ML14044A028

2013 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Initial License Examination Proposed Exam Files

ML14044A028
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	10/21/2013
From:	Walton R NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Shared Package
ML11355A024	List: ML13148A469 ML14044A028
References
Download: ML14044A028 (5)

Text

2013 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION PROPOSED EXAM FILES

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Dresden Units 2 & 3 Date of Examination: 10/21/2013 Operating Test Number:

Initials

1. General Criteria a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). c.QI1 NIA uv

~

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered NIA ~\i) during this examination. CiJ"1

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) Of!'? NIA ~\!.)

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within NIA ~\)

acceptable limits. !cO?

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent NIA ~\J applicants at the designated license level. I~

2. Walk-Through Criteria -- -- --

a.

..

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions NIA

..

initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific

. designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee ~'W operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature COJ

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through NIA outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance cry ~w criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria -- -- --

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with CP7 NIA ~w Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Date c e : : r ; m e I :::ure

a. Author Chuck Zoia/ toLI7/t3

b. Facility Reviewer(*) N/A ,1- I

c. NRC Ch;ef Exam<oo< (#) Raymood Ke(lh I!Jrcvte:rr; 2', 2: k~ f.u..1_:;:::;x:

' ':1,k_~Z

..\.JJt;;-

"ff -h-~

iO /17['2.0\3

d. NRC Supervisor Pl/

,** -;c..

(/'<-"

ioJJ/13 r

NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4

~sden Units 2 & 3 Date of Exam: October 21, 2013 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 I 3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 01'7 N/A ~~\.~

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. Clh; N/A ~

/

3. Each event description consists of N/A

• the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

• the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event

~~

4.

• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

.

• the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

"

~

N/A R~

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. I~ N/A ~\,)

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. C"J N/A

~v

~\J

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. N/A Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given. diJ

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. I~ N/A ~'J-'w

/

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated N/A

~w to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. N/A '?)-.W All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. ~

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). ~

N/A ww

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events N/A ~vJ specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scefiarios). PfeJ

~~\))

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. ~ N/A Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 51 5 /5 *'! N/A ~~I;

,~(\'1\W

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) ..:Jf ~ r - lvfii!.Jt t:1l"7 N/A  ?-'A'w

3. Abnormal events (2-4) 4/ 3 /3 r;+; N/A ~

4. Major transients (1-2) 2/ 2 /2 Htl N/A ~¥~

5.

6.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 2/ 2 /2 01 2 /2 ,.,""' N/A N/A

\A\J.:

~Z\1~

7. Critical tasks (2-3) 21 5 12 lA? N/A ~w..:

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: DRESDEN UNITS 2 & 3 Date of Exam: 10130/2013 Exam Level: RO X SRO Initial Item Description a b* c#

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. ww N/A ~

\i)

~

2. a. NRC K!As are referenced for all questions. N/A

b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. ~

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 ~\.) N/A ~

4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions Ri\.J were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office). tk

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled N/A as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

_the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or ~\t\J

_the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or ~

1.. the examinations were developed independently; or

_the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

_other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New N/A from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest 51 I 68%

~w ~

new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only 17 I 23% 7/9%

question distribution(s) at right.

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA N/A exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 34 I 45% 41/55%

~w ~

selected K!As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right.

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers Ri~ N/A

~

or aid in the elimination of distractors.

Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved N/A

~\I-)

9.

examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; ~

deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. WvW NIA ~

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

\?iW N/A

&~

Printed Nam~ature.., Date

~ w~ ioh1\Zol3

= .

a. Author Raymond Keith Walton I DeiiMoNe;l/~

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

C. NRC Chief Examiner(#) ~L.ePs

d. NRC Regional Supervisor /n::.f.'t.'i~~o".... - .\ ~ /flsP Note:

• The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: DRESDEN UNITS 2 & 3 Date of Exam: 10/30/2013 Exam Level: RO SROX Initial Item Description a b* c*

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. ~\J N/A ~VIA.

2. a.

b.

NRC K!As are referenced for all questions.

Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

R~w N/A ~

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 lpi\0 N/A ~

4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office). ~

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled N/A as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

_the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

_the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

_ the examinations were developed independently; or fW }W\

_the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

_other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New N/A from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only 1/4% 1/4% 23/92% ~\J ~

question distribution(s) at right.

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA N/A exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 6/24% 19/76%

~~ )>"""-

selected K!As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right.

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

((t\0 N/A "J)W\

9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned;

\¥\\) N/A

~

deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. ~w N/A ~

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; ~w N/A

~

the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

POoled Nam~""' Date

a. Author Raymond Keith Walton I _*_ _ ~ Ub~ l()/,7)~o 13

-=13

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

C. NRC Chief Examiner(#)

DeiiM,Nell_

~N/ - ~

d. NRC Regional Supervisor

/'

/f;xa~k-.. ** '

/d-~ ~

• S L '3 Note:

• The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.