ML14107A012: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1As of: April 08, 2014Received:
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1 As of: April 08, 2014 Received:
April 04, 2014PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status:Pending-Post PUBLC S BMISIONTracking No. ljy-8bce-av3f Comments Due: April 10, 2014Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2014-0002 Emergency Planning Exemption Requests for Deconmmissioning Nuclear Power PlantsComment On: NRC-2014-0002-0003 Emergency Planning Exemption Requests for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants; Extension of CommentPeriodDocument:
April 04, 2014 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status:Pending-Post PUBLC S BMISIONTracking No. ljy-8bce-av3f Comments Due: April 10, 2014 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2014-0002 Emergency Planning Exemption Requests for Deconmmissioning Nuclear Power Plants Comment On: NRC-2014-0002-0003 Emergency Planning Exemption Requests for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants; Extension of Comment Period Document:
NRC-2014-0002-DRAFT-0003 Comment on FR Doc # 2014-05105 Submitter Information Name: Bud Haas 7-- 1i3Address:
NRC-2014-0002-DRAFT-0003 Comment on FR Doc # 2014-05105 Submitter Information Name: Bud Haas 7-- 1i3 Address: r-", 4733 South Rd -n cc, t:-7" Bradford, VT, 05033 Email: wawker@gmail.com V-- -C/)',.1 W.General Comment Do not exempt Nuclear Plant owners from off-site Emergency Planning from Reactors which are being decommissioned but still have toxic materials on site.In the case of Vermont Yankee, the recent approval of the license to operate the plant until the end of 2014 included evidence concerning the unreliability of the owners to be responsible in their actions regarding safety at the Plant. They have had a record of lying to the government and the public.In other words, can they be trusted to safely move waste to dry cask storage safely without endangering the surrounding areas, people and property?Without exemption, there is a better chance of the public being aware of what's going on with the decommissioning, and that it is being done safely.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= 14. &,)qý r e /w https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648169dacO&for...
r-",4733 South Rd -n cc, t:-7"Bradford, VT, 05033Email: wawker@gmail.com V-- -C/)',.1W.General CommentDo not exempt Nuclear Plant owners from off-site Emergency Planning from Reactors which are beingdecommissioned but still have toxic materials on site.In the case of Vermont Yankee, the recent approval of the license to operate the plant until the end of 2014included evidence concerning the unreliability of the owners to be responsible in their actions regarding safetyat the Plant. They have had a record of lying to the government and the public.In other words, can they be trusted to safely move waste to dry cask storage safely without endangering thesurrounding areas, people and property?
Without exemption, there is a better chance of the public being aware of what's going on with thedecommissioning, and that it is being done safely.SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate
= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= 14. &,)qý r e /whttps://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648169dacO&for...
04/08/2014}}
04/08/2014}}

Latest revision as of 18:42, 9 July 2018

Comment (5) of Bud Haas on Behalf of Emergency Planning Exemption Requests for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants; Extension of Comment Period
ML14107A012
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/04/2014
From: Haas B
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Division of Administrative Services
References
79FR1900 00005, NRC-2014-0002
Download: ML14107A012 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1 As of: April 08, 2014 Received:

April 04, 2014 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status:Pending-Post PUBLC S BMISIONTracking No. ljy-8bce-av3f Comments Due: April 10, 2014 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2014-0002 Emergency Planning Exemption Requests for Deconmmissioning Nuclear Power Plants Comment On: NRC-2014-0002-0003 Emergency Planning Exemption Requests for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants; Extension of Comment Period Document:

NRC-2014-0002-DRAFT-0003 Comment on FR Doc # 2014-05105 Submitter Information Name: Bud Haas 7-- 1i3 Address: r-", 4733 South Rd -n cc, t:-7" Bradford, VT, 05033 Email: wawker@gmail.com V-- -C/)',.1 W.General Comment Do not exempt Nuclear Plant owners from off-site Emergency Planning from Reactors which are being decommissioned but still have toxic materials on site.In the case of Vermont Yankee, the recent approval of the license to operate the plant until the end of 2014 included evidence concerning the unreliability of the owners to be responsible in their actions regarding safety at the Plant. They have had a record of lying to the government and the public.In other words, can they be trusted to safely move waste to dry cask storage safely without endangering the surrounding areas, people and property?Without exemption, there is a better chance of the public being aware of what's going on with the decommissioning, and that it is being done safely.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= 14. &,)qý r e /w https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648169dacO&for...

04/08/2014