLiscontinuingtoperformareviewoftheSt.LucieUnit1ESFASsurveillancetestproceduresand'logiccircuittestinginaccordance.withtherecommendationsofGenericLetter(GL)96-01toensurethatTSrequirementsarebeingadequatelyimplemented.4,InordertoreemphasizetheexpectationthatplantsurveillancesandproceduresfullyimplementtheTechnicalSpecificationrequirementsinaverbatimmanner,trainingbriefsarebeingissuedtokeymaintenanceandsiteengineeringpersonnel.Inaddition,thiseventwillbeincludedintothecontinuingtrainingprogramforlicensedoperatorsasareviewoflessonslearned.-NonePreviousSimilarEvents-LERs389/96-005and389/96-006describesurveillanceinadequaciespreviouslyidentifiedbyFPLduringlogiccircuitrytestingreviewsperformedinaccordancewiththerecommendationsofGL96-01.}}
RES/DET/EIB EXTERNAL:
LSTLOBBYWARDNOACPOOREFW.NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL11111111111111111111111RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME WIENS,L.AEEPPESECENRRDE/EELBNRR/DRCH/HHFB NRR/DRCH/HOLB NRR/DRPM/PECB NRR/DSSA/SRXB RGN2FILE01LITCOBRYCEFJHNOACQUEENERFDS
.NUDOCSFULLTXTCOPIESLTTRENCL1122111111111.1111~1111111NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTETHCONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMOWFN5D-5(EXT.
415-2083)
TOELIMINATE YOURNAMEPROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSFORDOCUMENTS YOUDON'TNEEDlFULLTEXTCONVERSION REQUIREDTOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR25ENCL25 FloridaPower8LightCompany,6501SouthOceanOrive,JensenBeach,FL34957July29,1997L-97-19010CFR50.73U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Re:St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389Reportable Event:97-006DateofEvent:June30,1997Operation Prohibited byTechnical Specifications duetoInadequate TheattachedLicenseeEventReportisbeingsubmitted pursuanttotherequirements of10CFR50.73toprovidenotification ofthesubjectevent.Verytrulyyours,J.A.StallVicePresident St.LuciePlantJAS/EJBAttachment cc:RegionalAdministrator, USNRCRegionIISeniorResidentInspector, USNRC,St.LuciePlant9708050269 970729'DR ADQCK05000$89SPDR0!llll!llll!
Illl!Illlllllllllllllllllll anFPLGroupcompany NRCFORM366(4-95)U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)ISBBreverseforrequirednumberofdigits/characters foreachblock)APPROVEDBYOMSNO.3'l60%(04 EXPIRES04/30/SSESTIMATED BURDENPERRESPONSEToCOMPLYWITHTHISMANDATORINFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST:60.0HRS.REPORTEDLESSONLEARNEDAREINCORPORATED INTOTHEUCENSINGPROCESSANOFsACKToINDUSTRY.
FO/r/t/ARD COMMENTSREGARDING BURoENEst/MATToTHEINFORMATION ANDRECORDSMANAGEMENT BRANCH(T-0F33)U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC20$6$%001ANDToTHEPAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT(3160%104),
OFFICE0MANAGEMENT ANDBUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC20603.FACIUTyNAME(1)STLUCIEUNIT2DOCKETNUMBER(2)05000389PAGE(3)1OF4TITLE(4)Operation Prohibited byTechnical Specifications duetoInadequate Surveillance TestingofEngineered SafetyFeaturesSubgroupRelaysMONTH06DAYYEAR3097YEARSEQUENTIAL REVISIONNUMBERNUMBER97-006-00MONTH07OAY29YEAR97FACIUTYNAMEFACIUTYNAMEN/AN/ADOCKETNUMBER DOCKETNUMBER OPERATING MODE(9)POWERLEVEL(10)10020.2201(b)20.2203(a)
(2)(i)20.2203(a)
(2)(v)20.2203(a)
(3)(ii)50.73(a)(2)(i)50.73(a)(2)(iii)50.73(a)(2)(viii) 73.71OTHERp./y~~~~iiagm//2 j';...Y@~y<a'ayr20.2203(a)
(2)(iii)20.2203(a)(2)
(iv)50.36(c)(1) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(0)(2)(v)50.73(a)(2)(vii)
SpecifyinAbstractbeloworinNRCForm366ANAMEEdwinJ.Benken,Licensing EngineerTELEPHONE NUMBERBoo/udeAreaCode)(561)467-7156CAUSESYSTEMCOMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE ToNPRDSCAUSESYSTEMCOMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE ToNPRDSYES,(lfyes,completeEXPECTEDSUBMISSION DATE).XNoEXPECTEDSUBMISSION DATE(15)MONTHDAYYEARABSTRACT(Limitto1400spaces,i.e.,approximately 15single-spaced typewritten lines)(16)OnJune30,1997,St.LucieUnit2wasoperating inMode1at100percentpower.Anengineering reviewidentified adeficiency intheperformance ofEngineered SafetyFeatures(ESF)logictestingassociated withtwosubgrouprelaysforthecontainment isolation system.Thesubgrouprelayswererequiredtobetested'at asemi-annual frequency, buthadinsteadbeentestedonceper18months.Thisrepresented afailuretoperformasurveillance requirement withintheallowedsurveillance intervalandtherefore acondition prohibited bytheplantTechnical Specifications.
Thesubjectrelaysfunctiontosecuretheoperation ofthecontainment purgefansandtoclosethecontainment purgeisolation valvesduringactuation ofacontainment isolation signal.Sincethesecontainment purgecomponents arerequiredtobemaintained intheirpost-accident configuration duringreactoroperation, themissedtesting'was notsafetysignificant.
Thesubgrouprelayswererecentlytestedsatisfactorily andarecurrently withintheallowable surveillance interval.
ThefailuretotesttheESFASsubgrouprelaysattherequiredsurveillance intervalwascausedbyaninadequacy inimplementing theTSrequirements intheplantsurveillance procedures.
Corrective Actionsinclude:1)Plantsurveillance procedures willberevisedtoincludetheappropriate requirements forsurveillance testingofthesubgrouprelays.2)Surveillance testingistobeperformed inaccordance withrevisedprocedural instructions andwithintheallowable surveillance interval.
3)Logiccircuittestprocedures arecontinuing tobereviewedatSt.LucieUnit1forproperTSimplementation.
NRCFOAM366(4-95)
NRCFORM366AI4-95)LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATION U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSIO ST.LUCIEUNIT205000389YEARSEQUENTIAL REVISION97-006-002OF4TEXTilfmorespaceisrequired, useadditional copiesofhlRCForm366AiI17ISt.LucieUnit2Technical Specifications (TS)fortheEngineered SafetyFeaturesActuation System(ESFAS)[EIIS:JEj requirethatasubgrouprelaytestbeperformed semi-annually toverifyoperability oftheautomatic actuation logicforthecontainment isolation system(CIS).TheUnit2UpdatedFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(UFSAR),Table7.3-9a,identifies specificsubgrouprelayswhichcannotbetestedwiththereactoratpowerduetothepotential impacttoplantoperation.
Fortheserelays,surveillance testingisperformed whentheunitisshutdown.
OnJune30,1997,adiscrepancy wasidentified regarding theplantTSsurveillance requirement (TS4.3.2.1)fortheESFASsubgrouprelays,theUFSARtable7.3-9a,andcurrentplanttestingpractices.
Areviewoftheplanttestingprocedures performed byFPLengineering personnel determined thattwoESFASsubgrouprelays(K512AandK612A)[EIIS:JE:RLYJ werenotbeingappropriately testedwithinthesemi-annual periodasrequiredbyTSandthattheserelayswerenotexemptfromtestingatpowerasdescribed intheUFSARtable.Therelayswerebeingfunctionally testedonan18monthbasisduringperformance oftheEngineered SafetyFeatures(ESF)periodictestandnotona6monthfrequency asrequired.
SubgrouprelaysK512AandK612AfunctionuponreceiptofaContainment Isolation Actuation System(CIAS)signaltosecurethecontainment purgefans,HVE-8AandHVE-88[EIIS:VA:FAN),
andto'closethecontainment purgeisolation valvesFCV-25-1throughFCV-25-6[EIIS:VA:ISVJ.
Thepurgefansandisolation valvesaremaintained intheirpost-accident configuration whentheUnitisatpower.St.LucieUnit2wasoperating inMode1at100percentpowerwhenthetestingdiscrepancies wereidentified.
Performance ofthe18monthintegrated ESFtest,completed May19,1997,currently satisfies thesixmonthsurveillance requirement.
Theidentification oftheESFASsubgrouprelaytestdiscrepancy wasmadeduringthepreparation ofanengineering evaluation foraplantlicenseamendment designedtoclarifytheplantTSwithregardtosubgrouprelaytesting.Thiswasafollowupactionbeingimplemented subsequent toFPL'sreviewofelectrical logiccircuittestingforSt.LucieUnit2,whichwasperformed inaccordance withtherecommendations ofGenericLetter96-01.ThefailuretotestESFASsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Awascausedbyaninadequate surveillance testprocedure.
Surveillance Operating Procedure 2-0400053, "Engineered Safeguards RelayTest,"containstheinstructions requiredforverifying theproperfunctioning ofESFrelaysasrequiredbytheplantTechnical Specifications.
Thesurveillance procedure aswrittendidnotprovideaconclusive testofoperability forsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Abyverifying component actuation ortheoperation ofoutputcontactsfromtherelays.Justification fornotincluding testinstructions forthesubgrouprelaysintheprocedure wasinsufficient, inthatitwasbasedupontherequirement thatthecontainment purgeisolation valvesmustremainintheirclosed(safe)positionduringpoweroperation.
SincethevalvescouldnotbeopenedinModes'1through4,andthepurgefanswererequiredtobemaintained deenergized, itwasincorrectly assumedthattestingforthecontainment isolation functionwasnotrequiredintheseModes.
NRCFORM366A(4-95)LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATION U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSIO FACILITYNAME1ST.LUCIEUNIT2TEXTflfmoreepecelerequired, ueeeddidonel copleeofNRCForm366AJ(17)DOCKET05000389LERNUMBER(6SEQUENTIAL REVISIONNUMBERNUMBER97-006-00PAGE33OF4ESFAStestingisconducted periodically duringnormalplantoperation inaccordance withtheSt.LucieUnit2Technical Specifications toverifyoperability.
TSsurveillance requirement 4.3.2.1,requiresthateachESFASinstrument channelbedemonstrated operablebytheperformance oftheChannelCheck,ChannelCalibration andChannelFunctional testoperations fortheModesandatthefrequencies
'escribed inTSTable4.3-2.Note2ofthistablespecifies thatfortheautomatic actuation logicassociated withCIAS,asubgrouprelaytestshallbeperformed toincludetheenergization ordeenergization ofeachsubgrouprelayandverification oftheoperability foreachrelay.Thefrequency specified bytheTSforperformance ofthissurveillance issemi-annual (SA)~Thiscondition doesnotapplytoSt.LucieUnit1,astheESFASinstrumentation Technical Specifications atUnit1donotcontainthesamerequirement forsemi-annual testingoftheCIASsubgrouprelays.TheESFASactuation deviceswhicharenottestedduringreactoroperation, duetotheirimpacttotheplant,aretestedduringscheduled reactorshutdowns toassurethattheyarecapableofperforming theirintendedfunction.
Thisisdescribed intheSt.LucieUnit2UFSAR,Table7.3-9a,whichliststheESFASactuation relaydevicesnottestedduringnormaloperating conditions.
SubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Aarenotincludedinthetableandarecapableofbeingtestedduringpoweroperation, byverification ofoutputcontactstatususingadigitalvoltmeter(DVM).Theserelaysaretherefore requiredtobetestedonasemi-annual basis.SubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Aactuatecomponents ofthecontainment purgesystemuponreceiptofaCIASsignal.Specifically, therelaysfunctiontoclosethecontainment purgeisolation valvesFCV-25-1,2,3,4,5and6,andtostopcontainment purgefansHVE8Aand8B.Therelaysarecycledduringthesemi-annual surveillance test,howeververification ofcomponent actuation oroutputcontactstatusisnotperformed.
Althoughacompleteverification ofoperability fortheserelayswasnotperformed onasemi-annual basis,therelayswerefunctionally testedevery18monthsduringtheperformance oftheintegrated Engineered SafetyFeaturesPeriodicTestandhadbeensatisfactorily testedduringthelastperformance ofthistest,completed May19,1997.Asaresultoftheprevioussurveillance, currentsystemoperation iswithintheallowable sixmonthsurveillance intervalandtherefore, nooperability concernexists.Thefailuretopreviously testESFASsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Aonasemi-annual basis,asrequiredbyTS4,3.2,1,represents acondition prohibited bytheplantTechnical Specifications andistherefore reportable under50.73(a)(2)(i)(B).ESFASsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Aaffectonlythecontainment purgecomponents previously described.
With'theexception ofthecontainment isolation
: function, thecontainment purgesystemisanon-safety relatedandnon-seismic systemusedtoprovideventilation ofthecontainment buildingforpersonnel accessduringshutdownandrefueling.
Thesystemisnotusedatpowerandistherefore notrequiredtooperatefollowing adesignbasisaccident.
NRCFORM366AI4-8SILICENSEEEVENT.REPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATION U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSIO ST.LUCIEUNIT205000389YEARSEQUENTIAL REVISION97-006-004OF4TEXT(Ifmorespecsisrequired, useedditionel copiesofNRCFarm386AiI17lThecontainment purgeexhaustfans,HVE-8AandHVE-88aremaintained deenergized duringplantoperation.
Additionally, TS3.6.1.7requiresthateachcontainment purgeisolation valvebesealedclosedwhenoperating inModes1,2,3or4.Asaresultoftheabovemeasures, thecontainment purgesystemismaintained initspost-accident configuration duringpoweroperation (Modes1through4)andisnotrequiredtoreposition intheeventofanESFASactuation duringtheseModes.Theactuation ofCIScomponents bysubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Awassatisfactorily testedduringanintegrated ESFperiodicsurveillance completed onMay19,1997.ThefailuretotesttheESFASsubgrouprelays,K512AandK612A,atasemi-annual frequency isnotsafetysignificant sincethecomponents affectedbytheserelaysarerequiredtobemaintained intheirpost-accident configuration duringModes1through4.Plantoperating procedure 2-0400053, "Engineered Safeguards RelayTest"willberevisedtoincludesurveillance testingfortheoutputcontactstatusofsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Awhichaffectthecontainment purgecomponents.
2.ESFASsurveillance testingfortheUnit2containment purgeisolation valvesandfanswillbeconducted inaccordance withtherevisedprocedure andwithintheallowable surveillance intervalbasedonthelastsurveillance testcompleted forthesecomponents.
3.FPLiscontinuing toperformareviewoftheSt.LucieUnit1ESFASsurveillance testprocedures and'logic circuittestinginaccordance.
withtherecommendations ofGenericLetter(GL)96-01toensurethatTSrequirements arebeingadequately implemented.
4,Inordertoreemphasize theexpectation thatplantsurveillances andprocedures fullyimplement theTechnical Specification requirements inaverbatimmanner,trainingbriefsarebeingissuedtokeymaintenance andsiteengineering personnel.
Inaddition, thiseventwillbeincludedintothecontinuing trainingprogramforlicensedoperators asareviewoflessonslearned.-NonePreviousSimilarEvents-LERs389/96-005 and389/96-006 describesurveillance inadequacies previously identified byFPLduringlogiccircuitry testingreviewsperformed inaccordance withtherecommendations ofGL96-01.}}

Revision as of 15:42, 29 June 2018

LER 97-006-00:on 970630,discovered Inadequate Testing of Engineered Safety Features Subgroup Relays.Caused by Inadequacy in Implementing TS Requirements in Surveillance Procedures.Revised Surveillance procedures.W/970729 Ltr
ML17229A431
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/29/1997
From: BENKEN E J, STALL J A
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-97-190, LER-97-006-01, LER-97-6-1, NUDOCS 9708050269
Download: ML17229A431 (6)


Text

CA,'l'K(iUK XJ.REGUDATO%

TNFORMATYON DYSTRIBUTYONAYSTEM (RYDS)IACCESSION NBR:9708050269 DOC.DATE:

97/07/29NOTARIZED:

NOFACIL:50-389 St.LuciePlant,Unit2,FloridaPower&LightCo.AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIA'TION BENKEN,E.J.

FloridaPower&.LightCo.STALL,J.A.

FloridaPower&LightCo.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DOCKET¹05000389

SUBJECT:

LER97-006-00:on 970630,discovered inadequate testingofengineered safetyfeaturessubgrouprelays.Causedbyinadequacy inimplementing TSrequirements insurveillance procedures.

Revisedsurveillance procedures.W/970729 ltr.DISTRIBUTION CODE:IE22TCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR ENCLSIZE:TITLE:50.73/50.9 LicenseeEventReport(LER),IncidentRpt,etc..NOTES:RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD2-3PDINTERNAL:

ACRSAEOD/SPD/RRAB NRR/DE/ECGB NRR/DE/EMEB NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DRCH/HQMB NRR/DSSA/SPLB.

RES/DET/EIB EXTERNAL:

LSTLOBBYWARDNOACPOOREFW.NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL11111111111111111111111RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME WIENS,L.AEEPPESECENRRDE/EELBNRR/DRCH/HHFB NRR/DRCH/HOLB NRR/DRPM/PECB NRR/DSSA/SRXB RGN2FILE01LITCOBRYCEFJHNOACQUEENERFDS

.NUDOCSFULLTXTCOPIESLTTRENCL1122111111111.1111~1111111NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:

PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTETHCONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMOWFN5D-5(EXT.

415-2083)

TOELIMINATE YOURNAMEPROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSFORDOCUMENTS YOUDON'TNEEDlFULLTEXTCONVERSION REQUIREDTOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:

LTTR25ENCL25 FloridaPower8LightCompany,6501SouthOceanOrive,JensenBeach,FL34957July29,1997L-97-19010CFR50.73U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Re:St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389Reportable Event:97-006DateofEvent:June30,1997Operation Prohibited byTechnical Specifications duetoInadequate TheattachedLicenseeEventReportisbeingsubmitted pursuanttotherequirements of10CFR50.73toprovidenotification ofthesubjectevent.Verytrulyyours,J.A.StallVicePresident St.LuciePlantJAS/EJBAttachment cc:RegionalAdministrator, USNRCRegionIISeniorResidentInspector, USNRC,St.LuciePlant9708050269 970729'DR ADQCK05000$89SPDR0!llll!llll!

Illl!Illlllllllllllllllllll anFPLGroupcompany NRCFORM366(4-95)U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)ISBBreverseforrequirednumberofdigits/characters foreachblock)APPROVEDBYOMSNO.3'l60%(04 EXPIRES04/30/SSESTIMATED BURDENPERRESPONSEToCOMPLYWITHTHISMANDATORINFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST:60.0HRS.REPORTEDLESSONLEARNEDAREINCORPORATED INTOTHEUCENSINGPROCESSANOFsACKToINDUSTRY.

FO/r/t/ARD COMMENTSREGARDING BURoENEst/MATToTHEINFORMATION ANDRECORDSMANAGEMENT BRANCH(T-0F33)U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC20$6$%001ANDToTHEPAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT(3160%104),

OFFICE0MANAGEMENT ANDBUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC20603.FACIUTyNAME(1)STLUCIEUNIT2DOCKETNUMBER(2)05000389PAGE(3)1OF4TITLE(4)Operation Prohibited byTechnical Specifications duetoInadequate Surveillance TestingofEngineered SafetyFeaturesSubgroupRelaysMONTH06DAYYEAR3097YEARSEQUENTIAL REVISIONNUMBERNUMBER97-006-00MONTH07OAY29YEAR97FACIUTYNAMEFACIUTYNAMEN/AN/ADOCKETNUMBER DOCKETNUMBER OPERATING MODE(9)POWERLEVEL(10)10020.2201(b)20.2203(a)

(2)(i)20.2203(a)

(2)(v)20.2203(a)

(3)(ii)50.73(a)(2)(i)50.73(a)(2)(iii)50.73(a)(2)(viii) 73.71OTHERp./y~~~~iiagm//2 j';...Y@~y<a'ayr20.2203(a)

(2)(iii)20.2203(a)(2)

(iv)50.36(c)(1) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(0)(2)(v)50.73(a)(2)(vii)

SpecifyinAbstractbeloworinNRCForm366ANAMEEdwinJ.Benken,Licensing EngineerTELEPHONE NUMBERBoo/udeAreaCode)(561)467-7156CAUSESYSTEMCOMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE ToNPRDSCAUSESYSTEMCOMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE ToNPRDSYES,(lfyes,completeEXPECTEDSUBMISSION DATE).XNoEXPECTEDSUBMISSION DATE(15)MONTHDAYYEARABSTRACT(Limitto1400spaces,i.e.,approximately 15single-spaced typewritten lines)(16)OnJune30,1997,St.LucieUnit2wasoperating inMode1at100percentpower.Anengineering reviewidentified adeficiency intheperformance ofEngineered SafetyFeatures(ESF)logictestingassociated withtwosubgrouprelaysforthecontainment isolation system.Thesubgrouprelayswererequiredtobetested'at asemi-annual frequency, buthadinsteadbeentestedonceper18months.Thisrepresented afailuretoperformasurveillance requirement withintheallowedsurveillance intervalandtherefore acondition prohibited bytheplantTechnical Specifications.

Thesubjectrelaysfunctiontosecuretheoperation ofthecontainment purgefansandtoclosethecontainment purgeisolation valvesduringactuation ofacontainment isolation signal.Sincethesecontainment purgecomponents arerequiredtobemaintained intheirpost-accident configuration duringreactoroperation, themissedtesting'was notsafetysignificant.

Thesubgrouprelayswererecentlytestedsatisfactorily andarecurrently withintheallowable surveillance interval.

ThefailuretotesttheESFASsubgrouprelaysattherequiredsurveillance intervalwascausedbyaninadequacy inimplementing theTSrequirements intheplantsurveillance procedures.

Corrective Actionsinclude:1)Plantsurveillance procedures willberevisedtoincludetheappropriate requirements forsurveillance testingofthesubgrouprelays.2)Surveillance testingistobeperformed inaccordance withrevisedprocedural instructions andwithintheallowable surveillance interval.

3)Logiccircuittestprocedures arecontinuing tobereviewedatSt.LucieUnit1forproperTSimplementation.

NRCFOAM366(4-95)

NRCFORM366AI4-95)LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATION U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSIO ST.LUCIEUNIT205000389YEARSEQUENTIAL REVISION97-006-002OF4TEXTilfmorespaceisrequired, useadditional copiesofhlRCForm366AiI17ISt.LucieUnit2Technical Specifications (TS)fortheEngineered SafetyFeaturesActuation System(ESFAS)[EIIS:JEj requirethatasubgrouprelaytestbeperformed semi-annually toverifyoperability oftheautomatic actuation logicforthecontainment isolation system(CIS).TheUnit2UpdatedFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(UFSAR),Table7.3-9a,identifies specificsubgrouprelayswhichcannotbetestedwiththereactoratpowerduetothepotential impacttoplantoperation.

Fortheserelays,surveillance testingisperformed whentheunitisshutdown.

OnJune30,1997,adiscrepancy wasidentified regarding theplantTSsurveillance requirement (TS4.3.2.1)fortheESFASsubgrouprelays,theUFSARtable7.3-9a,andcurrentplanttestingpractices.

Areviewoftheplanttestingprocedures performed byFPLengineering personnel determined thattwoESFASsubgrouprelays(K512AandK612A)[EIIS:JE:RLYJ werenotbeingappropriately testedwithinthesemi-annual periodasrequiredbyTSandthattheserelayswerenotexemptfromtestingatpowerasdescribed intheUFSARtable.Therelayswerebeingfunctionally testedonan18monthbasisduringperformance oftheEngineered SafetyFeatures(ESF)periodictestandnotona6monthfrequency asrequired.

SubgrouprelaysK512AandK612AfunctionuponreceiptofaContainment Isolation Actuation System(CIAS)signaltosecurethecontainment purgefans,HVE-8AandHVE-88[EIIS:VA:FAN),

andto'closethecontainment purgeisolation valvesFCV-25-1throughFCV-25-6[EIIS:VA:ISVJ.

Thepurgefansandisolation valvesaremaintained intheirpost-accident configuration whentheUnitisatpower.St.LucieUnit2wasoperating inMode1at100percentpowerwhenthetestingdiscrepancies wereidentified.

Performance ofthe18monthintegrated ESFtest,completed May19,1997,currently satisfies thesixmonthsurveillance requirement.

Theidentification oftheESFASsubgrouprelaytestdiscrepancy wasmadeduringthepreparation ofanengineering evaluation foraplantlicenseamendment designedtoclarifytheplantTSwithregardtosubgrouprelaytesting.Thiswasafollowupactionbeingimplemented subsequent toFPL'sreviewofelectrical logiccircuittestingforSt.LucieUnit2,whichwasperformed inaccordance withtherecommendations ofGenericLetter96-01.ThefailuretotestESFASsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Awascausedbyaninadequate surveillance testprocedure.

Surveillance Operating Procedure 2-0400053, "Engineered Safeguards RelayTest,"containstheinstructions requiredforverifying theproperfunctioning ofESFrelaysasrequiredbytheplantTechnical Specifications.

Thesurveillance procedure aswrittendidnotprovideaconclusive testofoperability forsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Abyverifying component actuation ortheoperation ofoutputcontactsfromtherelays.Justification fornotincluding testinstructions forthesubgrouprelaysintheprocedure wasinsufficient, inthatitwasbasedupontherequirement thatthecontainment purgeisolation valvesmustremainintheirclosed(safe)positionduringpoweroperation.

SincethevalvescouldnotbeopenedinModes'1through4,andthepurgefanswererequiredtobemaintained deenergized, itwasincorrectly assumedthattestingforthecontainment isolation functionwasnotrequiredintheseModes.

NRCFORM366A(4-95)LICENSEEEVENTREPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATION U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSIO FACILITYNAME1ST.LUCIEUNIT2TEXTflfmoreepecelerequired, ueeeddidonel copleeofNRCForm366AJ(17)DOCKET05000389LERNUMBER(6SEQUENTIAL REVISIONNUMBERNUMBER97-006-00PAGE33OF4ESFAStestingisconducted periodically duringnormalplantoperation inaccordance withtheSt.LucieUnit2Technical Specifications toverifyoperability.

TSsurveillance requirement 4.3.2.1,requiresthateachESFASinstrument channelbedemonstrated operablebytheperformance oftheChannelCheck,ChannelCalibration andChannelFunctional testoperations fortheModesandatthefrequencies

'escribed inTSTable4.3-2.Note2ofthistablespecifies thatfortheautomatic actuation logicassociated withCIAS,asubgrouprelaytestshallbeperformed toincludetheenergization ordeenergization ofeachsubgrouprelayandverification oftheoperability foreachrelay.Thefrequency specified bytheTSforperformance ofthissurveillance issemi-annual (SA)~Thiscondition doesnotapplytoSt.LucieUnit1,astheESFASinstrumentation Technical Specifications atUnit1donotcontainthesamerequirement forsemi-annual testingoftheCIASsubgrouprelays.TheESFASactuation deviceswhicharenottestedduringreactoroperation, duetotheirimpacttotheplant,aretestedduringscheduled reactorshutdowns toassurethattheyarecapableofperforming theirintendedfunction.

Thisisdescribed intheSt.LucieUnit2UFSAR,Table7.3-9a,whichliststheESFASactuation relaydevicesnottestedduringnormaloperating conditions.

SubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Aarenotincludedinthetableandarecapableofbeingtestedduringpoweroperation, byverification ofoutputcontactstatususingadigitalvoltmeter(DVM).Theserelaysaretherefore requiredtobetestedonasemi-annual basis.SubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Aactuatecomponents ofthecontainment purgesystemuponreceiptofaCIASsignal.Specifically, therelaysfunctiontoclosethecontainment purgeisolation valvesFCV-25-1,2,3,4,5and6,andtostopcontainment purgefansHVE8Aand8B.Therelaysarecycledduringthesemi-annual surveillance test,howeververification ofcomponent actuation oroutputcontactstatusisnotperformed.

Althoughacompleteverification ofoperability fortheserelayswasnotperformed onasemi-annual basis,therelayswerefunctionally testedevery18monthsduringtheperformance oftheintegrated Engineered SafetyFeaturesPeriodicTestandhadbeensatisfactorily testedduringthelastperformance ofthistest,completed May19,1997.Asaresultoftheprevioussurveillance, currentsystemoperation iswithintheallowable sixmonthsurveillance intervalandtherefore, nooperability concernexists.Thefailuretopreviously testESFASsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Aonasemi-annual basis,asrequiredbyTS4,3.2,1,represents acondition prohibited bytheplantTechnical Specifications andistherefore reportable under50.73(a)(2)(i)(B).ESFASsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Aaffectonlythecontainment purgecomponents previously described.

With'theexception ofthecontainment isolation

function, thecontainment purgesystemisanon-safety relatedandnon-seismic systemusedtoprovideventilation ofthecontainment buildingforpersonnel accessduringshutdownandrefueling.

Thesystemisnotusedatpowerandistherefore notrequiredtooperatefollowing adesignbasisaccident.

NRCFORM366AI4-8SILICENSEEEVENT.REPORT(LER)TEXTCONTINUATION U.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSIO ST.LUCIEUNIT205000389YEARSEQUENTIAL REVISION97-006-004OF4TEXT(Ifmorespecsisrequired, useedditionel copiesofNRCFarm386AiI17lThecontainment purgeexhaustfans,HVE-8AandHVE-88aremaintained deenergized duringplantoperation.

Additionally, TS3.6.1.7requiresthateachcontainment purgeisolation valvebesealedclosedwhenoperating inModes1,2,3or4.Asaresultoftheabovemeasures, thecontainment purgesystemismaintained initspost-accident configuration duringpoweroperation (Modes1through4)andisnotrequiredtoreposition intheeventofanESFASactuation duringtheseModes.Theactuation ofCIScomponents bysubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Awassatisfactorily testedduringanintegrated ESFperiodicsurveillance completed onMay19,1997.ThefailuretotesttheESFASsubgrouprelays,K512AandK612A,atasemi-annual frequency isnotsafetysignificant sincethecomponents affectedbytheserelaysarerequiredtobemaintained intheirpost-accident configuration duringModes1through4.Plantoperating procedure 2-0400053, "Engineered Safeguards RelayTest"willberevisedtoincludesurveillance testingfortheoutputcontactstatusofsubgrouprelaysK512AandK612Awhichaffectthecontainment purgecomponents.

2.ESFASsurveillance testingfortheUnit2containment purgeisolation valvesandfanswillbeconducted inaccordance withtherevisedprocedure andwithintheallowable surveillance intervalbasedonthelastsurveillance testcompleted forthesecomponents.

3.FPLiscontinuing toperformareviewoftheSt.LucieUnit1ESFASsurveillance testprocedures and'logic circuittestinginaccordance.

withtherecommendations ofGenericLetter(GL)96-01toensurethatTSrequirements arebeingadequately implemented.

4,Inordertoreemphasize theexpectation thatplantsurveillances andprocedures fullyimplement theTechnical Specification requirements inaverbatimmanner,trainingbriefsarebeingissuedtokeymaintenance andsiteengineering personnel.

Inaddition, thiseventwillbeincludedintothecontinuing trainingprogramforlicensedoperators asareviewoflessonslearned.-NonePreviousSimilarEvents-LERs389/96-005 and389/96-006 describesurveillance inadequacies previously identified byFPLduringlogiccircuitry testingreviewsperformed inaccordance withtherecommendations ofGL96-01.