ML17328A829: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 1PROPOSEDCHANGESTOTHEQAPD9012270060 90i2i9PDRADOCK050003i5PPDR | ||
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0847S Page1ChangesareproposedtoclarifythatreviewsdonebytheQAorganization | |||
-areaudit-type activities insteadof100%reviews/assessments. | |||
Therefore, theword"audit"isproposedasareplacement fortheword"review"inthefollowing sectionsoftheQAPD."1.7.1.2.5 1.7.2.2.4 | |||
.1.7.3.2.7 1.7.3.2.13 1.7.4.2.4 1.7.6.2.2 1.7.7.2.7 1.7.9.2.2 (Lastparagraph) | |||
(Thissectionisalsoaffectedbythethirdgroupofproposedchanges.) | |||
(Firstandsecondparagraphs areaffected.) | |||
Second,theword"Superintendent" isdeletedfromthephrase"QualityAssurance Superintendent" inthefollowing sectiontoclarifythattheQAactivities arenotnecessarily performed bytheQASuperintendent himself:1~7.2.2.4(Secondandlastparagraphs) | |||
Note:'nthelastparagraph ofSection1.7.2.2.4, thephrase"andmaintaining closeinterface withtheCookPlantProjectEngineers" isbeingdeleted..Thisphraseisproperlyincludedinthesecondparagraph ofSection1.7.3.2.3 andwasincorrectly includedinSection1.7.2.2.4 duringtheJuly1990QAPDupdate.Third,areduction inthecommitment toperformcertainin-linereviews(e.g.,subtierprocedures, completed designchangepackages) bytheQAorganization isproposed. | |||
Thischangewouldprovideformoremeaningful realtimeperformance-based auditactivities tobeperformed (e.g.,assessments oftheeffectiveness ofsubtierprocedures andin-process designchangeinstallations). | |||
Ourintentistodiscontinue the100$reviewbytheQAorganization ofthoseactivities inw'hichqualityandsafetyarebeingmaintained withoutdirectQAorganization involvement. | |||
TheQAorganization wouldcontinuetoperformaudits,surveillances, orreviewscommensurate withthelevelofperformance demonstrated bytheorganizations havingfirst-line responsibilities. | |||
Forsafety-related activities withlessthandesirable performance levels,QAwouldfocusmoreattention viaauditsorotherappropriate evaluation techniques. | |||
ThisproposedchangewouldallowtheQAorganization todiscontinue non-beneficial audie/review activities inareasnotwarranting such | |||
Attachment 1'toAEP:NRC:0847S Page2attention. | |||
Thisproposedchangewouldprovideadditional flexibility forQAtorespondtorealtimeperformance indicators, insteadofout-of-date commitments. | |||
leericaaElectricNeerCeel~lou1AiverseePlazaCo4rnlas.OH4321$~INCAÃ | Thefollowing aretheQAPDsectionsaffectedbythisproposedchange:1.7'.2.4(Thirdparagraph) 1.7.7.2.7 Fourth,Section1.7.10.2.5 isaproposedadditionwhichclarifies theresponsibility ofIndianaMichiganPowerCompanypersonnel toperforminspections associated withpackaging andshippingradioactive | ||
.wasteandmaterials attheCookNuclearPlant.Also,thisadditionestablishes qualification requirements forIndianaMichiganPowerCompanypersonnel performing theseinspections inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.Fifth,areduction inthecommitment concerning therequireddistribution ofQAauditreportsisproposedforSection1.7.18.2.3. | |||
Specifically, theproposedchangewouldpermitdistribution toonlyappropriate management andeliminate therequirement fordistribution tothePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC),realizing thatmanyoftheappropriate management are,alsoinvolvedwiththePNSRC.TheoffsiteNuclearSafetyDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC)willcontinuetoprovideanindependent assessment oftheauditprogram.Thus,theadditional attention toauditreports,asafunctionofthePNSRC,isnotwarranted. | |||
ThisproposedchangedoesnotcreateaconflictwithCookNuclearPlantTechnical Specification 6.5.1.6.Last,theentireQAPDhasbeenrepaginated. | |||
Changesincontentarereflected bymarginbarsinthemargintotherightofthetext. | |||
ATTACHMENT 2REVISEDQAPD DONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTCOOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITNUMBERS1AND2DOCKETNOS.50-315AND50-316LICENSENOS.DPR-58ANDDPR-74UPDATEDQUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAMDESCRIPTION FORTHECOOKNUCLEARPLANTDECEMBER, 1990Approvedby:AEPSCDirector,- | |||
QualityAssurance Date: | |||
leericaaElectricNeerCeel~lou1AiverseePlazaCo4rnlas. | |||
OH4321$~INCAÃIMCTaCtOWIRSTATBiCBNT OFPOLICYPORTHPDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLhNTQUAL1TYASSURANCB PROGRAMWI.Wltte,Jc.ChairmanoftheBoardandCh+BecutiveOtficerN42231500POUCYAmericanElectricPowerCompany,inc.,recognizes thefundamental importance ofcontrolling thedesign,modification, andoperation ofindianaMichiganPowerCompany's DonaldC.CookNuclearPlane(CookNuctearPlane)byimplementing aplannedanddocumenced QualityAssurance Program,including QualityControl,chatcompileswithapplicable regulacions, codes,andstandards. | |||
TheQualityAssurance Programhasbeenestablished toconcrolactivities affecting safety-related functions ofsrructures, systems,andcomponents intheCookNuciearPlant.TheQualttyAssurance Programsupportschegoalofmaincaining chesafetyandreliability oftheCookNuclearPlantacthehighestlevelthroughasystematic programdesignedtoassurethatsafety-related itemsareconducted incompliance withtheapplicable regulations, codes,standards, andestablished corporate policiesandpractices. | |||
AsChairmanoftheBoardandChiefExecuttve OfftcerofAmericanElectricPowerCompany,inc.,Imaintaintheultimateresponsibility forcheQualtcyAssurance Programassociated withcheCookNuclearPlant.lhavedelegated functional responsibility fortheQualttyAssurance ProgramtotheAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporacton (AEPSC)SeniorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andCdnstruction. | |||
Hehas,withmyapproval, detegated furtherresponsibilities asoutlinedinthisstatement. | |||
IMPLEMENTATIONTheAEPSCDirector-Quality Assurance, underchedirectton ofcheAEPSCSentorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andConstruction, hasbeenassignedtheoverallresponsibility forspecifying theQualityAssurance Programrequirements forcheCookNuclearPlantandverifying theirimplementacion. | |||
TheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andConstrucrion hasgivencheAEPSCDirector-Qualiry Assurance auchoricy tostopwork.onanyactivityaffecting safecy-related itemschatdoesnocRevised6-27-881.7-1December, 1990 0 | |||
Statement ofPolicyfortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantQualityAssurance ProgramPage?meetapplicable administrative, technical, and/orregulatory requirements. | |||
TheAEPSCDirector-Quality hssurance doesnothavetheauthority tostopunitoperations, butshallnotifyappropriate plantand/orcorporate manage-mentofconditions notmeetingtheaforementioned criteriaandrecommend thatunitoperations beterminated. | |||
TheAEPSCVicePresident-Nuclear Operations, underthedirection oftheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andConstruction, hasbeendelegated responsibility foreffectively implementing theQualityAssurance Program.TheAEPSCVicePresident-Nuclear Operations istheManagerofNuclearOperations. | |||
AllotherAEPSCdivisions anddepartments. | |||
exceptQualityAssurance, havingasupporting rolefortheCookNuclearPlantarefunctionally responsible torheManagerofNuclearOperations. | |||
ThePlantManager,underthedirection oftheAEPSCVicePresident-Nuclear Operations, isdelegated theresponsibility forestablishing theCookNuclearPlantQualityControlProgramandimplementing theQualityAssurance ProgramattheCookNuclearPlant.TheAEPSCDirector-Quality Assurance isresponsible forproviding technical direction tothePlantManagerformattersrelatingtotheQualityAssurance ProgramattheCookNuclearPlant.ThehEPSCDirector-Quality Assurance isalsoresponsible formaintaining aQualityAssurance SectionattheCookNuclearPlanttoperformrequiredrevie~s,audits,andsurveillances, andtoprovidetechnical liaisonservicestothePlantManager.Theimplementation oftheQualityAssurance Programisdescribed intheAEPSCGeneralProcedures (GPs)andsubtierdepartment/division procedures, PlantManager's Instructions (PMIs),andsubtlerDepartment Headinstruc-tionsandProcedures, whichintotaldocumenttherequirements forimplementation oftheProgram.EachAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantorganization involvedinactivities affecting safety-related functions ofstructures, systems,andcomponents intheCookNuclearPlanthastheresponsibility toimplement theapplicable policiesandrequirements oftheQualityAssurance Program.Thisrespon-sibilityincludesbeingfamiliarwith,andcomplying with,therequirements oftheapplicable QualityAssurance Programrequirements. | |||
Revised6-27-88Oecember, 1990 Statement otPolicyfortheDonald,C.CookNuclearPlantQualityAssurance Programpage3COMPLIANCE ThAEPSCDirector-Quality Assurance shallmonitorpcornliancewiththeestablished QualityAssurance Program.Auditprogramsshaallbeestablished AEPSCandCookNuclearPlantactivities complywithtoensurethatestablished programrequirements, identifydeficiencies orrnoncomiiances,Pandobtaineffective andtimelycorrective actions.Employees engageinad'ctivities affecting safety-related functions ofstructures, systems,anndcomponents intheCookNuclearPlantwhobelievethattheQualityAssurance Programisnotbeingcompliedwith,orthatadeficiency inqualityexists,shouldnotifytheirsupervisor> | |||
theAEPSCDirector-Quality Assurance, and/orthePlantManager.lfthenotification doesnotintheemployee's opinionreceivepromptorappropriate attention, shouldcontactsuccessively hlghezlevelsofmanagement. | |||
Employees reporting suchconditions shallnotbediscrimaagytnatedainstbcompanies oftheAmericanElectricPowerSystem.Discrimination includesdischarge orotheractionsrelativetocompensation, terms,conditions, orprivileges ofemployment. | |||
V.S.%hite,2r.ChairmanoftheBoardandChiefExecutive OfficerAmericanElectricPowerCompany,inc.Revtsed6-27-881.7-3Oecember, 1990 1,7.1ORGANIZATION 1,7.1.1SCOPE~~~AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation (AEPSC)isresponsible forestablishing andimplementing theQualityAssurance (QA)Programfortheoperational phaseoftheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant(CookNuclearPlant).Althoughauthority fordevelopment andexecution ofvariousportionsoftheprogrammaybedelegated toothers,suchascontractors, agentsorconsultants, AEPSCretainsoverallresponsibility. | |||
AEPSCshallevaluatework'delegated tosuchorganizations. | |||
Evaluations shallbebasedonthestatusofsafetyimportance oftheactivitybeingperformed andshallbeinitiated earlyenoughtoassureeffective qualityassurance duringtheperformance ofthedelegated activity. | |||
ThissectionoftheQualityAssurance ProgramDescription (QAPD)identifies theAEPSCorganizational responsibilities foractivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related nuclearpowerplantstructures, systems,andcomponents, anddescribes theauthority anddutiesassignedtothem.Itaddresses responsibilities forbothattaining qualityobjectives andforthefunctions ofestablishing theQAProgram,andverifying thatactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsareperformed effectively inaccordance withQAProgramrequirements. | |||
1.7.1.2IHPLEHENTAT ION1.7.1.2.1 SourceofAuthoritTheChairmanoftheBoardandChiefExecutive OfficerofAmericanElectricPowerCompany,Inc.(AEP)andAEPSCisresponsible forsafeoperation oftheCookNuclearPlant.Authority andresponsibility foreffectively implementing theQAProgramforplantmodifications, opera-tionsandmaintenance aredelegated throughtheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Engineering andConstruction, totheAEPSCVicePresident | |||
-NuclearOperations (HanagerofNuclearOperations). | |||
1.7-4December, 1990 Intheoperation ofanuclearpowerplantthelicenseeisrequiredtoestablish clearanddirectlinesofresponsibility, authority andaccoun-tability. | |||
Thisrequirement isapplicable totheorganization providing supporttotheplant,aswellastotheplantstaff.TheAEPSCcorporate supportoftheCookNuclearPlantistheresponsibility oftheentireorganization underthedirection oftheManagerofNuclearOperations whomaintains primaryresponsibility fortheCookNuclearPlant'withinthecorporate organization. | |||
TheAEPSCVicePresident | |||
-NuclearOperations istheManagerofNuclearOperations. | |||
AllotherAEPSCdivis'ions anddepartments, otherthanthegualityAssurance | |||
: Division, havingasupporting rolefortheCookNuclearPlantarefunctionally responsible totheManagerofNuclearOperations (reference Figure1.7-1).Inordertofacilitate amorethoroughunderstanding ofthesupportfunctions, someoftheresponsibilities, authorities, andaccountabilities withintheorganization areasfollows:1)Theresponsibilities oftheManagerofNuclearOperations shallbededicated totheareaofCookNuclearPlantoperations andsupport.2)TheManagerofNuclearOperations shallberesponsible for,andhastheauthority todirectallCookNuclearPlantoperational andsupportmatterswithinthecorporation andshallmakeorconcurinallfinaldecisions regarding significant nuclearsafetymatters.3)AEPSCorganization managersresponsible forCookNuclearPlantmattersshallbefamiliarwithactivities withintheirscopeofresponsibility thataffectplantsafetyandreliability. | |||
Theyshallbecognizant ofandsensitive tointernalandexternalfactorsthatmightaffecttheoperations ofCookNuclearPlant.4)AEPSCorganization managersresponsible forCookNuclearPlantmattershaveacommitment toseekandidentifyproblemareas1.7-5December, 1990 | |||
andtakecorrective actiontoeliminate unsafeconditions, ortoimprovetrendsthatwillupgradeplantsafetyandreliability, 5)TheManagerofNuclearOperations shallensurethatCookNuclearPlantpersonnel arenotrequested toperforminappropriate workortasksbycorporate personnel andshallcontrolassignments andrequeststhathavethepotential fordiverting theattention ofthePlantManagerfromtheprimaryresponsibility forsafeandreliableplantoperation. | |||
6)AEPSCdivisionanddepartment managershavingCookNuclearPlantsupportresponsibilities aswellasthePlantManagerandplantorganization managersshallbefamiliarwiththepolicystatements fromhighermanagement concerning nuclearsafetyandoperational priorities. | |||
Theyshallberesponsible forensuringthatactivities undertheirdirection areperformed inaccordance withthesepolicies. | |||
1.7.1.2.2 Resonsibilit forAttaininualitOb'ectives inAEPSCNuclear~~~~0TheAEPChairmanoftheBoardandChiefExecutive Officerhasdelegated thefunctional responsibility ofthegualityAssurance ProgramtotheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Engineering andConstruction. | |||
TheAEPSCDirector-gualityAssurance, underthedirection oftheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Engineering andConstruction, isresponsible forspecifying gAProgramrequirements andverifying theirimplementation. | |||
TheAEPSCVicePresident | |||
-NuclearOperations, underthedirection oftheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Engineering andConstruction, isresponsible foreffectively implementing thegAProgram.1.7-6December;* | |||
1990 ThePlantManager,underthedirection oftheAEPSCVicePresident-NuclearOperations, isresponsible forestablishing CookNuclearPlantgualityControlandimplementing thegAProgramattheCookNuclearPlant.Management/supervisory personnel receivefunctional trainingtothelevelnecessary toplan,coordinate, andadministrate thoseday-to-day verifi-cationactivities ofthegAProgramforwhichtheyareresponsible. | |||
AEPSChasanindependent off-siteNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC)whichhasbeenestablished pursuanttotherequirements oftheTechnical Specifications fortheCookNuclearPlant.ThefunctionoftheNSDRCistooverseetheengineering, design,operation, andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlantbyperforming auditsandindependent reviewsofactivities whicharespecified intheFacilityOperating Licenses. | |||
TheCookNuclearPlanton-sitereviewgroupistheIndianaMichiganPowerCompany(I&M)PlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC).Thiscommittee hasalsobeenestablished pursuanttotherequirements oftheCookNuclearPlantTechnical Specifications. | |||
ThefunctionofthePNSRCistoreviewplantoperations onacontinuing basisandadvisethePlantManageronmattersrelatedtonuclearsafety.1.7.1.2.3CororateOranization AmericanElectricPowerComanAEP,theparentholdingcompany,whollyownsthecommonstockofallAEPSystemsubsidiary (operating) companies. | |||
Themajoroperating companies andgeneration subsidiaries areshowninFigure1.7-2.TheChairmanoftheBoardofAEPistheChairmanoftheBoardofAEPSCandistheChiefExecutive OfficerofAEPSCandalloperating companies. | |||
Theresponsibility forthefunctional management ofthemajoroperating companies isvestedinthePresident ofeachoperating companyreporting totheAEPSCPresident andChiefOperating OfficerwhoreportstotheAEPSCChairmanoftheBoard.1.7-7December, 1990 AmericanElectricPowerServiceCororationTheresponsibility foradministrative andtechnical direction oftheAEPSystemanditsfacilities isdelegated toAEPSC.AEPSCprovidesmanagement andtechnological servicestothevariousAEPSystemcompanies. | |||
0eratin"ComaniesTheoperating facilities oftheAEPSystemareownedandoperatedbytherespective operating companies. | |||
Theresponsibility forexecuting theengineering, design,construction, specialized technical | |||
: training, andcertainoperations supervision isvestedinAEPSCwhileallorpartoftheadministrative functional responsibility isassignedtotheoperating companies. | |||
InthecaseofCookNuclearPlant,IMgeneralofficestaff(headquarters) providespublicaffairs,accounting, industrial safetydirection andprocurement support.TheCookNuclearPlantisownedandoperatedbyI&HwhichispartoftheAEPSystem.1.7.1.2.4ualitAssurance Resonsibilit ofAEPSC1)AEPSCprovidesthetechnical direction fortheCookNuclearPlant,andassuchmakesthefinaldecisions pertinent tosafety-related changesinplantdesign.Further,AEPSCreviewsNuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC)letters,bulletins, notices,etc.,forimpactonplantdesign,andtheneedfordesignchangesormodifications. | |||
2)AEPSCfurnishes qualityassurance, engineering, design,construction, licensing, NRCcorrespondence, fuelmanagement andradiological supportactivities. | |||
: December, 1990 3)AEPSCprovidesadditional serviceinmatterssuchassupplierqualification, procurement oforiginalequipment andreplacement partsandtheprocessofdedicating commercial gradeitemsorservicestosafety-related applications. | |||
4)TheAEPSCgADivisionprovidestechnical direction inqualityassurance matterstoAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPlant,andoverseestheadequacy, effectiveness andimplementation ofthegAProgramthroughreviewandauditactivities. | |||
5)Cognizant Engineer-(e.g.,SystemEngineer, Equipment | |||
: Engineer, LeadEngineer, Responsible | |||
: Engineer, etc.)-Thecognizant | |||
: engineer, and/orengineerwiththeothertitlesnoted,isthatAEPSCindividual whoprovidestheengineering/design expertise foraparticular areaofresponsibility. | |||
Thisresponsibility includestheimplementation ofthequalityassurance andqualitycontrolmeasuresforsystems,equipment, structures, orfunctional areasincludedinthatindividual's responsibility. | |||
Thevarioustitlesusedfortheidentification ofanindividual'.s responsibility andassignment shallbeunderstood tomeanthesameascognizant engineerintherespective areasofresponsibility. | |||
ualitAssurance Resonsibilit ofI&M-CookNuclearPlantISM'sCookNuclearPlantstaffoperatestheCookNuclearPlantinaccordance withlicensing requirements, including theTechnical Specifications andsuchothercommitments asestablished bytheoperating licenses. | |||
ThePlantManagerInstruction (PMI)systemand'subtierinstructions andprocedures describethemeansbywhichcompliance isachievedandresponsibilities areassigned, including interfaces withAEPSC.Figure1.7-3indicates theorganizational relationships withintheAEPSystempertaining totheoperation andsupportoftheCookNuclearPlant.December, 1990 s1.7.1.2.5Oranization AEPSCTheChairmanoftheBoardandChiefExecutive Officerisultimately responsible fortheQAProgramassociated withtheCookNuclearPlant.Thisresponsibility hasbeenfunctionally delegated totheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Engineering andConstruction. | |||
TheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Engineering andConstruction hasfurtherdelegated responsibilities whichareadministered throughthefollowing divisionanddepartment management personnel: | |||
AEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance AEPSCVicePresident | |||
-NuclearOperations AEPSCSeniorVicePresident andChiefEngineerAEPSCVicePresident ProjectManagement andConstruction ualitAssurance DivisionTheAEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance, reporting totheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Engineering andConstruction, isresponsible fortheQualityAssurance Division(QAD).TheQADconsistsoftheFollowing sections(Figure1.7-4):QualityAssurance Engineering SectionNuclearSoftwareQualityAssurance SectionAuditsandProcurement SectionQualityAssurance SupportSectionQualityAssurance Section(Site)TheQADisorganizationally independent andisresponsible toperformthefollowing: | |||
SpecifyQAProgramrequirements. | |||
Identifyqualityproblems. | |||
: Initiate, recommend, orprovidesolutions throughdesignated channels. | |||
Verifyimplementation ofsolutions, asappropriate. | |||
Prepare,issueandmaintainQAProgramdocuments, asrequired. | |||
Verifytheimplementation oftheQAProgram.throughscheduled auditsandsurveillances. | |||
1.7-10December, 1990 Verifytheimplementation ofcomputersoftwarequalityassurance throughreviews,surveillances andaudits.Auditengineering, design,procurement, construction andoperational documents forincorporation of,andcompliance withapplicable qualityassurance requirements to.theextentspecified bytheAEPSCmanagement approvedgAProgram.OrganizeandconductthegAauditororientation, | |||
: training, certification andqualification ofAEPSCauditpersonnel. | |||
Providedirection forthecollection, storage,maintenance, andretention ofqualityassurance records.Maintain, ondatabase,alistofsuppliers ofnuclear(N)itemsandservices, plusotherselectedcategories ofsuppliers. | |||
Identifynoncompliances oftheestablished gAProgramtotherespon-sibleorgan'izations forcorrective actionsandreportsignificant occurrences thatjeopardize qualitytoseniorAEPSCmanagement | |||
.Followuponcorrective actionsidentified bygAduringandafterdisposition implementation. | |||
Reviewthedisposition ofconditions adversetoqualitytoassurethatactiontakenwillprecluderecurrence. | |||
Conductin-process gAsurveillance atsupplier's facilities, asrequired. | |||
AssistandadviseotherAEP/AEPSC groupsinmattersrelatedtothegAProgram.ConductauditsasdirectedbytheNSDRC.ReviewAEPSCinvestigated ProblemReportsandassociated corrective andpreventative actionrecommendations. | |||
Haintaincognizance ofindustryandgovernmental qualityassurance requirements suchthatthegAProgramiscompatible withrequirements, asnecessary. | |||
Recommend forrevisionto,orimprovements intheestablished gAProgramtoseniorAEPSCmanagement. | |||
Auditdedication plansforcommercial gradeitemsandservices. | |||
IIssue"StopWork"orderswhensignificant conditions adversetosafety-related itemsareidentified topreventunsafeconditions fromoccurring and/orcontinuing. | |||
: December, 1990 ProvideAEPSCmanagement withperiodicreportsconcerning thestatus,adequacyandimplementation ofthegAProgram.Prepareandconductspecialverification and/orsurveillance programsonin-houseactivities, asrequiredorrequested. | |||
Routinely attendandparticipate indailyplantworkscheduleandstatusmeetings. | |||
ProvideadequategAcoveragerelativetoprocedural andinspection | |||
: controls, acceptance | |||
: criteria, andgAstaffingandqualification ofpersonnel tocarryoutgAassignments. | |||
Establish andmaintainacentralfileforequipment environmental qualification documentation. | |||
Amlification ofSecificResonsibilities ualification oftheAEPSCDirector-ualitAssurance TheAEPSCDirector-gualityAssurance shallpossessthefollowing positionrequirements: | |||
Bachelor's degreeinengineering, scientific orrelateddiscipline. | |||
Ten(10)yearsexperience inoneoracombination ofthefollowing areas:engineering, design,construction, operations, maintenance offossilornuclearpowergene-rationfacilities orutilityfacilities gA,ofwhichatleastfour(4)yearsmustbeexperience innuclearqualityassurance relatedactivities. | |||
Knowledge ofgAregulations, | |||
: policies, practices andstandards. | |||
Thesameorhigherorganization reporting levelasthehighestlinemanagerdirectlyresponsible forperforming activities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemssuchasengineering, procurement, construction andoperat'ion, andissufficiently independent fromcostandschedule. | |||
Effective communication channelswithotherseniormanage-mentpositions. | |||
Responsibility forapprovalofgAHanual(s). | |||
: December, 1990 | |||
Performance ofnootherdutiesorresponsibili'ties unre-latedtoQAthatwouldpreventfullattention toQAmatters'Et flkadTheAEPSCQADisresponsible forensuringthatactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsareperformed inamannerthatmeetsapplicable administrative, technical, andregulatory requirements. | |||
Inordertocarryoutthisrespon-sibility, theAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andConstruction hasgiventheAEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance, theauthority tostopworkonanyactivityaffecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsthatdoesnotmeettheaforementioned requirements. | |||
Stopworkauthority hasbeenfurtherdelegated bytheAEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance totheAEPSCQualityAssurance Superintendent (site).TheAEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance andtheAEPSCQualityAssurance Superintendent donothavetheauthority tostopunitoperations, butwillnotifyappropriate CookNuclearPlantand/orcorporate management ofconditions whichdonotmeettheaforementioned | |||
: criteria, andrecommend thatunitoperations beterminated. | |||
AOrientation Traininuglification andCertification Procrrama)AEPSCQAshallberesponsible forestablishing, maintaining andmakingavailable toAEPSCmanagement ageneralQAorientation andtrainingprogramforAEPSCpersonnel engagedinactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items.ThisprogramincludestheAEPSCQAphilosophy andanyspecificprogramsasmayberequiredbyfacilityorregulatory requirements. | |||
: December, 1990 | |||
b) | b)AEPSChasestablished andmaintains agAauditortrainingandcertification programforallAEPSCgAauditors. | ||
ProblemIdentification ReortinandEscalation AEPSChasestablished mechanisms fortheidentification, reporting andescalation ofproblemsaffecting thequalityofsafety-related itemstoalevelofmanagement wherebysatisfactory resolutions canbeobtained. | |||
Nuclear0erationsDivisionTheAEPSCVicePresident | |||
-NuclearOperations (ManagerofNuclearOper-ations),reporting totheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andConstruction, isresponsible fortheNuclearOperations Division(NOD).Reporting totheAEPSCVicePresident | |||
-NuclearOperations arethefollowing: | |||
PlantManagerAssistant DivisionManager-NuclearEngineering (notcharted)Assistant DivisionManager-NuclearOperations (notcharted)Consulting Engineer(s) | |||
(notcharted)Licensing Consultant (notcharted). | |||
Theorganization andresponsibilities ofthePlantManageraredefinedfurtherwithinthissectionunder1.7.1.2.6Oranization CookNuclear~Plant.TheAEPSCAssistant DivisionManager'- | |||
NuclearEngineering isresponsible fortwoofthefoursectionswithintheNOD,asfollows(notcharted): | |||
NuclearSafetyandLicensing (NSSL)SectionNuclearFuelandAnalyses(NFM)SectionTheAEPSCAssistant DivisionManager-NuclearOperations isresponsible fortheremaining twosections, asfollows(notcharted): | |||
NuclearOperations Support(NOS)SectionNuclearMaintenance Support(NMS)Section1.7-14December, 1990 | |||
Radiological Support(RS)SectionNODisresponsible forthefollowing: | |||
Formulate policiesandpractices relativetosafety,licensing, operation, maintenance, fuelmanagement, andradiological support.ProvidethePlantManagerwiththetechnical andmanagerial | |||
: guidance, direction andsupporttoensurethesafeoperation oftheplant.Pr'ovidedirection toallotherAEPSCengineering anddesignorganizations onengineering anddesignmatterspertaining totheCookNuclearPlant.MaintainliaisonwiththeAEPSCDirector-gualityAssurance. | |||
Implement therequirements oftheAEPSCgAProgram.Maintainknowledge ofthelatestsafety,licensing, andregulatory requirements, codes,standards andfederalregulations applicable totheoperation ofCookNuclearPlant.Accomplish theprocurement, | |||
: economic, technical, licensing andqualityassurance activities dealingwiththereactorcoreanditsrelatedfuelassemblies andcomponents. | |||
Preparebidspecifications, evaluatebids,andnegotiate andadmini-stercontracts fortheprocurement ofallnuclearfuelandrelatedcomponents andservices.'aintain aspecialnuclearmaterialaccountability system.Provideanalysestosupportnuclearsteamsupplysystemoperation including reactorphysics,fueleconomics, fuelmechanical | |||
: behavior, corethermalhydraulic andLOCAandnon-LOCAtransient safetyanaly-sisandotheranalysisactivities asrequested, furnishplantTechnical Specification changesandotherlicensing work,andparticipate inNRCandNSDRCmeetingsasrequiredbytheseanalyses. | |||
Performreactorcoreoperation follow-up activities andotherreactorcoretechnical supportactivities asrequested, andarrangeforsupportfromthefuelfabricator whenneeded.Contractfor,andprovidetechnical supportfor,disposalofbothhighlevelandlowlevelradioactive waste.Coordinate thedevelopment ofneutronics andthermalhydraulic safetycodesandconductsafetyanalyses. | |||
1.7-15December, 1990 ConductstudiesoftheCookNuclearPlantlicensing basestodetermine theoptimalchangestosupportunitoperations atalowerprimarypressureandtemperature. | |||
Coordinate NODcomputercodedevelopment andprovidetheinterface controlforNODwiththeAEPSCInformation SystemDepartment andCookNuclearPlant.ObtainandmaintaintheNRCOperating LicenseandTechnical Specifications fortheCookNuclearPlant.Actasthecommunication linkbetweentheNRC,AEPSC,andtheplantstaff.Performandcoordinate effortsinvolvedingathering information, performing calculations andgenericstudies,preparing | |||
: criteria, reports,andresponses, reviewing itemsaffecting safety,andinterpreting regulations. | |||
Review,coordinate, andresolveallmatterspertaining tonuclearsafetybetweenCookNuclearPlantandAEPSC.Thisincludes, butisnotlimitedto:thereviewofcertainplantdesignchangestoensurethattherequirements of10CFR50.59 aremet;thepreparation ofsafetyevaluations orreviewsforanydesignated subject;thepreparation ofchangesto,andappropriate interpretation of,theplantTechnical Specification submittals oflicenseamendments; andtheanalysisofplantcompliance withregulatory requirements. | |||
Primarycorporate contactformostoralandwrittencommunication withtheNRC.Providesupportinkeyareasofexpertise suchasnuclearengi-neering,probabilistic | |||
: analysis, thermohydraulic | |||
: analysis, chemicalengineering, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, andtechnical writing.Interface withvendorsandotheroutsideorganizations onmattersconnected withthenuclearsteamsupplysystemandotherareasaffecting thesafedesignandoperation ofnuclearplants.Participate asappropriate inthereviewofnuclearplantoperating experiences, andrelatethoseexperiences tothedesignandsafeoperation ofCookNuclearPlant.Review,evaluate, andrespondtoNRCrequestsforinformation andNRCnotifications ofregulatory changesresulting inplantmodifica-1.7-16December, 1990 tionsornewfacilities. | |||
Suchresponses aregenerated inaccordance withappropriate AEPSCAdministrative Procedures. | |||
Develop,specify,and/orreviewconceptual nuclearsafetycriteriaforCookNuclearPlant,inaccordance withestablished regulations, Thisincludesallinformation contained intheFSAR,aswellasspecialized information suchasenvironmental qualification andseismiccriteria. | |||
Reviewandevaluateperformance requirements forsystems,equipment andmaterials forcompliance withspecified safetycriteria. | |||
Review,onaconceptual basis,plantreportsandproposedplantsafety-related designchanges,totheextentthattheyarerelatedtotheultimatesafeoperation oftheplant,forcompliance withsafetyregulations, plantTechnical Specifications, theFSARdesignbasis,andwithanyotherrequirements undertheOperating Licenseandtodetermine ifthereareanyunreviewed safetyquestions asdefinedinIOCFR50.59. | |||
PerformreviewsofProblemReportsand10CFR21reviewsinaccordance withcorporate requirements. | |||
OperatetheActionItemTrackingSystem(AIT)forAEPSCinternalcommitment tracking. | |||
Coordinate designchangesfortheCookNuclearPlantactingasafocalpointwithinAEPSC.Thisprogramprimarily involvesprojectmanagement responsibilities forscheduling | |||
'andimplementing RequestforChanges(RFCs)andincludesextensive interfacing withengineer-ing,design,construction, andCookNuclearPlant.Provideworkinglevelcoordination withtheInstitute ofNuclearPowerOperations (INPO).Thiseffortincludesproviding AEPSCaccesstoINPOresources suchasNUCLEARNETWORKandNuclearPlantReliability DataSystem(NPRDS),andeffectively integrating AEPSCandCookNuclearPlanteffortstowardsutilizing INPOrecommendations contained inoperating experience reportstoimproveCookNuclearPlantperformance. | |||
Coordinate dailycommunication withtheCookNuclearPlant,provideAEPSCmanagement withadailyplantstatusreport,andmakepresentations toseniormanagement atregularly scheduled construction staffmeetings. | |||
1.7-17December, 1990 | |||
Processincomingvendorinformation. | Processincomingvendorinformation. | ||
Coordinate operations withinAEPSCthatsupporttheCookNuclearPlantFacilityDataBase(FOB).Contributing totheannualFSARupdatesthroughreviewsofLicenseeEventReports,designchangesandtheAnnualOperating Report.Radiological, emergency andsecurityplanning. | |||
Corporate supportoftheCookNuclearPlant'sradiation protection andhealthphysicsprogram,technical serviceandadviceontheradiological aspectsofdesignchanges,modifications orcapitalimprovements, theALARAprogram,theradiation monitoring system,theenvironmental radiological monitoring andsamplingprogram,doseandshielding | |||
: analysis, radiochemistry review,andmeteorological monitoring. | |||
CookNuclearPlantandcorporate emergency planningincluding procedure development, exercisescheduling, facilityprocurement andmaintenance, andtheliaisonwithoff-siteemergency planninggroupssuchasFEMAandtheHichiganStatePolice.Reviewfederalcodesandregulations astheyrelatetothedevelopment, implementation, revisionanddistribution oftheHodifiedAmendedSecurityPlan(HASP).Interface withtheplant'ssecuritydepartment providing supportforthesecurityplan,reviewing securityfacilities, maintaining securitydocumentfiles,anddeveloping theemployeefitnessforduty/background screening program.ProvideNuclearGeneralEmployeeTraining(NGET)forAEPSCpersonnel' Participate onALARAsubcommittees. | |||
Prepareresponses totheNRConradiological, emergency planningandsecurityissues.Serveastechnical advisorsonplantaudits.Remaincognizant ofcurrentdecommissioning practices anddevelopments. | |||
AEPSCEnineerinandDesinTheAEPSCSeniorVicePresident andChiefEngineer, reporting totheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Engineering andConstruction, is1.7-18December, 1990 responsible forcertainengineering anddesignfunctions throughtheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident | |||
-CivilEngineering, theAEPSCAssistant VicePresident | |||
-DesignandtheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident | |||
-NuclearEngineering. | |||
CivilEnineerinDeartmentTheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident | |||
-CivilEngineering, reporting totheAEPSCSeniorVicePresident andChiefEngineer, isresponsible fortheCivilEngineering Department. | |||
Therearetwo(2)GroupManagers(notcharted)reporting totheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident | |||
-CivilEngineering whoareresponsible forthevarioussectionsasfollows(notcharted): | |||
AEPSCGroupManagerStructural Engineering SectionCivilEngineering Laboratory SectionGeotechnical Engineering SectionAEPSCGroupManagerMaterials HandlingSectionTheCivilEngineering Department (CED)isresponsible forthefollowing: | |||
Makerecommendations andassistintheformulation ofpoliciesandpractices relatingtothedesignandengineering ofofficeandservicebuildings, miscellaneous structures andmaterialhandlingequipment, andprovidethegeneralsupervision oftheengineering ofsuchfacilities, structures andequipment. | |||
Reviewtheactivities ofequipment, facilities, buildings andotherstructures attheCookNuclearPlantandapprove,asrequired, alldesignchangesandmodifications including thepreparation ofspecifications, procurement ofequipment andmodifications toequipment. | |||
Providetraininganddevelopment programsnecessary forpersonnel ofthedepartment, (including thecompany's safetyandhealthprogram), | |||
whichareconsistent withthewrittenpoliciesofAEPSC.1.7-19December, 1990 Preparedesigncriteria, engineering standards, conceptual layouts,studiesandprocedures inconjunction withequipment, facilities, buildings andotherstructures attheCookNuclearPlant.Identifycriticalengineering anddesigninputandensurethatappropriate analysisandreviewsareconducted. | |||
Prepare,reviewandapprovespecifications, | |||
: sketches, drawings, designverifications andcalculations, asrequired. | |||
Provideinput-forspecialstudiesandreportswhichmayberequested byotherorganizations orgovernmental agenciessuchastheNRC.Initiateand/orreview,approveandcontrollaboratory andfieldinvestigations andfeasibility studies.Prepareandreviewimprovement requisitions forcapitalandleaseexpenditures. | |||
Reviewandevaluateproposals andmakerecommendations fortheawardofpurchaseordersandcontracts. | |||
Prepareandadminister equipment, laborandservicecontracts. | |||
Providetechnical guidancewhenrequested insupportofactivities attheCookNuclearPlantundertheOepartment's responsibilities. | |||
Prepareandapprovedesignchangespertaining toCookNuclearPlantinaccordance withtheGPs.Arrangeforoutsideengineering andconsulting assistance asrequired. | |||
Arbitrate disputeswhicharisebetweenconstruction forcesandoutsidesuppliers ofmaterials andservices. | |||
Coordinate consultant's reportswithotherinterfacing engineering organizations. | |||
Performshopandfieldinspections onequipment beingfabricated orinstalled whichiswithinthescopeofthedepartment's responsibility. | |||
Approveinvoicesforoutsideservices. | |||
ProvidefieldservicestotheCookNuclearPlantincluding theassigning ofpersonnel asarerequiredduringconstruction, normaloremergency outages,orasrequested. | |||
Assistintheplanningandexecution ofmaintenance workonequipment, facilities, buildings andotherstructures. | |||
1.7-20Oecember, 1990 Supervise maintenance andrepairsofallmasonryandconcreteworkatCookNuclearPlant,including supplying trainedinspection personnel. | |||
Directtestingofmaterials usedinconcreteandtestingofsoilstobeusedinworkattheCookNuclearPlant.Reviewandrecommend concretemixformulations forallnewconstruction. | |||
Preparesitestudies.Implement acorrective actionsystem,withregardtoallactivities ofthedepartment affecting qualityofsafety-related items,thatwillcontrolanddocumentallitems,servicesoractivities whichdonotconformtorequirements. | |||
Directthereviewof,andresponseto,assignedcorrective actions.Assistinthepreparation ofapplications forfederal,stateandlocalpermitsrelativetoinstallations'eing madewhichrequiresuchpermits.Conductperiodicmanagement reviewsoftheactivities ofthedepartment toensurecompliance withtheobjectives ofthegAProgram,andexternaltechnical surveillance, asnecessary, ofconsultants, outsideorganizations andvendorsoverwhichthedepartment iscognizant. | |||
Establish andmaintainapermanent fileforgArecords.DesinDeartmentTheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident | |||
-Design,reporting totheAEPSCSeniorVicePresident andChiefEngineerisresponsible fortheDesignDepartment. | |||
TheGroupManagers(notcharted)reporting totheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident | |||
-Designwhoisresponsible fortheNuclearDesignsectionsasfollows(notcharted): | |||
AEPSCGroupManager-Nuclear.DesignElectrical DesignNuclearSectionMechanical DesignNuclearSectionStructural andAnalytical DesignNuclearSectionCookNuclearPlant(Site)DesignSectionDecember, 1990 Additional supportisprovidedfromtheothersectionsoftheDesignDepartment whenrequired. | |||
TheControlServicessectionadministratively reportstoanotherDesignDepartment GroupManager(notcharted)buttakesfunctional direction inmatterspertaining toCookNuclearPlantfromtheGroupManager-NuclearDesign.TheDesignDepartment isresponsible forthefollowing: | |||
Develop,reviewandapprovedesignsanddrawingsformechanical, electrical andstructural systems,equipment andfacilities oftheCookNuclearPlant.Initiate, develop,approveandmaintaindesignprocedures, specifications, standards, criteriaandguidelines. | |||
Performrequiredcalculations andanalysesincluding pipestress,pipesupportdesign,cablesizing,conduitandcabletraysupportandstructural steelandconcrete. | |||
Initiateanddevelopdesignchangesintheareasofresponsibility oftheDesignDepartment. | |||
ProvideNRCresponses asrequired. | |||
Assistfieldpersonnel intheresolution ofproblemsstemmingfromtheinstallation ofdesignchangesorfromas-foundplantconditions, including assigning designpersonnel tothefield.Assignmembership totheNSDRCandSubcommittee onProposedChanges,participating inmatterscoveredinthecharter.Participate intheevaluation andremedyofanysituation requiring activation oftheemergency responseorganization including resourceallocation. | |||
Formulate, administer, andimplement policiesandpractices relatingtothedesignoftheCookNuclearPlant.Directthedevelopment, maintenance, procedural reviewandimplemen-tationbywhichtheDesignDepartment adherestothegAProgramelementsasestablished byAEPSCGeneralProcedures. | |||
Conductfunctions ofthedepartment soastobeinconformance withtheoperating licensesoftheCookNuclearPlant.1.7-22December, 1990 Investigate andevaluateproblems. | |||
Coordinate specialprojectsandstudies,asrequired. | |||
Establish andmaintainfilesofdesigndocuments forrecordpurposes, Coordinate the-development. | |||
andmaintenance ofthecomputerized DesignDrawingControl(DDC)andtheVendorDrawingControl(VDC)programswhichincludecoordinating theprogramswithinterfacing divisions/departments. | |||
Controltheissuanceanddistribution ofdrawingsfortheCookNuclearPlant,including monitoring oftheApertureCardMicrofilm Program.Supervise andcontroltheworkofconsultants, Architect/Engineers andoutsidedesignagenciessupplying servicestoAEPSCintheirdiscipline andprocessnotification ofdefectsinaccordance withcompanyrequirements. | |||
Alsoperformdetailedreviewsofdesignworksubmitted byoutsideagencies. | |||
Provideinputtothelistofmajorapprovedmaterials andmaintaincurrentspecifications usedwithinthegroup'sscopeofresponsibility. | |||
Provideengineering anddesignsupporttoNOD.Reviewandupdateapplicable sectionsofCookNuclearPlantFSARasassigned. | |||
Participate oncommittees thatreviewnuclearactivities asmemberswhenassigned. | |||
Coordinate andresolvedesigncommentsmadebyinterfacing departments/divisions. | |||
Prepare,review,approveandadminister designspecifications andpurchasedocuments fordesignservicesand/ormaterials. | |||
NuclearEnineerinDeartmentTheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident | |||
-NuclearEngineering, reporting totheAEPSCSeniorVicePresident andChiefEngineer, isresponsible fortheNuclearEngineering Department. | |||
Reporting totheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident | |||
-NuclearEngineering arethefollowing: | |||
1.7-23December, 1990 AEPSCDivisionManager-NuclearPlantEngineering (notcharted)AEPSCDivisionManager-Electrical Systems(notcharted)TheAEPSCDivisionManager-NuclearPlantEngineering isresponsible forthefollowing (notcharted): | |||
AEPSCGroupManager-Mechanical SystemsTechnical SupportSectionFurther,theAEPSCGroupManager-Mechanical Systemsisresponsible forthefollowing (notcharted): | |||
ChemicalEngineering andPerformance SectionHeatExchangers, Pumps,andTurbinesSectionPiping,Valves,HVAC,an'dFireProtection SectionTheAEPSCDivisionManager-Electrical Systemsisresponsible forthefollowing (notcharted): | |||
Instrumentation andControlsSectionPowerSystemsandHumanFactorsSectionTheNuclearEngineering Department (NED)isresponsible forthefollowing: | |||
Provideplanningandengineering, inconjunction withotherspecialists, | |||
: sections, anddivisions, electrical facilities insideCookNuclearPlantuptothehighvoltage(HV)bushingsofthemaingenerator transformers andmechanical facilities insideCookNuclearPlantincluding: | |||
determination ofgenerallayoutanddesign;selection ofequipment; preparation ofone-lineandflowdiagrams; and,coordination ofinsideandoutsideplantfacilities. | |||
1.7-24December, 1990 0 | |||
Provideengineering anddesignofallcontrolsforoperation andprotection ofsteamgenerator, turbinegenerator, andauxiliary equipment andgeneralplantprotection, including checkingandapproving elementary, one-line, andflowdrawings. | |||
Interface withotherorganizations toensurethatallpurchased equipment conformstoacceptedstandards andfulfillsthedesiredfunction. | |||
Closelyfollowing manufacturer's engineering anddesignprocesses toassureprovision ofadequateandreliableequipment uponwhichdependthesafety,reliability, economy,andperformance oftheunitandplant.Preparecost.estimates andimprovement requisitions forplantfacilities, including reviewofimprovement requisitions andcostestimates preparedbyothers.Prepareand/orapprovespecifications andpurchaserequisitions, andperforming drawingreviewofequipment, asappropriate. | |||
Reviewandapproveprocedures, correspondence, requestsfordesignchangesormodifications asappropriate. | |||
Obtainreviewandperformengineering evaluations including environmental equipment qualification (Eg).Performcalculations forproperapplication ofequipment. | |||
Performandevaluateeconomicstudies,investigations, analysesandreportsforfacilities pertaining tothedesign,operation andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlant.Assistfieldpersonnel ininstallation, start-up, andsubsequent locatingofproblemsinequipment andindetermining properoperation ofequipment duringnormalorafteremergency operations. | |||
Haintainaconstantawareness forimprovements andmorereliabledesignofequipment andfacilities, maintenance andoperating methodsorprocedures. | |||
Haintainaconstantawareness ofactivities toensurecompliance withallapplicable policiesandprocedures initiating, whenrequired, trainingorretraining programs. | |||
Participate, asassigned, ontheNSDRCandNSDRCsubcommittees, participating inmatterscoveredinthecommittee's charter.Provideresponses toNRCcorrespondence asrequired. | |||
1.7-25December, 1990 0 | |||
Participate intheevaluation andremedyofanysituation requiring activation oftheemergency responseorganization. | |||
Providetechnical engineering supportinareasofoperation andmaintenance, including: | |||
theInservice Inspection (ISI)Program;theQAProgram;theFireProtection QAProgram;theAEPALARAProgramcoveringradiation protection; and,thecorporate andplantIndustrial Safetyprogram.Provideengineering supporttotheAEPSCNOD.Providetechnical direction andassistance totheAEPSCDesignDivisioninthelayoutandarrangement ofequipment piping,systems,controls, etc.,forthedevelopment ofdrawings. | |||
Initiateanddevelopdesignchangesinareasofresponsibility oftheNED.DevelopSystemDescriptions. | |||
Providesupportpersonnel fortheemergency responseorganization. | |||
Provideanalytical supportinengineering disciplines (e.g.,heattransfer, thermodynamics, fluiddynamics). | |||
Provideengineering evaluations fo}PRs,LERs,INPOSOERs,andNRCBulletins. | |||
Participate, asassigned,'on theAEPSCProblemAssessment Group(PAG).Pro'ectManaementandConstruction DeartmentTheAEPSCVicePresident | |||
-ProjectManagement andConstruction, reporting totheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Engineering andConstruction, isresponsible fortheProjectManagement andConstruction Department. | |||
Reporting totheAEPSCVicePresident | |||
-ProjectManagement andConstruction arethefollowing: | |||
SiteConstruction Managerreporting administratively totheAEPSCVicePresident | |||
-ProjectManagement andConstruction andfunctionally totheCookNuclearPlant,PlantManager.Reporting totheSiteConstruction Managerare:1.7-26December, 1990 | |||
-Construction Chief-Electrical | |||
-Construction Chief-Hechanical | |||
-Construction Chief-Civil-Construction SafetySupervisor | |||
-Construction Contracting | |||
-'ompliance AuditorLaborRelations Director-Construction HumanResources Supervisor | |||
-Construction ProjectHanager(asrequired) | |||
TheProjectHanagement andConstruction Department isresponsible forthefollowing: | |||
Administering andimplementing construction jobordersissuedbytheCookNuclearPlantOrganization formajormodifications, replacement andmaintenance workwithoutsidecontractors. | |||
Administering andmonitoring contractor's industrial safetyprogramsandperformance. | |||
Administering humanresources functions forsiteconstruction organization. | |||
Hanagingconstruction laborrelations withtheInternational BuildingandConstruction TradesUnions.Scoping,bidding,recommending awardsandadministering construction laborandservicescontracts. | |||
: Planning, organizing andcontrolling majorconstruction projectsasassignedbytheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Engineering andConstruction. | |||
Haintaining cognizance onmatterspertaining totheCookNuclearPlantandcorporate emergency responseorganization. | |||
Preparation ofconstruction laborestimates. | |||
Providing constructability guidancewhenrequested insupportofengineering anddesignchanges.1.7-27December, 1990 0 | |||
Purchasin andStoresDeartment(notcharted)TheAEPSCExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Operations, reporting totheAEPSCPresident andChiefOperating Officer,isresponsible forthePurchasing andStoresDepartment throughtheAEPSCVicePresident | |||
-Purchasing andHaterials Hanagement. | |||
ThePurchasing andStoresDepartment isresponsible forthefollowing: | |||
Procurement of"N"itemsfromonlyqualified andapprovedsuppliers. | |||
Provideorderingandstockingdescriptions of"N"itemsandincludethesedescriptions intheCookNuclearPlantinventory catalogincluding necessary communications withsuppliers, cognizant engineers, theCookNuclearPlantStoresSupervisor andotherappropriate personnel. | |||
Coordinate procurement activities withAEPSCNuclearOperations, AEPSCengineering anddesigndivisions/departments, I&HPurchasing Department, theAEPSCgADandCookNuclearPlantpersonnel. | |||
Prepareandissuerequestsforquotations, contracts, serviceordersandpurchaseordersfor"N"items.Establish asystemtoimplement corrective actionasdescribed intheAEPSCGeneralProcedures fortheCookNuclearPlant.Establish asystemofdocumentkeeping,andtransmittal. | |||
Establish asystemofdocumentcontrolforcontrolled procedures, instructions, andpurchasing documents for"N"items.Conducttrainingsessionsinvolving purchasing personnel andothersonanannualbasisormorefrequently, asrequired, andascertain thattrainingsessionsincludecompleteresponsibilities associated withthepurchaseofsafety-related items.Notifysuppliers oftheirstatusregarding theiracceptability toprovideitemsorservicestoCookNuclearPlant.NotifytheIKHPurchasing Department andtheCookNuclearPlantStoresSupervisor ofchangestosupplierqualifications toprovideitemsorservices. | |||
1.7-28December, 1990 1.7.1.2.6Oranization CookNuclearPlantThePlantManagerreportsfunctionally andadministratively totheAEPSCVicePresident | |||
-NuclearOperations (ManagerofNuclearOperations) andisresponsible fortheCookNuclearPlantactivities. | |||
Reporting tothePlantManagerarethefollowing (Figure1.7-5):Assistant PlantManager-Production Assistant PlantManager-Technical SupportAssistant PlantManager-ProjectsLicensing ActivityCoordinator SafetyandAssessment Superintendent Radiation Protection Manager(reportsfunctionally tothePlantManager)NuclearSecurityManager(reportsfunctionally tothePlantManager)TheCookNuclearPlantorganization, underthePlantManagerisresponsible forthefollowing: | |||
Ensurethesafetyofallfacilityemployees andthegeneralpublicrelativetogeneralplantsafety,aswellasradiological safetybymaintaining strictcompliance withplantTechnical Specifications, procedures andinstructions. | |||
Recommend facilityengineering modification andinitiateandapproveplantimprovement requisitions. | |||
Ensurethatworkpractices inallplantdepartments areconsistent withregulatory standards, safety,approvedprocedures, andplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
Providemembership, asrequired, onthePNSRC.Maintaincloseworkingrelationships withtheNRCaswellaslocal,state,andfederalgovernment regulating officials regarding condi-tionswhichcouldaffect,orareaffectedbyCookNuclearPlantactivities. | |||
Setupplantloadschedules andarrangeforequipment outages.Developandefficiently implement allsitecentralized trainingactivities. | |||
1.7-29December, 1990 Administer thecentralized facilitytrainingcomplex,simulator, andprogramsensuringthatprogramdevelopment isconsistent withthesystematic approachtotraining, maintainINPOaccreditations, regulatory andcorporate requirements. | |||
Ensurethathumanresourceactivities includeemployeesupportprograms(i.e.,fitnessforduty)consistent withINPO/NUHARC guidelines, companypolicies, andregulatory requirements andstandards. | |||
Administer theNRCapprovedphysicalSecurityProgramincompliance withregulatory standards, ModifiedAmendedSecurityPlan(HASP),andcompanypolicy.Supervise, plan,anddirecttheactivit'ies relatedtothemaintenance andinstallation ofallCookNuclearPlantequipment, structures, grounds,andyards.Prepareandmaintainrecordsandreportspertinent toequipment maintenance andregulatory agencyrequirements. | |||
Administer contracts andscheduleoutsidecontractors'ork forces.Enforceandcoordinate CookNuclearPlantregulations, procedures, | |||
: policies, andobjectives toassuresafety,efficiency, andcontinuity intheoperation oftheCookNuclearPlantwithinthelimitsoftheoperating licenseandtheTechnical Specifications andformulation ofrelatedpoliciesandprocedures. | |||
Plan,schedule, anddirecttheactivities relatingtotheoperationoftheCookNuclearPlantandassociated switchyards; cooperate inplanningandscheduling of'orkandprocedures forrefueling andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlant;directandcoordinate fuelloadingoperations. | |||
Reviewreportsandrecordsanddirectgeneralinspection'f operating conditions ofplantequipment andinvestigate anyabnormalconditions, makingrecommendations forrepairs.Establish andadminister equipment clearance procedures consistent withcompany,plant,andradiation protection standards; authorize andarrangeforequipment outagestomeetnormaloremergency conditions. | |||
Providetheshiftoperating crewswithappropriate procedures andinstructions toassisttheminoperating theCookNuclearPlantsafelyandefficiently. | |||
1.7-30December, 1990 Approveoperatortrainingprogramsadministered bytheCookNuclearPlantTrainingDepartment designedtoprovideoperating personnel withtheknowledge andskillrequiredforsafeoperation ofthefacilityandforobtaining andholdingNRCoperatorlicenses. | |||
Coordinate trainingprogramsinplantsafetyandemergency procedures forCookNuclearPlantOperating Department personnel toensurethateachshiftgroupwillfunctionproperlyintheeventofinjuryofpersonnel, fire,nuclearincident, orcivildisorder. | |||
Advanceplanningandoverallconductofscheduled andforcedoutages,including thescheduling andcoordination ofallplantactivities associated withrefueling, preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, equipment | |||
: overhaul, Technical Specification surveillances, anddesignchangeinstallations. | |||
Coordinate allCookNuclearPlantactivities associated withtheinitiation, review,approval, engineering, design,production, examination, inspection, test,turnover, andcloseoutofdesignchanges.Developandimplement aneffective gualityControl(gC)Program.Thisencompasses, butisnotlimitedto,theplanninganddirecting ofqualitycontrolactivities toassurethatindustrycodes,NRCregulations, andcompanyinstructions andpoliciesregarding qualitycontrolforCookNuclearPlantareimplemented, qualified personnel performwork,andthattheseactivities areproperlydocumented. | |||
Preparereportsofreportable eventswhicharemandatedbytheNRCandtheTechnical Specifications. | |||
Directtheactivities ofcontractor gC/nondestructive examination (NDE)personnel assignedtotheSafetyandAssessment Department andprovideinspections ofworkper'formed. | |||
Preparestatistical reportsutilizedinNRCAppraisal MeetingsandEnforcement Conferen'ce. | |||
Coordinate theeffortsofoutsideagenciessuchasAmericanNuclearInsurers(ANI),INPO,andthirdpartyinspector programs. | |||
Maintainknowledge ofdevelopments andchangesinNRCrequirements, industrystandards andcodes,regulatory compliance activities, andqualitycontroldisciplines andtechniques. | |||
1.7-31December, 1990 Stopplantoperation intheeventthatconditions arefoundwhichareinviolation oftheTechnical Specifications oradversetoquality.Maintainandrenewaccreditation oftrainingprograms. | |||
gualification andcertification ofI&Hpersonnel performing inspections ortestsofmajormodifications andnonroutine maintenance totherequirements ofRegulatory Guide1.58andANSIN45.2.6,exceptasnotedinAppendixBhereto,item9.gualification andcertification ofI&MNDEpersonnel totherequirements oftheAEPNDEManual.gualification ofI&Hpersonnel performing inspection ofnormaloperating activities toANSIN18.1.Propercertification ofcontractor inspection, testandexamination personnel inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58,ANSIN45.2.6,ASMEB&PVCodeand/orSNT-TC-IA, asapplicable. | |||
Performpeerinspections ofworkcompleted byI&Mpersonnel= | |||
byindependent personsqualified toANSIN18.7.ConductoftheInservice Inspection (ISI)Program.Procurement, receiving, qualitycontrolreceiptinspection, storage,handling, issue,stocklevelmaintenance, andoverallcontrolofstoresitems.Providematerialserviceandsupportinaccordance withpoliciesandprocedures requiredbyAEPPurchasing andStores,AEPSCgA,andtheNRC,whichareadministered andenforcedinatotalefforttoensuresafetyandplantreliability. | |||
Plananddirectengineering andtechnical studies,nuclearfuelmanagement, equipment performance, instrument andcontrolmainte-nance,on-sitecomputersystems,ShiftTechnical | |||
: Advisors, andemergency planningfortheCookNuclearPlant.Theseactivities supportdailyon-siteoperations inasafe,reliable, andefficient mannerinaccordance withallcorporate | |||
: policies, applicable laws,regulations, | |||
: licenses, andTechnical Specification requirements. | |||
Implement stationperformance testingandmonitorprogramstoensureoptimumplantefficiency. | |||
Directprogramsrelatedtoon-sitefuelmanagement andreactorcorephysicstestingandensuresatisfactory completion. | |||
1.7-32December, 1990 | |||
Establish testingandpreventive maintenance programsrelatedtostationinstrumentation, electrical systems,andcomputers. | |||
Recommend alternatives toCookNuclearPlantoperation, technical oremergency procedures, anddesignofequipment toimprovesafetyofoperations andoverallplantefficiency. | |||
Implement thecorporate Emergency PlanasitpertainstotheCookNuclearPlantsite.Providetechnical andengineering servicesinthefieldsofchemis-try,radiation protection, ALARA,andenvironmental insupportofthesafeoperation oftheplantandthehealthandsafetyoftheemployees andthepublic.Planandscheduletheactivities oftheTechnical PhysicalScienceSectionsoftheCookNuclearPlantinsupportofoperations andmaintenance. | |||
Establish chemistry, radiochemistry, andhealthphysicscriteriawhichensuremaximumequipment lifeandtheprotection ofthehealthandsafetyoftheworkersandthepublic.Establish samplingandanalysisprogramswhichensurethechemistry, radiochemistry, andhealthphysicscriteriaarewithintheestab-lishedcriteria. | |||
Establish anddirectinvestigations, responses, andcorrective actionswhenoutsidetheestablished criteria. | |||
Administer anddirecttheCookNuclearPlant'sradioactive wasteprograms, including volumereduction, packaging andshipping. | |||
Administration ofthegARecordsProgram.MaintaintheCookNuclearPlantFacilityDataBase.1.7.2EQUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM1.7.2.1SCOPEPoliciesthatdefineandestablish theCookNuclearPlantgAProgramaresummarized intheindividual sectionsofthisdocument. | |||
Theprogramisimplemented throughprocedures andinstructions responsive toprovisions ofthegAPD,andwillbecarriedoutforthelifeoftheCookNuclearPlant.1.7-33December, 1990 | |||
Qualityassurance controlsapplytoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents, toanextentbasedontheimportance ofthosestructures, systems,components, etc.,(items)tosafety.Suchactivities areperformed undercontrolled conditions, including theuseofappropriate equipment, environmental conditions, assignment ofqualified personnel, andassurance thatallapplicable prerequisites havebeenmet.Safety-related itemsaredefinedasitems:whichareassociated withthesafeshutdown(hot)ofthereactor;orisolation ofthereactor;ormaintenance oftheintegrity ofthereactorcoolantsystempressureboundary. | |||
ORwhosefailuremightcauseorincreasetheseverityofadesignbasisaccidentasdescribed intheFSAR;orleadtoareleaseofradioac-tivityinexcessof10CFR100guidelines. | |||
Ingeneral,itemsareclassified assafety-related iftheyare:SeismicClassI,orElectrical ClassIE;orassociated withtheEngineered SafetyFeaturesActuation System(ESFAS);orassociated withtheReactorProtection System(RPS),AspecialQAprogramhasbeenimplemented forFireProtection items(Section1.7.19herein).TheQAProgramalsoincludesprovision forRadwasteQAinaccordance withtherequirements ofIOCFR71,partH.QAProgramstatus,scope,adequacy, andcompliance withIOCFR50,AppendixB,areregularly reviewedbyAEPSCmanagement throughreports,meetings, andreviewofauditresults.1.7-34December, 1990 | |||
Theimplementation oftheQAProgrammaybeaccomplished byAEPSCand/orIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyordelegated inwholeorinparttootherAEPSystemcompanies oroutsideparties.However,AEPSCand/orIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyretainfullresponsibility forallactivities affecting safety-related items.Theperformance ofthedelegated organization isevaluated byauditorsurveillances onafrequency commensurate withtheirscopeandimportance ofassignedwork.1.7.2.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.2.2.1 TheChairmanoftheBoardofAEPSC,asChiefExecutive Officer,hasstatedinasigned,formal"Statement ofPolicy",thatitisthecorporate policytocomplywiththeprovisions ofapplicable codes,standards andregulations pertaining toqualityassurance fornuclearpowerplantsasrequiredbytheCookNuclearPlantoperating licenses. | |||
Thestatement makesthisQAPDandtheassociated implementing procedures andinstructions mandatory, andrequirescompliance byallresponsible organizations andindividuals. | |||
Thestatement alsoidentifies themanagement positions withinthecompanies vestedwithresponsibility andauthority forimplementing theprogramandassuringitseffectiveness. | |||
1.7.2.2.2 TheQAProgramatAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPla'ntconsistofcontrolsexercised byorganizations responsible forattaining qualityobjectives, andbyorganizations responsible forassurance functions. | |||
TheQAProgrameffectiveness iscontinually assessedthroughmanagement reviewofvariousreports,NSDRCreviewoftheQAauditprogramandshallalsobeperiodically reviewedbyindependent outsidepartiesasdeemednecessary bymanagement. | |||
TheQAProgramdescribed inthisQAPDisintendedtoapplyforthelifeoftheCookNuclearPlant,1.7-35December, 1990 TheQAProgramappliestoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-relatedstructures, components, andrelatedconsumables duringplantoperation, maintenance, testing,andalldesignchanges.Safety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areidentified intheFacilityDataBaseandotherdocuments whicharedeveloped andmaintained fortheplant.Asdeemednecessary bytheAEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance, orthePlantHanager,applicable portionsoftheQAProgramcontrolswillbeappliedtononsafety-related activities associated withtheimplementa-tionoftheQAProgramtoensurethatcommitments aremet(e.g.,off-siterecordsstorage,trainingservices, etc.).1.7.2.2.3 ThisQAPD,organized topresenttheQAProgramfortheCookNuclearPlantintheorderofthe18criteriaof10CFR50,AppendixB,statesAEPSCpolicyforeachofthecriteria, anddescribes howthecontrolspertinent toeacharecarriedout.AnychangesmadetothisQAPDthatdonotreducethecommitments previously acceptedbytheNRCmustbesubmitted totheNRCatleastannually. | |||
AnychangesmadetothisQAPDthatdoreducethecommitments previously acceptedbytheNRCmustbesubmitted totheNRCandreceiveNRCapprovalpriortoimplementation. | |||
Thesubmittal ofthechangesdescribed aboveshallbemadeinaccordance withtherequirements of10CFR50.54. | |||
Theprogramdescribed inthisQAPDwillnotbeintentionally changedinanywaythatwouldpreventitfrommeetingthecriteriaof10CFR50,AppendixB,andotherapplicable operating licenserequirements. | |||
1.7.2.2.4 Documents usedforimplementing theprovisions ofthisQAPDincludethefollowing: | |||
1.7-36December, 1990 0 | |||
PlantManagerInstructions (PMIs)establish thepolicyattheplantforcompliance withspecified | |||
: criteria, andassignresponsibility tothevariousdepartments, asrequired, forimplementation. | |||
Whennecessary, Department HeadProcedures (DHPs),andinsomecasesDepartment HeadInstructions (DHIs),havebeenpreparedtodescribethedetailedactivities requiredtosupportsafeandeffective plantoperation asperthePMIs.ThePMIsarereviewedbyAEPSCgAforconcurrence thattheywillsatisfactorily implement regulatory requirements andcommitments. | |||
TheyarethenreviewedbythePNSRCpriortoapprovalbythePlantManager.Safety-related OHPsandOHIsarereviewedbythedepartment headoforigination, PNSRCandPlantManagerpriortouse.AEPSCGeneralProcedures (GPs)areutilizedtodefinecorporate policies.andrequirements forqualityassurance, andtoimplement certaincorporate gAProgramrequirements. | |||
AEPSCdivision/department and/orsectionprocedures arealsousedtoimplement gAProgramrequirements. | |||
GPsmayalsobeusedtodefinepolicieswhicharenonprocedural innature.Whencontractors performworkon-siteundertheirownqualityassurance | |||
: programs, theprogramsareauditedforcompliance andconsistency withtheapplicable requirements oftheCookNuclearPlant'sgAProgramandthecontract, andareapprovedbyAEPSCgApriortothestartofwork.Implementation ofon-sitecontractor's gAprograms, willbeauditedtoassurethatthecontractor's programsareeffective. | |||
1.7.2.2.5 Provisions ofthegAProgramfortheCookNuclearPlantapplytoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items.AppendixAtothisSWAPOliststheRegulatory/Safety GuidesandANSIStandards that1.7-37December, 1990 identifyAEPSC'scommitment. | |||
Imposition oftheseguides/standards onAEPSC/18M suppliers andsubtiersuppliers willbeonacase-by-case basisdepending upontheitemorservicetobesupplied. | |||
AppendixBdescribes necessary exceptions andclarifications totherequirements ofthosedocuments. | |||
Thescopeoftheprogramandtheextenttowhichitscontrolsareapplied,areestablished asfollows:a)AEPSCusesthecriteriaspecified intheCookNuclearPlantFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR)foridentifying structures, systemsandcomponents towhichthegAProgramapplies.b)Thisidentification processresultsintheFacilityDataBasefortheCookNuclearPlant.ThisFacilityDataBaseiscontrolled byauthorized personnel. | |||
FacilityDataHaseitemsaredetermined byengineering analysisofthefunction(s) ofplantitemsinrelationtosafeoperation andshutdown. | |||
c)Theextenttowhichcontrolsspecified inthegAProgramareappliedtoFacilityDataBaseitemsisdetermined foreachitemconsidering itsrelativeimportance tosafety.Suchdeterminations arebasedondatainsuchdocuments astheCookNuclearPlantTechnical Specifications andtheFSAR.1.7.2.2.6 Activities affecting safety-related itemsareaccomplished undercontrolled conditions. | |||
Preparations forsuchactivities includeconsideration ofthefollowing: | |||
a)b)c)d)Assignedpersonnel arequalified. | |||
Workhasbeenplannedtoapplicable engineering and/orTechnical Specifications. | |||
Specified equipment and/ortoolsareavailable. | |||
Itemsareinanacceptable status.1.7-38December, 1990 e)f)g)h)Itemsonwhichworkistobeperformed areinthepropercondition forthetask.Properinstructions/procedures fortheworkareavailable foruse.Itemsandfacilities thatcouldbedamagedbytheworkhavebeenprotected, asrequired. | |||
Provisions havebeenmadeforspecialcontrols, processes, testsandverification methods.1.7.2.2.7 Responsibility andauthority forplanningandimplementing indoctrination andtrainingofAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantstaffpersonnel arespecifically designated, asfollows:a)Thetrainingandindoctrination programprovidesforon-goingtrainingandperiodicfamiliarization withthegAProgramfortheCookNuclearPlant.b)Personnel whoperforminspection andexamination functions arequalified inaccordance withrequirements ofRegulatory Guide1.8,ANSIN18.1,Regulatory Guide1.58,ANSIN45.2.6,theASHEB&PVCode,orSNT-TC-1A,asapplicable andwithexceptions asnotedinAppendixBhereto.c)AEPSCgAOauditorsarequalified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.146andANSIN45.2.23. | |||
d)Personnel assigneddutiessuchasspecialcleaningprocesses, welding,etc.,arequalified inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards, regulatory guidesand/orplantprocedures. | |||
e)Thetraining, qualification andcertification programincludes, asapplicable, provisions forretraining, reexamination andrecertification toensurethatproficiency ismaintained. | |||
1.7-39December, 1990 f)Training, qualification, andcertification recordsincluding documentation ofobjectives, waivers/exceptions, attendees anddatesofattendance aremaintained atleastaslongasthepersonnel involvedareperforming activities towhichthetraining, qualification andcertification isrelevant. | |||
g)Personnel responsible forperforming activities thataffectsafety-related itemsareinstructed astothepurpose,scopeandimplementation oftheapplicable manuals,instructions andprocedures. | |||
Hanagement/supervisory personnel receivefunctional trainingtothelevelnecessary toplan,coordinate andadminister theday-to-day verification activities ofthegAProgramforwhichtheyareresponsible. | |||
TrainingofAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantpersonnel isperformed employing thefollowing techniques, asapplicable: | |||
1)onthejobandformaltrainingadministered'y thedepartment orsectiontheindividual worksfor;2)formaltrainingconducted byqualified instructors fromtheCookNuclearPlantTrainingDepartment orotherentities(internal andexternaltotheAEPSystem);and3)formal,INPOaccredited trainingconducted bytheCookNuclearPlantTrainingDepartment.: | |||
Recordsoftrainingsessionsforsuchtrainingaremaintained. | |||
Wherepersonnel qualifications orcertifications arerequired, thesecertifications areperformed onascheduled basis(consistent withtheappropriate codeorstandard). | |||
CookNuclearPlantemployees receiveintroductory traininginqualityassurance usuallywithinthefirsttwoweeksofemployment. | |||
Inaddition, AEPSCpersonnel receivetrainingpriortobeingallowedunescorted accesstotheplant.Thistrainingincludesmanagement's policyforimplementation ofthegAProgramthroughPlantManagerandDepartment HeadInstructions andProcedures. | |||
Theseinstructions alsoincludeadescription ofthegAProgram,theuseofinstructions andprocedures, personnel requirements forprocedure compliance andthesystemsandcomponents controlled bythegAProgram.1.7-40December, 1990 | |||
- | 1.7.3DESIGNCONTROL1.7;3.1SCOPEDesignchangesareaccomplished inaccordance withapproveddesign.Activities todevelopsuchdesignsarecontrolled. | ||
Depending onthetypeofdesignchange,theseactivities includedesignandfieldengineering; theperformance ofphysics,seismic,stress,thermal,hydraulic andradiation evaluations; updateoftheFSAR;reviewofaccidentanalyses; | |||
'hedevelopment andcontrolofassociated computerprograms; studiesofmaterialcompatibility; accessibility forinservice inspection andmaintenance; determination ofqualitystandards; andrequirement forequipment qualification. | |||
Thecontrolsapplytopreparation andreviewofdesigndocuments, including thecorrecttranslation ofapplicable regula-toryrequirements anddesignbasesintodesign,procurement andprocedural documents. | |||
1.7.3.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.3.2.1 | |||
~~~~Designchangesarecontrolled byprocedures andinstructions andarereviewedasrequiredby10CFR50.59. | |||
Safety-related designchangesareaccomplished byoneoftwoseparateprocesses, theMinorModification (MM)ortheRequestforChange(RFC).Thosethatdonotaltertheintendedfunctionoftheitemandcanbedetermined byjudgement tohaveaminimaloverallimpactontheitembeingmodifiedmaybeimplemented viatheMMprocess.Allothersafety-related designchangesthatarenotappropriate forMMprocessing, areimplemented viatheRFCprocess.1.7.3.2.2 | |||
.RFCs(exceptforthoserequiring emergency processing) andMMsarereviewedandapprovedpriortoimplementation | |||
,asaminimum,bythecognizant AEPSCengineering section,PNSRC,andPlantManager.1.7-41December, 1990 RFCsandMMsarereviewedto'determine theirimpactonnuclearsafetyandtodetermine ifth'eproposedchangesinvolveanunreviewed safetyquestionasdefinedby10CFR50.59. | |||
Ifadesignchangeweretoinvolveanunreviewedsafetyquestion, itwouldnotbeapprovedforimplementation untiltherequiredNRCapprovalwasreceived. | |||
1.7.3.2.3 ForRFCs,theChangeControlBoard,established withinAEPSC,providesanadditional reviewandapprovallevel.TheChangeControlBoardiscomprised ofmembersoftheEngineering, Design,NuclearOperations andgAorganizations withinAEPSCandissupplemented byotherAEPSCorganizations orindividuals asrequired. | |||
Thecognizant memberoftheChangeControlBoardassignsaleadengineerforeachRFC.Theleadengineerisresponsible forcoordinating theRFCactivities withinAEPSCandmaintaining closeinterface withtheCookNuclearPlantProjectEngineers. | |||
y-1.7.3.2.4 | |||
~~~ProposedRFCswhichrequireemergency processing, areoriginated attheplant,reviewedbythePNSRCandapprovedbythePlantManager.CookNuclearPlantmanagement thencontactstheAEPSCNOD,andotherAEPSCmanagement, asrequired, describes thechangerequested andimplements the,changeonlyafterreceiving verbalAEPSCmanagement authorization toproceed.Thesereviewsandapprovals aredocumented andbecomeapartoftheRFCPacket.1.7.3.2.5 WhenRFCsorMMsinvolvedesigninterfaces betweeninternalorexternaldesignorganizations, oracrosstechnical disciplines, theseinterfaces arecontrolled. | |||
Procedures areusedforthereview,approval, release,distribution andrevisionofdocuments involving designinterfaces to1.7-42December, 1990 ensurethatstructures, systemsandcomponents arecompatible geometri-cally,functionally, withprocesses andtheenvironment. | |||
Linesofcommunication areestablished forcontrolling theflowofneededdesigninformation acrossdesigninterfaces, including changestotheinformation asworkprogresses. | |||
Decisions andproblemresolutions involving designinterfaces aremadebytheAEPSCorganization havingresponsibility forengineering direction ofthedesigneffort.1.7.3.2.6 Checksareperformed anddocumented toverifythedimensional accuracyandcompleteness ofdesigndrawingsandspecifications. | |||
1.7.3.2.7 RFCdesigndocumentpackagesareauditedbyAEPSCgAtoassurethatthedocuments havebeenprepared, | |||
: verified, reviewedandapprovedinaccor-dancewithcompanyprocedures. | |||
1.7.3.2.8 | |||
~~~Theextentofandmethodsfordesignverification aredocumented. | |||
Theextentofdesignverification performed isafunctionoftheimportance oftheitemtosafety,designcomplexity, degreeofstandardization, thestate-of-the-art, andsimilarity withpreviously provendesigns.Methodsfordesignverification includeevaluation oftheapplicability ofstandardized orpreviously provendesigns,alternate calculations, qualification testinganddesignreviews.Thesemethodsmaybeusedsinglyorincombination, depending ontheneedsforthedesignunderconsideration. | |||
Whendesignverification isdonebyevaluating standardized orpreviously provendesigns,theapplicability ofsuchdesignsisconfirmed. | |||
Anydifferences fromtheprovendesignaredocumented andevaluated fortheintendedapplication. | |||
1.7-43December, 1990 OIgualification testingofprototypes, components, orfeaturesisusedwhentheabilityofanitemtoperformanessential safetyfunctioncannototherwise beadequately substantiated. | |||
Thistestingisperformed beforeplantequipment installation wherepossible, butalwaysbeforerelianceupontheitemtoperformasafety-related function. | |||
gualification testingisperformed underconditions thatsimulatethemostadversedesignconditions, considering allrelevantoperating modes.Testrequirements, procedures andresultsaredocumented. | |||
Resultsareevalu-atedtoassurethattestrequirements havebeensatisfied. | |||
Designchangesshowntobenecessary throughtestingaremade,andanynecessary retesting orotherverification isperformed. | |||
Testconfigurations areclearlydocumented. | |||
Designreviewsareperformed bymulti-organizational orinterdisciplinary groups,orbysingleindividuals. | |||
Criteriaareestablished todetermine whenaformalgroupreviewisrequired, andwhenreviewbyanindividual issufficient. | |||
Procedures requirethatminordesignchangesaccomplished bytheHHprocessalsoreceiveformaldesignverification. | |||
Applicable designverification activities shallbecompleted priortodeclaring thedesignchangeorportionthereofoperational. | |||
1.7.3.2.9 Personsrepresenting applicable technical disciplines areassignedtoperformdesignverifications. | |||
Thesepersonsarequalified byappropriate education orexperience butare'otdirectlyresponsible forthedesign.Thedesigner's immediate supervisor mayperformtheverification, providedthat:1)Thesupervisor istheonlytechnically qualified individual. | |||
or1.7-44December, 1990 o2)Thesupervisor hasnotspecified asingulardesignapproach, ruledoutdesignconsiderations, norestablished thedesigninputs.and3)Theneedisindividually documented andapprovedinadvancebythesupervisor's management. | |||
and4)Regularly scheduled gAauditsverifyconformance topreviousitems1through3.Designverification onsafety-related designchangesshallbecompleted priortodeclaring adesignchange,orportionsthereofoperational. | |||
1.7.3.2.10 CookNuclearPlantimplementation ofdesignchangesisaccomplished bytheCookNuclearPlantProjectEngineering Department. | |||
Materialtoperformthedesignchangemustmeetthespecifications established fortheoriginalsystemorasspecified bytheleadengineer. | |||
Forthosedesignchangeswheretestingaftercompletion isrequired, thetestingdocumentation isreviewedbytheorganization performing thetestand,whenspecified, bytheAEPSCleadengineerorothercognizant engineer(s). | |||
Further,completed designchangesareauditedbyAEPSCgAfollowing installation andtesting.1.7.3.2.11 Changestodesigndocuments, including fieldchanges,arereviewed, approvedandcontrolled inamannercommensurate withthatusedfortheoriginaldesign.Suchchangesareevaluated forimpact.Information onapprovedchangesistransmitted toallaffectedorganizations. | |||
1.7-45December, 1990 0 | |||
1.7.3.2.12 Erroranddeficiencies in,anddeviations fromapproveddesigndocuments areidentified anddispositioned inaccordance withestablished designcontroland/orcorrective actionprocedures. | |||
1.7.3.2.13 Thismechanism provides'or: | |||
1)controlled submission ofdesignchanges,2)engineering evaluation, 3)reviewforimpactonnuclearsafety,4)auditbyAEPSCgA,5)design'odification, 6)AEPSCmanagerial review,and7)approvalandrecordkeepingfortheimplemented designchange.1.7.4PROCUREMENT DOCUNENTCONTROL1.7.4,1SCOPEProcurement documents definethecharacteristics ofitem(s)tobeprocured, identifyapplicable regulatory andindustrycodes/standards requirements andspecifysuppliergAProgramrequirements totheextentnecessary toassureadequatequality.1.7.4.2IHPLENENTATION 1.7.4.2.1 Procurement controlisestablished byinstructions. | |||
andprocedures. | |||
Thesedocuments requirethatpurchasedocuments besufficiently detailedtoensurethatpurchased materials, components andservicesassociated withsafety-related structures orsystemsare:1)purchased tospecification andcoderequirements equivalent tothoseoftheoriginalequipment orservice(exceptwhentheCodeofFederalRegulations requiresupgrading), | |||
2)properlydocumented toshowcompliance withtheapplicable specifica-tions,codesandstandards, and3)purchased fromvendorsorcontractors whohavebeenevaluated anddeemedqualified. | |||
1.7-46December, 1990 | |||
Procedures establish thereviewofprocurement documents todetermine that:qualityrequirements arecorrectly stated,inspectable andcontrollable; thereareadequateacceptance criteria; procurement documents havebeenprepared, reviewedandapprovedinaccordance withestablished requirements. | |||
Eachinvolvedmanagerisresponsible forassuringthattheapplicable gArequirements aresetforthintheprocurement documents. | |||
TheCookNuclearPlantmayrequestassistance ofAEPSCcognizant engineers inanyprocurement activity. | |||
1.7.4.2.2 TheFacilityDataBase,inconjunction withothersources,isusedasthesourcedocumentforequipment safetyclassification andprocurement grade.AEPSCSpecifications fortheCookNuclearPlant(DCCSpecifications) areusedtodetermine itemanddocumentation requirements, codesorstandards thatitemsmustfulfill,anddefinethedocumentation thatmustaccompany theitemtotheplant.Organizational management cognizant oftheequipment anditsqualityassurance requirements reviewprocurement documents, asrequired, toensurethat:correctclassification ismade;theappropriate plantspecifications whichidentifyqualityrequirements arereferenced orattached; andthatthedocumentation requirements areproperlystated.Purchaserequisitions fornewsafety-related equipment areinitiated bytheAEPSCcognizant engineers whoestablish theinitialequipment qualityassurance requirements. | |||
Replacement orspareequipment isprocuredviatheoriginalpurchaserequirements. | |||
Ininstances wheretheserequirements havebeensuperseded byarevisedspecification, andwhenapplicable thereplacement/ | |||
sparepartisprocuredtotherevisedrequirements. | |||
1,7-47December, 1990 1.7.4.2.3 Thecontentsofprocurement documents varyaccording totheitem(s)beingpurchased anditsfunction(s) intheCookNuclearPlant.Provisions ofthisgAPDareconsidered forapplication toservicecontractors also.Asapplicable, procurement documents include:a)Scopeofworktobeperformed. | |||
b)Technical requirements, withapplicable | |||
: drawings, specifications, codesandstandards identified bytitle,documentnumber,revisionanddate,withanyrequiredprocedures suchasspecialprocessinstructions identified insuchawayastoindicatesourceandneed.c)Regulatory, administrative andreporting requirements. | |||
d)gualityrequirements appropriate tothecomplexity andscopeofthework,including necessary testsandinspections. | |||
e)Arequirement foradocumented gAProgram,subjecttogAreviewandwrittenconcurrence priortothestartofwork.f)Arequirement forthesuppliertoinvokeapplicable qualityrequire-mentsonsubtiersuppliers. | |||
g)Provisions foraccesstosupplierandsubtiersuppliers'acilities andrecordsforinspections, surveillances andaudits.h)Identification ofdocumentation tobeprovidedbythesupplier, thescheduleofsubmittals anddocuments requiring AEPSCapproval. | |||
1.7.4.2.4 TheAEPSCgADivisionperformsauditsofprocurement documents toassurethatgAProgramrequirements havebeenmet.Theseauditsareconducted inaccordance withAEPSCgADivisionprocedures. | |||
1.7-48December, 1990 | |||
'.7.4.2.5 Changestoprocurement documents arecontrolled inamannercommensurate withthatusedfortheoriginaldocuments. | |||
1.7.5INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, ANDDRAWINGS1.7.5.1SCOPEActivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areaccomplished usinginstructions, procedures anddrawingsappropriate tothecircumstances, including acceptance criteriafordetermining ifanactivityhasbeensatisfactorily completed. | |||
1.7.5.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.5.2'Instructions andprocedures incorporate: | |||
1)adescription oftheactivitytobeaccomplished, and2)appropriate quantitative (suchastolerances andoperating limits)andqualitative (suchasworkmanship andstandards) acceptance criteriasufficient todetermine thattheactivityhasbeensatisfactorily accomplished. | |||
Holdpointsforinspection areestablished whenrequired. | |||
Instructions andprocedures pertaining tothespecification ofand/orimplementation ofthegAProgramreceivemultiplereviewsfortechnical adequacyandinclusion ofappropriate qualityrequirements. | |||
Toptierinstructions andprocedures arereviewedand/orapprovedbyAEPSCgA,Lowertierdocuments arereviewedandapproved, asaminimumbymanagement/supervisory personnel trainedtothelevelnecessary toplan,coordinate andadminister thoseday-to-day verification activities ofthegAProgramforwhichtheyareresponsible. | |||
Specialprocedures maybeissuedforactivities whichhaveshort-term applicability. | |||
1.7-49December, 1990 1.7.5.2.2 AEPSCactivities relativetotheCookNuclearPlantareoutlinedbyprocedures whichprovidethecontrolsfortheimplementation oftheseactivities. | |||
AEPSChastwocategories ofQAProgramimplementation procedures: | |||
1)GeneralProcedures (GPs)whichareapplicable toallAEPSCdivisions anddepartments involvedwithCookNuclearPlant.2)Division/department/section procedures whichapplytothespecificdivision, department orsectioninvolved. | |||
1.7.5,2.3 Activities at'theCookNuclearPlantarecontrolled usingplantprocedures. | |||
ThePMIshavebeenclassified intothefollowing series:1000Organization andResponsibilities 2000Administration | |||
-DocumentControl,Security, | |||
: Training, Records,Radiation Protection andFireProtection 3000Procurement, Receiving, ShippingandStorage4000Operations, FuelHandling, Surveillance Testing5000Maintenance, Repair,Modification, Special'rocesses, EQandISI6000Technical | |||
-Chemistry, Radiological | |||
: Controls, Performance/Engineering Testing;andInstrument andControlMaintenance andCalibration 7000QualityAssurance, QualityControlProgramandCondition/Problem Reporting Instructions andprocedures identifytheregulatory requirements andcommitments whichpertaintothesubjectthatitwillcontrolandestab-lishresponsibilities forimplementation. | |||
Instructions andprocedures 1.7-50December, 1990 mayeitherprovidetheguidancenecessary forthedevelopment ofsupple-mentalinstructions and/orprocedures toimplement theirrequirements, orprovidecomprehensive guidancebasedonthesubjectmatter.1.7.5.2.4 CookNuclearPlantdrawingsareproduced, controlled anddistributed underthecontrolofAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPlant.AEPSCdesigndrawingsareproducedbyorunderthecontroloftheAEPSCNuclearDesignGroupunderasetofprocedures whichdirecttheirdevelopment andreview.Theseprocedures specifyrequirements forinclusion ofquantitative andqualitative acceptance criteria. | |||
Specificdrawingsarereviewedandapprovedbythecognizant engineering divisions/department. | |||
AEPSChasstationed anon-sitedesignstafftoprovidefortherevisionofcertaintypesofdesigndrawingstoreflectas-builtconditions. | |||
1.7.5.2.5 ComplexCookNuclearPlantprocedures aredesignated as"InHand"procedures. | |||
Examplesof"InHand"procedures arethosedeveloped forextensive orcomplexjobswhererelianceonmemorycannotbetrusted.Further,thoseprocedures whichdescribeasequencewhichcannotbealteredorrequirethedocumentation ofdataduringthecourseoftheprocedure, areconsidered. | |||
"InHand"procedures aredesignated assuchbydoubleasterisks | |||
(**)whichprecedetheprocedure numberonthecoversheet,allpagesandattachments ofaprocedure andthecorresponding index.1.7.6DOCUMENTCONTROL1,7.6:1SCOPEDocuments controlling activities withinthescopedefinedin1.7.2hereinareissuedandchangedaccording toestablished procedures. | |||
Documents suchasinstructions, procedures anddrawings, including changesthereto,1.7-51December, 1990 | |||
arereviewedforadequacy, approvedforreleasebyauthorized personnel andaredistributed andusedatthelocationwhereaprescribed activityisperformed. | |||
Changestocontrolled documents. | |||
arereviewedandapprovedbythesameorganizations thatperformed theoriginalreviewandapproval, orbyotherqualified, responsible organizations specifically designated inaccordance withtheprocedures governing thesedocuments. | |||
Obsoleteorsuperseded documents arecontrolled topreventinadvertent use.1.7.6.2IHPLEHENTATION 1.7.6.2.1 Controlsareestablished forapproval, issueandchangeofdocuments inthefollowing categories: | |||
a)b)c)d)e)f)g)Designdocuments (e.g.,calculations, specifications, analyses) | |||
Drawingsandrelateddocuments Procurement documents Instructions andprocedures FinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR)PlantTechnical Specifications Safeguards documents 1.7.6.2.2 Thereview,approval, issuanceandchangeofdocuments arecontrolled by:a)Establishment ofcriteriatoensurethatadequatetechnical andqualityrequirements areincorporated. | |||
b)Identification oftheorganization responsible forreview,approval, issueandmaintenance. | |||
c)Reviewofchangestodocuments bytheorganization thatperformed theinitialreviewandapproval, orbytheorganization designated inaccordance withtheprocedure governing thereviewandapprovalofspecifictypesofdocuments. | |||
1.7-52December, 1990 Maintenance, modification andinspection procedures areauditedbyAEPSCgAforcompliance withestablished inspection requirements. | |||
1.7.6.2.3 Documents areissuedandcontrolled sothat:a)Thedocuments areavailable priortocommencing work.b)Obsoletedocuments arereplacedbycurrentdocuments inatimelymanner.1.7.6.2.4 Masterlistsorequivalent controlsareusedtoidentifythecurrentrevisionofinstructions, procedures, specifications anddrawings. | |||
Thesecontroldocuments areupdatedanddistributed todesignated personnel whoareresponsible formaintaining currentcopiesoftheapplicable documents. | |||
Thedistribution ofcontrolled documents isperformed underprocedures requiring receiptacknowledgement andinaccordance withestablished distribution lists.1.7.6,2.5 Intheeventadrawingisdeveloped on-sitetoreflectanas-builtconfiguration, themarked-up drawingismaintained intheMasterPlantFileandallholdersofthedrawingareissuedappropriate notification toinformthemtherevisiontheyholdisnotcurrent,cannotbeusedand,ifrequired, reference mustbemadetotheMasterPlantFiledrawing.1.7.6.2.6 Documents preparedforuseintrainingorforinter'ested partiesareappropriately markedtoindicatethattheyareforinformation useonly,andcannotbeusedtooperateormaintainthefacility, ortoconductactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items.AtCook1.7-53December, 1990 0 | |||
NuclearPlant,unlessadocumentisidentified as"controlled" itisautomatically assumedthedocumentisforinformational useonly.1.7.7CONTROLOFPURCHASED ITEMSANDSERVICES1.7.7.1SCOPEActivities thatimplement approvedprocurement requestsforitemsandservicesarecontrolled toassureconformance withprocurement documentrequirements. | |||
Controlsincludeasystemofsupplierevaluation andselection audits,acceptance ofitemsanddocumentation upondelivery, andperiodicassessment ofsupplierperformance. | |||
Objective evidenceofqualitythatdemonstrates conformance withspecified procurement documentrequirements isavailable totheCookNuclearPlantsitepriortouseofequipment, | |||
: material, orservices. | |||
1.7.7.2IMPLEMENTATION 1,7.7.2,1 AEPSCqualifies suppliers anddistributors byperforming adocumented evaluation oftheircapability toprovideitemsorservicesspecified byprocurement documents. | |||
Itemsandservicesdesignated assafety-related arepurchased fromsuppliers whosegAprogramshavebeenacceptedinaccordance withAEPSCrequirements orfromcommercial gradesuppliers throughtheAEPSCdedication program.Suppliers ofotheritems/services, suchasfireprotection, recordsstorage,etc.,arealsoevaluated usingdifferent criteriaforacceptance. | |||
gualification ofsuchsuppliers isdetermined bytheAEPSCgADivision. | |||
Inthedischarge ofthisresponsibility, theAEPSCgADivisionutilizesinformation generated byotherutilities. | |||
Thesupplierordistributor mustbeapprovedbeforeprocurement canbecompleted. | |||
AEPSCisamemberoftheNuclearProcurement IssuesCouncil(NUPIC)andparticipants injointsupplierauditsandsharesauditinformation consistent withNUPICrequirements. | |||
Thesupplierordistributor mustbeacceptable, or1.7-54.December, 1990 acceptable subjecttofollow-up beforeaprocurement canbeapprovedandprocessed. | |||
Additional auditswillbeconducted, asnecessary, tomeetrequirements. | |||
Acceptance isnotcompleteuntilithasbeendetermined thatthesuppliercanmeetthebasicgAandtechnical requirements oftheitemorservicethatisrequired. | |||
1.7.7.2.2 Foritemsthatarenotuniquetoanuclearpowerplant("Commercial Grade")whererequirements cannotbeimposedinapractical mannerattimeofprocurement, programsfordedication andupgrading tosafety-relatedstandards areestablished andaccomplished bytheAEPSCcognizant engineerpriortotheitembeingacceptedforsafety-related use.1.7.7.2.3 In-process auditsofsuppliers'ctivities duringfabrication, inspection, testingandshipmentofitemsareperformed whendeemednecessary, depending uponsupplierqualification status,complexity andimportance tosafetyoftheitembeingfurnished, and/orprevioussupplierhistory.Theseauditsareperformed byAEPSCgA.Thecognizant engineerand/orresponsible CookNuclearPlantpersonnel alsoparticipate, ifdeemednecessary. | |||
1.7.7.2.4 Spareandreplacement partsareprocuredinsuchamannerthattheirperformance andqualityareatleastequivalent tothoseofthepartsthatwillbereplaced. | |||
a)Specifications andcodesreferenced inprocurement documents forspareorreplacement itemsareatleastequivalent tothosefortheoriginalitemsortoproperlyreviewedandapprovedrevisions. | |||
1.7-55December, 1990 b)Partsintendedassparesorreplacement for"off-the-shelf" items,orotheritemsforwhichqualityrequirements werenotoriginally specified, areevaluated forperformance atleastequivalent totheoriginal. | |||
c)d)Wherequalityrequirements fortheoriginalitemscannotbedeter-mined,requirements andcontrolsareestablished byengineering evaluation performed byqualified individuals. | |||
Theevaluation assuresthereisnoadverseeffectoninterfaces, safety,interchangeability, fit,form,function, orcompliance withapplicable regulatory orcoderequirements. | |||
Evaluation resultsaredocumented. | |||
Anyadditional ormodifieddesigncriteria, imposedafterpreviousprocurement oftheitem(s),areidentified andincorporated. | |||
1.7.7.2.5 Instructions andprocedures addressrequirements forsupplierselection andcontrolaswellasprocurement documentcontrol.ThePNIonreceiptinspection ofsafety-related itemsaddresses theprogramforinspection ofincomingitemsincluding areviewofthedocumentation requiredundertheprocurement. | |||
Receiptinspection personnel arequalified andcertified inaccordance withtherequirements ofANSIN45.2.6.Provisions forreceiptinspection applyregardless ofwheretheprocurement originates. | |||
Additional inspections mayapplyifrequiredbytheprocurement document. | |||
Whereitemsand/orservicesaresafety-related andprocurement isaccomplished withoutassistance ofAEPSC,supplierselection islimitedtothosecompanies identified asbeingqualified. | |||
1.7.7.2.6 Itemsreceivedatthesitearetaggedwitha"HOLD"tagandplacedinadesignated, controlled areauntilreceiptinspected. | |||
Duringreceipt1.7-56December, 1990 inspection, designated materialcharacteristics andattributes arechecked,anddocumentation ischeckedagainsttheprocurement documents. | |||
Iffoundacceptable, the"HOLD"tagisremovedandreplacedwithan"ACCEPTED" tagandtheitemisplacedinadesignated areaofthestoreroom. | |||
Itemtraceability toprocurement documents andtoenduseismaintained throughrecording of"HOLD"and"ACCEPTED" tagnumberonapplicable documents. | |||
Nonconforming items,ormissingorquestionable documentation resultsinitemsbeingplacedon"hold"andmaintained inadesignated, controlled areaofthestoreroom. | |||
Ifthenonconformance cannotbecleared,theitemiseitherscrapped, returnedtomanufacturer, ordispositioned throughengineering analysis. | |||
1.7.7.2.7 Contractors providing services(on-site) forsafety-related components, arerequiredtohaveeitheraformalqualityassurance programandprocedures, ortheymustabidebytheCookNuclearPlantgAProgramandprocedures. | |||
PriortotheirworkingattheCookNuclearPlant,contractor qualityassurance programsmustbeauditedandapprovedbyAEPSCgA.Contractor procedures mustbereviewedandapprovedbytheoriginating/ | |||
sponsoring department supervisor, PNSRCandthePlantManager.IFurther,periodicauditsofsitecontractor activities areconducted underthedirection oftheAEPSCgualityAssurance Superintendent. | |||
1.7.7.2.8 Suppliers arerequiredtofurnishthefollowing records:a)Applicable drawingsandrelatedengineering documentation thatidentifythepurchased itemandthespecificprocurement require-ments(e.g.,codes,standards andspecifications) metbytheitem.b)Documentation identifying anyprocurement requirements thathavenotbeenmet.1.7-57December, 1990 0 | |||
Qoc)Adescription ofthosenonconformances fromtheprocurement require-mentsdispositioned "use-as-is" or"repair". | |||
d)gualityrecordsasspecified intheprocurement requirements. | |||
1.7.7.2.9 Thevalidityofsuppliercertificates ofconformance isevaluated atthetimeofsupplierresurveyandrequalification, andisbasedonthecontinual implementation ofthesupplier's gAprogram.1.7.8IDENTIFICATION ANDCONTROLOFITEHS1.7.8.1SCOPEItemsareidentified andcontrolled topreventtheirinadvertent use.Identification ofitemsismaintained eitherontheitems,theirstorageareasorcontainers, oronrecordstraceable totheitems.1.7.8.2INPLEHENTATION 1.7.8.2.1 Controlsareestablished thatprovidefortheidentification andcontrolofitems(including partially fabricated assemblies), | |||
1.7.8.2.2 Itemsareidentified byphysically markingtheitemoritscontainer, andbymaintaining recordstraceable totheitem.Themethodofidenti-ficationissuchthatthequalityoftheitemisnotdegraded. | |||
1.7.8.2.3 Itemsaretraceable toapplicable | |||
: drawings, specifications orotherpertinent documents toensurethatonlycorrectandacceptable itemsareused.Verification oftraceability isperformed anddocumented priortoreleaseforfabrication, | |||
: assembly, orinstallation. | |||
1.7;58December, 1990 1.7.8.2.4 Requirements fortheidentification byuseofheatnumber,partnumber,serialnumber,etc.,areincludedinAEPSCSpecifications (DCCs)and/ortheprocurement document. | |||
1.7.8.2'Separatestorageisprovidedforincorrect ordefective itemsthatareonhold,andmaterialwhich,hasbeenacceptedforuse.Allsafety-related itemsareappropriately taggedoridentified (stamping, etc.)toprovideeasyidentification astotheitems'sage status.Recordsaremaintained fortheissueofitems,.toprovidetraceability fromstoragetoenduseintheCookNuclearPlant.1.7.8.2.6 Whenmaterials aresubdivided, appropriate identification numbersaretransferred toeachsectionofthematerial, ortraceability ismain-tainedthroughdocumentation. | |||
1.7.9CONTROLOFSPECIALPROCESSES 1.7.9.1SCOPESpecialprocesses arecontrolled andareaccomplished byqualified personnel usingapprovedprocedures andequipment inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards, specifications, criteriaandotherspecialrequirements. | |||
1.7.9.2INPLEHENTAT ION1.7.9.2.1 Processes subjecttospecialprocesscontrolsarethoseforwhichfullverification orcharacterization bydirectinspection isimpossible orimpractical. | |||
Suchprocesses includewelding,heattreating, chemicalcleaning, application ofprotective | |||
: coatings, concreteplacement andNDE.1.7-59December, 1990 QI1.7.9.2.2 Specialprocessrequirements forchemicalcleaning, application ofprotective coatingsandconcreteplacement aresetforthinAEPSCSpeci-fications (OCCs)and/ordirectives preparedbytheresponsible AEPSCcognizant engineer. | |||
Thesedocuments arereviewedandapprovedbyotherpersonnel withthenecessary technical competence. | |||
AEPSCSpecifications areauditedbytheAEPSCgADivision. | |||
Specialprocessrequirements forwelding,heattreatingandNDEaresetforthinAEPSCSpecifications, theAEPWeldingandNOEManualsandplantprocedures. | |||
Thesespecifications andmanualsarepreparedbyorarereviewedandapprovedbytheAEPSCStaffEngineer-ChiefHetallurgist (NOEAdministrator). | |||
Theadministrative controlsportionoftheNOEManualisauditedbyAEPSCgA.Specialprocessprocedures, withtheexception ofweldingandheattreating, arepreparedbyCookNuclearPlantpersonnel withtechnical knowledge inthediscipline involved. | |||
Theseprocedures whicharealsoreviewedbyotherpersonnel withthenecessary technical competence arequalified bytesting.Weldingisperformed inaccordance withprocedures contained intheAEPWeldingManual.Theseprocedures arequalified inaccordance withapplicable codes,andProcedure gualification Recordsareprepared. | |||
WeldProcedure gualification RecordsarereviewedandapprovedbytheAEPSCStaffEngineer-ChiefMetallurgist. | |||
Weldqualification documentation isretainedintheAEPWeldingManual.Contractor weldingprocedures arequalified bythecontractor. | |||
Theseprocedures andthequalification documentation arereviewedandapprovedbytheAEPSCStaffEngineer-ChiefMetallurgist. | |||
Thisdocumentation isretainedbythecontractor. | |||
1.7-60December, 1990 NDEpersonnel arequalified andcertified byeitherthedesignated NOEAdministrator orbyaCookNuclearPlantNDELevelIIIwhohasbeenqualified andcertified bythedesignated NOEAdministrator. | |||
Certification isbyexamination. | |||
Personnel qualification iskeptcurrentbyreexamination attimeintervals specified bytheAEPNOEManual,andinaccordance withtheASMECode.CookNuclearPlantweldersarequalified bytheMaintenance Department utilizing theprocedures intheAEPWeldingManual.Supervision ofCookNuclearPlantwelderqualifications isperformed bytheMaintenance Department. | |||
Examination ofspecimens isperformed underthesupervision oftheSafetyandAssessment Department inaccordance withtheAEPSCSpecification coveringwelderqualification. | |||
CookNuclearPlantwelderqualification recordsaremaintained foreachwelderbytheMaintenance Department. | |||
Contractor andcraftweldersarequalified bythecontractor utilizing procedures approvedbytheAEPSCStaffEngineer-ChiefMetallurgist. | |||
Contractor andcraftwelderqualification recordsaremaintained bythecontractor, 1.7.9.2.4 gC/NDETechnicians assignedtotheSafetyandAssessment Department performnondestructive testingforworkperformed byCookNuclearPlantandcontractor personnel. | |||
Theseindividuals arequalified toeitherSNT-TC-IA orANSIN45.2.6andrecordsofthequalifications/ | |||
certifications aremaintained atCookNuclearPlant.1.7.9.2.5 Forspecialprocesses thatrequirequalified equipment, suchequipment isqualified inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards andspecifications. | |||
1.7-61December, 1990 1.7.9.2.6 Specialprocessqualifications arereviewedduringregularly scheduled gAaudits.gualification recordsaremaintained inaccordance with1.7.17herein.1.7.9.2.7 Thedocumentation resulting fromweldingandnondestructive testingisreviewedbyappropriate personnel. | |||
1.7.10INSPECTION 1.7.10.1SCOPEActivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areinspected toverifytheirconformance withrequire-ments.Theseinspections areperformed bypersonnel otherthanthosewhoperformtheactivity, Inspections areperformed byqualified personnel utilizing writtenprocedures whichestablish prerequisites andprovidedocumentation forevaluating testandinspection results.Directinspec-tion,processmonitoring, orboth,areusedasnecessary. | |||
Whenapplicable, holdpointsareusedtoensurethatinspections areaccomplished atthecorrectpointsinthesequenceofactivities. | |||
1.7.10.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.10.2.1 Inspections areappliedtoappropriate activities toassureconformance tospecified requirements. | |||
Holdpointsareprovidedinthesequenceofprocedures toallowfortheinspection, witnessing, examination, measurement, orreviewnecessary toassurethatthecriticalorirreversible elementsofanactivityarebeingperformed asrequired. | |||
Notethatholdpointsmaynotapplytoallprocedures buteachmustbereviewedforthisattribute. | |||
1.7-62December, 1990 | |||
Holdpointsspecifyexactlywhatistobedone(e.g.,typeofinspection orexamination, etc.),acceptance | |||
: criteria, orreference toanotherprocedure, etc.,forthesatisfactory completion oftheholdpoint.Nhenincludedinthesequenceofaprocedure, theactivities requiredbyholdpointsarecompleted priortocontinuing workbeyondthatpoint.Processmonitoring isusedinwholeorinpartwheredirectinspection aloneisimpractical orinadequate. | |||
1.7.10.2.2 | |||
: Training, qualification andcertification programsforpersonnel whoperforminspections areestablished, implemented anddocumented inaccordance with1,7.2hereinandasdescribed inAppendixBhereto,item9b,withexceptions asnotedtherein.1.7.10.2.3 Inspection requirements arespecified inprocedures, instructions, | |||
: drawings, orchecklists asapplicable. | |||
Theyprovideforthefollowing asappropriate: | |||
a)Identification ofapplicable revisions ofrequiredinstructions, drawingsandspecifications b)Identification ofcharacteristics andactivities tobeinspected c)Inspection methodsd)Specification ofmeasuring andtestequipment havingthenecessary accuracye)Identification ofpersonnel responsible forperforming theinspection 1.7-63December, 1990 f)Acceptance andrejection criteriag)Recording oftheinspection resultsandtheidentification oftheinspector 1.7.10.2.4 Inspections areconducted usingthefollowing programs: | |||
a)WorkActivities Performed bI&MPersonnel Workfunctions associated withnormaloperation oftheplant,routinemaintenance, calibrations, etc.,areroutinely assignedtoplantpersonnel. | |||
I&M,personnel whoinspectthisworkarequalified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,andareperiodically trainedintheirskillareausingINPO"accredited" training. | |||
Asaresultofthequalifications andtrainingwhichI&Npersonnel receive,apeerinspection systemisused.Peerinspection personnel areindependent inthattheydonotperformordirectlysupervise theworkbeinginspected, butmaybefromthesameworkgroup.CookNuclearPlantSafetyandAssessment Department personnel qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1willensure(throughsurveillance) thatinspections havebeencorrectly implemented andmakeroutinereportstomanagement. | |||
b)WorkActivities Performed bContractors Majormodifications, non-routine maintenance, and/orotherservicesonsafety-related itemsaregenerally performed bycontractors, whoarerequiredtocomplywiththeapplicable requirements ofRegulatory Guide1.33andANSIN45.2.Inspections oftheseworkactivities areperformed byinspectors qualified andcertified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58andANSIN45.2.6.Apeerinspection programisnotusedforworkactivities performed bythesepersonnel. | |||
Contractor inspection personnel arerequiredtobequalified andcertified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58andANSIN45.2.6.I&MCookNuclearPlantgualityControlpersonnel whoarealsoqualified andcertified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58andANSIN45.2.6mayperforminspections and/orsurveillances oftheseactivities. | |||
1.7-64December, 1990 1.7.10.2.5 Inspections associated withthepackaging andshipmentofradioactive wasteandmaterials areconducted usingthefollowing program:a)NRCLicensedPackains-Inspections ofNRClicensedradioactive materialpackagings, shallbeperformed byindividuals independent fromtheworkbeingperformed. | |||
Theindependent inspectors shallbeIndianaHichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.Additionally, theinspector shallbefamiliarwiththeactivities beingperformed. | |||
b)NonNRCLicensedPackainsandContainers | |||
-Inspections ofnonNRCLicensedradioactive materialpackagings andcontainers (shipping and/orburial),shallbeperformed byIndianaHichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.c)TransortationVehicles-Inspection oftransportation vehiclesbeingshippedas"exclusive use",shallbeperformed byIndianaMichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.d)OtherinsectionsandVerification | |||
-Inspections andverifications ofotheractivities associated withthepackaging andshipmentofradioactive materials andwaste,shallbeperformed byIndianaandHichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1asaminimum.1.7.10.2.6 Inspections areperformed, documented, andtheresultsevaluated bydesignated personnel inordertoensurethattheresultssubstantiate theacceptability oftheitemorwork.Evaluation andreviewresultsaredocumented. | |||
1.7-65December, 1990 1.7.11TESTCONTROL1.7.11.1SCOPE~~~~Testingisperformed inaccordance withestablished programstodemon-stratethatstructures, systemsandcomponents willperformsatisfactorily inservice.Thetestingisperformed byqualified personnel inaccordance withwrittenprocedures thatincorporate specified requirements andacceptance criteria. | |||
Typesoftestsare:Scheduled Surveillance, preventive maintenance, post-design, qualification. | |||
Unscheduled Pre-andpost-maintenance. | |||
Testparameters (including anyprerequisites), | |||
instrumentation require-mentsandenvironmental conditions, arespecified intestprocedures. | |||
Testresultsaredocumented andevaluated. | |||
1.7.11.2INPLEHENTAT ION1.7.11.2.1 Testsareperformed inaccordance withprograms, procedures andcriteriathatdesignate whentestsarerequiredandhowtheyaretobeperformed. | |||
Suchtestingincludesthefollowing: | |||
a)gualification tests,asapplicable, toverifydesignadequacy. | |||
b)Acceptance testsofequipment andcomponents toassuretheiropera-tionpriortodeliveryorinstallation. | |||
c)Post-design teststoassureproperandsafeoperation ofsystemsandequipment priortounrestricted operation. | |||
1.7-66December, 1990 d)Surveillance teststoassurecontinuing properandsafeoperation ofsystemsandequipment. | |||
ThePMIonsurveillance testingcontrolstheperiodictestingofequipment andsystemstofulfillthesurveillance requirements established bytheTechnical Specifications. | |||
Controlshavebeenestablished toidentifyuncompleted surveillance testingtoassureitisrescheduled forcompletion tomeetTechnical Specifi-cationfrequency requirements. | |||
Datatakenduringsurveillance testingisreviewedbyappropriate management personnel toassurethatacceptance criteriaisfulfilled, orcorrective actionistakentocorrectdeficiencies. | |||
e)Maintenance testsafterpreventive orcorrective maintenance. | |||
1.7.11.2.2 Testprocedures, asrequired, providemandatory holdpointsforwitness,orreview.1.7.11.2.3 | |||
~~~~Testingisaccomplished afterinstallation, maintenance, orrepair,bysurveillance testprocedures orperformance testswhichmustbesatisfac-torilycompleted priortodetermining theequipment isinanoperablestatus.Alldataresulting fromthesetestsisretainedattheCookNuclearPlantafterreviewbyappropriate management personnel. | |||
1.7.12CONTROLOFMEASURING ANDTESTE(UIPHENT1.7.12.1SCOPEMeasuring andtestingequipment usedinactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related systems,components andstructures areproperlyiden-tified,controlled, calibrated andadjustedatspecified intervals tomaintainaccuracywithinnecessary limits.1.7-67December, 1990 1.7.12.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7'.12.2.1 | |||
~~~~~Established procedures andinstructions areusedforcalibration andcontrolofmeasuring andtestequipment utilizedinthemeasurement, inspection andmonitoring ofstructures, systemsandcomponents. | |||
Theseprocedures andinstructions describecalibration techniques andfrequencies, andmaintenance andcontroloftheequipment. | |||
AEPSCgAperiodically assessestheeffectiveness ofthecalibration programviathegAauditprogram.1.7.12.2.2 Measuring andtestequipment isuniquelyidentified andistraceable toitscalibration source.1.7.12.2.3 Asystemhasbeenestablished forattaching oraffixinglabelstomeasuring andtestequipment todisplaythedatecalibrated andthenextcalibration duedateoracontrolsystemisusedthatidentifies topotential usersanyequipment beyondthecalibration duedate.1.7.12.2.4 Measuring andtestequipment iscalibrated atspecified intervals. | |||
Theseintervals arebasedonthefrequency | |||
.ofuse,stability characteristics andotherconditions thatcouldadversely affecttherequiredmeasurement accuracy. | |||
Calibration standards aretraceable tonationally recognized standards, orwheresuchstandards donotexistprovisions areestablished todocumentthebasisforcalibration. | |||
Theprimarystandards usedtocalibrate secondary standards have,exceptincertaininstances, anaccuracyofatleastfour(4)timestherequired1,7-68December, 1990 accuracyofthesecondary standard. | |||
Inthosecase'swherethefour(4)timesaccuracycannotbeachieved, thebasisforacceptance isdocumented andisauthorized bytheresponsible manager.Thesecondary standards haveanaccuracythatassuresequipment beingcalibrated willbewithinrequiredtolerances. | |||
Thebasisforacceptance isdocumented andauthorized bytheresponsible manager.1,7.12.2.5 CookNuclearPlantprocedures definetherequirements forthecontrolofstandards, testequipment andprocessequipment. | |||
1.7.12.2.6 Whenmeasuring andtestingequipment usedforinspection andtestingisfoundtobeoutsideofrequiredaccuracylimitsatthetimeofcalibration, evaluations areconducted todetermine thevalidityoftheresultsobtainedsincethemostrecentcalibration. | |||
Retestsorreinspections areperformed onsuspectitems.Theresultsofevaluations aredocumented. | |||
1.7.13HANDLING, STORAGE,ANDSHIPPING1.7.13.1SCOPEActivities withthepotential forcausingcontamination ordeterioration, byenvironmental conditions suchastemperature orhumiditythatcouldadversely affecttheabilityofanitemtoperformitssafety-related functions andactivities necessary topreventdamageorlossareidenti-fiedandcontrolled. | |||
Theseactivities arecleaning, packaging, preserving, | |||
: handling, shippingandstoring.Controlsareeffectedthroughtheuseofappropriate procedures andinstructions. | |||
1.7-69December, 1990 1.7.13.2IHPLENENTATION 1.7.13.2.1 | |||
~~~~Procedures areusedtocontrolthecleaning, | |||
: handling, storing,packaging, preserving andshippingofmaterials, components andsystemsinaccor-dancewithdesignated procurement requirements. | |||
Theseprocedures include,butarenotlimitedto,thefollowing functions: | |||
a)Cleaning-toassurethatrequiredcleanliness levelsareachievedandmaintained. | |||
b)Packaging andpreservation | |||
-toprovideadequateprotection againstdamageordeterioration. | |||
Whennecessary, theseprocedures provideforspecialenvironments suchasinertgasatmosphere, specificmoisturecontentlevelsandtemperature levels.c)Handling-toprecludedamageorsafetyhazards.d)Storing-tominimizethepossibility ofloss,damage,ordeterio-rationofitemsinstorage,including consumables suchaschemicals, reagentsandlubricants. | |||
1.7.13.2.2 Controlshavebeenestablished forlimitedshelflifeitemssuchas"0"rings,epoxy,lubricants, solventsandchemicals toassuretheyarecorrectly identified, storedandcontrolled topreventshelflifeexpiredmaterials frombeingusedintheCookNuclearPlant.Controlsareestablished inplantprocedures. | |||
1,7.13.2'Packaging andshippingrequirements areprovidedtovendorswiththeAEPSCSpecifications (DCCs)whichareapartofthepurchaseorder.Controlsforreceiptinspection, damageditemsandspecialhandlingrequirements attheCookNuclearPlantareestablished byplantprocedures. | |||
Specialcontrolsareprovidedtoassurethatstainless steelcomponents andmaterials arehandledwithapprovedliftingslings.1.7-70December, 1990 1.7.13.2.4 Storageandsurveillance requirements havebeenestablished toassuresegregation ofstorage'pecial controlshavebeenimplemented forcritical, highvalue,orperishable items.Routinesurveillance isconducted onstoredmaterialtoprovideinspection fordamage,rotationofstoredpumpsandmotors,inspection forprotection ofexposedsurfacesandcleanliness ofthestoragearea.1.7.13.2.5 Specialhandlingprocedures havebeenimplemented fortheprocessing ofnuclearfuelduringrefueling outages.Theseprocedures minimizetheriskofdamagetothenewandspentfuelandthepossiblereleaseofradioactive materialwhenplacingthespentfuelintothespentfuelpools1.7.14INSPECTION, TEST,ANDOPERATING STATUS1.7.14.1SCOPE~~~Operating statusofstructures, systemsandcomponents isindicated bytaggingofvalvesandswitches, orbyotherspecified means,insuchamannerastopreventinadvertent operation. | |||
Thestatusofinspections andtestsperformed onindividual itemsisclearlyindicated bymarkingsand/orloggingunderstrictprocedural controlstopreventinadvertent bypassing ofsuchinspections andtests.1.7.14.2INPLENENTATI ON1.7.14.2.1 Fordesignchangeactivities, including itemfabrication, installation andtest,aprogramexistswhichspecifies thedegreeofcontrolrequiredfortheidentification ofinspection andteststatusofstructures, systemsandcomponents. | |||
1.7-71December, 1990 Physicalidentification isusedtotheextentpractical toindicatethestatusofitemsrequiring inspections, tests,orexaminations. | |||
Proce-duresexistwhichprovidefortheuseofcalibration andrejection | |||
: stickers, tags,stampsandotherformsofidentification toindicatetestandinspection status.TheClearance PermitSystemusesvarioustagstoidentifyequipment andsystemoperability status.Anotherprogramestablishes ataggingsystemforliftedleads,etc.Forthoseitemsrequiring calibration, theprogramprovidesforphysicalindication ofcalibration statusbycalibration stickersoracontrolsystemisused.1.7.14.2.2 Application andremovalofinspection andweldingstamps,andofsuchstatusindicators astags,marking,labels,etc.,iscontrolled byplantprocedures. | |||
Theinspection statusofmaterials receivedattheCookNuclearPlantisidentified inaccordance withestablished instructions. | |||
Thestatusisidentified asHold,HoldforgualityControlClearance, Reject,orAccept.Theinspection statusofworkinprogressiscontrolled bytheuseofholdpointsinprocedures. | |||
PlantgualityControlordepartmental ANSIN18.1qualified personnel (reference 1.7.10.2.4herein)inspectanactivityatvariousstagesandsignofftheprocedural inspection steps'hestatusofweldingiscontrolled throughtheuseofawelddatablockwhichidentifies theinspection andNDEstatusofeachweld.1.7,14.2.3 Requiredsurveillance testprocedures aredefinedinPHIs.Theseinstructions providefordocumenting bypassedtests,andrescheduling ofthetest.1.7-72December, 1990 Thestatusoftestingafterminormaintenance isrecordedaspartoftheJobOrder.Thestatusoftestingaftermajormaintenance isincludedaspartoftheprocedure, andincludestheperformance offunctional testingandapprovalofdatabysupervisory personnel. | |||
Testing,inspection andotheroperations important tosafetyareconducted inaccordance withproperlyreviewedandapprovedprocedures. | |||
ThePHIforplantprocedures requiresthatprocedures befollowedaswritten.Alteration tothesequenceofaprocedure canonlybeaccomplished byaprocedure changewhichissubjecttothesamecontrolsastheoriginalreviewandapproval. | |||
Whenanimmediate procedure changeisrequiredtocontinuein-process workortestingandtherequiredcompletereviewandapprovalprocesscannotbeaccomplished, an"OnTheSpot"changeisprocessed inaccordance withthePHIonplantprocedures. | |||
1.7.14.2.4 Nonconforming, inoperable, ormalfunctioning structures, systems.andcomponents areclearlyidentified bytags,stickers, stamps,etc.,anddocumented topreventinadvertent use.1.7.15NONCONFORMING ITEMS1.7.15.1SCOPENaterials, parts,orcomponents thatdonotconformtorequirements arecontrolled inordertopreventtheirinadvertent use.Nonconforming itemsareidentified, documented, segregated whenpractical anddisposi-tioned.Affected" organizations aren'otified ofnonconformances. | |||
1.7.15.2IHPLEHENTAT ION1.7..15.2.1 Items,services, oractivities thataredeficient incharacteristic, documentation, orprocedure, whichrenderthequalityunacceptable orindeterminate, areidentified asnonconforming, andanyfurtheruseis1.7-73December, 1990 controlled. | |||
Nonconformances aredocumented anddispositioned, andnotification ismadetoaffectedorganizations. | |||
Personnel authorized todisposition, conditionally releaseandcloseoutnonconformances aredesignated. | |||
TheJobOrderSystemand/ortheCondition/Problem Reports(referto1.7.16herein)areusedatCookNuclearPlanttoidentifynonconforming itemsandinitiatecorrective actionforitemswhichareinstalled orhavebeenreleasedtotheCookNuclearPlant,Systems,components, ormaterials whichrequirerepairorinspection arecontrolled undertheJobOrderSystem.Inaddition, thevariousprocedures identified in1.7.14hereinprovideforidentification, segregation anddocumentation, ofnonconforming items.1.7.15.2.2 Nonconforming itemsareidentified bymarking,tagging,segregating, orbydocumented administrative controls. | |||
Documentation describes thenonconformance, thedisposition ofthenonconformance andtheinspection requirements. | |||
Italsoincludessignature approvalofthedisposition. | |||
Completed JobOrdersarereviewedbythesupervisor responsible foraccomplishing theworkandthesupervisor ofthedepartment/section thatoriginated theJobOrder.ThegADivisionperiodically auditstheJobOrderSystem,andonasamplebasis,JobOrders.1.7.15.2.3 Itemsthathavebeenrepairedorreworkedareinspected andtestedinaccordance withtheoriginalinspection andtestrequirements oralternatives thathavebeendocumented. | |||
Itemsthathavethedisposition of"repair"or"use-as-is" requiredocumentation justifying acceptability. | |||
Thechangesarerecordedtodenotetheas-builtcondition. | |||
1.7-74December, 1990 | |||
'henrequiredbyestablished procedures, surveillance oroperability testsareconducted onanitemafterrework,repairorreplacement. | |||
1,7,15.2.4 Disposition ofconditionally releaseditemsareclosedoutbeforetheitemsarereliedupontoperformsafety-related functions. | |||
1.7.16CORRECTIVE ACTION1.7.16.1SCOPEConditions adversetoquality,suchasfailures, malfunctions, deficien-cies,deviations, defective materialandequipment andnonconformances, areidentified promptlyandcorrected assoonaspractical. | |||
Forsignificant conditions adversetoquality,thecauseofthecondition isdetermined, corrective actionistakentocorrecttheimmediate problem,andpreventive actionisimplemented topreventrecurrence. | |||
Inthesecases,thecondition, causeandcorrective actiontakenisdocu-mentedandreportedtoappropriate levelsofmanagement. | |||
1,7.16.2INPLEHENTATION 1.7.16,2.1 Procedures areestablished thatdescribetheplantandAEPSCcorrective actionprograms. | |||
Theseprocedures arereviewedandconcurred withbytheAEPSCQADivision. | |||
1.7.16.2.2 Condition/Problem Reportsprovidethemechanism forplantandAEPSCpersonnel tonotifymanagement ofconditions adversetoquality.Condition/Problem Reportsarealsousedtoreportviolations tocodes,regulations andtheTechnical Specifications. | |||
Investigations ofreportedconditions adversetoqualityareassignedbymanagement. | |||
TheCondition/ | |||
ProblemReportisusedtodocumenttheinvestigation ofaproblem;andto,1.7-75December, 1990 | |||
identifytheneedforadesignchangetocorrectsystemorequipment deficiencies, ortoidentifytheneedfortheinitiation ofJobOrderstocorrectminordeficiencies. | |||
Further,Condition/Problem Reportsareusedtoidentifythoseactionsnecessary topreventrecurrence ofthereportedcondition. | |||
Significant | |||
: problems, whicharesodesignated onCondition/Problem Reports,arereviewedbythePNSRCforevaluation ofactionstakenorbeingtakentocorrectthedeficiency andpreventrecurrence. | |||
TheAEPSCNSDRCisresponsible forassuringthatindependent reviewsofviolations (asspecified intheTechnical Specifications) areperformed. | |||
Theseviolations areconsidered significant problemswhicharedocumented onCondition/Problem Reports.Thereviewswillprovideanindependent evaluation ofthereportedproblemsandcorrective actions.TheAEPSCgADivisionperiodically auditsthecorrective actionsystemsforcompliance andeffectiveness. | |||
1.7.17EQUALITYASSURANCE RECORDS1.7.17.1SCOPERecordsthatfurnishevidenceofactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents aremaintained. | |||
Theyareaccurate, | |||
: complete, legibleandareprotected againstdamage,deteri-oration,orloss.Theyareidentifiable andretrievable. | |||
1.7.17.2IHPLENENTAT ION1.7.17.2.1 Documents thatfurnishevidenceofactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsaregenerated andcontrolled inaccordance withtheprocedure thatgovernsthoseactivities. | |||
Uponcompletion, thesedocuments areconsidered records.Theserecordsinclude:1.7-76December, 1990 a)Resultsofreviews,inspections, surveillances, tests,auditsandmaterialanalyses. | |||
b)gualification ofpersonnel, procedures andequipment. | |||
c)-Operation logs.d)Maintenance andmodification procedures andrelatedinspection results.e)f)g)h)Reportable occurrences. | |||
RecordsrequiredbytheplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
ProblemReports.Otherdocumentation suchasdrawings, specifications, procurement documents, calibration procedures andreports.Radiographs (whicharealsoclassified assafety-related items).1.7.17.2.2 Instructions andprocedures establish therequirements fortheidenti-ficationandpreparation ofrecordsforsystemsandequipment underthegAProgram,andprovidesthecontrolsforretention oftheserecords,Criteriaforthestoragelocationofqualityrelatedrecordsandaretention schedulefortheserecordshasbeenestablished. | |||
FileIndexeshavebeenestablished toprovidedirection forfilingandtoprovidefortheretrievability oftherecords.Controlshavebeenestablished forlimitingaccesstothePlantMasterFiletopreventunauthorized entry,unauthorized removalandforuseoftherecordsunderemergency conditions. | |||
TheAccounting Supervisor isresponsible forthecontrolandoperation ofthePlantMasterFileroom.1.7.17.2.3 WithinAEPSC,eachdepartment/division managerisresponsible fortheidentification, collection, maintenance andstorageofrecordsgenerated 1.7-77December, 1990 bytheirdepartment/division. | |||
Procedures ensurethemaintenance ofrecordssufficient tofurnishobjective evidencethatactivities affecting qualityareincompliance withtheestablished gAProgram.1.7.17.2.4 Whenadocumentbecomesarecord,itisdesignated aspermanent ornonpermanent andthentransmitted tofile.Nonpermanent recordshavespecified retention times.Permanent recordsaremaintained forthelifeoftheplantorequipment, asapplicable. | |||
1.7.17.2.5 Onlyauthorized personnel mayissuecorrections orsupplements torecords.1.7.17.2.6 Traceability betweentherecordandtheitemoractivitytowhichitappliesisprovided. | |||
1.7.17.2.7 Exceptforrecordsthatcanonlybestoredasoriginals, suchasradio-graphsandsomestripcharts,ormicrographs thereof,recordsarestoredinremote,dualfacilities topreventdamage,deterioration, orlossduetonaturalorunnatural causes.Whenonlythesingleoriginalcanberetained, specialfire-rated faciliti'es areused.1.7.18AUDITS1.7.18.1SCOPEAcomprehensive systemofauditsiscarriedouttoprovideindependent evaluation ofcompliance with,andtheeffectiveness ofthegAProgram,including thoseelementsoftheprogramimplemented bysuppliers and1.7-78December, 1990 acontractors. | |||
Auditsareperformed inaccordance withwrittenprocedures orchecklists byqualified personnel nothavingdirectresponsibility intheareasaudited.Auditresultsaredocumented andarereviewedbymanagement. | |||
Follow-up actionistakenwhereindicated. | |||
1.7.18.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.18.2.1 AEPSCADivisionResonsibilities Thebasicresponsibility fortheassessment ofthegAProgramisvestedintheAEPSCgAD.TheAEPSCgADisprimarily responsible forensuringthatpropergAprogramsareestablished andforverification oftheirimplementation. | |||
Theseresponsibilities aredischarged incooperation withtheAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantmanagement, andtheirstaffs.1.7.18,2.2 Internalauditsareperformed inaccordance withestablished schedules thatreflectthestatusandimportance ofsafetytotheactivities beingperformed. | |||
Allareaswheretherequirements oflOCFR50,AppendixBapplyareauditedwithinaperiodofonetotwoyears.1.7.18.2.3 TheAEPSCgADconductsauditstoverifytheadequacyandimplementation ofthegAProgramattheCookNuclearPlantandwithintheAEPSystem.gAauditreportsaredistributed to:Appropriate CookNuclearPlantmanagement andtheNSORC(allaudits).1.7.18.2.4 Theindependent off-sitereviewandauditorganization istheAEPSCNSORC.Thiscommittee iscomposedofAEPSC,18MandCookNuclearPlantmanagement members.AnNSORCManualhasbeendeveloped forthiscommittee whichcontainstheNSORCCharterandprocedures. | |||
TheNSORCconductsperiodicauditsofCookNuclearPlantoperations pursuanttoestablished criteria(Technical Specifications, etc'~)~1,7-79December, 1990 NSDRCauditreportsaresubmitted forreviewtotheChairmanoftheNSDRCandtotheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident | |||
-Engineering andConstruction. | |||
ProblemReportsprovidefortherecording ofactionstakentocorrectdeficiencies foundduringtheseaudits.1.7.18.2.5 TheCookNuclearPlanton-sitereviewgroupisthePNSRC.Thiscommittee reviewsplantoperations asaroutineevaluation andservestoadvisethePlantManageronmattersrelatedtonuclearsafety.Thecomposition ofthecommittee isdefinedintheTechnical Specifications. | |||
ThePNSRCalsoreviewsinstructions andprocedures, anddesignchangesforsafety-related systemspriortoapprovalbythePlantHanager.Inaddition, thiscommittee servestoconductinvestigations ofviolations toTechnical Specifications, andreviewssignificant ProblemReportstodetermine ifappropriate actionhasbeentaken.1.7.18.2.6 | |||
~~~~Auditsofsuppliers andcontractors arescheduled basedonthestatusofsafetyimportance oftheactivities beingperformed, andareinitiated earlyenoughtoassureeffective qualityassurance duringdesign,pro-curement, manufacturing, construction, installation, inspection andtesting.Principal contractors arerequiredtoaudittheirsuppliers systematically inaccordance withthecriteriaestablished withintheirqualityassurance programs. | |||
1.7.18.2.7 Regularly scheduled auditsaresupplemented by"specialaudits"whensignificant changesaremadeinthegAProgram,whenitissuspected thatqualityisinjeopardy, orwhenanindependent assessment ofprogrameffectiveness isconsidered necessary. | |||
1.7-80December, 1990 1.7.18.2.8 | |||
~~~Auditsincludeanobjective evaluation ofpractices, procedures,'nstruc-tions,activities anditemsrelatedtoquality;andreviewofdocuments andrecordstoconfirmthatthegAProgramiseffective andproperlyimplemented. | |||
1.7.18.2.9 Auditprocedures andthescope,plans,checklists andresultsofindivi-dualauditsaredocumented. | |||
1'.18.2.10 Personnel selectedforauditingassignments haveexperience oraregiventrainingcommensurate withtheneeds'oftheauditandhavenodirectresponsibilities intheareasaudited.1.7.18.2.11 | |||
~~~~Hanagement oftheauditedorganization identifies andtakesappropriate actiontocorrectobserveddeficiencies andtopreventrecurrence. | |||
Follow-up isperformed bytheauditingorganization toensurethattheappropriate actionsweretaken.Suchfollow-up includesreauditswhennecessary. | |||
1.7.18.2.12 TheadequacyofthegAProgramisregularly assessedbyAEPSCmanagement. | |||
Thefollowing activities constitute formalelementsofthatassessment: | |||
a)Auditreports,including follow-up oncorrective actionaccomplish-mentandeffectiveness, aredistributed toappropriate levelsofmanagement. | |||
1.7-81December, 1990 b)Individuals independent fromtheQAorganization, butknowledgeable inauditingandqualityassurance, periodically reviewtheeffectiveness oftheQAPrograms. | |||
Conclusions andrecommendations arereportedtotheAEPSCVicePresident | |||
-NuclearOperations. | |||
1.7.19FIREPROTECTION QAPROGRAH1.7.19.1Introduction TheCookNuclearPlantFireProtection QAProgramhasbeendeveloped usingtheguidanceofNRCBranchTechnical Position(APCSB)9.5-1,AppendixA,SectionC,"QualityAssurance Program," | |||
andNRCclarification "NuclearPlantFireProtection Functional Responsibilities, Administrative | |||
: Controls, andQualityAssurance," | |||
datedJune14,1977.Assuch,theFireProtection QAProgramispartoftheoverallQAProgramfortheplant.TheFireProtection QAProgramencompasses design,procurement, fabrication, construction, surveillance, inspection, operation, maintenance, modification, andaudits.Implementation andassessment oftheFireProtection QAProgramistheresponsibility ofeachinvolvedAEPSCandIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyorganization. | |||
1.1.19.9TheFireProtection QAProgramisunderthemanagement controlofAEPSC.Thiscontrolconsistsof:1)verifying theeffectiveness oftheFireProtection QAProgramthroughreview,surveillance, andaudits.2)directing formulation, implementation, andassessment oftheFireProtection QAProgrambyprocedural controlsand,3)assuringtheQAprogramisacceptable tothemanagement responsible forfireprotection. | |||
1.7-82December, 1990 | |||
ThePlantManagerhasdelegated responsibility tovariousCookNuclearPlantdepartments forthefollowing fireprotection activities: | |||
1. | a)b)c)d)e)f)g)Maintenance offireprotection systems,Testingoffireprotection equipment, Firesafetyinspections, Firefightingprocedures, Firedrills,Emergency remoteshutdownprocedures, andEmergency repairprocedures (lOCFR50, AppendixR).TheFireProtection gAProgramattheCookNuclearPlantalsoprovidesforinspection offirehazards,explosion hazards,andtrainingoffirebrigadeandresponding firedepartments. | ||
TheAssistant ShiftSupervisor onduty,ordesignee, isdesignated astheFireBrigadeLeaderandcoordinates thefirefightingeffortsofshiftpersonnel andtheFireBrigade.1.7.19.3DesinControlandProcurement DocumentControlgualitystandards arespecified inthedesigndocuments suchasappropriate fireprotection codesandstandards, andasnecessary deviations andchangesfromthesequalitystandards arecontrolled. | |||
TheCookNuclearPlant'design wasreviewedbyqualified personnel toensureinclusion ofappropriate fire'protection requirements. | |||
Thesereviewsincludeitemssuchas:1)Verification astotheadequacyofelectrical isolation andcableseparation criteria. | |||
2)Verification ofappropriate requirements forroomisolation (sealingpenetrations, floorsandotherfirebarriers). | |||
1.7-83December, 1990 3)Determination forincreaseinfireloadings. | |||
4)Determination fortheneedofadditional firedetection andsuppression equipment. | |||
Procurement offireprotection equipment andrelateditemsaresubjecttotherequirements ofthefireprotection procurement documents. | |||
Areviewofthesedocuments isperformed toassurefireprotection requirements andqualityrequirements arecorrectly stated,verifiable, andcontrollable, andthatthereisadequateacceptance andrejection criteria. | |||
Procurement documents mustbeprepared, | |||
: reviewed, andapprovedaccording togAProgramrequirements. | |||
Designandprocurement documentchanges,including fieldchangesanddesigndeviations arecontrolled byprocedure. | |||
1.7.19.4Instructions Procedures andOrawinsInspections, tests,administrative | |||
: controls, firedrillsandtrainingthatassistinimplementing thefireprotection programareprescribed byapprovedinstructions orprocedures. | |||
Indoctrination andtrainingprogramsforfireprevention andfirefightingareimplemented inaccordance withapprovedprocedures. | |||
Activities associated withthefireprotection systemsandfireprotection relatedsystemsareprescribed andaccomplished inaccordance withdocumented instructions, procedures, anddrawings. | |||
Instructions andprocedures fordesign,installation, inspection, tests,maintenance, modification andadministrative controlsarereviewedthroughaudittoassurethatthefireprotection programismaintained. | |||
Operation andmaintenance information hasbeenprovidedtotheplantintheformofSystemDescriptions andequipment supplierinformation. | |||
1.7-84December, 1990 1.7.19.5ControlofPurchased ItemsandServicesHeasuresareestablished toassurethatpurchased itemsandservicesconformtoprocurement documents. | |||
Thesemeasuresincludeprovisions, asappropriate, forsourceevaluation andselection, objective evidenceofqualityfurnished bythecontractor, inspections atsuppliers, orreceiptinspection. | |||
Sourceorreceiptinspection isprovided, asaminimum,forthoseitemswherequalitycannotbeverifiedafterinstallation. | |||
Aprogramforindependent inspection ofthefireprotection activities hasbeenestablished andimplemented. | |||
Theseinspections areperformed bypersonnel otherthanthoseresponsible forimplementation oftheact.ivity. | |||
Theinspections include:a)Inspection ofinstallation, maintenance andmodification offireprotection systemsandequipment. | |||
b)Inspections ofpenetration sealsandfireretardant coatinginstal-lationstoverifytheactivityissatisfactorily completed inaccordance withinstallation specifications. | |||
c)Inspections ofcableroutingtoverifyconformance withdesignrequirements asspecified inAEPSCSpecifications and/orplantprocedures. | |||
d)Inspections toverifythatappropriate requirements forfirebarriersaresatisfied following installation, modification, repairorreplacement activities. | |||
e)Heasurestoassurethatinspection personnel areindependent fromtheindividuals performing theactivitybeinginspected, andare1.7-85December, 1990 knowledgeable inthedesignandinstallation requirements forfireprotection. | |||
f)Inspection procedures, instructions orchecklists forrequiredinspections. | |||
ig)Periodicinspections offireprotection systems,emergency breathing andauxiliary equipment. | |||
h)Periodicinspections ofmaterials subjecttodegradation suchasfirestops,sealsandfireretardant coatingasrequiredbyTechnical Specifications ormanufacturer's recommendations. | |||
1.7.19.7TestandTestControla)Installation testing-Following installation, modification, repair,orreplacement, sufficient testingisperformed todemonstrate thatthefireprotection systemsandequipment willperformsatisfactorily. | |||
Writtentestprocedures forinstallation testsincorporate therequirements andacceptance limitscontained inapplicable designdocuments, b)Periodictesting-Periodictestingoccurstodocumentthatfireprotection equipment, functions inaccordance withitsdesign.c)Programshavebeenestablished toverifythetestingoffireprotec-tionsystemsandtoverifythattestpersonnel areeffectively trained.d)Testresultsaredocumented, evaluated, andtheiracceptability determined byaqualified responsible individual orgroup.1.7.19.8InsectionTestand0eratinStatus1.7-86December, 1990Theinspection, testandoperating statusforplantTechnical Specification fireprotection systemsareperformed asdescribed in1,7.14herein. | |||
1.7.19.9Nonconformin ItemssTechnical Specification fireprotection equipment nonconformances areidentified anddispositioned asdescribed in1.7.15herein.1.7.19.10Corrective ActionThecorrective actionmechanism described in1.7.16hereinappliestotheTechnical Specification fireprotection equipment. | |||
1.7.19.11 RecordsRecordsgenerated tosupportthefireprotection programarecontrolled asdescribed in1.7.17herein.1.7.19.12 AuditsAuditsareconducted anddocumented toverifycompliance withtheFireProtection gAProgramasdescribed in1.7.18herein.Auditsareperiodically performed toverifycompliance withtheadminis-trativecontrolsandimplementation offireprotection qualityassurance criteria. | |||
Theauditsareperformed inaccordance withpreestablished writtenprocedures orchecklists. | |||
Auditresultsaredocumented andreviewedbymanagement havingresponsibility intheareaaudited.Follow-up actionistakenbyresponsible management tocorrectthedeficiencies revealedbytheaudit.1.7-87December, 1990 AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation SupportOrganization forIheCoottNuclearPlanl.seen<<>>ts>>IUsrseV>>nPI<<Us~IrIet<<>>>>>>>><<t ASrs>>sslrs>> | |||
I<<m&secsorOUalet1AsSUIIenrrsVKePres<<nmlN>>eternerthol~lionsVKePres<<tent l+1>>Nclancte>>>>ment ACohstr>>ct L.o>>estyAssr>>ancertssss<<nPlantStansctee Cr<<ANI>>kesPlantIIt<<KA<<ssolreranons rssessonlAsssstarsl VerePens>>s<<eIters<<psQeefI<<ttnaNerattteeartmantAs>>starIV>>~I'Ies<<ts>>slIn>>leertest<<seer>>et nPsISIKIslarsaQS>>U<<I Acsee\IIIKIKII Department jSe~Constr>>clson No>>attnD'nolpastolAfpscorator>>tat<<et, stshnnlos>>JUmel<<rn eeocNUtearPtarslrr<<srs>>se>>IIAsns>>es assn>>eslratree AIrncbonatrareclson | |||
<<gnatalsensesl>>rKt<<mesleerl<<nIrcCreatsnlearI'laniarIs<<streeC9rDOrD2CJrDt AmericanElecricPowerCompanyAmericanElectricPowerCompanyAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation Appalachian PowerCompanyOhioPowerCompanyIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyColumbusSouthernPowerCompanyKingsportPowerCompanyKentuckyPowerCompanyMichiganPowerCompanyWheelingPowerCompanyCentralOperating CompanyICookNuclearPlantadministrative, technical. | |||
andfunctional correction KanawhaValleyPowerICompanyCardinalIOperating Company'generating subsidiary I)ointlyownedwithBuckeyePower.Inc. | |||
0 rIgureilO.I.t-~Organizational Relationships WithintheAmericanElectricPowerSystemPertaining toQualityAssurance 8QualityControlSupportoftheCookNuclearPlantChairmanoftheBoardlLChiefExecutive Officer.AEPSC.IndianaMichiganPowerCompany,andOtherAEPSubsidaries SeniorExecutive VlccPresident Engineering 8Construction, AEPSCandVicePreskfent.lndktna MichiganPowerCompanyVIcePresident NuclearOperations, AEPSCandVicePresident. | |||
IndktnaMichiganPowerCompany(ManagerofNuclearOperations) | |||
DirectorQualityAssurance, AEPSCfItManagersEngineering 8Construction Organization. | |||
AEPSCm~~wmdPlantManager,CookNuclearPlantQualityAssurance Superintendent (onsite),AEPSCSafety4Assessment Superintendent 1.7-90administrative 8functkeal direction technical direction technical liaisonfunctional ckectionforCookNucIeerPlantactivities Decenibet, 1990 | |||
AEPSCQualityAssurance DivisionOrganization AEPSCDrrectorOuslrtyAssurance SectionManagerOuastyAssurance SupportSectionManagerAudtsandProcurement SectionManagerOusatyAssurance Engineering SectkNlManagerNuclearSoftwareOusltyAssurance OustrtyAssurance Superintendent (site)StsttSPedalisl StallSpec(asst SeniorAudtorAudlorPro)actsTeohniotan(S) | |||
AudlorsEngineering Technotopst(s) | |||
Su~AudtorAudtsSupervisory AudtorSunreitlance/Rer tawsTechnician(s) | |||
Departmental Assistant AudtorsSunrsittance fngrneertngTechnologist | |||
IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyOrganization fortheCookNuclearPlantPlantManagerAEPSCSectronManagerNuclearSafetydLicensing Licensing ActivilyCoordinator Assistant PlantManagerProduction Assistant PlantManagerTechnical SupportAssistant PlantManagerProjectsAdministration Superintendent OperatfonsSuperIntendant Technical Superintendent PhysicalScienceProjectEngineering Superintendent SafetyendAssessment Superintendent StoresSupervisor Technical Superintendent Engineering SiteConstruction ManagerOuafityControl/NDE SectionMaintenance Superintendent ComputerSciencesSuperintendent AEPSCSiteDesigna*ninfstrative responsklftty foehn<cat haisontunclional responsfhfffty APPENDIXAREGULATORY ANDSAFETYGUIDESANSISTANDARDS 1.Reg.Guide1.8(9/75)ANSIN18.1(1971)Personnel Selection andTrainingSelection andTrainingofNuclearPowerPlantPersonnel 2.Reg.Guide1.14(8/75)ReactorCoolantPumpFlywheelIntegrity3.Reg.Guide1.16(8/75)Reporting ofOperating Information, AppendixA-Technical Specifications 4.SafetyGuide30(8/72)ANSIN45.2.4(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements fortheInstallation, Inspection, andTestingofInstrumentation andElectricEquipment Installation, Inspection, andTestingRequirements forInstrumentation andElectricEquipment DuringtheConstruction ofNuclearPowerGenerating Stations5.Reg.Guide1.33(02/78)ANSIN18.7(1976)(ANS3.21976)ANSIN45.2(1977)gualityAssurance ProgramRequirements (Operation) | |||
Administrative ControlsandgualityAssurance fortheOperational PhaseofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance ProgramRequirements forNuclearFacilities 1.7-A-93December, 1990 | |||
,6.Reg.Guide1.37(3/73)~~~~~ANSIN45.2.1(1973)7.Reg.Guide1.38(10/76)ANSIN45.2.2(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements forCleaningofFluidSystemsandAssociated Components ofWater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsCleaningofFluidSystemsandAssociated Components DuringConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance Requirements forPackaging, | |||
: Shipping, Receiving, StorageandHandlingofIt'emsforWater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsPackaging, | |||
: Shipping, Receiving, StorageandHandlingofItemsforNuclearPowerPlants(DuringtheConstruction Phase)8.Reg.Guide1.39(10/76)ANSIN45.2.3(1973)Housekeeping Requirements forWater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsHousekeeping DuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants9.Reg.Guide1.54(6/73)ANSIN101~4(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements forProtective CoatingsAppliedtoMater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance forProtective CoatingsAppliedtoNuclearFacilities 10.Reg.Guide1.58(9/80)ANSIN45.2.6(1978)gualification ofNuclearPowerPlantInspection, Examination, andTestingPersonnel gualifications ofInspection, Examination, andTestingPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlants1.7-A-94December, 1990 ll.Reg.Guide1.63(7/78)ElectricPenetration Assemblies inContainment Structures forLight-Mater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlants12.Reg.Guide1.64{10/73)ANSIN45.2.11(1974)gualityAssurance Requirements fortheDesignofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance Requirements fortheDesignofNuclearPowerPlants13.Reg.Guide1.74{2/74)ANSIN45.2.10(1973)gualityAssurance TermsandDefinitions gualityAssurance TermsandDefinitions 14.Reg.Guide1.88(10/76)ANSIN45.2.9(1974)Collection, Storage,andMaintenance ofNuclearPowerPlantgualityAssurance RecordsRequirements forCollection, Storage,andNaintenance ofgualityAssurance RecordsforNuclearPowerPlants15.Reg.Guide1.94(4/76)ANSIN45.2.5(1974)gualityAssurance Requirements forInstallation, Inspection, andTestingofStructural ConcreteandStructural SteelDuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlantsSupplementary gualityAssurance Requirements forInstallation, Inspection, andTestingofStructural ConcreteandStructural SteelDuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants1.7-A-95December, 1990 16.Reg.Guide1.108(8/77)PeriodicTestingofDieselGenerator UnitsusedasOnsiteElectricPowerSystemsatNuclearPowerPlants17.Reg.Guide1.123(7/77)ANSIN45.2.13(1976)gualityAssurance Requirements forControlofProcurement ofItemsandServicesforNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance Requirements forControlofProcurement ofItemsandServicesforNuclearPowerPlants18.Reg.Guide1.144(1/79)ANSIN45.2.12(1977)AuditingofgualityAssurance ProgramsforNuclearPowerPlantsRequirements forAuditingofgualityAssurance ProgramsforNuclearPowerPlants19.Reg.Guide1.146(8/80)ANSIN45.2.23(1978)gualification ofgualityAssurance ProgramAuditPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlantsgualification ofgualityAssurance ProgramAuditPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlants20.ANSIN45.2.8(1975)Supplementary gualityAssurance Requirements forInstallation, Inspection andTestingofMechanical Equipment andSystemsfortheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants21.ANSIN45.4(1972)Leakage-Rate TestingofContainment Structures forNuclearReactors1.7-A-96December, 1990 APPENDIXBAEPSC/I&M EXCEPTIONS TOOPERATING PHASESTANDARDS ANDREGULATORY GUIDES1.GENERAL~RCertainRegulatory GuidesinvokeorimplyRegulatory Guidesandstandards inadditiontothestandardeachprimarily endorses. | |||
CertainANSIStandards invokeorimplyadditional standards. | |||
ExcetionInterretationTheAEPSC/I&M commitment referstotheRegulatory GuidesandANSIStandards specifically identified inAppendixA.Additional Regulatory Guides,ANSIStandards andsimilardocuments impliedorreFerenced inthosespecifically identified arenotpartofthiscommitment. | |||
'18.7GeneralExcetionInterretationAEPSCandI&Mhaveestablished bothanon-siteandoff-sitestandingcommittee forindependent reviewactivities. | |||
Togethertheyformtheindependent reviewbody.Thestandardnumericandqualification requirement maynotbemetbyeachgroupindividually. | |||
Procedures willbeestablished tospecifyhoweachgroupwillbeinvolvedinreviewactivities. | |||
Thisexception/interpreta-tionisconsistent withtheplant'sTechnical Specifications. | |||
2a.Sec.4.3.1~R"Personnel assignedresponsibility forindependent reviewsshallbespecified inbothnumberandtechnical disciplines, andshallcollectively havetheexperience andcompetence requiredtoreviewproblemsinthefollowing areas:1.7-B-97December, 1990 ExcetionInterretationAEPSCNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC)andPlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC)willnothavemembersspecified bynumbernorbytechnical disciplines, anditsmembersmaynothavetheexperience andcompetence requiredtoreviewproblemsinallareaslistedinthissection.Thisexception/interpretation isconsistent withtheplant'sTechnical Specifications. | |||
TheNSDRCandPNSRCwillnotspecifically includeamemberqualified innondestructive testingbutwillusequalified technical consultants toperformthisandotherfunctions asdetermined necessary bytherespec-tivecommittee chairman. | |||
2b.Sec.4.3.2.1~Rit"Whenastandingcommittee isresponsible fortheindependent reviewprogram,itshallbecomposedofnolessthanfivepersonsofwhomnomorethanaminorityaremembersoftheon-siteoperating organization. | |||
Competent alternates arepermitted ifdesignated inadvance.Theuseofalternates shallberestricted tolegitimate absencesofprincipals." | |||
ExcetionInterretationSeeItem2a.2c.Sec.4.3.3.1~R"...recommendations | |||
...shallbedisseminated promptlytoappropriate membersofmanagement havingresponsibility intheareareviewed." | |||
ExcetionInterretationRecommendations madeasaresultofreviewwillgenerally beconveyedtotheon-si.teoroff-sitestandingcommittee. | |||
Procedures willbemaintained specifying howrecommendations aretobeconsidered. | |||
1.7-B-98December, 1990 2d.Sec.4.3.4"Thefollowing subjectsshallbereviewedbytheindependent reviewbody:...."ExcetionInterretationSubjectsrequiring reviewwillbeasspecified intheplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
2e.Sec.4.3.4(3)~ll"ChangesintheTechnical Specifications orLicenseAmendments relatingtonuclearsafetyaretobereviewedbytheindependent reviewbodypriortoimplementation, exceptinthosecaseswherethechangeisidentical toapreviously reviewedproposedchange."ExcetionInterretationAlthoughtheusualpracticeisto'eetthisrequirement, exceptions aremadetoNSDRCreviewandapprovalpriortoimplementation inrarecaseswiththepermission oftheNSDRCChairmanandSecretary. | |||
PNSRCreviewandapprovalisalwaysdonepriortoimplementation ofTechnical Specification changes.2f.Sec.4.4Reuirement"Theon-siteoperating organization shallprovide,aspartofthenormaldutiesofplantsupervisory personnel ExcetionInterretationSomeoftheresponsibilities oftheon-siteoperating organization described inSection4.4maybecarriedoutbythePNSRCand/orNSDRCasdescribed inplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
1.7-B-99December, 1990 0 | |||
~2g.Sec.5.2.2~~~~~"Temporary changes,whichclearlydonotchangetheintentoftheapprovedprocedure, shallasaminimumbeapprovedbytwomembersoftheplantstaffknowledgeable intheareasaffectedbytheprocedures. | |||
Atleastoneoftheseindividuals shallbethesupervisor inchargeoftheshiftandholdasenioroperator's licenseontheunitaffected." | |||
ExcetionInterretationI&Hconsiders thatthisrequirement appliesonlytoprocedures identi-fiedinplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
Temporary changestotheseprocedures shallbeapprovedasdescribed inplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
2h.Sec.5.2.6~R"Incaseswhererequireddocumentary evidenceisnotavailable, theassociated equipment ormaterials mustbeconsidered nonconforming inaccordance withSection5.2.14.Untilsuitabledocumentary evidenceisavailable toshowtheequipment ormaterialisinconformance, affectedsystemsshallbeconsidered tobeinoperable andrelianceshallnotbeplacedonsuchsystemstofulfilltheirintendedsafetyfunctions." | |||
ExcetionInterretationI&Hinitiates appropriate corrective actionwhenitisdiscovered thatdocumentary evidencedoesnotexistforatestorinspection whichisarequirement toverifyequipment acceptability. | |||
Thisactionincludesatechnical evaluation oftheequipment's operability status.2i.Sec.5.2.8~tit"Asurveillance testingandinspection program...shallincludetheestablishment ofamastersurveillance schedulereflecting thestatusofallplannedin-plantsurveillances testsandinspections." | |||
1,7-8-100 | |||
: December, 1990 ExcetionInterretationSeparatemasterschedules mayexistfordifferent programssuchasISI,pumpandvalvetestingandTechnical Specification surveillance testing.2j.Sec.5.2.13.1~Rit"Totheextentnecessary, procurement documents shallrequiresuppliers toprovideagualityAssurance Programconsistent withthepertinent requirements ofANSIN45.2-1977."ExcetionInterretationTotheextentnecessary, procurement documents requireth'atthesupplierhasadocumented gualityAssurance Programconsistent withthepertinent requirements ofIOCFRSO,Appendix8;ANSIN45.2;orothernationally recognized codesandstandards. | |||
2k,Sec.5.2.13.2~llANSIN18.7andN45.2.13specifythatwhererequiredbycode,regulation, | |||
.orcontract, documentary evidencethatitemsconformtoprocurement requirements shallbeavailable atthenuclearpowerplantsitepriortoinstallation oruseofsuchitems.ExcetionInterretationTherequireddocumentary evidenceisavailable atthesitepriortouse,butnotnecessarily priortoinstallation. | |||
Thisallowsinstallation toproceedwhileanymissingdocuments arebeingobtained, butprecludes dependence ontheitemforsafetypurposes. | |||
21,Sec.5.2.15~R"Plantprocedures shallbereviewedbyanindividual knowledgeable intheareaaffectedbytheprocedure nolessfrequently thaneverytwoyearstodetermine ifchangesarenecessary ordesirable." | |||
1.7-8-101 | |||
: December, 1990 ExcetionInterretationBiennialreviewsarenotperformed inthatIMhasprogrammatic controlrequirements inplacethatmakethebiennialreviewprocessredundant fromaregulatory perspective. | |||
Theseprogrammatic controlswereeffectedinanefforttoensurethatplantinstructions andprocedures, arereviewedforpossiblerevisionwhenpertinent sourcematerialisrevised,therefore maintaining theprocedures current.Webelievethatthisapproachinadditiontoanannualrandomsamplingofprocedures, betteraddresses theintentofthebiennialreviewprocessandismoreacceptable frombothatechnical andpractical perspective thanastatictwo-yearreviewprocess.2m.Sec.5.2.16~RtRecordsshallbemadeandequipment suitablymarkedtoindicatecali-brationstatus.ExcetionInterretationSeeItem6b.2n,Sec.5.3.5(4)~RThissectionrequiresthatwheresectionsofdocuments suchasvendormanuals,operating andmaintenance instructions ordrawingsareincor-porateddirectlyorbyreference intoamaintenance procedure, theyshallreceivethesamelevelofreviewandapprovalasoperating procedures. | |||
ExcetionInterretationSuchdocuments arereviewedbyappropriately qualified personnel priortousetoensurethat,whenusedasinstructions, theyprovideproperandadequateinformation toensuretherequiredqualityofwork.Maintenance procedures whichreference thesedocuments receivethesamelevelofreviewandapprovalasoperating procedures. | |||
1.7-B-103December, 1990 3.N45~2.1,~~~3a..Sec.3~RN45.2.1establishes criteriaforclassifying itemsinto"cleanliness levels",andrequiresthatitemsbesoclassified. | |||
ExcetionInterretationInsteadofusingthecleanliness levelclassification systemofN45.2.1,therequiredcleanliness forspecificitemsandactivities isaddressed onacase-by-case basis.Cleanliness ismaintained, consistent withtheworkbeingperformed, soastopreventtheintroduction offoreignmaterial. | |||
Asaminimum,cleanliness inspections areperformed priortoclosureof"nuclear" systemsandequipment. | |||
Suchinspections aredocumented. | |||
3b.Sec.5~Rit"Fittingandtack-welded joints(whichwillnotbeimmediately sealedbywelding)shallbewrappedwithpolyethylene orothernonhalogenated plasticfilmuntiltheweldscanbecompleted." | |||
ExcetionInterretationIMsometimes usesothernonhalogenated | |||
: material, compatible withtheparentmaterial, sinceplasticfilmissubjecttodamageanddoesnotalwaysprovideadequateprotection. | |||
4.N45.2.2,General~titN45.2.2establishes requirements andcriteriaforclassifying safetyrelateditemsintoprotection levels.ExcetionInterretationInsteadofclassifying safetyrelateditemsintoprotection levels,controlsoverthepackaging, | |||
: shipping, handlingandstorageofsuchitemsareestablished onacase-by-case basiswithdueregardfortheitem'st1.7-B-103December, 1990 complexity, useandsensitivity todamage.Priortoinstallation oruse,theitemsareinspected andservicedasnecessary toassurethatnodamageordeterioration existswhichcouldaffecttheirfunction. | |||
4a.Sec.3.9andAppendixA3.9~Rit"Theitemandtheoutsideofcontainers shallbemarked."(FurthercriteriaformarkingandtaggingaregivenintheAppendix.) | |||
ExcetionInterretationTheserequirements wereoriginally writtenforitemspackagedandshippedtoconstruction projects. | |||
Fullcompliance isnotalwaysnecessary inthecaseofitemsshippedtooperating plantsandmay,insomecases,increasetheprobability ofdamagetotheitem.Therequirements areimplemented totheextentnecessary toassuretraceability andintegrity oftheitem.4b.Sec.5.2.2~Rit"Receiving inspections shallbeperformed inanareaequivalent tothelevelofstorage." | |||
'xcetionInterretationReceiving inspection areaenvironmental controlsmaybelessstringent thanstorageenvironmental requirements foranitem.However,suchinspections areperformed inamannerandinanenvironment whichdonotendangertherequiredqualityoftheitem.4c.Sec.6.2.4~R"Theuseorstorageoffood,drinksandsalttabletdispensers inanystorageareashallnotbepermitted." | |||
1.7-8-104 | |||
: December, 1990ExcetionInterretationPackagedfoodforemergency orextendedovertimeusemaybestoredinmaterialstockrooms.Thepackaging assuresthatmaterials arenotcontaminated. | |||
Foodwillnotbe"used"intheseareas. | |||
4d.Sec.6.3.4"Allitemsandtheircontainers shallbeplainlymarkedsothattheyareeasilyidentified withoutexcessive handlingorunnecessary openingofcratesandboxes."ExcetionInterretationSeeN45.2.2,Section3.9(Exception 4b.).4e.Sec.6.4.1"Inspections andexaminations shallbeperformed anddocumented onaperiodicbasistoassurethattheintegrity oftheitemanditscontainer | |||
...isbeingmaintained." | |||
ExcetionInterretationTherequirement impliesthatallinspections andexaminations ofitemsinstoragearetobeperformed onthesameschedule. | |||
Instead,theinspections andexaminations areperformed inaccordance withmaterialstorageprocedures whichidentifythecharacteristics tobeinspected andincludetherequiredfrequencies. | |||
Theseprocedures arebasedontechnical considerations whichrecognize thatinspections andfrequencies neededvaryfromitemtoitem.5.N45.2.3,5a.Sec.2.1~RCleanliness requirements forhousekeeping activities shallbeestablished onthebasisoffivezonedesignations. | |||
ExcetionInterretationInsteadofthefive-level zonedesignation systemreferenced inANSIN45.2.3,IEMbasesitscontrolsoverhousekeeping activities onaconsideration ofwhatisnecessary andappropriate fortheactivityinvolved. | |||
Thecontrolsareeffectedthroughprocedures orinstructions. | |||
Factorsconsidered indeveloping theprocedures andinstructions includecleanliness control,personnel safety,fireprevention andprotection, 1.7-B-105December, 1990 radiation controlandsecurity. | |||
Theprocedures andinstructions makeuseofstandardjanitorial andworkpractices totheextentpossible. | |||
However,inpreparing theseprocedures, consideration isalsogiventotherecommendations ofSection2.1ofANSIN45.2.3.6.N45.2.4t6a,Sec.2.2~RtSection2.2establishes prerequisites whichmustbemetbeforetheinstallation, inspections andtestingofinstrumentation andelectrical equipment mayproceed.Theseprerequisites includepersonnel qualifi-cation,controlofdesign,conforming andprotected materials andavailability ofspecified documents. | |||
ExcetionInterretationDuringtheoperations phase,thisrequirement isconsidered tobeappli-cabletomodifications andinitialstart-upofelectrical equipment. | |||
Forroutineorperiodicinspection andtesting,theprerequisite conditions willbeachievedasnecessary. | |||
6b.Sec.6.2.1~R"Itemsrequiring calibration shallbetaggedorlabeledon,completion, indicating dateofcalibration andidentityofpersonthatperformed calibration." | |||
ExcetionInterretationFrequently, physicalsizeand/orlocationofinstalled plantinstrumenta-tionprecludes attachment ofcalibration labelsortags.Instead,eachinstrument isuniquelyidentified andistraceable toitscalibration record.Ascheduled calibration programassuresthateachinstrument's calibration iscurrent.1.7-B-106 | |||
: December, 1990 0 | |||
7.N45.2.5,~~~~~~7a.Sec.2.5.2"Whendiscrepancies, malfunctions orinaccuracies ininspection andtestingequipment arefoundduringcalibration, allitemsinspected withthatequipment sincethelastpreviouscalibration shallbeconsidered unacceptable untilanevaluation hasbeenmadebytheresponsible author-ityandappropriate actiontaken.ExcetionInterretationI&Musestherequirements ofN18.7,Section5.2.16,ratherthanN45.2.5,Section2.5.2.TheN18.7requirements aremoreapplicable toanoperating plant.7b.Sec.5.4~R"Handtorquewrenchesusedforinspection shallbecontrolled andmustbecalibrated atleastweeklyandmoreoftenifdeemednecessary. | |||
Impacttorquewrenchesusedforinspection mustbecalibrated atleasttwicedaily."ExcetionInterretationTorquewrenchesarecontrolled asmeasuring andtestequipment inaccor-dancewithANSIN18.7,Section5.2.16.Calibration intervals arebasedonuseandcalibration historyratherthanasperN45.2.5.8.N45.2.6,Sec.1.2~Rit"Therequirements ofthisstandardapplytopersonnel whoperforminspec-tions,examinations andtestsduringfabrication priortoorduringreceiptofitemsattheconstruction site,duringconstruction, duringpreoperational andstart-uptestingandduringoperational phasesofnuclearpowerplants."ExcetionInterretationPersonnel participating intestingwhotakedataormakeobservations, wherespecialtrainingisnotrequiredtoperformthisfunction, neednotI.7-B-107December, 1990 bequalified inaccordance withANSIN45.2.6butneedonlybetrainedtotheextentnecessary toperformtheassignedfunction. | |||
9.Re.Guide1.58-GeneralR~itgualification ofnuclearpowerplantinspection, examination and,testing personnel. | |||
9a.C.2.a(7)~RitRegulatory Guide1.58endorsestheguidelines ofSNT-TC-1A asanaccep-tablemethodoftrainingandcertifying personnel conducting leaktests.ExcetionInterretationI&Htakesthepositionthatthe"Level"designation | |||
.guidelines asrecommended inSNT-TC-1A, paragraph 4donotnecessarily assureadequateleaktestcapability, I&Hmaintains thatdepartmental supervisors arebestabletojudgewhetherengineers andotherpersonnel arequalified todirectand/orperformleaktests.Therefore, I&Hdoesnotimplement therecommended "Level"designation guidelines. | |||
ItisI&M'sopinionthatthetrainingguidelines ofSNT-TC-1A, TableI-G,paragraph 5.2specifically areorientedtowardsthebasicphysicsinvolvedinleaktesting,andfurther,towardsindividuals whoarenotgraduateengineers. | |||
I&Mmaintains thatitmeetstheessenceofthesetrainingguidelines'he preparation ofleaktestprocedures andtheconductofleaktestsatCookNuclearPlantisunderthedirectsupervision ofPerformance Engineers'who holdengineering degreesfromaccredited engineering schools.Thebasicphysicsofleaktestinghavebeenincorporated intotheapplicable testprocedures. | |||
Thereviewandapprovalofthedataobtainedfromleaktestsisperformed bydepartment supervisors whoarealsograduateengineers. | |||
I&Hdoesrecognize theneedtoassurethatindividuals involvedinleak*testsarefullycogn'izant ofleaktestprocedural requirements andthoroughly familiarwiththetestequipment involved. | |||
Plantperformance | |||
,1.7-B-108 | |||
: December, 1990 engineers receiveroutine,informalorientation ontestingprograms, toensurethattheseindividuals fullyunde'rstand therequirements ofperforming aleaktest.9b.C5,C6,C7,C8,C10ExcetionInterretationI&Mtakesthepositionthattheclassification ofinspection, exami-nationandtestpersonnel (inspection personnel) into"Levels"basedontherequirements statedinSection3.0ofANSIN45.2.6doesnotneces-sarilyassureadequateinspection capability. | |||
I&Mmaintains thatdepartmental andfirstlinesupervisors arebestabletojudgetheinspection capability ofthepersonnel undertheirsupervision, andthat"level"classification wouldrequireanoverlyburdensome administrative workload,couldinhibitinspection activities andprovidesnoassurance ofinspection capabilities. | |||
Therefore, I&Mdoesnotimplement the"levelclassification" conceptforinspection, examination andtestpersonnel. | |||
Themethodology underwhichinspections, examinations andtestsareconducted attheCookNuclearPlantrequirestheinvolvement offirstlinesupervisors, engineering personnel, departmental supervisors andplantmanagement. | |||
Inessence,thelastseven(7)projectfunctions showninTable1toANSIN45.2.6areassignedtosupervisory andengineering personnel andnottopersonnel oftheinspector category. | |||
Thesemanagement supervisory andengineering personnel, asaminimum,meettheeducational andexperience requirements of"LevelIIandLevelIII"personnel, asrequired, tomeetthecriteriaofANSI18.1whichexceedsthoseofANSIN45.2.6.InI&M'sopinion,nousefulpurposeisservedbyclassification ofmanagement, supervisory andengineering personnel into"Levels." | |||
Therefore, I&Mtakesthefollowing positions relativetoregulatory positions C5,6,7,8and10ofRegulatory Guide1.58.C-5Basedonthediscussion in9b,thispositionisnotapplicable totheCookNuclearPlant.1.7-B-109 | |||
: December, 1990 C-6Replacement personnel forCookNuclearPlantmanagement, supervisory andengineering positions subjecttoANSI18.1willmeettheeducational andexperience requirements ofANSI18.1andtherefore thoseofANSIN45.2.6.Replacement inspection personnel will,asaminimum,meettheeducational andexperience requirements ofANSIN45.2.6,Section3.5.1-"LevelI".C-7I&H,asageneralpractice, complieswiththetrainingrecommen-dationsassetforthinthisregulatory position. | |||
C-8AllI&Hinspection, examination andtestpersonnel areinstructed inthenormalcourseofemployeetraininginradiation protection andthemeanstominimizeradiation doseexposure. | |||
C-10I&Hmaintains documentation toshowthatinspection personnel meettheminimumrequirements of"LevelI"andthatmanagement, supervisory andengineering personnel meettheminimumrequirements ofANSI18.1.10.N45.2.8,10a~Sec.2.9e~RSection2.9eofN45.2.8listsdocuments relatingtothespecificstageofinstallation activitywhicharetobeavailable attheconstruction site.ExcetionInterretationAllofthedocuments listedarenotnecessarily requiredattheconstruc-tionsiteforinstallation andtesting.AEPSCandI&Hassurethattheyareavailable tothesiteasnecessary. | |||
10b.Sec.2.9e~titEvidencethatengineering ordesignchangesaredocumented andapprovedshallbeavailable attheconstruction sitepriortoinstallation. | |||
1.7-8-110 | |||
: December, 1990 ExcetionInterretationEquipment maybeinstalled beforefinalapprovalofengineering ordesignchanges.However,thesystemisnotplacedintoserviceuntilsuchchangesaredocumented andapproved. | |||
10c.Sec.4.5.1R~it"Installed'ystems andcomponents shallbecleaned,flushedandcondi-tionedaccording totherequirements ofANSIN45.2.1.Specialconsidera-tionshallbegiventothefollowing requirements: | |||
...."(Requirements aregivenforchemicalconditioning, flushingandprocesscontrols.) | |||
ExcetionInterretationSystemsandcomponents arecleaned,flushedandconditioned asdetermined onacase-by-case basis.Measuresaretakentohelpprecludetheneedforcleaning, flushingandconditioning throughgoodpractices duringmaintenance ormodification activities. | |||
11.N45.2.9lla.Sec.5.4,Item2~RRecordsshallnotbestoredloosely."Theyshallbefirmlyattachedinbindersorplacedinfoldersorenvelopes forstorageonshelvingincontainers." | |||
Steelfilecabinetsarepreferred. | |||
ExcetionInterretationRecordsaresuitablystoredinsteelfilecabinetsoronshelvingincontainers. | |||
Methodsotherthanbinders,folders,orenvelopes (forexample,dividers) maybeusedtoorganizetherecordsforstorage.lib.Sec.6.2I~I"Alistshallbemaintained designating thosepersonnel whoshallhaveaccesstothefiles".1.7-B-111 | |||
: December, 1990 fxcetionInterretationRulesareestablished governing accesstoandcontroloffilesaspro-videdforinANSIN45.2.9,Section5.3,Item5.Theserulesdonotalwaysincludearequirement foralistofpersonnel whoareauthorized access.Itshouldbenotedthatduplicate filesand/ormicroforms mayexistforgeneraluse.llc.Sec.5.6~RWhenasinglerecordsstoragefacilityismaintained, atleastthefollowing featuresshouldbeconsidered initsconstruction: | |||
etc.ExcetionInterretationTheCookNuclearPlantHasterFileRoomandotheroff-siterecordstoragefacilities complywiththerequirements ofNUREG-0800 (7/81),Section17,1,17.4, 12.Re.Guide1.144,12a.SecC3a(2)~RitApplicable elementsofanorganization's gualityAssurance Programfor"designandconstruction phaseactivities shouldbeauditedatleastannuallyoratleastoncewithinthelifeoftheactivity, whichever isshorter." | |||
ExcetionInterretationSincemostmodifications arestraightforward,theyarenotauditedindividually. | |||
Instead,selectedcontrolsovermodifications areauditedperiodically. | |||
12b.Sec.C3b(l)R~itThissectionidentifies procurement contracts whichareexemptedfrombeingaudited.1.7-B-112 | |||
: Oecember, 1990 | |||
@ExcetionInterretationInadditiontotheexemptions ofReg.Guide1.144,AEPSC/I&M considers thattheNationalBureauofStandards orotherStateandFederalAgencieswhichmayprovideservicestoAEPSC/I&M arenotrequiredtobeaudited.13,N45.2.13, 13a.Sec.3.2.2~RitN45.2.13requiresthattechnical requirements bespecified inprocurement d<<~bftRtTRttd.Trequirement documents aretobeprepared, reviewedandreleasedundertherequirements established byANSIN45.2.11.ExcetionInterretationForreplacement partsandmaterials, AEPSC/I&H followANSIN18.7,Section5.2.13,Subitem1,whichstates:"Wheretheoriginalitemorpartisfoundtobecommercially | |||
'offtheshelf'rwithoutspecifically identified gArequirements, spareandreplacement partsmaybesimilarly | |||
: procured, butcareshallbeexercised toensureatleastequivalent performance." | |||
13b.Sec.3.2.3~R"Procurement documents shallrequirethatthesupplierhaveadocumented gualityAssurance Programthatimplements partsorallofANSIN45.2aswellasapplicable gualityAssurance Programrequirements ofothernationally recognized codesandstandards." | |||
ExcetionInterretationRefertoItem2j.13c.Sec.3.3(a)~titReviewsofprocurement documents shallbeperformed priortoreleaseforbidandcontractaward.1.7-8-113 | |||
: December, 1990 ExcetionInterretationDocuments maybereleasedforbidorcontractawardbeforecompleting thenecessary reviews.However,thesereviewsarecompleted beforetheitemorserviceisputintoservice,orbeforeworkhasprogressed beyondthepointwhereitwouldbeimpractical toreversetheactiontaken.13d.Sec.3.3(b)~RitReviewofchangestoprocurement documents shallbeperformed priortoreleaseforbidandcontractaward.ExcetionInterretationThisrequirement appliesonlytoqualityrelatedchanges(i.e.,changestotheprocurement documentprovisions identified inANSIN18.7,Section5.2.13.1,Subitems1through5).Thetimingofreviewswillbethesameasforreviewoftheoriginalprocurement documents. | |||
13e.Sec.10.1~Rit"Whererequiredbycode,regulation, orcontractrequirement, documentary evidencethatitemsconformtoprocurement documents shallbeavailable atthenuclearpowerplantsitepriortoinstallation oruseofsuchitems,regardless ofacceptance methods." | |||
ExcetionInterretationRefertoItem2j.~tt"Post-installation testrequirements andacceptance documentation shallbemutuallyestablished bythepurchaser andsupplier." | |||
ExcetionInterretationInexercising itsultimateresponsibility foritsgualityAssurance Program,AEPSC/ISN establishes post-installation testrequirements givingdueconsideration tosupplierrecommendations. | |||
1.7-B-114 | |||
: December, 1990 (0 | |||
14.Re.Guide1.146ANSIN45.2.23andANSIN45.2.2.12 14a.ANSIN45.2.23, Sec.1.1Thisstandardprovidesrequirements andguidanceforthequalification ofauditteamleaders,henceforth identified as"leadauditors". | |||
14b.ANSIN45.2.12, Sec.4.2.2~titAleadauditorshallbeappointed teamleader.ExcetionInterretationTheAEPSCauditprogramisdirectedbytheAEPSCDirector-gualityAssurance andisadministered bydesignated gADivisionsectionmanagers/supervisor whoarecertified leadauditors. | |||
Auditsare,inmostcases,conducted byindividual | |||
: auditors, notby"auditteams".Theseauditorsarecertified inaccordance withestablished procedures andareassignedbytheresponsible gAsectionmanager/supervisor basedontheirdemonstrated auditcapability andgeneralknowledge oftheauditsubject.Incertaincases,thisresultsinanindividual otherthana"leadauditor"conducting theactualauditfunction. | |||
Established AEPSCauditprocedures requirethat,inallcases,theauditfunctions ofpreparation/organization, reporting ofauditfindingsandevaluation ofcorrective actionsbereviewedbygADivisionsectionmanagers/supervisor, therebymeetingtherequirements ofANSIN45.2.23relativeto"leadauditors", | |||
and"auditteamleaders". | |||
1.7-B-115 | |||
: December, 1990}} |
Revision as of 07:46, 29 June 2018
ML17328A829 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook |
Issue date: | 12/31/1990 |
From: | INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML17328A828 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 9012270060 | |
Download: ML17328A829 (151) | |
Text
ATTACHMENT 1PROPOSEDCHANGESTOTHEQAPD9012270060 90i2i9PDRADOCK050003i5PPDR
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0847S Page1ChangesareproposedtoclarifythatreviewsdonebytheQAorganization
-areaudit-type activities insteadof100%reviews/assessments.
Therefore, theword"audit"isproposedasareplacement fortheword"review"inthefollowing sectionsoftheQAPD."1.7.1.2.5 1.7.2.2.4
.1.7.3.2.7 1.7.3.2.13 1.7.4.2.4 1.7.6.2.2 1.7.7.2.7 1.7.9.2.2 (Lastparagraph)
(Thissectionisalsoaffectedbythethirdgroupofproposedchanges.)
(Firstandsecondparagraphs areaffected.)
Second,theword"Superintendent" isdeletedfromthephrase"QualityAssurance Superintendent" inthefollowing sectiontoclarifythattheQAactivities arenotnecessarily performed bytheQASuperintendent himself:1~7.2.2.4(Secondandlastparagraphs)
Note:'nthelastparagraph ofSection1.7.2.2.4, thephrase"andmaintaining closeinterface withtheCookPlantProjectEngineers" isbeingdeleted..Thisphraseisproperlyincludedinthesecondparagraph ofSection1.7.3.2.3 andwasincorrectly includedinSection1.7.2.2.4 duringtheJuly1990QAPDupdate.Third,areduction inthecommitment toperformcertainin-linereviews(e.g.,subtierprocedures, completed designchangepackages) bytheQAorganization isproposed.
Thischangewouldprovideformoremeaningful realtimeperformance-based auditactivities tobeperformed (e.g.,assessments oftheeffectiveness ofsubtierprocedures andin-process designchangeinstallations).
Ourintentistodiscontinue the100$reviewbytheQAorganization ofthoseactivities inw'hichqualityandsafetyarebeingmaintained withoutdirectQAorganization involvement.
TheQAorganization wouldcontinuetoperformaudits,surveillances, orreviewscommensurate withthelevelofperformance demonstrated bytheorganizations havingfirst-line responsibilities.
Forsafety-related activities withlessthandesirable performance levels,QAwouldfocusmoreattention viaauditsorotherappropriate evaluation techniques.
ThisproposedchangewouldallowtheQAorganization todiscontinue non-beneficial audie/review activities inareasnotwarranting such
Attachment 1'toAEP:NRC:0847S Page2attention.
Thisproposedchangewouldprovideadditional flexibility forQAtorespondtorealtimeperformance indicators, insteadofout-of-date commitments.
Thefollowing aretheQAPDsectionsaffectedbythisproposedchange:1.7'.2.4(Thirdparagraph) 1.7.7.2.7 Fourth,Section1.7.10.2.5 isaproposedadditionwhichclarifies theresponsibility ofIndianaMichiganPowerCompanypersonnel toperforminspections associated withpackaging andshippingradioactive
.wasteandmaterials attheCookNuclearPlant.Also,thisadditionestablishes qualification requirements forIndianaMichiganPowerCompanypersonnel performing theseinspections inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.Fifth,areduction inthecommitment concerning therequireddistribution ofQAauditreportsisproposedforSection1.7.18.2.3.
Specifically, theproposedchangewouldpermitdistribution toonlyappropriate management andeliminate therequirement fordistribution tothePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC),realizing thatmanyoftheappropriate management are,alsoinvolvedwiththePNSRC.TheoffsiteNuclearSafetyDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC)willcontinuetoprovideanindependent assessment oftheauditprogram.Thus,theadditional attention toauditreports,asafunctionofthePNSRC,isnotwarranted.
ThisproposedchangedoesnotcreateaconflictwithCookNuclearPlantTechnical Specification 6.5.1.6.Last,theentireQAPDhasbeenrepaginated.
Changesincontentarereflected bymarginbarsinthemargintotherightofthetext.
ATTACHMENT 2REVISEDQAPD DONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTCOOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITNUMBERS1AND2DOCKETNOS.50-315AND50-316LICENSENOS.DPR-58ANDDPR-74UPDATEDQUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAMDESCRIPTION FORTHECOOKNUCLEARPLANTDECEMBER, 1990Approvedby:AEPSCDirector,-
QualityAssurance Date:
leericaaElectricNeerCeel~lou1AiverseePlazaCo4rnlas.
OH4321$~INCAÃIMCTaCtOWIRSTATBiCBNT OFPOLICYPORTHPDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLhNTQUAL1TYASSURANCB PROGRAMWI.Wltte,Jc.ChairmanoftheBoardandCh+BecutiveOtficerN42231500POUCYAmericanElectricPowerCompany,inc.,recognizes thefundamental importance ofcontrolling thedesign,modification, andoperation ofindianaMichiganPowerCompany's DonaldC.CookNuclearPlane(CookNuctearPlane)byimplementing aplannedanddocumenced QualityAssurance Program,including QualityControl,chatcompileswithapplicable regulacions, codes,andstandards.
TheQualityAssurance Programhasbeenestablished toconcrolactivities affecting safety-related functions ofsrructures, systems,andcomponents intheCookNuciearPlant.TheQualttyAssurance Programsupportschegoalofmaincaining chesafetyandreliability oftheCookNuclearPlantacthehighestlevelthroughasystematic programdesignedtoassurethatsafety-related itemsareconducted incompliance withtheapplicable regulations, codes,standards, andestablished corporate policiesandpractices.
AsChairmanoftheBoardandChiefExecuttve OfftcerofAmericanElectricPowerCompany,inc.,Imaintaintheultimateresponsibility forcheQualtcyAssurance Programassociated withcheCookNuclearPlant.lhavedelegated functional responsibility fortheQualttyAssurance ProgramtotheAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporacton (AEPSC)SeniorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andCdnstruction.
Hehas,withmyapproval, detegated furtherresponsibilities asoutlinedinthisstatement.
IMPLEMENTATIONTheAEPSCDirector-Quality Assurance, underchedirectton ofcheAEPSCSentorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andConstruction, hasbeenassignedtheoverallresponsibility forspecifying theQualityAssurance Programrequirements forcheCookNuclearPlantandverifying theirimplementacion.
TheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andConstrucrion hasgivencheAEPSCDirector-Qualiry Assurance auchoricy tostopwork.onanyactivityaffecting safecy-related itemschatdoesnocRevised6-27-881.7-1December, 1990 0
Statement ofPolicyfortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantQualityAssurance ProgramPage?meetapplicable administrative, technical, and/orregulatory requirements.
TheAEPSCDirector-Quality hssurance doesnothavetheauthority tostopunitoperations, butshallnotifyappropriate plantand/orcorporate manage-mentofconditions notmeetingtheaforementioned criteriaandrecommend thatunitoperations beterminated.
TheAEPSCVicePresident-Nuclear Operations, underthedirection oftheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andConstruction, hasbeendelegated responsibility foreffectively implementing theQualityAssurance Program.TheAEPSCVicePresident-Nuclear Operations istheManagerofNuclearOperations.
AllotherAEPSCdivisions anddepartments.
exceptQualityAssurance, havingasupporting rolefortheCookNuclearPlantarefunctionally responsible torheManagerofNuclearOperations.
ThePlantManager,underthedirection oftheAEPSCVicePresident-Nuclear Operations, isdelegated theresponsibility forestablishing theCookNuclearPlantQualityControlProgramandimplementing theQualityAssurance ProgramattheCookNuclearPlant.TheAEPSCDirector-Quality Assurance isresponsible forproviding technical direction tothePlantManagerformattersrelatingtotheQualityAssurance ProgramattheCookNuclearPlant.ThehEPSCDirector-Quality Assurance isalsoresponsible formaintaining aQualityAssurance SectionattheCookNuclearPlanttoperformrequiredrevie~s,audits,andsurveillances, andtoprovidetechnical liaisonservicestothePlantManager.Theimplementation oftheQualityAssurance Programisdescribed intheAEPSCGeneralProcedures (GPs)andsubtierdepartment/division procedures, PlantManager's Instructions (PMIs),andsubtlerDepartment Headinstruc-tionsandProcedures, whichintotaldocumenttherequirements forimplementation oftheProgram.EachAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantorganization involvedinactivities affecting safety-related functions ofstructures, systems,andcomponents intheCookNuclearPlanthastheresponsibility toimplement theapplicable policiesandrequirements oftheQualityAssurance Program.Thisrespon-sibilityincludesbeingfamiliarwith,andcomplying with,therequirements oftheapplicable QualityAssurance Programrequirements.
Revised6-27-88Oecember, 1990 Statement otPolicyfortheDonald,C.CookNuclearPlantQualityAssurance Programpage3COMPLIANCE ThAEPSCDirector-Quality Assurance shallmonitorpcornliancewiththeestablished QualityAssurance Program.Auditprogramsshaallbeestablished AEPSCandCookNuclearPlantactivities complywithtoensurethatestablished programrequirements, identifydeficiencies orrnoncomiiances,Pandobtaineffective andtimelycorrective actions.Employees engageinad'ctivities affecting safety-related functions ofstructures, systems,anndcomponents intheCookNuclearPlantwhobelievethattheQualityAssurance Programisnotbeingcompliedwith,orthatadeficiency inqualityexists,shouldnotifytheirsupervisor>
theAEPSCDirector-Quality Assurance, and/orthePlantManager.lfthenotification doesnotintheemployee's opinionreceivepromptorappropriate attention, shouldcontactsuccessively hlghezlevelsofmanagement.
Employees reporting suchconditions shallnotbediscrimaagytnatedainstbcompanies oftheAmericanElectricPowerSystem.Discrimination includesdischarge orotheractionsrelativetocompensation, terms,conditions, orprivileges ofemployment.
V.S.%hite,2r.ChairmanoftheBoardandChiefExecutive OfficerAmericanElectricPowerCompany,inc.Revtsed6-27-881.7-3Oecember, 1990 1,7.1ORGANIZATION 1,7.1.1SCOPE~~~AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation (AEPSC)isresponsible forestablishing andimplementing theQualityAssurance (QA)Programfortheoperational phaseoftheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant(CookNuclearPlant).Althoughauthority fordevelopment andexecution ofvariousportionsoftheprogrammaybedelegated toothers,suchascontractors, agentsorconsultants, AEPSCretainsoverallresponsibility.
AEPSCshallevaluatework'delegated tosuchorganizations.
Evaluations shallbebasedonthestatusofsafetyimportance oftheactivitybeingperformed andshallbeinitiated earlyenoughtoassureeffective qualityassurance duringtheperformance ofthedelegated activity.
ThissectionoftheQualityAssurance ProgramDescription (QAPD)identifies theAEPSCorganizational responsibilities foractivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related nuclearpowerplantstructures, systems,andcomponents, anddescribes theauthority anddutiesassignedtothem.Itaddresses responsibilities forbothattaining qualityobjectives andforthefunctions ofestablishing theQAProgram,andverifying thatactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsareperformed effectively inaccordance withQAProgramrequirements.
1.7.1.2IHPLEHENTAT ION1.7.1.2.1 SourceofAuthoritTheChairmanoftheBoardandChiefExecutive OfficerofAmericanElectricPowerCompany,Inc.(AEP)andAEPSCisresponsible forsafeoperation oftheCookNuclearPlant.Authority andresponsibility foreffectively implementing theQAProgramforplantmodifications, opera-tionsandmaintenance aredelegated throughtheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident
-Engineering andConstruction, totheAEPSCVicePresident
-NuclearOperations (HanagerofNuclearOperations).
1.7-4December, 1990 Intheoperation ofanuclearpowerplantthelicenseeisrequiredtoestablish clearanddirectlinesofresponsibility, authority andaccoun-tability.
Thisrequirement isapplicable totheorganization providing supporttotheplant,aswellastotheplantstaff.TheAEPSCcorporate supportoftheCookNuclearPlantistheresponsibility oftheentireorganization underthedirection oftheManagerofNuclearOperations whomaintains primaryresponsibility fortheCookNuclearPlant'withinthecorporate organization.
TheAEPSCVicePresident
-NuclearOperations istheManagerofNuclearOperations.
AllotherAEPSCdivis'ions anddepartments, otherthanthegualityAssurance
- Division, havingasupporting rolefortheCookNuclearPlantarefunctionally responsible totheManagerofNuclearOperations (reference Figure1.7-1).Inordertofacilitate amorethoroughunderstanding ofthesupportfunctions, someoftheresponsibilities, authorities, andaccountabilities withintheorganization areasfollows:1)Theresponsibilities oftheManagerofNuclearOperations shallbededicated totheareaofCookNuclearPlantoperations andsupport.2)TheManagerofNuclearOperations shallberesponsible for,andhastheauthority todirectallCookNuclearPlantoperational andsupportmatterswithinthecorporation andshallmakeorconcurinallfinaldecisions regarding significant nuclearsafetymatters.3)AEPSCorganization managersresponsible forCookNuclearPlantmattersshallbefamiliarwithactivities withintheirscopeofresponsibility thataffectplantsafetyandreliability.
Theyshallbecognizant ofandsensitive tointernalandexternalfactorsthatmightaffecttheoperations ofCookNuclearPlant.4)AEPSCorganization managersresponsible forCookNuclearPlantmattershaveacommitment toseekandidentifyproblemareas1.7-5December, 1990
andtakecorrective actiontoeliminate unsafeconditions, ortoimprovetrendsthatwillupgradeplantsafetyandreliability, 5)TheManagerofNuclearOperations shallensurethatCookNuclearPlantpersonnel arenotrequested toperforminappropriate workortasksbycorporate personnel andshallcontrolassignments andrequeststhathavethepotential fordiverting theattention ofthePlantManagerfromtheprimaryresponsibility forsafeandreliableplantoperation.
6)AEPSCdivisionanddepartment managershavingCookNuclearPlantsupportresponsibilities aswellasthePlantManagerandplantorganization managersshallbefamiliarwiththepolicystatements fromhighermanagement concerning nuclearsafetyandoperational priorities.
Theyshallberesponsible forensuringthatactivities undertheirdirection areperformed inaccordance withthesepolicies.
1.7.1.2.2 Resonsibilit forAttaininualitOb'ectives inAEPSCNuclear~~~~0TheAEPChairmanoftheBoardandChiefExecutive Officerhasdelegated thefunctional responsibility ofthegualityAssurance ProgramtotheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident
-Engineering andConstruction.
TheAEPSCDirector-gualityAssurance, underthedirection oftheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident
-Engineering andConstruction, isresponsible forspecifying gAProgramrequirements andverifying theirimplementation.
TheAEPSCVicePresident
-NuclearOperations, underthedirection oftheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident
-Engineering andConstruction, isresponsible foreffectively implementing thegAProgram.1.7-6December;*
1990 ThePlantManager,underthedirection oftheAEPSCVicePresident-NuclearOperations, isresponsible forestablishing CookNuclearPlantgualityControlandimplementing thegAProgramattheCookNuclearPlant.Management/supervisory personnel receivefunctional trainingtothelevelnecessary toplan,coordinate, andadministrate thoseday-to-day verifi-cationactivities ofthegAProgramforwhichtheyareresponsible.
AEPSChasanindependent off-siteNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC)whichhasbeenestablished pursuanttotherequirements oftheTechnical Specifications fortheCookNuclearPlant.ThefunctionoftheNSDRCistooverseetheengineering, design,operation, andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlantbyperforming auditsandindependent reviewsofactivities whicharespecified intheFacilityOperating Licenses.
TheCookNuclearPlanton-sitereviewgroupistheIndianaMichiganPowerCompany(I&M)PlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC).Thiscommittee hasalsobeenestablished pursuanttotherequirements oftheCookNuclearPlantTechnical Specifications.
ThefunctionofthePNSRCistoreviewplantoperations onacontinuing basisandadvisethePlantManageronmattersrelatedtonuclearsafety.1.7.1.2.3CororateOranization AmericanElectricPowerComanAEP,theparentholdingcompany,whollyownsthecommonstockofallAEPSystemsubsidiary (operating) companies.
Themajoroperating companies andgeneration subsidiaries areshowninFigure1.7-2.TheChairmanoftheBoardofAEPistheChairmanoftheBoardofAEPSCandistheChiefExecutive OfficerofAEPSCandalloperating companies.
Theresponsibility forthefunctional management ofthemajoroperating companies isvestedinthePresident ofeachoperating companyreporting totheAEPSCPresident andChiefOperating OfficerwhoreportstotheAEPSCChairmanoftheBoard.1.7-7December, 1990 AmericanElectricPowerServiceCororationTheresponsibility foradministrative andtechnical direction oftheAEPSystemanditsfacilities isdelegated toAEPSC.AEPSCprovidesmanagement andtechnological servicestothevariousAEPSystemcompanies.
0eratin"ComaniesTheoperating facilities oftheAEPSystemareownedandoperatedbytherespective operating companies.
Theresponsibility forexecuting theengineering, design,construction, specialized technical
- training, andcertainoperations supervision isvestedinAEPSCwhileallorpartoftheadministrative functional responsibility isassignedtotheoperating companies.
InthecaseofCookNuclearPlant,IMgeneralofficestaff(headquarters) providespublicaffairs,accounting, industrial safetydirection andprocurement support.TheCookNuclearPlantisownedandoperatedbyI&HwhichispartoftheAEPSystem.1.7.1.2.4ualitAssurance Resonsibilit ofAEPSC1)AEPSCprovidesthetechnical direction fortheCookNuclearPlant,andassuchmakesthefinaldecisions pertinent tosafety-related changesinplantdesign.Further,AEPSCreviewsNuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC)letters,bulletins, notices,etc.,forimpactonplantdesign,andtheneedfordesignchangesormodifications.
2)AEPSCfurnishes qualityassurance, engineering, design,construction, licensing, NRCcorrespondence, fuelmanagement andradiological supportactivities.
- December, 1990 3)AEPSCprovidesadditional serviceinmatterssuchassupplierqualification, procurement oforiginalequipment andreplacement partsandtheprocessofdedicating commercial gradeitemsorservicestosafety-related applications.
4)TheAEPSCgADivisionprovidestechnical direction inqualityassurance matterstoAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPlant,andoverseestheadequacy, effectiveness andimplementation ofthegAProgramthroughreviewandauditactivities.
5)Cognizant Engineer-(e.g.,SystemEngineer, Equipment
- Engineer, LeadEngineer, Responsible
- Engineer, etc.)-Thecognizant
- engineer, and/orengineerwiththeothertitlesnoted,isthatAEPSCindividual whoprovidestheengineering/design expertise foraparticular areaofresponsibility.
Thisresponsibility includestheimplementation ofthequalityassurance andqualitycontrolmeasuresforsystems,equipment, structures, orfunctional areasincludedinthatindividual's responsibility.
Thevarioustitlesusedfortheidentification ofanindividual'.s responsibility andassignment shallbeunderstood tomeanthesameascognizant engineerintherespective areasofresponsibility.
ualitAssurance Resonsibilit ofI&M-CookNuclearPlantISM'sCookNuclearPlantstaffoperatestheCookNuclearPlantinaccordance withlicensing requirements, including theTechnical Specifications andsuchothercommitments asestablished bytheoperating licenses.
ThePlantManagerInstruction (PMI)systemand'subtierinstructions andprocedures describethemeansbywhichcompliance isachievedandresponsibilities areassigned, including interfaces withAEPSC.Figure1.7-3indicates theorganizational relationships withintheAEPSystempertaining totheoperation andsupportoftheCookNuclearPlant.December, 1990 s1.7.1.2.5Oranization AEPSCTheChairmanoftheBoardandChiefExecutive Officerisultimately responsible fortheQAProgramassociated withtheCookNuclearPlant.Thisresponsibility hasbeenfunctionally delegated totheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident
-Engineering andConstruction.
TheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident
-Engineering andConstruction hasfurtherdelegated responsibilities whichareadministered throughthefollowing divisionanddepartment management personnel:
AEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance AEPSCVicePresident
-NuclearOperations AEPSCSeniorVicePresident andChiefEngineerAEPSCVicePresident ProjectManagement andConstruction ualitAssurance DivisionTheAEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance, reporting totheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident
-Engineering andConstruction, isresponsible fortheQualityAssurance Division(QAD).TheQADconsistsoftheFollowing sections(Figure1.7-4):QualityAssurance Engineering SectionNuclearSoftwareQualityAssurance SectionAuditsandProcurement SectionQualityAssurance SupportSectionQualityAssurance Section(Site)TheQADisorganizationally independent andisresponsible toperformthefollowing:
SpecifyQAProgramrequirements.
Identifyqualityproblems.
- Initiate, recommend, orprovidesolutions throughdesignated channels.
Verifyimplementation ofsolutions, asappropriate.
Prepare,issueandmaintainQAProgramdocuments, asrequired.
Verifytheimplementation oftheQAProgram.throughscheduled auditsandsurveillances.
1.7-10December, 1990 Verifytheimplementation ofcomputersoftwarequalityassurance throughreviews,surveillances andaudits.Auditengineering, design,procurement, construction andoperational documents forincorporation of,andcompliance withapplicable qualityassurance requirements to.theextentspecified bytheAEPSCmanagement approvedgAProgram.OrganizeandconductthegAauditororientation,
- training, certification andqualification ofAEPSCauditpersonnel.
Providedirection forthecollection, storage,maintenance, andretention ofqualityassurance records.Maintain, ondatabase,alistofsuppliers ofnuclear(N)itemsandservices, plusotherselectedcategories ofsuppliers.
Identifynoncompliances oftheestablished gAProgramtotherespon-sibleorgan'izations forcorrective actionsandreportsignificant occurrences thatjeopardize qualitytoseniorAEPSCmanagement
.Followuponcorrective actionsidentified bygAduringandafterdisposition implementation.
Reviewthedisposition ofconditions adversetoqualitytoassurethatactiontakenwillprecluderecurrence.
Conductin-process gAsurveillance atsupplier's facilities, asrequired.
AssistandadviseotherAEP/AEPSC groupsinmattersrelatedtothegAProgram.ConductauditsasdirectedbytheNSDRC.ReviewAEPSCinvestigated ProblemReportsandassociated corrective andpreventative actionrecommendations.
Haintaincognizance ofindustryandgovernmental qualityassurance requirements suchthatthegAProgramiscompatible withrequirements, asnecessary.
Recommend forrevisionto,orimprovements intheestablished gAProgramtoseniorAEPSCmanagement.
Auditdedication plansforcommercial gradeitemsandservices.
IIssue"StopWork"orderswhensignificant conditions adversetosafety-related itemsareidentified topreventunsafeconditions fromoccurring and/orcontinuing.
- December, 1990 ProvideAEPSCmanagement withperiodicreportsconcerning thestatus,adequacyandimplementation ofthegAProgram.Prepareandconductspecialverification and/orsurveillance programsonin-houseactivities, asrequiredorrequested.
Routinely attendandparticipate indailyplantworkscheduleandstatusmeetings.
ProvideadequategAcoveragerelativetoprocedural andinspection
- controls, acceptance
- criteria, andgAstaffingandqualification ofpersonnel tocarryoutgAassignments.
Establish andmaintainacentralfileforequipment environmental qualification documentation.
Amlification ofSecificResonsibilities ualification oftheAEPSCDirector-ualitAssurance TheAEPSCDirector-gualityAssurance shallpossessthefollowing positionrequirements:
Bachelor's degreeinengineering, scientific orrelateddiscipline.
Ten(10)yearsexperience inoneoracombination ofthefollowing areas:engineering, design,construction, operations, maintenance offossilornuclearpowergene-rationfacilities orutilityfacilities gA,ofwhichatleastfour(4)yearsmustbeexperience innuclearqualityassurance relatedactivities.
Knowledge ofgAregulations,
- policies, practices andstandards.
Thesameorhigherorganization reporting levelasthehighestlinemanagerdirectlyresponsible forperforming activities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemssuchasengineering, procurement, construction andoperat'ion, andissufficiently independent fromcostandschedule.
Effective communication channelswithotherseniormanage-mentpositions.
Responsibility forapprovalofgAHanual(s).
- December, 1990
Performance ofnootherdutiesorresponsibili'ties unre-latedtoQAthatwouldpreventfullattention toQAmatters'Et flkadTheAEPSCQADisresponsible forensuringthatactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsareperformed inamannerthatmeetsapplicable administrative, technical, andregulatory requirements.
Inordertocarryoutthisrespon-sibility, theAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andConstruction hasgiventheAEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance, theauthority tostopworkonanyactivityaffecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsthatdoesnotmeettheaforementioned requirements.
Stopworkauthority hasbeenfurtherdelegated bytheAEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance totheAEPSCQualityAssurance Superintendent (site).TheAEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance andtheAEPSCQualityAssurance Superintendent donothavetheauthority tostopunitoperations, butwillnotifyappropriate CookNuclearPlantand/orcorporate management ofconditions whichdonotmeettheaforementioned
- criteria, andrecommend thatunitoperations beterminated.
AOrientation Traininuglification andCertification Procrrama)AEPSCQAshallberesponsible forestablishing, maintaining andmakingavailable toAEPSCmanagement ageneralQAorientation andtrainingprogramforAEPSCpersonnel engagedinactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items.ThisprogramincludestheAEPSCQAphilosophy andanyspecificprogramsasmayberequiredbyfacilityorregulatory requirements.
- December, 1990
b)AEPSChasestablished andmaintains agAauditortrainingandcertification programforallAEPSCgAauditors.
ProblemIdentification ReortinandEscalation AEPSChasestablished mechanisms fortheidentification, reporting andescalation ofproblemsaffecting thequalityofsafety-related itemstoalevelofmanagement wherebysatisfactory resolutions canbeobtained.
Nuclear0erationsDivisionTheAEPSCVicePresident
-NuclearOperations (ManagerofNuclearOper-ations),reporting totheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident-Engineering andConstruction, isresponsible fortheNuclearOperations Division(NOD).Reporting totheAEPSCVicePresident
-NuclearOperations arethefollowing:
PlantManagerAssistant DivisionManager-NuclearEngineering (notcharted)Assistant DivisionManager-NuclearOperations (notcharted)Consulting Engineer(s)
(notcharted)Licensing Consultant (notcharted).
Theorganization andresponsibilities ofthePlantManageraredefinedfurtherwithinthissectionunder1.7.1.2.6Oranization CookNuclear~Plant.TheAEPSCAssistant DivisionManager'-
NuclearEngineering isresponsible fortwoofthefoursectionswithintheNOD,asfollows(notcharted):
NuclearSafetyandLicensing (NSSL)SectionNuclearFuelandAnalyses(NFM)SectionTheAEPSCAssistant DivisionManager-NuclearOperations isresponsible fortheremaining twosections, asfollows(notcharted):
NuclearOperations Support(NOS)SectionNuclearMaintenance Support(NMS)Section1.7-14December, 1990
Radiological Support(RS)SectionNODisresponsible forthefollowing:
Formulate policiesandpractices relativetosafety,licensing, operation, maintenance, fuelmanagement, andradiological support.ProvidethePlantManagerwiththetechnical andmanagerial
- guidance, direction andsupporttoensurethesafeoperation oftheplant.Pr'ovidedirection toallotherAEPSCengineering anddesignorganizations onengineering anddesignmatterspertaining totheCookNuclearPlant.MaintainliaisonwiththeAEPSCDirector-gualityAssurance.
Implement therequirements oftheAEPSCgAProgram.Maintainknowledge ofthelatestsafety,licensing, andregulatory requirements, codes,standards andfederalregulations applicable totheoperation ofCookNuclearPlant.Accomplish theprocurement,
- economic, technical, licensing andqualityassurance activities dealingwiththereactorcoreanditsrelatedfuelassemblies andcomponents.
Preparebidspecifications, evaluatebids,andnegotiate andadmini-stercontracts fortheprocurement ofallnuclearfuelandrelatedcomponents andservices.'aintain aspecialnuclearmaterialaccountability system.Provideanalysestosupportnuclearsteamsupplysystemoperation including reactorphysics,fueleconomics, fuelmechanical
- behavior, corethermalhydraulic andLOCAandnon-LOCAtransient safetyanaly-sisandotheranalysisactivities asrequested, furnishplantTechnical Specification changesandotherlicensing work,andparticipate inNRCandNSDRCmeetingsasrequiredbytheseanalyses.
Performreactorcoreoperation follow-up activities andotherreactorcoretechnical supportactivities asrequested, andarrangeforsupportfromthefuelfabricator whenneeded.Contractfor,andprovidetechnical supportfor,disposalofbothhighlevelandlowlevelradioactive waste.Coordinate thedevelopment ofneutronics andthermalhydraulic safetycodesandconductsafetyanalyses.
1.7-15December, 1990 ConductstudiesoftheCookNuclearPlantlicensing basestodetermine theoptimalchangestosupportunitoperations atalowerprimarypressureandtemperature.
Coordinate NODcomputercodedevelopment andprovidetheinterface controlforNODwiththeAEPSCInformation SystemDepartment andCookNuclearPlant.ObtainandmaintaintheNRCOperating LicenseandTechnical Specifications fortheCookNuclearPlant.Actasthecommunication linkbetweentheNRC,AEPSC,andtheplantstaff.Performandcoordinate effortsinvolvedingathering information, performing calculations andgenericstudies,preparing
- criteria, reports,andresponses, reviewing itemsaffecting safety,andinterpreting regulations.
Review,coordinate, andresolveallmatterspertaining tonuclearsafetybetweenCookNuclearPlantandAEPSC.Thisincludes, butisnotlimitedto:thereviewofcertainplantdesignchangestoensurethattherequirements of10CFR50.59 aremet;thepreparation ofsafetyevaluations orreviewsforanydesignated subject;thepreparation ofchangesto,andappropriate interpretation of,theplantTechnical Specification submittals oflicenseamendments; andtheanalysisofplantcompliance withregulatory requirements.
Primarycorporate contactformostoralandwrittencommunication withtheNRC.Providesupportinkeyareasofexpertise suchasnuclearengi-neering,probabilistic
- analysis, thermohydraulic
- analysis, chemicalengineering, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, andtechnical writing.Interface withvendorsandotheroutsideorganizations onmattersconnected withthenuclearsteamsupplysystemandotherareasaffecting thesafedesignandoperation ofnuclearplants.Participate asappropriate inthereviewofnuclearplantoperating experiences, andrelatethoseexperiences tothedesignandsafeoperation ofCookNuclearPlant.Review,evaluate, andrespondtoNRCrequestsforinformation andNRCnotifications ofregulatory changesresulting inplantmodifica-1.7-16December, 1990 tionsornewfacilities.
Suchresponses aregenerated inaccordance withappropriate AEPSCAdministrative Procedures.
Develop,specify,and/orreviewconceptual nuclearsafetycriteriaforCookNuclearPlant,inaccordance withestablished regulations, Thisincludesallinformation contained intheFSAR,aswellasspecialized information suchasenvironmental qualification andseismiccriteria.
Reviewandevaluateperformance requirements forsystems,equipment andmaterials forcompliance withspecified safetycriteria.
Review,onaconceptual basis,plantreportsandproposedplantsafety-related designchanges,totheextentthattheyarerelatedtotheultimatesafeoperation oftheplant,forcompliance withsafetyregulations, plantTechnical Specifications, theFSARdesignbasis,andwithanyotherrequirements undertheOperating Licenseandtodetermine ifthereareanyunreviewed safetyquestions asdefinedinIOCFR50.59.
PerformreviewsofProblemReportsand10CFR21reviewsinaccordance withcorporate requirements.
OperatetheActionItemTrackingSystem(AIT)forAEPSCinternalcommitment tracking.
Coordinate designchangesfortheCookNuclearPlantactingasafocalpointwithinAEPSC.Thisprogramprimarily involvesprojectmanagement responsibilities forscheduling
'andimplementing RequestforChanges(RFCs)andincludesextensive interfacing withengineer-ing,design,construction, andCookNuclearPlant.Provideworkinglevelcoordination withtheInstitute ofNuclearPowerOperations (INPO).Thiseffortincludesproviding AEPSCaccesstoINPOresources suchasNUCLEARNETWORKandNuclearPlantReliability DataSystem(NPRDS),andeffectively integrating AEPSCandCookNuclearPlanteffortstowardsutilizing INPOrecommendations contained inoperating experience reportstoimproveCookNuclearPlantperformance.
Coordinate dailycommunication withtheCookNuclearPlant,provideAEPSCmanagement withadailyplantstatusreport,andmakepresentations toseniormanagement atregularly scheduled construction staffmeetings.
1.7-17December, 1990
Processincomingvendorinformation.
Coordinate operations withinAEPSCthatsupporttheCookNuclearPlantFacilityDataBase(FOB).Contributing totheannualFSARupdatesthroughreviewsofLicenseeEventReports,designchangesandtheAnnualOperating Report.Radiological, emergency andsecurityplanning.
Corporate supportoftheCookNuclearPlant'sradiation protection andhealthphysicsprogram,technical serviceandadviceontheradiological aspectsofdesignchanges,modifications orcapitalimprovements, theALARAprogram,theradiation monitoring system,theenvironmental radiological monitoring andsamplingprogram,doseandshielding
- analysis, radiochemistry review,andmeteorological monitoring.
CookNuclearPlantandcorporate emergency planningincluding procedure development, exercisescheduling, facilityprocurement andmaintenance, andtheliaisonwithoff-siteemergency planninggroupssuchasFEMAandtheHichiganStatePolice.Reviewfederalcodesandregulations astheyrelatetothedevelopment, implementation, revisionanddistribution oftheHodifiedAmendedSecurityPlan(HASP).Interface withtheplant'ssecuritydepartment providing supportforthesecurityplan,reviewing securityfacilities, maintaining securitydocumentfiles,anddeveloping theemployeefitnessforduty/background screening program.ProvideNuclearGeneralEmployeeTraining(NGET)forAEPSCpersonnel' Participate onALARAsubcommittees.
Prepareresponses totheNRConradiological, emergency planningandsecurityissues.Serveastechnical advisorsonplantaudits.Remaincognizant ofcurrentdecommissioning practices anddevelopments.
AEPSCEnineerinandDesinTheAEPSCSeniorVicePresident andChiefEngineer, reporting totheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident
-Engineering andConstruction, is1.7-18December, 1990 responsible forcertainengineering anddesignfunctions throughtheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident
-CivilEngineering, theAEPSCAssistant VicePresident
-DesignandtheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident
-NuclearEngineering.
CivilEnineerinDeartmentTheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident
-CivilEngineering, reporting totheAEPSCSeniorVicePresident andChiefEngineer, isresponsible fortheCivilEngineering Department.
Therearetwo(2)GroupManagers(notcharted)reporting totheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident
-CivilEngineering whoareresponsible forthevarioussectionsasfollows(notcharted):
AEPSCGroupManagerStructural Engineering SectionCivilEngineering Laboratory SectionGeotechnical Engineering SectionAEPSCGroupManagerMaterials HandlingSectionTheCivilEngineering Department (CED)isresponsible forthefollowing:
Makerecommendations andassistintheformulation ofpoliciesandpractices relatingtothedesignandengineering ofofficeandservicebuildings, miscellaneous structures andmaterialhandlingequipment, andprovidethegeneralsupervision oftheengineering ofsuchfacilities, structures andequipment.
Reviewtheactivities ofequipment, facilities, buildings andotherstructures attheCookNuclearPlantandapprove,asrequired, alldesignchangesandmodifications including thepreparation ofspecifications, procurement ofequipment andmodifications toequipment.
Providetraininganddevelopment programsnecessary forpersonnel ofthedepartment, (including thecompany's safetyandhealthprogram),
whichareconsistent withthewrittenpoliciesofAEPSC.1.7-19December, 1990 Preparedesigncriteria, engineering standards, conceptual layouts,studiesandprocedures inconjunction withequipment, facilities, buildings andotherstructures attheCookNuclearPlant.Identifycriticalengineering anddesigninputandensurethatappropriate analysisandreviewsareconducted.
Prepare,reviewandapprovespecifications,
- sketches, drawings, designverifications andcalculations, asrequired.
Provideinput-forspecialstudiesandreportswhichmayberequested byotherorganizations orgovernmental agenciessuchastheNRC.Initiateand/orreview,approveandcontrollaboratory andfieldinvestigations andfeasibility studies.Prepareandreviewimprovement requisitions forcapitalandleaseexpenditures.
Reviewandevaluateproposals andmakerecommendations fortheawardofpurchaseordersandcontracts.
Prepareandadminister equipment, laborandservicecontracts.
Providetechnical guidancewhenrequested insupportofactivities attheCookNuclearPlantundertheOepartment's responsibilities.
Prepareandapprovedesignchangespertaining toCookNuclearPlantinaccordance withtheGPs.Arrangeforoutsideengineering andconsulting assistance asrequired.
Arbitrate disputeswhicharisebetweenconstruction forcesandoutsidesuppliers ofmaterials andservices.
Coordinate consultant's reportswithotherinterfacing engineering organizations.
Performshopandfieldinspections onequipment beingfabricated orinstalled whichiswithinthescopeofthedepartment's responsibility.
Approveinvoicesforoutsideservices.
ProvidefieldservicestotheCookNuclearPlantincluding theassigning ofpersonnel asarerequiredduringconstruction, normaloremergency outages,orasrequested.
Assistintheplanningandexecution ofmaintenance workonequipment, facilities, buildings andotherstructures.
1.7-20Oecember, 1990 Supervise maintenance andrepairsofallmasonryandconcreteworkatCookNuclearPlant,including supplying trainedinspection personnel.
Directtestingofmaterials usedinconcreteandtestingofsoilstobeusedinworkattheCookNuclearPlant.Reviewandrecommend concretemixformulations forallnewconstruction.
Preparesitestudies.Implement acorrective actionsystem,withregardtoallactivities ofthedepartment affecting qualityofsafety-related items,thatwillcontrolanddocumentallitems,servicesoractivities whichdonotconformtorequirements.
Directthereviewof,andresponseto,assignedcorrective actions.Assistinthepreparation ofapplications forfederal,stateandlocalpermitsrelativetoinstallations'eing madewhichrequiresuchpermits.Conductperiodicmanagement reviewsoftheactivities ofthedepartment toensurecompliance withtheobjectives ofthegAProgram,andexternaltechnical surveillance, asnecessary, ofconsultants, outsideorganizations andvendorsoverwhichthedepartment iscognizant.
Establish andmaintainapermanent fileforgArecords.DesinDeartmentTheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident
-Design,reporting totheAEPSCSeniorVicePresident andChiefEngineerisresponsible fortheDesignDepartment.
TheGroupManagers(notcharted)reporting totheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident
-Designwhoisresponsible fortheNuclearDesignsectionsasfollows(notcharted):
AEPSCGroupManager-Nuclear.DesignElectrical DesignNuclearSectionMechanical DesignNuclearSectionStructural andAnalytical DesignNuclearSectionCookNuclearPlant(Site)DesignSectionDecember, 1990 Additional supportisprovidedfromtheothersectionsoftheDesignDepartment whenrequired.
TheControlServicessectionadministratively reportstoanotherDesignDepartment GroupManager(notcharted)buttakesfunctional direction inmatterspertaining toCookNuclearPlantfromtheGroupManager-NuclearDesign.TheDesignDepartment isresponsible forthefollowing:
Develop,reviewandapprovedesignsanddrawingsformechanical, electrical andstructural systems,equipment andfacilities oftheCookNuclearPlant.Initiate, develop,approveandmaintaindesignprocedures, specifications, standards, criteriaandguidelines.
Performrequiredcalculations andanalysesincluding pipestress,pipesupportdesign,cablesizing,conduitandcabletraysupportandstructural steelandconcrete.
Initiateanddevelopdesignchangesintheareasofresponsibility oftheDesignDepartment.
ProvideNRCresponses asrequired.
Assistfieldpersonnel intheresolution ofproblemsstemmingfromtheinstallation ofdesignchangesorfromas-foundplantconditions, including assigning designpersonnel tothefield.Assignmembership totheNSDRCandSubcommittee onProposedChanges,participating inmatterscoveredinthecharter.Participate intheevaluation andremedyofanysituation requiring activation oftheemergency responseorganization including resourceallocation.
Formulate, administer, andimplement policiesandpractices relatingtothedesignoftheCookNuclearPlant.Directthedevelopment, maintenance, procedural reviewandimplemen-tationbywhichtheDesignDepartment adherestothegAProgramelementsasestablished byAEPSCGeneralProcedures.
Conductfunctions ofthedepartment soastobeinconformance withtheoperating licensesoftheCookNuclearPlant.1.7-22December, 1990 Investigate andevaluateproblems.
Coordinate specialprojectsandstudies,asrequired.
Establish andmaintainfilesofdesigndocuments forrecordpurposes, Coordinate the-development.
andmaintenance ofthecomputerized DesignDrawingControl(DDC)andtheVendorDrawingControl(VDC)programswhichincludecoordinating theprogramswithinterfacing divisions/departments.
Controltheissuanceanddistribution ofdrawingsfortheCookNuclearPlant,including monitoring oftheApertureCardMicrofilm Program.Supervise andcontroltheworkofconsultants, Architect/Engineers andoutsidedesignagenciessupplying servicestoAEPSCintheirdiscipline andprocessnotification ofdefectsinaccordance withcompanyrequirements.
Alsoperformdetailedreviewsofdesignworksubmitted byoutsideagencies.
Provideinputtothelistofmajorapprovedmaterials andmaintaincurrentspecifications usedwithinthegroup'sscopeofresponsibility.
Provideengineering anddesignsupporttoNOD.Reviewandupdateapplicable sectionsofCookNuclearPlantFSARasassigned.
Participate oncommittees thatreviewnuclearactivities asmemberswhenassigned.
Coordinate andresolvedesigncommentsmadebyinterfacing departments/divisions.
Prepare,review,approveandadminister designspecifications andpurchasedocuments fordesignservicesand/ormaterials.
NuclearEnineerinDeartmentTheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident
-NuclearEngineering, reporting totheAEPSCSeniorVicePresident andChiefEngineer, isresponsible fortheNuclearEngineering Department.
Reporting totheAEPSCAssistant VicePresident
-NuclearEngineering arethefollowing:
1.7-23December, 1990 AEPSCDivisionManager-NuclearPlantEngineering (notcharted)AEPSCDivisionManager-Electrical Systems(notcharted)TheAEPSCDivisionManager-NuclearPlantEngineering isresponsible forthefollowing (notcharted):
AEPSCGroupManager-Mechanical SystemsTechnical SupportSectionFurther,theAEPSCGroupManager-Mechanical Systemsisresponsible forthefollowing (notcharted):
ChemicalEngineering andPerformance SectionHeatExchangers, Pumps,andTurbinesSectionPiping,Valves,HVAC,an'dFireProtection SectionTheAEPSCDivisionManager-Electrical Systemsisresponsible forthefollowing (notcharted):
Instrumentation andControlsSectionPowerSystemsandHumanFactorsSectionTheNuclearEngineering Department (NED)isresponsible forthefollowing:
Provideplanningandengineering, inconjunction withotherspecialists,
- sections, anddivisions, electrical facilities insideCookNuclearPlantuptothehighvoltage(HV)bushingsofthemaingenerator transformers andmechanical facilities insideCookNuclearPlantincluding:
determination ofgenerallayoutanddesign;selection ofequipment; preparation ofone-lineandflowdiagrams; and,coordination ofinsideandoutsideplantfacilities.
1.7-24December, 1990 0
Provideengineering anddesignofallcontrolsforoperation andprotection ofsteamgenerator, turbinegenerator, andauxiliary equipment andgeneralplantprotection, including checkingandapproving elementary, one-line, andflowdrawings.
Interface withotherorganizations toensurethatallpurchased equipment conformstoacceptedstandards andfulfillsthedesiredfunction.
Closelyfollowing manufacturer's engineering anddesignprocesses toassureprovision ofadequateandreliableequipment uponwhichdependthesafety,reliability, economy,andperformance oftheunitandplant.Preparecost.estimates andimprovement requisitions forplantfacilities, including reviewofimprovement requisitions andcostestimates preparedbyothers.Prepareand/orapprovespecifications andpurchaserequisitions, andperforming drawingreviewofequipment, asappropriate.
Reviewandapproveprocedures, correspondence, requestsfordesignchangesormodifications asappropriate.
Obtainreviewandperformengineering evaluations including environmental equipment qualification (Eg).Performcalculations forproperapplication ofequipment.
Performandevaluateeconomicstudies,investigations, analysesandreportsforfacilities pertaining tothedesign,operation andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlant.Assistfieldpersonnel ininstallation, start-up, andsubsequent locatingofproblemsinequipment andindetermining properoperation ofequipment duringnormalorafteremergency operations.
Haintainaconstantawareness forimprovements andmorereliabledesignofequipment andfacilities, maintenance andoperating methodsorprocedures.
Haintainaconstantawareness ofactivities toensurecompliance withallapplicable policiesandprocedures initiating, whenrequired, trainingorretraining programs.
Participate, asassigned, ontheNSDRCandNSDRCsubcommittees, participating inmatterscoveredinthecommittee's charter.Provideresponses toNRCcorrespondence asrequired.
1.7-25December, 1990 0
Participate intheevaluation andremedyofanysituation requiring activation oftheemergency responseorganization.
Providetechnical engineering supportinareasofoperation andmaintenance, including:
theInservice Inspection (ISI)Program;theQAProgram;theFireProtection QAProgram;theAEPALARAProgramcoveringradiation protection; and,thecorporate andplantIndustrial Safetyprogram.Provideengineering supporttotheAEPSCNOD.Providetechnical direction andassistance totheAEPSCDesignDivisioninthelayoutandarrangement ofequipment piping,systems,controls, etc.,forthedevelopment ofdrawings.
Initiateanddevelopdesignchangesinareasofresponsibility oftheNED.DevelopSystemDescriptions.
Providesupportpersonnel fortheemergency responseorganization.
Provideanalytical supportinengineering disciplines (e.g.,heattransfer, thermodynamics, fluiddynamics).
Provideengineering evaluations fo}PRs,LERs,INPOSOERs,andNRCBulletins.
Participate, asassigned,'on theAEPSCProblemAssessment Group(PAG).Pro'ectManaementandConstruction DeartmentTheAEPSCVicePresident
-ProjectManagement andConstruction, reporting totheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident
-Engineering andConstruction, isresponsible fortheProjectManagement andConstruction Department.
Reporting totheAEPSCVicePresident
-ProjectManagement andConstruction arethefollowing:
SiteConstruction Managerreporting administratively totheAEPSCVicePresident
-ProjectManagement andConstruction andfunctionally totheCookNuclearPlant,PlantManager.Reporting totheSiteConstruction Managerare:1.7-26December, 1990
-Construction Chief-Electrical
-Construction Chief-Hechanical
-Construction Chief-Civil-Construction SafetySupervisor
-Construction Contracting
-'ompliance AuditorLaborRelations Director-Construction HumanResources Supervisor
-Construction ProjectHanager(asrequired)
TheProjectHanagement andConstruction Department isresponsible forthefollowing:
Administering andimplementing construction jobordersissuedbytheCookNuclearPlantOrganization formajormodifications, replacement andmaintenance workwithoutsidecontractors.
Administering andmonitoring contractor's industrial safetyprogramsandperformance.
Administering humanresources functions forsiteconstruction organization.
Hanagingconstruction laborrelations withtheInternational BuildingandConstruction TradesUnions.Scoping,bidding,recommending awardsandadministering construction laborandservicescontracts.
- Planning, organizing andcontrolling majorconstruction projectsasassignedbytheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident
-Engineering andConstruction.
Haintaining cognizance onmatterspertaining totheCookNuclearPlantandcorporate emergency responseorganization.
Preparation ofconstruction laborestimates.
Providing constructability guidancewhenrequested insupportofengineering anddesignchanges.1.7-27December, 1990 0
Purchasin andStoresDeartment(notcharted)TheAEPSCExecutive VicePresident
-Operations, reporting totheAEPSCPresident andChiefOperating Officer,isresponsible forthePurchasing andStoresDepartment throughtheAEPSCVicePresident
-Purchasing andHaterials Hanagement.
ThePurchasing andStoresDepartment isresponsible forthefollowing:
Procurement of"N"itemsfromonlyqualified andapprovedsuppliers.
Provideorderingandstockingdescriptions of"N"itemsandincludethesedescriptions intheCookNuclearPlantinventory catalogincluding necessary communications withsuppliers, cognizant engineers, theCookNuclearPlantStoresSupervisor andotherappropriate personnel.
Coordinate procurement activities withAEPSCNuclearOperations, AEPSCengineering anddesigndivisions/departments, I&HPurchasing Department, theAEPSCgADandCookNuclearPlantpersonnel.
Prepareandissuerequestsforquotations, contracts, serviceordersandpurchaseordersfor"N"items.Establish asystemtoimplement corrective actionasdescribed intheAEPSCGeneralProcedures fortheCookNuclearPlant.Establish asystemofdocumentkeeping,andtransmittal.
Establish asystemofdocumentcontrolforcontrolled procedures, instructions, andpurchasing documents for"N"items.Conducttrainingsessionsinvolving purchasing personnel andothersonanannualbasisormorefrequently, asrequired, andascertain thattrainingsessionsincludecompleteresponsibilities associated withthepurchaseofsafety-related items.Notifysuppliers oftheirstatusregarding theiracceptability toprovideitemsorservicestoCookNuclearPlant.NotifytheIKHPurchasing Department andtheCookNuclearPlantStoresSupervisor ofchangestosupplierqualifications toprovideitemsorservices.
1.7-28December, 1990 1.7.1.2.6Oranization CookNuclearPlantThePlantManagerreportsfunctionally andadministratively totheAEPSCVicePresident
-NuclearOperations (ManagerofNuclearOperations) andisresponsible fortheCookNuclearPlantactivities.
Reporting tothePlantManagerarethefollowing (Figure1.7-5):Assistant PlantManager-Production Assistant PlantManager-Technical SupportAssistant PlantManager-ProjectsLicensing ActivityCoordinator SafetyandAssessment Superintendent Radiation Protection Manager(reportsfunctionally tothePlantManager)NuclearSecurityManager(reportsfunctionally tothePlantManager)TheCookNuclearPlantorganization, underthePlantManagerisresponsible forthefollowing:
Ensurethesafetyofallfacilityemployees andthegeneralpublicrelativetogeneralplantsafety,aswellasradiological safetybymaintaining strictcompliance withplantTechnical Specifications, procedures andinstructions.
Recommend facilityengineering modification andinitiateandapproveplantimprovement requisitions.
Ensurethatworkpractices inallplantdepartments areconsistent withregulatory standards, safety,approvedprocedures, andplantTechnical Specifications.
Providemembership, asrequired, onthePNSRC.Maintaincloseworkingrelationships withtheNRCaswellaslocal,state,andfederalgovernment regulating officials regarding condi-tionswhichcouldaffect,orareaffectedbyCookNuclearPlantactivities.
Setupplantloadschedules andarrangeforequipment outages.Developandefficiently implement allsitecentralized trainingactivities.
1.7-29December, 1990 Administer thecentralized facilitytrainingcomplex,simulator, andprogramsensuringthatprogramdevelopment isconsistent withthesystematic approachtotraining, maintainINPOaccreditations, regulatory andcorporate requirements.
Ensurethathumanresourceactivities includeemployeesupportprograms(i.e.,fitnessforduty)consistent withINPO/NUHARC guidelines, companypolicies, andregulatory requirements andstandards.
Administer theNRCapprovedphysicalSecurityProgramincompliance withregulatory standards, ModifiedAmendedSecurityPlan(HASP),andcompanypolicy.Supervise, plan,anddirecttheactivit'ies relatedtothemaintenance andinstallation ofallCookNuclearPlantequipment, structures, grounds,andyards.Prepareandmaintainrecordsandreportspertinent toequipment maintenance andregulatory agencyrequirements.
Administer contracts andscheduleoutsidecontractors'ork forces.Enforceandcoordinate CookNuclearPlantregulations, procedures,
- policies, andobjectives toassuresafety,efficiency, andcontinuity intheoperation oftheCookNuclearPlantwithinthelimitsoftheoperating licenseandtheTechnical Specifications andformulation ofrelatedpoliciesandprocedures.
Plan,schedule, anddirecttheactivities relatingtotheoperationoftheCookNuclearPlantandassociated switchyards; cooperate inplanningandscheduling of'orkandprocedures forrefueling andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlant;directandcoordinate fuelloadingoperations.
Reviewreportsandrecordsanddirectgeneralinspection'f operating conditions ofplantequipment andinvestigate anyabnormalconditions, makingrecommendations forrepairs.Establish andadminister equipment clearance procedures consistent withcompany,plant,andradiation protection standards; authorize andarrangeforequipment outagestomeetnormaloremergency conditions.
Providetheshiftoperating crewswithappropriate procedures andinstructions toassisttheminoperating theCookNuclearPlantsafelyandefficiently.
1.7-30December, 1990 Approveoperatortrainingprogramsadministered bytheCookNuclearPlantTrainingDepartment designedtoprovideoperating personnel withtheknowledge andskillrequiredforsafeoperation ofthefacilityandforobtaining andholdingNRCoperatorlicenses.
Coordinate trainingprogramsinplantsafetyandemergency procedures forCookNuclearPlantOperating Department personnel toensurethateachshiftgroupwillfunctionproperlyintheeventofinjuryofpersonnel, fire,nuclearincident, orcivildisorder.
Advanceplanningandoverallconductofscheduled andforcedoutages,including thescheduling andcoordination ofallplantactivities associated withrefueling, preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, equipment
- overhaul, Technical Specification surveillances, anddesignchangeinstallations.
Coordinate allCookNuclearPlantactivities associated withtheinitiation, review,approval, engineering, design,production, examination, inspection, test,turnover, andcloseoutofdesignchanges.Developandimplement aneffective gualityControl(gC)Program.Thisencompasses, butisnotlimitedto,theplanninganddirecting ofqualitycontrolactivities toassurethatindustrycodes,NRCregulations, andcompanyinstructions andpoliciesregarding qualitycontrolforCookNuclearPlantareimplemented, qualified personnel performwork,andthattheseactivities areproperlydocumented.
Preparereportsofreportable eventswhicharemandatedbytheNRCandtheTechnical Specifications.
Directtheactivities ofcontractor gC/nondestructive examination (NDE)personnel assignedtotheSafetyandAssessment Department andprovideinspections ofworkper'formed.
Preparestatistical reportsutilizedinNRCAppraisal MeetingsandEnforcement Conferen'ce.
Coordinate theeffortsofoutsideagenciessuchasAmericanNuclearInsurers(ANI),INPO,andthirdpartyinspector programs.
Maintainknowledge ofdevelopments andchangesinNRCrequirements, industrystandards andcodes,regulatory compliance activities, andqualitycontroldisciplines andtechniques.
1.7-31December, 1990 Stopplantoperation intheeventthatconditions arefoundwhichareinviolation oftheTechnical Specifications oradversetoquality.Maintainandrenewaccreditation oftrainingprograms.
gualification andcertification ofI&Hpersonnel performing inspections ortestsofmajormodifications andnonroutine maintenance totherequirements ofRegulatory Guide1.58andANSIN45.2.6,exceptasnotedinAppendixBhereto,item9.gualification andcertification ofI&MNDEpersonnel totherequirements oftheAEPNDEManual.gualification ofI&Hpersonnel performing inspection ofnormaloperating activities toANSIN18.1.Propercertification ofcontractor inspection, testandexamination personnel inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58,ANSIN45.2.6,ASMEB&PVCodeand/orSNT-TC-IA, asapplicable.
Performpeerinspections ofworkcompleted byI&Mpersonnel=
byindependent personsqualified toANSIN18.7.ConductoftheInservice Inspection (ISI)Program.Procurement, receiving, qualitycontrolreceiptinspection, storage,handling, issue,stocklevelmaintenance, andoverallcontrolofstoresitems.Providematerialserviceandsupportinaccordance withpoliciesandprocedures requiredbyAEPPurchasing andStores,AEPSCgA,andtheNRC,whichareadministered andenforcedinatotalefforttoensuresafetyandplantreliability.
Plananddirectengineering andtechnical studies,nuclearfuelmanagement, equipment performance, instrument andcontrolmainte-nance,on-sitecomputersystems,ShiftTechnical
- Advisors, andemergency planningfortheCookNuclearPlant.Theseactivities supportdailyon-siteoperations inasafe,reliable, andefficient mannerinaccordance withallcorporate
- policies, applicable laws,regulations,
- licenses, andTechnical Specification requirements.
Implement stationperformance testingandmonitorprogramstoensureoptimumplantefficiency.
Directprogramsrelatedtoon-sitefuelmanagement andreactorcorephysicstestingandensuresatisfactory completion.
1.7-32December, 1990
Establish testingandpreventive maintenance programsrelatedtostationinstrumentation, electrical systems,andcomputers.
Recommend alternatives toCookNuclearPlantoperation, technical oremergency procedures, anddesignofequipment toimprovesafetyofoperations andoverallplantefficiency.
Implement thecorporate Emergency PlanasitpertainstotheCookNuclearPlantsite.Providetechnical andengineering servicesinthefieldsofchemis-try,radiation protection, ALARA,andenvironmental insupportofthesafeoperation oftheplantandthehealthandsafetyoftheemployees andthepublic.Planandscheduletheactivities oftheTechnical PhysicalScienceSectionsoftheCookNuclearPlantinsupportofoperations andmaintenance.
Establish chemistry, radiochemistry, andhealthphysicscriteriawhichensuremaximumequipment lifeandtheprotection ofthehealthandsafetyoftheworkersandthepublic.Establish samplingandanalysisprogramswhichensurethechemistry, radiochemistry, andhealthphysicscriteriaarewithintheestab-lishedcriteria.
Establish anddirectinvestigations, responses, andcorrective actionswhenoutsidetheestablished criteria.
Administer anddirecttheCookNuclearPlant'sradioactive wasteprograms, including volumereduction, packaging andshipping.
Administration ofthegARecordsProgram.MaintaintheCookNuclearPlantFacilityDataBase.1.7.2EQUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM1.7.2.1SCOPEPoliciesthatdefineandestablish theCookNuclearPlantgAProgramaresummarized intheindividual sectionsofthisdocument.
Theprogramisimplemented throughprocedures andinstructions responsive toprovisions ofthegAPD,andwillbecarriedoutforthelifeoftheCookNuclearPlant.1.7-33December, 1990
Qualityassurance controlsapplytoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents, toanextentbasedontheimportance ofthosestructures, systems,components, etc.,(items)tosafety.Suchactivities areperformed undercontrolled conditions, including theuseofappropriate equipment, environmental conditions, assignment ofqualified personnel, andassurance thatallapplicable prerequisites havebeenmet.Safety-related itemsaredefinedasitems:whichareassociated withthesafeshutdown(hot)ofthereactor;orisolation ofthereactor;ormaintenance oftheintegrity ofthereactorcoolantsystempressureboundary.
ORwhosefailuremightcauseorincreasetheseverityofadesignbasisaccidentasdescribed intheFSAR;orleadtoareleaseofradioac-tivityinexcessof10CFR100guidelines.
Ingeneral,itemsareclassified assafety-related iftheyare:SeismicClassI,orElectrical ClassIE;orassociated withtheEngineered SafetyFeaturesActuation System(ESFAS);orassociated withtheReactorProtection System(RPS),AspecialQAprogramhasbeenimplemented forFireProtection items(Section1.7.19herein).TheQAProgramalsoincludesprovision forRadwasteQAinaccordance withtherequirements ofIOCFR71,partH.QAProgramstatus,scope,adequacy, andcompliance withIOCFR50,AppendixB,areregularly reviewedbyAEPSCmanagement throughreports,meetings, andreviewofauditresults.1.7-34December, 1990
Theimplementation oftheQAProgrammaybeaccomplished byAEPSCand/orIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyordelegated inwholeorinparttootherAEPSystemcompanies oroutsideparties.However,AEPSCand/orIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyretainfullresponsibility forallactivities affecting safety-related items.Theperformance ofthedelegated organization isevaluated byauditorsurveillances onafrequency commensurate withtheirscopeandimportance ofassignedwork.1.7.2.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.2.2.1 TheChairmanoftheBoardofAEPSC,asChiefExecutive Officer,hasstatedinasigned,formal"Statement ofPolicy",thatitisthecorporate policytocomplywiththeprovisions ofapplicable codes,standards andregulations pertaining toqualityassurance fornuclearpowerplantsasrequiredbytheCookNuclearPlantoperating licenses.
Thestatement makesthisQAPDandtheassociated implementing procedures andinstructions mandatory, andrequirescompliance byallresponsible organizations andindividuals.
Thestatement alsoidentifies themanagement positions withinthecompanies vestedwithresponsibility andauthority forimplementing theprogramandassuringitseffectiveness.
1.7.2.2.2 TheQAProgramatAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPla'ntconsistofcontrolsexercised byorganizations responsible forattaining qualityobjectives, andbyorganizations responsible forassurance functions.
TheQAProgrameffectiveness iscontinually assessedthroughmanagement reviewofvariousreports,NSDRCreviewoftheQAauditprogramandshallalsobeperiodically reviewedbyindependent outsidepartiesasdeemednecessary bymanagement.
TheQAProgramdescribed inthisQAPDisintendedtoapplyforthelifeoftheCookNuclearPlant,1.7-35December, 1990 TheQAProgramappliestoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-relatedstructures, components, andrelatedconsumables duringplantoperation, maintenance, testing,andalldesignchanges.Safety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areidentified intheFacilityDataBaseandotherdocuments whicharedeveloped andmaintained fortheplant.Asdeemednecessary bytheAEPSCDirector-QualityAssurance, orthePlantHanager,applicable portionsoftheQAProgramcontrolswillbeappliedtononsafety-related activities associated withtheimplementa-tionoftheQAProgramtoensurethatcommitments aremet(e.g.,off-siterecordsstorage,trainingservices, etc.).1.7.2.2.3 ThisQAPD,organized topresenttheQAProgramfortheCookNuclearPlantintheorderofthe18criteriaof10CFR50,AppendixB,statesAEPSCpolicyforeachofthecriteria, anddescribes howthecontrolspertinent toeacharecarriedout.AnychangesmadetothisQAPDthatdonotreducethecommitments previously acceptedbytheNRCmustbesubmitted totheNRCatleastannually.
AnychangesmadetothisQAPDthatdoreducethecommitments previously acceptedbytheNRCmustbesubmitted totheNRCandreceiveNRCapprovalpriortoimplementation.
Thesubmittal ofthechangesdescribed aboveshallbemadeinaccordance withtherequirements of10CFR50.54.
Theprogramdescribed inthisQAPDwillnotbeintentionally changedinanywaythatwouldpreventitfrommeetingthecriteriaof10CFR50,AppendixB,andotherapplicable operating licenserequirements.
1.7.2.2.4 Documents usedforimplementing theprovisions ofthisQAPDincludethefollowing:
1.7-36December, 1990 0
PlantManagerInstructions (PMIs)establish thepolicyattheplantforcompliance withspecified
- criteria, andassignresponsibility tothevariousdepartments, asrequired, forimplementation.
Whennecessary, Department HeadProcedures (DHPs),andinsomecasesDepartment HeadInstructions (DHIs),havebeenpreparedtodescribethedetailedactivities requiredtosupportsafeandeffective plantoperation asperthePMIs.ThePMIsarereviewedbyAEPSCgAforconcurrence thattheywillsatisfactorily implement regulatory requirements andcommitments.
TheyarethenreviewedbythePNSRCpriortoapprovalbythePlantManager.Safety-related OHPsandOHIsarereviewedbythedepartment headoforigination, PNSRCandPlantManagerpriortouse.AEPSCGeneralProcedures (GPs)areutilizedtodefinecorporate policies.andrequirements forqualityassurance, andtoimplement certaincorporate gAProgramrequirements.
AEPSCdivision/department and/orsectionprocedures arealsousedtoimplement gAProgramrequirements.
GPsmayalsobeusedtodefinepolicieswhicharenonprocedural innature.Whencontractors performworkon-siteundertheirownqualityassurance
- programs, theprogramsareauditedforcompliance andconsistency withtheapplicable requirements oftheCookNuclearPlant'sgAProgramandthecontract, andareapprovedbyAEPSCgApriortothestartofwork.Implementation ofon-sitecontractor's gAprograms, willbeauditedtoassurethatthecontractor's programsareeffective.
1.7.2.2.5 Provisions ofthegAProgramfortheCookNuclearPlantapplytoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items.AppendixAtothisSWAPOliststheRegulatory/Safety GuidesandANSIStandards that1.7-37December, 1990 identifyAEPSC'scommitment.
Imposition oftheseguides/standards onAEPSC/18M suppliers andsubtiersuppliers willbeonacase-by-case basisdepending upontheitemorservicetobesupplied.
AppendixBdescribes necessary exceptions andclarifications totherequirements ofthosedocuments.
Thescopeoftheprogramandtheextenttowhichitscontrolsareapplied,areestablished asfollows:a)AEPSCusesthecriteriaspecified intheCookNuclearPlantFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR)foridentifying structures, systemsandcomponents towhichthegAProgramapplies.b)Thisidentification processresultsintheFacilityDataBasefortheCookNuclearPlant.ThisFacilityDataBaseiscontrolled byauthorized personnel.
FacilityDataHaseitemsaredetermined byengineering analysisofthefunction(s) ofplantitemsinrelationtosafeoperation andshutdown.
c)Theextenttowhichcontrolsspecified inthegAProgramareappliedtoFacilityDataBaseitemsisdetermined foreachitemconsidering itsrelativeimportance tosafety.Suchdeterminations arebasedondatainsuchdocuments astheCookNuclearPlantTechnical Specifications andtheFSAR.1.7.2.2.6 Activities affecting safety-related itemsareaccomplished undercontrolled conditions.
Preparations forsuchactivities includeconsideration ofthefollowing:
a)b)c)d)Assignedpersonnel arequalified.
Workhasbeenplannedtoapplicable engineering and/orTechnical Specifications.
Specified equipment and/ortoolsareavailable.
Itemsareinanacceptable status.1.7-38December, 1990 e)f)g)h)Itemsonwhichworkistobeperformed areinthepropercondition forthetask.Properinstructions/procedures fortheworkareavailable foruse.Itemsandfacilities thatcouldbedamagedbytheworkhavebeenprotected, asrequired.
Provisions havebeenmadeforspecialcontrols, processes, testsandverification methods.1.7.2.2.7 Responsibility andauthority forplanningandimplementing indoctrination andtrainingofAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantstaffpersonnel arespecifically designated, asfollows:a)Thetrainingandindoctrination programprovidesforon-goingtrainingandperiodicfamiliarization withthegAProgramfortheCookNuclearPlant.b)Personnel whoperforminspection andexamination functions arequalified inaccordance withrequirements ofRegulatory Guide1.8,ANSIN18.1,Regulatory Guide1.58,ANSIN45.2.6,theASHEB&PVCode,orSNT-TC-1A,asapplicable andwithexceptions asnotedinAppendixBhereto.c)AEPSCgAOauditorsarequalified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.146andANSIN45.2.23.
d)Personnel assigneddutiessuchasspecialcleaningprocesses, welding,etc.,arequalified inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards, regulatory guidesand/orplantprocedures.
e)Thetraining, qualification andcertification programincludes, asapplicable, provisions forretraining, reexamination andrecertification toensurethatproficiency ismaintained.
1.7-39December, 1990 f)Training, qualification, andcertification recordsincluding documentation ofobjectives, waivers/exceptions, attendees anddatesofattendance aremaintained atleastaslongasthepersonnel involvedareperforming activities towhichthetraining, qualification andcertification isrelevant.
g)Personnel responsible forperforming activities thataffectsafety-related itemsareinstructed astothepurpose,scopeandimplementation oftheapplicable manuals,instructions andprocedures.
Hanagement/supervisory personnel receivefunctional trainingtothelevelnecessary toplan,coordinate andadminister theday-to-day verification activities ofthegAProgramforwhichtheyareresponsible.
TrainingofAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantpersonnel isperformed employing thefollowing techniques, asapplicable:
1)onthejobandformaltrainingadministered'y thedepartment orsectiontheindividual worksfor;2)formaltrainingconducted byqualified instructors fromtheCookNuclearPlantTrainingDepartment orotherentities(internal andexternaltotheAEPSystem);and3)formal,INPOaccredited trainingconducted bytheCookNuclearPlantTrainingDepartment.:
Recordsoftrainingsessionsforsuchtrainingaremaintained.
Wherepersonnel qualifications orcertifications arerequired, thesecertifications areperformed onascheduled basis(consistent withtheappropriate codeorstandard).
CookNuclearPlantemployees receiveintroductory traininginqualityassurance usuallywithinthefirsttwoweeksofemployment.
Inaddition, AEPSCpersonnel receivetrainingpriortobeingallowedunescorted accesstotheplant.Thistrainingincludesmanagement's policyforimplementation ofthegAProgramthroughPlantManagerandDepartment HeadInstructions andProcedures.
Theseinstructions alsoincludeadescription ofthegAProgram,theuseofinstructions andprocedures, personnel requirements forprocedure compliance andthesystemsandcomponents controlled bythegAProgram.1.7-40December, 1990
1.7.3DESIGNCONTROL1.7;3.1SCOPEDesignchangesareaccomplished inaccordance withapproveddesign.Activities todevelopsuchdesignsarecontrolled.
Depending onthetypeofdesignchange,theseactivities includedesignandfieldengineering; theperformance ofphysics,seismic,stress,thermal,hydraulic andradiation evaluations; updateoftheFSAR;reviewofaccidentanalyses;
'hedevelopment andcontrolofassociated computerprograms; studiesofmaterialcompatibility; accessibility forinservice inspection andmaintenance; determination ofqualitystandards; andrequirement forequipment qualification.
Thecontrolsapplytopreparation andreviewofdesigndocuments, including thecorrecttranslation ofapplicable regula-toryrequirements anddesignbasesintodesign,procurement andprocedural documents.
1.7.3.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.3.2.1
~~~~Designchangesarecontrolled byprocedures andinstructions andarereviewedasrequiredby10CFR50.59.
Safety-related designchangesareaccomplished byoneoftwoseparateprocesses, theMinorModification (MM)ortheRequestforChange(RFC).Thosethatdonotaltertheintendedfunctionoftheitemandcanbedetermined byjudgement tohaveaminimaloverallimpactontheitembeingmodifiedmaybeimplemented viatheMMprocess.Allothersafety-related designchangesthatarenotappropriate forMMprocessing, areimplemented viatheRFCprocess.1.7.3.2.2
.RFCs(exceptforthoserequiring emergency processing) andMMsarereviewedandapprovedpriortoimplementation
,asaminimum,bythecognizant AEPSCengineering section,PNSRC,andPlantManager.1.7-41December, 1990 RFCsandMMsarereviewedto'determine theirimpactonnuclearsafetyandtodetermine ifth'eproposedchangesinvolveanunreviewed safetyquestionasdefinedby10CFR50.59.
Ifadesignchangeweretoinvolveanunreviewedsafetyquestion, itwouldnotbeapprovedforimplementation untiltherequiredNRCapprovalwasreceived.
1.7.3.2.3 ForRFCs,theChangeControlBoard,established withinAEPSC,providesanadditional reviewandapprovallevel.TheChangeControlBoardiscomprised ofmembersoftheEngineering, Design,NuclearOperations andgAorganizations withinAEPSCandissupplemented byotherAEPSCorganizations orindividuals asrequired.
Thecognizant memberoftheChangeControlBoardassignsaleadengineerforeachRFC.Theleadengineerisresponsible forcoordinating theRFCactivities withinAEPSCandmaintaining closeinterface withtheCookNuclearPlantProjectEngineers.
y-1.7.3.2.4
~~~ProposedRFCswhichrequireemergency processing, areoriginated attheplant,reviewedbythePNSRCandapprovedbythePlantManager.CookNuclearPlantmanagement thencontactstheAEPSCNOD,andotherAEPSCmanagement, asrequired, describes thechangerequested andimplements the,changeonlyafterreceiving verbalAEPSCmanagement authorization toproceed.Thesereviewsandapprovals aredocumented andbecomeapartoftheRFCPacket.1.7.3.2.5 WhenRFCsorMMsinvolvedesigninterfaces betweeninternalorexternaldesignorganizations, oracrosstechnical disciplines, theseinterfaces arecontrolled.
Procedures areusedforthereview,approval, release,distribution andrevisionofdocuments involving designinterfaces to1.7-42December, 1990 ensurethatstructures, systemsandcomponents arecompatible geometri-cally,functionally, withprocesses andtheenvironment.
Linesofcommunication areestablished forcontrolling theflowofneededdesigninformation acrossdesigninterfaces, including changestotheinformation asworkprogresses.
Decisions andproblemresolutions involving designinterfaces aremadebytheAEPSCorganization havingresponsibility forengineering direction ofthedesigneffort.1.7.3.2.6 Checksareperformed anddocumented toverifythedimensional accuracyandcompleteness ofdesigndrawingsandspecifications.
1.7.3.2.7 RFCdesigndocumentpackagesareauditedbyAEPSCgAtoassurethatthedocuments havebeenprepared,
- verified, reviewedandapprovedinaccor-dancewithcompanyprocedures.
1.7.3.2.8
~~~Theextentofandmethodsfordesignverification aredocumented.
Theextentofdesignverification performed isafunctionoftheimportance oftheitemtosafety,designcomplexity, degreeofstandardization, thestate-of-the-art, andsimilarity withpreviously provendesigns.Methodsfordesignverification includeevaluation oftheapplicability ofstandardized orpreviously provendesigns,alternate calculations, qualification testinganddesignreviews.Thesemethodsmaybeusedsinglyorincombination, depending ontheneedsforthedesignunderconsideration.
Whendesignverification isdonebyevaluating standardized orpreviously provendesigns,theapplicability ofsuchdesignsisconfirmed.
Anydifferences fromtheprovendesignaredocumented andevaluated fortheintendedapplication.
1.7-43December, 1990 OIgualification testingofprototypes, components, orfeaturesisusedwhentheabilityofanitemtoperformanessential safetyfunctioncannototherwise beadequately substantiated.
Thistestingisperformed beforeplantequipment installation wherepossible, butalwaysbeforerelianceupontheitemtoperformasafety-related function.
gualification testingisperformed underconditions thatsimulatethemostadversedesignconditions, considering allrelevantoperating modes.Testrequirements, procedures andresultsaredocumented.
Resultsareevalu-atedtoassurethattestrequirements havebeensatisfied.
Designchangesshowntobenecessary throughtestingaremade,andanynecessary retesting orotherverification isperformed.
Testconfigurations areclearlydocumented.
Designreviewsareperformed bymulti-organizational orinterdisciplinary groups,orbysingleindividuals.
Criteriaareestablished todetermine whenaformalgroupreviewisrequired, andwhenreviewbyanindividual issufficient.
Procedures requirethatminordesignchangesaccomplished bytheHHprocessalsoreceiveformaldesignverification.
Applicable designverification activities shallbecompleted priortodeclaring thedesignchangeorportionthereofoperational.
1.7.3.2.9 Personsrepresenting applicable technical disciplines areassignedtoperformdesignverifications.
Thesepersonsarequalified byappropriate education orexperience butare'otdirectlyresponsible forthedesign.Thedesigner's immediate supervisor mayperformtheverification, providedthat:1)Thesupervisor istheonlytechnically qualified individual.
or1.7-44December, 1990 o2)Thesupervisor hasnotspecified asingulardesignapproach, ruledoutdesignconsiderations, norestablished thedesigninputs.and3)Theneedisindividually documented andapprovedinadvancebythesupervisor's management.
and4)Regularly scheduled gAauditsverifyconformance topreviousitems1through3.Designverification onsafety-related designchangesshallbecompleted priortodeclaring adesignchange,orportionsthereofoperational.
1.7.3.2.10 CookNuclearPlantimplementation ofdesignchangesisaccomplished bytheCookNuclearPlantProjectEngineering Department.
Materialtoperformthedesignchangemustmeetthespecifications established fortheoriginalsystemorasspecified bytheleadengineer.
Forthosedesignchangeswheretestingaftercompletion isrequired, thetestingdocumentation isreviewedbytheorganization performing thetestand,whenspecified, bytheAEPSCleadengineerorothercognizant engineer(s).
Further,completed designchangesareauditedbyAEPSCgAfollowing installation andtesting.1.7.3.2.11 Changestodesigndocuments, including fieldchanges,arereviewed, approvedandcontrolled inamannercommensurate withthatusedfortheoriginaldesign.Suchchangesareevaluated forimpact.Information onapprovedchangesistransmitted toallaffectedorganizations.
1.7-45December, 1990 0
1.7.3.2.12 Erroranddeficiencies in,anddeviations fromapproveddesigndocuments areidentified anddispositioned inaccordance withestablished designcontroland/orcorrective actionprocedures.
1.7.3.2.13 Thismechanism provides'or:
1)controlled submission ofdesignchanges,2)engineering evaluation, 3)reviewforimpactonnuclearsafety,4)auditbyAEPSCgA,5)design'odification, 6)AEPSCmanagerial review,and7)approvalandrecordkeepingfortheimplemented designchange.1.7.4PROCUREMENT DOCUNENTCONTROL1.7.4,1SCOPEProcurement documents definethecharacteristics ofitem(s)tobeprocured, identifyapplicable regulatory andindustrycodes/standards requirements andspecifysuppliergAProgramrequirements totheextentnecessary toassureadequatequality.1.7.4.2IHPLENENTATION 1.7.4.2.1 Procurement controlisestablished byinstructions.
andprocedures.
Thesedocuments requirethatpurchasedocuments besufficiently detailedtoensurethatpurchased materials, components andservicesassociated withsafety-related structures orsystemsare:1)purchased tospecification andcoderequirements equivalent tothoseoftheoriginalequipment orservice(exceptwhentheCodeofFederalRegulations requiresupgrading),
2)properlydocumented toshowcompliance withtheapplicable specifica-tions,codesandstandards, and3)purchased fromvendorsorcontractors whohavebeenevaluated anddeemedqualified.
1.7-46December, 1990
Procedures establish thereviewofprocurement documents todetermine that:qualityrequirements arecorrectly stated,inspectable andcontrollable; thereareadequateacceptance criteria; procurement documents havebeenprepared, reviewedandapprovedinaccordance withestablished requirements.
Eachinvolvedmanagerisresponsible forassuringthattheapplicable gArequirements aresetforthintheprocurement documents.
TheCookNuclearPlantmayrequestassistance ofAEPSCcognizant engineers inanyprocurement activity.
1.7.4.2.2 TheFacilityDataBase,inconjunction withothersources,isusedasthesourcedocumentforequipment safetyclassification andprocurement grade.AEPSCSpecifications fortheCookNuclearPlant(DCCSpecifications) areusedtodetermine itemanddocumentation requirements, codesorstandards thatitemsmustfulfill,anddefinethedocumentation thatmustaccompany theitemtotheplant.Organizational management cognizant oftheequipment anditsqualityassurance requirements reviewprocurement documents, asrequired, toensurethat:correctclassification ismade;theappropriate plantspecifications whichidentifyqualityrequirements arereferenced orattached; andthatthedocumentation requirements areproperlystated.Purchaserequisitions fornewsafety-related equipment areinitiated bytheAEPSCcognizant engineers whoestablish theinitialequipment qualityassurance requirements.
Replacement orspareequipment isprocuredviatheoriginalpurchaserequirements.
Ininstances wheretheserequirements havebeensuperseded byarevisedspecification, andwhenapplicable thereplacement/
sparepartisprocuredtotherevisedrequirements.
1,7-47December, 1990 1.7.4.2.3 Thecontentsofprocurement documents varyaccording totheitem(s)beingpurchased anditsfunction(s) intheCookNuclearPlant.Provisions ofthisgAPDareconsidered forapplication toservicecontractors also.Asapplicable, procurement documents include:a)Scopeofworktobeperformed.
b)Technical requirements, withapplicable
- drawings, specifications, codesandstandards identified bytitle,documentnumber,revisionanddate,withanyrequiredprocedures suchasspecialprocessinstructions identified insuchawayastoindicatesourceandneed.c)Regulatory, administrative andreporting requirements.
d)gualityrequirements appropriate tothecomplexity andscopeofthework,including necessary testsandinspections.
e)Arequirement foradocumented gAProgram,subjecttogAreviewandwrittenconcurrence priortothestartofwork.f)Arequirement forthesuppliertoinvokeapplicable qualityrequire-mentsonsubtiersuppliers.
g)Provisions foraccesstosupplierandsubtiersuppliers'acilities andrecordsforinspections, surveillances andaudits.h)Identification ofdocumentation tobeprovidedbythesupplier, thescheduleofsubmittals anddocuments requiring AEPSCapproval.
1.7.4.2.4 TheAEPSCgADivisionperformsauditsofprocurement documents toassurethatgAProgramrequirements havebeenmet.Theseauditsareconducted inaccordance withAEPSCgADivisionprocedures.
1.7-48December, 1990
'.7.4.2.5 Changestoprocurement documents arecontrolled inamannercommensurate withthatusedfortheoriginaldocuments.
1.7.5INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, ANDDRAWINGS1.7.5.1SCOPEActivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areaccomplished usinginstructions, procedures anddrawingsappropriate tothecircumstances, including acceptance criteriafordetermining ifanactivityhasbeensatisfactorily completed.
1.7.5.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.5.2'Instructions andprocedures incorporate:
1)adescription oftheactivitytobeaccomplished, and2)appropriate quantitative (suchastolerances andoperating limits)andqualitative (suchasworkmanship andstandards) acceptance criteriasufficient todetermine thattheactivityhasbeensatisfactorily accomplished.
Holdpointsforinspection areestablished whenrequired.
Instructions andprocedures pertaining tothespecification ofand/orimplementation ofthegAProgramreceivemultiplereviewsfortechnical adequacyandinclusion ofappropriate qualityrequirements.
Toptierinstructions andprocedures arereviewedand/orapprovedbyAEPSCgA,Lowertierdocuments arereviewedandapproved, asaminimumbymanagement/supervisory personnel trainedtothelevelnecessary toplan,coordinate andadminister thoseday-to-day verification activities ofthegAProgramforwhichtheyareresponsible.
Specialprocedures maybeissuedforactivities whichhaveshort-term applicability.
1.7-49December, 1990 1.7.5.2.2 AEPSCactivities relativetotheCookNuclearPlantareoutlinedbyprocedures whichprovidethecontrolsfortheimplementation oftheseactivities.
AEPSChastwocategories ofQAProgramimplementation procedures:
1)GeneralProcedures (GPs)whichareapplicable toallAEPSCdivisions anddepartments involvedwithCookNuclearPlant.2)Division/department/section procedures whichapplytothespecificdivision, department orsectioninvolved.
1.7.5,2.3 Activities at'theCookNuclearPlantarecontrolled usingplantprocedures.
ThePMIshavebeenclassified intothefollowing series:1000Organization andResponsibilities 2000Administration
-DocumentControl,Security,
- Training, Records,Radiation Protection andFireProtection 3000Procurement, Receiving, ShippingandStorage4000Operations, FuelHandling, Surveillance Testing5000Maintenance, Repair,Modification, Special'rocesses, EQandISI6000Technical
-Chemistry, Radiological
- Controls, Performance/Engineering Testing;andInstrument andControlMaintenance andCalibration 7000QualityAssurance, QualityControlProgramandCondition/Problem Reporting Instructions andprocedures identifytheregulatory requirements andcommitments whichpertaintothesubjectthatitwillcontrolandestab-lishresponsibilities forimplementation.
Instructions andprocedures 1.7-50December, 1990 mayeitherprovidetheguidancenecessary forthedevelopment ofsupple-mentalinstructions and/orprocedures toimplement theirrequirements, orprovidecomprehensive guidancebasedonthesubjectmatter.1.7.5.2.4 CookNuclearPlantdrawingsareproduced, controlled anddistributed underthecontrolofAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPlant.AEPSCdesigndrawingsareproducedbyorunderthecontroloftheAEPSCNuclearDesignGroupunderasetofprocedures whichdirecttheirdevelopment andreview.Theseprocedures specifyrequirements forinclusion ofquantitative andqualitative acceptance criteria.
Specificdrawingsarereviewedandapprovedbythecognizant engineering divisions/department.
AEPSChasstationed anon-sitedesignstafftoprovidefortherevisionofcertaintypesofdesigndrawingstoreflectas-builtconditions.
1.7.5.2.5 ComplexCookNuclearPlantprocedures aredesignated as"InHand"procedures.
Examplesof"InHand"procedures arethosedeveloped forextensive orcomplexjobswhererelianceonmemorycannotbetrusted.Further,thoseprocedures whichdescribeasequencewhichcannotbealteredorrequirethedocumentation ofdataduringthecourseoftheprocedure, areconsidered.
"InHand"procedures aredesignated assuchbydoubleasterisks
(**)whichprecedetheprocedure numberonthecoversheet,allpagesandattachments ofaprocedure andthecorresponding index.1.7.6DOCUMENTCONTROL1,7.6:1SCOPEDocuments controlling activities withinthescopedefinedin1.7.2hereinareissuedandchangedaccording toestablished procedures.
Documents suchasinstructions, procedures anddrawings, including changesthereto,1.7-51December, 1990
arereviewedforadequacy, approvedforreleasebyauthorized personnel andaredistributed andusedatthelocationwhereaprescribed activityisperformed.
Changestocontrolled documents.
arereviewedandapprovedbythesameorganizations thatperformed theoriginalreviewandapproval, orbyotherqualified, responsible organizations specifically designated inaccordance withtheprocedures governing thesedocuments.
Obsoleteorsuperseded documents arecontrolled topreventinadvertent use.1.7.6.2IHPLEHENTATION 1.7.6.2.1 Controlsareestablished forapproval, issueandchangeofdocuments inthefollowing categories:
a)b)c)d)e)f)g)Designdocuments (e.g.,calculations, specifications, analyses)
Drawingsandrelateddocuments Procurement documents Instructions andprocedures FinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR)PlantTechnical Specifications Safeguards documents 1.7.6.2.2 Thereview,approval, issuanceandchangeofdocuments arecontrolled by:a)Establishment ofcriteriatoensurethatadequatetechnical andqualityrequirements areincorporated.
b)Identification oftheorganization responsible forreview,approval, issueandmaintenance.
c)Reviewofchangestodocuments bytheorganization thatperformed theinitialreviewandapproval, orbytheorganization designated inaccordance withtheprocedure governing thereviewandapprovalofspecifictypesofdocuments.
1.7-52December, 1990 Maintenance, modification andinspection procedures areauditedbyAEPSCgAforcompliance withestablished inspection requirements.
1.7.6.2.3 Documents areissuedandcontrolled sothat:a)Thedocuments areavailable priortocommencing work.b)Obsoletedocuments arereplacedbycurrentdocuments inatimelymanner.1.7.6.2.4 Masterlistsorequivalent controlsareusedtoidentifythecurrentrevisionofinstructions, procedures, specifications anddrawings.
Thesecontroldocuments areupdatedanddistributed todesignated personnel whoareresponsible formaintaining currentcopiesoftheapplicable documents.
Thedistribution ofcontrolled documents isperformed underprocedures requiring receiptacknowledgement andinaccordance withestablished distribution lists.1.7.6,2.5 Intheeventadrawingisdeveloped on-sitetoreflectanas-builtconfiguration, themarked-up drawingismaintained intheMasterPlantFileandallholdersofthedrawingareissuedappropriate notification toinformthemtherevisiontheyholdisnotcurrent,cannotbeusedand,ifrequired, reference mustbemadetotheMasterPlantFiledrawing.1.7.6.2.6 Documents preparedforuseintrainingorforinter'ested partiesareappropriately markedtoindicatethattheyareforinformation useonly,andcannotbeusedtooperateormaintainthefacility, ortoconductactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items.AtCook1.7-53December, 1990 0
NuclearPlant,unlessadocumentisidentified as"controlled" itisautomatically assumedthedocumentisforinformational useonly.1.7.7CONTROLOFPURCHASED ITEMSANDSERVICES1.7.7.1SCOPEActivities thatimplement approvedprocurement requestsforitemsandservicesarecontrolled toassureconformance withprocurement documentrequirements.
Controlsincludeasystemofsupplierevaluation andselection audits,acceptance ofitemsanddocumentation upondelivery, andperiodicassessment ofsupplierperformance.
Objective evidenceofqualitythatdemonstrates conformance withspecified procurement documentrequirements isavailable totheCookNuclearPlantsitepriortouseofequipment,
- material, orservices.
1.7.7.2IMPLEMENTATION 1,7.7.2,1 AEPSCqualifies suppliers anddistributors byperforming adocumented evaluation oftheircapability toprovideitemsorservicesspecified byprocurement documents.
Itemsandservicesdesignated assafety-related arepurchased fromsuppliers whosegAprogramshavebeenacceptedinaccordance withAEPSCrequirements orfromcommercial gradesuppliers throughtheAEPSCdedication program.Suppliers ofotheritems/services, suchasfireprotection, recordsstorage,etc.,arealsoevaluated usingdifferent criteriaforacceptance.
gualification ofsuchsuppliers isdetermined bytheAEPSCgADivision.
Inthedischarge ofthisresponsibility, theAEPSCgADivisionutilizesinformation generated byotherutilities.
Thesupplierordistributor mustbeapprovedbeforeprocurement canbecompleted.
AEPSCisamemberoftheNuclearProcurement IssuesCouncil(NUPIC)andparticipants injointsupplierauditsandsharesauditinformation consistent withNUPICrequirements.
Thesupplierordistributor mustbeacceptable, or1.7-54.December, 1990 acceptable subjecttofollow-up beforeaprocurement canbeapprovedandprocessed.
Additional auditswillbeconducted, asnecessary, tomeetrequirements.
Acceptance isnotcompleteuntilithasbeendetermined thatthesuppliercanmeetthebasicgAandtechnical requirements oftheitemorservicethatisrequired.
1.7.7.2.2 Foritemsthatarenotuniquetoanuclearpowerplant("Commercial Grade")whererequirements cannotbeimposedinapractical mannerattimeofprocurement, programsfordedication andupgrading tosafety-relatedstandards areestablished andaccomplished bytheAEPSCcognizant engineerpriortotheitembeingacceptedforsafety-related use.1.7.7.2.3 In-process auditsofsuppliers'ctivities duringfabrication, inspection, testingandshipmentofitemsareperformed whendeemednecessary, depending uponsupplierqualification status,complexity andimportance tosafetyoftheitembeingfurnished, and/orprevioussupplierhistory.Theseauditsareperformed byAEPSCgA.Thecognizant engineerand/orresponsible CookNuclearPlantpersonnel alsoparticipate, ifdeemednecessary.
1.7.7.2.4 Spareandreplacement partsareprocuredinsuchamannerthattheirperformance andqualityareatleastequivalent tothoseofthepartsthatwillbereplaced.
a)Specifications andcodesreferenced inprocurement documents forspareorreplacement itemsareatleastequivalent tothosefortheoriginalitemsortoproperlyreviewedandapprovedrevisions.
1.7-55December, 1990 b)Partsintendedassparesorreplacement for"off-the-shelf" items,orotheritemsforwhichqualityrequirements werenotoriginally specified, areevaluated forperformance atleastequivalent totheoriginal.
c)d)Wherequalityrequirements fortheoriginalitemscannotbedeter-mined,requirements andcontrolsareestablished byengineering evaluation performed byqualified individuals.
Theevaluation assuresthereisnoadverseeffectoninterfaces, safety,interchangeability, fit,form,function, orcompliance withapplicable regulatory orcoderequirements.
Evaluation resultsaredocumented.
Anyadditional ormodifieddesigncriteria, imposedafterpreviousprocurement oftheitem(s),areidentified andincorporated.
1.7.7.2.5 Instructions andprocedures addressrequirements forsupplierselection andcontrolaswellasprocurement documentcontrol.ThePNIonreceiptinspection ofsafety-related itemsaddresses theprogramforinspection ofincomingitemsincluding areviewofthedocumentation requiredundertheprocurement.
Receiptinspection personnel arequalified andcertified inaccordance withtherequirements ofANSIN45.2.6.Provisions forreceiptinspection applyregardless ofwheretheprocurement originates.
Additional inspections mayapplyifrequiredbytheprocurement document.
Whereitemsand/orservicesaresafety-related andprocurement isaccomplished withoutassistance ofAEPSC,supplierselection islimitedtothosecompanies identified asbeingqualified.
1.7.7.2.6 Itemsreceivedatthesitearetaggedwitha"HOLD"tagandplacedinadesignated, controlled areauntilreceiptinspected.
Duringreceipt1.7-56December, 1990 inspection, designated materialcharacteristics andattributes arechecked,anddocumentation ischeckedagainsttheprocurement documents.
Iffoundacceptable, the"HOLD"tagisremovedandreplacedwithan"ACCEPTED" tagandtheitemisplacedinadesignated areaofthestoreroom.
Itemtraceability toprocurement documents andtoenduseismaintained throughrecording of"HOLD"and"ACCEPTED" tagnumberonapplicable documents.
Nonconforming items,ormissingorquestionable documentation resultsinitemsbeingplacedon"hold"andmaintained inadesignated, controlled areaofthestoreroom.
Ifthenonconformance cannotbecleared,theitemiseitherscrapped, returnedtomanufacturer, ordispositioned throughengineering analysis.
1.7.7.2.7 Contractors providing services(on-site) forsafety-related components, arerequiredtohaveeitheraformalqualityassurance programandprocedures, ortheymustabidebytheCookNuclearPlantgAProgramandprocedures.
PriortotheirworkingattheCookNuclearPlant,contractor qualityassurance programsmustbeauditedandapprovedbyAEPSCgA.Contractor procedures mustbereviewedandapprovedbytheoriginating/
sponsoring department supervisor, PNSRCandthePlantManager.IFurther,periodicauditsofsitecontractor activities areconducted underthedirection oftheAEPSCgualityAssurance Superintendent.
1.7.7.2.8 Suppliers arerequiredtofurnishthefollowing records:a)Applicable drawingsandrelatedengineering documentation thatidentifythepurchased itemandthespecificprocurement require-ments(e.g.,codes,standards andspecifications) metbytheitem.b)Documentation identifying anyprocurement requirements thathavenotbeenmet.1.7-57December, 1990 0
Qoc)Adescription ofthosenonconformances fromtheprocurement require-mentsdispositioned "use-as-is" or"repair".
d)gualityrecordsasspecified intheprocurement requirements.
1.7.7.2.9 Thevalidityofsuppliercertificates ofconformance isevaluated atthetimeofsupplierresurveyandrequalification, andisbasedonthecontinual implementation ofthesupplier's gAprogram.1.7.8IDENTIFICATION ANDCONTROLOFITEHS1.7.8.1SCOPEItemsareidentified andcontrolled topreventtheirinadvertent use.Identification ofitemsismaintained eitherontheitems,theirstorageareasorcontainers, oronrecordstraceable totheitems.1.7.8.2INPLEHENTATION 1.7.8.2.1 Controlsareestablished thatprovidefortheidentification andcontrolofitems(including partially fabricated assemblies),
1.7.8.2.2 Itemsareidentified byphysically markingtheitemoritscontainer, andbymaintaining recordstraceable totheitem.Themethodofidenti-ficationissuchthatthequalityoftheitemisnotdegraded.
1.7.8.2.3 Itemsaretraceable toapplicable
- drawings, specifications orotherpertinent documents toensurethatonlycorrectandacceptable itemsareused.Verification oftraceability isperformed anddocumented priortoreleaseforfabrication,
- assembly, orinstallation.
1.7;58December, 1990 1.7.8.2.4 Requirements fortheidentification byuseofheatnumber,partnumber,serialnumber,etc.,areincludedinAEPSCSpecifications (DCCs)and/ortheprocurement document.
1.7.8.2'Separatestorageisprovidedforincorrect ordefective itemsthatareonhold,andmaterialwhich,hasbeenacceptedforuse.Allsafety-related itemsareappropriately taggedoridentified (stamping, etc.)toprovideeasyidentification astotheitems'sage status.Recordsaremaintained fortheissueofitems,.toprovidetraceability fromstoragetoenduseintheCookNuclearPlant.1.7.8.2.6 Whenmaterials aresubdivided, appropriate identification numbersaretransferred toeachsectionofthematerial, ortraceability ismain-tainedthroughdocumentation.
1.7.9CONTROLOFSPECIALPROCESSES 1.7.9.1SCOPESpecialprocesses arecontrolled andareaccomplished byqualified personnel usingapprovedprocedures andequipment inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards, specifications, criteriaandotherspecialrequirements.
1.7.9.2INPLEHENTAT ION1.7.9.2.1 Processes subjecttospecialprocesscontrolsarethoseforwhichfullverification orcharacterization bydirectinspection isimpossible orimpractical.
Suchprocesses includewelding,heattreating, chemicalcleaning, application ofprotective
- coatings, concreteplacement andNDE.1.7-59December, 1990 QI1.7.9.2.2 Specialprocessrequirements forchemicalcleaning, application ofprotective coatingsandconcreteplacement aresetforthinAEPSCSpeci-fications (OCCs)and/ordirectives preparedbytheresponsible AEPSCcognizant engineer.
Thesedocuments arereviewedandapprovedbyotherpersonnel withthenecessary technical competence.
AEPSCSpecifications areauditedbytheAEPSCgADivision.
Specialprocessrequirements forwelding,heattreatingandNDEaresetforthinAEPSCSpecifications, theAEPWeldingandNOEManualsandplantprocedures.
Thesespecifications andmanualsarepreparedbyorarereviewedandapprovedbytheAEPSCStaffEngineer-ChiefHetallurgist (NOEAdministrator).
Theadministrative controlsportionoftheNOEManualisauditedbyAEPSCgA.Specialprocessprocedures, withtheexception ofweldingandheattreating, arepreparedbyCookNuclearPlantpersonnel withtechnical knowledge inthediscipline involved.
Theseprocedures whicharealsoreviewedbyotherpersonnel withthenecessary technical competence arequalified bytesting.Weldingisperformed inaccordance withprocedures contained intheAEPWeldingManual.Theseprocedures arequalified inaccordance withapplicable codes,andProcedure gualification Recordsareprepared.
WeldProcedure gualification RecordsarereviewedandapprovedbytheAEPSCStaffEngineer-ChiefMetallurgist.
Weldqualification documentation isretainedintheAEPWeldingManual.Contractor weldingprocedures arequalified bythecontractor.
Theseprocedures andthequalification documentation arereviewedandapprovedbytheAEPSCStaffEngineer-ChiefMetallurgist.
Thisdocumentation isretainedbythecontractor.
1.7-60December, 1990 NDEpersonnel arequalified andcertified byeitherthedesignated NOEAdministrator orbyaCookNuclearPlantNDELevelIIIwhohasbeenqualified andcertified bythedesignated NOEAdministrator.
Certification isbyexamination.
Personnel qualification iskeptcurrentbyreexamination attimeintervals specified bytheAEPNOEManual,andinaccordance withtheASMECode.CookNuclearPlantweldersarequalified bytheMaintenance Department utilizing theprocedures intheAEPWeldingManual.Supervision ofCookNuclearPlantwelderqualifications isperformed bytheMaintenance Department.
Examination ofspecimens isperformed underthesupervision oftheSafetyandAssessment Department inaccordance withtheAEPSCSpecification coveringwelderqualification.
CookNuclearPlantwelderqualification recordsaremaintained foreachwelderbytheMaintenance Department.
Contractor andcraftweldersarequalified bythecontractor utilizing procedures approvedbytheAEPSCStaffEngineer-ChiefMetallurgist.
Contractor andcraftwelderqualification recordsaremaintained bythecontractor, 1.7.9.2.4 gC/NDETechnicians assignedtotheSafetyandAssessment Department performnondestructive testingforworkperformed byCookNuclearPlantandcontractor personnel.
Theseindividuals arequalified toeitherSNT-TC-IA orANSIN45.2.6andrecordsofthequalifications/
certifications aremaintained atCookNuclearPlant.1.7.9.2.5 Forspecialprocesses thatrequirequalified equipment, suchequipment isqualified inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards andspecifications.
1.7-61December, 1990 1.7.9.2.6 Specialprocessqualifications arereviewedduringregularly scheduled gAaudits.gualification recordsaremaintained inaccordance with1.7.17herein.1.7.9.2.7 Thedocumentation resulting fromweldingandnondestructive testingisreviewedbyappropriate personnel.
1.7.10INSPECTION 1.7.10.1SCOPEActivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areinspected toverifytheirconformance withrequire-ments.Theseinspections areperformed bypersonnel otherthanthosewhoperformtheactivity, Inspections areperformed byqualified personnel utilizing writtenprocedures whichestablish prerequisites andprovidedocumentation forevaluating testandinspection results.Directinspec-tion,processmonitoring, orboth,areusedasnecessary.
Whenapplicable, holdpointsareusedtoensurethatinspections areaccomplished atthecorrectpointsinthesequenceofactivities.
1.7.10.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.10.2.1 Inspections areappliedtoappropriate activities toassureconformance tospecified requirements.
Holdpointsareprovidedinthesequenceofprocedures toallowfortheinspection, witnessing, examination, measurement, orreviewnecessary toassurethatthecriticalorirreversible elementsofanactivityarebeingperformed asrequired.
Notethatholdpointsmaynotapplytoallprocedures buteachmustbereviewedforthisattribute.
1.7-62December, 1990
Holdpointsspecifyexactlywhatistobedone(e.g.,typeofinspection orexamination, etc.),acceptance
- criteria, orreference toanotherprocedure, etc.,forthesatisfactory completion oftheholdpoint.Nhenincludedinthesequenceofaprocedure, theactivities requiredbyholdpointsarecompleted priortocontinuing workbeyondthatpoint.Processmonitoring isusedinwholeorinpartwheredirectinspection aloneisimpractical orinadequate.
1.7.10.2.2
- Training, qualification andcertification programsforpersonnel whoperforminspections areestablished, implemented anddocumented inaccordance with1,7.2hereinandasdescribed inAppendixBhereto,item9b,withexceptions asnotedtherein.1.7.10.2.3 Inspection requirements arespecified inprocedures, instructions,
- drawings, orchecklists asapplicable.
Theyprovideforthefollowing asappropriate:
a)Identification ofapplicable revisions ofrequiredinstructions, drawingsandspecifications b)Identification ofcharacteristics andactivities tobeinspected c)Inspection methodsd)Specification ofmeasuring andtestequipment havingthenecessary accuracye)Identification ofpersonnel responsible forperforming theinspection 1.7-63December, 1990 f)Acceptance andrejection criteriag)Recording oftheinspection resultsandtheidentification oftheinspector 1.7.10.2.4 Inspections areconducted usingthefollowing programs:
a)WorkActivities Performed bI&MPersonnel Workfunctions associated withnormaloperation oftheplant,routinemaintenance, calibrations, etc.,areroutinely assignedtoplantpersonnel.
I&M,personnel whoinspectthisworkarequalified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,andareperiodically trainedintheirskillareausingINPO"accredited" training.
Asaresultofthequalifications andtrainingwhichI&Npersonnel receive,apeerinspection systemisused.Peerinspection personnel areindependent inthattheydonotperformordirectlysupervise theworkbeinginspected, butmaybefromthesameworkgroup.CookNuclearPlantSafetyandAssessment Department personnel qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1willensure(throughsurveillance) thatinspections havebeencorrectly implemented andmakeroutinereportstomanagement.
b)WorkActivities Performed bContractors Majormodifications, non-routine maintenance, and/orotherservicesonsafety-related itemsaregenerally performed bycontractors, whoarerequiredtocomplywiththeapplicable requirements ofRegulatory Guide1.33andANSIN45.2.Inspections oftheseworkactivities areperformed byinspectors qualified andcertified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58andANSIN45.2.6.Apeerinspection programisnotusedforworkactivities performed bythesepersonnel.
Contractor inspection personnel arerequiredtobequalified andcertified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58andANSIN45.2.6.I&MCookNuclearPlantgualityControlpersonnel whoarealsoqualified andcertified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58andANSIN45.2.6mayperforminspections and/orsurveillances oftheseactivities.
1.7-64December, 1990 1.7.10.2.5 Inspections associated withthepackaging andshipmentofradioactive wasteandmaterials areconducted usingthefollowing program:a)NRCLicensedPackains-Inspections ofNRClicensedradioactive materialpackagings, shallbeperformed byindividuals independent fromtheworkbeingperformed.
Theindependent inspectors shallbeIndianaHichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.Additionally, theinspector shallbefamiliarwiththeactivities beingperformed.
b)NonNRCLicensedPackainsandContainers
-Inspections ofnonNRCLicensedradioactive materialpackagings andcontainers (shipping and/orburial),shallbeperformed byIndianaHichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.c)TransortationVehicles-Inspection oftransportation vehiclesbeingshippedas"exclusive use",shallbeperformed byIndianaMichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.d)OtherinsectionsandVerification
-Inspections andverifications ofotheractivities associated withthepackaging andshipmentofradioactive materials andwaste,shallbeperformed byIndianaandHichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1asaminimum.1.7.10.2.6 Inspections areperformed, documented, andtheresultsevaluated bydesignated personnel inordertoensurethattheresultssubstantiate theacceptability oftheitemorwork.Evaluation andreviewresultsaredocumented.
1.7-65December, 1990 1.7.11TESTCONTROL1.7.11.1SCOPE~~~~Testingisperformed inaccordance withestablished programstodemon-stratethatstructures, systemsandcomponents willperformsatisfactorily inservice.Thetestingisperformed byqualified personnel inaccordance withwrittenprocedures thatincorporate specified requirements andacceptance criteria.
Typesoftestsare:Scheduled Surveillance, preventive maintenance, post-design, qualification.
Unscheduled Pre-andpost-maintenance.
Testparameters (including anyprerequisites),
instrumentation require-mentsandenvironmental conditions, arespecified intestprocedures.
Testresultsaredocumented andevaluated.
1.7.11.2INPLEHENTAT ION1.7.11.2.1 Testsareperformed inaccordance withprograms, procedures andcriteriathatdesignate whentestsarerequiredandhowtheyaretobeperformed.
Suchtestingincludesthefollowing:
a)gualification tests,asapplicable, toverifydesignadequacy.
b)Acceptance testsofequipment andcomponents toassuretheiropera-tionpriortodeliveryorinstallation.
c)Post-design teststoassureproperandsafeoperation ofsystemsandequipment priortounrestricted operation.
1.7-66December, 1990 d)Surveillance teststoassurecontinuing properandsafeoperation ofsystemsandequipment.
ThePMIonsurveillance testingcontrolstheperiodictestingofequipment andsystemstofulfillthesurveillance requirements established bytheTechnical Specifications.
Controlshavebeenestablished toidentifyuncompleted surveillance testingtoassureitisrescheduled forcompletion tomeetTechnical Specifi-cationfrequency requirements.
Datatakenduringsurveillance testingisreviewedbyappropriate management personnel toassurethatacceptance criteriaisfulfilled, orcorrective actionistakentocorrectdeficiencies.
e)Maintenance testsafterpreventive orcorrective maintenance.
1.7.11.2.2 Testprocedures, asrequired, providemandatory holdpointsforwitness,orreview.1.7.11.2.3
~~~~Testingisaccomplished afterinstallation, maintenance, orrepair,bysurveillance testprocedures orperformance testswhichmustbesatisfac-torilycompleted priortodetermining theequipment isinanoperablestatus.Alldataresulting fromthesetestsisretainedattheCookNuclearPlantafterreviewbyappropriate management personnel.
1.7.12CONTROLOFMEASURING ANDTESTE(UIPHENT1.7.12.1SCOPEMeasuring andtestingequipment usedinactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related systems,components andstructures areproperlyiden-tified,controlled, calibrated andadjustedatspecified intervals tomaintainaccuracywithinnecessary limits.1.7-67December, 1990 1.7.12.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7'.12.2.1
~~~~~Established procedures andinstructions areusedforcalibration andcontrolofmeasuring andtestequipment utilizedinthemeasurement, inspection andmonitoring ofstructures, systemsandcomponents.
Theseprocedures andinstructions describecalibration techniques andfrequencies, andmaintenance andcontroloftheequipment.
AEPSCgAperiodically assessestheeffectiveness ofthecalibration programviathegAauditprogram.1.7.12.2.2 Measuring andtestequipment isuniquelyidentified andistraceable toitscalibration source.1.7.12.2.3 Asystemhasbeenestablished forattaching oraffixinglabelstomeasuring andtestequipment todisplaythedatecalibrated andthenextcalibration duedateoracontrolsystemisusedthatidentifies topotential usersanyequipment beyondthecalibration duedate.1.7.12.2.4 Measuring andtestequipment iscalibrated atspecified intervals.
Theseintervals arebasedonthefrequency
.ofuse,stability characteristics andotherconditions thatcouldadversely affecttherequiredmeasurement accuracy.
Calibration standards aretraceable tonationally recognized standards, orwheresuchstandards donotexistprovisions areestablished todocumentthebasisforcalibration.
Theprimarystandards usedtocalibrate secondary standards have,exceptincertaininstances, anaccuracyofatleastfour(4)timestherequired1,7-68December, 1990 accuracyofthesecondary standard.
Inthosecase'swherethefour(4)timesaccuracycannotbeachieved, thebasisforacceptance isdocumented andisauthorized bytheresponsible manager.Thesecondary standards haveanaccuracythatassuresequipment beingcalibrated willbewithinrequiredtolerances.
Thebasisforacceptance isdocumented andauthorized bytheresponsible manager.1,7.12.2.5 CookNuclearPlantprocedures definetherequirements forthecontrolofstandards, testequipment andprocessequipment.
1.7.12.2.6 Whenmeasuring andtestingequipment usedforinspection andtestingisfoundtobeoutsideofrequiredaccuracylimitsatthetimeofcalibration, evaluations areconducted todetermine thevalidityoftheresultsobtainedsincethemostrecentcalibration.
Retestsorreinspections areperformed onsuspectitems.Theresultsofevaluations aredocumented.
1.7.13HANDLING, STORAGE,ANDSHIPPING1.7.13.1SCOPEActivities withthepotential forcausingcontamination ordeterioration, byenvironmental conditions suchastemperature orhumiditythatcouldadversely affecttheabilityofanitemtoperformitssafety-related functions andactivities necessary topreventdamageorlossareidenti-fiedandcontrolled.
Theseactivities arecleaning, packaging, preserving,
- handling, shippingandstoring.Controlsareeffectedthroughtheuseofappropriate procedures andinstructions.
1.7-69December, 1990 1.7.13.2IHPLENENTATION 1.7.13.2.1
~~~~Procedures areusedtocontrolthecleaning,
- handling, storing,packaging, preserving andshippingofmaterials, components andsystemsinaccor-dancewithdesignated procurement requirements.
Theseprocedures include,butarenotlimitedto,thefollowing functions:
a)Cleaning-toassurethatrequiredcleanliness levelsareachievedandmaintained.
b)Packaging andpreservation
-toprovideadequateprotection againstdamageordeterioration.
Whennecessary, theseprocedures provideforspecialenvironments suchasinertgasatmosphere, specificmoisturecontentlevelsandtemperature levels.c)Handling-toprecludedamageorsafetyhazards.d)Storing-tominimizethepossibility ofloss,damage,ordeterio-rationofitemsinstorage,including consumables suchaschemicals, reagentsandlubricants.
1.7.13.2.2 Controlshavebeenestablished forlimitedshelflifeitemssuchas"0"rings,epoxy,lubricants, solventsandchemicals toassuretheyarecorrectly identified, storedandcontrolled topreventshelflifeexpiredmaterials frombeingusedintheCookNuclearPlant.Controlsareestablished inplantprocedures.
1,7.13.2'Packaging andshippingrequirements areprovidedtovendorswiththeAEPSCSpecifications (DCCs)whichareapartofthepurchaseorder.Controlsforreceiptinspection, damageditemsandspecialhandlingrequirements attheCookNuclearPlantareestablished byplantprocedures.
Specialcontrolsareprovidedtoassurethatstainless steelcomponents andmaterials arehandledwithapprovedliftingslings.1.7-70December, 1990 1.7.13.2.4 Storageandsurveillance requirements havebeenestablished toassuresegregation ofstorage'pecial controlshavebeenimplemented forcritical, highvalue,orperishable items.Routinesurveillance isconducted onstoredmaterialtoprovideinspection fordamage,rotationofstoredpumpsandmotors,inspection forprotection ofexposedsurfacesandcleanliness ofthestoragearea.1.7.13.2.5 Specialhandlingprocedures havebeenimplemented fortheprocessing ofnuclearfuelduringrefueling outages.Theseprocedures minimizetheriskofdamagetothenewandspentfuelandthepossiblereleaseofradioactive materialwhenplacingthespentfuelintothespentfuelpools1.7.14INSPECTION, TEST,ANDOPERATING STATUS1.7.14.1SCOPE~~~Operating statusofstructures, systemsandcomponents isindicated bytaggingofvalvesandswitches, orbyotherspecified means,insuchamannerastopreventinadvertent operation.
Thestatusofinspections andtestsperformed onindividual itemsisclearlyindicated bymarkingsand/orloggingunderstrictprocedural controlstopreventinadvertent bypassing ofsuchinspections andtests.1.7.14.2INPLENENTATI ON1.7.14.2.1 Fordesignchangeactivities, including itemfabrication, installation andtest,aprogramexistswhichspecifies thedegreeofcontrolrequiredfortheidentification ofinspection andteststatusofstructures, systemsandcomponents.
1.7-71December, 1990 Physicalidentification isusedtotheextentpractical toindicatethestatusofitemsrequiring inspections, tests,orexaminations.
Proce-duresexistwhichprovidefortheuseofcalibration andrejection
- stickers, tags,stampsandotherformsofidentification toindicatetestandinspection status.TheClearance PermitSystemusesvarioustagstoidentifyequipment andsystemoperability status.Anotherprogramestablishes ataggingsystemforliftedleads,etc.Forthoseitemsrequiring calibration, theprogramprovidesforphysicalindication ofcalibration statusbycalibration stickersoracontrolsystemisused.1.7.14.2.2 Application andremovalofinspection andweldingstamps,andofsuchstatusindicators astags,marking,labels,etc.,iscontrolled byplantprocedures.
Theinspection statusofmaterials receivedattheCookNuclearPlantisidentified inaccordance withestablished instructions.
Thestatusisidentified asHold,HoldforgualityControlClearance, Reject,orAccept.Theinspection statusofworkinprogressiscontrolled bytheuseofholdpointsinprocedures.
PlantgualityControlordepartmental ANSIN18.1qualified personnel (reference 1.7.10.2.4herein)inspectanactivityatvariousstagesandsignofftheprocedural inspection steps'hestatusofweldingiscontrolled throughtheuseofawelddatablockwhichidentifies theinspection andNDEstatusofeachweld.1.7,14.2.3 Requiredsurveillance testprocedures aredefinedinPHIs.Theseinstructions providefordocumenting bypassedtests,andrescheduling ofthetest.1.7-72December, 1990 Thestatusoftestingafterminormaintenance isrecordedaspartoftheJobOrder.Thestatusoftestingaftermajormaintenance isincludedaspartoftheprocedure, andincludestheperformance offunctional testingandapprovalofdatabysupervisory personnel.
Testing,inspection andotheroperations important tosafetyareconducted inaccordance withproperlyreviewedandapprovedprocedures.
ThePHIforplantprocedures requiresthatprocedures befollowedaswritten.Alteration tothesequenceofaprocedure canonlybeaccomplished byaprocedure changewhichissubjecttothesamecontrolsastheoriginalreviewandapproval.
Whenanimmediate procedure changeisrequiredtocontinuein-process workortestingandtherequiredcompletereviewandapprovalprocesscannotbeaccomplished, an"OnTheSpot"changeisprocessed inaccordance withthePHIonplantprocedures.
1.7.14.2.4 Nonconforming, inoperable, ormalfunctioning structures, systems.andcomponents areclearlyidentified bytags,stickers, stamps,etc.,anddocumented topreventinadvertent use.1.7.15NONCONFORMING ITEMS1.7.15.1SCOPENaterials, parts,orcomponents thatdonotconformtorequirements arecontrolled inordertopreventtheirinadvertent use.Nonconforming itemsareidentified, documented, segregated whenpractical anddisposi-tioned.Affected" organizations aren'otified ofnonconformances.
1.7.15.2IHPLEHENTAT ION1.7..15.2.1 Items,services, oractivities thataredeficient incharacteristic, documentation, orprocedure, whichrenderthequalityunacceptable orindeterminate, areidentified asnonconforming, andanyfurtheruseis1.7-73December, 1990 controlled.
Nonconformances aredocumented anddispositioned, andnotification ismadetoaffectedorganizations.
Personnel authorized todisposition, conditionally releaseandcloseoutnonconformances aredesignated.
TheJobOrderSystemand/ortheCondition/Problem Reports(referto1.7.16herein)areusedatCookNuclearPlanttoidentifynonconforming itemsandinitiatecorrective actionforitemswhichareinstalled orhavebeenreleasedtotheCookNuclearPlant,Systems,components, ormaterials whichrequirerepairorinspection arecontrolled undertheJobOrderSystem.Inaddition, thevariousprocedures identified in1.7.14hereinprovideforidentification, segregation anddocumentation, ofnonconforming items.1.7.15.2.2 Nonconforming itemsareidentified bymarking,tagging,segregating, orbydocumented administrative controls.
Documentation describes thenonconformance, thedisposition ofthenonconformance andtheinspection requirements.
Italsoincludessignature approvalofthedisposition.
Completed JobOrdersarereviewedbythesupervisor responsible foraccomplishing theworkandthesupervisor ofthedepartment/section thatoriginated theJobOrder.ThegADivisionperiodically auditstheJobOrderSystem,andonasamplebasis,JobOrders.1.7.15.2.3 Itemsthathavebeenrepairedorreworkedareinspected andtestedinaccordance withtheoriginalinspection andtestrequirements oralternatives thathavebeendocumented.
Itemsthathavethedisposition of"repair"or"use-as-is" requiredocumentation justifying acceptability.
Thechangesarerecordedtodenotetheas-builtcondition.
1.7-74December, 1990
'henrequiredbyestablished procedures, surveillance oroperability testsareconducted onanitemafterrework,repairorreplacement.
1,7,15.2.4 Disposition ofconditionally releaseditemsareclosedoutbeforetheitemsarereliedupontoperformsafety-related functions.
1.7.16CORRECTIVE ACTION1.7.16.1SCOPEConditions adversetoquality,suchasfailures, malfunctions, deficien-cies,deviations, defective materialandequipment andnonconformances, areidentified promptlyandcorrected assoonaspractical.
Forsignificant conditions adversetoquality,thecauseofthecondition isdetermined, corrective actionistakentocorrecttheimmediate problem,andpreventive actionisimplemented topreventrecurrence.
Inthesecases,thecondition, causeandcorrective actiontakenisdocu-mentedandreportedtoappropriate levelsofmanagement.
1,7.16.2INPLEHENTATION 1.7.16,2.1 Procedures areestablished thatdescribetheplantandAEPSCcorrective actionprograms.
Theseprocedures arereviewedandconcurred withbytheAEPSCQADivision.
1.7.16.2.2 Condition/Problem Reportsprovidethemechanism forplantandAEPSCpersonnel tonotifymanagement ofconditions adversetoquality.Condition/Problem Reportsarealsousedtoreportviolations tocodes,regulations andtheTechnical Specifications.
Investigations ofreportedconditions adversetoqualityareassignedbymanagement.
TheCondition/
ProblemReportisusedtodocumenttheinvestigation ofaproblem;andto,1.7-75December, 1990
identifytheneedforadesignchangetocorrectsystemorequipment deficiencies, ortoidentifytheneedfortheinitiation ofJobOrderstocorrectminordeficiencies.
Further,Condition/Problem Reportsareusedtoidentifythoseactionsnecessary topreventrecurrence ofthereportedcondition.
Significant
- problems, whicharesodesignated onCondition/Problem Reports,arereviewedbythePNSRCforevaluation ofactionstakenorbeingtakentocorrectthedeficiency andpreventrecurrence.
TheAEPSCNSDRCisresponsible forassuringthatindependent reviewsofviolations (asspecified intheTechnical Specifications) areperformed.
Theseviolations areconsidered significant problemswhicharedocumented onCondition/Problem Reports.Thereviewswillprovideanindependent evaluation ofthereportedproblemsandcorrective actions.TheAEPSCgADivisionperiodically auditsthecorrective actionsystemsforcompliance andeffectiveness.
1.7.17EQUALITYASSURANCE RECORDS1.7.17.1SCOPERecordsthatfurnishevidenceofactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents aremaintained.
Theyareaccurate,
- complete, legibleandareprotected againstdamage,deteri-oration,orloss.Theyareidentifiable andretrievable.
1.7.17.2IHPLENENTAT ION1.7.17.2.1 Documents thatfurnishevidenceofactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsaregenerated andcontrolled inaccordance withtheprocedure thatgovernsthoseactivities.
Uponcompletion, thesedocuments areconsidered records.Theserecordsinclude:1.7-76December, 1990 a)Resultsofreviews,inspections, surveillances, tests,auditsandmaterialanalyses.
b)gualification ofpersonnel, procedures andequipment.
c)-Operation logs.d)Maintenance andmodification procedures andrelatedinspection results.e)f)g)h)Reportable occurrences.
RecordsrequiredbytheplantTechnical Specifications.
ProblemReports.Otherdocumentation suchasdrawings, specifications, procurement documents, calibration procedures andreports.Radiographs (whicharealsoclassified assafety-related items).1.7.17.2.2 Instructions andprocedures establish therequirements fortheidenti-ficationandpreparation ofrecordsforsystemsandequipment underthegAProgram,andprovidesthecontrolsforretention oftheserecords,Criteriaforthestoragelocationofqualityrelatedrecordsandaretention schedulefortheserecordshasbeenestablished.
FileIndexeshavebeenestablished toprovidedirection forfilingandtoprovidefortheretrievability oftherecords.Controlshavebeenestablished forlimitingaccesstothePlantMasterFiletopreventunauthorized entry,unauthorized removalandforuseoftherecordsunderemergency conditions.
TheAccounting Supervisor isresponsible forthecontrolandoperation ofthePlantMasterFileroom.1.7.17.2.3 WithinAEPSC,eachdepartment/division managerisresponsible fortheidentification, collection, maintenance andstorageofrecordsgenerated 1.7-77December, 1990 bytheirdepartment/division.
Procedures ensurethemaintenance ofrecordssufficient tofurnishobjective evidencethatactivities affecting qualityareincompliance withtheestablished gAProgram.1.7.17.2.4 Whenadocumentbecomesarecord,itisdesignated aspermanent ornonpermanent andthentransmitted tofile.Nonpermanent recordshavespecified retention times.Permanent recordsaremaintained forthelifeoftheplantorequipment, asapplicable.
1.7.17.2.5 Onlyauthorized personnel mayissuecorrections orsupplements torecords.1.7.17.2.6 Traceability betweentherecordandtheitemoractivitytowhichitappliesisprovided.
1.7.17.2.7 Exceptforrecordsthatcanonlybestoredasoriginals, suchasradio-graphsandsomestripcharts,ormicrographs thereof,recordsarestoredinremote,dualfacilities topreventdamage,deterioration, orlossduetonaturalorunnatural causes.Whenonlythesingleoriginalcanberetained, specialfire-rated faciliti'es areused.1.7.18AUDITS1.7.18.1SCOPEAcomprehensive systemofauditsiscarriedouttoprovideindependent evaluation ofcompliance with,andtheeffectiveness ofthegAProgram,including thoseelementsoftheprogramimplemented bysuppliers and1.7-78December, 1990 acontractors.
Auditsareperformed inaccordance withwrittenprocedures orchecklists byqualified personnel nothavingdirectresponsibility intheareasaudited.Auditresultsaredocumented andarereviewedbymanagement.
Follow-up actionistakenwhereindicated.
1.7.18.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.18.2.1 AEPSCADivisionResonsibilities Thebasicresponsibility fortheassessment ofthegAProgramisvestedintheAEPSCgAD.TheAEPSCgADisprimarily responsible forensuringthatpropergAprogramsareestablished andforverification oftheirimplementation.
Theseresponsibilities aredischarged incooperation withtheAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantmanagement, andtheirstaffs.1.7.18,2.2 Internalauditsareperformed inaccordance withestablished schedules thatreflectthestatusandimportance ofsafetytotheactivities beingperformed.
Allareaswheretherequirements oflOCFR50,AppendixBapplyareauditedwithinaperiodofonetotwoyears.1.7.18.2.3 TheAEPSCgADconductsauditstoverifytheadequacyandimplementation ofthegAProgramattheCookNuclearPlantandwithintheAEPSystem.gAauditreportsaredistributed to:Appropriate CookNuclearPlantmanagement andtheNSORC(allaudits).1.7.18.2.4 Theindependent off-sitereviewandauditorganization istheAEPSCNSORC.Thiscommittee iscomposedofAEPSC,18MandCookNuclearPlantmanagement members.AnNSORCManualhasbeendeveloped forthiscommittee whichcontainstheNSORCCharterandprocedures.
TheNSORCconductsperiodicauditsofCookNuclearPlantoperations pursuanttoestablished criteria(Technical Specifications, etc'~)~1,7-79December, 1990 NSDRCauditreportsaresubmitted forreviewtotheChairmanoftheNSDRCandtotheAEPSCSeniorExecutive VicePresident
-Engineering andConstruction.
ProblemReportsprovidefortherecording ofactionstakentocorrectdeficiencies foundduringtheseaudits.1.7.18.2.5 TheCookNuclearPlanton-sitereviewgroupisthePNSRC.Thiscommittee reviewsplantoperations asaroutineevaluation andservestoadvisethePlantManageronmattersrelatedtonuclearsafety.Thecomposition ofthecommittee isdefinedintheTechnical Specifications.
ThePNSRCalsoreviewsinstructions andprocedures, anddesignchangesforsafety-related systemspriortoapprovalbythePlantHanager.Inaddition, thiscommittee servestoconductinvestigations ofviolations toTechnical Specifications, andreviewssignificant ProblemReportstodetermine ifappropriate actionhasbeentaken.1.7.18.2.6
~~~~Auditsofsuppliers andcontractors arescheduled basedonthestatusofsafetyimportance oftheactivities beingperformed, andareinitiated earlyenoughtoassureeffective qualityassurance duringdesign,pro-curement, manufacturing, construction, installation, inspection andtesting.Principal contractors arerequiredtoaudittheirsuppliers systematically inaccordance withthecriteriaestablished withintheirqualityassurance programs.
1.7.18.2.7 Regularly scheduled auditsaresupplemented by"specialaudits"whensignificant changesaremadeinthegAProgram,whenitissuspected thatqualityisinjeopardy, orwhenanindependent assessment ofprogrameffectiveness isconsidered necessary.
1.7-80December, 1990 1.7.18.2.8
~~~Auditsincludeanobjective evaluation ofpractices, procedures,'nstruc-tions,activities anditemsrelatedtoquality;andreviewofdocuments andrecordstoconfirmthatthegAProgramiseffective andproperlyimplemented.
1.7.18.2.9 Auditprocedures andthescope,plans,checklists andresultsofindivi-dualauditsaredocumented.
1'.18.2.10 Personnel selectedforauditingassignments haveexperience oraregiventrainingcommensurate withtheneeds'oftheauditandhavenodirectresponsibilities intheareasaudited.1.7.18.2.11
~~~~Hanagement oftheauditedorganization identifies andtakesappropriate actiontocorrectobserveddeficiencies andtopreventrecurrence.
Follow-up isperformed bytheauditingorganization toensurethattheappropriate actionsweretaken.Suchfollow-up includesreauditswhennecessary.
1.7.18.2.12 TheadequacyofthegAProgramisregularly assessedbyAEPSCmanagement.
Thefollowing activities constitute formalelementsofthatassessment:
a)Auditreports,including follow-up oncorrective actionaccomplish-mentandeffectiveness, aredistributed toappropriate levelsofmanagement.
1.7-81December, 1990 b)Individuals independent fromtheQAorganization, butknowledgeable inauditingandqualityassurance, periodically reviewtheeffectiveness oftheQAPrograms.
Conclusions andrecommendations arereportedtotheAEPSCVicePresident
-NuclearOperations.
1.7.19FIREPROTECTION QAPROGRAH1.7.19.1Introduction TheCookNuclearPlantFireProtection QAProgramhasbeendeveloped usingtheguidanceofNRCBranchTechnical Position(APCSB)9.5-1,AppendixA,SectionC,"QualityAssurance Program,"
andNRCclarification "NuclearPlantFireProtection Functional Responsibilities, Administrative
- Controls, andQualityAssurance,"
datedJune14,1977.Assuch,theFireProtection QAProgramispartoftheoverallQAProgramfortheplant.TheFireProtection QAProgramencompasses design,procurement, fabrication, construction, surveillance, inspection, operation, maintenance, modification, andaudits.Implementation andassessment oftheFireProtection QAProgramistheresponsibility ofeachinvolvedAEPSCandIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyorganization.
1.1.19.9TheFireProtection QAProgramisunderthemanagement controlofAEPSC.Thiscontrolconsistsof:1)verifying theeffectiveness oftheFireProtection QAProgramthroughreview,surveillance, andaudits.2)directing formulation, implementation, andassessment oftheFireProtection QAProgrambyprocedural controlsand,3)assuringtheQAprogramisacceptable tothemanagement responsible forfireprotection.
1.7-82December, 1990
ThePlantManagerhasdelegated responsibility tovariousCookNuclearPlantdepartments forthefollowing fireprotection activities:
a)b)c)d)e)f)g)Maintenance offireprotection systems,Testingoffireprotection equipment, Firesafetyinspections, Firefightingprocedures, Firedrills,Emergency remoteshutdownprocedures, andEmergency repairprocedures (lOCFR50, AppendixR).TheFireProtection gAProgramattheCookNuclearPlantalsoprovidesforinspection offirehazards,explosion hazards,andtrainingoffirebrigadeandresponding firedepartments.
TheAssistant ShiftSupervisor onduty,ordesignee, isdesignated astheFireBrigadeLeaderandcoordinates thefirefightingeffortsofshiftpersonnel andtheFireBrigade.1.7.19.3DesinControlandProcurement DocumentControlgualitystandards arespecified inthedesigndocuments suchasappropriate fireprotection codesandstandards, andasnecessary deviations andchangesfromthesequalitystandards arecontrolled.
TheCookNuclearPlant'design wasreviewedbyqualified personnel toensureinclusion ofappropriate fire'protection requirements.
Thesereviewsincludeitemssuchas:1)Verification astotheadequacyofelectrical isolation andcableseparation criteria.
2)Verification ofappropriate requirements forroomisolation (sealingpenetrations, floorsandotherfirebarriers).
1.7-83December, 1990 3)Determination forincreaseinfireloadings.
4)Determination fortheneedofadditional firedetection andsuppression equipment.
Procurement offireprotection equipment andrelateditemsaresubjecttotherequirements ofthefireprotection procurement documents.
Areviewofthesedocuments isperformed toassurefireprotection requirements andqualityrequirements arecorrectly stated,verifiable, andcontrollable, andthatthereisadequateacceptance andrejection criteria.
Procurement documents mustbeprepared,
- reviewed, andapprovedaccording togAProgramrequirements.
Designandprocurement documentchanges,including fieldchangesanddesigndeviations arecontrolled byprocedure.
1.7.19.4Instructions Procedures andOrawinsInspections, tests,administrative
- controls, firedrillsandtrainingthatassistinimplementing thefireprotection programareprescribed byapprovedinstructions orprocedures.
Indoctrination andtrainingprogramsforfireprevention andfirefightingareimplemented inaccordance withapprovedprocedures.
Activities associated withthefireprotection systemsandfireprotection relatedsystemsareprescribed andaccomplished inaccordance withdocumented instructions, procedures, anddrawings.
Instructions andprocedures fordesign,installation, inspection, tests,maintenance, modification andadministrative controlsarereviewedthroughaudittoassurethatthefireprotection programismaintained.
Operation andmaintenance information hasbeenprovidedtotheplantintheformofSystemDescriptions andequipment supplierinformation.
1.7-84December, 1990 1.7.19.5ControlofPurchased ItemsandServicesHeasuresareestablished toassurethatpurchased itemsandservicesconformtoprocurement documents.
Thesemeasuresincludeprovisions, asappropriate, forsourceevaluation andselection, objective evidenceofqualityfurnished bythecontractor, inspections atsuppliers, orreceiptinspection.
Sourceorreceiptinspection isprovided, asaminimum,forthoseitemswherequalitycannotbeverifiedafterinstallation.
Aprogramforindependent inspection ofthefireprotection activities hasbeenestablished andimplemented.
Theseinspections areperformed bypersonnel otherthanthoseresponsible forimplementation oftheact.ivity.
Theinspections include:a)Inspection ofinstallation, maintenance andmodification offireprotection systemsandequipment.
b)Inspections ofpenetration sealsandfireretardant coatinginstal-lationstoverifytheactivityissatisfactorily completed inaccordance withinstallation specifications.
c)Inspections ofcableroutingtoverifyconformance withdesignrequirements asspecified inAEPSCSpecifications and/orplantprocedures.
d)Inspections toverifythatappropriate requirements forfirebarriersaresatisfied following installation, modification, repairorreplacement activities.
e)Heasurestoassurethatinspection personnel areindependent fromtheindividuals performing theactivitybeinginspected, andare1.7-85December, 1990 knowledgeable inthedesignandinstallation requirements forfireprotection.
f)Inspection procedures, instructions orchecklists forrequiredinspections.
ig)Periodicinspections offireprotection systems,emergency breathing andauxiliary equipment.
h)Periodicinspections ofmaterials subjecttodegradation suchasfirestops,sealsandfireretardant coatingasrequiredbyTechnical Specifications ormanufacturer's recommendations.
1.7.19.7TestandTestControla)Installation testing-Following installation, modification, repair,orreplacement, sufficient testingisperformed todemonstrate thatthefireprotection systemsandequipment willperformsatisfactorily.
Writtentestprocedures forinstallation testsincorporate therequirements andacceptance limitscontained inapplicable designdocuments, b)Periodictesting-Periodictestingoccurstodocumentthatfireprotection equipment, functions inaccordance withitsdesign.c)Programshavebeenestablished toverifythetestingoffireprotec-tionsystemsandtoverifythattestpersonnel areeffectively trained.d)Testresultsaredocumented, evaluated, andtheiracceptability determined byaqualified responsible individual orgroup.1.7.19.8InsectionTestand0eratinStatus1.7-86December, 1990Theinspection, testandoperating statusforplantTechnical Specification fireprotection systemsareperformed asdescribed in1,7.14herein.
1.7.19.9Nonconformin ItemssTechnical Specification fireprotection equipment nonconformances areidentified anddispositioned asdescribed in1.7.15herein.1.7.19.10Corrective ActionThecorrective actionmechanism described in1.7.16hereinappliestotheTechnical Specification fireprotection equipment.
1.7.19.11 RecordsRecordsgenerated tosupportthefireprotection programarecontrolled asdescribed in1.7.17herein.1.7.19.12 AuditsAuditsareconducted anddocumented toverifycompliance withtheFireProtection gAProgramasdescribed in1.7.18herein.Auditsareperiodically performed toverifycompliance withtheadminis-trativecontrolsandimplementation offireprotection qualityassurance criteria.
Theauditsareperformed inaccordance withpreestablished writtenprocedures orchecklists.
Auditresultsaredocumented andreviewedbymanagement havingresponsibility intheareaaudited.Follow-up actionistakenbyresponsible management tocorrectthedeficiencies revealedbytheaudit.1.7-87December, 1990 AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation SupportOrganization forIheCoottNuclearPlanl.seen<<>>ts>>IUsrseV>>nPI<<Us~IrIet<<>>>>>>>><<t ASrs>>sslrs>>
I<<m&secsorOUalet1AsSUIIenrrsVKePres<<nmlN>>eternerthol~lionsVKePres<<tent l+1>>Nclancte>>>>ment ACohstr>>ct L.o>>estyAssr>>ancertssss<<nPlantStansctee Cr<<ANI>>kesPlantIIt<<KA<<ssolreranons rssessonlAsssstarsl VerePens>>s<<eIters<<psQeefI<<ttnaNerattteeartmantAs>>starIV>>~I'Ies<<ts>>slIn>>leertest<<seer>>et nPsISIKIslarsaQS>>U<>clson No>>attnD'nolpastolAfpscorator>>tat<<et, stshnnlos>>JUmel<<rn eeocNUtearPtarslrr<<srs>>se>>IIAsns>>es assn>>eslratree AIrncbonatrareclson
<<gnatalsensesl>>rKt<<mesleerl<<nIrcCreatsnlearI'laniarIs<<streeC9rDOrD2CJrDt AmericanElecricPowerCompanyAmericanElectricPowerCompanyAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation Appalachian PowerCompanyOhioPowerCompanyIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyColumbusSouthernPowerCompanyKingsportPowerCompanyKentuckyPowerCompanyMichiganPowerCompanyWheelingPowerCompanyCentralOperating CompanyICookNuclearPlantadministrative, technical.
andfunctional correction KanawhaValleyPowerICompanyCardinalIOperating Company'generating subsidiary I)ointlyownedwithBuckeyePower.Inc.
0 rIgureilO.I.t-~Organizational Relationships WithintheAmericanElectricPowerSystemPertaining toQualityAssurance 8QualityControlSupportoftheCookNuclearPlantChairmanoftheBoardlLChiefExecutive Officer.AEPSC.IndianaMichiganPowerCompany,andOtherAEPSubsidaries SeniorExecutive VlccPresident Engineering 8Construction, AEPSCandVicePreskfent.lndktna MichiganPowerCompanyVIcePresident NuclearOperations, AEPSCandVicePresident.
IndktnaMichiganPowerCompany(ManagerofNuclearOperations)
DirectorQualityAssurance, AEPSCfItManagersEngineering 8Construction Organization.
AEPSCm~~wmdPlantManager,CookNuclearPlantQualityAssurance Superintendent (onsite),AEPSCSafety4Assessment Superintendent 1.7-90administrative 8functkeal direction technical direction technical liaisonfunctional ckectionforCookNucIeerPlantactivities Decenibet, 1990
AEPSCQualityAssurance DivisionOrganization AEPSCDrrectorOuslrtyAssurance SectionManagerOuastyAssurance SupportSectionManagerAudtsandProcurement SectionManagerOusatyAssurance Engineering SectkNlManagerNuclearSoftwareOusltyAssurance OustrtyAssurance Superintendent (site)StsttSPedalisl StallSpec(asst SeniorAudtorAudlorPro)actsTeohniotan(S)
AudlorsEngineering Technotopst(s)
Su~AudtorAudtsSupervisory AudtorSunreitlance/Rer tawsTechnician(s)
Departmental Assistant AudtorsSunrsittance fngrneertngTechnologist
IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyOrganization fortheCookNuclearPlantPlantManagerAEPSCSectronManagerNuclearSafetydLicensing Licensing ActivilyCoordinator Assistant PlantManagerProduction Assistant PlantManagerTechnical SupportAssistant PlantManagerProjectsAdministration Superintendent OperatfonsSuperIntendant Technical Superintendent PhysicalScienceProjectEngineering Superintendent SafetyendAssessment Superintendent StoresSupervisor Technical Superintendent Engineering SiteConstruction ManagerOuafityControl/NDE SectionMaintenance Superintendent ComputerSciencesSuperintendent AEPSCSiteDesigna*ninfstrative responsklftty foehn<cat haisontunclional responsfhfffty APPENDIXAREGULATORY ANDSAFETYGUIDESANSISTANDARDS 1.Reg.Guide1.8(9/75)ANSIN18.1(1971)Personnel Selection andTrainingSelection andTrainingofNuclearPowerPlantPersonnel 2.Reg.Guide1.14(8/75)ReactorCoolantPumpFlywheelIntegrity3.Reg.Guide1.16(8/75)Reporting ofOperating Information, AppendixA-Technical Specifications 4.SafetyGuide30(8/72)ANSIN45.2.4(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements fortheInstallation, Inspection, andTestingofInstrumentation andElectricEquipment Installation, Inspection, andTestingRequirements forInstrumentation andElectricEquipment DuringtheConstruction ofNuclearPowerGenerating Stations5.Reg.Guide1.33(02/78)ANSIN18.7(1976)(ANS3.21976)ANSIN45.2(1977)gualityAssurance ProgramRequirements (Operation)
Administrative ControlsandgualityAssurance fortheOperational PhaseofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance ProgramRequirements forNuclearFacilities 1.7-A-93December, 1990
,6.Reg.Guide1.37(3/73)~~~~~ANSIN45.2.1(1973)7.Reg.Guide1.38(10/76)ANSIN45.2.2(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements forCleaningofFluidSystemsandAssociated Components ofWater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsCleaningofFluidSystemsandAssociated Components DuringConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance Requirements forPackaging,
- Shipping, Receiving, StorageandHandlingofIt'emsforWater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsPackaging,
- Shipping, Receiving, StorageandHandlingofItemsforNuclearPowerPlants(DuringtheConstruction Phase)8.Reg.Guide1.39(10/76)ANSIN45.2.3(1973)Housekeeping Requirements forWater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsHousekeeping DuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants9.Reg.Guide1.54(6/73)ANSIN101~4(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements forProtective CoatingsAppliedtoMater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance forProtective CoatingsAppliedtoNuclearFacilities 10.Reg.Guide1.58(9/80)ANSIN45.2.6(1978)gualification ofNuclearPowerPlantInspection, Examination, andTestingPersonnel gualifications ofInspection, Examination, andTestingPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlants1.7-A-94December, 1990 ll.Reg.Guide1.63(7/78)ElectricPenetration Assemblies inContainment Structures forLight-Mater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlants12.Reg.Guide1.64{10/73)ANSIN45.2.11(1974)gualityAssurance Requirements fortheDesignofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance Requirements fortheDesignofNuclearPowerPlants13.Reg.Guide1.74{2/74)ANSIN45.2.10(1973)gualityAssurance TermsandDefinitions gualityAssurance TermsandDefinitions 14.Reg.Guide1.88(10/76)ANSIN45.2.9(1974)Collection, Storage,andMaintenance ofNuclearPowerPlantgualityAssurance RecordsRequirements forCollection, Storage,andNaintenance ofgualityAssurance RecordsforNuclearPowerPlants15.Reg.Guide1.94(4/76)ANSIN45.2.5(1974)gualityAssurance Requirements forInstallation, Inspection, andTestingofStructural ConcreteandStructural SteelDuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlantsSupplementary gualityAssurance Requirements forInstallation, Inspection, andTestingofStructural ConcreteandStructural SteelDuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants1.7-A-95December, 1990 16.Reg.Guide1.108(8/77)PeriodicTestingofDieselGenerator UnitsusedasOnsiteElectricPowerSystemsatNuclearPowerPlants17.Reg.Guide1.123(7/77)ANSIN45.2.13(1976)gualityAssurance Requirements forControlofProcurement ofItemsandServicesforNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance Requirements forControlofProcurement ofItemsandServicesforNuclearPowerPlants18.Reg.Guide1.144(1/79)ANSIN45.2.12(1977)AuditingofgualityAssurance ProgramsforNuclearPowerPlantsRequirements forAuditingofgualityAssurance ProgramsforNuclearPowerPlants19.Reg.Guide1.146(8/80)ANSIN45.2.23(1978)gualification ofgualityAssurance ProgramAuditPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlantsgualification ofgualityAssurance ProgramAuditPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlants20.ANSIN45.2.8(1975)Supplementary gualityAssurance Requirements forInstallation, Inspection andTestingofMechanical Equipment andSystemsfortheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants21.ANSIN45.4(1972)Leakage-Rate TestingofContainment Structures forNuclearReactors1.7-A-96December, 1990 APPENDIXBAEPSC/I&M EXCEPTIONS TOOPERATING PHASESTANDARDS ANDREGULATORY GUIDES1.GENERAL~RCertainRegulatory GuidesinvokeorimplyRegulatory Guidesandstandards inadditiontothestandardeachprimarily endorses.
CertainANSIStandards invokeorimplyadditional standards.
ExcetionInterretationTheAEPSC/I&M commitment referstotheRegulatory GuidesandANSIStandards specifically identified inAppendixA.Additional Regulatory Guides,ANSIStandards andsimilardocuments impliedorreFerenced inthosespecifically identified arenotpartofthiscommitment.
'18.7GeneralExcetionInterretationAEPSCandI&Mhaveestablished bothanon-siteandoff-sitestandingcommittee forindependent reviewactivities.
Togethertheyformtheindependent reviewbody.Thestandardnumericandqualification requirement maynotbemetbyeachgroupindividually.
Procedures willbeestablished tospecifyhoweachgroupwillbeinvolvedinreviewactivities.
Thisexception/interpreta-tionisconsistent withtheplant'sTechnical Specifications.
2a.Sec.4.3.1~R"Personnel assignedresponsibility forindependent reviewsshallbespecified inbothnumberandtechnical disciplines, andshallcollectively havetheexperience andcompetence requiredtoreviewproblemsinthefollowing areas:1.7-B-97December, 1990 ExcetionInterretationAEPSCNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC)andPlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC)willnothavemembersspecified bynumbernorbytechnical disciplines, anditsmembersmaynothavetheexperience andcompetence requiredtoreviewproblemsinallareaslistedinthissection.Thisexception/interpretation isconsistent withtheplant'sTechnical Specifications.
TheNSDRCandPNSRCwillnotspecifically includeamemberqualified innondestructive testingbutwillusequalified technical consultants toperformthisandotherfunctions asdetermined necessary bytherespec-tivecommittee chairman.
2b.Sec.4.3.2.1~Rit"Whenastandingcommittee isresponsible fortheindependent reviewprogram,itshallbecomposedofnolessthanfivepersonsofwhomnomorethanaminorityaremembersoftheon-siteoperating organization.
Competent alternates arepermitted ifdesignated inadvance.Theuseofalternates shallberestricted tolegitimate absencesofprincipals."
ExcetionInterretationSeeItem2a.2c.Sec.4.3.3.1~R"...recommendations
...shallbedisseminated promptlytoappropriate membersofmanagement havingresponsibility intheareareviewed."
ExcetionInterretationRecommendations madeasaresultofreviewwillgenerally beconveyedtotheon-si.teoroff-sitestandingcommittee.
Procedures willbemaintained specifying howrecommendations aretobeconsidered.
1.7-B-98December, 1990 2d.Sec.4.3.4"Thefollowing subjectsshallbereviewedbytheindependent reviewbody:...."ExcetionInterretationSubjectsrequiring reviewwillbeasspecified intheplantTechnical Specifications.
2e.Sec.4.3.4(3)~ll"ChangesintheTechnical Specifications orLicenseAmendments relatingtonuclearsafetyaretobereviewedbytheindependent reviewbodypriortoimplementation, exceptinthosecaseswherethechangeisidentical toapreviously reviewedproposedchange."ExcetionInterretationAlthoughtheusualpracticeisto'eetthisrequirement, exceptions aremadetoNSDRCreviewandapprovalpriortoimplementation inrarecaseswiththepermission oftheNSDRCChairmanandSecretary.
PNSRCreviewandapprovalisalwaysdonepriortoimplementation ofTechnical Specification changes.2f.Sec.4.4Reuirement"Theon-siteoperating organization shallprovide,aspartofthenormaldutiesofplantsupervisory personnel ExcetionInterretationSomeoftheresponsibilities oftheon-siteoperating organization described inSection4.4maybecarriedoutbythePNSRCand/orNSDRCasdescribed inplantTechnical Specifications.
1.7-B-99December, 1990 0
~2g.Sec.5.2.2~~~~~"Temporary changes,whichclearlydonotchangetheintentoftheapprovedprocedure, shallasaminimumbeapprovedbytwomembersoftheplantstaffknowledgeable intheareasaffectedbytheprocedures.
Atleastoneoftheseindividuals shallbethesupervisor inchargeoftheshiftandholdasenioroperator's licenseontheunitaffected."
ExcetionInterretationI&Hconsiders thatthisrequirement appliesonlytoprocedures identi-fiedinplantTechnical Specifications.
Temporary changestotheseprocedures shallbeapprovedasdescribed inplantTechnical Specifications.
2h.Sec.5.2.6~R"Incaseswhererequireddocumentary evidenceisnotavailable, theassociated equipment ormaterials mustbeconsidered nonconforming inaccordance withSection5.2.14.Untilsuitabledocumentary evidenceisavailable toshowtheequipment ormaterialisinconformance, affectedsystemsshallbeconsidered tobeinoperable andrelianceshallnotbeplacedonsuchsystemstofulfilltheirintendedsafetyfunctions."
ExcetionInterretationI&Hinitiates appropriate corrective actionwhenitisdiscovered thatdocumentary evidencedoesnotexistforatestorinspection whichisarequirement toverifyequipment acceptability.
Thisactionincludesatechnical evaluation oftheequipment's operability status.2i.Sec.5.2.8~tit"Asurveillance testingandinspection program...shallincludetheestablishment ofamastersurveillance schedulereflecting thestatusofallplannedin-plantsurveillances testsandinspections."
1,7-8-100
- December, 1990 ExcetionInterretationSeparatemasterschedules mayexistfordifferent programssuchasISI,pumpandvalvetestingandTechnical Specification surveillance testing.2j.Sec.5.2.13.1~Rit"Totheextentnecessary, procurement documents shallrequiresuppliers toprovideagualityAssurance Programconsistent withthepertinent requirements ofANSIN45.2-1977."ExcetionInterretationTotheextentnecessary, procurement documents requireth'atthesupplierhasadocumented gualityAssurance Programconsistent withthepertinent requirements ofIOCFRSO,Appendix8;ANSIN45.2;orothernationally recognized codesandstandards.
2k,Sec.5.2.13.2~llANSIN18.7andN45.2.13specifythatwhererequiredbycode,regulation,
.orcontract, documentary evidencethatitemsconformtoprocurement requirements shallbeavailable atthenuclearpowerplantsitepriortoinstallation oruseofsuchitems.ExcetionInterretationTherequireddocumentary evidenceisavailable atthesitepriortouse,butnotnecessarily priortoinstallation.
Thisallowsinstallation toproceedwhileanymissingdocuments arebeingobtained, butprecludes dependence ontheitemforsafetypurposes.
21,Sec.5.2.15~R"Plantprocedures shallbereviewedbyanindividual knowledgeable intheareaaffectedbytheprocedure nolessfrequently thaneverytwoyearstodetermine ifchangesarenecessary ordesirable."
1.7-8-101
- December, 1990 ExcetionInterretationBiennialreviewsarenotperformed inthatIMhasprogrammatic controlrequirements inplacethatmakethebiennialreviewprocessredundant fromaregulatory perspective.
Theseprogrammatic controlswereeffectedinanefforttoensurethatplantinstructions andprocedures, arereviewedforpossiblerevisionwhenpertinent sourcematerialisrevised,therefore maintaining theprocedures current.Webelievethatthisapproachinadditiontoanannualrandomsamplingofprocedures, betteraddresses theintentofthebiennialreviewprocessandismoreacceptable frombothatechnical andpractical perspective thanastatictwo-yearreviewprocess.2m.Sec.5.2.16~RtRecordsshallbemadeandequipment suitablymarkedtoindicatecali-brationstatus.ExcetionInterretationSeeItem6b.2n,Sec.5.3.5(4)~RThissectionrequiresthatwheresectionsofdocuments suchasvendormanuals,operating andmaintenance instructions ordrawingsareincor-porateddirectlyorbyreference intoamaintenance procedure, theyshallreceivethesamelevelofreviewandapprovalasoperating procedures.
ExcetionInterretationSuchdocuments arereviewedbyappropriately qualified personnel priortousetoensurethat,whenusedasinstructions, theyprovideproperandadequateinformation toensuretherequiredqualityofwork.Maintenance procedures whichreference thesedocuments receivethesamelevelofreviewandapprovalasoperating procedures.
1.7-B-103December, 1990 3.N45~2.1,~~~3a..Sec.3~RN45.2.1establishes criteriaforclassifying itemsinto"cleanliness levels",andrequiresthatitemsbesoclassified.
ExcetionInterretationInsteadofusingthecleanliness levelclassification systemofN45.2.1,therequiredcleanliness forspecificitemsandactivities isaddressed onacase-by-case basis.Cleanliness ismaintained, consistent withtheworkbeingperformed, soastopreventtheintroduction offoreignmaterial.
Asaminimum,cleanliness inspections areperformed priortoclosureof"nuclear" systemsandequipment.
Suchinspections aredocumented.
3b.Sec.5~Rit"Fittingandtack-welded joints(whichwillnotbeimmediately sealedbywelding)shallbewrappedwithpolyethylene orothernonhalogenated plasticfilmuntiltheweldscanbecompleted."
ExcetionInterretationIMsometimes usesothernonhalogenated
- material, compatible withtheparentmaterial, sinceplasticfilmissubjecttodamageanddoesnotalwaysprovideadequateprotection.
4.N45.2.2,General~titN45.2.2establishes requirements andcriteriaforclassifying safetyrelateditemsintoprotection levels.ExcetionInterretationInsteadofclassifying safetyrelateditemsintoprotection levels,controlsoverthepackaging,
- shipping, handlingandstorageofsuchitemsareestablished onacase-by-case basiswithdueregardfortheitem'st1.7-B-103December, 1990 complexity, useandsensitivity todamage.Priortoinstallation oruse,theitemsareinspected andservicedasnecessary toassurethatnodamageordeterioration existswhichcouldaffecttheirfunction.
4a.Sec.3.9andAppendixA3.9~Rit"Theitemandtheoutsideofcontainers shallbemarked."(FurthercriteriaformarkingandtaggingaregivenintheAppendix.)
ExcetionInterretationTheserequirements wereoriginally writtenforitemspackagedandshippedtoconstruction projects.
Fullcompliance isnotalwaysnecessary inthecaseofitemsshippedtooperating plantsandmay,insomecases,increasetheprobability ofdamagetotheitem.Therequirements areimplemented totheextentnecessary toassuretraceability andintegrity oftheitem.4b.Sec.5.2.2~Rit"Receiving inspections shallbeperformed inanareaequivalent tothelevelofstorage."
'xcetionInterretationReceiving inspection areaenvironmental controlsmaybelessstringent thanstorageenvironmental requirements foranitem.However,suchinspections areperformed inamannerandinanenvironment whichdonotendangertherequiredqualityoftheitem.4c.Sec.6.2.4~R"Theuseorstorageoffood,drinksandsalttabletdispensers inanystorageareashallnotbepermitted."
1.7-8-104
- December, 1990ExcetionInterretationPackagedfoodforemergency orextendedovertimeusemaybestoredinmaterialstockrooms.Thepackaging assuresthatmaterials arenotcontaminated.
Foodwillnotbe"used"intheseareas.
4d.Sec.6.3.4"Allitemsandtheircontainers shallbeplainlymarkedsothattheyareeasilyidentified withoutexcessive handlingorunnecessary openingofcratesandboxes."ExcetionInterretationSeeN45.2.2,Section3.9(Exception 4b.).4e.Sec.6.4.1"Inspections andexaminations shallbeperformed anddocumented onaperiodicbasistoassurethattheintegrity oftheitemanditscontainer
...isbeingmaintained."
ExcetionInterretationTherequirement impliesthatallinspections andexaminations ofitemsinstoragearetobeperformed onthesameschedule.
Instead,theinspections andexaminations areperformed inaccordance withmaterialstorageprocedures whichidentifythecharacteristics tobeinspected andincludetherequiredfrequencies.
Theseprocedures arebasedontechnical considerations whichrecognize thatinspections andfrequencies neededvaryfromitemtoitem.5.N45.2.3,5a.Sec.2.1~RCleanliness requirements forhousekeeping activities shallbeestablished onthebasisoffivezonedesignations.
ExcetionInterretationInsteadofthefive-level zonedesignation systemreferenced inANSIN45.2.3,IEMbasesitscontrolsoverhousekeeping activities onaconsideration ofwhatisnecessary andappropriate fortheactivityinvolved.
Thecontrolsareeffectedthroughprocedures orinstructions.
Factorsconsidered indeveloping theprocedures andinstructions includecleanliness control,personnel safety,fireprevention andprotection, 1.7-B-105December, 1990 radiation controlandsecurity.
Theprocedures andinstructions makeuseofstandardjanitorial andworkpractices totheextentpossible.
However,inpreparing theseprocedures, consideration isalsogiventotherecommendations ofSection2.1ofANSIN45.2.3.6.N45.2.4t6a,Sec.2.2~RtSection2.2establishes prerequisites whichmustbemetbeforetheinstallation, inspections andtestingofinstrumentation andelectrical equipment mayproceed.Theseprerequisites includepersonnel qualifi-cation,controlofdesign,conforming andprotected materials andavailability ofspecified documents.
ExcetionInterretationDuringtheoperations phase,thisrequirement isconsidered tobeappli-cabletomodifications andinitialstart-upofelectrical equipment.
Forroutineorperiodicinspection andtesting,theprerequisite conditions willbeachievedasnecessary.
6b.Sec.6.2.1~R"Itemsrequiring calibration shallbetaggedorlabeledon,completion, indicating dateofcalibration andidentityofpersonthatperformed calibration."
ExcetionInterretationFrequently, physicalsizeand/orlocationofinstalled plantinstrumenta-tionprecludes attachment ofcalibration labelsortags.Instead,eachinstrument isuniquelyidentified andistraceable toitscalibration record.Ascheduled calibration programassuresthateachinstrument's calibration iscurrent.1.7-B-106
- December, 1990 0
7.N45.2.5,~~~~~~7a.Sec.2.5.2"Whendiscrepancies, malfunctions orinaccuracies ininspection andtestingequipment arefoundduringcalibration, allitemsinspected withthatequipment sincethelastpreviouscalibration shallbeconsidered unacceptable untilanevaluation hasbeenmadebytheresponsible author-ityandappropriate actiontaken.ExcetionInterretationI&Musestherequirements ofN18.7,Section5.2.16,ratherthanN45.2.5,Section2.5.2.TheN18.7requirements aremoreapplicable toanoperating plant.7b.Sec.5.4~R"Handtorquewrenchesusedforinspection shallbecontrolled andmustbecalibrated atleastweeklyandmoreoftenifdeemednecessary.
Impacttorquewrenchesusedforinspection mustbecalibrated atleasttwicedaily."ExcetionInterretationTorquewrenchesarecontrolled asmeasuring andtestequipment inaccor-dancewithANSIN18.7,Section5.2.16.Calibration intervals arebasedonuseandcalibration historyratherthanasperN45.2.5.8.N45.2.6,Sec.1.2~Rit"Therequirements ofthisstandardapplytopersonnel whoperforminspec-tions,examinations andtestsduringfabrication priortoorduringreceiptofitemsattheconstruction site,duringconstruction, duringpreoperational andstart-uptestingandduringoperational phasesofnuclearpowerplants."ExcetionInterretationPersonnel participating intestingwhotakedataormakeobservations, wherespecialtrainingisnotrequiredtoperformthisfunction, neednotI.7-B-107December, 1990 bequalified inaccordance withANSIN45.2.6butneedonlybetrainedtotheextentnecessary toperformtheassignedfunction.
9.Re.Guide1.58-GeneralR~itgualification ofnuclearpowerplantinspection, examination and,testing personnel.
9a.C.2.a(7)~RitRegulatory Guide1.58endorsestheguidelines ofSNT-TC-1A asanaccep-tablemethodoftrainingandcertifying personnel conducting leaktests.ExcetionInterretationI&Htakesthepositionthatthe"Level"designation
.guidelines asrecommended inSNT-TC-1A, paragraph 4donotnecessarily assureadequateleaktestcapability, I&Hmaintains thatdepartmental supervisors arebestabletojudgewhetherengineers andotherpersonnel arequalified todirectand/orperformleaktests.Therefore, I&Hdoesnotimplement therecommended "Level"designation guidelines.
ItisI&M'sopinionthatthetrainingguidelines ofSNT-TC-1A, TableI-G,paragraph 5.2specifically areorientedtowardsthebasicphysicsinvolvedinleaktesting,andfurther,towardsindividuals whoarenotgraduateengineers.
I&Mmaintains thatitmeetstheessenceofthesetrainingguidelines'he preparation ofleaktestprocedures andtheconductofleaktestsatCookNuclearPlantisunderthedirectsupervision ofPerformance Engineers'who holdengineering degreesfromaccredited engineering schools.Thebasicphysicsofleaktestinghavebeenincorporated intotheapplicable testprocedures.
Thereviewandapprovalofthedataobtainedfromleaktestsisperformed bydepartment supervisors whoarealsograduateengineers.
I&Hdoesrecognize theneedtoassurethatindividuals involvedinleak*testsarefullycogn'izant ofleaktestprocedural requirements andthoroughly familiarwiththetestequipment involved.
Plantperformance
,1.7-B-108
- December, 1990 engineers receiveroutine,informalorientation ontestingprograms, toensurethattheseindividuals fullyunde'rstand therequirements ofperforming aleaktest.9b.C5,C6,C7,C8,C10ExcetionInterretationI&Mtakesthepositionthattheclassification ofinspection, exami-nationandtestpersonnel (inspection personnel) into"Levels"basedontherequirements statedinSection3.0ofANSIN45.2.6doesnotneces-sarilyassureadequateinspection capability.
I&Mmaintains thatdepartmental andfirstlinesupervisors arebestabletojudgetheinspection capability ofthepersonnel undertheirsupervision, andthat"level"classification wouldrequireanoverlyburdensome administrative workload,couldinhibitinspection activities andprovidesnoassurance ofinspection capabilities.
Therefore, I&Mdoesnotimplement the"levelclassification" conceptforinspection, examination andtestpersonnel.
Themethodology underwhichinspections, examinations andtestsareconducted attheCookNuclearPlantrequirestheinvolvement offirstlinesupervisors, engineering personnel, departmental supervisors andplantmanagement.
Inessence,thelastseven(7)projectfunctions showninTable1toANSIN45.2.6areassignedtosupervisory andengineering personnel andnottopersonnel oftheinspector category.
Thesemanagement supervisory andengineering personnel, asaminimum,meettheeducational andexperience requirements of"LevelIIandLevelIII"personnel, asrequired, tomeetthecriteriaofANSI18.1whichexceedsthoseofANSIN45.2.6.InI&M'sopinion,nousefulpurposeisservedbyclassification ofmanagement, supervisory andengineering personnel into"Levels."
Therefore, I&Mtakesthefollowing positions relativetoregulatory positions C5,6,7,8and10ofRegulatory Guide1.58.C-5Basedonthediscussion in9b,thispositionisnotapplicable totheCookNuclearPlant.1.7-B-109
- December, 1990 C-6Replacement personnel forCookNuclearPlantmanagement, supervisory andengineering positions subjecttoANSI18.1willmeettheeducational andexperience requirements ofANSI18.1andtherefore thoseofANSIN45.2.6.Replacement inspection personnel will,asaminimum,meettheeducational andexperience requirements ofANSIN45.2.6,Section3.5.1-"LevelI".C-7I&H,asageneralpractice, complieswiththetrainingrecommen-dationsassetforthinthisregulatory position.
C-8AllI&Hinspection, examination andtestpersonnel areinstructed inthenormalcourseofemployeetraininginradiation protection andthemeanstominimizeradiation doseexposure.
C-10I&Hmaintains documentation toshowthatinspection personnel meettheminimumrequirements of"LevelI"andthatmanagement, supervisory andengineering personnel meettheminimumrequirements ofANSI18.1.10.N45.2.8,10a~Sec.2.9e~RSection2.9eofN45.2.8listsdocuments relatingtothespecificstageofinstallation activitywhicharetobeavailable attheconstruction site.ExcetionInterretationAllofthedocuments listedarenotnecessarily requiredattheconstruc-tionsiteforinstallation andtesting.AEPSCandI&Hassurethattheyareavailable tothesiteasnecessary.
10b.Sec.2.9e~titEvidencethatengineering ordesignchangesaredocumented andapprovedshallbeavailable attheconstruction sitepriortoinstallation.
1.7-8-110
- December, 1990 ExcetionInterretationEquipment maybeinstalled beforefinalapprovalofengineering ordesignchanges.However,thesystemisnotplacedintoserviceuntilsuchchangesaredocumented andapproved.
10c.Sec.4.5.1R~it"Installed'ystems andcomponents shallbecleaned,flushedandcondi-tionedaccording totherequirements ofANSIN45.2.1.Specialconsidera-tionshallbegiventothefollowing requirements:
...."(Requirements aregivenforchemicalconditioning, flushingandprocesscontrols.)
ExcetionInterretationSystemsandcomponents arecleaned,flushedandconditioned asdetermined onacase-by-case basis.Measuresaretakentohelpprecludetheneedforcleaning, flushingandconditioning throughgoodpractices duringmaintenance ormodification activities.
11.N45.2.9lla.Sec.5.4,Item2~RRecordsshallnotbestoredloosely."Theyshallbefirmlyattachedinbindersorplacedinfoldersorenvelopes forstorageonshelvingincontainers."
Steelfilecabinetsarepreferred.
ExcetionInterretationRecordsaresuitablystoredinsteelfilecabinetsoronshelvingincontainers.
Methodsotherthanbinders,folders,orenvelopes (forexample,dividers) maybeusedtoorganizetherecordsforstorage.lib.Sec.6.2I~I"Alistshallbemaintained designating thosepersonnel whoshallhaveaccesstothefiles".1.7-B-111
- December, 1990 fxcetionInterretationRulesareestablished governing accesstoandcontroloffilesaspro-videdforinANSIN45.2.9,Section5.3,Item5.Theserulesdonotalwaysincludearequirement foralistofpersonnel whoareauthorized access.Itshouldbenotedthatduplicate filesand/ormicroforms mayexistforgeneraluse.llc.Sec.5.6~RWhenasinglerecordsstoragefacilityismaintained, atleastthefollowing featuresshouldbeconsidered initsconstruction:
etc.ExcetionInterretationTheCookNuclearPlantHasterFileRoomandotheroff-siterecordstoragefacilities complywiththerequirements ofNUREG-0800 (7/81),Section17,1,17.4, 12.Re.Guide1.144,12a.SecC3a(2)~RitApplicable elementsofanorganization's gualityAssurance Programfor"designandconstruction phaseactivities shouldbeauditedatleastannuallyoratleastoncewithinthelifeoftheactivity, whichever isshorter."
ExcetionInterretationSincemostmodifications arestraightforward,theyarenotauditedindividually.
Instead,selectedcontrolsovermodifications areauditedperiodically.
12b.Sec.C3b(l)R~itThissectionidentifies procurement contracts whichareexemptedfrombeingaudited.1.7-B-112
- Oecember, 1990
@ExcetionInterretationInadditiontotheexemptions ofReg.Guide1.144,AEPSC/I&M considers thattheNationalBureauofStandards orotherStateandFederalAgencieswhichmayprovideservicestoAEPSC/I&M arenotrequiredtobeaudited.13,N45.2.13, 13a.Sec.3.2.2~RitN45.2.13requiresthattechnical requirements bespecified inprocurement d<<~bftRtTRttd.Trequirement documents aretobeprepared, reviewedandreleasedundertherequirements established byANSIN45.2.11.ExcetionInterretationForreplacement partsandmaterials, AEPSC/I&H followANSIN18.7,Section5.2.13,Subitem1,whichstates:"Wheretheoriginalitemorpartisfoundtobecommercially
'offtheshelf'rwithoutspecifically identified gArequirements, spareandreplacement partsmaybesimilarly
- procured, butcareshallbeexercised toensureatleastequivalent performance."
13b.Sec.3.2.3~R"Procurement documents shallrequirethatthesupplierhaveadocumented gualityAssurance Programthatimplements partsorallofANSIN45.2aswellasapplicable gualityAssurance Programrequirements ofothernationally recognized codesandstandards."
ExcetionInterretationRefertoItem2j.13c.Sec.3.3(a)~titReviewsofprocurement documents shallbeperformed priortoreleaseforbidandcontractaward.1.7-8-113
- December, 1990 ExcetionInterretationDocuments maybereleasedforbidorcontractawardbeforecompleting thenecessary reviews.However,thesereviewsarecompleted beforetheitemorserviceisputintoservice,orbeforeworkhasprogressed beyondthepointwhereitwouldbeimpractical toreversetheactiontaken.13d.Sec.3.3(b)~RitReviewofchangestoprocurement documents shallbeperformed priortoreleaseforbidandcontractaward.ExcetionInterretationThisrequirement appliesonlytoqualityrelatedchanges(i.e.,changestotheprocurement documentprovisions identified inANSIN18.7,Section5.2.13.1,Subitems1through5).Thetimingofreviewswillbethesameasforreviewoftheoriginalprocurement documents.
13e.Sec.10.1~Rit"Whererequiredbycode,regulation, orcontractrequirement, documentary evidencethatitemsconformtoprocurement documents shallbeavailable atthenuclearpowerplantsitepriortoinstallation oruseofsuchitems,regardless ofacceptance methods."
ExcetionInterretationRefertoItem2j.~tt"Post-installation testrequirements andacceptance documentation shallbemutuallyestablished bythepurchaser andsupplier."
ExcetionInterretationInexercising itsultimateresponsibility foritsgualityAssurance Program,AEPSC/ISN establishes post-installation testrequirements givingdueconsideration tosupplierrecommendations.
1.7-B-114
- December, 1990 (0
14.Re.Guide1.146ANSIN45.2.23andANSIN45.2.2.12 14a.ANSIN45.2.23, Sec.1.1Thisstandardprovidesrequirements andguidanceforthequalification ofauditteamleaders,henceforth identified as"leadauditors".
14b.ANSIN45.2.12, Sec.4.2.2~titAleadauditorshallbeappointed teamleader.ExcetionInterretationTheAEPSCauditprogramisdirectedbytheAEPSCDirector-gualityAssurance andisadministered bydesignated gADivisionsectionmanagers/supervisor whoarecertified leadauditors.
Auditsare,inmostcases,conducted byindividual
- auditors, notby"auditteams".Theseauditorsarecertified inaccordance withestablished procedures andareassignedbytheresponsible gAsectionmanager/supervisor basedontheirdemonstrated auditcapability andgeneralknowledge oftheauditsubject.Incertaincases,thisresultsinanindividual otherthana"leadauditor"conducting theactualauditfunction.
Established AEPSCauditprocedures requirethat,inallcases,theauditfunctions ofpreparation/organization, reporting ofauditfindingsandevaluation ofcorrective actionsbereviewedbygADivisionsectionmanagers/supervisor, therebymeetingtherequirements ofANSIN45.2.23relativeto"leadauditors",
and"auditteamleaders".
1.7-B-115
- December, 1990