ML11356A335: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML11356A335
| number = ML11356A335
| issue date = 08/10/2010
| issue date = 08/10/2010
| title = New York State (NYS) Pre-Filed Evidentiary Hearing Exhibit NYS000352, Entergy'S Submission to the Aslb Conveying Entergy'S NL-10-082 Communication to NRC Staff (Aug. 9, 2010) Re Indian Point Lic. Renwl.L Applctn.
| title = New York State (NYS) Pre-Filed Evidentiary Hearing Exhibit NYS000352, Entergy'S Submission to the ASLB Conveying Entergy'S NL-10-082 Communication to NRC Staff (Aug. 9, 2010) Re Indian Point Lic. Renwl.L Applctn.
| author name = Sutton K M
| author name = Sutton K
| author affiliation = Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP
| author affiliation = Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP
| addressee name = Lathrop K D, McDade L G, Wardwell R E
| addressee name = Lathrop K, Mcdade L, Wardwell R
| addressee affiliation = NRC/ASLBP
| addressee affiliation = NRC/ASLBP
| docket = 05000247, 05000286
| docket = 05000247, 05000286
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111' Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Tel: 202.739.3000 Fax: 202.739.3001 www.morganlewis.com Kathryn M. Sutton Partner 202.739.5738  
{{#Wiki_filter:NYS000352 Submitted: December 22, 2011 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111' Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Morgan Lewis Tel: 202.739.3000                                                         C 0 U N S E L 0 R S . A T  L A. W Fax: 202.739.3001                                                                             DOCKETED USNRC .
.. ksutton@morganlewis.com Paul M. Bessette *Partner 202.739.5796 pbessette  
www.morganlewis.com August 11, 2010 (8:30a.m.)
@morgan lewis .com August 10; 2010 \ . Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Morgan Lewis C 0 U N S E L 0 R S . A T L A. W DOCKETED USNRC . August 11, 2010 (8:30a.m.)
Kathryn M. Sutton Partner                                                                                 OFFICE OF SECRETARY 202.739.5738                                                                             RULEMAKINGS AND
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Docket: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3), Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR RE: Notification of Entergy's Submittal Regarding Completion of Commitment 33 for Indian Point Units 2 and 3 Dear Administrative Judges: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ("Entergy")
.. ksutton@morganlewis.com                                                                 ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Paul M. Bessette
is providing this notice to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board and the parties regarding Entergy' s August 9, 2010 submittal of a. notice-,to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
*Partner 202.739.5796 pbessette @morgan lewis .com August 10; 2010
("NRC") regarding completion of Commitment 33 to the Indian Point Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application associated with the Fatigue Monitoring Program. See NL-1 0-082, Letter from Fred Dacimo, Entergy, to NRC Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application-Completion of Commitment  
                  \   .
#33 Regarding the Fatigue Monitoring Program" (August 9, 2010). A copy ofNL-10-082 is attached for your reference.
Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Docket:    Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3), Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR RE:       Notification of Entergy's Submittal Regarding Completion of Commitment 33 for Indian Point Units 2 and 3
Counsel is providing this notification insofar as the completion of Commitment 33 may be relevant and material to admitted contentions NYS-26/26A and Riverkeeper TC-1/lA. OAGI0001230 00001 Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop August 1 0, 201 0 Page 2 CBM/als Attachment cc: Service List Respectfully submitted, ..
 
Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq. Paul M. Bessette, Esq. Morgan Lewis COUNSELORS AT LAW Counsel for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. OAGI0001230_00002 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
==Dear Administrative Judges:==
* BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of . ) Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 286-LR ) ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. * ) ) (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3) )
 
August 10,2010 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the letter entitled "Notification ofEntergy's Submittal Regarding Completion of Commitment 33 for Indian Point Units 2 and 3," dated August 10,
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ("Entergy") is providing this notice to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board and the parties regarding Entergy' s August 9, 2010 submittal of a.
* 2010, were served this lOth day of August, 2010 upon the persons listed below, by first class mail and e-mail as shown below. Administrative Judge Lawrence G: McDade, Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 * . U.S. Nuciear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: lgml @nrc.gov)
notice-,to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") regarding completion of Commitment 33 to the Indian Point Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application associated with the Fatigue Monitoring Program. See NL-1 0-082, Letter from Fred Dacimo, Entergy, to NRC Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application- Completion of Commitment #33 Regarding the Fatigue Monitoring Program" (August 9, 2010). A copy ofNL-10-082 is attached for your reference. Counsel is providing this notification insofar as the completion of Commitment 33 may be relevant and material to admitted contentions NYS-26/26A and Riverkeeper TC-1/lA.
Administrative Judge Richard E. Wardwell Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: rew@nrc.gov)
OAGI0001230 00001
Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: 0-1604 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: ocaamail@nrc.gov)
 
Administrative Judge Kaye D. Lathrop Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel 190 Cedar Lane E. Ridgway, CO 81432 (E-mail: kdl2@nrc.gov)
Morgan Lewis Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman                                        COUNSELORS AT LAW Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop August 10, 201 0 Page 2 Respectfully submitted,
Office of the Secretary*
                                . ~Jh<f!-:tr Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.
Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 (E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov)
Paul M. Bessette, Esq.
Josh Kirstein, Law Clerk Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Josh.Kirstein@nrc.gov)
Counsel for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
OAGI0001230 00003 Page 2 Sherwin E. Turk, Esq. Beth N. Mizuno, Esq. David E. Roth, Esq. Brian G. Harris, Esq. Andrea Z. Jones, Esq. Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: 0-15 D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: set@nrc.gov) (E-mail: bnml @nrc.gov) (E-mail: david.roth@nrc.gov) (E-mail: brian.harris(a),nrc.gov) (E-mail: andrea.jones@nrc.gov)
CBM/als Attachment cc:    Service List OAGI0001230_00002
Manna J o Greene Enviromnental Director Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. 724 Wolcott Avenue Beacon, NY 12508 (E-mail: manna j o@cl earwater .or g) Stephen C. Filler, Board Member Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. 303 South Broadway, Suite 222 Tarrytown, NY 10591 (E-mail: sfiller@nylawline.com)
 
Ross Gould, Member Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. 10 Park Avenue, #5L New York, NY 10016 (E-mail: rgouldesq@gmail.com)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Greg Spicer, Esq. Office ofthe Westchester County Attorney 148 Martine A venue, 6th Floor .. White Plains, NY 10601 (E-mail: gss 1 @westchestergov.
* BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of .                                       )     Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and
com) Thomas F. Wood, Esq. Daniel Riesel, Esq. Ms. Jessica Steinberg, J.D. Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C. 460 Park Avenue New York, NY 1 0022 (E-mail: driesel@sprlaw.com) (E-mail: jsteinberg@sprlaw.com)
                                                          )                  286-LR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.                       *)
John Louis Parker, Esq. Regional Attorney Office of General Counsel, Region 3 NYS Dept. of Enviromnental Conservation 21 S. Putt Comers Road New Paltz, New York 12561-1620 (E-mail: jlparker@,gw.dec.state.ny.us)
                                                          )
Michael J. Delaney, V.P.-Energy New York City Economic Development Corp. 110 William Street New York, NY 10038 (E-mail: mdelaney@nycedc.com)
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)         )
OAGI0001230 00004 Page 3 Phillip Musegaas, Esq. Deborah Brancato, Esq. Riverkeeper, Inc. 828 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY 10591 (E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org) (E-mail: dbrancato@riverkeeper.org)
  ------------------~-----------)                                August 10,2010 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the letter entitled "Notification ofEntergy's Submittal Regarding Completion of Commitment 33 for Indian Point Units 2 and 3," dated August 10,
Robert D. Snook, Esq. Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 (E-mail: Robert.Snook@po.state.ct.us)
* 2010, were served this lOth day of August, 2010 upon the persons listed below, by first class mail and e-mail as shown below.
Andrew M. Cuomo, Esq. Attorney General ofthe State ofNew York John J. Sipos, Esq. Charlie Donaldson Esq. Assistants Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224-0341 (E-mail: john.sipos@oag.state.ny.us)
Administrative Judge                                    Administrative Judge Lawrence G: McDade, Chair                               Kaye D. Lathrop Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel                  Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 *                     .              190 Cedar Lane E.
Joan Leary Matthews, Esq. Senior Attorney for Special Projects Office of the General Counsel New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, 14th Floor Albany, NY 12207 (E-mail: jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.
U.S. Nuciear Regulatory Commission                       Ridgway, CO 81432 Washington, DC 20555-0001                               (E-mail: kdl2@nrc.gov)
us) Daniel E. O'Neill, Mayor James Siermarco, M.S. Liaison to Indian Point Village of Buchanan MUnicipal Building 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 (E-mail: vob@bestweb.net)
(E-mail: lgml @nrc.gov)
Mylan L. Denerstein, Esq. Executive Deputy Attorney General, Social Justice Office of the Attorney General ofthe State ofNew York 120 Broadway, 25 1 h Floor New York, New York 10271 (E-mail: Mylan.Denerstein@oag.state.ny.us).
Administrative Judge                                    Office of the Secretary*
Janice A. Dean Office of the Attorney General ofthe State ofNew York Assistant Attorney General 120 Broadway, 26th Floor New York; New York 10271 (E-mail: Janice.Dean@oag.state.ny.us)
Richard E. Wardwell                                     Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel                 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: T-3 F23                                       Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                       (E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov)
* OAGI0001230 00005 Page4
Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: rew@nrc.gov)
* Original and 2 copies provided to the Office oft/Secretary. . . * ..
Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication             Josh Kirstein, Law Clerk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                       Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: 0-1604                                       Mail Stop: T-3 F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001                               U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (E-mail: ocaamail@nrc.gov)                               Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Josh.Kirstein@nrc.gov)
* Paul M. Bessette, Esq. Counsel for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. DBJ/65420875.
OAGI0001230 00003
1 OAGI0001230 00006 
 
. ,;:-* . '' ' ' . *'' . Entergy Nuclear Northeast Iridian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, N.Y. 10511-0249 Tel (914) 788-2055.
Page 2 Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.               Greg Spicer, Esq.
Fred Dacimo Vice President License Renewal NL-10-082 August 9, 2010 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001  
Beth N. Mizuno, Esq.               Office ofthe Westchester County Attorney David E. Roth, Esq.                148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor          ..
Brian G. Harris, Esq.               White Plains, NY 10601 Andrea Z. Jones, Esq.              (E-mail: gss 1@westchestergov. com)
Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: 0-15 D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: set@nrc.gov)
(E-mail: bnml @nrc.gov)
(E-mail: david.roth@nrc.gov)
(E-mail: brian.harris(a),nrc.gov)
(E-mail: andrea.jones@nrc.gov)
Manna J o Greene                    Thomas F. Wood, Esq.
Enviromnental Director              Daniel Riesel, Esq.
Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. Ms. Jessica Steinberg, J.D.
724 Wolcott Avenue                  Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.
Beacon, NY 12508                   460 Park Avenue (E-mail: manna jo@cl earwater.or g) New York, NY 10022 (E-mail: driesel@sprlaw.com)
(E-mail: jsteinberg@sprlaw.com)
Stephen C. Filler, Board Member     John Louis Parker, Esq.
Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. Regional Attorney 303 South Broadway, Suite 222      Office of General Counsel, Region 3 Tarrytown, NY 10591                NYS Dept. of Enviromnental Conservation (E-mail: sfiller@nylawline.com)     21 S. Putt Comers Road New Paltz, New York 12561-1620 (E-mail: jlparker@,gw.dec.state.ny.us)
Ross Gould, Member                  Michael J. Delaney, V.P.- Energy Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. New York City Economic Development 10 Park Avenue, #5L                  Corp.
New York, NY 10016                  110 William Street (E-mail: rgouldesq@gmail.com)       New York, NY 10038 (E-mail: mdelaney@nycedc.com)
OAGI0001230 00004
 
Page 3 Phillip Musegaas, Esq.                 Daniel E. O'Neill, Mayor Deborah Brancato, Esq.                  James Siermarco, M.S.
Riverkeeper, Inc.                      Liaison to Indian Point 828 South Broadway                      Village of Buchanan Tarrytown, NY 10591                    MUnicipal Building (E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org)      236 Tate Avenue (E-mail: dbrancato@riverkeeper.org)     Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 (E-mail: vob@bestweb.net)
Robert D. Snook, Esq.                   Mylan L. Denerstein, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General              Executive Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General          Social Justice State of Connecticut                    Office of the Attorney General 55 Elm Street                            ofthe State ofNew York P.O. Box 120                            120 Broadway, 25 1h Floor Hartford, CT 06141-0120                New York, New York 10271 (E-mail: Robert.Snook@po.state.ct.us)  (E-mail: Mylan.Denerstein@oag.state.ny.us).
Andrew M. Cuomo, Esq.                   Janice A. Dean Attorney General ofthe State ofNew York Office of the Attorney General John J. Sipos, Esq.                     ofthe State ofNew York Charlie Donaldson Esq.                  Assistant Attorney General Assistants Attorney General            120 Broadway, 26th Floor The Capitol                            New York; New York 10271 Albany, NY 12224-0341                  (E-mail: Janice.Dean@oag.state.ny.us) *
(E-mail: john.sipos@oag.state.ny.us)
Joan Leary Matthews, Esq.
Senior Attorney for Special Projects Office of the General Counsel New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, 14th Floor Albany, NY 12207 (E-mail: jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny. us)
OAGI0001230 00005
 
Page4
* Original and 2 copies provided to the Office oft/Secretary.      . .
                      *      ..                ~~
* Paul M. Bessette, Esq.
Counsel for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
DBJ/65420875. 1 OAGI0001230 00006
 
                                                            ' ' .~
Entergy Nuclear Northeast Iridian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, N.Y. 10511-0249 Tel (914) 788-2055.
Fred Dacimo Vice President License Renewal NL-10-082 August 9, 2010 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
License Renewal Application-Completion of Commitment#33 Regarding the Fatigue Monitoring Program Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64 REFERENCE  
License Renewal Application- Completion of Commitment#33 Regarding the Fatigue Monitoring Program Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64 REFERENCE         1. Entergy Letter dated April 23, 2007, F. R. Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application" (NL-07 -039)
: 1. Entergy Letter dated April 23, 2007, F. R. Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application" (NL-07 -039) 2. Entergy Letter dated April 23, 2007, F. R. Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application Boundary Drawings (NL-07-040)  
: 2. Entergy Letter dated April 23, 2007, F. R. Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application Boundary Drawings (NL-07-040)
: 3. Entergy Letter dated April 23, 2007, F. R. Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application Environmental Report *References (NI:.-07 -041) 4. Entergy Letter dated October 11, 2007, F. R, Dacirrio to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application (LRA)" (NL-07-124)  
: 3. Entergy Letter dated April 23, 2007, F. R. Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application Environmental Report
: 5. Entergy Letter November 14, 2007, F. R, Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "Supplement to License Renewa'l Application (LRA) Environmental Report References" (NL-07-133)  
                    *References (NI:.-07 -041)
: 4. Entergy Letter dated October 11, 2007, F. R, Dacirrio to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application (LRA)" (NL-07-124)
: 5. Entergy Letter November 14, 2007, F. R, Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "Supplement to License Renewa'l Application (LRA)
Environmental Report References" (NL-07-133)


==Dear Sir or Madam:==
==Dear Sir or Madam:==
In the referenced letters, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. applied for renewal of the Indian Point Energy Center operating license. This letter contains information supporting the completion of commitment 33 to the License Renewal Application regarding the Fatigue Monitoring Program. OAGI0001230 00007
 
*' NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 2 of 2 There are no new commitments identified in this submittal.
In the referenced letters, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. applied for renewal of the Indian Point Energy Center operating license. This letter contains information supporting the completion of commitment 33 to the License Renewal Application regarding the Fatigue Monitoring Program.
If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact Mr. Robert Walpole at 914-734-6710.
OAGI0001230 00007
Sincerely, FD/mb Attachments:  
 
: 1. 2. Environmental Fatigue Evaluations List of Regulatory Commitments cc: Mr. S. J. Collins, Regional Administrator, NRC Region I Mr. J. Boska, Senior Project Manager, NRC, NRR, DORL Mr. SherWin E. Turk, NRC Office of General Counsel, Special Counsel Ms. Kimberly Green, NRC Safety Project Manager
NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 2 of 2 There are no new commitments identified in this submittal. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact Mr. Robert Walpole at 914-734-6710.
* NRC Resident Inspectors Office, Indian Point Mr. Paul Eddy, NYS Dept. of Public Service Mr. Francis J. Murray, Jr., President and CEO, NYSERDA OAGI0001230 00008 ATTACHMENT 1 TO NL-10-082 Environmental Fatigue Evaluations ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-247 & 50-286 OAGI0001230 00009 Attachment 1 . NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 1 of 4 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL FATIGUE EVALUATIONS Environmental Fatigue Evaluation for Indian Point Unit 2 and Unit 3 Entergy has applied* for renewed operating licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 and Unit 3 (IP2 and IP3). In the license renewal application, Entergy committed to address environmentally assisted fatigue. Entergy's commitment, amended by letter, NL-08-021, dated January 22, 2008, reads as follows. ' At least 2 years prior to entering the period of extended operation, for the locations identified in LRA Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3}, under the Fatigue Monitoring Program, IP2 and IP3 will implement one or more of the following:  
Sincerely,
(1) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program, Detection of Aging Effects, update the fatigue usage calculations using refined fatigue analyses to determine valid CUFs less than 1.0 when accounting for the effects of reactor water environment.
  !3J~
This includes applying the appropriate Fen factors to valid CUFs determined in accordance with one of the following:
FD/mb Attachments:       1. Environmental Fatigue Evaluations
I. For locations in LRA Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3), with existing fatigue analysis valid for the period of extended operation, use the existing CUF. 2. Additional plant-specific locations with a valid CUF may be In particular, the pressurizer lower shell will be reviewed to ensure the surge nozzle remains the limiting component.  
: 2. List of Regulatory Commitments cc:     Mr. S. J. Collins, Regional Administrator, NRC Region I Mr. J. Boska, Senior Project Manager, NRC, NRR, DORL Mr. SherWin E. Turk, NRC Office of General Counsel, Special Counsel Ms. Kimberly Green, NRC Safety Project Manager
: 3. Representative CUF values from other plants, adjusted to or enveloping the IPEC plant specific extern(J.IIoads may be used ifdemonstrated applicable to IPEC. 4. An analysis using an NRC-approved version of the ASME code or NRC-approved alternative (e.g., NRC-approved code case) may be performed to determine a valid CUF. (2) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program, Corrective Actions, repair or replace the affected locations before exceeding a CUF of 1.0. Entergy has updated the fatigue usage calculations using refined fatigue analyses to determine CUFs when accounting for the effects of reactor water environment.
* NRC Resident Inspectors Office, Indian Point Mr. Paul Eddy, NYS Dept. of Public Service Mr. Francis J. Murray, Jr., President and CEO, NYSERDA OAGI0001230 00008
This includes applying the appropriate Fen factors to valid CUFs for the locations shown in LRA Table 4.3-13 and LRA Table 4.3-14. The tables from the LRA are repeated as follows with the updated CUF values inserted.
 
The results of the refined analyses are shown in the tables as underlined values. OAGI0001230 00010
ATTACHMENT 1 TO NL-10-082 Environmental Fatigue Evaluations ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-247 & 50-286 OAGI0001230 00009
* *. l*. ** ,**, II* Table 4.3-13, Attachment 1 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 2 of 4 , IP2 Cumulative Usage Factors for NUREG/CR-6260 Limiting Locations  
 
.. Per NUREG/CR-6583 or NUREG-6260 Generic IP2 Plant* Material . CUF of NUREG/CR-5704 Location Specific Type .. Record Location Fen Environmental!
Attachment 1
y Adjusted CUF .1 Vessel shell and Bottom head to lower head shell LAS 0.004 2.45 O.o1 2 Vessel inlet and Reactor vessel outlet nozzles inlet nozzle LAS 0.05 2.45' 0.12 2 Vessel inlet and Reactor vessel LAS outlet nozzles outlet nozzle 0.281 2.45 0.69 3 Pressurizer surge Pressurizer  
                                                                                        . NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 1 of 4 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL FATIGUE EVALUATIONS Environmental Fatigue Evaluation for Indian Point Unit 2 and Unit 3 Entergy has applied* for renewed operating licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 and Unit 3 (IP2 and IP3). In the license renewal application, Entergy committed to address environmentally assisted fatigue. Entergy's commitment, amended by letter, NL-08-021, dated January 22, 2008, reads as follows.                                                       '
(},2e4 2.46 M46 line nozzles surge line LAS* 0.109 noZ.zle 1.74 0.188 3 Pressurizer surge Surge line piping g,.e lirie piping to safe end weld ss 0.062 13.26 0.822 4 RCS piping Charging system Q...99 charging system nozzle ss nozzle 0.0323 8.7 0.2809 5 RCS piping safety NA NAa NA:! injection nozzle ss 0.1083 7.8975 0.8553 6 RHR Class 1 piping NA NAa NA:! ss Q.Qm. 1M.6. 0.9434 OAGI0001230 00011 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 Table 4.3*14 Attachment 1 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 3 of 4 IP3 Cumulative*
At least 2 years prior to entering the period of extended operation, for the locations identified in LRA Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3}, under the Fatigue Monitoring Program, IP2 and IP3 will implement one or more of the following:
Usage Factors for NUREG/CR-6260 Limiting Locations Per NUREG/CR-6583 or IP3 Plant* Material . CUFof NUREG/CR-5704 NUREG-6260 Location Specific Location Type Record Fen Environmentally Adjusted CUF Vessel shell and lower Bottom head to head shell LAS 0.02 2.45 0.05 Vessel inlet and outlet Reactor vessel 2.45 nozzles inlet nozzle LAS 0.049 0.12 Vessel inlet and outlet Reactor vessel nozzles outlet nozzle LAS 0.259 2.45 0.64 Pressurizer surge line Pressurizer surge 2-:4& nozzles line nozzle LAS 0.0903. 1.74 0.157 Pressurizer surge line Surge line piping o;e 9-:2+ piping to safe end weld ss 0.0411 14.45 0.594 RCS piping charging NA NAa NAa system nozzle ss 0.1812 3.98 0.722 RCS piping safety NA NAa NAa injection nozzle ss 0.1709 5.0117 0.8565 RHR Class 1 piping .NA ss NA2 NAa 0.1279 7.79 0.9961 \ OAGI0001230 00012
(1) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program, Detection of Aging Effects, update the fatigue usage calculations using refined fatigue analyses to determine valid CUFs less than 1.0 when accounting for the effects of reactor water environment. This includes applying the appropriate Fen factors to valid CUFs determined in accordance with one of the following:
*, . :*** ' ' ' * .. Attachment 1 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 4 of 4 .. As described in LRA Section 4.3.3 and shown in Tables 4.3-13 and 4.3-14, the CUFs for the reactor vessel locations were not changed. The evaluation documented in the LRA used bounding Fens applied to the CUFs of record for'the bottom head to shell region, the reactor vessel inlet nozzle and the reactor vessel outlet nozzle. The tables show the Cumulative Usage Factors are all below 1.0 for these three locations tor both units. The stress and fatigue evaluations tor the remaining piping components listed in Table 4.3-13 and 4.3-14 were performed using standard methods of the ASME Code, Section !II. Detailed stress models of the surge line hot leg nozzle, pressurizer surge nozzle, reactor coolant piping charging system nozzle, reactor coolant piping safety injection nozzle, and the AHA system . class *1 piping locations were prepared.
I. For locations in LRA Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3), with existing fatigue analysis valid for the period of extended operation, use the existing CUF.
The analyst developed detailed stress history inputs for all transients considered in the evaluation, which were subsequently used to provide detailed inputs used in the EAF evaluations.
: 2. Additional plant-specific locations with a valid CUF may be evaluated~ In particular, the pressurizer lower shell will be reviewed to ensure the surge nozzle remains the limiting component.
The ASME Code evaluations were performed tor the piping components to reduce conservatism in the analyses or because the current licensing basis (CLB) qualification was to the ANSI 831.1 Power Piping Code, which did not require a fatigue usage factor calculation.
: 3. Representative CUF values from other plants, adjusted to or enveloping the IPEC plant specific extern(J.IIoads may be used ifdemonstrated applicable to IPEC.
The evaluations were limited to the stress qualifications related tothe fatigue requirements of the ASME Code. The primary stress qualifications documented in the CLB remain applicable tor the components evaluated.
: 4. An analysis using an NRC-approved version of the ASME code or NRC-approved alternative (e.g., NRC-approved code case) may be performed to determine a valid CUF.
* The evaluation of EAF was accomplished through the application of Fen factors, as described in for the stainless steels in the pressurizer surge line, the reactor coolant piping charging and safety injection system nozzles, and the RHR system Class l piping. In addition, Fen factors tor the pressurizer surge nozzle dissimilar metal weld also considered the carbon steel factors in NUREG/CR-6583.
(2) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program, Corrective Actions, repair or replace the affected locations before exceeding a CUF of 1.0.
The Fen factors are calculated based on detailed inputs described in the applicable NUREG and are directly applied tothe ASME Code fatigue results. The refined fatigue analyses of the Indian Point Unit 2 and Unit 3 piping locations corresponding to the locations identified in NUREG/CR-6260 for older vintage Westinghouse plants demonstrate that cumulative fatigue usage factors including consideration of reactor water environmental effects are below a value of 1 .0 for transients postulated tor 60 years of operation.
Entergy has updated the fatigue usage calculations using refined fatigue analyses to determine CUFs when accounting for the effects of reactor water environment. This includes applying the appropriate Fen factors to valid CUFs for the locations shown in LRA Table 4.3-13 and LRA Table 4.3-14.
The results of this evaluation resolve commitment number 33 in the NRC Safety Evaluation Report on license renewal tor Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 and Unit 3. OAGI0001230 00013
The tables from the LRA are repeated as follows with the updated CUF values inserted.
*. ATTACHMENT 2 TO-NL-10-082 List of Regulatory Commitments ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-247 & 50-286 _ OAGI0001230 00014
The results of the refined analyses are shown in the tables as underlined values.
# 1 2 . Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 1 of 17 .. List of Regulatory Commitments Rev. 12 The following table identifies those actions committed to by Entergy in this document.
OAGI0001230 00010
 
                              **. l*. ** ,**, II*
Attachment 1 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 2 of 4 ,
Table 4.3-13, IP2 Cumulative Usage Factors for NUREG/CR-6260 Limiting Locations Per NUREG/CR-6583 or IP2 Plant*                       . CUF of           NUREG/CR-5704 NUREG-6260 Generic                                Material Specific Location                                     Type .. Record Location Environmental!
Fen y Adjusted CUF
.1 Vessel shell and     Bottom head to lower head           shell                       LAS         0.004       2.45         O.o1 2 Vessel inlet and     Reactor vessel outlet nozzles       inlet nozzle                 LAS         0.05       2.45'         0.12 2 Vessel inlet and     Reactor vessel outlet nozzles       outlet nozzle               LAS        0.281       2.45           0.69 3 Pressurizer surge   Pressurizer                             (},2e4     2.46         M46 line nozzles         surge line                   LAS*
0.109       1.74         0.188 noZ.zle 3  Pressurizer surge   Surge line piping                         g,.e     ~              ~
lirie piping         to safe end weld             ss         0.062       13.26         0.822 4 RCS piping           Charging system                           Q...99   ~              ~
charging system     nozzle                       ss       0.0323       8.7         0.2809 nozzle 5 RCS piping safety   NA                                       NAa       ~              NA:!
injection nozzle                                   ss       0.1083     7.8975       0.8553 6 RHR Class 1 piping   NA                                       NAa       ~              NA:!
ss       Q.Qm.       1M.6.         0.9434 OAGI0001230 00011
 
Attachment 1 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 3 of 4 Table 4.3*14 IP3 Cumulative* Usage Factors for NUREG/CR-6260 Limiting Locations Per NUREG/CR-6583 or
                                                        . CUFof           NUREG/CR-5704 IP3 Plant*      Material NUREG-6260 Location Specific Location     Type     Record Environmentally Fen Adjusted CUF 1 Vessel shell and lower   Bottom head   to head                     shell                 LAS       0.02     2.45           0.05 2 Vessel inlet and outlet Reactor vessel nozzles                 inlet nozzle           LAS       0.049     2.45          0.12 2 Vessel inlet and outlet Reactor vessel nozzles                 outlet nozzle         LAS       0.259     2.45           0.64 3 Pressurizer surge line   Pressurizer surge               ~          2-:4&         ~
nozzles                 line nozzle           LAS 0.0903. 1.74         0.157 3 Pressurizer surge line   Surge line piping                 o;e   ~                9-:2+
piping                   to safe end weld       ss     0.0411   14.45         0.594 4 RCS piping charging     NA                               NAa   ~                NAa system nozzle                                   ss     0.1812   3.98           0.722 5 RCS piping safety       NA                               NAa   ~                NAa injection nozzle                                 ss 0.1709   5.0117         0.8565 6 RHR Class 1 piping     .NA                               NA2   ~                NAa ss      0.1279   7.79         0.9961
                                                                      \
OAGI0001230 00012
 
                                                      ~    ' '
                                                                  ~
Attachment 1 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 4 of 4..
As described in LRA Section 4.3.3 and shown in Tables 4.3-13 and 4.3-14, the CUFs for the reactor vessel locations were not changed. The evaluation documented in the LRA used bounding Fens applied to the CUFs of record for'the bottom head to shell region, the reactor vessel inlet nozzle and the reactor vessel outlet nozzle. The tables show the Cumulative Usage Factors are all below 1.0 for these three locations tor both units.
The stress and fatigue evaluations tor the remaining piping components listed in Table 4.3-13 and 4.3-14 were performed using standard methods of the ASME Code, Section !II. Detailed stress models of the surge line hot leg nozzle, pressurizer surge nozzle, reactor coolant piping charging system nozzle, reactor coolant piping safety injection nozzle, and the AHA system
  . class *1 piping locations were prepared. The analyst developed detailed stress history inputs for all transients considered in the evaluation, which were subsequently used to provide detailed inputs used in the EAF evaluations. The ASME Code evaluations were performed tor the piping components to reduce conservatism in the analyses or because the current licensing basis (CLB) qualification was to the ANSI 831.1 Power Piping Code, which did not require a fatigue usage factor calculation. The evaluations were limited to the stress qualifications related tothe fatigue requirements of the ASME Code. The primary stress qualifications documented in the CLB remain applicable tor the components evaluated.
* The evaluation of EAF was accomplished through the application of Fen factors, as described in NUREG/CR~5704 for the stainless steels in the pressurizer surge line, the reactor coolant piping charging and safety injection system nozzles, and the RHR system Class l piping. In addition, Fen factors tor the pressurizer surge nozzle dissimilar metal weld also considered the carbon steel factors in NUREG/CR-6583. The Fen factors are calculated based on detailed inputs described in the applicable NUREG and are directly applied tothe ASME Code fatigue results.
The refined fatigue analyses of the Indian Point Unit 2 and Unit 3 piping locations corresponding to the locations identified in NUREG/CR-6260 for older vintage Westinghouse plants demonstrate that cumulative fatigue usage factors including consideration of reactor water environmental effects are below a value of 1.0 for transients postulated tor 60 years of operation.
The results of this evaluation resolve commitment number 33 in the NRC Safety Evaluation Report on license renewal tor Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 and Unit 3.
OAGI0001230 00013
 
ATTACHMENT 2 TO- NL-10-082 List of Regulatory Commitments ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-247 & 50-286 _
OAGI0001230 00014
 
                                                                                . Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 1 of 17 ..
List of Regulatory Commitments Rev. 12 The following table identifies those actions committed to by Entergy in this document.
Changes are shown as strikethroughs for deletions and underlines for additions.
Changes are shown as strikethroughs for deletions and underlines for additions.
* COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE SCHED.ULE Enhance the Aboveground Steel Tanks Program for IP2: NL-07-039
#
!september 28, IP2 and IP3 to perform thickness measurements of 12013 the bottom surfaces of the condensate storage tanks, city water tank, and fire water tanks once during the IP3: first ten years of the period of extended operation.
* COMMITMENT                         IMPLEMENTATION     SOURCE       RELATED SCHED.ULE                 LRASECTION
December 12, Enhance the Aboveground Steel Tanks Program for 12015 IP2 and IP3 to require trending of thickness measurements when material loss is detected.
                                                                                            /AUDIT ITEM IP2:              NL-07-039      A.2.1.1 1 Enhance the Aboveground Steel Tanks Program for
Enhance the Bolting Integrity Program for IP2 and IP3 IP2:
                                                            !september 28,                   A.3.1.1 IP2 and IP3 to perform thickness measurements of 12013                               8.1.1 the bottom surfaces of the condensate storage tanks, city water tank, and fire water tanks once during the IP3:
28, to clarify that actual yield strength is used in selecting materials for low susceptibility to sec and clarify the prohibition on use of lubricants containing MoS 2 for IP3: NL-07-153 bolting. December 12, The Bolting Integrity Program manages loss of 2015 preload and loss of material for all external boltina. RELATED LRASECTION  
first ten years of the period of extended operation.
/AUDIT ITEM A.2.1.1 A.3.1.1 8.1.1 A.2.1.2 A.3.1.2 8.1.2 Audit Items 201, 241,. 270 OAGI0001230 00015 
December 12, Enhance the Aboveground Steel Tanks Program for           12015 IP2 and IP3 to require trending of thickness measurements when material loss is detected.
# COMMITMENT 3 Implement the Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA Section B.1.6. This new program will be implemented consistent with the corresponding program described in NUREG-1801 Section XI.M34, Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection.
IP2:              NL~07-039      A.2.1.2 2 Enhance the Bolting Integrity Program for IP2 and IP3
Include in the Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection Program described in LRA Section B.1.6 a risk assessment of in-scope buried piping and tanks that includes consideration of the impacts of buried piping or tank leakage and of conditions affecting the risk for corrosion.
                                                            ~eptember 28,                     A.3.1.2 to clarify that actual yield strength is used in selecting and clarify the ~013 8.1.2 materials for low susceptibility to sec prohibition on use of lubricants containing MoS2 for IP3:             NL-07-153 Audit Items bolting.
Classify pipe segments and tanks as having a high, medium or low impact of leakage based on the safety class, the hazard posed by fluid contained in the piping and the impact of leakage on reliable plant operation.
December 12,                     201, 241,.
Determine corrosion risk through consideration of piping or tank material, soil resistivity, drainage, the presence of cathodic protection and the type of coating. Establish inspection priority and frequency for periodic inspections of the in-scope piping and tanks based on the results of the risk assessment.
The Bolting Integrity Program manages loss of             2015                               270 preload and loss of material for all external boltina.
Perform inspections using inspection techniques with demonstrated effectiveness.
OAGI0001230 00015
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 2 of 17 , IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.5 !September 28, A.3.1.5
 
-B.1.6 --* NL-07-153 Audit Item IP3: 173 December 12, 12015 NL-09-106 NL-09-111 OAGI0001230 00016 
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 2 of 17 ,
;; '-'' # COMMITMENT 4 Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to include cleaning and inspection of the IP2 GT-1 gas turbine fuel oil storage tanks, IP2 and IP3 fuel oil. day tanks, IP2 SBO/Appendix R diesel generator fuel oil day tank, and IP3 Appendix R fuel oil storage tank and day tank once every ten years. Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to include quarterly sampling and analysis of the IP2 SBO/Appendix R diesel generator fuel oil day tank, IP2 security diesel fuel oil storage tank, IP2*security diesel fuel oil day tank, and IP3 Appendix R fuel oil storage tank. Particulates, water and sediment checks will be performed on the samples. Filterable solids acceptance criterion will be less than or equal to 10mg/l. Water and sediment acceptance criterion will be less than or equal to 0.05% .. Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to include thickness measurement of the bottom of the following tanks. once every ten years. IP2: EDG fuel oil storage tanks, EDG fuel oil day tanks, SBO/Appendix R diesel generator fuel oil day tank, GT-1 gas turbine fuel oil storage tanks, and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank; I P3: EDG fuel oil day tanks, EDG fuel oil storage tanks, Appendix R fuel oil storage tank, and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank. Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to change the analysis for water and <particulates to a quarterly frequency for the following tanks. IP2: GT-1 gas turbine fuel oil storage tanks and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank; IP3: Appendix R fuel oil day tank and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank. Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to specify acceptance criteria for thickness measurements of the fuel oil storage tanks within the scope of the program. Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to direct samples be taken include direction to remove water when detected.
#                        COMMITMENT                        IMPLEMENTATION    SOURCE      RELATED SCHEDULE                LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2:              NL-07-039      A.2.1.5 3 Implement the Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection
                                                          !September 28,                  A.3.1.5 Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA Section B.1.6.                                                   ~013          -                  B.1.6
                                                                      --*  NL-07-153    Audit Item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3:                                  173 the corresponding program described in NUREG-           December 12, 1801 Section XI.M34, Buried Piping and Tanks             12015 Inspection.
Include in the Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection                         NL-09-106 Program described in LRA Section B.1.6 a risk assessment of in-scope buried piping and tanks that                       NL-09-111 includes consideration of the impacts of buried piping or tank leakage and of conditions affecting the risk for corrosion. Classify pipe segments and tanks as having a high, medium or low impact of leakage based on the safety class, the hazard posed by fluid contained in the piping and the impact of leakage on reliable plant operation. Determine corrosion risk through consideration of piping or tank material, soil resistivity, drainage, the presence of cathodic protection and the type of coating. Establish inspection priority and frequency for periodic inspections of the in-scope piping and tanks based on the results of the risk assessment. Perform inspections using inspection techniques with demonstrated effectiveness.
OAGI0001230 00016
 
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 3 of 17_ ~-
#                        COMMITMENT                        IMPLEMENTATION     SOURCE       RELATED SCHEDULE               LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2:               NL-07-039     A.2.1.8 4 Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to                                               A.3.1.8 September 28, include cleaning and inspection of the IP2 GT-1 gas 2013            -                  8.1.9 turbine fuel oil storage tanks, IP2 and IP3 ~DG fuel oil. . *- -            NL-07-153    Audit items day tanks, IP2 SBO/Appendix R diesel generator fuel                                       128, 129, IP3:
oil day tank, and IP3 Appendix R fuel oil storage tank                                       132, December 12, and day tank once every ten years.                                           NL-08-057    491,492, 2015 Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to                                                 510 include quarterly sampling and analysis of the IP2 SBO/Appendix R diesel generator fuel oil day tank, IP2 security diesel fuel oil storage tank, IP2*security diesel fuel oil day tank, and IP3 Appendix R fuel oil storage tank. Particulates, water and sediment checks will be performed on the samples. Filterable solids acceptance criterion will be less than or equal to 10mg/l. Water and sediment acceptance criterion will be less than or equal to 0.05% ..
Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to include thickness measurement of the bottom of the following tanks. once every ten years. IP2: EDG fuel oil storage tanks, EDG fuel oil day tanks, SBO/Appendix R diesel generator fuel oil day tank, GT-1 gas turbine fuel oil storage tanks, and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank; I P3: EDG fuel oil day tanks, EDG fuel oil storage tanks, Appendix R fuel oil storage tank, and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank.
Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to change the analysis for water and <particulates to a quarterly frequency for the following tanks. IP2: GT-1 gas turbine fuel oil storage tanks and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank; IP3: Appendix R fuel oil day tank and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank.
Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to specify acceptance criteria for thickness measurements of the fuel oil storage tanks within the scope of the program.
Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to direct samples be taken ~nd include direction to remove water when detected.
Revise applicable procedures to direct sampling of the onsite portable fuel oil contents prior to transferring*
Revise applicable procedures to direct sampling of the onsite portable fuel oil contents prior to transferring*
the contents to the storage tanks. Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to direct the addition of chemicals including biocide when the presence of biological activity is confirmed.
the contents to the storage tanks.
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 3 of 17_ IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.8 September 28, A.3.1.8 2013 -8.1.9 . *--NL-07-153 Audit items IP3: 128, 129, December 12, 132, 2015 NL-08-057 491,492, 510 OAGI0001230 00017 
Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to direct the addition of chemicals including biocide when the presence of biological activity is confirmed.
# COMMITMENT 5 Enhance the External Surfaces Monitoring Program for IP2and IP3 to include periodic inspections of systems in scope.and subject to aging management_
OAGI0001230 00017
review for license renewal in accordance with 1 0 CFR 54.4(a)(1) and (a)(3). *Inspections shall include areas surrounding the subject systems to identify hazards to those systems. Inspections of nearby systems that could impact the subject systems will include SSCs that are in scope and subject to aging management review for license renewal in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).
 
6 Enhance the Fatigue Monitoring Program for IP2 to monitor steady state cycles and feedwater cycles*or perform an evaluation to determine monitoring Is not required.
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 4 of 17
Review the number of allowed events and resolve discrepancies between reference documents and monitoring procedures.
#                        COMMITMENT                        IMPLEMENTATION   SOURCE*      RELATED SCHEDULE                 LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2:.            NL-07-039     A.2.1.10 5 Enhance the External Surfaces Monitoring Program September 28,                   A.3.1.10 for IP2and IP3 to include periodic inspections of 2013          -                  8.1.11 systems in scope.and subject to aging management_
Enhance the Fatigue Monitoring Program for IP3 to include all the transients identified.
review for license renewal in accordance with 10 CFR IP3:
Assure all fatigue analysis transients are included with the lowest limiting numbers. Update the number of design transients accumulated to date. 7 Enhance the Fire Protection Program to inspect external surfaces of the IP3 RCP oil collection systems for loss of material each refueling cycle.
54.4(a)(1) and (a)(3). *Inspections shall include areas December 12, surrounding the subject systems to identify hazards to those systems. Inspections of nearby systems that         ~015 could impact the subject systems will include SSCs that are in scope and subject to aging management review for license renewal in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).
* Enhance the Fire Protection Program to explicitly state that the IP2 and IP3 diesel fire pump engine sub-systems (including the fuel supply line) shall be observed while the pump is running. Acceptance criteria will be revised to verify that the diesel engine . . does not exhibit signs of degradation while running; such as fuel oil, lube oil, coolant, or exhaust gas leakage. Enhance the Fire Protection Program to speCify that the IP2 and IP3 diesel fire pump engine carbon steel exhaust components are inspected for evidence of corrosion and cracking at least once each operating cycle. Enhance the Fire Protection Program for IP3 to visually inspect the cable spreading room, 480V
IP2:              NL-07-039    A.2.1.11 6 Enhance the Fatigue Monitoring Program for IP2 to
* switchgear room, and EDG room C0 2 fire suppression system for signs of degradation, such as corrosion and mechanical damage at least once every six months. Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 4 of 17 IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE* RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2:. NL-07-039 A.2.1.10 September 28, A.3.1.10 2013 -8.1.11 IP3: December 12, IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.11 !September 28, A.3.1.11 8.1.12, NL-07-153 Audit Item 164 .. IP3: !December 12, IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.12 September 28, A.3.1.12 2013 8.1.13 IP3: December 12,. 2015 OAGI0001230 00018 
                                                            !September 28,                  A.3.1.11 monitor steady state cycles and feedwater cycles*or
# COMMITMENT 8 Enhance the Fire Water Program to include inspection of IP2 and IP.3 hose reels for evidence of corrosion.  
                                                            ~013                            8.1.12, perform an evaluation to determine monitoring Is not required. Review the number of allowed events and                           NL-07-153    Audit Item 164 resolve discrepancies between reference documents and monitoring procedures.
.. --*-Acceptance criteria will be revised to verify no unacceptable signs of degradation.
Enhance the Fatigue Monitoring Program for IP3 to         IP3:
Enhance the Fire Water Program to replace all or test a sample of IP2 and IP3 sprinkler heads required for 10 CFR 50.48. using guidance of NFPA 25 (2002 edition), Section 5.3.1.1.1 before the end of the 50-year sprinkler head service life and at 10-year intervals thereafter during the extended period of to ensure that signs of degradation, such as corrosion, are detected in a timely manner. Enhance the Fire Water Program to perform wall thickness evaluations of IP2 and IP3 fire protection.
include all the transients identified. Assure all fatigue !December 12, analysis transients are included with the lowest         ~015 limiting numbers. Update the number of design transients accumulated to date.
piping on system components using non-intrusive techniques  
7                                                           IP2:              NL-07-039    A.2.1.12 Enhance the Fire Protection Program to inspect September 28,                  A.3.1.12 external surfaces of the IP3 RCP oil collection systems for loss of material each refueling cycle.
{e.g., volumetric testing) to identify evidence of loss of material due to corrosion.
* 2013                            8.1.13 Enhance the Fire Protection Program to explicitly         IP3:
These inspections will be performed before the end of the current operating term and at intervals thereafter during the period of extended operation.
state that the IP2 and IP3 diesel fire pump engine       December 12,.
Results.of the initial evaluations will be used to determine the appropriate inspection interval to ensure aging effects are identified prior to loss of intended function.
sub-systems (including the fuel supply line) shall be     2015 observed while the pump is running. Acceptance criteria will be revised to verify that the diesel engine does not exhibit signs of degradation while running; such as fuel oil, lube oil, coolant, or exhaust gas leakage.
Enhance the Fire Water Program to inspect the internal surface of foam based fire suppression tanks. Acceptance criteria will be enhanced to verify no significant corrosion.
Enhance the Fire Protection Program to speCify that the IP2 and IP3 diesel fire pump engine carbon steel exhaust components are inspected for evidence of corrosion and cracking at least once each operating cycle.
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 5 of 17 IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.13 September 28, A.3.1.13 2013 -. 8.1.14 Audit Items IP3: 105, 106 December 12, NL-08-014 2015 OAGI0001230 00019
Enhance the Fire Protection Program for IP3 to visually inspect the cable spreading room, 480V
# COMMITMENT 9 Enhance the Flux Thimble Tube Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 to implement comparisons to wear rates identified in
* switchgear room, and EDG room C02 fire suppression system for signs of degradation, such as corrosion and mechanical damage at least once every six months.
_Include provisions to. compare data to the previous performances and perform evaluations regarding-change to test frequency and scope. Enhance the Flux Thimble Tube Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 to specify the acceptance criteria as outlined in WCAP-12866 or other plant-specific values based .on evaluation of previous test results. Enhance the Flux Thimble Tube Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 to direct evaluation and performance of corrective actions based on tubes that exceed or are projected to exceed the acceptance criteria.
OAGI0001230 00018
Also stipulate that flux thimble tubes that cannot be inspected over the tube length and cannot be shown by analysis to be satisfactory for continued service, must be removed from service to ensure the integrity of _the reactor coolant system pressure boundary.
 
I . Attachment 2
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 5 of 17
  #                            COMMITMENT                      IMPLEMENTATION   SOURCE       RELATED SCHEDULE                 LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2:             NL-07-039     A.2.1.13 8     Enhance the Fire Water Program to include inspection September 28,                 A.3.1.13 of IP2 and IP.3 hose reels for evidence of corrosion.                                 . 8.1.14 2013        -
..   --*- Acceptance criteria will be revised to verify no NL-07-15~  Audit Items unacceptable signs of degradation.
IP3:                          105, 106 Enhance the Fire Water Program to replace all or test December 12,      NL-08-014 a sample of IP2 and IP3 sprinkler heads required for   2015 10 CFR 50.48. using guidance of NFPA 25 (2002 edition), Section 5.3.1.1.1 before the end of the 50-year sprinkler head service life and at 10-year intervals thereafter during the extended period of operatic~ to ensure that signs of degradation, such as corrosion, are detected in a timely manner.
Enhance the Fire Water Program to perform wall thickness evaluations of IP2 and IP3 fire protection.
piping on system components using non-intrusive techniques {e.g., volumetric testing) to identify evidence of loss of material due to corrosion. These inspections will be performed before the end of the current operating term and at intervals thereafter during the period of extended operation. Results.of the initial evaluations will be used to determine the appropriate inspection interval to ensure aging effects are identified prior to loss of intended function.
Enhance the Fire Water Program to inspect the internal surface of foam based fire suppression tanks.
Acceptance criteria will be enhanced to verify no significant corrosion.
OAGI0001230 00019
 
I .
Attachment 2
* NL-10-082
* NL-10-082
* Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 -Page 6 of 17 . IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM "IP2:
* Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 -
A.2.1.15 September 28, A.3.1.15 2013 -
Page 6 of 17 .
IP3: . December 12, -2015 .. \ OAGI0001230 00020   
#                        COMMITMENT                        IMPLEMENTATION     SOURCE       RELATED SCHEDULE                 LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM "IP2:               NL-07~039    A.2.1.15 9 Enhance the Flux Thimble Tube Inspection Program September 28,                   A.3.1.15 for IP2 and IP3 to implement comparisons to wear 2013         -                  8.~.16 rates identified in WCAP-12866~ _Include provisions to.
# COMMITMENT 10 Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to include the following heat exchangers in the. scope of the program.
compare data to the previous performances and IP3:
* Safety injection pump lube oil heat exchangers
perform evaluations regarding-change to test
* RHR heat exchangers
                                                          . December 12, -
frequency and scope.
2015 ..
Enhance the Flux Thimble Tube Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 to specify the acceptance criteria as                \
outlined in WCAP-12866 or other plant-specific values based .on evaluation of previous test results.
Enhance the Flux Thimble Tube Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 to direct evaluation and performance of corrective actions based on tubes that exceed or are projected to exceed the acceptance criteria. Also stipulate that flux thimble tubes that cannot be inspected over the tube length and cannot be shown by analysis to be satisfactory for continued service, must be removed from service to ensure the integrity of _the reactor coolant system pressure boundary.
OAGI0001230 00020
 
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 7 of 17
  #                       COMMITMENT                       IMPLEMENTATION      SOURCE      RELATED SCHED,ULE                  LRASECTION
                                                                                          /AUDIT ITEM IP2:                NL-07-039    A ..2.1.16 10 Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for                                         A.3.1.16
                                                          !september 28, IP2 and IP3 to include the following heat exchangers                 .                    8.1.17, 12013 in the. scope of the program.                                             *Nt::o7-t53  Audit Item
* Safety injection pump lube oil heat exchangers IP3:.                                  52 December 12,
* RHR heat exchangers                           ~015 .
* RHR pump seal coolers
* RHR pump seal coolers
* Non-regenerative heat exchangers
* Non-regenerative heat exchangers
Line 143: Line 255:
* Secondary system steam generator sample coolers
* Secondary system steam generator sample coolers
* Waste gas compressor heat exchangers
* Waste gas compressor heat exchangers
* SBO/Appendix R diesel jacket water heat exchanger (IP2 only) Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to perform visual inspection on heat exchangers where non-destructive examination, such as eddy current inspection, is not possible due to heat exchanger design limitations.
* SBO/Appendix R diesel jacket water heat exchanger (IP2 only)
Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to include consideration of material-environment combinations.
Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to perform visual inspection on heat exchangers where non-destructive examination, such as eddy current inspection, is not possible due to heat exchanger design limitations.
when determining sample population of heat exchangers.
Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to include consideration of material-environment combinations. when determining sample population of heat exchangers.
Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to establish minimum tube wall thickness for the new heat exchangers identified in the scope of the program. Establish acceptance criteria for heat exchangers visually inspected to include no indication of tube erosion, vibration wear, corrosion, pitting, fouling, or scalino. 11 Delete commitment.
Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to establish minimum tube wall thickness for the new heat exchangers identified in the scope of the program. Establish acceptance criteria for heat exchangers visually inspected to include no indication of tube erosion, vibration wear, corrosion, pitting,                       NL-09-018 fouling, or scalino.
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 7 of 17 IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHED,ULE LRASECTION  
NL-09-056 11 Delete commitment.
/AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A .. 2.1.16 !september 28, A.3.1.16 12013 . 8.1.17, *Nt::o7-t53 Audit Item IP3:. 52 December 12, . * . NL-09-018 NL-09-056 OAG 10001230 _ 00021 
OAG 10001230_ 00021
# COMMITMENT 12 Enhance the Masonry Wall Program for IP2 and IP3 *to specify that the I P1 intake structure is !ncluded in -the program. --. .. -*""':---13 Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program to add IP2 480V bus associated with substation A to the scope of bus inspected.
 
Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 to visually inspect the external surface of MEB enclosure assemblies for loss of material at least once every 10 years. The first inspection will occur prior to the period of extended operation and the acceptance criterion will be no significant loss of material.
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 8 of 17
Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program to add acceptance criteria for MEB internal visual inspections to include the absence of indications of dust accumulation on the bus bar, on the insulators, and in the duct, in addition to the absence of indications of moisture intrusion into the duct. Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 to inspect bolted connections at least once every five years if performed visually or at least once every ten years using quantitative measurements such as thermography or contact resistance measurements.
#                          COMMITMENT                                    IMPLEMENTATION     SOURCE       RELATED SCHEDULE                LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2:               NL-07-039     A.2.1.18 12   Enhance the Masonry Wall Program for IP2 and IP3
The first inspection will \ occur prior to the period of extended operation.
                                                                        ~eptember 28,                    A.3.1.18
  *to specify that the I P1 intake structure is !ncluded in 12013          -                  B.1.19
    -the program.                                       - -.
IP3:
December 12, 2015 Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program IP2:                                NL-07-039    A.2.1.19 13 to add IP2 480V bus associated with substation A to               ~eptember 28,                    A.3.1.19 the scope of bus inspected.                                       ~013                              B.1.20 NL-07-153 Audit Items Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program IP3:                                                124, for IP2 and IP3 to visually inspect the external surface December 12,                  NL-08-057    133,519 of MEB enclosure assemblies for loss of material at               2015 least once every 10 years. The first inspection will occur prior to the period of extended operation and the acceptance criterion will be no significant loss of material.
Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program to add acceptance criteria for MEB internal visual inspections to include the absence of indications of dust accumulation on the bus bar, on the insulators, and in the duct, in addition to the absence of indications of moisture intrusion into the duct.
Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 to inspect bolted connections at least once every five years if performed visually or at least once every ten years using quantitative measurements such as thermography or contact resistance measurements. The first inspection will \
occur prior to the period of extended operation.
The plant will process*a change to applicable site procedure to remove the reference to "re-torquing" connections for phase bus maintenance and bolted connection maintenance.
The plant will process*a change to applicable site procedure to remove the reference to "re-torquing" connections for phase bus maintenance and bolted connection maintenance.
14 Implement the Non-EO Bolted Cable Connections Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA Section B.1.22. r Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 8 of 17 IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.18 28, A.3.1.18 12013 -B.1.19 -** .. IP3: December 12, 2015 IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.19 28, A.3.1.19 B.1.20 NL-07-153 Audit Items IP3: 124, December 12, NL-08-057 133,519 2015 IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.21 September 28, A.3.1.21 2013 B.1.22 IP3: December 12, OAGI0001230 00022 
14                                                                     IP2:                NL-07-039    A.2.1.21 Implement the Non-EO Bolted Cable Connections September 28,                    A.3.1.21 Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA Section 2013                              B.1.22 B.1.22.
# 15 16 17 18 ., Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 9 of 17 COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE IP2: Implement the Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage 28 , Cable Program for-IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA -Section 8.1.23. . . .. . ... . . . This new program will be implemented consistent with the corresponding program described in NUREG-. 1801 SectionXI.E3, Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cables Not Subject To 10 CFR 50.49 Environmental Qualification Requirements.
r                                     IP3:
IP3: December 12, IP2: Implement the Non-EQ Instrumentation Circuits Test September 2 8 , Review Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA 2013 Section 8.1.24. This new program will be implemented consistent with the corresponding program described in NUREG-1801 Section XI.E2, Electrical Cables and Connections Not Subject to 10 CFR 50.49 Environmental Qualification Requirements Used in Instrumentation Circuits.
December 12,
IP3: December 12, 2015 IP2: Implement the Non-EQ Insulated Cables and 1c. Connections Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in peptember 2 8, LRA Section 8.1_.25.
                                                                        ~015 OAGI0001230 00022
This new program will be implemented consistent with the corresponding program described in NUREG-1801* Section XI. E1, Electrical Cables and Connections Not Subject to 1 0 CFR 50.49 Environmental Qualification Requirements.
 
Enhance the Oil Analysis Program for IP2 to sample and analyze lubricating oil used in the S80/Appendix R diesel generator consistent with oil analysis for other site diesel generators.
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 9 of 17
Enhance the Oil Analysis Program for IP2 and IP3 to sample and analyze generator seal oil and turbine hydraulic control oil. Enhance the Oil Analysis Program for IP2 and IP3 to formalize preliminary oil screening for water and particulates and laboratory analyses including defined acceptance criteria for all components included in the scope of this program. The program will specify corrective actions in the event acceptance criteria are not met. Enhance the.Oil Analysis Program for IP2 and IP3 to formalize trending of preliminary oil screening results as well as data provided from independent laboratories.
#                        COMMITMENT                        IMPLEMENTATION     SOURCE       RELATED SCHEDULE                 LRASECTION
IP3: December 12, IP2:
                                                                                          /AUDIT ITEM IP2:               NL-07 -039   A.2.1.22 15 Implement the Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage        ~eptember 28 ,                   A.3.1.22 Cable Program for-IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA Section 8.1.23.         .. . . ... ~ .    ..
28, IP3: December 12, 2015 SOURCE RELATED LRASECTION
                                                          ~
/AUDIT ITEM NL-07 -039 A.2.1.22 A.3.1.22 8.1.23 NL-07-153 Audit item 173 NL-07-039 A.2.1.2:3 A.3.1.23 8.1.24 NL-07-153 Audit item 173 NL-07-039 A.2.1.24 A.3.1.24 8.1.25 NL-07-153 Audit item 173 NL-07-039 A.2.1.25 A.3.1.25 8.1.26 OAGI0001230 00023 
013          -
; .* ., # COMMITMENT 19 Implement the One-Time Program for IP2.: --and I P3 as described in LRA Section B.1.27. *This -new program will be implemented consistent with the corresponding program described in NUREG-1801, Section XI.M32, One-Time Inspection.
8.1.23 NL-07-153   Audit item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3:                                  173 the corresponding program described in NUREG- .        December 12, 1801 SectionXI.E3, Inaccessible Medium-Voltage          ~015 Cables Not Subject To 10 CFR 50.49 Environmental Qualification Requirements.
20 Implement the One-Time Inspection-Small Bore Piping Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA Section B.1.28. This new program will be implemented consistent with the corresponding program described in NUREG-1801, Secti<?n XI.M35, One-Time Inspection of ASME Code Class I Small-Bore Pipina. 21 Enhance the Periodic Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program for IP2 and IP3 as necessary to assure that the effects of aging will be managed such that applicable components will continue to perform their intended functions consistent with the current licensing basis through the period of extended operation.
IP2:               NL-07-039     A.2.1.2:3 16 Implement the Non-EQ Instrumentation Circuits Test September 2 ,                         A.3.1.23 8
22 Enhance the Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program for IP2 and IP3 revising the specimen capsule withdrawal schedules to draw and test a standby capsule to cover the peak reactor vessel fluence expected through the end of the period of extended operation.
Review Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA 2013                             8.1.24 Section 8.1.24.
Enhance the Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program for IP2 and IP3 to require that tested and untested specimens from all capsules pulled from the reactor* vessel are maintained in storaae. 23 Implement the Selective Leaching Program for I P2 and I P3 as described in LRA Section B.1.33. This new program will be implemented consistent with the corresponding program described in NUREG-1801, Section XI.M33 Selective Leaching of Materials.
NL-07-153    Audit item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3:                                 173 the corresponding program described in NUREG-           December 12, 1801 Section XI.E2, Electrical Cables and               2015 Connections Not Subject to 10 CFR 50.49 Environmental Qualification Requirements Used in Instrumentation Circuits.
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 1 0 of 17 ... _ IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.26 jseptember 28, A.3.1.26 j2013 . -B.1.27
IP2:              NL-07-039    A.2.1.24 17 Implement the Non-EQ Insulated Cables and              1c.
* NL-07-153 Audit item IP3: 173 December 12, 2015 IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.27 September 28, A.3.1.27 2013 B.1.28 . NL-07-153  
Connections Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in peptember 2 8,                      A.3.1.24 LRA Section 8.1_.25.                                   ~013                              8.1.25 NL-07-153    Audit item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3:                                  173 the corresponding program described in NUREG-           December 12, 1801* Section XI. E1, Electrical Cables and            ~015 Connections Not Subject to 10 CFR 50.49 Environmental Qualification Requirements.
'Audit item IP3: 173 December 12, IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.28 28, A.3.1.28 12013 B.1.29 IP3: Decembe.r 12, 2015 IP2: . NL-07-039 A.2.1.31 28, A.3.1.31 j2013 B.1.32 IP3: December 12, j2015 IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.32 28, A.3.1.32 B.1.33 NL-07-153 Audit item 'IP3: 173 December 12, 2015 OAGI0001230 00024 
IP2:               NL-07-039    A.2.1.25 18 Enhance the Oil Analysis Program for IP2 to sample
# 24 25 ..... COMMITMENT Enhance the Steam Generator Integrity for, IP2 and IP3 to require that the results of the condition monitoring assessment are compared to the operational assessment performed for the prior operating cycle with differences evaluated.
                                                          ~eptember 28,                    A.3.1.25 and analyze lubricating oil used in the S80/Appendix R diesel generator consistent with oil analysis for    ~013                              8.1.26 other site diesel generators.
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 11 of 17 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE IP2:
IP3:
28;
Enhance the Oil Analysis Program for IP2 and IP3 to    December 12, sample and analyze generator seal oil and turbine      2015 hydraulic control oil.
-IP3: December 12, SOURCE RELATED LAASECTION I AUDIT ITEM NL-07-039 A.2.1.34 A.3.1.34 8.1.35 Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program to IP2: explicitly specify that the following structures are September 28, NL-07-039 A.2.1.35 A.3.1.35 8.1.36 included in the program.
Enhance the Oil Analysis Program for IP2 and IP3 to formalize preliminary oil screening for water and particulates and laboratory analyses including defined acceptance criteria for all components included in the scope of this program. The program will specify corrective actions in the event acceptance criteria are not met.
* 2013
Enhance the.Oil Analysis Program for IP2 and IP3 to formalize trending of preliminary oil screening results as well as data provided from independent laboratories.
* Appendix R diesel generator foundation (IP3)
OAGI0001230 00023
* Appendix R diesel generator fuel oil tank vault (IP3)
 
* Appendix R diesel generator switchgear and enclosure (IP3)
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 10 of 17 ..._
#                        COMMITMENT                        IMPLEMENTATION    SOURCE        RELATED SCHEDULE                  LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2:              NL-07-039      A.2.1.26 19  Implement the One-Time lnsp~ction Program for IP2.:
--                                                          jseptember 28,                   A.3.1.26 and IP3 as described in LRA Section B.1.27.                                               B.1.27 j2013      . -
  *This -new program will be implemented consistent with
* NL-07-153     Audit item the corresponding program described in NUREG-          IP3:                                173 1801, Section XI.M32, One-Time Inspection.              December 12, 2015 IP2:              NL-07-039     A.2.1.27 20  Implement the One-Time Inspection- Small Bore September 28,                    A.3.1.27 Piping Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA 2013                              B.1.28 Section B.1.28.                                                          . NL-07-153   'Audit item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3:                                  173 the corresponding program described in NUREG-           December 12, 1801, Secti<?n XI.M35, One-Time Inspection of ASME .~015 Code Class I Small-Bore Pipina.
IP2:              NL-07-039     A.2.1.28 21  Enhance the Periodic Surveillance and Preventive
                                                            ~eptember 28,                    A.3.1.28 Maintenance Program for IP2 and IP3 as necessary 12013                              B.1.29 to assure that the effects of aging will be managed such that applicable components will continue to IP3:
perform their intended functions consistent with the Decembe.r 12, current licensing basis through the period of extended 2015 operation.
IP2: .             NL-07-039      A.2.1.31 22  Enhance the Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program for IP2 and IP3 revising the specimen capsule withdrawal ~eptember 28, A.3.1.31 j2013                              B.1.32 schedules to draw and test a standby capsule to cover the peak reactor vessel fluence expected IP3:
through the end of the period of extended operation.
December 12, Enhance the Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program for j2015 IP2 and IP3 to require that tested and untested specimens from all capsules pulled from the reactor*
vessel are maintained in storaae.
IP2:              NL-07-039      A.2.1.32 23  Implement the Selective Leaching Program for I P2
                                                            ~eptember 28,                    A.3.1.32 and I P3 as described in LRA Section B.1.33.
                                                            ~013                              B.1.33 This new program will be implemented consistent with                      NL-07-153    Audit item the corresponding program described in NUREG-          'IP3:                                173 1801, Section XI.M33 Selective Leaching of Materials. December 12, 2015 OAGI0001230 00024
 
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 11 of 17
#                      COMMITMENT                        IMPLEMENTATION    SOURCE      RELATED SCHEDULE                LAASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2:            NL-07-039    A.2.1.34 24 Enhance the Steam Generator Integrity ~rogram for,
                                                            ~eptember 28;                  A.3.1.34 IP2 and IP3 to require that the results of the condition ~013        -                   8.1.35 monitoring assessment are compared to the operational assessment performed for the prior IP3:
operating cycle with differences evaluated.
December 12,
                                                            ~015 Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program to            IP2:             NL-07-039     A.2.1.35 25 explicitly specify that the following structures are    September 28,                 A.3.1.35 included in the program.
* 2013                            8.1.36
* Appendix R diesel generator foundation (IP3)                            NL-07-153
* Appendix R diesel generator fuel oil tank vault        IP3:                         Audit itenis (IP3)                                                December 12,                 86, 87, 88,
* Appendix R diesel generator switchgear and            ~015            NL-08-057        417 enclosure (IP3)
* city water storage tank foundation
* city water storage tank foundation
* condensate storage tanks foundation (IP3)
* condensate storage tanks foundation (IP3)
Line 198: Line 342:
* superheater stack
* superheater stack
* transformer/switchyard support structures (IP2)
* transformer/switchyard support structures (IP2)
* waste holdup tank pits (IP2/3) Enhance the Structures*Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to clarify that in addition to structural steel and concrete, the following commodities (including their anchorages) are inspected for each structure as applicable.
* waste holdup tank pits (IP2/3)
* cable trays and supports IP3: December 12, NL-07-153 Audit itenis 86, 87, 88, NL-08-057 417 OAGI0001230 00025 
Enhance the Structures*Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to clarify that in addition to structural steel and concrete, the following commodities (including their anchorages) are inspected for each structure as applicable.
# -COMMITMENT
* cable trays and supports OAGI0001230 00025
 
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 12 of 17
#       -               COMMITMENT                     IMPLEMENTATION    SOURCE      RELATED SCHEDULE                LRA. SECTION I AUDIT ITEM
* concrete portion of reactor vessel supports
* concrete portion of reactor vessel supports
* conduits and supports
* conduits and supports
Line 208: Line 355:
* HVAC duct supports
* HVAC duct supports
* jib cranes
* jib cranes
* manholes and duct banks * *manways, hatches and hatch covers
* manholes and duct banks
  *   *manways, hatches and hatch covers
* monorails
* monorails
* new fuel storage racks
* new fuel storage racks
* sumps, sump screens, strainers and flow barriers Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to inspect inaccessible concrete areas that are exposed by excavation for any reason. IP2 and IP3 will also inspect inaccessible concrete areas in environments where observed conditions in accessible areas exposed to the same environment indicate that significant concrete degradation is occurring.
* sumps, sump screens, strainers and flow barriers Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to inspect inaccessible concrete areas that are exposed by excavation for any reason. IP2 and IP3 will also inspect inaccessible concrete areas in environments where observed conditions in accessible areas exposed to the same environment indicate that significant concrete degradation is occurring.
Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to perform inspections of elastomers (seals, gaskets, seismic joint filler, and roof elastomers) to identify cracking and change in material properties and for inspection of aluminum vents and louvers to identify loss of material.
Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to perform inspections of elastomers (seals, gaskets, seismic joint filler, and roof elastomers) to identify cracking and change in material properties and for inspection of aluminum vents and louvers to identify loss of material.
Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 and I P3 to perform an engineering evaluation of groundwater samples to assess aggressiveness of groundwater to concrete on a periodic basis (at least once every five years). IPEC will obtain samples from at least 5 wells that are representative of the ground water surrounding below-grade site structures and perform an engineering evaluation of the results from those samples for sulfates, pH and chlorides.
Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2                     NL-08-127    Audit Item and I P3 to perform an engineering evaluation of                                       360 groundwater samples to assess aggressiveness of groundwater to concrete on a periodic basis (at least once every five years). IPEC will obtain samples from at least 5 wells that are representative of the ground water surrounding below-grade site structures and perform an engineering evaluation of the results from those samples for sulfates, pH and chlorides.
Additionally, to assess potential indications of spent fuel pool leakage, IPEC will sample for tritium in groundwater wells in close proximity to the IP2 spent fuel pool at least once every 3 months. Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 and I P3 to perform inspection of normally submerged Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 12 of 17 IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRA. SECTION I AUDIT ITEM -NL-08-127 Audit Item 360 OAGI0001230 00026 
Additionally, to assess potential indications of spent fuel pool leakage, IPEC will sample for tritium in groundwater wells in close proximity to the IP2 spent fuel pool at least once every 3 months.
# COMMITMENT concrete portions of the intake structures at least every 5 years. Inspect the baffling/grating partition and . . support platfqrm of the IP3 intake structure at least once every 5 years. Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 and I P3 to perform inspection of the degraded areas of the water control structure once per 3 years rather than the normal frequency of once per 5 years during the PEO. 26. Implement the Thermal Aging Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel (CASS) Program for IP2. and IP3 as described in LRA Section 8.1.37. This new program will be implemented consistent with the corresponding program described in NUREG-1801, Section XI.M12, Thermal Aging Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic*
Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 and I P3 to perform inspection of normally submerged OAGI0001230 00026
Stainless Steel (CASS) Program. 27 Implement the Thermal Aging and Neutron Irradiation Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel ' (CASS) Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA Section B. 1.38. This new program will be implemented consistent with the corresponding program described in NUREG-1801 Section XI.M13, Thermal Aging and Neutron Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel (CASS) Program. 28 Enhance the Water Chemistry Control-Closed Cooling Water Program to maintain water chemistry of the IP2 SBO/Appendix R diesel generator cooling system per EPRI guidelines.*
 
Enhance the Water Chemistry Control-Closed Cooling Water Program to maintain the IP2 and IP3 security generator and fire protection diesel cooling water pH and glycol within limits specified by EPRI guidelines.
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50c286 Page 13 of 17
29 Enhance the Water Chemistry Control -Primary and Secondary Program for IP2 to test sulfates monthly in the RWST with a limit of <150 ppb. Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50c286 Page 13 of 17 IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE I,.RASECTION I AUDIT ITEM -Audit Item 358 IP2:
#                        COMMITMENT                            IMPLEMENTATION   SOURCE       RELATED SCHEDULE               I,.RASECTION I AUDIT ITEM concrete portions of the intake structures at least one.~
A.2.1.36 September 28, A.3.1.36 2013 8.1.37 NL-07-153 Audit item IP3: 173 December 12, 12015 IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.37 28, A.3.1.37 j2013 8.1.38 NL-07-153 Audit item IP3: 173 December 12, 12015 IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.39 28, A.3.1.39 2013 . 8.1.40 NL-08-057 Audit item IP3: 509 December 12, 2015 IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.40 September 28, 8.1.41 2013 OAGI0001230 00027
every 5 years. Inspect the baffling/grating partition and support platfqrm of the IP3 intake structure at least                   -
# 30 31 32 --.,,:*, . 't:l'*.'*
once every 5 years.
COMMITMENT For agiflg management of the reactor vessel internals, lPEC will (1} participate in the industry programs for investigating and managing aging effects on reactor internals; (2} evaluate and implement the results of the industry programs as applicable to the reactor internals; and (3) upon completion of these programs, but not less than 24 months before entering the period of extended operation, submit an inspection plan for reactor internals to the NRC for review and approval.
Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2                                       Audit Item and IP3 to perform inspection of the degraded areas                                           358 of the water control structure once per 3 years rather than the normal frequency of once per 5 years during the PEO.
Additional P-T curves will be submitted as required per 1 0 CFR 50, Appendix G prior to the period of extended operation as part of the Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program. As required by 10 CFR 50.61(b}(4}, IP3 will submit a plant-specific safety analysis for plate 82803-3 to the NRC three years prior to reaching the RT PTs screening criterion.
: 26.                                                             IP2:            NL~07-039      A.2.1.36 Implement the Thermal Aging Embrittlement of Cast September 28,                    A.3.1.36 Austenitic Stainless Steel (CASS) Program for IP2.
Alternatively, the site may choose to implement the revised PTS rule when approved.
2013                              8.1.37 and IP3 as described in LRA Section 8.1.37.
' Attachment 2
NL-07-153    Audit item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3:                                    173 the corresponding program described in NUREG-             December 12, 1801, Section XI.M12, Thermal Aging Embrittlement 12015 of Cast Austenitic* Stainless Steel (CASS) Program.
* NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 14 of 17 IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM 1P2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.41 !September 28, A.3.1.41
IP2:              NL-07-039      A.2.1.37 27   Implement the Thermal Aging and Neutron Irradiation
-1P3: December 12, 1P2: NL-07-039 A.2.2.1.2 September 28, A.3.2.1.2 2013 4.2.3 1P3: December 12, 2015 IP3: NL-07-039 A.3.2.1.4 December 12, 4.2.5 2015 NL-08-127 OAGI0001230 00028 
                                                              ~eptember 28,                    A.3.1.37 Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel (CASS) Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA
*,.;'-\. # COMMITMENT 33 At least 2 years prior to entering the period of extended operation, for the locations identified in LRA -.. *Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3), under the Fatigue Monitoring Program, IP2 and IP3 will implement one or more of the following:
                                                            ' j2013                            8.1.38 NL-07-153    Audit item Section B. 1.38.
(1) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program, Detection of Aging Effects, update the fatigue usage calculations using refined fatigue analyses to determine valid CUFs less than 1.0 when accounting for the effects of reactor water environment.
IP3:                                173 This new program will be implemented consistent with December 12, the corresponding program described in NUREG-             12015 1801 Section XI.M13, Thermal Aging and Neutron Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel (CASS) Program.
This includes applying the appropriate Fen factors to valid CUFs determined in accordance with one of the following:
IP2:              NL-07-039      A.2.1.39 28   Enhance the Water Chemistry Control- Closed Cooling Water Program to maintain water chemistry of     ~epternber 28,                  A.3.1.39 2013                            . 8.1.40 the IP2 SBO/Appendix R diesel generator cooling NL-08-057    Audit item system per EPRI guidelines.*
: 1. For locations in LRA Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3), with existing fatigue analysis valid for the period of extended operation, use the existing CUF. 2. Additional plant-specific locations with a valid CUF may be evaluated.
IP3:                              509 Enhance the Water Chemistry Control- Closed               December 12, Cooling Water Program to maintain the IP2 and IP3         2015 security generator and fire protection diesel cooling water pH and glycol within limits specified by EPRI guidelines.
In particular, the pressurizer lower shell will be reviewed to ensure the surge nozzle remains the limiting component.
IP2:              NL-07-039    A.2.1.40 29   Enhance the Water Chemistry Control - Primary and September 28,                    8.1.41 Secondary Program for IP2 to test sulfates monthly in 2013 the RWST with a limit of <150 ppb.
: 3. Representative CUF values from other plants, adjusted to or enveloping the IPEC plant specific external loads may be used if demonstrated applicable to IPEC. 4. An analysis using an NRC-approved version of the ASME code or NRC-approved alternative (e.g., NRC-approved code case) may be performed to determine a valid CUF. (2) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program, Corrective Actions, repair or replace the affected locations before exceeding a CUF of 1 ,0. 34 IP2 SBO I Appendix R diesel generator will be installed and operational by April30, 2008. This committed change to the facility meets the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59(c)(1) and, therefore, a license amendment pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90 is not required.
OAGI0001230 00027
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 15 of.17 ,
 
* IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION
                                                    -- .,,:*, . 't:l'*.'*
/AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039*
A.2.2.2.3 September 28, A.3.2.2.3
-4.3.3
* NL-07-153 Audit item IP3: 146 December 12, NL-08-021 ComQiete
* NL-10-082 April 30, 2008 NL-07-078 2.1.1.3.5 Complete NL-08-074 OAGI0001230 00029 
.. # COMMITMENT 35 Perform a one-time inspection of representative sample area of IP2 containment liner affected by the 1.973 event behind the insulation, prior to entering the extended period of operation, to assure liner ' degradation is not occurring in this area. Perform a one-time inspection of representative sample area of the IP3 containment steel liner at the juncture with the concrete floor slab, prior to entering the extended period of operation, to assure liner degradation is not occurring in this area. Any degradation will be evaluated for updating of the containment liner analyses as needed. 36 Perform a one-time Inspection and evaluation of a sample of potentially affected I P2 refueling cavity concrete prior to the period of extended operation.
The sample will be obtained by core boring the refueling cavity wall in an area that is susceptible to exposure to borated water leakage. The inspection will include an assessment of embedded reinforcing steel. Additional core bore samples will be taken, if the leakage is not stopped, prior to the end of the first ten* years of the period of extended operation.
A sample of leakage fluid will be analyzed to determine the composition of the fluid. If additional core samples are taken prior to the end of the first ten years of the period of extended operation, a sample of leakage fluid will be analyzed.
37 Enhance the Containment lnservice Inspection (CII-IWL} Program to include inspections of the containment using enhanced characterization of degradation (i.e., quantifying the dimensions of noted indications through the use of optical aids) during the period of extended operation.
The enhancement includes obtaining critical dimensional data of
* degradation where possible through direct measurement or the use of scaling technologies for. photographs, and the use of consistent vantage points for visual inspections.
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 16 of 17. IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION  
* NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 14 of 17
.. I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-08-127 Audit Item .
#                        COMMITMENT                              IMPLEMENTATION       SOURCE       RELATED SCHEDULE                 LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM 1P2:                 NL-07-039      A.2.1.41 30 For agiflg management of the reactor vessel internals,
28, 27
                                                                !September 28,                       A.3.1.41 lPEC will (1} participate in the industry programs for                          -
-..... IP3: December 12, NL-09-018 IP2: NL-08-127 Audit Item September 28, \ 359 2013 NL-09-056 IP2: NL-08-127 Audit Item September 28, 361 2013 IP3: December 12, OAGI0001230 00030 
                                                                  ~011 investigating and managing aging effects on reactor internals; (2} evaluate and implement the results of 1P3:
' . ...:**** ... .. . '"':* .,.1' # COMMITMENT 38 For Reactor Vessel Fluence, should future core loading patterns invalidate the basis for the projected values of RTpts or CvUSE, updated calculations will be provided to the NRC. . 39 Deleted 40 Evaluate plant specific and appropriate industry operating experience and incorporate lessons learned in establishing appropriate monitoring and inspection frequencies to assess aging effects for the new aging management programs.
the industry programs as applicable to the reactor December 12, internals; and (3) upon completion of these programs,
Documentation of the evaluated for each new program w1ll be available on s1te for NRC review prior. to the period of extended operation.
                                                                  ~013 but not less than 24 months before entering the period of extended operation, submit an inspection plan for reactor internals to the NRC for review and approval.
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 17 of 17, _, ,_ IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM *IP2: NL-08-143 4.2.1 !September 28,  
1P2:                  NL-07-039      A.2.2.1.2 31 Additional P-T curves will be submitted as required September 28,                        A.3.2.1.2 per 10 CFR 50, Appendix G prior to the period of 2013                                    4.2.3 extended operation as part of the Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program.
-**-**-**-IP3: December 12, 12015 NL-09-079 IP2: NL-09-106 8.1.6 September 28, 8.1.22 j2013 . 8.1.23 8.1.24 IP3: 8.1.25 December 12, 8;1.27 2015 8.1.28 8.1.33 8.1.37 8.1.38 OAGI0001230_00031}}
1P3:
December 12, 2015 As required by 10 CFR 50.61(b}(4}, IP3 will submit a          IP3:                  NL-07-039      A.3.2.1.4 32 plant-specific safety analysis for plate 82803-3 to the        December 12,                          4.2.5 NRC three years prior to reaching the RTPTs                  2015                  NL-08-127 screening criterion. Alternatively, the site may choose to implement the revised PTS rule when approved.
OAGI0001230 00028
 
                                                      *,.;'-\.
Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 15 of.17 , *
#                                  COMMITMENT                            IMPLEMENTATION      SOURCE      RELATED SCHEDULE                  LRASECTION
                                                                                                        /AUDIT ITEM IP2:               NL-07-039*    A.2.2.2.3 33        At least 2 years prior to entering the period of September 28,                   A.3.2.2.3 extended operation, for the locations identified in LRA
                                                                          ~011          -                  4.3.3
  - ~ .. *Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3), under
        ~
* NL-07-153    Audit item the Fatigue Monitoring Program, IP2 and IP3 will IP3:                                146 implement one or more of the following:
December 12,      NL-08-021 (1) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program,            ~013 Detection of Aging Effects, update the fatigue usage calculations using refined fatigue analyses to determine valid CUFs less than 1.0 when accounting                ComQiete
* NL-10-082 for the effects of reactor water environment. This includes applying the appropriate Fen factors to valid CUFs determined in accordance with one of the following:
: 1. For locations in LRA Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3), with existing fatigue analysis valid for the period of extended operation, use the existing CUF.
: 2. Additional plant-specific locations with a valid CUF may be evaluated. In particular, the pressurizer lower shell will be reviewed to ensure the surge nozzle remains the limiting component.
: 3. Representative CUF values from other plants, adjusted to or enveloping the IPEC plant specific external loads may be used if demonstrated applicable to IPEC.
: 4. An analysis using an NRC-approved version of the ASME code or NRC-approved alternative (e.g., NRC-approved code case) may be performed to determine a valid CUF.
(2) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program, Corrective Actions, repair or replace the affected locations before exceeding a CUF of 1,0.
April 30, 2008  NL-07-078    2.1.1.3.5 34        IP2 SBO I Appendix R diesel generator will be installed and operational by April30, 2008. This Complete      NL-08-074 committed change to the facility meets the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59(c)(1) and, therefore, a license amendment pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90 is not required.
OAGI0001230 00029
 
Attachment 2 NL-10~082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 16 of 17. *~-
    #                        COMMITMENT                            IMPLEMENTATION    SOURCE      RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2:            NL-08-127    Audit Item 35 Perform a one-time inspection of representative
                                                                . ~eptember 28,                    27 sample area of IP2 containment liner affected by the
                                                                  ~013          -
1.973 event behind the insulation, prior to entering the                                           .....
extended period of operation, to assure liner degradation is not occurring in this area.
Perform a one-time inspection of representative              IP3:
sample area of the IP3 containment steel liner at the        December 12, juncture with the concrete floor slab, prior to entering    ~015 the extended period of operation, to assure liner degradation is not occurring in this area.
NL-09-018 Any degradation will be evaluated for updating of the containment liner analyses as needed.
IP2:            NL-08-127    Audit Item 36 Perform a one-time Inspection and evaluation of a                                      \
September 28,                    359 sample of potentially affected I P2 refueling cavity 2013 concrete prior to the period of extended operation.
The sample will be obtained by core boring the refueling cavity wall in an area that is susceptible to exposure to borated water leakage. The inspection will include an assessment of embedded reinforcing steel.
Additional core bore samples will be taken, if the                            NL-09-056 leakage is not stopped, prior to the end of the first ten*
years of the period of extended operation.
NL-09~079 A sample of leakage fluid will be analyzed to determine the composition of the fluid. If additional core samples are taken prior to the end of the first ten years of the period of extended operation, a sample of leakage fluid will be analyzed.
IP2:            NL-08-127    Audit Item 37 Enhance the Containment lnservice Inspection (CII-September 28,                    361 IWL} Program to include inspections of the 2013 containment using enhanced characterization of degradation (i.e., quantifying the dimensions of noted IP3:
indications through the use of optical aids) during the December 12, period of extended operation. The enhancement includes obtaining critical dimensional data of *            ~015 degradation where possible through direct measurement or the use of scaling technologies for.
photographs, and the use of consistent vantage points for visual inspections.
OAGI0001230 00030
 
                                              .,.1' Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 17 of 17, _,
    #                      COMMITMENT                            IMPLEMENTATION     SOURCE         RELATED SCHEDULE                     LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM
                                                                *IP2:             NL-08-143           4.2.1 38 For Reactor Vessel Fluence, should future core
                                                                !September 28, loading patterns invalidate the basis for the projected
                                                                ~013          -
values of RTpts or CvUSE, updated calculations will                          **-**-**-
be provided to the NRC.
                                            .                    IP3:
December 12, 12015 NL-09-079 39 Deleted IP2:             NL-09-106           8.1.6 40 Evaluate plant specific and appropriate industry September 28,                         8.1.22 operating experience and incorporate lessons learned j2013     .                           8.1.23 in establishing appropriate monitoring and inspection 8.1.24 frequencies to assess aging effects for the new aging IP3:                                 8.1.25 management programs. Documentation of the December 12,                         8;1.27 o~erating ~xperienc~ evaluated for each new program 2015                                 8.1.28 w1ll be available on s1te for NRC review prior. to the period of extended operation.                                                                    8.1.33 8.1.37 8.1.38 OAGI0001230_00031}}

Latest revision as of 14:15, 10 March 2020

New York State (NYS) Pre-Filed Evidentiary Hearing Exhibit NYS000352, Entergy'S Submission to the ASLB Conveying Entergy'S NL-10-082 Communication to NRC Staff (Aug. 9, 2010) Re Indian Point Lic. Renwl.L Applctn.
ML11356A335
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/10/2010
From: Sutton K
Morgan, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP
To: Lathrop K, Lawrence Mcdade, Richard Wardwell
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
Shared Package
ML11356A332 List:
References
RAS 21620, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01
Download: ML11356A335 (31)


Text

NYS000352 Submitted: December 22, 2011 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111' Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Morgan Lewis Tel: 202.739.3000 C 0 U N S E L 0 R S . A T L A. W Fax: 202.739.3001 DOCKETED USNRC .

www.morganlewis.com August 11, 2010 (8:30a.m.)

Kathryn M. Sutton Partner OFFICE OF SECRETARY 202.739.5738 RULEMAKINGS AND

.. ksutton@morganlewis.com ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Paul M. Bessette

  • Partner 202.739.5796 pbessette @morgan lewis .com August 10; 2010

\ .

Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Docket: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3), Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR RE: Notification of Entergy's Submittal Regarding Completion of Commitment 33 for Indian Point Units 2 and 3

Dear Administrative Judges:

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ("Entergy") is providing this notice to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board and the parties regarding Entergy' s August 9, 2010 submittal of a.

notice-,to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") regarding completion of Commitment 33 to the Indian Point Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application associated with the Fatigue Monitoring Program. See NL-1 0-082, Letter from Fred Dacimo, Entergy, to NRC Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application- Completion of Commitment #33 Regarding the Fatigue Monitoring Program" (August 9, 2010). A copy ofNL-10-082 is attached for your reference. Counsel is providing this notification insofar as the completion of Commitment 33 may be relevant and material to admitted contentions NYS-26/26A and Riverkeeper TC-1/lA.

OAGI0001230 00001

Morgan Lewis Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman COUNSELORS AT LAW Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop August 10, 201 0 Page 2 Respectfully submitted,

. ~Jh<f!-:tr Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.

Paul M. Bessette, Esq.

Counsel for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

CBM/als Attachment cc: Service List OAGI0001230_00002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

  • BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of . ) Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and

) 286-LR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. *)

)

(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3) )


~-----------) August 10,2010 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the letter entitled "Notification ofEntergy's Submittal Regarding Completion of Commitment 33 for Indian Point Units 2 and 3," dated August 10,

  • 2010, were served this lOth day of August, 2010 upon the persons listed below, by first class mail and e-mail as shown below.

Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Lawrence G: McDade, Chair Kaye D. Lathrop Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 * . 190 Cedar Lane E.

U.S. Nuciear Regulatory Commission Ridgway, CO 81432 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: kdl2@nrc.gov)

(E-mail: lgml @nrc.gov)

Administrative Judge Office of the Secretary*

Richard E. Wardwell Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: T-3 F23 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov)

Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: rew@nrc.gov)

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Josh Kirstein, Law Clerk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: 0-1604 Mail Stop: T-3 F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (E-mail: ocaamail@nrc.gov) Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Josh.Kirstein@nrc.gov)

OAGI0001230 00003

Page 2 Sherwin E. Turk, Esq. Greg Spicer, Esq.

Beth N. Mizuno, Esq. Office ofthe Westchester County Attorney David E. Roth, Esq. 148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor ..

Brian G. Harris, Esq. White Plains, NY 10601 Andrea Z. Jones, Esq. (E-mail: gss 1@westchestergov. com)

Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: 0-15 D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: set@nrc.gov)

(E-mail: bnml @nrc.gov)

(E-mail: david.roth@nrc.gov)

(E-mail: brian.harris(a),nrc.gov)

(E-mail: andrea.jones@nrc.gov)

Manna J o Greene Thomas F. Wood, Esq.

Enviromnental Director Daniel Riesel, Esq.

Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. Ms. Jessica Steinberg, J.D.

724 Wolcott Avenue Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.

Beacon, NY 12508 460 Park Avenue (E-mail: manna jo@cl earwater.or g) New York, NY 10022 (E-mail: driesel@sprlaw.com)

(E-mail: jsteinberg@sprlaw.com)

Stephen C. Filler, Board Member John Louis Parker, Esq.

Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. Regional Attorney 303 South Broadway, Suite 222 Office of General Counsel, Region 3 Tarrytown, NY 10591 NYS Dept. of Enviromnental Conservation (E-mail: sfiller@nylawline.com) 21 S. Putt Comers Road New Paltz, New York 12561-1620 (E-mail: jlparker@,gw.dec.state.ny.us)

Ross Gould, Member Michael J. Delaney, V.P.- Energy Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. New York City Economic Development 10 Park Avenue, #5L Corp.

New York, NY 10016 110 William Street (E-mail: rgouldesq@gmail.com) New York, NY 10038 (E-mail: mdelaney@nycedc.com)

OAGI0001230 00004

Page 3 Phillip Musegaas, Esq. Daniel E. O'Neill, Mayor Deborah Brancato, Esq. James Siermarco, M.S.

Riverkeeper, Inc. Liaison to Indian Point 828 South Broadway Village of Buchanan Tarrytown, NY 10591 MUnicipal Building (E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org) 236 Tate Avenue (E-mail: dbrancato@riverkeeper.org) Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 (E-mail: vob@bestweb.net)

Robert D. Snook, Esq. Mylan L. Denerstein, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General Executive Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General Social Justice State of Connecticut Office of the Attorney General 55 Elm Street ofthe State ofNew York P.O. Box 120 120 Broadway, 25 1h Floor Hartford, CT 06141-0120 New York, New York 10271 (E-mail: Robert.Snook@po.state.ct.us) (E-mail: Mylan.Denerstein@oag.state.ny.us).

Andrew M. Cuomo, Esq. Janice A. Dean Attorney General ofthe State ofNew York Office of the Attorney General John J. Sipos, Esq. ofthe State ofNew York Charlie Donaldson Esq. Assistant Attorney General Assistants Attorney General 120 Broadway, 26th Floor The Capitol New York; New York 10271 Albany, NY 12224-0341 (E-mail: Janice.Dean@oag.state.ny.us) *

(E-mail: john.sipos@oag.state.ny.us)

Joan Leary Matthews, Esq.

Senior Attorney for Special Projects Office of the General Counsel New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, 14th Floor Albany, NY 12207 (E-mail: jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny. us)

OAGI0001230 00005

Page4

  • Original and 2 copies provided to the Office oft/Secretary. . .
  • .. ~~
  • Paul M. Bessette, Esq.

Counsel for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

DBJ/65420875. 1 OAGI0001230 00006

' ' .~

Entergy Nuclear Northeast Iridian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, N.Y. 10511-0249 Tel (914) 788-2055.

Fred Dacimo Vice President License Renewal NL-10-082 August 9, 2010 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

License Renewal Application- Completion of Commitment#33 Regarding the Fatigue Monitoring Program Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64 REFERENCE 1. Entergy Letter dated April 23, 2007, F. R. Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application" (NL-07 -039)

2. Entergy Letter dated April 23, 2007, F. R. Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application Boundary Drawings (NL-07-040)
3. Entergy Letter dated April 23, 2007, F. R. Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application Environmental Report
  • References (NI:.-07 -041)
4. Entergy Letter dated October 11, 2007, F. R, Dacirrio to Document Control Desk, "License Renewal Application (LRA)" (NL-07-124)
5. Entergy Letter November 14, 2007, F. R, Dacimo to Document Control Desk, "Supplement to License Renewa'l Application (LRA)

Environmental Report References" (NL-07-133)

Dear Sir or Madam:

In the referenced letters, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. applied for renewal of the Indian Point Energy Center operating license. This letter contains information supporting the completion of commitment 33 to the License Renewal Application regarding the Fatigue Monitoring Program.

OAGI0001230 00007

NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 2 of 2 There are no new commitments identified in this submittal. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact Mr. Robert Walpole at 914-734-6710.

Sincerely,

!3J~

FD/mb Attachments: 1. Environmental Fatigue Evaluations

2. List of Regulatory Commitments cc: Mr. S. J. Collins, Regional Administrator, NRC Region I Mr. J. Boska, Senior Project Manager, NRC, NRR, DORL Mr. SherWin E. Turk, NRC Office of General Counsel, Special Counsel Ms. Kimberly Green, NRC Safety Project Manager
  • NRC Resident Inspectors Office, Indian Point Mr. Paul Eddy, NYS Dept. of Public Service Mr. Francis J. Murray, Jr., President and CEO, NYSERDA OAGI0001230 00008

ATTACHMENT 1 TO NL-10-082 Environmental Fatigue Evaluations ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-247 & 50-286 OAGI0001230 00009

Attachment 1

. NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 1 of 4 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL FATIGUE EVALUATIONS Environmental Fatigue Evaluation for Indian Point Unit 2 and Unit 3 Entergy has applied* for renewed operating licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 and Unit 3 (IP2 and IP3). In the license renewal application, Entergy committed to address environmentally assisted fatigue. Entergy's commitment, amended by letter, NL-08-021, dated January 22, 2008, reads as follows. '

At least 2 years prior to entering the period of extended operation, for the locations identified in LRA Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3}, under the Fatigue Monitoring Program, IP2 and IP3 will implement one or more of the following:

(1) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program, Detection of Aging Effects, update the fatigue usage calculations using refined fatigue analyses to determine valid CUFs less than 1.0 when accounting for the effects of reactor water environment. This includes applying the appropriate Fen factors to valid CUFs determined in accordance with one of the following:

I. For locations in LRA Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3), with existing fatigue analysis valid for the period of extended operation, use the existing CUF.

2. Additional plant-specific locations with a valid CUF may be evaluated~ In particular, the pressurizer lower shell will be reviewed to ensure the surge nozzle remains the limiting component.
3. Representative CUF values from other plants, adjusted to or enveloping the IPEC plant specific extern(J.IIoads may be used ifdemonstrated applicable to IPEC.
4. An analysis using an NRC-approved version of the ASME code or NRC-approved alternative (e.g., NRC-approved code case) may be performed to determine a valid CUF.

(2) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program, Corrective Actions, repair or replace the affected locations before exceeding a CUF of 1.0.

Entergy has updated the fatigue usage calculations using refined fatigue analyses to determine CUFs when accounting for the effects of reactor water environment. This includes applying the appropriate Fen factors to valid CUFs for the locations shown in LRA Table 4.3-13 and LRA Table 4.3-14.

The tables from the LRA are repeated as follows with the updated CUF values inserted.

The results of the refined analyses are shown in the tables as underlined values.

OAGI0001230 00010

    • . l*. ** ,**, II*

Attachment 1 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 2 of 4 ,

Table 4.3-13, IP2 Cumulative Usage Factors for NUREG/CR-6260 Limiting Locations Per NUREG/CR-6583 or IP2 Plant* . CUF of NUREG/CR-5704 NUREG-6260 Generic Material Specific Location Type .. Record Location Environmental!

Fen y Adjusted CUF

.1 Vessel shell and Bottom head to lower head shell LAS 0.004 2.45 O.o1 2 Vessel inlet and Reactor vessel outlet nozzles inlet nozzle LAS 0.05 2.45' 0.12 2 Vessel inlet and Reactor vessel outlet nozzles outlet nozzle LAS 0.281 2.45 0.69 3 Pressurizer surge Pressurizer (},2e4 2.46 M46 line nozzles surge line LAS*

0.109 1.74 0.188 noZ.zle 3 Pressurizer surge Surge line piping g,.e ~ ~

lirie piping to safe end weld ss 0.062 13.26 0.822 4 RCS piping Charging system Q...99 ~ ~

charging system nozzle ss 0.0323 8.7 0.2809 nozzle 5 RCS piping safety NA NAa ~ NA:!

injection nozzle ss 0.1083 7.8975 0.8553 6 RHR Class 1 piping NA NAa ~ NA:!

ss Q.Qm. 1M.6. 0.9434 OAGI0001230 00011

Attachment 1 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 3 of 4 Table 4.3*14 IP3 Cumulative* Usage Factors for NUREG/CR-6260 Limiting Locations Per NUREG/CR-6583 or

. CUFof NUREG/CR-5704 IP3 Plant* Material NUREG-6260 Location Specific Location Type Record Environmentally Fen Adjusted CUF 1 Vessel shell and lower Bottom head to head shell LAS 0.02 2.45 0.05 2 Vessel inlet and outlet Reactor vessel nozzles inlet nozzle LAS 0.049 2.45 0.12 2 Vessel inlet and outlet Reactor vessel nozzles outlet nozzle LAS 0.259 2.45 0.64 3 Pressurizer surge line Pressurizer surge ~ 2-:4& ~

nozzles line nozzle LAS 0.0903. 1.74 0.157 3 Pressurizer surge line Surge line piping o;e ~ 9-:2+

piping to safe end weld ss 0.0411 14.45 0.594 4 RCS piping charging NA NAa ~ NAa system nozzle ss 0.1812 3.98 0.722 5 RCS piping safety NA NAa ~ NAa injection nozzle ss 0.1709 5.0117 0.8565 6 RHR Class 1 piping .NA NA2 ~ NAa ss 0.1279 7.79 0.9961

\

OAGI0001230 00012

~ ' '

~

Attachment 1 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 4 of 4..

As described in LRA Section 4.3.3 and shown in Tables 4.3-13 and 4.3-14, the CUFs for the reactor vessel locations were not changed. The evaluation documented in the LRA used bounding Fens applied to the CUFs of record for'the bottom head to shell region, the reactor vessel inlet nozzle and the reactor vessel outlet nozzle. The tables show the Cumulative Usage Factors are all below 1.0 for these three locations tor both units.

The stress and fatigue evaluations tor the remaining piping components listed in Table 4.3-13 and 4.3-14 were performed using standard methods of the ASME Code, Section !II. Detailed stress models of the surge line hot leg nozzle, pressurizer surge nozzle, reactor coolant piping charging system nozzle, reactor coolant piping safety injection nozzle, and the AHA system

. class *1 piping locations were prepared. The analyst developed detailed stress history inputs for all transients considered in the evaluation, which were subsequently used to provide detailed inputs used in the EAF evaluations. The ASME Code evaluations were performed tor the piping components to reduce conservatism in the analyses or because the current licensing basis (CLB) qualification was to the ANSI 831.1 Power Piping Code, which did not require a fatigue usage factor calculation. The evaluations were limited to the stress qualifications related tothe fatigue requirements of the ASME Code. The primary stress qualifications documented in the CLB remain applicable tor the components evaluated.

  • The evaluation of EAF was accomplished through the application of Fen factors, as described in NUREG/CR~5704 for the stainless steels in the pressurizer surge line, the reactor coolant piping charging and safety injection system nozzles, and the RHR system Class l piping. In addition, Fen factors tor the pressurizer surge nozzle dissimilar metal weld also considered the carbon steel factors in NUREG/CR-6583. The Fen factors are calculated based on detailed inputs described in the applicable NUREG and are directly applied tothe ASME Code fatigue results.

The refined fatigue analyses of the Indian Point Unit 2 and Unit 3 piping locations corresponding to the locations identified in NUREG/CR-6260 for older vintage Westinghouse plants demonstrate that cumulative fatigue usage factors including consideration of reactor water environmental effects are below a value of 1.0 for transients postulated tor 60 years of operation.

The results of this evaluation resolve commitment number 33 in the NRC Safety Evaluation Report on license renewal tor Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 and Unit 3.

OAGI0001230 00013

ATTACHMENT 2 TO- NL-10-082 List of Regulatory Commitments ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-247 & 50-286 _

OAGI0001230 00014

. Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 1 of 17 ..

List of Regulatory Commitments Rev. 12 The following table identifies those actions committed to by Entergy in this document.

Changes are shown as strikethroughs for deletions and underlines for additions.

  • COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHED.ULE LRASECTION

/AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.1 1 Enhance the Aboveground Steel Tanks Program for

!september 28, A.3.1.1 IP2 and IP3 to perform thickness measurements of 12013 8.1.1 the bottom surfaces of the condensate storage tanks, city water tank, and fire water tanks once during the IP3:

first ten years of the period of extended operation.

December 12, Enhance the Aboveground Steel Tanks Program for 12015 IP2 and IP3 to require trending of thickness measurements when material loss is detected.

IP2: NL~07-039 A.2.1.2 2 Enhance the Bolting Integrity Program for IP2 and IP3

~eptember 28, A.3.1.2 to clarify that actual yield strength is used in selecting and clarify the ~013 8.1.2 materials for low susceptibility to sec prohibition on use of lubricants containing MoS2 for IP3: NL-07-153 Audit Items bolting.

December 12, 201, 241,.

The Bolting Integrity Program manages loss of 2015 270 preload and loss of material for all external boltina.

OAGI0001230 00015

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 2 of 17 ,

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.5 3 Implement the Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection

!September 28, A.3.1.5 Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA Section B.1.6. ~013 - B.1.6

--* NL-07-153 Audit Item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3: 173 the corresponding program described in NUREG- December 12, 1801 Section XI.M34, Buried Piping and Tanks 12015 Inspection.

Include in the Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection NL-09-106 Program described in LRA Section B.1.6 a risk assessment of in-scope buried piping and tanks that NL-09-111 includes consideration of the impacts of buried piping or tank leakage and of conditions affecting the risk for corrosion. Classify pipe segments and tanks as having a high, medium or low impact of leakage based on the safety class, the hazard posed by fluid contained in the piping and the impact of leakage on reliable plant operation. Determine corrosion risk through consideration of piping or tank material, soil resistivity, drainage, the presence of cathodic protection and the type of coating. Establish inspection priority and frequency for periodic inspections of the in-scope piping and tanks based on the results of the risk assessment. Perform inspections using inspection techniques with demonstrated effectiveness.

OAGI0001230 00016

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 3 of 17_ ~-

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.8 4 Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to A.3.1.8 September 28, include cleaning and inspection of the IP2 GT-1 gas 2013 - 8.1.9 turbine fuel oil storage tanks, IP2 and IP3 ~DG fuel oil. . *- - NL-07-153 Audit items day tanks, IP2 SBO/Appendix R diesel generator fuel 128, 129, IP3:

oil day tank, and IP3 Appendix R fuel oil storage tank 132, December 12, and day tank once every ten years. NL-08-057 491,492, 2015 Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to 510 include quarterly sampling and analysis of the IP2 SBO/Appendix R diesel generator fuel oil day tank, IP2 security diesel fuel oil storage tank, IP2*security diesel fuel oil day tank, and IP3 Appendix R fuel oil storage tank. Particulates, water and sediment checks will be performed on the samples. Filterable solids acceptance criterion will be less than or equal to 10mg/l. Water and sediment acceptance criterion will be less than or equal to 0.05% ..

Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to include thickness measurement of the bottom of the following tanks. once every ten years. IP2: EDG fuel oil storage tanks, EDG fuel oil day tanks, SBO/Appendix R diesel generator fuel oil day tank, GT-1 gas turbine fuel oil storage tanks, and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank; I P3: EDG fuel oil day tanks, EDG fuel oil storage tanks, Appendix R fuel oil storage tank, and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank.

Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to change the analysis for water and <particulates to a quarterly frequency for the following tanks. IP2: GT-1 gas turbine fuel oil storage tanks and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank; IP3: Appendix R fuel oil day tank and diesel fire pump fuel oil storage tank.

Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to specify acceptance criteria for thickness measurements of the fuel oil storage tanks within the scope of the program.

Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to direct samples be taken ~nd include direction to remove water when detected.

Revise applicable procedures to direct sampling of the onsite portable fuel oil contents prior to transferring*

the contents to the storage tanks.

Enhance the Diesel Fuel Monitoring Program to direct the addition of chemicals including biocide when the presence of biological activity is confirmed.

OAGI0001230 00017

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 4 of 17

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE* RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2:. NL-07-039 A.2.1.10 5 Enhance the External Surfaces Monitoring Program September 28, A.3.1.10 for IP2and IP3 to include periodic inspections of 2013 - 8.1.11 systems in scope.and subject to aging management_

review for license renewal in accordance with 10 CFR IP3:

54.4(a)(1) and (a)(3). *Inspections shall include areas December 12, surrounding the subject systems to identify hazards to those systems. Inspections of nearby systems that ~015 could impact the subject systems will include SSCs that are in scope and subject to aging management review for license renewal in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(2).

IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.11 6 Enhance the Fatigue Monitoring Program for IP2 to

!September 28, A.3.1.11 monitor steady state cycles and feedwater cycles*or

~013 8.1.12, perform an evaluation to determine monitoring Is not required. Review the number of allowed events and NL-07-153 Audit Item 164 resolve discrepancies between reference documents and monitoring procedures.

Enhance the Fatigue Monitoring Program for IP3 to IP3:

include all the transients identified. Assure all fatigue !December 12, analysis transients are included with the lowest ~015 limiting numbers. Update the number of design transients accumulated to date.

7 IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.12 Enhance the Fire Protection Program to inspect September 28, A.3.1.12 external surfaces of the IP3 RCP oil collection systems for loss of material each refueling cycle.

state that the IP2 and IP3 diesel fire pump engine December 12,.

sub-systems (including the fuel supply line) shall be 2015 observed while the pump is running. Acceptance criteria will be revised to verify that the diesel engine does not exhibit signs of degradation while running; such as fuel oil, lube oil, coolant, or exhaust gas leakage.

Enhance the Fire Protection Program to speCify that the IP2 and IP3 diesel fire pump engine carbon steel exhaust components are inspected for evidence of corrosion and cracking at least once each operating cycle.

Enhance the Fire Protection Program for IP3 to visually inspect the cable spreading room, 480V

  • switchgear room, and EDG room C02 fire suppression system for signs of degradation, such as corrosion and mechanical damage at least once every six months.

OAGI0001230 00018

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 5 of 17

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.13 8 Enhance the Fire Water Program to include inspection September 28, A.3.1.13 of IP2 and IP.3 hose reels for evidence of corrosion. . 8.1.14 2013 -

.. --*- Acceptance criteria will be revised to verify no NL-07-15~ Audit Items unacceptable signs of degradation.

IP3: 105, 106 Enhance the Fire Water Program to replace all or test December 12, NL-08-014 a sample of IP2 and IP3 sprinkler heads required for 2015 10 CFR 50.48. using guidance of NFPA 25 (2002 edition), Section 5.3.1.1.1 before the end of the 50-year sprinkler head service life and at 10-year intervals thereafter during the extended period of operatic~ to ensure that signs of degradation, such as corrosion, are detected in a timely manner.

Enhance the Fire Water Program to perform wall thickness evaluations of IP2 and IP3 fire protection.

piping on system components using non-intrusive techniques {e.g., volumetric testing) to identify evidence of loss of material due to corrosion. These inspections will be performed before the end of the current operating term and at intervals thereafter during the period of extended operation. Results.of the initial evaluations will be used to determine the appropriate inspection interval to ensure aging effects are identified prior to loss of intended function.

Enhance the Fire Water Program to inspect the internal surface of foam based fire suppression tanks.

Acceptance criteria will be enhanced to verify no significant corrosion.

OAGI0001230 00019

I .

Attachment 2

  • Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 -

Page 6 of 17 .

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM "IP2: NL-07~039 A.2.1.15 9 Enhance the Flux Thimble Tube Inspection Program September 28, A.3.1.15 for IP2 and IP3 to implement comparisons to wear 2013 - 8.~.16 rates identified in WCAP-12866~ _Include provisions to.

compare data to the previous performances and IP3:

perform evaluations regarding-change to test

. December 12, -

frequency and scope.

2015 ..

Enhance the Flux Thimble Tube Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 to specify the acceptance criteria as \

outlined in WCAP-12866 or other plant-specific values based .on evaluation of previous test results.

Enhance the Flux Thimble Tube Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 to direct evaluation and performance of corrective actions based on tubes that exceed or are projected to exceed the acceptance criteria. Also stipulate that flux thimble tubes that cannot be inspected over the tube length and cannot be shown by analysis to be satisfactory for continued service, must be removed from service to ensure the integrity of _the reactor coolant system pressure boundary.

OAGI0001230 00020

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 7 of 17

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHED,ULE LRASECTION

/AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A ..2.1.16 10 Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for A.3.1.16

!september 28, IP2 and IP3 to include the following heat exchangers . 8.1.17, 12013 in the. scope of the program. *Nt::o7-t53 Audit Item

  • Safety injection pump lube oil heat exchangers IP3:. 52 December 12,
  • RHR heat exchangers ~015 .
  • RHR pump seal coolers
  • Non-regenerative heat exchangers
  • Charging pump seal water heat exchangers
  • Charging pump fluid drive coolers
  • Charging pump crankcase oil coolers
  • Spent fuel pit heat exchangers
  • Waste gas compressor heat exchangers
  • SBO/Appendix R diesel jacket water heat exchanger (IP2 only)

Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to perform visual inspection on heat exchangers where non-destructive examination, such as eddy current inspection, is not possible due to heat exchanger design limitations.

Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to include consideration of material-environment combinations. when determining sample population of heat exchangers.

Enhance the Heat Exchanger Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to establish minimum tube wall thickness for the new heat exchangers identified in the scope of the program. Establish acceptance criteria for heat exchangers visually inspected to include no indication of tube erosion, vibration wear, corrosion, pitting, NL-09-018 fouling, or scalino.

NL-09-056 11 Delete commitment.

OAG 10001230_ 00021

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 8 of 17

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.18 12 Enhance the Masonry Wall Program for IP2 and IP3

~eptember 28, A.3.1.18

  • to specify that the I P1 intake structure is !ncluded in 12013 - B.1.19

-the program. - -.

IP3:

December 12, 2015 Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.19 13 to add IP2 480V bus associated with substation A to ~eptember 28, A.3.1.19 the scope of bus inspected. ~013 B.1.20 NL-07-153 Audit Items Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program IP3: 124, for IP2 and IP3 to visually inspect the external surface December 12, NL-08-057 133,519 of MEB enclosure assemblies for loss of material at 2015 least once every 10 years. The first inspection will occur prior to the period of extended operation and the acceptance criterion will be no significant loss of material.

Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program to add acceptance criteria for MEB internal visual inspections to include the absence of indications of dust accumulation on the bus bar, on the insulators, and in the duct, in addition to the absence of indications of moisture intrusion into the duct.

Enhance the Metal-Enclosed Bus Inspection Program for IP2 and IP3 to inspect bolted connections at least once every five years if performed visually or at least once every ten years using quantitative measurements such as thermography or contact resistance measurements. The first inspection will \

occur prior to the period of extended operation.

The plant will process*a change to applicable site procedure to remove the reference to "re-torquing" connections for phase bus maintenance and bolted connection maintenance.

14 IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.21 Implement the Non-EO Bolted Cable Connections September 28, A.3.1.21 Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA Section 2013 B.1.22 B.1.22.

r IP3:

December 12,

~015 OAGI0001230 00022

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 9 of 17

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION

/AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07 -039 A.2.1.22 15 Implement the Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage ~eptember 28 , A.3.1.22 Cable Program for-IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA Section 8.1.23. .. . . ... ~ . ..

~

013 -

8.1.23 NL-07-153 Audit item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3: 173 the corresponding program described in NUREG- . December 12, 1801 SectionXI.E3, Inaccessible Medium-Voltage ~015 Cables Not Subject To 10 CFR 50.49 Environmental Qualification Requirements.

IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.2:3 16 Implement the Non-EQ Instrumentation Circuits Test September 2 , A.3.1.23 8

Review Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA 2013 8.1.24 Section 8.1.24.

NL-07-153 Audit item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3: 173 the corresponding program described in NUREG- December 12, 1801 Section XI.E2, Electrical Cables and 2015 Connections Not Subject to 10 CFR 50.49 Environmental Qualification Requirements Used in Instrumentation Circuits.

IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.24 17 Implement the Non-EQ Insulated Cables and 1c.

Connections Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in peptember 2 8, A.3.1.24 LRA Section 8.1_.25. ~013 8.1.25 NL-07-153 Audit item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3: 173 the corresponding program described in NUREG- December 12, 1801* Section XI. E1, Electrical Cables and ~015 Connections Not Subject to 10 CFR 50.49 Environmental Qualification Requirements.

IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.25 18 Enhance the Oil Analysis Program for IP2 to sample

~eptember 28, A.3.1.25 and analyze lubricating oil used in the S80/Appendix R diesel generator consistent with oil analysis for ~013 8.1.26 other site diesel generators.

IP3:

Enhance the Oil Analysis Program for IP2 and IP3 to December 12, sample and analyze generator seal oil and turbine 2015 hydraulic control oil.

Enhance the Oil Analysis Program for IP2 and IP3 to formalize preliminary oil screening for water and particulates and laboratory analyses including defined acceptance criteria for all components included in the scope of this program. The program will specify corrective actions in the event acceptance criteria are not met.

Enhance the.Oil Analysis Program for IP2 and IP3 to formalize trending of preliminary oil screening results as well as data provided from independent laboratories.

OAGI0001230 00023

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 10 of 17 ..._

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.26 19 Implement the One-Time lnsp~ction Program for IP2.:

-- jseptember 28, A.3.1.26 and IP3 as described in LRA Section B.1.27. B.1.27 j2013 . -

  • This -new program will be implemented consistent with
  • NL-07-153 Audit item the corresponding program described in NUREG- IP3: 173 1801,Section XI.M32, One-Time Inspection. December 12, 2015 IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.27 20 Implement the One-Time Inspection- Small Bore September 28, A.3.1.27 Piping Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA 2013 B.1.28 Section B.1.28. . NL-07-153 'Audit item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3: 173 the corresponding program described in NUREG- December 12, 1801, Secti<?n XI.M35, One-Time Inspection of ASME .~015 Code Class I Small-Bore Pipina.

IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.28 21 Enhance the Periodic Surveillance and Preventive

~eptember 28, A.3.1.28 Maintenance Program for IP2 and IP3 as necessary 12013 B.1.29 to assure that the effects of aging will be managed such that applicable components will continue to IP3:

perform their intended functions consistent with the Decembe.r 12, current licensing basis through the period of extended 2015 operation.

IP2: . NL-07-039 A.2.1.31 22 Enhance the Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program for IP2 and IP3 revising the specimen capsule withdrawal ~eptember 28, A.3.1.31 j2013 B.1.32 schedules to draw and test a standby capsule to cover the peak reactor vessel fluence expected IP3:

through the end of the period of extended operation.

December 12, Enhance the Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program for j2015 IP2 and IP3 to require that tested and untested specimens from all capsules pulled from the reactor*

vessel are maintained in storaae.

IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.32 23 Implement the Selective Leaching Program for I P2

~eptember 28, A.3.1.32 and I P3 as described in LRA Section B.1.33.

~013 B.1.33 This new program will be implemented consistent with NL-07-153 Audit item the corresponding program described in NUREG- 'IP3: 173 1801,Section XI.M33 Selective Leaching of Materials. December 12, 2015 OAGI0001230 00024

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 11 of 17

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LAASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.34 24 Enhance the Steam Generator Integrity ~rogram for,

~eptember 28; A.3.1.34 IP2 and IP3 to require that the results of the condition ~013 - 8.1.35 monitoring assessment are compared to the operational assessment performed for the prior IP3:

operating cycle with differences evaluated.

December 12,

~015 Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program to IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.35 25 explicitly specify that the following structures are September 28, A.3.1.35 included in the program.

  • 2013 8.1.36
  • Appendix R diesel generator foundation (IP3) NL-07-153
  • Appendix R diesel generator fuel oil tank vault IP3: Audit itenis (IP3) December 12, 86, 87, 88,
  • Appendix R diesel generator switchgear and ~015 NL-08-057 417 enclosure (IP3)
  • city water storage tank foundation
  • condensate storage tanks foundation (IP3)
  • containment access facility and annex (IP3)
  • discharge canal (I P2/3)
  • fire pumphouse (IP2)
  • fire protection pumphouse (IP3)
  • fire water storage tank foundations (IP2/3)
  • gas turbine 1 fuel storage tank foundation
  • maintenance and outage building-elevated passageway (IP2)
  • new station security building (IP2)
  • nuclear service building (IP1)
  • primary water storage tank foundation (IP3)
  • refueling water storage tank foundation (IP3)
  • security access and office building (IP3)
  • superheater stack
  • transformer/switchyard support structures (IP2)
  • waste holdup tank pits (IP2/3)

Enhance the Structures*Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to clarify that in addition to structural steel and concrete, the following commodities (including their anchorages) are inspected for each structure as applicable.

  • cable trays and supports OAGI0001230 00025

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 12 of 17

  1. - COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRA. SECTION I AUDIT ITEM
  • concrete portion of reactor vessel supports
  • conduits and supports
  • cranes,_rails and girders
  • equipment pads and foundations
  • fire proofing (pyrocrete)
  • jib cranes
  • manholes and duct banks
  • *manways, hatches and hatch covers
  • monorails
  • new fuel storage racks
  • sumps, sump screens, strainers and flow barriers Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to inspect inaccessible concrete areas that are exposed by excavation for any reason. IP2 and IP3 will also inspect inaccessible concrete areas in environments where observed conditions in accessible areas exposed to the same environment indicate that significant concrete degradation is occurring.

Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 and IP3 to perform inspections of elastomers (seals, gaskets, seismic joint filler, and roof elastomers) to identify cracking and change in material properties and for inspection of aluminum vents and louvers to identify loss of material.

Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 NL-08-127 Audit Item and I P3 to perform an engineering evaluation of 360 groundwater samples to assess aggressiveness of groundwater to concrete on a periodic basis (at least once every five years). IPEC will obtain samples from at least 5 wells that are representative of the ground water surrounding below-grade site structures and perform an engineering evaluation of the results from those samples for sulfates, pH and chlorides.

Additionally, to assess potential indications of spent fuel pool leakage, IPEC will sample for tritium in groundwater wells in close proximity to the IP2 spent fuel pool at least once every 3 months.

Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 and I P3 to perform inspection of normally submerged OAGI0001230 00026

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50c286 Page 13 of 17

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE I,.RASECTION I AUDIT ITEM concrete portions of the intake structures at least one.~

every 5 years. Inspect the baffling/grating partition and support platfqrm of the IP3 intake structure at least -

once every 5 years.

Enhance the Structures Monitoring Program for IP2 Audit Item and IP3 to perform inspection of the degraded areas 358 of the water control structure once per 3 years rather than the normal frequency of once per 5 years during the PEO.

26. IP2: NL~07-039 A.2.1.36 Implement the Thermal Aging Embrittlement of Cast September 28, A.3.1.36 Austenitic Stainless Steel (CASS) Program for IP2.

2013 8.1.37 and IP3 as described in LRA Section 8.1.37.

NL-07-153 Audit item This new program will be implemented consistent with IP3: 173 the corresponding program described in NUREG- December 12, 1801,Section XI.M12, Thermal Aging Embrittlement 12015 of Cast Austenitic* Stainless Steel (CASS) Program.

IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.37 27 Implement the Thermal Aging and Neutron Irradiation

~eptember 28, A.3.1.37 Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel (CASS) Program for IP2 and IP3 as described in LRA

' j2013 8.1.38 NL-07-153 Audit item Section B. 1.38.

IP3: 173 This new program will be implemented consistent with December 12, the corresponding program described in NUREG- 12015 1801 Section XI.M13, Thermal Aging and Neutron Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel (CASS) Program.

IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.39 28 Enhance the Water Chemistry Control- Closed Cooling Water Program to maintain water chemistry of ~epternber 28, A.3.1.39 2013 . 8.1.40 the IP2 SBO/Appendix R diesel generator cooling NL-08-057 Audit item system per EPRI guidelines.*

IP3: 509 Enhance the Water Chemistry Control- Closed December 12, Cooling Water Program to maintain the IP2 and IP3 2015 security generator and fire protection diesel cooling water pH and glycol within limits specified by EPRI guidelines.

IP2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.40 29 Enhance the Water Chemistry Control - Primary and September 28, 8.1.41 Secondary Program for IP2 to test sulfates monthly in 2013 the RWST with a limit of <150 ppb.

OAGI0001230 00027

-- .,,:*, . 't:l'*.'*

Attachment 2

  • NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 14 of 17
  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM 1P2: NL-07-039 A.2.1.41 30 For agiflg management of the reactor vessel internals,

!September 28, A.3.1.41 lPEC will (1} participate in the industry programs for -

~011 investigating and managing aging effects on reactor internals; (2} evaluate and implement the results of 1P3:

the industry programs as applicable to the reactor December 12, internals; and (3) upon completion of these programs,

~013 but not less than 24 months before entering the period of extended operation, submit an inspection plan for reactor internals to the NRC for review and approval.

1P2: NL-07-039 A.2.2.1.2 31 Additional P-T curves will be submitted as required September 28, A.3.2.1.2 per 10 CFR 50, Appendix G prior to the period of 2013 4.2.3 extended operation as part of the Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program.

1P3:

December 12, 2015 As required by 10 CFR 50.61(b}(4}, IP3 will submit a IP3: NL-07-039 A.3.2.1.4 32 plant-specific safety analysis for plate 82803-3 to the December 12, 4.2.5 NRC three years prior to reaching the RTPTs 2015 NL-08-127 screening criterion. Alternatively, the site may choose to implement the revised PTS rule when approved.

OAGI0001230 00028

  • ,.;'-\.

Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 15 of.17 , *

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION

/AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-07-039* A.2.2.2.3 33 At least 2 years prior to entering the period of September 28, A.3.2.2.3 extended operation, for the locations identified in LRA

~011 - 4.3.3

- ~ .. *Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3), under

~

  • NL-07-153 Audit item the Fatigue Monitoring Program, IP2 and IP3 will IP3: 146 implement one or more of the following:

December 12, NL-08-021 (1) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program, ~013 Detection of Aging Effects, update the fatigue usage calculations using refined fatigue analyses to determine valid CUFs less than 1.0 when accounting ComQiete

  • NL-10-082 for the effects of reactor water environment. This includes applying the appropriate Fen factors to valid CUFs determined in accordance with one of the following:
1. For locations in LRA Table 4.3-13 (IP2) and LRA Table 4.3-14 (IP3), with existing fatigue analysis valid for the period of extended operation, use the existing CUF.
2. Additional plant-specific locations with a valid CUF may be evaluated. In particular, the pressurizer lower shell will be reviewed to ensure the surge nozzle remains the limiting component.
3. Representative CUF values from other plants, adjusted to or enveloping the IPEC plant specific external loads may be used if demonstrated applicable to IPEC.
4. An analysis using an NRC-approved version of the ASME code or NRC-approved alternative (e.g., NRC-approved code case) may be performed to determine a valid CUF.

(2) Consistent with the Fatigue Monitoring Program, Corrective Actions, repair or replace the affected locations before exceeding a CUF of 1,0.

April 30, 2008 NL-07-078 2.1.1.3.5 34 IP2 SBO I Appendix R diesel generator will be installed and operational by April30, 2008. This Complete NL-08-074 committed change to the facility meets the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59(c)(1) and, therefore, a license amendment pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90 is not required.

OAGI0001230 00029

Attachment 2 NL-10~082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 16 of 17. *~-

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM IP2: NL-08-127 Audit Item 35 Perform a one-time inspection of representative

. ~eptember 28, 27 sample area of IP2 containment liner affected by the

~013 -

1.973 event behind the insulation, prior to entering the .....

extended period of operation, to assure liner degradation is not occurring in this area.

Perform a one-time inspection of representative IP3:

sample area of the IP3 containment steel liner at the December 12, juncture with the concrete floor slab, prior to entering ~015 the extended period of operation, to assure liner degradation is not occurring in this area.

NL-09-018 Any degradation will be evaluated for updating of the containment liner analyses as needed.

IP2: NL-08-127 Audit Item 36 Perform a one-time Inspection and evaluation of a \

September 28, 359 sample of potentially affected I P2 refueling cavity 2013 concrete prior to the period of extended operation.

The sample will be obtained by core boring the refueling cavity wall in an area that is susceptible to exposure to borated water leakage. The inspection will include an assessment of embedded reinforcing steel.

Additional core bore samples will be taken, if the NL-09-056 leakage is not stopped, prior to the end of the first ten*

years of the period of extended operation.

NL-09~079 A sample of leakage fluid will be analyzed to determine the composition of the fluid. If additional core samples are taken prior to the end of the first ten years of the period of extended operation, a sample of leakage fluid will be analyzed.

IP2: NL-08-127 Audit Item 37 Enhance the Containment lnservice Inspection (CII-September 28, 361 IWL} Program to include inspections of the 2013 containment using enhanced characterization of degradation (i.e., quantifying the dimensions of noted IP3:

indications through the use of optical aids) during the December 12, period of extended operation. The enhancement includes obtaining critical dimensional data of * ~015 degradation where possible through direct measurement or the use of scaling technologies for.

photographs, and the use of consistent vantage points for visual inspections.

OAGI0001230 00030

.,.1' Attachment 2 NL-10-082 Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 Page 17 of 17, _,

  1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION SOURCE RELATED SCHEDULE LRASECTION I AUDIT ITEM
  • IP2: NL-08-143 4.2.1 38 For Reactor Vessel Fluence, should future core

!September 28, loading patterns invalidate the basis for the projected

~013 -

values of RTpts or CvUSE, updated calculations will **-**-**-

be provided to the NRC.

. IP3:

December 12, 12015 NL-09-079 39 Deleted IP2: NL-09-106 8.1.6 40 Evaluate plant specific and appropriate industry September 28, 8.1.22 operating experience and incorporate lessons learned j2013 . 8.1.23 in establishing appropriate monitoring and inspection 8.1.24 frequencies to assess aging effects for the new aging IP3: 8.1.25 management programs. Documentation of the December 12, 8;1.27 o~erating ~xperienc~ evaluated for each new program 2015 8.1.28 w1ll be available on s1te for NRC review prior. to the period of extended operation. 8.1.33 8.1.37 8.1.38 OAGI0001230_00031