ML18051B233: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 21: Line 21:
Power distribution information was obtained from the computer routine INCA which uses incore detector readings to evaluate power parameters.
Power distribution information was obtained from the computer routine INCA which uses incore detector readings to evaluate power parameters.
The INCA program is routinely run and the computer run chosen for this report was one at 97.5% power and 463.0 MWD/MTU burnup. The information derived from 'l the INCA output consisted of quadrant tilt, assembly power and assembly power RMS deviation.
The INCA program is routinely run and the computer run chosen for this report was one at 97.5% power and 463.0 MWD/MTU burnup. The information derived from 'l the INCA output consisted of quadrant tilt, assembly power and assembly power RMS deviation.
The assembly powers and assembly power RMS were compared to the predicted information supplied bv Exxon in Reference  
The assembly powers and assembly power RMS were compared to the predicted information supplied bv Exxon in Reference
: 1. The predicted informa-tion was taken from a PDQ computer run at 100% power and 100 MWD/MTU burnup. Quadrant Tilt The INCA calculated quadrant tilt of 0.31% is well below the review criterion of 3%. Quadrant tilt did not have an acceptance criterion.
: 1. The predicted informa-tion was taken from a PDQ computer run at 100% power and 100 MWD/MTU burnup. Quadrant Tilt The INCA calculated quadrant tilt of 0.31% is well below the review criterion of 3%. Quadrant tilt did not have an acceptance criterion.
Assembly Power PDQ predicted assembly power, measured assembly power, and percent difference between the two are given in Figure 1. The review criterion of +/- 10% was not exceeded.
Assembly Power PDQ predicted assembly power, measured assembly power, and percent difference between the two are given in Figure 1. The review criterion of +/- 10% was not exceeded.
MI1284-0305A-TCOi Assemble Power RMS Deviation power RMS deviation calculated from the assembly powers is also played in Figure 1. The RMS deviation of 3.7% was within the 5% review terion. CONCLUSION 3 Review and acceptance criteria were met for all power distribution parameters.
MI1284-0305A-TCOi Assemble Power RMS Deviation power RMS deviation calculated from the assembly powers is also played in Figure 1. The RMS deviation of 3.7% was within the 5% review terion. CONCLUSION 3 Review and acceptance criteria were met for all power distribution parameters.
This completes the Cycle 6 Start-Up Report. REFERENCES  
This completes the Cycle 6 Start-Up Report. REFERENCES
: 1. Palisades Cycle 6 Start-up and Operations Report, XN-NF-83-81, Exxon Nuclear Company, September 1983. 2. Physics Testing Report for Cycle 6 Start-Up, October 1984.
: 1. Palisades Cycle 6 Start-up and Operations Report, XN-NF-83-81, Exxon Nuclear Company, September 1983. 2. Physics Testing Report for Cycle 6 Start-Up, October 1984.
10 X 10 TO THE INCH* I -. II* INl.tH :, K&#xa3;Ut-"fEL 6-t0 MAltl IN U-, A I ,. T--lf------* -ir --** *--fT -r*---r I J. I l I *:i 16 IJ 4* D .f i9 -r: .. --* -* .. -: t -. l "' l . *----) I 15 .* .. --*'-.* --1--( --.. -... '---* .. --. --*. -...* -. --L-L----.... -.&.... ** 1-. .. ---. , __ ----.. --L-L-.. '--* -I----1---L-1-L---I--. *. -.. -*. 1-.. -'--. .l---L--.. . '---I I 1 I . *--.. . .. I ' I I . !. 11 _I Ek r r: '--,,)> L 1D <IC -D ( 5 . -D -ID (9 IC 0 IC u K;cl>J pl)
10 X 10 TO THE INCH* I -. II* INl.tH :, K&#xa3;Ut-"fEL 6-t0 MAltl IN U-, A I ,. T--lf------* -ir --** *--fT -r*---r I J. I l I *:i 16 IJ 4* D .f i9 -r: .. --* -* .. -: t -. l "' l . *----) I 15 .* .. --*'-.* --1--( --.. -... '---* .. --. --*. -...* -. --L-L----.... -.&.... ** 1-. .. ---. , __ ----.. --L-L-.. '--* -I----1---L-1-L---I--. *. -.. -*. 1-.. -'--. .l---L--.. . '---I I 1 I . *--.. . .. I ' I I . !. 11 _I Ek r r: '--,,)> L 1D <IC -D ( 5 . -D -ID (9 IC 0 IC u K;cl>J pl)

Revision as of 22:30, 25 April 2019

Suppl to Physics Testing Rept for Cycle 6 Startup.
ML18051B233
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1984
From:
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML18051B232 List:
References
NUDOCS 8501150356
Download: ML18051B233 (4)


Text

. ,, ** PlfYSICS TESTING REPORT FOR CYCLE 6 START-lTP SUPPLEMENT DECEMBER 1984 p ADOCK 05000255 ---PPR MI1284-0305A-TC01

" . ,, *' 2 *,' INTRODUCTION This report is a supplement to the "Physks Te:s:ti:ng Report for Cycle 6 Start-Up, October 1984." The original report included power distt:ibution informa-tion, but due to several forced outages the highest power level achieved at that point was 79%. This supplementary report presents the result,s of power distribution at essen-tially full power. POWER DISTRIBUTION (SUPPLEMENT)

Power distribution information was obtained from the computer routine INCA which uses incore detector readings to evaluate power parameters.

The INCA program is routinely run and the computer run chosen for this report was one at 97.5% power and 463.0 MWD/MTU burnup. The information derived from 'l the INCA output consisted of quadrant tilt, assembly power and assembly power RMS deviation.

The assembly powers and assembly power RMS were compared to the predicted information supplied bv Exxon in Reference

1. The predicted informa-tion was taken from a PDQ computer run at 100% power and 100 MWD/MTU burnup. Quadrant Tilt The INCA calculated quadrant tilt of 0.31% is well below the review criterion of 3%. Quadrant tilt did not have an acceptance criterion.

Assembly Power PDQ predicted assembly power, measured assembly power, and percent difference between the two are given in Figure 1. The review criterion of +/- 10% was not exceeded.

MI1284-0305A-TCOi Assemble Power RMS Deviation power RMS deviation calculated from the assembly powers is also played in Figure 1. The RMS deviation of 3.7% was within the 5% review terion. CONCLUSION 3 Review and acceptance criteria were met for all power distribution parameters.

This completes the Cycle 6 Start-Up Report. REFERENCES

1. Palisades Cycle 6 Start-up and Operations Report, XN-NF-83-81, Exxon Nuclear Company, September 1983. 2. Physics Testing Report for Cycle 6 Start-Up, October 1984.

10 X 10 TO THE INCH* I -. II* INl.tH :, K£Ut-"fEL 6-t0 MAltl IN U-, A I ,. T--lf------* -ir --** *--fT -r*---r I J. I l I *:i 16 IJ 4* D .f i9 -r: .. --* -* .. -: t -. l "' l . *----) I 15 .* .. --*'-.* --1--( --.. -... '---* .. --. --*. -...* -. --L-L----.... -.&.... ** 1-. .. ---. , __ ----.. --L-L-.. '--* -I----1---L-1-L---I--. *. -.. -*. 1-.. -'--. .l---L--.. . '---I I 1 I . *--.. . .. I ' I I . !. 11 _I Ek r r: '--,,)> L 1D <IC -D ( 5 . -D -ID (9 IC 0 IC u K;cl>J pl)

I.Ne J rr e ) ( 1-:; ,_ ) (IE r '" . 'I.:: . . ( D D ! D i-. 6. 0 .s . ".: B II . as llltda lh :1id.d -+ H. D f f P . .., r IU;! .1-i ' -' -D I ID s 1 I co . 5 I< . ' ... 1D. s . 46 0702 "' JlC . "' JI! 1

  • 1b [1S b 5 12 ,_ 0 -. ) -1D IE 9 1 b 512 --"' : -.D I 6 . . ... -lCIJ . .. * * .D Ii 9-: -......

--. : . :_ B It_ . -: . . IC 9 *-. .. tc l .. ... l.C 7 . . :1 1$ '7 . . i( -: ,IJ -*--*--* L 3 .* I l .. JI .1 ' .c'I : ff '. .11 .. JO .D t . -** -: I "J 12 .* l * ( 9. . . h i I : n_ I< 8 -, n: 11 . : .I c : n IE 4 *, n . IE o I h 1 'j 11 ! i ! I ci!J ... D ci.e .... b . . .. -* -. [ ... . -* 11 I* 4 . :1) 0 . * :. D .11 : -** ... :.:* -*-.. -*-... --. -t11 . . . . tn ... b .. . 3 -. ..,. -. ... . --19 .. -k . h '": :_ : l5 .: :'= * . ** -L.---__ .,__ ----* h -* --; . --. -.. -IA -....... -***:

T --"" ----" --l 1 1 I ! I I I I ' I i L i.LL.1.... . I. * <