ML093020232: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML093020232
| number = ML093020232
| issue date = 10/29/2009
| issue date = 10/29/2009
| title = Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 - Acceptance Review Email Relief Request W3-ISI-015 (TAC ME2401)
| title = Acceptance Review Email Relief Request W3-ISI-015
| author name = Kalyanam N
| author name = Kalyanam N
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Kalyanam, Kaly Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:24 AM To: POLLOCK, JIM Cc: MURILLO, ROBERT J  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                       Kalyanam, Kaly Sent:                       Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:24 AM To:                         POLLOCK, JIM Cc:                         MURILLO, ROBERT J


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Report Result for W3-ISI-015 (TAC No. ME2401)  
Acceptance Report Result for W3-ISI-015 (TAC No. ME2401)
 
Bob/Jim:
Bob/Jim: By letter dated October 19, 2009, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) submitted a request relief from the inspection requirements of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-729-1, as conditioned by         10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(D), for Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3) for-the third 10-year inservice inspection (ISI) interval. The request covered the Inspection of Reactor Vessel Head In-Core Instrument Nozzles.  
By letter dated October 19, 2009, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) submitted a request relief from the inspection requirements of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-729-1, as conditioned by           10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(D), for Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3) for-the third 10-year inservice inspection (ISI) interval. The request covered the Inspection of Reactor Vessel Head In-Core Instrument Nozzles.
 
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this RR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this RR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
 
the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
 
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1480.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1480.
N. Kalyanam  
N. Kalyanam E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()
 
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Report Result for W3-ISI-015 (TAC No. ME2401)
Acceptance Report Result for W3-ISI-015 (TAC No. ME2401)
Sent Date:        10/29/2009 10:08:20 AM Received Date:       10/29/2009 10:24:00 AM From:               Kalyanam, Kaly  
Sent Date:        10/29/2009 10:08:20 AM Received Date:         10/29/2009 10:24:00 AM From:             Kalyanam, Kaly Created By:        Kaly.Kalyanam@nrc.gov


Created By:        Kaly.Kalyanam@nrc.gov Recipients:
Recipients:
RPOLLOC@entergy.com (POLLOCK, JIM)
RPOLLOC@entergy.com (POLLOCK, JIM)
Tracking Status: None RMURILL@entergy.com (MURILLO, ROBERT J)
Tracking Status: None RMURILL@entergy.com (MURILLO, ROBERT J)
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
 
Files         Size     Date & Time MESSAGE         8955     10/29/2009 Options Expiration Date:
Post Office:  
Priority:             olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:       False Return Notification:     False Sensitivity:     olNormal Recipients received:}}
 
Files               Size       Date & Time  
 
MESSAGE       8955       10/29/2009  
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                       olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:       False Return Notification:       False  
 
Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 02:04, 14 November 2019

Acceptance Review Email Relief Request W3-ISI-015
ML093020232
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/29/2009
From: Kalyanam N
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Joseph E Pollock
Entergy Operations
Kalyanam N, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 415-1480
References
TAC ME2401
Download: ML093020232 (2)


Text

From: Kalyanam, Kaly Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:24 AM To: POLLOCK, JIM Cc: MURILLO, ROBERT J

Subject:

Acceptance Report Result for W3-ISI-015 (TAC No. ME2401)

Bob/Jim:

By letter dated October 19, 2009, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) submitted a request relief from the inspection requirements of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-729-1, as conditioned by 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(D), for Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3) for-the third 10-year inservice inspection (ISI) interval. The request covered the Inspection of Reactor Vessel Head In-Core Instrument Nozzles.

The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this RR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),

the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1480.

N. Kalyanam E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()

Subject:

Acceptance Report Result for W3-ISI-015 (TAC No. ME2401)

Sent Date: 10/29/2009 10:08:20 AM Received Date: 10/29/2009 10:24:00 AM From: Kalyanam, Kaly Created By: Kaly.Kalyanam@nrc.gov

Recipients:

RPOLLOC@entergy.com (POLLOCK, JIM)

Tracking Status: None RMURILL@entergy.com (MURILLO, ROBERT J)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 8955 10/29/2009 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: