Information Notice 2011-22, Instrumentation & Control Module Failures, Incorrect Configurations and Settings

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Instrumentation & Control Module Failures, Incorrect Configurations and Settings
ML112500437
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/21/2011
From: Mcginty T
Division of Policy and Rulemaking
To:
Joseph Giantelli, NRR/DIRS/IOEB
References
IN-11-022
Download: ML112500437 (5)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 December 21, 2011 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2011-22: INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL MODULE

HARDWARE, CONFIGURATION, AND

PROCEDURE ISSUES

ADDRESSEES

All holders of an operating license or construction permit for a nuclear power reactor under

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Domestic Licensing of

Production and Utilization Facilities, except those who have permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.

PURPOSE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to inform

addressees of recent instrumentation and control (I&C) module issues involving component

failures, degraded connections, incorrect configurations and settings, and inadequate plant

operational procedures. The NRC expects that recipients will review the information for

applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.

Suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or

written response is required.

DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES

Recent licensee event reports (LERs) contain examples of I&C module issues. The causes of

these I&C module issues can be separated into the following categories:

  • incorrect process controller tuning and setting
  • degraded connections for I&C modules
  • I&C power supply failures
  • plant maintenance procedures

Examples of LERs in each category are described below.

Incorrect Process Controller Tuning and Setting

Millstone Power Station, Unit 3 On May 17, 2010, an automatic reactor trip occurred from 17 percent power due to low steam

generator (S/G) water level. Inadequate design of the system that controls S/G levels at low

power caused the event. Because of the slow response of the level control system, excessive

oscillations in S/G levels began while in automatic control. As operators attempted to smooth

the oscillations while in manual control, the shrink effect from the introduction of cooler

feedwater caused the S/G water level to decrease to its reactor trip setpoint. Additional

information appears in LER 05000423/2010-002-00 on the NRCs public Web site in the

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession

No. ML103340497.

Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit 2

On September 3, 2010, an automatic reactor trip occurred from 41 percent power during a

scheduled plant shutdown. A turbine trip initiated by high S/G water level caused the reactor

trip. The high S/G level occurred following an S/G level transient that began when operators

removed one main feedwater pump from service by manually reducing the pump speed at an

unnecessarily rapid rate, thus securing discharge flow in only 60 seconds. The operating main

feedwater pump, which was in automatic control, increased in speed; however, the initial

response was slow because of a mispositioned gain adjustment on the pump speed controller.

Operators attempted to stabilize the S/G water level by placing main feedwater water-regulating

valves in manual operation, but they could not successfully avoid the high S/G water level. (See

LER 05000247/2010-007-00 (ADAMS Accession No. ML103130040).)

Wolf Creek Generating Station

On October 17, 2010, an automatic reactor trip occurred from 15 percent power when control

room operators were unable to maintain S/G levels at low reactor power as the facility increased

reactor power during plant startup. As reactor power and feedwater flow increased, the

temperature mitigating effect of feedwater pre-heating was eventually overcome by higher

feedwater flow rates, resulting in lower feedwater temperatures (and the attendant effects on

S/G level of shrink and swell). Additionally, at these higher feedwater flow rates, the main

feedwater bypass valves are not in their optimum throttling range (i.e., more valve actuator

movement is necessary to change the flow). As a result, the desired S/G level could not be

maintained with the S/G level control in automatic. S/G level oscillations required operators to

attempt to control feedwater in manual to regain control of S/G level. Divergent S/G level

oscillations produced a high S/G level that challenged the experience and ability of operators

trying to manually control the feedwater system, and produced a turbine trip and main feedwater

isolation, leading to a decrease in S/G levels and resulting in an automatic reactor trip on low

S/G level. (See LER 05000482/2010-012-00 (ADAMS Accession No. ML103570047).)

H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit 2

On March 28, 2010, following a reactor trip and safety injection initiated by an electrical fault, when volume control tank level (the normal source of borated water to the charging pumps)

reached a predefined point, the charging pump suction failed to automatically realign to the

refueling water storage tank because of the improper configuration of a level comparator. The

operating crew was unaware of this condition for approximately 49 minutes. Review of plant

indications revealed that the charging system was no longer delivering flow to the reactor

coolant system or reactor coolant pump seals after approximately 37 minutes. The licensee

determined that when it upgraded the volume control tank level comparator in 2008, the

installation instructions specified an incorrect configuration for the internal jumpers of the level comparator. In addition, the post-maintenance testing did

not identify the incorrect configuration. (See LER 05000261/2010-002-00 (ADAMS Accession

No. ML101530502).)

Degraded Connections

Turkey Point Nuclear Generating, Unit 4 On September 21, 2010, an automatic reactor trip occurred from 100 percent power while the

licensee was performing its quarterly surveillance of the reactor protection system for channel II

of the high pressurizer pressure protection loop. A reactor trip was caused by a spurious trip

signal from channel I of the high pressurizer pressure protection loop coincident with channel II

tripped as part of the surveillance procedure. Excessive separation in the electrical bifurcated

pins of the connectors of the instrument comparator module caused the spurious trip signal from

channel I. (See LER 05000251/2010-006-00 (ADAMS Accession No. ML103330189).)

Instrumentation and Control Power Supply Failure

H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit 2 On November 6, 2009, while the plant was operating at 100 percent power, the feed regulating

valve to S/G A unexpectedly closed, and operators manually tripped the reactor because of

the decreasing S/G level. The licensee determined that a vendor design error resulted in a

premature part failure in the power supply for the associated feed regulating valve control loop.

(See LER 05000261/2009-003-00 (ADAMS Accession No. ML100110218).)

Plant Maintenance Procedures

Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit 3 On May 28, 2009, in response to vibration alarms for main feedwater pump B, control room

operators reduced reactor power from 100 percent to approximately 65 percent and removed

the pump from service. Main feedwater pump A unexpectedly could not supply sufficient

feedwater flow to all four S/Gs (particularly to S/G B) because the pump could not reach full

speed due to excessive play in the governor linkages. Operators reduced power to 61 percent

so that the available feedwater flow was sufficient to restore S/G levels. Although all four main

feedwater regulating valves had opened fully to restore S/G levels, the feedwater regulating

valve B unexpectedly remained fully open after S/G B reached the programmed level. The

S/G B water level reached the high-level trip setpoint, thus initiating a turbine trip that resulted

in an automatic reactor trip. The licensee determined that the main feedwater pump A

governor problem was the result of poor oversight of the vendor maintenance work order that

was performed without completing governor valve stroke readings that would have revealed the

excessive play in the linkages. The licensee determined that the S/G B level controller

problem was caused by an incorrect controller setting (i.e., the reset time was too short)

because of inadequate programmatic control of controller settings. (See

LER 05000286/2009-004-00 (ADAMS Accession No. ML092330119).)

DISCUSSION

I&C modules monitor and/or control plant parameters within a range as specified in plant

technical specifications. Properly functioning I&C modules provide accurate automatic control

of plant processes, which reduces the burden on operators and allows them to focus on overall

plant safety. On the other hand, I&C module failures can cause plant transients, such as turbine

trips or reactor trips, and can complicate transient recovery. The examples in this IN illustrate

the importance of (1) understanding the function of lead/lag modules and knowing how to test

the timing function individually and within the process loop, (2) understanding the design

settings for each module and performing relevant tests to attain the correct process loop

response for all operating conditions, and (3) using the proper methods to test newly installed

I&C modules, including bench and rack testing.

CONTACT

This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this

matter to the technical contact listed below or to the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation project manager.

/RA/

Timothy J. McGinty, Director

Division of Policy and Rulemaking

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Joseph Giantelli

301-415-0504 E-mail: Joseph.Giantelli@nrc.gov

Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under NRC Library.

DISCUSSION

I&C modules monitor and/or control plant parameters within a range as specified in plant

technical specifications. Properly functioning I&C modules provide accurate automatic control

of plant processes, which reduces the burden on operators and allows them to focus on overall

plant safety. On the other hand, I&C module failures can cause plant transients, such as turbine

trips or reactor trips, and can complicate transient recovery. The examples in this IN illustrate

the importance of (1) understanding the function of lead/lag modules and knowing how to test

the timing function individually and within the process loop, (2) understanding the design

settings for each module and performing relevant tests to attain the correct process loop

response for all operating conditions, and (3) using the proper methods to test newly installed

I&C modules, including bench and rack testing.

CONTACT

This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this

matter to the technical contact listed below or to the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation project manager.

/RA/

Timothy J. McGinty, Director

Division of Policy and Rulemaking

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Joseph Giantelli

301-415-0504 E-mail: Joseph.Giantelli@nrc.gov

Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under NRC Library.

ADAMS Accession Number: ML112500437 TAC ME6791 OFFICE NRR/DIRS/IOEB Tech Editor BC: NRR/DIRS/IOEB BC:NRR/DE/EICB D:NRR/DE

NAME JGiantelli JThorp GWilson PHiland

DATE 11/22/11 11/02/11 12/12/11 12/14/11 12/15/11 OFFICE NRR/DPR/PGCB NRR/DPR/PGCB BC:NRR/DPR/PGCB D:NRR/DPR

NAME CHawes DBeaulieu SRosenberg TMcGinty

OFFICE 12/19/11 12/16/11 12/20/11 12/21/11 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY