Information Notice 2011-20, NRC060 - NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011): Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD | ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD | ||
In the Matter of | In the Matter of | ||
Exhibit Number: | NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC | ||
(Seabrook Station, Unit 1) | |||
Docket No. 50-443-LA-2 | |||
ASLBP No. 17-953-02-LA-BD01 | |||
Hearing Exhibit | |||
Exhibit Number: | |||
Exhibit Title: | |||
NRC060 | |||
NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by | |||
Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011) | Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011) | ||
UNITED STATES | ML112241029 UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
| Line 38: | Line 51: | ||
OFFICE OF NEW REACTORS | OFFICE OF NEW REACTORS | ||
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 November 18, 2011 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2011-20: | WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 | ||
November 18, 2011 | |||
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2011-20: | |||
CONCRETE DEGRADATION BY ALKALI-SILICA | |||
REACTION | REACTION | ||
| Line 67: | Line 85: | ||
operating license or construction permit under 10 CFR Part 40, Domestic Licensing of Source | operating license or construction permit under 10 CFR Part 40, Domestic Licensing of Source | ||
Material. Uranium recovery facilities include conventional mills, heap leach facilities, and in situ | Material. Uranium recovery facilities include conventional mills, heap leach facilities, and in situ | ||
recovery facilities. | recovery facilities. | ||
| Line 80: | Line 98: | ||
addressees of the occurrence of alkali-silica reaction (ASR)-induced concrete degradation of a | addressees of the occurrence of alkali-silica reaction (ASR)-induced concrete degradation of a | ||
seismic Category 1 structure at Seabrook Station. The NRC expects that recipients will review | seismic Category 1 structure at Seabrook Station. The NRC expects that recipients will review | ||
the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid | the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid | ||
similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC requirements; | similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC requirements; | ||
therefore, no specific action or written response is required. | therefore, no specific action or written response is required. | ||
==BACKGROUND== | ==BACKGROUND== | ||
ASR is one type of alkali-aggregate reaction that can degrade concrete structures. ASR is a | ASR is one type of alkali-aggregate reaction that can degrade concrete structures. ASR is a | ||
slow chemical process in which alkalis, usually predominantly from the cement, react with | slow chemical process in which alkalis, usually predominantly from the cement, react with | ||
| Line 94: | Line 112: | ||
certain reactive types of silica (e.g., chert, quartzite, opal, and strained quartz crystals) in the | certain reactive types of silica (e.g., chert, quartzite, opal, and strained quartz crystals) in the | ||
aggregate, when moisture is present. This reaction produces an alkali-silica gel that can absorb | aggregate, when moisture is present. This reaction produces an alkali-silica gel that can absorb | ||
water and expand to cause micro-cracking of the concrete. Excessive expansion of the gel can | water and expand to cause micro-cracking of the concrete. Excessive expansion of the gel can | ||
lead to significant cracking which can change the mechanical properties of the concrete. In | lead to significant cracking which can change the mechanical properties of the concrete. In | ||
order for ASR to occur, three conditions must be present: a sufficient amount of reactive silica | order for ASR to occur, three conditions must be present: a sufficient amount of reactive silica | ||
in the aggregate, adequate alkali content in the concrete, and sufficient moisture. | in the aggregate, adequate alkali content in the concrete, and sufficient moisture. | ||
| Line 108: | Line 126: | ||
craze, map or patterned cracking and the presence of alkali-silica gel (see Figure 1 in the | craze, map or patterned cracking and the presence of alkali-silica gel (see Figure 1 in the | ||
enclosure). However, ASR-induced degradation can only be confirmed by optical microscopy | enclosure). However, ASR-induced degradation can only be confirmed by optical microscopy | ||
performed as part of petrographic examination of concrete core samples. | performed as part of petrographic examination of concrete core samples. | ||
| Line 116: | Line 134: | ||
(ASTM) has issued standards for testing concrete aggregate during construction to verify that | (ASTM) has issued standards for testing concrete aggregate during construction to verify that | ||
only non-reactive aggregates are present. These standards include ASTM C227, Standard | only non-reactive aggregates are present. These standards include ASTM C227, Standard | ||
Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Cement-Aggregate Combinations (Mortar-Bar | Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Cement-Aggregate Combinations (Mortar-Bar | ||
| Line 159: | Line 177: | ||
These concrete core samples demonstrated a substantial reduction in compressive strength compared to test cylinders cast during construction and a modulus of elasticity substantially | These concrete core samples demonstrated a substantial reduction in compressive strength compared to test cylinders cast during construction and a modulus of elasticity substantially | ||
lower than the expected value. The licensee completed a prompt operability determination that | lower than the expected value. The licensee completed a prompt operability determination that | ||
concluded margins to the code design limits remained such that the structural integrity of the | concluded margins to the code design limits remained such that the structural integrity of the | ||
| Line 169: | Line 187: | ||
using ASTM C289 and ASTM C295, which were the accepted standards at the time of | using ASTM C289 and ASTM C295, which were the accepted standards at the time of | ||
construction. However, ASR-induced degradation still occurred. | construction. However, ASR-induced degradation still occurred. | ||
The licensee believes that the waterproof membrane was damaged during original installation or | The licensee believes that the waterproof membrane was damaged during original installation or | ||
backfill activities causing water intrusion that resulted in the ASR problems. Water intrusion was | backfill activities causing water intrusion that resulted in the ASR problems. Water intrusion was | ||
exacerbated by the fact that dewatering channels were abandoned. | exacerbated by the fact that dewatering channels were abandoned. | ||
| Line 190: | Line 208: | ||
verify that only non-reactive aggregates are present, thereby preventing future ASR-induced | verify that only non-reactive aggregates are present, thereby preventing future ASR-induced | ||
degradation. However, ASTM issued updated standards ASTM C1260 and ASTM C1293 and | degradation. However, ASTM issued updated standards ASTM C1260 and ASTM C1293 and | ||
provided guidance in the appendices of ASTM C289 and ASTM C1293 that cautions that the | provided guidance in the appendices of ASTM C289 and ASTM C1293 that cautions that the | ||
| Line 198: | Line 216: | ||
when dealing with late- or slow-expanding aggregates containing strained quartz or | when dealing with late- or slow-expanding aggregates containing strained quartz or | ||
microcrystalline quartz. Therefore, licensees that tested using ASTM C227 and ASTM C289 could have concrete that is susceptible to ASR-induced degradation. Beginning at initial | microcrystalline quartz. Therefore, licensees that tested using ASTM C227 and ASTM C289 could have concrete that is susceptible to ASR-induced degradation. Beginning at initial | ||
construction, licensees may implement measures to prevent ASR-inducted concrete | construction, licensees may implement measures to prevent ASR-inducted concrete | ||
| Line 206: | Line 224: | ||
protecting and preserving waterproof membranes, or adding and maintaining dewatering | protecting and preserving waterproof membranes, or adding and maintaining dewatering | ||
channels. Regardless of the measures taken during initial construction, visual inspections of | channels. Regardless of the measures taken during initial construction, visual inspections of | ||
concrete can identify the unique map or patterned cracking and the presence of alkali-silica | concrete can identify the unique map or patterned cracking and the presence of alkali-silica | ||
gel in areas likely to experience ASR (i.e., concrete exposed to moisture). Additional | gel in areas likely to experience ASR (i.e., concrete exposed to moisture). Additional | ||
information can be found in the American Concrete Institutes ACI 349.3R-02, Evaluation of | information can be found in the American Concrete Institutes ACI 349.3R-02, Evaluation of | ||
| Line 224: | Line 242: | ||
in a manner sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that such SSCs are capable of fulfilling | in a manner sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that such SSCs are capable of fulfilling | ||
their intended function. The regulations in 10 CFR 50.65 require that these goals be | their intended function. The regulations in 10 CFR 50.65 require that these goals be | ||
established commensurate with safety and, where practical, take into account industry-wide | established commensurate with safety and, where practical, take into account industry-wide | ||
operating experience. In practice, for concrete structures, this usually translates into periodic | operating experience. In practice, for concrete structures, this usually translates into periodic | ||
visual inspection; however, specific inspection criteria related to ASR are generally not included. | visual inspection; however, specific inspection criteria related to ASR are generally not included. | ||
| Line 248: | Line 266: | ||
of concrete cores; and in situ monitoring of the concrete over time, such as crack mapping and | of concrete cores; and in situ monitoring of the concrete over time, such as crack mapping and | ||
monitoring of concrete relative humidity. Nuclear power plant licensees may consider these | monitoring of concrete relative humidity. Nuclear power plant licensees may consider these | ||
actions to determine the remaining potential reactivity, and the rate of ASR progression. | actions to determine the remaining potential reactivity, and the rate of ASR progression. | ||
| Line 258: | Line 276: | ||
monitor the condition of the structures against licensee-established goals to provide reasonable | monitor the condition of the structures against licensee-established goals to provide reasonable | ||
assurance that the structures are capable of fulfilling their intended functions. If ASR-induced | assurance that the structures are capable of fulfilling their intended functions. If ASR-induced | ||
degradation is identified in these structures, this condition monitoring would include determining | degradation is identified in these structures, this condition monitoring would include determining | ||
| Line 268: | Line 286: | ||
submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 54, Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for | submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 54, Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for | ||
Nuclear Power Plants. The Seabrook Station is the first plant to address ASR-induced | Nuclear Power Plants. The Seabrook Station is the first plant to address ASR-induced | ||
concrete degradation as part of license renewal. The licensee for Seabrook Station is | concrete degradation as part of license renewal. The licensee for Seabrook Station is | ||
developing aging management programs that will include additional measures and actions to | developing aging management programs that will include additional measures and actions to | ||
| Line 276: | Line 294: | ||
manage the effects of aging from ASR-induced degradation during the period of extended | manage the effects of aging from ASR-induced degradation during the period of extended | ||
operation. In support of its license renewal application, the licensee for Seabrook Station will | operation. In support of its license renewal application, the licensee for Seabrook Station will | ||
submit additional information that the NRC staff will review to ensure the licensee develops an | submit additional information that the NRC staff will review to ensure the licensee develops an | ||
| Line 283: | Line 301: | ||
==CONTACT== | ==CONTACT== | ||
This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this | This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this | ||
matter to the technical contact listed below or to the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor | matter to the technical contact listed below or to the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor | ||
| Line 289: | Line 307: | ||
Regulation project manager. | Regulation project manager. | ||
/RA by DWeaver for/ | /RA by DWeaver for/ | ||
/RA/ | |||
and Transportation | Vonna Ordaz, Director | ||
Timothy J. McGinty, Director | |||
Division of Spent Fuel Storage | |||
Division of Policy and Rulemaking | |||
and Transportation | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Office of Nuclear Material Safety | |||
and Safeguards | and Safeguards | ||
/RA by JTappert for/ | /RA by JTappert for/ | ||
Laura A. Dudes, Director | |||
Division of Construction Inspection | Division of Construction Inspection | ||
and Operational Programs | and Operational Programs | ||
Office of New Reactors | |||
===Technical Contact:=== | ===Technical Contact:=== | ||
Bryce C. Lehman, NRR | |||
301-415-1626 E-mail: Bryce.Lehman@nrc.gov | |||
Enclosure: | |||
Photograph of Concrete Degradation | |||
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under NRC Library/Document Collections. | |||
ML112241029 OFFICE | |||
NRR/DLR/RASB | |||
Tech Editor* | |||
BC:NRR/DLR/RASB D: NRR/DLR | |||
BC:NRO/DE/SEB1 NAME | |||
BLehman | |||
KAzariah-Kribbs | |||
RAuluck | |||
BHolian | |||
BThomas | |||
DATE | |||
09/12/2011 | |||
09/29/2011 email | |||
09/13/2011 | |||
09/22/2011 | |||
09/26/2011 email | |||
OFFICE | |||
BC: NRR/DE/EMCB LA: NRR/PGCB | |||
PM:NRR/PGCB | |||
BC:NRR/PGCB | |||
NAME | |||
MKhanna | |||
CHawes | |||
DBeaulieu | |||
SRosenberg | |||
DATE | |||
09/12/2011 email | |||
10/03/2011 | |||
09/29/2011 | |||
10/17/2011 | |||
OFFICE | |||
D:NRO/DCIP | |||
D:DSFST:NMSS | |||
D:NRR/DPR | |||
NAME | |||
LDudes JTappert for V Ordaz | |||
TMcGinty | |||
OFFICE | |||
10/21/2011 | |||
11/18/11 | |||
10/24/11 | |||
IN 2011-20 Photograph of Concrete Degradation | IN 2011-20 Photograph of Concrete Degradation | ||
Figure 1 Patterned cracking indicative of ASR-induced degradation | Figure 1 Patterned cracking indicative of ASR-induced degradation | ||
(generic example-NOT from nuclear industry)}} | (generic example-NOT from nuclear industry)}} | ||
{{Information notice-Nav}} | {{Information notice-Nav}} | ||
Revision as of 01:57, 5 January 2025
| ML19205A432 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | |
| Issue date: | 07/24/2019 |
| From: | NRC/OGC |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-443 LA-2, ASLBP-17-953-02-LA-BD01, RAS 55108 | |
| Download: ML19205A432 (8) | |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
In the Matter of
NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC
(Seabrook Station, Unit 1)
Docket No. 50-443-LA-2
ASLBP No. 17-953-02-LA-BD01
Hearing Exhibit
Exhibit Number:
Exhibit Title:
NRC060
NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by
Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011)
ML112241029 UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS
OFFICE OF NEW REACTORS
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001
November 18, 2011
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2011-20:
CONCRETE DEGRADATION BY ALKALI-SILICA
REACTION
ADDRESSEES
All holders of an operating license or construction permit for a nuclear power reactor under
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Domestic Licensing of
Production and Utilization Facilities, except those who have permanently ceased operations
and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
All holders of or applicants for an early site permit, standard design certification, standard
design approval, manufacturing license, or combined license under 10 CFR Part 52, Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.
All holders of or applicants for a license for a fuel cycle facility issued pursuant to
10 CFR Part 70, Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material.
All holders of and applicants for a gaseous diffusion plant certificate of compliance or an
approved compliance plan under 10 CFR Part 76, Certification of Gaseous Diffusion Plants.
All holders of and applicants for a specific source material license or for uranium recovery
operating license or construction permit under 10 CFR Part 40, Domestic Licensing of Source
Material. Uranium recovery facilities include conventional mills, heap leach facilities, and in situ
recovery facilities.
All holders of and applicants for an independent spent fuel storage installation license under
10 CFR Part 72, Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C Waste.
PURPOSE
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to inform
addressees of the occurrence of alkali-silica reaction (ASR)-induced concrete degradation of a
seismic Category 1 structure at Seabrook Station. The NRC expects that recipients will review
the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid
similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC requirements;
therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
BACKGROUND
ASR is one type of alkali-aggregate reaction that can degrade concrete structures. ASR is a
slow chemical process in which alkalis, usually predominantly from the cement, react with
certain reactive types of silica (e.g., chert, quartzite, opal, and strained quartz crystals) in the
aggregate, when moisture is present. This reaction produces an alkali-silica gel that can absorb
water and expand to cause micro-cracking of the concrete. Excessive expansion of the gel can
lead to significant cracking which can change the mechanical properties of the concrete. In
order for ASR to occur, three conditions must be present: a sufficient amount of reactive silica
in the aggregate, adequate alkali content in the concrete, and sufficient moisture.
ASR can be identified as a likely cause of degradation during visual inspection by the unique
craze, map or patterned cracking and the presence of alkali-silica gel (see Figure 1 in the
enclosure). However, ASR-induced degradation can only be confirmed by optical microscopy
performed as part of petrographic examination of concrete core samples.
To prevent ASR-induced concrete degradation, the American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) has issued standards for testing concrete aggregate during construction to verify that
only non-reactive aggregates are present. These standards include ASTM C227, Standard
Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Cement-Aggregate Combinations (Mortar-Bar
Method); ASTM C289, Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of
Aggregates (Chemical Method); ASTM C295, Standard Guide for Petrographic Examination of
Aggregates for Concrete; ASTM C1260, Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity
of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method); ASTM C1293, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Length of Change of Concrete Due to Alkali-Silica Reaction; and ASTM C1567, Standard Test
Method for Determining the Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Combinations of Cementitious
Materials and Aggregates (Accelerated Mortar-Bar Method).
ASR degrades the measured mechanical properties of the concrete at different rates.
Therefore, relationships between compressive strength and tensile or shear strength and
assumptions about modulus of elasticity that were used in the original design of affected
structures may no longer hold true if ASR-induced degradation is identified.
Technical information on ASR-induced concrete degradation appears in specialized literature, such as the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administrations Report on the
Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Mitigation of Alkali-Silica Reaction in Transportation Structures, issued January 2010, and the American Concrete Institutes ACI 221.1R-98, Report on Alkali
Reactivity.
DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES
After observing concrete cracking patterns typical of ASR, in August 2010, the licensee for
Seabrook Station performed petrographic examinations and compressive strength and modulus
of elasticity testing of concrete core samples removed from below-grade portions of the control
building (a seismic Category I structure) that confirmed that ASR had caused the cracking.
These concrete core samples demonstrated a substantial reduction in compressive strength compared to test cylinders cast during construction and a modulus of elasticity substantially
lower than the expected value. The licensee completed a prompt operability determination that
concluded margins to the code design limits remained such that the structural integrity of the
control building continued to be demonstrated.
The Seabrook Station final safety analysis report specifies concrete testing during construction
using ASTM C289 and ASTM C295, which were the accepted standards at the time of
construction. However, ASR-induced degradation still occurred.
The licensee believes that the waterproof membrane was damaged during original installation or
backfill activities causing water intrusion that resulted in the ASR problems. Water intrusion was
exacerbated by the fact that dewatering channels were abandoned.
Additional information appears in the licensees responses to requests for additional information
related to license renewal, dated December 17, 2010, April 14 and August 11, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos.
ML103540534, ML11108A131, and ML11227A023, respectively), and in NRC inspection reports
dated May 12 and May 23, 2011 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML111330689 and ML111360432, respectively).
DISCUSSION
As noted above, ASTM has several standards for testing aggregates during construction to
verify that only non-reactive aggregates are present, thereby preventing future ASR-induced
degradation. However, ASTM issued updated standards ASTM C1260 and ASTM C1293 and
provided guidance in the appendices of ASTM C289 and ASTM C1293 that cautions that the
tests described in ASTM C227 and ASTM C289 may not accurately predict aggregate reactivity
when dealing with late- or slow-expanding aggregates containing strained quartz or
microcrystalline quartz. Therefore, licensees that tested using ASTM C227 and ASTM C289 could have concrete that is susceptible to ASR-induced degradation. Beginning at initial
construction, licensees may implement measures to prevent ASR-inducted concrete
degradation such as selecting non-reactive materials, and controlling water infiltration by
protecting and preserving waterproof membranes, or adding and maintaining dewatering
channels. Regardless of the measures taken during initial construction, visual inspections of
concrete can identify the unique map or patterned cracking and the presence of alkali-silica
gel in areas likely to experience ASR (i.e., concrete exposed to moisture). Additional
information can be found in the American Concrete Institutes ACI 349.3R-02, Evaluation of
Existing Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures.
In 10 CFR 50.65, Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear
Power Plants (the maintenance rule), the NRC requires that licensees monitor the performance
or condition of structures, systems, and components (SCCs) against licensee-established goals
in a manner sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that such SSCs are capable of fulfilling
their intended function. The regulations in 10 CFR 50.65 require that these goals be
established commensurate with safety and, where practical, take into account industry-wide
operating experience. In practice, for concrete structures, this usually translates into periodic
visual inspection; however, specific inspection criteria related to ASR are generally not included.
Section 1.5 of Regulatory Guide 1.160, Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants, explains that an acceptable structural monitoring program should evaluate the
results of periodic assessments to determine the extent and rate of any degradation of the
structures.
Once visual indications of ASR-induced concrete degradation have been identified, additional
actions to evaluate and monitor the condition, as recommended in the Federal Highway
Administration report (referenced above), may include confirming the presence of ASR through
microscopic examination of concrete cores; verifying the mechanical properties through testing
of concrete cores; and in situ monitoring of the concrete over time, such as crack mapping and
monitoring of concrete relative humidity. Nuclear power plant licensees may consider these
actions to determine the remaining potential reactivity, and the rate of ASR progression.
Because safety-related structures and nonsafety-related structures whose failure could affect
safety-related structures are within the scope of the maintenance rule, licensees are required to
monitor the condition of the structures against licensee-established goals to provide reasonable
assurance that the structures are capable of fulfilling their intended functions. If ASR-induced
degradation is identified in these structures, this condition monitoring would include determining
the extent and rate of the degradation.
The NRC staff is currently reviewing the license renewal application for Seabrook Station
submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 54, Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for
Nuclear Power Plants. The Seabrook Station is the first plant to address ASR-induced
concrete degradation as part of license renewal. The licensee for Seabrook Station is
developing aging management programs that will include additional measures and actions to
manage the effects of aging from ASR-induced degradation during the period of extended
operation. In support of its license renewal application, the licensee for Seabrook Station will
submit additional information that the NRC staff will review to ensure the licensee develops an
acceptable program to manage the effects of ASR.
CONTACT
This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this
matter to the technical contact listed below or to the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation project manager.
/RA by DWeaver for/
/RA/
Vonna Ordaz, Director
Timothy J. McGinty, Director
Division of Spent Fuel Storage
Division of Policy and Rulemaking
and Transportation
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards
/RA by JTappert for/
Laura A. Dudes, Director
Division of Construction Inspection
and Operational Programs
Office of New Reactors
Technical Contact:
Bryce C. Lehman, NRR
301-415-1626 E-mail: Bryce.Lehman@nrc.gov
Enclosure:
Photograph of Concrete Degradation
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under NRC Library/Document Collections.
ML112241029 OFFICE
NRR/DLR/RASB
Tech Editor*
BC:NRR/DLR/RASB D: NRR/DLR
BC:NRO/DE/SEB1 NAME
BLehman
KAzariah-Kribbs
RAuluck
BHolian
BThomas
DATE
09/12/2011
09/29/2011 email
09/13/2011
09/22/2011
09/26/2011 email
OFFICE
BC: NRR/DE/EMCB LA: NRR/PGCB
PM:NRR/PGCB
BC:NRR/PGCB
NAME
MKhanna
CHawes
DBeaulieu
SRosenberg
DATE
09/12/2011 email
10/03/2011
09/29/2011
10/17/2011
OFFICE
D:NRO/DCIP
D:DSFST:NMSS
D:NRR/DPR
NAME
LDudes JTappert for V Ordaz
TMcGinty
OFFICE
10/21/2011
11/18/11
10/24/11
IN 2011-20 Photograph of Concrete Degradation
Figure 1 Patterned cracking indicative of ASR-induced degradation
(generic example-NOT from nuclear industry)