ML19312D219: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 22: Line 22:
E sl NI  s, JIu:sussEcQoE 0 l C l P l 1 l @ is0 l0 l-uce=Se 34                          10 l0        l0 l0 lo }- as@asuce=st muutam                                        4l1lIl1l1l@l TvPE ao          6)    was@
E sl NI  s, JIu:sussEcQoE 0 l C l P l 1 l @ is0 l0 l-uce=Se 34                          10 l0        l0 l0 lo }- as@asuce=st muutam                                        4l1lIl1l1l@l TvPE ao          6)    was@
M
M
:
               's      cE  LLj@[015 l 0 l 0 l0 l2 l1 l9 j@l 0 l 2 l 1 l 9 l 8 l014 l@l                                            76 01REPORT  3l IlDATE 7l 810l@    to                    i Go          el              DOCS (Ef NuMsgR            88    69      EVENT DATE 5
               's      cE  LLj@[015 l 0 l 0 l0 l2 l1 l9 j@l 0 l 2 l 1 l 9 l 8 l014 l@l                                            76 01REPORT  3l IlDATE 7l 810l@    to                    i Go          el              DOCS (Ef NuMsgR            88    69      EVENT DATE 5
EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROSAsLE CONSEQUENCES h E [., On February 19, 1980 during a scheduled surveillance test on the Stand-                                                                                                  l              ,
EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROSAsLE CONSEQUENCES h E [., On February 19, 1980 during a scheduled surveillance test on the Stand-                                                                                                  l              ,
Line 30: Line 29:
y!                                                                                                                                                                                        .
y!                                                                                                                                                                                        .
E;              occurrence in accordance with T.S.6.9.2.B.2.                                                                                                                  j i                                                                                                                                                                      I E ,                                                                                                                                                                      so
E;              occurrence in accordance with T.S.6.9.2.B.2.                                                                                                                  j i                                                                                                                                                                      I E ,                                                                                                                                                                      so
                                                                                                                                    *
                                 '55I's"            [o"oY        sNiIS$E                :D .trotE :T eccE                  sLc "co'E        sU$cEmE g
                                 '55I's"            [o"oY        sNiIS$E                :D .trotE :T eccE                  sLc "co'E        sU$cEmE g
6 ddh lE lh I X lh l ll N l S lT lR lU l@ W@ W @
6 ddh lE lh I X lh l ll N l S lT lR lU l@ W@ W @
Line 43: Line 41:
{
{
gi                Ing line is considered to have failed as a result of having been stepped                                                                                        l            l gl                on.      The defective flow sensir:g line was replaced.                                          The plant engineer-                                            l l
gi                Ing line is considered to have failed as a result of having been stepped                                                                                        l            l gl                on.      The defective flow sensir:g line was replaced.                                          The plant engineer-                                            l l
gg                Ing staff will determine what can be kne to prevent recurrence.                                                                                                I ae                                                                                                                                                                          so
gg                Ing staff will determine what can be kne to prevent recurrence.                                                                                                I ae                                                                                                                                                                          so RY STA                % POWER                        OTHER STATUS              DIS                                    DISCOVERY DESCRI' TION h y W @ l0l0l0l@l                                                NA                l      lBl@!                      Surveillance Test                                              l s 4,,, g                            u        n                            4.      o          as                                                                        oc RECEASED OF RELEASE                          AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY                                                        LOCATION OF RELEASE "A                      I            l                              NA                                                  l E. L. EJ            @ LzJ@l
      '
RY STA                % POWER                        OTHER STATUS              DIS                                    DISCOVERY DESCRI' TION h y W @ l0l0l0l@l                                                NA                l      lBl@!                      Surveillance Test                                              l s 4,,, g                            u        n                            4.      o          as                                                                        oc RECEASED OF RELEASE                          AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY                                                        LOCATION OF RELEASE "A                      I            l                              NA                                                  l E. L. EJ            @ LzJ@l
                         ~
                         ~
                            .
trER$0NNEL EXPOSUR*.S u                                                        ..                                                                              .c NUMSER                TYPE        DEScPtPTION
trER$0NNEL EXPOSUR*.S u                                                        ..                                                                              .c NUMSER                TYPE        DEScPtPTION
{ l0l0l0l@lzl@l
{ l0l0l0l@lzl@l NA l
    **                                        "
nRsONNEl' .uuns nuMeER                oEsCRIPfloNO NA                                                                  l E..I01Olol@L'            n        n                                                                                                                                            .o 800321066&-
NA
* l nRsONNEl' .uuns nuMeER                oEsCRIPfloNO NA                                                                  l E..I01Olol@L'            n        n                                                                                                                                            .o 800321066&-
                '
W,5E E. Lz.J@We"'A'l ''''"" @
W,5E E. Lz.J@We"'A'l ''''"" @
                                                                                                          -
l                                                                                        "A'                                                            =J
l                                                                                        "A'                                                            =J
         .            io                                                                                                                                .                        .o stSUE              M ''T I ON l Yj        l                                    We,biv News Release - 3/27/80                                                  l        lllllIIII'IIIl
         .            io                                                                                                                                .                        .o stSUE              M ''T I ON l Yj        l                                    We,biv News Release - 3/27/80                                                  l        lllllIIII'IIIl
Line 62: Line 53:
{
{


o
o I:
    '.,      '
I:
I h      h~4
I h      h~4
                  ,, ,.
                         '  (f    pj                                                    Jersey Central Power & Ught Company Madison Avenue at Punen Bow! Road Monistown. New Jersey 07960 f
                         '  (f    pj                                                    Jersey Central Power & Ught Company Madison Avenue at Punen Bow! Road Monistown. New Jersey 07960 f
[
[
5 (201)455-8200 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Forked River, New Jersey 08731                                                    i i
5 (201)455-8200 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Forked River, New Jersey 08731                                                    i i
Licensee Event Report Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/80-11/3L                                                j s
Licensee Event Report Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/80-11/3L                                                j s
                                                                                                                            '
Report Date                                                                                                        $
Report Date                                                                                                        $
                                                                                                                               ?
                                                                                                                               ?
Harch 17, 1980 1
Harch 17, 1980 1
Occurrence Date
Occurrence Date February 19, 1980                                                                                                  ]
:
February 19, 1980                                                                                                  ]
Identification of Occurrence Stapdby Gas Treatment System #1 was found to be inoperable during a scheduled surveillance test.            .                                                                                    ,
Identification of Occurrence Stapdby Gas Treatment System #1 was found to be inoperable during a scheduled surveillance test.            .                                                                                    ,
This event is considered to be a reportable occurrence as defined in the Techni-cal Specifications, paragraph 6.9.2.B.2.
This event is considered to be a reportable occurrence as defined in the Techni-cal Specifications, paragraph 6.9.2.B.2.
Conditions Prior to Occurrence The plant was shutdown for a refueling / maintenance outage.
Conditions Prior to Occurrence The plant was shutdown for a refueling / maintenance outage.
* The reactor. mode switch was locked in_ refuel.                                                                      l The reactor cavity was flooded and less than 212*F.                                                                  l Description of Occurrence
* The reactor. mode switch was locked in_ refuel.                                                                      l The reactor cavity was flooded and less than 212*F.                                                                  l Description of Occurrence On Tuesday, February 19, 1980, at approximately 2130 hours, during a scheduled surveillance of the Standby Gas Treatment System (SGTS), a trip was experienced on SGTS #1 and automatic circuitry started SGTS #2 which performed satisfactority.
                                                                            .
On Tuesday, February 19, 1980, at approximately 2130 hours, during a scheduled surveillance of the Standby Gas Treatment System (SGTS), a trip was experienced on SGTS #1 and automatic circuitry started SGTS #2 which performed satisfactority.
A s'ubsequent investigation ~-revealed that the absence of a system flow signal resulted in a shutdown of SGTS #1.
A s'ubsequent investigation ~-revealed that the absence of a system flow signal resulted in a shutdown of SGTS #1.
    *
        .
Apparent Cause of Occurrence The cause of the occurrence was due to a cracked flow sensing line (tygon tubing) which provided an erroneous signal to the system control circuitry indicating no system flow. The sensing line is considered to have failed as a result of being
Apparent Cause of Occurrence The cause of the occurrence was due to a cracked flow sensing line (tygon tubing) which provided an erroneous signal to the system control circuitry indicating no system flow. The sensing line is considered to have failed as a result of being
           ~ stepped on by station personnel.
           ~ stepped on by station personnel.
,
P Jersey Central Power & Lght Company is a Member of the Genera: Pubic Utames System                          I l                        .
P Jersey Central Power & Lght Company is a Member of the Genera: Pubic Utames System                          I l                        .
                                                                                              .


          ,
        ...        .
            .
R:porttblo Occurrcnco'No.- 50-219/80-11/3L.                                Pcg2 2
R:porttblo Occurrcnco'No.- 50-219/80-11/3L.                                Pcg2 2
               , March 17. 1980
               , March 17. 1980 Analysis of-Occurrence                                                                !
      -
                                        .
Analysis of-Occurrence                                                                !
i Standby Gas Treatment' System'Is used to process the reactor building atmosphere,      !
i Standby Gas Treatment' System'Is used to process the reactor building atmosphere,      !
should conditions be present which require its functioning, and exhaust it through-    l
should conditions be present which require its functioning, and exhaust it through-    l
                 .the plant-stack. Although_SGTS #1 was observed to be Inoperable when the system    i was initiated, the control; logic did, as designed, initiate SGTS #2 which proved
                 .the plant-stack. Although_SGTS #1 was observed to be Inoperable when the system    i was initiated, the control; logic did, as designed, initiate SGTS #2 which proved
   ~
   ~
l
l to be functional.- The safety significance of this event is considered minimal        ;
              '
to be functional.- The safety significance of this event is considered minimal        ;
since the only concern was a loss of redundancy in the SGTS's.                      ,
since the only concern was a loss of redundancy in the SGTS's.                      ,
s Corrective Action SGTS #1 was removed from service and the defective flow sensing line was replaced.
s Corrective Action SGTS #1 was removed from service and the defective flow sensing line was replaced.
An operability test was performed.to prove the system operable. The plant engi-
An operability test was performed.to prove the system operable. The plant engi-
               -'neering staff will evaluate the' current design of the SGTS flow-sensing line to
               -'neering staff will evaluate the' current design of the SGTS flow-sensing line to
_
                 . prevent a recurrence of this type.
                 . prevent a recurrence of this type.
Failure Data Nonc
Failure Data Nonc 9
                      .
8 4
9 8
         > 9 E
4
         > 9
  .
E
     \
     \
f v                    w e,}}
f v                    w e,}}

Latest revision as of 09:38, 1 February 2020

LER 80-011/03L-0:on 800219,during Surveillance Test,Trip Occurred on Standby Gas Treatment Sys 1.Caused by Cracked Flow Sensing Line Which Was Probably Stepped On.Line Replaced
ML19312D219
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 03/17/1980
From: Ross D
JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19312D218 List:
References
LER-80-011-03L, LER-80-11-3L, NUDOCS 8003210552
Download: ML19312D219 (3)


Text

. _. . . _ . __

o IPLE AsE PRlwT C4 TYPE ALL RE",;UIRED INPoRIAATION)

QW.0L stocx: l l l l l l l l l .

E sl NI s, JIu:sussEcQoE 0 l C l P l 1 l @ is0 l0 l-uce=Se 34 10 l0 l0 l0 lo }- as@asuce=st muutam 4l1lIl1l1l@l TvPE ao 6) was@

M

's cE LLj@[015 l 0 l 0 l0 l2 l1 l9 j@l 0 l 2 l 1 l 9 l 8 l014 l@l 76 01REPORT 3l IlDATE 7l 810l@ to i Go el DOCS (Ef NuMsgR 88 69 EVENT DATE 5

EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROSAsLE CONSEQUENCES h E [., On February 19, 1980 during a scheduled surveillance test on the Stand- l ,

EI by Gas Treatment System (SGTS), a trip was experienced on SGTS No. 1.  ; ,

I SGTS No. 2 started automatically and performed satisfactorily. An in-EI l i

@i 'vestigation revealed that the absence of a system flow s'Ignal was the 9 cause of the SGTS No. I shutdown. This event is considered a reportable ',

y! .

E; occurrence in accordance with T.S.6.9.2.B.2. j i I E , so

'55I's" [o"oY sNiIS$E :D .trotE :T eccE sLc "co'E sU$cEmE g

6 ddh lE lh I X lh l ll N l S lT lR lU l@ W@ W @

9 to 11 12 12 13 20 SEOUENTIAL OCCURRENCE .19 REPOnT REVISION (g g 1to EVENT YE AR REPORT NO. CCDE TYPE NO.

O" Ligg !8101

_ 21 22 1-1 23 1011111 24 26 IA 27 I 01 31 28 29 L'_1 30 l--J 31 W

32 8C N A O P NT METH HOUR 3 $$ 1 P L4 B. 5 L MA FACTU ER Lz_J@l u 24 r l@ lasz i@ Lz_l@

a6 LOI010101 31 do Idi v i@ In 42 l@ Laj@

43 l-I-1-l-l@

44 o CAUSE DEscalPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS h El The cause of this occurrence is attributen to a erneked finw sensinn I i

EI line (tygon tubing) causing an erroneous system flow sional. The sens I

{

gi Ing line is considered to have failed as a result of having been stepped l l gl on. The defective flow sensir:g line was replaced. The plant engineer- l l

gg Ing staff will determine what can be kne to prevent recurrence. I ae so RY STA  % POWER OTHER STATUS DIS DISCOVERY DESCRI' TION h y W @ l0l0l0l@l NA l lBl@! Surveillance Test l s 4,,, g u n 4. o as oc RECEASED OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOCATION OF RELEASE "A I l NA l E. L. EJ @ LzJ@l

~

trER$0NNEL EXPOSUR*.S u .. .c NUMSER TYPE DEScPtPTION

{ l0l0l0l@lzl@l NA l

nRsONNEl' .uuns nuMeER oEsCRIPfloNO NA l E..I01Olol@L' n n .o 800321066&-

W,5E E. Lz.J@We"'A'l '"" @

l "A' =J

. io . .o stSUE M T I ON l Yj l We,biv News Release - 3/27/80 l lllllIIII'IIIl

, 3 . 1, tu . CB 69 g ;, , -

n A. Ross Lc8;- R7RL NAME OF PRE *ARER PHONE:

{

o I:

I h h~4

' (f pj Jersey Central Power & Ught Company Madison Avenue at Punen Bow! Road Monistown. New Jersey 07960 f

[

5 (201)455-8200 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Forked River, New Jersey 08731 i i

Licensee Event Report Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/80-11/3L j s

Report Date $

?

Harch 17, 1980 1

Occurrence Date February 19, 1980 ]

Identification of Occurrence Stapdby Gas Treatment System #1 was found to be inoperable during a scheduled surveillance test. . ,

This event is considered to be a reportable occurrence as defined in the Techni-cal Specifications, paragraph 6.9.2.B.2.

Conditions Prior to Occurrence The plant was shutdown for a refueling / maintenance outage.

  • The reactor. mode switch was locked in_ refuel. l The reactor cavity was flooded and less than 212*F. l Description of Occurrence On Tuesday, February 19, 1980, at approximately 2130 hours0.0247 days <br />0.592 hours <br />0.00352 weeks <br />8.10465e-4 months <br />, during a scheduled surveillance of the Standby Gas Treatment System (SGTS), a trip was experienced on SGTS #1 and automatic circuitry started SGTS #2 which performed satisfactority.

A s'ubsequent investigation ~-revealed that the absence of a system flow signal resulted in a shutdown of SGTS #1.

Apparent Cause of Occurrence The cause of the occurrence was due to a cracked flow sensing line (tygon tubing) which provided an erroneous signal to the system control circuitry indicating no system flow. The sensing line is considered to have failed as a result of being

~ stepped on by station personnel.

P Jersey Central Power & Lght Company is a Member of the Genera: Pubic Utames System I l .

R:porttblo Occurrcnco'No.- 50-219/80-11/3L. Pcg2 2

, March 17. 1980 Analysis of-Occurrence  !

i Standby Gas Treatment' System'Is used to process the reactor building atmosphere,  !

should conditions be present which require its functioning, and exhaust it through- l

.the plant-stack. Although_SGTS #1 was observed to be Inoperable when the system i was initiated, the control; logic did, as designed, initiate SGTS #2 which proved

~

l to be functional.- The safety significance of this event is considered minimal  ;

since the only concern was a loss of redundancy in the SGTS's. ,

s Corrective Action SGTS #1 was removed from service and the defective flow sensing line was replaced.

An operability test was performed.to prove the system operable. The plant engi-

-'neering staff will evaluate the' current design of the SGTS flow-sensing line to

. prevent a recurrence of this type.

Failure Data Nonc 9

8 4

> 9 E

\

f v w e,