ML13232A137: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| document type = Report, Technical | | document type = Report, Technical | ||
| page count = 82 | | page count = 82 | ||
| project = | |||
| stage = Other | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C332 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class, Medium Voltage, Metal- | {{#Wiki_filter:Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C332 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UD-- | ||
Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class, Medium Voltage, Metal-CladSwitch-gear (03) | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Equipment Description 4KV Emercency Bus Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Anchorage is only partially visible, therefore not chosen for 50%verification. | Anchorage | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Visible anchors at the front section of the panel are acceptable. | : 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI-- N[R of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | ||
Anchors at the | Anchorage is only partially visible, therefore not chosen for 50% | ||
The abandoned anchor was noted to be a replacement | verification. | ||
The result was to cut off the anchor and abandon it in place. Based on the SEWs analysis and FRN's, the | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI ULI N/AF] | ||
A nut securing a wire chase to the side of the panel in cabinet A6-6 is loose and not fully engaged to the washer. It is located inside the cabinet on the top left side. Although not a seismic hazard CR-PNP-2012-04547 was written to correct the issue.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | Visible anchors at the front section of the panel are acceptable. | ||
On visible anchorage, no oxidation was noted.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the | Anchors at the rearof the cabinet are not visible. It was noted that panels A 6-5, A 6-9 and A 6-11 had spalling concrete around the anchors at the front. PanelA6-11 also had an anchorabandoned in place and appearedmissing at first glance. This was detailed in the SEWs package dated 3/13/98 and furtherclarified in FRN 96-01-136A, -136B, and -136C. The anchors with spalling concrete have been replaced with longer, 6" embedment anchors, which have full capacity. The abandoned anchor was noted to be a replacement anchorfor previous outlier concerns, and was damage during installation. The result was to cut off the anchor and abandon it in place. Based on the SEWs analysis and FRN's, the anchorageof the panel is acceptable. | ||
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C333 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class Medium Volta-ge, Metal-Clad Switchgear (03)Equipment Description 4KV Emergency Bus 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | A nut securing a wire chase to the side of the panel in cabinet A6-6 is loose and not fully engaged to the washer. It is located inside the cabinet on the top left side. Although not a seismic hazard CR-PNP-2012-04547 was written to correct the issue. | ||
Y[I NE] U[I N/AZ (Note: This question only applies | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NDI Ur- N/A[- | ||
Although only anchors in the front of the panel were visible, their location was verified by sketches in the SEWs package as well as FRN's 96-01-136A through -136C.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y; NE] U[E]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | oxidation? | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | On visible anchorage,no oxidation was noted. | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEI U[- N/A[l anchors? | |||
Concrete surroundingvisible anchors was free of cracking. | |||
'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C333 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[-- | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class Medium Volta-ge, Metal-Clad Switchgear (03) | |||
Equipment Description 4KV Emergency Bus | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I NE] U[I N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Although only anchors in the front of the panel were visible, their location was verified by sketches in the SEWs package as well as FRN's 96-01-136A through -136C. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y; NE] U[E] | |||
potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE] urE] N/AE] | |||
Previously noted outliers from A-46 such as conduit tray touching the cabinet were noted to be resolved by adding clips to attach the two items, making it seismically acceptable. | Previously noted outliers from A-46 such as conduit tray touching the cabinet were noted to be resolved by adding clips to attach the two items, making it seismically acceptable. | ||
A sheet metal plate located on the top of the inside of panel A6-6 is secured by two bolts, both on one side of the plate. There are holes for the remaining 4 bolt holes, which | A sheet metal plate located on the top of the inside of panel A6-6 is secured by two bolts, both on one side of the plate. There are holes for the remaining 4 bolt holes, which appearto be missing. This is not a seismic hazard as it is not likely to fall and is not touching any critical relays in its currentposition, but engineeringjudgment suggests that the bolts should be properly added for adequateanchorage. CR-PNP-2012-04550 was written to address this item. | ||
CR-PNP-2012-04550 was written to address this item.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE:] UE] N/A[] | ||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? | and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | ||
This is not a seismic hazard. Operations was notified and a request was created in eSOMS.A plastic equipment tag label, tagged 163, in A6-3 is hanging by a single bolt. | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] Ur-] N/AE] | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NW] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | ||
CabinetA6-11 has a broken tag on the front exteriorof the cabinet that reads "DieselGenerator Voltage Balance". This is not a seismic hazard. Operations was notified and a request was created in eSOMS. | |||
Area walk-by is AWC-024.Evaluated by: Gary Sweder | A plastic equipment tag label, tagged 163, in A6-3 is hanging by a single bolt. Originallyit appearedto be secured by two, but now it only has one. This is not a seismic hazard. | ||
-T~~ r-ASOW Note: Equipment tag Note: Loose nut in | CR-PNP-201-04551waswritten to address both these items. | ||
! G(dU1ifftf EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C337 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[ Nr- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C334 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UF-W Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03) | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Equipment Description 4KV Emergency Bus Other Adverse Conditions | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NW] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Refer to question #1.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface | CabinetA6-5 is missing a bolt on the exterior upperportion of the panel. CabinetA6-11 is also missing two bolts on the exterior upper portion of the panel. Previousoperations guidancespecified that these bolts were only used during shipment of the panels en route to the plant, therefore not a seismic hazard. | ||
Refer to question #1.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Refer to question #1. | The back of cabinet A6 is missing one bolt and one bolt is not fully engaged and appears to be hanging out of the top portion of the panel. | ||
Due to redundantanchorageof panels, this is not a seismic hazard. | |||
CR-PNP-2012-04549 was written to address these items. | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
Area walk-by is AWC-024. | |||
Evaluated by: Gary Sweder I -- mo - --- Date: 10-12-12 I AiArA If*nl*v AVIAa-c"aCAOUI 10-12-12 VU U | |||
: | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C335 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UFD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03) | |||
Equipment Description 4KV Emergency Bus Photographs | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | - T~~ r-ASOW Note: Equipment tag Note: Loose nut in cabinetA6-6, refer to response to question #2 above. | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEil U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOQ1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C336 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE] UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03) | |||
Eauipment Description 4KV Emeraencv Bus Note: Plate missing anchors at top of panel. rdIm ule : ki Iy1U1 iI.1UfiVI1WU ! G(dU1ifftf Refer to response to question #7 above. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C337 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[ Nr- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment IDNo. D16 Equip. Class, DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus A Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Cabinetis anchored to the floor, but anchorage is not visible due to inability to open lower half of panel until an outage, therefore, this was not chosen for the 50% verification. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI- NnI U[I N/AZ Refer to question #1. | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[- N [ | |||
N[-] I N/AU oxidation? | |||
Refer to question #1. | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y-I NEI U~l N/A[ | |||
anchors? | |||
Refer to question #1. | |||
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C338 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NEI Ur-] | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. D16 Equip. Class- DistributionPanels and Automatic TransferSwitches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus A | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NE] UE] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Refer to question #1. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U-IJ potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN N[] u[] N/AF-There is a cart, wires and tools near the cabinet, but is adequately marked as work in progress, with the cart wheel choked, therefore acceptable. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UE] N/AE] | |||
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
The masonry block wall behind the panel, #210.0 (C967ShI), is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE] uE] N/AE] | |||
A 2" rigid conduit spans horizontallybetween panels D-4 and D-16 in the upper switchgearroom. PanelD-4 is wall mounted while panel D- 16 is floor mounted. The concern is for differential seismic motion between panels potentially causing damage to cables inside the cabinets. | |||
Because the cabinets are within two feet of each otherthey would see the same vertical seismic accelerationand displacement. Horizontal displacement of the floor mounted panel could be higher than the wall mounted cabinet, however both panels are very stiff and well anchored. | |||
Any differential seismic displacementwould be relieved by the inherent flexibility of screwed conduit connections at each panel. There may be some local deformation of the walls of the panels where the conduits enter but not enough to cause any damage to the cables inside. These panels do not contain any essential relays. Therefore during a seismic event, the panels will be able to perform their intended functions. | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[] | |||
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C339 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NFi- U[' | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. D16 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus A Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEil U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Bolts on the front of the panel are secure, but two on the right side are missing. Due to the redundancy of multiple other bolts, this is not a seismic concern. Refer to picture below. CR-PNP-2012-4534 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Bolts on the front of the panel are secure, but two on the right side are missing. Due to the redundancy of multiple other bolts, this is not a seismic concern. Refer to picture below. CR-PNP-2012-4534 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area walk-by is A WC-022.Evaluated by: Laura Maclay Date: 10-11-12 T-'UJ Gary Sweder 10-11-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0340 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[-- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. D16 Equip. Class | Area walk-by is A WC-022. | ||
Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Evaluated by: Laura Maclay Date: 10-11-12 T-' | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | UJ Gary Sweder 10-11-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Although the cabinet is anchored, the | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0340 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[-- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. D16 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | ||
Therefore it was not chosen for the 50%verification. | Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus A Photoaraohs Note: Equipment Tag Note: Work in progress nearcabinet, adequately secured. | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?See response #1 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
See response #1 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C343 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NE] UFL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. D17 Equip. Class | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C341 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE-] UJi-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. D16 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | ||
Y[I- NEI UEL N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus A Rdole. 1SIU& | ||
See response #1 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEi UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | isU1 1UP PdflITU. Note: Overall view of panel. Note two missing bolts on right side EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
See response #1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
A conduit runs within 1" along the top of the cabinet. This conduit is rigidly supported and will not significantly impact the cabinet. This is acceptable because the cabinet does not contain essential relays.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C342 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UD] | ||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. D17 Equip. Class' DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC ControlBus B Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Although the cabinet is anchored, the reardoor, which houses a live bus, is inaccessible. Therefore it was not chosen for the 50% | |||
verification. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YLI NEI tiEl N/AZ See response #1 | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI ULIE NIAZ oxidation? | |||
See response #1 | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-]j NEJ U[II] N/An anchors? | |||
See response #1 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C343 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NE] UFL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. D17 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus B | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I- NEI UEL N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
See response #1 | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEi UE] | |||
potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
See response #1 Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI Ur] N/AL] | |||
A conduit runs within 1" along the top of the cabinet. This conduit is rigidly supported and will not significantly impact the cabinet. This is acceptable because the cabinet does not contain essential relays. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NE]I UE N/AL] | |||
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
The masonry block wall behind the panel, #209.0 (C966Sh 1), is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable. | The masonry block wall behind the panel, #209.0 (C966Sh 1), is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable. | ||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[E] U[] N/Al] | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ N[-] U[- | ||
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C344 of C41 3 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. D17 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus B Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area walk-by is A WC-024. | Area walk-by is A WC-024. | ||
Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | r- I..MAtA, Iva ID uI v-lutq* | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | k,, I2 a LLFV'.O Y4 L CnAAIdnr 1N~. h*AA..A Date: 10-12-12 U | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Laura Maclav Laura Maclav | ||
~- I 10-12-12 (3L EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C345 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ N7 uF-L Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. D17 Equip. Class Distribution Panels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus B Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C346 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE] UF-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. D17 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus B Note: Conduit near top of cabinet Note: | |||
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C347 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF U[ | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. D4 Equip. Class' DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelA Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEF NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Cabinet is anchored to Unistrut on the wall, but is located behind the panel, therefore, this was not chosen for the 50% verification. | Cabinet is anchored to Unistrut on the wall, but is located behind the panel, therefore, this was not chosen for the 50% verification. | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Refer to question #1. Eight screws securing the | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-- NE] ULI N/A[ | ||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | Refer to question #1. Eight screws securing the internalsof the panel are in good condition. | ||
Refer to question #1.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete near anchors is visible and free of cracking. | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI"- NEI UL- N/Az oxidation? | ||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0348 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF-R! Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. D4 Equip. Class | Refer to question #1. | ||
Y[I N[il ULI N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO NEI Ur- N/A[:] | ||
Refer to question #1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI U[-]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | anchors? | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | Concrete near anchors is visible and free of cracking. | ||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | ||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0348 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF-R! Ur] | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. D4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelA | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I N[il ULI N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Refer to question #1. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI U[-] | |||
potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y; NEI UD- N/AD- | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
The masonry block wall behind the panel, #2 10.0 (C967Sh 1), is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable. | The masonry block wall behind the panel, #2 10.0 (C967Sh 1), is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable. | ||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?A 2" rigid conduit spans horizontally between panels D-4 and D- 16 in the upper | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI U[- N/AD:] | ||
Horizontal displacement of the floor mounted panel could be higher than the wall mounted cabinet; however both panels are very stiff and well anchored.Any differential seismic displacement would be relieved by the inherent flexibility of screwed conduit connections at each panel. There may be some local deformation of the walls of the panels where the conduits enter but not enough to cause any damage to the cables inside. These panels do not contain any essential relays. Therefore during a seismic event, the panels will be able to perform their intended functions. | A 2" rigid conduit spans horizontally between panels D-4 and D- 16 in the upper switchgearroom. Panel D-4 is wall mounted while panel D- 16 is floor mounted. The concern is for differential seismic motion between panels potentially causing damage to cables inside the cabinets. | ||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | Because the cabinets are within two feet of each other they would see the same vertical seismic accelerationand displacement.Horizontal displacement of the floor mounted panel could be higher than the wall mounted cabinet; however both panels are very stiff and well anchored. | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE]i UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | Any differential seismic displacement would be relieved by the inherent flexibility of screwed conduit connections at each panel. There may be some local deformation of the walls of the panels where the conduits enter but not enough to cause any damage to the cables inside. These panels do not contain any essential relays. Therefore during a seismic event, the panels will be able to perform their intended functions. | ||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y; NDl U[D of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C349 of C41 3 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y; NE] U[] | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. D4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelA Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE]i UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area walk-by is A WC-022."M IIA't ')-Y) (, o'.. I | Area walk-by is A WC-022. | ||
Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Evaluated by: Laura MaclaV "M IIA't ')-Y) (,o'.. I Date: 10-11-12 (J | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | rA1V .w*dlr AQA. U .OJA 10-11-12 0 | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
The panel is | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C350 of C413 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NE] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. D4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelA Photographs IMOILe; Ljvufdii PdrIG-1 NOWe; it IIVfI U1 PaneI& | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0351 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NFI- Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. D4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125 VDC DistributionPanelA lid conduit to the left of panel D4. Note: Rigid conduit between two panels EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C352 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ ND] UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. D5 Equip. Class, DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelB Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
The panel is anchoredto the wall and is visually inaccessible. | |||
Therefore it was not chosen for the 50% verification. | Therefore it was not chosen for the 50% verification. | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?See Response #1 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE[I NEil ULI N/A; See Response #1 | ||
See Response #1 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YLI NEI UEl N/AZ oxidation? | ||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C353 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. D5 Equip. Class | See Response #1 | ||
YE] NE] U[:] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] NEIl Ull N/AZ anchors? | ||
See Response #1 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI Ui-]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | See Response #1 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C353 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UE] | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. D5 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanel B | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] U[:] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
See Response #1 | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI Ui-] | |||
potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UE] N/AE1 | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UE] N/AE-] | |||
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
The panel is mounted to masonry block wall, #209.0 (C966Sh 1), which is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable. | The panel is mounted to masonry block wall, #209.0 (C966Sh 1), which is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable. | ||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N-] uE-] N/AE] | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo Nl Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[E NEI UE] | ||
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
I Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0354 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN Nil UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment IDNo. D5 Equip. Class DistributionPanels andAutomatic TransferSwitches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelB Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo Nl Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area walk-by is AWC-024.Evaluated by, Gary Sweder Date: 10-12-12 Laura Maclay 4OAaQIL 10-12-12 L/U)EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C355 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. D5 Equip. Class | Area walk-by is AWC-024. | ||
Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SET Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Evaluated by, Gary Sweder Date: 10-12-12 Laura Maclay 4OAaQIL 10-12-12 L/ | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | U) | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C355 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. D5 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanel B PhotouraDhs Note: Note: | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C356 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF UW Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment IDNo. Y3 Equip. Class, DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SET Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Panel is anchored to Unistrut, which is attached to the wall. Anchorage is not visible as it is behind the panel, therefore this is not part of the 50% verification. | Panel is anchored to Unistrut, which is attached to the wall. Anchorage is not visible as it is behind the panel, therefore this is not part of the 50% verification. | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE] N/AZ | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] N[W UW N/AZ oxidation? | ||
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C357 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ | : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NE U"] N/AM anchors? | ||
YE] NE- UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | ||
Refer to response to question # 1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 | ||
A small box of lightbulbs used by operations or maintenance was found behind the panel, sitting on the Unistrut. | |||
Due to the size of the box and lightweight, this is not a seismic or safety concern.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C357 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE1 UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. Y3 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic TransferSwitches (14) | ||
Junction box J2289 is mounted to the underside of cable tray in the overhead. | Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power | ||
The cover of the box is missing five of eight fasteners. | : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE- UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | ||
Due to the light weight of the cover, it is not | Refer to response to question # 1. | ||
Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified. | : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE] | ||
See Drawing C-961 SH1, Rev. El.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | potentially adverse seismic conditions? | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D N[:] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | A small box of lightbulbs used by operations or maintenance was found behind the panel, sitting on the Unistrut. Due to the size of the box and lightweight, this is not a seismic or safety concern. | ||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NE-] UE] N/AE] | |||
Junction box J2289 is mounted to the underside of cable tray in the overhead. The cover of the box is missing five of eight fasteners. Due to the light weight of the cover, it is not hangingdown from the box, nor does it pose a seismic hazard. | |||
CR-PNP-2012-04665 was written to replace the bolts. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NE] U[] N/A[E] | |||
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified. See Drawing C-961 SH1, Rev. El. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NE] UE] N/AE] | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] UE] | |||
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C358 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEL UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. Y3 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D N[:] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area walk-by is AWC-017.&W ou -nwcoau | Area walk-by is AWC-017. | ||
Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area CSR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Evaluated by: Laura Maclay Ž&W ou VI | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | -nwcoau Date: 10-17-12 | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | - I Uz 10-17-12 6/ | ||
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0359 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[-] UF] | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment IDNo. Y3 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description Safe-quard Control Power Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Overall view of panel EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C360 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UD-- | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. Y3 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C361 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NO- U[-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment IDNo. Y4 Equip. Classi DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | |||
Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area CSR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[I NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Panel is anchored to Unistrut, which is attached to the wall. Anchorage is not visible as it is behind the panel, therefore this is not part of the 50% verification. | Panel is anchored to Unistrut, which is attached to the wall. Anchorage is not visible as it is behind the panel, therefore this is not part of the 50% verification. | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NE] UE1 N/AZ | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UE] N/AZ oxidation? | ||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0362 of 0413 ATRACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NI UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. Y4 Equip. Class | : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NEI UE] N/AN anchors? | ||
YrI NEI UL- N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | ||
Refer to response to question #1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NEIl UL-potentially adverse seismic conditions? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
It was noted that a conduit/ conduit pull box is within an inch of the panel This conduit is well supported and the cabinet does not house relays, therefore is not prone to chatter. This was verified in the SEWs package.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0362 of 0413 ATRACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NI UE] | ||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. Y4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UO-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | Equipment Description Safe-guard Control Power | ||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YrI NEI UL- N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Refer to response to question #1. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NEIl UL-potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI uEr N/AEr It was noted that a conduit/ conduit pull box is within an inch of the panel This conduit is well supported and the cabinet does not house relays, therefore is not prone to chatter. This was verified in the SEWs package. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UEr N/AD-] | |||
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE U-] N/AR | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y; NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C363 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 SWELl- 090 Status: Y*] Nil ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No. Y4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic TransferSwitches (14) | |||
Equipment Description SafeauardControl Power Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UO-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area walk-by is AWC-018.A loose/broken conduit tag, B2501, is lying on top of panel Y4. Operations has been notified.Evaluated by: Laura Maclay bAA9,2 E | Area walk-by is AWC-018. | ||
Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A BTTRY Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | A loose/broken conduit tag, B2501, is lying on top of panel Y4. Operations has been notified. | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Evaluated by: Laura Maclay bAA9,2 E Date: 10-17-12 Halie Aroz O D 10-17-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Although drawings E1OA13, E1OA 12 and EIOA2 show the size of the mounting hole and anchor, they do not specify the | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C364 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NF UI-] | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Battery rack has slightly oversized holes that are visible next to washers under batteries 43, 45, and 39. The gap is approximately 1/16" or less and is acceptable. | Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. Y4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic TransferSwitches (14) | ||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power Photoaraohs EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
An | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C365 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NRIl UrL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. Y4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14) | ||
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C367 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15)Equipment Description 125VDC | Equipment Description SafeauardControl Power Note: Conduit nearpanel, refer to response Note: | ||
Yr- NEI] UI N/AZ (Note: This question only applies | from question #7. | ||
Refer to question #1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
Maintenance equipment is properly chained along the wall in the room and is acceptable. | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C366 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEr] Ur-] | ||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class, Battery Racks (15) | |||
Lighting in the room is secured by closed 's' hooks.Masonry block wall 210.0 is seismically qualified per drawing C967 SH1.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YZ NEI UEL N/AL1 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEl UL of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C368 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15)Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack A Other Adverse Conditions | Equipment Description 125VDC ControlBattery Rack A Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A BTTRY Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NWJ UW-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Although drawings E1OA13, E1OA 12 and EIOA2 show the size of the mounting hole and anchor,they do not specify the anchoragepattern and number of anchors, therefore, this was not chosen for the 50% | |||
verification. | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NE-] U[-] N/A[-D Battery rack has slightly oversized holes that are visible next to washers under batteries 43, 45, and 39. The gap is approximately 1/16" or less and is acceptable. | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UrI N/A[-D oxidation? | |||
An anchorbolt securing the battery rack under battery 24 has mild surface oxidation. | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YER NE] UD- N/AD-] | |||
anchors? | |||
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C367 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC ControlBattery Rack A | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yr- NEI] UI N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Refer to question #1. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEi U-- N/A-1 Maintenance equipment is properly chained along the wall in the room and is acceptable. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UEL N/AL-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Lighting in the room is secured by closed 's' hooks. | |||
Masonry block wall 210.0 is seismically qualified per drawing C967 SH1. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UEL N/AL1 | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEl UL of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C368 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack A Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NWJ UW-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area walk-by is A WC-023."ArMA il 4ýýOnM-l -OM A | Area walk-by is A WC-023. | ||
Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B BTTRY Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Evaluated by: QLaura Mac "ArMA il 4ýýOnM-l -OM A Date: 10-11-12 f,,r .*Cz&""4& A. AIuJIý%IleC-1, 1 1-12 | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | -- p EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Anchorage forD2 battery rack is verified using EIOA3, EIOA6, EIOA7, EIOA8, EIOA9, EIOAh, and E10A13 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C369 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UIr Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15) | ||
Some mild acidic | Equipment Description 125VDC ControlBattery Rack A Photographs Note: Overall view of battery racks and properly restrainedmaintenance equipment EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C372 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YIg NE] U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C370 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NR- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15) | ||
YN NI] U[I- N/As](Note: This question only applies | Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack A Note: Typical anchorage Note: | ||
44 | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
Step ladder | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C371 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[--1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. D2 Equip. Class, Battery Racks (15) | ||
Masonry block wall 209.0 is seismically qualified per drawing C966 SH1.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack B Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B BTTRY Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NF-1 UI-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[KNEJ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Anchorage forD2 battery rack is verified using EIOA3, EIOA6, EIOA7, EIOA8, EIOA9, EIOAh, and E10A13 | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NW UW- N/A-- | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEi Uil N/AL-oxidation? | |||
Some mild acidic corrosionwas noted, but is acceptable. | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y; NE Ut--i N/AL-] | |||
anchors? | |||
' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C372 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YIg NE] U[- | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment IDNo. D2 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack B | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NI] U[I- N/As] | |||
(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
44 anchorplates and bolts venrfied in the field per referenced drawings in response to question #1. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEL U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI U[-] N/AF] | |||
Step ladder nearD2 has built-in front stoppers that prohibitits movement during a seismic event. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDl UD- N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Masonry block wall 209.0 is seismically qualified per drawing C966 SH1. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN ND-] UD1 N/ADl | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[D UD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C373 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NFl UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. D2 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack B Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NF-1 UI-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area walk-by is A WC-025.Evaluated by: | Area walk-by is A WC-025. | ||
Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Evaluated by: GarySweder Date: 10-12-12 Laura Maclav AOAAL-Q-ýW V. | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | -Pao 10-12-* | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | 12 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Right | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C374 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. D2 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15) | ||
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack B Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C377 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF-] U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. Dll Equip. Class Battery | |||
YZ Ni] ULi N/Anl (Note: This question only applies | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C375 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y] NF U-- | ||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. D2 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15) | |||
Equipment Description 125VDC ControlBattery Rack B Note: Wide base ladder with stoppers built in Note: | |||
instead of front wheels EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C376 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NIO U-- | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. Dll Equip. Class, Battery Chargersand Inverters (16) | |||
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D1 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YH N[i of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI U[i N/AZl | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE:" U[] N/AZ-oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ N[l ULi N/AZ-- | |||
anchors? | |||
Right rearanchorhas slight spalling of approximately Y4" deep next to the anchor. The drawing for the anchorageof the cabinet details the anchorageto be a minimum of 3 Y2" deep maxi bolts, therefore, the minimal spalling is acceptable to maintain full anchorage. | |||
'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C377 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF-] U[-- | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. Dll Equip. Class Battery Chargersand Inverters (16) | |||
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D1 | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ Ni] ULi N/Anl (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Refer to drawing E 11A 1 Sh 1, E 1 for anchorage configuration. | Refer to drawing E 11A 1 Sh 1, E 1 for anchorage configuration. | ||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[E UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions? | : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[E UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions? | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | Interaction Effects | ||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE ur- N/AF- | ||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YNJ NM uM N/A-- | |||
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
The masonry block wall behind the panel, #210.0 (C967Sh 1), is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable. | The masonry block wall behind the panel, #210.0 (C967Sh 1), is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable. | ||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI ulI N/A[-- | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEil UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM N-I Ur] | ||
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Although it latches, it vibrates! | EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 | ||
moves from the air handler. This is not a seismic condition because the door is secure. CR-PNP-4543 written to fix door fastener. | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C378 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ N[j] U-- | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. DQl Equip. Class Battery Chargiersand Inverters (16) | |||
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D1 Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEil UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Cabinetdoor was noted to be loose by operator. Although it latches, it vibrates!moves from the air handler. This is not a seismic condition because the door is secure. CR-PNP-4543 written to fix door fastener. | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area walk-by is A WC-024.Evaluated by: Gary Sweder J QJ, j wJI,, | Area walk-by is A WC-022. | ||
Bldg. DG A Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Evaluated by: Laura Maclav qkrnA(LCJ1(o-QOv-A Date: 10-11-12 V | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | U) | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Gmary wKdr 109-1-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Reference C103, El 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
The southernmost two bolts on the west and the southernmost two bolts on the east of the EDG A showed | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C379 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NE] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment IDNo. Dll Equip. Class Battery Chargers and Inverters (16) | ||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C387 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ Nil] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. X107A Equip. Class Engine Generators (17)Equipment Description DG A Engine & Generator 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D1 Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
YZ NDl UD] N/AD](Note: This question only applies | |||
Spot checked dimensions, bolts size and | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C380 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. Dli Equip. Class Battery Chargers and Inverters (16) | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D1 Note: Anchorage showing slight spalling at Note: | ||
Scaffold built over SWELl-101 equipment. | rearat right bolt. | ||
Scaffold 11-279 (see | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C381 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment ID No. D12 Equip. Class' Battery Chargersand Inverters (16) | |||
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Charnerfor D2 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NE] | |||
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI UE- N/AE-- | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE] U[-] N/A[-] | |||
oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEI UE- N/AE1 anchors? | |||
1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C382 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment ID No. D12 Equip. Class Battery Chargersand Inverters (16) | |||
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D2 | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UrL N/AJ-] | |||
(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Anchorage verified using E11A IShl, El. Tape measure used to verified bolt configurationand spacing. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] UF] | |||
potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
During the walkdown an anchorsecuring the top of the panel to the frame of the cabinet was noted as not fully engaged. During a closer inspection of a close up picture, it was determined to be acceptable, as it is flush with the nut, therefore fully engaged. | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NE] ur] N/A-- | |||
An emergency light is on a stanchion with approximatelytwo inches of clearancebetween the edge of the support and the panel, therefore, engineeringjudgment concludes that this is acceptable. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI uE] N/AEr and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Masonry block wall 209.0 behind the panel is safety related. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UE- N/AEr | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NF] Ur] | |||
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C383 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NIF U-IIJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment ID No. D12 Equip. Class Battery Chargqers and Inverters (16) | |||
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D2 Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEi ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | |||
Area walk-by is A WC-024. | |||
Evaluated by: Gary Sweder J QJ,j J- wJI,, Date: 10-12-12 Laura macdav ?YOn.LQ~ | |||
"n* C, I 10-12-12 VI tU EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C384 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment IDNo. D12 Equip. Class Battery Chargersand Inverters (16) | |||
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D2 Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Overall view showing emergency light next to panel EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C385 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment IDNo. D12 Equip. Class Battery Charqersand Inverters (16) | |||
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D2 Note: Inswce OT panei Note: | |||
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C386 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YN Nr- Ui-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. X1O7A Equip. Class, Engine Generators(17) | |||
Equipment Description DG A Engine & Generator Location: Bldg. DG A Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Reference C103, El | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? | |||
Y[ NE!I U[I N/A[! | |||
22 d and 3 rd bolt from north (generator),west side was noted to have a shadow under washer. Per note 2, detail 7 of C103 acceptance criteria for connection tightness is at least light contact between washer surfaces and between the washer and the underside of nut. This acceptance criterion is met. Further,bolt thread was noted to be staked as noted in C103, detail 7 | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEIl ULI N/Al] | |||
oxidation? | |||
The southernmost two bolts on the west and the southernmost two bolts on the east of the EDG A showed greateroxidation than other anchorage,but still mild. | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI ULI N/AEl anchors? | |||
' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C387 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ Nil] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. X107A Equip. Class Engine Generators(17) | |||
Equipment Description DG A Engine & Generator | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NDl UD] N/AD] | |||
(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Spot checked dimensions, bolts size and anchorageconfiguration against C103, El. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ ND UFD potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDI UD- N/AD-] | |||
Scaffold built over SWELl-101 equipment. Scaffold 11-279 (see attachedphoto) is a long term safety related,seismic scaffold evaluated and approved in accordancewith EN-MA-133. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ ND] uD-] N/AD-] | |||
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Light on west side on a long chain. This item is not likely to collapse due to its light mass and relatively large period of oscillation. | Light on west side on a long chain. This item is not likely to collapse due to its light mass and relatively large period of oscillation. | ||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Fire piping does not have 3" | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI UD- N/ADl Fire piping does not have 3" clearancewith scaffold (see attached photo). Scaffold log 11-279 notes this condition and deems the pipe riser acceptable based on the small seismic displacements anticipated for the scaffold. | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[-] UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDl UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | ||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C388 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN Nr-1 UrE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. X107A Equip. Class Engine Generators(17) | |||
Equipment Description DG A Engine'& Generator Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[-] UE] | |||
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area Walk-by Checklist is A WC-O01.Evaluated by: | Area Walk-by Checklist is A WC-O01. | ||
Bldg. DG B Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Evaluated by: GarySweder Date: 10-3-12 Lau..a...a..lay 10-3-12 Laura Maclav V EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C389 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NFi- ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. X1O7A Equip. Class Engine Generators(17) | ||
Equipment Description DG A Engine & Generator Photographs Note: Scaffold tag EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C392 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. X1O7B Equip. Class Engine Generators (17)Equipment Description DG B Engine & Generator 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C390 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NR UF-] | ||
YZ N[l ULI N/AEl (Note: This question only applies | Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. X107A Equip. Class Engine Generators (17) | ||
See Drawing No. C103, Rev. El.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UD-]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | Eauibment DescriDtion DG A Engine & Generator Note: t-ipe Kiser Note: | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Masonry block walls 198.0 and 198.1 are seismically qualified. | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C391 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U[- | ||
See Drawing No. C-964 SH 1, Rev. 0.Trolleys at the north end of the room are secured with C-clamps, and the chain control is neatly bundled. Therefore, this is not a seismic | Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. XIO7B Equip. Class' Engine Generators (17) | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NE] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | Equipment Description DG B Engine & Generator Location: Bldg. DG B Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE-] uE] N/AF- | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[K NE] Ur] N/A[- | |||
oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NE]I U-] N/A-] | |||
anchors? | |||
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C392 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. X1O7B Equip. Class Engine Generators(17) | |||
Equipment Description DG B Engine & Generator | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ N[l ULI N/AEl (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
See Drawing No. C103, Rev. El. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UD-] | |||
potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN ND: U[-I N/AD | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDJ UD1 N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Masonry block walls 198.0 and 198.1 are seismically qualified. See Drawing No. C-964 SH 1, Rev. 0. | |||
Trolleys at the north end of the room are secured with C-clamps, and the chain control is neatly bundled. Therefore, this is not a seismic interactionconcern. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y; NDI U-J N/AD | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C393 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. X1O7B Equip. Class Engine Generators(17) | |||
Equipment Description DG B Engine & Generator Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NE] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
A loose label for 37-CR-31 1 was found on the west side of the diesel generator. | A loose label for 37-CR-31 1 was found on the west side of the diesel generator. This was reportedto Operationsand an ESOMS request was initiated. | ||
This was | SWEL 1-102 is on AWC-002. | ||
SWEL 1-102 is on AWC-002.2~~i2~u1 | Evaluated by: David Small 2~~i2~u1 Date: 10/15/2012 Hafie Aroz A, j 10/15/2012 W, Q6ý ýUtli!y EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Bldg. DG A Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG A -Day Tank Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C394 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NIF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. XIO7B Equip. Class Engine Generators(17) | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Equipment Description DG B Engine & Generator Photographs Note: Note: | ||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C395 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NF UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. XIO7B Equip. Class Engine Generators (17) | |||
EauiDment Description DG B Enaine & Generator Note: Typical anchorbolt. Note: | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C396 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YE NFI-' U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. T124A Equip. Class' Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21) | |||
Equipment Description DG A Day Tank Location: Bldg. DG A Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG A - Day Tank Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ N[] | |||
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI UE[N/AE- | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NR] UE] N/AE] | |||
oxidation? | |||
Bolts have only mild surface oxidation. | Bolts have only mild surface oxidation. | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The edge of the pedestal on the north side is | : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UE] NIAE]1 anchors? | ||
See | The edge of the pedestal on the north side is partiallychipped away to accommodate piping. This is not close to the anchorbolt and is judged to be insignificant.See attachedphoto. | ||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C397 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NE U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. T124A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description DG A Day Tank 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | ||
YZ NEil Ul1 N/AZ1 (Note: This question only applies | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Reference Drawings C-103 Rev. El and C-100 Rev. E3.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN Nil UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C397 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NE U-- | ||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. T124A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21) | ||
Masonry block walls 198.2 and 198.3 are seismically qualified. | Equipment Description DG A Day Tank | ||
See drawing C-964 SH 1, Rev. EO.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEil Ul1 N/AZ1 (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NWI U[']adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | Reference Drawings C-103 Rev. El and C-100 Rev. E3. | ||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN Nil UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI UZ- N/Ar1 | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[l N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Masonry block walls 198.2 and 198.3 are seismically qualified. See drawing C-964 SH 1, Rev. EO. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI Uil N/Ail | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ Nn U[- | |||
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C398 of C413 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEI U[- | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment IDNo. T124A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21) | |||
Equipment Description DG A Day Tank Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NWI U['] | |||
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
SWEL 1-103 is on AWC-029. | SWEL 1-103 is on AWC-029. | ||
Bldg. DG B Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG B -Day Tank Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Evaluated by: David Small 2pod16J Date: 10/02/2012 Halie Aroz 10/02/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C399 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-- | ||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. T124A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchanqers (21) | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The north end of both pedestals is cut to accommodate piping. This is deliberate and not near the | Equipment Description DG A Day Tank Photographs Note: Note: | ||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C402 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. T124B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description DG B Day Tank 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
YZ NE] ULi N/A--(Note: This question only applies | |||
See Drawing No. C103, Rev. El.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEi U[-I potentially adverse seismic conditions? | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C400 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y; N[D UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. T124A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21) | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | Eauioment DescriDtion DG A Day Tank Note: Typical anchorbolt. Note: Chipped concrete on edge of pedestal. | ||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Masonry block walls 198.0 and 198.1 are seismically qualified. | |||
See Drawing No. C-964 SH 1, Rev. 0.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C401 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UtlE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. T124B Equip. Class, Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21) | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | Equipment Description DG B Day Tank Location: Bldg. DG B Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG B - Day Tank Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[E N[-] | |||
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI ULI N/Ar] | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UEI N/AL] | |||
oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE-- U[- N/AL] | |||
anchors? | |||
The north end of both pedestals is cut to accommodate piping. This is deliberate and not near the anchorbolts, and so is not considereda seismic hazard. See attachedphoto. | |||
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C402 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. T124B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21) | |||
Equipment Description DG B Day Tank | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE] ULi N/A-- | |||
(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
See Drawing No. C103, Rev. El. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEi U[-I potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEJ U[- N/A[] | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE] U-] N/AF-] | |||
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Masonry block walls 198.0 and 198.1 are seismically qualified. See Drawing No. C-964 SH 1, Rev. 0. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE-1 Ur- N/A[] | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM N[-] U[- | |||
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C403 of C413 ATTrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NF-J UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. T124B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21) | |||
Equipment Description DG B Day Tank Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
SWEL 1-104 is on AWC-030./1)"- L24- | SWEL 1-104 is on AWC-030. | ||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 91 Room, Area 91 FT Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Evaluated by: David Small /1)"- L24- Date: 10/15/2012 HalieAroz "7 **".2 10/15/2012 U-' U) | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C404 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y] NEr] U-] | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. T124B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchanqers (21) | |||
Equipment Description DG B Day Tank Photoqraohs EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C405 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NF Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. T124B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers(21) | |||
Equipment Description DG B Day Tank Note: Typical anchorbolt. Note: Comerof pedestal cut to accommodate piping. | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C406 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YE NEI] ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-149 Equip. Class, Other (0) | |||
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 91 Room, Area 91 FT Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | Inline component, no anchorage. | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-- NEI UEI N/AO | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEr' UF-I N/AO oxidation? | ||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C407 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-149 Equip. Class Other(O)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-] NEJ UE- N/AO anchors? | ||
Y[I NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies | I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | ||
Refer to response to question #1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[-] U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C407 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-149 Equip. Class Other(O) | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free | Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[-] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | ||
Refer to response to question #1. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[-] U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y; N[] U[I N/AL! | |||
Indicatorabove equipment is adequately secure. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ Nil U-] N/A[] | |||
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[-] U[] N/AE! | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NE--] Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C408 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-149 Equip. Class Other (0) | |||
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[-] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-009.Ar), I I I UNPA L - | Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-009. | ||
Bldg. RB Floor El. 91 Room, Area 91 FT Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | Evaluated by: Gary Sweder Ar), I I I UNPA L- Date: 10-16-12 Laura Maclay 10-16-12 U) | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | V EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C409 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI] U[il Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-149 Equip. Class Other (0)) | |||
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Photographs Note: Note: | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C410 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ N- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-150 Equip. Class' Other(O) | |||
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 91 Room, Area 91 FT Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Inline component, no anchorage. | Inline component, no anchorage. | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEi U[i N/AN | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI-] NRj urI N/AA oxidation? | ||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C411 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ N[] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-150 Equip. Class Other(O)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? | : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YI-] Nil[ Ul- N/A[ | ||
YE] NE] UI-- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies | anchors? | ||
See response to question #1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] UiE]potentially adverse seismic conditions? | IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | EN-DC-168 REV 0 | ||
YO NE-] UE] N/AE-]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] urE] N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YE NEi U[-] N/AE]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] uF-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C412 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YO NI- uFr Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-150 Equip. Class Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Other Adverse Conditions | Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C411 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ N[] U-- | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE! U[1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-150 Equip. Class Other(O) | ||
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UI-- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
See response to question #1. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] UiE] | |||
potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE-] UE] N/AE-] | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] urE] N/AE] | |||
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEi U[-] N/AE] | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] uF-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C412 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YO NI- uFr Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-150 Equip. Class Other (0) | |||
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE! U[1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) | ||
Area Walk-By Checklist is AWC-010.Evaluated by: Gary Sweder ,JO-. -Laura Maclay 'tQ LjyV C Qa | Area Walk-By Checklist is AWC-010. | ||
Evaluated by: Gary Sweder ,JO-. - Date: 10-16-12 Laura Maclay 'tQ LjyV C Qa 10-16-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0 | |||
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C413 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NEi UI-] | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-150 Equip. Class Other(O) | |||
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Photographs Note: Note: uveral view EN-DC-168 REV 0}} |
Latest revision as of 03:22, 6 February 2020
ML13232A137 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Pilgrim |
Issue date: | 06/17/2013 |
From: | Maclay L Entergy Nuclear Operations |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
2.13.056 PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev 1 | |
Download: ML13232A137 (82) | |
Text
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C332 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UD--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class, Medium Voltage, Metal-CladSwitch-gear (03)
Equipment Description 4KV Emercency Bus Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI-- N[R of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage is only partially visible, therefore not chosen for 50%
verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI ULI N/AF]
Visible anchors at the front section of the panel are acceptable.
Anchors at the rearof the cabinet are not visible. It was noted that panels A 6-5, A 6-9 and A 6-11 had spalling concrete around the anchors at the front. PanelA6-11 also had an anchorabandoned in place and appearedmissing at first glance. This was detailed in the SEWs package dated 3/13/98 and furtherclarified in FRN 96-01-136A, -136B, and -136C. The anchors with spalling concrete have been replaced with longer, 6" embedment anchors, which have full capacity. The abandoned anchor was noted to be a replacement anchorfor previous outlier concerns, and was damage during installation. The result was to cut off the anchor and abandon it in place. Based on the SEWs analysis and FRN's, the anchorageof the panel is acceptable.
A nut securing a wire chase to the side of the panel in cabinet A6-6 is loose and not fully engaged to the washer. It is located inside the cabinet on the top left side. Although not a seismic hazard CR-PNP-2012-04547 was written to correct the issue.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NDI Ur- N/A[-
oxidation?
On visible anchorage,no oxidation was noted.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEI U[- N/A[l anchors?
Concrete surroundingvisible anchors was free of cracking.
'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C333 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class Medium Volta-ge, Metal-Clad Switchgear (03)
Equipment Description 4KV Emergency Bus
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I NE] U[I N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Although only anchors in the front of the panel were visible, their location was verified by sketches in the SEWs package as well as FRN's 96-01-136A through -136C.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y; NE] U[E]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE] urE] N/AE]
Previously noted outliers from A-46 such as conduit tray touching the cabinet were noted to be resolved by adding clips to attach the two items, making it seismically acceptable.
A sheet metal plate located on the top of the inside of panel A6-6 is secured by two bolts, both on one side of the plate. There are holes for the remaining 4 bolt holes, which appearto be missing. This is not a seismic hazard as it is not likely to fall and is not touching any critical relays in its currentposition, but engineeringjudgment suggests that the bolts should be properly added for adequateanchorage. CR-PNP-2012-04550 was written to address this item.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE:] UE] N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] Ur-] N/AE]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
CabinetA6-11 has a broken tag on the front exteriorof the cabinet that reads "DieselGenerator Voltage Balance". This is not a seismic hazard. Operations was notified and a request was created in eSOMS.
A plastic equipment tag label, tagged 163, in A6-3 is hanging by a single bolt. Originallyit appearedto be secured by two, but now it only has one. This is not a seismic hazard.
CR-PNP-201-04551waswritten to address both these items.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C334 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UF-W Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)
Equipment Description 4KV Emergency Bus Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NW] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
CabinetA6-5 is missing a bolt on the exterior upperportion of the panel. CabinetA6-11 is also missing two bolts on the exterior upper portion of the panel. Previousoperations guidancespecified that these bolts were only used during shipment of the panels en route to the plant, therefore not a seismic hazard.
The back of cabinet A6 is missing one bolt and one bolt is not fully engaged and appears to be hanging out of the top portion of the panel.
Due to redundantanchorageof panels, this is not a seismic hazard.
CR-PNP-2012-04549 was written to address these items.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is AWC-024.
Evaluated by: Gary Sweder I -- mo - --- Date: 10-12-12 I AiArA If*nl*v AVIAa-c"aCAOUI 10-12-12 VU U
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C335 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UFD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)
Equipment Description 4KV Emergency Bus Photographs
- T~~ r-ASOW Note: Equipment tag Note: Loose nut in cabinetA6-6, refer to response to question #2 above.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOQ1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C336 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE] UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. A6 Equip. Class Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switch-gear (03)
Eauipment Description 4KV Emeraencv Bus Note: Plate missing anchors at top of panel. rdIm ule : ki Iy1U1 iI.1UfiVI1WU ! G(dU1ifftf Refer to response to question #7 above.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C337 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[ Nr- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment IDNo. D16 Equip. Class, DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus A Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Cabinetis anchored to the floor, but anchorage is not visible due to inability to open lower half of panel until an outage, therefore, this was not chosen for the 50% verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI- NnI U[I N/AZ Refer to question #1.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[- N [
N[-] I N/AU oxidation?
Refer to question #1.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y-I NEI U~l N/A[
anchors?
Refer to question #1.
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C338 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NEI Ur-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. D16 Equip. Class- DistributionPanels and Automatic TransferSwitches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus A
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NE] UE] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Refer to question #1.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U-IJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN N[] u[] N/AF-There is a cart, wires and tools near the cabinet, but is adequately marked as work in progress, with the cart wheel choked, therefore acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UE] N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
The masonry block wall behind the panel, #210.0 (C967ShI), is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE] uE] N/AE]
A 2" rigid conduit spans horizontallybetween panels D-4 and D-16 in the upper switchgearroom. PanelD-4 is wall mounted while panel D- 16 is floor mounted. The concern is for differential seismic motion between panels potentially causing damage to cables inside the cabinets.
Because the cabinets are within two feet of each otherthey would see the same vertical seismic accelerationand displacement. Horizontal displacement of the floor mounted panel could be higher than the wall mounted cabinet, however both panels are very stiff and well anchored.
Any differential seismic displacementwould be relieved by the inherent flexibility of screwed conduit connections at each panel. There may be some local deformation of the walls of the panels where the conduits enter but not enough to cause any damage to the cables inside. These panels do not contain any essential relays. Therefore during a seismic event, the panels will be able to perform their intended functions.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C339 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NFi- U['
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. D16 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus A Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEil U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Bolts on the front of the panel are secure, but two on the right side are missing. Due to the redundancy of multiple other bolts, this is not a seismic concern. Refer to picture below. CR-PNP-2012-4534 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is A WC-022.
Evaluated by: Laura Maclay Date: 10-11-12 T-'
UJ Gary Sweder 10-11-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0340 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[-- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. D16 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus A Photoaraohs Note: Equipment Tag Note: Work in progress nearcabinet, adequately secured.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C341 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE-] UJi-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. D16 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus A Rdole. 1SIU&
isU1 1UP PdflITU. Note: Overall view of panel. Note two missing bolts on right side EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C342 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UD]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. D17 Equip. Class' DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC ControlBus B Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Although the cabinet is anchored, the reardoor, which houses a live bus, is inaccessible. Therefore it was not chosen for the 50%
verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YLI NEI tiEl N/AZ See response #1
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI ULIE NIAZ oxidation?
See response #1
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-]j NEJ U[II] N/An anchors?
See response #1 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C343 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NE] UFL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. D17 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus B
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I- NEI UEL N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
See response #1
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEi UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
See response #1 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI Ur] N/AL]
A conduit runs within 1" along the top of the cabinet. This conduit is rigidly supported and will not significantly impact the cabinet. This is acceptable because the cabinet does not contain essential relays.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NE]I UE N/AL]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
The masonry block wall behind the panel, #209.0 (C966Sh 1), is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[E] U[] N/Al]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ N[-] U[-
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C344 of C41 3 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. D17 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus B Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is A WC-024.
r- I..MAtA, Iva ID uI v-lutq*
k,, I2 a LLFV'.O Y4 L CnAAIdnr 1N~. h*AA..A Date: 10-12-12 U
Laura Maclav Laura Maclav
~- I 10-12-12 (3L EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C345 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ N7 uF-L Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. D17 Equip. Class Distribution Panels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus B Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C346 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NE] UF-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. D17 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Bus B Note: Conduit near top of cabinet Note:
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C347 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF U[
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. D4 Equip. Class' DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelA Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEF NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Cabinet is anchored to Unistrut on the wall, but is located behind the panel, therefore, this was not chosen for the 50% verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-- NE] ULI N/A[
Refer to question #1. Eight screws securing the internalsof the panel are in good condition.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI"- NEI UL- N/Az oxidation?
Refer to question #1.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO NEI Ur- N/A[:]
anchors?
Concrete near anchors is visible and free of cracking.
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0348 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF-R! Ur]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. D4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelA
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I N[il ULI N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Refer to question #1.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI U[-]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y; NEI UD- N/AD-
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
The masonry block wall behind the panel, #2 10.0 (C967Sh 1), is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI U[- N/AD:]
A 2" rigid conduit spans horizontally between panels D-4 and D- 16 in the upper switchgearroom. Panel D-4 is wall mounted while panel D- 16 is floor mounted. The concern is for differential seismic motion between panels potentially causing damage to cables inside the cabinets.
Because the cabinets are within two feet of each other they would see the same vertical seismic accelerationand displacement.Horizontal displacement of the floor mounted panel could be higher than the wall mounted cabinet; however both panels are very stiff and well anchored.
Any differential seismic displacement would be relieved by the inherent flexibility of screwed conduit connections at each panel. There may be some local deformation of the walls of the panels where the conduits enter but not enough to cause any damage to the cables inside. These panels do not contain any essential relays. Therefore during a seismic event, the panels will be able to perform their intended functions.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y; NDl U[D of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C349 of C41 3 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y; NE] U[]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. D4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelA Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE]i UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is A WC-022.
Evaluated by: Laura MaclaV "M IIA't ')-Y) (,o'.. I Date: 10-11-12 (J
rA1V .w*dlr AQA. U .OJA 10-11-12 0
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C350 of C413 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NE] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. D4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelA Photographs IMOILe; Ljvufdii PdrIG-1 NOWe; it IIVfI U1 PaneI&
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0351 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NFI- Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. D4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125 VDC DistributionPanelA lid conduit to the left of panel D4. Note: Rigid conduit between two panels EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C352 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ ND] UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. D5 Equip. Class, DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelB Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
The panel is anchoredto the wall and is visually inaccessible.
Therefore it was not chosen for the 50% verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE[I NEil ULI N/A; See Response #1
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YLI NEI UEl N/AZ oxidation?
See Response #1
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] NEIl Ull N/AZ anchors?
See Response #1 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C353 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UE]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. D5 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanel B
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] U[:] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
See Response #1
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI Ui-]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UE] N/AE1
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UE] N/AE-]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
The panel is mounted to masonry block wall, #209.0 (C966Sh 1), which is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N-] uE-] N/AE]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[E NEI UE]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
I Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0354 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN Nil UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment IDNo. D5 Equip. Class DistributionPanels andAutomatic TransferSwitches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanelB Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo Nl Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is AWC-024.
Evaluated by, Gary Sweder Date: 10-12-12 Laura Maclay 4OAaQIL 10-12-12 L/
U)
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C355 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. D5 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description 125VDC DistributionPanel B PhotouraDhs Note: Note:
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C356 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF UW Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment IDNo. Y3 Equip. Class, DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SET Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Panel is anchored to Unistrut, which is attached to the wall. Anchorage is not visible as it is behind the panel, therefore this is not part of the 50% verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE] N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] N[W UW N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NE U"] N/AM anchors?
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C357 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE1 UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. Y3 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic TransferSwitches (14)
Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE- UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Refer to response to question # 1.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
A small box of lightbulbs used by operations or maintenance was found behind the panel, sitting on the Unistrut. Due to the size of the box and lightweight, this is not a seismic or safety concern.
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NE-] UE] N/AE]
Junction box J2289 is mounted to the underside of cable tray in the overhead. The cover of the box is missing five of eight fasteners. Due to the light weight of the cover, it is not hangingdown from the box, nor does it pose a seismic hazard.
CR-PNP-2012-04665 was written to replace the bolts.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NE] U[] N/A[E]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified. See Drawing C-961 SH1, Rev. El.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NE] UE] N/AE]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] UE]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C358 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEL UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. Y3 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D N[:] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is AWC-017.
Evaluated by: Laura Maclay Ž&W ou VI
-nwcoau Date: 10-17-12
- I Uz 10-17-12 6/
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0359 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[-] UF]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment IDNo. Y3 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description Safe-quard Control Power Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Overall view of panel EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C360 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UD--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. Y3 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C361 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NO- U[-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment IDNo. Y4 Equip. Classi DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power Location: Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area CSR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[I NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Panel is anchored to Unistrut, which is attached to the wall. Anchorage is not visible as it is behind the panel, therefore this is not part of the 50% verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NE] UE1 N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UE] N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NEI UE] N/AN anchors?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0362 of 0413 ATRACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NI UE]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. Y4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description Safe-guard Control Power
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YrI NEI UL- N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Refer to response to question #1.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NEIl UL-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI uEr N/AEr It was noted that a conduit/ conduit pull box is within an inch of the panel This conduit is well supported and the cabinet does not house relays, therefore is not prone to chatter. This was verified in the SEWs package.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UEr N/AD-]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE U-] N/AR
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y; NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C363 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 SWELl- 090 Status: Y*] Nil ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Y4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic TransferSwitches (14)
Equipment Description SafeauardControl Power Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UO-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is AWC-018.
A loose/broken conduit tag, B2501, is lying on top of panel Y4. Operations has been notified.
Evaluated by: Laura Maclay bAA9,2 E Date: 10-17-12 Halie Aroz O D 10-17-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C364 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NF UI-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. Y4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic TransferSwitches (14)
Equipment Description Safeguard Control Power Photoaraohs EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C365 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NRIl UrL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. Y4 Equip. Class DistributionPanels and Automatic Transfer Switches (14)
Equipment Description SafeauardControl Power Note: Conduit nearpanel, refer to response Note:
from question #7.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C366 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEr] Ur-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class, Battery Racks (15)
Equipment Description 125VDC ControlBattery Rack A Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A BTTRY Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Although drawings E1OA13, E1OA 12 and EIOA2 show the size of the mounting hole and anchor,they do not specify the anchoragepattern and number of anchors, therefore, this was not chosen for the 50%
verification.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NE-] U[-] N/A[-D Battery rack has slightly oversized holes that are visible next to washers under batteries 43, 45, and 39. The gap is approximately 1/16" or less and is acceptable.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UrI N/A[-D oxidation?
An anchorbolt securing the battery rack under battery 24 has mild surface oxidation.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YER NE] UD- N/AD-]
anchors?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C367 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15)
Equipment Description 125VDC ControlBattery Rack A
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yr- NEI] UI N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Refer to question #1.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEi U-- N/A-1 Maintenance equipment is properly chained along the wall in the room and is acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UEL N/AL-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Lighting in the room is secured by closed 's' hooks.
Masonry block wall 210.0 is seismically qualified per drawing C967 SH1.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UEL N/AL1
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEl UL of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C368 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack A Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NWJ UW-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is A WC-023.
Evaluated by: QLaura Mac "ArMA il 4ýýOnM-l -OM A Date: 10-11-12 f,,r .*Cz&""4& A. AIuJIý%IleC-1, 1 1-12
-- p EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C369 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UIr Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15)
Equipment Description 125VDC ControlBattery Rack A Photographs Note: Overall view of battery racks and properly restrainedmaintenance equipment EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C370 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NR- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. D1 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack A Note: Typical anchorage Note:
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C371 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[--1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. D2 Equip. Class, Battery Racks (15)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack B Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B BTTRY Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[KNEJ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage forD2 battery rack is verified using EIOA3, EIOA6, EIOA7, EIOA8, EIOA9, EIOAh, and E10A13
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NW UW- N/A--
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEi Uil N/AL-oxidation?
Some mild acidic corrosionwas noted, but is acceptable.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y; NE Ut--i N/AL-]
anchors?
' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C372 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YIg NE] U[-
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment IDNo. D2 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack B
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NI] U[I- N/As]
(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
44 anchorplates and bolts venrfied in the field per referenced drawings in response to question #1.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEL U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI U[-] N/AF]
Step ladder nearD2 has built-in front stoppers that prohibitits movement during a seismic event.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDl UD- N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Masonry block wall 209.0 is seismically qualified per drawing C966 SH1.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN ND-] UD1 N/ADl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[D UD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C373 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NFl UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. D2 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack B Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NF-1 UI-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is A WC-025.
Evaluated by: GarySweder Date: 10-12-12 Laura Maclav AOAAL-Q-ýW V.
-Pao 10-12-*
12 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C374 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. D2 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15)
Equipment Description 125VDC Control Battery Rack B Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C375 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y] NF U--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. D2 Equip. Class Battery Racks (15)
Equipment Description 125VDC ControlBattery Rack B Note: Wide base ladder with stoppers built in Note:
instead of front wheels EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C376 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NIO U--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. Dll Equip. Class, Battery Chargersand Inverters (16)
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D1 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 37 Room, Area A SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YH N[i of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI U[i N/AZl
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE:" U[] N/AZ-oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ N[l ULi N/AZ--
anchors?
Right rearanchorhas slight spalling of approximately Y4" deep next to the anchor. The drawing for the anchorageof the cabinet details the anchorageto be a minimum of 3 Y2" deep maxi bolts, therefore, the minimal spalling is acceptable to maintain full anchorage.
'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C377 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF-] U[--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. Dll Equip. Class Battery Chargersand Inverters (16)
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D1
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ Ni] ULi N/Anl (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Refer to drawing E 11A 1 Sh 1, E 1 for anchorage configuration.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[E UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE ur- N/AF-
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YNJ NM uM N/A--
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
The masonry block wall behind the panel, #210.0 (C967Sh 1), is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI ulI N/A[--
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM N-I Ur]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C378 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ N[j] U--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. DQl Equip. Class Battery Chargiersand Inverters (16)
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D1 Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEil UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Cabinetdoor was noted to be loose by operator. Although it latches, it vibrates!moves from the air handler. This is not a seismic condition because the door is secure. CR-PNP-4543 written to fix door fastener.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is A WC-022.
Evaluated by: Laura Maclav qkrnA(LCJ1(o-QOv-A Date: 10-11-12 V
U)
Gmary wKdr 109-1-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C379 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE NE] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment IDNo. Dll Equip. Class Battery Chargers and Inverters (16)
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D1 Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C380 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. Dli Equip. Class Battery Chargers and Inverters (16)
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D1 Note: Anchorage showing slight spalling at Note:
rearat right bolt.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C381 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment ID No. D12 Equip. Class' Battery Chargersand Inverters (16)
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Charnerfor D2 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 23 Room, Area B SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NE]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI UE- N/AE--
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE] U[-] N/A[-]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEI UE- N/AE1 anchors?
1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C382 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment ID No. D12 Equip. Class Battery Chargersand Inverters (16)
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D2
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UrL N/AJ-]
(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified using E11A IShl, El. Tape measure used to verified bolt configurationand spacing.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] UF]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
During the walkdown an anchorsecuring the top of the panel to the frame of the cabinet was noted as not fully engaged. During a closer inspection of a close up picture, it was determined to be acceptable, as it is flush with the nut, therefore fully engaged.
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NE] ur] N/A--
An emergency light is on a stanchion with approximatelytwo inches of clearancebetween the edge of the support and the panel, therefore, engineeringjudgment concludes that this is acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI uE] N/AEr and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Masonry block wall 209.0 behind the panel is safety related.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UE- N/AEr
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NF] Ur]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C383 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NIF U-IIJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment ID No. D12 Equip. Class Battery Chargqers and Inverters (16)
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D2 Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEi ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area walk-by is A WC-024.
Evaluated by: Gary Sweder J QJ,j J- wJI,, Date: 10-12-12 Laura macdav ?YOn.LQ~
"n* C, I 10-12-12 VI tU EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C384 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment IDNo. D12 Equip. Class Battery Chargersand Inverters (16)
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D2 Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Overall view showing emergency light next to panel EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C385 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment IDNo. D12 Equip. Class Battery Charqersand Inverters (16)
Equipment Description Normal 125VDC Chargerfor D2 Note: Inswce OT panei Note:
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C386 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YN Nr- Ui-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. X1O7A Equip. Class, Engine Generators(17)
Equipment Description DG A Engine & Generator Location: Bldg. DG A Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Reference C103, El
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Y[ NE!I U[I N/A[!
22 d and 3 rd bolt from north (generator),west side was noted to have a shadow under washer. Per note 2, detail 7 of C103 acceptance criteria for connection tightness is at least light contact between washer surfaces and between the washer and the underside of nut. This acceptance criterion is met. Further,bolt thread was noted to be staked as noted in C103, detail 7
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEIl ULI N/Al]
oxidation?
The southernmost two bolts on the west and the southernmost two bolts on the east of the EDG A showed greateroxidation than other anchorage,but still mild.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI ULI N/AEl anchors?
' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C387 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ Nil] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. X107A Equip. Class Engine Generators(17)
Equipment Description DG A Engine & Generator
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NDl UD] N/AD]
(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Spot checked dimensions, bolts size and anchorageconfiguration against C103, El.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ ND UFD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDI UD- N/AD-]
Scaffold built over SWELl-101 equipment. Scaffold 11-279 (see attachedphoto) is a long term safety related,seismic scaffold evaluated and approved in accordancewith EN-MA-133.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ ND] uD-] N/AD-]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Light on west side on a long chain. This item is not likely to collapse due to its light mass and relatively large period of oscillation.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI UD- N/ADl Fire piping does not have 3" clearancewith scaffold (see attached photo). Scaffold log 11-279 notes this condition and deems the pipe riser acceptable based on the small seismic displacements anticipated for the scaffold.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDl UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C388 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN Nr-1 UrE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. X107A Equip. Class Engine Generators(17)
Equipment Description DG A Engine'& Generator Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[-] UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area Walk-by Checklist is A WC-O01.
Evaluated by: GarySweder Date: 10-3-12 Lau..a...a..lay 10-3-12 Laura Maclav V EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C389 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NFi- ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. X1O7A Equip. Class Engine Generators(17)
Equipment Description DG A Engine & Generator Photographs Note: Scaffold tag EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C390 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NR UF-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. X107A Equip. Class Engine Generators (17)
Eauibment DescriDtion DG A Engine & Generator Note: t-ipe Kiser Note:
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C391 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U[-
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. XIO7B Equip. Class' Engine Generators (17)
Equipment Description DG B Engine & Generator Location: Bldg. DG B Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE-] uE] N/AF-
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[K NE] Ur] N/A[-
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NE]I U-] N/A-]
anchors?
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C392 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. X1O7B Equip. Class Engine Generators(17)
Equipment Description DG B Engine & Generator
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ N[l ULI N/AEl (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
See Drawing No. C103, Rev. El.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UD-]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN ND: U[-I N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDJ UD1 N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Masonry block walls 198.0 and 198.1 are seismically qualified. See Drawing No. C-964 SH 1, Rev. 0.
Trolleys at the north end of the room are secured with C-clamps, and the chain control is neatly bundled. Therefore, this is not a seismic interactionconcern.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y; NDI U-J N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-1 68 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C393 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. X1O7B Equip. Class Engine Generators(17)
Equipment Description DG B Engine & Generator Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NE] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
A loose label for 37-CR-31 1 was found on the west side of the diesel generator. This was reportedto Operationsand an ESOMS request was initiated.
SWEL 1-102 is on AWC-002.
Evaluated by: David Small 2~~i2~u1 Date: 10/15/2012 Hafie Aroz A, j 10/15/2012 W, Q6ý ýUtli!y EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C394 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NIF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. XIO7B Equip. Class Engine Generators(17)
Equipment Description DG B Engine & Generator Photographs Note: Note:
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C395 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NF UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. XIO7B Equip. Class Engine Generators (17)
EauiDment Description DG B Enaine & Generator Note: Typical anchorbolt. Note:
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C396 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YE NFI-' U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. T124A Equip. Class' Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)
Equipment Description DG A Day Tank Location: Bldg. DG A Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG A - Day Tank Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ N[]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI UE[N/AE-
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NR] UE] N/AE]
oxidation?
Bolts have only mild surface oxidation.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI UE] NIAE]1 anchors?
The edge of the pedestal on the north side is partiallychipped away to accommodate piping. This is not close to the anchorbolt and is judged to be insignificant.See attachedphoto.
1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C397 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NE U--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. T124A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)
Equipment Description DG A Day Tank
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEil Ul1 N/AZ1 (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Reference Drawings C-103 Rev. El and C-100 Rev. E3.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN Nil UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI UZ- N/Ar1
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[l N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Masonry block walls 198.2 and 198.3 are seismically qualified. See drawing C-964 SH 1, Rev. EO.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI Uil N/Ail
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ Nn U[-
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C398 of C413 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEI U[-
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment IDNo. T124A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)
Equipment Description DG A Day Tank Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NWI U[']
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWEL 1-103 is on AWC-029.
Evaluated by: David Small 2pod16J Date: 10/02/2012 Halie Aroz 10/02/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C399 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. T124A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchanqers (21)
Equipment Description DG A Day Tank Photographs Note: Note:
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C400 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y; N[D UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 103 Equipment ID No. T124A Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)
Eauioment DescriDtion DG A Day Tank Note: Typical anchorbolt. Note: Chipped concrete on edge of pedestal.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C401 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UtlE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. T124B Equip. Class, Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)
Equipment Description DG B Day Tank Location: Bldg. DG B Floor El. 23 Room, Area DG B - Day Tank Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[E N[-]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI ULI N/Ar]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UEI N/AL]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE-- U[- N/AL]
anchors?
The north end of both pedestals is cut to accommodate piping. This is deliberate and not near the anchorbolts, and so is not considereda seismic hazard. See attachedphoto.
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C402 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. T124B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)
Equipment Description DG B Day Tank
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE] ULi N/A--
(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
See Drawing No. C103, Rev. El.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEi U[-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEJ U[- N/A[]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE] U-] N/AF-]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Masonry block walls 198.0 and 198.1 are seismically qualified. See Drawing No. C-964 SH 1, Rev. 0.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE-1 Ur- N/A[]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM N[-] U[-
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C403 of C413 ATTrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NF-J UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. T124B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)
Equipment Description DG B Day Tank Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWEL 1-104 is on AWC-030.
Evaluated by: David Small /1)"- L24- Date: 10/15/2012 HalieAroz "7 **".2 10/15/2012 U-' U)
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C404 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y] NEr] U-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. T124B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchanqers (21)
Equipment Description DG B Day Tank Photoqraohs EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C405 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NF Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 104 Equipment ID No. T124B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers(21)
Equipment Description DG B Day Tank Note: Typical anchorbolt. Note: Comerof pedestal cut to accommodate piping.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C406 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YE NEI] ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-149 Equip. Class, Other (0)
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 91 Room, Area 91 FT Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-- NEI UEI N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEr' UF-I N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-] NEJ UE- N/AO anchors?
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C407 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-149 Equip. Class Other(O)
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Refer to response to question #1.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[-] U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y; N[] U[I N/AL!
Indicatorabove equipment is adequately secure.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ Nil U-] N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[-] U[] N/AE!
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NE--] Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C408 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-149 Equip. Class Other (0)
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[-] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-009.
Evaluated by: Gary Sweder Ar), I I I UNPA L- Date: 10-16-12 Laura Maclay 10-16-12 U)
V EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C409 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI] U[il Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-149 Equip. Class Other (0))
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Photographs Note: Note:
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C410 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ N- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-150 Equip. Class' Other(O)
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 91 Room, Area 91 FT Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline component, no anchorage.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEi U[i N/AN
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI-] NRj urI N/AA oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YI-] Nil[ Ul- N/A[
anchors?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C411 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ N[] U--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-150 Equip. Class Other(O)
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UI-- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
See response to question #1.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] UiE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE-] UE] N/AE-]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] urE] N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEi U[-] N/AE]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] uF-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C412 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YO NI- uFr Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-150 Equip. Class Other (0)
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE! U[1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area Walk-By Checklist is AWC-010.
Evaluated by: Gary Sweder ,JO-. - Date: 10-16-12 Laura Maclay 'tQ LjyV C Qa 10-16-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0
Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C413 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NEi UI-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. 19-HO-150 Equip. Class Other(O)
Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains Photographs Note: Note: uveral view EN-DC-168 REV 0