ML17334B744

Documents Info Presented During 980403 Public Meeting in Bridgman,Mi Re SALP & Restart Plan Overview

ML17334B744
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	04/21/1998
From:	Fitzpatrick E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
AEP:NRC:1289A, NUDOCS 9804270035
Download: ML17334B744 (41)

Text

CATEGORY 1(g REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9804270035 DOC.DATE: 98/04/21 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET FACXL:50-315 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M'5000315 50-316 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M 05000316 AUTH.NAME.'AUTHOR AFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E.

Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana E Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Documents info provided during 980403,public meetings held at DC Nuclear Plant.in Bridgman,MI.Overhead slides used during meetings, encl.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE40D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP)Report NOTES: A E RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-3 LA STANG, J INTERNAL: COMMXSSION NTE HOLB NRR/DRPM/PERB OE DIR RGN3 FILE 01 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-3 PD DEDRO NRR/DRCH/HHFB NRR/DRPM/PECB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 R Y EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD NOAC 1 1 1 1 LITCO BRYCE,J H NRC PDR 1 1 1 1 D Wqg Zzzp 0 N NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE.TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD)ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR~ENCL

0)

Indiana Michigan Power Company 500 Circle Drive Buchanan.Ml 49107 1395 Z INDIANA NICHIGAN PQMfER April 21, 1998 AEP: NRC: 1289A Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Stop 0-P1-17 Washington, D.C.20555-0001 Gentlemen:

Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 DOCUMENT INFORMATION PRESENTED DURING APRIL 3~1998'UBLIC MEETINGS REGARDING SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE (SALP)AND RESTART PLAN OVERVIEW This letter documents the information provided to you during the April 3, 1998, public meetings in Bridgman, Michigan.The attachment to this letter provides copies of the overhead slides used during these meetings, discussing our engineering improvement program and restart plan.Sincerely, E.ED Fitzpatrick Vice President/vlb Attachment A.Abramson A.B.Beach MDEQ-DW&RPD NRC Resident Inspector J.R.Sampson 9804270035 980421 PDR ADOCK 050003i5 P PDR I T ATTACHMENT TO AEP:NRC:1289A DOCUMENT INFORMATION PRESENTED DURING APRIL 3i 1998'UBLIC MEETINGS REGARDING SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE-(SALP)AND RESTART PLAN OVERVIEW

\'1 uclear Kn ineerin m rovement an Alan Blind Vice President Nuclear Engineering 0

ssues Understanding the design basis Maintaining the design basis Design control Material condition~Personnel qualifications Culture~Backlogs~Engineering staff

~Focus on achieving excellence going forward~Engineering excellence

-engineering excellence policy-engineering excellence plan-engineering excellence results iSion I Upgrade engineering outputs as we:-resolve issues in support of the AEP start-up plan-maintain operations excellence

~Demonstrate ongoing results reflective of engineering excellence Broad Safety Focus Engineering Excellence Plan~Establish and maintain a work environment that supports a broad safety focus Start-Up Plan Operations Excellence 0~A oal I~Conform plant material condition to align with design basis Upgrade AEP nuclear engineering infrastructure Upgrade AEP nuclear engineering organization

~Ensure implementation of system design basis meets requirements

~Upgrade design basis documentation Start-Up Plan Unit Startup;h,;Engineering Improvement Plan~44:-.)EQ)g de~)C Phase One g~>~+&)))+j@g giiv Phase Two ra e n rastructure, PhaseI I~Work management

~Engineering records.~Procedure compliance

~Role clarity~Corrective action program~Staffing analysis~Assessment of safety significant program challenges ra e r anization, Phase I I~s~10CFR50.59 fundamentals

-change identification

-rigorous evaluations

-design basis champion~Fundamental team building~Human performance

ra e r anization, Phase I ont'Critical self assessment culture~Industry wide perspective

~Analytical expertise~NSSS vendor interface~In-line quality verification reports to vice president nuclear engineering

ra e n rastructure, Phase II~Long range work management

~Integrated engineering records management Upgrade and integrate engineering procedures

~Configuration control~Program assessments

-maintenance rule-EOPs-steam generators

-operating experience

-others as appropriate

ra e In rastructure, Phase II Ont'Engineering backlogs-completed design changes-corrective actions-work control requests-.drawings-operating experience ra e r anization, Phase II~Re'build plant engineering training program~Advanced team building Process optimization

~Personnel development plans~Frequent self assessments

Desi n Basis Issues Phase I~Conform plant material condition with design basis~Ensure implementation of system design basis meets requirements Phase II~Upgrade design basis documentation

~Upgrade safety related calculations

~Easy access to design basis documentation

~~~~~ook uclear Plant estart an vervlew John Sampson Site Vice President T e oo uclear lant estart I~~~0 4~~0 A formalized, methodical approach for Cook Nuclear Plant to identify and correct issues that are required for: 1)restart, arid 2)event free operation while the units are on line.

Restart Plan Foun ations C.~Rigorous self.-assessment and readiness reviews~Effective corrective action program~Employee involvement

~Improving human performance

~Continuous communication

~Management effectiveness Restart Process verview'System reviews and readiness assessments

~Restart work scope determination

~Restart work scope performance

~Restart authorization

~Startup and power ascension 1 System Reviews&Readiness'ssessments Determine Restart VYork Scope Perform Restart Work Authorize Restart Power Operation k

stem Reviews n eadiness ssessments

~Plant systems~Functional areas~Programs~C.ontainment 1 System Reviews 8 Readiness Assessments Determine Restart Work Scope Perform Restart Work Authorize Restart Power Operation ystem Reviews nd Readiness ssessments Corrective Action Program Improvements

~Corrective action program manager~Problem identification and classification

~Root cause analysis~Corrective action implementation r System Reviews 8 Readiness Assessments Determine Restart Work Scope Perform Restart Work Authorize Restart Power Operation Restart ork co e etermination

~Restart work scope criteria~System engineer review board (SERB)~Restart oversight committee (ROC)~Records 1 System Reviews 8 Readiness Assessments Determine Restart Work Scope Perform Restart Work Authorize Restart Power Operation estart ork co e er ormance~Management oversight~Responsibility for each item~Process for tracking the status of restart items System Reviews 8 Readiness Assessments Determine Restart Work Scope Perform Restart Work Authorize Restart Power Operation

(~~~~Restart uthorization

~Restart oversight committee (ROC)~Senior manager review team (SMRT)-Senior managers-Independent safety review committee member~NRC 1 System Reviews 8 Readiness Assessments Determine Restart Work Scope Perform Restart Work Authorize Restart 5 Power Operation tartu an Power scension~Augmented management team~Power operation 1 System Reviews 8 Readiness Assessments Determine Restart Work Scope Perform Restart Work Authorize Restart Power Operation

Im lementation

~Restart plan approval~Restart plan communication

~System reviews~System engineer review board (SERB)meetings~Restart oversight committee (ROC)meetings~Restart work activities onclusion American Electric Power Nuclear Generation Vision Statement: "The vision of the AEP Nuclear Generation Group is for Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant to be the safest, most reliable, most cost-effective generating station in the United States."