NL-12-2270, SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 5 of 20

SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 5 of 20

ML13003A245
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	11/26/2012
From:	Volodarsky D Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2270 SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML13003A245 (33)

Text

NO. SNCVO61-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. /-/6o106-

.--4$'/ Equip. Class','Equipment Description .A,4 te2. 6'W44 4 Pr""/ 7- Lersvwfe_(P e m," , .A IT Location:

Bldg. dA2A'r-/eo4 Floor El. 2'90 Room, Area i -" -z~c Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorag 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO ND9 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

//~o 7- l 5-001 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YRJ NO U- N/A-Y03 NO UO N/A-YVJ NO U- N/AD YO NEI U" N/AX YX NO U-,2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<CC-3 >PAGE 161 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Shee(t2 of02 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Eq-iuipnent ID No. /-/$o5- Cý AS! Equip. Class1 /i'2 ,rdA1iV_/$

4OL Equipment.Description ?v/ .rt~',-yA1,c 4~fN&7 Interaction Effects 1. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment oristructures?

8. Are overheade.quipment, distributitfiý tems, jeiling tiles and.lighting, and masýown' blo6ck wallsnot likelyto collapse ontoihe equipment?

,9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?,0.ý BaS,3 d on 4,-the above.9eisnmicihteraction eValuations, is equipment free of potentially adver*sseismic*

interaction.effects?

YN ND DUE] N/AQ YXNQ UQ. N/ADI Y,ý NI [I D[ N/AD Y% NEI UE.Other Adverse Conditions 1,1. Have you~looked for and found no other seismicconditions that coild YW N[D UD adversely affect'the"afety functioni o f the equipmenf

.....?'Comme ts (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: &Zb A/k77 14,1oto4p4R$kY I Ifabit~J jIJ Date: .-.< C->.PAGE 162 of 668

• ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 163 of 668 IACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO#.0 PAGE 164 of 668 I 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 165 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOVWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIANO PAGE 166 of 668

• -ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 167 of 668

• ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSI 0 I PAGE 168 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sh4eet of 2'stats NU.Seismic WalkdOwn Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

-oS 5-Ag .l Equip. Class'1 2 zo Equipment Description I. "r .-afo MP ~rL Z CAM Location:

Bldg. Floor El. Room, Area Manufacturer,, Model, Etc- (optional but:recommended-Instructions for Compl[ting Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results0ofthe Seismic Walkdown of anifem.of equipment on the SWEL. The sjatebeeow each oifthe foll6wing:questi6ns may be usdedto record the;results 6fjudgmentf:and findings.

Additional space :is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorte0 SEL te ri uei 1. -Is the anchorage configurationl verification required (i.re~,is the item 'one YEI NE:]of the 50% of S\VEL items r~cjirifig such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is t~he anchorage free of corrosion that is more. than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visiblecracks in the concrete near the'aich~fs?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Notte: This question only applie§s ifthe item is one of the .50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluati6ns, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse, seismic conditions?

YE-I NEI UE-] N/AF Y] NEI UJE] N/AD]YE] NE], UE]ý N/AE]'Yr-,NE] UE] N/AE]YE] NE] .UE P? Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13I: Classes of Eqipmet< C-3 >PAGE 169 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 6of2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ll).No. H-t6 5-C-AS , Equip. .OiasS'zc'JEquipne~nt Description zil4r Cc-&T ). ~ 2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipfnent or structures?

8.- Are overhead'equipment, distribution~systems, ceiling, tiles andlighting,"7and .nason bjoc walls no~t likely to collapse onto the'equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate:f6exibility to avoid damaige?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free ofpotenti.lly advei~se, seismic.iinteraction effects?YlENEI N UE N/AE1, YEI NE0 EY N/AEn YEINE UEl N/AE YEI NE UE, Oiher Adverse Conditions I1.- Ilava you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could N%,NE U-]adversely affect the safety functions ofthe equipment?

~~N'r.twrrit4AI ov, -T~ITR~~C.1?~4~

Vrots c.Astv't-WAS vfOlMw 0:~~CKI Z tS&ALC. v o~44~t~ ~~o c~.C ~4~t0 atmv~I pV'C.A ~0 C~ ~ ~ ~ ~JANYE~ ' AV"C AV 3Vet I~C VMV.4Q~~Av- I -5Cktý.ýwt A 1K'v'~Comments (Additional pages may be a.dded as-necessary)

Evaluated by: ~ $Date.:. !,/1<C;-4 PAGE 170 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS1000 PAGE 171 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 172 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of StatupU& IN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Eqluipment ID.No. .1 ; a -013 Eqjuip. .Class.1"2-0.Equipetesrpin X _____Location:

Bldg. .Floor El. * -Room, Area. -.ModeL Etc. (optional but recommended) 4- A)Instructions for, Completing Checklist this checklist may be.used to document the rfesuIts offthe SeismiC. Whlkdown of an itemofequipment on the SWEL. The space below 'each ofthe following questions may be used to record the results of juidgmcnts and findings.

Additional space is provided!

at the end of this checklistfdr othef, cdmihents.

Anchorage:. Is the arithorage co .iguriatioil verification required (i.e., ig:#the item one of the 50% of SWEL items reqMiring suchlverif~cation)?

YJNm 2- Is the atnchOrage free of bent, brkern, miissing or loose hardware?3. Is fre cQfcorrosion that is moretliari i ild surface oxidatioin?

4. Is the anchorage free of v9sibsie-cracksin'the concrete near the anchors?, 5. 1.s.the anchorage conifiguration' consistchtvwith plant d6ctidifitdtion?(Nbte'-This question only, applies if the item is one of the. 50%.forýwhich verificfion, is-requiried.), 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage ftfeof pbtentiqll adverse seismic .Conditions'?

Ye~'NEJ UEJ N/Afl YeJNQI UE1 N/AEI Y9 INQ UEJ1 N/A.[]Y[!J/ND UfJ N/-AE1 1 NEI LI'~Efter thee 11. mn ssn Me rmAppendix B: Chuses of ~quifpment.

PAGE 173 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 6f-2: Selsmic:Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquiprnentfD No. Arquip. Class r'3/4'~ i~'ik I 7~A!R Eqtipmenri; Description Interaction Fffects 7' Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipmenrt or structures?

8. Are overhleidd equipment, distributidn syst.¢-es, Ceoiing tiles and lIghting, andmasonry block walls not likely týo collapse doito: the equipment?

9. Do-attached linies have adequate flexibilitV to avoid damage?YflNEI U0 N/AO Y.VNIE uC N/ACI Y5]'NC UC1 N/AC1 10. Based orniheabove seismic ,interaction evalua!tions, isequipmentfiee Yf',Nc UC1.of p6tentiail lyadverse seismic ,Other Adverse Conditions 1i1. Have you.:1oked for findfoundno othcr seismic conditions that i6uld Y[Y N'C 'UC"adyeqrsely affect the safety functions of the equipmefit?

Comfinent.f (Additiobga pages: may be added as necessary)

'Evaluated by: 9'Thý01: ;).C-4,:>PAGE 174 of 668 4TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONR I PAGE 175 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 176 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Stfatus:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)1 Equipment ID No. 1- 1 c S5- Equip. Class'2 Equipment Description Srt4-r_:ow~

VAj&t~ Location:-

Bldg. c.6tT-0.o%-

Floor El. _ Room, Area A is Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be -used to record the results ofjudgments aid findings.

Additional space is provided at'the end of this checklist for documenting other cormnents.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification requ~ired (i.e;, is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?'

YO NO.Is the anchorage free of bent, brqken, missing odrloose hardware?3:.,Is.the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild sudface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near ihe anichors?5. Is the aifi6hrage cofig"uratio'n, consistenit'with plant documentution?(Note; This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which, an anclorage configquation verificatibn is rtequired.,)

6., Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of, potentially adverse seismic¢conditions?-

YO] NC1 UC N/AC YE] NO UC11 N./AC YE] NC Ufl N/AC YC: NEI UC1 N/AC YEI NEI UE IZ Enter the equipment class name freni Appendix B: Classes ofEquipmen&,.

< C >PAGE 177 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismnic WMIikdown CheCklist

('S.WC)Equipment ID No. :.I.- G Equip. Class 1 2 Z , Equipment Description

_$ r " " linteraction Effects, (v5Ec --vy/c es/ ,Z 7. Are soft targets free from impact-by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Afeýoverhead equipment, distribution Systems, ,ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely tofcollapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid d~amage?10. :Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic iteraction effects?YE] NO UCIO N/AD YE] NEr] UE] N/Ar]YEI ýNEI UE- N/Ar]YEI NEI Ur]Other Adverse Conditions

11. Haveyou looked for andifound no other seismic cotiditions that could YA.NE] UE[A adversely affect the safe tyfunctions of the eqdipment?

Comhments,(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

OM/ 't~~~ti~~~~¶LzP 621ptlLV4 M~ (. o=~Evaluated by:S. --: ( Jw" Date: /6 411 PAGE 178 of 668

,ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS100NO PAGE 179 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 180 of 668 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS100NO PAGE 181 of 668

• ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO .0 oose boh PAGE 182 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 I Ai i6 g PAGE 183 of 668 9 T ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS1000 r~sn~g PAGE 184 of 668 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 185 of 668 tACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONRO~oI~ on noc~Iats PAGE 186 of 668

• ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOVVN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOV.i recepta PAGE 187 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: QD N UýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. /-/..jjP -/' Equip. Class~2 Equipmjent Description SoL/D 5'7"-,7 / 7T -,YJ .e " 7-, IW ,1I 1 Locatjion:

Bldg. t'ry l, Floor El. .?2O Room, Area ,, /Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional'butreconmnended) -/A / -'O'.fE Instructlons for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkd.own of anl. itemof eqmuipmentot .he SVEL. The space below each of the following questioiis'may be used to record the results of judgments-and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (ixe., is the.jtemn one: Y] MN of the050%,of SWEL items requiring

'such vetificati6n)?

-2; Is the anchorage free of bent, brokeni iussing or loose'hafdýVafr?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage~freeof visible crack.s~ffinthe concrete near the ancIhors?5. Is the :anchorage configuration-consistent~with plant documentatii 0 (Note-: This-question only-applies ifthe item is ohe of the 50% for Which an anchorage configuration, eri~fication isrequired.)

6. Based on, the,:abovela'nht6ag-eeValiutis[, is the aiichofige freeof potentially adverse.seiIsmic conditions?

YK, NOE UE] N/AE Y], NE] UE] N/AX Yx NEI UE]12 Ente~r~the-cqiiipmentrcass nameý from,ýppcnaix B- Clases of Ecquil~riefr PAGE 188 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDWNo. -Q' SPBEquip.

Class'2 ZQ EquiprnintDescription. t /?)ý -e ,ýOf 7 3Y" & -S 070?6:/1 5;.. .. ....... ... .in tferaction Effects 7. Are-soft targcts.free from impaqt by nearby equipment.orstructureS?

Y: NO UO NIAO 8.: Are overhead cquipment,,distribuhion'systemrs, ceiling tiles and lighting, NX NO U[J N/Ar and masonry blocklwalls not likelyto collapse ontod the eq-uipment?-

r '/x7;. R, /'L' 6EcfRA~o W.J., 9. Do attached lines have adequatepflexibility to avoid damage?NOI [JO N/AOI 10. Based on the~above seismic interaction evaluations; is equipment free Y)<,Nn uLJ of potentiadly adverse seismic interaetibn effects?pAfocv-at:

dOL- a.gE (: S4 VS',,/Sis

Other AdverseConditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other:seismic conditionsthat could. Yg' NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

iCommint!ts (Additionia1 p'ageshay be added aý niecesary)

EvaluatedbytS 1ý911ý-P/I VI Date:; 2~ 02 PAGE 189 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOONO V, IBCOSP8 PAGE 190 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 9.PAGE 191 of 668 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCVO61-RPT-01, VERS1IO0 PAGE 192 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS1000 PAGE 193 of 668