ML19239A074

ES-301-3 and ES-301-4

ML19239A074
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	08/23/2019
From:	Joseph Demarshall Operations Branch III
To:	FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Demarshall J
Shared Package
ML17215A920	List: L-18-265, Proposed Examination Submittal Letter ML19239A074 ML19239A082
References
Download: ML19239A074 (2)

Text

ES-30r Operatinq Test Qual ity Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Perry Date of Examinationl Feb 2019 Operating Test Number: 2019-01 lnitials

1. General Criteria a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with b.

sampling requirements (e.9., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered

,r[

'oV, o-during this examination. 4y )l* o c, The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) vl tc, d

e.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent 4W vq c applicants at the designated license level. 4W fç

2. Walk-Through Griteria

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

. initial conditions r initiating cues

. references and tools, including associated procedures

. reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee

. operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant b.

criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through 4t// fl ,-

outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.9., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specifed on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria

/{t' li c The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301 -4 and a copy is attached. 4lw fli /a v

Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Author I t, /u

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) I o,rylt

d. NRC Supervisor Xl'\/'il r e/'r /t7 NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Perry Date of Exam: Feb 2019 Scenario Numbers: 1 I2I4 Operating Test No.: 201 9-01 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES lnitials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 4/{' ørr 2.

3.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

Each event description consists of X)tL K dc r the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

.

the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) {l,t/ ø &

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics 14ø .W a

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. /l/^ Ø r

6. lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. N/A NIA

&, "

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given. W

7. The simulator modeling is not altered )v/ X Ãç

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ,{,tr ç, fra

9. Scenarios are new or signifcantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301 )vt,/ (/t ç

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). )l-y- e

-w n 1 1. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when

,fi,/ X @u possible. ./YIr/ ,w Ã*

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position ,fl,t XU t Tarqet Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes

^t

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 21 3 I I nlu vh bu a a

2. Abnormalevents(2-4) J 2 J

.llr/ 94t e-

3. Major transients (1-2) TI 2 2

.n/ $o-

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (l-2) 1l 2 2 l)' ,w ffa

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (> 1 per scenario set) 0t I I 1 lv/ 4 tjr 6.' EOP based Critical tasks (>2) 3l 2*/ 2 lLL Vl 4\ r'

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests, NOTE:

1. lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required

• Number does not include I Potential CT NUREG 1021, Rev.11 Page 25 of 33 FENOC Facsimile