ML17229A744

Proposed Tech Specs Providing for More Efficient Use of on- Site Mgt Personnel in Review & Approval Process for Plant Procedures

ML17229A744
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	05/27/1998
From:	FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17229A743	List: ML17229A742 ML17229A744
References
NUDOCS 9806020317
Download: ML17229A744 (20)

Text

St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments:

OnsiteFacilityReviewGroupTACNos.M97209/M97210 ChanestoOriinalReuestATTACHMENT 2toL-98-072ST.LUCIEUNIT1MARKED-UP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGESPage6-7Page6-8Page6-13INSERT-A,BPage6-14980b0203ii 980M7PDRADQCK05000335PPDR d'~6..0ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLSALTERNATES 6.5.i.3Allalternate membersshallbeappointed inwritingbytheFRGChair-mantoserveonatemporary basis;however,nomorethantwoalternates shallparticipate asvotingmembersinFRGactivities atanyonetime.MEETINGFREUENCY6.5.1.4TheFRGshallmeetatleastoncepercalendarmonthandas.convenedbytheFRG.Chairman orhisdesignated alternate.

UORUM6.5.1.5ThequorumoftheFRGnecessary fortheperformance oftheFRGresponsibility andauthority provisions oftheseTechnical Specifications shallconsistoftheChairmanorhisdesignated alternate andfourmembersincluding alternates.

RESPONSIBILITIES 6.5.1.6TheFacilityReviewGroupshallberesponsible for:y/Iprocedure.

Reviewof1)allprocedures requiredbySpecification 6.8andchaneser,(2)allprogramsrequiredbySpecification 6.8andcangesthereto,and(3)anyotherproposedprocedures orchangestheretoasdetermined bythePlantGeneralHanagertoaffectnuclearetui'cea~<<we~M'Pekyava4O+~~b.Rev>ewofa1proposedtestsandexperiments, thataffectnuclearsafety.c.ReviewofallproposedchangestoAppendixATechnical Specifications.

d.Reviewofallproposedchangesormodifications tounitsystemsorequipment thataffectnuclearsafety.e.Investigation ofallviolations oftheTechnical Specifications, including thepreparation andforwarding ofreportscoveringevalua-tionandrecommendations topreventrecurrence tothePresident-NuclearDivisionandtotheChairmanoftheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.f.ReviewofallREPORTABLE EVENTS.g.Reviewofunitoperations todetectpotential nuclearsafetyhazards.h.Performance ofspecialreviews,investigations oranalysesandreportsthereonasrequested bythePlantGeneralManagerortheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.ST.LUCIE-UNITI6-7dIII 0,E).<<hUt,25rI k.Reviewofeveryunplanned on-sitereleaseofradioactive materialtotheenvironsincluding thepreparation ofreportscoveringevaluation, recommendations anddisposition ofthecorrective actiontopreventrecurrence andtheforwarding ofthesereportstothePresident-Nuclear DivisionandtotheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.I.ReviewofchangestothePROCESSCONTROLPROGRAMandtheOFFSITEDOSECALCULATlON MANUALandRADWASTETREATMENT SYSTEMS.m.Reviewanddocumentation ofjudgmentconcerning prolonged operation inbypass,channeltrip,anchorrepairofdefective protection channelsofprocessvariables placedinbypasssincethelastFRGmeeting.n.ReviewoftheFireProtection Programandimplementing procedures andsubmittal ofrecommended changestotheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.6.5.1.7TheFacilityReviewshall:@ranga.Recommend inwritingtothePlantGeneralManager,approvalordisapproval ofitemsconsidered underSpecifications 6.5.1,6.a throughdabove.b.Renderdeterminations inwritingwithregardtowhetherornoteachitemconsidered underSpecifications 6.5.1.6.a, b,d,andeaboveconstitutes anunreviewed safetyquestion.

c.Providewrittennotication within24hourstothePresident-Nuclear DivisionandtheCompanyNuclearReviewBoardofdisagreement betweentheFRGandthePlantGeneralManager,however,thePlantGeneral'Manager shallhaveresponsibility forresolution ofsuchdisagreements pursuanttoSpecification 6.1.1above.BKt'QBDS6.5.1.8TheFacilityReviewGroupshallmaintainwrittenminutesofeachFRGmeetingthat,ataminimum,documenttheresultsofallFRGactivities performed undertheresponsibility andauthority provisions oftheseTechnical Specifications.

Copiesshallbeprovidedtotheresident-Nuclear DivisionandtheChairmanoftheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.P)~QQaAev'o(ST.LUCIE-UNIT1Amendment No.69,W,88, c.TheSafetyLimitViolation Reportshallbesubmitted totheCommission, theCNRB,andthePresident-Nuclear Divisionwithin14daysoftheviolation.

d.Criticaloperation oftheunitshallnotberesumeduntilauthorized bytheCommission.

6.8.1Writtenprocedures shallbeestablished, implemented andmaintained coveringtheactivities referenced below:a.Theapplicable procedures recommended inAppendix"A"ofRegulatory Guide1.33,Revision2,February1978,andthoserequiredforimplementing therequirements ofNUREG0737.b.Refueling operations.

1c.Surveillance andtestactivities ofsafety-related equipment.

e.f.FireProtection Programimplementation, g.PROCESSCONTROLPROGRAMimplementation.

h.OFFSlTEDOSECALCULATiON MANUALimplementation.

6.8.26.8.3i.QualityControlProgramforeffluentmonitoring, usingtheguidanceinRegQlatoiy Guide1.21,Revision1,June1974.j.QualityControlProgramforenvironmental monitoring usingtheguidance.

inRegulatory Guide4.1,Revision1,April1975.Eachprur~LSpecification 6.8.1athroughi.above,andceeo,shallbereviewedbythe FRGancVShall4 romd-bantGeneralManagerprior toimplementation andewedperii~-sehinadministrative rurrarychangestoprocuresopeciIcation6.8.1arougi.aovemmadeprode'.Theintentoftheoriginalprdu'snltb.Thechangeisytwomembersoftheplanaementstaff,atleastomholdsaSeniorReactorOperator's Licenseon'tected.gpIL+'$ST.LUCIE-UNIT16-13Amendment No.,59,69.99,~,

Pa St.LucieUnit1andUnit2Bocket.Nos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments:

OnsiteFacilityReviewGroupTACNos.M97209/M97210 ChanestoOriinalReuest-L-98-072Attachment 2INSERT-TS6.8.26.8.2ReviewandAroyalofProcedures:

Eachnewprocedure ofSpecification 6.8.1.athroughi.aboveshallbeindependently reviewedbyanindividual orgroupfromtheappropriate discipline(s),

andshallbereviewedbytheFRG.Newprocedures shallbeapprovedbythePlantGeneralManagerorindividuals designated inwritingbythePlantGeneralManagerpriortoimplementation.

Eachprocedure ofSpecification 6.8.1shallbereviewedperiodically assetforthinadministrative procedures.

INSERT-BTS6.8.36.8.3ChanestoProcedures Eachrevisiontotheprocedures ofSpecification 6.8.1.athroughi.aboveshallbeindependently reviewedbyanindividual orgroupfromtheappropriate discipline(s),

andrevisions thatrequireawrittensafetyevaluation pursuantto10CFR50.59shallbereviewedbytheFRG.Procedure revisions shallbeapprovedbythePlantGeneralManagerorindividuals designated inwritingbythePlantGeneralManagerpriortoimplementation.

b.Temporary changestoprocedures ofSpecification 6.8.1athroughi.abovemaybemadeprovided:

1.Theintentoftheoriginalprocedure isnotaltered.2.Thechangeisapprovedbytwomembersoftheplantmanagement staff,atleastoneofwhomholdsaSeniorReactorOperator's Licenseontheunitaffected.

3.Thechangeisdocumented and,ifappropriate, incorporated inthenextrevisionoftheaffectedprocedure pursuanttoSpecification 6.8.3.a.

eIbyMOO!

6g0ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLSggg'g'-gg-gg~ggP~gl~&.llg~'ll6.8.4Thefollowing programsshallbeestablished, implemented, maintained,

,andshall.beauditedunderthecognizance oftheCNRB:a.PimarolanSrcsuidnainmn,.:Aprogramtoreduceleakagefromthoseportionsofsystemsoutsidecontainment thatcouldcontainhighlyradioactive fluidsduringaserious'ransient oraccidenttoaslowaspractical levels.ThesystemsincludetheShutdownCoolingSystem,High'Pressure SafetyInjection System,Containment SpraySystem,andRCSSampling.

Theprogramshallincludethefollowing:

g(i)Preventive maintenance andperiodicvisualinspection require-ments,andg(ii)Integrated leaktestrequirements foreachsystematrefueling cycleintervals orless.b.-PlantRadiiodinHonkrinAprogramwhichwillensurethecapability toaccurately determine theairborneiodineconcentration invitalareasunderaccidentconditions.

Thisprogramshallincludethefollowing:

(i)Trainingofpersonnel, (ii)Procedures formonitoring, and(iii')Provisions formaintenance ofsamplingandanalysisequipment.

c.SndarMahemiAprogramformonitoring ofsecondary waterchemistry toinhibitsteamgenerator tubedegradation.

Thisprogramshallinclude:(i)Identification ofasamplingscheduleforthecriticalvari-ablesandcontrolpointsforthesevariables, (ii)Identification oftheprocedures usedtomeasurethevaluesofthecriticalvariables, (iii)Identification ofprocesssamplingpoints,whichshallincludemonitoring thedischarge ofthecondensate pumpsforevidenceofcondenser in-leakage,

'ST.LUCIE-UNITI6-]4Amendment No.69.~,

St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments:

OnsiteFacilityReviewGroupTAGNos.M97209/M97210 ChanestoOriinalReuestATTACHMENT 3toL-98-072ST.LUCIEUNIT2MARKED-UP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGESPage6-8Page6-9Page6-14INSERT-A, B

6.5.1ATheFRGshallmeetatleastoncepercalendarmonthandasconvenedbytheFRGChairmanorhisdesignated alternate.

6.5.1.5ThequorumoftheFRGnecessary fortheperformance oftheFRGresponsibility andauthority provisions oftheseTechnical SpecIcations shallconsistoftheChairmanorhisdesignated alternate andfourmembersincluding alternates.

a.t(pr~c~ure6.5.1.6TheFacilityReviewGroupshallberesponsible for:a.Re'of1alyrocedures requiredbySpecmcation 6.8andGhanges4m

~e+~(2)allprogramsrequiredbySpecification 6.8andchangesthereto,and(3)anyotherproposedprocedures orchangestheretoasdetermined bythePlantGeneralManagertoaffectnuclearsafe~~4tea(Yeavie'i+&'n Silg4eveuatio+b.Reviewofally)roposed testsandexperiments thataffectnuclearsafety.c.ReviewofallproposedchangestoAppendixATechnical SpecNcations.

d.Reviewofallproposedchangesormodifications tounitsystemsorequipment thataffectnuclearsafety.e.Investigation ofallviolations oftheTechnical Specmcations, including thepreparation andforwarding ofreportscoveringevaluation andrecommendations topreventrecurrence tothePresident-Nuclear DivisionandtottteChairmanoftheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.f.ReviewofallREPORTABLE EVENTS.g,Reviewofunitoperations todetectpotential nuclearsafetyhazards.h.Performance ofspecialreviews,investigations oranalysesandreportsthereonasrequested bythePlantGeneralManagerortheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.ST.LUCIE-UNIT2Amendment No.+3,49,4P,65,pQ

~o'cIIriIrrr"SIlrr,burrs'r~~

~EIIIE(Itlk.n.AUTHORITY Reviewofeveryunplanned onsitereleaseofradioactive materialtotheenvironsincluding thepreparation ofreportscoveringevalua-tion,recomendations anddisposition ofthecorrective actiontopreventrecurrence andtheforwarding ofthesereportstothePresi-dent-NuclearDivisionandtotheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.ReviewofchangestothePROCESSCONTROLPROGRAMandtheOFFSITEDOSECALCULATION MANUALandRADMASTETREATMENT SYSTEMS.Reviewanddocumentation ofjudgmentconcerning prolonged"operation inbypass,channeltrip,and/orrepairofdefective protection channelsofprocessvariables placedinbypasssincethelastFRGmeeting.ReviewoftheFireProtection Programandimplementing procedures andsubmittal ofrecommended changestotheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.6.5.1.7TheFacilityReviewGroupshall:a.Recoaeend inwritingtothePlantGeneralManagerapprovalordisap-provalofitemsconsidered underSpecifications 6.5.1.6a.

throughd.andm.above.b.Renderdeterminations inwritingwithregardtowhetherornoteachitemconsidered underSpecifications 6.5.1.6a, b,dandeaboveconstitutes anunreviewed safetyquestion.

C.RECORDSProvidewrittennotification within24hourstothePresident-NuclearDivisionandtheCompanyNuclearReviewBoardofdisagreement betweentheFRGandthePlantGeneralManager;however,thePlantGeneralManagershallhaveresponsibility forresolution ofsuchdisagreements pursuanttoSpecification 6.1.1above.6.5.1.8TheFacilityReviewGroupshallmaintainwrittenminutesofeachFRGmeetingthat,ataminimum,documenttheresultsofallFRGactivities performed undertheresponsibility andauthority provisions ofthesetechnical specifi-cations.CopiesshallbeprovidedtothePresident

-NuclearDivisionandtheChairmanoftheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.6.5.2COMPANYNUCLEARREVIEWBOARDCNRB)FUNCTIONe(~+a<~~~8~~er>6.5.2.1TheCompanyNuclearReviewBoardshallfunctiontoprovideindependent reviewandauditofdesignated activities intheareasof:a.nuclearpowerplantoperations b.nuclearengineering c..chemistry andradiochemistry d.metallurgy ST.LUCIE-UNIT2IEE.~P DMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS~PROCEDURES ANDPROGRAMS(Continued) f.FireProtection Programimplementation.

g.'PROCESSCONTROLPROGRAMimplementation.

h.OFFSITEDOSECALCULATION MANUAL'implementation.i.gualityControlProgramforeffluentmonitoring usingtheguidanceinRegulatory Guide1.21,Revision1,June1974.j.gualityControlProgramforenvironmental monitoring usingtheguid-anceinRegulatory Guide4.1,Revision1,April19?5.'.1.2 1&Op-~'~gl',shallberevsewey-t4dshalpproePlantGeneNanagerpriortoimlemon-a~er'ed-pecallyassetforthinerocedures.

.8.3~hg~-pdf.ap'+i-'tkglmayemade'ded:a.Theintentofiginalprocedure isnotaltb.Thechangeisapprovedbytheplantmanagement staff,atleastoneofwhomholeniortorOperator's Licenseontheunitaffected.

c.Thgeisdocumented, reviewedbytheFRGandapproantGenera1Managerwithin14daysofimplementation.

the6.8.4Thefollowing programsshallbeestablished, implemented, maintained, andshallbeauditedunderthecognizance oftheCNRB-Ia0b.PrimarCoo1antSourcesOutsideContainment eAprogramtoreduceleakagefromthoseportionsofsystemsoutsidecontainment thatcouldcontainhighlyradioactive fluidsduringaserioustransient oraccidenttoaslowaspractical levels.ThesystemsincludetheShutdownCoolingSystem,HighPressureSafetyInjection System,Containment SpraySystem,andRCSSampling.

Theprogramshallincludethefollowing:

(i)Preventive maintenance and.periodic visualinspection require-ments,and(ii)Integrated leaktestrequirements foreachsystematrefueling cycleintervals orless.In-PlantRadioiodine Monitorin Aprogramwhichwillensurethecapability toaccurately determine theairborneiodineconcentration invitalareasunderaccidentcondi-tions.Thisprogramshallincludethefollowing:

(i)Trainingofpersonnel, (ii)Procedures formonitoring, and(iii)Provisions formaintenance ofsamplingandanalysisequipment.

ST.LUCIE-UNIT26-14Amendment No.=".,

St.LucieUnit1andUnit2BocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments:

OnsiteFacilityReviewGroupTACNos.M97209/M97210 ChanestoOriinalReuestL-98-072Attachment 3INSERT-ATS6.8.26.8.2ReviewandAroyalofProcedures:

Eachnewprocedure ofSpecification 6.8.1.athroughi.aboveshallbeindependently reviewedbyanindividual orgroupfromtheappropriate discipline(s),

andshallbereviewedbytheFRG.Newprocedures shallbeapprovedbythePlantGeneralManagerorindividuals designated inwritingbythePlantGeneralManagerpriortoimplementation.

Eachprocedure ofSpecification 6.8.1shallbereviewedperiodically assetforthinadministrative procedures.

INSERT-BTS6.8.36.8.3ChanestoProcedures Eachrevisiontotheprocedures ofSpecification 6.8.1.athroughi.aboveshallbeindependently reviewedbyanindividual orgroupfromtheappropriate discipline(s),

andrevisions thatrequireawrittensafetyevaluation pursuantto10CFR50.59shallbereviewedbytheFRG.Procedure revisions shallbeapprovedbythePlantGeneralManagerorindividuals designated inwritingbythePlantGeneralManagerpriortoimplementation.

'.Temporary changestoprocedures ofSpecification 6.8.1athroughi.abovemaybemadeprovided:

1.Theintentoftheoriginalprocedure isnotaltered.2.Thechangeisapprovedbytwomembersoftheplantmanagement staff,atleastoneofwhomholdsaSeniorReactorOperator's Licenseontheunitaffected.

3.Thechangeisdocumented and,ifappropriate, incorporated inthenextrevisionoftheaffectedprocedure pursuanttoSpecification 6.8.3.a.

4 St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments:

OnsiteFacilityReviewGroupTACNos.M97209/M97210 ChanestoOriinalReuestATTACHMENT 4toL-98-072PROPOSEDCHANGETOPSL1ANDPSL2UPDATEDFINALSAFETYANALYSISREPORT(UFSAR)

'U St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments:

OnsiteFacilityReviewGroupACNos.M97209/M97210 ChanestoOriinalReuestL-98-072Attachment 4ADDNEWSECTION17.2.1tothePSL1andPSL2UFSARroosed:17.2.1PlantProcedures TheFPLQualityAssurance ManualcontainstheTopicalQualityAssurance Reportwhichcomplieswiththecriteriaof10CFR50,AppendixB.Genericrequirements forInstructions, Procedures andDrawingsareprovidedinsectionTQR5.0oftheFPLTQAR,which,inpart,requiresthatinstructions andprocedures foractivities affecting qualityshallbeprepared,

reviewed, andapprovedinaccordance withwrittenQualityInstructions.

TheQualityAssurance Department reviewsandcommentsonQualityInstructions writtenbyotherdepartments.

Commentsconcerning compliance withcorporate QualityAssurance commitments andregulatory requirements areresolvedpriortoissuance.

InadditiontotheguidanceprovidedinsectionTQR5.0oftheFPLTQAR,thefollowing requirements applytothereviewprocessforon-siteinstructions andplantprocedures exceptEmergency Operating Procedures (EOPs)forwhichotherspecificadministrative controlshavebeenestablished.

Newprocedures andprocedure revisions areindependently reviewedfortechnical andfunctional

,accuracy byindividuals orgroupsotherthantheauthor(s).

QualityInstruction(s) and/orAdministrative Procedure(s) provideguidancefortheconductoftheindependent reviewprocess.Individuals performing thesereviewsareknowledgeable inthefunctional area(s)addressed byeachneworrevisedprocedure.

Interdisciplinary review(s) isperformed whenaprocedure orprocedure revisionaffectsmorethanonedepartment/functional area.Commentsresulting fromtheindependent reviewprocessaredocumented inplantrecordsandareresolvedpriortoimplementation ofeachneworrevisedprocedure.

Newprocedures andprocedure revisions arereviewedtodetermine ifa10CFR50.59writtensafetyevaluation orlicenseamendment isrequiredpriortoimplementation.

QualityInstruction(s) and/orAdministrative Procedure(s) provideguidancefortheconductofthescreening processincluding criteriathereviewershouldconsidertodetermine ifasafetyevaluation isrequired.

Ifasafetyevaluation orlicenseamendment isnotrequired, thebasisforthatdetermination isdocumented andretainedinplantrecords.Individuals authorized toperformthesescreening reviewshavedemonstrated acceptable knowledge ofthescreening processandaredesignated inwritingasqualified reviewers.

Additional reviewofeachprocedure revisionthatrequiresawrittensafetyevaluation andallnewprocedures isrequiredpursuanttofacilityTechnical Specification 6.8.

Reference:

St.LucieUnit,1[2]PacttityOperating LicenseAmendment No.~NoteNote:Theappropriate licenseamendment numbertobeinserted.

ilII