ML15345A263: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                              NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUIT
                                                REGION III
E 210 LISLE, IL 60532
                                      2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210
-4352   December 10, 2015
                                            LISLE, IL 60532-4352
  Mr. Bryan C. Hanson
                                          December 10, 2015
Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Mr. Bryan C. Hanson
President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear
Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC
4300 Winfield Road
President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear
4300 Winfield Road
Warrenville, IL 60555
Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2
SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
- REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
              FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES
; INSPECTION REPORT 05000 373/20 1 6007; 05000 374/20 1 6007 Dear Mr. Hanson: On April 11, 2016
              INSPECTION; INSPECTION REPORT 05000373/2016007; 05000374/2016007
, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a  
Dear Mr. Hanson:
triennial baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at
On April 11, 2016, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial
the La Salle County Station, Units 1  
baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at the LaSalle County Station, Units 1
and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21. The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk
and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection
-significant components
Procedure 71111.21.
associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation week that occurs prior to the first onsite inspection
The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components
week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also
associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed
be selected for review. The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from you
during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation week that occurs
r simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with minimal impact.
prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated
The inspection will include three weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance
with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request
and one on operations. The current inspection schedule is as follows:
scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your
Onsite weeks:
simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions which
April 11 - 15, 2016; April 25 - 29, 2016; and May 9 - 13, 2016.  
would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team will work closely with your
B. Hanson -2- The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of
staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with
April 4 - 8, 2016, as discussed in the enclosure.
minimal impact.
Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown that th is type of inspection is
The inspection will include three weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC
extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the inspection.
inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance and one on operations. The
It is important that all of these documents are up
current inspection schedule is as follows:
-to-date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of
Onsite weeks:             April 11 - 15, 2016;
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
                          April 25 - 29, 2016; and
   The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. This information should be provide d to the lead inspector no later than
                          May 9 - 13, 2016.
February 29, 2016. By March 11, 2016, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of approximately  
 
2 0 components
B. Hanson                                       -2-
The second group of documents requested is
The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of April 4 - 8, 2016,
those items needed to support our in
as discussed in the enclosure.
-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector
Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown
at the Regional Office no
that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the
later than March 30, 2016. During the inoffice preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection.
licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive
   The last group includes the additional information above
inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the
, as well as plant specific reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on April 11, 2016. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated.
inspection.
The lead inspector for this inspection is
It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the
Néstor J. Féliz
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of
-Adorno. We understand that our licensing contact for this inspection is
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead
Dwi Murray
inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
of your organization. If there are any questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact  
    *   The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.
the lead inspector at (630) 829-9739 , or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz
        This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than February 29,
-Adorno@nrc.gov
        2016. By March 11, 2016, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of
. This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number.    
        approximately 20 components.
B. Hanson -3- In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
    *  The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our in-
(10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy  
        office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the
        with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector at the
NRC's Agencywide
        Regional Office no later than March 30, 2016. During the inoffice preparation activities,
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
        the team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection.
-rm/adams.html
    *   The last group includes the additional information above, as well as plant specific
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
        reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on April 11,
Sincerel y, /RA/   Christine A. Lipa , Chie f Engineering Branch 2
        2016. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed
        during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated.
Division of Reactor Safety  
The lead inspector for this inspection is Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno. We understand that our
Docket Nos. 50
licensing contact for this inspection is Dwi Murray of your organization. If there are any
-373; 50-374 License Nos. NPF
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact
-11; NPF-18 Enclosure:
the lead inspector at (630) 829-9739, or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov.
Information Request for  
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to
CDBI  cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
 
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control
Number.
 
B. Hanson                                     -3-
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
                                              Sincerely,
                                              /RA/
                                              Christine A. Lipa, Chief
                                              Engineering Branch 2
                                              Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-373; 50-374
License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18
Enclosure:
Information Request for CDBI
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
 
        COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Inspection Report:              05000373/2016007; 05000374/2016007
Inspection Dates:              April 11 - 15, 2016;
                                April 25 - 29, 2016; and
                                May 9 - 13, 2016.
Inspection Procedure:          IP 71111.21 Component Design Bases Inspection
Lead Inspector:                Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS
                                (630) 829-9739
                                Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov
I.    Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week
      The following information is requested by February 29, 2016, or sooner, to facilitate
      inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please
      call the team leader as soon as possible. Unless stated otherwise, please provide the
      information electronically in pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably
      on some portable electronic media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD, etc.). The portable electronic
      media should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate
      ease of use. Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily
      understood by someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology.
      1.      Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific probabilistic
              safety analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include
              values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley
              (as applicable).
      2.      Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e. ,Large Early
              Release Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW.
      3.      Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.
      4.      Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that
              contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.
      5.      Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.
      6.      List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job
              performance measures.
      7.      Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.
      8.      If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information
              requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative
              description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).
      9.      Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events,
              if available.
                                                                                          Enclosure
 
    COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
    10.    Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations
            with low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or
            pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers
            close to rated design heat removal etc.).
    11.    List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction
            (identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and
            Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was
            determined.
    12.    List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering
            or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the
            PSA).
    13.    Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category
            for the last 3 years.
    14.    Site top ten issues list (if applicable).
    15.    A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.
    16.    Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last
            5 years at your facility.
    17.    List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design
            issues initiated/completed in the last 5 years.
    18.    List of open operability evaluations.
    19.    List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming.
    20.    Current management and engineering organizational chart.
    21.    Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical
            Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements
            Manual.
    22.    Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies).
    23.    Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs), including the
            table of content (if available).
II. Information Requested (for the approximate 20 selected components) to be
    Available by March 30, 2016, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional
    office during the week of April 4 - 8, 2016).
    This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if
    provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,
    condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).
    1.      List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of
            the selected components for the last 6 years.
                                                2
 
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Enclosure Inspection Report:
2.  The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with
05000 373/20 1 6007; 05000 374/20 1 6007 Inspection Dates:
    each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of
April 11 - 15, 2016; April 25 - 29, 2016; and  May 9 - 13, 2016. Inspection Procedure:
    preventive maintenance activities.
IP 71111.21 "Component Design Bases Inspection"
3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not
Lead Inspector:
    previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and
Néstor J. Féliz
    also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings,
-Adorno , Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS
    engineering requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations are excluded
  (630) 829-9739 Nestor.Feliz
    from this request.
-Adorno@nrc.gov
4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or
I. Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week
    Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.
The following information is requested by
5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,
February 29, 2016 , or sooner, to facilitate inspection
    associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a
preparation.  If you have any questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as possible.  Unless stated otherwise, please provide the information electronically in "pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably
    descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list
on some portable electronic media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD, etc.).  The portable electronic media should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.  Information in "lists" should contain enough information to be easily
    only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.
understood by someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology.
6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with
1. Risk-ranking of top
    each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.
2 50 components from your site specific probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk
7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the
-Achievement Worth (RAW)Include values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk
    selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
-Reduction Worth, and Fussell
8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected
-Veseley (as applicable).
    components, if applicable.
2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment
9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for
-related components (i.e. ,Large Early Release Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by
    last 3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other
RAW. 3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut
    vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate
-sets from your PSA.
    results, etc.).
4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the P
10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with
SA that contributes more than 5
    the selected components and selected scenarios.
percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.
11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective
5. Copies of PSA "system notebooks" and latest PSA summary document.
    action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
6. List of time critical operator actions.  Identify those actions that do not have job performance measures.
12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for
7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures
    example:
. 8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire.  Provide narrative description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description)
    *  Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
. 9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events , if available.
    *   Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.
 
    *  Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
        flows, etc.
2 10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated design heat removal etc.). 11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the
    Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
open and closed direction (identify safety
13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
-related direction) for valves
                                      3
in the Motor-Operated Valve
 
and Air-Operated Valve Programs
        COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
.  Identify the basis for how the margin was determin ed. 12. List of high
  III.   Additional Information to be Provided on April 11, 2016, Onsite (for final selected
-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering
        components)
or expert panel judgment
        1.     During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections
(i.e., those systems/components not identified in the
              and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The
P S A). 13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category
              lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the
for the last
              week of April 4 - 8, 2016.
3 years. 14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable)
        2.     Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected
. 15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last
              components during the three onsite inspection weeks.
3 years. 16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last 5 years at your facility
        3.     One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies).
. 17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues initiated/completed in the last
IV.     Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
5 years. 18. List of open operability evaluations.
        1.     Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams
19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming.
              questions or queries during this inspection.
20. Current management and engineering organizational chart
        2.     Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
. 21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual. 22. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies).
              status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection
23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawing
              to each team member).
s (P&IDs), including the table of content
        3.     Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on-site weeks):
(if available).
              *   Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment Report;
II. Information Requested (for the approximate 20 selected components) to be
              *  Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
Available by
              *   Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
March 30, 2016, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office during the week of April 4 - 8, 2016). This information
              *   Vendor manuals.
should be separated for each selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
condition reports, maintenance history, etc
                                                  4
.). 1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the selected components for the last
 
6 years. 
B. Hanson                                                                 -3-
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
3 2. The maintenance history  
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
(corrective, preventive, and elective)
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
associated with each of the selected components
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
for the last  
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
10 years. Identify frequency of preventive maintenance activities.
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
are excluded from this request.
                                                                          Sincerely,
4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.
                                                                          /RA/
5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes, associated with each of the selected components
                                                                          Christine A. Lipa, Chief
. This list should include a descriptive paragraph on the
                                                                          Engineering Branch 2
purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.
                                                                          Division of Reactor Safety
6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable
Docket Nos. 50-373; 50-374
. 7. Copies of selected operator work
License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18
-around evaluations associated with each of the selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
Enclosure:
8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected components, if applicable.
Information Request for CDBI
9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components' performance for last 3 years (For example, pumps' performance including in
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
-service testing, other vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves:  
DISTRIBUTION:
stroke time and leak rate results, etc.
Janelle Jessie
). 10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the selected components
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource
and selected scenarios
RidsNrrPMLaSalle
. 11. A copy of any internal/external self
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
-assessments and associated corrective action documents generated in preparation for the inspection
Cynthia Pederson
. 12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component
, for example: Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.  
   Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc. Heat Exchangers/room coolers
: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan flows, etc.
Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
 
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
  4 III. Additional Information to
be Provided on April 11, 2016, On site (for final selected components)  
1. During the in
-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead inspector will
provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of April 4 - 8, 2016. 2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected components during the three onsite inspection weeks.
3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies)
. IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the team's questions or queries during this inspection
. 2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team
members and the status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection  
to each team member)
. 3. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on
-site weeks):
   Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment  
Report; Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
   Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
   Vendor manuals.
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
 
  B. Hanson -3- In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy  
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely, /RA/   Christine A. Lipa, Chie f Engineering Branch 2
Division of Reactor Safety  
Docket Nos. 50
-373; 50-374 License Nos. NPF
-11; NPF-18 Enclosure:
Information Request for CDBI cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
DISTRIBUTION
: Janelle Jessie
RidsNrrDorlLpl3
-2 Resource
  RidsNrrPMLaSalle
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
Cynthia Pederson
Darrell Roberts
Darrell Roberts
Richard Skokowski
Richard Skokowski
Allan Barker
Allan Barker
Carole Ariano
Carole Ariano
Linda Linn
Linda Linn
DRPIII DRSIII Jim Clay Carmen Olteanu
DRPIII
  ADAMS Accession Number ML15345A263
DRSIII
  Publicly Available
Jim Clay
  Non-Publicly Available
Carmen Olteanu
  Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
ADAMS Accession Number ML15345A263
OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII NAME NFeliz-Adorno:cl CLipa   DATE 12/10/15 12/10/15   OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
    Publicly Available                           Non-Publicly Available                   Sensitive               Non-Sensitive
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
  OFFICE             RIII                               RIII                           RIII                               RIII
  NAME               NFeliz-Adorno:cl                   CLipa
  DATE               12/10/15                           12/10/15
                                                            OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Revision as of 04:24, 31 October 2019

Ltr 12/10/15 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection; Inspection Report 05000373/2016007; 05000374/2016007 (Nja)
ML15345A263
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/10/2015
From: Christine Lipa
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
To: Bryan Hanson
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
IR 2016007
Download: ML15345A263 (8)


See also: IR 05000373/2016007

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210

LISLE, IL 60532-4352

December 10, 2015

Mr. Bryan C. Hanson

Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC

President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear

4300 Winfield Road

Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES

INSPECTION; INSPECTION REPORT 05000373/2016007; 05000374/2016007

Dear Mr. Hanson:

On April 11, 2016, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial

baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at the LaSalle County Station, Units 1

and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection

Procedure 71111.21.

The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components

associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed

during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation week that occurs

prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated

with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request

scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your

simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions which

would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team will work closely with your

staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with

minimal impact.

The inspection will include three weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC

inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance and one on operations. The

current inspection schedule is as follows:

Onsite weeks: April 11 - 15, 2016;

April 25 - 29, 2016; and

May 9 - 13, 2016.

B. Hanson -2-

The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of April 4 - 8, 2016,

as discussed in the enclosure.

Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown

that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the

licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive

inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the

inspection.

It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the

number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of

the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead

inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:

  • The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.

This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than February 29,

2016. By March 11, 2016, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of

approximately 20 components.

  • The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our in-

office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated

with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector at the

Regional Office no later than March 30, 2016. During the inoffice preparation activities,

the team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection.

  • The last group includes the additional information above, as well as plant specific

reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on April 11,

2016. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed

during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated.

The lead inspector for this inspection is Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno. We understand that our

licensing contact for this inspection is Dwi Murray of your organization. If there are any

questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact

the lead inspector at (630) 829-9739, or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control

Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control

Number.

B. Hanson -3-

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public

Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy

of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)

component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Christine A. Lipa, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-373; 50-374

License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18

Enclosure:

Information Request for CDBI

cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Inspection Report: 05000373/2016007; 05000374/2016007

Inspection Dates: April 11 - 15, 2016;

April 25 - 29, 2016; and

May 9 - 13, 2016.

Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21 Component Design Bases Inspection

Lead Inspector: Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS

(630) 829-9739

Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov

I. Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week

The following information is requested by February 29, 2016, or sooner, to facilitate

inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please

call the team leader as soon as possible. Unless stated otherwise, please provide the

information electronically in pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably

on some portable electronic media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD, etc.). The portable electronic

media should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate

ease of use. Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily

understood by someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology.

1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific probabilistic

safety analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include

values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley

(as applicable).

2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e. ,Large Early

Release Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW.

3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.

4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that

contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.

5. Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.

6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job

performance measures.

7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.

8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information

requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative

description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).

9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events,

if available.

Enclosure

COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations

with low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or

pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers

close to rated design heat removal etc.).

11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction

(identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and

Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was

determined.

12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering

or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the

PSA).

13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category

for the last 3 years.

14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable).

15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.

16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last

5 years at your facility.

17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design

issues initiated/completed in the last 5 years.

18. List of open operability evaluations.

19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming.

20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.

21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical

Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements

Manual.

22. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies).

23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs), including the

table of content (if available).

II. Information Requested (for the approximate 20 selected components) to be

Available by March 30, 2016, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional

office during the week of April 4 - 8, 2016).

This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if

provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,

condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).

1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of

the selected components for the last 6 years.

2

COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with

each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of

preventive maintenance activities.

3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not

previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and

also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings,

engineering requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations are excluded

from this request.

4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or

Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.

5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,

associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a

descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list

only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.

6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with

each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.

7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the

selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.

8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected

components, if applicable.

9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for

last 3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other

vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate

results, etc.).

10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with

the selected components and selected scenarios.

11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective

action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.

12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for

example:

  • Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
  • Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.
  • Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan

flows, etc.

Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.

13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.

3

COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

III. Additional Information to be Provided on April 11, 2016, Onsite (for final selected

components)

1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections

and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The

lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the

week of April 4 - 8, 2016.

2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected

components during the three onsite inspection weeks.

3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies).

IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection

1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams

questions or queries during this inspection.

2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the

status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection

to each team member).

3. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on-site weeks):

  • Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment Report;
  • Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
  • Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
  • Vendor manuals.

If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.

4

B. Hanson -3-

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public

Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy

of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)

component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Christine A. Lipa, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-373; 50-374

License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18

Enclosure:

Information Request for CDBI

cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

DISTRIBUTION:

Janelle Jessie

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource

RidsNrrPMLaSalle

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource

Cynthia Pederson

Darrell Roberts

Richard Skokowski

Allan Barker

Carole Ariano

Linda Linn

DRPIII

DRSIII

Jim Clay

Carmen Olteanu

ADAMS Accession Number ML15345A263

Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy

OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII

NAME NFeliz-Adorno:cl CLipa

DATE 12/10/15 12/10/15

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY