ML082050467: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML082050467
| number = ML082050467
| issue date = 09/03/2008
| issue date = 09/03/2008
| title = Columbia, Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure
| title = Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure
| author name = Lyon C F
| author name = Lyon C F
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV

Revision as of 10:28, 17 April 2019

Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure
ML082050467
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 09/03/2008
From: Lyon C F
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV
To: Parrish J V
Entergy Northwest
Lyon, C F, NRR/DLPM, 415-2296
References
TAC MD9247
Download: ML082050467 (5)


Text

September 3, 2008

Mr. J. V. Parrish Chief Executive Officer Energy Northwest P.O. Box 968 (Mail Drop 1023)

Richland, WA 99352-0968

SUBJECT:

COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION - REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE (TAC NO. MD9247)

Dear Mr. Parrish:

By letter dated July 16, 2008, Energy Northwest submitted an affidavit dated July 23, 2008, executed by Andrew A. Lingenfelter, Global Nuclear Fuel - Americas, LLC (GNF-A), requesting that the information contained in the following document be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.390:

GNF Licensing Topical Report, NEDC-33419P, Revision 0, GEXL97 Correlation Applicable to ATRIUM-10 Fuel, June 2008.

The document is included in Attachment 4 to Energy Northwest's letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated July 16, 2008. A nonproprietary copy of this document has been placed in the NRC's Public Document Room and added to the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Public Electronic Reading Room.

The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:

$ The information...is classified as proprietary because it contains details of GNF-A=s fuel design and licensing methodology.

The development of the methods used in these analyses, along with the testing, development, and approval of the supporting methodology was achieved at a significant cost, on the order of several million dollars, to GNF-A or its licensor.

$ Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to GNF-A

=s competitive position and foreclose or reduce the availability of profit-mak ing opportunities. The information is part of GNF-A

=s comprehensive BWR [boiling-water reactor] safety and technology base, and its commercial value extends beyond the original development cost. The value of J.V. Parish the technology base goes beyond the extensive physical database and analytical methodology and includes development of the expertise to determine and apply the appropriate evaluation process. In addition, the technology base includes the value derived from providing analyses done with NRC-approved methods.

The research, development, engineering, analytical, and NRC review costs comprise a substantial investment of time and money by GNF-A or its licensor.

The precise value of the expertise to devise an evaluation process and apply the correct analytical methodology is difficult to quantify, but it clearly is substantial.

GNF-A=s competitive advantage will be lost if its competit ors are able to use the results of the GNF-A experience to normalize or verify their own process or if they are able to claim an equivalent understanding by demonstrating that they can arrive at the same or similar conclusions.

The value of this information to GNF-A would be lost if the information were disclosed to the public. Making such information available to competitors without their having been required to undertake a similar expenditure of resources would unfairly provide competitors with a windfall, and deprive GNF-A of the opportunity to exercise its competitive advantage to seek an adequate return on its large investment in developing and obtaining these very valuable analytical tools.

We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure.

Therefore, the version of the submitted info rmation marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.

If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.

J.V. Parish If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at 301-415-2296.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Carl F. Lyon, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket No. 50-397

cc: See next page

ML082050467 (*)Previously concurred OFFICE NRR/LPL4/PM NRR/LPL4/LA SRXB/BC NRR/LPL4/BC NRR/LPL4/PM NAME FLyon GLappert(*) GCranston MMarkley FLyon DATE 8/27/08 7/31/08 8/29/08 9/03/08 9/03/08 Columbia Generating Station (6/10/2008)

cc:

Chairman Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council P.O. Box 43172 Olympia, WA 98504-3172

Mr. Gregory V. Cullen Manager, Regulatory Programs Energy Northwest P.O. Box 968, Mail Drop PE20 Richland, WA 99352-0968

Chairman Benton County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 190 Prosser, WA 99350-0190

Mr. William A. Horin, Esq.

Winston & Strawn 1700 K Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20006-3817

Mr. Matt Steuerwalt Executive Policy Division Office of the Governor P.O. Box 43113 Olympia, WA 98504-3113

Ms. Lynn Albin Washington State Department of Health P.O. Box 7827 Olympia, WA 98504-7827

Technical Services Branch Chief FEMA Region X 130 - 228th Street, SW Bothell, WA 98021-9796

Mr. Mike Hammond Department of Homeland Security FEMA/REP 130 - 228th Street SW Bothell, WA 98021-9796

Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 69 Richland, WA 99352-0069

Mr. Ken Niles Assistant Director Oregon Department of Energy 625 Marion Street NE Salem, OR 97301-3737

Special Hazards Program Manager Washington Emergency Management Div.

127 W. Clark Street Pasco, WA 99301