NL-12-2270, SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 17 of 20

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 17 of 20
ML13003A260
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2270 SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML13003A260 (39)
v • d • e


Text

NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Stanis:(Y-N U:

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. /-- t/ '2ow.*. Equip. Class',

Equipment Description C.7' ,.

Location: Bldg. 0723 FloorEf. 2ok *'-4 Room, Area .;.L* l Manufacturer, Model,.Etc. (optional but recommended) /?,I7f.~ t~

,TInstructionsJfor Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkd6wn of an item of eqUiPment on the SWEL..,The spacc below each of the following questions may be used to record the resulis ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this, checklist for documentihg. other comments.

Anchoragte

1. Is the:anchorage configu.rati6n verification required (i.e,, is the item one Yg N. ,

ofethle % of SWEL.items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the.anctiorage.frec:ofbent, broken,missing or loose hardware? YW/NO U[ N/A[,
3. Is theancthorage free of corrosi6o thatis more than mii'd'tirface Y NOC UC N./AC oxidatiiii?

4'!;ls the arnchoragefree of visible cracks in the concietchar the anchors? 'Y0N.U N/AD

5. *s.li6h anichorage con.figuration consistent with plant documentatioIn? 'YmK1Nr UEI N/AM (N.t Tl-ihis applies if the item isone.of:the 50% tr liuesiirnny

.whiichn anchorage, cbnfiginrafion verifitafion-:is requir d.)

Or~ 1A':X 4

6. Based on thc above ahchornge!.,"Suations, is the auchorage free0 YE*'NEJ UEJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?.

OvI:~e..cqwipmeatcc ass name froin Appeid.ix 13:CL~ssesof Equlpti~ihf (C-3 >

PAGE 630 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheetz2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment iDNo. 1  :-111/4 7 Class......

12qup.

EqupmntesroC . -p Class/ !

Equipment Description e '* G,)* Cz*]***.:* i,*

Interaction Effects:

7. Are soft targets fiee from impact by nearby equipment or, stnictyures? YffYNrl UE3 WIAD,
8. Are overhead.equipment, distribution systemsj, eiling tiles ard lighting, YýNEJ UfJ N/Ar andnmasonry blockwalls not likely to collapsc dhto the equipment?

to avoid damage?

A9 Do attached lines.have adequate flexibility Y2. fý[ UE3 N/AEJ

10. Based on.the above.seismic interadtion, evaluations, is equipment free YO'IND GOJ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no. other seismic conditions thatcould YI0"NEI UnE adversely affect the safety ftimctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additi0aal pages~iay be added as niecessary)

Evaluated ~/~~~ Y-i Date:

< 04 >

PAGE 631 of 668

tA CHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .010 PAGE 632 of 668

NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Sfatus:) N. U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. 8-4uip. g/-i1 Class . -

Equipment Description ., Gd,"/f, C'ca( Q,/.,-. j-*

  • Location: Bldg;, . . FloorEl. 2.O6:ý-: 6' Room,.Area / ,4-Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recomrnended):

Instructions for C(ompleting Checklist This checklist may be used, to document the results of theSeismic Walkdown.of an item of equipment potnthe SWEL. The space below each of the.following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of'this checklist for documentingother commcnts, Anchorag L. s the anchorage configuration verification required (iLe., is the item .one Y[*NXI of the 50% of SWEL.items requiring such verification)?

.2,; !sthe anchorage free of bent,broken, missing or lobSe hardware? Y L"!'§UC UC NAC 3.. Is the anchorage free of corrosiOn that is more than mild.:surfhce Y 4 NEI UE N/AC o'xidation?

1j 041 cp!,J,44ýuf 4; I the, anchorage free of Visible cracksin the concrete near the anchors? Y[01'NE3 UIC N/ACI

.5,, sthe ancloibageConfiguration congisteni with:plantdocumeiradtion? Y0NC UE1 N/AC

'(Ndte: This qWestiononly applies if the item is o-he of the 50%for Wliihh an ý:inchoragec.onifigutratiori Veifit~tion'is required.)

6. Based onithe above anchorag e,*Valuati0ns, is the anchorage, free of Y~4-N El tI potentially advyCrsc sismvriC conditions?

FEntcrýthecqtupmcn~tclass na~nic (rom Appendkix n Claws iý 5 ofipr~

<03 PAGE 633 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2. of 2 Seismic Walkdown Cheodk~ist (SWC)ý Equip'mient D No., -i /1 no -60 27 Equip. Class" ~ .,,

Equipment Descriotibn. J_____

____ __7______

interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets ftrbee from.impact*by nearby equipmednt*or structures? Yfl E lE N/ACI YEN1.UE] U-E N/An]
8. Are :ov0erhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles 3and lightingi and: masonry' block walls not likely to'collapse onto the equir ment'?

Ytfd NE1 UE] N/AC

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10., Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE(E] U[]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. HaveCyou and foundj-noothetismic conditions that could Y a/N] ,UE:

advefse[y affect, the safety functions of Lhe equipment?

Coqmnieni.s (Addi'ioiial pages maoy be added "necessary)

Evaluated b _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Date:0, -Zi

"<C-4 >

PAGE 634 of 668

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 100 PAGE 635 of 668

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOONO PAGE 636 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet, 1 of 2 Status: (9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

  • Equipment [.DNo. L*0 -5151S Equip. Class12 '4 EquipmentD'escription ... T -- -FSX Location: Bldg. ¢Ai .Floor El. Ifl._IL Room, Area It, r '0 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc; (optional but recommended)

Trhis checklist may-bezused to document the results.of the Seismic Walkdown of an item ofe uiprent on the SWE L The space bel ow each: of the following questions may be used to:record the, results ofj udgmen's and.

findings. Additional space is provided at the end of tiis checklist fordodumenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such -verification)?:
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YRI NO 130 N/AO1
3. Is the anchorage free ofcorrsion that'is more than mild surface YN Nn Uf] N/An oxidation?,
4. s: the a*tchorage free of v. ible cracks,in the concrete near the a*nhors? YXI NO U0 !A
5. Is theanchorage configuration consisten with plant'documentation?

YV NEO 1Un N/AU (Note:.This:question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verificationis required.)

6. Biased on the.aibove aichotage evaluations, is, the anchorage .f*eeotf YI NO U1" potentfiallyIa'dverse seismic conditions?.

En~t~erthe equi prilnt claiss nanw front Appendi~K4:

BýCl ssdf Equipmentr 4 C-3 )>

PAGE 637 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Shee't 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist .(SWC),

Equipmenti:D No. l-l.....$3.i.. -. Equip. c Equipment Description , Ib15X Interaction Effec(s

7. Are sofl targets free from impact by nearby equipment or.structures? YZ NO LJO N/AE
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiJling tiles and lighting, YO NO U 'NW/At:

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.. Do attached lines have adequateiflexibility to avoid damage? YM Nt Ut N/*A't:

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YvJ NO Ut:

of potentially adverse seismicinteraction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions It. Have you looked for and'found no other seismic conditions that could Y .NEI Ur adversely affect the safety ltinctions of the equipment2? 9- A io.1.p , -

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:. Date:9 i -

<"'C-4>

PAGE 638 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 639 of 668

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 640 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 V

PAGE 641 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 642 of 668

NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2" Status: Y' ) U Sesmic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. l.5-, -. Equip. Cass'2 v 4, EquipmientDescription g*

  • U*9 ______

Location* Bldg. A_ . FloorEl. #U Room,,Area RAO\

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optiona:l.but'recommiiended)

Ihstructions, for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the resultS of'the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the foIlowing questions may be uscd to :record the results of judgments and,

'findings.; Additional space is providedat the end ofthis checklIist for documenting 'other comments.

Anehorageý

1. is the anchorage configuration verifi catioireq ired (i.e., is the iten one. NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring suchverification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? XE U N/AO

-7 - #J4 l 6p

-&t~~

YoN j (U

3. Is the amihorage free of corrosion that)is moree than mild surfae oxidation? `YX NO UD N/Ax
4. is-the anchorage free of visible.qracks in the concrete near the anchors? YONO U N/AX
5. Is'jthe Anchorage c6nfiguration consistent. with plant, documentationi? YONO N AD (Note:;This quiestion only applies ifthe item is one of the 5.0% for which an. anchdro ge configuration verification is required.)

Kt SSýNm& tMOLMS

NF1 :UO3 61 Based dn the abbve anchorage: evaliuations, is the.anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equi~nient class harrie frorn ANp'd' ,E e 0h -!sof e

< ýC-3 >~

PAGE 643 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) 2 Equipment ID No. L-* ';A Equip ..--,

.C.ass.

1Eauinment D ri.nii*t fin:* '~

Equipment Dcýscrintiot!'

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? NO yE N/AE1 8.oAre0overheadequipment, distributtion systemrs,.ceiling tiles tmd lighting,. 1V EI0 N/AEI and masonry blocikwalls not likbely to *ollps.e onto the equipment?

-9. Do attached lines ýhiav adequate, flexibility to avoid damage? Yk/NEI UE N/AE1 i0, Based on-the above seismicc iteraction evaluatIons, is eqluipnient free NEI UE of potentially. adverse seismic interactibh effects?

-Other Adverse Conditions 1 lUave you Iooked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y4,NEn U El adverselyaffect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional.pages tiay be added as npcessafy)

Evaluatedhby: Date: -

< C-4 >

PAGE 644 of 668

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 AFWI I

PAGE 645 of 668

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS O01.0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION PAGE 646 of 668

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 647 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOONO PAGE 648 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 649 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 qjllý!Cuti OIL-

& N U Status:-

Seismic Wafkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment tD No.,- . i 13 ti" ) Equip Class's ___ ~~~2-1j c j FTiiipment D'escript .ion, ~tt Pi. t4X A-Location: Bldg, " X Floor EL flct L! Room, Area AS* 3.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recormnended).

iWstructions for Completing Checklist Tis checklist may be used to document thetresults of the Seismic Walkdon of an ite'm of equipment on the SWEL. The, spac below each of the follwi questimns may be used to record the results ofjudpgents and findings. Additional space is provided attthe end of this checkdist for documenting other commens.

t. Is the a0chorage cWfguaion verifioreir(one s ND of the 56)% Of SWE'L itm requiring such veriflea, on)? Y
12. Is te anchorage free ofbent, broken, missing-or loose hardware? YNO tIC N/AD 3, Is te; achorage free of corroson that is mor han mild surfaice.

oxidation'!

NO UD U N/AD

4. s~te achoagefiee of visible cracksninthe concrete near te anchiors?

Yý ND0 li N/AD.

  • . Is the anchorage configuration consisteat with plant documentation?

(Note: This qaestiononly applies if the itemi is 'one of the 50% fox whch an nhbotage configuration verifiction isreqtitfed.)

ND tiC /A

.6. Based on theabove nhorage vauations, is the anchorage fee of potettlially adverse seismiuc condlitions!

'~neteeqipreneicllass na~me fromi Appendix B:Claset of Equipmenit.

< C-3 >

PAGE 650 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2of2

  • Seismic Walkdown Checki st.(SWC)

EquipmentlD No. 14-i Wý&6L"-t Equip. Class' 22.I (T~-~ci Fk'

.:Equipment Description S-,0it Pit1-6I+A interaction Effects

7. Are soft tatrgets free from impact by nearby equipment.oT stnictthes?

Y&N[D U[ N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceilingtiles and. lighting, Yý.N UO N/IA and masonry-block walls. not likely to collapse:onto the- equipment?
9. Do attached :lines haveadequate flexibility to ayoid damage?

4NEI UD) N/AD1 10, Based on: the abve seismiciintleraction evalations,.is equipment: fee Yk NO UD.,

ofpotentially adverse Seismic interaction: effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I'l. Have you lot*ed for and found hoother seismic condlitions that could, Yf Nn uc]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

]Evaluated by: AI ~ -~ TY~-' Date- 'Wp~

b~~'- )/4~~

<C-4 >

PAGE 651 of 668

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOP PAGE 652 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS100NO PAGE 653 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of!2 Status: & N U seismic:Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equip..nt 1N z

1 .&-.,o Equip. Class12_"* ( t,4 Equipment Description 'zýT,* *-,*_ ', '*,"*'* t -

Location.: Bldg. . . Floor El. ' Room, Area Af7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optiohial but rccommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist Thischecklist may be used to document the results of!the.Seismic talkdown of an item of equipment n;the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.,is the iteinone: Y1 NiE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2 Is :the anchorage freebof bent, broken,:missing or loose hardware? Ni] i]U N/AEi

3. Is the anchorage free.of corrosion that is more than mild surfar4e okidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks: in the concrete near the anchors?

YKIN Ui] NIAi]

5. Is the, anchorage configuration consistent with plaht documentation?

(Note: This qlcion onlyapplies if theitem insofie ofthe.50%fori, which an anchorage c6nfiguratibnviwrification is required.)

'PtZ4.yq -W 64iý4013ý4W65- c j A xzfvi4x7FA 4 /1~ý-ýJ

6. Based on the above'anchorage evaluations, is the anchoiage fzie¢of Y Ni] Ui pot6dtially: adverse seismic conditions?

2 1 Enter thezouinment class namne fromn Appendix B:, Classes, of E olpircnt.

<0C-3 >

PAGE 654 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment iDINo. - 10', _" Equip., Classn .

fc1A~1 P (kc~v&wTAL)

Equipment Description $aP/F'rka~ P.ýT 6ý 4'r% p'fMP Inteiaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impacI by nearby equipment or strumfue? yX NO UEC N/ACI
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,. Yk Nr UC N/AC and masonry block walls.not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YkN[ UC N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YNEIUpC of potentially adverse, seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no othierseismic conditious that could .NCI U-
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

COmments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by; L ~-~s ~ Date;::

iA.'i

< C04. >

PAGE 655 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONPO

(

PAGE 656 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDN0,  !. i Z I3 - bA 6-I04 Equip. Classn 0ý '-o-rac.R.

Equipment Description . Pt(MP A *C4i1*tq' 1roi-Ai"XT0AI VAL-V Location: Bldg. Floor El, F(4I 05-'0' Room, Area - A0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

InStructions for CompletingtChecklist This checklist may be used to document the results of theSeismic Walkdown of an ifein of equiminent on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be usod to record the results ofejudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other cormnents.

Anchorake

.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NVt of the 50% of SWPL items requiring such verification)?

2. is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YD Nn UD N/A9 3, Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more thanmild surface Y0 NO TJD.N/AM oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in theconcrete nea the anchors?

YO 'NDI UD IA 5, Is the anchorage configuration-consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only :applies if the item is one of the,50% for which an anchorage configuration verification .is required.)

YO ND UD /V

6. Based on the above anchorage eva.luations,is ihe anchorage free'of potentially adverse seismic, conditions?

Enter tlm:iqjipnient clas:naime from Appendix B: Clamses ofE~uipmrnet,

<.C3>

PAGE 657 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown .Checklist(SWC)

Equipment ID Noo. 1- IW-5 ` 4-, Equip. Class!z A,- yr1 Equipment Description S ' Wi'A Su 7-10,,/ JSOLAT!r~eW VALS4, Interaction Effects

7. Ar* gft targets free from impact by heahby equipment or structuteS? YVNO. UO N/AO

.8.Are overhead equipment, distribution systems. ceiling tiles and lighting, Y' NO UO N/AO and masonry block 'va1ls not likely to collapse ontothe equipment?

9. Do, attached lines have adequate. flexibility to,avoid damage? 'Yý,NO VO. N/AO 10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y19 No UP of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for:and found 0oother seismicconditions. that 0ould Y NO U[3 adversely affrct the safety functions of the equipiint? "

Comments (Additional pages mpay be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:,

zx~- *Z~ ~Ž A

< C-4 .>

PAGE 658 of 668

9

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 659 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 staltusv §)N U AP",

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentJD No. I" 7.,'J Equip. Class',,. 77#k>(

Equipment Desýcription, 00:479L1T 7 0T4TC ,ALItI/

Location: Bldg. i.96 ,'Floor El. 1*'* Room, Area A4 o 7 Manufacturer, ModeI,,Etc. (optional but recommended) . . 6 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used toldocurnent the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item6 of equipment on the SWEL. The: spacebelow each of the following questionsmay be, used .to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

. IsJthe anchorage configumtion, verificatiori required (i~e., is the item one Y"] NX ofthe 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2, Is theanchorage free of bent, broken, missing or tIoose:hardware? Y117NM] UE]Ný 3.Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UE] NIA,

.oxidation?

4, Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in, the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI VE NIA~

5. Is. the anchorage configuration consistent with plant-documentationp? Ym NE] TIE] , /

(Note:: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration Verification is'required.)

6. Based onthe above.anchorage evalhations, is the, Ahchoiage free of ýKNE VE1]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12Enertbe equipmeent class name~ from Appendix 13:Cla~ms0EfIquipmien.

-< C-3 >~

PAGE 660 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.Zo2.2

,Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)ý EquipmentDNo, NZ7SY fID Equip. Class'2 Cf &At Equipment DesCription *P 13 t(tx aa1ET- ;rp¢Tr- oin Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targcts free from impact byriearby equipfinent or stnietures? YNCO UC. N/AC
8. Are overhead equiipment, distribution.systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NO UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO.NO UC N/AC
10. Based on the above seismic4interaction evaluationsi is equipmenit free YONCUC of potentially adyvrse seismic inteiaption effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

.l1 .. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could4 Yý N3 tfC adversely affect the safetyfunctions0of the equipment?

na.~zi5~f PA F04' AAvecsa

.Commnenfts(Addidonal pages may.be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: ~'" Date:__ _ _ _ _ _

iuz(-~ff~ ii PAGE 661 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 662 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 663 of 668

9 0 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 664 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentJiD No. I - 61 'VC&Equip. Cass'2s 0 o'W~

Equipment Description MV IYU, tWIJae- [ tL f Location: Bldg. .:L. Floor El. I J/k* Room, Area I2A S--3 P

Manufacturer, Model,:Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructionsf6Ir Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown. of an item of equipment on the, SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided, at the end of this checklist for documenting, other cominents; Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (ie., is the item one YD N ofthe 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?X
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

y N UD N/ADO NDI

3. is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks inithe-concrete fiear the anchors? NO UDD N/AD]
5. Is ihe ancboragecoiifiguration consistent with plant:docuimentation? YDND NuD NIAs (Note: This question only applies itthe item is one of the.50% fo0r which-an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchoirage evaluations, is-the anchorage. free of XE ND UOD potentially adverse seismnic.conditions?

.t'Intler the'equipment c1iiss unwntfrom Appendix.B:,Clwises oFEj~fipmerft.

C-3 >

PAGE 665 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of2

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equjpme~nt ID o. I- -13No-, - Equip. Class" Equipment Description v M ct A .. e'A* U _S 1nteraction Effects

7. Are soft ffgets free from impact by nearby. equipment or.struttures? NYj NOUDN/AIJ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO: UO :N/AD and mason*y block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

4 NO- U[ N/AF

10. Based on the above'seismic interactionevaluations, is equipment free of potentially EX0UEJ adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions i ,, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO, UCI, adversely affect the safety ffunctionsOof the eqUipment?

Cotntments (Additional pages may be added as fnece'sary)

S . F. .1 -v Evialulated by- Date:,

( C-4>

PAGE 666 of 668

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 667 of 668

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 668 of 668

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2270,_SNCV061-RPT-01,_Ver_1.0,_Vogtle_Unit_1_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic._Part_17_of_20&oldid=2458710"