ML13116A270: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Saba, Farideh Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 12:28 PM To: Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com Cc: Hanek, Olga; Klett, Audrey
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                         Saba, Farideh Sent:                         Friday, April 26, 2013 12:28 PM To:                           Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com Cc:                           Hanek, Olga; Klett, Audrey


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance review for Turkey Point, Un its 3 and 4, Relief Request #11 (TACs MF1391/92)
Acceptance review for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4, Relief Request #11 (TACs MF1391/92)
Importance:
Importance:                   High
HighBob, By letter dated April 5, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management Syst em Accession No. ML13114A294), Florida Power and Light Company (the licensee) submitted a request (Relief Request No. 11) to use alternative requirements for the reactor vessel nozzle to elbow/pipe dissimilar metal butt end welds examination for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there was is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
: Bob, By letter dated April 5, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML13114A294),
The NRC staff reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Florida Power and Light Company (the licensee) submitted a request (Relief Request No. 11) to use alternative requirements for the reactor vessel nozzle to elbow/pipe dissimilar metal butt end welds examination for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there was is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1447 or Audrey Klett at (301) 415-0489.  
The NRC staff reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1447 or Audrey Klett at (301) 415-0489.
Farideh E. Saba, P.E.
Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV 1


Farideh E. Saba, P.E. Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           676 Mail Envelope Properties     (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20130426122800)
 
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 676   Mail Envelope Properties   (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20130426122800)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance review for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4, Relief Request #11 (TACs MF1391/92) Sent Date:   4/26/2013 12:28:13 PM Received Date: 4/26/2013 12:28:00 PM From:   Saba, Farideh Created By:   Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Hanek, Olga" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None "Klett, Audrey" <Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com" <Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com>
Acceptance review for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4, Relief Request #11 (TACs MF1391/92)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1968     4/26/2013 12:28:00 PM
Sent Date:             4/26/2013 12:28:13 PM Received Date:         4/26/2013 12:28:00 PM From:                   Saba, Farideh Created By:             Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"Hanek, Olga" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com>
Options Priority:     High   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   Yes   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None "Klett, Audrey" <Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com" <Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                           Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                         1968                     4/26/2013 12:28:00 PM Options Priority:                       High Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               Yes Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 20:13, 4 November 2019

Acceptance Review for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4, Relief Request #11 (TACs MF1391/92)
ML13116A270
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/2013
From: Farideh Saba
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Tomonto B
Florida Power & Light Co
References
TAC MF1391, TAC MF1392
Download: ML13116A270 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Saba, Farideh Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 12:28 PM To: Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com Cc: Hanek, Olga; Klett, Audrey

Subject:

Acceptance review for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4, Relief Request #11 (TACs MF1391/92)

Importance: High

Bob, By letter dated April 5, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML13114A294),

Florida Power and Light Company (the licensee) submitted a request (Relief Request No. 11) to use alternative requirements for the reactor vessel nozzle to elbow/pipe dissimilar metal butt end welds examination for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there was is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1447 or Audrey Klett at (301) 415-0489.

Farideh E. Saba, P.E.

Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 676 Mail Envelope Properties (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20130426122800)

Subject:

Acceptance review for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4, Relief Request #11 (TACs MF1391/92)

Sent Date: 4/26/2013 12:28:13 PM Received Date: 4/26/2013 12:28:00 PM From: Saba, Farideh Created By: Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Hanek, Olga" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None "Klett, Audrey" <Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com" <Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1968 4/26/2013 12:28:00 PM Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: Yes Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: