|
|
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:- ._. _ -- . _ _ . . - - . . _. . - ~ | | {{#Wiki_filter:-._. |
| - f~\ 0
| | . - ~ |
| | f~\\ 0 |
| ( | | ( |
| g l | | g l |
| 1 ' Westinghouse Electric Company, Energy Systems Nuclear Services Division l a dnnsson of CBS Corporation Box 355 l Pittsburgh. Pennsytvania 152304 355 l | | 1 |
| CAW-98-1278 September 3,1998 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention: Mr. Samuel J. Collins APPLICATION FOR WITHHOLDING PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE , | | ' Westinghouse Electric Company, Energy Systems Nuclear Services Division l |
| l | | a dnnsson of CBS Corporation Box 355 Pittsburgh. Pennsytvania 152304 355 CAW-98-1278 September 3,1998 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention: Mr. Samuel J. Collins APPLICATION FOR WITHHOLDING PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE l |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| " Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Safety Analysis intermediate Range Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint Change" (NSA-SSO-96-524), Revision 2, (Proprietary)
| | " Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Safety Analysis intermediate Range Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint Change" (NSA-SSO-96-524), Revision 2, (Proprietary) |
|
| |
|
| ==Dear Mr. Collins:== | | ==Dear Mr. Collins:== |
| | | The Proprietary information for which withholding is being requested in the above referenced report is further identified in Affidavit CAW-98-1278 signed by the owner of the proprietary informatiW Westinghouse Electric Company. The affidavit, which accompanies this letter, sets forth the basis on which the information may be withheld from public disclosure by the Commission and addresses with specificity the considerations listed in paragraph (b)(4) of 10 CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations. |
| The Proprietary information for which withholding is being requested in the above referenced ! | |
| report is further identified in Affidavit CAW-98-1278 signed by the owner of the proprietary informatiW Westinghouse Electric Company. The affidavit, which accompanies this letter, sets forth the basis on which the information may be withheld from public disclosure by the Commission and addresses with specificity the considerations listed in paragraph (b)(4) of 10 CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations. | |
| Accordingly, this letter authorizes the utilization of the accompanying Affidavit by Southem Nuclear Operating Company. | | Accordingly, this letter authorizes the utilization of the accompanying Affidavit by Southem Nuclear Operating Company. |
| Correspondence with respect to the proprietary aspects of the application for withholding or the Westinghouse affidavit should reference this letter, CAW-98-1278 and should be addressed to the undersigned. | | Correspondence with respect to the proprietary aspects of the application for withholding or the Westinghouse affidavit should reference this letter, CAW-98-1278 and should be addressed to the undersigned. |
| Very truly yours, H.A. epp Ma ager Regulatory and Licensing Engineering Enclosures cc: T. Carter /NRC (SE7) l l | | Very truly yours, H.A. |
| 9809150082 980911 PDR ADOCK 05000348 P PDR l | | epp Ma ager Regulatory and Licensing Engineering Enclosures cc: T. Carter /NRC (SE7) l l |
| | 9809150082 980911 PDR ADOCK 05000348 P |
| | PDR l |
|
| |
|
| CAW-98-1278 AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: | | CAW-98-1278 AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: |
| ss COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY: | | ss COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY: |
| Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Henry A. Sepp, who, being by me duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he is authorized to execute this Affidavit on behalf of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (" Westinghouse") and that the averments of fact set forth in th'.s Affidavit are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief: | | Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Henry A. Sepp, who, being by me duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he is authorized to execute this Affidavit on behalf of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (" Westinghouse") and that the averments of fact set forth in th'.s Affidavit are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief: |
| I b /f,/ ,. | | I b |
| Henry A. S,epp, M,anager Regulatory and Licensing Engineering Sworn to and subscribed before thisi day of / , | | /f,/ |
| ,1998 n ,6L,wii) i*~C-.,=em - ,f g,yrg!c l':?ts Mtre W.? 'A*f pu <;r,,s *ru,at s*4%t'4 W9 % 2-
| | Henry A. S,epp, M,anager Regulatory and Licensing Engineering Sworn to and subscribed before thisi day of /, |
| %%M'YAbIb Notary Public 2814C-RMim0N8
| | ,1998 |
| | -,f n,6L,wii) i*~C-.,=em g,yrg!c l':?ts Mtr W.? 'A*f e |
| | pu <;r,,s *ru,at s*4%t'4 W % 2-9 |
| | %%M'YAbIb Notary Public 2814C-RMim0N8 |
|
| |
|
| CAW-98-1278 (1) I am Manager, Regulatory and Licensing Engineering, in the Nuclear Services Division, of the Westinghouse Electric Company, a division of CBS Corporation (" Westinghouse''), and as such, I have been specifically delegated the function of reviewing the proprietary information sought to be withheld from public disclosure in connection with nuclear power plant licensing and rulemaking proceedings, and am authorized to apply for its withholding on behalf of the Westinghouse Energy Systems Business Unit. | | - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. CAW-98-1278 (1) |
| (2) I am making this Affidavit in conformance with the provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations and in conjunction with the Westinghouse application for withholding accompanying this Affidavit. | | I am Manager, Regulatory and Licensing Engineering, in the Nuclear Services Division, of the Westinghouse Electric Company, a division of CBS Corporation (" Westinghouse''), and as such, I have been specifically delegated the function of reviewing the proprietary information sought to be withheld from public disclosure in connection with nuclear power plant licensing and rulemaking proceedings, and am authorized to apply for its withholding on behalf of the Westinghouse Energy Systems Business Unit. |
| (3) I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by the Westinghouse Energy Systems Business Unit in aesignating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information. | | (2) |
| (4) Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld. | | I am making this Affidavit in conformance with the provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations and in conjunction with the Westinghouse application for withholding accompanying this Affidavit. |
| (i) The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse. | | (3) |
| (ii) T 1 information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information c.rstomarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes | | I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by the Westinghouse Energy Systems Business Unit in aesignating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information. |
| * Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required.
| | (4) |
| | Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld. |
| | (i) |
| | The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse. |
| | (ii) |
| | T 1 information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information c.rstomarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required. |
| Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows: | | Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows: |
| 28HCRM29AW4 | | 28HCRM29AW4 |
|
| |
|
| ', CAW-98-1278 | | '' CAW-98-1278 |
| (:) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over oth:r companies. | | (:) |
| (b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures ; | | The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over oth:r companies. |
| a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability. | | (b) |
| 1 (c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, l assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
| | It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability. |
| (d) It reveals cost or price information, I roduction capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers. , | | (c) |
| i (e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.
| | Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product. |
| (f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable. | | (d) |
| | It reveals cost or price information, I roduction capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers. |
| | (e) |
| | It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse. |
| | (f) |
| | It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable. |
| There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following: | | There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following: |
| (a) The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitors. It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position. | | (a) |
| (b) It is information which is marketable in many ways. The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information, unnmoos | | The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitors. It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position. |
| | (b) |
| | It is information which is marketable in many ways. The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information, unnmoos |
|
| |
|
| ', CAW-98-1278 (c) Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense.
| | ', CAW-98-1278 (c) |
| (d) Each component of proprietary information pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive advantage. If competitors acquire components of proprietary information, any one component may be the key to the entire puzzle, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage. | | Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense. |
| 1 i
| | (d) |
| (e) Unrestric+ed disclosure would jeopardize the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advantage to the competition of those countries. | | Each component of proprietary information pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive advantage. If competitors acquire components of proprietary information, any one component may be the key to the entire puzzle, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage. |
| 1 (f) The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a competitive advantage.
| | i (e) |
| (iii) The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790, it is to be received in confidence by the l Commission. | | Unrestric+ed disclosure would jeopardize the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advantage to the competition of those countries. |
| (iv) The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources or available information has not been previously employed in the same original manner or method to the best of our knowledge and belief. | | (f) |
| (v) The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is appropriately marked in " Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Safety Analysis Intermediate Range Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint Change," NSA-SSO-96-524, Revision 2 (Proprietary), September,1998 for Joseph M. Farley Units 1 and 2, being transmitted j by the Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC) letter and Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, to the Document Control Desk, Attention Mr. Samuel J. Collins. The proprietary information as submitted for l | | The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a competitive advantage. |
| | (iii) |
| | The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790, it is to be received in confidence by the Commission. |
| | (iv) |
| | The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources or available information has not been previously employed in the same original manner or method to the best of our knowledge and belief. |
| | (v) |
| | The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is appropriately marked in " Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Safety Analysis Intermediate Range Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint Change," NSA-SSO-96-524, Revision 2 (Proprietary), September,1998 for Joseph M. Farley Units 1 and 2, being transmitted j |
| | by the Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC) letter and Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, to the Document Control Desk, Attention Mr. Samuel J. Collins. The proprietary information as submitted for l |
| 2314C-RA4-49KD08 | | 2314C-RA4-49KD08 |
|
| |
|
| _m | | _m |
| - r-. . _, . _ . _ - _ . _ _ _ _ .. _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ ._ ...-_ _ _ _ _
| | - r-. |
| CAW-98-1278 use by SNC for the J. M. Farley Units 1 and 2 is expected to be applicable in other licensee submittals in response to certain NRC requirements for justification of revising the intermediate range neutron flux reactor trip setpoint. | | ' CAW-98-1278 use by SNC for the J. M. Farley Units 1 and 2 is expected to be applicable in other licensee submittals in response to certain NRC requirements for justification of revising the intermediate range neutron flux reactor trip setpoint. |
| This information is part of that which will enable Westinghouse to: l | | This information is part of that which will enable Westinghouse to: |
| \
| | \\ |
| (a) Provide documentation of the current intermediate range (IR) reactor trip uncertainties. | | (a) |
| I (b) Provide the method for applying the test data for use in uncertainty calculations for the revised IR setpoint. | | Provide documentation of the current intermediate range (IR) reactor trip uncertainties. |
| | I (b) |
| | Provide the method for applying the test data for use in uncertainty calculations for the revised IR setpoint. |
| | (c) |
| Assist the customer in obtaining NRC approval. | | Assist the customer in obtaining NRC approval. |
| l (c) !
| |
| 1 I | | 1 I |
| ! Further this information has substantial commercial value as follows:
| | Further this information has substantial commercial value as follows: |
| (a) Westinghouse plans to sell the use of similar information to its customers for i purposes of revising the IR neutron flux reactor trip setpoint. | | (a) |
| | Westinghouse plans to sell the use of similar information to its customers for i |
| | purposes of revising the IR neutron flux reactor trip setpoint. |
| l l | | l l |
| (b) Westinghouse can sell support and defense of the methodology in the licensing l | | (b) |
| l process. | | Westinghouse can sell support and defense of the methodology in the licensing l |
| | l process. |
| l t | | l t |
| Public disclosure of this proprietary information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghouse because it would enhance the ability of competitors to provide similar methodologies and licensing defense services for commercial power reactors without commensurate expenses. Also, public disclosure of the information would enable others to use the information to meet NRC | | Public disclosure of this proprietary information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghouse because it would enhance the ability of competitors to provide similar methodologies and licensing defense services for commercial power reactors without commensurate expenses. Also, public disclosure of the information would enable others to use the information to meet NRC requirements for licensing documentation without purchasing the right to use the information. |
| ; requirements for licensing documentation without purchasing the right to use the ;
| | 1 l |
| ! information.
| | The development of the technology described in part by the information is the result of applying the results of many years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse effort j |
| 1 l l | | and the expenditure of a considerable sum of money. |
| . The development of the technology described in part by the information is the result of applying the results of many years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse effort j
| | i a |
| ; and the expenditure of a considerable sum of money.
| | 2814C-RM5:00lDU8 - |
| l i
| |
| a 2814C-RM5:00lDU8 -
| |
|
| |
|
| .- . . . - , - - . ~_ - - - - - - . - - - - - . . - . .-. .
| | . ~_ - - |
| ', CAW-98-1278 a
| | ', CAW-98-1278 a |
| r i | | r i |
| i In order for competitors of Westinghouse to duplicate this information, similar technical programs would have to be performed and a significant manpower effort, having the requisite talent and experience, would have to be expended for developing the methodology. | | i In order for competitors of Westinghouse to duplicate this information, similar technical programs would have to be performed and a significant manpower effort, having the requisite talent and experience, would have to be expended for developing the methodology. |
| ]
| | ] |
| i | | i Further the deponent sayeth nct. |
| { Further the deponent sayeth nct. ;
| | { |
| 1 I 4 I i ! | | 1 4 |
| 1 4 l I | | I i |
| J 1
| | 1 4 |
| I j l I-i 4
| | I J |
| | 1 I |
| | j l |
| | I-i 4 |
| 4 | | 4 |
| ) | | ) |
Line 119: |
Line 148: |
| l j-WlORN4:Ue0MB | | l j-WlORN4:Ue0MB |
|
| |
|
| Proprietary Information Notice Transmitted herewith are proprietary and/or non-proprietary versions of documents furnished .o the l | | Proprietary Information Notice Transmitted herewith are proprietary and/or non-proprietary versions of documents furnished.o the NRC in connection with requests for generic and/or plant-specific review and approval. |
| NRC in connection with requests for generic and/or plant-specific review and approval. | | l l |
| l In order to conform to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations concerning the protection of proprietary information so submitted to the NRC, the information which is proprietary in the proprietary versions is contained within brackets, and where the proprietary l information has been deleted in the non-proprietary versions, only the brackets remain (the information i that was contained within the brackets in the proprietary versions having been deleted). The justification for claiming the information so designated as proprietary is indicated in both versions by l | | In order to conform to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations concerning the protection of proprietary information so submitted to the NRC, the information which is proprietary in the proprietary versions is contained within brackets, and where the proprietary l |
| means of lower case letters (a) through (t) contained within parentheses located as a superscript immediately following the brackets enclosing each item of information being identified as proprietary or in the margin opposite such information. These lower case letters refer to the types of infortnation Westinghouse customarily holds in confidence identified in Sections (4)(ii)(a) through (4)(ii)(t) of the l affidavit accompanying this transmittal pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(b)(1). | | information has been deleted in the non-proprietary versions, only the brackets remain (the information i |
| | that was contained within the brackets in the proprietary versions having been deleted). The justification for claiming the information so designated as proprietary is indicated in both versions by l |
| | means of lower case letters (a) through (t) contained within parentheses located as a superscript immediately following the brackets enclosing each item of information being identified as proprietary or in the margin opposite such information. These lower case letters refer to the types of infortnation Westinghouse customarily holds in confidence identified in Sections (4)(ii)(a) through (4)(ii)(t) of the l |
| | affidavit accompanying this transmittal pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(b)(1). |
| 1 i | | 1 i |
| i l | | i l |
| l l | | l l |
| I l
| | i i |
| ! i l
| | i t |
| i | | a |
| ! I i
| | ,m-w |
| t a
| | ---,+--m |
| , . , , ,m- w - , - ---,+--m -, w
| | -, w |
|
| |
|
| _ -. - - - ....-. --_ - .-- - ._~ - - -.- . - . - _ ~ _ - - - . . . - . -
| | -.-- -._~ - - -.-. -. - _ ~ _ - - -... |
| 4 Copyright Notice The reports transmitted herewith each bear a Westinghouse copyright notice. The NRC is permitted to make the number of copies of the information contained in these reports which are necessary for its internal use in connection with generic and plant-specific reviews and approvals as well as the issuance, denial, amendment, transfer, renewal, modification, suspension, revocation, or violation of a license, permit, order, or regulation subject to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.790 regarding restrictions on public disclosure to the extent such information has been identified as proprietary by Westinghouse, copyright protection notwithstanding. With respect to the non-proprietary versions of these repons, the NRC is permitted to make the number of copies beyond those necessary for its internal use which are necessary in order to have one copy available for public viewing in the appropriate docket files in the public document room in Washington, DC and in local public document rooms as may be required by NRC regulations if the number of copies submitted is insufficient for this purpose. Copies made by the NRC must include the copyright notice in all instances and the proprietary notice if the original was identified as proprietary. | | 4 Copyright Notice The reports transmitted herewith each bear a Westinghouse copyright notice. The NRC is permitted to make the number of copies of the information contained in these reports which are necessary for its internal use in connection with generic and plant-specific reviews and approvals as well as the issuance, denial, amendment, transfer, renewal, modification, suspension, revocation, or violation of a license, permit, order, or regulation subject to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.790 regarding restrictions on public disclosure to the extent such information has been identified as proprietary by Westinghouse, copyright protection notwithstanding. With respect to the non-proprietary versions of these repons, the NRC is permitted to make the number of copies beyond those necessary for its internal use which are necessary in order to have one copy available for public viewing in the appropriate docket files in the public document room in Washington, DC and in local public document rooms as may be required by NRC regulations if the number of copies submitted is insufficient for this purpose. Copies made by the NRC must include the copyright notice in all instances and the proprietary notice if the original was identified as proprietary. |
| l l | | l l |
Line 139: |
Line 171: |
| i i | | i i |
| [ | | [ |
| 1 j
| | j 4 |
| 4 Il i
| | Il i |
| ! I l
| | l t |
| t 7
| | 7 d |
| d 4}}
| | 4 |
| | .-.}} |
|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARL-99-035, Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs, Used to Support SG Replacement Project.Proprietary Encl Withheld1999-10-18018 October 1999 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs, Used to Support SG Replacement Project.Proprietary Encl Withheld ML20217G0801999-10-0707 October 1999 Informs That on 990930,staff Conducted mid-cycle PPR of Farley & Did Not Identify Any Areas in Which Performance Warranted More than Core Insp Program.Nrc Will Conduct Regional Insps Associated with SG Removal & Installation ML20217P0661999-10-0606 October 1999 Requests Withholding of Proprietary Rept NSD-SAE-ESI-99-389, Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs ML20217B1891999-10-0404 October 1999 Submits Clarification Re Development of Basis for Determining Limiting Internal Pressure Loads Re Review of NRC SE for Cycle 16 Extension Request.Util Intends to Use Guidelines When Evaluating SG Tube Structural Integrity ML20212J8391999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards RAI Re Request for Amends to Ts.Addl Info Needed to Complete Review to Verify That Proposed TS Are Consistent with & Validate Design Basis Analysis.Request Discussed with H Mahan on 990930.Info Needed within 10 Days of This Ltr ML20212J8801999-09-30030 September 1999 Discusses GL 98-01,suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Util 980731,990607 & 03 Ltrs Provided Requested Info in Subj Gl.Nrc Considers Subj GL to Be Closed for Unit 1 ML20212E7031999-09-23023 September 1999 Responds to GL 98-01, Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Util Requested to Submit Plans & Schedules for Resolving Y2K-related Issues ML20212F1111999-09-21021 September 1999 Discusses Closeout of GL 97-06, Degradation of Steam Generator Internals ML20212C2351999-09-16016 September 1999 Submits Corrected Info Concerning Snoc Response to NRC GL 99-02, Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal L-99-031, Forwards Info Requested in Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Exams1999-09-13013 September 1999 Forwards Info Requested in Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Exams ML20212D4581999-09-10010 September 1999 Responds to to D Rathbun,Requesting Review of J Sherman Expressing Concerns That Plant & Other Nuclear Plants Not Yet Y2K Compliant ML20212C8041999-09-10010 September 1999 Responds to to D Rathbun Requesting Review of J Sherman Re Y2K Compliance.Latest NRC Status Rept on Y2K Activities Encl ML20212A6951999-09-0909 September 1999 Requests That Licensees Affected by Kaowool Fire Barriers Take Issue on Voluntary Initiative & Propose Approach for Resolving Subj Issues.Staff Plans to Meet with Licensees to Discuss Listed Topics ML20212A8341999-09-0909 September 1999 Requests That Licensees Affected by Kaowool Fire Barriers Take Issue on Voluntary Initiative & Propose Approach for Resolving Subj Issues.Staff Plans to Meet with Licensees to Discuss Listed Topics ML20211N4301999-09-0808 September 1999 Discusses Proposed Meeting to Discuss Kaowool Fire Barriers. Staff Requesting That Affected Licensees Take Issue on Voluntary Initative & Propose Approach for Resolving Issues ML20211N8041999-09-0808 September 1999 Informs That on 990930 NRC Issued GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design-Basis Accident Condition, to Holders of Nuclear Plant Operating Licenses ML20212C0071999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-05 & 50-364/99-05 on 990627- 0807.No Violations Noted.Licensee Conduct of Activities at Farley Plant Facilities Generally Characterized by safety-conscious Operations & Sound Engineering ML20211Q4801999-09-0101 September 1999 Informs That on 990812-13,Region II Hosted Training Managers Conference on Recent Changes to Operator Licensing Program. List of Attendees,Copy of Slide Presentations & List of Questions Received from Participants Encl ML20211K2131999-08-31031 August 1999 Informs That Snoc Has Conducted Review of Reactor Vessel Integrity Database,Version 2 (RVID2) & Conclude That Latest Data Submitted for Farley Units Has Not Been Incorporated Into RVID2 ML20211K4101999-08-31031 August 1999 Resubmits Relief Requests Q1P16-RR-V-5 & Q2P16-RR-V-5 That Seek to Group V661 Valves from Each Unit Into Sample Disassembly & Insp Group,Per 990525 Telcon with NRC ML20211G6851999-08-26026 August 1999 Informs That During Insp,Technical Issues Associated with Design,Installation & fire-resistive Performance of Kaowool Raceway fire-barriers Installed at Farley Nuclear Plant Were Identified ML20211B9211999-08-17017 August 1999 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-348/99-09 & 50-364/99-09.Corrective Actions:Security Response Plan Was Revised to Address Vulnerabilities Identified During NRC Insp ML20211B9431999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Fitness for Duty Performance Data for six-month Reporting Period 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d).Rept Covers Employees at Jm Farley Nuclear Plant & Southern Nuclear Corporate Headquarters ML20210R5101999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Revised Page 6 to 990430 LAR to Operate Farley Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,for Cycle 16 Only,Based on risk- Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity,As Result of Staff Comments ML20212C8141999-08-0909 August 1999 Forwards Correspondence Received from Jm Sherman.Requests Review of Info Re Established Policies & Procedures ML20210T2021999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Draft SE Accepting Licensee Proposed Conversion of Plant,Units 1 & 2 Current TSs to Its.Its Based on Listed Documents ML20210Q4641999-08-0505 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Authorized Representative of Facility Must Submit Ltr to La Reyes,As Listed,With List of Individuals to Take exam,30 Days Before Exam Date ML20210J8341999-07-30030 July 1999 Forwards Second Request for Addl Info Re Util 990430 Amend Request to Allow Util to Operate Unit 1,for Cycle 16 Based on risk-informed Probability of SG Tube Rupture & Nominal accident-induced primary-to-second Leakage ML20210G4901999-07-30030 July 1999 Responds to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal, Issued 990603.Ltr Contains NRC License Commitment to Utilize ASTM D3803-1989 with Efficiency Acceptance Criteria Utilizing Safety Factor of 2 L-99-028, Responds to NRC 990730 RAI Re 990423 OL Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described by NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines1999-07-30030 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990730 RAI Re 990423 OL Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described by NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines ML20210G8181999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-04 & 50-364/99-04 on 990516- 0626.One Violation Identified & Being Treated as Noncited Violation ML20210E4071999-07-22022 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990702 RAI Re Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described in NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines L-99-027, Responds to NRC 990702 RAI Re Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described in NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines1999-07-22022 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990702 RAI Re Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described in NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines L-99-026, Forwards Response to NRC 990702 RAI Re SG Replacement Related TS Change Request Submitted 981201.Ltr Contains No New Commitments1999-07-19019 July 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990702 RAI Re SG Replacement Related TS Change Request Submitted 981201.Ltr Contains No New Commitments L-99-264, Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 20011999-07-13013 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 2001 ML20209H4721999-07-13013 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 2001 05000364/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Condenser Vacuum Steam Dump Drain Line Failure.Commitments Made by Licensee,Listed1999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Condenser Vacuum Steam Dump Drain Line Failure.Commitments Made by Licensee,Listed ML20196J6571999-07-0202 July 1999 Discusses Closure to TAC MA0543 & MA0544 Re GL 92-01 Rev 1, Suppl 1,RV Structural Integrity.Nrc Has Revised Rvid & Releasing It as Rvid,Version 2 as Result of Review of Responses ML20196J7471999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards RAI Re Cycle 16 Extension Request.Response Requested within 30 Days of Date of Ltr ML20196J5781999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards RAI Re 981201 & s Requesting Amend to TS Associated with Replacing Existing Westinghouse Model 51 SG with Westinghouse Model 54F Generators.Respond within 30 Days of Ltr Date ML20196J6191999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards Final Dam Audit Rept of 981008 of Category 1 Cooling Water Storage Pond Dam.Requests Response within 120 Days of Date of Ltr L-99-249, Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA1999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA ML20196J3591999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards SE of TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at Westinghouse 3-Loop Pwrs L-99-024, Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA1999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA L-99-025, Forwards Rev 2 to Jfnp Security plan,FNP-0-M-99,IAW 10CFR50.4(b)(4).Attachment 1 Contains Summary of Changes & Amended Security Plan Pages.Encl Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR73.211999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards Rev 2 to Jfnp Security plan,FNP-0-M-99,IAW 10CFR50.4(b)(4).Attachment 1 Contains Summary of Changes & Amended Security Plan Pages.Encl Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR73.21 ML20196J8631999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA ML20196D1931999-06-22022 June 1999 Discusses Requesting Approval & Issuance of Plant Units 1 & 2 ITS by 990930.New Target Date Agrees with Requested Date ML20196A3401999-06-10010 June 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-03 & 50-364/99-03 on 990404-0515.No Violations Noted ML20196H9801999-06-10010 June 1999 Submits Two RAI Re ITS Section 4.0 That Were Never Sent. Reply to RAI Via e-mail ML20195F1731999-06-0707 June 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Responses to NRC RAIs Re W TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at W 3-Loop Pwrs. W Proprietary Notice,Affidavit & Copyright Notice,Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld 1999-09-09
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARL-99-035, Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs, Used to Support SG Replacement Project.Proprietary Encl Withheld1999-10-18018 October 1999 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs, Used to Support SG Replacement Project.Proprietary Encl Withheld ML20217P0661999-10-0606 October 1999 Requests Withholding of Proprietary Rept NSD-SAE-ESI-99-389, Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs ML20217B1891999-10-0404 October 1999 Submits Clarification Re Development of Basis for Determining Limiting Internal Pressure Loads Re Review of NRC SE for Cycle 16 Extension Request.Util Intends to Use Guidelines When Evaluating SG Tube Structural Integrity ML20212C2351999-09-16016 September 1999 Submits Corrected Info Concerning Snoc Response to NRC GL 99-02, Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal L-99-031, Forwards Info Requested in Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Exams1999-09-13013 September 1999 Forwards Info Requested in Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Exams ML20211K4101999-08-31031 August 1999 Resubmits Relief Requests Q1P16-RR-V-5 & Q2P16-RR-V-5 That Seek to Group V661 Valves from Each Unit Into Sample Disassembly & Insp Group,Per 990525 Telcon with NRC ML20211K2131999-08-31031 August 1999 Informs That Snoc Has Conducted Review of Reactor Vessel Integrity Database,Version 2 (RVID2) & Conclude That Latest Data Submitted for Farley Units Has Not Been Incorporated Into RVID2 ML20211B9431999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Fitness for Duty Performance Data for six-month Reporting Period 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d).Rept Covers Employees at Jm Farley Nuclear Plant & Southern Nuclear Corporate Headquarters ML20211B9211999-08-17017 August 1999 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-348/99-09 & 50-364/99-09.Corrective Actions:Security Response Plan Was Revised to Address Vulnerabilities Identified During NRC Insp ML20210R5101999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Revised Page 6 to 990430 LAR to Operate Farley Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,for Cycle 16 Only,Based on risk- Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity,As Result of Staff Comments ML20212C8141999-08-0909 August 1999 Forwards Correspondence Received from Jm Sherman.Requests Review of Info Re Established Policies & Procedures ML20210G4901999-07-30030 July 1999 Responds to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal, Issued 990603.Ltr Contains NRC License Commitment to Utilize ASTM D3803-1989 with Efficiency Acceptance Criteria Utilizing Safety Factor of 2 L-99-028, Responds to NRC 990730 RAI Re 990423 OL Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described by NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines1999-07-30030 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990730 RAI Re 990423 OL Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described by NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines ML20210E4071999-07-22022 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990702 RAI Re Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described in NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines L-99-027, Responds to NRC 990702 RAI Re Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described in NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines1999-07-22022 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990702 RAI Re Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described in NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines L-99-026, Forwards Response to NRC 990702 RAI Re SG Replacement Related TS Change Request Submitted 981201.Ltr Contains No New Commitments1999-07-19019 July 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990702 RAI Re SG Replacement Related TS Change Request Submitted 981201.Ltr Contains No New Commitments L-99-264, Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 20011999-07-13013 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 2001 ML20209H4721999-07-13013 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 2001 05000364/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Condenser Vacuum Steam Dump Drain Line Failure.Commitments Made by Licensee,Listed1999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Condenser Vacuum Steam Dump Drain Line Failure.Commitments Made by Licensee,Listed L-99-249, Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA1999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA ML20196J8631999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA L-99-024, Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA1999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA L-99-025, Forwards Rev 2 to Jfnp Security plan,FNP-0-M-99,IAW 10CFR50.4(b)(4).Attachment 1 Contains Summary of Changes & Amended Security Plan Pages.Encl Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR73.211999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards Rev 2 to Jfnp Security plan,FNP-0-M-99,IAW 10CFR50.4(b)(4).Attachment 1 Contains Summary of Changes & Amended Security Plan Pages.Encl Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR73.21 L-99-224, Submits Rev to Unit 2 SG Tube voltage-based Repair Criteria Data Rept.Ltr Contains No Commitments1999-06-0707 June 1999 Submits Rev to Unit 2 SG Tube voltage-based Repair Criteria Data Rept.Ltr Contains No Commitments L-99-217, Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Responses to NRC RAIs Re W TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at W 3-Loop Pwrs. W Proprietary Notice,Affidavit & Copyright Notice,Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld1999-06-0707 June 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Responses to NRC RAIs Re W TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at W 3-Loop Pwrs. W Proprietary Notice,Affidavit & Copyright Notice,Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld L-99-225, Responds to GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants1999-06-0707 June 1999 Responds to GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants ML20195F0621999-06-0707 June 1999 Submits Rev to Unit 2 SG Tube voltage-based Repair Criteria Data Rept.Ltr Contains No Commitments ML20195E9581999-06-0707 June 1999 Responds to GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants ML20195F1731999-06-0707 June 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Responses to NRC RAIs Re W TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at W 3-Loop Pwrs. W Proprietary Notice,Affidavit & Copyright Notice,Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld L-99-022, Submits Rev to Unit 2 SG Tube voltage-based Repair Criteria Data Rept.Ltr Contains No Commitments1999-06-0707 June 1999 Submits Rev to Unit 2 SG Tube voltage-based Repair Criteria Data Rept.Ltr Contains No Commitments L-99-021, Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Responses to NRC RAIs Re W TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at W 3-Loop Pwrs. W Proprietary Notice,Affidavit & Copyright Notice,Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld1999-06-0707 June 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Responses to NRC RAIs Re W TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at W 3-Loop Pwrs. W Proprietary Notice,Affidavit & Copyright Notice,Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld L-99-203, Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re GL 96-05 for Farley Nuclear Plant.Farley Is Committing to Implement Phase 3 of JOG Program1999-05-28028 May 1999 Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re GL 96-05 for Farley Nuclear Plant.Farley Is Committing to Implement Phase 3 of JOG Program ML20195C6941999-05-28028 May 1999 Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re GL 96-05 for Farley Nuclear Plant.Farley Is Committing to Implement Phase 3 of JOG Program L-99-020, Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re GL 96-05 for Farley Nuclear Plant.Farley Is Committing to Implement Phase 3 of JOG Program1999-05-28028 May 1999 Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re GL 96-05 for Farley Nuclear Plant.Farley Is Committing to Implement Phase 3 of JOG Program ML20195F2101999-05-24024 May 1999 Requests That Farley Nuclear Plant Proprietary Responses to NRC RAI Re W WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at W 3-Loop Pwrs, Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790 L-99-180, Forwards Responses to NRC RAI Questions for Chapter 3.8 of Ts.Proposed Revs to TS Previously Submitted with LAR Related to RAI1999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards Responses to NRC RAI Questions for Chapter 3.8 of Ts.Proposed Revs to TS Previously Submitted with LAR Related to RAI ML20206F4321999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards Responses to NRC RAI Questions for Chapter 3.8 of Ts.Proposed Revs to TS Previously Submitted with LAR Related to RAI ML20206C8021999-04-26026 April 1999 Forwards 1998 Annual Rept, for Alabama Power Co.Encls Contain Financial Statements for 1998,unaudited Financial Statements for Quarter Ending 990331 & Cash Flow Projections for 990101-991231 ML20205S9501999-04-21021 April 1999 Forwards FNP Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1998, IAW TSs Sections 6.9.1.8 & 6.9.1.9.Changes to ODCM Revs 16,17 & 18 Are Encl,Iaw TS Section 6.14.2 L-99-172, Forwards FNP Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1998, IAW TSs Sections 6.9.1.8 & 6.9.1.9.Changes to ODCM Revs 16,17 & 18 Are Encl,Iaw TS Section 6.14.21999-04-21021 April 1999 Forwards FNP Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1998, IAW TSs Sections 6.9.1.8 & 6.9.1.9.Changes to ODCM Revs 16,17 & 18 Are Encl,Iaw TS Section 6.14.2 L-99-153, Forwards Correction to 960212 GL 95-07 180 Day Response. Level 3 Evaluation for Pressure Locking Utilized Analytical Models.Encl Page Has Been Amended to Correct Error1999-04-13013 April 1999 Forwards Correction to 960212 GL 95-07 180 Day Response. Level 3 Evaluation for Pressure Locking Utilized Analytical Models.Encl Page Has Been Amended to Correct Error L-99-125, Forwards Rev 0 to W Rept WCAP-15171, Analysis of Capsule Z from Alabama Power Co Jm Farley Unit 2 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program, Presenting Surveillance Capsule Test Results from Capsule Z1999-03-19019 March 1999 Forwards Rev 0 to W Rept WCAP-15171, Analysis of Capsule Z from Alabama Power Co Jm Farley Unit 2 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program, Presenting Surveillance Capsule Test Results from Capsule Z ML20205A2871999-03-19019 March 1999 Forwards Rev 0 to W Rept WCAP-15171, Analysis of Capsule Z from Alabama Power Co Jm Farley Unit 2 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program, Presenting Surveillance Capsule Test Results from Capsule Z ML20205A1531999-03-19019 March 1999 Forwards Corrected Typed & marked-up Current TS Pages for Replacing Previous Pages Submitted on 990222,re CR, Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Sys & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation L-99-012, Forwards 10CFR50.46 Annual Rept for 1998,re Effects of ECCS Evaluation Model Mod on Peak Cladding Temp Results Since 1997 Annual Rept & Most Recent PCT Error Rept Submitted 9809101999-03-19019 March 1999 Forwards 10CFR50.46 Annual Rept for 1998,re Effects of ECCS Evaluation Model Mod on Peak Cladding Temp Results Since 1997 Annual Rept & Most Recent PCT Error Rept Submitted 980910 L-99-010, Forwards ISI Refueling 15,Interval 2,Period 3,Outage 3 for Jfnp,Unit 1, & Vols 1 & 2 to ISI Refueling 15,Interval 3, Period 1,Outage 1 for Jfnp,Unit 1. Summary of Results May Be Found in Tab B of Encl 21999-03-18018 March 1999 Forwards ISI Refueling 15,Interval 2,Period 3,Outage 3 for Jfnp,Unit 1, & Vols 1 & 2 to ISI Refueling 15,Interval 3, Period 1,Outage 1 for Jfnp,Unit 1. Summary of Results May Be Found in Tab B of Encl 2 ML20205A7611999-03-18018 March 1999 Forwards Annual DG Reliability Data Rept for 1998,per Plant TS 6.9.1.12 & 10CFR50.36.Rept Provides Number of Tests (Valid or Invalid) & Number of Failures for DGs at Jm Farley Nuclear Plant.Ltr Contains No New Commitments ML20205H2741999-03-18018 March 1999 Forwards Info on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2,IAW 10CFR50.75(f)(i) ML20204D4281999-03-16016 March 1999 Forwards SG-99-03-001, Farley Unit-1 1999 Voltage-Based Repair Criteria 90-Day Rept, Per GL 95-05.Required Rept for Fall 1998 SG Insp Is Included in Rept ML20204E5841999-03-15015 March 1999 Submits Info on Current Levels & Sources of Insurance on Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 1999-09-16
[Table view] |
Text
-._.
. - ~
f~\\ 0
(
g l
1
' Westinghouse Electric Company, Energy Systems Nuclear Services Division l
a dnnsson of CBS Corporation Box 355 Pittsburgh. Pennsytvania 152304 355 CAW-98-1278 September 3,1998 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention: Mr. Samuel J. Collins APPLICATION FOR WITHHOLDING PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE l
Subject:
" Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Safety Analysis intermediate Range Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint Change" (NSA-SSO-96-524), Revision 2, (Proprietary)
Dear Mr. Collins:
The Proprietary information for which withholding is being requested in the above referenced report is further identified in Affidavit CAW-98-1278 signed by the owner of the proprietary informatiW Westinghouse Electric Company. The affidavit, which accompanies this letter, sets forth the basis on which the information may be withheld from public disclosure by the Commission and addresses with specificity the considerations listed in paragraph (b)(4) of 10 CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations.
Accordingly, this letter authorizes the utilization of the accompanying Affidavit by Southem Nuclear Operating Company.
Correspondence with respect to the proprietary aspects of the application for withholding or the Westinghouse affidavit should reference this letter, CAW-98-1278 and should be addressed to the undersigned.
Very truly yours, H.A.
epp Ma ager Regulatory and Licensing Engineering Enclosures cc: T. Carter /NRC (SE7) l l
9809150082 980911 PDR ADOCK 05000348 P
PDR l
CAW-98-1278 AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
ss COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY:
Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Henry A. Sepp, who, being by me duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he is authorized to execute this Affidavit on behalf of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (" Westinghouse") and that the averments of fact set forth in th'.s Affidavit are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief:
I b
/f,/
Henry A. S,epp, M,anager Regulatory and Licensing Engineering Sworn to and subscribed before thisi day of /,
,1998
-,f n,6L,wii) i*~C-.,=em g,yrg!c l':?ts Mtr W.? 'A*f e
pu <;r,,s *ru,at s*4%t'4 W % 2-9
%%M'YAbIb Notary Public 2814C-RMim0N8
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. CAW-98-1278 (1)
I am Manager, Regulatory and Licensing Engineering, in the Nuclear Services Division, of the Westinghouse Electric Company, a division of CBS Corporation (" Westinghouse), and as such, I have been specifically delegated the function of reviewing the proprietary information sought to be withheld from public disclosure in connection with nuclear power plant licensing and rulemaking proceedings, and am authorized to apply for its withholding on behalf of the Westinghouse Energy Systems Business Unit.
(2)
I am making this Affidavit in conformance with the provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations and in conjunction with the Westinghouse application for withholding accompanying this Affidavit.
(3)
I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by the Westinghouse Energy Systems Business Unit in aesignating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.
(4)
Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld.
(i)
The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.
(ii)
T 1 information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information c.rstomarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required.
Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows:
28HCRM29AW4
CAW-98-1278
(:)
The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over oth:r companies.
(b)
It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability.
(c)
Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
(d)
It reveals cost or price information, I roduction capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.
(e)
It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.
(f)
It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.
There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following:
(a)
The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitors. It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position.
(b)
It is information which is marketable in many ways. The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information, unnmoos
', CAW-98-1278 (c)
Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense.
(d)
Each component of proprietary information pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive advantage. If competitors acquire components of proprietary information, any one component may be the key to the entire puzzle, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage.
i (e)
Unrestric+ed disclosure would jeopardize the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advantage to the competition of those countries.
(f)
The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a competitive advantage.
(iii)
The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790, it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.
(iv)
The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources or available information has not been previously employed in the same original manner or method to the best of our knowledge and belief.
(v)
The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is appropriately marked in " Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Safety Analysis Intermediate Range Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint Change," NSA-SSO-96-524, Revision 2 (Proprietary), September,1998 for Joseph M. Farley Units 1 and 2, being transmitted j
by the Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC) letter and Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, to the Document Control Desk, Attention Mr. Samuel J. Collins. The proprietary information as submitted for l
2314C-RA4-49KD08
_m
- r-.
' CAW-98-1278 use by SNC for the J. M. Farley Units 1 and 2 is expected to be applicable in other licensee submittals in response to certain NRC requirements for justification of revising the intermediate range neutron flux reactor trip setpoint.
This information is part of that which will enable Westinghouse to:
\\
(a)
Provide documentation of the current intermediate range (IR) reactor trip uncertainties.
I (b)
Provide the method for applying the test data for use in uncertainty calculations for the revised IR setpoint.
(c)
Assist the customer in obtaining NRC approval.
1 I
Further this information has substantial commercial value as follows:
(a)
Westinghouse plans to sell the use of similar information to its customers for i
purposes of revising the IR neutron flux reactor trip setpoint.
l l
(b)
Westinghouse can sell support and defense of the methodology in the licensing l
l process.
l t
Public disclosure of this proprietary information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghouse because it would enhance the ability of competitors to provide similar methodologies and licensing defense services for commercial power reactors without commensurate expenses. Also, public disclosure of the information would enable others to use the information to meet NRC requirements for licensing documentation without purchasing the right to use the information.
1 l
The development of the technology described in part by the information is the result of applying the results of many years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse effort j
and the expenditure of a considerable sum of money.
i a
2814C-RM5:00lDU8 -
. ~_ - -
', CAW-98-1278 a
r i
i In order for competitors of Westinghouse to duplicate this information, similar technical programs would have to be performed and a significant manpower effort, having the requisite talent and experience, would have to be expended for developing the methodology.
]
i Further the deponent sayeth nct.
{
1 4
I i
1 4
I J
1 I
j l
I-i 4
4
)
i i
a 4
l j-WlORN4:Ue0MB
Proprietary Information Notice Transmitted herewith are proprietary and/or non-proprietary versions of documents furnished.o the NRC in connection with requests for generic and/or plant-specific review and approval.
l l
In order to conform to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations concerning the protection of proprietary information so submitted to the NRC, the information which is proprietary in the proprietary versions is contained within brackets, and where the proprietary l
information has been deleted in the non-proprietary versions, only the brackets remain (the information i
that was contained within the brackets in the proprietary versions having been deleted). The justification for claiming the information so designated as proprietary is indicated in both versions by l
means of lower case letters (a) through (t) contained within parentheses located as a superscript immediately following the brackets enclosing each item of information being identified as proprietary or in the margin opposite such information. These lower case letters refer to the types of infortnation Westinghouse customarily holds in confidence identified in Sections (4)(ii)(a) through (4)(ii)(t) of the l
affidavit accompanying this transmittal pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(b)(1).
1 i
i l
l l
i i
i t
a
,m-w
---,+--m
-, w
-.-- -._~ - - -.-. -. - _ ~ _ - - -...
4 Copyright Notice The reports transmitted herewith each bear a Westinghouse copyright notice. The NRC is permitted to make the number of copies of the information contained in these reports which are necessary for its internal use in connection with generic and plant-specific reviews and approvals as well as the issuance, denial, amendment, transfer, renewal, modification, suspension, revocation, or violation of a license, permit, order, or regulation subject to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.790 regarding restrictions on public disclosure to the extent such information has been identified as proprietary by Westinghouse, copyright protection notwithstanding. With respect to the non-proprietary versions of these repons, the NRC is permitted to make the number of copies beyond those necessary for its internal use which are necessary in order to have one copy available for public viewing in the appropriate docket files in the public document room in Washington, DC and in local public document rooms as may be required by NRC regulations if the number of copies submitted is insufficient for this purpose. Copies made by the NRC must include the copyright notice in all instances and the proprietary notice if the original was identified as proprietary.
l l
l l
i i
[
j 4
Il i
l t
7 d
4
.-.