ML16105A455: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Regner, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 12:48 PM To: Sterling, Lance (lsterling@STPEGS.COM) | ||
Cc:Gonzales, Rafael | Cc: Gonzales, Rafael | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review: | Acceptance Review: STP Unit 2 Relief Request (MF7428) | ||
By letter dated March 3, 2016, the STP Nuclear Operating Company submitted a relief request for the South Texas Project, Unit 2, for relief from the requirements of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The licensee proposed an alternative frequency of inservice inspection for the reactor pressure vessel cold leg nozzle butt welds. | |||
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this licensing action. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | |||
Lisa M Regner, Sr. Project Manager, Branch LPLIV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa.Regner@NRC.Gov Office: O8D08 Mail Stop: O8B01 (301) 415-1906 1 | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2774 Mail Envelope Properties (6b461d43a0104fbc81cc9aa7e5d8bd8f) | |||
Hearing Identifier: | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review: | Acceptance Review: STP Unit 2 Relief Request (MF7428) | ||
Tracking Status: None | Sent Date: 4/13/2016 12:48:19 PM Received Date: 4/13/2016 12:48:20 PM From: Regner, Lisa Created By: Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | "Gonzales, Rafael" <rjgonzales@STPEGS.COM> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Sterling, Lance (lsterling@STPEGS.COM)" <lsterling@STPEGS.COM> | |||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1949 4/13/2016 12:48:20 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received: | |||
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Regner, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 12:48 PM To: Sterling, Lance (lsterling@STPEGS.COM) | |||
Cc: Gonzales, Rafael | |||
Cc:Gonzales, Rafael | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review: | Acceptance Review: STP Unit 2 Relief Request (MF7428) | ||
By letter dated March 3, 2016, the STP Nuclear Operating Company submitted a relief request for the South Texas Project, Unit 2, for relief from the requirements of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The licensee proposed an alternative frequency of inservice inspection for the reactor pressure vessel cold leg nozzle butt welds. | |||
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this licensing action. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | |||
Lisa M Regner, Sr. Project Manager, Branch LPLIV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa.Regner@NRC.Gov Office: O8D08 Mail Stop: O8B01 (301) 415-1906 1 | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2774 Mail Envelope Properties (6b461d43a0104fbc81cc9aa7e5d8bd8f) | |||
Hearing Identifier: | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review: | Acceptance Review: STP Unit 2 Relief Request (MF7428) | ||
Tracking Status: None | Sent Date: 4/13/2016 12:48:19 PM Received Date: 4/13/2016 12:48:20 PM From: Regner, Lisa Created By: Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | "Gonzales, Rafael" <rjgonzales@STPEGS.COM> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Sterling, Lance (lsterling@STPEGS.COM)" <lsterling@STPEGS.COM> | |||
Files | Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1949 4/13/2016 12:48:20 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: | ||
Recipients Received:}} | |||
Options | |||
Revision as of 20:59, 30 October 2019
| ML16105A455 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 04/13/2016 |
| From: | Lisa Regner Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | Sterling L South Texas |
| References | |
| MF7428 | |
| Download: ML16105A455 (2) | |
Text
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Regner, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 12:48 PM To: Sterling, Lance (lsterling@STPEGS.COM)
Cc: Gonzales, Rafael
Subject:
Acceptance Review: STP Unit 2 Relief Request (MF7428)
By letter dated March 3, 2016, the STP Nuclear Operating Company submitted a relief request for the South Texas Project, Unit 2, for relief from the requirements of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The licensee proposed an alternative frequency of inservice inspection for the reactor pressure vessel cold leg nozzle butt welds.
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this licensing action. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Lisa M Regner, Sr. Project Manager, Branch LPLIV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa.Regner@NRC.Gov Office: O8D08 Mail Stop: O8B01 (301) 415-1906 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2774 Mail Envelope Properties (6b461d43a0104fbc81cc9aa7e5d8bd8f)
Subject:
Acceptance Review: STP Unit 2 Relief Request (MF7428)
Sent Date: 4/13/2016 12:48:19 PM Received Date: 4/13/2016 12:48:20 PM From: Regner, Lisa Created By: Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Gonzales, Rafael" <rjgonzales@STPEGS.COM>
Tracking Status: None "Sterling, Lance (lsterling@STPEGS.COM)" <lsterling@STPEGS.COM>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1949 4/13/2016 12:48:20 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Regner, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 12:48 PM To: Sterling, Lance (lsterling@STPEGS.COM)
Cc: Gonzales, Rafael
Subject:
Acceptance Review: STP Unit 2 Relief Request (MF7428)
By letter dated March 3, 2016, the STP Nuclear Operating Company submitted a relief request for the South Texas Project, Unit 2, for relief from the requirements of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The licensee proposed an alternative frequency of inservice inspection for the reactor pressure vessel cold leg nozzle butt welds.
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this licensing action. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Lisa M Regner, Sr. Project Manager, Branch LPLIV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa.Regner@NRC.Gov Office: O8D08 Mail Stop: O8B01 (301) 415-1906 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2774 Mail Envelope Properties (6b461d43a0104fbc81cc9aa7e5d8bd8f)
Subject:
Acceptance Review: STP Unit 2 Relief Request (MF7428)
Sent Date: 4/13/2016 12:48:19 PM Received Date: 4/13/2016 12:48:20 PM From: Regner, Lisa Created By: Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Gonzales, Rafael" <rjgonzales@STPEGS.COM>
Tracking Status: None "Sterling, Lance (lsterling@STPEGS.COM)" <lsterling@STPEGS.COM>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1949 4/13/2016 12:48:20 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: