Information Notice 2002-11, Recent Experience with Degradation of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 11
| page count = 11
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001March 12, 2002NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2002-11:RECENT EXPERIENCE WITH DEGRADATIONOF REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL HEAD
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
 
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 March 12, 2002 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2002-11:               RECENT EXPERIENCE WITH DEGRADATION
 
OF REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL HEAD


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses for pressurized-water reactors (PWRs), except those who havepermanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed
All holders of operating licenses for pressurized-water reactors (PWRs), except those who have
 
permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed


from the reactor.
from the reactor.


==Purpose==
==Purpose==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to informaddressees about findings from recent inspections and examinations of the reactor pressure
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to inform
 
addressees about findings from recent inspections and examinations of the reactor pressure


vessel (RPV) head at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station. It is expected that recipients will
vessel (RPV) head at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station. It is expected that recipients will


review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to
review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to


avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not
avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not


NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.


==Description of Circumstances==
==Description of Circumstances==
On February 16, 2002, the Davis-Besse facility began a refueling outage that includedinspection of the vessel head penetration (VHP) nozzles, which focused on the inspection of
On February 16, 2002, the Davis-Besse facility began a refueling outage that included
 
inspection of the vessel head penetration (VHP) nozzles, which focused on the inspection of


control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) nozzles, in accordance with the licensee's commitments
control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) nozzles, in accordance with the licensees commitments


to NRC Bulletin 2001-01, ?Circumferential Cracking of Reactor Pressure Vessel HeadPenetration Nozzles," which was issued on August 3, 2001. These inspections identified axial
to NRC Bulletin 2001-01, ?Circumferential Cracking of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head
 
Penetration Nozzles, which was issued on August 3, 2001. These inspections identified axial


indications in three CRDM nozzles, which had resulted in pressure boundary leakage.
indications in three CRDM nozzles, which had resulted in pressure boundary leakage.
Line 44: Line 60:
Specifically, these indications were identified in CRDM nozzles 1, 2, and 3, which are located
Specifically, these indications were identified in CRDM nozzles 1, 2, and 3, which are located


near the center of the RPV head. These findings were reported to the NRC on February 27,
near the center of the RPV head. These findings were reported to the NRC on February 27,
2002, and supplemented on March 5 and March 9, 2002. The licensee decided to repair these
2002, and supplemented on March 5 and March 9, 2002. The licensee decided to repair these


three nozzles, as well as two other nozzles that had indications but had not resulted in pressure
three nozzles, as well as two other nozzles that had indications but had not resulted in pressure


boundary leakage.The repair process for these nozzles included roll expanding the CRDM nozzle material into thesurrounding RPV head material, followed by machining along the axis of the CRDM nozzle to
boundary leakage.


an elevation above the indications in the nozzle material. On March 6, 2002, the machining
The repair process for these nozzles included roll expanding the CRDM nozzle material into the
 
surrounding RPV head material, followed by machining along the axis of the CRDM nozzle to
 
an elevation above the indications in the nozzle material. On March 6, 2002, the machining


process on CRDM nozzle 3 was prematurely terminated and the machining apparatus was
process on CRDM nozzle 3 was prematurely terminated and the machining apparatus was


removed from the nozzle. During the removal process, nozzle 3 was mechanically agitated and
removed from the nozzle. During the removal process, nozzle 3 was mechanically agitated and


subsequently displaced in the downhill direction (i.e., tipped away from the top of the RPV
subsequently displaced in the downhill direction (i.e., tipped away from the top of the RPV


head) until its flange contacted the flange of the adjacent CRDM nozzle. To identify the cause of the CRDM nozzle displacement, the licensee began an investigationinto the condition of the RPV head surrounding CRDM nozzle 3. This investigation included
head) until its flange contacted the flange of the adjacent CRDM nozzle.
 
To identify the cause of the CRDM nozzle displacement, the licensee began an investigation
 
into the condition of the RPV head surrounding CRDM nozzle 3. This investigation included


removing the CRDM nozzle from the RPV head, removing boric acid deposits from the top of
removing the CRDM nozzle from the RPV head, removing boric acid deposits from the top of
Line 65: Line 89:
the RPV head, and performing ultrasonic thickness measurements of the RPV head in the
the RPV head, and performing ultrasonic thickness measurements of the RPV head in the


vicinity of CRDM nozzles 1, 2, and 3. Upon completing the boric acid removal on March 7,
vicinity of CRDM nozzles 1, 2, and 3. Upon completing the boric acid removal on March 7,
2002, the licensee conducted a visual examination of the area, which identified a large cavity in
2002, the licensee conducted a visual examination of the area, which identified a large cavity in


the RPV head on the downhill side of CRDM nozzle 3. Followup characterization by ultrasonic
the RPV head on the downhill side of CRDM nozzle 3. Followup characterization by ultrasonic


testing indicated wastage of the low alloy steel RPV head material adjacent to the nozzle.
testing indicated wastage of the low alloy steel RPV head material adjacent to the nozzle.
Line 76: Line 100:
the penetration for CRDM nozzle 3, with a width of approximately 4 to 5 inches at its widest
the penetration for CRDM nozzle 3, with a width of approximately 4 to 5 inches at its widest


part. The minimum remaining thickness of the RPV head in the wastage area was found to be
part. The minimum remaining thickness of the RPV head in the wastage area was found to be


approximately
approximately d inch. This thickness was attributed to the thickness of the stainless steel


d inch.  This thickness was attributed to the thickness of the stainless steelcladding on the inside surface of the RPV head, which is nominally
cladding on the inside surface of the RPV head, which is nominally d inch thick.


d inch thick.BackgroundThe Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station has an RPV head that is constructed from low alloysteel, fabricated in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Background
specification SA-533, Grade B, Class1, and clad on the inside surface with stainless steel. Of
 
The Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station has an RPV head that is constructed from low alloy
 
steel, fabricated in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
specification SA-533, Grade B, Class1, and clad on the inside surface with stainless steel. Of


those 69 VHP nozzles, 61 are used for CRDMs, 7 are spare (empty) nozzles, and 1 is used for
those 69 VHP nozzles, 61 are used for CRDMs, 7 are spare (empty) nozzles, and 1 is used for


the RPV head vent piping. Each of the 69 nozzles is approximately 4 inches in outside
the RPV head vent piping. Each of the 69 nozzles is approximately 4 inches in outside


diameter, with a wall-thickness of approximately
diameter, with a wall-thickness of approximately e inch. Each is constructed of Alloy 600 and


e inch.  Each is constructed of Alloy 600 andis attached to the RPV head by a partial-penetration, J-groove weld using Alloy 82 and 182.
is attached to the RPV head by a partial-penetration, J-groove weld using Alloy 82 and 182.


The distance from the center of one nozzle to the center of the next is approximately 12 inches.The vessel head is insulated with metal reflective insulation, which is located on a horizontalplane slightly above the RPV head (i.e., it is not in direct contact with the head). The minimum
The distance from the center of one nozzle to the center of the next is approximately 12 inches.
 
The vessel head is insulated with metal reflective insulation, which is located on a horizontal
 
plane slightly above the RPV head (i.e., it is not in direct contact with the head). The minimum


distance between the RPV head and the insulation is approximately 2 inches at the center (top)
distance between the RPV head and the insulation is approximately 2 inches at the center (top)
of the head. The CRDM nozzles pass from the RPV head through the insulation and terminate
of the head. The CRDM nozzles pass from the RPV head through the insulation and terminate
 
at flanges to which the CRDM housings are attached.
 
The limited gap between the insulation and the RPV head does not impede the performance


at flanges to which the CRDM housings are attached.The limited gap between the insulation and the RPV head does not impede the performanceof a visual inspection of the CRDM nozzles, as described in Bulletin 2001-01. This is because
of a visual inspection of the CRDM nozzles, as described in Bulletin 2001-01. This is because


the top of the RPV head is surrounded by a service structure that has 18 openings (referred to
the top of the RPV head is surrounded by a service structure that has 18 openings (referred to


as "weep holes") near the bottom of the structure, through which small cameras can be inserted
as weep holes) near the bottom of the structure, through which small cameras can be inserted


to facilitate visual inspections of the RPV head.During refueling outages in 1998 and 2000, the licensee performed visual inspections of theRPV head surface that was accessible through the service structure weep holes. The scope of
to facilitate visual inspections of the RPV head.
 
During refueling outages in 1998 and 2000, the licensee performed visual inspections of the
 
RPV head surface that was accessible through the service structure weep holes. The scope of


these visual inspections covered the bare metal of the RPV head to identify the presence of
these visual inspections covered the bare metal of the RPV head to identify the presence of


boric acid deposits, which would be indicative of primary coolant leakage. These inspections
boric acid deposits, which would be indicative of primary coolant leakage. These inspections
 
also included checking for leakage from any of the CRDM flanges, located above the insulation, in response to Generic Letter 88-05, Boric Acid Corrosion of Carbon Steel Reactor Pressure
 
Boundary Components, which the NRC issued on March 17, 1988.


also included checking for leakage from any of the CRDM flanges, located above the insulation, in response to Generic Letter 88-05, "Boric Acid Corrosion of Carbon Steel Reactor Pressure
The visual inspections in 1998 showed an uneven layer of boric acid deposits scattered over


Boundary Components," which the NRC issued on March 17, 1988.The visual inspections in 1998 showed an uneven layer of boric acid deposits scattered overthe RPV head (including deposits near CRDM nozzle 3). The outside diameter of the CRDM
the RPV head (including deposits near CRDM nozzle 3). The outside diameter of the CRDM


nozzles had white streaks, which indicated to the licensee that the boric acid evident on the
nozzles had white streaks, which indicated to the licensee that the boric acid evident on the


head flowed downward from leakage in the CRDM flanges. During the refueling outage in 2000, the licensee also performed visual inspections of theCRDM flanges and nozzles. Above the RPV head insulation, those inspections revealed five
head flowed downward from leakage in the CRDM flanges. During the refueling outage in 2000, the licensee also performed visual inspections of the
 
CRDM flanges and nozzles. Above the RPV head insulation, those inspections revealed five


CRDM flanges with evidence of leakage, including one flange that was the principal leakage
CRDM flanges with evidence of leakage, including one flange that was the principal leakage


point. Boric acid deposits on the vertical faces of three of these five flanges and the associated
point. Boric acid deposits on the vertical faces of three of these five flanges and the associated


nozzles confirmed leakage from the flanges. Similarly, one of the other two leaking CRDM
nozzles confirmed leakage from the flanges. Similarly, one of the other two leaking CRDM


flanges had boric acid deposits between the flange and the insulation, which indicated leakage
flanges had boric acid deposits between the flange and the insulation, which indicated leakage


from the flange. All of these leaking flanges were repaired by replacing their gaskets. The
from the flange. All of these leaking flanges were repaired by replacing their gaskets. The


faces of the flange that was the principal leakage point were also machined to ensure a better
faces of the flange that was the principal leakage point were also machined to ensure a better


seal. Visual inspections performed below the RPV head insulation during the 2000 refueling outageindicated some accumulation of boric acid deposits on the RPV head. These deposits were
seal.
 
Visual inspections performed below the RPV head insulation during the 2000 refueling outage
 
indicated some accumulation of boric acid deposits on the RPV head. These deposits were


located beneath the leaking flanges, with clear evidence of downward flow from the flange area.
located beneath the leaking flanges, with clear evidence of downward flow from the flange area.
Line 136: Line 186:
No visible evidence of CRDM nozzle leakage (i.e., leakage from the gap between the nozzle
No visible evidence of CRDM nozzle leakage (i.e., leakage from the gap between the nozzle


and the RPV head) was detected. The licensee described that the RPV head area was cleaned
and the RPV head) was detected. The licensee described that the RPV head area was cleaned


with demineralized water to the greatest extent possible, while trying to maintain the dose
with demineralized water to the greatest extent possible, while trying to maintain the dose


as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). Subsequent video inspection of the partially
as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). Subsequent video inspection of the partially


cleaned RPV head and nozzles was performed for future reference.A subsequent review of the 1998 and 2000 inspection videotapes in 2001 confirmed that therewas no evidence of leakage from the RPV head nozzles, although many areas of the RPV head
cleaned RPV head and nozzles was performed for future reference.
 
A subsequent review of the 1998 and 2000 inspection videotapes in 2001 confirmed that there
 
was no evidence of leakage from the RPV head nozzles, although many areas of the RPV head


were not accessible because of persistent boric acid deposits that the licensee did not clean
were not accessible because of persistent boric acid deposits that the licensee did not clean


because of ALARA issues (including the region around nozzle 3).The inspections in 2002 did not reveal any visual evidence of flange leakage from above theRPV head. However, as discussed above, three CRDM nozzles had indications of cracking
because of ALARA issues (including the region around nozzle 3).
 
The inspections in 2002 did not reveal any visual evidence of flange leakage from above the
 
RPV head. However, as discussed above, three CRDM nozzles had indications of cracking


(identified by ultrasonic testing of the nozzles), which could result in leakage from the RPV to
(identified by ultrasonic testing of the nozzles), which could result in leakage from the RPV to
Line 152: Line 210:
the top of the RPV head.
the top of the RPV head.


DiscussionThe following documents describe reactor operating experience with boric acid corrosionof ferritic steel reactor coolant pressure boundary components in PWR plants:*Information Notice 86-108, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure BoundaryResulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," issued December 29, 1986*Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 1, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant SystemPressure Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," issued April 20, 1987*Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant SystemPressure Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," issued November 19, 1987*Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 3, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant SystemPressure Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," issued January 5, 1995*Generic Letter 88-05, "Boric Acid Corrosion of Carbon Steel Reactor Pressure BoundaryComponents in PWR Plants," issued March 17, 1988 Several instances of boric acid corrosion discussed in these generic communications areassociated with corrosion of the RPV head.  NRC Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 1, for example, described an instance in which boric acid had severely corroded three of the RPV
Discussion


flange bolts, the control rod drive shroud support, and an instrument tube seal clamp. Similarly, NRC Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, described an instance in which boric acid
The following documents describe reactor operating experience with boric acid corrosion
 
of ferritic steel reactor coolant pressure boundary components in PWR plants:
*        Information Notice 86-108, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure Boundary
 
Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, issued December 29, 1986
*        Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 1, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System
 
Pressure Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, issued April 20, 1987
*        Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System
 
Pressure Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, issued November 19, 1987
*        Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 3, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System
 
Pressure Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, issued January 5, 1995
*        Generic Letter 88-05, Boric Acid Corrosion of Carbon Steel Reactor Pressure Boundary
 
Components in PWR Plants, issued March 17, 1988 Several instances of boric acid corrosion discussed in these generic communications are
 
associated with corrosion of the RPV head. NRC Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 1, for example, described an instance in which boric acid had severely corroded three of the RPV
 
flange bolts, the control rod drive shroud support, and an instrument tube seal clamp. Similarly, NRC Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, described an instance in which boric acid


resulted in nine pits in the surface of the RPV head, ranging in depth from 0.9 to 1 cm
resulted in nine pits in the surface of the RPV head, ranging in depth from 0.9 to 1 cm


[approximately 0.4 inch] and ranging in diameter from 2.5 to 7.5 cm [1 to 3 inches]. As discussed in Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, the primary effect of boric acidleakage onto the ferritic steel RPV head is wastage or general dissolution of the material.
[approximately 0.4 inch] and ranging in diameter from 2.5 to 7.5 cm [1 to 3 inches].
 
As discussed in Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, the primary effect of boric acid
 
leakage onto the ferritic steel RPV head is wastage or general dissolution of the material.


Pitting, stress corrosion cracking (SCC), intergranular attack, and other forms of corrosion are
Pitting, stress corrosion cracking (SCC), intergranular attack, and other forms of corrosion are
Line 164: Line 247:
not generally of concern in concentrated boric acid solutions at elevated temperatures such as
not generally of concern in concentrated boric acid solutions at elevated temperatures such as


those that may occur on the surface of the RPV head. The rate of general corrosion (wastage)
those that may occur on the surface of the RPV head. The rate of general corrosion (wastage)
of ferritic steel from boric acid varies and depends on several conditions, including whether the
of ferritic steel from boric acid varies and depends on several conditions, including whether the


boric acid is dry or in solution. If the boric acid is dry (i.e., boric acid crystals), the corrosion rate
boric acid is dry or in solution. If the boric acid is dry (i.e., boric acid crystals), the corrosion rate


is less severe; however, boric acid crystals are not completely benign to carbon steel. During
is less severe; however, boric acid crystals are not completely benign to carbon steel. During


operation, the temperature of the RPV head is sufficiently high that any leaking primary coolant
operation, the temperature of the RPV head is sufficiently high that any leaking primary coolant


would be expected to flash to steam, leaving behind dry boric acid crystals.Given the wide range of conditions around reactor primary coolant leakage sites and the widevariation in boric acid corrosion rates, the deleterious effects of boric acid on ferritic steel
would be expected to flash to steam, leaving behind dry boric acid crystals.
 
Given the wide range of conditions around reactor primary coolant leakage sites and the wide
 
variation in boric acid corrosion rates, the deleterious effects of boric acid on ferritic steel


components indicate the importance of minimizing boric acid leakage, detecting and correcting
components indicate the importance of minimizing boric acid leakage, detecting and correcting


leaks in a timely manner, and promptly cleaning any boric acid residue.The investigation of the causative conditions surrounding the degradation of the RPV head atDavis-Besse is continuing. Boric acid or other contaminants could be contributing factors.
leaks in a timely manner, and promptly cleaning any boric acid residue.
 
The investigation of the causative conditions surrounding the degradation of the RPV head at
 
Davis-Besse is continuing. Boric acid or other contaminants could be contributing factors.


As discussed above, factors contributing to the degradation might also include the environment
As discussed above, factors contributing to the degradation might also include the environment
Line 185: Line 276:
which the RPV head is exposed to boric acid, and the source of the boric acid (e.g., leakage
which the RPV head is exposed to boric acid, and the source of the boric acid (e.g., leakage


from the CRDM nozzle or from sources above the RPV head such as CRDM flanges).Related Generic CommunicationsBulletin 2001-01, "Circumferential Cracking of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head PenetrationNozzles," August 3, 2001.Bulletin 82-02, "Degradation of Threaded Fasteners in the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundaryof PWR Plants," June 2, 1982.Generic Letter 88-05, "Boric Acid Corrosion of Carbon Steel Reactor Pressure BoundaryComponents in PWR Plants," March 17, 1988.Generic Letter 97-01, "Degradation of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Nozzles and Other VesselClosure Head Penetrations," April 1, 1997.Information Notice 80-27, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant Pump Studs," June 11, 1980.
from the CRDM nozzle or from sources above the RPV head such as CRDM flanges).
 
===Related Generic Communications===
Bulletin 2001-01, Circumferential Cracking of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetration
 
Nozzles, August 3, 2001.
 
Bulletin 82-02, Degradation of Threaded Fasteners in the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary
 
of PWR Plants, June 2, 1982.
 
Generic Letter 88-05, Boric Acid Corrosion of Carbon Steel Reactor Pressure Boundary
 
Components in PWR Plants, March 17, 1988.
 
Generic Letter 97-01, Degradation of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Nozzles and Other Vessel
 
Closure Head Penetrations, April 1, 1997.
 
Information Notice 80-27, Degradation of Reactor Coolant Pump Studs, June 11, 1980.
 
Information Notice 82-06, Failure of Steam Generator Primary Side Manway Closure Studs, March 12, 1982. Information Notice 86-108, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure Boundary
 
Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, December 29, 1986.
 
Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 1, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure
 
Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, April 20, 1987.
 
Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure
 
Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, November 19, 1987.
 
Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 3, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure
 
Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, January 5, 1995.
 
Information Notice 90-10, Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of INCONEL 600,
February 23, 1990.
 
Information Notice 94-63, Boric Acid Corrosion of Charging Pump Casing Caused by Cladding
 
Cracks, August 30, 1994.
 
Information Notice 96-11, Ingress of Demineralizer Resins Increases Potential for Stress


Information Notice 82-06, "Failure of Steam Generator Primary Side Manway Closure Studs,"March 12, 1982. Information Notice 86-108, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure BoundaryResulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," December 29, 1986.Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 1, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant System PressureBoundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," April 20, 1987.Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant System PressureBoundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," November 19, 1987.Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 3, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant System PressureBoundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," January 5, 1995.Information Notice 90-10, "Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of INCONEL 600,"February 23, 1990.Information Notice 94-63, "Boric Acid Corrosion of Charging Pump Casing Caused by CladdingCracks," August 30, 1994.Information Notice 96-11, "Ingress of Demineralizer Resins Increases Potential for StressCorrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetrations," February 14, 1996.Information Notice 2001-05, "Through-Wall Circumferential Cracking of Reactor PressureVessel Head Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetration Nozzles at Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3," April 30, 2001.This information notice does not require any specific action or written response.  If you haveany questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetrations, February 14, 1996.


listed below or the appropriate project manager in the NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor
Information Notice 2001-05, Through-Wall Circumferential Cracking of Reactor Pressure


Regulation (NRR)./RA/William D. Beckner, Program Director
Vessel Head Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetration Nozzles at Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3, April 30, 2001.
 
This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. If you have
 
any questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
 
listed below or the appropriate project manager in the NRCs Office of Nuclear Reactor
 
Regulation (NRR).
 
/RA/
                                            William D. Beckner, Program Director
 
Operating Reactor Improvements Program


===Operating Reactor Improvements Program===
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs


Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contacts:  Allen Hiser, NRRKen Karwoski, NRR(301) 415-1034(301) 415-2752 E-mail: alh1@nrc.govE-mail: kjk1@nrc.govJerry Dozier, NRR                              (301) 415-1014        E-mail: jxd@nrc.govAttachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices Information Notice 86-108, ?Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure BoundaryResulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," December 29, 1986.Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 1, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant System PressureBoundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," April 20, 1987.Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant System PressureBoundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," November 19, 1987.Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 3, "Degradation of Reactor Coolant System PressureBoundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion," January 5, 1995.Information Notice 90-10, ?Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of INCONEL 600,"February 23, 1990.Information Notice 94-63, ?Boric Acid Corrosion of Charging Pump Casing Caused by CladdingCracks," August 30, 1994.Information Notice 96-11, ?Ingress of Demineralizer Resins Increases Potential for StressCorrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetrations," February 14, 1996.Information Notice 2001-05, "Through-Wall Circumferential Cracking of Reactor PressureVessel Head Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetration Nozzles at Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3," April 30, 2001.This information notice does not require any specific action or written response.  If you haveany questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


listed below or the appropriate project manager in the NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor
Technical contacts:    Allen Hiser, NRR              Ken Karwoski, NRR


Regulation (NRR)./RA/William D. Beckner, Program Director
(301) 415-1034                (301) 415-2752 E-mail: alh1@nrc.gov          E-mail: kjk1@nrc.gov
 
Jerry Dozier, NRR
 
(301) 415-1014 E-mail: jxd@nrc.gov
 
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices Information Notice 86-108, ?Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure Boundary
 
Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, December 29, 1986.
 
Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 1, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure
 
Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, April 20, 1987.
 
Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure
 
Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, November 19, 1987.
 
Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 3, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure
 
Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, January 5, 1995.
 
Information Notice 90-10, ?Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of INCONEL 600,
February 23, 1990.
 
Information Notice 94-63, ?Boric Acid Corrosion of Charging Pump Casing Caused by Cladding
 
Cracks, August 30, 1994.
 
Information Notice 96-11, ?Ingress of Demineralizer Resins Increases Potential for Stress
 
Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetrations, February 14, 1996.
 
Information Notice 2001-05, Through-Wall Circumferential Cracking of Reactor Pressure
 
Vessel Head Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetration Nozzles at Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3, April 30, 2001.
 
This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. If you have
 
any questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
 
listed below or the appropriate project manager in the NRCs Office of Nuclear Reactor
 
Regulation (NRR).
 
/RA/
                                            William D. Beckner, Program Director
 
Operating Reactor Improvements Program


===Operating Reactor Improvements Program===
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs


Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contacts: Allen Hiser, NRRKen Karwoski, NRR(301) 415-1034(301) 415-2752 E-mail: alh1@nrc.govE-mail: kjk1@nrc.govJerry Dozier, NRR                               (301) 415-1014       E-mail: jxd@nrc.govAttachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Technical contacts:   Allen Hiser, NRR              Ken Karwoski, NRR
 
(301) 415-1034               (301) 415-2752 E-mail: alh1@nrc.gov          E-mail: kjk1@nrc.gov
 
Jerry Dozier, NRR
 
(301) 415-1014 E-mail: jxd@nrc.gov
 
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
 
DISTRIBUTION:
 
===PUBLIC                        IN Reading File===
ADAMS ACCESSION NO.: ML020700556                                              Template: NRR-052
*See previous concurrence
 
OFFICE  RSE:RORP:DRIP    RSE:EMCB:DE    BC:EMCB:DE      (A)SC:RORP:DRIP    PD:RORP:DRIP
 
NAME    IJDozier*        KJKarwoski*    WHBateman*      TKoshy*            WDBeckner
 
DATE    03/11/2002        03/11/2002      03/11/2002      03/11/2002        03/12/2002 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY


===DISTRIBUTION===
Attachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
:PUBLICIN Reading FileADAMS ACCESSION NO.: ML020700556Template: NRR-052*See previous concurrenceOFFICERSE:RORP:DRIPRSE:EMCB:DEBC:EMCB:DE(A)SC:RORP:DRIPPD:RORP:DRIPNAMEIJDozier*KJKarwoski*WHBateman*TKoshy*WDBecknerDATE03/11/200203/11/200203/11/200203/11/200203/12/2002OFFICIAL RECORD COPY


______________________________________________________________________________________OL = Operating License
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES


CP = Construction PermitAttachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICES
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Information                                        Date of


_____________________________________________________________________________________InformationDate of
Notice No.              Subject                    Issuance  Issued to


===Notice No.        SubjectIssuanceIssued to===
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________2002-10Nonconservative Water LevelSetpoints on Steam
2002-10          Nonconservative Water Level      03/07/2002  All holders of operating licenses


Generators03/07/2002All holders of operating licensesfor nuclear power reactors, except those who have
Setpoints on Steam                          for nuclear power reactors, Generators                                  except those who have


permanently ceased operations
permanently ceased operations
Line 227: Line 443:
been permanently removed from
been permanently removed from


the reactor.2002-09Potential for Top NozzleSeparation and Dropping of
the reactor.


===Certain Type of Westinghouse===
2002-09          Potential for Top Nozzle        02/13/2002  All holders of operating licenses
Fuel Assembly02/13/2002All holders of operating licensesfor nuclear power reactors, and


non-power reactors and holders
Separation and Dropping of                  for nuclear power reactors, and


of licenses for permanently
Certain Type of Westinghouse                non-power reactors and holders
 
Fuel Assembly                                of licenses for permanently


shutdown facilities with fuel
shutdown facilities with fuel


onsite.2002-08Pump Shaft Damage Due toExcessive Hardness of Shaft
onsite.


Sleeve01/30/2002All holders of operating licensesfor nuclear power reactors, except those who have
2002-08          Pump Shaft Damage Due to        01/30/2002  All holders of operating licenses
 
Excessive Hardness of Shaft                  for nuclear power reactors, Sleeve                                      except those who have


permanently ceased operations
permanently ceased operations
Line 248: Line 467:
been permanently removed from
been permanently removed from


the reactor.2002-07Use of Sodium Hypochlorite forCleaning Diesel Fuel Oil
the reactor.


Supply Tanks01/28/2002All holders of operating licensesfor nuclear power except those
2002-07          Use of Sodium Hypochlorite for  01/28/2002  All holders of operating licenses


who have ceased operations and
Cleaning Diesel Fuel Oil                    for nuclear power except those
 
Supply Tanks                                who have ceased operations and


have certified that fuel has been
have certified that fuel has been
Line 258: Line 479:
permanently removed from the
permanently removed from the


reactor vessel.2002-06Design Vulnerability in BWRReactor Vessel Level
reactor vessel.
 
2002-06          Design Vulnerability in BWR      01/18/2002  All holders of operating licenses
 
Reactor Vessel Level                         or construction permits for boiling
 
Instrumentation Backfill                    water reactors (BWRs).
 
Modification
 
2002-05          Foreign Material in Standby      01/17/2002  All holders of licenses for nuclear
 
Liquid Control Storage Tanks                power reactors.
 
2002-04          Wire Degradation at Breaker      01/10/2002  All holders of operating licenses
 
Cubicle Door Hinges                          for nuclear power reactors.


===Instrumentation Backfill===
______________________________________________________________________________________
Modification01/18/2002All holders of operating licensesor construction permits for boiling
OL = Operating License


water reactors (BWRs).2002-05Foreign Material in StandbyLiquid Control Storage Tanks01/17/2002All holders of licenses for nuclearpower reactors.2002-04Wire Degradation at BreakerCubicle Door Hinges 01/10/2002All holders of operating licensesfor nuclear power reactors.}}
CP = Construction Permit}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 05:26, 24 November 2019

Recent Experience with Degradation of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head
ML020700556
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/2002
From: Beckner W
NRC/NRR/DRIP/RORP
To:
Dozier J, NRR/RLSB 415-1014
References
IEB-01-001 IN-02-011
Download: ML020700556 (11)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 March 12, 2002 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2002-11: RECENT EXPERIENCE WITH DEGRADATION

OF REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL HEAD

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for pressurized-water reactors (PWRs), except those who have

permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed

from the reactor.

Purpose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to inform

addressees about findings from recent inspections and examinations of the reactor pressure

vessel (RPV) head at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station. It is expected that recipients will

review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to

avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not

NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.

Description of Circumstances

On February 16, 2002, the Davis-Besse facility began a refueling outage that included

inspection of the vessel head penetration (VHP) nozzles, which focused on the inspection of

control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) nozzles, in accordance with the licensees commitments

to NRC Bulletin 2001-01, ?Circumferential Cracking of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head

Penetration Nozzles, which was issued on August 3, 2001. These inspections identified axial

indications in three CRDM nozzles, which had resulted in pressure boundary leakage.

Specifically, these indications were identified in CRDM nozzles 1, 2, and 3, which are located

near the center of the RPV head. These findings were reported to the NRC on February 27,

2002, and supplemented on March 5 and March 9, 2002. The licensee decided to repair these

three nozzles, as well as two other nozzles that had indications but had not resulted in pressure

boundary leakage.

The repair process for these nozzles included roll expanding the CRDM nozzle material into the

surrounding RPV head material, followed by machining along the axis of the CRDM nozzle to

an elevation above the indications in the nozzle material. On March 6, 2002, the machining

process on CRDM nozzle 3 was prematurely terminated and the machining apparatus was

removed from the nozzle. During the removal process, nozzle 3 was mechanically agitated and

subsequently displaced in the downhill direction (i.e., tipped away from the top of the RPV

head) until its flange contacted the flange of the adjacent CRDM nozzle.

To identify the cause of the CRDM nozzle displacement, the licensee began an investigation

into the condition of the RPV head surrounding CRDM nozzle 3. This investigation included

removing the CRDM nozzle from the RPV head, removing boric acid deposits from the top of

the RPV head, and performing ultrasonic thickness measurements of the RPV head in the

vicinity of CRDM nozzles 1, 2, and 3. Upon completing the boric acid removal on March 7,

2002, the licensee conducted a visual examination of the area, which identified a large cavity in

the RPV head on the downhill side of CRDM nozzle 3. Followup characterization by ultrasonic

testing indicated wastage of the low alloy steel RPV head material adjacent to the nozzle.

The wastage area was found to extend approximately 5 inches downhill on the RPV head from

the penetration for CRDM nozzle 3, with a width of approximately 4 to 5 inches at its widest

part. The minimum remaining thickness of the RPV head in the wastage area was found to be

approximately d inch. This thickness was attributed to the thickness of the stainless steel

cladding on the inside surface of the RPV head, which is nominally d inch thick.

Background

The Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station has an RPV head that is constructed from low alloy

steel, fabricated in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

specification SA-533, Grade B, Class1, and clad on the inside surface with stainless steel. Of

those 69 VHP nozzles, 61 are used for CRDMs, 7 are spare (empty) nozzles, and 1 is used for

the RPV head vent piping. Each of the 69 nozzles is approximately 4 inches in outside

diameter, with a wall-thickness of approximately e inch. Each is constructed of Alloy 600 and

is attached to the RPV head by a partial-penetration, J-groove weld using Alloy 82 and 182.

The distance from the center of one nozzle to the center of the next is approximately 12 inches.

The vessel head is insulated with metal reflective insulation, which is located on a horizontal

plane slightly above the RPV head (i.e., it is not in direct contact with the head). The minimum

distance between the RPV head and the insulation is approximately 2 inches at the center (top)

of the head. The CRDM nozzles pass from the RPV head through the insulation and terminate

at flanges to which the CRDM housings are attached.

The limited gap between the insulation and the RPV head does not impede the performance

of a visual inspection of the CRDM nozzles, as described in Bulletin 2001-01. This is because

the top of the RPV head is surrounded by a service structure that has 18 openings (referred to

as weep holes) near the bottom of the structure, through which small cameras can be inserted

to facilitate visual inspections of the RPV head.

During refueling outages in 1998 and 2000, the licensee performed visual inspections of the

RPV head surface that was accessible through the service structure weep holes. The scope of

these visual inspections covered the bare metal of the RPV head to identify the presence of

boric acid deposits, which would be indicative of primary coolant leakage. These inspections

also included checking for leakage from any of the CRDM flanges, located above the insulation, in response to Generic Letter 88-05, Boric Acid Corrosion of Carbon Steel Reactor Pressure

Boundary Components, which the NRC issued on March 17, 1988.

The visual inspections in 1998 showed an uneven layer of boric acid deposits scattered over

the RPV head (including deposits near CRDM nozzle 3). The outside diameter of the CRDM

nozzles had white streaks, which indicated to the licensee that the boric acid evident on the

head flowed downward from leakage in the CRDM flanges. During the refueling outage in 2000, the licensee also performed visual inspections of the

CRDM flanges and nozzles. Above the RPV head insulation, those inspections revealed five

CRDM flanges with evidence of leakage, including one flange that was the principal leakage

point. Boric acid deposits on the vertical faces of three of these five flanges and the associated

nozzles confirmed leakage from the flanges. Similarly, one of the other two leaking CRDM

flanges had boric acid deposits between the flange and the insulation, which indicated leakage

from the flange. All of these leaking flanges were repaired by replacing their gaskets. The

faces of the flange that was the principal leakage point were also machined to ensure a better

seal.

Visual inspections performed below the RPV head insulation during the 2000 refueling outage

indicated some accumulation of boric acid deposits on the RPV head. These deposits were

located beneath the leaking flanges, with clear evidence of downward flow from the flange area.

No visible evidence of CRDM nozzle leakage (i.e., leakage from the gap between the nozzle

and the RPV head) was detected. The licensee described that the RPV head area was cleaned

with demineralized water to the greatest extent possible, while trying to maintain the dose

as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). Subsequent video inspection of the partially

cleaned RPV head and nozzles was performed for future reference.

A subsequent review of the 1998 and 2000 inspection videotapes in 2001 confirmed that there

was no evidence of leakage from the RPV head nozzles, although many areas of the RPV head

were not accessible because of persistent boric acid deposits that the licensee did not clean

because of ALARA issues (including the region around nozzle 3).

The inspections in 2002 did not reveal any visual evidence of flange leakage from above the

RPV head. However, as discussed above, three CRDM nozzles had indications of cracking

(identified by ultrasonic testing of the nozzles), which could result in leakage from the RPV to

the top of the RPV head.

Discussion

The following documents describe reactor operating experience with boric acid corrosion

of ferritic steel reactor coolant pressure boundary components in PWR plants:

Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, issued December 29, 1986

Pressure Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, issued April 20, 1987

Pressure Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, issued November 19, 1987

Pressure Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, issued January 5, 1995

Components in PWR Plants, issued March 17, 1988 Several instances of boric acid corrosion discussed in these generic communications are

associated with corrosion of the RPV head. NRC Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 1, for example, described an instance in which boric acid had severely corroded three of the RPV

flange bolts, the control rod drive shroud support, and an instrument tube seal clamp. Similarly, NRC Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, described an instance in which boric acid

resulted in nine pits in the surface of the RPV head, ranging in depth from 0.9 to 1 cm

[approximately 0.4 inch] and ranging in diameter from 2.5 to 7.5 cm [1 to 3 inches].

As discussed in Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, the primary effect of boric acid

leakage onto the ferritic steel RPV head is wastage or general dissolution of the material.

Pitting, stress corrosion cracking (SCC), intergranular attack, and other forms of corrosion are

not generally of concern in concentrated boric acid solutions at elevated temperatures such as

those that may occur on the surface of the RPV head. The rate of general corrosion (wastage)

of ferritic steel from boric acid varies and depends on several conditions, including whether the

boric acid is dry or in solution. If the boric acid is dry (i.e., boric acid crystals), the corrosion rate

is less severe; however, boric acid crystals are not completely benign to carbon steel. During

operation, the temperature of the RPV head is sufficiently high that any leaking primary coolant

would be expected to flash to steam, leaving behind dry boric acid crystals.

Given the wide range of conditions around reactor primary coolant leakage sites and the wide

variation in boric acid corrosion rates, the deleterious effects of boric acid on ferritic steel

components indicate the importance of minimizing boric acid leakage, detecting and correcting

leaks in a timely manner, and promptly cleaning any boric acid residue.

The investigation of the causative conditions surrounding the degradation of the RPV head at

Davis-Besse is continuing. Boric acid or other contaminants could be contributing factors.

As discussed above, factors contributing to the degradation might also include the environment

of the head during both operating and shutdown conditions (e.g., wet/dry), the duration for

which the RPV head is exposed to boric acid, and the source of the boric acid (e.g., leakage

from the CRDM nozzle or from sources above the RPV head such as CRDM flanges).

Related Generic Communications

Bulletin 2001-01, Circumferential Cracking of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetration

Nozzles, August 3, 2001.

Bulletin 82-02, Degradation of Threaded Fasteners in the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary

of PWR Plants, June 2, 1982.

Generic Letter 88-05, Boric Acid Corrosion of Carbon Steel Reactor Pressure Boundary

Components in PWR Plants, March 17, 1988.

Generic Letter 97-01, Degradation of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Nozzles and Other Vessel

Closure Head Penetrations, April 1, 1997.

Information Notice 80-27, Degradation of Reactor Coolant Pump Studs, June 11, 1980.

Information Notice 82-06, Failure of Steam Generator Primary Side Manway Closure Studs, March 12, 1982. Information Notice 86-108, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure Boundary

Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, December 29, 1986.

Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 1, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure

Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, April 20, 1987.

Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure

Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, November 19, 1987.

Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 3, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure

Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, January 5, 1995.

Information Notice 90-10, Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of INCONEL 600,

February 23, 1990.

Information Notice 94-63, Boric Acid Corrosion of Charging Pump Casing Caused by Cladding

Cracks, August 30, 1994.

Information Notice 96-11, Ingress of Demineralizer Resins Increases Potential for Stress

Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetrations, February 14, 1996.

Information Notice 2001-05, Through-Wall Circumferential Cracking of Reactor Pressure

Vessel Head Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetration Nozzles at Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3, April 30, 2001.

This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. If you have

any questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts

listed below or the appropriate project manager in the NRCs Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation (NRR).

/RA/

William D. Beckner, Program Director

Operating Reactor Improvements Program

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contacts: Allen Hiser, NRR Ken Karwoski, NRR

(301) 415-1034 (301) 415-2752 E-mail: alh1@nrc.gov E-mail: kjk1@nrc.gov

Jerry Dozier, NRR

(301) 415-1014 E-mail: jxd@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices Information Notice 86-108, ?Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure Boundary

Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, December 29, 1986.

Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 1, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure

Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, April 20, 1987.

Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 2, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure

Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, November 19, 1987.

Information Notice 86-108, Supplement 3, Degradation of Reactor Coolant System Pressure

Boundary Resulting from Boric Acid Corrosion, January 5, 1995.

Information Notice 90-10, ?Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of INCONEL 600,

February 23, 1990.

Information Notice 94-63, ?Boric Acid Corrosion of Charging Pump Casing Caused by Cladding

Cracks, August 30, 1994.

Information Notice 96-11, ?Ingress of Demineralizer Resins Increases Potential for Stress

Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetrations, February 14, 1996.

Information Notice 2001-05, Through-Wall Circumferential Cracking of Reactor Pressure

Vessel Head Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetration Nozzles at Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3, April 30, 2001.

This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. If you have

any questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts

listed below or the appropriate project manager in the NRCs Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation (NRR).

/RA/

William D. Beckner, Program Director

Operating Reactor Improvements Program

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contacts: Allen Hiser, NRR Ken Karwoski, NRR

(301) 415-1034 (301) 415-2752 E-mail: alh1@nrc.gov E-mail: kjk1@nrc.gov

Jerry Dozier, NRR

(301) 415-1014 E-mail: jxd@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC IN Reading File

ADAMS ACCESSION NO.: ML020700556 Template: NRR-052

  • See previous concurrence

OFFICE RSE:RORP:DRIP RSE:EMCB:DE BC:EMCB:DE (A)SC:RORP:DRIP PD:RORP:DRIP

NAME IJDozier* KJKarwoski* WHBateman* TKoshy* WDBeckner

DATE 03/11/2002 03/11/2002 03/11/2002 03/11/2002 03/12/2002 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Attachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Information Date of

Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to

_____________________________________________________________________________________

2002-10 Nonconservative Water Level 03/07/2002 All holders of operating licenses

Setpoints on Steam for nuclear power reactors, Generators except those who have

permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the reactor.

2002-09 Potential for Top Nozzle 02/13/2002 All holders of operating licenses

Separation and Dropping of for nuclear power reactors, and

Certain Type of Westinghouse non-power reactors and holders

Fuel Assembly of licenses for permanently

shutdown facilities with fuel

onsite.

2002-08 Pump Shaft Damage Due to 01/30/2002 All holders of operating licenses

Excessive Hardness of Shaft for nuclear power reactors, Sleeve except those who have

permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the reactor.

2002-07 Use of Sodium Hypochlorite for 01/28/2002 All holders of operating licenses

Cleaning Diesel Fuel Oil for nuclear power except those

Supply Tanks who have ceased operations and

have certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the

reactor vessel.

2002-06 Design Vulnerability in BWR 01/18/2002 All holders of operating licenses

Reactor Vessel Level or construction permits for boiling

Instrumentation Backfill water reactors (BWRs).

Modification

2002-05 Foreign Material in Standby 01/17/2002 All holders of licenses for nuclear

Liquid Control Storage Tanks power reactors.

2002-04 Wire Degradation at Breaker 01/10/2002 All holders of operating licenses

Cubicle Door Hinges for nuclear power reactors.

______________________________________________________________________________________

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit